1 White Paper Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation By Brian Babineau March, 2010 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by FTI Technology and is distributed under license from ESG. 2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved
2 White Paper: Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation 2 Contents Introduction... 3 How Did We Get Here?... 3 Leveraging External Resources... 3 Technology Delivers Automation... 3 The Current Reality... 4 Time to Move Forward... 5 The Stakes are Higher... 5 Solutions are Maturing and Expanding... 5 Only a Matter of Time... 6 The Benefits... 6 One Throat to Choke... 6 Simplified, Repeatable Processes... 7 Efficient Chain of Custody... 7 Purchasing Power... 8 What to Keep in Mind... 8 The Bigger Truth... 8 All trademark names are property of their respective companies. Information contained in this publication has been obtained by sources The Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) considers to be reliable but is not warranted by ESG. This publication may contain opinions of ESG, which are subject to change from time to time. This publication is copyrighted by The Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. Any reproduction or redistribution of this publication, in whole or in part, whether in hard-copy format, electronically, or otherwise to persons not authorized to receive it, without the express consent of the Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc., is in violation of U.S. copyright law and will be subject to an action for civil damages and, if applicable, criminal prosecution. Should you have any questions, please contact ESG Client Relations at (508)
3 Introduction White Paper: Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation 3 Electronic discovery is an extremely complex process that only worsens as corporate data stores continue to grow and the number of matters involving electronically stored information (ESI) increases. Initially, organizations outsourced all aspects of the electronic discovery process because they did not have the skills or resources necessary to handle it in-house. As matters involving ESI and data volumes became more frequent, outsourcing every job became prohibitively expensive and companies responded by investing in a myriad of technology solutions enabling them to manage the initial steps of the electronic discovery process themselves. These investments solved a number of problems by automating certain tasks such as identifying and collecting data, but also introduced new issues. First, despite deploying several solutions, companies still need to procure certain services from legal process outsourcers. Secondly, IT and legal have to manage data import and export operations between various products and services. This worsens with the more disparate products and services a company uses to support electronic discovery. Lastly, the more information has to be touched or managed during import and export operations, the greater the risk of accidental data loss or deletion. Altogether, deploying multiple technology solutions to automate electronic discovery can actually increase cost and risk two things companies are trying to avoid. There are ways that an increase in technology investment can lead to lower electronic discovery costs. At the beginning of 2010, 30% of enterprises surveyed by ESG stated that they were going to reduce the number of vendors they work with in order to bolster cost containment initiatives. 1 When applied to electronic discovery, this strategy can have a significant impact if the vendor a company chooses to work with integrates its own products and services and if these offerings are flexible enough to connect with third party solutions. This paper discusses why out of control electronic discovery processes are ideal for the application of vendor consolidation principles because doing so would simplify operations, cut costs, and minimize risk to legal and IT departments. How Did We Get Here? Leveraging External Resources Well before ESI-related amendments were added to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in December 2006, organizations were forced to produce s, files, and other digital records during discovery. Without the tools or the competency to manage electronic discovery, organizations turned to legal process outsourcers (a.k.a., legal service providers) specialized consultants, and external counsel. Corporate counsel also took advantage of external resources to shift some of the risk and potential liabilities associated with electronic discovery as there wasn t much guidance or penalties associated with how it was managed. Consultants and external law firms assisted with the identification, collection, and preservation of data as well as project management. Legal service providers processed ESI to create a hosted, searchable index where in-house and external counsel as well as contractors could log on to and review the corpus for any responsive and privileged data. Together, the service provider and external counsel helped prepare the information for production to opposing counsel, courts, or regulators. For these services, attorneys and consultants charged an hourly rate while service providers often were compensated per gigabyte of data processed and hosted for review. Technology Delivers Automation After the December 2006 FRCP amendments went into effect, corporate counsels realized that electronic discovery was here to stay. They were going to have to figure out how to manage the process more efficiently, something most were unprepared for. In 2007, most corporate counsel interviewed by ESG didn t have an electronic discovery budget or the means to track electronic discovery-related spending. 2 However, most knew that the number of matters involving ESI was increasing. In 2008, a study by the American College of Trial Lawyers revealed that of 1 Source: ESG Research Report, 2010 Data Center Spending Intentions Survey, January Source: ESG Research Report, Electronic Discovery Requirements Escalate, November 2007.
4 White Paper: Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation 4 those attorneys that dealt with matters involving electronic discovery issues, 86% had issued or received a discovery request for ESI since December Corporate counsel soon realized two things: they needed to reduce legal service provider costs and make in-house electronic discovery resources especially Litigation Support Specialists and their IT counterparts more productive because the frequency of matters involving ESI was unlikely to drop. Thus began the technology investment phase of electronic discovery; companies began purchasing solutions that helped with the identification, collection, preservation, and initial analysis of ESI the first steps in the electronic discovery process (see Figure 1). Some tools help cull data sets and provide insight into matters early on in the discovery process. However, legal service providers were still needed to process the data albeit a smaller amount of it host it for review by outside counsel, and produce it to opposing counsel. With several deployment options including on-premises software (a solution is deployed behind a corporate firewall) and Software as a Service or SaaS (a solution is deployed at a third party provider with users leveraging a browser to complete tasks), companies could easily take advantage of emerging electronic discovery-specific technology. The good news for corporate counsel was that some of these technology investments lowered legal service provider bills and consultant fees, and they found themselves able to manage some risk by triaging cases. The bad news was that corporate counsel had to find additional budget for technology, which was something that legal departments rarely had to do in the past. Figure 1. The Electronic Discovery Process Defined The Current Reality Source: Realizing the positive impact that technology solutions had on certain steps of the electronic discovery process, investment continued. The problem was that at that time, no single technology vendor offered a wide enough range of solutions to address all electronic discovery requirements. For example, in a late 2008 interview with a litigation support specialist who worked for a $10B (revenue) company, ESG discovered that this individual s team used approximately nine different technology solutions to assist with various electronic discovery tasks, depending on the scope of the request. 4 Today, organizations still work with legal service providers because a preponderance of the technologies in the marketplace focus only on the initial phases of electronic discovery. External consultants are also often needed when a request is so large that in-house resources cannot support it or when the scope of an inquiry is unique, such as when dealing with old data saved in outdated formats. 3 American College of Trial Lawyers, Interim Report on the Joint Project of The American College of Trial Lawyers Task Force on Discovery and the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System, August 1, Source: ESG White Paper, Getting Control of Electronic Discovery, December 2008.
5 White Paper: Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation 5 As a result of the aforementioned market dynamics, companies now find themselves managing multiple point electronic discovery solutions as well as legal service provider and consultant relationships. All this increases costs as in-house staff must learn how to use a variety of products, companies cannot optimize electronic discovery processes because it is difficult to create standard operating procedures when dealing with so many different solutions, and matters are often delayed because technology-related issues cannot be addressed immediately when it is unclear which product is the problem. Worse, the costs extend beyond management complexity and potential delays in completing discovery. The more point products and services an organization uses, the more likely it is that legal and IT are forced to import and export data between the various solutions so the next phase of the process can be completed. The more data is touched, the higher the probability that it can be altered, even unintentionally, reducing the likelihood that its integrity can be defended. Time to Move Forward The Stakes are Higher Aside from chain of custody risks and complexity, organizations must also examine electronic discovery processes yet again because the penalties for mismanaging ESI are becoming clearer through various court opinions and sanctions. Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, LLP, a well known global law firm, reported in July 2009 that more than 60 federal and state court opinions addressing electronic discovery were issued in the first half of the year, with over half of the opinions involving the consideration of sanctions. According to the firm s estimates, these figures represented a two-fold increase in the proportion of e-discovery opinions courts consider and a similar increase in the proportion of e-discovery opinions that impose sanctions. 5 While the opinions provide additional guidance and interpretation regarding various electronic discovery challenges, the sanctions serve as a reminder that mismanagement of the process can lead to financial penalties and adverse outcomes. Corporate counsel should expect more opinions and sanctions related to electronic discovery to be issues as the legal system examines more cases involving ESI. This trend makes it imperative for organizations to get their own electronic discovery houses in order. On a more optimistic note, Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher s report also reveals that some organizations are using competencies in electronic discovery process management especially preservation against an opposing party: Typically, a party establishes a data preservation protocol in order to defend or shield itself from accusations of discovery shortcomings and potential sanctions resulting from them. However, a party that is conversant in e-discovery can also use it to assail an opposing party if it fails to meet its obligations. 6 Improvements in electronic discovery processes can actually help an organization achieve a more favorable outcome, especially if the opposing party does not have the same expertise, technology, or experience in managing matters involving ESI. Solutions are Maturing and Expanding As organizations increase their investments in electronic discovery solutions and services, they are starting to select products that solve more than just one step of the electronic discovery process. One of the motivations for doing so is to consolidate vendors and products in an effort to reduce expenses, representing an extension of a strategy first employed in In 2009, 32% of companies surveyed by ESG that planned to maintain or increase spending on electronic discovery also said they planned on reducing the number of vendors they worked with in an effort to control costs. 7 5 Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, 2009 Mid-Year Update on E-Discovery Cases, July Ibid. 7 Source: ESG Research Report, 2009 Data Center Spending Intentions Survey, February 2009.
6 White Paper: Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation 6 In response, vendors are quickly expanding their portfolios to support and automate multiple electronic discoveries. For some, this means offering a suite of individual products that are then integrated translated, each product can move data from one step in the process to the next without cumbersome import/export operations. Others may offer one product that supports multiple functions, allowing the data to be transitioned through the workflow without actually being moved. As a further benefit, many of these products can be deployed onpremises or via Software as a Service (SaaS). The former is ideal is when companies want to complete a task immediate such as first pass review and security of information (i.e., they want to prevent any external party access) is critical whereas SaaS facilitates a more collaborative process such as final review and production when external resources (i.e., outside counsel) need to interact with the information. Vendor consolidation efforts do not need to end with purpose-built electronic discovery technology regardless of whether they are delivered on-premises or via SaaS. Legal service providers are still needed for certain steps and may need consultants to assist with project management or other activities. Some vendor services portfolios include forensic collection and analysis, outsourced document review, and expert testimony. Fortunately, some of these service providers and consultancies now have technology solutions to help their clients manage the initial steps of the electronic discovery process internally, representing a comprehensive solution portfolio that makes electronic discovery vendor consolidation possible. Only a Matter of Time Even if a company doesn t take the initiative to consolidate vendors, the market is likely to do it for them. In IT, history has a tendency to repeat itself and any time a series of applications solving a point part of a business process (or series of business processes) appears, the market eventually consolidates. As an example, the enterprise application market was once populated by vendors (J.D. Edwards, PeopleSoft, Siebel, Business Objects, Hyperion, Great Plains Software, etc.) that handled specific business processes such as accounting, supply chain management, and enterprise resource planning. These companies offered focused software solutions, but customers started combining business processes. In order to optimize these newly joined business processes, the underlying software had to be joined as well. Software investments shifted from point products to integrated suites. The point product vendors could not survive and were acquired; the enterprise application market is now dominated by a few suppliers (Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, etc.) that have integrated all of their acquired point solutions into application suites. ESG expects that electronic discovery will follow a similar path. The process itself is intertwined and does not necessarily occur linearly. Some tasks need to be repeated if the scope of a request changes or if attorneys uncover more custodians from which data must be collected. The only way the process gets simplified is if all the solutions work together. As such, all signs indicate that the market will consolidate as smaller point-products are overlooked for more comprehensive solutions. Vendors that do not have comprehensive solutions will likely acquire pointproduct vendors. Vendors that do not have integrated solutions will need to increase research and development investments to address the challenge or likely be left off customers evaluation lists. The Benefits Working with fewer vendors may seem like an easy decision for most organizations, but some may not realize all the benefits, which can vary depending on the degree of vendor actually achieved. One Throat to Choke As with any technology, there will be situations where users need assistance in resolving a bug or figuring out how a particular feature works. If a company is using solutions from multiple vendors to support an electronic discovery workflow, identifying the basis of a particular issue can be a nightmare vendors often point fingers rather than collaborate. Corporate and external counsels often end up waiting for a resolution instead of pursuing initial analysis and investigation activities.
7 White Paper: Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation 7 This issue often manifests when a customer sends data from a specific technology solution, such as an initial case analysis tool, to a legal service provider for final review. If the service provider and product vendor are the same, there is very little chance that processing will be delayed because of file support issues. If the vendors are not the same but have done integration work, transitioning an exported file for processing should be straightforward. Without integration, processing is delayed and countless hours may be spent trying to resolve the issue. This challenge is mitigated by working with one vendor offering integrated products. In instances where a company works with a small group of vendors, negotiations and billing can be simplified and services-related issues can be expedited provided the vendors have integrated their solutions, have a joint services agreement in place, or both. The bottom line is that fewer vendors means fewer places to call when something goes wrong. This leads to faster problem resolution, which reduces the risk that electronic discovery processes are disrupted or halted for an extended period of time. Simplified, Repeatable Processes When dealing with multiple electronic discovery vendors and products, legal and IT staffs may end up treating every request as a unique process where different solutions are used depending on the scope of the inquiry. While it is always good to maintain flexibility, it is very hard to scale electronic discovery processes when every inquiry is treated as a one off. In fact, managing electronic discovery this way can actually increase costs because companies are forced to hire more staff to operate different technologies and project manage different matters. Minimizing the number of technology solutions litigation support specialists and IT staff have to manage as part of electronic discovery can improve productivity. There certainly is inherent value in familiarity. Knowing what certain technology solutions can and cannot do enables the creation of standard operating procedures. In turn, these procedures allow companies to establish repeatable processes, making it easier to deal with higher volumes of electronic discovery activity. By making electronic discovery an automated business process that in-house resources are familiar with, legal and IT can easily identify when a certain request should be treated as an exception and turned over to a service provider and specialized consultants. Establishing repeatable processes with vendors that offer technology, processing and hosted review, and consultancy services drives more efficiency because customers do not have to explain or educate external resources on which products they use and how they use them. The bottom line is that standardized technology leads to standardized electronic discovery processes which can scale. Companies also gain more control over when and how they leverage external resources. Efficient Chain of Custody No organization wants to go through the entire electronic discovery process only to have the data s integrity questioned because corporate counsel cannot adequately prove chain of custody mandates were properly followed. The more often ESI is handled for whatever reason, the greater the chance that someone can unintentionally or maliciously alter metadata or delete the content altogether. Working with fewer, more integrated products minimizes the need to frequently import and export data. Litigation support specialists and IT do not have to manipulate the data to create acceptable load files for a specific solution or service provider. Additionally, there is less chain of custody auditing and documentation to be done to prove that the information has not been altered in any way. The bottom line is that ESI chain of custody requirements are complex enough given the amount of data that moves through an electronic discovery workflow. The fewer times ESI has to be exported from one solution and imported to another, the less likely something bad will happen. The easiest way to achieve this is by working with standalone products that assist with multiple steps of the ediscovery process and making sure those products are integrated with other solutions, such as legal service provider offerings, to expedite data transfer operations. Alternatively, customers have to work with a single vendor that is accountable for the entire process (i.e., has a broad range of integrated products and services) and can defend it in court.
8 Purchasing Power White Paper: Minimizing ediscovery Complexity Through Vendor Consolidation 8 The basic rules of procurement dictate that the more you buy, the bigger the discount. This can be easily applied to electronic discovery technologies and services. Organizations that consolidate vendors will not eliminate spending; they will still have all of the technology and services they always used. This spend, however, will be directed at fewer vendors, giving customers more leverage in negotiating software licenses, service providers, and consulting rates. The bottom line is that when customers exercise their purchasing power, cost savings quickly accumulate. What to Keep in Mind Organizations may be hesitant to put all their [electronic discovery] eggs in one basket, which can be a problem if a vendor doesn t continuously innovate and bring new capabilities to market or struggles to remain financially viable. To minimize the downside of working with fewer vendors, companies must make sure that the technology and services offered by those few vendors address their requirements. Customers shouldn t settle for average technology just to reduce the number of vendors they work with the savings will just be offset by higher operating costs (manually completing tasks, external counsel fees, etc.). Conversely, companies should not keep technology around if it doesn t solve an immediate issue. To help figure out what solutions and providers to keep, ESG recommends creating a dynamic (i.e., flexible and updated) list of features that are must haves and nice to haves, enabling more informed decisions when consolidating offerings and vendors. One such capability that should be in the must have category for both onpremises and legal service provider solutions is auditing and tracking. Corporate counsels need this feature to easily prepare chain of custody documentation. This alleviates some of the manual work that in-house resources do to prepare to defend the overall integrity of their electronic discovery processes and the associated ESI managed within these processes. Further, vendor consolidation strategies do not necessarily mean that an organization work with only one vendor, especially when it comes to technology supporting critical business processes like electronic discovery. ESG believes that customers would be smart to maintain a multi-vendor strategy. There is a big difference between buying one of everything to address electronic discovery challenges and a multi-vendor strategy. The latter entails establishing strong partnerships within a limited group of vendors offering a broad spectrum of integrated technology, legal services, and consulting capabilities. The Bigger Truth In its 6 th Annual Litigation Trends Survey Report released in October 2009, Fulbright & Jaworski, a global law firm with a history in electronic discovery expertise, asked over 400 corporate counsels about their plans to reduce electronic discovery costs. 8 Nearly half of respondents said they were going to in-source some electronic discovery activities, a process that many other companies have already started. Regardless of how far along organizations are on the in-sourcing electronic discovery path, this is only the first step toward gaining control over the process and reducing expenses for the long term. Efficient electronic discovery operations require people, processes, and technology. Cost effective and risk adverse electronic discovery means an organization gets all of that from as few places as possible. 8 Source: Fulbright & Jaworski, 6th Annual Litigation Trends Survey Report, October 2009.
White Paper How Archiving Reduces the Cost and Complexity of Reactive ediscovery By Brian Babineau April 2010 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by Symantec and is distributed under license from ESG.
Research Report Abstract: e-discovery Market Trends A View from the Legal Department By Katey Wood and Brian Babineau With Bill Lundell and Jennifer Gahm October 2011 2011 Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc.
White Paper Trends in e-discovery: Cloud and Collection A Market Perspective By Brian Babineau and Katey Wood June, 2011 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by Clearwell Systems and is distributed under
White Paper Getting Exchange 2010 Archiving Right A Use Case Analysis of Symantec Enterprise Vault and Native Exchange Capabilities By Brian Babineau November, 2009 2009, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc.
ESG Brief Commvault: Integrating Enterprise File Sync and Share Capabilities with Data Protection and Backup Date: September 2015 Author: Terri McClure, Senior Analyst, and Leah Matuson, Research Analyst
EnCase Enterprise/ ediscovery Strategic Consulting EnCase customers now have a trusted expert advisor to meet their discovery goals. NightOwl Discovery offers complete support for the EnCase Enterprise
WhitePaper Concise Guide to E-discovery Contents i. Overview ii. Importance of e-discovery iii. How to prepare for e-discovery? iv. Key processes & issues v. The next step vi. Conclusion Overview E-discovery
Lowering E-Discovery Costs Through Enterprise Records and Retention Management An Oracle White Paper March 2007 Lowering E-Discovery Costs Through Enterprise Records and Retention Management Exponential
WHITE PAPER: THE ediscovery BALANCING ACT The ediscovery Balancing Act Striking the Right Mix of In-House and Outsourced Expertise The ediscovery Balancing Act Contents Introduction...........................................
TM GUIDANCE SOFTWARE EnCASE ediscovery EnCase ediscovery Automatically search, identify, collect, preserve, and process electronically stored information across the network. GUIDANCE SOFTWARE EnCASE ediscovery
How to Manage Costs and Expectations for Successful E-Discovery: Best Practices Mukesh Advani, Esq., Advisory Board Member, UBIC North America, Inc. UBIC North America, Inc. 3 Lagoon Dr., Ste. 180, Redwood
Research Report Abstract: Online File Sharing and Collaboration: Deployment Model Trends By Terri McClure, Senior Analyst and Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst With Jennifer Gahm, Senior Project Manager
ESI Risk Assessment: Critical in Light of the new E-discovery and notification laws Scott Bailey, CISM Christopher Sobota, J.D. Enterprise Risk Management Group Disclaimer This presentation is for informational
What organizations need to know in today s litigious and digital world. The main objective for a corporation s law department is to mitigate risk throughout the company, while keeping costs under control.
Research Report Abstract: The Impact of Cloud Computing on the Channel By Jeff Hine and Bill Lundell September 2011 2011 Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Introduction Research Objectives
The Discovery-Ready Enterprise II: Challenges and Opportunities on the Road to Litigation Preparedness This comprehensive survey report reveals how many organizations are still grappling with being prepared
White Paper Incorporating SharePoint into Electronic Discovery Processes By Brian Babineau May, 2010 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by FTI Technology and is distributed under license from ESG. 2010,
Nexsan and FalconStor Team for High Performance, Operationally Efficient Disk-based Backup Date: August, 2009 Author: Brian Babineau, Senior Consulting Analyst, and Lauren Whitehouse, Senior Analyst Abstract:
The Ethics of E-Discovery By John M. Barkett Chicago, Illinois, 2009; ISBN 978-1-60442-256-6 Price $69.95, pp. 125 Reviewed by Tracy Flynn Journal of High Technology Law Suffolk University Law School E-discovery
Director, Value Engineering April 25 th, 2012 Copyright OpenText Corporation. All rights reserved. This publication represents proprietary, confidential information pertaining to OpenText product, software
White Paper The Modern Network Monitoring Mandate By Bob Laliberte, Senior Analyst April 2014 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by Emulex and is distributed under license from ESG. White Paper: The
Next Generation NAS: A market perspective on the recently introduced Snap Server 500 Series ABSTRACT In February 2006, Snap Server announced the 500 Series of Networked Attached Storage systems as well
IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR MID-RANGE EDISCOVERY DATA COLLECTION REUTERS / SUHAIB SALEM Written by Kyle Sparks White paper EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Data collection during ediscovery is critically important because
WHITE PAPER: PREDICTIVE CODING DEFENSIBILITY........................................ Predictive Coding Defensibility and the Transparent Predictive Coding Workflow Who should read this paper Predictive
I. Some Key Considerations In Whether To Engage An E-Discovery Vendor (Or Vendors) A. It is difficult to decide whether to retain a vendor if you don t know what your organization can do and at what cost.
ESG REPORT Software-as-a-Service: An Ideal E-mail Archive Solution for Medium-Size Businesses By Brian Babineau February, 2009 Table of Contents ESG REPORT Table of Contents... i Introduction... 1 Medium-Size
2972 NW 60 th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Tel 954.462.5400 Fax 954.463.7500 5218 South East Street, Suite E-3, Indianapolis, IN 46227 Tel 317.247.4400 Fax 317.247.0044 Presented by Providing
Predictive Coding Defensibility and the Transparent Predictive Coding Workflow Who should read this paper Predictive coding is one of the most promising technologies to reduce the high cost of review by
White Paper The Converged Network By Bob Laliberte November, 2009 2009, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved White Paper: The Converged Network 2 Contents Introduction... 3 What s Needed...
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT BRIEF Realizing and Maximizing an E-mail Archive ROI with EMC SourceOne Email Management Date: April, 2009 Author: Brian Babineau, Senior Analyst Abstract: ESG research indicates
WHEPAPER The Disconnect Between and Teams Examples of what each side doesn t know #2 in a series of 4 whitepapers. Circulate this document to,, and company management. It can be used to start a dialog,
Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010 Presented by Brian Wilkinson, Director of ediscovery & Computer Forensics firstname.lastname@example.org 410-659-3473 Table of Contents Page 1 Electronic
Litigation Solutions i n s i g h t f u l i n t e r a c t i ve c u l l i n g d i s t r i b u t e d e d i s cove r y p ro ce s s i n g p owe r i n g d i g i t a l re v i e w Advanced Analytical Review Data
BEYOND THE HYPE: UNDERSTANDING THE REAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE AMENDED FRCP PA G E : 1 BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Clearwell Systems
Research Brief The Evolving Public Cloud Landscape Date: June 2014 Author: Mark Bowker, Senior Analyst and Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst Abstract: ESG research indicates that the corporate usage
CLIENT MEMORANDUM Hong Kong High Court Procedure E-Discovery: Practice Direction Effective September 1, 2014 August 28, 2014 Mandatory application of e-discovery Mandatory application of e-discovery to
SOLUTION BRIEF: CLEARWELL LEGAL ediscovery SOLUTION Solution Brief Clearwell Legal ediscovery Solution The Challenge: Months Delay in Ascertaining Case Facts and Determining Case Strategy, High Cost of
Proactive Data Management for ediscovery Simon Taylor Snr. Director Information Management CommVault Systems Inc. Why ediscovery sucks for IT The US Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 34(a), (b) Definition
E-Discovery Quagmires An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure Rebecca Herold, CISSP, CISA, CISM, FLMI Final Draft for February 2007 CSI Alert While updating the two-day seminar Chris Grillo and
Ethics in Technology and ediscovery Stuff You Know, But Aren t Thinking About Kelly H Twigger, Esq. Oil and Gas Symposium Arkansas Law Review October 16-17, 2014 Overview In the last two decades, business
Brought to you by: ediscovery Policies: Planned Protection Saves More than Money Anticipating and Mitigating the Costs of Litigation Introduction: Rising costs of litigation The chance of your organization
An Oracle White Paper September 2014 Adapting to PeopleSoft Continuous Delivery Oracle White Paper PeopleSoft Enterprise and Fusion Middleware Disclaimer The following is intended to outline our general
NOT FOR REPRINT Click to Print or Select 'Print' in your browser menu to print this document. Page printed from: Corporate Counsel E-Discovery #NoFilter A Survey of Current Trends and Candid Perspectives
Field Audit Report Asigra Hybrid Cloud Backup and Recovery Solutions By Brian Garrett with Tony Palmer May, 2009 Field Audit: Asigra Hybrid Cloud Backup and Recovery Solutions 2 Contents Introduction...
ZL UNIFIED ARCHIVE A Project Manager s Guide to E-Discovery ZL TECHNOLOGIES White Paper PAGE 1 A project manager s guide to e-discovery In civil litigation, the parties in a dispute are required to provide
eops 2010: Electronic Discovery Operational Parameters Survey Executive Summary April, 2010 Better information will make E-Discovery more efficient. The multi-billion dollar electronic discovery market
IBM ediscovery Identification and Collection Turning unstructured data into relevant data for intelligent ediscovery Highlights Analyze data in-place with detailed data explorers to gain insight into data
BUYER CASE STUDY A United States Based Telecommunications Firm Employs FTI Harvester to Address ediscovery Challenges in Microsoft SharePoint Vivian Tero IDC OPINION Global Headquarters: 5 Speen Street
E-discovery Project Decision Guide Policy, Process & Software FORMING POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTING SUCCESSFULLY A MANAGEMENT DECISION GUIDE THIS REPORT IS A CRITICAL GUIDE FOR RECORDS MANAGERS, IT MANAGERS,
Todd Heythaler Information Governance & ediscovery Trends & Landscapes State & Local Government Challenges Approach to ediscovery & FOIL requests Getting Started Trends & Landscape Requests for Information
Company Brief Data Protection Services Should Be About Services, as Well as Data Protection Date: February 2013 Author: Jason Buffington, Senior Analyst Abstract: Organizations trying to modernize or fix
Self-diagnose Your ediscovery Pain by Vice President of Client Services Troy Dunham How is ediscovery like health screening? In our personal lives, we tend to put items on our to-do list in either a need
E- Discovery in Criminal Law ! An e-discovery Solution for the Criminal Context Criminal lawyers often lack formal procedures to guide them through preservation, collection and analysis of electronically
White Paper Evaluating Sync and Share Solutions Balancing Security, Control, and Productivity By Terri McClure, Senior Analyst September, 2014 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by Code42 and is distributed
Research Report Abstract: 2013 Public Cloud Computing Trends By Wayne Pauley, Senior Analyst and Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst With Jenn Gahm, Senior Project Manager March 2013 Introduction Research
MDLA TTS August 23, 2013 ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS Kate Burke Mortensen, Esq. email@example.com Scott Polus, Director of Forensic Services firstname.lastname@example.org 1 Where Do I Start??
ESG Case Study Primatics Financial Delivers SaaS-based Solution Excellence Using EMC s XtremIO Date: March 2015 Authors: Mark Peters, Senior Analyst; Adam DeMattia, Market Research Analyst; and Monya Keane,
The Radicati Group, Inc. www.radicati.com ediscovery Solutions A Radicati Group, Inc. Webconference The Radicati Group, Inc. Copyright November 2010, Reproduction Prohibited 9:30 am, PT November 4, 2010
Enterprise Strategy Group Getting to the bigger truth. By Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst and John McKnight, VP Research and Analysts March 2015 4 Cloud Computing: Not a Question of If, but Rather
Research Report Abstract: Enterprise Big Data, Business Intelligence, and Analytics Trends By Nik Rouda, Senior Analyst With Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst, and Jennifer Gahm, Senior Project Manager
ESG Brief Varonis: Secure Enterprise Collaboration and File Sharing Date: June 2015 Author: Terri McClure, Senior Analyst; and Leah Matuson, Research Analyst Abstract: With the burgeoning workplace mobility
Research Report Abstract: 2014 Public Cloud Computing Trends By Wayne Pauley, Senior Analyst and Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst With Jenn Gahm, Senior Project Manager March 2014 Introduction Research
A Practical Guide to Understanding ediscovery for Insurance Claims Professionals ediscovery Defined and its Relationship to an Insurance Claim Simply put, ediscovery (or Electronic Discovery) refers to
Forensically Sound Preservation and Processing of Exchange Databases Microsoft Exchange server is the communication hub for most organizations. Crucial email flows through this database continually, day
White Paper Extracting the Value of Big Data with HP StoreAll Storage and Autonomy By Terri McClure, Senior Analyst and Katey Wood, Analyst December 2012 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by HP and
Product Brief Symantec Enterprise Vault Portfolio Extends the Value of IBM Collaboration Environments Date: January 2013 Author: Steve Duplessie, Senior Analyst, Brian Babineau, Senior Analyst, and Katey
Research Report Abstract: Enterprise Database Trends in a Big Data World By Nik Rouda, Senior Analyst With Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst and Jennifer Gahm, Senior Project Manager July 2014 Introduction
ESG Lab Review Acopia ARX: Transparent, Heterogeneous Data Migrations for NAS Storage A Product Review by ESG Lab February 2006 Authors: Tony Asaro Brian Garrett Copyright 2006,, Inc. All Rights Reserved
White Paper THE FIVE STEPS TO MANAGING THIRD-PARTY RISK By James Christiansen, VP, Information Management Executive Summary The Common Story of a Third-Party Data Breach It begins with a story in the newspaper.
NASCIO Staff Contact: Mary Gay Whitmer Senior Issues Coordinator email@example.com The Search Is On: State CIO Starting Points for E-Discovery Opportunities for State CIOs to Prepare for E-Discovery NASCIO
BDO CONSULTING FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES MARCH 2013 AGENDA Introduction About BDO Consulting Computer Forensics & E-Discovery Practice Current Trends Case Studies Q&A Page 2 Michael Barba Managing Director,
ESG Brief Virtual Patch Management Offers Automation, Availability, and Cost Benefits Date: June 2013 Author: Jon Oltsik, Senior Principal Analyst Abstract: Timely patch management is a security best practice,
Social Media, Instant Messaging, Webmail and E-Discovery: How the Internet Boosts the Power of ESI Written by Vere Software Contents Contents...2 Internet Evidence is Increasingly Important to E-Discovery...3
THE WINDOWS MANAGER S GUIDE TO INSIDE: Reactive litigation hold tools Proactive litigation hold tools Review tools Enterprise search tools Archive systems CHAPTER Exploring e-discovery tools Simplify the
This is not your grandfather s litigation. BUT ediscovery Services are not legal services. TYPES OF ETHICAL ISSUES THAT MIGHT ARISE IN THE CONTEXT OF ediscovery: Document collection Privacy issues Inadvertent
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved White Paper The Data Center of the Future By Mark Bowker and Lauren Whitehouse March, 2010 This ESG White Paper was commissioned by Veeam and is
White Paper A Storage Network Architecture for Highly Dynamic Virtualized and Cloud Computing Environments Juniper s QFabric Solution for EMC Storage Environments By Bob Laliberte, Senior Analyst May 2013
125 In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum Retta A. Miller Carl C. Butzer Jackson Walker L.L.P. April 21, 2007 www.pointmm.com I. OVERVIEW OF THE RULES GOVERNING ELECTRONICALLY- STORED INFORMATION
Simplifying Contact Center Technology Eliminating complexity with a single-vendor on-demand contact center solution An Oracle White Paper August 2006 Simplifying Contact Center Technology EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Reducing the Cost of ediscovery in Today s Economic Climate Strategies for reducing the cost and Strategies for reducing the cost and risk of ediscovery The 2009 Corporate ediscovery Challenge Corporate
Legal exchange Total Legal Spend Management Solution for Corporate legal departments Delivering greater efficiency, insight and control of Legal Spend. That s Uniquely Bottomline. With a continued reliance
Right-Sizing Electronic Discovery: The Case For Managed Services A White Paper 1 2 Table of Contents Introduction....4 An Overview of the Options...4 Insourcing: Bringing E-Discovery Processes In-House....4
Electronic Record Retention and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance Agenda What is all this ediscovery buzz? Email is major focus of ESI Impact of New FRCP rules
Predictability in E-Discovery Presented by: John G. Roman, Jr. National Manager, Practice Group Technology Services Nixon Peabody LLP Tom Barce Assistant Director of Practice Support Fulbright & Jaworski
A Secure-24 Business White Paper August 2015 Application Performance Management Secure-24 Application Performance Management as a Service Business Performance Equals Application Performance Executive Overview
AccessData Group CASE STUDY: Top 5 Communications Company Evaluates Leading ediscovery Solutions White Paper "#$%&'()'*+&*+, Overview... 1 Top 5 Communications Company: Background and Its ediscovery Requirements...
E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011 This presentation does not present the views of the U.S. Department of Justice. This presentation is not legal advice.
Research Report Abstract: Backup and Archiving Convergence Trends By Jason Buffington, Senior Analyst and Bill Lundell, Senior Research Analyst With Jennifer Gahm, Senior Project Manager April 2014 Introduction
White Paper Integrated Computing Platforms: Infrastructure Builds for Tomorrow s Data Center By Mark Bowker, Senior Analyst, and Perry Laberis, Senior Research Associate March 2013 This ESG White Paper
2016 CLM Annual Conference April 6-8, 2016 Orlando, FL Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY Understanding e-discovery definitions and concepts is critical to working with vendors,