1 Filing the FCC Form 499 Good Filing Practices March 17, 2015 Webinar
2 Agenda Agenda New For the 2015 FCC Form 499-A Annual True-Up De Minimis Good Filing Practices How to Avoid Common Findings FCC Form 499-A FCC Form 499-Q
3 Filing the FCC Form 499-A New For 2015
4 New For FCC Form 499-A No substantive change to data collected or to the form instructions. All companies that have access to the Internet must file the FCC Form 499-A/Q using E-File: FCC announcement: DA Doc Online filing resources available on USAC s website: Online Filing Webinar (visit Training & Outreach) Online User Guide (visit Forms)
5 Filing the FCC Form 499-A Annual True-Up
6 Annual True-Up Background The purpose of the true up is two-fold: Reverse any billings associated with filers determined to be de minimis. To compare quarterly filings to the year-end annual filing, so to adjust non-de minimis accounts for any differences in the revenue reported.
7 Annual True-Up Background USAC uses the actual end-user interstate and international revenues from Line 423 of your 2015 FCC Form 499-A to determine your final Universal Service obligation for calendar year Interstate (Line 423d) + International (Line 423e) = 499A Contribution Base (499A C Base)
8 De Minimis Determine whether a company is de minimis using the following formula: (499-A C Base *.162 Avg Contribution Factor) minus Annual True-Up (499-A C Base *.162 Avg Contribution Factor * Avg Circulatory Factor) If result is < $10,000, contributor is de minimis, and the January- December 2014 support mechanism charges will be reversed on the contributor s July 2015 invoice If result is > or = $10,000, contributor is NOT de minimis; continue to step 2.
9 Annual True-Up De Minimis For Calendar Year 2014: - Filers that report less than $71, 782 of combined interstate and international revenues on Line 423, will be considered de minimis. For Calendar Year 2015: - Based on the FCC estimation factor, filers that will report less than $65,790 of combined interstate and international revenues on Line 423 will likely be considered de minimis.
10 Obligations for De Minimis Companies Must file the FCC Form 499-A each year. Annual True-Up Must notify underlying providers of de minimis/non-de minimis status. Not required to file FCC Form 499-Q; USAC recommends de minimis filers notify USAC each quarter of their continued de minimis status. Annually, about the time of the November FCC Form 499- Q, USAC recommends filers project the following year revenues to estimate if they will retain de minimis status.
11 499A/Q True Up Annual True-Up If the sum of the 499-Qs projections exceeds the 499-A actual revenues, USAC will use the average of 2 lowest FCC Contribution and Circularity Factors from 2014 to calculate your credit. If the sum of the 499-Qs projections is less than the 499- A actual revenues, USAC will use the average of 2 Highest FCC Contribution and Circularity Factors from 2014 to calculate your adjustment. All credits and adjustments are issued on the July September invoices. Subsequent Revised A Forms result in a recalculation of the original true up.
12 499A/Q True Up Annual True-Up Interstate Revenue (Line 423D) International Revenue (Line 423E) Contribution Base A $2,377,064 + $19,218 = $2,396,282 Interstate Revenue (Line 120B) International Revenue (Line 120C) Contribution Base Nov Q $621,080 + $7,495 = $628,575 Feb Q $603,005 + $4,978 = $607,983 May Q $623,264 + $4,627 = $627,891 Aug Q $639,772 + $4,211 = $643, Q Contribution Base $2,487,121 + $21,311 = $2,508,432 True Up Base = (499-A) - (Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4) -$112,150 = ($2,396,282) - ($628,575 + $607,983 + $627,891 + $643,983)
13 Annual True-Up 499A/Q True Up Credit Calculation Quarterly Credit Monthly Credit Example: (True Up Base *.159) (True Up Base *.159 * ) (uses average of 2 lowest FCC Contribution and Circulatory Factors) Quarterly Credit / 3 (-$112,150 *.159) - (-$112,150 *.159 * ) = -$15,393 (Credit) Company will receive -$5,131 credit on its July, August, and September 2015 invoices
14 499A/Q True Up Adjustment Calculation Annual True-Up Quarterly Adjustment (True Up Base *.165) (True Up Base *.165 * ) (uses average of 2 highest FCC Contribution and Circulatory Factors) Monthly Adjustment Quarterly Adjustment / 3 Company will receive +$xxxx adjustment on its July, August, and September 2015 invoices
15 Filing the FCC Form 499-A Good Filing Practices
16 General Suggestions Start early! Good Filing Practices Required to use E-File online filing starting with 2015 Form 499-A Review/update contact information with each filing. If you have a question about your bill, see the revised USAC.ORG Understanding My Invoice pages. Each section of the invoice is shown and clarified. If still have questions, contact USAC s Customer Operations. Any correspondence with USAC should include a Filer ID
17 Filing the FCC Form 499-A Avoid Common Findings
18 Avoid Common Findings FCC Form 499 Analysis All FCC Form 499 filings are checked against prior filings and FCC rules for compliance and accuracy. 40 checks conducted on the 499-A 10 checks conducted on the 499-Q USAC uses to communicate: FCC 499 Notice Non-Responder Notice Issue Carrier Response Required Accepted
19 Form 499 Confirmation s Example: Avoid Common Findings The April 2015 Form 499-Q (Rev 0) received on Wednesday, April 01, 2015 for Filer ID Generic Telephone has been approved by USAC. This filing will decrease your company's contribution base by ~5.38% as compared to your company's Apr A.
20 Interstate Revenues USAC will seek an explanation when: Avoid Common Findings The current year reported assessable revenues changed significantly. The ratio of Local versus Long Distance revenues % change is greater than expected.
21 Carriers Carrier vs. End User USAC will seek an explanation when: Avoid Common Findings - When large shift of revenues is reported in Block 3 vs. Block 4 in comparing years. Reminder: in order to report revenues as Carrier s Carrier, the Filer s customer must: 1. Incorporate the purchased services into its own offerings which are, at least in part, assessable U.S. telecommunications or interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol services. 2. The company either directly contributes or has a reasonable expectation that another entity in the downstream chain of resellers directly contributes to the federal universal service support mechanisms on the assessable portion of revenues from offerings that incorporate the purchased services.
22 Carriers Carrier vs. End User Reasonable Expectation Standard Avoid Common Findings Pursuant to the 2012 Wholesaler-Reseller Clarification Order, a filer may demonstrate that it has a reasonable expectation that a customer contributes to federal universal service support mechanisms based on revenues from the customer s offerings by following the guidance in these instructions or by submitting other reliable proof FCC Form 499-A Instructions - Page 23
23 Carriers Carrier vs. End User Reasonable Expectation Standard Avoid Common Findings Each filer should have documented procedures to ensure it reports revenue from resellers accurately. Minimum information on filer s resellers must include: Filer ID Legal name Legal address Name of a contact person Phone number of contact Annual certification signed by reseller
24 Carriers Carrier vs. End User Reasonable Expectation Standard Avoid Common Findings At the filer s discretion, the filer may, for example, rely on certificates that specify any of the following: 1. Entity-level certification; 2. Account-level certification; 3. Service-specific certification; or 4. Exception-specific certification
25 Carriers Carrier vs. End User Avoid Common Findings The following categories of revenues are not end-user revenue and are reported in Block 3: Category of Revenue Report on Per-minute switched access charges and reciprocal compensation Line 304 Revenues received from carriers as payphone compensation for originating toll calls Line 306 Charges for physical collocation of equipment pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 251(c)(6) Line 307 Revenues that filers receive as universal service support from either states or the federal government Line 308 Revenues received from another U.S. carrier for roaming service provided to customers of that carrier Line 309 For these revenue items, the filer is not required to retain Filer 499 ID information or verify that the customer is a reseller FCC Form 499-A Instructions pg. 25
26 Avoid Common Findings Private Line or WATS Lines: Ten Percent Rule [U]nder the Commission's rules, if over ten percent of the traffic carried over a private or WATS line is interstate, then the revenues and costs generated by the entire line are classified as interstate. * The Joint Board also concluded that the administrative benefits of this rule could best be achieved through certification by customers that each of their special access lines carries more than a de minimis amount of interstate traffic. ** The FCC has defined internet traffic to carry more than 10% interstate *In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No , Report and Order, FCC , 12 FCC Rcd 8776, 778 (1997). **MTS and WATS Market Structure, Amendment of Part 36 of the Commission s Rules and Establishment of a Joint Board, CC Dockets Nos and , Recommended Decision and Order, 4 FCC Rcd 1352 ( 3) (1989).
27 Mobile Service Safe Harbor The FCC provides the following safe harbor percentages of interstate revenues associated with Line 309, Line 409, and Line 410: 37.1% of cellular and broadband PCS telecommunications revenues 12.0% of paging revenues 1.0% of analog SMR dispatch revenues Avoid Common Findings Report this % of total revenues as interstate revenue and the FCC will not find it necessary to review or question the data underlying the reported percentages.
28 Avoid Common Findings Interconnected VoIP Safe Harbor The FCC provides the following safe harbor percentages of interstate revenues associated with: Carriers Carrier VoIP (Line 303.2) Local service via VoIP in conjunction with Broadband connection or not (Line 404.4, 404.5) Separately billed long distance using VoIP ( Line 414.2) 64.9% of interconnected VoIP telecommunications revenues Report this % of total revenues as interstate revenue and the FCC will not find it necessary to review or question the data underlying the reported percentages.
29 Use of Safe Harbor Avoid Common Findings These safe harbor percentages may not be applied to universal service pass-through charges, fixed local service revenues, or toll-service charges. All filers must report the actual amount of interstate and international revenues for these services. All affiliated providers must make a single election, each quarter, whether to report actual revenues or to use the current safe harbor within the same safe harbor category
30 Use of Safe Harbor Avoid Common Findings Filers should use the same methodology (traffic study or safe harbor) to report interstate and international jurisdictions on the FCC Form 499-A as used on the FCC Forms 499-Q to forecast revenue in each quarter of the applicable calendar year. Submit Traffic Studies to the FCC and USAC
31 Subscriber Line Charges Avoid Common Findings Line 405 should include charges to end users specified in access tariffs, such as tariffed subscriber line charges (SLCs), Access Recovery Charges (ARCs), and Primary Interexchange Carrier Charges (PICCs) Federal SLC are to be reported as 100% interstate
32 Subscriber Line Charges (SLCs) Avoid Common Findings Non-incumbents are not required to assess a non-traffic sensitive charge for the costs of providing interstate or interstate access service from their customers through a separately stated end user charge. To the extent non-incumbent contributors choose to assess SLC, they should report such revenues on Line 405 and allocate those revenues to the interstate jurisdiction, in a manner that is consistent with their supporting books of account and records.
33 Long Distance USAC will seek an explanation when: The current year reported interstate and international revenues changed significantly from prior filings Or when the % of interstate and international revenues are very low. Changes in LIRE status Avoid Common Findings
34 Local USAC will seek an explanation when: Avoid Common Findings Reported Local/Long Distance bundled revenues on Lines and but have reported no interstate revenues. Or when the % of interstate and international revenues are very high.
35 USF Charges USAC will seek an explanation when: The % of interstate revenues is low. Avoid Common Findings If the surcharge reported on Line 403 is to recover federal universal service fund costs, the federal figure should be reported as either interstate (d) or international (e), as appropriate. Column (a) = includes state + federal USF surcharge revenues collected.
36 USF Charges USAC will seek an explanation when: Avoid Common Findings The % Federal USF revenue as compared to total End- User revenue is very high. If a contributor chooses to recover its federal universal service contribution costs through a line item on a customer's bill the amount of the federal universal service line-item charge may not exceed the interstate telecommunications portion of that customer's bill times the relevant contribution factor.
37 Avoid Common Findings What is non-telecommunications revenue? Line 418 For example: Information services offering a capability for generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing, retrieving, utilizing, or making available information via telecommunications are not included in the universal service or other fund contribution bases Published directory services, billing and collection services, inside wiring, inside wiring maintenance insurance, pole attachments, open video systems (OVS), cable leased access, cable service, and direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service
38 Avoid Common Findings What is non-telecommunications revenue? (cont.) Line 418 For example: Revenues from the sale, lease, installation, maintenance, or insurance of customer premises equipment (CPE) and from the sale or lease of transmission facilities, such as dark fiber or bare transponder capacity, that are not provided as part of a telecommunications service or as a UNE Late payment charges and charges imposed by the filer for customer checks returned for non-payment Telecommunications provided in a foreign country where the traffic does not transit the United States or where the provider is offering service as a foreign carrier, i.e., a carrier licensed in that country.
39 Telcom and Non-Telecom Bundles Avoid Common Findings The Commission adopted two safe harbor methods for allocating revenue when telecommunications and CPE/enhanced services are offered as a bundled package. 1. The first option is to report revenues from bundled telecommunications and CPE/enhanced service offerings based on the unbundled service offering prices, with no discount from the bundled offering being allocated to telecommunications. 2. Alternatively, contributors may elect to treat all bundled revenues as telecommunications revenues for purposes of determining their universal service obligations. Note: Filers may choose to use allocation methods other than the two described above. Filers should realize, however, that any other allocation method may not be considered reasonable and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis in an audit or enforcement context.
40 Avoid Common Findings Interconnected VoIP A service that (1) enables real-time, two-way voice communications, (2) requires a broadband connection from the user s location, (3) requires Internet protocol compatible customer premises equipment (CPE), and (4) permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network.
41 Avoid Common Findings Non-Interconnected VoIP A service that (1) enables real-time voice communications that originate from or terminate to the user s location using Internet protocol or any successor protocol and, (2) requires Internet protocol compatible customer premises equipment, and (3) is not an interconnected VoIP service.
42 Avoid Common Findings Non-Telecommunications Revenue: TRS Contributions Order For TRS purposes, providers of non-interconnected VoIP services that are offered with other (non-voip) services that generate end-user revenues [are required] to allocate a portion of those end-user revenues to the noninterconnected VoIP service in two circumstances: 1. When those providers also offer the non-interconnected VoIP service on a stand-alone basis for a fee; or 2. When those providers also offer the other (non-voip) services without the noninterconnected VoIP service feature at a different (discounted) price. See 2011 TRS Contributions Order, 26 FCC Rcd at , para. 15. For example, a video gaming service may integrate chat functions that utilize noninterconnected VoIP services, but use of such functions may not be readily identifiable or separable from the gaming service components. Id., 26 FCC Rcd at , paras
43 Bad Debt (Lines 421 and 422) USAC will seek an explanation when: Avoid Common Findings When the % Bad Debt as compared to total revenue is very high. Or when the allocation of bad debt to the filer s assessable revenue is not proportional to filer s allocation of total revenues to assessable revenues
44 Avoid Common Findings Reseller Revenue on Line 511 USAC will seek an explanation when: The % of revenue reported on Line 511 is high as compared to total end user revenues. Revenues from resellers that do not contribute to universal service support mechanisms are included on Line 420 but may be excluded from a filer s TRS, NANPA, LNP, and FCC interstate telephone service provider regulatory fee contribution bases when reported on Line 511. You must have the 499 Filer ID for each reseller whose revenues you report here.
45 Filing the FCC Form 499-Q Avoid Common Findings
46 Historical Revenues USAC will send you a notification when: Avoid Common Findings The historical actual revenue reported on Lines 114, 115, and 117 are not consistent with the how the revenues were reported on your last FCC Form 499-A. The forecasted revenues on Lines 119 and 120 are not consistent to the historical revenues reported on Line 116.
48 Thank You!
49 For more assistance: Thank You USAC has set up a special Hotline at (866) to answer any FCC Form 499 questions; this Hotline will be available until April 3, Submit an to Visit our newly redesigned website:
How To File the FCC Form 499-A March 2013 Completing the 2013 FCC Form 499-A Who must file the FCC Form 499-A? Instructions pgs. 2-3 ALL intrastate, interstate, and international providers of telecommunications
2012 499-A Webinar March 2012 Topics What is New for 2012 Completing the 2012 FCC Form 499-A 2012 499 A/Q True Up Navigating E-File What is New For 2012 Non-Interconnected VoIP For Purposes of TRS Contribution
Low Income Program Best Practices 1 Overview One Lifeline account per household Advertising and Outreach FCC Form 497 Certification and Verification Recordkeeping 2 Best Practices One-per Household 3 One
Hello and welcome to the How to File Form FCC 499-A Webcast. Our presenters for today are Fred Theobald, Billing Manager of Financial Operations, and Debbie Tosi, Senior Analyst of Contributions. Right
Questions Received during the Webinar, 2016 FCC Form 499-A, Line by Line Presented Tuesday, March 15, 2016, at 3:00 PM EST A recording of the event is available in the Online Learning Library. Questions
REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 September 11, 2015 WHAT YOU OWE INTERSTATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS (ITSP) FOR FY 2015
PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 15-326 Released: March
Telecom Regulatory Reporting The material appearing in this presentation is for informational purposes only and is not legal or accounting advice. Communication of this information is not intended to create,
Moderator: Hello and welcome to the webcast titled 2013 Universal Service Fund Contributions. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Fred Theobald, Senior Manager of USF Contributions, and Ms. Jennifer Ullman,
Implementing InterCall: USF Implications for the Conference Call Industry July 15, 2008 Presented by Brad Mutschelknaus, Steve Augustino, and Tom Cohen Agenda Overview of USF and the InterCall Decision
FCC Regulatory Compliance Training October 3, 2013 Federal Telecom Laws and Regulations Communications Act of 1934 Amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 FCC Regulations Rulemaking Notice of Inquiry
Regulatory and Tax Issues Impacting Non-Interconnected VoIP and Other One-Way VoIP Services Speaker Bios Michael P. Donahue Partner, The CommLaw Group Mr. Donahue has represented CLECs, ISPs, VoIP providers,
ALASKA UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND Monthly Carrier Remittance I. Filing Requirements and General Instruction A. Introduction On December 30, 1998, the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) (formerly known as
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review by InterCall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted:
New Balance: $ 43,198.25 Payment Due Date: 12/15/2014 Enclosed: Telecom, Inc. Attention: Fred Smith 800 W 33rd St Edmond, IL, 73883 Mail Payment To: Universal Service Administrative Company PO Box 105056
EDUCATIONAL ADVISORY FORM 499 REVENUE REPORTING PRIMER SERIES Reporting Revenue from Interconnected VoIP Bundles and Corollary/Peripheral Services Sold in Conjunction With I-VoIP Issues, Options, Risks
I. Filing Requirements and General Instructions A. Introduction On April 4, 1996, the Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas (KCC) issued an Order to create the Kansas Universal Service Fund (KUSF)
Control Number : 39717 Item Number : 29 Addendum StartPage: 0 PROJECT NO. 39717 cz * s; ^^1^,jA lt RULEMAKING PROCEEDING PUBLIC UTILITY COMNIISj^; RELATED TO VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) OF TEXAS
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Contributions to the Telecommunications ) CG Docket No. 11-47 Relay Services Fund ) ) COMMENTS OF THE INFORMATION
WIRELESS DEVELOPMENT March 2005 Keller and Heckman LLP Serving Business through Law and Science Regulatory Predictions for BPL Broadband over Power Line ( BPL ) technology is justifiably receiving a great
Michael 3. Wid Director Public Affiin. Policy, and Communications 100 Communications Drive P.O. Box 49 Sun Prairie, WI 535950049 January 13,2009 Phone: 608-837-1732 FAX: 608-837-1 128 E-mail: email@example.com
1st Revised Page 3-1 Cancels Original Page 3-1 3. End User Access Service The Telephone Company will provide End User Access Service (End User Access) to End Users who obtain Local Telephone Service from
Glossary of Telecommunications Terms (Source: Federal Communications Commission) ACCESS CHARGE A fee charged subscribers or other telephone companies by a local exchange carrier for the use of its local
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Contributions to the Telecommunications ) CG Docket No. 11-47 Relay Services Fund ) Introduction Comments of the
KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report 2014 REPORT ON IP- TO- IP INTERCONNECTION A Summary of Status of the FCC s Internet Protocol- to- Internet Protocol Interconnection Proceeding
Chapter 27 CABLE/VIDEO SERVICE PROVIDER FEE 27.01 Definitions 27.02 Cable/Video Service Provider Fee Imposed 27.03 Applicable Principles 27.04 No Impact on Other Taxes Due from Holder 27.05 Audits of Cable/Video
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism A National Broadband Plan for Our Future ORDER CC Docket No.
Regulatory Landscape: FCC Regulation of Non-Interconnected VoIP Services and the Cloud Jonathan Marashlian Introduction Welcome to the uncertain regulatory universe of the Cloud Cloud-based communications
CONTACT firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com 209-955-6100 FCC Order 11-161 USF/ICC Reform Order REGULATORY DUE DATES SUMMARY Date Filing Submit to Notes December 29, 2011 Billing of
CHAPTER 119: CABLE/VIDEO SERVICE PROVIDER FEE, AND CABLE AND VIDEO CUSTOMER PROTECTION LAW Article I. Cable/Video Service Provider Fee Chapter/Article/Section General Provisions 119-I.01 119-I.02 119-I.03
CHAPTER 111: CABLE AND VIDEO SERVICES Section Cable/Video Service Provider Fee 111.01 Findings 111.02 Definitions 111.03 Fee imposed 111.04 Applicable principles 111.05 No impact on other taxes due from
139.195 Definitions for KRS 139.105, 139.200, 139.215, and 139.775. As used in KRS 139.105, 139.200, 139.215, and 139.775: (1) "Ancillary services" means services that are associated with or incidental
IDAPA 31 TITLE 46 Chapter 01 31.46.01 - UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS 000. Legal Authority (Rule 0)...1 001. Title and Scope (Rule 1)...1 002. Written Interpretations Agency Guidelines
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Request for Review by Deltacom, Inc. of ) WC Docket No. 06-122 Universal Service Administrator Decision ) COMMENTS
New FCC Regulations for Prepaid Card Providers NACT Telecommunications 1 Disclaimer This presentation has been made available by NACT Telecommunications to the general public for the purpose of alerting
NAPCS List for NAICS 517: Telecom s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 National 1.1 X Carrier services and Internet backbone services Providing wired or wireless facilities to originate, terminate or transit voice or data
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review of PaeTec Communications, Inc. of Universal Service Administrator Decision WC Docket No. 06-122 COMMENTS
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STAFF LEGISLATIVE BILL ANALYSIS Date Amended: 03/23/11 Bill No: Senate Bill 530 Tax Program: Satellite TV Author: Wright Sponsor: Author Code Sections: Part 14.5 (commencing
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of High-Cost Universal Service Support Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service WC Docket No. 05-337 CC Docket No.
ORIGINAL TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE This PRICE LIST applies to Long Distance Message Telecommunications Service ( LDMTS ) furnished by Windstream Communications, Inc. ( Windstream ) for interstate or international
Before the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Madison Wisconsin Investigation of Voice over ) Case No. 5-TI-2071 Internet Protocol in Wisconsin ) Public Comments of Communications Workers of America
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Universal Service Contribution Methodology ) WC Dkt. No. 06-122 ) ) COMMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF ADVOCACY, U.S. SMALL
LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE ADDENDUM to the THIS LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE ADDENDUM ( Addendum ) shall be attached to and become a part of the ( Agreement ) by and between Electric Lightwave, LLC ( ELI ) and
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CALEA Monitoring Report for Broadband Access and VOIP Services Notice to Individuals Required by the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Public
Dear Consumer, Telephone service competition holds many benefits for New Yorkers. Significant changes are taking place in the world of telecommunications. Different companies are now competing to provide
BEFORE THE GUAM PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of: PTI PACIFICA INC. USAC CERTIFICATION PUC LEGAL COUNSEL REPORT BACKGROUND On August 7, 2012, ( PTI petitioned the Guam Public Utilities Commission
MAINE REVENUE SERVICES SALES, FUEL & SPECIAL TAX DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL BULLETIN NO. 56 TELECOMMUNICATIONS This bulletin is intended solely as advice to assist persons in determining and complying with
CABLE TELEVISION 8-1-1 CHAPTER 8 CABLE TELEVISION ARTICLE I CABLE/VIDEO SERVICE PROVIDER FEE 8-1-1 DEFINITIONS. As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (A) Cable
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review By InterCall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator CC Docket No. 96-45 To: The Commission
498 Company Officer 499 Company Officer The officer of a service provider company who is authorized to certify that data set forth in the FCC Form 498 is true, accurate, and complete. The 498 Company Officer
Terms and Conditions for North State s Digital Subscriber Line Access Service NORTH STATE TELEPHONE COMPANY Original Page 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS 8. DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE ACCESS SERVICES 8-1 8.1 Asymmetric
IDAPA 31 TITLE 42 Chapter 01 31.42.01 - THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RULES FOR TELEPHONE CORPORATIONS SUBJECT TO THE RULES OF THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION UNDER THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Head in the Sand Presented by Kris Twomey Law Office of Kristopher E. Twomey, P.C. A FISPA Event January 19, 2012 Regulation by the Federal Communications Commission Offering voice services to the public
Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism Eligible Services List (WC Docket No. 13-184; CC Docket No. 02-6; GN Docket No. 09-51) The Federal Communications Commission s (FCC s) rules provide
Section 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sheet SECTION 1: RULES AND REGULATIONS 1.1 General Regulations 1 1.2 Limitations of Service 1 1.3 Basic Terms and Conditions of Service 1 1.4 Billing and Payment 1 1.5 Liability
Reg. IV.18.(i). Special Rules: Telecommunications and ancillary service providers. [Adopted July 31, 2008] The following special rules are established with respect to the apportionment of income from the
NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 This is an unofficial announcement
GENERAL 1.1 General Regulations ( Cooperative ) is an Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier (ILEC). The service provided under these terms and conditions is the transport component of wireline broadband Internet
APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF TERRITORIAL AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS State Form 52648 (R5 / 8-11) INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Applicants are required to file an original
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Definitions 1 General Description of Services Offered 2 Calculation of Rates 2 Credit and Collection Procedures 3 Maine Telecommunications Education Access Fund (MTEAF) 4 Maine Universal
USF/ICC: Rate of Return Recovery Mechanisms Oregon Public Utilities Commission Susan Barrett NECA Director Western Region 303-893-4409 firstname.lastname@example.org Universal Service Reform: The Basics Extends USF
File electronically at http://usac.org/about/tools/e-file.aspx/ FCC Form 498 OMB 3060-0824 Service Provider And Billed Entity Identification Number and General Contact Information Form Estimated Average
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Universal Service Contribution Methodology Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review
Annex No.1 to the 25th resolution of the Communications Regulatory Commission, 2007 REGULATION ON VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL /Amended by 26th resolution of 2009, 4th resolution of 2012, 39th resolution
CHAPTER 15 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS 37-15-101. Short title; sunset. (a) This chapter shall be known as the "Wyoming Telecommunications Act." (b) This chapter is repealed effective
Original Page 19-1 1 INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN COLLOCATED SPACES Dedicated Transit Service Unless otherwise specified herein, general regulations contained in other sections of this tariff apply in addition
The FCC s New Disabilities Access Requirements What Telcos, VoIP Providers and Advanced Communications Service Providers Need to Know Now (Before It s Too Late) Steven Augustino John Heitmann Joshua Guyan
278.516 Alternative regulation process for small telephone utilities -- Findings -- Definitions -- Procedures -- Withdrawal. (1) The legislature finds and determines that: (a) Small telephone utilities
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISISON Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) SBC IP Communications, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 99-200 Petition for Limited Waiver of ) Section 52.15(g) of the ) Commissions
Douglas J. MacGinnitie Commissioner State of Georgia Department of Revenue Administrative Division Office of Tax Policy Suite 15107 1800 Century Blvd., N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30345-3205 (404) 417-6649 September
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Jurisdictional Separations Reform ) and Referral to the Federal-State ) CC Docket No. 80-286 Joint Board ) ) Communications
STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UTILITIES BOARD IN RE: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner, DOCKET NO. ARB-05-4 vs. QWEST CORPORATION, Respondent. ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR HEARING AND GRANTING
VOIP Eligibility Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is a technology that allows users to place voice phone calls using the same technology as an Internet connection. This technology can replace traditional
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 XO Communication Services, Inc. ) Request for Review of Decision of the ) WC Docket No. 06-122 Universal Service Administrator ) COMMENTS
Search GO LOGIN LOGOUT HOME JOIN ALEC CONTACT ABOUT MEMBERS EVENTS & MEETINGS MODEL LEGISLATION TASK FORCES ALEC INITIATIVES PUBLICATIONS NEWS Model Legislation Civil Justice Commerce, Insurance, and Economic
Original Page 1 Regulations, Rates and Charges applying to the provision of Interstate Digital Subcriber Line Services (DSL) for connection to interstate communications facilities for Interstate Customers
FCC Urban Rates Survey Data Collection Filing Instructions Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Before
1 Telecom Regulation for IP-Based Providers: 6 Need-to-Know Facts Telecom Regulation: 6 Need-to-Know Facts for IP-based Communication Providers The disruptive nature of IP telephony continues to create
1. Digital Subscriber Line Access Services Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Access Services provide transmission services over local exchange service facilities that can be used for simultaneous voice and
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Reporting Requirements for U.S. Providers of International Telecommunications Services Amendment of Part 43 of the Commission
I TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 1 To promote and enhance public safety and to encourage the rapid deployment of IP-enabled voice services. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MAY 1, 00 Mr. GORDON (for himself,
Voice of the Industry 64 j u l y 2012 ISSN 1948-3031 Regional Systems Edition In This Issue: In Cuba, Mystery Shrouds Fate Of Internet Cable U.S. Regulatory Update: FCC Proposes Extraordinary Increases