1 Risk Management of Outsourced Technology Services November 28, 2000 Purpose and Background This statement focuses on the risk management process of identifying, measuring, monitoring, and controlling the risks associated with outsourcing technology services. 1 Financial institutions should consider the guidance outlined in this statement and the attached appendix in managing arrangements with their technology service providers. 2 While this guidance covers a broad range of issues that financial institutions should address, each financial institution should apply those elements based on the scope and importance of the outsourced services as well as the risk to the institution from the services. Financial institutions increasingly rely on services provided by other entities to support an array of technology-related functions. While outsourcing to affiliated or nonaffiliated entities can help financial institutions manage costs, obtain necessary expertise, expand customer product offerings, and improve services, it also introduces risks that financial institutions should address. This guidance covers four elements of a risk management process: risk assessment, selection of service providers, contract review, and monitoring of service providers. 3 Risk Assessment The board of directors and senior management are responsible for understanding the risks associated with outsourcing arrangements for technology services and ensuring that effective risk management practices are in place. As part of this responsibility, the board and management should assess how the outsourcing arrangement will support the institution s objectives and strategic plans and how the service provider s relationship will be managed. Without an effective risk assessment phase, outsourcing technology services may be inconsistent with the institution s strategic plans, too costly, or introduce unforeseen risks. 1 The FFIEC Information Systems Examination Handbook is a reference source that contains further discussion and explanation of a number of concepts addressed in this FFIEC guidance. 2 Technology service providers encompass a broad range of entities including but not limited to affiliated entities, nonaffiliated entities, and alliances of companies providing products and services. This may include but is not limited to: core processing; information and transaction processing and settlement activities that support banking functions such as lending, deposit-taking, funds transfer, fiduciary, or trading activities; Internet related services; security monitoring; systems development and maintenance; aggregation services; digital certification services, and call centers. 3 The federal banking agencies have authority to regulate and examine services provided to insured depository institutions under 12 U.S.C. 1867(c), 12 U.S.C. 1786(a), and 12 U.S.C. 1464(d)(7).
2 Page 2 of 3 Outsourcing of information and transaction processing and settlement activities involves risks that are similar to the risks that arise when these functions are performed internally. Risks include threats to security, availability and integrity of systems and resources, confidentiality of information, and regulatory compliance. In addition, the nature of the service provided, such as bill payment, funds transfer, or emerging electronic services, may result in entities performing transactions on behalf of the institution, such as collection or disbursement of funds, that can increase the levels of credit, liquidity, transaction, and reputation risks. 4 Management should consider additional risk management controls when services involve the use of the Internet. The broad geographic reach, ease of access, and anonymity of the Internet require close attention to maintaining secure systems, intrusion detection and reporting systems, and customer authentication, verification, and authorization. Institutions should also understand that the potential risks introduced are a function of a system s structure, design and controls and not necessarily the volume of activity. An outsourcing risk assessment should consider the following: Strategic goals, objectives, and business needs of the financial institution. Ability to evaluate and oversee outsourcing relationships. Importance and criticality of the services to the financial institution. Defined requirements for the outsourced activity. Necessary controls and reporting processes. Contractual obligations and requirements for the service provider. Contingency plans, including availability of alternative service providers, costs and resources required to switch service providers. Ongoing assessment of outsourcing arrangements to evaluate consistency with strategic objectives and service provider performance. Regulatory requirements and guidance for the business lines affected and technologies used. Due Diligence in Selecting a Service Provider Once the institution has completed the risk assessment, management should evaluate service providers to determine their ability, both operationally and financially, to meet the institution s needs. Management should convey the institution s needs, objectives, and necessary controls to the potential service provider. Management also should discuss provisions that the contract should contain. The appendix to this statement contains some specific factors for management to consider in selecting a service provider. Contract Issues Contracts between the institution and service provider should take into account business requirements and key risk factors identified during the risk assessment and due diligence phases. Contracts should be clearly written and sufficiently detailed to provide assurances for performance, reliability, security, confidentiality, and reporting. Management should consider 4 For example, emerging electronic services may include aggregation. Aggregation is a service that gathers on-line account information from many web sites and presents that information in a consolidated format to the customer.
3 whether the contract is flexible enough to allow for changes in technology and the financial institution's operations. Appropriate legal counsel should review contracts prior to signing. Page 3 of 3 Institutions may encounter situations where service providers cannot or will not agree to terms that the institution requests to manage the risk effectively. Under these circumstances, institutions should either not contract with that provider or supplement the service provider s commitments with additional risk mitigation controls. The appendix to this statement contains some specific considerations for management in contracting with a service provider. Service Provider Oversight Institutions should implement an oversight program to monitor each service provider s controls, condition, and performance. Responsibility for the administration of the service provider relationship should be assigned to personnel with appropriate expertise to monitor and manage the relationship. The number of personnel, functional responsibilities, and the amount of time devoted to oversight activities will depend, in part, on the scope and complexity of the services outsourced. Institutions should document the administration of the service provider relationship. Documenting the process is important for contract negotiations, termination issues, and contingency planning. The appendix to this statement contains some specific factors to consider regarding oversight of the service provider. Summary The board of directors and management are responsible for ensuring adequate risk mitigation practices are in place for effective oversight and management of outsourcing relationships. Financial institutions should incorporate an outsourcing risk management process that includes a risk assessment to identify the institution s needs and requirements; proper due diligence to identify and select a provider; written contracts that clearly outline duties, obligations and responsibilities of the parties involved; and ongoing oversight of outsourcing technology services.
4 Page A - 1 APPENDIX Risk Management of Outsourced Technology Services Due Diligence in Selecting a Service Provider Some of the factors that institutions should consider when performing due diligence in selecting a service provider are categorized and listed below. Institutions should review the service provider s due diligence process for any of its significant supporting agents (i.e., subcontractors, support vendors, and other parties). Depending on the services being outsourced and the level of in-house expertise, institutions should consider whether to hire or consult with qualified independent sources. These sources include consultants, user groups, and trade associations that are familiar with products and services offered by third parties. Ultimately, the depth of due diligence will vary depending on the scope and importance of the outsourced services as well as the risk to the institution from these services. Technical and Industry Expertise Assess the service provider s experience and ability to provide the necessary services and supporting technology for current and anticipated needs. Identify areas where the institution would have to supplement the service provider s expertise to fully manage risk. Evaluate the service provider s use of third parties or partners that would be used to support the outsourced operations. Evaluate the experience of the service provider in providing services in the anticipated operating environment. Consider whether additional systems, data conversions, and work are necessary. Evaluate the service provider s ability to respond to service disruptions. Contact references and user groups to learn about the service provider s reputation and performance. Evaluate key service provider personnel that would be assigned to support the institution. Perform on-site visits, where necessary, to better understand how the service provider operates and supports its services. Operations and Controls Determine adequacy of the service provider s standards, policies and procedures relating to internal controls, facilities management (e.g., access requirements, sharing of facilities, etc.), security (e.g., systems, data, equipment, etc.), privacy protections, maintenance of records, business resumption contingency planning, systems development and maintenance, and employee background checks. Determine if the service provider provides sufficient security precautions, including, when appropriate, firewalls, encryption, and customer identity authentication, to protect institution resources as well as detect and respond to intrusions. Review audit reports of the service provider to determine whether the audit scope, internal controls, and security safeguards are adequate.
5 Page A - 2 Evaluate whether the institution will have complete and timely access to its information maintained by the provider. Evaluate the service provider s knowledge of regulations that are relevant to the services they are providing. (e.g., Regulation E, privacy and other consumer protection regulations, Bank Secrecy Act, etc.). Assess the adequacy of the service provider s insurance coverage including fidelity, fire, liability, data losses from errors and omissions, and protection of documents in transit. Financial Condition Analyze the service provider s most recent audited financial statements and annual report as well as other indicators (e.g., publicly traded bond ratings), if available. Consider factors such as how long the service provider has been in business and the service provider s market share for a given service and how it has fluctuated. Consider the significance of the institution s proposed contract on the service provider s financial condition. Evaluate technological expenditures. Is the service provider s level of investment in technology consistent with supporting the institution s activities? Does the service provider have the financial resources to invest in and support the required technology? Contract Issues Some considerations for contracting with service providers are discussed below. This listing is not all-inclusive and the institution may need to evaluate other considerations based on its unique circumstances. The level of detail and relative importance of contract provisions varies with the scope and risks of the services outsourced. Scope of Service The contract should clearly describe the rights and responsibilities of parties to the contract. Considerations include: Timeframes and activities for implementation and assignment of responsibility. Implementation provisions should take into consideration other existing systems or interrelated systems to be developed by different service providers (e.g., an Internet banking system being integrated with existing core applications or systems customization). Services to be performed by the service provider including duties such as software support and maintenance, training of employees or customer service. Obligations of the financial institution. The contracting parties rights in modifying existing services performed under the contract. Guidelines for adding new or different services and for contract re-negotiation. Performance Standards Institutions should generally include performance standards defining minimum service level requirements and remedies for failure to meet standards in the contract. For example, common service level metrics include percent system uptime, deadlines for completing batch processing, or number of processing errors. Industry standards for service levels may provide a reference point. The institution should periodically review overall performance standards to ensure consistency with its goals and objectives.
6 Page A - 3 Security and Confidentiality The contract should address the service provider s responsibility for security and confidentiality of the institution s resources (e.g., information, hardware). The agreement should prohibit the service provider and its agents from using or disclosing the institution s information, except as necessary to or consistent with providing the contracted services, to protect against unauthorized use (e.g., disclosure of information to institution competitors). If the service provider receives nonpublic personal information regarding the institution s customers, the institution should notify the service provider to assess the applicability of the privacy regulations. Institutions should require the service provider to fully disclose breaches in security resulting in unauthorized intrusions into the service provider that may materially affect the institution or its customers. The service provider should report to the institution when material intrusions occur, the effect on the institution, and corrective action to respond to the intrusion. Controls Consideration should be given to contract provisions addressing control over operations such as: Internal controls to be maintained by the service provider. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Records to be maintained by the service provider. Access to the records by the institution. Notification by the service provider to the institution and the institution s approval rights regarding material changes to services, systems, controls, key project personnel allocated to the institution, and new service locations. Setting and monitoring of parameters relating to any financial functions, such as payments processing and any extensions of credit on behalf of the institution. Insurance coverage to be maintained by the service provider. Audit The institution should generally include in the contract the types of audit reports the institution is entitled to receive (e.g., financial, internal control and security reviews). The contract can specify audit frequency, cost to the institution associated with the audits if any, as well as the rights of the institution and its agencies to obtain the results of the audits in a timely manner. The contract may also specify rights to obtain documentation regarding the resolution of audit disclosed deficiencies and inspect the processing facilities and operating practices of the service provider. Management should consider, based upon the risk assessment phase, the degree to which independent internal audits completed by service provider audit staff can be used and the need for external audits and reviews (e.g., SAS 70 Type I and II reviews). 5 For services involving access to open networks, such as Internet-related services, special attention should be paid to security. The institution may wish to include contract terms requiring periodic audits to be performed by an independent party with sufficient expertise. These audits may include penetration testing, intrusion detection, and firewall configuration. The institution should receive sufficiently detailed reports on the findings of these ongoing audits to adequately assess security without compromising the service provider s security. It can be beneficial to both the service provider and the institution to contract for such ongoing tests on a coordinated basis 5 AICPA Statement of Auditing Standards 70 Reports of Processing of Transactions by Service Organizations, known as SAS 70 Reports, are one commonly used form of external review. Type I SAS 70 reports review the service provider s policies and procedures. Type II SAS 70 reports provide tests of actual controls against policies and procedures.
7 Page A - 4 given the number of institutions that may contract with the service provider and the importance of the test results to the institution. Reports Contractual terms should discuss the frequency and type of reports the institution will receive (e.g., performance reports, control audits, financial statements, security, and business resumption testing reports). Guidelines and fees for obtaining custom reports should also be discussed. Business Resumption and Contingency Plans The contract should address the service provider s responsibility for backup and record protection, including equipment, program and data files, and maintenance of disaster recovery and contingency plans. Responsibilities should include testing of the plans and providing results to the institution. The institution should consider interdependencies among service providers when determining business resumption testing requirements. The service provider should provide the institution with operating procedures the service provider and institution are to implement in the event business resumption contingency plans are implemented. Contracts should include specific provisions for business recovery timeframes that meet the institution s business requirements. The institution should ensure that the contract does not contain any provisions that would excuse the service provider from implementing its contingency plans. Sub-contracting and Multiple Service Provider Relationships Some service providers may contract with third-parties in providing services to the financial institution. To provide accountability, it may be beneficial for the financial institution to seek an agreement with and designate a primary contracting service provider. The institution may want to consider including a provision specifying that the contracting service provider is responsible for the service provided to the institution regardless of which entity is actually conducting the operations. The institution may also want to consider including notification and approval requirements regarding changes to the service provider s significant subcontractors. Cost The contract should fully describe fees and calculations for base services, including any development, conversion, and recurring services, as well as any charges based upon volume of activity and for special requests. Cost and responsibility for purchase and maintenance of hardware and software may also need to be addressed. Any conditions under which the cost structure may be changed should be addressed in detail including limits on any cost increases. Ownership and License The contract should address ownership and allowable use by the service provider of the institution s data, equipment/hardware, system documentation, system and application software, and other intellectual property rights. Other intellectual property rights may include the institution s name and logo; its trademark or copyrighted material; domain names; web sites designs; and other work products developed by the service provider for the institution. The contract should not contain unnecessary limitations on the return of items owned by the institution. Institutions that purchase software should consider establishing escrow agreements. These escrow agreements may provide for the following: institution access to source programs under certain conditions (e.g., insolvency of the vendor), documentation of programming and systems, and verification of updated source code.
8 Page A - 5 Duration Institutions should consider the type of technology and current state of the industry when negotiating the appropriate length of the contract and its renewal periods. While there can be benefits to long-term technology contracts, certain technologies may be subject to rapid change and a shorter-term contract may prove beneficial. Similarly, institutions should consider the appropriate length of time required to notify the service provider of the institutions intent not to renew the contract prior to expiration. Institutions should consider coordinating the expiration dates of contracts for inter-related services (e.g., web site, telecommunications, programming, network support) so that they coincide, where practical. Such coordination can minimize the risk of terminating a contract early and incurring penalties as a result of necessary termination of another related service contract. Dispute Resolution The institution should consider including in the contract a provision for a dispute resolution process that attempts to resolve problems in an expeditious manner as well as provide for continuation of services during the dispute resolution period. Indemnification Indemnification provisions generally require the financial institution to hold the service provider harmless from liability for the negligence of the institution, and vice versa. These provisions should be reviewed to reduce the likelihood of potential situations in which the institution may be liable for claims arising as a result of the negligence of the service provider. Limitation of Liability Some service provider standard contracts may contain clauses limiting the amount of liability that can be incurred by the service provider. If the institution is considering such a contract, consideration should be given to whether the damage limitation bears an adequate relationship to the amount of loss the financial institution might reasonably experience as a result of the service provider s failure to perform its obligations. Termination The extent and flexibility of termination rights sought can vary depending upon the service. Contracts for technologies subject to rapid change, for example, may benefit from greater flexibility in termination rights. Termination rights may be sought for a variety of conditions including change in control (e.g., acquisitions and mergers), convenience, substantial increase in cost, repeated failure to meet service levels, failure to provide critical services, bankruptcy, company closure, and insolvency. Institution management should consider whether or not the contract permits the institution to terminate the contract in a timely manner and without prohibitive expense (e.g., reasonableness of cost or penalty provisions). The contract should state termination and notification requirements with time frames to allow the orderly conversion to another provider. The contract must provide for return of the institution s data, as well as other institution resources, in a timely manner and in machine readable format. Any costs associated with transition assistance should be clearly stated. Assignment The institution should consider contract provisions that prohibit assignment of the contract to a third party without the institution s consent, including changes to subcontractors.
9 Page A - 6 Oversight of Service Provider Some of the oversight activities management should consider in administering the service provider relationship are categorized and listed below. The degree of oversight activities will vary depending upon the nature of the services outsourced. Institutions should consider the extent to which the service provider conducts similar oversight activities for any of its significant supporting agents (i.e., subcontractors, support vendors, and other parties) and the extent to which the institution may need to perform oversight activities on the service provider s significant supporting agents. Monitor Financial Condition and Operations Evaluate the service provider s financial condition periodically. Ensure that the service provider s financial obligations to subcontractors are being met in a timely manner. Review audit reports (e.g., SAS 70 reviews, security reviews) as well as regulatory examination reports if available, and evaluate the adequacy of the service providers systems and controls including resource availability, security, integrity, and confidentiality. 6 Follow up on any deficiencies noted in the audits and reviews of the service provider. Periodically review the service provider s policies relating to internal controls, security, systems development and maintenance, and back up and contingency planning to ensure they meet the institution s minimum guidelines, contract requirements, and are consistent with the current market and technological environment. Review access control reports for suspicious activity. Monitor changes in key service provider project personnel allocated to the institution. Review and monitor the service provider s insurance policies for effective coverage. Perform on-site inspections in conjunction with some of the reviews performed above, where practicable and necessary. Sponsor coordinated audits and reviews with other client institutions. Assess Quality of Service and Support Regularly review reports documenting the service provider s performance. Determine if the reports are accurate and allow for a meaningful assessment of the service provider s performance. Document and follow up on any problem in service in a timely manner. Assess service provider plans to enhance service levels. Review system update procedures to ensure appropriate change controls are in effect, and ensure authorization is established for significant system changes. Evaluate the provider s ability to support and enhance the institution s strategic direction including anticipated business development goals and objectives, service delivery requirements, and technology initiatives. Determine adequacy of training provided to financial institution employees. Review customer complaints on the products and services provided by the service provider. Periodically meet with contract parties to discuss performance and operational issues. 6 Some services provided to insured depository institutions by service providers are examined by the FFIEC member agencies. Regulatory examination reports, which are only available to clients/customers of the service provider, may contain information regarding a service provider s operations. However, regulatory reports are not a substitute for a financial institution s due diligence in oversight of the service provider.
10 Page A - 7 Participate in user groups and other forums. Monitor Contract Compliance and Revision Needs Review invoices to assure proper charges for services rendered, the appropriateness of rate changes and new service charges. Periodically, review the service provider s performance relative to service level agreements, determine whether other contractual terms and conditions are being met, and whether any revisions to service level expectations or other terms are needed given changes in the institution s needs and technological developments. Maintain documents and records regarding contract compliance, revision and dispute resolution. Maintain Business Resumption Contingency Plans Review the service provider s business resumption contingency plans to ensure that any services considered mission critical for the institution can be restored within an acceptable timeframe. Review the service provider s program for contingency plan testing. For many critical services, annual or more frequent tests of the contingency plan are typical. Ensure service provider interdependencies are considered for mission critical services and applications.
GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING THIRD-PARTY RISK Introduction An institution s board of directors and senior management are ultimately responsible for managing activities conducted through third-party relationships,
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council FFIEC Outsourcing Technology Services OT JUNE 2004 IT EXAMINATION H ANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 BOARD AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES...
Outsourcing Technology Services A Management Decision A Telephone Seminar for National Banks Tuesday, July 20, 2004 And again on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 Agenda Outsourcing activities and relationships
Office of Thrift Supervision September 1, 2004 Department of the Treasury Thrift Bulletin TB 82a Handbooks: Thrift Activities Section: 310 Subject: Oversight by the Board of Directors Third Party Arrangements
Guidelines for Financial Institutions Outsourcing of Business Activities, Functions, and Processes Date: July 2004 1. INTRODUCTION Financial institutions outsource business activities, functions and processes
PRINCIPLES ON OUTSOURCING OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR MARKET INTERMEDIARIES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS FEBRUARY 2005 Preamble The IOSCO Technical Committee
World Council of Credit Unions Annual Conference Credit Union Liability with Third-Party Processors Andrew (Andy) Poprawa CEO, Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario Canada 1 Credit Union Liability with
OCC BULLETIN Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Subject: Third-Party Relationships Description: Risk Management Principles TO: Chief Executive Officers of National Banks, Federal
FINAL May 2005 Guideline on Security Systems for Safeguarding Customer Information Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Guideline 1 2 Definitions 2 3 Internal Controls and Procedures 2 3.1
Financial Services Group To: Our Clients and Friends March 25, 2014 A Significant Change Is Occurring Regarding Regulatory Oversight of Banks and Their Third Party Relationships. Both Banks and their Vendors
Outsourced Third Party Relationship Management/ Vendor Management TTS Webinar July 15, 2015 Susan Orr CISA, CISM, CRISC, CRP 1 Risk Management Guidance 2 3 Appendix J: 4 - Key Elements Third Party Management
Third Party Risk Introduction The board of directors and senior management of an insured depository institution (institution) are ultimately responsible for managing activities conducted through third-party
To: Chief Executive Officers and Chief Information Officers of all National Banks, General Managers of Federal Branches and Agencies, Deputy Comptrollers, Department and Division Heads, and Examining Personnel
Cloud Computing: Legal Risks and Best Practices A Bennett Jones Presentation Toronto, Ontario Lisa Abe-Oldenburg, Partner Bennett Jones LLP November 7, 2012 Introduction Security and Data Privacy Recent
An Overview for Bank Directors Managing the Third Party Relationship Patrick Neuman Boardman & Clark LLP Madison, Wisconsin Any business relationship between a bank and another entity, by contract or otherwise
Vendor Risk Management in the New Regulatory Environment kpmg.com Vendor Risk Management in the New Regulatory Environment 2 Vendor Risk Management in the New Regulatory Environment Background Regulators
1 VENDOR RISK MANAGEMENT UPDATE- ARE YOU AT RISK? Larry L. Llirán, CISA, CISM December 10, 2015 ISACA Puerto Rico Symposium 2 Agenda Introduction Vendor Management what is? Available Guidance Vendor Management
PRINCIPLES ON OUTSOURCING OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR MARKET INTERMEDIARIES A CONSULTATION REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS STANDING COMMITTEE 3 ON MARKET INTERMEDIARIES
Instructions for Completing the The (Questionnaire) contains questions covering significant areas of a bank s information technology (IT) function. Your responses to these questions will help determine
Guidance Note GGN 221.1 Managing Outsourcing Arrangements 1. This Guidance Note provides further detail on the requirements for managing material outsourcing arrangements (refer Prudential Standard GPS
Statement of Guidance: Outsourcing All Regulated Entities 1. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. This Statement of Guidance ( Guidance ) is intended to provide guidance to regulated entities on
GUIDANCE NOTE OUTSOURCING OF FUNCTIONS BY ENTITIES LICENSED UNDER THE PROTECTION OF INVESTORS (BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY) LAW, 1987 CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 3-4 2. The Commission s Policy 5 3. Outsourcing
APES GN 30 Outsourced Services Prepared and issued by Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board Limited ISSUED: March 2013 Copyright 2013 Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board Limited
Technology Outsourcing Effective Practices for Selecting a Service Provider Technology Outsourcing Effective Practices for Selecting a Service Provider Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 550 17th Street
GREAT AMERICAN TITLE OF HOUSTON, LLC D/B/A GREAT AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY EXAMINATION REPORT NOVEMBER 24, 2015 INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT To the Board of Directors of Great American Title of Houston,
VENDORINSIGHTU P D A T E November 12, 2013 COMPLIANCE VendorINSIGHT is the industry-leading solution for financial institutions offering the most features and capabilities for vendor risk monitoring. Ask
White Paper on Financial Institution Vendor Management Virtually every organization in the modern economy relies to some extent on third-party vendors that facilitate business operations in a wide variety
Technology Outsourcing Techniques for Managing Multiple Service Providers Technology Outsourcing Techniques for Managing Multiple Service Providers Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 550 17th Street
Third Party Risk Introduction The board of directors and senior management of an insured depository institution (institution) are ultimately responsible for managing activities conducted through third-party
23 rd Annual and One Day Seminar Vendor Management Best Practices Catherine Bruder CPA, CITP, CISA, CISM, CTGA Michigan Texas Florida Insight. Oversight. Foresight. SM Doeren Mayhew Bruder 1 $100 billion
www.pwc.com Third Party Risk Management 12 April 2012 Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Drivers of Increased Focus on Third Parties 3. Governance 4. Third Party Risks and Scope 5. Third Party Risk Profiling 6.
Morgan Stanley Policy for the Management of Third Party Residential Mortgage Servicing Providers Title Policy for the Management of Third Party Residential Mortgage Servicing Providers Effective Date Owner
CLOUD COMPUTING FOR SMALL- AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES: Privacy Responsibilities and Considerations Cloud computing is the delivery of computing services over the Internet, and it offers many potential
DEALERSHIP IDENTITY THEFT RED FLAGS AND NOTICES OF ADDRESS DISCREPANCY POLICY This Plan we adopted by member, partner, etc.) on Our Program Coordinator (date). (Board of Directors, owner, We have appointed
POV on Draft Guidelines on Managing Risks and Code of Conduct in Outsourcing of Financial Services by NBFCs April 2015 For private circulation only Draft Guidelines on Managing Risks and Code of Conduct
Skadden Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum, please contact the following attorneys or call your regular Skadden
TRUE TITLE BEST PRACTICES Mission Statement The American Land Title Association (ALTA) seeks to guide its membership on best practices to protect consumers, promote quality service, provide for ongoing
Prudential Practice Guide PPG 231 Outsourcing October 2006 www.apra.gov.au Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Disclaimer and copyright This prudential practice guide is not legal advice and users
Tool QQ Early Childhood Iowa CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES This tool provides an overview of the components of a contract. If your ECI area board currently uses contracts to purchase services, use this tool
Managing General Agents (MGAs) Guideline JUNE 2013 DRAFT FOR COMMENT BC AUTHORIZED LIFE INSURERS www.fic.gov.bc.ca PURPOSE This draft guideline outlines best practices that the Financial Institutions Commission
Advanced AMC, Inc.. Appraiser Services Agreement (Independent Contractor Agreement) This Appraiser Services Agreement ( Agreement ) shall be effective as of the Effective Date by and between Advanced AMC,
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Business Continuity Program subsidiaries) 1 Content Overview A. Introduction Page 3 B. Governance Model Page 4 C. Program Components Page 4 Business Impact Analysis
Forensic Services Third Party Risks Landscape of third party risk Focus on third parties that: perform functions on behalf of the company provide products and services that the company does not originate
A How-To Guide for Updating HIPAA Policies & Procedures to Align with ARRA Health Care Provider Edition Version 1 Policy and Procedure Templates Reflects modifications published in the Federal Register
Certification Scheme Y03 Compliance Management Systems ISO 19600 ONR 192050 Issue V2.1:2015-01-08 Austrian Standards plus GmbH Dr. Peter Jonas Heinestraße 38 A-1020 Vienna, Austria E-Mail: email@example.com
Compliance Management System Introduction Financial institutions operate in a dynamic environment influenced by industry consolidation, convergence of financial services, emerging technology, and market
OFHEO Director's Advisory Policy Guidance Issuance Date: December 19, 2001 Doc. #: PG-01-002 Subject: Safety and Soundness Standards for Information To: Chief Executive Officers of Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mobile Deposit Policy Mobile Deposit, a deposit transaction delivery system, allows the Credit Union to receive digital information from deposit documents captured at remote locations (i.e., the Credit
ALTA Title Insurance & Settlement Company Best Practices N e w C a s t l e T i t l e 7 5 0 N o r t h 3 r d S t r e e t, S u i t e B ( 6 0 8 ) 7 8 3-9 2 6 5 ( 6 0 8 ) 7 8 3-9 2 6 6 5 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 5 0 5/22/15
SHARED ASSESSMENTS PROGRAM STANDARD INFORMATION GATHERING (SIG) QUESTIONNAIRE 2014 MAPPING TO OCC GUIDANCE (2013-29) ON THIRD PARTY RELATIONSHIPS An overview of how the Shared Assessments Program SIG 2014
November 8, 2010 To All Insurers Draft Guidelines on Outsourcing of activities by Insurance Companies Reference: 1. INV/CIR/031/2004-05 dated 27 th July, 2004 2. INV/CIR/058/2004-05 dated 28 th December,
Institution Charter Date of Exam Prepared By INFORMATION TECHLOGY OFFICER S QUESTIONNAIRE Instructions for Completing the Information Technology Examination Officer s Questionnaire The Information Technology
TERMS OF BUSINESS AGREEMENT 2525 E Camelback Rd, Suite 800 As used in this Agreement, The Keating Group, Inc. (tkg) shall refer to any business unit or entity that may be affiliated through common ownership
PLC Intellectual Property & Technology An intellectual property (IP) and information technology (IT) due diligence request list for use in connection with an M&A transaction. This request list is designed
OUTSOURCING GUIDELINES FOR BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, 2008 BANK OF TANZANIA PART I PRELIMINARY 1 These guidelines may be cited as the Outsourcing Guidelines for Banks and Financial Institutions,
Software as a Service: Guiding Principles As the Office of Information Technology (OIT) works in partnership with colleges and business units across the University, its common goals are to: substantially
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation National Credit Union Administration Office of Thrift Supervision Office of the Comptroller of the Currency April 23, 2003 WEBLINKING: IDENTIFYING RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
30-SECOND SUMMARY The Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have issued extensive new guidance to financial institutions about the use of third parties to perform functions
PRIVACY OF CONSUMERS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION PART 12 501(b) AND BANK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES PROVIDED THROUGH APRIL 2001 Slides Narration In the last presentation, you learned about some of the general responsibilities
CONSULTATION PAPER P019-2014 SEPTEMBER 2014 GUIDELINES ON OUTSOURCING PREFACE 1 MAS first issued the Guidelines on Outsourcing ( the Guidelines ) in 2004 1 to promote sound risk management practices for
REGULATIONS FOR THE SECURITY OF INTERNET BANKING PAYMENT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN Table of Contents PREFACE... 3 DEFINITIONS... 4 1. SCOPE OF THE REGULATIONS... 6 2. INTERNET BANKING SECURITY
Internet Banking Internal Control Questionnaire Completed by: Date Completed: 1. Has the institution developed and implemented a sound system of internal controls over Internet banking technology and systems?
Columbia University Agreement Agreement ( Agreement ) dated as of, 20 (the Effective Date ) between The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York ( Columbia ) and ( Service Provider ). 1.
SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT This Software License Agreement (the "Agreement") is made as of the day of, 2015 ( Effective Date ), by and between ("Company"), located at and ("Subscriber"), located at. Both
Invitation to Tender Provision of Training in Technology Transfer and Related Areas for The Southern Africa Innovation Support Programme 1. Drawing up the tender The tender must be submitted in writing
Information Technology Risk Joint World Bank/Federal Reserve System Seminar for Senior Bank Supervisors from Emerging Economies Adrienne Haden & Mike Wallas Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
This module should be read in conjunction with the Introduction and with the Glossary, which contains an explanation of abbreviations and other terms used in this Manual. If reading on-line, click on blue
ABA Financial Privacy TOOLBOX This tool will help ensure that privacy remains a core value in all corners of your institution. The success of your privacy program depends upon your board s and your management
Prudential Standard CPS 231 Outsourcing Objective and key requirements of this Prudential Standard This Prudential Standard requires that all outsourcing arrangements involving material business activities
NCP 2016 Exam Cycle Core Training Series Session 11 National Check Payments Certification Fraud, Risk, and Risk Mitigation Part II Copyright 2015 by the Electronic Check Clearing House Organization NOTICES
BITS GUIDE TO CONCENTRATION RISK IN OUTSOURCING RELATIONSHIPS BITS A DIVISION OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW SUITE 500 SOUTH WASHINGTON, DC 20004 202-289-4322 WWW.BITS.ORG
PM-36: Attachment 4 Business Associate Contract Addendum On this day of, 20, the undersigned, [Name of Covered Entity] ("Covered Entity") and [Name of Business Associate] ("Business Associate") have entered
Are your business partners watching your back when you are watching your front? Danny Shaw SE Practice Leader IT Risk Advisory Services Experis Thursday, October 4, 2012 1 Objectives: Organizations frequently
Data Processing Agreement for Oracle Cloud Services Version December 1, 2013 1. Scope and order of precedence This is an agreement concerning the Processing of Personal Data as part of Oracle s Cloud Services
OUTSOURCING DUE DILIGENCE FORM SERVICE TO BE OUTSOURCED 1. Type of service to be outsourced: Accounting/Finance: Compliance Consulting: Legal Services: Administrative Functions: Information Technology:
1 AIRBUS GROUP BINDING CORPORATE RULES 2 Introduction The Binding Corporate Rules (hereinafter BCRs ) of the Airbus Group finalize the Airbus Group s provisions on the protection of Personal Data. These
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Business Associate Agreement (the Agreement ), is made effective as of the sign up date on the login information page of the CarePICS.com website, by and between CarePICS,