State Tax Return. Nexus And Web-Related Activities: How The New York "Grinch" Tried To Ruin The Holiday Spirit
|
|
- Griffin Cummings
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 December 2007 Volume 14 Number 11 State Tax Return Nexus And Web-Related Activities: How The New York "Grinch" Tried To Ruin The Holiday Spirit Maryann B. Gall Columbus (614) Carolyn Joy Lee New York (212) Laura A. Kulwicki Columbus (330) As a general rule, since the Supreme Court of the United States decided Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), state tax departments have respected the interstate commerce exemption for internet retailers. The exemption has been respected where the retailer itself has no physical facilities in the state, even if the retailer has certain affiliation advertising arrangements with in-state retailers and other entities, like schools and other organizations, as well as certain "affiliation" arrangements with instate retailers and other entities, like schools and other organizations. However, in early November, 2007, the New York State Department of Taxation & Finance took a different position which is discussed below. Below is a summary of various state positions on this important issue. 1. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMUNICATION DOES NOT CREATE NEXUS IF THE OUT-OF-STATE VENDOR HAS NO PHYSICAL PRESENCE IN THE STATE (a) GENERAL RULE (ii) (iii) For over 60 years, the United States Supreme Court has declared that interstate commerce communication, including various forms of advertising, direct mail, and mail order catalogs, does not create nexus for sales and use tax purposes if the out-of-state vendor has no physical presence in the state. In the "computer age," as noted below, most states have held by statute, regulation, or interpretation, that various forms of advertising on the internet do not create tax nexus. For example, in Section 4 below, discussing website linking arrangements, Illinois, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Texas and Virginia uniformly held that linking arrangements, sometimes called "affiliation agreements," did not create nexus for an out-of-state internet vendor. New York's tax law expressly provided that an out-of-state vendor was not subject to tax if its only connection to the Empire State was
2 advertising stored on a server located in New York or if its advertising was disseminated or displayed on the internet by an entity subject to tax in New York. See Section 4(d). (iv) However, for less than a week, the New York State Department of Taxation & Finance took a different position. In TSB-M-07(6)S, issued November 9, 2007, New York attempted to treat affiliation arrangements between an out-of-state internet vendor and a New York "agent" as sufficient to create sales tax nexus. In less than a week, the New York Department pulled the new memorandum off its website. However, the broader implications of this position remain unclear, especially since the November 9, 2007, memorandum noted that it was intended "to clarify current policy and does not reflect any change in requirements for vendors doing business in New York State." 2. MAINTAINING A WEBSITE ON A COMPUTER SERVER IN THE STATE (a) California Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18, Under California law, an out-of-state retailer whose only contact with California is the use of a computer server on the Internet to create or maintain a web site does not have substantial nexus with the state. No Internet service provider, on-line provider or other similar provider of Internet access services or World Wide Web hosting services shall be deemed the agent or representative of any out-of-state retailer solely as the result of the service provider maintaining a web site on a computer server that is physically located in the state. In summary, agency nexus is not created when an out-of-state company uses an in-state computer server to either host its web site or transact e- commerce. (b) Maryland Responses to CCH Internet/Electronic Commerce Survey indicate that having a web page on a computer server in Maryland by itself does not create nexus. (c) New Jersey Responses to CCH Internet/Electronic Commerce Survey, CCH (N.J. Div. of Tax Sept. 22, 1999).
3 In the Department s response to the CCH Internet Survey, the Department stated that the maintenance of a web page on a computer server located in New Jersey does not give rise to sales/use tax collection responsibility for an out-ofstate vendor with respect to sales of products delivered into New Jersey. For income tax nexus purposes, the Department concluded that nexus will be created if the taxpayer also has some physical presence in New Jersey connected with the construction, maintenance or operation of the website. According to the Department, the computer server and the technicians that kept it functioning are located in New Jersey, and the web page is accessible in New Jersey by downloading it into computers located in New Jersey. As such, the out-of-state vendor is considered to have the intention to exploit the market in New Jersey and consequently, would be considered doing business in New Jersey. In addition, the vendor is considered to be employing or maintaining tangible personal property in the state which also would give rise to nexus. N.J.A.C. 18:71.6(a).2.v. See also Response to CCH Internet/Electronic Commerce Survey, CCH (Sept. 12, 2000). (d) New York Maintaining a web page on a server located in New York does not, by itself, create nexus for an out-of-state retailer with respect to sales of products delivered in New York. (ii) N.Y. Tax Law 12 (2003). New York s tax statutes expressly provide that an out-ofstate company is not subject to income tax, and will not be required to collect sales tax, if its only connection is advertising stored on a server located in-state, or if its advertising is disseminated or displayed on the Internet by an individual or entity subject to tax in New York State. (e) Oklahoma Ok. Admin. Code 710: The use of an on-line service or the establishment of a website, whether the server on which the website is maintained is located inside or outside Oklahoma, is not a sufficient physical presence in Oklahoma, absent any other
4 connection, to require the website owner to register as a business and to collect Oklahoma sales tax on sales of tangible personal property or service to consumers located in Oklahoma or on sales of goods sold for use in Oklahoma. (f) Texas (ii) Maintaining a web page on a third-party server in Texas does not create nexus for an out-of-state seller unless the seller owns, leases or rents the server. Hearing No. 44,127, CCH (Tex. Cmptr. Pub. Accts. Nov. 22, 2005). The Texas Department stated that the location of the server will be disregarded for determining the vendor s situs or for nexus unless the Texas server is owned, leased, or rented by the vendor. See also Rul. No L and Rul. No L (an out-of-state seller of taxable items who owns, leases, or rents a server in Texas has nexus with Texas, but an out-of-state seller who sells products on a website stored on a Texas server that is owned or maintained by a third party does not have nexus in Texas). (g) Vermont Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 32, 5811(15)(C)(ii), 9701(9)(H)(2003). Vermont will not tax an out-of-state company if its activities are limited to using in-state computer servers for e- commerce or maintaining a web site including owning the server. Accordingly, ownership of server by an out-of-state company in Vermont, by itself, does not establish substantial nexus over the company for Vermont sales and use tax, income and franchise tax purposes. (h) Virginia P.D , 2000 Va. Tax LEXIS 75 (Va. Dep't of Taxation Apr. 14, 2000). Facts: Taxpayer was an out-of-state company with no physical presence in Virginia engaged in the sale of auto parts. Taxpayer had websites that allowed customers to view and order products. If an order was placed, the product was shipped from inventory located outside of Virginia. Taxpayer was contemplating doing business with web hosting companies located in Virginia. One alternative was a
5 managed hosting service, whereby the web hosting company would provide power and bandwidth connections, other web hosting services, and Internet servers dedicated exclusively to Taxpayer s websites. These servers were owned by and remain the property of the web hosting company. A second alternative was a co-locating hosting service. Under this alternative, the web hosting company would provide the power and bandwidth connections and other web hosting services to servers which were owned or leased by Taxpayer. Taxpayer s servers would be located in Virginia at the web hosting service s facility. Taxpayer s servers would be dedicated exclusively to Taxpayer s websites. Held: The Department held that no nexus would be created under both alternatives and thus Taxpayer would not be subject to Virginia sales and use taxes. The Department held that Taxpayer met the definition of a dealer but did not find nexus because the use of servers, by itself, did not constitute physical presence sufficient under the Commerce Clause. Based on this ruling, nexus will not be established for out-of-state vendors whose only presence is the use of computer servers provided to them under a Virginia managed hosting service. Nor will nexus be established for out-of-state vendors whose only presence is the use of computer servers owned by them in connection with a Virginia co-location hosting service. Washington Wash. Rev. Code Washington does not tax web site hosting or e-commerce conducted on an in-state computer server for an out-of-state company as long as the company, or an affiliate, does not own the server. 3. MAINTAINING WEBSITES ACCESSIBLE BY IN-STATE RESIDENTS (a) South Carolina Rev. Rul. #98-3 (S.C. Dep t of Revenue April 30, 1998). Facts: An Ohio company has a web site server in North Carolina. The web site can be accessed in South Carolina through a South Carolina or out-of-state third party Internet service provider.
6 Held: The Department held that the Ohio company did not have nexus with South Carolina for income tax purposes. According to the Department, a website which is accessible in, but not located in, South Carolina is viewed as the equivalent of an 800 telephone number. Soliciting through electronic mail is viewed as the equivalent of soliciting by letter. (b) Tennessee Letter Ruling No , 1999 Tenn. Rev. Rul. LEXIS 4 (Mar. 17, 1999). Facts: Taxpayer operated retail stores and sales offices located through the country, including Tennessee. Beside employing direct salespeople who solicited sales, Taxpayer also sold its products via mail order and solicited mail order sales through catalogs, other promotional material and its web site. Held: The Department concluded that maintaining web sites accessible by Tennessee residents is no different than any other mail order business and would also, absent all other indicators, fail to rise to the level of nexus. 4. WEBSITE LINKING ARRANGEMENTS (a) Illinois Priv. Ltr. Rul. No. ST GIL, 2006 Ill. PLR LEXIS 81 (Ill. Dept. of Rev. Apr. 19, 2006). Facts: Taxpayer sold footwear over the Internet. It had no traditional physical presence in Illinois and it did not maintain its website or server in Illinois. Although most of the footwear it sold was acquired from unrelated third-party vendors, Taxpayer also sold private label shoes that were designed, manufactured, marketed and sold by sister companies through affiliated brick and mortar retail stores (some of which were in Illinois) and via the Internet on their own separately-branded websites. Taxpayer planned to pay its sister companies to send out s directing their customers to Taxpayer s website. In addition, Taxpayer will pay an arm s-length price to have its link appear on the sister companies separate websites.
7 Held: The Illinois Department of Revenue held that the link on the Sister Companies website to the [Taxpayer s] website will not create nexus for sales and use tax purposes in Illinois, primarily because all solicitation was done via the Internet. Key to the Department s determination was that all technology infrastructure for Taxpayer and the sister companies was located entirely outside Illinois, and that there was no local element or solicitation whatsoever in this link. The Department also noted that tax collection obligations based on website linking activities run afoul of the Internet Tax Freedom Act by discriminating against electronic commerce. Because the ruling expressly noted that the companies at issue had no technology infrastructure in Illinois, it is possible that the Department could reach a different result if the sister companies had conducted its website operations from within Illinois or maintained its Internet shopping mall on a server located in Illinois. (ii) Priv. Ltr. Rul. No. ST GIL, 2005 Ill. PLR LEXIS 11 (Ill. Dept. of Rev. Jan. 11, 2005). Facts: Taxpayer was an out-of-state corporation engaged in the sale of nutritional supplements via a website. Taxpayer s website was maintained on an out-of-state server. All design, implementation, support, maintenance, and administrative services associated with Taxpayer s website were performed outside Illinois. Taxpayer planned to enter into an Affiliate Agreement with various retailers (some of them had physical presence in Illinois) who themselves maintained websites accessible through the Internet. Under this Agreement, the affiliate partner s website contained an Internet link to the Taxpayer s website. Held: The Department declined to make any nexus determination but set out the applicable principles of law as guidance. Authority cited by the Department included Quill and Brown s Furniture. (b) Missouri Ltr. Rul. No. LR2257, 2004 Mo. Tax Ltr. Rul. LEXIS 82 (Mo. Dept. of Rev. Dec. 17, 2004).
8 Facts: Taxpayer was an Internet seller that had no physical presence in Missouri. Taxpayer planned to enter into agreements with various retailers who maintained websites on servers located within Missouri. Under the proposed agreement, a link to Taxpayer s website would be placed on the retailer s websites. Taxpayer would pay a commission to each retailer for purchasers routed to Taxpayer via the retailer s website. Held: The Department held that Taxpayer did not have nexus for sales tax, income tax, and franchise tax in Missouri due to its web link on the retailer s website (even when the retailer had nexus with Missouri). (c) New Mexico Ruling , CCH (N.M. Taxation and Rev. Dept. May 18, 2005). Facts: Taxpayer was a Nevada corporation engaged in the sale of tangible personal property via a web site accessible through the Internet. Taxpayer had no sales force and no employees or property in New Mexico. The server for Taxpayer s website was located in Ohio. Taxpayer planned to enter into agreements with other Internet retailers ( affiliate partners ), some of whom had websites maintained on servers in New Mexico. Under these agreements, the affiliate partners agree to carry a linked advertisement on their websites. If a customer browsing that web page clicks on the advertising and links to Taxpayer s web page, Taxpayer will pay the affiliated partner a commission on any resulting sales. Taxpayer and the affiliate partners do not have any connection or affiliation beyond the web link capability. Held: The Department held the website advertising link and commission arrangements with the affiliate partners would not create nexus for Taxpayer for New Mexico gross receipts and compensating use tax purposes. Specifically, the Department relied upon a statutory safe harbor for computer websites. Under New Mexico law, engaging in business for gross receipts and compensating use tax purposes does not include having a worldwide web site as a third party content provider on a computer physically located in New Mexico but owned by another nonaffiliated person. N.M. Stat. Ann
9 (d) New York N.Y. Tax Law 12 (2003). New York s tax statutes expressly provide that an out-ofstate company is not subject to tax if its only connection is advertising stored on a server located in-state, or if its advertising is disseminated or displayed on the Internet by an individual or entity subject to tax in New York State. (ii) TSB-M-07(6)S (Withdrawn) This short-lived Technical Services bureau Memorandum addressed the sales tax nexus of internet vendors who use independent contractors, agents or other representatives within New York State to solicit sales or to make or maintain a market for their products or services. The Memorandum provided three examples of the situations it sought to cover: A vendor of skis contracted with a New York ski club to maintain on the ski club s website links to the vendor s website. The ski club then solicited its members and the local community to purchase the vendor s products through those links, and earned commissions the vendor paid on sales originating through the ski club s website. Instead of having a link on its website, the ski club encouraged its members and the community to purchase from the vendor s website using a code number. Through that code the vendor associated the sales with the ski club, and paid commissions accordingly. (C) An individual authored a book that was sold on a retail e- commerce website. He traveled throughout New York promoting his book, referring purchasers to the vendor s website. He was paid commissions on sales originating from the link he maintained, on his own website, to the vendor s website. In each case, the Department concluded that the vendor had nexus to New York. Specifically, the vendors were soliciting business in New York through the representatives, and thus satisfied the physical presence necessary for sales tax nexus. As noted above, the Memorandum explicitly described this as a clarification, and not any change in policy. Nevertheless, the Memorandum provided an amnesty of sorts for vendors with contacts like those described in the Memorandum, provided they registered and began collecting
10 sales tax by December 7, 2007 (a mere thirty days after the Memorandum was issued). Following adverse press coverage, which characterized the Memorandum as an Amazon tax and a pre-holiday tax grab suitable of the Grinch, the Memorandum was withdrawn. Query, however, whether the genie still fits in the bottle. The Memorandum was described by Department officials as based on Scripto, longstanding authority for the proposition that in-state solicitation by independent contractors is sufficient contact to establish sales tax nexus. 362 U.S. 207 (1960). And as compared with the fact pattern described in the Illinois ruling (4(a), above), the representatives in the Memorandum were regularly soliciting sales through activities carried on in New York. Thus, whether the Department s position is really withdrawn, or instead might resurface in audits or as prospective, revenue-raising legislation, remains to be seen. (e) North Carolina CCH Survey on the Sales and Use Taxation of E-Commerce, CCH (N.C. Dept of Rev. July 11, 2000). The North Carolina Department of Revenue provided some nexus guidance in its informal responses to general questions regarding sales and use tax nexus, including questions related to web malls and website advertising. This non-binding response indicated that the state would find nexus if an Internet seller pays for banner exchanges, perclick commission on a third-party web page displayed in North Carolina. However, no nexus is created if the seller pays for advertising only on such web page. With specific regard to web malls, the Department concluded that nexus does not exist if the seller has a webbased mall arrangement (a web site comprised of several other commercial web sites) with a mall in your state under which the mall provides services for the seller such as design, advertising or order processing. (f) Texas Letter No L (Tex. Cmptr. of Pub. Accts. Jan. 5, 1998). Facts: Taxpayer had no physical presence in Texas and received its website orders through a server located outside Texas. Taxpayer s only connection with Texas was that it
11 had a link to its website on an unrelated third party s website that was located on a Texas server. Held: The Comptroller held that such website linking arrangement did not create nexus for Taxpayer in Texas for sales tax purposes. (g) Virginia Rul. No , 2005 Va. Tax LEXIS 145 (Va. Dept. of Tax Aug. 2, 2005). Facts: Taxpayer was an Internet seller located outside Virginia. Taxpayer was seeking to enter into website linking arrangements with various retail partners. Pursuant to the agreement, an Internet link would be placed on the retail partners website that would establish a direct link to Taxpayer s website. The link also would contain technology provided by Taxpayer that allowed Taxpayer to track sales to individuals who made purchases from Taxpayer while linked through the retail partners website. The retail partners owned or used computer servers within Virginia, but had no other physical presence nexus in Virginia. The ruling did not indicate whether or not the taxpayer paid a commission to its retail partners. Held: The Department concluded that Taxpayer s use of an Internet link on these facts did not create nexus in Virginia for sales and use tax purposes. The Department similarly concluded that nexus did not exist for income tax purposes. The Department found that the retail partners were independent contractors acting on behalf of Taxpayer, and also reasoned that permission to include Taxpayer s link and sales tracking technology on a website by a retail partner did not exceed the protection afforded by P.L As such, Taxpayer would not be subject to either the sales and use tax or the corporate income tax based on its relationship with its Virginia partners. 5. OTHERS (a) New York Advisory Opinion, No. S990421A, TSB-A-99(49)S (N.Y. Dept. of Tax and Finance Nov. 17, 1999). Facts: Sothebys (Taxpayer) established and maintained an Internet website on which dealers offered property for sale
12 by auction. It was not known whether the server will be located in New York state. Held: The Department held that Sothebys activities in connection with the website constituted a combination of the provision of Internet advertising services and fulfillment services. These activities were insufficient to make Sothebys a vendor of the auctioned items. (b) Texas Ruling 9609L1438G12 (Tex. Cmptr. Pub. Accts. Sept. 18, 1996). Facts: A California company ( MallCo ) provided support, maintenance, and administration of an electronic mall accessible through the Internet. The mall was maintained on a server outside of Texas. MallCo performed the following services for its Texas clients: (1) website design and set up; (ii) website maintenance and support; (iii) receive, record, and take payment for sales made through the mall; and (iv) send the client its share of mall sales. MallCo received a commission on all mall sales, but its clients were solely responsible for filling any order generated through the mall. Held: The Department held that MallCo did not have nexus with Texas for sales tax purposes. According to the Department, even if MallCo was acting as an agent for Texas clients under the terms of its contracts with such clients, such agency relationship itself is not sufficient to constitute nexus in Texas sufficient to subject MallCo s own sales of tangible personal property to sales tax. MallCo, however, as agent for the retailers located in Texas, would be responsible for the collection of sales tax due on sales transacted with the retailers customers in Texas. In addition, the Department held that retailers located outside Texas would not acquire nexus solely based on their relationship with MallCo. This article is reprinted from the State Tax Return, a Jones Day monthly newsletter reporting on recent developments in state and local tax. Requests for a subscription to the State Tax Return or permission to reproduce this publication, in whole or in part, or comments and suggestions should be sent to Gail Whelan (214/ )1 in Jones Day s Dallas Office, 2727 N. Harwood, Dallas, Texas or StateTaxReturn@jonesday.com. Jones Day All Rights Reserved. No portion of the article may be reproduced or used without express permission. Because of its generality, the information contained herein should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts and circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only.
State Tax Return. Maryland Legislation Requires Corporate Taxpayers To Bare It All. December 2007 SCHEDULE
December 2007 Volume 14 Number 11 SCHEDULE 1 Maryland Legislation Requires Corporate Taxpayers To Bare It All 5 Frank and Ernest 6 Michigan Repeals Services Tax In The Nick Of Time 7 Floodgates Reopen:
More informationJune 2010 State Tax Return
June 2010 State Tax Return Volume 17 Number 2 Colorado Leads the Charge: Adopts Affiliate Nexus and New Notice and Reporting Requirements for Sales Tax and Economic Nexus Rules for Income Tax Laura A.
More informationState Tax Nexus General Concepts
State Tax Nexus General Concepts Linda Joers Senior Manager, Deloitte Tax LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin December 1, 2011 Agenda General Nexus Principles Income Tax Nexus Sales/Use Tax Nexus Taxpayer Responses
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Major Nexus Developments of 2010 Examined; States Follow Trend of Adopting Bright-Line Nexus Standards During 2010,
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New Mexico Supreme Court Holds Online Retailer Has Substantial Nexus for Gross Receipts Tax Due to In-State Retailer
More informationState Tax Return. i. The Alabama Supreme Court has since denied the Department s petition for review.
July 2007 Volume 14 Number 7 State Tax Return NEXUS: UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Maryann B. Gall Laura A. Kulwicki Columbus Columbus (614) 469-3924 (330) 656-0416 We keep track of nexus developments
More informationCloud Computing and Affiliate Nexus
Cloud Computing and Affiliate Nexus Jonathan Feldman Charlie Kearns Eric Tresh July 20, 2011 1 Agenda Cloud Computing What is Cloud Computing? Nexus Characterization Determines Taxability State Taxability
More informationState Tax Return. Vendor Beware: Drop Shipments May Result In Unexpected Sales Tax Collection Obligations
June 2007 Volume 14 Number 6 State Tax Return Vendor Beware: Drop Shipments May Result In Unexpected Sales Tax Collection Obligations Phyllis J. Shambaugh Columbus (614) 281-3824 This article will be published
More informationOnline Sales Taxes and E-Fairness
Georgia Chamber of Commerce s 2011 Tax Forum November 3, 2011 Stephen Kranz Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Washington, D.C. Warren Townsend Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, AR Online Sales Taxes and
More informationSales Taxation of Cloud Computing
Sales Taxation of Cloud Computing Accounting & Financial Women s Alliance Annual Conference New Orleans September 29, 2014 Laurie Wik, Tax Director, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Learning Objectives
More informationVolume 19 Number 1 March 2012 NEXUS: FOURTH QUARTER 2011 DEVELOPMENTS. Karen H. Currie Dallas 1.214.969.5285 kcurrie@jonesday.com
Volume 19 Number 1 March 2012 NEXUS: FOURTH QUARTER 2011 DEVELOPMENTS Charolette Noel Dallas 1.214.969.4538 cfnoel@jonesday.com Karen H. Currie Dallas 1.214.969.5285 kcurrie@jonesday.com We keep track
More informationC loud computing, which grants users the ability to
Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report Reproduced with permission from Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report, Volume: 19 Issue: 43, 10/26/2012. Copyright 2012 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)
More informationFTA Annual Conference June 17, 2012 Jeffrey A. Friedman, Sutherland Harley T. Duncan, KPMG. Hey You! Get Off Of My Cloud!
FTA Annual Conference June 17, 2012 Jeffrey A. Friedman, Sutherland Harley T. Duncan, KPMG Hey You! Get Off Of My Cloud! 1 Agenda Cloud Computing What is Cloud Computing? Nexus Characterization Determines
More informationTAX INFORMATION RELEASE NO. 96-1
BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO GOVERNOR MAZIE HIRONO LT. GOVERNOR RAY K. KAMIKAWA DIRECTOR OF TAXATION SUSAN K. INOUYE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION STATE OF HAWAII P.O. BOX 259 Honolulu, Hawaii 96809 January
More informationSales Tax, SaaS, and Cloud Computing. Colorado Bar Association Tax Luncheon September 26, 2012
Sales Tax, SaaS, and Cloud Computing Colorado Bar Association Tax Luncheon September 26, 2012 Presented by Bruce Nelson, M.A., CPA bnelson@eksh (970) 282-5446 Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner Hottman PC 7979 E Tufts
More informationCLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF APPORTIONMENT
CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF APPORTIONMENT Marilyn A. Wethekam Jordan M. Goodman The pinnacle is always small. 1 Agenda Overview of Cloud Computing and SaaS How to Approach Taxation Multistate Perspective and
More informationPhysical Presence Triggers N/A
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut District of Columbia Delaware Authorization Requirements License from AL Department of Postsecondary Education; Certificate of Authority
More informationIn today s business climate, lean inventories are
September 2007 Vendor Beware: Drop Shipments May Result in Unexpected Sales Tax Collection Obligations * By Phyllis J. Shambaugh In today s business climate, lean inventories are essential to reduce business
More informationTable of Mortgage Broker (and Originator) Bond Laws by State Current as of July 1, 2010
Alabama Ala. Code 5-25-5 Bond only required where licensee does not submit evidence of net worth. Loan originators may be covered by Alaska 25,000 Alaska Stat. 06.60.045 Arizona $10,000-$15,000 Ariz. Rev.
More informationMARKETING AND SALE OF TRAVEL INSURANCE GETS TOUGHER IN NEW YORK
MARKETING AND SALE OF TRAVEL INSURANCE GETS TOUGHER IN NEW YORK (FORC Journal: Vol. 18 Edition 2 - Summer 2007) According to Bureau of Transportation statistics at the U.S. Department of Transportation,
More informationTax Management. Tax Base
Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report Reproduced with permission from Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report, Volume: 20 Issue: 43, 10/25/2013. Copyright 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)
More informationUNDERSTANDING NEXUS TO AVOID UNEXPECTED LIABILITY
UNDERSTANDING NEXUS TO AVOID UNEXPECTED LIABILITY ONESOURCE Indirect Tax The Tax & Accounting Business of Thomson Reuters Presenter: NICOLE HUBERTY February 7, 2013 Upcoming Events Webinars: February 12,
More informationIWLA - STATEMENT OF FACTS
IWLA - STATEMENT OF FACTS The International Warehouse Logistics Associations ("IWLA") is a warehousing and logistics industry association representing more than 400 members that are thirdparty logistics
More informationWhat s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax Let s Get Personal About Sourcing Sales of Personal Services Out-of-state service providers should be familiar with how states source
More informationRelief from Effects of Amazon Laws - Multistate Tax Commission Voluntary Disclosure
Relief from Effects of Amazon Laws - Multistate Tax Commission Voluntary Disclosure by Betty J. Williams 1 and Ulises Pizano-Diaz 2 Given the current economic climate and the ever increasing global nature
More informationUniform Cost-Sharing Regulations
UniFirst.com Uniform Program Options Uniform Cost-Sharing Regulations Uniform cost-sharing through employee payroll deductions presents many benefits to both the uniform wearer and the company. The net
More informationMarch 18, 2015. Dear XXXX:
ST 15-0020 GIL 03/18/2015 SALE OF SERVICE If no tangible personal property is transferred to the customer, then no Illinois Retailers Occupation Tax or Service Occupation Tax would apply. See 86 Ill. Adm.
More informationMEMORANDUM. Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages
MEMORANDUM DATE: August 26, 2008 RE: Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages The following sets forth the individual state and federal requirements regarding express consent for the
More informationModel Regulation Service - January 1993 GUIDELINES ON GIFTS OF LIFE INSURANCE TO CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS
Model Regulation Service - January 1993 These Guidelines have been prepared for use by state insurance department personnel who may be presented with questions or concerns regarding charitable gifts of
More informationADULT PROTECTION STATUTES DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS QUICK REFERENCE 2008 & 2009
ADULT PROTECTION STATUTES DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS QUICK REFERENCE 2008 & 2009 STATE: DELETIONS (RED): ADDITIONS (GREEN): Alabama Ala. Code 38-9-7 Ala. Code 38-9-8 Arkansas Ark. Code Ann. 9-20-103 Ark.
More informationState and Local Tax: Up in the Air: Sales Taxation of Cloud Computing. National State and Local Tax Practice
State and Local Tax: Up in the Air: Sales Taxation of Cloud Computing Craig Williams Managing Director Marshal Kline Managing Director National State and Local Tax Practice Objectives Provide an overview
More informationNexus Reviews: Uncovering State Sales or Income Tax Obligations Designing an Effective Internal Process to Identify Potential Tax Exposures
Presenting a live 110 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Nexus Reviews: Uncovering State Sales or Income Tax Obligations Designing an Effective Internal Process to Identify Potential Tax Exposures THURSDAY,
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP GT Perspective on the Marketplace Fairness Act The Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA), currently under consideration
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #01-15 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #01-15 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of
More informationMODEL REGULATION TO REQUIRE REPORTING OF STATISTICAL DATA BY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES
Model Regulation Service June 2004 MODEL REGULATION TO REQUIRE REPORTING OF STATISTICAL DATA Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-24 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-24 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP U.S. Bankruptcy Court Rules Imposition of Oregon Corporate Excise Tax on Out-of-State Holding Company Was Unconstitutional
More informationState Income and Franchise Tax Laws that Conform to the REIT Modernization Act of 1999 (May 1, 2001). 1
State Income and Franchise Tax Laws that Conform to the REIT Modernization Act of 1999 (May 1, 2001). 1 1. Alabama does not adopt the Code on a regular basis but instead specifically incorporates only
More informationNEXUS. Navigating Through the Rising Oceans of Nexus- Economic Nexus and P.L 86-272, Protected and Unprotected Activity
NEXUS Navigating Through the Rising Oceans of Nexus- Economic Nexus and P.L 86-272, Protected and Unprotected Activity Ben Elliott, Deloitte Tax LLP Scott Ewing, Deloitte Tax LLP May 14, 2015 1 Agenda
More informationListing of Mortgage Broker Definitions
State Definition Citation Text ALABAMA MORTGAGE BROKERS LICENSING ACT Mortgage broker means any person who directly or indirectly solicits, Ala. Code 5 25 2(9) processes, places, or negotiates mortgage
More informationMarke C. Greene, Moss Adams LLP Jeffrey A. Friedman, Sutherland Michele Borens, Sutherland TEI Region VIII Conference Seattle, June 9, 2014
Marke C. Greene, Moss Adams LLP Jeffrey A. Friedman, Sutherland Michele Borens, Sutherland TEI Region VIII Conference Seattle, June 9, 2014 On Cloud 9: Almost 10 Use Cases of Cloud Taxation 1 Use Case
More informationModel Regulation Service October 1993
Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 1. Model Regulation Service October 1993 PERMITTING SMOKER/NONSMOKER MORTALITY TABLES Authority Purpose
More informationSURVEY OF THE CURRENT INSURANCE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR AFFINITY MARKETIG 1 A
SURVEY OF THE CURRENT INSURANCE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR AFFINITY MARKETIG ARRANGEMENTS (FORC Journal: Vol. 23 Edition 4 - Winter 2012) Kevin G. Fitzgerald, Esq. (414) 297-5841 N. Wesley Strickland (850)
More informationSTATE TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR STOCK PLAN PROFESSIONALS
STATE TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR STOCK PLAN PROFESSIONALS A. William Caporizzo Kimberly B. Wethly Julie Hogan Rodgers WilmerHale February 25, 2008 Table of Contents I. State Taxation of Optionee...1 A. State
More informationSales Tax Considerations in Financing Transactions Does Substance over Form Govern?
Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives (Thomson Reuters/Tax & Accounting) Volume 25, Number 10, February 2016 SALES AND USE TAXES Sales Tax Considerations in Financing Transactions Does Substance
More informationINFORMATION BRIEF Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department 600 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 December 1998.
INFORMATION BRIEF Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department 600 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 December 1998 Pat Dalton, Legislative Analyst (651) 296-7434 Internet Taxation Internet
More informationIT 96-50 Tax Type: INCOME TAX Issue: 1005 Penalty (Reasonable Cause Issue) Nexus (Taxable Connection With Or Even Within State)
IT 96-50 Tax Type: INCOME TAX Issue: 1005 Penalty (Reasonable Cause Issue) Nexus (Taxable Connection With Or Even Within State) THE STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DIVISION
More informationTaxing Software and Cloud Computing: Yesterday s Law, Today s Technology
Taxing Software and Cloud Computing: Yesterday s Law, Today s Technology by Carolynn Iafrate Kranz and Iris Kitamura Carolynn Iafrate Kranz is the founder of Industry Sales Tax Solutions, a company that
More informationPostsecondary. Tuition and Fees. Tuition-Setting Authority for Public Colleges and Universities. By Kyle Zinth and Matthew Smith October 2012
Postsecondary Tuition and Fees Introduction Tuition-Setting Authority for Public Colleges and Universities By Kyle Zinth and Matthew Smith October 2012 Who sets tuition? Regardless of the state in question,
More informationSALES TAX EXEMPTION FOR ADVERTISING JUNE, 2015 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE TO EVALUATE TAX PREFERENCES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SALES TAX EXEMPTION FOR ADVERTISING JUNE, 2015 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE TO EVALUATE TAX PREFERENCES PREFERENCE: 58.1-609.6 (5) EXEMPTS ADVERTISING FROM SALES AND USE TAX. SUMMARY: PROVIDES
More informationTSB-A-10(4)C Corporation Tax TSB-A-10(23)S Sales Tax May 27, 2010
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Counsel Advisory Opinion Unit STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO. Z071015A On October 15, 2007,
More informationState and local tax update for law firms. Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP,
State and local tax update for law firms Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an independently owned and managed member of Baker Tilly International. 2010 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause,
More informationDefault Definitions of Person in State Statutes
Default Definitions of Person in State Statutes State Alabama ALA. CODE 1-1-1 (2014) 1-1-1. Definitions. The following words, whenever they appear in this code, shall have the signification attached to
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 06-27 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 06-27 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
More informationPUBLIC INSURANCE ADJUSTER FEE PROVISIONS 50 STATE SURVEY AS OF 6/29/07. LIKELY YES [Cal. Ins. Code 15027]
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California [Cal. Ins. Code 15027] ] Colorado [Cal. Ins. Code 15027] Connecticut Delaware of the actual or final settlement of a loss [Conn. Ins. Code 38a-788-8] 2.5% of
More informationADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE AND LONG TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM LAWS: CITATIONS, BY STATE
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE AND LONG TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM LAWS: CITATIONS, BY STATE (Laws current as of 12/31/06) Prepared by Lori Stiegel and Ellen Klem of the American Bar Association
More informationState taxation in a global environment factor presence nexus considerations for foreign companies. by Charlie Fischer, Deloitte Tax LLP
State taxation in a global environment factor presence nexus considerations for foreign companies by Charlie Fischer, Deloitte Tax LLP Spring 2015 FEATURED ARTICLES ISSUE 121 MARCH 5, 2015 State Taxation
More informationREGULATORY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
REGULATORY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 1. Federal Consumer Protection Regulations 2. State Activities on Privacy March 29, 2001 ABI has had several questions from the membership about the federal consumer protection
More informationTable A-7. State Medical Record Laws: Minimum Medical Record Retention Periods for Records Held by Medical Doctors and Hospitals*
Summary of statutory or regulatory provision by entity. Alabama As long as may be necessary to treat the patient and for medical legal purposes. Ala. Admin. Code r. 545-X-4-.08 (2007). (1) 5 years. Ala.
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 11-22 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 11-22 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 13-03 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 13-03 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This ruling is based on the particular facts and circumstances presented, and is an interpretation
More informationDigital Unrest Legislation, Litigation and Other Policy Changes Impacting the Tech Sector
Michele Borens, Partner Charlie Kearns, Counsel June 17, 2014 Digital Unrest Legislation, Litigation and Other Policy Changes Impacting the Tech Sector Agenda Industry Trends Related to Digital Goods and
More informationListing of Mortgage Servicer Definitions
State Definition Citation Text ALABAMA This state does not define a mortgage servicer or the act of servicing a mortgage loan under the Mortgage Brokers Licensing Act, Consumer Credit Act or the Secure
More informationJune 2010 State Tax Return
June 2010 State Tax Return Volume 17 Number 2 NEXUS: Update On Recent Developments New Jersey Distinguishes Selling Prewritten Software from Licensing IP; Washington Finds Mere License of Trademark Not
More informationSTATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO. S960209A On February
More informationThis chart accompanies Protection From Creditors for Retirement Plan Assets, in the January 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser.
This chart accompanies Protection From Creditors for Retirement Plan Assets, in the January 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser. State-by-state analysis of IRAs as exempt property State State Statute IRA Alabama
More informationMEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATE STATUTORY
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATE STATUTORY REFERENCE GUIDE 41 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATE STATUTORY REFERENCE GUIDE The following references to statutes relevant to medical malpractice cases are intended exclusively
More informationState Tax Return. Georgia Court Ruling Spotlights Significant Complexities of 338(h)(10) Elections for State Income Tax Purposes
June 2009 State Tax Return Volume 16 Number 2 Georgia Court Ruling Spotlights Significant Complexities of 338(h)(10) Elections for State Income Tax Purposes Kirk Kringelis Atlanta (404) 581-8565 In most
More informationOREGON Multistate Taxation and E-Commerce. John H. Gadon
OREGON Multistate Taxation and E-Commerce John H. Gadon Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP 601 S.W. Second Avenue, Suite 2100 Portland, Oregon 97204-3158 (503) 778-2100 www.lanepowell.com I. Oregon and the
More informationBattle California! Sales Tax Nexus Gets Even More Interesting
Battle California! Sales Tax Nexus Gets Even More Interesting by Thomas H. Steele and Kirsten Wolff Thomas H. Steele is a partner and Kirsten Wolff is an associate with Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco.
More informationGrowing Number of States Enact Amazon Affiliate Nexus Statutes
Growing Number of States Enact Amazon Affiliate Nexus Statutes Critics Call Laws Unconstitutional; Congress Considers Legislative Solution Prepared By: The Tax Group Written By: Ivan H. Golden 1 1 Special
More informationSales Tax on Software, Digital Products and Information Services. Presented by Timothy P. Noonan, Esq.
Sales Tax on Software, Digital Products and Information Services Presented by Timothy P. Noonan, Esq. Today s Discussion Topics Jurisdictional Issues & Sales Tax Nexus How sales tax is applied to the sale
More informationTHE SALES AND USE TAX AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau THE SALES AND USE TAX AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS Effective September 1, 1989, three amendments to the
More informationSales and Use Taxes: Texas
Jay M. Chadha, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP A Q&A guide to sales and use tax law in Texas. This Q&A addresses key areas of sales and use tax law such as tax scope, multi-state transactions and collecting taxes
More informationModel Regulation Service April 2005 GUIDELINES ON CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
Model Regulation Service April 2005 Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI) is life insurance a corporate employer buys covering one or more employees. With COLI, the employer is generally the applicant,
More informationSales and Use Tax Chart: Taxablity of Utilities in the State Sales Tax Source: Bloomberg BNA
Sales and Use Tax Chart: Taxablity of Utilities in the State Sales Tax Source: Bloomberg BNA Jurisdiction Alabama Taxation of Utilities The sale of gas, water, or electricity sold by public utilities is
More informationProtecting Social Security Numbers
Protecting Social Security Numbers: Federal Legislation in Sight STEVEN C. BENNETT, MAURICIO F. PAEZ, and Gwendolynne Chen Due to an alarming increase in identity theft crimes, a bipartisan bill, Protecting
More informationSC REVENUE RULING #97-15. Public Law 86-272 and South Carolina Income Tax. EFFECTIVE DATE: Applies to all periods open under the statute.
State of South Carolina Department of Revenue 301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214 SC REVENUE RULING #97-15 SUBJECT: Public Law 86-272 and South Carolina Income Tax EFFECTIVE
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL32928 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Breastfeeding and Jury Duty: State Laws, Court Rules, and Related Issues May 17, 2005 Douglas Reid Weimer Legislative Attorney American
More informationIII. Nexus Expansion Section 2 sets forth various provisions a state could use to expand a definition of doing business.
I. Introduction The attached model legislative language is a proposal for expanding sales/use tax collection requirements through state lawmaking. The proposal consists of three primary parts: 1. Nexus
More informationState General Sales Tax Rates 2015 As of January 1, 2015
4-Feb-15 General Sales Tax Rates 2015 As of January 1, 2015 Exemptions for General Sales Tax Rate (%) Food 1 Prescription Nonprescription Arizona 5.6 Exempt Exempt Taxable Arkansas 6.5 1.5 4 Exempt Taxable
More informationDIGITAL GOODS & CLOUD COMPUTING
DIGITAL GOODS & IPT ANNUAL CONFERENCE CLOUD COMPUTING Jennifer Jensen S. Matthew McNeilly State & Local Tax Director Sr. Manager State/Local Tax PricewaterhouseCoopers Amazon.com McLean, VA Seattle, WA
More informationChart Overview of Nurse Practitioner Scopes of Practice in the United States
Chart Overview of Nurse Practitioner Scopes of Practice in the United States Sharon Christian, JD, Catherine Dower, JD, Edward O Neil, PhD, MPA, FAAN Center for the Health Professions University of California,
More informationNoonan s Notes on Tax Practice State Tax Notes, June 30, 2008, p. 1063 48 State Tax Notes 1063 (June 30, 2008)
Noonan s Notes on Tax Practice State Tax Notes, June 30, 2008, p. 1063 48 State Tax Notes 1063 (June 30, 2008) Multistate Taxation of Stock Option Income -- Time for a National Solution? by Timothy P.
More informationD.C. Code Ann. Prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of tobacco use except where
National Conference of State Legislatures Discrimination Laws Regarding Off-Duty Conduct Updated October 18, 2010 The issue of employees' rights to engage in certain off-duty activities and in the competing
More informationSales and Use Tax Chart: Taxability of Telecommunications Services in the State Sales Tax Source: Bloomberg BNA
Sales and Use Tax Chart: Taxability of Telecommunications Services in the State Sales Tax Source: Bloomberg BNA Jurisdiction Alabama Taxation of Telecommunications Services Telecommunication services are
More information2013 TRUST NEXUS SURVEY:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// BLOOMBERG BNA SPECIAL REPORT 2013 TRUST NEXUS
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-04
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-04 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) 716-6090 Janice K. Brewer Governor
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) 716-6090 Janice K. Brewer Governor CERTIFIED MAIL [redacted] John A. Greene Director The Director's Review of the Decision ) O R D E
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas ALJ Holds Software Delivered to Texas Is Taxable Use On July 2, 2015, a Texas Comptroller Administrative
More informationSTATE BY STATE ANTI-INDEMNITY STATUTES. Sole or Partial Negligence. Alaska X Alaska Stat. 45.45.900. Except for hazardous substances.
State STATE BY STATE ANTI-INDEMNITY STATUTES Sole Negligence Sole or Partial Negligence Closes A.I. Loophole Comments Alabama Alaska Alaska Stat. 45.45.900. Except for hazardous substances. Arizona (Private
More informationStaying Out of Trouble Sales & Use Tax Due Diligence for Mergers and Acquisitions
Staying Out of Trouble Sales & Use Tax Due Diligence for Mergers and Acquisitions Council on State Taxation 39 th Annual Meeting Orland, Florida October 22, 2008 Jeffrey S. Blum National Leader of Multistate
More informationLIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY LANGUAGE SIMPLIFICATION MODEL ACT
Model Regulation Service April 1995 LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY LANGUAGE SIMPLIFICATION MODEL ACT Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section
More informationGROUP LIFE INSURANCE DEFINITION AND GROUP LIFE INSURANCE STANDARD PROVISIONS MODEL ACT
Table of Contents Model Regulation Service October 2005 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE DEFINITION AND GROUP LIFE INSURANCE STANDARD PROVISIONS MODEL ACT Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section
More informationArticles: A Roadmap of How One Governor Used Economic Development to Create a New Virginia Economy: Part Two
Multistate Tax State Tax Matters August 21, 2015 In this issue: Articles: A Roadmap of How One Governor Used Economic Development to Create a New Virginia Economy: Part Two... 1 Income/Franchise: Alabama:
More information50-State Analysis. School Attendance Age Limits. 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO 80203-3442 303.299.3600 Fax: 303.296.8332
0-State Analysis School Attendance Age Limits 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO 80203-32 303.299.3600 Fax: 303.296.8332 Introduction School Attendance Age Limits By Marga Mikulecky April 2013 This 0-State
More informationState Taxation of Cloud Computing
Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal Volume 29 Issue 2 Article 3 2-28-2013 State Taxation of Cloud Computing Stephen J. Lusch Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj
More informationPerformance Marketing Ass n, Inc. v. Hamer, Illinois Supreme Court, No. 114496, October 18, 2013
October 2013 Illinois Provisions of Click-Through Nexus Law Held Void The Illinois Supreme Court held that the definition provisions in Public Act 96-1544 (H.B. 3659), Laws 2011, the sales tax click-through
More informationMASS MARKETING OF PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE MODEL REGULATION
Table of Contents Model Regulation Service January 1996 MASS MARKETING OF PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE MODEL REGULATION Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7.
More informationNON-LICENSEE INTERNET ADVERTISING AND REFERRALS. Marc M. Tract, Esq. 212.940.8760
NON-LICENSEE INTERNET ADVERTISING AND REFERRALS Marc M. Tract, Esq. 212.940.8760 It has been five years since the New York Insurance Department ( New York Department ) issued Circular Letter No. 5 (2001)(the
More information