Floods of April 28, 1966 In the Northern Part of Dallas, Texas
|
|
- Marcia Sparks
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Floods of April 28, 1966 In the Northern Part of Dallas, Texas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-B Prepared in cooperation with the city of Dallas
2 Floods of April 28, 1966 In the Northern Part of Dallas, Texas By WILLARD B. MILLS and ELMER E. SCHROEDER FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-B Prepared in cooperation with the city of Dallas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969
3 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C
4 CONTENTS Page Abstract Bl Introduction. 1 Acknowledgments 2 The study area 2 Flood history. 11 Rainfall 12 Antecedent rainfall 12 Rainfall on April 28, General description of the April 28, 1966, flood 19 Inundation 22 Flood damage. 23 Determination of flood discharge. 23 Summary 24 Streamflow data _-_ Explanation of data. 27 Station data. 29 Joes Creek at Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, Tex. 29 Joes Creek at State Highway 114, Dallas, Tex 29 Bachman Branch at Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, Tex 30 Slaughter Branch at Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, Tex 30 Bachman Branch at Northwest Highway, Dallas, Tex 30 Bachman Branch at Midway Road, Dallas, Tex 31 Bachman Branch at Webbs Chapel Road, Dallas, Tex 31 Bachman Branch at Bachman Lake, Dallas, Tex 31 Turtle Creek below McFarlin Boulevard, Dallas, Tex 32 Turtle Creek at Dallas, Tex.. -_-_ White Rock Creek at Keller Springs Road, Dallas, Tex 32 Spanky Branch at McCallum Lane, Dallas, Tex Armstrong Branch at Melrose Drive, Richardson, Tex 33 Cottonwood Creek at Forest Lane, Dallas, Tex Floyd Branch at Valley View Road, Dallas, Tex 34 Floyd Branch at Forest Lane, Dallas, Tex 34 White Rock Creek at Greenville Avenue, Dallas, Tex 34 White Rock Creek at White Rock Lake, Dallas, Tex 35 Ash Creek at Highland Drive, Dallas, Tex 35 Forney Creek at Lawnview Avenue, Dallas, Tex 36 White Rock Creek at Scyene Road, Dallas, Tex 36 Selected references.. 37 m
5 IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Map showing areas flooded in the north Dallas area, Texas. In pocket 2. Maps and graphs showing cumulative rainfall at 30- minute intervals and total rainfall for the storm of April 28, 1966, north Dallas area, Texas In pocket FIGURE 1. Map showing location of watersheds. B Flood profiles: 2. Joes Creek Bachman Branch Turtle Creek 8 5. Upper White Rock Creek 9 6. Cottonwood Creek Floyd Branch- -_ Graph showing accumulated rainfall, April 13-28, 1966, at rain gage 6-W Graph showing comparison of maximum point rainfall intensity at gage 12-W with the rainfall intensityduration-frequency curves for Dallas Graphs showing comparison of rainfall intensities on watersheds with the rainfall intensity-durationfrequency curves for Dallas: 10. Bachman Branch watershed Joes Creek watershed Turtle Creek watershed Rainfall-runoff hydrographs for storm on Joes Creek and Bachman Branch watersheds Rainfall-runoff hydrographs for storm on Turtle Creek and White Rock Creek watersheds Photographs of flood damage: 15. Joes Creek at Walnut Hill Lane. _-_-. _ Bachman Branch Turtle Creek at Fitzhugh Avenue Photograph of flooding on White Rock Creek at Scyene Road TABLE Page TABLE 1. Flood stages and discharges B28
6 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES FLOODS OF APRIL 28, 1966, IN THE NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS By WILLARD B. MILLS AND ELMER E. SCHRQEDER ABSTRACT The floods of April 28, 1966, in the northern part of Dallas, Tex., caused heavy damage to a relatively small area. Flood damage was estimated at $2,500,000; and of this amount, $1,330,000 damage was along Bachman Branch, which has a drainage area of 12.3 square miles. At least seven persons died as a direct result of the floodwaters. The flood was caused by a 5-hour storm in the early hours of April 28. Antecedent rainfall had so saturated the area that the intense, but relatively low, total rainfall (less than a 50-year return period) caused historical floods to be exceeded at many points. A peak runoff rate of 3,160 cubic feet per second per square mile occurred on a 1.5 square-mile area within the watershed. INTRODUCTION A rainstorm in the northern part of Dallas during the early hours of April 28,1966, produced up to 6.7 inches of rain in a 6-hour period; 4.9 inches of rain fell within 1 hour. The intensity of the rainfall exceeded a 100-year return period by a considerable amount for durations of 30 minutes to 2 hours, as indicated by U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper 25. Because almost 8 inches of rain had fallen during the preceding 2 weeks, the watershed was well saturated, and all storage areas were full. In addition, most of the area is urbanized. This combination of intense rainfall and other hydrologic conditions favorable to high runoff resulted in flood flows greater at some points than the highest flood flows ever recorded on small streams in Dallas. A peak runoff rate of 3,160 cfs per sq mi (cubic feet per second per square mile) occurred on a 1.5 square mile area. This is the second highest peak rate of runoff per square mile recorded by the U.S. Geological Survey in Texas. The highest peak runoff rate recorded, 3,350 cfs per sq mi, occurred on June 30, 1936, on the 4.12 square mile drainage area of Bunton Branch near Kyle, 20 miles southwest of Austin. Bl
7 B2 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES Flood damage in Dallas was extensive. Bridges were washed away; more than 270 homes and at least 40 businesses were severely damaged; lawns, gardens, and cemeteries were inundated; and seven lives were lost. Flooding on Bachman Branch, one of the watersheds in north Dallas, caused damages estimated at $1,330,000. This report describes the flood event of April 28, 1966, for the following watersheds in north Dallas: Joes Creek, Bachman Branch, Turtle Creek, Cottonwood Creek, and Floyd Branch. This flood event is described in terms of rainfall (magnitude, intensity, frequency, and distribution), peak discharge at selected points, flood profiles, inundated areas, comparison with previous floods, effects of channel changes on flood profiles, and property damage and loss of life due to the flood. The flood on the main stem of White Rock Creek is also described, but in less detail. Figure 1 shows the location of the watersheds, and plate 1 shows the flooded areas. In August 1961 the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the city of Dallas, began a program of continuing investigations designed to evaluate the hydrologic factors affecting floods on several small streams in Dallas. Supporting data and computations are in the files of the U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Room 647, Federal Building, 300 East 8th Street, Austin, Tex. The height of a flood at any location is generally stated in terms of the stage, which is the elevation of the water surface above a selected datum plane. In this report, flood heights (stages) are expressed in feet above mean sea level. The rate of flow of a stream is the volume of water that passes a particular point in a given period of time. Discharge rates are given in cubic feet per second. The peak discharge is the maximum instantaneous rate of flow for a given flood. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The aid of personnel from the city of Dallas who furnished data and assistance for this report is gratefully acknowledged. H. H. Stirman, Director of Public Works, Dallas, Tex., and his staff worked closely with the field engineers to aid in collecting the most accurate data. On the morning of April 28, 1966, Public Works crews were in the flood area and flagged highwater marks. These marks were very helpful in establishing elevations for the flood profiles. THE STUDY AREA The study area comprises about 150 square miles in or near Dallas. Most of the study area is in the 136-square-mile drainage area of White Rock Creek, a tributary to the Trinity River. Because the storm
8 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B3 was centered in the northern part of the city, two subwatersheds, Cotton wood Creek watershed (8.50 sq mi) and Floyd Branch watershed (4.17 sq mi), within the White Eock Creek watershed were studied in detail. The upstream part of these two watersheds is in the city limits of Richardson, north of the Dallas city limits. Three other watersheds Joes Creek, Bachman Branch, and Turtle Creek were investigated in detail '30" 47'30" '30"- FIGURE 1. Location of watersheds in flood area.
9 B4 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES Within the reaches subject to extreme flooding, the stream channels are similar in shape and capacity, even though they differ in size. Each channel generally consists of a wide flood plain along both banks in the upper reaches and a relatively narrow flood plain in the lower reaches. As tributaries approach the Trinity River, the flood plain of the Trinity River provides a wide area of overflow. Much of the flood plain is in urban areas and is covered with well-kept lawns and paved streets. The rest of the flood plain is mostly covered with natural grasses on abandoned farmland. The main channels of the major tributaries, which are generally incised to limestone bedrock, are approximate trapezoids cut into the well-compacted alluvial material. Trees and brush growth along both banks of the main channels is fairly heavy. The low-flow channels are in solid limestone and contain some sand and gravel riffles. Little scour occurred except at bridges and constrictions where a large part of the water flowed over the roads. The areas described in this report are in metropolitan Dallas. Each area has a high percentage of impervious cover. The drainage area of Joes Creek at Interstate Highway 35E is 7.51 square miles. The streambed slopes uniformly from an elevation of 633 feet at the headwater near Valley View Lane to 479 feet at Marsh Lane in a distance of 3.6 miles. In the 3.3 miles below Marsh Lane the streambed slopes uniformly from an elevation of 479 feet to 410 feet at Interstate Highway 35E. Figure 2 shows the profiles of the floods and elevations of the streambed. The drainage area of Bachman Branch is 12.3 square miles at Bachman Lake spillway and 12.6 square miles at Interstate Highway 35E. The streambed slopes uniformly from an elevation of 655 feet at the headwaters near Valley View Lane and Preston Road to 474 feet at Brookview Drive in a distance of 4.4 miles. From Brookview Drive the streambed slopes uniformly for 1.2 miles to an elevation of 447 feet at Midway Road. Beyond this point the streambed has a constantly decreasing slope to Bachman Lake, where the spillway elevation is feet. Below Bachman Lake the streambed slopes from an elevation of 419 feet to 405 feet at Interstate Highway 35E in 0.7 mile. The dam retaining Bachman Lake was built in 1901 as part of the water-supply system for Dallas. The lake, which covers about 128 acres, is at the lower end of Bachman Branch just above the confluence with Elm Fork Trinity River. Floodwater will bypass the spillway and flow around the right end (north side) of the dam when the lake water level exceeds 443 feet in elevation. Figure 3 shows the profiles of the floods and elevations of the streambed. The drainage area of Turtle Creek is 7.98 square miles at the streamgaging station 200 feet above Hall Street. The streambed slopes uniformly from an elevation of about 620 feet between Royal Lane and
10 -69 o ess-ses ELEVATION ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL, IN FEET tb Webbs Chapel Road (10- by 10-ft barrel added to culvert after 1962) svxai, 'svaiva.10 j,hvd '9951 ( sz
11 RIVER MILES ABOVE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35E FIGURE 3. Profiles of floods on Bachman Branch. EXPLANATION Flood of April 28, 1966 Flood of October 8, 1962 (actual) D April 28, 1966,floodmark October 8,1962,floodmark Channel dam Backwater from Trinity River elevation uncertain) wo5 Approximate bed of stream in 1966 A (Dashed line shows 1962 streambed) Gaging station at Midway Road. Mile 3.4
12 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS Walnut Hill Lane to 541 feet just downstream from Lovers Lane in a distance of about 2.8 miles. In the upper part of this reach the channel is concrete lined to Northwood Road. From Northwood Road to below Lovers Lane, the main stream channel consists of two 6- by 4- foot storm sewers. Downstream from Lovers Lane the channel drops uniformly for 3.0 miles to an elevation of 433 feet at Turtle Creek Drive. In the 1.8 miles from Turtle Creek Drive to Harry Hines Boulevard, the streambed drops uniformly 46 feet. Below Lovers Lane the channel consists mainly of a rectified channel interspersed with small dams. A large-volume pressure storm sewer (278 sq ft in cross-sectional area ranging from 18i/ ft semieliptical to a 16-ft modified horseshoe) begins at the dam below Cedar Springs Road and ends at the Trinity River. The design capacity at the elevation of the dam crest is 3,600 cf s. Figure 4 shows profile of the flood, elevation of the streambed and the dam sites. Turtle Creek watershed was completely urbanized before the streamgaging station was installed. Paved streets, well-kept lawns, and rather expensive homes cover most of the area in the watershed. White Rock Creek is in the northern and eastern parts of Dallas County. The headwaters of White Rock Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, are about 10% miles north of the Dallas city boundary. Headwater elevations are about 780 feet. The stream flows southward about 30 miles into White Rock Lake, which has a conservation pool elevation of 458 feet. The stream continues southward from White Rock Lake for 10.3 miles to the Trinity River. From the northern city boundary of Dallas (mile 27.6) to the Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co. bridge (mile 18.7), the streambed has a nearly uniform slope of about 10 feet per mile. In the 5-mile reach between the railroad bridge and White Rock Lake, the slope decreases from a drop of about 5 feet per mile to about 2 feet per mile. The streambed slopes from the 458-foot spillway elevation to about 414 feet at Garland Road in a distance of 0.2 mile. Within 0.9 mile the streambed drops another 8 feet. Downstream from Garland Road the streambed slopes uniformly at a rate of 4.4 feet per mile. Figure 5 shows profiles of the floods and elevations of the streambed in upper White Rock Creek. The drainage area of Cottonwood Creek, a tributary to White Rock Creek that rises 1.3 miles north of Dallas County, is 8.50 square miles at Forest Lane, 0.6 mile upstream from the mouth. The streambed slopes from an elevation of 730 feet 1.5 miles north of Dallas city limits to 564 feet at Belt Line Road in a distance of about 4.6 miles. From this point the streambed slopes uniformly to an elevation of 476 feet at the mouth in a distance of 3.9 miles. Figure 6 shows profile of the flood and elevation of the streambed. B7
13 FIGURE 4. 'Profile of flood on Turtle Creek. EXPLANATION o Floodmark J Channel dam Flood of April 28, 1966 W 00 CD Approximate elevation of stream bed RIVER MILES ABOVE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35E
14 ELEVATION ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL, IN FEET g 2 ui en ui ui ui ui m Dallas //"County line- 'j_lntermediate / section fi 2 S* <» 3 a *» = T. & N. 0. Railroad /^ / Intermediate section i'/// M.K. &T. Railroad ' Loop 12 svxax 'svnva jo '996 1 'sz
15 FIGURE 6. Profile of flood on Oottonwood Greek. Floodmark Channel dam Flood of April 28, 1966 Approximate elevation of streambed 4 3 RIVER MILES ABOVE MOUTH
16 APRIL 28, 196&, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS Bll The flood plain has been developed with residences and parks from Campbell Road to Spring Valley Road. Below Spring Valley Road the flood plain is not as completely developed, and a few areas are covered with native grasses, trees, or shrubs. The drainage area of Floyd Branch, which joins Cottonwood Creek about 0.6 mile upstream from the confluence of Cottonwood Creek with White Rock Creek, is 4.17 square miles at Forrest Lane, 0.3 mile upstream from the mouth. The streambed slopes uniformly from an elevation of 680 feet at the headwaters between Campbell Road and Arapaho Road to an elevation of 565 feet at the low-water crossing in the Restland Memorial Park Cemetery in a distance of about 2.9 miles. From the low-water crossing the streambed slopes uniformly for 1.1 miles to an elevation of 529 feet near the Interstate Highway 635 (LBJ Freeway). From this point the streambed slopes uniformly to an elevation of 489 feet at the mouth in a distance of 1.5 miles. Figure 7 shows the profile of the flood and elevation of the streambed. Floyd Branch is similar to Cottonwood Creek in development of the flood-plain area. Upstream from Spring Valley Road, commercial and residential building has fairly well covered the flood plain. Down stream from Valley View Road, the area is less developed. FLOOD HISTORY Previous investigations have traced the flood history of the study area back to about At that time the number of flood-recording installations was limited; consequently, much of the information for the early records was obtained by interviewing long-time residents and by reading flood accounts in old publications. This report tabulates these historical floods as recorded in preceding reports, along with pertinent remarks. (See "Notable Flood Events" below.) NOTABLE FLOOD EVENTS May 25, 1908 Flooding of the Elm Fork Trinity River produced backwater and caused severe flooding in the lower reaches of Bachman Branch and Joes Creek. Flood stages in lower reaches exceeded those of the October 8, 1962, flood. April 25, 1922 A high intensity rainfall, which followed a wet period, produced unusually high runoff from the Bachman Branch and Joes Creek watersheds. Discharges were almost equal to those of the October 8, 1962, flood. April 19-20, 1942 Heavy rainfall produced runoff reported to be the highest since at least 1886 along White Rock Creek. May 1946 Substantial runoff occurred. August Substantial runoff occurred.
17 B12 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES NOTABLE FLOOD EVENTS Continued June The city of Richardson reported 11.5 inches of rainfall in a 12-hour period. This area contains the headwaters of Cottonwood Creek and Floyd Branch. Cottonwood Creek at Forest Lane had the highest stage since April 26, 1957 Substantial runoff occurred. October 1, 1959 _. The highest stage since at least 1903 occurred at the Turtle Creek streamflow station upstream from Hall Street. July 27, 1962 _ The greatest flood since 1942 at many points in north Dallas. October 8,1962 Prior to April 28, 1966, this was the greatest headwater flood since about 1900 along Bachman Branch and Joes Creek. September 21, 1964 Flooding was severe although not recordbreaking in the five watersheds of the study area except in upper White Rock Creek. Flooding in the upper White Rock Creek watershed was the greatest known. The average rainfall for an 8-hour period was nearly 12.5 inches on the upper 29.4 square miles of the watershed, resulting in 11 inches of runoff. April 28, 1966 _ The greatest known headwater flood on Bachman Branch, Turtle Creek, Cottonwood Creek, and Floyd Branch. Flood history begins about RAINFALL ANTECEDENT RAINFALL The U.S. Weather Bureau station at Dallas recorded more rain during April 1966 than had been recorded in any month since the record began in Rain gage 6-W, in the White Eock Creek watershed, near the center of the study area, recorded inches of rain during the period April Of this amount, 7.95 inches fell prior to the April 28, 1966, storm. Figure 8 shows the accumulated rainfall from seven storms at rain gage 6-W for the period April 13-28,1966, which is typical for the study area. Because of these antecedent-rainfall conditions, which caused the ground to be saturated and all the storage areas to be full, a high percentage of rainfall from almost any storm would have become runoff. RAINFALL ON APRIL 28, 1966 The rains that caused the floods in Dallas began at about 0030 hours on the 28th of April and ceased at about 0600 hours the same day. During this interval, rainfall was intense for about 1 hour. The maximum storm rainfall occurred at rain gage 12-W, where the intensity for a 30-minute period was 6.40 inches per hour, and the hourly total was 4.92 inches. (These totals reflect the most intense rainfall and are
18 S 09H-O 0S8-S&8 ELEVATION ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL, IN FEET -Spring Valley Road._Low-water crossing in cemetery Cemetery maintenance-area road Valley View Lane Interstate Highway 635 (L B J Freeway) -Tobian Street -Forest Lane Z! O 33 a = 3 ' Cottonwood Creek svxai, 'sviiva ^o i,hvd NHSHI-HON '-9961 'sz IIH.IV
19 B14 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES more than the rainfall shown on plate 2 for 12-W.) Figures 9-12 show the intensity of the rainfall at various sites as compared with the intensity-duration frequency for the period at the Dallas Weather Bureau station (U.S. Weather Bureau, 1955). Figure 9 compares the rainfall intensity that occurred at gage 12-W with the intensity-duration-frequency relations developed for Dallas. The 500- year return-period curve was extrapolated, using techniques suggested by U.S. Weather Bureau (1961) in Technical Paper 40. An extrapolation to this great return period was done to show the relative intensity of the storm at 12-W. Figures 10, 11, and 12 compare the areal weighted rainfall intensity (the intensity that occurred over the entire watershed at the same time) over Bachman Branch, Joes Creek, and Turtle Creek, respectively, with the intensity-duration-frequency relation for Dallas. The return-period curves were drawn using point rainfall. A correction factor can be determined from the inset in figure 10 for each area. For example, to determine the return period for a 1-hour areal weighted-mean rainfall intensity on a 50-square-mile drainage area, divide the mean intensity by 0.80 and then enter the rainfall intensity-duration charts on the 60-minute line. Note that for Bachman Branch and Joes Creek the areal weighted rainfall inten: sity reached the 50-year return-period line. The figures show that the in uj 10 1 O :.95 I 4 O% ^ APRIL 1966 FIGURE 8. Accumulated rainfall, April 13-28, 1966, at rain gage
20 APRIL 28, 1966., NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B15 intensity was rather constant for the first hour until it reached the maximum-return-period line, and then it followed this line for at least 1 hour. Figure 12 shows a decrease of the rainfall southward, but Turtle Creek experienced a record-breaking flood. The storm centered on the middle of White Eock Creek watershed. Plate 2 indicates the pattern of rainfall for the first 3 hours of the storm. The individual 30-minute totals are shown for each rain gage < D I o:2.0 LU 0. (/) LU f" (/) 5-4 t- 2 i < o: ^. ~-~, [^~~ ~- ^ -- x..^ ~- Ṉ -x. " " ^^ ^^ ^^ ^ L^^ <^J K~~-^ "\ "^ 1 ~-> \2 ^x^ K^_ ^~- K~~- x^- -^ ^ ^1 C^ "^ ^ <.; ^ \ itensity fo r Ap ril v t i ^> v. ^ \ ^\ \ X x X Note: Frequency analysis by method of extreme values, after Gumbel, k^/v 1941, for the period <^Q%j ^^ ^"x 1966 jf%^ " N ' $xn \ > N x 1v \ k N \ s NS \ s N N ^s ^ s,\ \ N\ \ N N N ^ \ \sx \ \\ N \ \ o Vs ^v\ \ MINUTES DURATION HOURS FIGTTKE 9. Comparison of maximum point rainfall intensity at gage 12-W with the rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves for Dallas. The 500-year return-period curve was extrapolated, as suggested by U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper 40, and is shown for comparative purpose only.
21 B16 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES to indicate the amount of rain that accumulated at each site. Plate 2 also shows the total storm rainfall. Note that the storm traveled slowly downstream. Plate 2 (first 1 hour, 30 minutes) indicates, for example, that the peak intensity occurred at all rain gages north of Eoyal Lane and at none of the rain gages south of this road. This timing would logically increase the peak discharge-rainfall ratio and should account, in part, for the magnitude of the flood Note: Frequency analysis by method of extreme values, after Gumbel, 1941, for the period Intensity for April 28, Z 0.8 z.0.6 Z 0.4 < AREA, IN SQUARE MILES MINUTES HOURS DURATION Note: 10.0 square miles drainage area above Midway Road FIGURE 10. Comparison of rainfall intensities on Bachman Branch watershed with the rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves for Dallas.
22 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B Note: Frequency analysis by method of extreme values, after Gumbel, 1941, for the period oc D O I ^.0.6 X N \ ^\ Z0.4 <0.2 Intensity for April 28, MINUTES DURATION HOURS Note: 7.51 square miles drainage area above State highway 114 FIGTJBE 11. Comparison of rainfall intensities on Joes Creek watershed with the rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves for Dallas.
23 B18 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES _ =»-~ ^^ ~ 5^ - U ^ ^ ^ "-- ^ "~» ^ ^. "- ^ ^ -- ^ -. [^ ~- ^^ -1 L^,^ ^ -^ ^ ^ ^^" <^ (^^ "^ tm -C^\ h?^ ^ ^ ^: ^ \ ;\ Note: Frequency analysis by method of extreme values, after Gumbel, 1941, for the period *? )(/^ ^\ ^Op^ %/Q X( ^ X ^^$xx X ^x/^ ^ \ *j X = ~ ~ ~ - ~ Inte nsity 1or April a, 1966 X * X^ F^ 1 X v > X s K\ V t \ s \ \x [\ X \^vx N vs ^s^ X N, N \ s^ N \\\ - \ x\^^ \ \ \ x> ^ X ^\ ~ n n? MINUTES HOURS DURATION Note: 7.98 square miles drainage area above Hall Street FIGUBE 12. Comparison of rainfall intensities on Turtle Creek watershed with the rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves for Dallas.
24 APRIL 28, 1966,, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B19 The pattern and amount of rainfall resulted in a flood that exceeded historical floods. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE APRIL 28, 1966, FLOOD The weighted-mean rainfall for Joes Creek watershed was 4.86 inches. A point total of 4.45 inches was measured on the upper end of the watershed, and 5.04 inches was measured on the lower end. Rain fell on the entire watershed within 5 minutes after the storm began. The maximum intensity for a 30-minute period was 3.74 inches per hour (fig. 11). Joes Creek at State Highway 114 had a peak discharge of 6,350 cfs. Eighty-five percent of the 4.86-inch rainfall on the 7.51-square-mile watershed above this site ran off. Figure 13 shows rainfall-runoff JOES CREEK AT STATE HIGHWAY 114 (Drainage area, 7.51 square miles) 10 i. i i i i 10 BACHMAN BRANCH AT MIDWAY ROAD (Drainage area, 10.0 square miles) 10 i. i i i i G 18 Z O Z < O CD D O 10 < en 8 D Oi i- 6 z A4 K TIME, IN HOURS Q EXPLANATION Discharge Accumulated rainfall Accumulated runoff minute-interval weighted rainfall TIME, IN HOURS FIGTJEE 13. Rainfall-runoff hydrographs for storm of April 28, 1966, on Creek and Bachman Branch watersheds. Joes
25 B20 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES graphs for the State Highway 114 site. Upstream at Walnut Hill Lane, the peak discharge was 6,530 cfs, or a unit runoff of 1,750 cfs per sq mi from 3.73 square miles. (See pi. 2 for flood-determination points.) Figure 2 shows the April 28 flood profile for Joes Creek, along with a profile of the October 8, 1962, flood. Note that above Merrell Eoad the 1966 flood was lower than the 1962 flood. This is due in part to new bridges and channel rectification. Other measurements of discharge show the April 28, 1966, flood to be equal to or greater than the October 8,1962, flood. Total rainfall measured on the Bachman Branch watershed was 5.30 inches in the upper part and 5.27 inches in the lower part. The influence of rainfall measurements at points outside the watershed lowered the weighted-mean rainfall for the watershed to 5.17 inches. Eain was falling on the entire watershed within 20 minutes. The maximum intensity for a 30-minute period was 3.86 inches per hour (fig. 10). ^ Peak discharge was determined at six sites in the watershed (pi. 2). The highest measured peak rate of runoff per square mile was 3,160 cfs on Slaughter Branch at Walnut Hill Lane from a drainage area of 1.51 square miles. Bachman Branch at Webbs Chapel Road, with a drainage area of 11.0 square miles, had a peak discharge of 18,200 cfs, or a unit discharge rate of 1,650 cfs per sq mi. Eighty-nine percent of the 5.17-inch rainfall on the 10.0 square mile watershed above Bachman Branch at Midway Eoad ran off. Figure 13 shows rainfallrunoff graphs for the Midway Eoad site. Figure 2 shows the April 28 flood profile for Bachman Branch along with a profile of the October 8, 1962, flood. Note that above Forest Lane the April 28, 1966, flood was lower. This is due to the new bridge at Willow Lane and the channel rectification in the area. Downstream discharge measurements indicate the 1966 flood to be greater than the 1962 flood. Weighted-mean rainfall on the Turtle Creek watershed was 3.53 inches. Point rainfall totals measured in the Turtle Creek watershed ranged from 2.49 inches on the lower end to 4.78 inches on the upper end. The maximum 30-minute intensity was 3.42 inches per hour (fig. 12). Eain fell on the entire watershed within 15 minutes after the rain began. The two storm sewers from Northwood Eoad to below Lovers Lane overflowed, and floodwaters ran down the streets. Peak discharge was determined at two sites in this watershed (pi. 2). The maximum measured unit rate of runoff was 2,090 cfs per sq mi at a dam 600 feet below McFarlin Boulevard; drainage area is 2.43 square miles. Ninetytwo percent of the 3.53-inch rainfall on the 7.98-square-mile watershed above Turtle Creek at Hall Street ran off. Figure 14 shows rainfall-
26 APRIL 28, 1966,, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B21 runoff graphs for the Hall Street site. Figure 4 shows the April 28 flood profile for Turtle Creek. Weighted-mean rainfall for the 125-square-mile area above White Eock Creek at Scyene Koad was 4.06 inches. Measured-point rainfall ranged from 2.59 inches on the upper end, to 6.70 inches near the center, to 2.20 inches on the lower end of the watershed. The maximum intensity was recorded and the highest total rainfall for this storm was measured in the White Eock Creek watershed at rain gage 12-W (fig. 9). Peak discharge was determined at 11 sites (pi. 2). The highest measured unit rate of runoff was 2,070 cfs per sq mi from the 8.50-square mile area above Cottonwood Creek at Forest Lane. An almost equal unit discharge of 2,060 cfs per sq mi was determined for the 4.17 square miles above Floyd Branch at Forest Lane. Seventy-six per- TURTLE CREEK AT HALL STREET (Drainage area, 7.98 square miles) 10 WHITE ROCK AT GREENVILLE AVENUE (Drainage area, 66.4 square miles) TIME, IN HOURS EXPLANATION - Discharge - Accumulated rainfall Accumulated runoff [] 30-minute-interval weighted rainfall TIME, IN HOURS 12 FIGURE 14. Rainfall-runoff hydrographs for storm of April 28, 1966, on Turtle Creek and White Bock Creek watersheds.
27 B22 FLOODS OF 196,6 IN THE UNITED STATES cent of the rainfall on the 29.4-square-mile area above White Eock Creek at Keller Springs Road ran off. Sixty-six percent of the rainfall on the 66.4-square-mile area above White Bock Creek at Greenville Avenue ran off. Figure 14 shows the rainfall-runoff graphs for the Greenville Avenue site. Figure 5 shows peak stages for White Rock Creek above Northwest Highway (Loop 12) as determined from the network of the creststage gages. These peak stages are compared with profiles of other floods. Profiles of the April 28 flood were determined for Cottonwood Creek and Floyd Branch and are shown in figures 6 and 7, respectively. INUNDATION Flood plains in five of the watersheds were investigated for inundation. Plate 1 shows the area inundated by Joes Creek, Bachman Branch, Turtle Creek, Cottonwood Creek, and Floyd Branch. The map used as a base for plate 1 was prepared in 1958 and, consequently, does not detail the development since that time. New areas have been urbanized; industrial plants have been built; freeways have been constructed ; bridges have been rebuilt; and channels have been rectified. These developments have resulted in filling of the natural flood plain, straightening of the channel, changes in road grade, and addition of impervious cover. Each of these factors influences the magnitude and mode of the peak discharge and the consequent inundation. Examples of the effect of urban development are shown in figures 2 and 3. Most of the upper Joes Creek channel had been rectified prior to April 28, 1966, and since October 8,1962. As a result the April 28, 1966, peak stages were considerably lower than the October 8, 1962, peak stages in the rectified sections (fig. 2), even though the peak discharges in 1966 were equal to or greater than those in The bridge at Willow Lane on Bachman Branch had been rebuilt and the channel rectified since the flood of October 8, Figure 3 indicates the results of the hydraulic improvement at Bachman Branch at Willow Lane. The April 28, 1966, peak was 2 feet lower than the October 8,1962, peak. There is some uncertainty as to the exact area inundated by overflow from the north end of Bachman Lake Dam. Reportedly, this overflow inundated the area as far north as the Northwest Highway. An investigation of this area showed that certain parts of it had been under water; however, this could have been due to sheet runoff from local rainfall.
28 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B23 FLOOD DAMAGE At least seven persons died in Dallas as a direct result of the floodwaters. Early damage estimates in the city were $2,500,000; according to Col. Jack Fickessen, District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Of this amount, $1,330,000 was damage along Bachman Branch, where homes and businesses were inundated. The flash flood swept over north Dallas in the early morning hours of April 28, 1966, inundating the low-lying areas and sweeping cars, furniture, small buildings, and other items along with it. At some constricting points the water washed out bridges or removed large parts of the channel banks. Engineers collecting field data 2-3 weeks later found items such as clothing, furniture, garden tools, small tool sheds, and books in the flood plains of the streams. The inundation of many luxurious homes caused especially high flood damage. Figures show some results of the flood. DETERMINATION OF FLOOD DISCHARGE The standard method used by the Geological Survey to determine discharge at a gaging station is to develop a stage-discharge relation from current-meter discharge measurements made at various stages FIGURE 15. Flood damage on Joes Creek at Walnut Hill Lane.
29 B24 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES and then to apply this relation to records of stage. The record of stage is generally obtained from a water-stage-recorder installation that provides a continuous graphic or punch-tape record of stage. The reliability of the stage-discharge relation depends upon how adequately the discharge measurements define the entire range in stage. Current-meter measurements at or near the time of peak discharge at the gaging stations were impossible to obtain because the flood of April 28, 1966, was of short duration and occurred during the night. Indirect determinations of peak discharge were made at sites shown on plate 1. These peak discharges were obtained by slope-area, contracted-opening, culvert, or other types of indirect discharge measurements. These indirect measurements are based on field surveys of highwater profiles, channel geometry, and hydraulic-structure geometry and are computed in accordance with established hydraulic principles. They are indirect only because the data were collected subsequent to the passage of the flood. SUMMARY 1. The floods of April 28,1966, were the result of a combination of the events and conditions, as follows: a. The rain fell at the same intensity for about 1 hour (figs. 9-12). The gage (12-W) that recorded 6.7 inches in 6 hours and 4.92 inches in a 1-hour period also recorded rainfall intensities for durations of 30 minutes-2 hours that exceeded a 100-year return period by a considerable amount (fig. 9). FIGURE 16. Flood damage on Bachman Branch. Peak marks can be seen on curtains. Photograph by Dallas Morning News.
30 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B25 FIGUEE 17. Flood damage on Turtle Creek at Fitzhugh Avenue. Photograph by Dallas Morning News.
31 B26 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES FIGURE 18. Flooding on White Rock Creek at Scyene Road. Photograph by Dallas Morning News,
32 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B27 b. Seven storms had occurred in the preceding 2 weeks, leaving the ground well saturated and the storage areas full. c. The watersheds are extensively urbanized and therefore contain a large amount of impervious cover. 2. Floods exceeded historical floods on Joes Creek, Bachman Branch, Turtle Creek, Cottonwood Creek, and Floyd Branch. (Flood history at some sites dates as far back as 1892.) 3. The second highest peak-runoff rate per square mile ever measured in Texas occurred on Slaughter Branch at Walnut Hill Eoad, where 4,770 cfs ran off from an area of 1.51 square miles (3,160 cfs per sq mi). This peak rate of runoff is second only to the 3,350 cfs per sq mi that occurred on Bunton Branch on June 30, 1936, from an area of 4.12 square miles. 4. A high percentage of the rainfall ran off each watershed. Joes Creek had 81 percent runoff, Bachman Branch had 89 percent, and Turtle Creek had 92 percent. STREAMFLOW DATA EXPLANATION OF DATA Maximum stages and discharges at the continuous-record gaging stations, crest-stage partial-record stations, and miscellaneous sites are summarized in table 1. The derivation of the maximum data is explained in the station descriptions for each site in the "Station Data" section of this report. The peak-discharge values given in table 1 are for flow as it passed the gaging station or measuring site. Under the heading "Maximum Flood Prior to April 28,1966," the maximum historical flood is given. Peak discharges, in cubic feet per second per square mile, were computed for all sites. Following table 1, additional data are presented for each station where streamflow information was collected by the Geological Survey during the April 28, 1966, flood. In general, the information for each continuous-record gaging station is as follows: A description of the station, and a tabulation of stages and discharges at selected times during the day of April 28,1966. For the miscellaneous sites and creststage partial-record stations, only the station description is presented, because no information other than maximum stages and discharges is available.
33 B28 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES TABLE 1. Flood stages and discharges, flood of April 28, 1966, in Dallas, Texas Map Permanent Stream and place No. station of determination (pi. 1) No. Drainage area (sqmi) Prior to April 28, 1966 Period Year Maximum floods April ] Elevation. Discharge 1966 (ft) Cfs per Cfs sq. mi. Joes Creek watershed Hill Lane. Joes Creek at State Highway i (2) 6,530 7,430 6,350 1, Bachman Branch watershed Bachman Branch at Walnut Hill Lane. Slaughter Branch at Walnut Hill Lane. Bachman Branch at Northwest Highway. Bachman Branch at Midway Road. Bachman Branch at Webbs Chapel Road. Bachman Branch at Bachman Lake ,160 10,400 4,770 8,530 14,400 9,200 16,000 18,200 15,000 1,300 2,200 3, , ,600 1,660 1,200 Turtle Creek watershed Turtle Creek below McFarlin Boulevard. Turtle Creek at Hall Street. o ,080 4,660 12,200 2, ,500 White Rock Creek watershed " White Rock Creek at Seller Springs Road. Spanky Branch at McCallum Lane Armstrong Branch at Melrose Avenue, Richardson, Tex. Cottonwood Creek at Forest Lane. Floyd Branch at Valley View Road. Floyd Branch at Forest Lane. White Rock Creek at Greenville Avenue. White Rock Creek at White Rock Lake. Ash Creek at Highland Drive. Forney Creek at Lawnview Avenue. White Rock Creek at Scyene Road ,900 9,020 7,870 5,000 1,290 (») 17,400 17,600 4,030 6,170 (») 8,590 38,100 27,000 28,300 18,800 «5,180 «1,090 "36,"206" 21,600 1, , ,220 2,050 2,070 1,270 1,940 2, """ Peak elevation not comparable with that of April 8,1966, because of subsequent channel rectification. 8 Not determined. 3 Affected by backwater from the Trinity River.
34 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B29 The station description gives the following information: Location of the gage; size of drainage basin area above the gage; nature of the gage-height record obtained during the period discussed in this report; datum of the gage; definition of the stage-discharge relation; maximum stage and discharge during the April 28, 1966, flood; previous maximum during the period of station operation; and available maximum data for floods outside the period of station operation, as indicated from interviews with local residents and from reading historical documents. The tables of stage and discharge at selected times where such detailed definition is warranted are given after the station description. Enough detail is presented so that hydrographs for the flood period can be accurately constructed. STATION DATA JOES CREEK AT WALNUT HILL LANE, DALLAS, TEX. (Miscellaneous site) Location. Lat 32 52'50" N., long 96 51'38" W., at culvert on Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, Dallas County, 2.6 miles upstream from Interstate Highway 35B. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. From floodmarks. Datum is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Maximum discharge by computation of flow through culvert and over road. Maximums. April 28, 1966: Discharge, 6,530 cfs (elev, ft) to April 28, 1966: Elevation, ft Oct. 8, Remarks. Road at both ends of the bridge was raised and the channel rectified for about 2,000 ft downstream since the Oct. 8,1962 flood JOES CREEK AT STATE HIGHWAY 114, DALLAS, TEX. Location. Lat 32 51'33" N., long 96 53'00" W., at bridge on State Highway 114, 0.9 mile above mouth, 7.8 miles northeast of Dallas County Courthouse in Dallas. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. SR (stage-rainfall) recorder graph, outside peak marks, and outside staff-gage readings. Datum of gage is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Stage-discharge relation defined by current-meter measurements below 730 cfs and by contracted-opening measurements at 3,300 and 6,350 cfs. Maximums April 28, 1966: Discharge, 6,350 cfs 0300 hours (elev, ft) to April 28, 1966: Discharge, 7,430 cfs Oct. 8, 1962 (elev, ft, from floodmarks). Since at least 1904: Discharge, that of Oct. 8,1962; elevation: 431 ft in 1908; backwater from Trinity River.
35 B30 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES [Elevation, in feet; discharge, in cubic feet per second; and accumulated runoff, in inches, at indicated time, April 28,1966] Hour Elevation Discharge Accumulated runoff Hour Elevation Discharge Accumulated runoff ,340 4,300 4,900 5,000 5,600 5,800 6,350 5,800 5,600 5,150 4, ,800 2,250 1,850 1,580 1,370 1,200 1, BACHMAN BRANCH AT WALNUT HILL LANE, DALLAS, TEX. (Miscellaneous site) Location. Lat 32 52'48" N., long 96 49'26" W., at bridge on Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, Dallas County, 5.4 miles upstream from Interstate 35E. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. From floodmarks. Datum is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Maximum discharge by contracted-opening measurement. Maximums. April 28,1966 : Discharge, 10,400 cfs (elev, ft) to April 28, 1966: Discharge, 6,160 cfs on Oct. 8, 1962 (elev, ft, from floodmarks). Remarks. Dam about 1,000 ft downstream from Walnut Hill Lane removed since Oct. 8, 1962 flood. SLAUGHTER BRANCH AT WALNUT HILL LANE, DALLAS, TEX. (Miscellaneous site) Location. Lat 32 52'48" N., long 96 49'03" W., at Culvert on Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, Dallas County, 1.1 miles upstream from mouth. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. From floodmarks. Datum is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Maximum discharge by computation of flow through culvert and flow over road. Maximum. April 28,1966: Discharge, 4,770 cfs (elev, ft). BACHMAN BRANCH AT NORTHWEST HIGHWAY, DALLAS, TEX. (Miscellaneous site) Location. Lat 32 51'48" N., Long 96 49'48" W., at culvert on Northwest Highway (Loop 12), Dallas, Dallas County. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. From floodmarks. Datum is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Dioharge record. Maximum discharge by computation of flow through culvert and over road. Maximums. April 28,1966 : Discharge, 14,400 cfs (elev, ft) to April 28, 1966: Discharge, 8,530 cfs on Oct. 8, 1962 (elev, ft).
36 APRIL 28, 1966, NORTHERN PART OF DALLAS, TEXAS B BACHMAN BRANCH AT MIDWAY ROAD, DALLAS, TEX. Location. Lat 32 51'26" N., long 96 50'12" W., on right bank at downstream side of bridge on Midway Road at Dallas, Dallas County, 1,400 ft south of Northwest Highway, 1.5 miles upstream from Bachman Lake Dam, and 6.0 miles northwest of Dallas City Hall. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. Water-stage recorder graph to 0330 hours. Graph drawn on basis of floodmarks and wire-weight gage readings. Datum of gage is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Stage-discharge relation defined by current-meter measurements below 4,000 cfs; by contracted-opening measurements of 5,300, 9,200, and 16,000 cfs. Maximums April 28, 1966: Discharge, 16,000 cfs 0410 hours (elev, ft, from floodmarks) to April 28, 1966: Discharge, 5,170 cfs May 10, 1965 (elev, ft). Since at least 1900: Discharge, 9,200 cfs Oct. 8, 1962 (elev, ft, from floodmarks). [Elevation, in feet; discharge, in cubic feet per second; and accumulated runoff, in inches, at indicated time, April 28,1966] Hour Elevation Discharge Accumulated runoff Hour Elevation Discharge Accumulated runoff ,700 5,410 13,100 16,000 12,800 6,680 2,490 1, BACHMAN BRANCH AT WEBBS CHAPEL ROAD, DALLAS, TEX. (Miscellaneous site) Location. Lat 32 51'33" N., long 96 51'21" W., at bridge on Webbs Chapel Road, Dallas, Dallas County. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. From floodmarks. Datum is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Maximum discharge by contracted-opening measurement and computation of flow over road. Maximum. April 28, 1966: Discharge, 18,200 cfs (elev, ft). BACHMAN BRANCH AT BACHMAN LAKE, DALLAS, TEX. (Miscellaneous site) Location. Lat 32 50'55" N., long 96 52'16" W., at spillway of Bachman Lake, Dallas, Dallas County. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. From floodmarks. Datum is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Maximum discharge by computation of flow over spillway and flow over embankment. Maximum. April 28,1966: Discharge, 15,000 cfs (elev, ft).
37 B32 FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES TURTLE CREEK BELOW McFARLIN BOULEVARD, DALLAS, TEX. (Miscellaneous site) Location. Lat 32 50'35" N., long 96 47'54" W., at dam 600 ft downstream from McFarlin Boulevard, Dallas, Dallas County. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. From floodmarks. Datum is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Maximum discharge determined by computation of flow over dam. Maximum. April 28,1966: Discharge, 5,080 cfs (elev, ft) TURTLE CREEK AT DALLAS, TEX. Location. Lat 32 48'26" N., long 96 48'08" W., on left bank 68 ft upstream from Hall Street at Dallas, Dallas County, and 2.0 miles north of Dallas County Courthouse. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. Water-stage recorder graph. Datum of gage is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of Discharge record. Stage-discharge relation defined by current-meter measurements below 2,500 cfs and by computation of flow over dam and flow over embankment at 12,200 cfs. Maximums. April 28, 1966: Discharge, 12,200 cfs 0410 hours (elev, ft) to April 28, 1966: Discharge, 4,650 cfs Oct. 1, 1959 (elev, ft). Since at least 1903: Discharge, that of April 28,1966. [Elevation, in feet; discharge, in cubic feet per second; and accumulated runoff, in inches, at indicated time, April 28,1966] Hour Elevation Discharge Accumulated runoff Hour Elevation Discharge Accumulated runoff ,880 4,130 6,160 10,400 12,200 11,200 7,900 4,850 3,750 2,690 1,550 1, , WHITE ROCK CREEK AT KELLER SPRINGS ROAD, DALLAS, TEX. Location. Lat 32 58'13" N., long 96 48'19" W., on left bank at downstream side of bridge on Keller Springs Road in Dallas, 0.5 mile upstream from St. Louis Southwestern Railway Lines bridge, 0.9 mile upstream from Spanky Branch, and 13 miles north of Dallas County Courthouse. Drainage area sq mi. Elevation record. Water-stage recorder graph. Datum of gage is mean sea level, datum of 1929, supplementary adjustment of 1953.
Travel Time. Computation of travel time and time of concentration. Factors affecting time of concentration. Surface roughness
3 Chapter 3 of Concentration and Travel Time Time of Concentration and Travel Time Travel time ( T t ) is the time it takes water to travel from one location to another in a watershed. T t is a component
More informationFlooding in the Middle Koyukuk River Basin, Alaska August 1994
Flooding in the Middle Koyukuk River Basin, Alaska August 1994 By David F. Meyer U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4118 Prepared in cooperation with the FEDERAL EMERGENCY
More informationCharles R. Gamble TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CANE CREEK FLOOD-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AT STATE ROUTE 30 NEAR SPENCER, TENNESSEE
CANE CREEK FLOOD-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AT STATE ROUTE 30 NEAR SPENCER, TENNESSEE Charles R. Gamble U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 83-267 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF
More informationA Flood Warning System for City of Findlay, Ohio
A Flood Warning System for City of Findlay, Ohio Matt Whitehead US Geological Survey, Ohio Water Science Center 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43229 Abstract The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and
More informationROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND
ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND The Rose Creek Watershed (RCW) consists of three planning
More informationURBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA
URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA I. Introduction This division contains guidelines for drainage system design and establishes a policy for recognized and established engineering design of storm drain facilities
More informationPrattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location
Prattsville Berm Removal Project 1.0 Project Location The project site is located between the New York State Route 23 Bridge over the Schoharie Creek and the Schoharie Reservoir. The restoration plan encompassed
More informationTENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR WATERBODIES CROSSED BY CONNECTICUT PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT CONNECTICUT LOOP Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company,
More informationSmall Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory
Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory What would happen if your dam were to fail? This is a question that most dam owners hope they will never have to answer. However it is a question you, as a responsible
More information2011 HYDRAULICS MANUAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT P.O. Box 94245 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9245 http://www.dotd.la.gov/ HYDRAULICS MANUAL Hydraulics (225) 379-1306 PREFACE The following
More informationLand Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department
Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist Walworth County Land Conservation Department The following checklist is designed to assist the applicant in complying with the Walworth
More informationOutlet stabilization structure
Overview of Sedimentation and Erosion Control Practices Practice no. 6.41 Outlet stabilization structure Erosion at the outlet of channels, culverts, and other structures is common, and can cause structural
More informationHYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC MODELING OF WESTMINSTER WATERSHED ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC MODELING OF WESTMINSTER WATERSHED ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA James Chieh, Ph.D., P.E., Senior Hydraulic Engineer, USACE, Los Angeles, California, Shih.H.Chieh@usace.army.mil; Jay Pak,
More informationCHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
CHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 3.7 Storm Drains 3.7.1 Introduction After the tentative locations of inlets, drain pipes, and outfalls with tail-waters have been determined and the inlets sized, the next
More informationDevelopment of Technical Data For Long Term Flood Solutions For the Red River Basin
IDENTIFYING WHAT WE DIDN T KNOW Development of Technical Data For Long Term Flood Solutions For the Red River Basin LTFS Study Area U.S. Portion of Red River Basin (MN, ND & SD) Main Stem Red River Tributaries
More informationCLEARWATER DAM BLACK RIVER, MISSOURI MAJOR REHABILITATION STUDY
US Army Corps of Engineers Little Rock District CLEARWATER DAM BLACK RIVER, MISSOURI MAJOR REHABILITATION STUDY HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSES NOTES: 1) All elevations listed in this report are referenced
More informationIndex. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) 6.50.1 6.51.1. Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary) 6.52.1
6 Index inlet protection excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) 6.50.1 HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary) sod drop inlet protection ROCK DOUGHNUT
More informationCHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS
CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS SANITARY SEWERS The hydraulic design procedure for sewers requires: 1. Determination of Sewer System Type 2. Determination of Design Flow 3. Selection of Pipe Size 4. Determination
More informationCHAPTER 9 CHANNELS APPENDIX A. Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow
CHAPTER 9 CHANNELS APPENDIX A Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow SEPTEMBER 2009 CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX A Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow Introduction The Equations presented
More informationFlash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes
Chapter 2 Flash Flood Science A flash flood is generally defined as a rapid onset flood of short duration with a relatively high peak discharge (World Meteorological Organization). The American Meteorological
More informationFlood Protection in Garland Past, Present, and Future. Presented by: R. Lyle Jenkins, P.E., CFM City of Garland, Texas
Flood Protection in Garland Past, Present, and Future Presented by: R. Lyle Jenkins, P.E., CFM City of Garland, Texas A few facts about Garland: Originally incorporated in 1891 Population 226,876 (2010
More informationCITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL
CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL Book 2 (SW) SW9 June 2015 SW9.01 Purpose This Chapter provides information for the design of open channels for the conveyance of stormwater in the City of Fort Wayne.
More informationSwannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study
Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study Measures Evaluated to Reduce Future Flood Damages City of Asheville U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flooding History Part of the 132 square mile Swannanoa River
More informationFlood Guide lcra.org
COLORADO RIVER Flood Guide lcra.org Be prepared for weather and flood emergencies If you live along the Highland Lakes, the lower Colorado River or its tributaries, it s critically important to be prepared
More informationHEADWATERS CONTROL STRUCTURE MANAGEMENT POLICY AND OPERATING PROCEDURES
HEADWATERS CONTROL STRUCTURE MANAGEMENT POLICY AND OPERATING PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION The Headwaters Control Structure at Gray's Bay is the outlet of Lake Minnetonka to Minnehaha Creek. It is an adjustable
More informationBentle Branch Storm Water and Stream Bank Stability Study ABSTRACT
Bentle Branch Storm Water and Stream Bank Stability Study Walter Skipwith, PE 1, Jeffrey Alvarez, EIT 2 and Dr. Peter Allen, PhD 3 ABSTRACT In the summer of 2004, flooding caused 2 deaths and an estimated
More informationFLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS
IV. (340 points) Flood Protection Benefits A. Existing and potential urban development in the floodplain (50) 1. Describe the existing and potential urban development at the site and the nature of the
More informationCITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet WHAT IS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT? Stormwater management is the method for channeling rainfall through pipes and sewers away from property to
More informationEvaluation of Open Channel Flow Equations. Introduction :
Evaluation of Open Channel Flow Equations Introduction : Most common hydraulic equations for open channels relate the section averaged mean velocity (V) to hydraulic radius (R) and hydraulic gradient (S).
More information1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21230-1718 www.mde.maryland.gov 410-537-3000 800-633-6101 TTY Users 800-735-2258 Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE DESIGN (ESD) REDEVELOPMENT EXAMPLES OCTOBER 2010 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21230-1718 www.mde.maryland.gov 410-537-3000 800-633-6101 TTY Users 800-735-2258 Larry Hogan,
More informationComputing Stormwater Runoff Rates and Volumes
New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual February 2004 C H A P T E R 5 Computing Stormwater Runoff Rates and Volumes This chapter discusses the fundamentals of computing stormwater runoff
More informationThe Rational Method. David B. Thompson Civil Engineering Deptartment Texas Tech University. Draft: 20 September 2006
The David B. Thompson Civil Engineering Deptartment Texas Tech University Draft: 20 September 2006 1. Introduction For hydraulic designs on very small watersheds, a complete hydrograph of runoff is not
More informationDANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT
DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT By: Conor C. Shea Stream Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service CBFO-S07-01 Prepared in
More informationBasic Hydrology. Time of Concentration Methodology
Basic Hydrology Time of Concentration Methodology By: Paul Schiariti, P.E., CPESC Mercer County Soil Conservation District What is the Time of Concentration? The time it takes for runoff to travel from
More informationEFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA
EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA René Leclerc Geomorphologist Robert C. MacArthur, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Headwaters
More information2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT
2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT Open channel flow is defined as flow in any channel where the liquid flows with a free surface. Open channel flow is not under pressure; gravity is the
More informationThe 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods... Have We Forgotten?
The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood.
More informationUNION COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
UNION COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER LAKE BUTLER, CITY OF 120595 RAIFORD, TOWN OF 120593 UNION COUNTY 120422 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) WORTHINGTON SPRINGS, CITY OF
More informationShooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology
Shooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: City of Colorado Springs CH2M DATE: April 9, 2015 Introduction This document is intended to provide an introduction to Colorado Springs
More informationPERFORMANCE OF DAMS AND SPILLWAYS 2009 GEORGIA FLOOD. Randall P. Bass, P.E. 1, 2. James R. Crowder, P. Joseph S. Monroe, P.E.
PERFORMANCE OF DAMS AND SPILLWAYS 2009 GEORGIA FLOOD Randall P. Bass, P.E. 1, 2 James R. Crowder, P. Joseph S. Monroe, P.E. 3 ABSTRACT During the latter part of September 2009, the Atlanta metro area received
More informationStream Channel Cross Sections for a Reach of the Boise River in Ada County, Idaho
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey In cooperation with Federal Emergency Management Agency, City of Boise, City of Garden City, City of Eagle, and Ada County Stream Channel Cross Sections
More informationTookany Creek Flood Damage Reduction Feasibility Study Section 205 Continuing Authorities Program
Tookany Creek Flood Damage Reduction Feasibility Study Section 205 Continuing Authorities Program Field Inspection Notes 27 29 September 2012 Introduction The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), in
More informationChapter 4. Flood Risk Assessment
Chapter 4 Flood Risk Assessment Chapter Overview Any floodplain management program must be established on a sound technical and scientific basis in order to be effective, whether for flood loss reduction
More informationUsing probability to understand 100-year storms
1 + Using probability to understand 100-year storms Grade Level: 5-7 Activity Duration: 30-45 minutes Overview: I. Storm stories II. 100-year Storm Probability III. Delineating Storms in NE Minnesota Summary:
More informationThe Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA
The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA April 17, 2013 Goal To develop a basic understanding of PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and US Army Corps of Engineers
More informationStandards for the Analysis and Processing of Surface-Water Data and Information Using Electronic Methods
Standards for the Analysis and Processing of Surface-Water Data and Information Using Electronic Methods Water-Resources Investigations Report 01 4044 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
More informationAZ EGER-PATAK HIDROLÓGIAI VIZSGÁLATA, A FELSZÍNI VÍZKÉSZLETEK VÁRHATÓ VÁLTOZÁSÁBÓL ADÓDÓ MÓDOSULÁSOK AZ ÉGHAJLATVÁLTOZÁS HATÁSÁRA
AZ EGER-PATAK HIDROLÓGIAI VIZSGÁLATA, A FELSZÍNI VÍZKÉSZLETEK VÁRHATÓ VÁLTOZÁSÁBÓL ADÓDÓ MÓDOSULÁSOK AZ ÉGHAJLATVÁLTOZÁS HATÁSÁRA GÁBOR KEVE 1, GÉZA HAJNAL 2, KATALIN BENE 3, PÉTER TORMA 4 EXTRAPOLATING
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project I. Description of the Project and its Relationship to Other Projects in the Proposal The Lower
More informationLecture 4: Streamflow and Stream Gauging
Lecture 4: Streamflow and Stream Gauging Key Questions 1. What is stream discharge and what controls its magnitude? 2. What is a hydrograph? 3. Where is the velocity highest in a stream? 4. Where is the
More informationRational Method Hydrologic Calculations with Excel. Rational Method Hydrologic Calculations with Excel, Course #508. Presented by:
Rational Method Hydrologic Calculations with Excel, Course #508 Presented by: PDH Enterprises, LLC PO Box 942 Morrisville, NC 27560 www.pdhsite.com Calculation of peak storm water runoff rate from a drainage
More informationEnvironmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization
Introduction A visual examination of Doolittle Creek in a highly developed suburban county in Georgia yielded telltale signs of a creek whose original streambed had been altered. Examination of official
More informationEmergency Spillways (Sediment basins)
Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins) DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short-Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] [1]
More informationHCP Team Meeting. November 18, 2015. icfi.com
HCP Team Meeting November 18, 2015 icfi.com 1 Welcome and Introductions Where are we in the HCP process Hydrology modeling update Native fish survey Fish translocation Finalize covered activities Next
More informationThe Alternatives of Flood Mitigation in The Downstream Area of Mun River Basin
The Alternatives of Flood Mitigation in The Downstream Area of Mun River Basin Dr.Phattaporn Mekpruksawong 1, Thana Suwattana 2 and Narong Meepayoong 3 1 Senior Civil Engineer, Office of Project Management,
More informationCLIFTY CREEK PLANT MADISON, INDIANA
2015 DAM AND DIKE INSPECTION REPORT GERS-15-018 CLIFTY CREEK PLANT MADISON, INDIANA PREPARED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AEP SERVICE CORPORATION 1 RIVERSIDE PLAZA COLUMBUS, OHIO Annual Dam and Dike Inspection
More informationOpen Channel Flow 2F-2. A. Introduction. B. Definitions. Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2F - Open Channel Flow
Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2F - Open Channel Flow 2F-2 Open Channel Flow A. Introduction The beginning of any channel design or modification is to understand the hydraulics of the stream. The
More informationThe Mississippi River & Tributaries Project
The Mississippi River & Tributaries Project The Mississippi River & Tributaries (MR&T) project was authorized by the 1928 Flood Control Act. Following the devastating 1927 flood, the nation was galvanized
More informationBurnsville Stormwater Retrofit Study
Burnsville Stormwater Retrofit Study Prepared for City of Burnsville June 2006 4700 West 77 th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: (952) 832-2600 Fax: (952) 832-2601 Burnsville Stormwater Retrofit
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST *This checklist must be completed and part of the Land Disturbing Permit submittal for review if the acreage disturbed is one (1) acre or more: I. SUPPORTING DATA Narrative
More informationHydrologic Engineering Techniques for Regional Water Resources Planning
US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic Engineering Techniques for Regional Water Resources Planning October 1969 Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited. TP-17
More informationFloodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design
Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design 2015 Symposium on Restoration in a Contaminated Environment: Lessons Learned and Challenges in Moving Forward Part II April 2015 Karin Boyd Applied Geomorphology,
More informationC.3 Workshop Track 2: Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures
C.3 Workshop Track 2: Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures Jill Bicknell, P.E., EOA, Inc. Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Presentation Overview
More informationGRADY COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
GRADY COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number CAIRO, CITY OF 130097 GRADY COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 130096 WHIGHAM, CITY OF 130674 Grady County EFFECTIVE: August 18,
More informationRiver Flood Assessment for northeast SC and southeast NC Saturday, October 17, 2015 1120 AM EDT
River Flood Assessment for northeast SC and southeast NC Saturday, October 17, 2015 1120 AM EDT National Weather Service Wilmington NC http://weather.gov/ilm Prepared By: Rick Neuherz Richard.Neuherz@noaa.gov
More informationCity of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist
City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist General Information Project Name: KYR10 Permit Number: Date: Project Location: Contractor: Conractor Representative: Inspector's Name: Title: Signature : Weather
More informationAppendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures
Appendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures Acronyms used in Appendix F: AA B AA C AA D BC BFE EAD FEMA NED O&M PV RED USACE Average Annual Benefits Average Annual Cost Average Annual
More informationUSGS StreamStats Web Application for Kentucky
USGS StreamStats Web Application for Kentucky Implementation of selected low- and mean-flow estimating equations Gary Martin, Hydrologist Project Chief U.S. Geological Survey, Kentucky Water Science Center
More informationBLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Harmony Creek subwatershed Harmony Creek subwatershed BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT April 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More informationGeneral Insurance - Domestic Insurance - Home Contents Storm water damage policy exclusion flood damage
Determination Case number: 227307 General Insurance - Domestic Insurance - Home Contents Storm water damage policy exclusion flood damage 4 April 2011 Background 1. The Applicants insured their home contents
More informationLower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1
Strategy Name: Reduce Existing Potential for Flood Damages LRSW-S3C1. Develop and implement a program to: Minimize flood damages through the use of structural measures. Minimize flood damages through the
More informationCOLORADO FRONT RANGE FLOOD OF 2013:
USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE COLORADO COLORADO FRONT RANGE FLOOD OF 2013: Peak Flow Estimates at Selected Mountain Stream Locations December 2013 James Creek in Jamestown North Fork of the
More informationSanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Incident Report Form
Submit completed form to EHS. Date of SSO spill: Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Incident Report Form Identify the SSO category (check one): Category 1 SSO Spills of any volume that reach surface water Category
More informationMulti-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Flooding General Flooding is the leading cause of death among all types of natural disasters throughout the United States, with its ability to roll boulders the size of cars, tear out trees, and destroy
More informationMethods for Determination of Safe Yield and Compensation Water from Storage Reservoirs
US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Methods for Determination of Safe Yield and Compensation Water from Storage Reservoirs October 1966 Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited.
More informationThe Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:
The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary: The Teton Creek Restoration Project area extends for approximately one mile upstream from the Cemetery Road Bridge and includes the Aspen Pointe, The Aspens
More informationStormwater Drainage Design for Parking Lots
PDHonline Course C201 (4 PDH) Stormwater Drainage Design for Parking Lots 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.pdhonline.org www.pdhcenter.com
More informationAdopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:
CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN Adopted 9/23/98 PART 1: GOALS. POLICY. COVERAGE. A. Goals The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are: 1. Preservation and protection
More informationStream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration
Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples Pierre Y. Julien Wuhan 2005 Objectives Part I - Stream restoration and rehabilitation: 1. Present and discuss important concepts, laws, criteria
More informationIndividual Residential Property Credit
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT Stormwater Management Program Individual Residential Property Credit Revised 12/11/12 why stormwater management? flooding POLLUTION EROSION The inability to effectively
More informationFort Dodge Stormwater Master Planning. Prepared By: Ralph C. Stark, Jr., P.E., C.F.M. Joel N. Krause, P.E., C.F.M.
Fort Dodge Stormwater Master Planning Prepared By: Ralph C. Stark, Jr., P.E., C.F.M. Joel N. Krause, P.E., C.F.M. Project Location Project Background Flooding History Localized flooding and storm sewer
More informationDesign Charts for Open-Channel Flow HDS 3 August 1961
Design Charts for Open-Channel Flow HDS 3 August 1961 Welcome to HDS 3-Design Charts for Open-Channel Flow Table of Contents Preface DISCLAIMER: During the editing of this manual for conversion to an electronic
More informationRuby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008
Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008 In partnership with Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP), American Wildlands, and Wildlife Forever, the Madison
More informationBase-Flow Yields of Watersheds in Berkeley County, West Virginia
Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia By Ronald D. Evaldi and Katherine S. Paybins Prepared in cooperation with the Berkeley County Commission Data Series 216 U.S. Department
More information11 Flooding 11.1 HISTORICAL FLOODS
11 Flooding Flood hazards in Humboldt County are attributable to rivers, dam failure, and coastal high water hazards (tsunamis and flood tides), with river flooding being by far the most prevalent. Flooding
More informationCHAPTER 5 OPEN CHANNEL HYDROLOGY
5.4 Uniform Flow Calculations 5.4.1 Design Charts CHAPTER 5 OPEN CHANNEL HYDROLOGY Following is a discussion of the equations that can be used for the design and analysis of open channel flow. The Federal
More informationAntecedent Conditions:
Antecedent Conditions: Record to Near Record Heat occurred across Northeast & North Central Colorado September 2-8. A cold front moved across Northeast Colorado the morning of the 9 th, and deeper subtropical
More informationRed River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Framework
Red River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Framework Red River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Work Group Technical and Scientific Advisory Committee Technical Paper No. 11 Principal Authors: Charles Anderson,
More informationFLOOD FORECASTING PRACTICE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
FLOOD FORECASTING PRACTICE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA California Department of Water Resources Post Office Box 219000, Sacramento, California 95821 9000 USA By Maurice Roos, Chief Hydrologist ABSTRACT Although
More informationMicromanagement of Stormwater in a Combined Sewer Community for Wet Weather Control The Skokie Experience
Micromanagement of Stormwater in a Combined Sewer Community for Wet Weather Control The Skokie Experience Robert W. Carr 1 * and Stuart G. Walesh 2 1 Water Resources Modeling, LLC, 4144 S. Lipton Ave,
More informationTypes of flood risk. What is flash flooding? 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology. Main types of climatically influenced flooding:
GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology Types of flood risk Main types of climatically influenced flooding: 1. Flash (rapid-onset) 2. Lowland (slow-rise) 3. Coastal (not covered here) But! Causal factors
More informationFlooding Hazards, Prediction & Human Intervention
Page 1 of 10 EENS 3050 Tulane University Natural Disasters Prof. Stephen A. Nelson Flooding Hazards, Prediction & Human Intervention This page last updated on 19-Oct-2015 Hazards Associated with Flooding
More information5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES
5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES Flood damage reduction consists of two basic techniques structural and non-structural. Structural methods modify the flood and take the flood away from people
More informationSims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project
Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project A. Gene Rushing, Jr., P.E., PMP HCFCD Project Manager January 15, 2014 Harris County s Watersheds Historical Flooding in Harris County 1929 1935 HCFCD
More informationKing County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012
King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers Public Meeting December 5, 2012 Goals of the Presentation Cedar and Sammamish R. Plan Update Context - Brief summary info about the
More informationWatershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas
Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas 1 Dams Constructed by Year (nationwide) 700 600 500 PL-566 Pilot/RC&D PL-534 400 300 200 100 0 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 Year 2 Number
More informationTable 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for
BMP C220: Storm Drain Inlet Protection Purpose To prevent coarse sediment from entering drainage systems prior to permanent stabilization of the disturbed area. Conditions of Use Type of Inlet Protection
More informationWatershed Delineation
ooooo Appendix D: Watershed Delineation Department of Environmental Protection Stream Survey Manual 113 Appendix D: Watershed Delineation Imagine a watershed as an enormous bowl. As water falls onto the
More informationScreening Transportation Assets for Vulnerability
Screening Transportation Assets for Vulnerability Impacts of Climate Change and Variability on Transportation Systems & Infrastructure (Gulf Coast Study, Phase 2) FHWA Office of Planning Environment and
More informationGuide To Bridge Planning Tools
Guide To Bridge Planning Tools The following bridge planning and hydrotechnical analysis tools (Excel spreadsheets, some with associated databases and VBA code), and GIS data-sets are available from the
More informationDes Moines River Regulated Flow Frequency Study
E S I Des Moines River Regulated Flow Frequency Study MINNESOTA WISCONSIN D E S C E D A R M I S S I M O I N S S I P P R A C C O O N R I V E R Saylorville Lake Des Moines - SE 6th St #* Lake Red Rock I
More information