CIVIL CASE INFORMATION SHEET
|
|
- Susanna O’Connor’
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CIVIL CASE INFORMATION SHEET CAUSE NUMBER (FOR CLERK USE ONLY): COURT (FOR CLERK USE ONLY): STYLED City of San Antonio, Texas v. San Antonio Police Officers' Association (e.g., John Smith v. All American Insurance Co; In re Mary Aun Jones; In the Matter of the Estate of George Jackson) A civil case information sheet must be completed and submitted when an original petition or application is filed to initiate a new civil, family law, probate, or mental health case or when a post-judgment petition for modification or motion for enforcement is filed in a family law case. The infmmation should be the best available at the time of filing. 1, Contact information for person completin2 case information sheet: Names of parties in case: Person or entity completing sheet is: Iii Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner Name: Plaintiff( s )/Petitioner( s): [JPro Se Plaintiff/Petitioner Bettye Lynn Lynn@laborcounsel.net City of San Antonio, Texas []Title N-D Agency []Other: Address: Telephone: 306 West Broadway Avenue Additional Patties in Child Suppmt Case: Defendant( s )/Respondent( s ): Custodial Parent: City/State/Zip: Fax: San Antonio Police Officers' Fort Worth, Texas Non-Custodial Parent: Association Signature: State Bar No: Presumed Father: , Indicate case type, or identify the most important issue in the case (select 011/y 1): Civil [Attach additional page as necessary to list all parties] FamilvLaw Post-judgment Actions Contract Injury or Dama2e Real Property Marriage Relationship (non-title IV-D) Debt/Contract [JAssault/Battery l:!eminent Domain/ DAnnulment (]Enforcement C)Consumer/DTP A [I Construction Condenmation [JDeclare Marriage Void [!Modification-Custody Cf Debt/Contract [I Defamation [JPartition Divorce CIModification-Other Cl Fraud/Misrepresentation Malpractice CIQuietTitle. CIWitl1 Children TitleIV-D [IOther Debt/Contract: CIAccounting [!Trespass to Try Title [INo Children blenforcement/modification Cl Legal [JOther Prope1ty: CIPaternity Foreclosure Cl Medical [IReciprocals (UIFSA) CIHome Equity-Expedited [JOther Professional l:isupport Order I:) Other Foreclosure Liability: Cl Franchise Related to Cl'iminal Cl Insurance CIMotor Vehicle Accident Matters Other Familv Law Parent-Child Relationship [JLandlord!Ienant [JPremises [IExpunction []Enforce Foreign [JAdoptioll/Adoplioh with [JN on-competition Product Liability [IJudgment Nisi Judgment 'temuila!iilti CIPartnership [JAsbestos/Silica [JN on-disclosure [IHabeas Corpus [Jch11;ri>i~t~ptiotl' II!Other Contract: [IOther Product Liability [JSeizure/Fmfeiture []Name Change l:lc!lild sii\lp-olt~ CBA -- Evergreen List Product: []Writ of Habeas C01pus- CIProtective Order Pre-indictment [JRemoval of Disabilities Cl Other Injury or Damage: l:)other: of Minority Cl Other: Employment Other Civil [JDiscrimination l:)administrative Appeal []Lawyer Discipline CIRetaliation [JAntitrnst/Unfair [1Pe1petuate Testimony CITe1mination Competition Cf Securities/Stock [JWorkers' Compensation [JCode Violations CITmtious Inteiference CIOther Employment: []Foreign Judgment El Other: [IIntellectual Prope1ty Tax Probate & Mental Health [JTax Appraisal Probate/Willslb1testate Admi11ist1 ation l;!guardianship-adult ClTax Delinquency [JDependent Administration [I Guardianship-Minor ClotherTax l:)independent Administration []Mental Health CIOther Estate Proceedings [JOther: [iii~!~? DTerniifi~tlon or Pai-ental Right$ _... CICJthei' ParenFChild: 3. Indicate procednl"e or remedy, if applicable (may select more than 1): 0Appeal from Municipal or Justice Court li)declaratory Judgment 0Prejudgment Remedy 0Arbitration-related 0Garnishment 0Protective Order 0Attachment 0Inte1pleader 0Receiver 0Bill of Review 0License 0Sequestration 0Cettiorari 0Mandamus 0Temporaiy Restraining Order/Injunction Octass Action 0Post-judgment 0Turnover 4. Indicate dama2es sou2ht (do not select if it is a familv law case): [ILess than $100,000, including damages of any kind, penalties, costs, expenses, pre-judgment interest, and attorney fees E]Less than $100,000 and non-moneta1y relief Clover $100, 000 but not more than $200,000 Clover $200,000 but not more than $1,000,000 []Over $1,000,000
2 CAUSE NO. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT SAN ANTONIO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Defendant. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES TO THE HONORABLE COURT: PLAINTIFF, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS ( Plaintiff or the City ) files this, its Original Petition for Declaratory Judgment under Chapter 37 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, also entitled the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, for the construction of a contract against Defendant SAN ANTONIO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ( Defendant, the UNION or SAPOA ) as follows: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1. Plaintiff intends to conduct discovery under Level II of Rule of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. II. PARTIES 2. Plaintiff is the CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, a political subdivision under the laws of the State of Texas. 3. Defendant is a union, and it is the sole and exclusive bargaining representative of AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 1 of 11
3 the sworn police officers employed by the City of San Antonio s Police Department pursuant to Chapter 174 of the Texas Local Govt. Code. Defendant may be served with process by personally serving its President, Michael Helle, at the office of the San Antonio Police Officers Association, 1939 Interstate 410, Access Road, #300, San Antonio, Texas AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 2 of 11 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. Venue of this case is proper in Bexar County, Texas pursuant to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code (a)(3), in that Plaintiff s principle office is located in Bexar County. Code IV. BOND 5. No bond is due from Plaintiff City of San Antonio, Texas. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. V. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 6. The relationship between the parties has been controlled by a Collective Bargaining Agreement ( CBA ) since the 1970 s. The most recent CBA between the parties became effective on October 1, 2009 and its initial term was for five years, extending through September 30, By its own terms, the CBA continues to bind the parties due to its Evergreen Clause. See, 8 infra. To comply with Article 1 of the CBA, the parties commenced collective bargaining on January 24, 2014, to replace the CBA with a new agreement. 7. A copy of the CBA is attached hereto as Exhibit Article I of the CBA, entitled DURATION, provided as follows:
4 This Agreement shall be effective as of the first day of October, This agreement shall remain in effect until the 30 th day of September, 2014, or until such time as it is superseded by a new agreement between the parties, whichever occurs later, provided however, that in no event shall this Agreement continue in effect after September 30 th, Thus, the CBA does not have an absolute expiration date until September 30, 2024, i.e. nearly ten years from the date this Original Petition is filed. The Clause enlarging the duration of a CBA is commonly known as an Evergreen Clause, and it will be referred to by that name in this Petition. 9. In accordance with the CBA, the parties held their first collective bargaining negotiations meeting on January 24, Subsequent collective bargaining negotiations were conducted on March 18, April 3 and 7, On April 11, 2014, the City was notified that Defendant Union had replaced its first Chief Negotiator with another Chief Negotiator, Ron DeLord. 10. By letter dated April 11, 2014, Mr. DeLord notified the City that the Union was unilaterally cancelling all future collective bargaining negotiations that had been scheduled for April 15, April 29, May 5, May 13 and May 19, These dates had been previously set by the parties in Agreed Ground Rules that were executed on March 18, The parties met on April 29 and May 5, 2014, but did not meet on April 15, May 13 and 19, 2014 due to the Union s unilateral cancellation of those bargaining sessions. The Agreed Ground Rules require mutual agreement to change the scheduled collective bargaining dates and to add additional dates. The 60-day bargaining period established under Texas Local Gov t Code (a) expired May 19, The parties resumed collective bargaining on June 12 and held additional meetings on September 23 and 30, October 7 and 21 and November 3, 2014 and exchanged several proposals and counter-proposals regarding health benefits. 11. In recent years, the cost of City-provided health benefits has escalated and AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 3 of 11
5 continues to escalate annually, thereby burdening the General Fund of the City. Plaintiff s projected cost of health benefits for Police Officers is over $38,800,000 for FY 2015, and this cost will increase greatly over the next 10 years if changes are not made to the plan s benefit structure as well as to contributions made by the City on behalf of the Police Officers. 12. Currently, funding for emergency (Public Safety) services in the City (Police and Fire Departments) consumes 66% of the General Fund. Public Safety expenditures are growing at a faster rate than General Fund revenues, thus crowding out other essential services such as Street Maintenance, Parks and Libraries. The City Council has implemented a limitation of Public Safety expenditures to 66% of the General Fund, to avoid reducing other General Fund services. 13. During collective bargaining in 2014, the City has sought significant changes to the current health benefits and other benefits received by the bargaining unit employees represented by the Union that are mandated by the parties CBA, in an effort to slow or reverse the troubling trend of crowding out other essential City services. The City has proposed both benefit changes and that employees pay a share of their own and their dependents health benefits. Under the CBA, the City pays 100% of the costs for both employee and dependent health benefits. The City has also proposed during collective bargaining sessions held in 2014 that police officers and their dependents be offered health benefits under health benefit plan(s) that are significantly higher in costs and richer in benefits than the health benefit plans provided to civilian employees of the City. 14. On May 19, 2014, statutory impasse occurred pursuant to (a) of the Texas Local Government Code. Thereafter, the parties have engaged in six additional days of collective bargaining negotiations. 15. The City has adopted its budget for its Fiscal Year 2015, which began on October 1, The City needs to have a resolution of the health benefits matter immediately, as the City AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 4 of 11
6 Council has adopted a Fiscal Year 2015 budget for the Police Department which included budget cuts, and which allocated $10,000 per uniform employee for health benefits during FY Without this change, the City s costs are estimated to total more than $38,800,000 for the members of the police bargaining unit during the current Fiscal Year. 16. The Union has refused to agree to adequate changes in health benefits and other changes to the CBA, and the City is now faced with serious budgetary challenges. As a result of the Evergreen Clause, the CBA automatically rolled over on September 30, 2014 into the next year, and is potentially effective for ten more years, until September 30, Unless the Evergreen Clause is declared null, void, invalid and unenforceable by the Court, there will be significant impact on other essential services provided to residents. 17. If the CBA continues in effect, bargaining unit employees will not be obligated to pay a penny of escalating health benefits costs (they currently do not pay any premiums for employee and/or dependent coverage) until September 30, The City will be obligated to pay millions of dollars during this time period for police officers health benefits and other contractually required benefits -- dollars which are not now available to the City, are not currently budgeted by the City, and for which no funding mechanism has been established. Starting January, 2015, the Public Safety budget shortfall for health benefits over what has been budgeted by City Council is calculated to be $1.6 million per month. 18. Without effective changes to the CBA s health care plan, the City also faces a 40% federal excise tax starting in 2018 that the City will be obligated to pay to the Federal government due to the Affordable Care Act. The CBA requires the City to maintain a high-cost employersponsored health benefit plan commonly called a Cadillac Plan. The Cadillac Plan tax due as a AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 5 of 11
7 result of a rich health benefit plan contained in the Police Officers CBA is estimated to total over $36 million dollars through The purpose of this lawsuit is to request the Court s determination as to the constitutionality of the Evergreen Clause. It is not for the purpose of delaying collective bargaining. The City intends to continue collective bargaining with the Union during the pendency of this declaratory action. AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 6 of 11 VI. SUIT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 20. Pursuant to Chapter 37, Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, Plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring the Evergreen Clause null, void, invalid and unenforceable. A. THE EVERGREEN CLAUSE VIOLATES THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION. 21. The Police Officers Association s CBA s ten-year Evergreen Clause is illegal as it violates Article 11, 5 of the Texas Constitution by creating an unconstitutional unfunded debt. See McNeal v. City of Waco, 89 Tex. 83, 33 S.W. 322, 324 (1895); T.&N. O.R.R. Co. v. Galveston County, 141 Tex. 34, 169 S.W.2d 713 (1943); Guerra v. McClellan, 250 S.W.2d 241 (Ct. App. San Antonio) aff d 152 Tex. 373 (1953)(same result under Article 11, 7 regarding counties); White v. Thos. Y. Pickett & Co., 355 S.W.2d 848 (Ct. App.-San Antonio, 1962) writ ref d, n.r.e.; City-County Solid Waste Control Board v. Capital City Leasing Inc., 813 S.W.2d 705, 717 (Ct. App.-Austin, 1991), writ denied; Atty. Gen. Op. Daniel ( debt is any obligation which is not to be satisfied out of lawful current revenues or out of some fund within immediate control of the Commissioner s Court and such debt is not payable out of current funds; debt is void without levy of tax). 22. The Evergreen Clause included in the parties CBA unconstitutionally binds the
8 City to fund a debt over the course of ten more fiscal years without the City having established a sinking fund. Thus, the Evergreen Clause results in an unconstitutional limitation on the legislative powers of the City s elected representatives, its City Council. B. THE EVERGREEN CLAUSE IS CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY. 23. Evergreen Clauses in government contracts, like the one in the parties CBA, have been declared by Texas courts to be contrary to public policy and, thus, illegal and void. See Clear Lake City Water Auth. v. Clear Lake Utils. Co., 549 S.W.2d 385, (Tex. 1977). Clear Lake held the evergreen provision in the contract at issue had the potential to control, hamper or impede, the water authority in the exercise of its governmental powers, and invalidated the contract. Id. at 392. See also City of Corpus Christi v. Taylor, 126 S.W.3d 712, 719, 722 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 2004, pet. dism d). 24. As a result of the ten-year Evergreen Clause, the City is saddled with the costs of providing richer health benefits to Union members than it does to other City employees. Such a result hinders and prohibits the City Council from exercising its legislative and governmental authority. Because the City s Public Safety budget consumes such a large percentage of the City s General Fund (66%), these expenditures nullify the City Council s authority to determine the appropriate allocation of General Fund monies to a wide array of essential City services. The Evergreen Clause poses a significant hindrance to the City Council s management of its finances, now and in the future. This situation was considered and addressed by the City s Legacy Task Force during the Fall of 2013, with its recommendations mirrored in the City s proposals on health care benefits made during the last 10 months of collective bargaining with the Union. This situation begs for the Court s attention as the Evergreen Clause here extends for an unconscionable 10 years -- literally tying the hands of the currently elected City Council, as well as future City AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 7 of 11
9 Councils, for a decade. The City Council is effectively prohibited from adjusting General Fund expenditures to meet changing needs of the City and its citizens. VII. PRAYER For these reasons, Plaintiff asks that Defendant be cited to appear and answer and the Court to do the following: 25. The Evergreen Clause should be immediately declared null, void, invalid and unenforceable as it violates Article 11, 5 of the Texas Constitution. The Evergreen Clause should be declared null, void, invalid and unenforceable, inasmuch as it binds Plaintiff s current and future City Councils and prevents the City Council from exercising its legislative and other governmental authority for ten years. 26. The Evergreen Clause should be declared null, void, invalid and unenforceable because it has the effect of violating public policy by controlling, hampering and impeding the legislative powers and duties of the City Council of the City of San Antonio. 27. The Evergreen Clause should be declared null, void, invalid and unenforceable because it purports to accomplish a surrender of the City s governmental and legislative functions. 28. The Evergreen Clause should be declared null, void, invalid and unenforceable because it purports to abdicate the governmental functions and police powers of the City as applied to its Police Officers. 29. The Collective Bargaining Agreement with the Union should be declared by the Court as expired and/or terminable at the will of the City. 30. Plaintiff prays that the Court award Plaintiff all other relief, in law and in equity, to which the Plaintiff may be entitled. AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 8 of 11
10 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bettye Lynn Bettye Lynn State Bar No LYNN, ROSS & GANNAWAY, LLP 306 West Broadway Avenue Fort Worth, Texas Telephone: (817) Facsimile: (817) Jeffrey C. Londa State Bar No OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. One Allen Center, 500 Dallas Street, Suite 3000 Houston, Texas Telephone: (713) Facsimile: (713) Michael Bernard State Bar No BRACEWELL & GIULIANI 300 Convent Street San Antonio, Texas Telephone: (210) Robert F. Greenblum, City Attorney State Bar No Martha G. Sepeda, First Assistant City Attorney State Bar No Kenneth Clark, Deputy City Attorney State Bar No Deborah L. Klein, Assistant City Attorney State Bar No AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 9 of 11
11 CITY OF SAN ANTONIO 100 Military Plaza, City Hall, Third Floor San Antonio, Texas Telephone: (210) Facsimile: (210) ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 10 of 11
12 REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Pursuant to Rule 194 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby requests Defendant to disclose within 50 days of service of this request, the information or material described in Rule (a)-(k) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. /s/ Bettye Lynn Bettye Lynn AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Page 11 of 11
CIVIL CASE INFORMATION SHEET
CIVIL CASE INFORMATION SHEET CAUSE NUMBER (FOR CLERK USE ONLY): COURT (FOR CLERK USE ONLY):---------- STYLED City of San Antonio, Texas v. San Antonio Fire Fighters' Association, Local 624 (e.g., John
More informationThe County of Galveston P.O. BOX 17253 COUNTY COURTHOUSE GALVESTON, TEXAS 77552-7253
The County of Galveston P.O. BOX 17253 COUNTY COURTHOUSE GALVESTON, TEXAS 77552-7253 DWIGHT D. SULLIVAN COUNTY CLERK Occupational Driver s License Procedures Before beginning, it is recommended that you
More informationCIVIL AND FAMILY CASES
================================================================ CIVIL AND FAMILY CASES FILING AND SERVICE FEES Effective September 1, 2015 (updated) Page 1 of 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS ========================================================
More informationCounty-Level Court Civil Filing Fees Prepared by the Office of Court Administration (OCA) Effective January 1, 2014
County-Level Court Civil Filing Fees Prepared by the Office of Court Administration (OCA) Effective January 1, 2014 I. Statewide Required Filing Fees (Set Amounts) 1. Clerk s Fee (Original Civil Suit)...3
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued April 30, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00920-CV IN RE LEA PERCY MCLAURIN, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus O P
More informationNUMBER 13-11-00757-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
NUMBER 13-11-00757-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY & WILLIAMS, L.L.P., Appellant, v. FRANCISCO FRANK LOPEZ, Appellee. On appeal from
More informationSupplemental Instructions for Self-Represented (Pro Se) Litigants Civil Case Information Sheet
Supplemental Instructions for Self-Represented (Pro Se) Litigants Civil Case Information Sheet There are many kinds of Civil Cases. Civil Cases are the cases in court that are not about breaking a criminal
More informationCAUSE NO. DC-12-07825
CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 Filed 13 September 9 P4:46 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District CADE MANNETTI, v. Plaintiff, VISIONARY RESTAURANTS LLC, VISIONARY STAFFING LLC, WILLIAM McCROREY, AND THOMAS
More informationNo. 05-11-00700-CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON,
No. 05-11-00700-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016616444 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 November 30 P8:40 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS WELLS FARGO BANK,
More informationDistrict Court Civil Filing Fees Prepared by the Office of Court Administration (OCA) Effective January 1, 2014
District Court Civil Filing Fees Prepared by the Office of Court Administration (OCA) Effective January 1, 2014 I. Statewide Required Filing Fees (Set Amounts) 1. Clerk s Basic Filing Fee (New Civil Suits)...3
More informationNO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Now comes, Tommy Adkisson, individually, in his official capacity as Bexar County
NO. Filed 10 June 24 P12:29 Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza District Clerk Travis District D-1-GN-10-002120 TOMMY ADKISSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND OFFICIALLY ON BEHALF OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERPCT.4
More informationNO. D-1-GN-11-003142 DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NO. D-1-GN-11-003142 Filed 12 May 14 P1:17 Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza District Clerk Travis District D-1-GN-11-003142 CONSUMER SERVICE ALLIANCE OF TEXAS, INC. Plaintiff, TITLEMAX OF TEXAS, INC. Plaintiff
More informationEFILING FILING CONFIGURATIONS
EFILING FILING CONFIGURATIONS Below are the standard filing configurations to be used in the efiling system for district, county court at law, probate, and county courts. This list of filing configurations
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00815-CV IN THE ESTATE OF Alvilda Mae AGUILAR From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802 Honorable
More informationORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSc Docket No. 99m 9047
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MiSc Docket No. 99m 9047 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable John
More informationCAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE
More informationNO. 12-12-00183-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NO. 12-12-00183-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, ORIGINAL PROCEEDING RELATOR MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Truck Insurance Exchange
More informationNO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION TO THE HONORABLE
More informationORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. âboclkct No. 01-9002 Appointment of a District Judge to Rule on a Motion to Recuse filed in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints
More informationCase 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584
Case 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationCAUSE NO. THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS NEDITH TORRES JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION
CAUSE NO. THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS NEDITH TORRES JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES THE CITY
More informationIn The NO. 14-99-00657-CV. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant. JOHNNY NASH, Appellee
Reversed and Rendered Opinion filed May 18, 2000. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-99-00657-CV HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant V. JOHNNY NASH, Appellee On Appeal from the 189 th District Court Harris
More informationCase 10-03582 Document 11 Filed in TXSB on 04/27/11 Page 1 of 10
Case 10-03582 Document 11 Filed in TXSB on 04/27/11 Page 1 of 10 SAN ANTONIO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant(s). IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
More informationGeneral District Courts
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
More informationMISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Bob
More informationTHE PROPERTY TAX PROTEST PROCESS
THE PROPERTY TAX PROTEST PROCESS A summary of the appeal procedures under the Texas Property Tax Code Presented by: Jason C. Marshall THE MARSHALL FIRM PC 302 N. Market Suite 510 Dallas TX 75202 214.742.4800
More informationCAUSE NO. D-1-GN-14-004628 MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND ORIGINAL ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-14-004628 JERRY PATTERSON, COMMISSIONER, TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE v. Plaintiff, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, Defendant. IN THE 53 RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION TO TRANSFER
More informationORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 96-9196 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Mark Davidson,
More informationto add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred
REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed May 11, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00616-CV DOROTHY HENRY, Appellant V. BASSAM ZAHRA, Appellee On Appeal from the
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction, and Opinion filed August 20, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00925-CV ATLAS GULF-COAST, INC. D/B/A ATLAS
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO and PROJECT ARCHITECT for A PROJECT OF LIMITED SIZE OR SCOPE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO and PROJECT ARCHITECT for A PROJECT OF LIMITED SIZE OR SCOPE This Agreement is made as of, 20 (the Effective Date ), by and
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationAPPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0236 444444444444 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., PETITIONER, v. PATRICK O BRIEN MURPHY A/K/A O BRIEN MURPHY AND BEVERLY MURPHY, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued December 19, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00515-CV MICHAEL SKINNER, Appellant V. PAMELA SKINNER, Appellee On Appeal from the 257th District Court
More informationNPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS
NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee
More informationCase4:14-cv-04322-PJH Document1 Filed09/25/14 Page1 of 34
Case4:14-cv-04322-PJH Document1 Filed09/25/14 Page1 of 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP CLEMENT L. GLYNN, Bar No. 57117 JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE, Bar No. 238559 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue,
More informationA. For the consideration agreed below to be paid to Contractor by City, Contractor shall provide
STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DALLAS THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DALLAS, a Texas municipal corporation, located in Dallas County, Texas (hereinafter
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00593-CV Venus MINSAL, Appellant v. Abel H. GARCIA, Appellee From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court
More informationPREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.
Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee
More informationAgreement for Services
Agreement for Services This Agreement is entered into as of the day of, 20, between Inc. ( the Company ) and ( the Contractor ). The purposes of this agreement are to define the rights and obligations
More informationCase 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035
Case 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
More informationPlaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00792-CV Richard LARES, Appellant v. Martha FLORES, Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court
More informationPREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com
Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 06-0258 444444444444 DENIS PROULX, PETITIONER v. MICHAEL A. WELLS, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00055-CV Paula Villanueva, Appellant v. McCash Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Comet Cleaners and Comet Cleaners, Appellees FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT
More informationMEDIATION RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ISSUES IN CONSTRUCTION CASES by Benton T. Wheatley
MEDIATION RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ISSUES IN CONSTRUCTION CASES by Benton T. Wheatley State Bar of Texas Construction Law Newsletter, Summer 2001, p. 6. Introduction: Many lawyers have been in
More informationCOMPLAINT. Now come Plaintiffs, personal care attendants, consumers, surrogates,
DOCKET NO. SUPERIOR COURT Catherine D. Ludlum, : Amber L. Michaud, : The Connecticut Association of Personal : SUPERIOR COURT Assistance, Inc., : Senator Joseph Markley, : State Representative Robert C.
More informationNo. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition
FILED 9/24/2014 10:11:33 AM Donna Kay McKinney Bexar County District Clerk Accepted By: Roxanne Mujica 2014CI15241 No. W/ JD EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. Plaintiff, KOONTZ/MCCOMBS CONSTRUCTION,
More informationMisc Docket No. 98-9020
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 98-9020 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Horace
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 14-9 0 7 9 APPROVAL OF TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS, VERSION 1.3, SET BY THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ORDERED that: The Supreme Court of Texas
More informationAppeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays
Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays Appellate Lawyers Association April 22, 2009 Brad Elward Peoria Office The Effect of a Judgment A judgment is immediately subject to enforcement and collection. Illinois
More information2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 05/03/12. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-159-CV JACK WHITE APPELLANT V. GAIL WHITE APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 90TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF YOUNG COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-13-01351-CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.J.G. AND J.O.G., CHILDREN
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed April 9, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01351-CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.J.G. AND J.O.G., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial
More informationAbility of a School District to make Payments on Bonds From Funds Other than a Tax Levied for the Payment of Debt Service
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT May 14,2010 To All Bond Counsel Re: Ability of a School District to make Payments on Bonds From Funds Other than a Tax Levied for the Payment of Debt Service By letter
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-463-CV ROXANNE HUNTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF H.H., A MINOR STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS A/K/A STATE FARM
More informationThe Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update
The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update Texas Case Law Mara Flanagan Friesen Deputy Director for Child Support Texas Office of the Attorney General The Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Scholer,
More informationTwo Texas Cases That You Need To Know When You Settle Lawsuits Or Claims
Two Texas Cases That You Need To Know When You Settle Lawsuits Or Claims Lauren Pierce Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75202 Tel: 214-712-9539 Email: lauren.pierce@cooperscully.com
More informationEX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE MEDICAL RECORDS
EX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE MEDICAL RECORDS PR 2 The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501 EX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE MEDICAL
More informationDebt Claim Petition Packet
Debt Claim Petition Packet Judge Michael C. Roach Justice Court Stephens County Courthouse 200 West Walker / 3 rd Floor Breckenridge, TX 76424 Phone#: 254.559.5322 Fax#: 254.559.1127 Justice Court, Precinct
More informationORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS tt C^ Misc. i[ Docket No. OIl- 2-?^ ^ Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable
More informationORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 0g----- ---- Appointment of a District Judge to Rule on a Motion to Recuse filed in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby
More information2572-022cv UHL30.1 02.336176.1
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CONVENTION CENTER PHASE III EXPANSION AND EXPANSION HOTEL PROJECT BY AND BETWEEN: CITY OF SAN DIEGO BRIGETTE BROWNING SERGIO GONZALES UNITE HERE LOCAL 30 2572-022cv UHL30.1
More informationCIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77 77.01 Right to writ of garnishment.--every person or entity who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered judgment in any court against any person
More informationMichie's Legal Resources. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence Act of 1999. [Acts 1999, ch. 201, 2.
http://www.michie.com/tennessee/lpext.dll/tncode/12ebe/13cdb/1402c/1402e?f=templates&... Page 1 of 1 47-18-2101. Short title. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA BENJAMIN T. BROWN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; A foreign corporation. Defendant.
More informationCase 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8
Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued June 11, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00636-CV SINHUE TEMPLOS, Appellant V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court
More informationA. Introduction: Preserving the Status Quo
II. Prejudgment: Protecting the Government's Ability to Collect Taxes A. Introduction: Preserving the Status Quo The Tax Division plays an important role in the collection of revenue. We work with the
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY
THE HONORABLE CAROL MURPHY 1 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY TARVA LEE, ) ) No: --00- Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF ) CONTRACT, BAD FAITH, FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Mary Lou
More information2:05-cv-74922-GER-VMM Doc # 5 Filed 02/08/06 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:05-cv-74922-GER-VMM Doc # 5 Filed 02/08/06 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MCCONNELL ADAMS, JR., Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 05-CV-74922-DT HONORABLE
More informationMisc. Docket No. Il--------- Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action
ER OF T H E SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. Il---------.91. 88 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued December 16, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00351-CV JAMES W. PAULSEN, Appellant / Cross-Appellee v. ELLEN A. YARRELL, Appellee / Cross-Appellant
More informationMay 2005 68 Tex. B. J. 442
May 2005 68 Tex. B. J. 442 DISBARMENTS On Oct. 4, 2004, Colin Kelly Kaufman, 58, of Corpus Christi was disbarred. Kaufman failed to hold funds belonging in whole or in part to clients or third parties
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO. 650177/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO. 650177/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 01/17/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140 CHAPTER 1950. ACTIONS PURSUANT TO THE PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE OR INTIMIDATION ACT Rule 1951.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 09-50769 Document: 00511373963 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D February 7, 2011 No.
More informationIn The NO. 14-99-00494-CV. ALTON SIMMONS, Appellant. DREW WILLIAMS, Appellee
Affirmed and Opinion filed December 21, 2000. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-99-00494-CV ALTON SIMMONS, Appellant V. DREW WILLIAMS, Appellee On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-13-01135-CV
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed August 12, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01135-CV RICHARD P. DALE, JR., D/B/A SENIOR HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS, Appellant V. TAMMY S.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Lake James H. Perriguey, OSB No. 983213 lake@law-works.com LAW WORKS LLC 1906 SW Madison Street Portland, OR 97205-1718 Telephone: (503) 227-1928 Facsimile: (503) 334-2340 Lea Ann Easton, OSB No. 881413
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00300-CV Adrian Tijerina, Appellant v. Texas Property Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association as Receiver for SIR Lloyd s Insurance Company and
More information(Effective July 1, 2014) APPENDIX A
(Effective July 1, 2014) APPENDIX A FILING FEE SCHEDULE - DISTRICT COURT AND MAGISTRATE DIVISION COMMENCING A CIVIL ACTION A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint, petition, application, or other
More informationCommencing an Action: Texas
View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/w-000-2524 Commencing an Action: Texas STEVEN WEISBURD, AMY RUDD AND LINDSEY COHAN, DECHERT, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION A Q&A guide to commencing
More informationAddendum StartPage : 0
Control Number : 42946 Item Number : 26 Addendum StartPage : House Bill (HB) 16 and Senate Bill (SB) 567 83`a Legislature, Regular Session, transferred the functions relating to the economic regulation
More informationHow To Get A Court Order To Stop A Flat Fee From Being Charged In Florida
MICHAEL BARFIELD, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, Case No.: IMMEDIATE HEARING v. REQUESTED PURSUANT TO Fla. Stat. 119.11 (2009) BERNADETTE DIPINO,
More informationHow To Grant A Writ Of Mandamus In Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00454-CV IN RE AIG AVIATION (TEXAS), INC., and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Alma L.
More informationRIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS AND ATTORNEYS
Filer s Name, Address, Phone, Fax, Email: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII 1132 Bishop Street, Suite 250 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 hib_2016-1g1 (12/09) Debtor: Case No.: Joint Debtor: (if
More informationOWNERSHIP TO EMPLOYEE INVENTIONS WHEN THERE IS NO WRITTEN AGREEMENT
DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF EMPLOYEE INVENTIONS IN THE U.S. BY: Kenneth J. Rose, Esquire, The Rose Group, San Diego, California* Originally published in English and Japanese in International Legal Strategy,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-356-CV CINDY PENA APPELLANT V. MICHAEL A. SMITH APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY ------------ OPINION ------------
More informationThe Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas
The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas NIGHTMARE ON MEDIATION STREET You mediate a case where the Plaintiff is suing
More information14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. FILED: 7/15/2014 1:32:23 PM SHERRI ADELSTEIN Denton County District Clerk By: Heather Goheen, Deputy JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON Plaintiff
More informationCAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff VS. LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION
More informationREVERSE, RENDER, REMAND, and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 22, 2014. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.
REVERSE, RENDER, REMAND, and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 22, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01428-CV CRAWFORD SERVICES, INC., Appellant V. SKILLMAN INTERNATIONAL
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-12-00543-CV
REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed May 28, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00543-CV BROWN CONSULTING AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND A LEARNING CENTER JUST FOR ME,
More informationChapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec. 213.001.
Chapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec. 213.001. Representation in Court... 2 Sec. 213.002. Prosecution of Criminal Actions...
More informationTHE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF FORT BEND FULL RELEASE, INDEMNIFICATION, AND REQUIREMENT FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE
THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF FORT BEND FULL RELEASE, INDEMNIFICATION, AND REQUIREMENT FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE This Full Release, Indemnification, and Requirement for Liability
More information