MN1 MARCH 9, 2015 MINNESOTA. I. Restoration of Civil Rights/Firearms Privileges
|
|
- Andra Andrews
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MARCH 9, 2015 MINNESOTA MN1 I. Restoration of Civil Rights/Firearms Privileges A. Civil rights: Person convicted of treason or felony may not vote unless restored to civil rights. Minn. Const. art. VII, 1. By statute, civil rights (including right to sit on jury) restored upon discharge from sentence. Minn. Stat , subd. 1 ( When a person has been deprived of civil rights by reason of conviction of a crime and is thereafter discharged, such discharge shall restore the person to all civil rights and to full citizenship, with full right to vote and hold office, the same as if such conviction had not taken place, and the order of discharge shall so provide. ). Two exceptions: firearms privileges following a crime of violence, , subd. 1a; and forfeiture of and disqualification from public office following a conviction of bribery under Minn. Stat , subd. 2. Juvenile adjudications do not give rise to any of the civil disabilities that may be imposed as a consequence of an adult conviction, except that a person adjudicated delinquent for a crime of violence as defined in Minn. Stat (5) is not entitled to ship, transport, possess, or receive a firearm for the remainder of the person's lifetime. Minn. Stat. 260B.245 subd. 1. B. Firearms: Individuals convicted of a crime of violence, as defined in Minn. Stat , subd. 5, are barred from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon or, except for juveniles in specified monitored circumstances], any other firearm subd. 1. Firearms rights are not restored automatically upon completion of sentence along with other civil rights, but may be regained by petitioning a court for restoration , subdsubd. 1a. Court may grant the relief sought if the person shows good cause to do so and the person has been released from physical confinement , subdsubd. 1d. 1 Crime of violence is defined broadly in (5) to include drug crimes and a variety of theft and burglary offenses (in addition to violent offenses). 2 II. Discretionary Restoration Mechanisms A. Executive pardon: Authority: The governor, the attorney general and the chief justice of the supreme court constitute a board of pardons. Its powers and duties shall be defined and regulated by law. The governor in conjunction with the board of pardons has power to grant reprieves and pardons after conviction for an offense against the state except in cases of impeachment. Minn. Const. art. V, 7; Minn. Stat The Board has the power to grant an absolute or conditional pardon, to people currently serving a sentence. Minn. Stat , subd. 1. The Board also has the power to grant a pardon extraordinary, to people who have completed their sentences , subd. 2. The commissioner of corrections, or his or her designee, is the Secretary of the Board and conducts investigations and makes recommendations to the Board The Board is required to report to legislature by February 15 each year Relevant laws and policies are set forth at 1 Until 2003, the right to possess firearms was automatically restored to persons convicted of a crime of violence (with the exception of persons convicted of domestic assault involving the use of a firearm) 10 years after restoration of rights or expiration of sentence, whichever occurs first, provided the person had not been convicted of another crime of violence in that 10 year period. Minn. Stat , subdiv. 1(b) (2002). The 2003 Minnesota Citizen s Personal Protection Act, 2003 Minn. Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 28 (S.F. 842), modified the ban against possession of firearms to a lifetime ban for all persons discharged from sentence of court supervision on or after August 1, 1993, unless and until privileges are restored by a court. See Minn. Stat , subdiv. 1(11). 2 Because Minnesota offenders regain all three basic civil rights upon discharge from sentence, their federal firearms rights are restored along with their state firearms privileges. See 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(20) ( Any conviction which has been expunged, or set aside or for which a person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored shall not be considered a conviction for purposes of this chapter, unless such pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms. ).
2 MN2 Eligibility: For pardon extraordinary, five crime-free years from final discharge for nonviolent crimes, or ten crime-free years for violent offenses as broadly defined under Minn. Stat , subd. 5. Minn. Stat , subd. 2. The Board may set aside this waiting period by expressly provid[ing] otherwise in writing by unanimous vote. Id. (But see Minn. R , providing that application for pardon extraordinary is premature if filed less than 18 months after discharge from sentence.) Federal felony offenders and persons convicted under the law of another state are not eligible for a state pardon. See Minn. Const. art. V, 7; Minn. Stat Once a pardon has been denied, reconsideration is possible only with the consent of two members of the Board. Minn. Stat Individuals re-imprisoned for violation of parole or other supervision are barred from application for 12 months following their return. Minn. R Standard: To qualify for a pardon extraordinary, applicant must be found to be of good character and reputation. Minn. Stat , subd. 2(2). Effect: A pardon extraordinary restores all rights not otherwise regained upon completion of sentence, including firearms rights, and in addition has the effect of setting aside and nullifying the conviction and of purging the person of it, and the person shall never after that be required to disclose the conviction at any time or place other than in a judicial proceeding or as part of the licensing process for peace officers. Minn. Stat , subd. 2. However, a pardon extraordinary does not seal or expunge the record. 3 After a pardon extraordinary is granted, a copy of the pardon is filed with the district court in the county of conviction; and the court is directed to issue an order setting aside the conviction, and to include a copy of the pardon in the court file , subd. 3. Deportation: The 2005 report of the Board describes a unique case presented to it that year, in which a foreign national whose conviction for a minor drug offense had been set-aside under Minn. Stat sought pardon to avoid deportation by federal immigration authorities. The Board was presented with the problem that its constitutional and statutory authority is limited to granting clemency for convictions. The Office of the Attorney General issued an opinion that the Board did have the authority under these unique circumstances to grant the applicant a pardon extraordinary to avoid deportation. 4 Process: For general pardons and commutations, Secretary of Board screens applications to determine eligibility, and makes recommendations to the Board. Minn. R Application forms must be obtained directly from the Secretary s Office by mail after eligibility requirements have been reviewed. Minn. R ( Applications for relief shall be made on forms approved by the board and supplied by the secretary to the applicant. ). Application forms typically are sent only to those deemed eligible by the Secretary. See (Board of Pardons 2011 annual report indicating that [a]s in the past, when an inquiry for application is made, the staff makes every effort to determine whether the potential applicant meets the eligibility requirements before an application is sent ). In 2010, 178 applications were sent out by the Board, and 32 applications were sent in In 1992, language in Minn. Stat that provided for sealing of records after pardon was repealed, so that even though the conviction is nullified the record is not expunged or sealed. See Minn. Stat (historical and statutory notes); 1992 Minn. Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 569 (H.F. 2181). Rather, the fact of the pardon is added to the record. Where there is a request from a member of the public for public criminal records, only the fact of the pardon is disseminated. When there is a background check for private data (authorized by the subject), both the conviction and the pardon are disseminated. See also State v. Stern, 297 N.W. 321 (Minn. 1941) (pardon granted defendant for previous conviction in California was not bar to imposition of enhanced punishment under Minnesota's habitual criminal statute following conviction of crime of performing illegal operation). 4 See 5 In 2011, the Board considered 45 applications for pardons extraordinary and granted applications for pardons extraordinary were denied, two additional applicants withdrew or were deferred prior to consideration, and 11 additional applications were not considered because the Board declined to set aside the waiting period. Nine applications for
3 MN3 See (2010 annual report); (2011 annual report). Applications the Secretary deems undeserving on the merits may also be excluded from consideration, with a report to the Board summarizing the application and basis for the exclusion. Minn. R Hearings: The board of pardons shall hold meetings at least twice each year and shall hold a meeting whenever it takes formal action on an application for a pardon or commutation of sentence. All board meetings shall be open to the public.... Minn. Stat For pardons extraordinary, except for less serious offenders discharged more than five years before, applicant must attend a hearing at which application is considered. Minn. R Persons seeking a waiver of the eligibility waiting period must also attend in person. Judge and DA are asked their views, and victims notified. Decision of Board usually announced at the conclusion of the hearing. See generally Minn. R , available at Every pardon or commutation of sentence shall be in writing and shall have no force or effect unless granted by a unanimous vote of the board duly convened. Minn. Stat , subd. 1. Frequency of Grants: The following data is derived from the Annual Reports to the Legislature of the Board of Pardons, available back to 2003 at In the past decade, between 10 and 25 pardons have been granted each year, approximately half of those whose applications are docketed (that is, those who are deemed eligible by the Secretary of the Board). According to the 2008 report of the Board, applications for waiver have increased as collateral consequences have become more onerous: Over the years as the collateral consequences of criminal conviction appear to have increased, there has also been an increase in the number of applicants seeking waiver of the waiting period, which the statute permits upon the unanimous written consent of the Board. The 2009 report noted that the trend of gradually increasing numbers of applications has continued. Data from the 2010 and 2011 reports indicate that the trend is continuing. Applications Sent (all forms relief) Applications for Relief (Docketed/ Granted) Relief Sought Pardon Extraordinary (considered/grant ed) Pardon Extraordinary + Waiver of Waiting Period Commutation/ Pardon /9 18/ 14 27/ 12 23/ 17 41/ 24 28/ 10 45/ 17 45/ Granted 0/0 0/0 3/0 13/1 11/2 6/0 11/1 11/0 1 Granted 12/0 10/0 6/0 3/0 10/0 7/0 6/0 9/0 0 Granted Leave to Reapply 3/1 0/0 2/0 1/1 1/0 4/0 1/0 4/1 0 Granted Contact: Randolph Hartnett, Secretary of the Board, (651) , rhartnett@co.doc.state.mn.us pardon/commutation were reviewed under Minn. R , eight of which were deemed ineligible for review. See
4 B. Judicial sealing or expungement: MN4 Expungement: Under legislation signed into law in April 2014, the courts are now authorized to expunge judicial and executive branch records in juvenile delinquency adjudications, cases resolved in an individual s favor, cases resulting in diversion or a stay of adjudication after a one-year waiting period, and misdemeanor and minor nonviolent felony convictions after waiting periods ranging from two to five years after completion of sentence. In a case involving a conviction, a person must be able to establish that the need to expunge the record outweighs any risk to public safety. The law protects employers from liability where a record has been expunged, and requires background screening companies to delete expunged records. The law is effective January 1, 2015, except for domestic violence convictions which are expungeable effective July 1, For a survey of the provisions of this comprehensive new law, see Emily Baxter, Minnesota s sweeping new expungement law takes effect, Sealing: Conviction information will not be publicly disseminated 15 years after discharge of sentence, Minn. Stat , subd. 1(b), except that information created or collected by law enforcement agencies which document any actions taken by them to cite, arrest, incarcerate or otherwise substantially deprive an adult individual of liberty shall be public at all times in the originating agency , subd. 2. Expungement: Minnesota has two types of expungement, common law and statutory. Statutory: Effective January 1, 2015, Minnesota law now specifically authorizes its courts to expunge (or seal, a term used interchangeably) court and executive branch records where all pending actions or proceedings are resolved in favor of the petitioner, and in cases involving misdemeanor convictions and certain minor non-violent felonies. See Minn. Stat. 609A.02, subd. 3.. o o Eligibility: Non-conviction records may be expunged pursuant to 609A.02, subds. 3(a)(1). Individuals who have completed a deferred adjudication or other diversion program may have the related arrest, indictment, trial, or other records sealed after remaining crime-free for a one year waiting period. 609A.02, subds. 3(a)(2). Those convicted of or who received a stayed sentence for a misdemeanor must wait two years after completion of sentence; those convicted of a gross misdemeanants must wait four years; and those convicted of eligible felonies listed in subds. 3(b) must wait five years. The records of a conviction for which registration is required may not be expunged. 609A.02 subd. 4. Minn. Stat. 609A.01, 609A.02, subds. 1, 3. Procedures and Standards: Procedures for filing a petition for expungement are set forth in Minn. Stat. 609A.03. (Under a new provision effective in January 2015, no petition is necessary with the agreement of the prosecutor. See 609A.025.) In all cases, a balancing test applies: expungement is an extraordinary remedy to be granted only upon clear and convincing evidence that it would yield a benefit to the petitioner commensurate with the disadvantages to the public and public safety. Id. subd. 5(a). In making a decision to expunge the court is directed to consider a number of factors, including the nature and severity of the underlying crime, the risk the petitioner poses to individuals or society, the length of time since the crime occurred, the steps taken by the petitioner toward rehabilitation, aggravating or mitigating factors relating to the underlying crime, the reasons expungement is sought, the petitioner s overall criminal record, official recommendations and the recommendations of victims, and payment of restitution. Subd. 5(b). Common Law: For convictions that do not fall within the list of statutorily eligible offenses, common law expungement may still be available, though the procedures set forth in 609A.03 apply. Minnesota courts have inherent authority to expunge records generated by the judicial branch in two situations: 1) when a convicted offender's constitutional rights may be seriously infringed by not expunging the record; and 2) even if no constitutional infringement, when expungement will yield a benefit to the offender commensurate with
5 MN5 the disadvantages to the public from the elimination of the record and the burden on the court in issuing, enforcing, and monitoring an expungement order. See State v. S.L.H., 755 N.W.2d 271, 274 (Minn. 2008); State v. Ambaye, 616 N.W.2d 256, 258 (Minn. 2000); see generally Lindsay W. Davis, An Amicus Perspective on Recent Minnesota Criminal Expungement, 2 Wm. Mitchell J. L. & Prac. 4 (2009); Jon Geffen & Stephanie Letze, Chained to the Past: An Overview of Criminal Expungement Law in Minnesota State v. Schultz, 31 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev (2005). It is not clear to what extent the standards developed and applied in common law expungement cases will be supplanted by the new statutory factors in 609A.03. See Ambaye, 616 N.W.2d at 258; see also State v. H.A., 716 N.W.2d 360, 364 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). The seriousness of the offense has been regarded as an important consideration in determining whether records should be expunged. Compare Ambaye, 616 N.W.2d at 261 (agreeing with district court determination of compelling interest in maintaining record of violence, in part due to underlying charge of first degree murder) with State v. Schultz, 676 N.W.2d 337, 341 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004) (listing mitigating circumstances following plea to charge of felony assault supporting trial court exercise of discretion to expunge). 6 The Minnesota Supreme Court held in May 2013 that courts inherent authority to expunge records created by the judicial branch does not extend to records maintained by the executive branch. State v. M.D.T., --- N.W.2d ----, 2013 WL (Minn. 2013) at *14 ( expungement of M.D.T. s records held in the executive branch is not necessary to the performance of a unique judicial function ). The court reasoned that because the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act establishes a presumption that government data are public for 15 years, see Minn. State 13.87, subd. 1(b) (see above), [r]ecognition of inherent judicial authority to expunge M.D.T. s criminal records held in the executive branch would effectively override the legislative policy judgments expressed in both of these statutes WL * 12. Effect of expungement: Minn. Stat. 609A.01: The remedy available is limited to a court order sealing the records and prohibiting the disclosure of their existence or their opening except under court order or statutory authority. Nothing in this chapter authorizes the destruction of records or their return to the subject of the records. Expungement seals the record, which remains available for law enforcement purposes, for purposes of evaluating a candidate for a law enforcement position, or for purposes of background checks by the Department of Human Services. See 609A.03 subd. 7. In addition, upon request by law enforcement, prosecution, or corrections authorities, an agency or jurisdiction subject to an expungement order shall inform the requester of the existence of a sealed record and of the right to obtain access to it as provided by this paragraph. For purposes of this section, a criminal justice agency means courts or a government agency that performs the administration of criminal justice under statutory authority. Id. 6 In Ambaye, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to expunge a violent offense: [T]he court stated that the benefit respondent stood to gain from expungement, if granted, would override the very purpose of the background check. Employers, sometimes pursuant to law and sometimes voluntarily, have required background checks in order to assess any potential risk involved with hiring certain individuals. Further, the district court reasoned that the public had a compelling interest in maintaining [respondent s] record of violence, particularly because the underlying offense [respondent] was charged with was murder in the first degree. Finally, the district court noted that respondent is currently gainfully employed, thus his [criminal record] is not preventing him from obtaining employment. Ambaye, 616 N.W.2d at 261. In Schultz, the petitioner granted expungement had been convicted of second degree assault shortly after his 18 th birthday, at a time when he was experiencing mental health difficulties that had subsequently been controlled through medication. Shultz, 676 N.W.2d at 340. In M.D.T., the court of appeals granted expungement, noting that appellant s offense, aggravated forgery, was a non-violent misdemeanor and that the facts surrounding the offense also showed that the nature and seriousness of the offense were minimal. M.D.T., 815 N.W.2d 628, 633 (Minn. App. 2012), rev d on other grounds by 2013 WL (Minn. 2013).
6 MN6 Consideration in employment: Records of arrest not leading to conviction, convictions that have been expunged, or misdemeanors for which a prison sentence could not be imposed, may not be considered in connection with public employment or licensing decision. Minn. Stat Negligent hiring standard: Information relating to a criminal history record of an employee, former employee, or tenant that has been expunged before the occurrence of the act giving rise to the civil action may not be introduced as evidence in a civil action against a private employer or landlord or its employees or agents that is based on the conduct of the employee, former employee, or tenant. Minn. Stat. 609A.03, subd. 5(e). Background screening companies: The new bill closes the gap on private data mining records: if a business screening service knows that a criminal record has been sealed, expunged, or is the subject of a pardon, the screening service shall promptly delete the record. Minn. Stat subd 3a. 7 Expungement has been a frequently sought remedy in Minnesota. According to press accounts prior to enactment of the new law, more than 100 applications for expungement are filed annually in Hennepin County alone. See Nick Coleman, This Diva Changed her Tune and her Life, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Sept. 18, 2005, at 1B. Juvenile Records: Unless expunged, juvenile records are retained and made available to certain government agencies, schools, and victims only until the person reaches age 28, with certain exceptions. If the person commits a felony as an adult, or the court convicts a child as an extended jurisdiction juvenile, the court shall retain the juvenile records for as long as the records would have been retained if the offender had been an adult at the time of the juvenile offense. See Minn. Stat. 260B.171, subd. 1. Juvenile records may be used to enhance subsequent adult criminal charges and sentences; disqualify adults from working at jobs or volunteer opportunities involving vulnerable adults, patients, or children; restrict access to firearms; and prevent access to public housing. Under Minn. Stat. 260B.198, subd. 6, as amended in April 2014 and effective January 1, 2015, the district court is authorized to expunge from executive branch and court files all records relating to a delinquency adjudication, after determining that expungement of the record would yield a benefit to the subject of the record that outweighs the detriment to the public and public safety in sealing the record and the burden on the court and public agencies or jurisdictions in issuing, enforcing and monitoring the order. In making this determination the court must consider a variety of factors set forth in subd. 6(b), including the age, education, experience, and background, including mental and emotional development, of the subject of the record at the time of commission of the offense; the nature and severity of the offense, including any aggravating or mitigating factors; victim and community impact; and the overall background and history of the subject of the record. This legislation effectively over-rules the holding of the Minnesota Supreme Court in In re Welfare of J.J. P., --- N.W.2d ----, 2013 WL (Minn. 2013). 7 Subd. 3a.Deletion of expunged records: If a business screening service knows that a criminal record has been sealed, expunged, or is the subject of a pardon, the screening service shall promptly delete the record. See also Subd. 4 ( A business screening service that disseminates a criminal record that was collected on or after July 1, 2010, must include the date when the record was collected by the business screening service and a notice that the information may include criminal records that have been expunged, sealed, or otherwise have become inaccessible to the public since that date. ); Subd. 5.Remedies; relationship to FCRA ( A business screening service that violates this section is liable to the individual who is the subject of the record for a penalty of $1,000 or actual damages caused by the violation, whichever is greater, plus costs and disbursements and reasonable attorney fees. =
7 MN7 A new report from the Center for Crime and Justice outlines how juvenile records are created, maintained, and accessed; it describes when juvenile records are public and when they are private; and it both identifies and defines the many collateral consequences legal disabilities and practice barriers that an individual with a juvenile record may face as they grow into adulthood. These collateral consequences often severely limit a youths ability to access employment, higher education, and housing; sometimes long after an individual s time in juvenile court is complete. See Juvenile Records in Minnesota, Effect of a Pardon: A pardon extraordinary nullifies and sets aside the conviction, but it does not expunge or seal the record. Deferred sentencing: A felony conviction will be deemed to be a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor if 1) the sentence imposed was no greater than that authorized for a misdemeanor; or 2) the imposition of the prison sentence is stayed, the defendant is placed on probation, and the defendant is thereafter discharged without a prison sentence. Minn. Stat , subd. 1. The purpose and effect of this statute is to avoid imposition of most legal disabilities that accompany a felony conviction, including those in administrative licensing proceedings. See id., advisory committee cmt., quoted in Matter of Woollett, 540 N.W.2d 829, 831 (Minn. 1995) ( It is believed desirable not to impose the consequences of a felony if the judge decides that the punishment to be imposed will be no more than that provided for misdemeanors or gross misdemeanors ). However, the conviction will still be counted as a felony for purposes of prosecution as a felon in possession, and for subsequent sentencing. Also, in Woollett, the Supreme Court of Minnesota held that a stay of sentencing did not convert a felony conviction for third-degree assault into a misdemeanor for purposes of peace officer licensing, because the Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training had specific statutory authority to disqualify an individual based on a felony conviction. The court compared the Minnesota statute with the California statute on which it was modeled, and found its coverage less comprehensive. See Woollett, 540 N.W.2d at 832, n. 3. Non-conviction records: Minn. Stat. 299C.11. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) and other state agencies (police departments, county attorneys) must return an individual s arrest record and certain identifying information upon request if the individual has not been convicted of a felony or gross misdemeanor within 10 years before the determination of all pending criminal actions in favor of the arrested person; and either no charges were filed or all changes were dismissed prior to a determination of probable cause. See State v. Bragg, 577 N.W.2d 516 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). The balancing test under Minn. Stat. 609A.03, subd. 5 applies even to sealing of nonconviction records. See Bragg, supra, 577 N.W. 2d at 521 (noting that petitioner in that case could have proceeded under 299C.11 but chose instead to proceed under 609A.03). See also Minn. Stat (deferred prosecution and expungement for minor drug offenses); 609A.03, subd. 6 ( If the court orders the sealing of the record of proceedings under [Minn. Stat ], the effect of the order shall be to restore the person, in the contemplation of the law, to the status the person occupied before the arrest, indictment, or information. ). Helpful information about how to apply for expungement is available on the Minnesota courts website at Forms are available at See also Geffen & Letze, supra. Firearms Restoration: A person convicted of a crime of violence and thus deprived of firearms rights under Minn. Stat , subd. 1a, may petition a court for restoration, and the court may grant the relief sought if the person shows good cause to do so and the person has been released from physical confinement , subd. 1d. III. Nondiscrimination in Licensing and Employment:
8 MN8 The Minnesota Criminal Rehabilitation Act (1974), Minn. Stat et seq., prohibits discrimination in public employment and licensing: The legislature declares that it is the policy of the state of Minnesota to encourage and contribute to the rehabilitation of criminal offenders and to assist them in the resumption of the responsibilities of citizenship. The opportunity to secure employment or to pursue, practice, or engage in a meaningful and profitable trade, occupation, vocation, profession or business is essential to rehabilitation and the resumption of the responsibilities of citizenship. Public employers and licensing agencies may not disqualify a person solely or in part based on criminal conviction unless 1) there is a direct relationship between occupation or license and conviction history, measured by the purposes of the occupation s regulation and the relationship of the crime to the individual s fitness to perform the duties of the position; and 2) the individual has not shown sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the duties of the public employment or licensed occupation , subd Direct Relationship Test: In determining if a conviction directly relates to the position of public employment sought or the occupation for which the license is sought, the hiring or licensing authority shall consider: (a) the nature and seriousness of the crime or crimes for which the individual was convicted; (b) the relationship of the crime or crimes to the purposes of regulating the position of public employment sought or the occupation for which the license is sought; (c) the relationship of the crime or crimes to the ability, capacity, and fitness required to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the position of employment or occupation. Minn. Stat , subd. 2. Judicial Interpretation of Direct Relationship Test: The Minnesota courts have interpreted the direct relationship test broadly. See, e.g., Peterson v. Minneapolis City Council, 274 N.W.2d 918 (Minn. 1979) (conviction for attempted theft by trick directly related to the operation of a massage parlor); In re Shelton, 408 N.W.2d 594 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987) (embezzlement directly related to fitness to teach; teacher with 20 years of service terminated in spite of efforts to make restitution). 2. Rehabilitation: Even where a crime is found to be directly related to the public employment or license sought, person shall not be disqualified if the person can show competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the duties of the public employment sought or the occupation for which the license is sought , subd. 3. Rehabilitation may be established by a record of lawabiding conduct for one year after release from confinement, and compliance with all terms of probation or parole. Licensing or hiring authority shall also consider evidence regarding nature and seriousness of crime, mitigating circumstances, age at time of conviction, time elapsed since conviction, and other evidence of rehabilitation such as letters of reference. Id. A public employee may demonstrate sufficient rehabilitation if one year has elapsed since release from incarceration without subsequent conviction of another crime. In re Shelton, 408 N.W.2d 594 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). Various bills have from time to time been introduced into the Minnesota legislature that would add to or clarify the test of rehabilitation. Readers are encouraged to check recent enactments for the most up-to-date information, or to consult with Emily Baxter, Council on Crime and Justice, baxtere@crimeandjustice.org. Certain records may not be considered: Records of arrest not leading to conviction, convictions that have been expunged, or misdemeanors for which a prison sentence could not be imposed, may not be considered in connection with public employment or licensing decision. Minn. Stat Notification of reasons for denial: If a hiring or licensing authority denies an individual a position of public employment or disqualifies the individual from pursuing, practicing, or engaging in any occupation for which a license is required, solely or in part because of the individual's prior conviction of a crime, the hiring or licensing
9 MN9 authority shall notify the individual in writing of the following: (1) the grounds and reasons for the denial or disqualification; (2) the applicable complaint and grievance procedure; (3) the earliest date the person may reapply for a position of public employment or a license; and (4) that all competent evidence of rehabilitation presented will be considered upon reapplication. Minn. Stat Enforcement through administrative procedure act. Minn. Stat See Commers v. Spartz, 294 N.W.2d 321, 322 (Minn. 1980) (county school board required to invoke mechanisms of the Administrative Procedure Act upon an aggrieved party's assertion of alleged violation of Minnesota Criminal Rehabilitation Act). Conviction may be considered as an element in good character inquiry. Minn. Stat Law enforcement and fire protection agencies are specifically excluded from a requirement of compliance with this statute. Minn. Stat See Woollett, 540 N.W.2d at 834. Exceptions: Since 1974, list of excepted professions and employments has been enlarged gradually. Chapter does not apply to the practice of law (Minn. Stat ); or to peace officers and law enforcement agencies, fire protection agencies, private detectives, certain transportation licenses (including school bus drivers, EMT personnel and taxi drivers if convicted of certain serious offenses and discharged from sentence within the past ten years) (Minn. Stat (a)). Chapter does not apply to juvenile corrections employment if crime involved sexual misconduct. Id. Chapter does not apply to school districts or teaching licenses. Minn. Stat (b). See also (c) ( Nothing in this section precludes the Minnesota police and peace officers training board or the state fire marshal from recommending policies set forth in this chapter to the attorney general for adoption in the attorney general's discretion to apply to law enforcement or fire protection agencies. ) Chapter also does not apply to a license to practice medicine that has been denied or revoked (d). Recent Legislative Measures to Regulate Hiring of People with Criminal Records (2009, 2013) Ban-the-Box Initiative In 2009 the Minnesota legislature enacted a state-wide ban-the-box law applicable to public employment prohibiting inquiry into criminal history until the applicant has been selected for an interview, or if no interview offered employment. Minn. Stat Effective January 1, 2014, the law was extended to cover private employment as well. See 2013 Minn. Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 61 (S.F. 523) (WEST). The law does not apply to the Department of Corrections or to employers who have a statutory duty to conduct a criminal history background check or otherwise take into consideration a potential employee's criminal history during the hiring process. It also does not prevent an employer from notifying applicants that law or the employer's policy will disqualify an individual with a particular criminal history background from employment in particular positions Specific additional exceptions are set forth in (includes fire and emergency personnel, taxicab drivers, school district personnel). Enforcement of is governed by Minn. Stat Complaints against public employers are handled under the state administrative procedures act. Complaints against private employers are investigated by the state human rights commissions, and violations may result in fines. A number of municipal directives have implemented Section 364. In 2006 the City of St. Paul passed an ordinance prohibiting municipal employers from making inquiry about an applicant s criminal record on an application for employment for positions covered by Section 364. See see also A criminal records check may be made only for certain positions deemed of sufficient sensitivity and responsibility to require one, and then only after a
10 MN10 conditional offer of employment has been made. 8 The City of Minneapolis followed suit. See id.; see also (containing copy of Resolution 2006R-642). 9 Negligent Hiring: Minnesota is one of 36 states that will hold employers liable for the negligent hiring of individuals with violent backgrounds. See Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments, 331 N.W. 2d 907 (Minn. 1983). Many employers assume this liability exposure is greater than it actually is and therefore do not hire individuals who, in fact, could be hired safely. In 2009 the Minnesota Legislature enacted Minn. Stat to clarify the liability of employers for hiring someone with a criminal record and limit liability regarding certain records. Minn. Stat : Subdivision 1. Limitation on admissibility of criminal history. Information regarding a criminal history record of an employee or former employee may not be introduced as evidence in a civil action against a private employer or its employees or agents that is based on the conduct of the employee or former employee, if: (1) the duties of the position of employment did not expose others to a greater degree of risk than that created by the employee or former employee interacting with the public outside of the duties of the position or that might be created by being employed in general; (2) before the occurrence of the act giving rise to the civil action, a court order sealed any record of the criminal case or the employee or former employee received a pardon; or (3) the record is of an arrest or charge that did not result in a criminal conviction. Subdivision 2. Relation to other law. This section does not supersede a statutory requirement to conduct a criminal history background investigation or consider criminal history records in hiring for particular types of employment. 8 The St. Paul resolution provides that the City will make a good faith determination as to which specific positions of employment are of such sensitivity and responsibility that a background check is warranted. Further, certain positions of employment with the City of Saint Paul are exempted from Chapter 364 including, but not limited to, police and fire, positions working with children, and positions that handle money or sensitive information. If it has been established that a position requires a background check, the City will not conduct that check until after the applicant is determined to be otherwise qualified for that position. See Moreover, the City will not conduct, request, or accept any background checks which contain information relating to (i) records of arrests not followed by a valid conviction; (ii) convictions which have been, pursuant to law, annulled or expunged; and (iii) misdemeanor convictions where no jail sentence can be imposed. Id. If the background check uncovers a prior conviction, the employee shall not be disqualified unless the crime directly relates to the employment sought. Id. Additionally, if a determination is made that an applicant has been convicted of a crime or crimes directly relating to the position sought, the City will comply with the notification requirements set forth in Minn. Stat Id. 9 The resolution of the Minneapolis City Council, approved on December 22, 2006, requires the City s Department of Human Resources to periodically review all positions of employment with the City and make a good faith determination as to which specific positions are of such sensitivity and responsibility that a background check is warranted. Minneapolis City Counsel, Resolution 2006R-642, available at Even as to those jobs, the City will not conduct that check until after the job applicant is determined to be otherwise qualified for that position. Id. If a determination is made that an applicant has been convicted of a crime or crimes directly relating to the position sought, the City s Human Resources Department will comply with the notification requirements set forth in Minn. Stat Id.
11 MN11 A 2013 amendment that goes into effect January 2014 will also limit liability based on compliance with the ban-the-box provisions in Minn. Stat See 2013 Minn. Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 61 (S.F. 523) (WEST). Notice to College Students: Minn. Stat. 135A.157 requires all public and private postsecondary educational institutions within the State of Minnesota to give notice of the potential effects of criminal convictions on future employment. By giving future students the notice required by this law, such students will know that their options may be limited in certain fields before they invest time and money in a particular area of study. Ideally, it will also make the general public more aware of some of the onerous and often unreasonable statutory employment restrictions and lead to the change of these policies. Juvenile adjudications may not disqualify the child in any future civil service examination, appointment, or application. Minn. Stat. 260B.245 subd. 1.
Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 364.02 Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION 364.01 POLICY. 364.02 DEFINITIONS. 364.021 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT; CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL
More informationThe Consequences of a Juvenile Delinquency Record in Minnesota
The Consequences of a Juvenile Delinquency Record in Minnesota 1. Is it true that a juvenile delinquency record will not limit a young person s future opportunities in Minnesota? No, it is not true. Although
More informationHow to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor
How to Apply for a Pardon State of California Office of the Governor Statement of Philosophy A California Governor's pardon is an honor traditionally granted only to individuals who have demonstrated exemplary
More informationCOLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS OF DELINQUENCY
COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS OF DELINQUENCY This document is meant to provide general information about the collateral consequences of juvenile adjudications. This document is not
More informationRestoration of Civil Rights. Helping People regain their Civil Liberties
Restoration of Civil Rights Helping People regain their Civil Liberties Consequences of a Felony Food Stamps and social security benefits: People convicted of a felony for possession or sell of controlled
More informationAN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
More informationTitle 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights
Section 15-23-60 Definitions. As used in this article, the following words shall have the following meanings: (1) ACCUSED. A person who has been arrested for committing a criminal offense and who is held
More informationCERTIFICATES OF RELIEF FROM DISABILITIES AND CERTIFICATES OF GOOD CONDUCT LICENSURE AND EMPLOYMENT OF OFFENDERS
NOTE: THE CONTENT OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT IS FROM A NYS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES PUBLICATION. CANDIDATES WHO HAVE A FELONY CONVICTION WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFIED FROM APPOINTMENT
More informationOLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of the Olmsted County Attorney to pursue all domestic abuse allegations with zealous, yet discretionary prosecution
More informationJob Applicants with Criminal Records
Job Applicants with Criminal Records What Every Employer Needs to Know The Council on Crime and Justice, a Minnesota nonprofit organization, offers this guidebook to help employers better understand the
More informationSEALING OF RECORDS. Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE. DAVID ROGER District Attorney
SEALING OF RECORDS Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE DAVID ROGER District Attorney NOTICE: This Website contains instructions for using the Clark County District
More informationof the Chancellor Summary of Changes
Subject: BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS OF PEDAGOGICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICANTS AND Page: 1 of 1 Summary of Changes This regulation has been revised to clarify the responsibilities of different offices
More informationARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Parole Board 220 IAC 1.1-1-1 Parole board membership (Repealed) Sec. 1. (Repealed by Parole Board; filed Jun 15, 1987, 2:45 pm: 10 IR 2496) 220 IAC 1.1-1-2 Definitions
More informationPolicy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated
Policy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated Employers in Philadelphia require skilled and dedicated workers in order to be successful. Returning citizens (those
More informationWEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. Senate Bill 411
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE 2016 REGULAR SESSION Introduced Senate Bill 411 BY SENATORS WALTERS, LAIRD, KESSLER, MILLER, FACEMIRE, ROMANO AND GAUNCH [Introduced January 27, 2016; Referred to the Committee
More informationCERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET
CERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET PKG-016 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION, 220 W. BROADWAY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3814 EAST COUNTY DIVISION, 250 E.
More informationNew Jersey Rehabilitated Convicted Offenders Act
New Jersey Rehabilitated Convicted Offenders Act 2A:168A-1. Legislative findings The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to assist the rehabilitation of convicted offenders
More informationMINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE www.pendletonupdates.com
MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE www.pendletonupdates.com MINNESOTA S NEW EXPUNGEMENT LAW A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR JUDGES & ATTORNEYS Minnesota s New Second Chance Law: Under the new expungement law,
More informationChapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018
More informationEXPUNCTIONS IN TEXAS
EXPUNCTIONS IN TEXAS Texas Young Lawyers Association Family Law Committee P.O. Box 12487, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711-2487 (800) 204-2222 Ext. 1800 For additional family law resources, visit www.tyla.org.
More informationMontana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum
Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office PO BOX 201706 Helena, MT 59620-1706 (406) 444-3064 FAX (406) 444-3036 Memorandum To: Law and Justice Interim Committee From: Julianne Burkhardt
More informationFirst Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-0.01 Michael Dohr x HOUSE BILL 1-1 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Lebsock and Tate, (None), SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees
More informationCRIMINAL LAW AND VICTIMS RIGHTS
Chapter Five CRIMINAL LAW AND VICTIMS RIGHTS In a criminal case, a prosecuting attorney (working for the city, state, or federal government) decides if charges should be brought against the perpetrator.
More informationAdult Plea Negotiation Guidelines
From the office of the Rice County Attorney: Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines Revision June, 2004 1. These guidelines apply to any adult felony defendant case prosecuted by this office, which is not disposed
More informationProposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
More informationOVERVIEW OF STATE LAWS THAT BAN DISCRIMINATION BY EMPLOYERS
OVERVIEW OF STATE LAWS THAT BAN DISCRIMINATION BY EMPLOYERS As states consider passing laws that prohibit employment discrimination against people with criminal records, it may be helpful to examine how
More informationNEW YORK. New York Executive Law 296 Human Rights Law Unlawful discriminatory practices
NEW YORK New York Executive Law 296 Human Rights Law Unlawful discriminatory practices 15. It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any person, agency, bureau, corporation or association, including
More informationMaryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters
Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters Presentation to the New Members of the Maryland General Assembly Department of Legislative Services Office of Policy Analysis Annapolis, Maryland December
More informationSenate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security
Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to offenses; providing that counseling and evaluations required for certain offenses may be conducted in
More informationCHAPTER 15. AN ACT concerning rehabilitation of drug and alcohol dependent offenders and amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:35-15.
CHAPTER 15 AN ACT concerning rehabilitation of drug and alcohol dependent offenders and amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:35-15. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New
More informationBRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY
BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY People make mistakes, especially young people. Juvenile lawyer Bryce Fetter believes children should get a second chance through rehabilitation rather
More informationTitle 34-A: CORRECTIONS
Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS Chapter 5: PROBATION AND PAROLE Table of Contents Subchapter 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 3 Section 5001. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 5002. PARDONS BY THE GOVERNOR... 4 Section 5003. PROHIBITED
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant.
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant. Filed January 3, 2012 Affirmed Kalitowski, Judge Hennepin County District Court File No.
More informationMINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE IN REVISING ITS JUVENILE CODE AND PROSECUTOR INPUT IN THE PROCESS September 1997
MINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE IN REVISING ITS JUVENILE CODE AND PROSECUTOR INPUT IN THE PROCESS September 1997 In 1991, Minnesota began a major effort to substantially revise the laws governing our juvenile justice
More informationCERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION & PARDON INSTRUCTION PACKET
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION & PARDON INSTRUCTION PACKET FORMS INCLUDED IN THIS PACKET General Information Certificate of Rehabilitation SDSC Form #CRM-208
More information(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *
House Proposal of Amendment S. 292 An act relating to term probation, the right to bail, medical care of inmates, and a reduction in the number of nonviolent prisoners, probationers, and detainees. The
More informationSENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session 0 SENATE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTION -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 00, CHAPTER, SECTION ; AMENDING
More informationCHAPTER 23. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
CHAPTER 23 AN ACT concerning treatment for drug and alcohol dependent persons, amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:44-6, and supplementing Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate
More informationKANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES I. MISSION The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce the
More informationGlossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench
Glossary of Terms The Glossary of Terms defines some of the most common legal terms in easy-tounderstand language. Terms are listed in alphabetical order. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
More informationARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES
ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES (a) Mission: The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN I. AUTHORITY Under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, as amended, (CJA), 18 U.S.C. 3006A and the Guidelines for Administering
More informationAs used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following
Page 1 Massachusetts General Laws Annotated Currentness Part IV. Crimes, Punishments and Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 263-280) Title II. Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 275-280) Chapter 278A.
More informationDefendant brought a Motion to Suppress the DNA Testing Results or in the alternative,
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN COUNTY ` DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF MINNESOTA, Plaintiff, vs. JIMMIE DALE JACKSON, File No: 04085182 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant. Defendant
More informationCalifornia s Alternative Sentencing Law for Veterans and Members of the U.S. Military
California s Alternative Sentencing Law for Veterans and Members of the U.S. Military You re a veteran, or maybe you re still in the military. But now you re looking at time in county jail or state prison.
More informationDEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Public Safety/Executive Agency FY14 Headcount: 11,007 http://www2.illinois.gov/idoc/pages/default.aspx Summary of Agency Operations The Department of Corrections (DOC) operates
More informationGlossary of Court-related Terms
Glossary of Court-related Terms Acquittal Adjudication Appeal Arraignment Arrest Bail Bailiff Beyond a reasonable doubt Burden of proof Capital offense Certification Charge Circumstantial evidence Citation
More informationQueensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000
Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Act No. 3 of 2000 Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Section TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Page 1 Short title.....................................................
More informationTitle 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 51: SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT Table of Contents Part 3.... Section 1251. IMPRISONMENT FOR MURDER... 3 Section 1252. IMPRISONMENT FOR CRIMES OTHER THAN MURDER...
More informationNo. 71,104. [October 13, 19881
No. 71,104 BENJAMIN U. SANDLIN, Petitioner, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS & TRAINING COMMISSION, Respondent. [October 13, 19881 A district court of appeal has certified the following question as being of
More informationI. ELIGIBILITY FOR BOTH PRE-CHARGE AND POST-CHARGE DIVERSION: 1. Admit guilt and acknowledge responsibility for their action.
ANOKA COUNTY ADULT CRIMINAL DIVERSION PLAN Effective July 1, 1994 - Revised 8/1/02, 9/5/07, 9/11/08 (Revisions apply only to crimes occurring on or after 9/1/08). The following plan has been developed
More informationCollateral Consequences of Conviction:
Collateral Consequences of Conviction: A Reminder of Some Possible Civil Penalties Judge Harold Baer, Jr. Rev. 11/1/11 THIS IS NOT A COMPLETE LIST CONSIDER ALL POTENTIAL PENALTIES. You are required to
More informationCHAPTER 93. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. N.J.S.2C:35-14 is amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 93 AN ACT concerning medication-assisted treatment for certain persons, amending N.J.S.2C:35-14, and supplementing Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly
More informationOFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney Shawnee County Courthouse Fax: (785) 251-4909 200 SE 7th Street, Suite 214 Family Law Fax: (785)
More informationCriminal Convictions and Employment Rights In New York State Robert D. Strassel
Policy Brief April 26, 2010 Criminal Convictions and Employment Rights In New York State Robert D. Strassel Executive Summary New York has a strong policy toward preventing discrimination based on prior
More informationRULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX Form 6. Suggested Questions to Be Put by the Court to an Accused Who Has Pleaded Guilty (Rule 3A:8). Before accepting
More informationTitle 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES
Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES Chapter 337-A: PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT Table of Contents Part 12. HUMAN RIGHTS... Section 4651. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 4652. FILING OF COMPLAINT; JURISDICTION...
More informationMatt Burress, Legislative Analyst Rebecca Pirius, Legislative Analyst Updated: September 2012. Traffic Citations
INFORMATION BRIEF Research Department Minnesota House of Representatives 600 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Matt Burress, Legislative Analyst Rebecca Pirius, Legislative Analyst Updated: September
More informationThis chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act.
9-23-1. Short title This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act. HISTORY: SOURCES: Laws, 2003, ch. 515, 1, eff from and after July 1, 2003. 9-23-3. Legislative
More informationChapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 813 2013 EDITION Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants GENERAL PROVISIONS 813.010 Driving under the influence of intoxicants; penalty 813.011 Felony driving under the influence of intoxicants;
More informationUnderstanding the Criminal Bars to the Deferred Action Policy for Childhood Arrivals
Understanding the Criminal Bars to the Deferred Action Policy for Childhood Arrivals 1. What are the criminal bars for deferred action? In addition to a number of other requirements, to qualify for deferred
More informationHOUSE BILL No. 2172. AN ACT concerning nurse aide trainees; criminal background checks.
Session of HOUSE BILL No. By Representative Whipple - 0 0 AN ACT concerning nurse aide trainees; criminal background checks. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: Section. (a) A sponsor
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1189 Rudolph Cooper, Relator, vs. Minnesota Department
More informationUsing Arrest, Conviction, and Misdemeanor Information in the Hiring Process
Summary It is a common belief that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) prohibits the use of arrest and misdemeanor information in the hiring process. As is discussed below, this is not the
More informationFiling Fee $117.00. Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record
Filing Fee $117.00 Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record Effective 1-1-2015 This packet is to be used to assist you in filing an application to seal your criminal record. * * * * * * * * * * * * *
More informationCAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, 2015. DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW.
CAYMAN ISLANDS Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, 2015. DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW (2015 Revision) Law 26 of 2006 consolidated with 19 of 2012. Revised under
More informationLANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT Administered by the Lancaster County Department of Community Corrections Judicial Oversight by the Lancaster County District Court www.lancaster.ne.gov keyword: drug court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/21/16 P. v. Archuleta CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationDistrict School Board of Collier County. Criminal Background Screening, Guidelines & Procedures
District School Board of Collier County Criminal Background Screening, Guidelines & Procedures I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide appropriate guidelines and procedures for determining
More informationVictims of Crime Act
Victims of Crime Act PURPOSE Recognizing the state's concern for victims of crime, it is the purpose of the Victims of Crime Act [31-26-1 NMSA 1978] to assure that: A. the full impact of a crime is brought
More informationUsing Proposition 47 to Reduce Convictions and Restore Rights (January 2015)
Using Proposition 47 to Reduce Convictions and Restore Rights (January 2015) A note on reproduction: You are welcome to copy and distribute this material, but please do not charge for the copies. A note
More informationcourt. However, without your testimony the defendant might go unpunished.
Office of State Attorney Michael J. Satz VICTIM RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS The stages of the criminal justice system are as follows: We realize that for
More informationMeetings of Public Bodies CHAPTER 13D OPEN MEETING LAW
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2012 13D.01 Meetings of Public Bodies CHAPTER 13D OPEN MEETING LAW 13D.01 MEETINGS MUST BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC; EXCEPTIONS. 13D.015 MEETINGS BY TELEPHONE OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS.
More informationWhat you don t know can hurt you.
What you don t know can hurt you. Why you need a defense lawyer if you are charged with a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor conviction is SERIOUS A misdemeanor is not a minor crime. If you are convicted of a
More informationREFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS BILL #: CS/HB 147 Expunging and Sealing Criminal History Records of Minors SPONSOR(S): Criminal Justice Subcommittee; Latvala; Sprowls and others TIED BILLS: None
More informationAPPLICANT INFORMATION (please print or type)
STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 85 7 TH PLACE EAST, SUITE 600 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (651) 539-1599 (For Department Use Only) DESIGNATED HOME STATE BUSINESS ENTITY INSURANCE ADJUSTER LICENSE
More informationArizona Constitution: Article II, Section 2.1 Victims Bill of Rights. Arizona Revised Statutes:
Arizona Laws Arizona Constitution: Article II, Section 2.1 Victims Bill of Rights Arizona Revised Statutes: Title 13, Chapter 40 Crime Victims Rights Title 8, Chapter 3, Article 7 Victims Rights for Juvenile
More informationSenate Bill No. 38 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security
Senate Bill No. 38 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to criminal records; creating the Records and Technology Division of the Department of Public Safety; enumerating
More informationCHAPTER 89. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
CHAPTER 89 AN ACT concerning juvenile justice, amending and supplementing various parts of the statutory law, and repealing section 7 of P.L.1982, c.77. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly
More informationFlorida Senate - 2016 SB 872
By Senator Bean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A bill to be entitled An act relating to federal immigration enforcement; providing a short title; creating
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT COMMUTATIONS AND PARDONS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT COMMUTATIONS AND PARDONS Q1: What does the term executive clemency mean? A: Executive clemency is a catch-all term that includes all the different ways a state s governor
More informationWhat Is Expungement?...1 When Can I File For Expungement?...2 Case Information...3 Petitions For Expungement...3 What Do the Dispositions Mean and
Expungement Information About Removing Criminal Records from Public Access in Maryland Table of Contents What Is Expungement?...1 When Can I File For Expungement?...2 Case Information...3 Petitions For
More information7 Things Every Family Lawyer Should Know About Criminal Law
7 Things Every Family Lawyer Should Know About Criminal Law Jason Kohlmeyer Rosengren Kohlmeyer, Law Office Chtd. Mankato, MN 1) What exactly is the whole misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor and felony thing?
More informationCriminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions
Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Accused: Acquittal: Adjudication: Admissible Evidence: Affidavit: Alford Doctrine: Appeal:
More informationMaricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process
The following is a brief description of the process to prosecute an adult accused of committing a felony offense. Most misdemeanor offenses are handled by municipal prosecutors; cases involving minors
More informationA Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process
A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney
More informationCRIMINAL RECORDS IN THE HIRING PROCESS
CRIMINAL RECORDS IN THE HIRING PROCESS What records employers can use, and how to help your clients take some control of their background checks. 1. A Guide to Reading Criminal Records 2. A Guide to the
More informationCriminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009
Criminal Justice 101 The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness April 2009 Acronyms DOC = Department of Corrections DYC = Division of Youth Corrections DCJ
More informationCollateral damage occurs in any war, including America s War on Crime.
12 Collateral damage occurs in any war, including America s War on Crime. Ironically, our zealous efforts to keep communities safe may have actually destabilized and divided them. The vast expansion of
More informationHEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING
HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING 19-301. License required; exceptions; practice without license (a) In general. -- Except as otherwise provided in this title, an individual
More informationCriminal Records and Expungement. Rhode Island Public Defender
Criminal Records and Expungement Rhode Island Public Defender Criminal Records How do I access a criminal record? The only way to obtain an official RI criminal record is by going to the Bureau of Criminal
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationSHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency.
SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency. STATE OF OKLAHOMA 2nd Session of the 45th Legislature (1996) SENATE BILL NO. 1153 By: Hobson AS INTRODUCED
More informationRemoval of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update. Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice
Removal of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice Juvenile Court founded in 1899 to create a separate justice system for
More informationCHAPTER 73 HOUSE BILL 2294 AN ACT
House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER HOUSE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS -.0, -0.0, - AND -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2012-149 SENATE BILL 707
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2012-149 SENATE BILL 707 AN ACT TO ENACT THE SCHOOL VIOLENCE PREVENTION ACT OF 2012; LIMIT PRAYERS FOR JUDGMENT CONTINUED; AND END SUNSET FOR
More informationFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry 830 West Jefferson Street 850-644-1234 VICTIMS' RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: ------- We realize that for many persons,
More informationIf you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.
What is an expungement? An expungement reopens your criminal case, dismisses and sets aside the conviction, and re-closes the case without a conviction. In effect, you are no longer a convicted person.
More informationPlease note that this Act can also be viewed online on the Illinois General Assembly website at www.ilga.gov.
Please note that this Act can also be viewed online on the Illinois General Assembly website at www.ilga.gov. SCHOOLS (105 ILCS 10/) Illinois School Student Records Act. (105 ILCS 10/1) (from Ch. 122,
More informationDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PENALTIES UNDER COLORADO LAW Fact/Discussion Sheet
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PENALTIES UNDER COLORADO LAW Fact/Discussion Sheet If you are convicted of a domestic violence charge, the penalties can be onerous. The following penalties assume a misdemeanor conviction.
More information