Agricultural Technology Policies for Rural Development
|
|
- Hugh Brooks
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Development Policy Review, 2001, 19 (4): Agricultural Technology Policies for Rural Development Robert Tripp The contribution of farming to rural development is highly dependent on the generation and delivery of new agricultural technology. The conventional narrative about agricultural technology calls for a new Green Revolution, aimed at small farmers, and driven by publicly funded research. However, agricultural technology policy for the future will need to differentiate clearly between the needs of emerging commercial farmers, many of them engaged with global commodity chains and requiring support in managing information- and skill-intensive innovations, and the needs of a semisubsistence and often part-time sector, requiring simple, often laboursaving, technology. The public sector has a role to play in both sectors, in research on its own account, but also in managing intellectual property rights, public-private research partnerships, and information delivery to farming. Introduction Agricultural technology is an exceptionally important determinant of farming s contribution to rural development. Discussions of agricultural technology policy frequently revolve around an extension of the green revolution model (Conway, 1997; IFAD, 2001). The original model incorporated new varieties, fertiliser and (often) irrigation, and led to widespread improvement in agricultural production. For many, the challenge is simply to consolidate and extend that revolution. But there are a number of factors that suggest that such a strategy will not be sufficient. These include the variable performance of these technologies, a changing economic and policy environment, and the significant diversification of the livelihood strategies of rural people. The Green Revolution was responsible for a significant increase in crop production, contributed to rural employment, and lowered food prices (Lipton and Longhurst, 1989). Although progress has been slower in less favoured environments, modern crop varieties have been adopted far beyond the bounds of the traditional green revolution areas (Byerlee, 1994), and even the relatively dismal agricultural statistics from sub- Saharan Africa obscure a number of success stories (Wiggins, 2000). However, there are worrying signs that food production is slowing down. In developing countries, the annual rate of yield growth for staples fell from 3% in the 1970s to about 1% in the 1990s (IFAD, 2001). This decline in yield growth is related to several factors. Early expansion of the seed-fertiliser technology concentrated on the most favoured areas, where yield increases may now be limited by second-generation problems, such as salinisation, pest build-ups and soil fertility imbalances. While these problems can be Research Fellow, Overseas Development Institute, London. Overseas Development Institute, Published by Blackwell Publishers, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
2 480 Robert Tripp addressed by further technological innovation, they also point to environmental concerns that impose additional constraints on technology development. Agricultural technology must not only contribute to more efficient food production, it must also address concerns of environmental protection and be compatible with policies that support diverse household livelihoods for rural development (Conway, 1997). Hence both the possibilities and the challenges for technical change in agriculture are more complex than a simple green revolution narrative would indicate. There have also been changes in the way that technology provision is managed. In the early years of the Green Revolution, government agencies managed much of the input distribution, and state enterprises took responsibility for seed production. Structural adjustment and liberalisation have brought an end to many of these arrangements (Carney, 1995). Chemical inputs are increasingly distributed by private suppliers, and those input subsidies that remain are under increasing pressure (Pletcher, 2000). Public sector plant breeding still produces many new varieties, but a growing proportion of seed production is done by private companies, some of which also have significant plant breeding capacity (Morris, 1998). The growing utilisation of hybrids for many of the crops used by developing country farmers, as well as the advent of biotechnology, signal further advances for the private seed industry. In addition, the forces of globalisation bring farmers in contact with a wider range of inputs and also mean that production must often meet the demands of distant markets (Reardon and Barrett, 2000). For many farmers, globalisation also means competing with imported grain supplies. Thus, farmers face increasingly complex, privatised, and competitive markets that condition their choice of technology. A third factor impinging on agricultural technology policy is the complex nature of rural livelihoods. Although it is generally recognised that agricultural technology development affects both farmers and rural landless labourers, there is less understanding of the implications for the many farming households that are significantly dependent on non-farm income (see Start in this volume). Diversified household strategies are nothing new, but they are gaining increasing attention because of their prevalence and their importance to rural livelihoods (Ellis, 1998). Growing national economies mean that many farm households have more opportunities for non-farm labour and employment, while in other cases inadequate yields and small plots force households to seek additional sources of income. The result is increasingly complex and varied conceptions of the small farmer, bringing additional challenges for guiding the development of agricultural technology. In summary, policies for agricultural technology development must take account of new economic and environmental challenges for farming, the increasing privatisation of technology provision, the complexity of agricultural markets, and the diversity of rural livelihoods. This article begins with a brief review of the types of agricultural technology likely to be available. It then examines three important areas that face policy-makers who wish to ensure that agricultural technology development is compatible with the wider goals of rural development. The first is related to the challenge of providing adequate information to farmers. The second is concerned with how policies envision the rural population and how they target technology development. The third concerns the future of public agricultural research.
3 New agricultural technology Agricultural Technology Policies for Rural Development 481 Before examining policies for supporting the development of agricultural technology it will be useful to review the types of technology most likely to be available. Although we have no crystal ball to guide us, we can establish a reasonable inventory by examining what is currently emerging (in both industrialised and developing countries) and by taking account of the economic and environmental challenges that face farming. Three of the major types of agricultural technology are genetic innovations, physical inputs, and management techniques. Plant genetic research will certainly continue to be a mainstay of agricultural technology. We can expect the continued development of new varieties through conventional plant breeding, increasingly assisted by the techniques of biotechnology (Persley and Lantin, 2000). In contrast to the original green revolution strategy of providing widely adapted varieties that could be planted in a range of environments, many of these new varieties will have characteristics that address specific conditions (e.g. pest or disease resistance), environments (e.g. acid soils), or markets (e.g. high nutrient varieties). They will be the products of both public and private plant breeding, but most will be delivered by private seed enterprises. Farmers will also have access to a wider range of inputs. Some of these will be within the traditional range of agricultural chemicals, although products such as pesticides will have to meet more stringent environmental and safety standards and will often be narrowly targeted (Rola and Pingali, 1993; Way and van Emden, 2000). There will also be an expanded use of biological inputs for soil and water conservation, including cover crops and green manures (Buckles et al., 1998). Pest and disease control will also rely more on biological inputs such as micro-organisms or natural enemies (Marrone, 1999). Virtually all the chemical inputs will be provided by the private sector, and an increasing proportion of the biological innovations will be supplied by private enterprise as well. Finally agricultural technology will be increasingly characterised by new management techniques. Some of these emphasise resource conservation, such as reduced tillage techniques to control soil erosion and reduce costs (Sain and Barreto, 1996). Other techniques emphasise input efficiency. Precision farming can target fertiliser application to the requirements of each part of a field, rather than relying on a single blanket recommendation (National Research Council, 1989), and changes in the timing and rates of fertiliser application can reduce both financial and environmental costs (Matson et al., 1998). Other new management techniques emphasise the use of monitoring and analysis, as in integrated pest management (IPM), which is based on decision rules and economic thresholds to guide pest control practices (Schillhorn van Veen et al., 1997). These are all knowledge-based techniques that will rely heavily on public research for their development. In summary, most of the new technologies that will be available to farmers will require increased levels of knowledge for appropriate management, and the majority of inputs will be delivered by private enterprises. Farmers' choice of technologies will be governed by a rapidly advancing technological frontier and by the requirements of increasingly integrated markets. Farmers will have to learn how to operate in this environment if agricultural technology is to make a significant contribution to rural development.
4 482 Robert Tripp Information provision Most of these new technologies can be described as information-intensive (Byerlee, 1998), although that term embraces several different elements (Lockeretz, 1991). For purchased inputs, farmers must know which product is required for their particular conditions and be able to distinguish it from others on the market. Some of these inputs require special management, which will demand supplementary information. In other cases, farmers are expected to make frequent observations or engage in monitoring to guide the application of new techniques. In some cases, such as IPM, farmers must have a basic understanding of biological processes, and the probability of adopting environmentally sound technology is increased if they appreciate the underlying rationale for these practices (Pingali and Carlson, 1985). It is, of course, true that, since the beginning of agriculture, farmers have made careful observations about the inputs and techniques that they use. But the new technologies require skills and knowledge that many of them do not currently possess (Bentley, 1996). In addition, many require a considerable investment in learning about input (and output) markets, acquiring new management techniques, and monitoring and assessing production conditions. There are two principal sources for the information required to manage new technology. One is the private input system and the other is public extension and education. Both deserve the attention of policy-makers concerned with agricultural development. Most inputs, including seed, will be delivered by the private sector. If all farmers are to have access to these products, input dealers need to be widely distributed and competent to manage the distribution of new products and complementary information. The liberalisation of input markets has not always led to a rapid expansion of private dealerships (Shepherd, 1989; Pletcher, 2000), and credit and regulatory bottlenecks currently limit the scope for small input businesses. Credit is also a problem for farmers wishing to acquire inputs, and more imaginative schemes are required that link output sales to input acquisition, and that simultaneously build trust (another manifestation of information) in local agricultural markets (Dorward et al., 1998). In addition, input firms need to develop their reputations and farmers need organisation and support from consumer protection mechanisms to defend themselves in the market (Tripp, 2001). There is growing interest in the privatisation of extension services (Umali and Schwartz, 1994), but the short-term prospects would seem to be limited. Private extension services can be organised for high-value commodities, especially where a producers' association can exert demand and exclude free riders, or where individual farmers are willing to pay for specialist advice. However, much of the information required by farmers to take advantage of new technology will remain in the public domain. Most of the responsibility for delivering information about new technology has traditionally fallen on government extension services, but there are several reasons to question whether this is a reasonable expectation for the future. In the first place, public extension services have felt some of the sharpest cuts of the structural adjustment knife. Secondly, even under rosier funding scenarios, extension has rarely performed adequately, as a recent review of the World Bank's Training and Visit Programme in Kenya illustrates (Gautam, 2000). Thirdly, much of the information that farmers will require concerns the management of private sector inputs or is related to locationspecific judgements, rather than the blanket recommendations that extension usually
5 Agricultural Technology Policies for Rural Development 483 offers. Finally, farmers increasingly require basic technical knowledge to help them manage new techniques rather than top-down instruction. If conventional public extension is not a sufficient answer, what are the alternatives? IPM promotion has often used farmer field schools (FFSs), where farmers meet periodically during the season to learn about ecology and test alternative pest control methods. But this strategy requires significant resources and has not been widely applied (Way and van Emden, 2000). Parallels have been drawn between FFSs and other attempts to organise farmers at the village level to manage adaptive experimentation (Braun et al., 2000). But these methods require considerable investment and are often dedicated to a limited range of technologies. In addition, they tend to be the products of temporary (and often competing) donor funding, rather than being integrated in a more sustainable, publicly supported strategy. The way forward is not clear, but the problems of the extension service underline the broader inadequacies of the rural education system. Much of the basic knowledge required for managing the new technology could be imparted in local secondary schools. In addition, an adequate rural education system should prepare farmers to operate in increasingly sophisticated input and output markets. The growth of information technology offers several more promising alternatives. Governments do not have to await the arrival of the computerised village in order to improve farmers' access to information. They can take better advantage of radio and television programmes and the production of attractive and widely available printed materials, to ensure that farmers have access to reliable information about agricultural technologies and markets. Much more thought needs to be invested in improving currently inadequate extension and education systems in order to offer innovative means of delivering knowledge and information to smallholders. Targeting technology development One of the principal responsibilities of policy-makers concerned with rural development is to see that agricultural technology is adequately targeted. This means ensuring that technology is available for various types of farmers and that it supports equitable rural development. The techniques for including a poverty dimension in public agricultural research policy are complex and of uncertain effect (Byerlee, 2000). The following discussion does not attempt to review particular planning methodologies, but rather emphasises several competing images of resource-poor farmers that influence the way that technology development policies are conceived. The range of farming environments and strategies makes it impossible to provide a simple system for classifying farmers for the purposes of technology development policy, but some approximations must be made. Farm size and production environment are often used as parameters for targeting technology, but there are also reasons to direct increasing attention to the status of human capital for differentiating among farms. Policies for targeting agricultural technology are often based on the assumption that small farms are more efficient than larger ones. However, that assumption is not always valid, and in many places larger farms are more productive, in part because of better access to capital and markets (Dorward, 1999; Harriss-White and Janakarajan, 1997). One of the answers is to improve credit availability and market performance in favour
6 484 Robert Tripp of smaller producers (Kydd and Dorward, this volume), but gaining access to these services still requires a significant investment from the household. The aftermath of the Green Revolution brought calls for policies to favour more marginal farming environments. One problem is the lack of an accepted definition of 'marginal', so such policy pronouncements often lack specificity. If marginality is associated with physical parameters such as rainfall (or access to irrigation), technologies different from those for favoured areas are obviously required. If marginality is more a function of isolation or market access, then infrastructural development is called for. More important, there is not a straightforward relationship between various types of physical marginality and rural poverty, in part because of differences in the diversification of household income. In addition, the relationship between household income and dependence on agriculture is not necessarily determined by the production environment. Renkow (2000) presents data showing a relatively higher dependence on non-farm income for the poorest households in several Asian studies, regardless of production environment, and the opposite trend in data from West Africa. These deficiencies of farm size and production environment for understanding how agricultural households take advantage of technology suggests that some attention should be given to other factors, particularly the human capital available for farm management. Paying closer attention to the labour, skills and education of farming households will help make technology development policies more consistent with wider rural development goals. There are several implications. First, technology design and delivery must take account of the many poor households for which agricultural production is only one of several income sources. These households require labour-saving technology to allow more time for other income-generating activities (de Janvry and Sadoulet, 2000). They will also usually have lower skills and education levels, which affects their capacities to adopt information-intensive technology. (Wealthier households may be equally diverse, but they often have the human and financial capital to take advantage of new technology.) Paradoxically, although these households are the primary targets of low-input, resourceconserving technologies (often under the rubric of 'sustainable agriculture'), their labour constraints often make it difficult for them to take advantage of these alternatives (Hogg, 1988; McDonald and Brown, 2000). The situation of part-time farming households has complex implications for technology generation. In many instances, a significant proportion of the households producing basic staples are in deficit and must rely on grain markets for the difference (e.g., de Janvry and Sadoulet, 2000). A recent study in Kenya showed that in most areas the majority of maize-growing households were net purchasers of maize (Jayne et al., 1999). These households must base their production decisions on the price of grain in food markets rather than on the farmgate sales price. Because of market deficiencies, the difference in these two prices can be significant. Heisey and Smale (1995) demonstrate that, because of these differences, deficit maize producers in Malawi should have significantly higher incentives to use hybrid seed and fertiliser than surplus households. Where sufficient non-farm income is available, such patterns of technology use are observed; Low (1986) shows that in Swaziland hybrid maize is adopted as a time-saving technology by households with non-farm wage income.
7 Agricultural Technology Policies for Rural Development 485 A related implication is that, because of their part-time and low-skill investment in agriculture, these poor, diversified rural households may be less likely to respond to messages about input efficiency or environmental protection. More carefully targeted use of inputs requires learning about new techniques and monitoring their results. Goals such as soil conservation have less immediate relevance to farmers with low farm productivity. Similarly, cheap, broad-spectrum pesticides may be an easy way to lower risks, even though the long-term environmental consequences are quite serious. This means that extra effort (and a somewhat different rationale) will have to be invested in bringing these messages to many of the lowest-income farming households. Finally, it is important to build the human capital of those households that can take full advantage of information-intensive technology and participate in commercial agriculture. Technologies for these farmers should ideally create additional demands for labour (de Janvry and Sadoulet, 2000). The simultaneous demand for labour-saving technology on part-time farms and labour creation on large-scale ones is not as contradictory as it may seem, but there are significant limits to the degree to which rural development policies can mandate such technology development paths. Naylor (1994) describes the expansion of labour-saving herbicide utilisation in Asian rice production. Although this trend is largely motivated by higher rural labour costs (a function of expanding non-farm opportunities) and other changes in rice-growing technology (particularly the switch to direct seeding), it can have negative consequences in particular circumstances, as with the older women who contribute much of the weeding labour in the Javanese rice system and who have few alternative sources of employment. In summary, an examination of human capital in farming can make the targeting of technology development more efficient by reminding policy-makers of the diversity of farming households. General categories (such as 'small farmers') are of decreasing utility for policy formulation. Household capabilities and aspirations should play a larger role in shaping policy on technology development. Some rural households need to be helped to find reasonable exits from agriculture, and investment in technology generation on their behalf may be misplaced. Many other households require help in using agricultural production as a backstop or safety net for their diversified portfolio of activities; although they may bring little produce to market, their prevalence and poverty demand particular attention to technologies that improve their efficiency and protect the natural resources that they manage. Finally, other rural households need help in becoming viable commercial farming enterprises. The appropriate technologies, and the techniques for delivering information, differ according to the type of livelihood strategy. Public agricultural research The changes in agricultural economies and technology described above have important implications for the future of public agricultural research. These include establishing a working relationship with the growing private agricultural research sector, investing more in information generation, and facing up to the increasing diversity of rural livelihoods. All of these challenges require an adequately organised and funded public agricultural research service and imply significant changes in government and donor behaviour.
8 486 Robert Tripp The majority (but certainly not all) of the plant breeding done in industrialised countries is managed by the private sector. This trend is also evident, to a lesser degree, in developing countries. The public sector must come to terms with the growing capacities of private research (Tripp and Byerlee, 2000). The challenge is to identify applied plant breeding priorities that neither the domestic nor transnational private sectors are willing to address. There will continue to be many crops and production environments that will be the responsibility of the public sector, which needs to position itself to make the best use of the international agricultural research centres (IARCs) and, increasingly, proprietary technology. The latter will require that public research systems have access to sufficient intellectual property management skills to be able to interact productively with the private sector. The increasing importance of efficient and environmentally responsible crop management presents an additional challenge to public agricultural research. Most of this information-intensive technology is a public good (Byerlee, 1998). Public research has an important responsibility for developing techniques to ensure safe and efficient use of private inputs, as well as to make better use of locally available resources (such as mulches and manure) for crop management. The development of such management techniques will lead to additional 'spin-offs' and opportunities for private technology development (e.g. biopesticides, field monitoring apparatus, or micro-irrigation equipment). But the public sector must take the lead in providing the information that allows farmers to make the best use of new technology (Naylor, 1994). This demands high quality field research from the public sector (Way and van Emden, 2000). The plant varieties and crop management advice from the public sector needs to be directed to both 'full-time' and 'part-time' farmers, although in many cases the precise recommendations and technologies will differ. The challenge of addressing the parttimers is particularly difficult. First, we have seen that they are less likely to be able to use information-intensive technology and may be less impressed by environmental arguments. Second, there is a strong tendency in public research systems to not regard such households as 'real farmers'. The importance of addressing the constraints of rural households that depend on multiple income sources has been discussed at least since the advent of Farming Systems Research (FSR) in the 1980s (e.g., Maxwell, 1986), but the message has rarely been taken on board in a serious fashion. Part of the public agricultural research mandate must include the welfare imperative of helping those households which follow a 'pluriactive path' out of poverty (de Janvry and Sadoulet, 2000). The burden placed on public agricultural research is exceptionally demanding, and it is not clear that these systems are up to the task. There is much to be done in strengthening the management and priority-setting capabilities of national research institutes (Byerlee and Alex, 1998). Government support for agricultural research is inadequate (Pardey et al., 1997) and external funding for agriculture is also falling (Trotter and Gordon, 2000). There are particularly pressing responsibilities for donor assistance to agricultural research, but neither the current CGIAR emphasis on high science and regional planning (von Braun, 2000) nor the myriad of dispersed, often competing, donor projects would seem to be the answer. No one is yet willing to pay attention to the importance of building national agricultural research systems that are financially sustainable, answerable to the farming population, and responsive to rural development policy.
9 Agricultural Technology Policies for Rural Development 487 Conclusion Agricultural technology has in the past been a catalyst for both agricultural development and rural poverty reduction. However, its future role must take account of an increasingly complex environment, featuring new economic circumstances, the expanding role of the private sector, and the growing complexity of rural livelihood strategies. Public sector responsibilities are correspondingly diverse and challenging. A particularly important requirement for technology diffusion is the improvement of services and infrastructure (such as education and markets) that serve rural development in general. In addition, more specific attention is required to public agricultural institutions. Agricultural development policy needs to adopt a much more sophisticated view of the rural population. Policy-makers must abandon the rubric of 'small farmers' in favour of strategies that recognise the variable contributions that agriculture makes to rural incomes and adjust technology development to differences in the skills, resources and objectives of rural households. Finally, re-invigorated and efficient public agricultural research and extension systems are required, that are able to interact with the private sector, help provide productive technology to support a robust farming sector, and contribute to the broader goals of enhancing rural livelihoods. References Bentley, J. (1989) What Farmers Don't Know Can t Help Them: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Indigenous Technical Knowledge in Honduras, Agriculture and Human Values 6: Braun, A., Thiele, G. and Fernández, M. (2000) Farmer Field Schools and Local Agricultural Research Committees: Complementary Platforms for Integrated Decision-making in Sustainable Agriculture. AgREN Network Paper No.105. London: Overseas Development Institute. Buckles, D., Triomphe, B. and Sain, G. (1998) Cover Crops in Hillside Agriculture. Ottawa and Mexico, DF: IDRC and CIMMYT. Byerlee, D. (1994) Modern Varieties, Productivity, and Sustainability. Mexico, DF: CIMMYT. Byerlee, D. (1998) Knowledge-intensive Crop Management Technologies: Concepts, Impacts and Prospects in Asian Agriculture in P. Pingali and M. Hossain (eds), Impact of Rice Research. Manila: IRRI. Byerlee, D. (2000) Targeting Poverty Alleviation in Priority Setting for Agricultural Research, Food Policy 25: Byerlee, D. and Alex, G. (1998) Strengthening National Agricultural Research Systems. Washington, DC: World Bank. Carney, D. (1995) The Changing Public Role in Services to Agriculture: A Framework for Analysis, Food Policy 20: Conway, G. (1997) The Doubly Green Revolution. London: Penguin Books. de Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E. (2000) Rural Poverty in Latin America. Determinants and Exit Paths, Food Policy 25: Dorward, A. (1999) Farm Size and Productivity in Malawian Smallholder Agriculture, Journal of Development Studies 35:
10 488 Robert Tripp Dorward, A., Kydd, J. and Poulton, C. (1998) Smallholder Cash Crop Production under Market Liberalisation. A New Institutional Economics Perspective. Wallingford: CABI. Ellis, F. (1998) Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification, Journal of Development Studies 35: Gautam, M. (2000) Agricultural Extension: The Kenya Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank. Harriss-White, B. and Janakarajan, S. (1997) From Green Revolution to Rural Industrial Revolution in South India, Economic and Political Weekly, 21 June: Heisey, P. and Smale, M. (1995) Maize Technology in Malawi: A Green Revolution in the Making? CIMMYT Research Report No. 4. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT. Hogg, R. (1988) Water Harvesting and Agricultural Production in Semi-arid Kenya, Development and Change 19: IFAD (2001) Rural Poverty Report The Challenge of Ending Rural Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press for IFAD. Jayne, T., Mukumbu, M., Chisvo, M., Tschirley, D., Weber, M., Zulu, B., Johansson, R., Santos, P. and Soroko, D. (1999) Successes and Challenges of Food Market Reform: Experiences from Kenya, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe. MSU International Development Working Paper No.72. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Lipton, M. and Longhurst, R. (1989) New Seeds and Poor People. London: Unwin Hyman. Lockeretz, W. (1991) Information Requirements of Reduced-chemical Production Methods, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 6 (2): Low, A. (1986) Agricultural Development in Southern Africa. Farm-Household Economics and the Food Crisis. London: James Currey. Marrone, P. (1999) Microbial Pesticides and Natural Products as Alternatives, Outlook on Agriculture 28 (3): Matson, P., Naylor, R. and Ortiz-Monasterio, I. (1998) Integration of Environmental, Agronomic and Economic Aspects of Fertilizer Management, Science 280: Maxwell, S. (1986) Farming Systems Research: Hitting a Moving Target, World Development 14 (1): McDonald, M. and Brown, K. (2000) Soil and Water Conservation Projects and Rural Livelihoods: Options for Design and Research to Enhance Adoption and Adaptation, Land Degradation and Development 11: Morris, M. (ed.) (1998) Maize Seed Industries in Developing Countries. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. National Research Council (1989) Alternative Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Naylor, R. (1994) Herbicide Use in Asian Rice Production, World Development 22 (1): Pardey, P., Roseboom, J. and Beintema, N. (1997) Investments in African Agricultural Research, World Development 25 (3): Persley, G. and Lantin, M. (eds) (2000) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor. Washington, DC: CGIAR.
11 Agricultural Technology Policies for Rural Development 489 Pingali, P. and Carlson, G. (1985) Human Capital, Adjustments in Subjective Probabilities and the Demand for Pest Control, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67: Pletcher, J. (2000) The Politics of Liberalizing Zambia s Maize markets, World Development 28 (1): Reardon, T. and Barrett, C. (2000) Agroindustrialization, Globalization, and International Development. An Overview of Issues, Patterns, and Determinants, Agricultural Economics 23: Renkow, M. (2000) Poverty, Productivity and Production Environment: A Review of the Evidence, Food Policy 25: Rola, A. and Pingali, P. L. (1993) Pesticides, Rice Productivity and Farmers Health - an Economic Assessment. Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI. Sain, G. and Barreto, H. (1996) The Adoption of Soil Conservation Technology in El Salvador: Linking Productivity and Conservation, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 51 (4): Schillhorn van Veen, T., Forno, D., Joffe, S., Umali-Deininger, D. and Cooke, S. (1997) Integrated Pest Management. Strategies and Policies for Effective Implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank. Shepherd, A. (1989) Approaches to the Privatization of Fertilizer Marketing in Africa, Food Policy 14: Tripp, R. (2001) Seed Provision and Agricultural Development. The Institutions of Rural Change. Oxford: James Currey. Tripp, R. and Byerlee, D. (2000) Public Plant Breeding in an Era of Privatisation. Natural Resource Perspectives No.57. London: Overseas Development Institute. Trotter, B. and Gordon, A. (2000) Charting Change in Official Assistance to Agriculture, Food Policy 25: Umali, D. and Schwartz, L. (1994) Public and Private Agricultural Extension: Beyond Traditional Frontiers. Washington, DC: World Bank. Von Braun, J. (2000) The New Strategic Directions for International Agricultural Research, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 39: Way, M. and van Emden, H. (2000) Integrated Pest Management in Practice Pathways Toward Successful Application, Crop Protection 19: Wiggins, S. (2000) Interpreting Changes from the 1970s to the 1990s in African Agriculture through Village Studies, World Development 22 (4):
Global Environment Facility GEF OPERATIONAL PROGRAM #13 ON CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE
Global Environment Facility GEF OPERATIONAL PROGRAM #13 ON CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE CONTENTS Introduction..1 Convention Guidance... 2 Agricultural
More informationEmmanuel Tumusiime-Mutebile: The challenge of modernising smallholder agriculture in East Africa
Emmanuel Tumusiime-Mutebile: The challenge of modernising smallholder agriculture in East Africa Keynote address by Mr Emmanuel Tumusiime-Mutebile, Governor of the Bank of Uganda, at the International
More informationWhat s wrong with GM?
CIIR environmental action leaflet What s wrong with GM? Why genetically modified crops are bad for people and bad for the environment Why should we care? Genetic engineering of crops is a complex and controversial
More informationTHE MASTERCARD FOUNDATION: RURAL AND AGRICULTURAL FINANCE STRATEGY
THE MASTERCARD FOUNDATION: RURAL AND AGRICULTURAL FINANCE STRATEGY SEPTEMBER 2015 The MasterCard Foundation works with visionary organizations to provide greater access to education, skills training and
More informationSpeaker Summary Note
2020 CONFERENCE MAY 2014 Session: Speaker: Speaker Summary Note Building Resilience by Innovating and Investing in Agricultural Systems Mark Rosegrant Director, Environment and Production Technology Division
More informationResearch to improve the use and conservation of agricultural biodiversity for smallholder farmers
Research to improve the use and conservation of agricultural biodiversity for smallholder farmers Agricultural biodiversity the variability of crops and their wild relatives, trees, animals, arthropods,
More informationHow To Help The World Coffee Sector
ICC 105 19 Rev. 1 16 October 2012 Original: English E International Coffee Council 109 th Session 24 28 September 2012 London, United Kingdom Strategic action plan for the International Coffee Organization
More informationTHE ROLE OF VET IN FACILITATING DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN TANZANIA
THE ROLE OF VET IN FACILITATING DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN TANZANIA Abstract Agriculture industry is the foundation of Tanzanian economy. It accounts for about half of the national income, three
More informationAgricultural Growth Is the Key to Poverty Alleviation in Low-Income Developing Countries
International Food Policy Research Institute 2020 Brief 15, April 1995 Agricultural Growth Is the Key to Poverty Alleviation in Low-Income Developing Countries by Per Pinstrup-Andersen and Rajul Pandya-Lorch
More informationOUTCOME AND IMPACT LEVEL INDICATORS AGRICULTURE & RURAL DEVELOPMENT WORKING PAPER: OCTOBER 2009
EC EXTERNAL SERVICES EVALUATION UNIT OUTCOME AND IMPACT LEVEL INDICATORS AGRICULTURE & RURAL DEVELOPMENT WORKING PAPER: OCTOBER 2009 This working paper outlines a set of indicators at the outcome and impact
More informationOutline. What is IPM Principles of IPM Methods of Pest Management Economic Principles The Place of Pesticides in IPM
Improving Control Systems in Thailand for Plant and Plants Products Intended for Export to the European Union co-funded by the European Union and Thai Department of Agriculture Preharvest Use of Pesticides
More information5. Industrial and sector strategies
5. Industrial and sector strategies 5.1 Issues identified by the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (AsgiSA) Industrial policy has three core aims, namely: creation and smaller enterprises.
More information3.3 Real Returns Above Variable Costs
3.3 Real Returns Above Variable Costs Several factors can impact the returns above variable costs for crop producers. Over a long period of time, sustained increases in the growth rate for purchased inputs
More informationMicro Crop Insurance and Protecting the Poor Lessons From the Field
Micro Crop Insurance and Protecting the Poor Lessons From the Field Aaron Oxley CTO, Micro Insurance Agency aaron.oxley@microinsuranceagency.com The Program Who are we an what do we do? Who are the poor?
More informationENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE
Farm Energy IQ Conserving Energy in Nutrient Use and Pest Control INTRODUCTION Fertilizers and pesticides are the most widely used sources of nutrients and pest control, respectively. Fertilizer and pesticides
More informationDRYLAND SYSTEMS Science for better food security and livelihoods in the dry areas
DRYLAND SYSTEMS Science for better food security and livelihoods in the dry areas CGIAR Research Program on Dryland Agricultural Production Systems The global research partnership to improve agricultural
More informationIndian Agrochemical Industry
Indian Agrochemical Industry Introduction. India is the fourth largest producer of agrochemicals globally, after United States, Japan and China. The agrochemicals industry is a significant industry for
More informationThe effects of Kenya s smarter input subsidy program on crop production, incomes, and poverty
Policy Brief No. 11 October, 2015 The effects of Kenya s smarter input subsidy program on crop production, incomes, and poverty Nicole M. Mason, Ayala Wineman, Lilian Kirimi, and David Mather SUMMARY Kenya
More informationSocial Networks/Capital in Sustainable Agriculture
Social Networks/Capital in Sustainable Agriculture Wilfred Nyangena EfD-K/Kippra UN Expert Group Meeting on Sustainable Land Management and Agricultural Practices in Africa Presentation Outline The problem/challenge
More informationASEAN INTEGRATED FOOD SECURITY (AIFS) FRAMEWORK AND STRATEGIC PLAN OF ACTION ON FOOD SECURITY IN THE ASEAN REGION (SPA-FS) 2009-2013
ASEAN INTEGRATED FOOD SECURITY (AIFS) FRAMEWORK AND STRATEGIC PLAN OF ACTION ON FOOD SECURITY IN THE ASEAN REGION (SPA-FS) 2009-2013 BACKGROUND The sharp increase in international food prices in 2007/2008
More informationTAILORING CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE TO LOCAL CONTEXTS AND CONDITIONS OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN AFRICA
TAILORING CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE TO LOCAL CONTEXTS AND CONDITIONS OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN AFRICA Marc Corbeels, Bernard Triomphe, Pablo Tittonell, François Affholder, Rabah Lahmar, Eric Scopel, Véronique
More informationHighlights of Organic Issues within National Agric Policy (20013)
Highlights of Organic Issues within National Agric Policy (20013) (Ministry of Agriculture Food Security and Cooperatives Tanzania By. Mibavu, G. M. 1 Outline i. Introduction ii. Opportunities on Organic
More informationAgricultural Productivity in Zambia: Has there been any Progress?
Agricultural Productivity in Zambia: Has there been any Progress? Presented by Antony Chapoto ACF/FSRP Research Presented to the Zambia National Farmers Union Congress Mulungushi Conference Centre, Lusaka
More informationBeyond biological nitrogen fixation: Legumes and the Sustainable Intensification of smallholder farming systems
Beyond biological nitrogen fixation: Legumes and the Sustainable Intensification of smallholder farming systems B Vanlauwe, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya [with
More informationSMALLHOLDER MAIZE PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY IN KENYA
EGERTON UNIVERSITY TEGEMEO INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT SMALLHOLDER MAIZE PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY IN KENYA John Olwande Regional Workshop on an Integrated Policy Approach to Commercializing
More informationThe 2024 prospects for EU agricultural markets: drivers and uncertainties. Tassos Haniotis
1. Introduction The 2024 prospects for EU agricultural markets: drivers and uncertainties Tassos Haniotis Director of Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations; Communication DG Agriculture and Rural
More informationKey words: genetically modified (GM) seeds; benefits; Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton; surplus; Monsanto.
AgBioForum Volume 2, Number 2 1999 Pages 94-98 THE DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFITS FROM THE INTRODUCTION OF TRANSGENIC COTTON VARIETIES Greg Traxler & Jose Falck-Zepeda 1 Some concern has been expressed about
More informationLiquid Biofuels for Transport
page 1/11 Scientific Facts on Liquid Biofuels for Transport Prospects, risks and opportunities Source document: FAO (2008) Summary & Details: GreenFacts Context - Serious questions are being raised about
More informationFACT SHEET. Production Risk
ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL & MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY SMALL FARMERS RESEARCH CENTER FACT SHEET Production Risk Any production related activity or event that is uncertain is a production risk. Agricultural production
More informationFINAL TECHNICAL REPORT
CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Development of biopesticide registration and risk assessment guidelines for Ghana R8430 (ZA 0659) FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT 01 February 2005 31 December 2005 Dr Andy Cherry Natural
More informationFood Security in a Volatile World
Issues in Brief Food Security in a Volatile World Developments in agriculture over the last fifty years have increased yields sufficiently to provide on average more than enough food for every person on
More informationWOMEN AND FOOD SECURITY: ROLES, CONSTRAINTS, AND MISSED OPPORTUNITIES
WOMEN AND FOOD SECURITY: ROLES, CONSTRAINTS, AND MISSED OPPORTUNITIES Lynn R. Brown World Bank, Washington, DC, USA Keywords: Poverty alleviation, nutrition, labor, land tenure, marriage, inheritance,
More informationSocial protection, agriculture and the PtoP project
Social protection, agriculture and the PtoP project Benjamin Davis Workshop on the Protection to Production project September 24-25, 2013 Rome What do we mean by social protection and agriculture? Small
More informationPJ 24/12. 13 February 2012 English only. Projects Committee/ International Coffee Council 5 8 March 2012 London, United Kingdom
PJ 24/12 13 February 2012 English only E Projects Committee/ International Coffee Council 5 8 March 2012 London, United Kingdom Enhancing competitiveness of African coffees through value chain strengthening
More informationCash Crops, Food Crops and Agricultural Sustainability
GATEKEEPER SERIES No. 2 International Institute for Environment and Development Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods Programme Cash Crops, Food Crops and Agricultural Sustainability EDWARD B.
More informationAnalysis of the determinants of prices and costs in product value chains
SUGAR PRODUCTS Analysis of the determinants of prices and costs in product value chains SUGAR OVERVIEW Background Sugar commodity returns from the world market are based on global demand and supply. The
More informationRwanda Agricultural Sector and its Impact on Food Security and Economy
Rwanda Agricultural Sector and its Impact on Food Security and Economy Workshop on Asian Lessons and Agriculture Transformation in Rwanda J.J. Mbonigaba Muhinda Rwanda Agriculture Board jj.mbonigaba@rab.gov.rw
More informationThe use of genetically modified crops in developing countries
The use of genetically modified crops in developing countries a guide to the Discussion Paper Introduction The Nuffield Council on Bioethics provoked vigorous debate with the publication of its Report,
More informationCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for Responsible Agricultural Investments (RAI)
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for Responsible Agricultural Investments (RAI) Background note for consultation meeting - Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 9 10 October 2012 Francesca Dalla Valle For info
More informationThe UNIDROIT/FAO/IFAD Legal Guide on Contract Farming
The UNIDROIT/FAO/IFAD Legal Guide on Contract Farming An Overview What is Contract Farming? The Importance of the Legal Framework The UNIDROIT/FAO/IFAD Legal Guide on Contract Farming Purpose of the Guide
More informationGCE Economics Candidate Exemplar Work ECON4: The National and International Economy
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Economics Candidate Exemplar Work ECON4: The National and International Economy The Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) is a company limited by guarantee registered
More informationTHE COMMODITY RISK MANAGEMENT GROUP WORLD BANK
THE COMMODITY RISK MANAGEMENT GROUP WORLD BANK Agricultural Insurance: Scope and Limitations for Rural Risk Management 5 March 2009 Agenda The global market Products Organisation of agricultural insurance
More informationRural and Agricultural Finance. Day 1: Block 1 What and Why of Rural Finance?
Rural and Agricultural Finance Day 1: Block 1 What and Why of Rural Finance? Self Introduction 7 Questions 1. Name, institution, and current job title. 2. What activity are you working on now that is related
More informationIntroduction to Integrated Pest Management. John C. Wise, Ph.D. Michigan State University MSU Trevor Nichols Research Complex
Introduction to Integrated Pest Management John C. Wise, Ph.D. Michigan State University MSU Trevor Nichols Research Complex What is Integrated Pest Management? Integrated Pest Management (IPM) New concept;
More informationINTRODUCTION. The 3-year upper primary syllabus development was guided by the RNPE, 1994, which called for the review of the Primary curriculum.
INTRODUCTION The 3-year upper primary syllabus development was guided by the RNPE, 1994, which called for the review of the Primary curriculum. It followed the introduction of lower primary Environmental
More informationThe role of Agricultural cooperatives in accessing input and output markets An overview of experiences of SRFCF, SNNPR, Ethiopia
The role of Agricultural cooperatives in accessing input and output markets An overview of experiences of SRFCF, SNNPR, Ethiopia By Yehulashet A.Argaw Managing director, Southern Region Farmers Cooperative
More informationNew Approaches to Economic Challenges - A Framework Paper
New Approaches to Economic Challenges - A Framework Paper 1. The global crisis was a wake-up call to policymakers around the world. Market and governance failures have led to the most pressing financial,
More informationEB 3946/08. 16 May 2008 Original: English. Executive Board/ International Coffee Council 19 23 May 2008 London, England
EB 3946/08 International Coffee Organization Organización Internacional del Café Organização Internacional do Café Organisation Internationale du Café 16 May 2008 Original: English E Executive Board/ International
More informationClimate-Smart Agriculture - Science for Action 24-26 October 2011 - Ede / Wageningen - The Netherlands
The Wageningen Statement: Climate-Smart Agriculture - Science for Action 24-26 October 2011 - Ede / Wageningen - The Netherlands The Wageningen Statement: Climate-Smart Agriculture Science for Action The
More informationSOCIAL PROTECTION BRIEFING NOTE SERIES NUMBER 4. Social protection and economic growth in poor countries
A DFID practice paper Briefing SOCIAL PROTECTION BRIEFING NOTE SERIES NUMBER 4 Social protection and economic growth in poor countries Summary Introduction DFID s framework for pro-poor growth sets out
More informationGlobalization and Global Food Crises: The Role of Official Statistics in African Context
Globalization and Global Food Crises: The Role of Official Statistics in African Context Abstract The globalization of world economy is increasing the need for basic statistics on supply and demand for
More informationSmall Farm Modernization & the Quiet Revolution in Asia s Food Supply Chains. Thomas Reardon
Small Farm Modernization & the Quiet Revolution in Asia s Food Supply Chains Thomas Reardon Part 1 of Talk: Introduction to research issues and method 1. Introduction to Research Issues 1. Research past
More informationSUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SECURITY UNDER CHANGING CLIMATE IN DRY AREAS
Expert Group Meeting on Promoting Best Practices On sustainable Rural Livelihoods in the ESCWA Region Beirut, 24-25 November 2010 SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SECURITY UNDER CHANGING CLIMATE IN DRY
More informationAssets & Market Access (AMA) Innovation Lab. Tara Steinmetz, Assistant Director Feed the Future Innovation Labs Partners Meeting April 21, 2015
Assets & Market Access (AMA) Innovation Lab Tara Steinmetz, Assistant Director Feed the Future Innovation Labs Partners Meeting April 21, 2015 Countries with Current AMA Innovation Lab Projects AMERICAS
More informationARIMNet 2 Call 2014-15
Coordination of the Agricultural Research In the Mediterranean Area Call i text ARIMNet 2 Call 2014-15 SUBMISSION Pre-proposal by December 1 st, 2014 Full Proposal by May 11 th 2015 on http://arimnet-call.eu/
More informationFinancing Smallholder Farmers. to Increase Incomes and Transform Lives in Rural Communities
Financing Smallholder Farmers to Increase Incomes and Transform Lives in Rural Communities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Africa is home to a quarter of the world s farmland, yet it generates only 10 percent of all
More informationCreating Gender-Responsive Agricultural Development Programs An Orientation Document
Creating Gender-Responsive Agricultural Development Programs An Orientation Document February 2012 Poor farmers are not a problem to be solved; they are the best answer for a world that is fighting hunger
More informationEnabling poor rural people to overcome poverty in Honduras
IFAD/F. Mattioli Enabling poor rural people to overcome poverty in Honduras Rural poverty in Honduras The Republic of Honduras is the second-poorest country in Central America. It is a lower middle-income
More informationAnnex 8. Market Failure in Broadcasting
Annex 8 Market Failure in Broadcasting 202 Review of the Future Funding of the BBC Market Failure in the Broadcasting Industry An efficient broadcasting market? Economic efficiency is a situation in which
More informationA diversified approach to fighting food insecurity and rural poverty in Malawi
case study A diversified approach to fighting food insecurity and rural poverty in Malawi Map of Malawi Malawi: Facts and Figures Ø Population: 13.1 million Ø Human development index ranking: 164 out of
More informationAGRICULTURAL SCIENCES Vol. II - Crop Production Capacity In North America - G.K. Pompelli CROP PRODUCTION CAPACITY IN NORTH AMERICA
CROP PRODUCTION CAPACITY IN NORTH AMERICA G.K. Pompelli Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, USA Keywords: Supply, policy, yields. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Past Trends in Demand
More informationProblem Tree Analysis
Problem Tree Analysis What is it? The Problem Tree method is a planning method based on needs, however it is not a mechanical translation of problems into objectives. While going through the process, taking
More informationSHANGHAI: TRENDS TOWARDS SPECIALISED AND CAPITAL-INTENSIVE URBAN AGRICULTURE
SHANGHAI: TRENDS TOWARDS SPECIALISED AND CAPITAL-INTENSIVE URBAN AGRICULTURE Cai Yi-Zhong and Zhang Zhangen 1. Introduction The Chinese are famous for their highly intensive urban cropping systems and
More informationFertilizer and Pesticide Taxes for Controlling Non-point Agricultural Pollution
Fertilizer and Pesticide Taxes for Controlling Non-point Agricultural Pollution David Pearce University College London, Environmental Science and Technology, Imperial College London; E-mail D.Pearce@Ucl.Ac.Uk
More informationAGRICULTURAL PROBLEMS OF JAPAN
AGRICULTURAL PROBLEMS OF JAPAN Takeshi Kimura, Agricultural Counselor Embassy of Japan, Washington, D. C. I would like, first, to sketch the Japanese agricultural situation and, second, to review Japan's
More informationClosing Yield Gaps. Or Why are there yield gaps anyway?
Closing Yield Gaps Or Why are there yield gaps anyway? Closing Yield Gaps: Large potential to increasing food production Major cereals: attainable yield achieved (%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
More informationBasic Farming Questions What did you grow on the farm when you first started? Are you a first generation farm owner or has your family been in
MASTER LIST OF POSSIBLE QUESTIONS FOR FARMER INTERVIEWS: Choose a subset of 15-20 of these questions and have them ready in case the conversation hits a slow spot. Personal History When did you start farming?
More informationAGRICULTURE AND POVERTY IN SOUTH AFRICA: CAN AGRICULTURE REDUCE POVERTY? 1
AGRICULTURE AND POVERTY IN SOUTH AFRICA: CAN AGRICULTURE REDUCE POVERTY? 1 Charles L Machethe Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development and Postgraduate School of Agriculture
More informationCLIMATE RISK SENSITIVITY IN THE FOOD VALUE CHAIN: WHEAT
CLIMATE RISK SENSITIVITY IN THE FOOD VALUE CHAIN: WHEAT Peter Johnston Climate System Analysis Group (Univ of Cape Town) Food, NutriAon and Health Security Research AAUN 27/28 August 2015 Canberra Our
More informationAbout 870 million people are estimated to have
Undernourishment around the world in 212 Undernourishment around the world Key messages The State of Food Insecurity in the World 212 presents new estimates of the number and proportion of undernourished
More informationConclusions. Towards a green economy
Conclusions Towards a green economy Conclusions Moving towards a green economy has the potential to achieve sustainable development and eradicate poverty on an unprecedented scale, with speed and effectiveness.
More information2. THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF EDUCATION
2. THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF EDUCATION How much more do tertiary graduates earn? How does education affect employment rates? What are the incentives for people to invest in education? What are the incentives
More informationSECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1
Country Operations Business Plan: Philippines, 2013 2015 SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1 A. Sector Performance, Problems, and Opportunities 1. Sector importance and growth
More informationBachelor of Agricultural Business Management Course Structure 2015
Bachelor of Agricultural Business Management Course Structure 2015 The Charles Sturt University, Bachelor of Agricultural Business Management is a prescribed course with details of curriculum etc. available
More informationRURAL AND AGRICULTURE FINANCE Prof. Puneetha Palakurthi School of Community Economic Development Sothern New Hampshire University
RURAL AND AGRICULTURE FINANCE Prof. Puneetha Palakurthi School of Community Economic Development Sothern New Hampshire University DRIVERS OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT High overall economic growth Effective land
More informationWeather Index Crop Insurance. White Paper. Implementation, Product Design, Challenges And Successes Lessons Learned In The Field
White Paper Weather Index Crop Insurance Implementation, Product Design, Challenges And Successes Lessons Learned In The Field By Shadreck Mapfumo, Vice President, Agriculture, MicroEnsure November 2008
More informationRICE CULTIVATION: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND WATER SAVING APPROACHES
RICE CULTIVATION: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND WATER SAVING APPROACHES Ragab Ragab 1 Introduction Globally, rice is the most important food crop with more than 90% produced in Asia. In most of Asian countries,
More informationFrequently Asked Questions about FAO and Agricultural Biotechnology. 5. What is FAO s position on release of GMOs in any specific country?
Frequently Asked Questions about FAO and Agricultural Biotechnology 1. What is agricultural biotechnology? 2. What are GMOs? 3. Are GMOs widely used in food and agriculture today? 4. What is FAO s position
More informationBusiness as Usual is Not an Option: Trade and Markets
Issues in Brief Business as Usual is Not an Option: Trade and Markets Underinvestment in developing country agriculture including in local and regional market infrastructure, information and services has
More informationContract Farming. One Option For Creating A Role For The Private Sector In Agriculture Development? By N. Ajjan. What Is Contract Farming?
Contract Farming One Option For Creating A Role For The Private Sector In Agriculture Development? By N. Ajjan What Is Contract Farming? ESSENTIALLY The Farmer Is Contracted to Plant the Contractor s Crop
More informationBRIEFING NOTE TRADE UNIONS AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE ROLE OF UNIONS IN TRAINING IN THE WORKPLACE: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
BRIEFING NOTE December 2008 (updated January 2011) Series briefing note 15 TRADE UNIONS AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 1. Introduction 2. The role of unions in training in the workplace: theory and evidence 3.
More informationChina s experiences in domestic agricultural support. Tian Weiming China Agricultural University
China s experiences in domestic agricultural support Tian Weiming China Agricultural University Contents Background The policy system Major measures and their implementation Empirical assessment of the
More informationBENCHMARKING THE BUSINESS OF SUSTAINABLE SMALLHOLDER FARMING
BENCHMARKING THE BUSINESS OF SUSTAINABLE SMALLHOLDER FARMING Introduction This is an updated advocacy briefing from the African Smallholder Farmers Group on the Benchmarking the Business of Agriculture
More informationDistance learning program for agricultural education in Southern Africa. Mungule Chikoye, Krishna Alluri, Richard Siaciwena, and Rainer Zachmann *
Distance learning program for agricultural education in Southern Africa Mungule Chikoye, Krishna Alluri, Richard Siaciwena, and Rainer Zachmann * Abstract The Commonwealth of Learning (COL) in collaboration
More informationFARMERS FIELD SCHOOLS (FFS): A GROUP EXTENSION PROCESS BASED ON ADULT NON-FORMAL EDUCATION METHODS KEVIN GALLAGHER, GLOBAL IPM FACILITY SECRETARIAT
FARMERS FIELD SCHOOLS (FFS): A GROUP EXTENSION PROCESS BASED ON ADULT NON-FORMAL EDUCATION METHODS KEVIN GALLAGHER, GLOBAL IPM FACILITY SECRETARIAT INTRODUCTION This Guideline will provide a brief overview
More information2 CHAPTER 1 Introduction
Introduction 1 Tropical tree seed handling continuously develops. Scientific research and less advanced, yet persistent practical progress bring about new knowledge and experience on tropical species.
More informationUnderlying Factors for Gender Inequality in African Agriculture
Underlying Factors for Gender Inequality in African Agriculture Gender perspectives in research for development (R4D), Annual Conference North-South Centre, ETH Zurich, Tuesday, June 12, 2012 Chinwe Ifejika
More informationAgricultural Technology for Development Old Issue, New Context
Agricultural Technology for Development Old Issue, New Context Secretary-General s Report to the 64 th General Assembly UN response to food crisis In mid-april 2008, ECOSOC held Special Session on the
More informationExecutive summary. Global Wage Report 2014 / 15 Wages and income inequality
Executive summary Global Wage Report 2014 / 15 Wages and income inequality Global Wage Report 2014/15 Wages and income inequality Executive summary INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE GENEVA Copyright International
More informationResults and Challenges
Soy Value Chain in Mozambique Results and Challenges Feed the Future Scaling Agricultural Technology/GLEE 3-5 Dec 2013, Addis Ababa Luis Pereira, Agricultural Program Director / TechnoServe Mozambique
More informationHLPE report on Nutrition and Food Systems
HLPE report on Nutrition and Food Systems e-consultation on an Issues Note proposed by the HLPE Steering Committee From 9 December 2015 to 15 February 2016 Short Summary by the HLPE Secretariat 1 There
More informationPopulation Growth and Land Scarcity in Rwanda: The other side of the Coin
Population Growth and Land Scarcity in Rwanda: The other side of the Coin Alfred R. BIZOZA (PhD) Agricultural Economist,University of Rwanda 2014 Conference on Land Policy in Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
More informationTRADE AND FOOD SECURITY: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
TRADE AND FOOD SECURITY: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE Jonathan Brooks, OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate Sahel and West Africa Week, Forum, 7th December, Ouagadougou Main message: open markets can improve
More informationExtra help where it is needed: a new Energy Company Obligation
Extra help where it is needed: a new Energy Company Obligation May 2011 The content of this paper is subject to the consultation outcome Contents 1 Our objectives for the ECO 1.1 Householder support: Lower
More informationCurrent capabilities in the analysis of climate risks and adaptation strategies in critical areas
Current capabilities in the analysis of climate risks and adaptation strategies in critical areas M. Arif Goheer Global Change Impact Studies Centre (GCISC) Islamabad- 44000, Pakistan Symposium on Climate
More informationlivelihoods? Evidence from Zambia
Do outgrower schemes improve rural livelihoods? Evidence from Zambia National Vision 2030. pro poor growth requires a focus on agriculture and rural development (GRZ, 2005). Davison Gumbo Position of Zambia
More informationChapter 1. What is Poverty and Why Measure it?
Chapter 1. What is Poverty and Why Measure it? Summary Poverty is pronounced deprivation in well-being. The conventional view links well-being primarily to command over commodities, so the poor are those
More informationMid-term review of the Business Innovation Fund. Business Innovation Fund
Mid-term review of the Business Innovation Fund Business Innovation Fund April 2012 Executive summary Background and purpose of the review The Business Innovation Fund was established as part of a political
More informationFRC Risk Reporting Requirements Working Party Case Study (Hospitality Industry)
FRC Risk Reporting Requirements Working Party Case Study (Hospitality Industry) Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Background and Scope... 3 Company Background and Highlights... 3 Sample Risk Register
More informationPoverty in Central America and Mexico
Courtney Taglauer, Student Participant Fairfield High School, Iowa Poverty in Central America and Mexico According to the World Food Bank, Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical
More information