Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation
|
|
- Bruce Henderson
- 2 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation Psychologist: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning Psychologist uses a wide range of assessment Psychologist consistently uses a range of Psychologist inconsistently uses the instruments, along with other performance assessment instruments, along with the appropriate assessment instruments to data to evaluate students, as well as incorporation of performance data to evaluate students. demonstrates the ability to incorporate the evaluate students and determine necessary diagnostic activities in order to accurate diagnoses. achieve a meaningful outcome for students in an evaluative process. 1a Demonstrating knowledge and skill in the implementation of assessment instruments to evaluate students 1b Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent development in order to establish goals for student programming 1c Establishing goals for the psychological services appropriate to the settings and students served Psychologist demonstrates extensive development and provides leadership in the planning and organization of IEPs. As a part of the service delivery, the psychologist provides training to staff in order to appropriately execute IEP. strategies/ interventions are diagnostically relevant to the situation in the school environment and to the age/developmental level of the student(s), and have been created following consultations with students, parents, and colleagues. Psychologist demonstrates thorough development and effectively integrates assessment/performance data in the development of IEPs. strategies/ interventions are clear and appropriate within the context of the educational setting and to the age/developmental level of the student(s) receiving therapeutic services. Psychologist demonstrates basic development and participates with the educational team in the development of IEPs. strategies/ interventions are rudimentary and only partially suitable to the situation and the age of the student(s). knowledge and skill in using assessment instruments to evaluate students. development and has difficulty guiding educational teams in the development of IEPs. Psychologist has no clear goals for the remediation strategies/interventions, or they are inappropriate to either the situation or the age of the student(s). 1d: Demonstrating knowledge of state and federal regulations, and resources within and beyond the school and district 1e: Planning and integrating the program to meet the needs of individual students, including prevention 1f: Incorporating an internal measurement process to evaluate the efficacy of the psychological services Psychologist s knowledge of governmental regulations and services for students is extensive, inclusive of district and community resources. In addition, the psychologist networks within and beyond the district to seek additional resources, as needed, in the provision of therapeutic services. Psychologist s plan is coherent and preventive, designed to support student progress. The intended objective guides application into the broader educational environment so as to facilitate independent functioning. Psychologist s plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the remediation strategies/ interventions is comprehensive, incorporating multiple sources of evidence derived across relevant settings/ activities, along with a connection intended to guide program improvements on an ongoing basis. Psychologist displays awareness of governmental regulations and resources for students available within the school or district, and some familiarity with resources external to the district. Psychologist has developed a plan that is appropriately aligned with the student s identified educational/social- emotional needs, incorporating the behavioral expectations of the general education setting that are a part of the student s school day. Psychologist s plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the remediation strategies/ interventions is organized around clear goals, inclusive of the collection of evidence to indicate the degree to which the goals have been met. Psychologist displays awareness of governmental regulations and resources for students available within the school or district, but no knowledge of resources available beyond the educational setting. Psychologist s plan has learning objectives aligned to the identified needs of the students and includes a number of meaningful activities, but some of them don t fit with the broader goals. Psychologist has a rudimentary plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the remediation strategies/ interventions that are used with students. knowledge of governmental regulations and resources for students available through the school or district. Psychologist s plan for intervention services consists of a random collection of unrelated activities, lacking coherence or an overall structure. Psychologist has no plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the remediation strategies/interventions, or resists suggestions that an evaluation is necessary. Page 1
2 2a Establishing rapport with students DOMAIN: Creating an Environment for Learning Students seek out the psychologist, Psychologist s interactions with students Psychologist s interactions are a mix of reflecting a high degree of comfort and are positive and respectful; students positive and negative; the psychologist s trust in the relationship and demonstrate appear comfortable during service efforts at developing rapport are partially the benefits derived from the social/ delivery. emotional supports provided through service delivery. Psychologist s interactions with students are negative or inappropriate; students appear uncomfortable during service delivery. 2b Establishing a culture that promotes pro- social behaviors among the students across educational settings 2c Establishing and maintaining clear procedures for referrals Psychologist takes the initiative to work collaboratively in the promotion of a school wide culture that systematically establishes and reinforces positive behaviors. Psychologist monitors the effectiveness of the referral procedures. The psychologist takes a leadership role in training staff on the utilization of the referral process and suggests revisions as necessary to ensure that the process remains appropriate for the students and school environment. Psychologist promotes a culture throughout the school that encourages positive behaviors across educational settings. Psychologist provides direct instructional support among the students in groups and between students and their teachers. Psychologist actively participates in establishing and maintaining referral procedures and guides stakeholders through implementation. Psychologist attempts to promote positive behaviors across educational settings and these attempts are partially Psychologist assists in establishing referral procedures when asked and inconsistently maintains established procedures. Psychologist is minimally responsive to teacher s requests for assistance. Psychologist makes no attempt to establish a culture for positive behaviors across school settings. Psychologist does not participate in establishing or maintaining procedures for referrals. Psychologist is unresponsive to teachers requests for assistance in the referral process. 2d Establishing standards of conduct across settings 2e Organizing physical space Standards of conduct have been clearly established. The psychologist has built the behavioral foundation with the students so that they are able to monitor and self- correct their behaviors. The physical space is arranged and organized to accommodate a variety of activities with children. If an alternative space is more suitable for an activity, the psychologist has arranged for the site in advance. Materials are stored in a secure location and are readily available. Standards of conduct have been clearly established. The psychologist monitors student behavior against those standards providing appropriate therapeutic supports and facilitating respectful behavior. The physical space is organized. Attempts are made to modify the available space or find an alternative site that is more suitable for the planned activity. Materials are stored in a secure location and are available when needed. Standards of conduct appear to have been established, yet the psychologist s attempts to monitor and correct negative student behavior is only partially The physical space is moderately organized. Some attempt is made to modify the available space or find an alternative site that is more suitable for the planned activity. Materials are stored in a secure location, but are not always readily available. No standards of conduct have been established and the psychologist disregards or fails to address negative student behavior. The physical space is disorganized and poorly suited for working with students. Materials are not stored in a secure location, and are difficult to find when needed. Page 2
3 3a Responding to referrals and evaluating student needs DOMAIN: Service Delivery Psychologist takes a leadership role in Psychologist responds to a referral Psychologist responds to a referral monitoring student performance with request in a timely manner with request with only minimal follow- up. The grade level teams, and guides the appropriate follow- up. The psychologist psychologist initiates the evaluative implementation of referral requests as initiates the evaluative process defined process defined in the referral, but is necessary. Upon receipt of the referral, the in the referral, and is consistent in the inconsistent in the completion of the psychologist efficiently initiates and completion of the process. process. completes the evaluative process defined in the referral. Psychologist fails to respond to a referral request or to initiate the evaluative process defined in the referral. 3b Evaluating student needs in compliance with state and federal guidelines, inclusive of RtI systems that are educationally relevant and diagnostically sound 3c Actively participating on the educational/ evaluation teams 3d Planning interventions to maximize students academic and/or behavioral successes 3e Maintaining professional relationships with community service providers to support student performance across settings 3f Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness Psychologist selects from a broad repertoire those assessments that are most appropriate and educationally relevant to the referral questions, and conducts information sessions with colleagues to ensure that they fully understand and comply with all established timelines and/or procedures. Psychologist actively participates on the educational/evaluation team and takes initiative in assembling materials for student meetings. IEPs are prepared in an exemplary manner, incorporating relevant diagnostic information that connects the student s performance to that of same- aged non- disabled peers. Psychologist takes a leadership role in the development of comprehensive interventions for students, finding ways to meet student needs aligned to remediate educational and/or behavioral deficits. Initiative is taken in seeking additional resources as needed. Psychologist initiates ongoing contact in order to network with professional colleagues and community service providers. Psychologist identifies when additional resources are necessary and procures those resources in collaboration with the educational team in the provision of educational services across settings. Psychologist is continually seeking ways to improve the service plan, and makes changes as needed in response to input of stakeholders. Psychologist administers appropriate and/or relevant evaluation instruments to students, and ensures that all established timelines and/or procedures are delivered with full compliance. Psychologist actively participates on the educational/evaluation teams, connecting the assessment data to the needs for service and prepares detailed IEPs based upon the derived diagnostic data. Psychologist s planned interventions for students are designed with integrity and aligned to remediate identified academic and/or behavioral needs. Psychologist maintains ongoing contact with professional colleagues and provision of educational services across settings. Psychologist makes revisions in the service plan as necessary based upon data and the educational setting. Psychologist attempts to administer appropriate and/or available evaluation instruments to students, but is inconsistent in following established timelines and procedures. Psychologist minimally participates with student educational and/or evaluation teams based upon the diagnostic data derived from the assessment reports in the development of the IEP. Psychologist has planned interventions for students, but the interventions are only partially suitable and sporadically aligned with identified needs. Psychologist maintains occasional contact with professional colleagues and provision of educational services. Psychologist makes modest changes in the service plan when confronted with evidence of the need for change. Psychologist resists administering evaluations, selects instruments inappropriate to the situation, or does not follow established timelines and procedures. Psychologist does not actively participate with student educational and/or evaluation teams. Psychologist fails to plan interventions suitable for students or the planned intervention is mismatched with the findings of the assessment data. Psychologist does not maintain contact with professional colleagues and provision of educational services. Psychologist adheres to his or her service plan, in spite of evidence of its inadequacy. Page 3
4 4a Reflecting on practice DOMAIN: Professionalism Psychologist s reflection is accurate and Psychologist s reflection provides an Psychologist s reflection on practice is perceptive, citing specific examples. accurate and objective description of moderately accurate and objective Psychologist draws on an extensive practice, citing specific evidence. without citing specific examples, and repertoire to suggest alternative Psychologist makes some specific with only global suggestions as to how it strategies and consistently incorporates suggestions based on evidence as to how might be improved. Psychologist evidence- based practices. the interventions might be improved. demonstrates a vague understanding of evidence- based practice and how it 4b Maintaining accurate and effective data management system 4c Communicating with parents, staff and administrators is effective and organized for monitoring student progress across settings and is used as a foundational component in the implementation of service delivery and is shared with all relevant stakeholders. Psychologist seeks out stakeholders to provide information to plan, answer questions and share assessment data. Psychologist solicits stakeholder s perspectives on individual students or needs within an educational setting and documents consultation/collaboration in progress notes and data management system. is effective for monitoring student progress and is used on an on- going basis to make adjustments to service delivery. Psychologist initiates contact with stakeholders to provide information to plan, answer questions and share assessment data. The communication supports on- going collaboration in the provision of educational programming. relates to interventions. is rudimentary or insufficient for monitoring student progress and is only occasionally used to make adjustments to service delivery. Psychologist is available to stakeholders only when requested for questions, planning or sharing of assessment data. The information provided may be insufficient or delivered in an insensitive manner. Psychologist resists reflection on practice. Reflections are inaccurate or self- serving. Psychologist is unable to identify any evidence- based practice to support interventions. is either nonexistent or inappropriate; it cannot be used to monitor student progress or to adjust service delivery. Psychologist is unavailable to stakeholders for questions, planning or for sharing of assessment data. 4d Participating in a professional community 4e Growing and developing professionally Psychologist makes a substantial contribution to school and district events and/or projects and assumes a leadership role with colleagues. Psychologist actively pursues professional development opportunities, and makes a substantial contribution to the profession through such activities as offering workshops to colleagues. Psychologist participates actively in school and district events and/or projects, while also maintaining positive and productive relationships with colleagues. Psychologist seeks out opportunities for professional development based on an assessment of professional need and/or needs identified within the school setting. Psychologist s relationships with colleagues are cordial, and psychologist participates in school and district events and/or projects when specifically requested. Psychologist s participation in professional development activities is limited to those that are convenient or are required. Psychologist s relationships with colleagues are negative or self- serving, and psychologist avoids being involved in school and district events and/or projects. Psychologist does not participate in professional development activities, even when such activities are clearly needed for the ongoing development of skills. 4f Showing professionalism Psychologist demonstrates the highest standards of ethical conduct, inclusive of confidentiality in documentation and sound therapeutically meaningful interactions with all stakeholders. The psychologist consistently advocates for students and takes a leadership role with colleagues. Psychologist displays high standards of honesty, integrity, and confidentiality in all documentation and interactions with stakeholders. The psychologist advocates for students when needed. The psychologist complies fully and voluntarily with school and district policies, and maintains confidentiality as required by state and federal law. Psychologist is trustworthy and dependable in his/her interactions with colleagues, students, and the public. The psychologist minimally complies with school and district policies and practices. The psychologist provides moderate advocacy for students, and does not violate practices of confidentiality as defined by state and federal law. Psychologist is not trustworthy or dependable in his/her interactions with colleagues, students, and the public. The psychologist fails to comply with school and district policies and practices. The psychologist violates practices of confidentiality as defined by state and federal law. Page 4
5 Page 5
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation Psychologist: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning Psychologist demonstrates little or no Psychologist inconsistently
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation Teacher Consultant: Evaluator: Date: Domain 1: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning The teacher consultant uses a wide
Lincoln Park Public Schools Occupational Therapist Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools Occupational Therapist Evaluation Occupational Therapist: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparation COMPONENT Ineffective 1Point Minimally Effective 2 Points Effective
School Psychologist Evaluation
1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST FOR DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION little or no knowledge
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students Psychologist demonstrates little or no knowledge
DOMAIN 1: School Psychologists: Planning and Preparation
DOMAIN 1: School Psychologists: Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker School Social Worker: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning Social worker displays little Social worker displays foundational
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Psychologist Performance Evaluation
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Psychologist Performance Evaluation School Year: 213-214 Job Classification: Certified Last Name: Document Type: Evaluation First Name: School: Department: Evaluator:
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker School Social Worker: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning 1a content and application in the practice of social work services
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Psychologist: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents
FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT VERSION 1.0. School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric
FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson The FNSBSD Evaluation Plan identifies
School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric
COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson* *Certified Specialist Input
School Psychologist Rubric Domain 1: Planning and Preparation LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE 1 UNSATISFACTORY 2 BASIC 3 PROFICIENT 4 DISTINGUISHED
School Psychologist Rubric Domain 1: Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrates knowledge of psychology and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students School Psychologist demonstrates
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students demonstrates little or no knowledge and skill
School Psychologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance
1 School Psychologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Social Worker Performance Evaluation
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Social Worker Performance Evaluation School Year: 213-214 Job Classification: Certified Last Name: Document Type: Evaluation First Name: School: Department: Evaluator:
MODIFIED DANIELSON INSTRUCTIONAL FRAMEWORK: SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS
CRITERION 1: KNOWLEDGE AND SCHOALRSHIP INA SPECIAL FIELD 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students no knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL COUNSELORS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL COUNSELORS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques Counselor demonstrates little understanding of counseling theory and techniques.
Domain 1 for School Counselors: Planning and Preparation L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Domain 1 for School Counselors: Planning and Preparation L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques Counselor demonstrates little understanding
APPR. Supplement B2. Specialized Services (School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers) August 30, 2012
APPR Supplement B2 Specialized Services (School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers) August 30, 2012 Frameworks for Specialized Services The Framework for Teaching is just that----a framework for
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK SCHOOL COUNSELORS
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK SCHOOL COUNSELORS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent development Establishing
DOMAIN 1: School Nurses: Planning and Preparation
DOMAIN 1: School Nurses: Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Medical knowledge and skill in nursing techniques 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Child and Adolescent Development 1c: Establishing Goals
DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation for School Counselors
DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation for School Counselors 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent development 1c: Establishing
School Nurse Evaluation Rubric
COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 School Nurse Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson* *Certified Specialist Input from
Speech Language Pathologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance
1 Speech Language Pathologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a Demonstrating knowledge and skill in the specialist therapy area; holding
Psychologist uses a limited number of psychological instruments with little or no flexibility to evaluate students.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST S DOMAIN 1: PLANNING, PREPARATION AND CURRICULUM 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students -Use of appropriate, variety and current
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Opening the world through education to children and young adults with diverse abilities Name: Assignment: Evaluator: Program: Completion
Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component Developing refers to instructors who have been teaching three years or less 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of counseling
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Counselor: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of
DOMAIN 1 FOR STUDENT RESOURCE TEAM LEADERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
DOMAIN 1 FOR STUDENT RESOURCE TEAM LEADERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in Special
VOLUSIA FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING School Counselor
1 UNSATISFACTORY Domain 1 : Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content The rarely practices professional competence in the delivery of school counseling and student service delivery
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SOCIAL WORKER STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SOCIAL WORKER STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Opening the world through education to children and young adults with diverse abilities Name: Assignment: Evaluator: Program:
AR TESS SCHOOL COUNSELOR RUBRIC
1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Counselor demonstrates little or no understanding of counseling theory and techniques. 1a: Critical Attributes
RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Name of Clinician: Name of Evaluator: School(s): RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
DOMAIN 1 FOR SOCIAL WORKERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT
DOMAIN 1 FOR SOCIAL WORKERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of School Social Work practices, theory,
RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (BASIC) PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a: Demonstrating
RUBRIC FOR SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
RUBRIC FOR SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (BASIC) PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a: Demonstrating knowledge
PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach.
PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach. Service and Support Audiologists should know and be able to: Level of
Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent
Form1: FfT Rubrics Special Education Teacher Name: Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent 1a Demonstrating Knowledge of
Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Language Pathologist
Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Pathologists are required to participate in all aspects of TESS and the VBSD Teacher Evaluation Plan. Speech Pathologist will follow
The Danielson Group Behavior Specialists
RUBRIC FOR BEHAVIOR SPECIALISTS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (BASIC) PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a: Demonstrating knowledge
Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches
Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to 1b. Specific Examples 1b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1a. Specific Examples 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of Content and Pedagogy
DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT
DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT 1a Demonstrating Knowledge Of Content And Pedagogy In planning
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Teacher: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of the
School Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
School - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component Developing refers to instructors who have been teaching three years or less 1a. Demonstrating skill in the content of the
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. (2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Accuracy Use in future teaching know whether a lesson was effective or achieved its instructional outcomes, or teacher profoundly misjudges the success of a lesson. Teacher has no suggestions for how a
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
Charlotte Danielson (Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education) KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING Including crosswalk documents connecting to national professional organizations for each category of Other
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS Revised 07/03/12 By David R. Skocy, Ph.D. Purpose: NON-TENURED SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES
SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Speech Language Pathologist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher
Westwood Public Schools. Teacher Evaluation Development Team. Guidance Counselor Self Reflection Rubrics
Teacher Evaluation Development Team s Adapted for the Westwood Public Schools Working Draft, Spring 2010 from the work of Marshall, Danielson & Westwood s PPEI I: Planning and Preparation Knowledge of
North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS
North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS District: Enrollment: Evaluator: School: Grades in School: Date of Evaluation: *Adapted from the American School Counseling Association National
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION DOMAIN 2: ENVIRONMENT 1a. Demonstrates Understanding of Professional Research, Theories, Content, Tools,
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Opening the world through education to children and young adults with diverse abilities Name: Assignment: Program: Evaluator:
Pilot School Counselor Evaluation
All evaluations are on a continuous basis. Name: School: Pre-Conference Date: Date of Hire: Evaluator: Post-Conference Date: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tenure Evaluative Assistance Plan Limited Contract Philosophy:
Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation
Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation Appendix A NAME: DATE: Certificated Employees new to the profession are responsible for ten components in the four domains. Second year Certificated
SASED CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE POST OBSERVATION FEEDBACK FORM DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION. Conference Date
DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Nurse Conference Date COMPONENTS UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a. School Nursing School Nurse displays little understanding of prerequisite knowledge
RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of current trends in library media practice, information technology, and literature Library Media Specialist demonstrates little or no understanding
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS Poway Unified School District Teaching Standards Domain I Domain II Domain III Domain IV Domain V Planning and Designing Instruction Element
Special Education Teacher
Special Education Teacher DCODE=09000 PLANNING AND PREPARATION ELEMENT Underdeveloped=1 Developing=2 Proficient=3 Exemplary=4 Knowledge of Content Knowledge of Students' Development and Skills Knowledge
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
IEP Coordinator Evaluation Rubric
COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 IEP Coordinator Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson* *Certified Specialist Input from
Planning & Preparation 2 Minimally Effective
Tuscola Intermediate School District School Social Worker Professional Name Date Program Evaluator Elements Planning & Preparation Minimally Highly Knowledge of Student s Development and Skills displays
SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION RUBRIC
Name: School Year: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Component 1a Demonstrates knowledge of content and pedagogy In planning, Teacher makes content errors or does not correct errors made by student; Teacher
Self Evaluation Colleague Evaluating Administrator Other Administrator
STANDARD SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION INSTRUMENT Self Evaluation Colleague Evaluating Administrator Other Administrator Grade Level/Subject Area: Date/Time: Evaluator: Title: Observation Date/Time: Observation
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
Evaluation of School Psychologists
Evaluation of Psychologists 2013 Directors Institute Dr. Elizabeth Danielson Coordinator of Psychological Services Mesa Public s Context for Evaluation of Psychologists in Arizona 2010 Arizona Statute
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Physical Therapists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Physical Therapists Definition of an Effective Physical Therapist Effective school physical therapists are vital members of the
Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric
St. Michael Albertville Independent School District 885 Excellence is Our Tradition Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric Adapted from Danielson, Charlotte. Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework
Domain I: Planning (assessed via artifact review, pre-observation and post-observation conferences)
[Type here] Revised July 0 Domain I: Planning (assessed via artifact review, pre-observation and post-observation conferences). Plans lessons that demonstrate knowledge of content and pedagogy Lesson Plans:
Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric
Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric Using leadership, collaboration and advocacy, the Professional School Counselor plans, delivers, manages and promotes a comprehensive guidance
South Dakota School Counselor Evaluation Program. 1 P age
South Dakota School Counselor Evaluation Program 1 P age Table of Contents Introduction and Overview... pg. 3 Proposed Timeline... pg. 4 School Counselor Description by Charlotte Danielson. pg. 6 Charlotte
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
Charlotte Danielson (Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education) KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING Including crosswalk documents connecting to national professional organizations for each category of Other
The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists
The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists The Massachusetts School Psychologists Association (MSPA) has developed this rubric for the evaluation of school psychologists for adoption, in part
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists STANDARD 1: School speech-language pathologists demonstrate leadership, advocacy, collaboration, and ethical practices. School Speech-Language
Rise Indiana School Counselor Rubric
Rise Indiana School Counselor Rubric 1 Domain 1: Academic Achievement 1.1 The School Counselor Utilizes Data To Monitor Student Achievement And Works Collaboratively With Stakeholders To Enhance Student
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists Definition of an Effective Occupational Therapist Effective occupational therapists are vital members
Mountain Home School District #193 Formal School Counselor Evaluation Appendix C
Mountain Home School District #193 Formal School Evaluation Appendix C NAME: DATE: 1a Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Knowledge of Content and Ethical Issues Knowledge of Prerequisite Relationships
POLK COUNTY SCHOOLS TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM. Evidence-Based Practices Rubrics and Situational Context Factors
POLK COUNTY SCHOOLS TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM Evidence-Based Practices Rubrics and Situational Context Factors This document identifies and describes the evidence-based teaching practices and situational
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component Failing Needs Improvement Proficient Distinguished 1a: Demonstrating
Boulder Valley School District Effective Specialized Service Professionals Standards Social Workers and Psychologists
Child Development Standard I: Social Workers/Psychologists demonstrate mastery of and expertise in the domain for which they are responsible Element a: School social workers/psychologists demonstrate knowledge
POSITION: Speech Language Pathologist
Please note: This job description is one of several adopted by the State Board of Education between 1984 and 1987 and was designed to correspond with the evaluation instrument. Local school systems can
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers Definition of an Effective School Social Worker Effective school social workers are vital members of the education
Garden City Public Schools
Garden City Public Schools RISE: Research-based Inclusive System of Evaluation Garden City, Michigan Professional School Counselor Evaluation Handbook 2012-2013 Prepared by Keith Anleitner, Director of
Principal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Ohio Principal Performance Rating Rubric Principal Performance Rubric The Principal Performance Rating Rubric is intended to be scored holistically. This means that evaluators
ALIGNING DANIELSON FRAMEWORK WITH ASCA s SCHOOL COUNSELOR COMPETENCIES AND ETHICAL STANDARDS
1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent behavior 1c: Establishing goals for the counseling program appropriate to the setting
The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and
STANDARD V: KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS SCHOOL COUNSELORS -Building on the mission to prepare educators who demonstrate a positive impact on student learning based on the Improvement of Student Achievement act
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date School Nurse Self-assessment Evaluator Assessment
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date School Nurse Self-assessment Evaluator Assessment Formal Observation Individual Growth Project Intensive Support Plan Summative Domain 1: Planning and
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses Definition of an Effective School Nurse Effective school nurses are vital members of the education team. They are properly
School Psychology Internship Evaluation. Psychology 686: Internship in School Psychology Millersville University Department of Psychology
School Psychology Internship Evaluation 1 Psychology 686: Internship in School Psychology Millersville University Department of Psychology Intern: Field Supervisor: Date of Evaluation: / / School District:
Indiana School Nurse Effectiveness Rubric
Indiana School Nurse Effectiveness Rubric This rubric combines many of the professional requirements of a professional School Nurse with those of the RISE Model. It is a working revision of the School
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers Definition of an Effective School Social Worker Effective school social workers are vital members of the
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors Definition of an Effective School Counselor Effective school counselors are vital members of the education
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists Definition of an Effective Speech-Language Pathologist Effective speech-language pathologists are
Job Description of the School Psychologist Reports To: Supervises: Purpose:
Reports To: Supervises: Purpose: Job Description of the School Psychologist Superintendent, Level II or Level III School Psychologists, Director, or Associate or Assistant Superintendent May supervise
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Licensed Employee Appraisal System Enhancing Professional Practice Professional Domain Standards and Indicators Levels of Performance Rubric
SCHOOL CITY OF MISHAWAKA TEACHER EVALUATION RUBRIC (SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS)
APPENDIX E DOMAIN A: PURPOSEFUL PLANNING 1. Utilizing Student, School, and Community Data to Plan. The school social worker does not monitor academic achievement. The social worker rarely or never uses
TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Nurses
TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Nurses Domain/Relative Weight Dimension Page Program Management %. Program Scheduling. Collaboration. Clinic Environment. Discipline Focus Instructional Skills 0%.
Some students are engaged in learning, but others do not respond to instructional strategies focused on the class as a whole.
Piedmont/California Standards for the Teaching Profession Self-Assessment Continuum of Teaching Practice Standard 1 P/CSTP: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning 1.1 Using knowledge of students