Market-Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)
|
|
- Angel Gardner
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Market-Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV) SOA Spring Meeting / Session 3 Phoenix, Arizona Hubert Mueller, Principal (860) May 9, Towers Perrin Agenda Recent Trends with European Embedded Value (EEV) Why move to MCEV? Technical Issues 1
2 Recent Trends with European Embedded Value (EEV) RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) In May 2004, the European CFO Forum published the European Embedded Value (EEV) Principles 12 key Principles, 65 areas of Guidance Commentary on Principles & Guidance Describes basis for conclusions Both real-world and market-consistent approaches are acceptable The EEV Principles introduce several major improvements: Codification of several areas of current best practice, including disclosure on methodology and assumptions used Requirement for stochastic evaluation of options and guarantees Suggestion to use company-specific economic capital requirements Disclosure of sensitivities and analysis of movement 2
3 RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) European Embedded Value (EEV) is now published by almost all major insurance groups in Europe Aegon Allianz Aviva AXA CNP Eureko Friends Provident Fortis Generali Hannover Re ING Irish Life Legal and General Mapfre Mediolanum Munich Re Old Mutual Prudential (UK) Scottish Widows Standard Life Swiss Re Zurich RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) Recent developments Life insurance companies have started to publish results under the EEV Principles (since 2004) Equity analysts have criticized the variety of approaches taken CFO Forum has responded to analyst comments by publishing Additional Guidance on EEV Disclosures and updates to the EEV principles (October 2005) 3
4 RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) Updated EEV Principles The main areas of change are around allowing for risk ILLUSTRATIVE 1. What is EEV 2. Business coverage 3. Allowance for risk 4. Free surplus 5. Required capital and cost of capital 6. Value of in-force covered business 7. Financial options and guarantees 8. New business and renewals 9. Assumptions 10. Economic assumptions 11. Participating business 12. Disclosures Key No change Small change, to previous methodology Significant changes to previous methodology RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) Some European-based companies are looking for greater sophistication than the EEV principles offer Issues with EEV principles Difficulty in selecting the appropriate RDR Single, company-wide RDR may give misleading product profitability information Need different RDRs for different products RDRs should vary with investment policy Cost of capital adjustment is too broad Preference to allow for product risk explicitly Need allowance for non-financial risk Calculating the cost of options and guarantees on a real world basis is not usually capital market-consistent In particular, not appropriate when evaluating cost/benefits of hedging 4
5 RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) What is MCEV? Market-Consistent Embedded Value ( MCEV ) is a development of traditional EV techniques which attempts to give a more robust answer to the questions: How should we set the risk discount rate? How should we allow for the cost of financial options and guarantees? How should we allow for the cost of holding capital? Further details on MCEV can be accessed at: RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) Bottom-up MCEV methodology was developed to help answer key questions Risk Discount Rates Options & Guarantees Cost of Capital Reflect risk inherent in individual cash flows and any asset/liability mismatches Valued explicitly, consistent with capital-market prices Reflects frictional costs (e.g., tax), based on overall capital requirements Market Consistent EV = market value of assets market-consistent value of liabilities frictional cost of capital 5
6 RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) Most major insurance groups are adopting MCEV as their main internal performance measure Insurance cash flows are valued by reference to equivalent traded capital market instruments Options are valued using option pricing techniques High-risk assets are discounted at higher RDRs Complex options depending on policyholder behavior are valued using stochastic modeling with risk-neutral scenarios, discounted at the risk-free rate Risk-neutral scenarios are validated by replicating to current market prices of options and futures Stochastic valuation of O&G using risk-neutral scenarios RDR varies based on the riskiness of the underlying products Using risk-free rate for some products (e.g. term) RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) In an MCEV framework, selecting assets does not create value Assume that the investor has capital of 20, borrows 80 (at 5% pa) and then invests 100 in equities (with an expected return of 7% pa) Day 1 One year on Assets Liabilities (80) (84) Capital The discount rate is an output of the valuation, not an input The actions of borrowing and investing do not create value on Day 1 Using traditional EV techniques the 23 might be discounted at, say, 8%. This would give a value of 21.3 on Day 1 Under MCEV the asset cash flows are discounted at 7% and the liability cash flows at 5%. This would give a value of 20 on Day 1. The effective risk discount rate is 15% 6
7 RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) MCEV in practice For cash flows without any embedded options, in practice MCV means using the certainty equivalent approach All gross earned rates equal the risk discount rate, which equals the gross risk free rate For cash flows with certain easily identifiable embedded options, in practice MCEV means using the certainty equivalent approach plus closed form, Black-Scholes type, option valuation formulae For everything else it typically means Monte Carlo simulation, using a risk neutral or equivalent Economic Scenario Generator (ESG) RECENT TRENDS WITH EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE (EEV) In North America, EEV adoption has been slower Traditional EV (TEV) not yet widely accepted in the US Dominance of US GAAP reporting Hartford Life is the only US-based company that has published EV results A growing number of US-based companies use TEV for performance measurement and incentive compensation US subsidiaries of European multinationals calculate and publish EEV results TEV reporting is more widely accepted in Canada Sun Life, Manulife and Industrial Alliance annually publish TEV Quarterly source of earnings analysis has replaced EV in importance Market consistent techniques are increasingly used in the US to model impact of hedging or to price embedded guarantees on a market-consistent basis Provides consistency between pricing and valuation AXA (US), Allianz Life, Munich Re and Old Mutual have published on MCEV basis for year-end
8 Why Move to MCEV? WHY MOVE TO MCEV? Why more multinationals are moving to MCEV this year Credibility with financial analysts (mostly Europe) Consistency with their peers Internal financial management Theoretical strength Increased use in pricing/risk management Link to Economic Capital a a a a a a 8
9 WHY MOVE TO MCEV? What does the market want from EEV? Hopes for EEV Disclosure Cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk profile Investment profits on contracts not booked until earned Options and guarantees would capture the actual cost of hedging potential risks to the balance sheet Consistent application of the rules to allow effective comparisons between companies Hopes for Cash Disclosure What is the cash (and free capital) emerging on the in-force How much is needed to finance new business for what return How much is residually available for dividends Source: Andrew Crean, Infoline EEV Conference, 9 November 2005 WHY MOVE TO MCEV? To date, EEV has not yet fully met these hopes EEV allowance for risk Top-down approach Bottom-up approach Unadjusted WACC Adjusted WACC Product-specific beta Stochastic real world Indirect MCEV Direct MCEV 9
10 WHY MOVE TO MCEV? Recent EEV disclosures have favored the marketconsistent approach CFO Forum Companies Non-CFO Forum Companies Total Other Top-down Other Other Top-down 3 9 Top-down Bottom-up market-consistent Bottom-up market-consistent Bottom-up market-consistent Source: Tillinghast Research WHY MOVE TO MCEV? By adopting MCEV for year-end 2006, Allianz became the first company to change EEV methodology after first-time adoption 10
11 Technical Issues TECHNICAL ISSUES There are a wide range of approaches to diversifiable risk Increased granularity Top-down WACC Addition to RDR Addition to CoC Granular risk allowance AEGON Prudential Allianz Friends Provident AVIVA Standard Life Fortis Scottish Widows ING Swiss Re Munich Re Zurich Market-consistent techniques increase the granularity of the allowance for market risk. We are seeing the same trend in non-market risk. The trend towards granularity is broader than EEV reporting Pricing Risk & capital management ICA (UK) / PBA (US) / Solvency II (Europe) 11
12 TECHNICAL ISSUES The rationale regarding the MCEV allowance for non-market risk has varied by company Number of Companies Allowance via best estimates and frictional costs (i.e. no addition) 4 Additional allowance and rationale provided 10 Additional allowance but no rationale provided 8 Source: Tillinghast Research (March 2007) TECHNICAL ISSUES The debate over the choice of risk-free rate continues UK-based Companies Non-UK Companies Total Based on government bonds Based on swaps Not disclosed Source: Tillinghast Research (March 2007) 12
13 TECHNICAL ISSUES In the US, credit risk modeling can get tricky Investment returns over time and their split between the stakeholders Credit spread shareholder Level of risk-free returns policyholder Is there symmetry in shareholder gains and losses with respect to credit risk? YES NO default We can use the take out credit spread approach Stochastic risk premiums and defaults TECHNICAL ISSUES Other technical issues Generating risk-neutral scenarios Economic scenario generator (ESG) Historical versus implied volatilities No Arbitrage test Impact of management actions Policyholder actions Reflecting dynamic policyholder behavior 13
14 TECHNICAL ISSUES So where have we got to with EEV/MCEV? Improvements Clearly linking allowance for risk and business valued Understanding impact of risk on value Improved disclosures Focus on managing the business EEV / MCEV Challenges Different methodologies Different applications of the methodology Different views of impact of risk on value Different levels of disclosure Has the industry achieved what companies and analysts need? TECHNICAL ISSUES What does this mean for North America? Multinationals are setting the bar for EEV/MCEV reporting Domestic players are gradually coming around, driven by advances in risk and capital management Canadian companies have introduced some changes since they first published EV in 2000 Quarterly reporting of VNB Quarterly Source of Earnings disclosure Move to IFRS should further accelerate development of MCEV in North America Provides fair value of liabilities IFRS #8 requires disclosure of a business segment s profit/loss and balance sheet on the basis that is used to manage the business more EV disclosures 14
15 Market Consistent Embedded Value Society of Actuaries Life 2007 Spring Meeting Chris Murphy Senior Actuary Phoenix 9 May Agenda 1. ING's approach to MCEV 2. What impact has it had on the company's strategy? 3. Practical issues around resources/modeling systems etc. 1
16 MCEV - Basic principles Management expectations of future financial market developments do not influence market consistent embedded value calculations. This means that investment decisions do not immediately lead to value changes, although the impact will come through in later periods in line with actual experience. Market consistent approaches uniquely determine the right discount rate to be used for financial risks, implying that equities, bonds, options and guarantees are priced in a manner consistent with their pricing in the financial markets; Insurance risks are priced using a proxy for how an external market would price them (expected losses and the cost of economic capital) Separates the valuation of assets and liabilities, which allows management to manage the business in a more informed manner The Market Value balance sheet is a key component of the market consistent framework Market Value Balance Sheet MVA MVL EC Free Assets MV Surplus = MCEV Market Value Surplus (MVS) is the difference between the Market Value of Assets (MVA) and Market Value of Liabilities (MVL). Market Value of Liabilities is the value at which the liabilities could be transferred to a willing, rational, diversified counterparty in an arms length transaction under normal business conditions. ING internally defines Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV) as being equal to the Market Value Surplus 2
17 Market Value Balance Sheet - stylized example Assets Year T Liabilities Year T Investments Market Value Insurance liabilities Real property and office buildings - Financial Component Liabilities (FCL) Participating interest 8 - Non-linked life insurance 2,982 Shares Unit-linked life insurance 3,525 Cash 390 Total Financial Component Liabilities 6,507 Fixed interest securities 3,819 MVM 291 Total investments 4,528 Total Market Value Insurance liabilities 6,798 MVL Investments for risk of policyholders 4,036 Deferred tax liabilities 280 Other assets 139 Other liabilities 405 7,483 MVA Market Value Surplus Tied surplus (EC) 667 Free surplus 553 Total market value surplus 1,220 MCEV Total market value assets 8,703 Total market value liabilities 8,703 Market Value Liabilities can be calculated by decomposing into parts Decomposition of liabilities MVL Financial Component of Liability MV Hedgeable Financial Risks MV Non-hedgeable Financial Risks Non-financial Component = MV Hedgeable Insurance Risks* MV Non-hedgeable Insurance Risks Examples 10 year USD, EUR, Yen cash flow or interest rate option 10 year equity option Rational lapse behaviour 60 year USD, EUR, Yen cash flow or interest rate option 15 yr emerging markets cash flow Irrational lapse behaviour Screen or Most insurance exchange traded risks, e.g. mortality, CAT risks property, casualty, Actively traded etc. securitized risks Valuation approach Mark-to-market based on market valuation rates (e.g. discount rates, volatilities, etc.) Mark-to-model based on extended market valuation rates (e.g. discount rates, volatilities, etc.) Mark to market approaches consistent with capital markets valuation Mark to model approach based on cost of capital, not confidence intervals * Defined by two-way, liquidly traded volume. Few markets for insurance risks exist today but may be developed in the future. 3
18 Risk neutral valuation Risk neutral valuation is stochastic valuation approach that allows us to value cost of embedded options of liability portfolios Risk neutral valuation is generally used in pricing of derivative securities, and therefore can be used to calculate the market value of liabilities assuming a full portfolio hedge The calibration of the risk-neutral valuation model is done to ensure that such a model would re-produce observed market prices for traded instruments; by extension it should fairly value the more complex options and guarantees embedded within the products Risk neutral valuation is only one of various forms of capital markets valuation tools e.g. state price deflators, analytical formulas Economic Capital is calculated to protect the market value surplus (MCEV) over a 1 year time horizon Probability Worst Case Value Economic Capital 99.95% Value Expected Value Economic Capital is calculated as the difference between expected Market Value Surplus in 1 year s time and the 1 in 2000 worst case outcome In practice, economic capital is calculated separately for each risk type separately Calculations take into account all financial options in assets and liabilities as well as company and policyholder behaviour 4
19 Under a market consistent framework, increases in value are measured as increases in market value of surplus Market Value Balance Sheet at Beginning of Period Market Value Balance Sheet at End of Period MVA = 1000 MVL = 900 EC = 50 Free Assets = 50 MCEV = 100 MVA = 1100 MVL = 950 EC = 50 Free Assets = 100 MCEV = 150 In this example, the MCEV has increased by 50, so value created over the period = 50. MCEVPROFIT = Change in MCEV less Cost of Capital Value creation comes from the usual sources (eg profitable new business, expense management, favorable investment markets), but is entirely measured using market value principles. MCEV source of earnings analysis is a powerful tool for understanding the performance of the business MCEVNB If the market consistent value of new business is positive, then this directly leads to an increase in MCEV. Underwriting profit As with traditional Embedded value, better than expected mortality and lapse experience leads to increases in value. Investment profit Equity and credit risk premiums are only reflected once they have been earned. In the calculation of MVL, a risk free earning rate is assumed. Risk Margins Profits from taking on non-market risks (eg policyholder behaviour) are released over time as the risk is reduced. Total Return on Assets backing MCEV The market value of surplus will change directly with the total return of the assets backing EC and Free Assets Cost of Capital Economic profit is generated if the total increase in MCEV exceeds cost of capital 5
20 Understanding the market value balance sheet is good preparation for the implementation of IFRS Phase II IFRS Phase II is widely expected to be market value based reporting. CRO and CFO forums in Europe are advocating IFRS II calculation of the market value of liabilities similar to the approach taken in this presentation. Full market value reporting would mean that changes in the market value balance sheet will go through the Profit & Loss statement. This is the approach that ING has taken with its implementation of MCEV. Market Consistent Embedded Value at issue - MCEV(0) MCEV (0) represents new business value assuming complete hedging of ALM risk and without accounting for future expected asset spread arbitrage including cost of non-market risk capital Market value of assets and liabilities includes capital markets valuation of options and guarantees Credit spreads and equity risk premiums are only recognized when earned Cost of EC for non-hedgeable risks included 6
21 MCEV (0) can be interpreted as the cost of raising funds that can then be invested MCEV (0) can be viewed as the value of this alternative relative to other sources of raising funds, eg debt MCEV (0) is positive MCEV (0) is negative Company has generated funds at less than the cost of funding Created shareholder value Company has generated funds at more than the cost of funding Destroyed shareholder value MVL methodology applied to new business provides pricing discipline and key source of change in MVS Traditional Value of New Business/IRR Gives an indication of future potential GAAP/STAT earnings. Based on best estimate future investment yields, equity premia, credit spreads. Does not value financial assets and liability cash flows, options and guarantees consistently with financial markets. Market Consistent Value of New Business Gives an indication of theoretical mark-to-market value. Based on current market rates, volatilities, etc., using capital markets pricing techniques. Values assets and liability cash flows, options & guarantees consistently with financial markets. MVL is independent of the asset or hedging strategy and reflects current market price to fully hedge risks If the MVL is less than the initial premium, implies that the product relies on assumed investment risk premia (equity risk premium, credit spreads) for profitability 7
22 Market consistent pricing is providing more insight into the profitability of products globally Market consistent pricing implemented globally for new products beginning 2006 Integrated into strategic planning targets for Nearly all products contribute value on a market consistent basis Products with negative market consistent price tend to be: Found in highly competitive markets Strongly reliant on investment returns for earnings, e.g. credit spreads/equity premia Products with negative value on an MC basis can be improved by: Product repricing Adjusting product features There is no single right answer - Often there is a tradeoff between value creation and earnings potential Key planning questions Resource availability How many risk professionals are there currently in the organisation? What other responsibilities do they have? How time consuming are the other responsibilities? What on-going projects are there? When do you expect the crunch times to be? Possibility of getting external resources? Possible relocation of internal resources for MC pricing? MC pricing capabilities Are there currently resources with MC pricing capabilities? How many resources do you expect to require to train? What is the best approach to training e.g. specific groups, all at one time, temporary relocation of personnel etc? Product prioritisation How many products do you aim to model? What new products are you expecting to sell that will require MC pricing? What are your main products e.g. in terms of volume, profitability? Can they be applicable to a large portfolio? Are there differing MC pricing capabilities in resources for different products? Infrastructure considerations What is the current feasibility of infrastructure adjustments e.g. adjust models internally, develop new models, construct an external MC pricing add-on? What is the man power requirement for each? Cost of implementation of each? How easy/difficult would it be to implement practically? Are you considering any updates to your current infrastructure? If so, is it applicable to MC pricing? 8
23 Analyst Opinion of MCEV Part 1 There is no clear consensus at any level, with a wide diversity of views ranging from very positive to very negative. There is general consensus that MCEV is a good management tool and should be used by companies, but a high proportion have doubts whether it is useful to analysts and fund managers. Many believe that MCEV is actually too complicated for the market and is therefore not going to be used by increasingly sceptical analysts who will revert to IFRS earnings. Many consider that MCEV is not understood and is confusing the market Analyst Opinion of MCEV Part 2 There are also many who see MCEV as less useful than traditional EV and would prefer to stay with EEV MCEV is more of a black box, analysts are suspicious that companies are fixing their assumptions with traditional EV they can make their own adjustments Most understand that MCEV disadvantages certain products especially spread products - they are suspicious that this has driven companies without spread business to be early adopters Some are concerned about reconciling EEV with MCEV and have asked for full disclosure of both sets of data. There is a general feeling of inevitability in that most analysts expect all companies to move to MCEV reporting. 9
Agenda. Questions. 2003 Deloitte & Touche LLP. 2 2005 Deloitte Advisory Sp. z o.o. Adjusted Net Asset. Value (ANAV)
Agenda Embedded Calculation for Life Insurers ICTI 00 Marcin Piskorski Traditional Embedded (TEV) European Embedded (EEV) Market Consistent Embedded (MCEV) Actuarial Software - Prophet Questions 00 Deloitte
More informationEmbedded Value Report
Embedded Value Report 2012 ACHMEA EMBEDDED VALUE REPORT 2012 Contents Management summary 3 Introduction 4 Embedded Value Results 5 Value Added by New Business 6 Analysis of Change 7 Sensitivities 9 Impact
More informationEmbedded Value of Life Insurance Companies in India. Presented by Philip Jackson FIA, FIAI Consulting Actuary
Embedded Value of Life Insurance Companies in India Presented by Philip Jackson FIA, FIAI Consulting Actuary 1 Disclaimer The views expressed here are my personal views and not that of my employer This
More informationSolvency Management in Life Insurance The company s perspective
Group Risk IAA Seminar 19 April 2007, Mexico City Uncertainty Exposure Solvency Management in Life Insurance The company s perspective Agenda 1. Key elements of Allianz Risk Management framework 2. Drawbacks
More informationING Insurance Economic Capital Framework
ING Insurance Economic Capital Framework Thomas C. Wilson Chief Insurance Risk Officer Kent University, September 5, 2007 www.ing.com Objectives of this session ING has been using economic capital internally
More informationUNIQA Group Group Embedded Value 2013. 10 April 2014 Kurt Svoboda, CRO
UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value 2013 10 April 2014 Kurt Svoboda, CRO Introduction Group Market Consistent Embedded Value Disclosure of Group Embedded Value (GEV) results: UNIQA discloses GEV results 2013
More information2013 Embedded Value Results Generating Value
Prepared by: Tatyana Egoshina, FIA Stuart Reynolds, FIA Richard See Toh, FIA Matt Cocke, PhD, FIA Philip Simpson, FIA, ASA, FSAI 2013 Embedded Value Results Generating Value is among the world's largest
More informationDisclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as at March 31, 2015
May 20, 2015 Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Himawari Life Insurance, Inc. Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as at March 31, 2015 Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Himawari Life Insurance, Inc. ( Himawari Life,
More informationDisclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2014
May 26, 2014 Sony Life Insurance Co., Ltd. Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2014 Tokyo, May 26, 2014 Sony Life Insurance Co., Ltd. ( Sony Life ), a wholly owned subsidiary
More informationMarket Consistent Embedded Values
A Public Policy Practice note Market Consistent Embedded Values March 2011 Members of the Life Financial Reporting Committee A PUBLIC POLICY PRACTICE NOTE Market Consistent Embedded Values March 2011 Developed
More informationMarket Consistent Embedded Value Principles October 2009. CFO Forum
CFO Forum Market Consistent Embedded Value Principles October 2009 Contents Introduction. 2 Coverage. 2 MCEV Definitions...3 Free Surplus 3 Required Capital 3 Value of in-force Covered Business 4 Financial
More informationSOA International Experience Survey Embedded Value Financial Assumptions
SOA International Experience Survey Embedded Value Financial Assumptions By Charles Carroll 1, William Horbatt and Dominique Lebel 2 Starting in 2003, the Society of Actuaries International Experience
More informationIntroduction 3 7. Assumptions 1. Covered Business 2. Market Consistent Embedded Value 2014 and its Components 3. New Business Appendix 19
MCEV Report 2014 Contents Introduction 3 1. Covered Business 3 2. Market Consistent Embedded Value 2014 and its Components 4 2.1 Performance 2014 4 2.2 Comparison: Market Consistent Embedded Value 2014
More informationMarket Consistent Embedded Value Basis for Conclusions October 2009. CFO Forum
CFO Forum Market Consistent Embedded Value Basis for Conclusions October 2009 Basis for Conclusions on CFO Forum Market Consistent Embedded Value Principles This Basis for Conclusions accompanies the proposed
More informationInsights. Understanding market value margins in options prices. September 2009. Background
Insights September 2009 Understanding market value margins in options prices John Hibbert john.hibbert@barrhibb.com At the heart of the emerging Solvency II regulations is the idea that both assets and
More informationIASB/FASB Meeting Week beginning 11 April 2011. Top down approaches to discount rates
IASB/FASB Meeting Week beginning 11 April 2011 IASB Agenda reference 5A FASB Agenda Staff Paper reference 63A Contacts Matthias Zeitler mzeitler@iasb.org +44 (0)20 7246 6453 Shayne Kuhaneck skuhaneck@fasb.org
More informationLiquidity premiums and contingent liabilities
Insights Liquidity premiums and contingent liabilities Craig Turnbull Craig.Turbull@barrhibb.com The liquidity premium the concept that illiquid assets have lower prices than equivalent liquid ones has
More informationDisclosure of European Embedded Value as of March 31, 2015
UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION Although the Company pays close attention to provide English translation of the information disclosed in Japanese, the Japanese original prevails over its English translation in
More informationJose Rodicio, ASA, CFA, FRM Deputy Chief Insurance Risk Officer ING Latin America Atlanta Actuarial Club March 26, 2009
Enterprise Risk Management and Economic Capital at ING A practical approach Jose Rodicio, ASA, CFA, FRM Deputy Chief Insurance Risk Officer ING Latin America Atlanta Actuarial Club March 26, 2009 Agenda
More informationSession 9b L&H Insurance in a Low Interest Rate Environment. Christian Liechti
Session 9b L&H Insurance in a Low Interest Rate Environment Christian Liechti L&H Insurance in a Low Interest Rate Environment SOA Annual Symposium 24-25 June 2013 Macau, China Christian Liechti Swiss
More informationPrinciples and models for the Embedded Value calculation
Principles and models for the Embedded Value calculation Trieste February 2012 AGENDA 2 1. Methodological Aspects: from the Traditional to the Market Consistent Embedded Value 2. CFO Principles: the MCEV
More informationInternational Financial Reporting for Insurers. August 19-21, 2013. Hong Kong. Session 2: Financial Reporting for Insurance Companies.
International Financial Reporting for Insurers August 19-21, 213 Hong Kong Session 2: Financial Reporting for Insurance Companies Matt Lawrence Financial Reporting for Insurance Companies (including management
More informationDisclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2015
May 28, 2015 SUMITOMO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2015 This is the summarized translation of the European Embedded Value ( EEV ) of Sumitomo Life
More informationTable of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 3. 1.1. Basis of Preparation... 3. 1.2. Covered Business... 3. 1.3. Definitions... 4
Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1. Basis of Preparation... 3 1.2. Covered Business... 3 1.3. Definitions... 4 2. MCEV AND MCVNB RESULTS... 5 2.1. Baloise MCEV... 5 2.2. Volume and Value of New
More informationAllianz. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report
Allianz Market Consistent Embedded Value Report 2008 Table of Contents: 1 INTRODUCTION...4 1.1 BASIS OF PREPARATION...4 1.2 COVERED BUSINESS...4 1.3 DEFINITIONS...5 2 OVERVIEW OF RESULTS...6 2.1 EMBEDDED
More informationDisclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2012
May 25, 2012 SUMITOMO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of 2012 This is the summarized translation of the European Embedded Value ( EEV ) of Sumitomo Life Insurance
More informationMarket Value of Liabilities for Insurance Firms
Chief Risk Officer Forum July 2008 Market Value of Liabilities for Insurance Firms Implementing elements for Solvency II 1 The Chief Risk Officer Forum (CRO Forum) comprises risk officers of the major
More informationEmbedded Value (EV) Reporting May 2009
A Public Policy PRACTICE NOTE Embedded Value (EV) Reporting May 2009 American Academy of Actuaries Life Financial Reporting Committee Practice Note on Embedded Value (EV) Reporting This practice note was
More information15 April 2015 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO. UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2014
15 April 2015 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2014 Economic Capital Embedded Value Sensitivities and other analysis Appendix Assumptions Glossary & Disclaimer
More information3/24/2010. Agenda. Introducing the Project
Discount Rates Forum Staple Inn, 23 March 2010 Agenda Welcome and Introduction - Ronnie Bowie Introducing the Project - Charles Cowling Presentation of initial findings - Chinu Patel, Chris Daykin Open
More informationEEV, MCEV, Solvency, IFRS a chance for actuarial mathematics to get to main-stream of insurance value chain
EEV, MCEV, Solvency, IFRS a chance for actuarial mathematics to get to main-stream of insurance value chain dr Krzysztof Stroiński, dr Renata Onisk, dr Konrad Szuster, mgr Marcin Szczuka 9 June 2008 Presentation
More informationEmbedded Value 2014 Report
Embedded Value 2014 Report Manulife Financial Corporation Page 1 of 13 Background: Consistent with our objective of providing useful information to investors about our Company, and as noted in our 2014
More informationGN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance
GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance Classification Recommended Practice MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT STANDARDS (PCS) AND THAT
More informationSWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB. 2015 European Embedded Value
SWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB 2015 European Embedded Value Content 1 Introduction... 2 2 Overview of results... 2 3 Covered business... 2 4 EEV results... 2 5 Value of new business... 4 6 Analysis of EEV earnings...
More informationEconomic Capital for Life Insurance Companies Society of Actuaries. Prepared by: Ian Farr Hubert Mueller Mark Scanlon Simon Stronkhorst
Economic Capital for Life Insurance Companies Society of Actuaries Prepared by: Ian Farr Hubert Mueller Mark Scanlon Simon Stronkhorst Towers Perrin February 2008 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1
More informationVariable Annuities. Society of Actuaries in Ireland Evening Meeting September 17, 2008
Variable Annuities Society of Actuaries in Ireland Evening Meeting September 17, 2008 Variable Annuities Working Party Presented paper to Faculty and Institute in March 2008 Working Party members Colin
More informationMarket Value Based Accounting and Capital Framework
Market Value Based Accounting and Capital Framework Presented by: Erik Anderson, FSA, MAAA New York Life Insurance Company Prannoy Chaudhury, FSA, MAAA Milliman 2014 ASNY Meeting November 5, 2014 1 07
More informationMarket Consistent Embedded Value Report 2014
Market Consistent Embedded Value Report 2014 CONTENT Introduction 2 1.1 Basis of preparation 2 1.2 Covered business 2 Overview of results 3 2.1 Embedded value results 3 2.2 New business 4 2.3 Analysis
More informationContent. Pages 02 36. 02 1.1 Basis of preparation 02 1.2 Covered business
Market Consistent Embedded Value Report 2013 Content Pages 02 36 02 Introduction 02 1.1 Basis of preparation 02 1.2 Covered business 03 Overview of results 03 2.1 Embedded value results 04 2.2 New business
More information!@# Agenda. Session 35. Methodology Modeling Challenges Scenario Generation Aggregation Diversification
INSURANCE & ACTUARIAL ADVISORY SERVICES!@# Session 35 Advanced Click to edit Economic Master Reserves title styleand Capital Matthew Clark FSA, CFA Valuation Actuary Symposium Austin, TX www.ey.com/us/actuarial
More informationGlobal Life. Source of earnings Briefing document
Global Life Source of earnings Briefing document Background and main changes to approach SOURCE OF EARNINGS What is the purpose of source of earnings? Sources of Earnings (SoE) reporting presents the key
More informationGuide to Financial Reporting In Irish Life & Permanent plc European Embedded Value and IFRS
Guide to Financial Reporting In Irish Life & Permanent plc European Embedded Value and IFRS This guide to financial reporting is designed to help investors and other users of our financial statements to
More informationMarket Consistent Embedded Value At a turning point
July 2011 Market Consistent Embedded Value At a turning point Welcome to this special edition of the Insurance Market Update Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV) reporting has not enjoyed a smooth ride
More informationIntroduction. Coverage. Principle 1: Embedded Value (EV) is a measure of the consolidated value of shareholders interests in the covered business.
Introduction Principle 1: Embedded Value (EV) is a measure of the consolidated value of shareholders interests in the covered business. G1.1 The EV Methodology ( EVM ) described here is applied to the
More informationUNIQA Group Group Embedded Value 2012. 17 May 2013 Kurt Svoboda, CRO
UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value 2012 17 May 2013 Kurt Svoboda, CRO Introduction Group Market Consistent Embedded Value Disclosure of Group Embedded Value (GEV) results: UNIQA discloses GEV results 2012
More informationMunich Re Market consistent embedded value REPORT 2010
Munich Re Market consistent embedded value REPORT 2010 1 Contents 1 Introduction 03 1.1 Scope of disclosure 03 1.2 Covered business 04 1.3 Definition of Market Consistent Embedded Value 04 2 Overview of
More informationThe Collateral Damage of Today s Monetary Policies: Funding Long-Term Liabilities
The Collateral Damage of Today s Monetary Policies: Funding Long-Term Liabilities Craig Turnbull, Harry Hibbert, Adam Koursaris October 2011 www.barrhibb.com Page Change in Spot Rate (Q3 2008 to Q3 2011)
More informationEUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE 2007
MUNICH RE GROUP EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE 2007 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REGARDING LIFE AND MEDICAL EMBEDDED VALUE RESULTS 2007 11 March 2008 Contents 1 Introduction... 4 1.1 Scope of disclosure... 4 1.2
More informationLife Modeling. Beyond Solvency II risk management unplugged. PillarOne Conference in Brussels, April 1st and 2nd 2009
Life Modeling Beyond Solvency II risk management unplugged PillarOne Conference in Brussels, April 1st and 2nd 2009 by Jon Bardola FS-Consulta GmbH, Switzerland Agenda Motivation for an open source EV
More informationSAVINGS PRODUCTS AND THE LIFE INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN CANADA
SAVINGS PRODUCTS AND THE LIFE INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN CANADA Carl Hiralal 25 November 2004 1 Topics OSFI s Role Canadian Industry Insurance Products in Canada Insurance versus Savings Segregated Funds Universal
More information2. This paper supplements Agenda Paper 2A Outreach and comment letter analysis for this meeting. This paper does not ask any questions.
IASB Agenda ref 2B STAFF PAPER REG IASB Meeting Project Insurance contracts Paper topic Feedback from users of financial statements January 2014 CONTACT(S) Izabela Ruta iruta@ifrs.org +44 (0)20 7246 6957
More informationSummary of the Paper Awarded the SCOR Prize in Actuarial Science 2012 in Germany (2 nd Prize)
Summary of the Paper Awarded the SCOR Prize in Actuarial Science 2012 in Germany (2 nd Prize) Title: Market-Consistent Valuation of Long-Term Insurance Contracts Valuation Framework and Application to
More informationIFRS 4 Fáze II aneb dočkáme se konce nekonečného příběhu? Hana Havlíčková 4. října 2013, SAV, Praha
IFRS 4 Fáze II aneb dočkáme se konce nekonečného příběhu? Hana Havlíčková 4. října 2013, SAV, Praha IFRS 4 Phase II Agenda Introduction Definitions & Scope Measurement IFRS 4 ED Open Issues Appendix: Solvency
More informationMarket Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)
38 Market Consistent Embedded Value Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV) The Group MCEV is a measure of the consolidated value of shareholders interest in the in-force business of the Swiss Life Group.
More informationProjection of the With-Profits Balance Sheet under ICA+ John Lim (KPMG) & Richard Taylor (AEGON) 11 November 2013
Projection of the With-Profits Balance Sheet under ICA+ John Lim (KPMG) & Richard Taylor (AEGON) 11 November 2013 Introduction Projecting the with-profits business explicitly is already carried out by
More informationKey performance indicators
The information included in the following sheets of this Excel file forms an integral part of the Aegon press release on the Q2 results 2013 as published on August 8, 2013. Cautionary note regarding non-ifrs
More informationM&A in a Solvency II World - An introduction to the S2AV methodology
M&A in a Solvency II World - An introduction to the S2AV methodology Presented by Ed Morgan March 17, 2016 Warsaw Contents 1. Why Solvency II can be very helpful 2. What we saw in recent projects 3. Issues
More informationEmbedded Value: Practice and Theory. Robert Frasca 1 and Ken LaSorella 2
Embedded Value: Practice and Theory Robert Frasca 1 and Ken LaSorella 2 Published in the March 2009 issue of the Actuarial Practice Forum Copyright 2009 by the Society of Actuaries. All rights reserved
More informationMain Business Indicators
Supplementary Financial Data Main Business Indicators (1) Policies in Force and New Policies 1) Policies in Force (Number of policies, millions of yen, %) As of March 31 2015 2014 Individual insurance
More informationMarket Consistent Embedded Value in Non-Life Insurance: How to measure it and why
Market Consistent Embedded Value in Non-Life Insurance: How to measure it and why Dorothea Diers, Provinzial NordWest Holding AG, Münster Martin Eling, University of Ulm Christian Kraus, University of
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary 3. Introduction 5. Purposes of the Joint Research Project 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Purposes of the Joint Research Project 6 Background 7 1. Contract and timeframe illustrated 7 2. Liability measurement bases 9 3. Earnings 10 Consideration
More informationAsset Liability Management at Munich Reinsurance Company
Asset Liability Management at Munich Reinsurance Company Helsinki, 17 th November 2004 Bernhard Kaufmann and Jochen Mayer Agenda ALM: Governance and Management The Munich Re ALM-Model: ALM on Macro Level
More informationMCEV reporting with mg-alfa
Prepared by:, FSA, MAAA MCEV reporting with mg-alfa A focus on movement analysis and sensitivity analysis Report on the Possible Impact of the Likely Solvency II QIS5 Standard Formula on the European Life
More informationFinancial Economics and Canadian Life Insurance Valuation
Report Financial Economics and Canadian Life Insurance Valuation Task Force on Financial Economics September 2006 Document 206103 Ce document est disponible en français 2006 Canadian Institute of Actuaries
More informationAsset Liability Management for Australian Life Insurers Anton Kapel Zac Roberts
Asset Liability Management for Australian Life Insurers Anton Kapel Zac Roberts Copyright 2006, the Tillinghast Business of Towers Perrin. All rights reserved. A licence to publish is granted to the Institute
More informationHedging at Your Insurance Company
Hedging at Your Insurance Company SEAC Spring 2007 Meeting Winter Liu, FSA, MAAA, CFA June 2007 2006 Towers Perrin Primary Benefits and Motives of Establishing Hedging Programs Hedging can mitigate some
More informationIAA PAPER VALUATION OF RISK ADJUSTED CASH FLOWS AND THE SETTING OF DISCOUNT RATES THEORY AND PRACTICE
Introduction This document refers to sub-issue 11G of the IASC Insurance Issues paper and proposes a method to value risk-adjusted cash flows (refer to the IAA paper INSURANCE LIABILITIES - VALUATION &
More informationHans Wagner AXA Group Life Chief Risk Officer. Ferdia Byrne Partner, KPMG. June, 2010. Congrès Annuel des Actuaires
Hans Wagner AXA Group Life Chief Risk Officer Ferdia Byrne Partner, KPMG June, 2010 Congrès Annuel des Actuaires Contents Perspectives from an insurer Brief reminder of Solvency II Lessons from the Financial
More information'&7%#6+10#.016' DISCLOSURE OF ACTUARIAL INFORMATION BY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES COMMITTEE ON THE ROLE OF THE APPOINTED/VALUATION ACTUARY
'&7%#6+10#.016' Educational notes do not constitute standards of practice. They are intended to assist actuaries in applying standards of practice in specific matters. Responsibility for the manner of
More informationAvivaSA Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report. Half-year 2015
AvivaSA Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report Half-year 2015 Market Consistent Embedded Value Report 1. Introduction 3 2. Definition of Embedded Value 3 3. Covered business 3
More informationNovember 2007. Comment Letter. Discussion Paper: Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts
November 2007 Comment Letter Discussion Paper: Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts The Austrian Financial Reporting and Auditing Committee (AFRAC) is the privately organised standard-setting body
More informationGuidelines on the valuation of technical provisions
EIOPA-BoS-14/166 EN Guidelines on the valuation of technical provisions EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20; Fax. + 49 69-951119-19; email: info@eiopa.europa.eu
More informationFINANCIAL REPORTING FOR LIFE INSURANCE BUSINESS. V Rajagopalan R Kannan K S Gopalakrishnan
FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR LIFE INSURANCE BUSINESS V Rajagopalan R Kannan K S Gopalakrishnan 6th Global Conference of Actuaries; February 2004 PRESENTATION LAYOUT Fair value reporting Recent developments
More informationWhite paper Danica. White paper. Consolidation policy and business activities. at Danica Pension. Unaudited. February 2009.
White paper Consolidation policy and business activities at Danica Pension Unaudited February 2009 February 2009 1 White paper Profit policy and business activities at Danica Pension Contents Page Management
More informationConsequences. Modelling. Starting Points. Timetable. Solvency II. Solvency I vs Solvency II. Solvency I
Consequences Modelling Starting Points Timetable Pillar I Minimum Capital Requirements Pillar II Supervisory Review Pillar III Market Discipline Solvency II Solvency I vs Solvency II Solvency I Solvency
More informationConference Call on Interim Report 1/2009
Conference Call on Interim Report 1/2009 Hannover, 5 May 2009 DISCLAIMER This presentation does not address the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular person or legal entity. Investors
More informationActuarial Guidance Note 9: Best Estimate Assumptions
ACTUARIAL SOCIETY OF HONG KONG Actuarial Guidance Note 9: Best Estimate Assumptions 1. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 1.1 Best estimate assumptions are an essential and important component of actuarial work. The
More informationSummary consolidated income statement 1. Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns 2
EEV disclosure European Embedded Value (EEV) basis results Page Summary consolidated income statement 1 Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns 2 Movement in
More informationRISK FACTORS. Prudential s businesses are inherently subject to market fluctuations and general economic conditions
RISK FACTORS A number of factors (risk factors) affect Prudential s operating results and financial condition and, accordingly, the trading price of its shares. The risk factors mentioned below should
More informationContents. About the author. Introduction
Contents About the author Introduction 1 Retail banks Overview: bank credit analysis and copulas Bank risks Bank risks and returns: the profitability, liquidity and solvency trade-off Credit risk Liquidity
More informationEmbedded Value in Life Insurance
Embedded Value in Life Insurance Gilberto Castellani Università di Roma La Sapienza Massimo De Felice Università di Roma La Sapienza Franco Moriconi Università di Perugia Claudio Pacati Università di Siena
More informationMeasuring performance Update to Insurance Key Performance Indicators
Measuring performance Update to Insurance Key Performance Indicators John Hele Member of Executive Board and CFO of ING Group Madrid 19 September 2008 www.ing.com Agenda Performance Indicators: Background
More informationChallenges in the Life Insurance Industry
Challenges in the Life Insurance Industry Remarks by Superintendent Julie Dickson Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI) to the 2010 Life Insurance Invitational Forum Cambridge,
More informationCanadian Life Insurance Company Asset/Liability Management Summary Report as at: 31-Jan-08 interest rates as of: 29-Feb-08 Run: 2-Apr-08 20:07 Book
Canadian Life Insurance Company Asset/Liability Management Summary Report as at: 31Jan08 interest rates as of: 29Feb08 Run: 2Apr08 20:07 Book Book Present Modified Effective Projected change in net present
More informationLIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL FRAMEWORK STANDARD APPROACH
LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL FRAMEWORK STANDARD APPROACH Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Process... 2 and Methodology... 3 Core Concepts... 3 Total Asset Requirement... 3 Solvency Buffer... 4 Framework Details...
More informationInternational Financial Reporting for Insurers: IFRS and U.S. GAAP September 2009 Session 25: Solvency II vs. IFRS
International Financial Reporting for Insurers: IFRS and U.S. GAAP September 2009 Session 25: Solvency II vs. IFRS Simon Walpole Solvency II Simon Walpole Solvency II Agenda Introduction to Solvency II
More informationEffective Financial Planning for Life Insurance Companies
6 th Global Conference of Actuaries Effective Financial Planning for Life Insurance Companies Presentation by Kim Hoong CHIN Senior Manager and Consultant Asia Financial Services Topics Recent worldwide
More informationCondensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board
Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board December 31, 2015 Condensed Interim Consolidated Balance Sheet As at December 31, 2015 (CAD millions) As at December
More informationSURVEY ON ASSET LIABILITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF CANADIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES
QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY ON ASSET LIABILITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF CANADIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES MARCH 2001 2001 Canadian Institute of Actuaries Document 20113 Ce questionnaire est disponible en français
More informationActuarial Risk Management
ARA syllabus Actuarial Risk Management Aim: To provide the technical skills to apply the principles and methodologies studied under actuarial technical subjects for the identification, quantification and
More informationIASB/FASB Joint Meeting - weeks beginning 15 and 22 March
IASB/FASB Joint Meeting - weeks beginning 15 and 22 March IASB agenda reference FASB memo reference 6D 41D Hans van der Veen Alessandro d Eri Mark Trench Jeffrey Cropsey hvanderveen@iasb.org aderi@iasb.org
More informationCondensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board
Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board September 30, 2015 Condensed Interim Consolidated Balance Sheet As at September 30, 2015 As at September 30,
More information1 Introduction. 1.1 Three pillar approach
1 Introduction 1.1 Three pillar approach The recent years have shown that (financial) companies need to have a good management, a good business strategy, a good financial strength and a sound risk management
More informationHow To Become A Life Insurance Agent
Traditional, investment, and risk management actuaries in the life insurance industry Presentation at California Actuarial Student Conference University of California, Santa Barbara April 4, 2015 Frank
More informationControls and accounting policies
Controls and accounting policies Controls and procedures Management s responsibility for financial information contained in this Annual Report is described on page 92. In addition, the Bank s Audit and
More informationA Shortcut to Calculating Return on Required Equity and It s Link to Cost of Capital
A Shortcut to Calculating Return on Required Equity and It s Link to Cost of Capital Nicholas Jacobi An insurance product s return on required equity demonstrates how successfully its results are covering
More informationSOLVENCY II HEALTH INSURANCE
2014 Solvency II Health SOLVENCY II HEALTH INSURANCE 1 Overview 1.1 Background and scope The current UK regulatory reporting regime is based on the EU Solvency I Directives. Although the latest of those
More informationCEIOPS Preparatory Field Study for Life Insurance Firms. Summary Report
CEIOPS-FS-08/05 S CEIOPS Preparatory Field Study for Life Insurance Firms Summary Report 1 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 1.1 Introduction CEIOPS has been asked to prepare advice for the European
More informationFINANCIAL REVIEW. 18 Selected Financial Data 20 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
2012 FINANCIAL REVIEW 18 Selected Financial Data 20 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 82 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 88
More informationLeadership in life insurance. April 2015
Leadership in life insurance April 2015 Agenda Industry overview and outlook Company strategy and performance Embedded value results 2 Agenda Industry overview and outlook Company strategy and performance
More information