STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia (706)

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia 31901 (706) 649-7372 www.sbwc.georgia."

Transcription

1 Trial Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia (706) STATEMENT OF CASE The employee requested a hearing in the above referenced case for a determination of all OCGA 34-9 issues. Specifically, the employee alleges he was moving ballasts filled with wet stand and felt a pop in his back. The employee alleges he is currently totally disabled from working as a result of his on the job injury. He is seeking the payment of temporary partial disability benefits from October 4, 2010 through May 22, 2011, alleging his hours were reduced after his work injury. He is also seeking the payment of temporary total disability benefits from May 23, 2011 and continuing. He is also seeking authorization for medical treatment with a physician of his own choosing and assessed attorney s fees. The employer/insurer raise as a bar to the receipt of income benefits by the employee, the defense established in Georgia Electric Co. vs. Rycroft, 259 Ga. 155, 378 S. E. 2d 111 (l989) alleging the employee knowingly and willfully made a false representation of his physical condition on his post job offer questionnaire, the employer relied upon the false representation which was a substantial factor in hiring the employee and that there is a causal connection between the false representation and the employee s alleged back injury. The employer /insurer further allege the employee did not suffer any on the job accident while in their employment. Based upon a consideration of all the evidence presented, I find the employee knowingly and willfully made a false representation as to his physical condition, that the employer relied upon the false representation which I find was a substantial factor in the hiring of the employee and find there to be a causal connection between the false representation and the employee s injury. I further find the employee has failed to prove by a preponderance of competent and credible evidence that he suffered an on the job injury while in the employment of the employer in this claim. I therefore conclude the employee is not entitled to benefits under Georgia s Worker s Compensation Act. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Based upon a careful consideration of all the evidence presented, I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 1. Venue in this claim is Muscogee County, Georgia. The employer is subject to Georgia s Workers Compensation Act and has workers compensation insurance with Insurer. On October 4, 2010, the employee was in the general employment of the employer, earning an average weekly wage of $ per week. The employer received notice of an alleged on the job injury within the statutory time provisions promulgated in OCGA The parties stipulated to the facts in this paragraph. Based upon the foregoing stipulations, I find the State Board of Workers Compensation has jurisdiction to determine all OCGA 34-9 issues. At issue for determination by the Board is whether the employee suffered an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. A further issue for

2 determination is whether the employer/insurer has carried the burden of proving a Rycroft defense to bar the receipt of income benefits. 2. The employee worked as a traffic control supervisor for the employer s road construction company. As part of his job duties he was required to direct traffic traveling through the road construction area, design and implement detours where needed, order signage, and place barrels and cones where needed to insure the flow of traffic through the road construction. The employee testified that while he was working for another company, he was contacted by the employer in this claim to come work for him. At that time, the employee admitted his current job was coming to an end. The employee admitted that he did receive a packet of documents to complete prior to his beginning work for the employer and in this packet of documents was a health questionnaire. On that questionnaire the employee was asked whether he was currently receiving treatment of any kind from a doctor and he answered no. However, the medical evidence shows that the employee had treated with Dr. Ross twice in the previous three weeks before coming to work for the employer for complaints of lower back and left leg pain. The employee was asked whether he had any medical treatment in the last six months to which he answered no. The medical evidence shows that the employee, just four days earlier, had seen Dr. Ross for complaints of worsening lower back and leg pain. The employee was asked whether he was taking any medication at present to which he answered no. However the medical records in evidence show the employee was prescribed Celebrex on August 11, 2012, specifically for complaints of lower back and radicular pain. The employee admitted at the hearing that he did not tell the employer before he was hired that he was seeing Dr. Ross for complaints of lower back and radicular pain or that he had been prescribed Celebrex for this pain. In reviewing the medical records of Dr. Ross dated August 11, 2010, just four days before the employee began working for the employer, the records clearly state: back is worse with radiculopathy in the right leg now---asking for referral but will have to wait a few weeks because of change in insurance. 3. As to why he answered no to questions about receiving medical treatment, the employee explained that he went to see Dr. Ross to become established as a new patient, not for treatment of back pain. He testified he had not seen a doctor in recent years, needed to become established with a primary care physician and saw Dr. Ross with the sole intent of establishing himself as a new patient. I find this explanation to be feeble at best. The employee had only worked for his previous employer for less than a year and admitted he had no health insurance with that employer. The employee saw Dr. Ross for back pain on August 11, 2010, before completing the health questionnaire for the employer in this claim. At that appointment, the employee requested a referral to a specialist because of his worsening lower back and radicular complaints. The employee asked Dr. Ross to delay the referral until the employee was hired by the employer so that his health insurance would cover the medical expenses. Just four days after asking Dr. Ross for a referral to a back specialist, the employee denied on the health questionnaire that he was treating with any physician, that he was taking any medications or that he had any condition that might make performance of his job difficult. The employee attempted to explain his misrepresentations on the questionnaire by testifying at the hearing that although he had seen a doctor twice in three weeks for worsening lower back and radicular pain, obtained medication expressly prescribed to treat those conditions and been referred to a specialist, he did not consider this treatment. The employee also testified at this deposition that he had no problems with his back prior to the alleged date of accident on October 4, The employee twice testified at his deposition that he had sought no medical treatment for his back for the 6 years prior to the alleged date of accident. Upon a careful review of the medical records I find the employee knowingly and willfully made a false statement to the employer about his physical condition. While the employee alleges he had a telephone interview with the employer, the President of the company testified he had a face to face interview with the employee. What both agree upon is that there was no mention at all by the employee to the employer of any ongoing back pain on the post job offer medical questionnaire.

3 4. The employee began work for the employer in this claim on August 15, In less than two months from his first day of work, the employee alleges he suffered an on the job accident. He alleges that while lifting a ballast filled with wet sand, he felt a pop in his back. This was a totally unwitnessed accident. He testified after going home that day, he could not get out of bed the next morning and reported his accident to the safety director. The safety director testified that the employee reported to him the following day of the alleged incident that he had injured his back while picking up a ballast filled with wet sand. The safety director drove to the job site to inspect the ballasts and could find none of them filled with either wet sand or water. The safety director brought an actual ballast to the hearing and stated it weighed 5.6 pounds. He further testified that nothing is ever placed inside the ballasts. The owner of the company also corroborated the testimony that no wet sand is ever put inside the ballasts. 5. After the employee reported his on the job accident, he received medical treatment from Dr. Sherrer, a panel physician. The employer/insurer accepted this claim on a medicals only basis. The medical records of Dr. Sherrer dated October 4, 2010 show a diagnosis of lumbosacral strain with severe spasm with radiation of pain into the right leg. The employee continued working for the employer. Dr. Sherrer prescribed a course of physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medication and placed the employee on a light duty work status. While the employee was on light duty, a new traffic control supervisor took the employee s position and became the employee s boss. The employee was transferred to the night shift as part of his light duty work. No doubt there is less traffic at night than there is during the day traveling through the construction area. From the employee s testimony, this transfer to the night shift seemed to anger him. He testified that he used to be in charge of personnel but was no longer, and that the new supervisor did not provide him the help he needed. Sometime later in December, 2011, Dr. Sherrer ordered an MRI which showed a herniated disc at L5 with nerve impingement. Twenty years prior to this alleged work injury, the employee had a workers compensation claim for a back injury and underwent back surgery at L4. 6. After providing conservative treatment for the employee s ongoing complaints of back pain, Dr. Sherrer referred the employee to Dr. Pahl, a spine surgeon. Dr. Pahl rendered an opinion on March 4, 2011 that the employee was born with a congenital stenosis problem of his spine.. He is of the opinion the employee does not have a surgical problem. Dr. Pahl is of the opinion the employee can work a 10 hour day/ 5 days a week with lifting limitations of 10 pounds and no bending, kneeling or squatting. Upon referral by Dr. Sherrer to Dr. Chang, the employee underwent a series of epidural injections with Dr. Chang. On May 24, 2011, the employee went to the emergency room of a local hospital for a shot of morphine and saw Dr. Sherrer two days later. Dr. Sherrer, based upon the employee s subjective complaints of back pain took the employee out of work. Because the employee was not working, the employer took the company truck that the employee was allowed to use. This too seemed to further anger the employee. The owner of the business testified that he had to have the truck at the work site, not parked in the employee s driveway. On June 14, 2011, Dr. Sherrer changed the employee s work status from one of no work to light duty. The employee did not report for work. 7. While the employee was out of work, he and his wife visited a night club on March 3, 2012, where the employee was involved in a bar brawl with Mr. G. The testimony of the events leading up to the bar brawl vary widely between the employee and Mr. G. The employee testified that Mr. G., whom the employee did not recognize, called out the employee s name in the bar. The employee approached Mr. G. and shook his hand.according to the employee, once he learned Mr. G. had been a co worker with him, the employee got up and walked away. The employee stated Mr. G. followed him in the bar and began to question the employee about his case. It was never explained how Mr. G. knew of the employee s case, since the employee had been out of for over a year. The employee stated he walked away from Mr. G.. According to the employee, Mr. G. then found the employee s fiancé in the bar and got nose to nose with her in a hostile manner. Again, it was never explained why Mr. G. would have hostility toward the employee s fiancé. According to the employee, he pulled Mr. G. away from the

4 fiancé and the brawl ensued between the two. The employee explained his attack of Mr. G. was because he felt as if Mr. G. was about to do physical harm to my fiancé. Again, no explanation was given as to why Mr. G. would want to harm the employee s fiancé. 8. Mr. G. credibly testified he is an equipment operator for the employer and knew nothing about the employee having any workers compensation case against the employer. According to Mr. G., the employee came into the bar, recognized Mr. G. as a co-worker and sat down beside him. The employee then asked Mr. G. if he was still employed with the employer in this claim. Upon Mr. G. confirming he was still employed by Mr. A., the employee stated that Mr. A. was buying his beer, paying his power bill and everything.(t110) When Mr. G. asked the employee how that was possible, the employee answered that he had a workers comp claim because of his back. (T 110). According to Mr. G. the employee continued to brag as how he took an early retirement. (T110). Mr. G. then asked the employee did you really get that messed up as if you couldn t work for the rest of your life? (T110). According to the testimony of Mr. G., the employee replied Hell no. That SOB tried to make me work 60 to 70 hours a week, so I will sit on my butt at the house and he will pay me. (T110). Mr. G. then expressed the fact, in an admittedly rude manner, that he thought the employee was wrong to do that. Immediately, the employee picked Mr. G. up off his feet, body slammed him to the floor and began punching him in the head before other patrons pulled the employee off Mr. G. Both parties took warrants out for each other. On the day of the criminal case, the employee asked Mr. G. outside the courtroom to drop the charges and both did so. Mr. G. stated he procured the security camera footage from the bar that would prove his innocence. 9. Mr. A., the owner of the company, testified that he, as the employer, relied upon the false representations made by the employee as to the condition of his back on the health questionnaire and that the answers given by the employee were a substantial factor in hiring the employee. Mr. A. credibly testified that he would not have hired the employee if the employee had revealed on the questionnaire that he was treating with a physician for worsening back pain and was taking medication for back pain. I find this reliance by the employer on the health questionnaire answers given by the employee was a substantial factor in the hiring of the employee. I find from a consideration of all the evidence given that there is a causal connection between the false representation made by the employee as to his back condition and the employee s current claim of a back injury. I find the employee s back pain existed and was worsening prior to the employee completing the health questionnaire as evidenced by the medical records of Dr. Ross. The employee had no health insurance with his former employer to procure treatment for his back pain. He had been contacted by Mr. A. for possible employment with the employer in this claim who provides health insurance to their employees. Knowing he was going to soon work for the employer, the employee then saw Dr. Ross for his worsening back pain. He declined to see the referral suggested by Dr. Ross until he could secure his job with the employer in this claim. This is clearly noted in the medical records of Dr. Ross who prescribed medication for the employee s back pain until the employee could get insurance to cover the expenses of a referral to a spine specialist. 10. Under Rycroft, an employee s claim for workers compensation benefits is barred where an employer/insurer can establish the following: (1) the employee knowingly and willfully made a false representation as to a physical condition, (2) the employer relied upon the employee s false representation and that employer s reliance was substantial factor in the employer s hiring of the employee; and (3) there was a causal connection between the condition falsely represented and the current injury. I find from a consideration of all the evidence presented that the employer/insurer has carried their burden of proving the employee s claim for benefits under the Act is barred by the holding in General Electric vs. Rycroft,. 259 Ga. 155, 378 S. E. 2d 111 (l989) I find the employee knowingly and willfully made a false representation as to his physical condition by falsely answering questions on the medical questionnaire which addressed prior medical treatment and current medications. I find according to the evidence adduced through the credible testimony of Mr. A. that the employer relied

5 upon the false representation which I find was a substantial factor in the hiring of the employee. I further find there to be a causal connection between the false representation and the employee s injury. Georgia Electric Co. v. Rycroft, 259 Ga. 155, 378 S. E. 2d 111 (l989). I therefore conclude the employee is barred from the receipt of benefits under Georgia s Workers Compensation Act. 11. Notwithstanding the Rycroft defense which bars the employee s receipt of benefits under the Act, I further find the employee has failed to prove by a preponderance of competent and credible evidence that he injured his back while working for the employer in this claim. An employee seeking benefits under the Act has the burden of proving an accident with injury that arose out of and in the course of the employee s work for the employer from whom benefits are sought. O.C.G.A (4). See Scandrett v. Talmadge Farms, 174 Ga. App. 547, 330 S. E. 2d 772 (1985). The standard of proof is by a preponderance of the credible evidence. See Maloney v. Gordon County Farms, 265 Ga. 825, 462 S. E. 2d 606 (1995). I find the employee had worsening back pain at the time he went to work for the employer but had no insurance to pay for treatment. I find he deliberately withheld this information from the employer. The incident in which the employee alleges he was injured at work was completely unwitnessed. The employee testified he was injured when lifting a ballast of wet sand, yet all other employees who testified denied that wet sand is ever placed in the ballasts. In observing the ballast in the courtroom, it appears to me to be almost impossible to put wet sand in the small opening. The employee received medical treatment from a panel physician, Dr. Sherrer. Once Dr. Sherrer placed the employee on a light duty work status, the employee lost his supervisory position which seemed to anger him. Further, the employee was given the night shift as a light duty position which he did not like. Also, while he was out of work, he lost the use of the company truck which was needed at the work site and this appeared to further anger the employee. The medical evidence shows the employee was capable of performing light duty work,yet the employee failed to return to work where light duty work was provided for him. The employee, by proof of the medical evidence, had worsening back pain before he began work for the employer and intentionally and willfully falsified his answers on the medical questionnaire. The employee contends he is so disabled he cannot work, yet he engaged in a bar fight which I find from a consideration of all the evidence, seems to point to him as the aggressor. He admitted that he posted on his Facebook page that he got the best of Mr. G. in the bar fight. He admitted that he did post something on his Facebook page that he was available to perform HVAC work although he tried to diminish his involvement by testifying at the hearing that his cousin did the work. I find the employee to be totally lacking in credibility. The credibility of a witness is to be determined by the finder of fact. See Harris v. State, 155 Ga. App. 530 (1980). I find the employee has failed to prove by a preponderance of competent and credible evidence that suffered any on the job accident with the employer in this claim. I therefore conclude the employee is not entitled to benefits under Georgia s Workers Compensation Act. AWARD Wherefore, based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law applicable thereto, the claim of the employee for benefits under Georgia s Workers Compensation Act is hereby denied. IT IS SO ORDERED, this the 06th day of April, This order is electronically signed and approved. Tasca Hagler DMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

6 Appeal 270 Peachtree Street, N.W. Atlanta, GA This appeal by the Employee is before the Appellate Division for review of the award of Judge Hagler, dated April 6, No cross-appeal was filed, and this matter was orally argued before the Appellate Division on June 18, After a review of the record as a whole, the Appellate Division now adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and award of Judge Hagler as its own. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW After a review of the record as a whole, we find that the administrative law judge was, in this case, in the best position to determine the credibility and weight of the evidence in the record. See Johnson v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 231 Ga. App. 627, 499 S.E.2d 916 (1998); Metro Interiors, Inc. v. Cox, 218 Ga. App. 396, 461 S.E.2d 570 (1995); Coats & Clark, Inc. v. Thompson, 166 Ga. App. 669, 305 S.E.2d 415 (1983). Consequently, as to the enumerations of error presented by the Employee, we find no error with the administrative law judge s award. Therefore, the findings of the administrative law judge in this matter are hereby accepted by the Appellate Division, as such findings are supported by a preponderance of competent and credible evidence contained within the record on review. See O.C.G.A (a). The Appellate Division adopts the conclusions of law of the administrative law judge, as such conclusions reflect an appropriate application of the Act to the findings of fact. AWARD Based upon the foregoing, the Appellate Division adopts the Award section of Judge Hagler s award, dated April 6, 2013, as its own. IT IS SO ORDERED, this the 31st day of July, Concurring: Judge Elizabeth D. Gobeil and Judge Harrill L. Dawkins. :lo This order is electronically signed and approved. Frank R. McKay/s. PRESIDING JUDGE APPELLATE DIVISION

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia 31901 (706) 649-7372 www.sbwc.georgia.

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia 31901 (706) 649-7372 www.sbwc.georgia. 2012003449 Trial Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia 31901 (706) 649-7372 www.sbwc.georgia.gov STATEMENT OF CASE The employee requested a hearing in the above referenced claim for

More information

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1299 (404) 656-2930 www.sbwc.georgia.gov STATEMENT OF THE CASE

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1299 (404) 656-2930 www.sbwc.georgia.gov STATEMENT OF THE CASE 2011031543 Trial STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1299 (404) 656-2930 www.sbwc.georgia.gov A hearing was held on June 11, 2013, to determine the Employee

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F311984. CHARLES MARTIN, Employee. VAN BUREN PIPE CORPORATION, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F311984. CHARLES MARTIN, Employee. VAN BUREN PIPE CORPORATION, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F311984 CHARLES MARTIN, Employee VAN BUREN PIPE CORPORATION, Employer CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICE COMPANY, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204754. JENNIFER WILLIAMS, Employee. MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204754. JENNIFER WILLIAMS, Employee. MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204754 JENNIFER WILLIAMS, Employee MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH, Employer SISTERS OF MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CARL C. WEBSTER ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 233,685 CORBIN FISH FARM ) Respondent ) AND ) ) FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE ) Insurance

More information

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Suite 600, 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1299 www.sbwc.georgia.

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Suite 600, 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1299 www.sbwc.georgia. 1994007422 Trial STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Suite 600, 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1299 www.sbwc.georgia.gov (404) 656-2978 STATEMENT OF THE CASE On or around September 22,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F409768. JUVENAL PEREZ, Employee. BUILT-WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F409768. JUVENAL PEREZ, Employee. BUILT-WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F409768 JUVENAL PEREZ, Employee BUILT-WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion)

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) KIRCHER V. THE MASCHHOFFS, LLC NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G100239 JANNETTE HALL, EMPLOYEE PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G100239 JANNETTE HALL, EMPLOYEE PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G100239 JANNETTE HALL, EMPLOYEE PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT, EMPLOYER ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G DONALD UNDERWOOD, Employee. STEWART STAINLESS SUPPLY, INC.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G DONALD UNDERWOOD, Employee. STEWART STAINLESS SUPPLY, INC. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G005463 DONALD UNDERWOOD, Employee STEWART STAINLESS SUPPLY, INC., Employer TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F301230. SAMUEL BEATTY, Employee. USA TRUCK, INC., Self-Insured Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F301230. SAMUEL BEATTY, Employee. USA TRUCK, INC., Self-Insured Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F301230 SAMUEL BEATTY, Employee USA TRUCK, INC., Self-Insured Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED AUGUST 1, 2003 Hearing before ADMINISTRATIVE

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F910691. TERRY FOSTER, Employee. TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, Self-Insured Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F910691. TERRY FOSTER, Employee. TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, Self-Insured Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F910691 TERRY FOSTER, Employee TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, Self-Insured Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 20, 2013 Hearing

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G405820. LINDA BECKER, Employee. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G405820. LINDA BECKER, Employee. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G405820 LINDA BECKER, Employee GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, Employer RISK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G304790 JANE E. JAMES, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT TYSON POULTRY, INC.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G304790 JANE E. JAMES, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT TYSON POULTRY, INC. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G304790 JANE E. JAMES, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT TYSON POULTRY, INC., EMPLOYER TYNET CORPORATION INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F209084 EDDIE WEBB, EMPLOYEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL, INC., EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F209084 EDDIE WEBB, EMPLOYEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL, INC., EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F209084 EDDIE WEBB, EMPLOYEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL, INC., EMPLOYER CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT APPELLATE DIVISION ROBERT BUELL ) ) VS. ) W.C.C. 03-00724 ) COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES ) DECISION OF THE APPELLATE

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MICHAEL L. McDONALD Claimant VS. FIBERGLASS SYSTEMS, LP Respondent Docket No. 1,003,977 AND PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INS. CO. Insurance

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION QUANITA A. PEOPLES ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,045,122 LANGLEY/EMPIRE CANDLE COMPANY ) Respondent ) AND ) ) SECURA INSURANCE,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F608015. AMANDA VOLKMANN, Employee. SONIC DRIVE-IN, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F608015. AMANDA VOLKMANN, Employee. SONIC DRIVE-IN, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F608015 AMANDA VOLKMANN, Employee SONIC DRIVE-IN, Employer FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F102457 OPINION FILED JULY 20, 2004

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F102457 OPINION FILED JULY 20, 2004 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F102457 KEN WATERS, EMPLOYEE CENTURY TUBE CORPORATION, EMPLOYER CROCKETT ADJUSTMENT, CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G103564. LEO HAPEMAN, Employee. ARKANSAS TRUCKING ASSOCIATION SI FUND, Carrier

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G103564. LEO HAPEMAN, Employee. ARKANSAS TRUCKING ASSOCIATION SI FUND, Carrier BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G103564 LEO HAPEMAN, Employee DELP, INC., Employer ARKANSAS TRUCKING ASSOCIATION SI FUND, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G ABILENE L. WENDT, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS HEALTH CENTER, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G ABILENE L. WENDT, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS HEALTH CENTER, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G002506 ABILENE L. WENDT, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS HEALTH CENTER, EMPLOYER PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARK RALEIGH ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,039,074 CHECKERS FOODS ) Respondent ) AND ) ) ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY ) OF

More information

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 708 S. Glenwood Ave, Suite 315 Dalton, Georgia 30721-4406 (706) 272-2284 www.sbwc.georgia.gov

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 708 S. Glenwood Ave, Suite 315 Dalton, Georgia 30721-4406 (706) 272-2284 www.sbwc.georgia.gov 2010030972 Trial STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 708 S. Glenwood Ave, Suite 315 Dalton, Georgia 30721-4406 (706) 272-2284 www.sbwc.georgia.gov NOTICE: This Award may be published by the State Board

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION GEORGIA R. KATZ ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,068,293 USD 229 ) Self-Insured Respondent ) ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Claimant

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F600259 MARION TREY CARTER, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 28, 2006

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F600259 MARION TREY CARTER, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 28, 2006 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F600259 MARION TREY CARTER, EMPLOYEE JOHNSON S BELT SERVICE & SUPPLY, INC., EMPLOYER COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE CO. c/o AIG CLAIM SERVICES

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION WAYNE M. McKIBBEN Claimant VS. DRY BASEMENT & FOUNDATION SYSTEMS Respondent Docket No. 1,034,394 AND ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE CO.

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F211814/F307154 AIG CLAIM SERVICES, INC. INSURANCE CARRIER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F211814/F307154 AIG CLAIM SERVICES, INC. INSURANCE CARRIER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F211814/F307154 GARY MCNABB CARGILL, INC. AIG CLAIM SERVICES, INC. INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JANUARY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204960 LASHAREN MARTIN, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JANUARY 27, 2014

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204960 LASHAREN MARTIN, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JANUARY 27, 2014 BEFORE THE RKNSS WORKERS' COMPENSTION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204960 LSHREN MRTIN, EMPLOYEE COPELNDS TEXRKN. LLC, EMPLOYER MRKEL INSURNCE CO./ FIRSTCOMP UNDERWRITER S GROUP INSURNCE CRRIER/TP CLIMNT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G102391 CURTIS GRAHAM, EMPLOYEE GET RID OF IT OF ARKANSAS, INC.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G102391 CURTIS GRAHAM, EMPLOYEE GET RID OF IT OF ARKANSAS, INC. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G102391 CURTIS GRAHAM, EMPLOYEE GET RID OF IT OF ARKANSAS, INC., EMPLOYER COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE CO./ CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC. (TPA), INSURANCE

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F008194 EMMA YOUNG, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 30, 2004

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F008194 EMMA YOUNG, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 30, 2004 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F008194 EMMA YOUNG, EMPLOYEE INTERNATIONAL WIRE GROUP, INC., EMPLOYER ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED OCTOBER 5, 2006

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED OCTOBER 5, 2006 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F402832 MICHAEL HOLMES USA TRUCK, INC. SELF INSURED CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED OCTOBER 5, 2006 Hearing before ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE February 23, 2009 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE February 23, 2009 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE February 23, 2009 Session DON R. DILLEHAY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F610657 ORDER AND OPINION FILED APRIL 24, 2007

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F610657 ORDER AND OPINION FILED APRIL 24, 2007 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F610657 SHERRY ALLEN BIRCH TREE COMMUNITIES, INC. INSURANCE COMPANY - STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CARRIER

More information

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Division of Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Appeals Board

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Division of Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Appeals Board STATE OF CALIFORNIA Division of Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Appeals Board JOE ELLIS, Case No. ADJ9312688 Applicant, vs. BELL PLASTICS INSURANCE CO OF THE WEST, FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DALE L. STILWELL ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) BOEING COMPANY and ) Docket Nos. 253,800 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY ) & 1,031,180 Respondents

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97 Suitable employment. The worker slipped and fell in January 1992, injuring her low back and hip. She was awarded a 28% NEL award for her low back condition. The worker appealed

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARION A. DAVIS ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 216,570 CONSPEC MARKETING & MANUFACTURING CO. ) Respondent ) AND ) ) UNITED STATES

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F401605. CAROL LUELLEN, Employee. WAL-MART STORES, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F401605. CAROL LUELLEN, Employee. WAL-MART STORES, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F401605 CAROL LUELLEN, Employee WAL-MART STORES, Employer CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC., Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JULY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G002396 RONNY W. FENTON, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 26, 2011

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G002396 RONNY W. FENTON, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 26, 2011 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G002396 RONNY W. FENTON, EMPLOYEE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER RISK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARY JANE WAGGONER ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,001,815 THE BOEING COMPANY ) Respondent ) AND ) ) INSURANCE COMPANY ) STATE

More information

Judge: Donna S. Remsnyder Employer/Carrier/Servicing Agent. / FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

Judge: Donna S. Remsnyder Employer/Carrier/Servicing Agent. / FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE William Bonner, Employee/Claimant, OJCC Case No. 13-001243DSR vs. Accident

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session STANLEY R. WILBANKS v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA Direct Appeal from the Circuit

More information

Warwick v. Howard University, CRB No. 14-112, AHD No. 12-440A, 5 (February 10, 2015).

Warwick v. Howard University, CRB No. 14-112, AHD No. 12-440A, 5 (February 10, 2015). A full evidentiary hearing occurred on August 4, 2014. Claimant sought an award of temporary total disability benefits from December 13, 2011 to the present and continuing as well as causally related medical

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DENNIS E. BURDETTE Claimant VS. MENNONITE HOUSING REHAB SERV. Respondent Docket No. 1,042,321 AND ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. CO.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO LARRY MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. STEPHEN BUEHRER, ADMINISTRATOR, OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, and SHEFFER CORPORATION,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F210713 OPINION FILED MARCH 11, 2004

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F210713 OPINION FILED MARCH 11, 2004 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F210713 ROBERT ROSS, EMPLOYEE ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, EMPLOYER ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED MARCH

More information

NO. COA08-1063 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 June 2009

NO. COA08-1063 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 June 2009 An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James Conace, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Armen Cadillac, Inc.), : Nos. 346 & 347 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: September

More information

NO. COA06-448 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 February 2007. Appeal by defendant from Opinion and Award dated 16 December 2005 by the Full

NO. COA06-448 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 February 2007. Appeal by defendant from Opinion and Award dated 16 December 2005 by the Full An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G103629 SHIKITA WRIGHT, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JULY 10, 2013

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G103629 SHIKITA WRIGHT, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JULY 10, 2013 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G103629 SHIKITA WRIGHT, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EMPLOYER PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT

More information

COMPENSATION ORDER TIMOTHY BURROUGHS, ) Claimant, ) ) AHD No. 06-094 v. ) OWC No. 597835 J & J MAINTENANCE, INC., ) and ) AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, )

COMPENSATION ORDER TIMOTHY BURROUGHS, ) Claimant, ) ) AHD No. 06-094 v. ) OWC No. 597835 J & J MAINTENANCE, INC., ) and ) AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, ) IN THE MATTER OF, TIMOTHY BURROUGHS, Claimant, AHD No. 06-094 v. OWC No. 597835 J & J MAINTENANCE, INC., and AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Employer/Carrier. Appearances REBEKAH ARCH MILLER, ESQUIRE For the Claimant

More information

BRB No. 07-0992 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BRB No. 07-0992 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BRB No. 07-0992 C.W. v. Claimant-Petitioner MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INCORORATED and ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Employer/Carrier- Respondents DATE ISSUED: 06/30/2008 DECISION and ORDER

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F201987 ORDER AND OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F201987 ORDER AND OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F201987 NANCY SISCO DAS FAMILY, INC. UNION STANDARD INSURANCE CO. CLAIMANT RESPONDENT EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CARRIER ORDER AND OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER

More information

APPEAL NO. 100822 FILED AUGUST 23, 2010

APPEAL NO. 100822 FILED AUGUST 23, 2010 APPEAL NO. 100822 FILED AUGUST 23, 2010 This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing (CCH) was held on June

More information

BEFORE THE KANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

BEFORE THE KANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD BEFORE THE KANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DONALD B. KNARD ) Claimant ) v. ) ) Docket No. 1,072,705 APPLEBEES SERVICES, INC. ) Respondent ) and ) ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORP. ) Insurance

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARVIN T. SMITH Claimant VS. WESTERN FEED MILLS, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,049,751 AND MICHIGAN MILLERS MUTUAL INS. CO. Insurance

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G006420 HOUMPHAENG DAOSAENG, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OK FOODS, INC., SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G006420 HOUMPHAENG DAOSAENG, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OK FOODS, INC., SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G006420 HOUMPHAENG DAOSAENG, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OK FOODS, INC., SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER RESPONDENT OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 12, 2015 Hearing before

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board

Commonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board Commonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board OPINION ENTERED: December 23, 2013 CLAIM NO. 201283206 SURVEY ANALYSIS PETITIONER VS. APPEAL FROM HON. CHRISTOPHER M. DAVIS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F600751 JAMES CURRY, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 13, 2006

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F600751 JAMES CURRY, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 13, 2006 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F600751 JAMES CURRY, EMPLOYEE BRADLEY COUNTY FARMERS ASSOCIATION, INC., EMPLOYER AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO. c/o AIG CLAIM SERVICES (TPA), INSURANCE

More information

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0235

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0235 JEFFREY P. GUERRIERO, PLAINTIFF, 1998 OPINION #301 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0235 CENTURY MACHINE INC AND SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15 BEFORE: E. Kosmidis : Vice-Chair E. Tracey : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

John Coronis v. Granger Northern Inc. (April 27, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

John Coronis v. Granger Northern Inc. (April 27, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR John Coronis v. Granger Northern Inc. (April 27, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR John Coronis Opinion No. 16-10WC v. By: Sal Spinosa, Esq. Hearing Officer Granger Northern, Inc. ATTORNEYS: For:

More information

SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' DECISION AND ORDER I. JURISDICTION, NOTICE, AND VENUE

SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' DECISION AND ORDER I. JURISDICTION, NOTICE, AND VENUE SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 FIRST RIO VALLEY MEDICAL, P.A., Petitioner V. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Respondent BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Sharon A. Jones, Petitioner v State Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1214 Agency

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G308511 TYLER J. FULMER, EMPLOYEE EVERETT BUICK GMC, LLC, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G308511 TYLER J. FULMER, EMPLOYEE EVERETT BUICK GMC, LLC, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G308511 TYLER J. FULMER, EMPLOYEE EVERETT BUICK GMC, LLC, EMPLOYER UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0089 OPINION

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0089 OPINION RICHARD P. BELLANT, PLAINTIFF, 1998 OPINION #328 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0089 STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SELF INSURED, DEFENDANT.

More information

IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT TO BE PUBLISHED OPINION

IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT TO BE PUBLISHED OPINION IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT TO BE PUBLISHED OPINION THIS OPINION IS DESIGNATED "NOT TO BE PUBLISHED." PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PROMULGATED BY THE SUPREME COURT, CR 76.28(4)(C), THIS OPINION IS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-WC-01407-COA MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALED:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-WC-01407-COA MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALED: IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-WC-01407-COA FLOYD MAYFIELD APPELLANT v. ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES MISSISSIPPI, LLC AND ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEES DATE OF JUDGMENT:

More information

SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT

SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT MEGAN PETERSON, HF No. 109, 2009/10 Claimant, v. DECISION THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY, Employer, and SENTRY INSURANCE,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F412931. DONNA NORTON, Employee. WAL-MART INC., Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F412931. DONNA NORTON, Employee. WAL-MART INC., Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F412931 DONNA NORTON, Employee WAL-MART INC., Employer CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC., Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED APRIL 14,

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] AND: APPELLANT WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT AND: WORKER EMPLOYEE DECISION #114 Appellant

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F903665 MELISSA MINOR, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED AUGUST 5, 2010

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F903665 MELISSA MINOR, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED AUGUST 5, 2010 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F903665 MELISSA MINOR, EMPLOYEE SOUTH ARKANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, EMPLOYER PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION JOSEPH B. GEIST ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 119,415 DODSON AVIATION, INC. ) Respondent ) AND ) ) OAK RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G304462 MATTHEW MCKAMIE, EMPLOYEE HOPE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G304462 MATTHEW MCKAMIE, EMPLOYEE HOPE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G304462 MATTHEW MCKAMIE, EMPLOYEE HOPE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, EMPLOYER ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION WORKERS COMPENSATION TRUST, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Vivian B. Nalu, Petitioner v Public School Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1872

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-94 **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-94 ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-94 DANIELLE C. GARRICK VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION - # 3 PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO.

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY PAMELA R. LECOMPTE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) C. A. No. 02A-01-010 JEB CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH ) SYSTEMS, ) ) Respondent. ) Submitted:

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G THOMAS BAKER, Employee. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G THOMAS BAKER, Employee. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G203787 THOMAS BAKER, Employee UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, Employer PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carmelo Olivares Hernandez, No. 2305 C.D. 2014 Petitioner Submitted May 15, 2015 v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Giorgio Foods, Inc.), Respondent BEFORE

More information

Griffis, Carol v. Five Star Food Service

Griffis, Carol v. Five Star Food Service University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law Winter 2-6-2015 Griffis, Carol

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F213395 WILMA L. PIERCE, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED FEBRUARY 8, 2005

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F213395 WILMA L. PIERCE, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED FEBRUARY 8, 2005 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F213395 WILMA L. PIERCE, EMPLOYEE KROGER, EMPLOYER SELF-INSURED SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT (TPA), INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

[Cite as State ex rel. Packaging Corp. of Am. v. Indus. Comm., 139 Ohio St.3d 591, 2014-Ohio- 2871.]

[Cite as State ex rel. Packaging Corp. of Am. v. Indus. Comm., 139 Ohio St.3d 591, 2014-Ohio- 2871.] [Cite as State ex rel. Packaging Corp. of Am. v. Indus. Comm., 139 Ohio St.3d 591, 2014-Ohio- 2871.] THE STATE EX REL. PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.,

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Employer) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Worker) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKER'S COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # OPINION

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKER'S COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # OPINION BETRICE ROBINSON, PLINTIFF, 2003 CO #177 S T T E O F M I C H I G N WORKER'S COMPENSTION PPELLTE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 02-0371 MGM GRND DETROIT, L.L.C., SELF INSURED, DEFENDNT. PPEL FROM MGISTRTE BRNEY.

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G011127 SHARON MCCULLER, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 29, 2011

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G011127 SHARON MCCULLER, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 29, 2011 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G011127 SHARON MCCULLER, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS SPECIALTY ORTHOPAEDICS, EMPLOYER TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. OF AMERICA, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT

More information

DECISION & ORDER BY: BEFORE THE SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC FILE NUMBER 1007414. Claimant,

DECISION & ORDER BY: BEFORE THE SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC FILE NUMBER 1007414. Claimant, DECISION & ORDER BEFORE THE SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC FILE NUMBER 1007414 XXXXXXXXX, Claimant, vs. BIG LOTS STORES, INC., Employer, ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendants.

More information

McQuiddy, Jana v. Saint Thomas Hospital

McQuiddy, Jana v. Saint Thomas Hospital University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 6-28-2016 McQuiddy, Jana v.

More information

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL CASE NO. 18 Z 600 08077 03 2 A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS In the Matter of the Arbitration between (Claimant) AAA CASE NO.: 18 Z 600 08077 03 v.

More information

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT. Workers Compensation Commission Division A.D., 2009

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT. Workers Compensation Commission Division A.D., 2009 Filed 12/23/09 No. 4--09--0144WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT Workers Compensation Commission Division A.D., 2009 GREENE WELDING AND HARDWARE, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of

More information

2013 IL App (4th) 111079WC-U. No. 4-11-1079WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION

2013 IL App (4th) 111079WC-U. No. 4-11-1079WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION 2013 IL App (4th 111079WC-U No. 4-11-1079WC Workers' Compensation Commission Division Filed: May 20, 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS VS. ) W.C.C. 02-04486 DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS VS. ) W.C.C. 02-04486 DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT APPELLATE DIVISION JOSEFINA DONAHUE ) ) VS. ) W.C.C. 02-04486 ) ROSS SIMONS, INC. ) DECISION OF THE APPELLATE

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G100744 DONALD RAGSDALE, EMPLOYEE LVL, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G100744 DONALD RAGSDALE, EMPLOYEE LVL, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G100744 DONALD RAGSDALE, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT LVL, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 TRIANGLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT NO.

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS PORT SAINT LUCIE DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS PORT SAINT LUCIE DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS PORT SAINT LUCIE DISTRICT EMPLOYEE: Tony E. Doran 703 Ramie Court Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 EMPLOYER: Florida

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Continental Tire of the Americas, LLC v. Illinois Workers Compensation Comm n, 2015 IL App (5th) 140445WC Appellate Court Caption CONTINENTAL TIRE OF THE AMERICAS,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F600549 VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 6, 2006

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F600549 VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 6, 2006 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F600549 JOHN SEARL ACTION, INC. VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 6, 2006 Hearing

More information

2013 IL App (5th) 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION

2013 IL App (5th) 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION NOTICE Decision filed 08/20/13. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2013 IL App (5th 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #194 Appellant

More information

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 98-C-1403 WILLIS THOMAS Versus TOWN OF ARNAUDVILLE PER CURIAM* This is a workers compensation case. The workers compensation judge found plaintiff failed to establish a work-related

More information