Recent Changes in U.S. Patent Law Affecting Cloud Services

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Recent Changes in U.S. Patent Law Affecting Cloud Services"

Transcription

1 Recent Changes in U.S. Patent Law Affecting Cloud Services Robert S. Blasi, Esq. Partner, Intellectual Property Transactions & Strategies November 7, Goodwin Procter LLP

2 About Goodwin Procter Global law firm Most of our attorneys in Boston, California, and New York City. Large technology companies practice 160+ attorneys focused on technology clients. Many attorneys from Testa Hurwitz, Gunderson Dettmer, Wilson Sonsini. Open source clients include Acquia, Citrix (Xen), Engine Yard, Hadapt, Hortonworks, Modo Labs, Pentaho, RStudio, Sencha, Twilio & Vyatta. Goodwin Procter LLP 2

3 Agenda Statement of the Problem Patent law in United States, pre-limelight The Limelight Decision The McKesson Decision Recommendations Questions? Goodwin Procter LLP 3

4 Statement of the Problem More data, more businesses moving into the cloud. Not a return to client-server model; third parties in the mix. Cloud services providers, cloud services consumers, private clouds. Patent litigation is prevalent, increasing. Outright purchases of patents also increasing. Strategic patent litigation in the minority, more troll litigation. Are you increasing your exposure by migrating to a cloud model? If so, can you address or hedge this risk? Goodwin Procter LLP 4

5 Patent Law in United States, pre-limelight A patent is a right to stop others; not a right to do something. Patents can cover methods of doing things, as well as things per se. A patent is a territorial right. E.g., U.S. patent reaches U.S. activities, but nothing lacking nexus with the U.S. Strongest kind of IP protection there is. Protects against independent reimplementation. Reaches making, using, selling, importing, offering for sale, etc. Goodwin Procter LLP 5

6 Patent Law in United States, pre-limelight (cont d) Joint infringement/a.k.a. divided infringement Infringement of a method requires a single entity to perform all the steps of the method. Third parties only count if they are: (a) agents of the entity, or (b) acting at the direction and control of the entity. What about infringement claims involving acts outside the U.S.? Microsoft v. EOLAS/AT&T Software crossing territorial borders counts as a component of an invention for infringement purposes Bayer v. Housey Pharma But mere information does not NTP v. RIM A system is used where it is used as a whole or where it is controlled ; in contrast, a method is used in a jurisdiction when all of the steps are performed in the jurisdiction Goodwin Procter LLP 6

7 Patent Law in United States, pre-limelight (cont d) Induced infringement You can also be liable if you get another to infringe a patent. But consider the interaction with joint infringement. Under these rules, you could reduce patent risk by: Shifting operations completely outside of the United States Breaking operations into stages and, optionally, placing a stage outside the United States Locating apparatus that you don t control outside the U.S. Cloud based operations facilitate these kinds of changes. Goodwin Procter LLP 7

8 The Limelight Decision Akamai has patent on a method for efficient delivery of web content Place some of a content provider s content elements on a set of replicated servers, and Modify the content provider s web page to instruct web browsers to retrieve that content from the replicated servers Limelight Maintains a network of servers and allows for efficient content delivery by placing some content elements on its servers Does not modify the content providers web pages Instructs its customers on the steps needed to do that modification Goodwin Procter LLP 8

9 The Limelight Decision (cont d) Finding of non infringement after jury verdict For a party to be liable for induced infringement, some other single entity must perform all steps of method No one infringing entity - Limelight s customers (and not Limelight itself) performed one of the steps of the claimed method. Decision reversed on appeal. New rules announced. Limelight would be liable for inducing infringement if Limelight: Knew of Akamai s patent Performed all but one of the steps of the claimed method, Induced the content providers to perform the final step, and The content providers in fact performed that final step Goodwin Procter LLP 9

10 Law of Induced Infringement and New Question 35 U.S.C. 271(b) Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer A party who advises, encourages, or otherwise induces others to engage in infringing conduct is liable Inducement requires that Alleged infringer knowingly induced infringement, and Possessed specific intent to encourage another s infringement No indirect infringement without direct infringement Inducement gives rise to liability only if the inducement leads to actual infringement Should a party inducing infringing conduct be liable when no single induced entity commits all of the infringing acts or steps? CAFC holds yes overrules prior case law Goodwin Procter LLP 10

11 Court s Reasoning Proving that there has been direct infringement is not the same as proving that a single party would be liable as a direct infringer (original emphasis) No reason to immunize an inducer If the inducer knowingly induced others to commit the acts necessary to infringe a patent, and Those others commit those acts Simply because the parties structured their conduct so that no single defendant committed all of the acts constituting infringement Statute and underlying policy do not distinguish between inducing one direct infringer and several actors who infringe together Goodwin Procter LLP 11

12 The McKesson Decision McKesson has a patent on a method of electronic communication between healthcare providers and their patients Steps are divided between Patients who initiate communications, and Healthcare providers, who perform the remainder of the steps McKesson loses on summary judgment Patients (and not Epic s direct customers) performed the step of initiating the communication On appeal, Epic can be held liable for inducing infringement if it: Knew of McKesson s patent Induced the performance of the claimed method steps, and Those steps were performed I.e., Epic doesn t need to be involved in the infringing process. Goodwin Procter LLP 12

13 Recommendations for Patent Holders Always file system claims Draft method claims to avoid joint infringement. One party per group of claims: CSP, cloud customer, or end user. Patent technology visible to end user. Easier to identify infringement. Patent what is new and non-obvious. Not enough to move known service to the cloud. File multiple applications for each invention. Easier to prosecute, easier to license. Goodwin Procter LLP 13

14 Recommendations for Cloud Users Cloud migration doesn t make patent exposure better or worse. BUT!, be careful not to move regulated data in contravention of law E.g., personally-identifiable information, healthcare data, controlled technologies, etc. Still prudent to make cloud vendor bear that risk. Can t diligence their technology, can t control their operations. Freedom to operate opinions under old standard may be obsolete Old standard: no direct infringement, no indirect infringement New standard: do you know customers are infringing using your products/services? Goodwin Procter LLP 14

15 Questions?

Patent Strategy for Open Source Companies

Patent Strategy for Open Source Companies Insert company logo in this space Patent Strategy for Open Source Companies Robert S. Blasi, Esq. Partner Goodwin Procter LLP Global law firm About Goodwin Procter Most of our attorneys in Boston, California,

More information

5/30/12. Legal Pluralism in Patenting - A more pluralistic regulation of cloud computing patents?- Nari Lee Nari.lee@hanken.fi.

5/30/12. Legal Pluralism in Patenting - A more pluralistic regulation of cloud computing patents?- Nari Lee Nari.lee@hanken.fi. WIPO Advanced Research Seminar 2012 Legal Pluralism in Patenting - A more pluralistic regulation of cloud computing patents?- Nari Lee Nari.lee@hanken.fi Background» Technological Changes» New Types of

More information

Patent Law Basics An Engineer s Journey To Become an IP Attorney. Deborah M. Vernon, Ph.D. BSc ME 95 dvernon@proskauer.com 617.526.

Patent Law Basics An Engineer s Journey To Become an IP Attorney. Deborah M. Vernon, Ph.D. BSc ME 95 dvernon@proskauer.com 617.526. Patent Law Basics An Engineer s Journey To Become an IP Attorney Deborah M. Vernon, Ph.D. BSc ME 95 dvernon@proskauer.com 617.526.9836 About Proskauer Rose LLP Founded in 1875 Over 750 attorneys With 12

More information

AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE LICENSE

AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE LICENSE AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE LICENSE 1. DEFINITIONS. 1.1. "Contributor" means each individual or entity that creates or contributes to the creation of Modifications. 1.2. "Contributor

More information

COMMON MASSACHUSETTS STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS

COMMON MASSACHUSETTS STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS COMMON MASSACHUSETTS STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS An overview of the limitations periods for several common civil and commercial claims in Massachusetts. Brought to You by The Jacobs Law, LLC Your Attorneys

More information

Obtaining and Using Opinions of Counsel

Obtaining and Using Opinions of Counsel Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Obtaining and Using Opinions of Counsel Presentation to: Ryuka IP Law Firm April 19, 2013 Disclaimer These materials are public information and have

More information

U.S. Litigation (Strategic Preparations and Statistics)

U.S. Litigation (Strategic Preparations and Statistics) U.S. Litigation (Strategic Preparations and Statistics) Thomas K. Scherer Federal and State Court, ITC actions Considerations of speed and remedies involved Eastern District of Texas Considerations of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DERMAFOCUS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, v. Plaintiff, ULTHERA, INC., a Delaware corporation. Civil Action No: DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation v. Plaintiff, SALESFORCE.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 v. FAIRWARNING, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Iatric Systems, Inc.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION Plaintiff, Case No. v. HAMILTON COMPANY AND HAMILTON

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE QAXAZ LLC, Plaintiff, v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY; MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC; MICROSOFT CORPORATION;

More information

Government Contract. Andrews Litigation Reporter. Intellectual Property Rights In Government Contracting. Expert Analysis

Government Contract. Andrews Litigation Reporter. Intellectual Property Rights In Government Contracting. Expert Analysis Government Contract Andrews Litigation Reporter VOLUME 23 h ISSUE 6 h July 27, 2009 Expert Analysis Commentary Intellectual Property Rights In Government Contracting By William C. Bergmann, Esq., and Bukola

More information

BUSINESS ASPECTS OF PATENTS: A PRIMER FOR THE NON-PATENT LAWYER

BUSINESS ASPECTS OF PATENTS: A PRIMER FOR THE NON-PATENT LAWYER BUSINESS ASPECTS OF PATENTS: A PRIMER FOR THE NON-PATENT LAWYER John R. Wetherell, Ph.D., J.D. Partner Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 12255 El Camino Real, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130-4088 858-509-4022

More information

ALPHA TEST LICENSE AGREEMENT

ALPHA TEST LICENSE AGREEMENT ALPHA TEST LICENSE AGREEMENT IMPORTANT NOTICE! PLEASE READ THIS STATEMENT AND THE ALPHA TEST LICENSE AGREEMENT COMPLETELY BEFORE USING THIS ALPHA SOFTWARE. BY CLICKING ON THE BUTTON MARKED YES BELOW OR

More information

INTERNET USAGE AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT IN YOUR MANAGEMENT OF YOUR PATENT PROGRAM. Steven D. Hemminger. Lyon & Lyon, LLP

INTERNET USAGE AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT IN YOUR MANAGEMENT OF YOUR PATENT PROGRAM. Steven D. Hemminger. Lyon & Lyon, LLP INTERNET USAGE AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT IN YOUR MANAGEMENT OF YOUR PATENT PROGRAM Steven D. Hemminger Lyon & Lyon, LLP {1} Much has been written and said about the Internet and the benefits for a company

More information

What every product manager should know about Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks. Varun A. Shah Patent Attorney

What every product manager should know about Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks. Varun A. Shah Patent Attorney What every product manager should know about Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks Silicon Valley Product Management Association February 3, 2010 Varun A. Shah Patent Attorney Hickman

More information

The Aftermath of Akamai: Induced Infringement and Opinions of Counsel

The Aftermath of Akamai: Induced Infringement and Opinions of Counsel The Aftermath of Akamai: Induced Infringement and Opinions of Counsel Induced Infringement and Opinions of Counsel By Richard M. Marsh Jr. Richard M. Marsh Jr. is a patent attorney with Faegre Baker Daniels

More information

Inspections and Access to Evidence in

Inspections and Access to Evidence in Inspections and Access to Evidence in Patent Litigation 10 th Annual Conference on Intellectual Property Law & Policy at Fordham IP Law Institute April, 12 th 2012, New York by Dr. Klaus Grabinski Judge

More information

'Safe Harbor' For Online Service Providers

'Safe Harbor' For Online Service Providers Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com 'Safe Harbor' For Online Service Providers

More information

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere

More information

Work for Hire Language Makes Independent Contractor an Employee

Work for Hire Language Makes Independent Contractor an Employee Work for Hire Language Makes Independent Contractor an Employee By June Lin Introduction Imagine a company that works with a variety of independent contractors based in California - for example, software

More information

Case 2:15-cv-01266-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv-01266-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 Case 2:15-cv-01266-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION AUTOMATION MIDDLEWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

More information

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE May 2007 1 Hogan & Hartson LLP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE Supreme Court Holds That 35 U.S.C. 271(f) Does Not Apply To Golden Master Disks In a decision handed down April

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-59 TIME WARNER CABLE INC., TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC, TIME WARNER

More information

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIM. Defendants Cablevision Systems Corporation and CSC Holdings, Inc. (collectively

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIM. Defendants Cablevision Systems Corporation and CSC Holdings, Inc. (collectively UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, : UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS

More information

No. 12-786. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Petitioner, AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL., Respondents.

No. 12-786. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Petitioner, AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL., Respondents. No. 12-786 IN THE LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Petitioner, AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit BRIEF OF PATENT

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00929-AWT Document 1 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:14-cv-00929-AWT Document 1 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Case 3:14-cv-00929-AWT Document 1 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ZIPLINK, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., JURY

More information

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5059. State of Washington 64th Legislature 2015 Regular Session

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5059. State of Washington 64th Legislature 2015 Regular Session S-1.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 0 State of Washington th Legislature 01 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Frockt, Fain, Pedersen, and Chase; by request of Attorney

More information

Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation

Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation by charlene m. morrow and dargaye churnet 1. Who enforces a patent? The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office grants a patent. Contrary to popular belief, a patent

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IP INNOVATION L.L.C. AND TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION,

More information

Federal Circuit Review

Federal Circuit Review Federal Circuit Review Infringement Volume One Issue Six March 2009 In This Issue: g Direct and Indirect Infringement g Joint Infringement g Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor and Research Tools g Infringing Use

More information

JUDGE RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

JUDGE RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT 1 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 11 Marc A Fenster Email mafenster@raklaw.corn Jeffrey Liao Email: iliao@raklaw.com Andrew D. Weiss Email: aweiss@raldaw.com RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Boulevard Twelfth

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No. 1 1 1 1 1 1 WORDLOGIC CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation and 01 BRITISH COLUMBIA LTD., a Canadian corporation, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiffs, TOUCHTYPE

More information

Information Security & Negligence Targeting the C-Class

Information Security & Negligence Targeting the C-Class Information Security & Negligence Targeting the C-Class By Carter Schoenberg Numerous recommendations since September 11, 2001 have been published on the evils of negligence relative to protecting one

More information

Issues in Software Licensing, Acquisition and

Issues in Software Licensing, Acquisition and Issues in Software Licensing, Acquisition and Development July 18, 2013 David Jennings Context For Our Purposes; What s a license? Fundamentally, it is a permission to do something(s). A license conveys

More information

INVALID LIKE OIL AND WATER: US DECISION PLACES MIXED CLAIMS IN JEOPARDY. by Christopher J. Palermo (Foreign Member)

INVALID LIKE OIL AND WATER: US DECISION PLACES MIXED CLAIMS IN JEOPARDY. by Christopher J. Palermo (Foreign Member) Christopher J. Palermo Hickman Palermo Truong & Becker LLP 2055 Gateway Place Suite 550 San Jose, California 95110 USA Tel. +1-408-414-1202 - cpalermo@hptb-law.com 1,800 words INVALID LIKE OIL AND WATER:

More information

Case 6:15-cv-00059 Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv-00059 Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 Case 6:15-cv-00059 Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case

More information

Case 1:12-cv-01105-RBJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv-01105-RBJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:12-cv-01105-RBJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. JERALD A. BOVINO, v. Plaintiff, APPLE, INC.,

More information

Out of the cloud of Cloud Computing. Adv. Ehud Hausman, Patent Attorney, Head of Hi-Tech Dept. ehhausman@rcip.co.il

Out of the cloud of Cloud Computing. Adv. Ehud Hausman, Patent Attorney, Head of Hi-Tech Dept. ehhausman@rcip.co.il Out of the cloud of Cloud Computing Adv. Ehud Hausman, Patent Attorney, Head of Hi-Tech Dept. ehhausman@rcip.co.il September 14, 2011 Our Fields Of Expertise Patent and Designs - Hi-tech, Biotech and Pharma,

More information

Entrepreneur-in-Residence Programs Key Legal Issues

Entrepreneur-in-Residence Programs Key Legal Issues Entrepreneur-in-Residence Programs Key Legal Issues July 2004 2486113 Introduction Informal entrepreneur-in-residence ("EIR") programs are a traditional feature of the private equity industry Recently,

More information

Intellectual Property Overview

Intellectual Property Overview Intellectual Property Overview Sanjiv Chokshi, Esq. Assistant General Counsel For Patents and Intellectual Property Office of General Counsel Fenster Hall- Suite 480 (973) 642-4285 Chokshi@njit.edu Intellectual

More information

Performance Marketing Ass n, Inc. v. Hamer, Illinois Supreme Court, No. 114496, October 18, 2013

Performance Marketing Ass n, Inc. v. Hamer, Illinois Supreme Court, No. 114496, October 18, 2013 October 2013 Illinois Provisions of Click-Through Nexus Law Held Void The Illinois Supreme Court held that the definition provisions in Public Act 96-1544 (H.B. 3659), Laws 2011, the sales tax click-through

More information

EIGHT IS ENOUGH? NEW US FEE REGIME FORCES RE-THINKING CLAIM STRATEGIES. by Christopher J. Palermo*

EIGHT IS ENOUGH? NEW US FEE REGIME FORCES RE-THINKING CLAIM STRATEGIES. by Christopher J. Palermo* Christopher J. Palermo Hickman Palermo Truong & Becker LLP 1600 Willow Street San Jose, California 95125 USA Tel. +1-408-414-1202 - cpalermo@hptb-law.com 1,680 words EIGHT IS ENOUGH? NEW US FEE REGIME

More information

Case5:15-cv-02579-NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8

Case5:15-cv-02579-NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8 Case:-cv-0-NC Document Filed0// Page of KALPANA SRINIVASAN (0) ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com OLEG ELKHUNOVICH () oelkhunovich@susmangodfrey.com SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 0 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 0 Los

More information

Federal Circuit Clears the Way for Large False Patent Marking Fines. by Corina Tanasa January 27, 2010

Federal Circuit Clears the Way for Large False Patent Marking Fines. by Corina Tanasa January 27, 2010 Federal Circuit Clears the Way for Large False Patent Marking Fines by Corina Tanasa January 27, 2010 PATENT MARKING By statute, each patented product must be marked to collect maximum patent damages.

More information

2014 Federation of Tax Administrators Annual Meeting St. Petersburg, FL

2014 Federation of Tax Administrators Annual Meeting St. Petersburg, FL 2014 Federation of Tax Administrators Annual Meeting St. Petersburg, FL Third-party Enforcement Actions Infringement on Tax Administration & Tax Policy Marilyn A. Wethekam Brian Hamer Horwood Marcus &

More information

From Ideation to Product Solutions Managing Intellectual Property and Translating Science to Practical Applications

From Ideation to Product Solutions Managing Intellectual Property and Translating Science to Practical Applications From Ideation to Product Solutions Managing Intellectual Property and Translating Science to Practical Applications Joshua Nelson Program Manager, TREAT Overview Introduce Simbex and the Center for Translation

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PRINTERON INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:13-CV-3025 v. JURY DEMANDED BREEZYPRINT CORPORATION and U.S. HOSPITALITY

More information

Master Software Purchase Agreement

Master Software Purchase Agreement Master Software Purchase Agreement This Master Software Purchase Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into as of Wednesday, March 12, 2014 (the Effective Date ) by and between with principal offices at (

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BLACK & HAMILL LLP Bradford J. Black (SBN 1) bblack@bchllp.com Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 1) ahamill@bchllp.com Embarcadero Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 1 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: -- DESMARAIS

More information

PERFORCE End User License Agreement for Open Source Software Development

PERFORCE End User License Agreement for Open Source Software Development Perforce Open Source End User License Agreement Page 1 1. Introduction PERFORCE End User License Agreement for Open Source Software Development This is a License Agreement ( Agreement ) between Perforce

More information

Patent Protection for Inventions Implemented In Software

Patent Protection for Inventions Implemented In Software Patent Protection for Inventions Implemented In Software ABPI Annual Conference 2014 August 26, 2014 Sao Paulo, Brazil By: Philip R. Wadsworth VP & Legal Counsel, Global IP Qualcomm Inc. Disclaimer: The

More information

TaxSaverNetwork. Terms of Service

TaxSaverNetwork. Terms of Service TaxSaverNetwork Terms of Service 1031 Exchange Advantage (1031 EA, LLC) provides 1031 accommodation services for investors to conclude a 1031 exchange under IRC code regulations. 1031 EA, LLC structures,

More information

REASONS FOR DECISION

REASONS FOR DECISION BL O/361/04 PATENTS ACT 1977 9 December 2004 APPLICANT Epic Systems Corporation ISSUE Whether patent application number GB 0415595.8 complies with section 1(2) HEARING OFFICER G M Rogers REASONS FOR DECISION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT

More information

Settlement Traps for the Unwary

Settlement Traps for the Unwary Settlement Traps for the Unwary Orange County Bar Association Intellectual Property/Technology Law August 21, 2006 Steve Comer Jae Hong Lee, MD, MPH 2005 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved 3 Cases

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ACQIS LLC, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., Case No. 6:11-CV-546 Jury Trial Demanded

More information

Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market. Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012

Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market. Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012 Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012 Overview Regulation of Products» Federal agencies» State laws Product Liability Lawsuits»

More information

Consumers and Businesses May Claim Microsoft Settlement Benefits

Consumers and Businesses May Claim Microsoft Settlement Benefits SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Consumers and Businesses May Claim Microsoft Settlement Benefits A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SMARTFLASH LLC, and SMARTFLASH TECHNOLOGIES

More information

Linklaters Knowledge Portal Terms of Use

Linklaters Knowledge Portal Terms of Use Linklaters Knowledge Portal Terms of Use These terms of use govern access by an individual to information provided by Linklaters through the Linklaters Knowledge Portal. 1 Definitions Information means

More information

Application Programming Interface (API) Application (app) - The API app is the connector between epages and the developers service.

Application Programming Interface (API) Application (app) - The API app is the connector between epages and the developers service. Developer Program 0. Preamble epages is the owner and vendor of the online shop software epages which enables merchants to run their online shop in the cloud. epages provides a developer program for third

More information

TRIPS Article 27 Patentable Subject Matter

TRIPS Article 27 Patentable Subject Matter TRIPS Article 27 Patentable Subject Matter 1. Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3, patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology,

More information

Slaying the Patent Troll: Learning to Throw Lightning Bolts

Slaying the Patent Troll: Learning to Throw Lightning Bolts Slaying the Patent Troll: Learning to Throw Lightning Bolts Presented to Association of Corporate Counsel, South/Central Texas Chapter Presented By: William B. Nash Haynes and Boone, LLC Phone: 210-978-7477

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ALLURE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No. NEST LABS, INC., a Delaware corporation, GREEN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BROADBAND GRAPHICS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BROADBAND GRAPHICS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, 0 Devon Zastrow Newman (State Bar # ) Johnathan E. Mansfield (State Bar # ) SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT SW TH Avenue, Suite 00 Phone: (0) - Fax: (0) -00 Email: dnewman@schwabe.com Email: jmansfield@schwabe.com

More information

FisherBroyles A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

FisherBroyles A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP Intellectual Property Law Update We hope everyone is enjoying springtime! In this issue, we address: The use of patent and trade secret strategies to protect ideas; The recent copyright law case involving

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA and ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., v. Plaintiffs, CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS LTD., Defendant.

More information

Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiff, C.A. No.: v.

More information

Hunt Biggs LLP is a multi-discipline practice existing under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada and the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Hunt Biggs LLP is a multi-discipline practice existing under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada and the Law Society of Upper Canada. Hunt Biggs LLP provides a full range of Intellectual Property Services. Our goal is to deliver personalized high quality Intellectual Property services in a direct, approachable and cost effective way.

More information

[This article originally appeared in the spring 2011 issue of Intellectual Property News, an

[This article originally appeared in the spring 2011 issue of Intellectual Property News, an Method vs. apparatus and software claims by Larry B. Donovan [This article originally appeared in the spring 2011 issue of Intellectual Property News, an electronic newsletter published on OhioBar.org.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A, v. Plaintiffs, RACKSPACE HOSTING, INC. and RACKSPACE US, INC., Defendants.

More information

Understanding the Legal Risks of Cloud Computing. Navigating the Network Security and Data Privacy Issues Associated with Cloud Services

Understanding the Legal Risks of Cloud Computing. Navigating the Network Security and Data Privacy Issues Associated with Cloud Services Understanding the Legal Risks of Cloud Computing Navigating the Network Security and Data Privacy Issues Associated with Cloud Services 2012 Thomson Reuters/Aspatore All rights reserved. Printed in the

More information

PATENT LITIGATION IN MEXICO: OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY

PATENT LITIGATION IN MEXICO: OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY PATENT LITIGATION IN MEXICO: OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES IN PATENT LITIGATION IN MEXICO Global E-Commerce Law and Business Report. September, 2003. Patent infringement actions. The Mexican

More information

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MASTER GRANT CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARDS

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MASTER GRANT CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARDS MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MASTER GRANT CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARDS DRAFT for Discussion Only 8.22.14 THIS MASTER GRANT CONTRACT, and amendments and supplements thereto, is between the State

More information

Excess Lawyers Professional Liability Policy DECLARATIONS. Attaching to and forming part of

Excess Lawyers Professional Liability Policy DECLARATIONS. Attaching to and forming part of Excess Lawyers Professional Liability Policy DECLARATIONS Attaching to and forming part of THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE EXCESS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY AND DISCUSS WITH YOUR INSURANCE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VERINT SYSTEMS INC. and VERINT AMERICAS INC. Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. CALLCOPY INC. Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs,

More information

MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS MICROSOFT DYNAMICS CRM 2011 BUSINESS READY LICENSING

MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS MICROSOFT DYNAMICS CRM 2011 BUSINESS READY LICENSING MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS MICROSOFT DYNAMICS CRM 2011 BUSINESS READY LICENSING These license terms are an agreement between Microsoft Corporation (or based on where you live, one of its affiliates)

More information

THOMSON REUTERS (TAX & ACCOUNTING) INC. FOREIGN NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TERMS OF USE

THOMSON REUTERS (TAX & ACCOUNTING) INC. FOREIGN NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TERMS OF USE THOMSON REUTERS (TAX & ACCOUNTING) INC. FOREIGN NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TERMS OF USE 1. License and Permitted Use The Foreign National Information System (FNIS) is licensed, not sold. Subject to the

More information

~~~~~N~~A~T~ ~~~~.S~~~H~~~~~5 LEM ENT ~~PR~~~ ~~~~c~~ ~~~~~

~~~~~N~~A~T~ ~~~~.S~~~H~~~~~5 LEM ENT ~~PR~~~ ~~~~c~~ ~~~~~ v~ ~~~~~N~~A~T~ ~~~~.S~~~H~~~~~5 LEM ENT ~~PR~~~ ~~~~c~~ ~~~~~ No. SJC - 11800 Suffolk County Chris E. Maling & another, Plaintiffs/Appellants v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. &

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL The Superior Court has authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

RESIDENTIAL LIMITED COVERAGE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION POLICY Issued By WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY

RESIDENTIAL LIMITED COVERAGE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION POLICY Issued By WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RESIDENTIAL LIMITED COVERAGE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION POLICY Issued By WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company

More information

Drafting a Teaming Agreement

Drafting a Teaming Agreement Drafting a Teaming Agreement It is common for contractors to join together to compete for government contracts under teaming agreements. Teaming arrangements allow companies to compete for government contracts

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)

More information

Leads may be resubmitted within 4 months of the leads license renewal date.

Leads may be resubmitted within 4 months of the leads license renewal date. 1. LEAD GENERATION SERVICES (a) IBP agrees to collect and provide School with Leads as further specified herein and as described in the Lead Payment Schedule as may be executed by the parties from time

More information

From I.P to N.P A Call for a New Paradigm. Dr A. Schwartz

From I.P to N.P A Call for a New Paradigm. Dr A. Schwartz From I.P to N.P A Call for a New Paradigm Dr A. Schwartz The Innovative Pharmaceutical business model Big Pharma identifies unmet clinical need Innovator loses Revenue on Older Products, Necessitating

More information

Do s And Don ts For Claim Drafting: A Litigator s Perspective

Do s And Don ts For Claim Drafting: A Litigator s Perspective Do s And Don ts For Claim Drafting: A Litigator s Perspective Presented by: Steven Katz ~ Fish & Richardson P.C. (617) 521-7803 katz@fr.com Five Recommendations 1. Consider How Infringement Will Be Proven

More information

WILLIAM GALLAGHER ASSOCIATES

WILLIAM GALLAGHER ASSOCIATES WILLIAM GALLAGHER ASSOCIATES It's Not Just the Insurance Clause Unintended Consequences of Onerous Contract Terms April 5, 2006 TODAY S S PANEL Moderator: Edward J. Flanagan, CPCU William Gallagher Associates

More information

Case3:12-cv-01212-JSW Document28 Filed04/27/12 Page1 of 37

Case3:12-cv-01212-JSW Document28 Filed04/27/12 Page1 of 37 Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0// Page of 0 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 0) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. ) jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Kevin A. Smith (Bar No. 0) kevinsmith@quinnemanuel.com

More information

Intellectual property experts SPAIN

Intellectual property experts SPAIN Intellectual property experts SPAIN Roland & Douglas Patentes y Marcas Protection and strategy: the mainstays of defending our clients interests Roland & Douglas Patentes y Marcas Roland & Douglas is

More information

Patent Infringement and Declaratory Judgment

Patent Infringement and Declaratory Judgment Patent Infringement and Declaratory Judgment U.S. Supreme Court Holds That a Patentee Has the Burden of Proving Infringement in a Declaratory Judgment Action Brought by a Licensee SUMMARY The U.S. Supreme

More information

Case 1:13-cv-00116-LY Document 1 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:13-cv-00116-LY Document 1 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Case 1:13-cv-00116-LY Document 1 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:13cv116 v.

More information

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any

More information

CLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION

CLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION CLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP 150 E. 42

More information

NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS

NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee

More information

CLIENT REFERRAL AGREEMENT

CLIENT REFERRAL AGREEMENT CLIENT REFERRAL AGREEMENT This CLIENT REFERRAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made by, and between, JBH Processing and Paul Jones("REFERRER"), effective as of, 2010. 1. Reporting In the event Referrer receives

More information

THE JOHN MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL CENTER FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW. 53 rd ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

THE JOHN MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL CENTER FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW. 53 rd ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW THE JOHN MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL CENTER FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 53 rd ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Strategies Regarding Patent Exhaustion After Quanta Timothy C.

More information

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Cono A. Carrano (pro hac vice to be filed) Email: ccarrano@akingump.com David C. Vondle (Bar

More information