FOURTH AMENDED OMNIBUS ORDER ON TRIAL SETTING, DISCOVERY AND PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION IN PERSONAL INJURY ASBESTOS LITIGATION (REVISED NOVEMBER, 2004)

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FOURTH AMENDED OMNIBUS ORDER ON TRIAL SETTING, DISCOVERY AND PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION IN PERSONAL INJURY ASBESTOS LITIGATION (REVISED NOVEMBER, 2004)"

Transcription

1 11!02!04 18 :28 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA L0002i023 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE l lei JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, 1N AND FOR MIAMI-DADS COUNTY FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. : 91-80,000 CA 42 1N RE : ASBESTOS LITIGATION FOURTH AMENDED OMNIBUS ORDER ON TRIAL SETTING, DISCOVERY AND PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION IN PERSONAL INJURY ASBESTOS LITIGATION (REVISED NOVEMBER, 2004) This Order shall apply to all asbestos personal injury lawsuits filed in the 11"' judicial Circuit and assigned for pretrial rulings to this Court. This Order supersedes and replaces all previous Omnibus Orders applicable to asbestos personal injury cases. It is the express intention and purpose of the Order that it manage and govern die timing and progress of the trial dockets and discovery in asbestos personal injury litigation. However, this Order shall not apply to cases presently scheduled for trial within 180 days of this Order. 1. MASTER FILE This Court, to eliminate redundancy and reduce litigation costs, has established the In RE : Asbestos Litigation file, case No ,000 CA 42. Said repository file shall be used for the filing of such pleadings, papers or other documents as this Court may specify, from time to time, so as to reduce the unnecessary redundancy o filings in individual asbestos personal injury lawsuits filed in the 11`'' judicial Circuit.

2 11!02!04 18 :28 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgJuusiuzs Case No ,000 Page 2 Parties to asbestos personal injury cases which have been assigned to this Court for pretrial rulings may file any and/or all of the following documents in the In Re : Asbestos Litigation file : A. Plaintiffs may file Master Complaints, which maybe adopted in individual cases by use of a short-form complaint. The Master Complaint shall set forth, in separate counts, sufficient ultimate facts to support all causes of action upon which Plaintiffs' claims are based. Separate Master Complaints applicable to single plaintiffs, married plaintiffs, and deceased plaintiffs may be filed by each Plaintiff's law firm. Plaintiffs shall designate "Asbestos Litigation" on the Civil Cover Sheet. B. Each Defendant may file Master Answers, Affirmative Defenses, and Motions to Dismiss directed to the Plaintiffs' Master Complaint(s). These Master Answers, Affirmative Defenses, and Motions to Dismiss shall be deemed filed in each individual case in which proper service has been made upon Defendant(s). C. Each Plaintiff and each Defendant may serve on all other parties a Standard/Master Witness and Exhibit List (unless previously filed and served), which shall he dated and which shall apply in all asbestos personal injury actions governed by this Omnibus Order. Additionally the parties may file in the In Re : Asbestos Litigation file any other pleadings, motions, memorandum, etc. which have application to more than one case pending before this Court. The Court will file in the In Re : Asbestos Litigation file all General or Omnibus Orders which rulings have application to more than one case pending before this Court. The rulings contained within these General or Omnibus Orders shall be applicable to all asbestos personal injury

3 11!02!04 18 :27 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgJuuviuZJ Case No. 91-Sq000 Page 3 cases assigned to this Court unless otherwise specified in the Order. It shall not be necessary to file copies of such Orders in each individual file. All filings in the In Re : Asbestos Litigation file or any individual file to which this Order is applicable shall designate in the style of the case, after the case number, "Asbestos Litigation" to is designated in the style of this Order. A copy of this Order shall be filed in the In Re : Asbestos Litigation file within ten (10) days of the entry of the same and shall not be required thereafter to be filed in each individual asbestos personal injury case. TI. TRIAL SETTINGS A. The Court shall schedule trial dockets for each Plaintiff's firm. The trial dockets shall consist of cases for each trial week which shall be tried in sequential order of their case numbers, with the lowest number being scheduled first. B. A case shall be placed on the trial calendar after the last Defendant to be sewed shall have been served. A letter or nonce certifying said service shall be served forthwith upon the Court, upon all Defense Counsel of record and upon Bice Cole Law Firm, P.L. Upon receipt of the notification aforementioned, the case will be placed on the next available trial docket setting for that Plaintiffs attorney such that the trial date will occur no sooner than nine (9) months after the date of the aforementioned notice.

4 11!02!04 18 :27 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LYJuu.-Jiuzs Casc No ,000 Page 4 C. The Plaintiffs' attorneys shall be responsible for filing and serving trial lists which specifically identify by case number and name those cases to be placed upon specific trial dockets no later than nine (9) months prior to the trial date scheduled for that docket. D. Cases shall not be substituted on any docket except by Order of the Court for good cause shown. E. The case with the lowest case number on each docket shall be tried first. Tf for any reason the lowest numbered case is removed from the docket, the case with the next lowest case number shall be tried. Cases shall be tried in sequential case number order with the lowest number being scheduled first absent good cause shown. However, the Court shall maintain control of its docket sequence. F. This Omnibus Order shall constitute a standing trial order and shall govern trial of all asbestos personal injury actions filed in this Judicial Circuit. G. There shall be no trials scheduled during the month of August unless otherwise ordered by the Court. H. If, upon good cause shown, the Court expedites a cue to a trial date sooner than it would ordinarily be reached, the Court shall set separate discovery, disclosure and filing deadlines for that case individually. i. In recognition of the special nature of asbestos litigation, it enhances the ability of the Court and parties to properly prepare for trial if advance notice of an upcoming trial is

5 11!02!04 18 :28 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA Lgjuuniuzj Case No ,000 Page 5 given to the Court by the parties. Therefore, the parties shall inform the Court and other parties which, if any, individual case is expected to result in a jury trial, at least three (3) months in advance of die trial date. If more flan one (1) individual case is designated as being expected to result in a jury trial on the same trial date, the Court may designate which case or cases must be prepared for trial on that trial date. IiI. A. DEFENDANTS' RULE AND RULE 1.070(j) MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TO STRIKE, AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT IN ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION All substantive causes of action in any Master Original or Master Amended Complaint other than the torts ofnegligent failure to warn and strictproducts liability are hereby dismissed without leave to amend. All causes of actions based upon theories of breach of warranty, whether expressed or implied, fraud or negligent misrepresentation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy are therefore hereby dismissed from the action and stricken from the Complaints. B. Defendants may file Master Answers, Motions to Dismiss and/or Motions to Strike Plaintiff's Complaints, including Affirmative Defenses, raising all defenses available to them, which Motions and Answers shall be deemed filed in each individual case in which proper service has been made upon Defendants. Defenses enumerated in Fla. R. Civ_ P (b) and 1.110(d) should be set forth in Defendants' Answer, and may be set for hearing in individual cases upon proper

6 11!02!04 18 :29 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgJuuriuzs Case No ,000 Pagc 6 notice in accordance wide this Order where appropriate, to the extent such defenses are not adjudicated by this Order. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint to add Defendants but must comply with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the provisions of this Fourth Amended Omnibus Order. C. By virtue of this Order, as amended, this Court has required that Plaintiffs file and serve an exposure Sheet identifying the products, dates and places of each exposure to each Defendant's asbestos-containing products. Accordingly, defense motions for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 1.140(e) are hereby denied. D. Pursuant to Fla. Stat , all allegations in any original or amended complaint alleging claims for punitive damages are hereby stricken. Upon separate motion and hearing no later than thirty (30) days prior to trial, Plaintiff may proffer evidence which Plaintiff believes would provide a reasonable basis for recovery of punitive damages against a given Defendant. A separate proffer must be made with respect to each Defendant from which Plaintiff seeks punitive damages. In the event that such a proffer is made and the Court determines that a reasonable evidentiary basis for the recovery of punitive damages has been demonstrated against a particular Defendant, the issue of punitive damages may be submitted to the jury with respect to that Defendant. The determination whether Plaintiff has demonstrated a reasonable basis for recovery of punitive damages against any given Defendant shall be based

7 11%02!04 18 :29 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgJuun1uca Case No. 91-8Q000 Page 7 upon the governing case law at the time of the hearing on Plaintiff's motion to add a claim for punitive damages. IV. A. FORUM NON CONVENIENS All asbestos personal injury cases shall have attached when served upon Defendants a properly completed Forum Non Conveniens Pact Sheet, a copy of which is appended to this Order. B. Any Defendant may move for a dismissal or transfer of the case to a more convenient forum, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.061,but shall notice said motion for hearing no later than sixty (60) days before trial, and for good cause, the Court may modify the time frame therefore. This time limit does not apply to the trial Court's inherent power to raise the issue of Forum Non Conveniens sua sponte. V. ALL PENDING MOTION HEARINGS The Court will conduct monthly hearings. The Court will issue a schedule to inform counsel of the dates of these monthly hearings. Counsel should schedule all non-emergency matters for these monthly hearings. Parties seeking to have a Motion or mutter heard at the hearing shall provide all parties of record with a copy of the Motion or matter and Notice of Hearing and at least five (5) business day's actual notice of the Motion or matter they intend to argue at the hearing. Tf notice is served less than ten (10) days before the noticed hearing, copies of the notice and motion shall be delivered via facsimile or by hand. Parties shall also serve Bice Cole Law Finn, P.L., with a copy

8 11!02!04 1B :a0 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgJuuaiuzs Case No ,000 Pagc R of the Motion or matter and corresponding Notice of Hearing so that the Motion or matter may be included in the Agenda prepared for each monthly hearing. VT. A. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION Plaintiff shall file and serve "Exposure Sheets" upon all counsel according to the timetable set forth in Paragraph B below. Exposure sheets shall follow this format : 1. Each such Exposure Sheet shall identify the Defendant(s) to whose asbestos fibers and/or asbestos-containing products Plaintiff was allegedly exposed. 2. Such sheets shall identify the asbestos fibers and/or asbestos-containing products to which Plaintiff claims exposure, the date(s) of each exposure, the place of each exposure and the witnesses (Plaintiff, co-worker or another) that will testify as to that exposure. The home address of the witness shall be given. If the witness is represented by counsel in an asbestos case, the name and address of that attorney shall also be given. B. 7n all cases, Plaintiff must serve an Exposure Sheet for a Defendant when that Defendant is served with the Complaint. The Exposure Sheet shall be deemed to be a part of the Complaint and a material allegation of fact. Failure to comply with this requirement shall result in that Defendant being dismissed without prejudice from the lawsuit ; in the event of such a dismissal, the applicable statute of limitations for that

9 11!02%04 1B :a0 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA Lgjuiuiuzo Case No ,000 Page 9 Defendant will be tolled for that period of time from the date of filing the case until the date of dismissal. C. Exposure evidence at trial against a particular Defendant, by testimony or otherwise, shall not deviate from the Exposure Sheet as to that Defendant. However, said exposure sheets may be amended a reasonable time, but no later than thirty (30) days before trial by Court Order for good cause shown. An amendment to an exposure Sheet, if allowed, shall supersede all prior Exposure Sheets as to those Defendants affected by the amendment. 1. In addition to amendment by motion, the Exposure Sheets will be deemed automatically amended to include the additional product exposure and/or work sites identified at a deposition of the Plaintiff upon the service of a Notice of Additional Product Exposure and/or Work Sites upon all Defense Counsel of record within seven (7) days from the date of the Plaintiffs deposition, but no later than thirty (30) days before trial. 2. The Notice shall specify the asbestos containing products, work sites and years at issue. Upon compliance with these requirements, such evidence may be admissible at trial as provided in subsection D. b. If Plaintiff establishes specific exposure to a particular Defendants products as stated above, Plaintiff may then testify as to his or her general familiarity with said

10 11!02!04 1B :a1 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgJuiiiuzs Case No ,000 Page 10 product(s). However, a Plaintiff maynot testify as to job sites, particular products, or co-workers not identified in the Exposure Sheets. E. Exposure sheets are part of the pleadings and are not evidence unless incorporated or adopted in sworn discovery or in admissions by a pity. VII. DISCOVERY A. Interrogatories and Requests.for Production : 1. The Defendants shall utilize the "Standard/Master Interrogatories to Plaintiff' and "Standard/Master Requests for Production to Plaintiff". Plaintiffs shall respond in each individual case to said Standard/Master Interrogatories and Requests for Production no later than sixty (60) days following the filing of the complaint, but no later than one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the tzial date. 2. The Court has approved a set of "Standard/Master Interrogatories to Defendants." Each Defendant who is a party to any individual asbestos personal injury action is required to respond to said Interrogatories within sixty (60) days after service therewith, unless Defendant has previously responded to these same Interrogatories in this Circuit. 3. No sooner than ten (10) days after receiving Plaintiffs' Responses to the Standard/Master Interrogatories, any Defendant may separately serve

11 11!02!04 1B :a2 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgjuiziuZj Case No ,000 Page 11 Supplemental Interrogatories to Plaintiff, but may not repeat questions previously asked. Plaintiffs shall have sixty (60) days to respond to any Supplemental Interrogatories. Plaintiff's may serve Supplemental Interrogatories to Defendants at any time prior to one hundred and twenty (120) days before trial_ Defendants shall have sixty (60) days to respond to any Supplemental Interrogatories. B. Other Discovery : At the time Plaintiff responds to Defendants' Standard/Master Interrogatories, Plaintiff shall also serve on each Defendant the following: 1. Copies of the documents and/or other items requested to be produced in the Standard/Master Requests for Production ; 2. A copy of the Plaintiffs' complete Social Security printout, if the printout has been secured from the Social Security Administration. If the printout has not been received at the time Plaintiff responds to the first set of Interrogatories, Plaintiff shall submit a statement in its place confirming that the printout has been ordered and will be supplied to each Defendant immediately upon its receipt by Plaintiffs' counsel ; or, if a complete printout has not been ordered, Plaintiff will provide a valid signed authorization with the answers to Interrogatories ; 3. Copies of Plaintiffs' income tax returns for five (5) years preceding the date of the filing of the lawsuit and a valid signed authorization to allow Defendants to obtain other relevant income tax returns; and

12 11!02!04 1B :a2 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA Lgjuisiuzs Case No. 91-Sq000 Page l2 4. A valid signed authorization, for all of Plaintiffs' medical treaters and providers, to allow Defendants to obtain Plaintiffs' medical records, reports and other materials. All authorizations must meet the requirements of applicable law including those set forth an the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). 5. Plaintiff must provide medical and income-tax authorizations containing the Plaintiff's original signatures to liaison counsel, the Bice Cole Law Firm, P.L., and to any Defendant that has requested that Plaintiff's counsel provide authorizations with original signatures. A Defendant need only make a general request to be provided with authorizations with original signatures in all cases, rather than a specific request in each case. Defendants shall notify Plaintiffs of each intended use of any such authorization. Upon receipt of notification, the Plaintiffs shall have ten (10) days to request that copies of the applicable records and/or materials received by the Defendant be provided to Plaintiff: The Defendant then shall have an obligation to provide copies of such records received by the Defendant within five (5) days of the receipt of the records at a reasonable cost to the Plaintiffs.

13 11!02!04 1B :aa FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA L9Juiniuzs Casc No ,000 Page 13 C. Deposition of Plaintiff(s) and Independent Medical Examinations : 1. Depositions of the Plaintiff(s) must betaken ninety (90) days before trial absent Court Order or unless this requirement is affirmatively waived. 2. If a Plaintiff fails to appear for a duly noticed deposition and/or independent medical examination, or cancels without rescheduling such deposition or independent medical examination, said case shall be deemed automatically stricken from the Court's asbestos personal injury trial docket on which it was previously scheduled. D. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses and Their Opinions : 1. Where expert opinion evidence, whether medical, technical or scientific, is to be offered at trial, the parties shall produce to opposing counsel the written reports of all their experts expected to testify at trial. ("Medical expert" as used in this subparagraph does not include treating physicians.) If an expert has not rendered a written report, then parties shall produce a detailed summary of the expert's opinions, stating the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion. 2. Plaintiff shall produce Plaintiffs experts' written reports and/or summaries thirty- five (35) days before the scheduled trial date. Defendants shall produce their

14 11!02!04 1B :aa FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA Lgju1.-J!uzs Case No ,000 Page 14 experts' written reports and/or summaries twenty-five (25) days before the scheduled trial date. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, a party may discover flee opinions of an opposing party's testifying expert before the date set forth in Subsection 2 above by any method allowed under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. Defense-requested medical examination shall be conducted and written reports thereon shall be available no later than thirty (30) days prior to trial, absent good cause shown. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure shall govern otherwise. E. The procedure, timing and completion of other discovery not governed by the specific terms of this Order shall be governed by the applicable Florida Rules of Civil Procedure unless modified by subsequent Order. F. Discovery shall remain open until ten (10) days prior to the assigned trial week absent good cause shown upon motion or by written agreement of the parties filed with the Court. VIII. WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS A. Each party may file Standard/Master Witness and Exhibit Lists. The last filed Standard/Master Witness and Exhibit Lists shall be deemed filed in each individual case.

15 11!02!04 1B :a4 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgjulUiuzs Case No ,000 Page IS B. No later than sixty (60) days prior to trial Plaintiffs shall file Case Specific Witness and Exhibit Lists. No later than forty-five (45) days prior to trial Defendants shall file Case Specific Witness and Exhibit Lists. C. If a listed witness is to testify by deposition or prior trial testimony, the name, Court and date of the testimony shall be listed on the Case Specific Witness List. The transcript of any such deposition or prior trial testimony shall be made available by the listing party no later than thirty (30) days prior to the trial to all opposing parties who make request for same; listing by specific Defendant those parties against whom the testimony is to be used. IX. TRIAL - TRIAL NOTEBOOK, PRE-MARKING EXHIBITS AND INDIVIDUAL CASE REPORT A. TRIAL NOTEBOOK Plaintiff's counsel shall file with this Court, and serve on all remaining parties three working days prior to trial, a Trial Notebook, which shall consist of the following : 1. Plaintiff(s) Case Specific Complaint(s) ; 2. Plaintiff(s) Master Complaint(s), if applicable ; 3. Defendant(s) Case Specific Answer(s) or Adoption of Answer(s), if applicable ; 4. Defendant(s) Master Answer(s), if applicable; 5. Plaintiff(s) Case Specific Exposure Sheets, Responses to Interrogatories, Request for Production and/or Request for Admissions ;

16 11!02!04 1B :a4 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA Lgulriuzs Cue No ,000 Page 16 G. Defendant(s) Case Specific Responses to Interrogatories, Request for Production and/or Request for Admissions; 7. Plaintiff(s) Punitive Damage Proffer, if applicable ; 8. Pre-trial Stipulation : including an Agreed Statement of Facts which maybe read to the jury and a Statement of Issues ; 9. Plaintiff(s) Master Witness and Exhibit List(s) ; 10. Plaintiff(s) Case Specific Witness and Exhibit List(s) ; 11. Defendant(s) Master Witness and Exhibit List(s) ; 12. Defendant(s) Case Specific Witness and Exhibit List(s) ; 13. Case Specific Orders ; 14. Copies of any outstanding motions, including Motions in Limine, and ; 15. Jury questionnaire, if applicable. B. PRE-MARKING EXHIBITS No later than five (5) business days prior to trial, the parties shall meet and exchange exhibits. X. SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH OMNIBUS ORDER In order to manage the asbestos caseload in an efficient and timely manner, the Court shall require strict compliance with the semis and provisions of this Order. All agreements between counsel and parties for modification or waiver of provisions of this Order or the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure shall be subscribed to in writing by all counsel or parties affected by the agreement

17 11!02!04 1B :a4 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA LgJuiniuzs Case No ,000 Page 17 and filed with this Court. Failure of a parry or counsel to comply with any of the requirements set forth herein may subject that party or counsel to sanctions, which may include the removal of the case from the trial docket, the striking of pleadings, the exclusion of expert and non-expert witnesses from testifying at trial, the entry of default, the dismissal of a party's complaint or defenses, assessment of attorneys' fees and costs as provided by law, and such other sanctions as the Court may deem just. <-' day of November, DONE ANA ORDE1tE D, in Miami, Miami-bade County, Florida, on this the

18 11!02!04 1B :a5 FAX CHIEF JUDGE FARINA [a ois/oza Forum Non Conveniens Fact Sheet Name of Plaintiff(s) Case Number 1. Residence of the Plainriff(s) : a. b. Does Plaintiff currently reside in Florida? If so, where in Florida? bid Plaintiff reside in Florida when alleged exposure to asbestos occurred? If so, where in Florida? 2. Asbestos exposure: a. Did any alleged asbestos exposure occur an Florida? If so, where in Florida? b. Did any alleged asbestos exposure occur in County, Florida? c. In which state(s), other than Florida, did alleged asbestos exposure occur? d. What percentage of total asbestos exposure occurred in Florida? 3 Witnesses : a. b. Do any fact witnesses reside in Florida? If so, where in Florida? Do any expert witnesses reside in Florida? If so, where in Florida? 4. Medical Treatment: a. In which state did diagnosis of disease relevant to this lawsuit take place? b. c. In which state(s) has Plaintiff received medical treatment relevant to this lawsuit? What percentage of said medical treatment was rendered in Florida? 5. Defendant(s) : a. Does any Defendant reside in Florida? If so, where in Florida? U. c. Does any domestic corporate Defendant have or usually keep an office for transaction of its customary business in Florida? If so, where in Florida? Does any foreign corporate Defendant have an agent ox other representative in Florida? If so, where in Florida?

19 11!02!04 16 :a5 FAX a05 a CHIEF JUDGE FARINA U020i02a MILAMI-DADE COUNTY ADDENDUM 1. In the 11`h judicial Circuit of Florida, the Court shall establish a "catch up" docket for each Plaintiffs' attorney. z for any reason cases on a regular docket are not reached for trial or settled, those cases shall be rescheduled to the catch up docket so as not to disturb the order o existing trial dockets. 2. Each law firm which has entered an appearance as counsel of record shall have no less than two trial attorneys available to try no fewer than two asbestos trials simultaneously, exclusive of other trial commitments in other Sections of this Court or other judicial Circuits or Districts.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order

More information

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202. JUSTICE GERALD E. LOEHR, J.S.C. Rockland County Supreme Court 1 South Main Street New City, New York 10956 Courtroom 1 Tel: (845) 483-8343 Fax: (845) 708-7236 Staff Bruce J. Pearl, Principal Law Secretary

More information

LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This

More information

NOTICE TO THE ASBESTOS BAR

NOTICE TO THE ASBESTOS BAR NOTICE TO THE ASBESTOS BAR Please be advised that the Case Management Order for Asbestos-Related Personal Injury Claims and the Asbestos Summary Judgment Motion Procedures have been revised, effective

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION GENERAL ORDER I. COMPLAINTS A. All complaints must: 1. Include

More information

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

More information

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0106. Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0106. Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing 00 STATE OF WYOMING 0LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB0 Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Gingery A BILL for AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing for

More information

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section 5.10 of the Combustion Engineering 524(g) Asbestos PI Trust Distribution Procedures (

More information

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a Business Case Division (hereinafter referred to as the Division). SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA Atlanta October 11, 2012 The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed: It is ordered that Paragraph 5 of Atlanta Judicial Circuit Rule

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA THIS ORDER APPLIES TO ALL CASES 2012 ASBESTOS CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WITH ATTACHED EXHIBITS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA THIS ORDER APPLIES TO ALL CASES 2012 ASBESTOS CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WITH ATTACHED EXHIBITS EFiled: Jan 6 2012 11:54AM EST Transaction ID 41724862 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA IN RE: ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION Master File Civil Action No. 03-C-9600 THIS ORDER

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-064 PA/PI-CIR

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-064 PA/PI-CIR IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-064 PA/PI-CIR RE: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES Rule 1.200(c) of the Florida Rules of

More information

) ) NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in me as Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, it is

) ) NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in me as Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, it is THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 03-1 (Court Administration) IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION ) ELECTRONIC SERVICE ) PROGRAM ) ) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 03-02 WHEREAS, technology

More information

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases... CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3

More information

RULE 7 PROBATE CASES. RULE 7.10 Probate Courts/Session

RULE 7 PROBATE CASES. RULE 7.10 Probate Courts/Session RULE 7 PROBATE CASES RULE 7.10 Probate Courts/Session The County Courts at Law of Fort Bend County, Texas setting as Probate Courts shall be deemed in session at all times regarding probate cases as set

More information

PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery

PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,

More information

GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS TAXATION OF COURT COSTS IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS TAXATION OF COURT COSTS IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS TAXATION OF COURT COSTS IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO The purpose of these guidelines is to explain the standard and customary practices of the Clerk s Office of the United

More information

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The following provisions apply to civil cases filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana that are not exempt from filing

More information

Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised

More information

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims Pursuant to Sections 3.4 and 3.5 of the Tronox Tort Claims Trust Distribution

More information

Rule 6 Adopted at a joint meeting of the District and County Court at Law Judges of Webb County on December 2, 2009

Rule 6 Adopted at a joint meeting of the District and County Court at Law Judges of Webb County on December 2, 2009 Rule 6 Adopted at a joint meeting of the District and County Court at Law Judges of Webb County on December 2, 2009 Committee Members Pete Garza Hugo Martinez Richard Gonzalez Fernando Sanchez Eduardo

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA PROTOCOL FOR THE USE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCING CIVIL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA PROTOCOL FOR THE USE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCING CIVIL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA PROTOCOL FOR THE USE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCING CIVIL The following provisions apply to civil matters: 1. General Provisions The court may conduct

More information

Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals.. 3. 4 Appointment of Counsel... 4

Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals.. 3. 4 Appointment of Counsel... 4 Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court Table of Contents Rule Page 1 Applicability. 1 2 Grand Jury 2 3 Dismissals.. 3 4 Appointment of Counsel...... 4 5 Case Filing and Court Designation. 6 6 Arraignment...

More information

FINAL JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER. This matter is before the Court on a Final Pretrial Conference pursuant to R. 4:25-1.

FINAL JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER. This matter is before the Court on a Final Pretrial Conference pursuant to R. 4:25-1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MIDDLESEX COUNTY:LAW DIVISION Docket No. Plaintiff(s), v. Defendant(s). FINAL JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Final Pretrial Conference pursuant to

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT JUVENILE COURT RULES

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT JUVENILE COURT RULES COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT JUVENILE COURT RULES FOR THE CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN Rule 1. Scope of Rules These rules apply to all actions in the Juvenile Court Department

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings. SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado

More information

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions

More information

CIVIL PROCEDURE 101. Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq.

CIVIL PROCEDURE 101. Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq. CIVIL PROCEDURE 101 Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq. The Federal Rules govern the conduct of all civil actions brought in Federal district courts. The Florida

More information

CHAPTER 246 HOUSE BILL 2603 AN ACT

CHAPTER 246 HOUSE BILL 2603 AN ACT House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER HOUSE BILL 0 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, CHAPTER, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE

More information

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF RULES OF COURT FOR THE COMMON PLEAS COURT PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO JUDGMENT ENTRY Pursuant to Superintendence

More information

Hon. Maria S. Vazquez-Doles, J.S.C. Orange County Supreme Court 285 Main Street Goshen, NY 10924. Part Rules (Effective September 29, 2014)

Hon. Maria S. Vazquez-Doles, J.S.C. Orange County Supreme Court 285 Main Street Goshen, NY 10924. Part Rules (Effective September 29, 2014) Law Clerk: Jane Harrington Secretary: Allison Cappella Part Clerk: Trisha Rittenhouse Phone: (845)476-3449 Fax: (845) 476-3684 APPEARANCES Hon. Maria S. Vazquez-Doles, J.S.C. Orange County Supreme Court

More information

Compulsory Arbitration

Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject

More information

ACTIONS FOR CUSTODY, PARTIAL CUSTODY, AND VISITATION OF MINOR CHILDREN

ACTIONS FOR CUSTODY, PARTIAL CUSTODY, AND VISITATION OF MINOR CHILDREN ACTIONS FOR CUSTODY, PARTIAL CUSTODY, AND VISITATION OF MINOR CHILDREN L-1915.1 SCOPE (a) These Rules shall apply to actions for custody, partial custody, and visitation of minor children and to modification

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES RULE 1. MEDIATION IN MALPRACTICE CASES In order to alleviate the burden to the parties

More information

ASARCO ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

ASARCO ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES ASARCO ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES ASARCO Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section

More information

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I (SCRU-13-0005988) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i As amended March 6, 1981 Effective March 6, 1981 With Further

More information

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013 SENATE BILL 1ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, INTRODUCED BY Joseph Cervantes 1 ENDORSED BY THE COURTS, CORRECTIONS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS; CLARIFYING

More information

2:14-mn-02502-RMG Date Filed 05/09/14 Entry Number 128 Page 1 of 3

2:14-mn-02502-RMG Date Filed 05/09/14 Entry Number 128 Page 1 of 3 2:14-mn-02502-RMG Date Filed 05/09/14 Entry Number 128 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: LIPITOR (ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM MARKETING,

More information

Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program

Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program 1 DAY FORWARD/MAJOR JURY PROGRAM The Day Forward/Major Jury Program encompasses all Major Civil Jury cases except Commerce and Mass Tort cases. Day Forward Case

More information

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i Section 672B-1 Definitions 672B-2 Administration of chapter 672B-3 Design claim conciliation

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY PREAMBLE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY PREAMBLE EFiled: Oct 10 2013 04:22PM EDT Transaction ID 54366264 Case No. MC 77C ASB 2 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION : C.A. No. 77C-ASB-2

More information

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT PINAL COUNTY Apache Junction Justice Court Eloy Justice Court Superior/Kearny Justice Court Maricopa/Stanfield Justice Court JUSTICE COURTS Casa Grande Justice Court Florence/Coolidge Justice Court Mammoth/San

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GOVERNING EXPERT DISCOVERY

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GOVERNING EXPERT DISCOVERY This is the sample expert discovery stipulation referenced at Section II(4(h(ii(d of the Guidelines on Best Practices for Litigating Cases Before the Court of Chancery. It should be modified to fit the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F PAMELA L. HENSLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PROPOSED JOINT JOHNSTON COUNTY BOARD

More information

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK 10.1 General. A Judge of the District Court may order that any monies in actions pending before the Court be invested in any local financial institution for safe keeping.

More information

ORDER. This matter is before the Court, en banc, on the motion to adopt the Rule For Expedited

ORDER. This matter is before the Court, en banc, on the motion to adopt the Rule For Expedited Serial: 149640 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 89-R-99025-SCT IN RE: UNIFORM RULES OF CIRCUIT AND COUNTY COURT PRACTICE ORDER This matter is before the Court, en banc, on the motion to adopt the

More information

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods. Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination

More information

Civil Suits: The Process

Civil Suits: The Process Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized

More information

United States District Court

United States District Court Case 4:11-cv-00655-RC-ALM Document 184 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 3232 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Civil Action

More information

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Orange County Circuit Civil Division 39 Judge John Marshall Kest

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Orange County Circuit Civil Division 39 Judge John Marshall Kest Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Orange County Circuit Civil Division 39 Judge John Marshall Kest **NOTE: REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 6/17/13** IN ORDER TO ASSIST COUNSEL AND THE LITIGANTS,

More information

In March, 2012, Judge Robinson was appointed to fill the Third Circuit Court vacancy.

In March, 2012, Judge Robinson was appointed to fill the Third Circuit Court vacancy. JUDGE PHILLIP ROBINSON 3rd Circuit Court Room 611 I. BRIEF BIOGRAPHY Judge Phillip Robinson is a lifelong Nashvillian having graduated from Montgomery Bell Academy in 1968, the University of Tennessee

More information

THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR ALL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY CASES

THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR ALL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY CASES 1 P a g e THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS IN RE: ALL ASBESTOS LITIGATION FILED IN MADISON COUNTY ) ) STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR ALL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY CASES

More information

CIRCUIT COURT. Uncontested Divorce Procedures Manual

CIRCUIT COURT. Uncontested Divorce Procedures Manual CIRCUIT COURT Uncontested Divorce Procedures Manual Adopted November 1, 2004. Last Revision Date: August 10, 2015 Notice to party proceeding pro se (without an attorney) If you are representing yourself

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read

More information

2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery

2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery 2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES A. [ 1] Purpose of Discovery. B. [ 2] Modern Discovery Procedures. C. [ 3] Relation to Pretrial Conference. D. Overview of California Discovery

More information

IN THE TIDRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S-2015-022 (Supersedes Administrative Order S-2015-015)

IN THE TIDRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S-2015-022 (Supersedes Administrative Order S-2015-015) IN THE TIDRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S-2015-022 (Supersedes Administrative Order S-2015-015) FORECLOSURE PROCEDURES In light of this circuit's Judicial Automated

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with

More information

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,

More information

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS For the purpose of facilitating disciplinary hearings and related proceedings that are conducted pursuant to Rule V of

More information

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation On January 1, 2012, new rules approved by the Colorado Supreme Court entitled the Civil Access Pilot Project ( CAPP

More information

JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM. Re: New Hampshire Superior Court Civil Rules Effective October 1, 2013

JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM. Re: New Hampshire Superior Court Civil Rules Effective October 1, 2013 JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM To: Attorneys; Legal Assistants; Litigants From: Patricia A. Lenz, Superior Court Administrator Julie W. Howard, Strafford Superior Court Clerk Date: Updated December 16, 2013

More information

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX C - New Jersey Tax Court Rules Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Rule 8:1. Rule 8:2. Rule 8:3. Rule 8:4. TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope: Applicability Review Jurisdiction

More information

Personal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.

Personal injury claim does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits. Wisconsin AB 19 (2013) (a) Personal injury claim" means any claim for damages, loss, indemnification, contribution, restitution or other relief, including punitive damages, that is related to bodily injury

More information

STA1E BAR OF TEXAS COURT RULES COMMI11EE REQUEST FOR NEW RULE OR CHANGE OF EXISTING RULE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

STA1E BAR OF TEXAS COURT RULES COMMI11EE REQUEST FOR NEW RULE OR CHANGE OF EXISTING RULE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE STA1E BAR OF TEXAS COURT RULES COMMI11EE REQUEST FOR NEW RULE OR CHANGE OF EXISTING RULE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Exact wording of existing Rule: RULE 166. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE In an appropriate action,

More information

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. 3721L.01I AN ACT To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI,

More information

CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CIVIL DIFFERENTIATED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CIVIL DIFFERENTIATED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CIVIL DIFFERENTIATED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FIRST EDITION: 1994 REVISED: JULY 2010 CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CIVIL NON DOMESTIC DIFFERENTIATED

More information

WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PRO SE CUSTODY PACKET

WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PRO SE CUSTODY PACKET WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PRO SE CUSTODY PACKET NOTICE ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN LITIGATION ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO SEEK PROFESSIONAL LEGAL ADVICE FROM AN ATTORNEY. Court staff cannot offer

More information

Civil Administration At A Glance 2005-2006 Section 4. Complex Litigation Center

Civil Administration At A Glance 2005-2006 Section 4. Complex Litigation Center Section 4 Complex Litigation Center 1 COMPLEX LITIGATION CENTER ROOM 622 CITY HALL The Complex Litigation Center was the first courthouse in the United States designed exclusively for complex, multi-filed

More information

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405. CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply

More information

Discovery Expert Reports

Discovery Expert Reports Discovery Expert Reports Local Rule 4002.1 Filing Discovery Material. Requests for Expert Reports in Professional Negligence and All requests for production of expert reports made in professional negligence

More information

HOUSE BILL No. 1400. Washburne

HOUSE BILL No. 1400. Washburne Introduced Version HOUSE BILL No. 1400 DIGEST OF INTRODUCED BILL Citations Affected: IC 22-3-11-1; IC 34-6-2; IC 34-20-3-2; IC 34-31. Synopsis: Asbestos litigation. Provides special proceedings for asbestos

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD DUTTON, : : Consolidated Under Plaintiff, : MDL DOCKET NO. 875 : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. : 09-62916 TODD SHIPYARDS CORP.,

More information

Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance.

Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance. Broward County False Claims Ordinance Sec. 1-276. - Short title; purpose. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (b) The purpose of the Broward County

More information

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations. RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall

More information

Rule 6. Civil Practice

Rule 6. Civil Practice Page 1 Rule 6. Civil Practice 6.01 Pretrial procedure. A pretrial conference may be ordered by the judge to whom a civil case is assigned. Upon notice of the scheduling of a pretrial conference it shall

More information

Prepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq.

Prepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq. Memorandum Summarizing Procedures With Respect To Removal Of Bankruptcy-Related State Court Actions To The United States District Court And United States Bankruptcy Court In Maryland Prepared by: Hon.

More information

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TO UNDERSTAND PROCEDURES IN THE PERSONAL INJURY (PI) COURTS, PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT S (LASC

More information

In January 2009, Judge Smith became board certified as a Family Law Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy.

In January 2009, Judge Smith became board certified as a Family Law Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy. JUDGE PHILIP SMITH 4th Circuit Court Room 607 I. BRIEF BIOGRAPHY Judge Philip E. Smith graduated from the University of Tennessee College of Law in May of 1988. In October of 1988, Judge Smith went to

More information

What to Expect When You re Expecting A Lawsuit

What to Expect When You re Expecting A Lawsuit What to Expect When You re Expecting A Lawsuit Jennifer G. Hall Meadowbrook Office Park 4268 I-55 North Jackson, MS 39211 601.351.2483 jhall@bakerdonelson.com What can Trigger a Lawsuit? Anything and everything

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Cheryl Coryea ( Coryea or Plaintiff ), and Rochester Independent School District

More information

Case 2:09-cv-07349-AJM-KWR Document 19 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:09-cv-07349-AJM-KWR Document 19 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:09-cv-07349-AJM-KWR Document 19 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA FIRST FINANCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO: 09-7349 JOSE ARRIAGA

More information

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS These Procedural Rules for Workers Compensation Hearings were formally

More information

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 10-1 (Court Administration)

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 10-1 (Court Administration) THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-1 (Court Administration) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 10-03 A1 (Amending and Superseding Administrative Order No. 10-03) IN RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

More information

Procedures and Rules Criminal, Division 14 Jenifer M. Davis, Circuit Court Judge

Procedures and Rules Criminal, Division 14 Jenifer M. Davis, Circuit Court Judge Procedures and Rules 1. General a. Expected that all attorneys will follow the Ninth Judicial Circuit Courtroom Decorum Policy. b. Many answers to frequently asked questions are contained in the Florida

More information

INTERROGATORIES: PROPOUNDING AND RESPONDING

INTERROGATORIES: PROPOUNDING AND RESPONDING INTERROGATORIES: PROPOUNDING AND RESPONDING 1 1.340 TO WHOM, AND WHEN, CAN INTERROGATORIES BE PROPOUNDED: Interrogatories may only be served on another party. Parker v. James, 997 So.2d 1225 (Fla. DCA

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 3 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 3 1 Article 3 Pleadings and Motions. Rule 7. Pleadings allowed; motions. (a) Pleadings. - There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a crossclaim,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM RE: ) Supreme Court Case No. PRM 06-006 ) ) QMENDING PROMULGATION ORDER ) PROMULGATION ORDER NO. YO. 06-006-02 ON THE LOCAL RULES 06-006-10 DF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM )

More information

FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES

FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES 1. Filing Pleadings: A Cover Sheet must be filed with the Complaint and any Cross-Complaint stating whether the case is contested or uncontested,

More information

Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MURIELLE MOLIERE, Plaintiff, v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.

More information

Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge:

Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES NGC BODILY INJURY TRUST Revised June 16, 2016

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES NGC BODILY INJURY TRUST Revised June 16, 2016 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES NGC BODILY INJURY TRUST Revised June 16, 2016 These Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures ( ADR Procedures ) are available to resolve Asbestos Claims that,

More information

Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents

Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents Part I: General provisions. Rule 101: Application and interpretation. Rule 102: Duties of a party. Rule 103: Conducting a lawsuit. Part II: The

More information

MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILDY BOWBEER Practice Pointers and Preferences

MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILDY BOWBEER Practice Pointers and Preferences MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILDY BOWBEER Practice Pointers and Preferences Rev. January 2015 CONTACT WITH CHAMBERS Chambers phone: (651) 848-1900 Chambers email: bowbeer_chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov Courtroom Deputy/Judicial

More information

CHAPTER 60Q-6 FLORIDA RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION ADJUDICATIONS

CHAPTER 60Q-6 FLORIDA RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION ADJUDICATIONS Workers Compensation Rules of Procedure CHAPTER 60Q-6 FLORIDA RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION ADJUDICATIONS *Effective 11/10/2014 (Section with/ Changes in text in BOLD) Cite to Rules as Fla.

More information

Personal Injury Litigation

Personal Injury Litigation Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction

More information

CALIFORNIA TORT FORMS FROM EXPERT LITIGATORS (1st Edition) July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CALIFORNIA TORT FORMS FROM EXPERT LITIGATORS (1st Edition) July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS CALIFORNIA TORT FORMS FROM EXPERT LITIGATORS (1st Edition) July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS File Name Book Section Title CH01 Chapter 1 Animals 01-006 1.6 Sample Client Authorization to Release Medical 01-007

More information

PENNSYLVANIA BUILDERS ASSOCIATION INSTRUCTIONS TO HOME IMPROVEMENT MODEL CONTRACT STANDARD FORM Introduction

PENNSYLVANIA BUILDERS ASSOCIATION INSTRUCTIONS TO HOME IMPROVEMENT MODEL CONTRACT STANDARD FORM Introduction PENNSYLVANIA BUILDERS ASSOCIATION INSTRUCTIONS TO HOME IMPROVEMENT MODEL CONTRACT STANDARD FORM Introduction Below are instructions for use with the Home Improvement Model Contract Standard Form, which

More information

7.010 PLEAS, NEGOTIATIONS, DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES IN CRIMINAL CASES

7.010 PLEAS, NEGOTIATIONS, DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES IN CRIMINAL CASES CHAPTER 7 Case Management and Calendaring 7.010 PLEAS, NEGOTIATIONS, DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES IN CRIMINAL CASES (1) At the time of arraignment, the court may either accept a not guilty plea and set a

More information