One Hundred Tenth Congress of the United States of America

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "One Hundred Tenth Congress of the United States of America"

Transcription

1 H. R One Hundred Tenth Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven An Act To provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the Water Resources Development Act of (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS. The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary. TITLE I WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS Sec Project authorizations. Sec Small projects for flood damage reduction. Sec Small projects for emergency streambank protection. Sec Small projects for navigation. Sec Small projects for improvement of the quality of the environment. Sec Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration. Sec Small projects for shoreline protection. Sec Small projects for snagging and sediment removal. Sec Small projects to prevent or mitigate damage caused by navigation projects. Sec Small projects for aquatic plant control. TITLE II GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec Non-Federal contributions. Sec Funding to process permits. Sec Written agreement for water resources projects. Sec Compilation of laws. Sec Dredged material disposal. Sec Remote and subsistence harbors. Sec Use of other Federal funds. Sec Revision of project partnership agreement; cost sharing. Sec Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction. Sec Watershed and river basin assessments. Sec Tribal partnership program. Sec Wildfire firefighting. Sec Technical assistance. Sec Lakes program. Sec Cooperative agreements. Sec Training funds. Sec Access to water resource data. Sec Shore protection projects. Sec Ability to pay. Sec Aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration. Sec Small flood damage reduction projects. Sec Small river and harbor improvement projects. Sec Protection of highways, bridge approaches, public works, and nonprofit public services.

2 H. R Sec Modification of projects for improvement of the quality of the environment. Sec Remediation of abandoned mine sites. Sec Leasing authority. Sec Fiscal transparency report. Sec Support of Army civil works program. Sec Sense of Congress on criteria for operation and maintenance of harbor dredging projects. Sec Interagency and international support authority. Sec Water resources principles and guidelines. Sec Water resource priorities report. Sec Planning. Sec Independent peer review. Sec Safety assurance review. Sec Mitigation for fish and wildlife and wetlands losses. Sec Regional sediment management. Sec National shoreline erosion control development program. Sec Monitoring ecosystem restoration. Sec Electronic submission of permit applications. Sec Project administration. Sec Program administration. Sec Studies and reports for water resources projects. Sec Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local actions. Sec Project streamlining. Sec Project deauthorization. Sec Federal hopper dredges. TITLE III PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS Sec Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama. Sec Cook Inlet, Alaska. Sec King Cove Harbor, Alaska. Sec Seward Harbor, Alaska. Sec Sitka, Alaska. Sec Tatitlek, Alaska. Sec Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona. Sec Nogales Wash and tributaries flood control project, Arizona. Sec Tucson drainage area, Arizona. Sec Osceola Harbor, Arkansas. Sec St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri. Sec Pine Mountain Dam, Arkansas. Sec Red-Ouachita River Basin Levees, Arkansas and Louisiana. Sec Cache Creek Basin, California. Sec CALFED stability program, California. Sec Compton Creek, California. Sec Grayson Creek/Murderer s Creek, California. Sec Hamilton Airfield, California. Sec John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, California. Sec Kaweah River, California. Sec Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California. Sec Llagas Creek, California. Sec Magpie Creek, California. Sec Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California. Sec Petaluma River, Petaluma, California. Sec Pinole Creek, California. Sec Prado Dam, California. Sec Redwood City Navigation Channel, California. Sec Sacramento and American Rivers flood control, California. Sec Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California. Sec Sacramento River bank protection, California. Sec Salton Sea restoration, California. Sec Santa Ana River Mainstem, California. Sec Santa Barbara Streams, Lower Mission Creek, California. Sec Santa Cruz Harbor, California. Sec Seven Oaks Dam, California. Sec Upper Guadalupe River, California. Sec Walnut Creek Channel, California. Sec Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California. Sec Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California. Sec Yuba River Basin project, California. Sec South Platte River basin, Colorado. Sec Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland.

3 H. R Sec St. George s Bridge, Delaware. Sec Brevard County, Florida. Sec Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida. Sec Canaveral Harbor, Florida. Sec Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida. Sec Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida. Sec Peanut Island, Florida. Sec Port Sutton, Florida. Sec Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida. Sec Tampa Harbor Cut B, Florida. Sec Allatoona Lake, Georgia. Sec Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia. Sec Dworshak Reservoir improvements, Idaho. Sec Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho. Sec Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois. Sec Cache River Levee, Illinois. Sec Chicago River, Illinois. Sec Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers project, Illinois. Sec Emiquon, Illinois. Sec Lasalle, Illinois. Sec Spunky Bottoms, Illinois. Sec Cedar Lake, Indiana. Sec Koontz Lake, Indiana. Sec White River, Indiana. Sec Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa. Sec Perry Creek, Iowa. Sec Rathbun Lake, Iowa. Sec Hickman Bluff stabilization, Kentucky. Sec Mcalpine Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Indiana. Sec Prestonsburg, Kentucky. Sec Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed. Sec Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana. Sec Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, regional visitor center, Louisiana. Sec Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana. Sec Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana. Sec Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana. Sec Red River (J. Bennett Johnston) Waterway, Louisiana. Sec Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana. Sec Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet relocation assistance, Louisiana. Sec Violet, Louisiana. Sec West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), Louisiana. Sec Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine. Sec Cumberland, Maryland. Sec Poplar Island, Maryland. Sec Detroit River shoreline, Detroit, Michigan. Sec St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan. Sec St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan. Sec Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan. Sec Ada, Minnesota. Sec Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota. Sec Grand Marais, Minnesota. Sec Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota. Sec Granite Falls, Minnesota. Sec Knife River Harbor, Minnesota. Sec Red Lake River, Minnesota. Sec Silver Bay, Minnesota. Sec Taconite Harbor, Minnesota. Sec Two Harbors, Minnesota. Sec Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi. Sec Jackson County, Mississippi. Sec Pearl River Basin, Mississippi. Sec Festus and Crystal City, Missouri. Sec L 15 levee, Missouri. Sec Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri. Sec River Des Peres, Missouri. Sec Lower Yellowstone project, Montana. Sec Yellowstone River and tributaries, Montana and North Dakota. Sec Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska. Sec Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska. Sec Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska. Sec Lower Truckee River, McCarran Ranch, Nevada.

4 H. R Sec Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey. Sec Passaic River basin flood management, New Jersey. Sec Cooperative agreements, New Mexico. Sec Middle Rio Grande restoration, New Mexico. Sec Buffalo Harbor, New York. Sec Long Island Sound oyster restoration, New York and Connecticut. Sec Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers watershed management, New York. Sec Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York. Sec Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey. Sec New York State Canal System. Sec Susquehanna River and Upper Delaware River watershed management, New York. Sec Missouri River restoration, North Dakota. Sec Wahpeton, North Dakota. Sec Ohio. Sec Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio. Sec Mahoning River, Ohio. Sec Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma. Sec Arkansas River Corridor, Oklahoma. Sec Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma. Sec Oklahoma lakes demonstration program, Oklahoma. Sec Ottawa County, Oklahoma. Sec Red River chloride control, Oklahoma and Texas. Sec Waurika Lake, Oklahoma. Sec Upper Willamette River watershed ecosystem restoration, Oregon. Sec Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. Sec Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania. Sec Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Sec Solomon s Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Sec South Central Pennsylvania. Sec Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania. Sec Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Sec Missouri River Restoration, South Dakota. Sec Cedar Bayou, Texas. Sec Freeport Harbor, Texas. Sec Lake Kemp, Texas. Sec Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas. Sec North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas. Sec Pat Mayse Lake, Texas. Sec Proctor Lake, Texas. Sec San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas. Sec Connecticut River restoration, Vermont. Sec Dam remediation, Vermont. Sec Lake Champlain Eurasian milfoil, water chestnut, and other nonnative plant control, Vermont. Sec Upper Connecticut River Basin wetland restoration, Vermont and New Hampshire. Sec Upper Connecticut River basin ecosystem restoration, Vermont and New Hampshire. Sec Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York. Sec Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Sec Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia. Sec Duwamish/Green, Washington. Sec McNary Lock and Dam, McNary National Wildlife Refuge, Washington and Idaho. Sec Snake River project, Washington and Idaho. Sec Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington. Sec Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia. Sec Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia. Sec Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia. Sec Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia. Sec Mcdowell County, West Virginia. Sec Parkersburg, West Virginia. Sec Green Bay Harbor, Green Bay, Wisconsin. Sec Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin. Sec Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs. Sec Upper basin of Missouri River. Sec Upper Mississippi River System environmental management program. Sec Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation system new technology pilot program. Sec Continuation of project authorizations.

5 H. R Sec Project reauthorizations. Sec Project deauthorizations. Sec Land conveyances. Sec Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use restrictions. TITLE IV STUDIES Sec John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program. Sec Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites. Sec Southwestern United States drought study. Sec Delaware River. Sec Eurasian milfoil. Sec Fire Island, Alaska. Sec Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska. Sec Kuskokwim River, Alaska. Sec Nome Harbor, Alaska. Sec St. George Harbor, Alaska. Sec Susitna River, Alaska. Sec Valdez, Alaska. Sec Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona. Sec Searcy County, Arkansas. Sec Aliso Creek, California. Sec Fresno, Kings, and Kern counties, California. Sec Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda, California. Sec Los Angeles River revitalization study, California. Sec Lytle Creek, Rialto, California. Sec Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California. Sec Orick, California. Sec Shoreline study, Oceanside, California. Sec Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California. Sec Sacramento River, California. Sec San Diego County, California. Sec San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California. Sec South San Francisco Bay Shoreline, California. Sec Twentynine Palms, California. Sec Yucca Valley, California. Sec Selenium studies, Colorado. Sec Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, Delaware. Sec Delaware inland bays and tributaries and Atlantic coast, Delaware. Sec Collier County Beaches, Florida. Sec Lower St. Johns River, Florida. Sec Herbert Hoover Dike supplemental major rehabilitation report, Florida. Sec Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida. Sec Meriwether County, Georgia. Sec Boise River, Idaho. Sec Ballard s Island Side Channel, Illinois. Sec Chicago, Illinois. Sec Salem, Indiana. Sec Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky. Sec Dewey Lake, Kentucky. Sec Louisville, Kentucky. Sec Vidalia Port, Louisiana. Sec Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Sec Clinton River, Michigan. Sec Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan. Sec Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan. Sec Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Sec Northeast Mississippi. Sec Dredged material disposal, New Jersey. Sec Bayonne, New Jersey. Sec Carteret, New Jersey. Sec Gloucester County, New Jersey. Sec Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Sec Batavia, New York. Sec Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York. Sec Finger Lakes, New York. Sec Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York. Sec Newtown Creek, New York. Sec Niagara River, New York. Sec Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York. Sec Upper Delaware River watershed, New York.

6 H. R Sec Lincoln County, North Carolina. Sec Wilkes County, North Carolina. Sec Yadkinville, North Carolina. Sec Flood damage reduction, Ohio. Sec Lake Erie, Ohio. Sec Ohio River, Ohio. Sec Toledo Harbor dredged material placement, Toledo, Ohio. Sec Toledo Harbor, Maumee River, and Lake Channel project, Toledo, Ohio. Sec Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon. Sec Walla Walla River basin, Oregon. Sec Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania. Sec Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania. Sec Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction. Sec Williamsport, Pennsylvania. Sec Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania. Sec Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico. Sec Woonsocket local protection project, Blackstone River basin, Rhode Island. Sec Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina. Sec Broad River, York County, South Carolina. Sec Savannah River, South Carolina and Georgia. Sec Chattanooga, Tennessee. Sec Cleveland, Tennessee. Sec Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee. Sec Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee. Sec Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis, Tennessee. Sec Abilene, Texas. Sec Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas. Sec Port of Galveston, Texas. Sec Grand County and Moab, Utah. Sec Southwestern Utah. Sec Ecosystem and hydropower generation dams, Vermont. Sec Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington. Sec Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia. Sec Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin. Sec Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin. Sec Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. Sec Debris removal. TITLE V MISCELLANEOUS Sec Maintenance of navigation channels. Sec Watershed management. Sec Dam safety. Sec Structural integrity evaluations. Sec Flood mitigation priority areas. Sec Additional assistance for authorized projects. Sec Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain projects. Sec Expedited completion of reports for certain projects. Sec Southeastern water resources assessment. Sec Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project. Sec Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration program. Sec Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation. Sec Great Lakes tributary models. Sec Great Lakes navigation and protection. Sec Saint Lawrence Seaway. Sec Upper Mississippi River dispersal barrier project. Sec Estuary restoration. Sec Missouri River and tributaries, mitigation, recovery, and restoration, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Sec Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River basins, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. Sec Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection program. Sec Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration, Virginia and Maryland. Sec Hypoxia assessment. Sec Potomac River watershed assessment and tributary strategy evaluation and monitoring program. Sec Lock and dam security. Sec Research and development program for Columbia and Snake River salmon survival. Sec Wage surveys.

7 H. R Sec Rehabilitation. Sec Auburn, Alabama. Sec Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama. Sec Alaska. Sec Barrow, Alaska. Sec Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska. Sec St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska. Sec Tanana River, Alaska. Sec Wrangell Harbor, Alaska. Sec Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas. Sec Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas. Sec Loomis Landing, Arkansas. Sec California. Sec Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, Stockton, California. Sec Cambria, California. Sec Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California. Sec Dana Point Harbor, California. Sec East San Joaquin County, California. Sec Eastern Santa Clara basin, California. Sec LA 3 dredged material ocean disposal site designation, California. Sec Lancaster, California. Sec Los Osos, California. Sec Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat, California. Sec Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel Basin, California. Sec San Francisco, California. Sec San Francisco, California, waterfront area. Sec San Pablo Bay, California, watershed and Suisun Marsh ecosystem restoration. Sec St. Helena, California. Sec Upper Calaveras River, Stockton, California. Sec Rio Grande environmental management program, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. Sec Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, Connecticut. Sec Stamford, Connecticut. Sec Delmarva conservation corridor, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Sec Anacostia River, District of Columbia and Maryland. Sec East Central and Northeast Florida. Sec Florida Keys water quality improvements. Sec Lake Worth, Florida. Sec Big Creek, Georgia, watershed management and restoration program. Sec Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District. Sec Savannah, Georgia. Sec Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and Wyoming. Sec Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho. Sec Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois. Sec Reconstruction of Illinois and Missouri flood protection projects. Sec Illinois River basin restoration. Sec Promontory Point third-party review, Chicago shoreline, Chicago, Illinois. Sec Kaskaskia River basin, Illinois, restoration. Sec Southwest Illinois. Sec Calumet region, Indiana. Sec Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa. Sec Paducah, Kentucky. Sec Southern and eastern Kentucky. Sec Winchester, Kentucky. Sec Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Sec Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana. Sec East Atchafalaya basin and Amite River basin region, Louisiana. Sec Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana. Sec Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana. Sec Southeast Louisiana region, Louisiana. Sec West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. Sec Charlestown, Maryland. Sec St. Mary s River, Maryland. Sec Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites. Sec Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan. Sec Crookston, Minnesota.

8 H. R Sec Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota. Sec Itasca County, Minnesota. Sec Minneapolis, Minnesota. Sec Northeastern Minnesota. Sec Wild Rice River, Minnesota. Sec Mississippi. Sec Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi. Sec Mississippi River, Missouri and Illinois. Sec St. Louis, Missouri. Sec St. Louis Regional Greenways, St. Louis, Missouri. Sec Missoula, Montana. Sec St. Mary project, Glacier County, Montana. Sec Lower Platte River watershed restoration, Nebraska. Sec Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey. Sec Atlantic Coast of New York. Sec College Point, New York City, New York. Sec Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York. Sec Hudson River, New York. Sec Mount Morris Dam, New York. Sec North Hempstead and Glen Cove North Shore watershed restoration, New York. Sec Rochester, New York. Sec North Carolina. Sec Stanly County, North Carolina. Sec John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina. Sec Cincinnati, Ohio. Sec Ohio River basin environmental management. Sec Toussaint River navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio. Sec Statewide comprehensive water planning, Oklahoma. Sec Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon. Sec Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Sec Clinton County, Pennsylvania. Sec Kehly Run Dams, Pennsylvania. Sec Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. Sec Northeast Pennsylvania. Sec Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York. Sec Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Sec Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina. Sec Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, South Dakota. Sec East Tennessee. Sec Fritz Landing, Tennessee. Sec J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee. Sec Nashville, Tennessee. Sec Nonconnah Weir, Memphis, Tennessee. Sec Tennessee River partnership. Sec Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee. Sec Upper Mississippi embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi. Sec Texas. Sec Bosque River watershed, Texas. Sec Dallas County region, Texas. Sec Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas. Sec Harris County, Texas. Sec Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas. Sec Onion Creek, Texas. Sec Connecticut River dams, Vermont. Sec Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New York. Sec Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia. Sec Eastern Shore and Southwest Virginia. Sec James River, Virginia. Sec Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington. Sec Hamilton Island campground, Washington. Sec Erosion control, Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington. Sec Willapa Bay, Washington. Sec West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control. Sec Central West Virginia. Sec Southern West Virginia. Sec Construction of flood control projects by non-federal interests. Sec Additional assistance for critical projects. TITLE VI FLORIDA EVERGLADES Sec Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida.

9 H. R Sec Pilot projects. Sec Maximum costs. Sec Credit. Sec Outreach and assistance. Sec Critical restoration projects. Sec Regional engineering model for environmental restoration. TITLE VII LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA Sec Definitions. Sec Comprehensive plan. Sec Louisiana coastal area. Sec Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force. Sec Project modifications. Sec Construction. Sec Non-Federal cost share. Sec Project justification. Sec Independent review. Sec Expedited reports. Sec Reporting. Sec New Orleans and vicinity. Sec Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet. Sec Hurricane and storm damage reduction. Sec Larose to Golden Meadow. Sec Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. TITLE VIII UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM Sec Definitions. Sec Navigation improvements and restoration. Sec Authorization of construction of navigation improvements. Sec Ecosystem restoration authorization. Sec Comparable progress. TITLE IX NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM Sec Short title. Sec Definitions. Sec Committee on Levee Safety. Sec Inventory and inspection of levees. Sec Limitations on statutory construction. Sec Authorization of appropriations. SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. In this Act, the term Secretary means the Secretary of the Army. TITLE I WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS SEC PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this section: (1) HAINES, ALASKA. The project for navigation, Haines, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of $14,040,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,232,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $2,808,000. (2) PORT LIONS, ALASKA. The project for navigation, Port Lions, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 14, 2006, at a total cost of $9,530,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,624,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $1,906,000.

10 H. R (3) SANTA CRUZ RIVER, PASEO DE LAS IGLESIAS, ARIZONA. The project for environmental restoration, Santa Cruz River, Pima County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 28, 2006, at a total cost of $97,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $63,300,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $34,400,000. (4) TANQUE VERDE CREEK, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. The project for environmental restoration, Tanque Verde Creek, Pima County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of $5,906,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,836,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $2,070,000. (5) SALT RIVER (RIO SALADO OESTE), MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. The project for environmental restoration, Salt River (Rio Salado Oeste), Maricopa County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $166,650,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $106,629,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $60,021,000. (6) SALT RIVER (VA SHLY AY AKIMEL), MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for environmental restoration, Salt River (Va Shly ay Akimel), Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of $162,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $105,200,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $56,900,000. (B) COORDINATION WITH FEDERAL RECLAMATION PROJECTS. The Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable, shall coordinate the design and construction of the project described in subparagraph (A) with the Bureau of Reclamation and any operating agent for any Federal reclamation project in the Salt River Basin to avoid impacts to existing Federal reclamation facilities and operations in the Salt River Basin. (7) MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS. The project for flood damage reduction, May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $30,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,010,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $15,840,000. (8) HAMILTON CITY, GLENN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. The project for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, Hamilton City, Glenn County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $52,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $34,100,000 and estimated non-federal cost of $18,300,000. (9) SILVER STRAND SHORELINE, IMPERIAL BEACH, CALI- FORNIA. The project for storm damage reduction, Silver Strand Shoreline, Imperial Beach, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $13,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,521,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $5,179,000, and at an estimated total cost of $42,500,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $21,250,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $21,250,000.

11 H. R (10) MATILIJA DAM, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. The project for environmental restoration, Matilija Dam, Ventura County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of $144,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $89,700,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $54,800,000. (11) MIDDLE CREEK, LAKE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. The project for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, Middle Creek, Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $45,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $29,500,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $15,700,000. (12) NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for environmental restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, Napa, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $134,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $87,500,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $47,000,000. (B) ADMINISTRATION. In carrying out the project authorized by this paragraph, the Secretary shall (i) construct a recycled water pipeline extending from the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment Plant and the Napa Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment Plant to the project; and (ii) restore or enhance Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, and 3. (13) DENVER COUNTY REACH, SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, DENVER, COLORADO. The project for environmental restoration, Denver County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of $20,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,065,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $7,035,000. (14) CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, FLORIDA. (A) IN GENERAL. The Secretary may carry out the project for ecosystem restoration, water supply, flood control, and protection of water quality, Central and Southern Florida, Indian River Lagoon, Florida, at a total cost of $1,365,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $682,500,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $682,500,000, in accordance with section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680) and the recommendations of the report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 6, (B) DEAUTHORIZATIONS. The following projects are not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act: (i) The uncompleted portions of the project for the C 44 Basin Storage Reservoir of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2682), at a total cost of $147,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $73,900,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $73,900,000. (ii) The uncompleted portions of the Martin County, Florida, modifications to the project for Central

12 H. R and Southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a total cost of $15,471,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,073,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $7,398,000. (iii) The uncompleted portions of the East Coast Backpumping, St. Lucie Martin County, Spillway Structure S 311 modifications to the project for Central and Southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a total cost of $77,118,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $55,124,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $21,994,000. (15) COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN, CEN- TRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. The project for ecosystem restoration, Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and Southern Florida, Picayune Strand Restoration Project, Collier County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 15, 2005, at a total cost of $375,330,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $187,665,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $187,665,000. (16) COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN, CEN- TRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, SITE 1 IMPOUNDMENT PROJECT, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. The project for ecosystem restoration, Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and Southern Florida, Site 1 Impoundment Project, Palm Beach County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $80,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $40,420,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $40,420,000. (17) MIAMI HARBOR, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for navigation, Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 25, 2005, at a total cost of $125,270,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $75,140,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $50,130,000. (B) GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT. The non-federal share of the cost of the general reevaluation report that resulted in the report of the Chief of Engineers referred to in subparagraph (A) shall be the same percentage as the non-federal share of cost of construction of the project. (C) AGREEMENT. The Secretary shall enter into a new partnership with the non-federal interest to reflect the cost sharing required by subparagraph (B). (18) EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILLINOIS. The project for environmental restoration and recreation, East St. Louis and Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $208,260,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $134,910,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $73,350,000. (19) PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, ILLINOIS. The project for environmental restoration, Peoria Riverfront Development, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 28, 2003, at a total cost of $18,220,000, with an estimated

13 H. R Federal cost of $11,840,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $6,380,000. (20) WOOD RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION, MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS. The project for flood damage reduction, Wood River Levee System Reconstruction, Madison County, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 18, 2006, at a total cost of $17,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,193,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $6,027,000. (21) DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, DES MOINES, IOWA. The project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 28, 2006, at a total cost of $10,780,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,967,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $3,813,000. (22) LICKING RIVER BASIN, CYNTHIANA, KENTUCKY. The project for flood damage reduction, Licking River Basin, Cynthiana, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost of $18,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,830,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $6,370,000. (23) BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LOUISIANA. The project for navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of $9,600,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be paid 1 2 from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and 1 2 from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. (24) MORGANZA TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LOUISIANA. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports of the Chief of Engineers dated August 23, 2002, and July 22, 2003, at a total cost of $886,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $576,355,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $310,345,000. (B) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. The operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of the Houma Navigation Canal lock complex and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway floodgate features of the project described in subparagraph (A) that provide for inland waterway transportation shall be a Federal responsibility in accordance with section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212). (25) PORT OF IBERIA, LOUISIANA. The project for navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of $131,250,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $105,315,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $25,935,000; except that the Secretary, in consultation with Vermillion and Iberia Parishes, Louisiana, and consistent with the mitigation plan in the report, shall use available dredged material and rock placement on the south bank of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the west bank of the Freshwater Bayou Channel to provide incidental storm surge protection that does not adversely affect the mitigation plan. (26) SMITH ISLAND, SOMERSET COUNTY, MARYLAND. The project for environmental restoration, Smith Island, Somerset County, Maryland: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated

14 H. R October 29, 2001, at a total cost of $15,580,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,127,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $5,453,000. (27) ROSEAU RIVER, ROSEAU, MINNESOTA. The project for flood damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $25,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,820,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $11,280,000. (28) ARGENTINE, EAST BOTTOMS, FAIRFAX-JERSEY CREEK, AND NORTH KANSAS LEVEES UNITS, MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBU- TARIES AT KANSAS CITIES, MISSOURI AND KANSAS. The project for flood damage reduction, Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax- Jersey Creek, and North Kansas Levees units, Missouri River and tributaries at Kansas Cities, Missouri and Kansas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $65,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $42,530,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $22,900,000. (29) SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, BLUE RIVER, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. The project for flood damage reduction, Swope Park Industrial Area, Blue River, Kansas City, Missouri: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,037,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $5,943,000. (30) GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NEW JERSEY. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost of $54,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $35,069,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $19,291,000, and at an estimated total cost of $202,500,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $101,250,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $101,250,000. (31) HUDSON RARITAN ESTUARY, LIBERTY STATE PARK, NEW JERSEY. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for environmental restoration, Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State Park, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 25, 2006, at a total cost of $34,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $22,200,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $11,900,000. (B) RESTORATION TEAMS. In carrying out the project, the Secretary shall establish and utilize watershed restoration teams composed of estuary restoration experts from the Corps of Engineers, the New Jersey department of environmental protection, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and other experts designated by the Secretary for the purpose of developing habitat restoration and water quality enhancement. (32) NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION STUDY, MANASQUAN INLET TO BARNEGAT INLET, NEW JERSEY. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, New Jersey Shore Protection Study, Manasquan Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $71,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $25,165,000,

15 H. R and at an estimated total cost of $119,680,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $59,840,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $59,840,000. (33) RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 4, 2006, at a total cost of $115,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $74,800,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $40,200,000, and at an estimated total cost of $6,500,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,250,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $3,250,000. (34) SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NEW JERSEY. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and environmental restoration, South River, Raritan River Basin, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of $122,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $79,500,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $42,800,000. (35) SOUTHWEST VALLEY, BERNALILLO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO. The project for flood damage reduction, Southwest Valley, Bernalillo County, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $24,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $16,150,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $8,690,000. (36) MONTAUK POINT, NEW YORK. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Montauk Point, New York: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at a total cost of $14,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,300,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $7,300,000. (37) HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OHIO. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for ecosystem restoration, Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 24, 2006, at a total cost of $20,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,440,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $7,540,000. (B) WAYNE NATIONAL FOREST. (i) IN GENERAL. The Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, may construct other project features on property that is located in the Wayne National Forest, Ohio, owned by the United States and managed by the Forest Service as described in the report of the Corps of Engineers entitled Hocking River Basin, Ohio, Monday Creek Sub-Basin Ecosystem Restoration Project Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment. (ii) COST. Each project feature carried out on Federal land shall be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained at Federal expense. (iii) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out this subparagraph $1,270,000. (38) TOWN OF BLOOMSBURG, COLUMBIA COUNTY, PENNSYL- VANIA. The project for flood damage reduction, town of

16 H. R Bloomsburg, Columbia County, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 25, 2006, at a total cost of $44,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $28,925,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $15,575,000. (39) PAWLEYS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Pawleys Island, South Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $8,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,840,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $3,140,000, and at an estimated total cost of $21,200,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,600,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $10,600,000. (40) CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for navigation and ecosystem restoration, Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, at a total cost of $188,110,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $87,810,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $100,300,000. (B) NAVIGATIONAL SERVITUDE. In carrying out the project under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall enforce the navigational servitude in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel (including the removal or relocation of any facility obstructing the project) consistent with the cost sharing requirements of section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211). (41) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, BRAZOS RIVER TO PORT O CONNOR, MATAGORDA BAY RE-ROUTE, TEXAS. The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port O Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 24, 2002, at a total cost of $17,280,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be paid 1 2 from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and 1 2 from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. (42) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER, TEXAS. The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, High Island to Brazos River, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of $14,450,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be paid 1 2 from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and 1 2 from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. (43) LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN PHASE I, TEXAS. The project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Lower Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of $110,730,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $69,640,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $41,090,000. (44) ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE REPLACE- MENT, DEEP CREEK, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA. The project for Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 3, 2003, at a total cost of $37,200,000.

17 H. R (45) CRANEY ISLAND EASTWARD EXPANSION, NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for navigation, Craney Island Eastward Expansion, Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Hampton Roads, Virginia: Report of Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost of $712,103,000. (B) NON-FEDERAL SHARE. Notwithstanding sections 101 and 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C and 2213), the Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 50 percent. (46) CENTRALIA, CHEHALIS RIVER, LEWIS COUNTY, WASH- INGTON. (A) IN GENERAL. The project for flood damage reduction, Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, Washington: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 27, 2004, at a total cost of $123,770,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $74,740,000 and an estimated non-federal cost of $49,030,000. (B) CREDIT. The Secretary shall (i) credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d 5b), toward the non-federal share of the cost of the project up to $6,500,000 for the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-federal interest in accordance with the project study plan dated November 28, 1999; and (ii) credit toward the non-federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. SEC SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. (a) IN GENERAL. The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s): (1) HALEYVILLE, ALABAMA. Project for flood damage reduction, Haleyville, Alabama. (2) WEISS LAKE, ALABAMA. Project for flood damage reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama. (3) FORT YUKON, ALASKA. Project for flood damage reduction, Fort Yukon, Alaska. (4) LITTLE COLORADO RIVER LEVEE, ARIZONA. Project for flood damage reduction, Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona. (5) CACHE RIVER BASIN, GRUBBS, ARKANSAS. Project for flood damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas. (6) BARREL SPRINGS WASH, PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, California. (7) BORREGO SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Borrego Springs, California. (8) COLTON, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Colton, California. (9) DUNLAP STREAM, YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California.

18 H. R (10) HUNTS CANYON WASH, PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, California. (11) ONTARIO AND CHINO, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California. (12) SANTA VENETIA, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, California. (13) WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California. (14) WILDWOOD CREEK, YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California. (15) BIBB COUNTY AND CITY OF MACON LEVEE, GEORGIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Bibb County and City of Macon Levee, Georgia. (16) FORT WAYNE AND VICINITY, INDIANA. Project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary s and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana. (17) ST. FRANCISVILLE, LOUSIANA. Project for flood damage reduction, St. Francisville, Louisiana. (18) SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS. Project for flood damage reduction, Salem, Massachusetts. (19) CASS RIVER, MICHIGAN. Project for flood damage reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, Michigan. (20) CROW RIVER, ROCKFORD, MINNESOTA. Project for flood damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota. (21) MARSH CREEK, MINNESOTA. Project for flood damage reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota. (22) SOUTH BRANCH OF THE WILD RICE RIVER, BORUP, MIN- NESOTA. Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota. (23) BLACKSNAKE CREEK, ST. JOSEPH, MISSOURI. Project for flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri. (24) ACID BROOK, POMPTON LAKES, NEW JERSEY. Project for flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey. (25) CANISTEO RIVER, ADDISON, NEW YORK. Project for flood damage reduction, Canisteo River, Addison, New York. (26) COHOCTON RIVER, CAMPBELL, NEW YORK. Project for flood damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, New York. (27) DRY AND OTTER CREEKS, CORTLAND, NEW YORK. Project for flood damage reduction, Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New York. (28) EAST RIVER, SILVER BEACH, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK. Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, New York City, New York. (29) EAST VALLEY CREEK, ANDOVER, NEW YORK. Project for flood damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, New York. (30) SUNNYSIDE BROOK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK. Project for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside Brook, Westchester County, New York. (31) LITTLE YANKEE AND MUD RUN, TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO. Project for flood damage reduction, Little Yankee and Mud Run, Trumbull County, Ohio.

19 H. R (32) LITTLE NESHAMINY CREEK, WARRINGTON, PENNSYL- VANIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, Warrington, Pennsylvania. (33) SOUTHAMPTON CREEK WATERSHED, SOUTHAMPTON, PENNSYLVANIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Southampton Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania. (34) SPRING CREEK, LOWER MACUNGIE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYL- VANIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Spring Creek, Lower Macungie Township, Pennsylvania. (35) YARDLEY AQUEDUCT, SILVER AND BROCK CREEKS, YARDLEY, PENNSYLVANIA. Project for flood damage reduction, Yardley Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania. (36) SURFSIDE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA. Project for flood damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South Carolina. (37) SANDY CREEK, JACKSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE. A project for flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee. (38) CONGELOSI DITCH, MISSOURI CITY, TEXAS. Project for flood damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas. (39) DILLEY, TEXAS. Project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas. (40) CHEYENNE, WYOMING. Project for flood damage reduction, Cheyenne, Wyoming. (b) SPECIAL RULES. (1) CACHE RIVER BASIN, GRUBBS, ARKANSAS. The Secretary may proceed with the project for the Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding that the project is located within the boundaries of the flood control project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950, (64 Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41). (2) ONTARIO AND CHINO, CALIFORNIA. The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California, referred to in subsection (a)(11) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible. (3) SANTA VENETIA, CALIFORNIA. The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, California, referred to in subsection (a)(12) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible and shall allow the non-federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary s evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the project. (4) WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA. The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California, referred to in subsection (a)(13) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible. (5) WILDWOOD CREEK, YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA. The Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for the project for flood damage, Wildwood Creek, California, referred to in subsection (a)(14) and, if the Secretary determines that the plan meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may use the plan to carry out the project and shall provide credit

20 H. R toward the non-federal share of the cost of the project for the cost of work carried out by the non-federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. (6) FORT WAYNE AND VICINITY, INDIANA. In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary s and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana, referred to in subsection (a)(16) the Secretary shall (A) provide a 100-year level of flood protection at the Berry Thieme, Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, and Tillman sites along the St. Mary s River; and (B) allow the non-federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary s evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the project. (7) SOUTH BRANCH OF THE WILD RICE RIVER, BORUP, MIN- NESOTA. In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(22) the Secretary may consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the project and shall allow the non-federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary s evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the project. (8) ACID BROOK, POMPTON LAKES, NEW JERSEY. The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, referred to in subsection (a)(24) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible. (9) SANDY CREEK, TENNESSEE. Consistent with the report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 24, 1948, on the West Tennessee Tributaries project, in carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Tennessee, referred to in section (a)(37) (A) Sandy Creek shall not be considered to be an authorized channel of the West Tennessee Tributaries project; and (B) the project shall not be considered to be part of the West Tennessee Tributaries project. (10) DILLEY, TEXAS. The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, referred to in subsection (a)(39) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible. SEC SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTEC- TION. The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r): (1) ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA. Projects for emergency streambank protection, Aliso Creek, California.

WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007 CONFERENCE REPORT H.R. 1495

WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007 CONFERENCE REPORT H.R. 1495 110TH CONGRESS " 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES! REPORT 110 280 WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007 CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 1495 VerDate Aug 31 2005 22:35 Aug 04, 2007 Jkt 036965

More information

Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007

Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 Rich Worthington U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Headquarters December 5, 2007 WRDA 2007 (PL 110-114 ) PROVISIONS IMPORTANT TO AAPA STATUS: Passed

More information

2010 Allocations to States of Volume Cap for Qualified School Construction Bonds

2010 Allocations to States of Volume Cap for Qualified School Construction Bonds 2010 Allocations to States of Volume Cap for Qualified School Construction Bonds Total Dollar Allocation by State/ State/Territory Territory Alabama 140,453,000 Alaska 28,163,000 Arizona 171,115,000 Arkansas

More information

Construction Initiative: Distribution of $24.8 Billion In Bonding Authority Initial Estimates for H.R. 4094

Construction Initiative: Distribution of $24.8 Billion In Bonding Authority Initial Estimates for H.R. 4094 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California SEA Allocation 208,207 Birmingham City 33,463 Mobile County 51,654 Montgomery County 21,960 QZABS 39,638 Total 354,922 SEA Allocation 47,418 Total 53,398 SEA

More information

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Mode Alabama Percent of Teachers FY Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile

More information

Compare Your Stats Pharmacy

Compare Your Stats Pharmacy THE PREMIER SOURCE FOR FUTURE DR. S *Data provided by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy **Data based on matriculated students at respective schools entering fall 2010 Compare Your Stats

More information

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana

More information

List of State DMV Websites

List of State DMV Websites List of State DMV Websites Alabama Alabama Department of Revenue Motor Vehicle Division http://www.ador.state.al.us/motorvehicle/index.html Alaska Alaska Department of Administration Division of Motor

More information

2013 VA County Loan Guaranty Limits for High-Cost Counties

2013 VA County Loan Guaranty Limits for High-Cost Counties 1 2013 VA COUNTY LOAN GUARANTY LIMITS FOR HIGH-COST COUNTIES -- USVAREALTY.COM 2013 VA County Loan Guaranty Limits for High-Cost Counties There is no limit on how much a veteran can borrow to buy a home,

More information

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST ** Utilize this list to determine whether or not a non-resident applicant may waive the Oklahoma examination or become licensed

More information

Qualified School Construction Bond Allocations for 2010. This Notice sets forth the maximum face amount of qualified school

Qualified School Construction Bond Allocations for 2010. This Notice sets forth the maximum face amount of qualified school Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Qualified School Construction Bond Allocations for 2010 Notice 2010-17 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This Notice sets forth the maximum face amount of qualified

More information

Tuition and Fees. & Room and Board. Costs 2011-12

Tuition and Fees. & Room and Board. Costs 2011-12 National and Regional Comparisons of Tuition and Fees & Room and Board Costs 2011-12 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 1 Comparator Institutions... 3 University of Wyoming Comparator Institutions...

More information

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees: Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees: Security Freeze Table AA, AP and AE Military addresses*

More information

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Impacts of Sequestration on the States Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds

More information

http://agnis/sites/amsissuances/shared%20documents/282.7.htm

http://agnis/sites/amsissuances/shared%20documents/282.7.htm Page 1 of 5 Directive Status List of Attachments Abatement of Air and Water Pollution at Federal Facilities I PURPOSE This Instruction sets forth policy and responsibilities in the Agricultural Marketing

More information

University Your selection: 169 universities

University Your selection: 169 universities University Your selection: 169 universities Level of study: bachelor, master Regions: United States, compareuni T eaching & Learning Research Knowledge T ransf er International Orientation Regional Engagement

More information

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption Real Progress in Food Code Adoption The Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), under contract to the Food and Drug Administration, is gathering data on the progress of FDA Food Code adoptions by

More information

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena) HAWAII () IDAHO () Illinois () MAINE () Maryland () MASSACHUSETTS () NEBRASKA () NEVADA (Carson ) NEW HAMPSHIRE () OHIO () OKLAHOMA ( ) OREGON () TEXAS () UTAH ( ) VERMONT () ALABAMA () COLORADO () INDIANA

More information

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability ALABAMA Alabama State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Alabama 1-2 Weeks ALASKA ARIZONA Arizona State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Arizona 7-8 Weeks by mail By Mail ARKANSAS

More information

Licensure Resources by State

Licensure Resources by State Licensure Resources by State Alabama Alabama State Board of Social Work Examiners http://socialwork.alabama.gov/ Alaska Alaska Board of Social Work Examiners http://commerce.state.ak.us/dnn/cbpl/professionallicensing/socialworkexaminers.as

More information

University of Massachusetts School of Law: Career Services Office State-By-State Online Job Search Resources

University of Massachusetts School of Law: Career Services Office State-By-State Online Job Search Resources University of Massachusetts School of Law: Career Services Office State-By-State Online Job Search Resources Alabama http://www.alabar.org - Alabama Bar Association http://www.judicial.state.al.us - Alabama

More information

Bob Ivarson, PE, D.WRE. Sustainable Water Technologies Business Conference. June 17, 2014

Bob Ivarson, PE, D.WRE. Sustainable Water Technologies Business Conference. June 17, 2014 Bob Ivarson, PE, D.WRE Sustainable Water Technologies Business Conference June 17, 2014 In the old days we use to talk about conservation. Unsustainability, often is the collision of good intentions with

More information

Psychology NRC Study R Rankings (1 of 6)

Psychology NRC Study R Rankings (1 of 6) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Princeton U. Harvard U. Stanford U. U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor Yale U. U. of Wisconsin at Madison U. of Rochester U. of California at Los Angeles Columbia U. Brown U. U. of Chicago U.

More information

Psychology NRC Study S Rankings (1 of 6)

Psychology NRC Study S Rankings (1 of 6) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Princeton U. Harvard U. Stanford U. U. of Wisconsin at Madison Yale U. U. of Rochester U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor San Diego State U. and U. of California at San Diego Columbia U. U. of California

More information

US Department of Health and Human Services Exclusion Program. Thomas Sowinski Special Agent in Charge/ Reviewing Official

US Department of Health and Human Services Exclusion Program. Thomas Sowinski Special Agent in Charge/ Reviewing Official US Department of Health and Human Services Exclusion Program Thomas Sowinski Special Agent in Charge/ Reviewing Official Overview Authority to exclude individuals and entities from Federal Health Care

More information

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State State Program Contact Alabama Alabama Health 1-866-833-3375 Insurance Plan 1-334-263-8311 http://www.alseib.org/healthinsurance/ahip/ Alaska Alaska Comprehensive

More information

Universities classified as "high research activity"

Universities classified as high research activity Universities classified as "high research activity" 99 institutions classified as "RU/H: Research Universities (high research activity)" in the 2010 Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.

More information

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES Small Business Ownership Description Total number of employer firms and self-employment in the state per 100 people in the labor force, 2003. Explanation Business ownership

More information

BenefitsMonitor National Higher Education Participants. Mercer Health & Benefits 20

BenefitsMonitor National Higher Education Participants. Mercer Health & Benefits 20 BenefitsMonitor National Higher Education Participants Arizona State University Austin Peay State University Bates College Baylor College of Medicine Baylor University Boston University Bowling Green State

More information

TITLE. Consulate General of Brazil in Miami, FL Florida, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas

TITLE. Consulate General of Brazil in Miami, FL Florida, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas The following pages are a guide to completing the Brazil visa application online. Page 2 has a summary of the Trip Information for this group. Pages 3-8 provide step by step instructions, including screenshots,

More information

The Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP) Credential: Number Granted in the Past Year by Institution and State and Total Active

The Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP) Credential: Number Granted in the Past Year by Institution and State and Total Active The Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP) Credential: Number Granted in the Past Year by Institution and State and Total Active Prepared by Eric Rossen, PhD, NCSP NASP Director of Professional

More information

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption Real Progress in Food Code Adoption August 27, 2013 The Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), under contract to the Food and Drug Administration, is gathering data on the progress of FDA Food

More information

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms. Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms. Search Term Position 1 Accent Reduction Programs in USA 1 2 American English for Business Students 1 3 American English for Graduate Students

More information

Commercial Automobile Insurance Manual

Commercial Automobile Insurance Manual Commonwealth Automobile Reinsurers Commercial Automobile Insurance Manual ZONE RATING TABLES For liability the following tables include the zone or combination zone base premiums, and for physical damage

More information

Appendix A. Entities Participating in WIST Needs Identification and Validation

Appendix A. Entities Participating in WIST Needs Identification and Validation Weather Information for Surface Appendix A Entities Participating in WIST Needs Identification and Validation A - 1 Federal Departments and Agencies Road Rail Sectors Department of Federal Aviation Administration

More information

Information About Filing a Case in the United States Tax Court. Attached are the forms to use in filing your case in the United States Tax Court.

Information About Filing a Case in the United States Tax Court. Attached are the forms to use in filing your case in the United States Tax Court. Information About Filing a Case in the United States Tax Court Attached are the forms to use in filing your case in the United States Tax Court. It is very important that you take time to carefully read

More information

Median, all 176 cities 21.1%

Median, all 176 cities 21.1% with no Internet access Median, all 176 cities 21.1% Laredo city Texas 65,685 26,376 40.2% 1 Detroit city Michigan 255,322 101,923 39.9% 2 Hialeah city Florida 70,280 27,648 39.3% 3 Birmingham city Alabama

More information

Top 5 'Best Value' Education Schools and Programs By State. Alabama. Alaska

Top 5 'Best Value' Education Schools and Programs By State. Alabama. Alaska Top 5 'Best Value' Education Schools and Programs By State KEY: State Alabama Graduate (G) Undergraduate (UG) Program 1 University of Alabama in Huntsville Secondary (UG) 2 Alabama A&M University Secondary

More information

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011 State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011 Alabama http://alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/docs/agr/mcword10agr9.pdf Alabama Pest Control Alaska http://dec.alaska.gov/commish/regulations/pdfs/18%20aac%2090.pdf

More information

Forestry Reading Room

Forestry Reading Room University of Arkansas School of Law Division of Agriculture www.nationalaglawcenter.com Forestry Reading Room Compilation of State Forestry Organizations Rusty W. Rumley Staff Attorney and Nastasya Knyazhishcheva

More information

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Effective 10/16/11: Producers holding a life line of authority on or before 10/16/11 who sell or wish to sell

More information

2004 KICKOFF WEEKEND COLLEGES - ALPHABETICALLY

2004 KICKOFF WEEKEND COLLEGES - ALPHABETICALLY Abilene Christian 1 Air Force 1 Akron 3 Ala.-Birmingham 4 Alabama 20 Alabama A&M 1 Alcorn State 4 Appalachian State 2 Arizona 14 Arizona State 23 Arkansas 13 Arkansas State 5 Arkansas-Monticello 1 Arkansas-Pine

More information

Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP) Credentials Granted in the Past Year

Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP) Credentials Granted in the Past Year State Institution Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP) Credentials Granted in the Past Year Prepared by Eric Rossen, PhD, NCSP NASP Director of Professional Development and Standards July, 205

More information

Vertical Market Selling Guide. Security Systems Services

Vertical Market Selling Guide. Security Systems Services Vertical Market Selling Guide Security Systems Services Purpose This guide is provided to you at no charge to create awareness for the needs of a payment terminal solution within a specific vertical market

More information

SUMMARIES OF ACOS SELECTED FOR JULY 1, 2012 START DATE 1

SUMMARIES OF ACOS SELECTED FOR JULY 1, 2012 START DATE 1 SUMMARIES OF ACOS SELECTED FOR JULY 1, 2012 START DATE 1 Arizona Health Advantage, Inc, located in Chandler, Arizona, is comprised of networks of individual ACO practices, with 73 physicians. It will serve

More information

Centers of Excellence

Centers of Excellence Centers of Excellence A program of the NMSDC to enhance corporate minority supplier development through knowledge sharing and excellence in implementing NMSDC best practices. Centers of Excellence enhances

More information

Universities classified as "very high research activity"

Universities classified as very high research activity Universities classified as "very high research activity" 108 institutions classified as "RU/VH: Research Universities (very high research activity)" in the 2010 Carnegie Classification of Institutions

More information

The following institutions have been identified as offering reciprocal rotations for UC students and will receive reduced fee of $300.

The following institutions have been identified as offering reciprocal rotations for UC students and will receive reduced fee of $300. The following institutions have been identified as offering reciprocal rotations for UC students and will receive reduced fee of $300. No Tuition Due State School Degree Alabama University of Alabama School

More information

$7.5 appropriation $6.5 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016. Preschool Development Grants

$7.5 appropriation $6.5 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016. Preschool Development Grants School Readiness: High-Quality Early Learning Head Start $10.5 $9.5 $10.1 +$1.5 +17.7% $8.5 $7.5 +$2.1 +27.0% $6.5 for fiscal year 2010 Included in the budget is $1.078 billion to ensure that every Head

More information

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds On November 26, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-297,

More information

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1 In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1 $18,464 New New Hampshire 2 Hampshire $16,552 3 Vermont

More information

American C.E. Requirements

American C.E. Requirements American C.E. Requirements Alaska Board of Nursing Two of the following: 30 contact hours 30 hours of professional nursing activities 320 hours of nursing employment Arizona State Board of Nursing Arkansas

More information

Alabama Commission of Higher Education P. O. Box 302000 Montgomery, AL. Alabama

Alabama Commission of Higher Education P. O. Box 302000 Montgomery, AL. Alabama Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Alabama Commission of Higher Education P. O. Box 302000 Montgomery, AL 36130-2000 (334) 242-1998 Fax: (334) 242-0268 Alaska Commission

More information

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network Net-Temps Job Distribution Network The Net-Temps Job Distribution Network is a group of 25,000 employment-related websites with a local, regional, national, industry and niche focus. Net-Temps customers'

More information

NIH 2009* Total $ Awarded. NIH 2009 Rank

NIH 2009* Total $ Awarded. NIH 2009 Rank Organization Name (Schools of Nursing) 2009* Total $ Awarded 2009 2008 Total $ Awarded 2008 2007 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA $10,908,657 1 $7,721,221 2 4 5 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO $8,780,469

More information

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11 Alabama Alaska Ai Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Initial 8 Hour Annuity Training Requirement: Prior to selling annuities in California,

More information

RECONNECTING OPPORTUNITY YOUTH

RECONNECTING OPPORTUNITY YOUTH RECONNECTING OPPORTUNITY YOUTH Data Reference Guide March 2015 Patrick Sims Opportunity Youth Opportunity youth are young adults aged 16-24 years who are neither connected to school nor work. These young

More information

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013 recovery: Projections of Jobs and Requirements Through June 2013 Projections of Jobs and Requirements Through This report projects education requirements linked to forecasted job growth by state and the

More information

State Tax Information

State Tax Information State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither

More information

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State Select a state below to display the current regulation and requirements, or continue to scroll down. Light grey text signifies states that have not adopted an annuity training program. Alabama Illinois

More information

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers Community health centers are a critical source of health care for millions of Americans particularly those in underserved communities. Thanks primarily

More information

SCHEDULE. Medical College of Alabama, Birmingham. University of Arkansas School, Little Rock. Loma Linda University School, Loma Linda.

SCHEDULE. Medical College of Alabama, Birmingham. University of Arkansas School, Little Rock. Loma Linda University School, Loma Linda. MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS ORDINANCE () Applied to Ascension by Chapter 5 of the 1950 Revised Edition of the Laws MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS (ASCENSION) REGULATIONS In exercise of the powers conferred upon the Governor

More information

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Jurisdiction 1 - American Samoa, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada and Northern Mariana Islands Total Number of Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries: 3,141,183 (as of Total Number of Beneficiaries

More information

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year Page 1 of 7 (https://www.insidehighered.com) Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year degree production Submitted by Doug Lederman on September 10, 2012-3:00am The notion that community colleges

More information

********************

******************** THE SURETY & FIDELITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA 1101 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D. C. 20036 Phone: (202) 463-0600 Fax: (202) 463-0606 Web page: www.surety.org APPLICATION Application

More information

State Tax Information

State Tax Information State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither

More information

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Annuity Training Requirement Currently Effective Initial 8-Hour Annuity Training Requirement:

More information

State Trivia. You found a shortcut! Board Game. Super Teacher Worksheets - www.superteacherworksheets.com

State Trivia. You found a shortcut! Board Game. Super Teacher Worksheets - www.superteacherworksheets.com Super Teacher Worksheets - www.superteacherworksheets.com If a player lands on Lose a turn, they skip their next turn. A player can only cross the Route 66 shortcut if they land on the square that says,

More information

1 of 5 9/18/2011 7:58 AM

1 of 5 9/18/2011 7:58 AM 1 of 5 9/18/2011 7:58 AM / HOME / LOCATIONS / PRIVACY POLICIES / CORPORATE PARTNERS / CONTACT / LINKS / LOGIN / A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Search for Map data 2011 Europa Technologies,

More information

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013 14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013 (millions) deduction in state dollars) claimed (dollars) taxes paid [1] state AGI United States 44.2 100.0 30.2 507.7 100.0 11,483 100.0

More information

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010 Renewable Energy LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010 y Searching for various forms of renewable energy and their actual cost in Louisiana

More information

State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Agencies

State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Agencies State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Agencies State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agencies furnish a wide variety of services to help people with disabilities return to work. These services are designed

More information

Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations

Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations All information in this document comes from the 2010-2011 Medical School Admission Requirements book (commonly known as the MSAR). Students should check

More information

Community College Advertisers Alphabetical by Name

Community College Advertisers Alphabetical by Name Community College Advertisers Alphabetical by Name Baton Rouge Community College... 34 Bellevue Community College... 38 Brevard Community College... 37 Broward Community College... 32 Bunker Hill Community

More information

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service SCHEDULE B Private Line Data Services DS1 & DS3 Service... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel, New Jersey... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel, Out-of-State...

More information

Statewide Universities That Accept ASL in Fulfillment of Foreign Language Requirements

Statewide Universities That Accept ASL in Fulfillment of Foreign Language Requirements Statewide Universities That Accept ASL in Fulfillment of Foreign Language Requirements List maintained by Sherman Wilcox, Ph.D. University of New Mexico http://web.mac.com/swilcox/unm/univlist.html Last

More information

90-400 APPENDIX B. STATE AGENCY ADDRESSES FOR INTERSTATE UIB CLAIMS

90-400 APPENDIX B. STATE AGENCY ADDRESSES FOR INTERSTATE UIB CLAIMS INTERSTATE UIB CLAIMS Alabama Multi- Unit (#01) Industrial Relations Bldg. Montgomery, AL 31604 Alaska Interstate Unit (#02) P.O. Box 3-7000 Juneau, AK 99801 Arizona Interstate Liable Office (#03) Department

More information

2015 ASHP Clinical Skills Competition Time Slots Saturday, December 5, 2015

2015 ASHP Clinical Skills Competition Time Slots Saturday, December 5, 2015 8:00-10:00 a.m. (Group I) Registration 7:15 a.m. 1 Auburn University Harrison of Pharmacy 1 2 Concordia University Wisconsin of Pharmacy 2 3 Creighton University of Pharmacy 3 4 Drake University College

More information

Web Supplement. Table of Contents

Web Supplement. Table of Contents Table of Contents Tax Filers Moving In and Out of New York City 2 Shares of New York City Total 2 New York City Tax Filers Moving To and From the 3 New York Metropolitan Statistical Area Source and Destination

More information

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC.

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC. Topic: LLC Managers/Members Question by: Jeff Harvey : Idaho Date: March 7, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Arizona requires that member-managed LLCs

More information

National Price Rankings

National Price Rankings National Price Rankings The links below provide the latest available electric service price data from a July 1, 2010 survey of more than 150 investor-owned utilities. Data source: Edison Electric Institute.

More information

DO NOT COPY. Psychiatric Mental Health Graduate Programs 2012 Update

DO NOT COPY. Psychiatric Mental Health Graduate Programs 2012 Update Psychiatric Mental Health Graduate Programs 2012 Update Graduate education in Psychiatric Mental Health (PMH) nursing has witnessed a significant shift in the last decade. The number of graduates has increased

More information

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF District of Columbia STATE DATA CENTER MONTHLY BRIEF N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 2 District Residents Health Insurance Coverage 2000-2010 By Minwuyelet Azimeraw Joy Phillips, Ph.D. This report is based on data

More information

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009 March of Dimes Foundation Office of Government Affairs 1146 19 th Street, NW, 6 th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone (202) 659-1800 Fax (202) 296-2964 marchofdimes.com nacersano.org Census Data on Uninsured

More information

Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations

Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations All information in this document comes from the 2011-2012 Medical School Admission Requirements book (commonly known as the MSAR). Students should check

More information

FOR RELEASE: 3/23/00 IR-2000-17 IRS EXPANDS LOW-INCOME TAXPAYER CLINIC GRANTS, AWARDS $4.4 MILLION TO PROGRAMS IN 32 STATES

FOR RELEASE: 3/23/00 IR-2000-17 IRS EXPANDS LOW-INCOME TAXPAYER CLINIC GRANTS, AWARDS $4.4 MILLION TO PROGRAMS IN 32 STATES FOR RELEASE: 3/23/00 IR-2000-17 IRS EXPANDS LOW-INCOME TAXPAYER CLINIC GRANTS, AWARDS $4.4 MILLION TO PROGRAMS IN 32 STATES WASHINGTON In another step to expand legal assistance for taxpayers, the Internal

More information

Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries 1445 Federal Drive Montgomery, AL 36107 http://www.agi.alabama.gov/pesticide_management

Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries 1445 Federal Drive Montgomery, AL 36107 http://www.agi.alabama.gov/pesticide_management Below is a list of the contact information for the department in each state that handles licenses for pesticides application, which is often required for HVAC system cleaners who use antimicrobial products.

More information

AN EXTRAORDINARY MEDIA BUY.

AN EXTRAORDINARY MEDIA BUY. AN EXTRAORDINARY MEDIA BUY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One-order, one-buy simplicity. 71 local business publications. 3.3 million readership by top business professionals. 75% discount. If it seems too good to

More information

Decline Admission to Boston College Law School - Fall 2016

Decline Admission to Boston College Law School - Fall 2016 Decline Admission to Boston College Law School - Fall 2016 We are sorry to hear that you will not be attending Boston College Law School. Please complete and submit this form to formally decline your admission

More information

VOLUNTEER INCOME TAX ASSISTANCE (VITA) A Reminder and Update About Potential CRA and Business Opportunities

VOLUNTEER INCOME TAX ASSISTANCE (VITA) A Reminder and Update About Potential CRA and Business Opportunities Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 550 17th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20429-9990 Financial Institution Letter FIL-5-2007 January 16, 2007 VOLUNTEER INCOME TAX ASSISTANCE (VITA) A Reminder and Update

More information

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List Alabama $5,000 rural physician tax credit o http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/alcode/40/18/4a/40-18-132 o http://adph.org/ruralhealth/index.asp?id=882 Area Health

More information

ATTACHMENT A NCHEMS PEERS - Adams State College. Date: Revised 7/24/2007. Institution

ATTACHMENT A NCHEMS PEERS - Adams State College. Date: Revised 7/24/2007. Institution ATTACHMENT A NCHEMS PEERS - Adams State College ADAMS STATE COLLEGE ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY AT THE WEST CAMPUS ARMSTRONG ATLANTIC STATE UNIVERSITY AUGUSTA STATE UNIVERSITY BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY CAMERON

More information

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1 Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1 Supplier Business Continuity Survey A response is required for every question General Information Supplier Name: JCI Supplier Number: Supplier Facility

More information

US Colleges Offering Interiorscape or Interior Horticulture Curriculum

US Colleges Offering Interiorscape or Interior Horticulture Curriculum US Colleges Offering Interiorscape or Interior Horticulture Curriculum (List compiled in March 2011. It is not a complete list.) Alabama Arkansas Arizona California James H Faulkner State Community College

More information

STATE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS UNDER PHS ACT SECTION 2793

STATE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS UNDER PHS ACT SECTION 2793 STATE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS UNDER PHS ACT SECTION 2793 Alabama (No program) Alaska (No program) Arizona (No program) Arkansas Arkansas Insurance Department Consumer Services Division 1200 West Third

More information

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273 STATISTICAL BRIEF #273 December 29 Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Employees of State and Local Governments, by Census Division, 28 Beth Levin Crimmel, M.S. Introduction Employees of state and

More information

NASPAA s Research Universities Report 3/4/16

NASPAA s Research Universities Report 3/4/16 NASPAA s Research Universities Report 3/4/16 Data Source: 2014-2015 NASPAA Annual Data Report N= 109 schools, 120 programs 70% of Research Universities Fall 2015 Current Enrollment 15552 students Average

More information

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014.

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014. The data in this chart was compiled from the physician fee schedule information posted on the CMS website as of January 2014. CPT codes and descriptions are copyright 2012 American Medical Association.

More information

State-by-State Listing of Departments of Insurance Updated August 2005

State-by-State Listing of Departments of Insurance Updated August 2005 BUREAUS State-by-State Listing of Departments of Insurance Updated August 2005 Alabama Dept. of Insurance P.O. Box 303351 201 Monroe St. #1700 Montgomery AL 36104 (334) 269-3550 http://www.aldoi.org E-mail:

More information