On Compulsory PerClaim Deductibles in Automobile Insurance


 Collin Reynolds
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 28: 25 32, 2003 c 2003 The Geneva Association On Compulsory PerClaim Deductibles in Automobile Insurance CHUSHIU LI Department of Economics, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, ROC CHWENCHI LIU Department of Insurance, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, ROC Received November 14, 2001; Revised July 15, 2002 Abstract The purposes of this paper are to analyze the theoretical characteristics of the compulsory deductible system and to verify the rationality of an increasing perclaim deductible in automobile insurance. We derive the optimal variable perclaim deductible by assuming the insurers are financially balanced and the expected utility of the insured is maximized in the absence of moral hazard. Our result suggests that a variable perclaim deductible increasing with the number of claims per year is not optimal. Instead, deductibles should be charged in a decreasing rate forming a secondbest solution. Key words: automobile insurance, deductible, perclaim, secondbest JEL Classification No.: G22 1. Introduction Designing the optimal form of an insurance contract is a major issue in insurance economics literature. Previous studies have shown that a preferred insurance policy contract by a riskaverse individual includes a deductible [Arrow, 1963; Raviv, 1979]. While attempting to derive the optimal solution, most studies analyze the case of a single risk and describe a deductible in terms of the expense of the total claim amount. The implicit assumption behind this description is that the claim occurs only once (but with a variable accident probability). Beyond the analyses of a single loss and a onetime deductible, Raviv [1979] shows that, with multiple losses, a single deductible for the aggregate loss is optimal. Gollier and Schlesinger [1995] discuss the insurance contract of one risk in the presence of other independent risks and conclude that individual deductibles are always secondbest optima. Paulsen [1995] considers the possibility of a peryear perclaim deductible that is assumed constant. While some of the previous analyses provide the possibility of separate deductibles for multiple losses, this paper considers the case that the deductible of a specific risk is decided contingent only upon the number of past losses. The insurance contract with perclaim deductibles rather than aggregate deductibles is not uncommon in insurance markets. The reimbursement system of medical insurance is a
2 26 LI AND LIU typical example. The insured receives insurance indemnity after paying a fixed deductible for each claim up to a total cap limit. Although it appears in the form of an aggregate deductible, Arrow s firstbest insurance contract can be interpreted as a policy in which the overall insurance indemnity equals the sum of the multiple losses minus a straight deductible. The deductible for each loss may be reinterpreted as a stochastic amount determined by previous losses and indemnity. A recent example of a perclaim deductible contract is the new paradigm of automobile collision insurance implemented in Taiwan in Under the new system, the insured is required to pay a deductible that increases with the number of claims per year. The deductible is 3,000 NTD for the first claim, 5,000 NTD for the second, and 7,000 NTD for the third and final claim. Intuitively, the design of an increasing perclaim deductible seems to be to punish negligent or reluctant behavior. But it is interesting to explore the nature of the variable form of deductibles. To analyze the theoretical foundation of variable peryear perclaim deductibles with random sequential loss severities, we want to understand the rational design. Should perclaim deductibles be constant, decreasing, or increasing? This paper derives the optimal variable peryear perclaim deductible by assuming that the insurers are financially balanced and that the expected utility of the insured is maximized in the absence of moral hazard. Our result suggests that an increasing variable perclaim deductible cannot meet the requirements of optimal conditions. Instead, deductibles should be charged in a decreasing rate providing a secondbest solution. In our examination, the decreasing marginal utility of income plays a crucial role. If the insured needs to pay the deductible twice for two claims, for example, the marginal utilities per dollar are different in each payment. In particular, the marginal utility per dollar for the first deductible is lower than that for the second deductible. Therefore, in order for the insured to maximize expected utility while the insurer remains financially balanced, the deductible for the second claim should be less than that for the first one. Section 2 of the paper outlines the analytical model. Section 3 presents a numerical illustration and Section 4 contains our conclusions. 2. The model Assume for each claim i = 0, 1,...,N, the claim size X i has a deductible of D i, and that X 0 = 0 and D 0 = 0 indicating no initial loss. For an insurer, the total claim expense is: Y (D) = N max{x i D i, 0}. (1) i=0 For the insured, outofpocket loss in addition to the premium paid is: Z(D) = N min{x i, D i }. (2) i=0 Most actuarial literature presumes that the claim number N is independent of the claim size and that X and N follow a Poisson distribution with expectation λ (see for instance Lemaire [1995], Ch. 15). 1
3 ON COMPULSORY PERCLAIM DEDUCTIBLES IN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 27 The notation Q(D) is the premium corresponding to coverage Y (D). Here, D is the vector (D 1, D 2,...,D N ). According to the basic assumption of Paulsen [1995], we can write Q(D) = (1 + α) E[Y (D)], (3) where α is a loading factor. In this paper, we assume that the deductible D i may vary with each claim. The sizes for each claim X 1, X 2,...,X N are independent and identically distributed. In order to avoid the problem of personal bankruptcy, we assume that each claim has a support of [0, x] and that N x is less than the initial wealth. Suppose for simplicity that there are no more than two claims per year. Therefore, the total expected claim expense for the insurer is: { x } E[Y (D)] = [1 F(X)] dx P 1 D 1 { x x } + [1 F(X)] dx + [1 F(X)] dx P 2 (4) D 1 D 2 where F(X) denotes the distribution function of each claim with density f (X), P i represents the probability of an insured with claim number i in a given time period has an accident, i = 0, 1, 2, and P 0 is the probability of no claim. The signs of the first and second order derivatives with respect to D i can be obtained as follows: and Q(D) D i = (1 + α) [1 F(D i )] (1 P 0 P 1 ) 0, (5) 2 Q(D) Di 2 = (1 + α) f (D i ) (1 P 0 P 1 ) 0, (6) where P 0 + P 1 + P 2 = 1. It is assumed that each insured is riskaverse and pursues expected utility maximization. Let EU and W 0 denote the expected utility and the initial endowment respectively. In the oneperiod model, we consider the case for which each claim X i has a different D i, i = 1, 2. The final wealth of the insured after paying the deductible is: W (X,D) = W 0 Q(D) Z(D). (7) The insured chooses the levels of D 1 and D 2 under the conditions X i 0(i = 1, 2) so as to maximize expected utility EU(W ). It is necessary to prove the following lemma to derive the first order optimal conditions for each claim deductible. Lemma 1: Suppose V (W, D) = E[U(W )], then V D i = Q(D) D i E[U (W )] [1 F(D i )] E[U (W i )], (8)
4 28 LI AND LIU where W i = W 0 Q(D) Z i (D), Q(D) is independent of D, and Z i (D) = 2 (X k, D k ) + D i, i = 1, 2 k=0 k i (See the Appendix for a proof.) By applying Eq. (8), the first order condition associated with V (W, D) is V/ D i = 0. Thus, the insured s optimization can be derived as follows: and D 1 : D 2 : Q(D) {U [W 0 Q(D)] P 0 + E{U [W 0 Q(D) Z(D)]} D 1 [1 F(D 1 )] E{U [W 0 Q(D) Z 1 (D)]}} = 0 (9) Q(D) {U [W 0 Q(D)] P 0 + E{U [W 0 Q(D) Z(D)]} D 2 [1 F(D 2 )] E{U [W 0 Q(D) Z 2 (D)]}} = 0. (10) where Z 1 = D 1 + min(x 2, D 2 ) and Z 2 = D 2 + min(x 1, D 1 ). In order to see whether D i is a local maximum, 2 we show that the second order conditions for maximization are satisfied, 2 V/ D 2 i < 0. 3 Following the results of (9) and (10), we get (1 P 0 ) (1 P 0 P 1 ) = E{U [W 0 Q(D) Z 1 (D)]} > 1. (11) E{U [W 0 Q(D) Z 2 (D)]} If P 1 is not equal to zero, then the left hand side of (11) is greater than one. This implies that E[U (W 1 )] > E[U (W 2 )], where W 1 = W 0 Q(D) Z 1, and W 2 = W 0 Q(D) Z 2. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the rational design of perclaim deductibles for a riskaverse individual. The following result of Proposition 1 shows that if D 1 > D 2, then E[U (W 1 )] > E[U (W 2 )]. Proposition 1: Suppose that a riskaverse insured endowed with nonrandom initial wealth is subject to two random losses in a given period. If deductibles vary with according to each claim, then it is optimal to choose an insurance policy in which the first claim deductible is higher than the second claim deductible in the absence of moral hazard. That is, D1 > D 2. Proof. Since X 1 and X 2 are independent random variables representing losses, we define Y 1 = min(t, D 2 ) + D 1, and Y 2 = min(t, D 1 ) + D 2. The value of E[U ] could be integrated along the random variable t for 0 t < x. For the interval D 1 t < x we have Y 1 = Y 2 = D 1 + D 2, and thus U (W 1 ) > U (W 2 ). However, for the interval 0 t < D 1 we see Y 1 > Y 2. This implies that U [W 0 Q(D) Y 1 ] > U [W 0 Q(D) Y 2 ]. Thus, the overall integration (0 t < x) results in E[U (W 1 )] > E[U (W 2 )].
5 ON COMPULSORY PERCLAIM DEDUCTIBLES IN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 29 The economic rationality behind Proposition 1 is the diminishing marginal utility of income. For a riskaverse individual, the marginal utility of insurance given a higher level of wealth is less than that with a lower one. When the insured suffers a collusion, he pays either the first claim deductible or the realized loss depending on which value is lower, and the final wealth is less than the initial wealth with no loss. Thus, given that the first claim deductible (or realized loss) has been paid, the insured chooses the lower second deductible for the second claim since the marginal utility of wealth is higher at this stage. As can be seen in earlier studies [Arrow, 1963; Gollier and Schlesinger, 1995], a single aggregate deductible would be a firstbest solution when there are multiple losses. This kind of contract implies that the optimal deductible is decreasing in the number of claims, but in a stochastic way. In contrast, Eeckhoudt et al. [1991] show that the optimal deductible per claim is a constant. Their model is based on the assumption that the total loss for a given period is scattered equally for each claim and the deductible for each claim is independent on the realization of other losses. This is in a sense a thirdbest solution. 4 In fact, our study provides a secondbest solution by restricting coverage to a decreasing deductible for each realized past loss and is intermediary between the firstbest stochastically decreasing deductible and the thirdbest constant deductible. The key idea is that, inspired by the newly designed automobile insurance contracts in Taiwan, we focus on the relationship between deductibles of sequential claims. In comparison with the case of Eeckhoudt et al. [1991] in which each claim is scattered equally, our model reflects the realistic situation of random claims. Since past losses definitely reduce the wealth of the insured, the net wealth after loss will affect the choice of deductible. Therefore it is rational to assume that the deductible for each claim can be made contingent upon the number of past accidents. We find that in an insurance policy designed with perclaim deductibles, a secondbest solution of decreasing deductibles is preferable. 3. Numerical illustration This section provides numerical examples to illustrate the model above. Since the probability of the third accident is very small, we only consider the case of two claims; that is, the policy is designed using the first deductible D 1 and the second deductible D 2 only. It is assumed that claim amounts are exponentially distributed, with expected value 30 for a sample of 5000 insured. The number of claims is Possion distributed with parameter λ = (Lemaire [1995], Ch. 15). It is further assumed that the insured s utility is approximated exponentially, U(W ) = e aw, where a is the level of absolute risk aversion and W is the final wealth. The initial endowment W 0 is 200 and the loading factor α is 0.1. Table 1 shows the different solutions of (D1, D 2 ) for various values of a. As expected, the size of the first claim deductible is greater than the second claim. 4. Generalization to N claims The simple model of two claims can be easily generalized to N claims per year. The insurance contract covers losses for one year and the deductible is on each claim. The key
6 30 LI AND LIU Table 1. Optimal deductibles for various level of absolute risk aversion (λ = , X = 30, W 0 = 200,α = 0.1). a D D issue of this paper is to explore the situation in which the perclaim deductible is not a constant. We examine any two successive claims i and j, where i = j 1. In particular, we try to indicate whether there is any relationship between D i and D j. The insured can select the levels of D i and D j when X i 0 and X j 0 under the condition of maximizing the expected utility E[U(W )]. In the general case, the optimal conditions for each perclaim deductible, Dl, can be derived as follows: 5 D l : Q(D) D l E[U (W )] [1 F(D l )] E{U [W 0 Q(D) Z l (D)]} =0 (12) where Z l = D l + N k=0 k l min(x k, D k ), and l = i, j. Let W i and W j be the final endofperiod wealth for i and j, respectively. By applying the results of the basic case as shown in Eqs. (10) and (11), we derive the following result: E[U (W i )] > E[U (W j )] for i = j 1, (13) where W i = W 0 Q(D) Z i (D) and W j = W 0 Q(D) Z j (D). It is easy to see that E[U (W i )] is a monotonically increasing function with respect to the variable D i, for i = 1, 2,...,N, where W i = W 0 Q(D) Z i (D), Q(D) is a constant, and Z i (D) = N k=0 k i (X k, D k ) + D i. Thus, for a riskaverse individual with a utility function satisfying U > 0 and U < 0, the result of Eq. (13) can be applied to show that Di > D j for i = j 1. The following proposition shows that the optimal deductible per claim is a decreasing function of past claims. Proposition 2: Suppose that a riskaverse individual faces N i.i.d. risks of losses X 1,...,X N for a given period. If deductibles vary according to each claim, then the riskaverse insured chooses an insurance policy in which the higher the claim number, the lower the size of the deductible in the absence of moral hazard. That is, D1 > D 2 > D 3 > > D N.
7 ON COMPULSORY PERCLAIM DEDUCTIBLES IN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE Concluding remarks This paper indicates the importance of extending previous models to incorporate the empirical features of the deductible system with random sequential loss severities. It adopts the usual assumption that the probabilities of claims are independent of the size of the deductibles. Our results show that a riskaverse insured prefers a perclaim deductible policy that varies with the number of claims. We also show that the size of the optimal perclaim deductible is decreasing when the number of claims is greater than one in a given time period. It may be asked, in the absence of moral hazard, what is the rationale for the existence of increasing deductibles? This may be explained by the presence of nonnegligible administrative costs for handling each claim, making it suboptimal to cover claims too small to justify the administrative costs. For cases where the moral hazard issue is important (i.e. where the size and probability of claims do vary with the size of the deductibles), an increasing variable perclaim deductible may serve to reduce the inefficiency of excessive moral hazard. This moral hazard consideration may be the reason for the new pattern of increasing perclaim deductibles introduced in Taiwan in Whether the importance of the effect in reducing moral hazard (that suggests increasing perclaim deductibles) offsets the effect of risk aversion (that suggests decreasing perclaim deductibles) is beyond the scope of this paper. Appendix Proof of Lemma 1. Notice V = Q(D) E[U (W )] + E{φ[Z(D)]}, (A1) D i D i D i where φ(z(d)) = U(W 0 Q(D) Z(D)), and Q(D) is assumed to be a constant. Our analysis will focus on the last term in (A1), D i E{φ[Z(D)]}. For simplicity, we first derive the derivative form for D 1, that is, { [ ]} E{U[W 0 Q(D) Z(D)]} = 2 E U W 0 Q(D) min(x k, D k ) D 1 D 1 k=1 = { x D1 U[W 0 Q(D) X 1 min(x 2, D 2 )] df(x 1 ) df(x 2 ) D 1 X 2 =0 X 1 =0 x x } + U[W 0 Q(D) D 1 min(x 2, D 2 )] df(x 1 ) df(x 2 ) X 2 =0 X 1 =D 1 x x = U [W 0 Q(D) D 1 min(x 2, D 2 )] df(x 1 ) df(x 2 ) X 2 =0 X 1 =D 1 = [1 F(D 1 )] E{U [W 0 Q(D) D 1 min(x 2, D 2 )]}. (A2)
8 32 LI AND LIU By applying the same procedure for D 2 as shown above, we could obtain the following result: D 2 E{U[W 0 Q(D) Z(D)]} = [1 F(D 2 )] E{U [W 0 Q(D) D 2 min(x 1, D 1 )]}. (A3) Thus, following the results of (A1), (A2), and (A3), we have proved Eq. (8). Acknowledgments We are grateful to the editor and anonymous referee for many helpful comments and instructions. We are also grateful to YewKwang Ng and LiChien Lin for valuable suggestions. Notes 1. In fact, the results of this paper would be hold without this Poisson assumption. 2. With multiple losses, it is reasonable to obtain that the deductibles equal the losses for early losses. 3. According to Eq. (8), V/ D i depends on the values of E[U (W )] and E[U (W i )]. The first term in Eq. (8) is derived when we assume Z(D) is a constant while the second term is derived by assuming Q(D) is a constant. By definition W = W 0 Z(D) Q(D), and when D i increases, Q(D) decreases but W increases if we treat W 0 Z(D) as a constant in the first term of Eq. (8). Thus, an increase in D i lowers the value of E[U (W )]. In contrast, when D i increases, W i decreases since W i = W 0 Q(D) Z i (D), as we treat D i as the only variable in W i. Thus, when D i increases, E[U (W i )] increases. This implies that an increase in D i decreases V/ D i ; that is, the second order conditions of maximizing the expected utility are satisfied. 4. We are indebted to a referee for pointing out the relationship between the secondbest and thirdbest solutions and that the deductible in the firstbest solution can be expressed as D i = max(0, D t 1 i=1 X i ). 5. All features in this model can be generalized to N claims. The proof for the general model is not given here due to the complex notation; interested readers may request it from the corresponding author. References ARROW, K. [1963]: Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care, American Economic Review, 53, EECKHOUDT, L., BAUWENS, L., BRIYS, E., and SCARMURE, P. [1991]: The Law of Large (Small?) Numbers and the Demand for Insurance, Journal of Risk and Insurance, GOLLIER, C. and SCHLESINGER, H. [1995]: SecondBest Insurance Contract Design in an Incomplete Market, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(1), LEMAIRE, J. [1995]: BonusMalus Systems in Automobile Insurance. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff. PAULSEN, J. [1995]: Optimal Per Claim Deductibility in Insurance with the Possibility of Risky Investments, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 17, RAVIV, A. [1979]: The Design of an Optimal Insurance Policy, American Economic Review, 69, SCHLESINGER, H. [1981]: The Optimal Level of Deductibility in Insurance Contracts, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 48,
Analyzing the Demand for Deductible Insurance
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18:3 3 1999 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Analyzing the emand for eductible Insurance JACK MEYER epartment of Economics, Michigan State
More informationHARVARD John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business
HRVRD John M. Olin Center for aw, Economics, and Business ISSN 0456333 THE DISDVNTGES OF GGREGTE DEDUCTIBES lma Cohen Discussion Paper No. 367 6/00 Harvard aw School Cambridge, M 038 This paper can be
More informationExplaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 22: 121 134 (1997) c 1997 The Geneva Association Explaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection VIRGINIA R. YOUNG AND MARK J. BROWNE School
More informationMULTIPLE LOSSES, EX ANTE MORAL HAZARD, AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR UMBRELLA POLICIES
C The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2005, Vol. 72, No. 4, 525538 MULTIPLE LOSSES, EX ANTE MORAL HAZARD, AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR UMBRELLA POLICIES Michael Breuer ABSTRACT Under certain cost conditions
More informationEffects of Subsidized Crop Insurance on Crop Choices
Effects of Subsidized Crop Insurance on Crop Choices Jisang Yu Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis UC Agricultural Issues Center 2015 AAEA&WAEA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA,
More informationRegret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance *
Regret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance * Yoichiro Fujii, Osaka Sangyo University Mahito Okura, Doshisha Women s College of Liberal Arts Yusuke Osaki, Osaka Sangyo University + Abstract This papers
More informationThe Effect of Ambiguity Aversion on Insurance and Selfprotection
The Effect of Ambiguity Aversion on Insurance and Selfprotection David Alary Toulouse School of Economics (LERNA) Christian Gollier Toulouse School of Economics (LERNA and IDEI) Nicolas Treich Toulouse
More informationOptimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk
Optimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk Alary D. Bien F. TSE (LERNA) University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note, we consider an adverse selection problem
More informationBasic Utility Theory for Portfolio Selection
Basic Utility Theory for Portfolio Selection In economics and finance, the most popular approach to the problem of choice under uncertainty is the expected utility (EU) hypothesis. The reason for this
More informationOptimal Risk Sharing With Limited Liability
Optimal Risk Sharing With Limited Liability Semyon Malamud, Huaxia Rui, and Andrew Whinston Abstract We solve the general problem of optimal risk sharing among a finite number of agents with limited liability.
More informationMoral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 PrincipalAgent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically
More information3. The Economics of Insurance
3. The Economics of Insurance Insurance is designed to protect against serious financial reversals that result from random evens intruding on the plan of individuals. Limitations on Insurance Protection
More informationNo Claim Bonus? by John D. Hey*
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 10 (No 36, July 1985), 209228 No Claim Bonus? by John D. Hey* 1. Introduction No claim bonus schemes are a prominent feature of some insurance contracts, most
More informationOptimal health insurance contract: Is a deductible useful?
Economics Letters 87 (2005) 313 317 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Optimal health insurance contract: Is a deductible useful? David Bardey a, T, Romain Lesur b a GREMAQ UMR CNRS 5604Manufacture des
More informationInsurance Fraud through Collusion between Policyholders and Car Dealers: Theory and Empirical Evidence.
Insurance Fraud through Collusion between Policyholders and Car Dealers: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Pierre Picard Department of Economics, Ecole Polytechnique Kili C. Department of Insurance, Tamkang
More informationThe Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance. Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University
\ins\liab\dlirpr.v3a 060607 The Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University Paul Thistle University of Nevada Las Vegas Thistle s research
More informationMicroeconomics Tutoral 5: Choice under Uncertainty and Revealed Preferences October, 21th
Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne Microeconomics: PSME  ngelo Secchi 1 Master I, cademic year 20152016 Microeconomics tutorials supervised by Elisa Baku 2 and ntoine Marsaudon 3. Microeconomics Tutoral
More informationProspect Theory and the Demand for Insurance
Prospect Theory and the emand for Insurance avid L. Eckles and Jacqueline Volkman Wise ecember 211 Abstract We examine the effect of prospect theory preferences on the demand for insurance to determine
More informationMaximum Likelihood Estimation
Math 541: Statistical Theory II Lecturer: Songfeng Zheng Maximum Likelihood Estimation 1 Maximum Likelihood Estimation Maximum likelihood is a relatively simple method of constructing an estimator for
More informationMinimum asset requirements and compulsory liability insurance as solutions to the judgmentproof problem
RAND Journal of Economics Vol. 36, No. 1, Spring 2005 pp. 63 77 Minimum asset requirements and compulsory liability insurance as solutions to the judgmentproof problem Steven Shavell Minimum asset and
More informationDemand and supply of health insurance. Folland et al Chapter 8
Demand and supply of health Folland et al Chapter 8 Chris Auld Economics 317 February 9, 2011 What is insurance? From an individual s perspective, insurance transfers wealth from good states of the world
More informationFAIR TRADE IN INSURANCE INDUSTRY: PREMIUM DETERMINATION OF TAIWAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE. Emilio Venezian Venezian Associate, Taiwan
FAIR TRADE IN INSURANCE INDUSTRY: PREMIUM DETERMINATION OF TAIWAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE Emilio Venezian Venezian Associate, Taiwan ChuShiu Li Department of Economics, Feng Chia University, Taiwan 100 Wen
More informationValuation of the Surrender Option Embedded in EquityLinked Life Insurance. Brennan Schwartz (1976,1979) Brennan Schwartz
Valuation of the Surrender Option Embedded in EquityLinked Life Insurance Brennan Schwartz (976,979) Brennan Schwartz 04 2005 6. Introduction Compared to traditional insurance products, one distinguishing
More informationAnalyzing the Surrender Rate of Limited Reimbursement LongTerm Individual Health Insurance
Analyzing the Surrender Rate of Limited Reimbursement LongTerm Individual Health Insurance ChihHua Chiao, ShingHer Juang, PinHsun Chen, ChenTing Chueh Department of Financial Engineering and Actuarial
More informationOn the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information
More informationCompulsory insurance and voluntary selfinsurance: substitutes or complements? A matter of risk attitudes
Compulsory insurance and voluntary selfinsurance: substitutes or complements? A matter of risk attitudes François Pannequin, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan and Centre d Economie de la Sorbonne pannequin@ecogest.enscachan.fr
More informationEffects of Subsidized Crop Insurance on Crop Choices
Effects of Subsidized Crop Insurance on Crop Choices Jisang Yu Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of California, Davis jiyu@primal.ucdavis.edu Selected Paper prepared for presentation
More informationEDUCATION AND EXAMINATION COMMITTEE SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RISK AND INSURANCE. Copyright 2005 by the Society of Actuaries
EDUCATION AND EXAMINATION COMMITTEE OF THE SOCIET OF ACTUARIES RISK AND INSURANCE by Judy Feldman Anderson, FSA and Robert L. Brown, FSA Copyright 25 by the Society of Actuaries The Education and Examination
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory
More informationExam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance
Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance Date: January 8, 2013. Duration: 3 hours. This is a closedbook exam. The exam does not use scrap cards. Simple calculators are allowed. The questions
More informationC2922 Economics Utility Functions
C2922 Economics Utility Functions T.C. Johnson October 30, 2007 1 Introduction Utility refers to the perceived value of a good and utility theory spans mathematics, economics and psychology. For example,
More informationA Portfolio Model of Insurance Demand. April 2005. Kalamazoo, MI 49008 East Lansing, MI 48824
A Portfolio Model of Insurance Demand April 2005 Donald J. Meyer Jack Meyer Department of Economics Department of Economics Western Michigan University Michigan State University Kalamazoo, MI 49008 East
More informationHealth Economics. University of Linz & Demand and supply of health insurance. Gerald J. Pruckner. Lecture Notes, Summer Term 2010
Health Economics Demand and supply of health insurance University of Linz & Gerald J. Pruckner Lecture Notes, Summer Term 2010 Gerald J. Pruckner Health insurance 1 / 25 Introduction Insurance plays a
More informationScreening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Maitreesh Ghatak presented by Chi Wan
Screening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Maitreesh Ghatak presented by Chi Wan 1. Introduction The paper looks at an economic environment where borrowers have some
More information3 Introduction to Assessing Risk
3 Introduction to Assessing Risk Important Question. How do we assess the risk an investor faces when choosing among assets? In this discussion we examine how an investor would assess the risk associated
More informationWHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES. A D Wilkie, United Kingdom. Summary and Conclusions
WHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES A D Wilkie, United Kingdom Summary and Conclusions The question of whether a risk averse investor might be the more willing to hold shares rather
More informationThe Values of Relative Risk Aversion Degrees
The Values of Relative Risk Aversion Degrees Johanna Etner CERSES CNRS and University of Paris Descartes 45 rue des SaintsPeres, F75006 Paris, France johanna.etner@parisdescartes.fr Abstract This article
More informationA Simple Insurance Model: Optimal Coverage and Deductible
A Simple Insurance Model: Optimal overage and eductible hristopher Gaffney Adi BenIsrael Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract An insurance model, with realistic assumptions about coverage, deductible
More information2. Information Economics
2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many
More informationThomas Russell. Dept. of Economics Santa Clara University
Catastrophe Insurance and the Demand for Deductibles Thomas Russell Dept. of Economics Santa Clara University The author acknowledges the assistance of a Leavey Grant in the preparation of this paper.
More informationHackingproofness and Stability in a Model of Information Security Networks
Hackingproofness and Stability in a Model of Information Security Networks Sunghoon Hong Preliminary draft, not for citation. March 1, 2008 Abstract We introduce a model of information security networks.
More informationAn Incomplete Market Approach to Employee Stock Option Valuation
An Incomplete Market Approach to Employee Stock Option Valuation Kamil Kladívko Department of Statistics, University of Economics, Prague Department of Finance, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen Mihail
More informationNotes  Gruber, Public Finance Section 12.1 Social Insurance What is insurance? Individuals pay money to an insurer (private firm or gov).
Notes  Gruber, Public Finance Section 12.1 Social Insurance What is insurance? Individuals pay money to an insurer (private firm or gov). These payments are called premiums. Insurer promises to make a
More informationFund Manager s Portfolio Choice
Fund Manager s Portfolio Choice Zhiqing Zhang Advised by: Gu Wang September 5, 2014 Abstract Fund manager is allowed to invest the fund s assets and his personal wealth in two separate risky assets, modeled
More informationLiability Insurance as Protection Against Legal Error. Vickie Bajtelsmit Colorado State University. and
lipale.v2a 071708 Liability Insurance as Protection Against Legal Error Vickie Bajtelsmit Colorado State University and Paul D. Thistle * University of Nevada Las Vegas Thistle s research was supported
More informationWhat we ll be discussing
Teaching programme: Course: Main text: Master of Public Health, University of Tromsø, Norway Health economics and policy (HEL3007) JA Olsen (2009): Principles in Health Economics and Policy, Oxford University
More informationOptimal Reinsurance Arrangements Under Tail Risk Measures
Optimal Reinsurance Arrangements Under Tail Risk Measures Carole Bernard, and Weidong Tian 6th March 2007 Abstract Regulatory authorities demand insurance companies to control the risks by imposing stringent
More informationAt t = 0, a generic intermediary j solves the optimization problem:
Internet Appendix for A Model of hadow Banking * At t = 0, a generic intermediary j solves the optimization problem: max ( D, I H, I L, H, L, TH, TL ) [R (I H + T H H ) + p H ( H T H )] + [E ω (π ω ) A
More informationUsing participating and financial contracts to insure catastrophe risk: Implications for crop risk management
Using participating and financial contracts to insure catastrophe risk: Implications for crop risk management 0. Abstract Geoffroy Enjolras High losses generated by natural catastrophes reduce the availability
More informationWhat we ll be discussing
Teaching programmes: Master of Public Health, University of Tromsø, Norway HEL3007 Health Economics and Policy Master of Public Health, Monash University, Australia ECC5979 Health Economics Master of
More informationA Sensitivity Analysis of the Real Option Model
A Sensitivity Analysis of the eal Option Model Junichi Imai and Takahiro Watanabe November 25, 2003 Abstract In this paper, we analyze the value of the flexibility of the project under the demand uncertainty.
More informationLIABILITY, INSURANCE AND THE INCENTIVE TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT RISK. Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University
\ins\liab\liabinfo.v9 082312 LIABILITY, INSURANCE AND THE INCENTIVE TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT RISK Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University Paul Thistle University of Nevada Las Vegas August 2012
More informationLecture Notes on Elasticity of Substitution
Lecture Notes on Elasticity of Substitution Ted Bergstrom, UCSB Economics 20A October 26, 205 Today s featured guest is the elasticity of substitution. Elasticity of a function of a single variable Before
More informationExtract from. Études et Dossiers No. 299. 11th Joint Seminar of the European Association of Law and Economics (EALE) and The Geneva Association (GA)
International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Études et Dossiers Extract from Études et Dossiers No. 299 11th Joint Seminar of the European Association of Law and Economics (EALE) and
More informationMath 370, Spring 2008 Prof. A.J. Hildebrand. Practice Test 2
Math 370, Spring 2008 Prof. A.J. Hildebrand Practice Test 2 About this test. This is a practice test made up of a random collection of 15 problems from past Course 1/P actuarial exams. Most of the problems
More informationDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Venice WORKING PAPER SERIES Working Paper n. 203/2010 October 2010
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Venice WORKING PAPER SERIES Antonella Campana and Paola Ferretti Initial premium, aggregate claims and distortion risk measures in X L reinsurance with
More informationFinancial Market Microstructure Theory
The Microstructure of Financial Markets, de Jong and Rindi (2009) Financial Market Microstructure Theory Based on de Jong and Rindi, Chapters 2 5 Frank de Jong Tilburg University 1 Determinants of the
More informationLecture notes on Moral Hazard, i.e. the Hidden Action PrincipleAgent Model
Lecture notes on Moral Hazard, i.e. the Hidden Action PrincipleAgent Model Allan CollardWexler April 19, 2012 CoWritten with John Asker and Vasiliki Skreta 1 Reading for next week: Make Versus Buy in
More informationLecture Notes on Elasticity of Substitution
Lecture Notes on Elasticity of Substitution Ted Bergstrom, UCSB Economics 210A March 3, 2011 Today s featured guest is the elasticity of substitution. Elasticity of a function of a single variable Before
More informationAn Introduction to Portfolio Theory
An Introduction to Portfolio Theory John Norstad jnorstad@northwestern.edu http://www.norstad.org April 10, 1999 Updated: November 3, 2011 Abstract We introduce the basic concepts of portfolio theory,
More informationAdverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton
Preliminary and Incomplete Please do not Quote Adverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton Washington University, Department of Economics Date: 4/24/01 Abstract Several
More informationOptimal Accident Compensation Schemes
Optimal Accident Compensation Schemes Abstract This paper considers the way in which accident compensation is offered as insurance against personal injury due to accidents. We firstly set up a simple microeconomic
More informationNonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion
Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion P. CoolenSchrijner, F.P.A. Coolen Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK email: Pauline.Schrijner@durham.ac.uk
More informationThe Demand for Life Insurance: An Application of the Economics of Uncertainty: A Comment
THE JOlJKNAL OF FINANCE VOL. XXXVII, NO 5 UECEMREK 1982 The Demand for Life Insurance: An Application of the Economics of Uncertainty: A Comment NICHOLAS ECONOMIDES* IN HIS THEORETICAL STUDY on the demand
More informationEcon 132 C. Health Insurance: U.S., Risk Pooling, Risk Aversion, Moral Hazard, Rand Study 7
Econ 132 C. Health Insurance: U.S., Risk Pooling, Risk Aversion, Moral Hazard, Rand Study 7 C2. Health Insurance: Risk Pooling Health insurance works by pooling individuals together to reduce the variability
More informationSaving and the Demand for Protection Against Risk
Saving and the Demand for Protection Against Risk David Crainich 1, Richard Peter 2 Abstract: We study individual saving decisions in the presence of an endogenous future consumption risk. The endogeneity
More informationWarranty Designs and Brand Reputation Analysis in a Duopoly
Warranty Designs and Brand Reputation Analysis in a Duopoly Kunpeng Li * Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, U.S.A. Qin Geng Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, Kutztown, PA, U.S.A. Bin Shao
More informationAggregate Risks, Collateral Value and the Role of Loan Guarantee in Small Business Financing
Aggregate Risks, Collateral Value and the Role of Loan Guarantee in Small Business Financing Ye (George) Jia UPEI Ye (George) Jia (UPEI) Aggregate Risks, Collateral Value and the Role of Loan Guarantee
More informationPrincipal Agent Model. Setup of the basic agency model. Agency theory and Accounting. 2 nd session: Principal Agent Problem
Principal Agent Model 2 nd session: Principal Agent Problem This lecture is mostly based on: IMSc in Business Administration OctoberNovember 2007 Richard A. Lambert, Contracting Theory and Accounting,
More informationInsurance Markets with Differential Information
Insurance Markets with Differential Information S. Hun Seog [석승훈] Graduate School of Management, KAIST (KGSM) 20743 CheongryangriDong, DongdaemunGu, Seoul, 130722, KOREA Email: seogsh@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr
More informationAutomobile Insurance Policy Options, Rating System, and Risk Classification
Automobile Insurance Policy Options, Rating System, and Risk Classification ChuShiu Li Department of Economics, Feng Chia University, Taiwan Email: csli@fcu.edu.tw ChwenChi Liu Department of Insurance,
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More informationWhy is Insurance Good? An Example Jon Bakija, Williams College (Revised October 2013)
Why is Insurance Good? An Example Jon Bakija, Williams College (Revised October 2013) Introduction The United States government is, to a rough approximation, an insurance company with an army. 1 That is
More informationFinancial Institutions I: The Economics of Banking
Financial Institutions I: The Economics of Banking Prof. Dr. Isabel Schnabel Gutenberg School of Management and Economics Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Summer term 2011 V4 1/30 I. Introduction II.
More informationMean Variance Analysis
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Mean Variance Analysis Consider the utility of an individual who invests her beginningofperiod wealth, W 0,ina particular portfolio of assets. Let r p betherandomrateofreturnonthisportfolio,sothatthe
More informationPDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/29354
More informationIndexed and NonIndexed Insurance
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 7 (No 24, July 1982), 264275 Indexed and NonIndexed Insurance by Yaffa Machnes * IntroductIon Inflation is usually defined as a substantial increase in the general
More informationMoral Hazard, Market Power, and Second Best Health Insurance
Moral Hazard, Market Power, and Second Best Health Insurance by Berthold U. Wigger* Department of Economics University of ErlangenNuremberg D90403 Nürnberg berthold.wigger@wiso.unierlangen.de and Markus
More informationInstitute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich. Working Paper Series ISSN 14240459. Working Paper No. 229
Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper Series ISSN 14240459 Working Paper No. 229 On the Notion of the First Best in Standard Hidden Action Problems Christian
More informationThe Financial Reporter
Article from: The Financial Reporter June 2006 Issue No 65 Setting the Level of Margins in a PrinciplesBased Valuation Using a Costof Capital Approach with Exponential Utility by Stephen J Strommen
More informationYes, No, Perhaps?  Explaining the Demand for Risk Classification Insurance with Fuzzy Private Information
Yes, No, Perhaps?  Explaining the Demand for Risk Classification Insurance with Fuzzy Private Information Richard Peter, Andreas Richter, Petra Steinorth December 9, 010 Abstract We examine the demand
More informationOptimal demand management policies with probability weighting
Optimal demand management policies with probability weighting Ana B. Ania February 2006 Preliminary draft. Please, do not circulate. Abstract We review the optimality of partial insurance contracts in
More informationOptimal Insurance With Divergent Beliefs. About Insurer Total Default Risk
Optimal Insurance With Divergent Beliefs About Insurer Total Default Risk J. David CUMMINS The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA Olivier MAHUL * INRA, Department of Economics, Rennes, France
More informationLOSS COVERAGE IN INSURANCE MARKETS: WHY ADVERSE SELECTION IS NOT ALWAYS A BAD THING
LOSS COVERAGE IN INSURANCE MARKETS: WHY ADVERSE SELECTION IS NOT ALWAYS A BAD THING MingJie Hao, Pradip Tapadar and R. Guy Thomas School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of
More informationLIABILITY FOR ACCIDENTS
Chapter 2 LIABILITY FOR ACCIDENTS STEVEN SHAVELL * School of Law, Harvard University, and National Bureau of Economic Research Contents 1. Introduction 142 Part A: Central theory of liability 142 2. Incentives
More informationOptimal Student Loans and Graduate Tax: under Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection
Optimal Student Loans and Graduate Tax: under Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection Robert GaryBobo Sciences Po, 2014 Introduction (1) Motivation Preview of Results Literature Student loans are quantitatively
More informationApproximation of Aggregate Losses Using Simulation
Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 6 (3): 233239, 2010 ISSN 15493644 2010 Science Publications Approimation of Aggregate Losses Using Simulation Mohamed Amraja Mohamed, Ahmad Mahir Razali and Noriszura
More informationWorking Paper Series
RGEA Universidade de Vigo http://webs.uvigo.es/rgea Working Paper Series A Market Game Approach to Differential Information Economies Guadalupe Fugarolas, Carlos HervésBeloso, Emma Moreno García and
More informationDecline in Federal Disability Insurance Screening Stringency and Health Insurance Demand
Decline in Federal Disability Insurance Screening Stringency and Health Insurance Demand Yue Li Siying Liu December 12, 2014 Abstract This paper proposes that the decline in federal disability insurance
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Theoretical Concepts/Techniques Expected Utility Theory Representing choice under uncertainty in statecontingent space Utility Functions and Attitudes towards Risk Risk Neutrality
More informationPricing Alternative forms of Commercial Insurance cover
Pricing Alternative forms of Commercial Insurance cover Prepared by Andrew Harford Presented to the Institute of Actuaries of Australia Biennial Convention 2326 September 2007 Christchurch, New Zealand
More informationMath 370, Spring 2008 Prof. A.J. Hildebrand. Practice Test 2 Solutions
Math 370, Spring 008 Prof. A.J. Hildebrand Practice Test Solutions About this test. This is a practice test made up of a random collection of 5 problems from past Course /P actuarial exams. Most of the
More informationLecture 15. Ranking Payoff Distributions: Stochastic Dominance. FirstOrder Stochastic Dominance: higher distribution
Lecture 15 Ranking Payoff Distributions: Stochastic Dominance FirstOrder Stochastic Dominance: higher distribution Definition 6.D.1: The distribution F( ) firstorder stochastically dominates G( ) if
More informationUncertainty, Asymmetric Information, and Market Failure
21 INTERNET CHAPTER TWO Uncertainty, Asymmetric Information, and Market Failure The failure of the market to insure against uncertainties has created many social institutions in which the usual assumptions
More informationInsurance as Operational Risk Management Tool
DOI: 10.7763/IPEDR. 2012. V54. 7 Insurance as Operational Risk Management Tool Milan Rippel 1, Lucie Suchankova 2 1 Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic 2 Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
More informationA Uniform Asymptotic Estimate for Discounted Aggregate Claims with Subexponential Tails
12th International Congress on Insurance: Mathematics and Economics July 1618, 2008 A Uniform Asymptotic Estimate for Discounted Aggregate Claims with Subexponential Tails XUEMIAO HAO (Based on a joint
More informationMarket Power and Efficiency in Card Payment Systems: A Comment on Rochet and Tirole
Market Power and Efficiency in Card Payment Systems: A Comment on Rochet and Tirole Luís M. B. Cabral New York University and CEPR November 2005 1 Introduction Beginning with their seminal 2002 paper,
More information2INTERNET CHAPTER TWO
ros51659_ch02_016035.indd Page 16 9/7/08 10:55:58 AM users173 2INTERNET CHAPTER TWO Uncertainty, Asymmetric Information, and Market Failure The failure of the market to insure against uncertainties has
More informationEconomic Policy Analysis: Lecture 6
Economic Policy Analysis: Lecture 6 Social Insurance Camille Landais Stanford University February 14, 2011 Outline What is Social Insurance? Rationale for Social Insurance Costs of Social Insurance What
More informationAnalysis of a Production/Inventory System with Multiple Retailers
Analysis of a Production/Inventory System with Multiple Retailers Ann M. Noblesse 1, Robert N. Boute 1,2, Marc R. Lambrecht 1, Benny Van Houdt 3 1 Research Center for Operations Management, University
More information