Lessons Learned (So Far) on FIN 48 and Transfer Pricing
|
|
- Kory Floyd
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Q INSIDE Lessons Learned (So Far) on FIN 48 and Transfer Pricing Hot Topics in Transfer Pricing About Duff & Phelps Lessons Learned (So Far) on FIN 48 and Transfer Pricing By Ray Brown, Sean Faulkner, Stephanie Graham and Steve Salvati With the first quarter reporting period for adoption of FASB Interpretation Number 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) 1 behind us, it is time to review what we have learned so far. Company tax managers, independent auditors and other advisors have been hard pressed to understand and apply the principles of FIN 48 to transfer pricing. Compliance has proven to be a significant task that places all aspects of a company s transfer pricing process under extreme scrutiny. We are just beginning to understand the impact of FIN 48, including some of its unanticipated benefits. In this article we share some key lessons learned (so far), which can assist those companies yet to adopt FIN 48 and those that have completed the first quarter adoption period and are preparing for the next reporting period. Lesson 1: Determine the scope of the FIN 48 analysis from the onset There is some variation as to what level of detail the independent auditors will expect or require from a company. Therefore, a good first step is to speak with your independent auditor at the beginning of the process to understand the approach they will follow and the detail they will require. For example, while we found that the independent auditors require a review of all material transactions, the materiality threshold is determined by the independent auditor and is dependent on factors specific to each company. In some situations, the materiality threshold required that virtually every transaction be reviewed, while in other cases, it only required the review of certain transactions among the companies largest affiliates. Companies that have completed the FIN 48 process should correspond with their independent auditors at the beginning of each audit period because expectations and requirements may change as audit firms gain more experience and develop additional procedures relating to the FIN 48 process. Lesson 2: So, what is MLTN? The first step in applying FIN 48 is to assess whether a tax benefit can be recognized in determining the tax provision in the financial statements. To be recognized, a tax position must meet a more likely than not ( MLTN ) (or greater than 50%) threshold of being sustained throughout the tax return examination process (including any appeals and litigation) based on the technical merits, in which the tax examiners are assumed to have full knowledge of all relevant information, and without regard to the risk of detection of the issue. In this regard, we had varied experiences in terms of what criteria the independent auditors relied on to determine if the company met the MLTN threshold. In many cases, the company was able to convince the independent auditor that it satisfied the MLTN threshold if the company was able to demonstrate that the intercompany transaction had economic substance. In other words, if the transaction occurred (i.e., a good was sold or a service was provided) and a payment was made, then the MLTN threshold was met. However, in cases where the company did not have adequate transfer pricing documentation or an effective policy in place, we experienced situations in which the company had to demonstrate to the independent auditor that the transfer pricing method used (i.e., the tax return position) satisfied the MLTN threshold. Therefore, companies that did not have documentation 1 Which is an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 Accounting for Income Taxes and supercedes FASB Statement 5 Accounting for Contingencies with respect to income taxes.
2 2 Transfer Pricing Insights and/or an established transfer pricing policy in place were at a substantial disadvantage, as recognition became a primary focus of the independent auditors reviews. Another factor to consider in relation to the MLTN threshold is the identification of intercompany transactions that may exist, but for which there is no compensation. While such circumstances are unlikely to occur in situations involving tangible good transactions, they may occur in cases concerning the provision of services or the use of intangibles. These previously unidentified intercompany transactions may require a separate MLTN analysis. Thus, if the MLTN threshold cannot be satisfied, then the company cannot recognize tax benefits from its transfer pricing. In this case, significant tax contingencies would need to be provided, which could materially impact a company s effective tax rate and earnings. Lesson 3: Scenario development - When is enough, enough? The second step in applying FIN 48 is the measurement of the benefit from a tax position in determining the tax provision in the financial statements. The benefit amount is measured as the largest amount having a greater than 50% cumulative probability of being realized upon settlement or other resolution, based on an expected outcome analysis of a set of potential outcome scenarios. Here we experienced some conceptual disagreements with independent auditors as to the scenarios we developed to reflect an appropriate and realistic variety of possible transfer pricing methods, critical facts and assumptions and audit risks. However, we were successful in limiting our analysis to a reasonable number of potential scenarios, typically ranging from the tax return position to the worst-case result. In one case, we found it necessary to prepare separate vs. aggregate analyses for two business operations to achieve an appropriate set of scenarios. In addition, computing the amount of the tax benefit under the various scenarios also presented some challenges in terms of obtaining the requisite factual information and financial data as well as creating innovative financial models that computed and presented the tax benefit to be derived from each identified scenario. In the course of review with the independent auditors, we experienced numerous rounds of iterative computations based on slight changes to the facts and assumptions. At some point the law of diminishing returns was realized and the independent auditors agreed that there were enough scenarios to yield a reasonable assessment. Lesson 4: What are the probabilities? After identifying the potential scenarios necessary to complete the measurement process, it is necessary to assign a probability of outcome to each scenario to determine which outcome scenario reaches the more than 50% cumulative probability. Determining the probability of each scenario is the heart of the FIN 48 analysis, as it involves the consideration of many factors, such as: (i) judgment based on the law and the facts and circumstances, (ii) the company s appetite for risk and settlement policy, (iii) the quality and completeness of the company s transfer pricing documentation, (iv) outside advisor opinions, (v) the company s willingness to endure a lengthy dispute resolution process, and (vi) current and prior audit experiences. In concept, and in fact, assigning probabilities presents the greatest challenge in the FIN 48 analysis. In some cases, we found that the judgment of the company s tax manager was sound in this regard, due to their extensive experience with issues specific to their own company. Accordingly, we relied heavily upon the company s judgment, although we did play devil s advocate on occasion to test their conclusions. In other cases, the company s tax managers did not have sufficient knowledge or experience to assign the probabilities, so they relied on our input. In any event, our significant experience dealing with tax authorities on transfer pricing audits certainly added value to this process. In general, we found that while the independent auditors did question the assigned probabilities, they did not challenge them if they were supportable. We should note that in one particularly complex case, we found it appropriate to develop comparative probabilities for each outcome scenario at each level in the dispute resolution process (assessment, appeals/negotiation toward settlement, and litigation). We then combined those probabilities to determine an overall weighted probability for each scenario, which was then used to determine the more than 50% cumulative probability outcome. Lesson 5: What about penalties and correlative relief? It is clear by its terms that FIN 48 requires that penalties (and interest) be taken into account in determining the tax benefit and the potential tax contingency reserves. Furthermore, the possibility of correlative relief under the Competent Authority provisions of a tax treaty (or unilateral relief) must also be taken into account. Both of these items are highly sensitive to the facts and circumstances, and they add yet another level of complexity to the FIN 48 analysis. In this regard, we sometimes needed to create another level of outcome scenarios specific to penalties, interest, and correlative relief to make a proper determination of a more than 50% cumulative probability to complete the FIN 48 analysis. In the case of transfer pricing, the penalty and correlative relief measurement analysis can be as difficult as the tax measurement analysis. Lesson 6: Potential hidden benefits? While many companies initially viewed FIN 48 as a cumbersome task which could only identify additional transfer pricing exposures, some companies quickly realized that performing a robust FIN 48 analysis could create unanticipated value for the company. A few of the potential benefits are provided below: Releasing Reserves In some cases, the FIN 48 analysis suggests that the company over-reserved for certain tax positions, enabling the company to release such reserves.
3 Transfer Pricing Insights 3 Planning Opportunities A FIN 48 analysis provides an excellent opportunity to identify transfer pricing planning opportunities because it requires the company (or tax advisor) to rigorously review its transfer pricing policies. Audit Plan A thorough FIN 48 analysis can help companies develop a strategic plan to prepare for potential future transfer pricing audits. This includes developing sound economic support for uncertain transfer pricing positions or evaluating the potential benefits of proactively addressing exposure via the Advance Pricing Agreement Program. Lesson 7: Protecting the FIN 48 analysis We learned that companies are concerned about the ability of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other tax authorities to gain access to the FIN 48 analyses. Such access was viewed as a road map to the company s tax issues. The IRS s position on access to FIN 48 analyses is unclear, and the extent and manner by which a company could protect the FIN 48 analyses from IRS discovery is beyond the scope of this article. However, note that in our experience companies desire to communicate FIN 48 analyses in a form and manner intended to protect the communication from discovery. While there have been many lessons learned up to this point, we anticipate even more lessons in the reporting quarter ahead. Both advisors and independent auditors will gain more experience on varying issues, including how changes in facts and circumstances may impact both the recognition and measurement of positions previously analyzed. Our View: The courts are showing increasing willingness to apply transfer pricing concepts outside the tax arena, as a means of policing the way corporations behave toward minority shareholders, licensors of valuable IP, and other supposedly vulnerable stakeholders. Companies dealing with such situations should consider ensuring their related party dealings are consistent with the arm s length principle. IRS View: Commensurate-with-Income Is a One-Way Street in Audits U.S. regulations require that the compensation paid in a related-party transfer or license of intangible property must be commensurate with the income reasonably expected to be earned from the exploitation of the intangible. In a recent Advisory Memorandum to the IRS Appeals Office, the IRS Associate Chief Counsel (International) outlined the IRS views on the application of the commensurate-with-income rule in IRS audits. In the IRS view, taxpayers are not permitted to affirmatively raise commensurate-with-income as an issue in an audit or in Appeals in order to reduce the U.S. taxable income from a transaction. The memorandum also takes the position that it is appropriate for the IRS to second-guess taxpayers up-front pricing decisions with the benefit of hindsight regarding the actual profits earned from the use of the intangible, where taxpayers cannot show that their pricing was supported by such upfront reasonable and conscientious evaluation of projected operating profits Hot Topics in Transfer Pricing By Dan Peters and Paul B. Burns Transfer Pricing Issues in a Non-Tax Context: The Will & Grace Litigation The creators of the hit television series Will & Grace sued the studio that produced the program, and the jury was on the verge of awarding the plaintiffs $49 million in damages when the case was settled. The theory of the plaintiff s case was that the studio, which was commonly owned with the NBC television network, had licensed the series to the network for a less-than-arm s length fee, thereby making the series appear less profitable and reducing the amount of contingent compensation due to back-end profit participants. The case follows on the heels of the landmark Ford Canada case, in which a Canadian court ruled that Ford had unlawfully oppressed the minority shareholders of its Canadian subsidiary by engaging in non-arm s length transfer pricing that caused the subsidiary to earn persistent losses. Our View: The IRS is clearly emboldened by a recent string of high-visibility litigation wins and favorable settlements, and is aggressively seeking to redefine the rules of engagement in the audit process. Further, taxpayer s need to consider greater support for their assumptions and forecasts, and structuring their arrangements properly to allow affirmative adjustments to payments for intangibles. New Chinese Transfer Pricing Law Provides Legal Authority for Cost-Sharing, APAs In March 2007, the People s Republic of China adopted a new Enterprise Income Tax Law. The transfer pricing provisions of this new law are an important update and expansion of the Chinese legal framework around intercompany transactions, which has previously been a hodgepodge of statutory provisions and administrative guidance from the central government (which provincial tax authorities sometimes failed to follow). Article 41 of the new law, which states that costs associated with the joint development of intangible assets must be allocated based on the arm s length standard, clearly
4 4 Transfer Pricing Insights contemplates that Chinese taxpayers can participate in cost-sharing arrangements. Article 42 of the new law clearly establishes the statutory authority for the Chinese tax authorities to enter into APAs. Articles 43 and 44 of the new law establish the statutory authority for the Chinese tax authorities to promulgate the long-awaited Chinese contemporaneous documentation rules. The new law also includes a thin-capitalization rule that will need to be supplemented by regulations defining the target ratio of debt to equity. Finally, the new law includes a provision (Article 47), that essentially is a general antiavoidance rule similar to (but potentially even more flexible in its application than) similar rules that are in effect in Canada and a number of other countries. Our View: The new law is a useful step in bringing Chinese transfer pricing law and practice more closely in line with generally accepted international norms. Multinationals with significant operations in China should review their existing pricing structures to ensure compliance and to determine whether planning opportunities exist. Canadian Court Docket Reflects Increased Aggressiveness of CRA Auditors In recent years, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has emerged as one of the most aggressive tax authorities in attacking multinational companies transfer pricing arrangements. The results of those initiatives are now being reflected in an increase in the number of transfer pricing disputes that find their way to the Tax Court of Canada. What is striking about some of the current cases is that they do not involve exotic structures or unusual transaction flows. Rather, the CRA is aggressively challenging even relatively common arrangements between related companies. For example, in Wyeth-Ayerst, the CRA agreed with the taxpayer that the cost plus method was an appropriate framework for pricing research and development services; however, it attempted to substitute its judgment for the taxpayer s as to the right markup on cost. In Tregasskiss, Ltd., a Canadian manufacturer established an offshore buy-sell distribution subsidiary to service its existing customer base and expand its marketing activities. The CRA has attempted to recharacterize the relationship, asserting that the offshore subsidiary is a mere call center that takes no meaningful market or financial risks and is therefore entitled to only a small markup on its operating costs. Our View: With increasing audit activity and a difficult relationship between the U.S. and Canadian competent authorities, Canada is a particularly difficult environment for multinational taxpayers. Multinationals with significant operations in Canada should expect close scrutiny of their intercompany arrangements, and prepare in advance to defend the appropriateness of their transfer pricing. IRS Focus on Cost-Sharing Issues Continues Issues relating to cost-sharing for intangible development have been a major focus of the IRS transfer pricing enforcement efforts. In an effort to better coordinate field activities, in April the IRS designated cost-sharing as a Tier I issue -- that is, one of the most significant compliance challenges facing [the IRS]. In the IRS view, cost-sharing is often used by taxpayers inappropriately to transfer intangible assets and associated profits offshore. The IRS has designated a centralized Issue Management Team to oversee and coordinate all of its enforcement activities relating to cost-sharing. Examining agents are strongly encouraged to closely follow a checklist of audit techniques that was developed in The IRS is augmenting its in-house capabilities by engaging a number of outside transfer pricing experts to assist in case development. A Coordinated Issue Paper on the subject is being prepared, and proposed regulations issued in 2005 are expected to be finalized in the near future. Our View: Many multinationals continue to find cost-sharing an efficient way of funding research and development projects that benefit business units in multiple countries. With these potentially taxpayer-unfriendly new regulations on the horizon, taxpayers with existing costsharing arrangements should be running diagnostics to assess potential adverse impacts of the new rules, and taxpayers considering setting up a cost-sharing arrangement should be acting now to position themselves to take advantage of potential grandfathering when the new rules go into effect. Recently, practitioners have also noted that the CRA has begun using transfer pricing principles to challenge intercompany financing arrangements. Historically, CRA auditors have used other statutory provisions, including Canada s strict thincapitalization rules, to police intercompany lending. It is to be expected that some of these cases will be litigated in the future.
5 Transfer Pricing Insights 5 From transfer pricing compliance and controversies to supply chain planning and intangible property transactions, the Transfer Pricing practice of Duff & Phelps provides trusted analysis and insight on critical issues. With more than 850 people working together across North America, Europe and Asia, Duff & Phelps has the depth and breadth of industry and technical expertise to meet your needs. Get the strength of one of the world s leading independent financial advisory firms. > Financial Reporting Valuation > Tax Services > Real Estate & Fixed Asset Services > Investment Banking > Transaction Advisory Services > Financial Restructurings > Dispute & Legal Management Consulting duffandphelps.com / Investment banking services are provided by Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC.
6 6 Transfer Pricing Insights About Duff & Phelps Duff & Phelps is one of the world s leading independent financial advisory firms serving client needs in the areas of valuation, investment banking and transaction advice, and dispute consulting. We are the foremost provider of industry focused, independent and objective valuation insight and advice. Our services include financial reporting valuation, tax valuation and consulting, transfer pricing, real estate and fixed asset services, merger and acquisition advisory, financial restructurings, fairness and solvency opinions, due diligence and dispute consulting. Our professionals bring practical experience, responsiveness and a collaborative approach to satisfy our clients needs with the rigor and independence that the market demands. When our clients can t afford to get their analysis wrong, they look to Duff & Phelps to get it right. With more than 800 employees serving clients worldwide through offices in the United States, Europe and Asia, Duff & Phelps is committed to delivering insightful advice and service of exceptional quality, integrity and objectivity. This publication is issued for informational purposes only. It is distributed with the understanding that the publisher is not rendering legal, accounting, tax or other consulting advice and assumes no liability in connection with its use. Investment banking services are provided by Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC, an NASD registered broker-dealer. IRS Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with the requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Transfer Pricing Contacts Dan Peters Ray Brown Nick Foster-Taylor Clarke Norton Timothy Reichert Stephen Salvati Theodor van Stephoudt Paul Burns Joy Dasgupta Sean Faulkner Rodrigo Fernandez Stephanie Graham Ian Gray Vinay Kapoor Justin Smith Zac Costello Jaeyoon Lee Joanne Lennox Maneesha Sharma Jared Walls Joshua Wookey Service Leader Managing Managing Managing Managing Managing Managing (973) (213) (20) (415) (720) (973) (0) (213) (720) (973) (720) (213) (720) (212) (415) (212) (212) (20) (212) (213) (415) Duff & Phelps LLC Avenue of the Americas 44th Floor New York, NY PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID DUFF & PHELPS
INSIDE. Implications of the
N O V E M B E R 2 0 0 6 1 2 3 6 INSIDE Implications of the GlaxoSmithKline Settlement FIN 48 Highlights Issues in Determining Transfer Pricing and Tax Valuation Risks The Services Cost Method of the New
More informationPeters Advisors LLC. Presentation to the Multistate Tax Commission. Arm s Length Adjustment Project
Peters Advisors LLC Presentation to the Multistate Tax Commission Arm s Length Adjustment Project October 6, 2014 IRS Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with the requirements imposed by the IRS,
More informationServices and Capabilities. Financial Services Transfer Pricing
Services and Capabilities Financial Services Transfer Pricing Our team of experts offers an unmatched combination of economic credentials, industry expertise, and testifying experience. FINANCIAL SERVICES
More informationServices and Capabilities. Transfer Pricing Services
Services and Capabilities Transfer Pricing Services Our team of experts offers an unmatched combination of economic credentials, industry expertise, and testifying experience. Transfer Pricing Services
More informationLifting the fog* Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
Lifting the fog* Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes Contents Introduction 01 Identifying uncertain tax positions 02 Recognizing uncertain tax positions 03 Measuring the tax benefit 04 Disclosures
More informationSeptember 2011. Tax accounting services: The impact of transfer pricing in financial reporting
September 2011 Tax accounting services: The impact of transfer pricing in financial reporting This publication serves to highlight several important areas of financial reporting that can be affected by
More informationOut-of-the-Money: The IRS Designates Basket Options as Listed Transactions and Transactions of Interest
Legal Update July 24, 2015 Out-of-the-Money: The IRS Designates Basket Options as Listed Transactions and It s been a long hard road for barrier options. In 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS
More informationThe Business Advantages of Transfer Pricing
Transfer pricing as an international tax strategy Compliance studies can lead to planning opportunities May 2005 Take it to the Max. 800 Liberty Building Buffalo, NY 14202 ph: 716.847.2651 fax: 716.847.0069
More informationWorkshop: Private Fund Fee and Expense Allocations
Workshop: Private Fund Fee and Expense Allocations November 10, 2015 Presented by Ann Gittleman & Sherif Assef 1. Introduction 2 Potential Risks for Private Funds Investor skepticism has increased as violations
More information70. Switzerland. Other regulations
70. Switzerland Introduction Switzerland does not have specific transfer pricing regulations but respectively adheres to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines. As
More informationU.S. Inbound Tax Services
TAX U.S. Inbound Tax Helping foreign companies achieve tax-efficiency in their U.S. operations kpmg.com 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network
More informationORIGINAL PRONOUNCEMENTS
Financial Accounting Standards Board ORIGINAL PRONOUNCEMENTS AS AMENDED FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 Copyright 2010
More informationParticipant Protections for Defined Benefit Plan Benefits: Benefit Security
TOPICS IN Pension risk management Participant Protections for Defined Benefit Plan Benefits: Benefit Security As persistent economic and related market factors continue to keep volatility front and center
More informationDirectors and officers liability best practices guidelines
Directors and officers liability best practices guidelines DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY BEST PRACTICES GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION A continuing challenge to all business is the efficient functioning of
More informationOvercoming the Challenge
TAX Overcoming the Challenge Transfer Pricing Dispute Resolution Services kpmg.com 2 Overcoming the Challenge: Transfer Pricing Dispute Resolution Services Given the importance of this issue to the tax
More informationFinancial Accounting Series
Financial Accounting Series NO. 281-B JUNE 2006 FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 Financial Accounting Standards Board of
More informationOur Value Proposition
Our Value Proposition Today s regulatory environment is tougher than ever. In the past, hedge fund managers could use mark-to-model values for illiquid assets or simply place them in a side pocket. Executives
More information3/22/2011. Financing an ESOP Transaction. Table of Contents. I. The Leveraged ESOP Transaction. John L. Miscione Managing Director
Presented by John L. Miscione Managing Director Table of Contents I. The Leveraged ESOP Transaction II. ESOP Tax Benefits III. Debt Capacity IV. Financing Markets and Terms V. The Lender s Perspective
More informationCase 12-7. Claims, Litigation, Settlements, and More Claims!
Case 12-7 Claims, Litigation, Settlements, and More Claims! Rossi Inc. (Rossi or the Company ) is a diversified manufacturer of industrial products. In 2008, Rossi updated its asbestos litigation liability,
More informationFinancial Statements 101 - An Accounting Primer for Tax Attorneys
Financial Statements 101 - An Accounting Primer for Tax Attorneys Devin Simon Clifton Gunderson LLP devin.simon@cliftoncpa.com Jessica Johnson KPMG LLP jessicaljohnson@kpmg.com Dustin Covello Chamberlain,
More informationTax Controversy and Dispute Resolution Alert
Tax Controversy and Dispute Resolution Alert Preventing Managing Resolving Tax Audits and Disputes Worldwide February 22, 2012 Learnings from the Vodofone case for China tax A Tax Controversy and Dispute
More informationVerifone Reports Results for the Second Quarter of Fiscal 2016
Verifone Reports Results for the Second Quarter of Fiscal 2016 SAN JOSE, Calif. (BUSINESS WIRE) Verifone (NYSE: PAY), a world leader in payments and commerce solutions, today announced financial results
More informationIllustrative Financial Statements Prepared Using the Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Entities
Illustrative Financial Statements Prepared Using the Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Entities Illustrative Financial Statements This component of the toolkit contains sample financial
More informationTAX SERVICES. Maximizing benefi ts. Minimizing risk.
TAX SERVICES Maximizing benefi ts. Minimizing risk. The right tax strategy can make a big difference in your bottom line results. CohnReznick s tax professionals can help you capitalize on applicable tax
More informationTax @ KPMG. kpmgcampus.com
Tax @ KPMG kpmgcampus.com b Tax @ KPMG Tax @ KPMG 1 We are making a significant investment in our people to help them grow and develop at KPMG Tax. Skip Robichaux, Tax Partner and People Leader The world
More informationYour Target Market. Taking Your Company Global. International Tax & Accounting Services
Your Target Market Taking Your Company Global & Company www.rowbotham.com (415) 433-1177 consulting@rowbotham.com San Francisco Silicon Valley Associated Firms Worldwide International Tax & Accounting
More informationStock Valuation and Stock Pricing Alternatives Ronald J. Adams, CPA Managing Director Newbury Piret & Co.
Stock Valuation and Stock Pricing Alternatives Ronald J. Adams, CPA Managing Director Newbury Piret & Co. Publicly traded companies, venture capital firms, and private equity firms are now dealing with
More informationSample Disclosures Accounting for Income Taxes. February 2015
Sample Disclosures Accounting for Income Taxes February 2015 Contents Use of These Sample Disclosures 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis General 2 MD&A Results of Operations 2 MD&A Critical Accounting
More informationTransfer Pricing Audit Management
FINANCE AND STRATEGY PRACTICE Tax Director Roundtable Transfer Pricing Audit Management Transfer Pricing Associates Steef Huibregtse and Richard Slimmen 13 April 2012 FINANCE AND STRATEGY PRACTICE Tax
More informationFinancial Reporting Advisors, LLC 100 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2215 Chicago, Illinois 60602 312.345.9101 www.finra.com.
Financial Reporting Advisors, LLC 100 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2215 Chicago, Illinois 60602 312.345.9101 www.finra.com VIA EMAIL TO: director@fasb.org Technical Director File Reference No. 2015-270
More informationPMS 288 Blue or CMYK = C100-M85-Y0-C43 PMS 1255 Ochre / Yellow or CMYK = C0-M35-Y85-C30. State Income and Franchise Tax
PMS 288 Blue or CMYK = C100-M85-Y0-C43 PMS 1255 Ochre / Yellow or CMYK = C0-M35-Y85-C30 State Income and Franchise Tax State Income and Franchise Tax Value-Added Tax Strategies and Services Year after
More informationThe $500 Million Question. Proactive Planning for Consolidated Capital Requirements. By: Lowell W. Harrison and Derek W. McGee
The $500 Million Question Proactive Planning for Consolidated Capital Requirements By: Lowell W. Harrison and Derek W. McGee Recently, we have received a number of questions from our clients regarding
More informationValuation Services. Global Capabilities Delivered Locally KPMG LLP
Valuation Services Global Capabilities Delivered Locally KPMG LLP Today s global environment has elevated the importance of valuations that support financial reporting, tax planning, litigation, and mergers
More informationA 360-Degree look at Secondment tax issues: China and the United States Corporate China Alert - 19 August 2013
A 360-Degree look at Secondment tax issues: China and the United States Corporate China Alert - 19 August 2013 In this article, Roberta Chang discusses the recent guidance issued by the Chinese State Administration
More informationCase 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
More informationAnother Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments
Another Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments idan netser I. Introduction The sale of a company in an M&A transaction often involves consideration to the selling shareholders
More informationCHICAGO PARKING METERS, LLC (A Delaware Limited Liability Company) Financial Statements. December 31, 2013 and 2012
Financial Statements (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) Table of Contents Independent Auditors Report 1 Financial Statements: Balance Sheets as of 2 Statements of Income for the years ended 3 Statements
More informationIRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Tax Return Preparer Penalty Rules Under Sections 6694 and 6695
July 2008 IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Tax Return Preparer Penalty Rules Under Sections 6694 and 6695 BY MARK S. LANGE AND CRISTIANE R. WOLFE Introduction On May 16, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service
More informationINTERNATIONAL GREER & WALKER, LLP CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
INTERNATIONAL GREER & WALKER, LLP CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS GREER & WALKER, LLP CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS WHO IS GREER & WALKER, LLP? Founded in 1984, Greer & Walker, LLP is the largest Charlotte-based
More informationTransfer Pricing Audits under the New IRS Roadmap and Disputing Proposed Adjustments
Intercompany Transfer Price Insights Thought Leadership Transfer Pricing Audits under the New IRS Roadmap and Disputing Proposed Adjustments Robert C. Morris, Esq., and Richard L. Hunn, Esq. Transfer prices
More informationPacific Association of Tax Administrators (PATA) Transfer Pricing Documentation Package
Pacific Association of Tax Administrators (PATA) Transfer Pricing Documentation Package I. Introduction The PATA members, which include Australia, Canada, Japan and the United States, are providing principles
More informationHow Canada Taxes Foreign Income
- 1 - How Canada Taxes Foreign Income (Summary) Purpose of the book The purpose of writing this book, entitled How Canada Taxes Foreign Income is particularly for the benefit of foreign tax lawyers, accountants,
More informationTRANSFER PRICING BASICS: RULES & PRINCIPLES FOR TECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIES
TRANSFER PRICING BASICS: RULES & PRINCIPLES FOR TECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIES August 4, 2011 MOSS ADAMS LLP 1 TODAY S PRESENTERS Moderator Rich Croghan, Partner Technology &Life Sciences Group San
More informationDefending Taxpayer Penalties - Audit, Appeals and Litigation Considerations
Walter Doggett, VP Taxes, E*Trade Tom Cullinan, Partner, Sutherland Joe DePew, Partner, Sutherland Defending Taxpayer Penalties - Audit, Appeals and Litigation Considerations 1 Accuracy-Related Penalties
More informationSLM CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION FIRST QUARTER 2006 (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts, unless otherwise stated)
SLM CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION FIRST QUARTER 2006 (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts, unless otherwise stated) The following supplemental information should be read in connection
More informationTax risk management strategy
Vodafone Group Plc has a tax strategy focused on the following 6 key areas: Integrity in compliance and reporting Enhancing shareholder value Business partnering Influencing tax policy Developing our people
More informationYOON & YANG LLC TAX PRACTICE GROUP
YOON & YANG LLC TAX PRACTICE GROUP TAX PRACTICE Group YOON & YANG LLC TAX PRACTICE GROUP TAX PRACTICE GROUP OUR FIRM Yoon & Yang LLC, a leading law firm based in Seoul, Korea, promises the highest-quality
More informationJEFFERIES REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND 2012 FISCAL YEAR FINANCIAL RESULTS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JEFFERIES REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND 2012 FISCAL YEAR FINANCIAL RESULTS NEW YORK and LONDON, December 18, 2012 Jefferies Group, Inc. (NYSE: JEF) announced today financial results
More informationImpairment Testing Procedures and Pitfalls
Audio Conference Dial-in Number: 877.691.9300; Access Code: 4321206 Impairment Testing Procedures and Pitfalls November 3, 2009 Presenters: Cory J. Thompson, CFA, CIRA Ryan A. Gandre, CFA Moderator: Jay
More informationTAX A M u l t i - D i s c i p l i n e L a w F i r m
TAX A M u l t i - D i s c i p l i n e L a w F i r m TAX Troutman Sanders LLP The Tax Practice Group is comprised of attorneys who are experienced in the representation of clients whose activities require
More informationTransfers of Property to Partnerships with Related Foreign Partners and Controlled Transactions Involving Partnerships
Transfers of Property to Partnerships with Related Foreign Partners and Controlled Transactions Involving Partnerships Notice 2015-54 SECTION 1. OVERVIEW This notice announces that the Department of the
More informationIndonesia. kpmg.com/id. Contact us. Siddharta & Widjaja Audit Services T: + 62 (0) 21 574 2333 / 574 2888 F: + 62 (0) 21 574 1777 / 574 2777
Contact us Siddharta & Widjaja Audit Services T: + 62 (0) 21 574 2333 / 574 2888 F: + 62 (0) 21 574 1777 / 574 2777 KPMG Advisory Indonesia Tax Services T: + 62 (0) 21 570 4888 F: + 62 (0) 21 570 5888
More informationEarn-out arrangements in a business combination impact of the revised IFRS 3
ey.com/ifrs Negotiation series Earn-out arrangements in a business combination impact of the revised IFRS 3 January 2010 When negotiating a business acquisition, the potential consequences of the accounting
More informationTAX 101 INTRODUCTORY LESSONS: FINANCING A U.S. SU BSIDIARY DEBT VS. EQUITY INTRODUCTION. Authors Galia Antebi and Nina Krauthamer
TAX 101 INTRODUCTORY LESSONS: FINANCING A U.S. SU BSIDIARY DEBT VS. EQUITY Authors Galia Antebi and Nina Krauthamer Tags Debt Equity INTRODUCTION When a foreign business contemplates operating in the U.S.
More informationChina Tax Alert. SAT issues draft guidance on transfer pricing rules and BEPS initiatives. Summary of key points in the Draft.
International Tax China Tax Alert Contacts Eunice Kuo eunicekuo@deloitte.com.cn Liantang He lhe@deloitte.com.cn Patrick Cheung patcheung@deloitte.com.hk 21 September 2015 SAT issues draft guidance on transfer
More informationEffective Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Strategies
Tax Executives Institute: Audits and Appeals Effective Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Strategies Gary Hook Chevron Corporation (Moderator) Julia Kazaks Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP David
More informationUncertainty in Income Taxes. A Roadmap to Applying Interpretation 48
Uncertainty in Income Taxes A Roadmap to Applying Interpretation 48 Section indicator Descriptor Deloitte Uncertainty in Income Taxes A Roadmap to Applying Interpretation 48 FASB Interpretation No. 48,
More informationTax Dispute Resolution Services kpmg.com
TAX Tax Dispute Resolution Services kpmg.com 1 Tax Dispute Resolution Services Are you prepared for a federal, state, or local income tax examination? Facing potential double taxation from an adjustment
More informationLeveraged Life Insurance Personal Ownership
Leveraged Life Insurance Personal Ownership Introduction Leveraged life insurance is a financial planning strategy that uses the cash value of an exempt life insurance policy as collateral security for
More informationFinancial Reporting for Taxes
Financial Reporting for Taxes TEI May A&A Update Meeting Acquisition accounting May 8, 2012 Orlando, FL Wendi Christensen Deloitte Tax LLP wendichristensen@deloitte.com Agenda Disclosures and supporting
More informationNATIONAL COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND AND AFFILIATE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
NATIONAL COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 CONTENTS Page Independent auditor s report 1-2 Consolidated financial statements: Statement
More informationCURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest
More informationComments by NERA Economic Consulting (Submitted 14 January 2015)
NERA Economic Consulting 28, avenue Victor Hugo 75116 Paris Cedex 16, France www.nera.com Via e-mail Andrew Hickman Head of Transfer Pricing Unit, OECD/CTPA Discussion Draft
More informationLitigation Valuation REPORT. Damage control Surviving a business interruption. In valuation, timing is everything. Estate wins the discount war
JULY/AUGUST 2009 & Litigation Valuation REPORT Damage control Surviving a business interruption Nonqualified deferred compensation Independent appraisals offer protection against 409A challenge In valuation,
More informationSCORPEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AUDIT REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS C O N T E N T S Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.... 3 Consolidated Balance Sheets...
More informationTax Court Lowers Canco s AR Factoring Transfer Price
Tax Court Lowers Canco s AR Factoring Transfer Price January 20, 2014 No. 2014-02 Canadian multinational companies may want to note the implications of the recent transfer pricing case McKesson Canada
More informationProtecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015: Effects on Taxation of Investment in US Real Estate
Legal Update December 21, 2015 Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015: Effects on Taxation of Investment in On December 18, 2015, Congress passed and President Obama signed into law the Protecting
More informationtransfer pricing insider
transfer pricing insider Volume 2, Number 2 august 2008 baker & mckenzie transfer pricing annual update Source: WG&L Journal of International Taxation Baker & McKenzie s Transfer Pricing Annual Update,
More informationApril 2009. Special rules apply to the grant of NSOs to purchase Preferred Stock.
April 2009 Background Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted on October 22, 2004, was intended to reduce the ability of participants in nonqualified deferred compensation plans to control at
More informationThe St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.
Must be Postmarked No Later Than September 12, 2004 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims
More informationSTRAIGHT TALK ABOUT CORPORATE/SECURITIES LAW
STRAIGHT TALK ABOUT CORPORATE/SECURITIES LAW Private Company Stock Option Pricing in the 409A Era Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, along with recent changes in financial accounting rules and
More informationTerms and Conditions for Tax Services
Terms and Conditions for Tax Services In the course of delivering services relating to tax return preparation, tax advisory, and assistance in tax controversy matters, Brady, Martz & Associates, P.C. (we
More informationCROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROTOCOL FOR 360NETWORKS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES
CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROTOCOL FOR 360NETWORKS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES 1. Certain defined terms used in this Protocol shall have the meanings assigned to them in Appendix A. 2. The 360 Group
More informationM&A Insights Purchasing and modifying discount debt What dealmakers should know
M&A Insights March 2013 Merger & Acquisition Services M&A Insights Purchasing and modifying discount debt What dealmakers should know Introduction In the current economy, a significant amount of outstanding
More informationEIGHT SOLUTIONS INC.
June 30, 2015 NOTICE OF NO AUDITOR REVIEW OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Under National Instrument 51-102, part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the condensed consolidated
More informationCHOOSING A BUSINESS ENTITY IN TODAY S BUSINESS WORLD
CHOOSING A BUSINESS ENTITY IN TODAY S BUSINESS WORLD Kenneth L. Wenzel Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C. City Center Tower II 301 Commerce Street, Suite 1500 Fort Worth, Texas 76102-4115 The information set
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. BUCKWALTER, J. May 8, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 01-0272 M. ROBERT ULLMAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, J. May
More informationThe Implications of Recent New York Transfer Pricing Decisions for IP Lawyers By Rebel Curd, Susan Fickling, and Molly Minnear
The Implications of Recent New York Transfer Pricing Decisions for IP Lawyers By Rebel Curd, Susan Fickling, and Molly Minnear I. Introduction Eye-catching headlines in the Wall Street Journal seem to
More informationGlobal Transfer Pricing Review
GLOBAL TRANSFER PRICING SERVICES Global Transfer Pricing Review Mexico kpmg.com TAX 2 Global Transfer Pricing Review Mexico KPMG observation Mexico has been very active in transfer pricing. The tax authority
More informationUnderstanding the international tax challenges of software as a service and cloud computing
Understanding the international tax challenges of software as a service and cloud computing Insights for technology companies October 2011 Randy Free, Partner, International Tax Consulting Alex Baulf,
More informationK+S CANADA HOLDINGS INC. K+S AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT POTASH ONE INC.
This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in doubt as to how to deal with it, you should consult your investment dealer, stockbroker, bank manager, lawyer or other professional
More informationVALIDUS ANNOUNCES 2015 FULL YEAR NET INCOME OF $374.9 MILLION 2015 NET OPERATING RETURN ON AVERAGE EQUITY OF 11.3%
VALIDUS ANNOUNCES 2015 FULL YEAR NET INCOME OF $374.9 MILLION 2015 NET OPERATING RETURN ON AVERAGE EQUITY OF 11.3% BOOK VALUE PER DILUTED COMMON SHARE OF $42.33 AT DECEMBER 31, 2015 Pembroke, Bermuda,
More informationCAPITAL ONE INVESTING, LLC (An Indirect Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Capital One Financial Corporation) Period Ended June 30, 2015.
S T A T E M E N T O F F I N A N C I A L C O N D I T I O N Period Ended June 30, 2015 (Unaudited) Contents Statement of Financial Condition (Unaudited)...1 Notes to Statement of Financial Condition...2
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationPRIME DEALER SERVICES CORP. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PRIME DEALER SERVICES CORP. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ******** REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
More informationCase 2:15-cv-00102-RSM Document 1 Filed 12/11/14 Page 1 of 9
Case :-cv-000-rsm Document Filed // Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ) )
More informationProtecting company assets is critical to the health of any
Uncover. Recover. Preserve. Protecting company assets is critical to the health of any organization. Without strict vigilance, a company may render itself exposed. Without keen oversight, insurance programs
More informationPINK OTC MARKETS. DALRADA FINANCIAL CORPORATION (A Delaware Company)
PINK OTC MARKETS DALRADA FINANCIAL CORPORATION (A Delaware Company) QUARTERLY REPORT: For the Three and Nine Months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 Contents: Section (I) Dalrada Financial Corporation Quarterly
More informationGlobal Transfer Pricing Conference
www.pwc.com/tp Managing multiple stakeholders in the new economy Global Transfer Pricing Conference Financial transactions in a changing world Today s presenters Jeff Rogers Arthur Mendoza Krishnan Chrandrasekhar
More informationCLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING
CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING As updated from time-to-time for billing rates and responsible attorney and, following actual notice to the client. This agreement forms the basis
More informationWhy Advisors Will Benefit and Add Value Using a 3(38) Investment Fiduciary
Why Advisors Will Benefit and Add Value Using a 3(38) Investment Fiduciary Defining the roles between a 3(38) Investment Fiduciary and a Plan Advisor offering non fiduciary services. Protecting both the
More informationAudit and Permitted Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (Pertaining to the Company s Independent Auditor)
Audit and Permitted Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (Pertaining to the Company s Independent Auditor) Statement of Principles Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act ) and in accordance
More informationTax, Legal, Bookkeeping & Payroll Services 2015 kpmg.hr
KPMG IN CROATIA Tax, Legal, Bookkeeping & Payroll Services 2015 kpmg.hr High performing people cutting through complexity to deliver informed perspectives and clear solutions that our clients and stakeholders
More informationIndependence Audit and Review Engagements. Independence Other Assurance Engagements
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants Exposure Draft December 2006 Comments are requested by April 30, 2007 Section 290 of the Code of Ethics Independence Audit and Review Engagements Section
More informationTaxation of Carried Interest: What the Future Holds
Taxation of Carried Interest: What the Future Holds Recent tax law changes have increased taxes in general on compensation received by managers of hedge funds and private equity funds through the implementation
More informationBlaney + AMT = Opportunities?
Blaney + AMT = Opportunities? by Herman Wacker and Monna Lux CPA 1 The October, 2002 Blaney decision by Division I of the Court of Appeals added much complexity to the already problematic issue of assessing
More informationCOST 44 th Annual Meeting
COST 44 th Annual Meeting Dealing with Debt in Related Entity Groups October 23, 2013 2:20 3:10 a.m. Giles Sutton Jeffrey M. Vesely Grant Thornton LLP Pillsbury Partner, State & Local Tax Partner 704.632.6885
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS. B. Industrial Revolution and Workers Compensation Statutes
I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND A. Common Law WORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS Before the advent of workers compensation statutes, the only protection afforded to victims of work place
More information