SEXUAL HARASSMENT: TRENDS & DEVELOPMENTS. Presented by Kent R. Smith Jackson Walker L.L.P.

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SEXUAL HARASSMENT: TRENDS & DEVELOPMENTS. Presented by Kent R. Smith Jackson Walker L.L.P."

Transcription

1 SEXUAL HARASSMENT: TRENDS & DEVELOPMENTS Presented by Kent R. Smith Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sexual Harassment Defined Sexual harassment, of course, is a form of sex discrimination under Title VII. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, (1986). While Title VII does not define sexual harassment, the EEOC has defined it as Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when (1) submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual s employment, (2) submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual, or (3) such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment. 29 C.F.R (a). This definition establishes two different types of sexual harassment, (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment and (2) hostile environment sexual harassment. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, (1986); EEOC Policy Guidance on Current Issues of Sexual Harassment (1990). Quid pro quo harassment occurs when submission to or rejection of the harassing conduct by an individual is used as the basis for an employment decision. EEOC Policy Guidance on Current Issues of Sexual Harassment (1990); 29 C.F.R (a)(2), (3). Harassment is unwelcome when submission to or rejection of the conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual s employment. EEOC Policy Guidance on Current Issues of Sexual Harassment (1990); 29 C.F.R (a)(1) Jackson Walker L.L.P. All rights reserved.

2 The U.S. Supreme Court has held that for harassment to violate Title VII it must be sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to alter the terms or conditions of the individual s employment. Id., at 67. Where the harassment is committed by a co-employee, an employer is only liable when it has been negligent either in discovering or remedying the harassment. Where an employer has taken reasonable steps to discover and rectify acts of sexual harassment by coemployees, it will not be held liable. Williamson v. City of Houston, 148 F.3d 462, (5 th Cir. 1998). In Meritor Saving Bank v. Vinson, the Court declined to resolve the issue of an employer s liability for the sexual harassment of it s supervisors. It only noted that courts should look to agency principles in deciding whether an employer was liable for it s supervisors harassment of another employee. Id., at 72. Employer Liability Revisited In 1998, the Supreme Court returned to the issue of employer liability for sexual harassment. In Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998) and Faragher v. City of Boca Rotan, 524 U.S. 775 (1998), the Supreme Court held that employers are vicariously liable for the unlawful harassment of their supervisors. However, the Court also created a limited affirmative defense for employers. Where no tangible employment action is taken, the employer can raise an affirmative defense in avoidance of liability by showing (1) that it exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct any sexually harassing behavior and (2) that the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to otherwise avoid harm. If a tangible employment action is taken against an employee who was the subject of severe or pervasive sexual harassment, then an employer is held vicariously liable for the harassment of it s supervisor regardless of any preventive steps taken by the employer. Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 2

3 Clarification of What Constitutes Sexual Harassment In 1998, the Supreme Court also clarified what constitutes sexual harassment in Faragher v. City of Boca Rotan, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998). In Faragher, in addition to addressing employers vicarious liability, the Supreme Court stated that simple teasing, offhand comments and isolated incidents, unless extremely serious, do not amount to discriminatory changes in the terms and conditions of employment. In so holding the Court said that to be actionable under Title VII, the environment must be both objectively and subjectively offensive. In other words, a reasonable person would have to find it to be hostile or abusive and the victim must in fact perceive it to be so. In Oncale v. Sundowner, the Supreme Court held that Title VII applied to harassment committed against members of the same sex. However, the Court again reiterated, that to be actionable, the harassment has to be based upon sex and that Title VII does not prohibit all forms of harassment in the work place. Same sex harassment was also recently held to be covered under the Texas Human Rights Act. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Gonzales, S.W.3d, 2002 WL (Tex. App.-El Paso 2002). RECENT DEVELOPMENTS What is a Supervisor? Unfortunately, the Ellerth and Faragher cases give us little clue as to what constitutes a supervisor. The EEOC enforcement guidance on vicarious liability states that an individual qualifies as a supervisor if he or she (1) has authority to undertake or recommend tangible employment decisions affecting the employee; or, (2) the individual has authority to direct the employee s daily work activities. EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 3

4 For Unlawful Harassment By Supervisors (1999). While this may seem straightforward at first, the application of this definition can be much more difficult. In Hall v. Bodine Electric Co., 276 F.3d 345, (7 th Cir. 2002), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the fact that one employee has authority to oversee some aspects of another employee s job performance does not necessarily make them a supervisor under Title VII. In that case Ms. Hall complained of sexual harassment by another employee by the name of Samuel Lopez. She had been told that Mr. Lopez had the authority to assign her to specific work assignments and that she was required to follow his instructions. Following Seventh Circuit precedent, the Court stated that the essence of supervisory status is the authority to affect the terms and conditions of the victim s employment. This authority primarily consists of the power to hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer or discipline an employee. Absent at least some of this authority, the Court noted, the employee does not qualify as a supervisor. The authority of Mr. Lopez to oversee Ms. Hall s work was not sufficient to establish a supervisory relationship in the absence of any authority to directly affect the terms and conditions of employment. This view appears to be the trend in cases where an alleged harasser is a low-level supervisor. Last year U.S. District Courts in New York and San Antonio came to a similar conclusion. Mark v. Otis Elevator, 2001 WL (S.D. N.Y. 2001); Rosales v. San Antonio, 2001 WL (W.D. Tex. 2001). In the Rosales case, the Court considered the question of how much and what kind of authority an individual must possess to be a true supervisor under the Faragher case. The District Court in that case decided that under Faragher it is only where the supervisor has the authority to affect the terms and conditions of employment that they will be classified as a true supervisor for the purposes of imputing liability to the employer. Since the Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 4

5 crew leader in that case did not have authority to hire, fire, reward, promote or significantly discipline, the Court found that he was not a supervisor under the Faragher test. In another supervisor case, the Seventh Circuit considered whether the fact that a supervisor was not in the direct chain of command but was still a superior was a supervisor for purposes of raising the Faragher affirmative defense. Gawley v. Indiana University, 276 F.3d 301 (7 th Cir. 2001). This case was an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the University. One of the issues was whether the alleged harasser was a supervisor under the Faragher affirmative defense. After discussing the facts which showed that although the harasser could not hire or fire Gawley, the Court noted that he could instigate disciplinary proceedings against her and had substantial control over the equipment she could use and how she performed her job. The Court also noted that the harasser apparently was aided in his harassment by his superior position. However, the Court sidestepped the issue and assumed that the individual was a supervisor and affirmed summary judgment on the University s affirmative defense on other grounds. Mere Hostility vs. Based on Sex Reiterating that in sexual harassment cases Title VII only prohibits actions that were based on sex, the D.C. Circuit relied on the Supreme Court s decision in Oncale v. Sundowner, in holding that obscene gestures, slashing of tires, vulgar and sexually demeaning comments did not constitute sexual harassment. Davis v. Coastal Int l Security, 275 F.3d 1119 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The conduct in that case arose out of a rancorous employment dispute that started after Davis disciplined two employees. The resulting harassment included the slashing of Davis tires, being told that he made the other employees sick and that he was aggravating. The other Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 5

6 employees also grabbed their crotch in front of him, made kissing gestures and used a phrase describing oral sex. The Court held that in a same sex case a Plaintiff can show that the harassment rises to the level of illegal sexual harassment if he can show 1) that the behavior was motivated by actual homosexual desire, 2) that the harassment was framed in sex specific and derogatory terms, 3) that the harasser was motivated by general hostility toward members of the same gender in the workplace or 3) that there was direct evidence of how the harasser treated members of both sexes in a mixed sex workplace. After reviewing the evidence, the Court noted that it was clear that the harassers in this case were motivated by a workplace grudge and not by sexual attraction. As such, the harassment was not based on sex. The Court also noted that such language and gestures, especially when used by men, are simply expressions of animosity or juvenile provocation. Tangible Employment Action The question of whether constructive discharge constitutes a tangible employment action for purposes of asserting the Faragher defense continues to be debated between the Federal Courts of Appeal. In 2001, the Eighth Circuit implied that constructive discharge did constitute a tangible employment action. Jackson v. Arkansas Dept. of Education, 272 F.2d 1020 (8 th Cir. 2001) If the Eighth Circuit continues with this interpretation in later cases, it will join the Third Circuit [Cardenas v. Massey, 269 F.2d 251 (3 rd Cir. 2001)] in holding that constructive discharge is a tangible employment action. However, the Second Circuit holds to the contrary [Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 191 F.2d 283 (2 nd Cir. 1999)] as does the Tenth Circuit. Mallinson-Montague v. Pocrnick, 224 F.3d 1224 (10 th Cir. 2000). Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 6

7 In the Mallinson case, the Tenth Circuit discussed in depth the concept of tangible employment action. In that case, Mallinson-Montague, and other former loan officers of ProBank sued the bank and others for sexual harassment committed by their former supervisor, James Pocrnick. Pocrnick repeatedly sexually harassed the Plaintiffs and retaliated against their rejection of his advances by denying them business leads and rejecting loans that they originated. After reporting the harassment and the ensuing investigation, the Plaintiffs quit after they found the working conditions intolerable. On appeal of a jury verdict, ProBank argued that only if the Plaintiffs working conditions had been so intolerable as to constitute a constructive discharge would there be a tangible employment action so as to prohibit it from raising the affirmative defense under Faragher. In rejecting this argument, the Tenth Circuit said that the only relevant inquiry on the tangible employment action issue was whether the Plaintiffs had demonstrated a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment. Citing the Second Circuit s decision in Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, the Court noted that not every constructive discharge would be a tangible employment action under Faragher. The Court held that evidence of the loss of business opportunities and the disapproved loans originated by the Plaintiffs were sufficient to constitute a tangible employment action. Reaching a similar conclusion but for different reasons, the Fifth Circuit on March 15th held that a demotion without any reduction in pay or other economic harm can still constitute a tangible employment action. Green v. The Administrator of the Tulane Educational Fund, F.3d, 2002 WL (5 th Cir. 2002). The Court reasoned that although the Supreme Court noted in Faragher and Ellerth that a tangible employment action inflicts economic injury in most cases, the Supreme Court never stated that an economic loss was required in all cases. Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 7

8 On another note, the Fifth Circuit also held in Green that harassment that resulted from personal animosity between a supervisor and his subordinate after a failed intimate relationship was harassment based on sex under Oncale. OTHER RECENT CASES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT The Fifth Circuit has continued to consider the extent and nature of sexual harassment liability in various contexts. Although not a sexual harassment case, the Court considered the issue of vicarious liability in Arguello v. Conoco, Inc. 207 F.3d 803 (5 th Cir. 2000). Conoco was sued for racial harassment and discrimination in a public accommodation in violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C because employees at various Conoco stores had harassed and abused African-American and Hispanic customers. The District Court granted summary judgment on all claims. One of the issues on appeal was whether Conoco, Inc. was liable for the acts of the employees. The employees who committed the harassment and abuse actually worked for stores that were independently owned and operated but that carried the Conoco brand. The Court rejected Conoco s argument that there was no vicarious liability for the harassment of non-supervisory employees under the Ellerth/Faragher decisions. Such a rule in public accommodation cases, the Court noted, would essentially be a no liability rule since most customers deal only with non-supervisory employees. Instead, the Fifth Circuit held that courts should apply standard agency principles to determine whether the acts complained of were within the scope of employment. The Court reversed the granting of summary judgment on this issue as the Plaintiffs had presented enough evidence to raise a question of fact as to whether the employees had been acting within the scope of their employment. In Mota v. University of Houston Health Science Center, 261 F.3d 512 (5 th Cir. 2001), Professor Mota, a native of Venezuela, brought suit for retaliation and same sex harassment. He Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 8

9 alleged a pattern of same sex harassment from his supervisor with repeated threats to his position and immigration status if he did not go along with the harassment. Some nine months after the harassment began, Mota filed a written complaint with the University. The University s investigation determined that there was no evidence of harassment. Mota was eventually terminated when he failed to return to work after an unpaid leave of absence. Mota had tape recordings of the harassment from his supervisor which were never given to the University during its investigation but were played for the jury at trial. The jury returned a six figure verdict against the University. One of the issues on appeal was whether the nine months between the time the harassment began and the first written complaint of harassment to the University amounted to Mota unreasonably taking advantage of the University s corrective and preventive procedures. In affirming the judgment, the Court held that although the nine month delay could be an excessive delay, in light of the fact that during that period of time Mota had been repeatedly threatened with retaliation unless he complied with the harassment, nine months was not an unreasonable delay. The Court also held that Mota s refusal to give the tape recordings to the University would not justify setting aside the jury s verdict for failure to use the University s corrective and preventive procedures because He [Mota] may have viewed the production of additional evidence, such as recordings of conversations, as futile, given his concerns over the effectiveness of the panels inquiry In a more recent case, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment in favor of an employer that promptly investigated reported harassment and took prompt remedial action. Woods v. Delta Beverage Group, Inc., 274 F.3d 295 (5 th Cir. 2001). Ms. Woods worked for Delta from June 18, 1998 to July 22, During that time she reported harassment by a co- Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 9

10 employee. Within one day of the report, the incident had been investigated and the harasser had been instructed to cease all such conduct, that if it occurred again he could be fired and that the harassment was going to be noted in his personnel file. Woods reported no other harassment during the next two weeks. After that time she did not show back up for work again. In her subsequent suit, Woods alleged that the harassment continued after the harasser had been reprimanded. The Fifth Circuit held that the employer was not liable for harassment of which it had no knowledge and which Woods failed to report. The Court also stated that the employer did not have to fire the harasser and that the actions taken under the circumstances were sufficient prompt remedial action. However, the Court also noted that had the harassment continued and been reported, and Delta had still only reprimanded the harasser, then such might not rise to the level of prompt remedial action. Interestingly, the Fifth Circuit recently upheld an arbitration award reversing the termination of an employee that committed sexual harassment. In Weber Aircraft, Inc. v. General Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local No. 767, 253 F.3d 821 (5 th Cir. 2001), an employee by the name of Sewell had been discharged by the company for repeated incidents of sexual harassment. The union filed a grievance under the collective bargaining agreement that provided for arbitration and the arbitrator determined that there was no just cause for the termination given the facts of the case and the employee s prior record of service. The arbitration award ordered that Sewell be reinstated without back-pay. Weber filed suit to vacate the award, and the District Court granted Weber s motion for summary judgment. The Fifth Circuit reversed and reinstated the award holding that the arbitrator did not exceed his authority and that the award did not violate any public policy against sexual harassment. Sexual Harassment: Trends & Developments Page 10

EMPLOYER S LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS. Charges of Sexual Harassment Are a Small Business Nightmare Statistics Bare This Out.

EMPLOYER S LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS. Charges of Sexual Harassment Are a Small Business Nightmare Statistics Bare This Out. EMPLOYER S LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS Charges of Sexual Harassment Are a Small Business Nightmare Statistics Bare This Out. Last year, 15,222 charges of sexual harassment were filed

More information

2.25 HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (SEXUAL AND OTHER HARASSMENT) (05/2015)

2.25 HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (SEXUAL AND OTHER HARASSMENT) (05/2015) 2.25 HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (SEXUAL AND OTHER HARASSMENT) (05/2015) The following charge is based on the Supreme Court's decision in Lehmann v.

More information

CHAPTER FIVE. The EEOC s regulations, at 29 CFR 1604.11(a), provide an explanation of what constitutes tangible employment action sexual harassment:

CHAPTER FIVE. The EEOC s regulations, at 29 CFR 1604.11(a), provide an explanation of what constitutes tangible employment action sexual harassment: CHAPTER FIVE Harassment Cases The theory of harassment can be divided into two categories: (1) harassment resulting in a tangible employment action, and (2) hostile environment harassment. In tangible

More information

Liabilities and defenses for sexual harassment

Liabilities and defenses for sexual harassment Liabilities and defenses for sexual harassment Liabilities and defenses for sexual harassment Resource kit 90132 By Jill R. Muratori, Esq. The U.S. Supreme Court issued two ground-breaking decisions on

More information

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR THE SINS OF THE WICKED

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR THE SINS OF THE WICKED SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR THE SINS OF THE WICKED by Peter M. Panken, Esq. Lauri F. Rasnick, Esq. Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, LLP New York, New York Johnna G. Torsone,

More information

August 2007 Education and Membership Development Department

August 2007 Education and Membership Development Department August 2007 Education and Membership Development Department Table of Contents Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 3 What is Sexual Harassment? 3 4 How Can Sexual Harassment Occur? 4 5 When is an

More information

Moreover, sexual harassment is a violation of federal, state and county fair employment laws.

Moreover, sexual harassment is a violation of federal, state and county fair employment laws. Sexual harassment interferes with a productive working environment, interjects irrelevant considerations into personnel decisions and generally demeans employees who are victims of harassment. Moreover,

More information

SEXUAL HARASSMENT. Taylor s Special Care Services, Inc. Simon Pop, MBA Chief Operating Officer 2015-2016

SEXUAL HARASSMENT. Taylor s Special Care Services, Inc. Simon Pop, MBA Chief Operating Officer 2015-2016 SEXUAL HARASSMENT Taylor s Special Care Services, Inc. Simon Pop, MBA Chief Operating Officer 2015-2016 1 Agenda Overview-Why talk about sexual harassment? Why get training? Statistics What is sexual harassment?

More information

INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees

INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may

More information

EEO 101 The Basic Theories of Employment Discrimination

EEO 101 The Basic Theories of Employment Discrimination EEO 101 The Basic Theories of Employment Discrimination An overview of the anti-discrimination statutes enforced by the EEOC An introduction to the theories under which claims of discrimination can be

More information

SEXUAL HARASSMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE

SEXUAL HARASSMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE SEXUAL HARASSMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE The policy of the City of Los Angeles is to promote and maintain a working environment free of sexual harassment, intimidation, and coercion. Sexual

More information

LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT ALERT

LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT ALERT November 2006 LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT ALERT SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: WHAT NONPROFITS NEED TO KNOW When it comes to the law of sexual harassment and retaliation, nonprofit organizations

More information

Sexual Harassment in the Law Firm Setting

Sexual Harassment in the Law Firm Setting Sexual Harassment in the Law Firm Setting Presented by Joel M.Grossman, Mediator and Arbitrator ADR Services, Inc 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 250 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 201-0010 Direct Tel: (323)

More information

EEOC RELEASES ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE ON VICARIOUS EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS

EEOC RELEASES ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE ON VICARIOUS EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS EEO RELEASES ENFOREMENT GUIDANE ON VIARIOUS EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS July 1999 www.morganlewis.com Brussels Frankfurt Harrisburg London Los Angeles Miami New York Philadelphia

More information

NLG SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE

NLG SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE NLG SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE 1.0 Introduction The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) is committed to providing a safe environment for all members of the organization, free from any harassing

More information

The Basics of Sexual Harassment

The Basics of Sexual Harassment The Basics of Sexual Harassment Sexual Harassment is a violation both of Federal Law and the laws of most states. For employers, it is fairly easy to take steps to prevent sexual harassment and to defeat

More information

Module #1 EEO Intro & Laws. Module #1. Module #1. Office of Human Resources/ Affirmative Action EEO Training

Module #1 EEO Intro & Laws. Module #1. Module #1. Office of Human Resources/ Affirmative Action EEO Training EEO Training for UHCL Faculty/Staff EEO Intro & Laws Office of Human Resources/ Affirmative Action EEO Training Introduction The Texas Labor Code, Chapter 21, Section 21.010 requires state agencies to

More information

Sexual Harassment Awareness

Sexual Harassment Awareness Sexual Harassment Awareness Orientation: This week s on-line assignment is about sexual harassment in the school and the workplace. We are discussing this subject because sexual harassment is an illegal

More information

Employer Liability for ^ Harassment by Supervisors^ An Overview of the \999 EEOC Guidelines> r -^

Employer Liability for ^ Harassment by Supervisors^ An Overview of the \999 EEOC Guidelines> r -^ Employer Liability for ^ Harassment by Supervisors^ An Overview of the \999 EEOC Guidelines> r -^ Although the Supreme Court held that employers are sometimes liable for the sexual harassmenl of employees

More information

Legal Resource Kit. Sex Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Employment

Legal Resource Kit. Sex Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Employment 395 HUDSON STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10014-3684 (212) 925-6635 FAX: (212) 226-1066 Legal Resource Kit Sex Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Employment 395 HUDSON STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10014-3684 (212)

More information

Department of Homeland Security DHS Directives System Directive Number: 256-01 Revision Number: 00. Issue Date: ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY

Department of Homeland Security DHS Directives System Directive Number: 256-01 Revision Number: 00. Issue Date: ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY I. Purpose Department of Homeland Security DHS Directives System Directive Number: 256-01 Revision Number: 00 Issue Date: ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY This Directive is intended to prohibit and prevent harassment

More information

Caregiver Discrimination. by Patti J. Skoglund

Caregiver Discrimination. by Patti J. Skoglund : by Patti J. Skoglund pskoglund@jlolaw.com 8519 Eagle Point Boulevard, Suite 100 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042-8624 (651) 290-6500 EMPLOYMENT LAW WHAT S NEW? I. FAMILY RESPONSIBILITY DISCRIMINATION FRD New

More information

DEVELOPMENT OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW

DEVELOPMENT OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW DEVELOPMENT OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW 1964 Title VII prohibits sex discrimination in employment. 1971 - Rogers v. E.E.O.C. - The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a Hispanic complainant could

More information

Alert. Client PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

Alert. Client PROSKAUER ROSE LLP PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Client Alert Third Circuit And New Jersey Appellate Division Decisions Expand Employers Potential Vicarious Liability For Workplace Harassment By Supervisors One of the key issues in

More information

Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia

Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia 1. Purpose. The purpose of this policy is to maintain a healthy work environment in which all individuals are treated with respect and dignity and to provide procedures for reporting, investigating and

More information

Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1

Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1 Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law Janet Savage 1 Plaintiffs suing their former employers for wrongful discharge or employment discrimination

More information

EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR SUPERVISORY SEXUAL (AND RACIAL) HARASSMENT AFTER FARAGHER AND ELLERTH By Jeff Scott Olson

EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR SUPERVISORY SEXUAL (AND RACIAL) HARASSMENT AFTER FARAGHER AND ELLERTH By Jeff Scott Olson EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR SUPERVISORY SEXUAL (AND RACIAL) HARASSMENT AFTER FARAGHER AND ELLERTH By Jeff Scott Olson INTRODUCTION In Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, S.Ct. (1998), and Burlington Industries,

More information

Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy OP 03.03

Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy OP 03.03 Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy OP 03.03 Policy Mississippi State University is committed to assuring that the University and its programs are free from discrimination and harassment based

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION Case 1:05-cv-01379-RLY-WTL Document 41 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CYNTHIA Y. MARCH, Plaintiff, vs. ADT

More information

Sexual Harassment, Prevention and California Law

Sexual Harassment, Prevention and California Law Sexual Harassment, Prevention and California Law Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII

More information

HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: Reducing an Employer s Risks

HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: Reducing an Employer s Risks HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: Reducing an Employer s Risks Lemle & Kelleher, LLP 2007, 2008 Baton Rouge One American Place 301 Main Street Suite 1100 Baton Rouge, LA 70825 Phone: 225.387.5068 Fax: 225.387.4995

More information

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. Prepared for the Association of Women in Computing Florida Institute of Technology. Cem Kaner December 2002

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. Prepared for the Association of Women in Computing Florida Institute of Technology. Cem Kaner December 2002 Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Prepared for the Association of Women in Computing Florida Institute of Technology Cem Kaner December 2002 This material is based upon work supported by the National

More information

SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY STATEMENT

SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY STATEMENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY STATEMENT The company is committed to providing a workplace that is free from all forms of discrimination, including sexual harassment. Any employee's behavior that fits the definition

More information

NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA REGULATIONS MANUAL. Chapter 3 Administrative Affairs

NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA REGULATIONS MANUAL. Chapter 3 Administrative Affairs 3-4018 Discrimination/ Harassment NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA The College shall actively promote a community in which diversity is valued. The College is committed to promoting an environment free from discrimination

More information

4014.2. PERSONNEL All Staff Permanent Personnel Conditions of Employment Equal Employment Opportunity/Anti-Harassment

4014.2. PERSONNEL All Staff Permanent Personnel Conditions of Employment Equal Employment Opportunity/Anti-Harassment PERSONNEL All Staff Permanent Personnel Conditions of Employment Equal Employment Opportunity/Anti-Harassment 4014.2 It is the policy of the Clintonville Public School District that no person may be illegally

More information

Sexual Harassment. Table of Contents

Sexual Harassment. Table of Contents Acknowledgements EJC is grateful to the following individuals for their assistance in updating the Chapter for the 6 th Edition: Jonathan Puth, Esq., Webster, Fredrickson, Correia & Puth PLLC Michael Robinson,

More information

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO M E M O R A N D U M. All City Employees, Elected Officials, Contract Workers and Volunteers

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO M E M O R A N D U M. All City Employees, Elected Officials, Contract Workers and Volunteers THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO M E M O R A N D U M DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: All City Employees, Elected Officials, Contract Workers and Volunteers Kevin Faulconer, Mayor Jan Goldsmith, City Attorney Judy von Kalinowski,

More information

Harassment Prevention for Small Business Owners

Harassment Prevention for Small Business Owners Harassment Prevention for Small Business Owners Compliance Training What you don't know or aren't doing can hurt you. www.runasmarterbusiness.com/nfib Disclaimer Although this webinar may contain legal

More information

FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION

FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-mc-0052 DECISION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-mc-0052 DECISION AND ORDER EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. Case No. 14-mc-0052 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

More information

Case 3:12-cv-00165-LRH-VPC Document 50 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:12-cv-00165-LRH-VPC Document 50 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case :-cv-00-lrh-vpc Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 GINA NELSON, Plaintiff, vs. NAV-RENO-GS, LLC, et al., Defendants. :-CV-0-LRH (VPC ORDER 0 This discovery

More information

CENTERPIECE FOCUS ON: SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE HARASSMENT POLICY

CENTERPIECE FOCUS ON: SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE HARASSMENT POLICY CENTERPIECE FOCUS ON: SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE HARASSMENT POLICY BY L. ROBERT BATTERMAN AND SHERI L. GILBERT On June 26, 1998, the Supreme Court issued two

More information

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 93-1789. George S. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 93-1789. George S. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 93-1789. George S. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Sept. 26, 1994. Appeal from the United States

More information

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA NUMBER: 2.09 (20.5) ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/15/04

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA NUMBER: 2.09 (20.5) ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/15/04 CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA NUMBER: 2.09 (20.5) Page 1 of 1 ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/15/04 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERCEDES: 1/19/96 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY

More information

WELCOME TO TEXAS! (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/la/content/htm/la.002.00.000021.00.htm) prohibits

WELCOME TO TEXAS! (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/la/content/htm/la.002.00.000021.00.htm) prohibits WELCOME TO TEXAS! The Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/la/content/htm/la.002.00.000021.00.htm) prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis

More information

COURT S INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY (CIVIL) SEXUAL HARASSMENT. I will now explain to you the rules of law that you must follow and apply in

COURT S INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY (CIVIL) SEXUAL HARASSMENT. I will now explain to you the rules of law that you must follow and apply in IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA KEYBOARD()DIVISION KEYBOARD(), Plaintiff, v. KEYBOARD(), Defendants. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] CV Members of the Jury: COURT S INSTRUCTIONS

More information

400 SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. XLII:399

400 SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. XLII:399 Employment Law Scope of Faragher-Ellerth Affirmative Defense to Vicarious Liability Not Defined by Employer s Own Sexual-Harassment Policy Chaloult v. Interstate Brands Corp., 540 F.3d 64 (1st Cir. 2008)

More information

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Sexual Harassment Policy (Employee-To-Employee) BUL-1893.1 Kevin S. Reed, General Counsel ROUTING Principals Administrators All Employees DATE: August 1, 2005 POLICY: The Los Angeles

More information

CITY OF LOS ANGELES SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, AND GENDER EXPRESSION DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE

CITY OF LOS ANGELES SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, AND GENDER EXPRESSION DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE CITY OF LOS ANGELES SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, AND GENDER EXPRESSION DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE The policy of the City of Los Angeles has been, and will continue to be, to promote and

More information

Labor & Employment Law Update

Labor & Employment Law Update , California 90071, California 92260-4305 Wrongful Termination/Retaliation for First Quarter 2007 WRONGFUL TERMINATION Catherine Coble, Esq. Public employer has immunity against direct liability for wrongful

More information

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures GENDER DISCRIMINATION/SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY & TITLE I X GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 1-0702 GENERAL UNIVERSITY April 2005 POLICY 1.01 GENERAL STATEMENT It is the

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 13 2018 PATRICIA BANKS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CHICAGO BOARD OF EDUCATION and FLORENCE GONZALES, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the

More information

SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY PROCEDURES FOR MANAGERS

SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY PROCEDURES FOR MANAGERS Town of Greenfield, Massachusetts Human Resources Department SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY PROCEDURES FOR MANAGERS Table of Contents Topic Page Policy Provisions 2 Definitions 3 Types of Sexual Harassment 4

More information

Measuring The Bounds Of Employer Liability For Anonymous Workplace Harassment

Measuring The Bounds Of Employer Liability For Anonymous Workplace Harassment Measuring The Bounds Of Employer Liability For Anonymous Workplace Harassment American Bar Association Labor And Employment Law Section Employee Rights & Responsibilities Committee 2012 Mid-Winter Meeting

More information

STATE OF MARYLAND JUDICIARY Policy on Equal Employment Opportunity and Harassment

STATE OF MARYLAND JUDICIARY Policy on Equal Employment Opportunity and Harassment Effective date of issue: September 2011 Page 1 of 10 STATE OF MARYLAND JUDICIARY I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to ensure compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations

More information

Retaliation and Whistleblower Claims

Retaliation and Whistleblower Claims Retaliation and Whistleblower Claims 2012 Labor and Employment Relations Law Seminar Thomas W. Scrivner TWScrivner@michaelbest.com This presentation is intended for general information purposes only and

More information

Administrative Bulletin

Administrative Bulletin STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DATE: 1/27/2015 NO. 15-03 EXPIRES: Indefinite DISTRIBUTION: A - MANAGEMENT Administrative Bulletin x B - MGMT& SUPERVISORY C - ALL EMPLOYEES SUBJECT Equal Employment

More information

Challenging EEOC Conciliation Charges

Challenging EEOC Conciliation Charges Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Challenging EEOC Conciliation Charges Law360, New

More information

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: WHAT EMPLOYERS SHOULD KNOW. Tamsin R. Kaplan, Esq. 1 Tamsin R. Kaplan & Associates, P.C.

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: WHAT EMPLOYERS SHOULD KNOW. Tamsin R. Kaplan, Esq. 1 Tamsin R. Kaplan & Associates, P.C. SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: WHAT EMPLOYERS SHOULD KNOW Tamsin R. Kaplan, Esq. 1 Tamsin R. Kaplan & Associates, P.C. A. Discrimination, Harassment and the Law Sexual harassment in the workplace

More information

Employment Practices Liability Insurance Claims are on the rise. Are you protected?

Employment Practices Liability Insurance Claims are on the rise. Are you protected? Employment Practices Liability Insurance Claims are on the rise. Are you protected? Administered by Cooper & McCloskey Inc. What is Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI)? (EPLI) protects companies

More information

Sex Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, and Related Unprofessional Conduct Policy No. G004

Sex Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, and Related Unprofessional Conduct Policy No. G004 EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Sex Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, and Related Unprofessional Conduct Policy No. G004 Supersedes Policy G004, Dated 10/7/88, 1/10/90, 12/2/92, 1/l/99, 1/1/04, 2/29/08,

More information

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaint & Investigation Guideline Number 200-002b-AOG Responsible Office Human Resources Date Revised 01/30/2014

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaint & Investigation Guideline Number 200-002b-AOG Responsible Office Human Resources Date Revised 01/30/2014 Title Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaint & Investigation Guideline Number 200-002b-AOG Responsible Office Human Resources Date Revised 01/30/2014 1. Purpose The SCA is committed to providing

More information

Harry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia. U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1

Harry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia. U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1 Harry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1 What is The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission? What are the Federal Laws Prohibiting Job Discrimination?

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 9, 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SHARON K. BOESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORT

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION

ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION Director of Administration and Management ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Diversity Programs References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 31 August 19, 2013 EEOD, WHS 1.

More information

Revised 18 January 2013. The University of Texas at Austin University Compliance Services

Revised 18 January 2013. The University of Texas at Austin University Compliance Services The University of Texas at Austin University Hello and welcome. This portion of the Compliance Program will introduce you to the topic of Employment Discrimination, and the University's policies and procedures

More information

MODEL LAW ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT

MODEL LAW ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT MODEL LAW ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT 0 MODEL LAW ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT Table of Contents Chapter I: General Provisions... 2 Article 1: [Title]... 2 Article 2: Purpose... 2 Article 3: Application... 2 Article

More information

STUDENT PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT

STUDENT PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT STUDENT PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT The Law School has been embracing diversity and equal opportunity since its founding in 1899. Our founders believed that a legal education should be

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

More information

WELCOME. EEO Laws That Impact Small Businesses. Michelle Crew. By Michelle Crew, Settlement Officer U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

WELCOME. EEO Laws That Impact Small Businesses. Michelle Crew. By Michelle Crew, Settlement Officer U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission WELCOME To the Advanced CBA ReadyTalk Webinar Training Equal Employment Opportunity Commission January 9, 2007 11:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time Please: Check Browser for plug-ins Un-plug PDAs

More information

By: Gerald M. Richardson

By: Gerald M. Richardson MANAGING THE RISKS POSED BY THE THREE PUBLIC POLICY WRONGFUL DISCHARGE CASES RECENTLY DECIDED BY THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT By: Gerald M. Richardson I. An At Will Employee Can Sue His Employer on a Claim

More information

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, v. LAURA G. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, Appellee. No. 08-11-00235-CV Appeal from the County Court at Law No.

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY: HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY TITLE: Sexual Misconduct

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY: HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY TITLE: Sexual Misconduct ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY: HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY TITLE: Sexual Misconduct Pursuant to Title IX of the Higher Education Act of 1972 ( Title IX ) Fox Valley Technical College ( FVTC or the College ) prohibits

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00125-CV CHRISTOPHER EDOMWANDE APPELLANT V. JULIO GAZA & SANDRA F. GAZA APPELLEES ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

More information

AR 5145.7 (a) Students SEXUAL HARASSMENT

AR 5145.7 (a) Students SEXUAL HARASSMENT AR 5145.7 (a) Students SEXUAL HARASSMENT As defined by Education Code Section 212.5, Sexual harassment means unwelcome sexual conduct including advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, visual,

More information

Whistleblower, Retaliation & Protected Concerted Activity. Presented by: Dean Pacific and Jonathan Kok

Whistleblower, Retaliation & Protected Concerted Activity. Presented by: Dean Pacific and Jonathan Kok Whistleblower, Retaliation & Protected Concerted Activity Presented by: Dean Pacific and Jonathan Kok Why Should You Care? 5. Very popular claims 4. Judges are conservative on Summary Judgment 3. Humans

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-1085 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ROBERT J. AYERS,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 13-1006 IN RE ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PER CURIAM Rafael Zuniga sued San Diego Tortilla (SDT) for personal injuries and then added

More information

The Continuing Expansive Pressure to Hold Employers Strictly Liable for Supervisory Sexual Extortion: An Alternative Approach Based on Reasonableness

The Continuing Expansive Pressure to Hold Employers Strictly Liable for Supervisory Sexual Extortion: An Alternative Approach Based on Reasonableness The Continuing Expansive Pressure to Hold Employers Strictly Liable for Supervisory Sexual Extortion: An Alternative Approach Based on Reasonableness Heather S. Murr Supervisory sexual extortion claims,

More information

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT ENDORSEMENT NO: This endorsement, effective 12:01 am, policy number forms part of issued to: by: THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

More information

Anti-discrimination Laws: North Carolina

Anti-discrimination Laws: North Carolina View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/w-000-2332 Anti-discrimination Laws: North Carolina J. TRAVIS HOCKADAY, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, WITH PRACTICAL

More information

Vedder Price - Bulletins: The Public Employer, January, 1999

Vedder Price - Bulletins: The Public Employer, January, 1999 Page 1 of 10 1998 Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz. Public Employer Bulletin is published by the law firm of Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz. It is intended to keep our clients and interested parties

More information

The World Bank Group Policy on Eradicating Harassment Guidelines for Implementation

The World Bank Group Policy on Eradicating Harassment Guidelines for Implementation 1.0 Introduction The World Bank Group Policy on Eradicating Harassment Guidelines for Implementation The World Bank Group is committed to fostering a workplace free of harassment and intimidation, where

More information

COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO 1 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION & HARASSMENT POLICY

COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO 1 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION & HARASSMENT POLICY COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO 1 Section I. Statement of Policy Columbia is committed to maintaining an environment that respects the dignity of all individuals. Accordingly, Columbia will not tolerate harassment

More information

N E W Y O R K S TAT E U N I F I E D C O U R T S Y S T E M

N E W Y O R K S TAT E U N I F I E D C O U R T S Y S T E M N E W Y O R K S TAT E U N I F I E D C O U RT S Y S T E M Sexual Harassment: Policy Procedures Message from the Chief Administrative Judge On behalf of New York State s Unified Court System, I am pleased

More information

Risk Management and Litigation Avoidance An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Risk Management and Litigation Avoidance An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Risk Management and Litigation Avoidance Risk Management and Litigation Avoidance An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. 2012 COSE Small Business Conference October 25-26, 2012 Presented by Robert

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 14-0582 444444444444 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, PETITIONER, v. GINGER WEATHERSPOON, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-13-00632-CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-13-00632-CV AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed June 16, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00632-CV OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellant V. GINGER WEATHERSPOON, Appellee On Appeal

More information

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY. Policy Subject: Number Page. HARASSMENT POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE C-25 1 of 3

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY. Policy Subject: Number Page. HARASSMENT POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE C-25 1 of 3 HARASSMENT POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE C-25 1 of 3 PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to establish a strong commitment to prohibit and to prevent unlawful harassment in employment, and to set forth

More information

The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company The Coca-Cola Company EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY STATEMENT 1.0 Policy Statement and Purpose The Coca-Cola Company is an Equal Opportunity Employer and maintains a work environment

More information

Contra Costa Community College District Human Resources Procedure 1040.07 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION AND UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT

Contra Costa Community College District Human Resources Procedure 1040.07 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION AND UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT Contra Costa Community College District Human Resources Procedure 1040.07 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION AND UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT 1. General This is the written procedure for filing and processing complaints of

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 1449 BASHIR SHEIKH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GRANT REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District

More information

HealthStream Regulatory Script

HealthStream Regulatory Script HealthStream Regulatory Script Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Version: May 2008 Lesson 1: Introduction Lesson 2: What Is Sexual Harassment? Lesson 3: Responsibilities of Employers and Employees Lesson

More information

What Supervisors Need to Know about Discrimination Reference Guide. Office of Human Resources Consulting Services 433 Archer House 292-2800

What Supervisors Need to Know about Discrimination Reference Guide. Office of Human Resources Consulting Services 433 Archer House 292-2800 What Supervisors Need to Know about Discrimination Reference Guide Office of Human Resources Consulting Services 433 Archer House 292-2800 Workshop Objectives Workshop participants will be able to: Define

More information

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 8.7

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 8.7 PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 8.7 Issued Date: 10-21-11 Effective Date: 10-21-11 Updated Date: SUBJECT: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURES 1. POLICY A. The Philadelphia Police Department

More information

Supreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions

Supreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions Supreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions The Supreme Court Holds That EEOC s Conciliation Efforts Are Subject to Judicial Review, Albeit Narrow SUMMARY A unanimous Supreme

More information

Response to Complaints of Harassment, Violence and Discrimination

Response to Complaints of Harassment, Violence and Discrimination Response to Complaints of Harassment, Violence and Discrimination To limit potential liability, employers should immediately respond to complaints of harassment, violence or threats of violence, and discrimination.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Washington v. Vericrest Financial, Inc. et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 0 1 TIFFANI WASHINGTON, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, VERICREST FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation

More information

FEHC Regulations for AB1825 Prevention of Sexual Harassment Training

FEHC Regulations for AB1825 Prevention of Sexual Harassment Training FEHC Regulations for AB1825 Prevention of Sexual Harassment Training The following discusses the requirements of AB 1825 (Gov Code section 12950.1) as clarified by the Fair Employment & Housing Commission

More information

What is Sexual Harassment

What is Sexual Harassment What is Sexual Harassment {PRIVATE}What? The EEOC has defined sexual harassment in its guidelines as: Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual

More information