1 NAO NOAA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Issued 2/13/98; Effective 2/6/98 (as amended: AM #1-9/25/98; AM #2-6/26/03 (also, certain pages were amended 6/10/98 - in truth, only a reissue in order to correct a misprint of appendices C & D) SECTION 1. PURPOSE. This Order establishes policy and procedures for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) General Workforce Performance Appraisal Program. SECTION 2. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITIES. The legal requirements and authorities described in title 5, United States Code, Chapter 43(5 U.S.C. Chapter 43) Subchapter I; title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 430(5 CFR Part 430), Subparts A and B; and the Department of Commerce (DOC) Performance Appraisal System Description approved by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management on August 19, 1996, apply. SECTION 3. POLICY AND OBJECTIVES. It is the policy of NOAA that, within the framework provided by this program, individual and organizational goals will be communicated to employees, individual responsibility for accomplishing team and organizational goals will be identified, performance will be evaluated and improved where necessary, and the results of performance management will be used as a basis for appropriate personnel actions. All participants in this process should expect to be held accountable for accomplishing their performance management responsibilities. SECTION 4. COVERAGE..01 The policies contained in this document apply to all NOAA employees except the following: a. Employees in the Senior Executive Service; b. Presidential appointees; c. Administrative law judges appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105; d. NOAA Corps Commissioned Officers; e. Positions for which employment is not reasonably expected to exceed 120 calendar days in a consecutive 12 month period; f. Employees outside the United States who are paid in accordance with local native prevailing wage rates;
2 g. Employees under demonstration projects authorized by 5 U.S.C. Chapter 47 where all or part of 5 CFR Part 430, Subpart B, are waived (e.g., DOC demonstration project); h. Individuals occupying positions, not in the competitive service, excluded from coverage by the Office of Personnel Management under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 4301(2)(G); and i. Experts and consultants..02 Any administrative action already initiated when this program becomes effective must continue to be processed consistent with the procedures and requirements of the program in effect when the action was initiated. SECTION 5. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this 0rder, the following definitions apply..01 Critical Element means a mission based outcome or end product that is essential to overall success in the position..02 Interim Rating is a summary level assigned during a rating cycle to document the performance of an employee who is changing positions (if the employee served in the position for 120 days or more) or is completing a detail or temporary promotion of 120 days or more. The interim rating is not a rating of record but is factored into the final summary level assigned the employee at the end of the rating cycle..03 Performance Indicator (performance standard as defined in 5 CFR ) means a statement of the performance expectations or requirements necessary for achieving the critical elements of the position. NOAA's generic performance indicators include quality, team work, and customer service measures, and they are designed to be a focal point for discussions between rating officials and employees throughout the rating period..04 Performance Plan means the employee's critical elements and the NOAA generic performance indicators..05 Progress Review means a discussion between the rating official and the employee held during the appraisal period to review the employee's progress toward achieving critical elements, to make any necessary revisions to the critical elements, and to consider any developmental needs or performance improvement required..06 Rating Official means the individual responsible for working with an employee to determine critical elements and identify performance indicators. The rating official conducts progress reviews and, at the end of the rating period, evaluates employee performance and prepares the rating of record. Rating officials may be supervisors, employees who meet the definition of a supervisor (Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA)) in 5 U.S.C. 7103(a)(10), or commissioned officers assigned to supervisory or supervisory (CSRA) positions.
3 .07 Rating Period means the period of time during which the employee's performance is observed for the purpose of assigning a rating of record. The official rating period is one year beginning October 1 and ending September 30. The official rating period for wage marines is one year beginning November 1 and ending October 31. The rating period can be extended for duties that warrant it, when an employee is on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), is unratable, or when other special circumstances dictate..08 Rating of Record means the official summary level signed and approved at the end of the rating period..09 Reviewing Official means the individual who is responsible for reviewing and approving "Does Not Meet Expectations" ratings. The reviewing official may review "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" ratings and perform other review functions as prescribed by the Line/Staff/Program Office..10 Summary Level means the rating (i.e., "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" or "Does Not Meet Expectations") assigned to describe the employee's overall performance..11 Unacceptable means a rating of "Does Not Meet Expectations" in one or more critical elements. It reflects unacceptable performance in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4301(3). SECTION 6. RESPONSIBILITIES..01 Employees are responsible for: a. participating with their rating official in determining critical elements and related performance indicators and revising them as necessary during the rating period; b. ensuring that they have a clear understanding of their rating official's expectations and requesting clarification if necessary; c. managing their performance to achieve critical elements and bringing circumstances that may affect achievement of critical elements to the rating official's attention; d. wherever possible, seeking performance feedback from their rating official and their internal and external customers; e. participating in discussions of their performance; and f. taking action to improve aspects of performance identified as needing improvement..02 Rating Officials are responsible for: a. determining critical elements and performance indicators with employee input and documenting them on the performance plan;
4 b. monitoring employee performance during the rating period and communicating with employees on an ongoing basis about their performance; c. conducting at least one progress review for each employee between the initial annual planning session and the end of the rating period; d. wherever possible, obtaining and using feedback from internal and external customers, team members, coworkers, or others as appropriate, concerning employee performance; e. assisting employees throughout the rating period in improving aspects of performance identified as needing improvement; f. preparing the rating of record and meeting with employees to discuss their individual ratings and developmental needs; g. recognizing employees who demonstrate high quality performance and ensuring that there is equity and consistency of consideration for Quality Step Increases in the organization for which they are responsible; h. taking remedial action, in accordance with 5 CFR 432, for employees who do not achieve one or more individual critical elements; i. maintaining ratings of record for four years in an Employee Performance File; and j. ensuring that, when an employee transfers to another agency, the employee's ratings of record for the last four years are transferred to the gaining agency..03 Reviewing Officials are responsible for reviewing and approving "Does Not Meet Expectations" ratings of record, and where required, for: a. reviewing and concurring in performance plans developed by rating officials and employees; b. reviewing and approving "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" ratings of record prepared by rating officials; and c. resolving with rating officials and employees their differences of opinion concerning employee ratings, and adjusting the ratings, if necessary..04 Line Office/Staff Office/Program Office (LO/SO/PO) Heads are responsible for: a. implementing and supporting the performance management program, documenting any discretionary options involving approval levels within the Office, and communicating the program elements to employees; and
5 b. developing, documenting, and implementing an award program for their Office, and communicating program information to employees..05 Human Resources Offices are responsible for: a. communicating the purpose and procedures of the performance management program and its relationship to the overall personnel management system to LO/SO/PO Heads; b. providing instruction on how to identify critical elements; c. providing training and/or orientation on the operation of the program for employees who are responsible for, or subject to, the system; d. coordinating and submitting required reports on the operation of the program; and e. participating in the development and implementation of a monitoring and evaluation program. SECTION 7. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS..01 The performance appraisal process involves three distinct stages: performance planning, progress review, and appraisal. Each stage of NOAA's program provides a point at which rating officials and employees shall meet to discuss performance objectives, assessment towards these objectives, and developmental opportunities to enhance performance. Furthermore, NOAA encourages continuous communication throughout the process, from development of the plan, through the progress reviews, and ending with the final appraisal. a. Performance Plan. Employee involvement in the development of these plans is consistent with 5 CFR which specifies that "Agencies shall encourage employee participation in establishing performance plans." 1. Critical Elements. (a) At the beginning of the rating period, the rating official will meet with the employee to identify two to five critical elements that the employee is expected to meet during the rating period. Critical elements must reflect major duties and responsibilities which are consistent with current job assignments and with the duties described in the employee's position description. Critical elements may address the individual results that an employee is expected to accomplish as well as an employee's individual participation in accomplishing team and organizational goals. In keeping with the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), critical elements should be mission related outcomes and reflect specific results outlined in the NOAA strategic plan and Office operating plans. The rating official will document the critical elements in Part I of the Performance Plan, Progress Review and Appraisal Record (Appendix A) within 60 days after the beginning of the rating period or when the employee has a significant change in critical elements. (b) For any job designated as supervisory, duties such as recommending or making human resources decisions, developing and appraising subordinates, fulfilling equal opportunity responsibilities and managing diversity, must be addressed in one or more critical elements.
6 2. NOAA Generic Performance Indicators. These performance indicators (NOAA's performance standards) are contained in Appendix B. The rating official will determine to what extent the quality, teamwork, and customer service performance indicators apply to each critical element. Definitions of the performance indicators are provided and must be discussed with the employee at the beginning of the rating period to ensure a common understanding of performance expectations. 3. Before the performance plan is signed by the employee and rating official, it will be reviewed, signed, and dated by the reviewing official, in those offices where a reviewing official is required. If the rating and reviewing officials do not concur, the reviewing official will make the final determination. 4. The employee and rating official will sign and date the performance plan in Part B of the Form CD 516, Classification and Performance Management Record (Appendix C). The employee's signature indicates that the performance plan has been discussed with the employee; it does not certify that the employee concurs with the plan. 5. The rating official will provide a copy of the signed performance plan to the employee. The performance plan can be modified by the rating official and employee during a progress review or at any other time during the rating period. 6. When an employee enters a covered position or changes positions after the start of the appraisal period, a performance plan must be established and approved within 60 days of the effective date of the appointment to the new position. 7. When an employee is detailed or temporarily promoted to a covered position and is expected to serve in the position for120 days or more, the employee must have an approved performance plan within 60 days of the beginning of the detail or temporary promotion. b. Progress Review. 1. Rating officials must conduct at least one progress review with each employee between the initial annual planning session and the end of the rating period. At the conclusion of each progress review, the rating official and employee will initial and date Part II of the Performance Plan, Progress Review and Appraisal Record. 2. During each progress review, the rating official and employee will discuss the employee's progress toward achieving critical elements, any necessary revisions in critical elements, and any performance improvement or developmental needs. In the event that the employee has not had an opportunity to perform a critical element, the performance plan should be modified or action should be taken to ensure that the employee is given an opportunity to perform that critical element. 3. For an employee who meets performance expectations for critical elements, progress review discussions may be summarized in Part II. For an employee who is not meeting expectations, the
7 rating official must document the specific problem areas and describe how performance must be improved in order to obtain a "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" rating. c. Appraisal. 1. Eligibility for Rating. To be eligible for a summary level and/or rating of record, an employee must have worked under a performance plan for at least 120 days. 2. Critical Element Rating. Within 30 days following the end of the rating period, the rating official will consider the employee's performance during the rating period and assign a rating of "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" or "Does Not Meet Expectations" for each critical element. Rating officials will obtain feedback concerning the employee's performance from the employee and, as appropriate, from internal and external customers, coworkers, team members, or other individuals who have knowledge of the employee's performance. 3. Summary Level. An employee must have met or exceeded expectations for all critical elements based on individual performance in order to be assigned a summary level of "Meets or Exceeds Expectations." An employee who does not meet expectations for one or more critical elements based on individual performance will receive a summary level of "Does Not Meet Expectations." (a) For employees assigned a summary level of "Meets or Exceeds Expectations," the rating official is encouraged to include narrative comments in Part III of the Performance Plan, Progress Review and Appraisal Record. For employees assigned a summary level of "Does Not Meet Expectations," the rating official must provide a written explanation describing the specific areas in which the employee failed to achieve critical elements and the employee must be placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP). (b) A "Does Not Meet Expectations" rating of record, assigned by the rating official, must be approved by the reviewing official. (c) A "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" rating of record is reviewable at LO/SO/PO discretion subject to provisions of paragraph 6.04 of this Order. If the rating and reviewing officials do not concur, the reviewing official will make the final determination. 4. Interim Ratings, Extension Periods, and Other Special Circumstances. (a) An employee who did not work under a performance plan for 120 days during the rating period will have the rating period extended no longer than 119 days to allow the employee to work under a performance plan for 120 days. The rating official will rate the employee's performance once the 120 days are completed. (b) When an employee changes positions during the rating period, the rating official in the employee's former position must prepare an interim rating, provided the employee has worked under a performance plan for at least 120 days. This rating will be taken into consideration in preparing the employee's annual rating of record at the end of the rating period.
8 (c) When an employee is detailed or temporarily promoted during the rating period, the rating official on the temporary assignment must prepare an interim rating, provided the employee has worked under a performance plan for at least 120 days. This rating will be taken into consideration in preparing the employee's annual rating of record at the end of the rating period. (d) If an employee has served on a detail to another Federal agency for 120 days or more during the appraisal cycle, or an assignment in a Federally sponsored program such as Intergovernmental Personnel Act or President's Executive Exchange, the rating official must make a reasonable effort to obtain an interim summary level from the other agency on the employee's performance on the detail or assignment. If the interim rating is obtained, it must be considered in deriving the employee's rating of record at the end of the appraisal cycle. If the employee has served for the entire rating cycle on detail to another agency and an appraisal of performance cannot be obtained despite reasonable efforts, the employee's current rating of record must be extended. If the employee has no current rating of record, the employee must be considered unratable and treated as though having received a "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" rating. (e) If an employee has begun, but not completed, an opportunity period to improve performance to an acceptable level as of the last day of the appraisal period, the rating will be deferred until the completion of the opportunity period. (f) When a rating official changes positions or leaves with less than 120 days remaining in the appraisal period, ratings must be completed for the employees. These ratings will serve as the rating of record for the appraisal period and the time remaining in the appraisal period will be included in the following appraisal period. Such appraisals will be effective on the date of the transfer of the rating official. (g) If an employee has not served in a position of record for 120 days of the appraisal period, but has served in one other position for which an interim rating was prepared, that interim rating will become the employee's rating of record for the appraisal cycle. 5. Unratable. (a) An employee may be unratable because of entry into a position within the last 119 days of the appraisal period; time in a non pay status; long term training; service on a Federally sponsored program such as an Intergovernmental Personnel Act or President's Executive Exchange assignment for which appraisal information is not available; the rating official's leaving the agency where no other rating official can reasonably appraise the employee's performance; service on detail to another Federal agency for which performance appraisal information is not available; or approved absence. (b) As stated in subparagraph 4. above, the current rating of record of an employee who is unratable on the last day of the appraisal period is extended if the employee is not working in a position which can provide the basis for appraisal (e.g., the employee is continuing on long term training) and is not expected to return to such a position within 120 days. If the employee has no
9 rating of record, the employee must be considered unratable and is treated as though having received a "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" rating..02 Appraisal Discussion. a. The employee may schedule a pre appraisal meeting with the rating official to present a self assessment of results achieved against the performance indicators set in the performance plan, inform the rating official of aspects of the work of which the rating official may not be aware, and identify objectives the employee would like to include in the performance plan for the next period. If a pre appraisal meeting is not initiated by the employee, the rating official may solicit a voluntary self assessment from the employee. b. Following any necessary approval of the annual rating of record, the rating official will discuss the rating and any developmental needs with the employee. The rating official will provide advance notice to the employee of the date and time for the formal appraisal meeting. c. Following the discussion, the rating official will ask the employee to sign Part IV of the Performance Plan, Progress Review and Appraisal Record to indicate that the rating has been discussed. If the employee declines to sign the rating, the rating official will so note on the form and include any written comments provided by the employee. d. If the employee disagrees with the rating and wishes to have a higher level review, the employee must give written comments within five workdays to the designated reviewing official (or the rating official's supervisor, if no reviewing official is designated). The reviewing official (or second line supervisor) has 10 workdays to respond to the employee in writing. The reviewing official must document any rating change on the CD 516. If the employee remains dissatisfied with the rating after receiving the reviewing official's response, the employee may file a formal administrative grievance or a negotiated grievance as appropriate. e. The rating official will ensure that the original of the rating of record, including any written comments provided by the employee, is included in the employee's Employee Performance File. The rating official will also ensure that a copy of the rating of record, with employee comments, is provided to the employee. SECTION 8. RELATIONSHIP OF SUMMARY LEVEL TO OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIONS..01 Within Grade Increase (WGI). An employee must have a current rating of record of "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" in order to be granted a WGI. An employee who has a current rating of record of "Does Not Meet Expectations" will not be granted a WGI until performance improves to the "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" level..02 Quality Step Increase (QSI). A QSI is an exceptional performance pay increase which provides faster than normal step increases for permanent general schedule employees who met all critical elements in their Performance Plan. This award is directly linked to the performance appraisal process. A QSI nomination must be accompanied by a Performance Plan, Progress
10 Review and Appraisal Record that reflects specific narrative examples (in Part III) of how expectations were exceeded in achieving all critical elements..03 Promotion. In order to receive a promotion, an employee must have a current rating of record of "Meets or Exceeds Expectations.".04 Training and Development. The performance plan, progress reviews, and summary level provide a basis and an opportunity to determine whether an employee's performance could be improved/enhanced by training or other developmental activities. Therefore, the rating official may use the rating of record as a basis for discussing the employee's developmental needs..05 Reduction in Force (RIF). a. For RIF purposes, ratings of record are those given at the end of the appraisal period or the extended appraisal period; or the improved rating following an opportunity to demonstrate acceptable performance. An employee must not be assigned a new rating of record for the sole purpose of affecting RIF retention standing. b. In a RIF, an employee will receive service credit based on an average of the employee's three most recent ratings of record received during the four year period prior to the date of issuance of a specific RIF notice (or some other officially designated date). An employee will receive service credit of 12 years for a "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" rating of record and zero (0) years of service credit for a "Does Not Meet Expectations" rating of record. An employee who does not have a rating of record will be assigned a modal rating (e.g., Meets or Exceeds), which is the most common rating given in the last appraisal cycle (see 5 CFR (c)), and receive 12 years of service credit. An employee who transfers into NOAA from another agency will receive service credit of 12 years for any rating at the Fully Successful (or equivalent) level or above..06 Awards. All awards, other than a QSI, are decoupled from the appraisal process and can be given at any time to recognize accomplishments or contributions as appropriate. Rating officials may submit employees for awards in accordance with their LO/SO/PO policy. A more detailed description of the NOAA awards program and policy is found in NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) Actions Based on Unacceptable Performance. a. If at any time during the rating period (provided the employee has been covered by a performance plan for at least 120 days) an employee's performance is determined to be unacceptable ("Does Not Meet Expectations") in one or more individual critical elements, the employee will be given a performance improvement plan (PIP) and an opportunity to demonstrate acceptable ("Meets or Exceeds Expectations") performance. If the employee's performance does not improve to the "Meets or Exceeds Expectations" level during the opportunity period, action will be initiated to reduce in grade, reassign, or remove the employee. NOTE: If the unacceptable determination does not coincide with the end of the rating period, there is no need to complete the Performance Plan, Progress Review and Appraisal Record.
11 b. An action based on unacceptable performance may be taken at any time, either during or at the end of the appraisal cycle. Except for the exclusions stated in Section 2 of Department Administrative Order (DAO) , "Reduction in Grade and Removal Based on Unacceptable Performance," before an employee may be removed or demoted for unacceptable performance under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. Chapter 43, the employee is entitled to be informed in writing of the critical element(s) in which performance is deficient; be assisted to improve performance to an acceptable level; and be given the opportunity to demonstrate acceptable performance. c. An employee whose performance is unacceptable must be notified in writing that the performance is unacceptable, and that the opportunity to improve the performance is being given. The written notice must also inform the employee of the critical elements in which performance is unacceptable and the performance standards required for retention. Such standards must be consistent with, and not more stringent than, the more generic standards stated in the plan. This formal notice will normally be preceded by some informal, oral feedback to the employee about the unacceptable performance. d. Once the employee is notified in writing of the unacceptable performance, reasonable time is granted to demonstrate acceptable performance. Neither law nor regulation specifies what that period of time must be. It depends on the nature of the job, the level of the position, and the consequences of unacceptable performance. In any case, the period of time allowed must be commensurate with the requirements of the position. The notice need not specify an exact period; however, it is good practice to specify a minimum period to display improvement (e.g., not less than 30 days). e. The efficacy of these notices may be increased by including the following information: specific examples of incidents, within the appraisal cycle, of unacceptable performance; where relevant, a description of the negative consequences of the performance deficiencies; a suggestion of steps the employee may take which would be expected to lead to improved performance such as, better work organization, time management, more follow up; a statement of the steps the rating official plans to take to assist the employee to improve (e.g., training, counseling or personal assistance, or monitoring work more closely); and an explicit statement of the possible consequence of failure to improve within a reasonable period of time (i.e., removal, demotion, or reassignment). SECTION 9. ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERSIGHT..01 Rating officials are held accountable for the judicious and timely execution of their performance management responsibilities. Accountability will be emphasized through all levels of the supervisory chain up to, and including, the senior executive level. LO/SO/PO Heads must certify to the Director for Human Resources Management within 60 days of the beginning of the rating cycle, that all employees under their management are covered by a performance plan and, within 60 days of the end of the rating cycle, that all such employees have been appraised (see Attachment). Correction action may be pursued for failure to comply with these requirements.
12 .02 The effectiveness of the performance appraisal system is assessed through NOAA's ongoing oversight program. Evaluations focus on: (1) the adequacy of performance plans and ratings as related to accomplishments associated with the NOAA strategic and operating plans; (2) the satisfaction of our supervisors and employees with the system; (3) our technical compliance with the pertinent laws, Office of Personnel Management regulations, and Department/NOAA policy; (4) the usefulness of the performance indicators in prompting meaningful feedback to employees during progress reviews and appraisal discussions; and (5) the ability of the system to adequately deal with employees who fail to meet performance expectations. SECTION 10. TRAINING AND INFORMATION. Human resources offices are responsible for establishing appropriate training and orientation programs on the purpose and procedures of the appraisal system. Rating officials must in turn communicate to their employees the basic tenets of the performance management program, emphasize performance plan development, foster ongoing and open feedback on performance, and make clear the relationship between performance ratings and other personnel decisions. SECTION 11. PROGRAM EVALUATION. The effectiveness of the performance appraisal program is assessed by its ability to meet the stated objectives for the program: simplification, better and increased feedback on performance, awards tied to results, and fostering teamwork. SECTION 12. RECORD KEEPING..01 Performance appraisal records and related documents will be maintained in accordance with the provisions of this document, the Privacy Act, the Freedom of Information Act, other legislative and regulatory requirements, and negotiated agreements. a. Maintenance of the Employee Performance Folder (EPF) is delegated to the rating official. Performance ratings of record and the performance plans on which those ratings were based must be retained for four years. Performance records that are superseded (e.g., through an administrative or judicial procedure) must be destroyed. b. Except where prohibited by law, automated records may be retained longer than four years for purposes of statistical analysis as long as the data are not used in any action affecting the employee when the manual record has been or should have been destroyed..02 When an employee transfers from one LO/SO/PO to another, from one operating unit to another within the Department, or to another Federal agency, the following performance records must be transferred: (1) performance ratings of record that are four years old or less; (2) the plan on which the most recent rating of record is based; and (3) the interim rating prepared when the employee changes positions.
13 .03 The Servicing Human Resources Office will obtain performance records from other Federal agencies when employees transfer to NOAA. The EPFs will be requested from the former agency at the same time as the Official Personnel Folder..04 Disclosure of performance related information must be made only as permitted by the Privacy Act. SECTION 13. EFFECT ON OTHER ISSUANCES. This Order supersedes NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) , NOAA Performance Management System, dated June 16, SIGNED, Acting Chief Financial Officer/Acting Chief Administrative Officer Attachments Appendices A, B, and C - refer to the html version of this Order Attachment - Annual Certification
14 Annual Certification Performance Plan, Progress (Appendix A C) [NOTE: These are downloadable from NOAA s Human Resources Website under the FORMS section] Office of Primary Interest: Office of Finance and Administration Human Resources Management Office Amendment 1 to NAO Attachment (Revised 9/25/98) (Due December 1 of each year) I certify that all employees within the Line/Staff/Program Office have received Meets or Exceeds Expectations performance appraisals for the rating cycle ending September 30, except those cited for the reasons below. Does Not Meet Expectations." The following employees received Does Not Meet Expectations ratings: Org Code Name SSN Extensions. The following employees did not complete the minimum 120 days work under a performance plan to be rated as of September 30th. They will complete 120 days under their current performance standards and will be rated on the date shown: Org Code Name SSN Scheduled Date of Rating Unratables. The following employees cannot be rated for the reason shown (such as: time in a non pay status; long term training; assignment on an IPA or detail to another Federal agency for which performance appraisal information is not available; or approved absence): Org Code Name SSN Scheduled Date of Rating New Plan Certification. I also certify that all employees within the Line/Staff/Program Office who are in covered positions and are not exceptions as noted above, have received performance plans for the new appraisal cycle. This includes employees on time limited appointments which are projected to extend beyond the first 119 days of the rating cycle.
3 FAM 2820 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE AND PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES 3 FAM 2821 GENERAL 3 FAM 2821.1 Authorities (Office of Origin: HR/CSHRM) The authorities cited for this subchapter
Department of Homeland Security Management Directives System MD Number: 3181 Issue Date: 3/23/2006 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT I. Purpose This Management Directive (MD) is an implementing directive as defined
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS) 1. DATE ISSUED CHAPTER S430_1 2. EMPLOYEES COVERED 3. LAW AND REGULATION 4. SSA DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY 5. SSA POLICY 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Overview
Technician Personnel Regulation 430 Performance Management National Guard Technician Performance Appraisal Program Departments of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau Arlington, VA 22202-3231
U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington, D.C. 20250 DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION SUBJECT: Performance Management NUMBER: 4040-430 DATE: September 30, 2013 OPI: Office of Human Resources Management Section
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE OF DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS 2461 EISENHOWER AVENUE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22331-1100 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Dependents SCHOOLS REGULATION SYSTEM TRANSMITTAL DS Regulation 5430.9
Office of Personnel Management 430.102 Subpart D Executive Development 412.401 Continuing executive development. (a) Each agency must establish a program or programs for the continuing development of its
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia POLICY STATEMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM I. COVERAGE This Policy Statement covers all Court Services and Offender Supervision
33 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Executive Performance Management System December 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose... 1 1.2 Policy..2 1.3 Authority 2 1.4 References..
Director of Administration and Management ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION NUMBER 63 November 9, 2012 Change 1, Effective September 22, 2015 HRD, WHS SUBJECT: Performance Appraisal System for General Schedule,
SUBCHAPTER 430 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS PAGE A. Purpose 430-1 B. Policy 430-1 C. Performance Appraisal 430-2 D. Awards 430-2 E. Responsibilities 430-2 APPENDIX A, DOD Performance
Defense Logistics Agency INSTRUCTION DLAI 1426.02 Effective June 20, 2014 DLA HQ J14 SUBJECT: Performance Management Program for Non-Supervisory General Schedule and Federal Wage System Employees References:
Pt. 430 appointment may not be used to fill an agency s regular positions on a continuing basis. (3) Schedule B appointments must be made in the same manner as merit staffing requirements prescribed for
Department of Homeland Security Management Directive System MD Number: 3180 SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 1. Purpose This directive establishes Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy
Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS Department of the Navy Handbook Version 2.0 September 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 BACKGROUND 3 WHO IS COVERED?
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 MCO 12430.2 MPO-30 MARINE CORPS ORDER 12430.2 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution
Department of Veterans Affairs VA HANDBOOK 5013/1 Washington, DC 20420 Transmittal Sheet November 18, 2003 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 1. REASON FOR ISSUE: To revise Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
DFAS 1426.3-R DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE (DFAS) PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FOREWORD This regulations sets forth the
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
Bonneville Power Administration Performance Management Program Policy This document contains DOE Order 331.1C, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program and Bonneville Power Administration
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP) Section 1.0 The Agency retains the right to determine how much of its budget will be allocated for performance awards. Should
MS 620 Direct Hire Merit Selection and Promotion Effective Date: January 7, 2013 Responsible Office: Human Resource Management Supersedes: 2/2/11; 07/05/95; MS 620-1/9/84, 11/22/76 MS261-8/4/87 Related
Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CENTRAL REGION SUPPLEMENT 06-2005 APPLICABLE TO 1-401 June 14, 2011 Employee Recognition
Performance Appraisal Systems INTRODUCTION There are a number of regulatory provisions that guide the design and development of performance appraisal systems. These provisions are presented on the following
Revision Date: First Version Page: 1 of 10 I. SCOPE This policy applies to all salaried operational employees of the College of William and Mary, including the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (hereafter
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 36-1001 1 JULY 1999 Personnel MANAGING THE CIVILIAN PERFORMANCE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND WINTHROP UNIVERSITY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS DOCUMENT DOES
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Senior Executive And Organizational Performance Management System July 2008 Revised 11/13/07 page 0 HHS Senior Executive and Organizational Performance Management
Senior Executive Service Performance Management System U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1. System Coverage The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (hereafter referred to as the agency) Senior Executive Service
South Dakota Parental Rights and Procedural Safeguards Special Education Programs Revised July 2011 Prior Written Notice... 1 Definition of Parental Consent... 3 Definition of a Parent... 3 Parental Consent...
MS 601 Administration of the Peace Corps Direct Hire Personnel System Effective Date: January 7, 2013 Responsible Office: Human Resource Management (M/HRM) Supersedes: 5/25/12; 2/2/11; 7/27/10; 07/15/98;
Aligns employee performance plans with organizational goals Focuses employees on achieving results Requires employee performance plans to include clear performance elements (expectations) with measurable
1. System Coverage Senior Executive Service Performance Management System [Agency Name] The [Agency Name] (hereafter referred to as the agency) Senior Executive Service (SES) performance management system
MPC-10 MARINE CORPS ORDER 12920.1B From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MANAGEMENT OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) AND OTHER SENIOR EXECUTIVE POSITIONS IN THE MARINE CORPS
Guidance for Completing the Supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Establishing Critical Elements and Performance Standards Critical elements (at least one, but not more than five) must be established
FFAS HANDBOOK Performance Management System For FSA, RMA, and FAS Offices (Except Foreign Service) SHORT REFERENE 5-PM (Revision 10) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRIULTURE Farm Service Agency Washington,
Form 1221-2 (June 1969) Subject UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET MS 1221 DIRECTIVES MANUAL Release 1-1759 Date 7/25/2014 1. Explanation of Materials
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1400.25, Volume 2012 April 28, 2012 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: DoD Civilian Personnel Management System: Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System (DCIPS) Performance-Based
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL POLICY (Revised and Effective 11/1/09) THE LANGUAGE USED IN THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT CREATE AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE EMPLOYEE AND THE AGENCY. THIS DOCUMENT
EFFECTIVE: 05 December 2012 SUPERSEDES: 16 March 2011 AUTHORITY: Council RATIFIED BY: Council 24 October 2012 Executive Council 30 October 2012 RELATED DOCUMENTS: By-Law #1 PAGE 1 of 9 of UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Merit Staffing Policy 335.1 CHAPTER 3. FILLING A POSITION THROUGH MERIT STAFFING PROCEDURES 3-1 Position Management and Classification Considerations When a position is to be vacated, managers have the
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Employee Name and Social Security Number: Title/Series/Grade: Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Part A-1: Notification of Standards:
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1400.25, Volume 1800 December 1996 incorporating through Change 5, June 7, 2007 Administratively reissued April 6, 2009 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: DoD Civilian Personnel
8.0 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REVIEW 8.10 AUTHORITY AND SCOPE Section 25-9-119(2)(c)(ii)(B) Mississippi Code of 1972, Annotated, as amended, requires the State Personnel Board and Director to provide a system
EFFECTIVE: 30 October 2012 SUPERSEDES: 16 March 2011 AUTHORITY: Council RATIFIED BY: Council 24 October 2012 Executive Council 30 October 2012 RELATED DOCUMENTS: By-Law #1 PAGE 1 of 9 of UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Working Smarter for America The Department of the Interior s Performance Appraisal Handbook A Guide for Managers/Supervisors and Employees Office of the Secretary Office of Human Resources 10/4/04 #370DM430HB-1
1. PURPOSE Employee Performance Management System The purpose of the Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) is as follows: A. To provide an accurate and objective method to evaluate classified and
Senior Executive Service (SES) Question Answer OPM URL 1 What is the basis for the Senior Executive Service? 2 What are the different types of SES positions? 3 What are the different types of SES appointments?
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
5-1 CASH MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES HANDBOOK CHAPTER 5. CASH ADVANCES Section 1.0 General This chapter prescribes the policies and procedures to be observed by organization units when making cash
Employee Performance Evaluation System Evaluator Handbook (June 2015) Personnel Cabinet Department of Human Resources Administration Performance Management Program State Office Building 501 High Street
Legislative Language SEC. 1. COORDINATION OF FEDERAL INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY. (a) IN GENERAL. Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking subchapters II and III and inserting
Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors Dated as of April 27, 2015 1. Purpose The Audit Committee is a committee of the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Yamana Gold Inc. (the Company
DEFINITIONS Annual Appraisal the performance evaluation conducted once a year that goes in an employee s permanent record. Appointing Authority Agency head or designee who is responsible for final review
H. R. 2458 48 (1) maximize the degree to which unclassified geographic information from various sources can be made electronically compatible and accessible; and (2) promote the development of interoperable
Chapter 451 Awards and Recognition Page 1 1.1 Purpose. This policy defines the options and requirements for recognizing individual and group achievement and acknowledging contributions that lead to achievement
A.R. Number: 5.7 Effective Date: 2/1/2007 Page: 1 of 9 I. PURPOSE A. This policy outlines the Employee Performance Evaluation System (EPES) and the process to be followed for evaluating City of Richmond
October 10, 2012 PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE/PPD-19 SUBJECT: Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information This Presidential Policy Directive ensures that employees (1) serving in the
Policy Memorandum No. 5 - FY 2009 TO: FROM: Elected Officials, Agency Directors, and Personnel Officers State Government Agencies Don Thompson (signed) State Personnel Director DATE: April 17, 2008 SUBJECT:
SUPERVISORY MANUAL Performance Appraisal System For a New Century State Workforce State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development July 1, 2001 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM POLICY STATEMENT Public
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY AUTHORITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE THE LANGUAGE USED IN THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT CREATE AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE EMPLOYEE
DMA POLICY: 3-05-01-2013 NAME: PAY PLAN POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1.2013 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to summarize the Department program for implementing compensation under the broadband
Introduction to the Position Classification Standards (Also See The Classifier s Handbook) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I. BACKGROUND... 2 A. Statutory Basis...2 B. Classification Standards Issuances... 2
Performance Management for DOI General Workforce Nancy Miller Chief of Labor and Employee Relations Department of the Interior 202-208 208-6754 Background FY07 Marks the third year under DOI s five-level
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) Revised April 2015 1 Introduction Performance management is an ongoing process of communication between a supervisor and an employee that occurs throughout the year,
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE COLORADO JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NUMBER 171-13-63 A. SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION 1. The United States Department of
Army Regulation 690 400 Civilian Personnel Chapter 4302 Total Army Performance Evaluation System Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 16 October 1998 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 690
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1400.25-V2011 August 14, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, January 15, 2010 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: DoD Civilian Personnel Management System: Defense Civilian Intelligence
Performance Management S TA F F D E V E L O P M E N T & T R A I N I N G Performance Objectives Identify the definition of Performance Management. Identify the Performance Management process. Identify the
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS Tennessee Department of Education Division of Special Education Department of Education February 11, 2008; Publication Authorization