1 FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION Winter 1998 December 5, 1998 Vol. X, Edition IV THE FEDERAL INSURANCE ANTIFRAUD STATUTE Emory L. White, Jr., Esq. (214) Are you guilty of a felony under The Violent Crime Control Law Enforcement Act of 1994? Is your client insurance company, agency, accounting firm, actuarial firm, or other service provider to the business of insurance in violation of this statute? The NAIC Antifraud Task Force found the application of this statute to be very broad. Indeed, the extent of its possible interpretation and its lack of clarity are troubling. This federal statute, in essence, provides that anyone engaging or participating in the business of insurance in any capacity who has been convicted at any time of a criminal felony involving dishonesty, or any individual in the business of insurance who willfully permits such participation, shall be fined or imprisoned, or both. The "business of insurance" not only means the writing of insurance, or the reinsuring of risks by an insurer, but includes all acts necessary or incidental to such writing or reinsuring and the activities of persons who are officers, directors, agents, or employees of insurers, or other persons authorized to act on behalf of such persons. Any person with such a felony conviction (a "prohibited person") may seek an exemption from the state insurance regulator. 1 A working group of the Antifraud (E) Task Force of the NAIC has provided a resource guide (the "Guidelines") for all insurance regulators regarding this statute and their responsibility to respond to requests from prohibited persons. The Guidelines which were adopted in March 1998 will be supplemented in early A training session is scheduled for December 5, 1998, at the NAIC Winter National Meeting to provide a general overview of the concepts, principles and procedures developed by the Antifraud (E) Task Force. The purpose is to provide suggestions to insurers (and others at risk of violating the statute) and to assist Commissioners and regulators regarding their obligations created by the statute and anticipated use of the statute by federal prosecutors. While the Guidelines attempt to provide some specificity and clarity, they expressly disclaim any authority to define the law or to create administrative or procedural requirements for state regulations. State regulators, who have been delegated the authority under the statute to establish administrative process for the consideration of exemptions, have the implied authority to interpret the provisions of the statute necessarily involved in the delegated authority. Outside of this delegation of authority, however, the interpretation of the statute by a state regulator is entitled to no deference under the law. 2 The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 was enacted for the purpose of controlling insurance fraud activities involving interstate commerce. As stated in the Guidelines: "The NAIC originally proposed this type of insurance fraud law because of the power of the federal government to bring additional jurisdictional, investigatory and law enforcement resources to bear in combating insurance fraud." A federal statutory basis was required to allow federal law enforcement agencies to assist the state insurance departments in so doing. 3 The provisions of Section 1033(a)-(d) deal with conduct in the business of insurance involving false reporting, embezzlements, misappropriation and the like. The subject of this article, Section 1033(e), leaps beyond such direct antifraud provisions and, as noted in a prior article, beyond the apparent legislative intent found in Congressional subcommittee reports. 4 Section 1033(e), with key words italicized, is quoted as follows: (e)(1)(a) Any individual who has been convicted of any criminal felony involving dishonesty or a breach of trust, or who has been convicted of an offense under this section, and who willfully engages in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce or participates in such business, shall be fined as provided in this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (B) Any individual who is engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce and who willfully permits the participation described in subparagraph (A) shall be fined as provided in this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
2 interstate commerce or participates in such business, shall be fined as provided in this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (B) Any individual who is engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce and who willfully permits the participation described in subparagraph (A) shall be fined as provided in this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (2) A person described in paragraph (1)(A) may engage in the business of insurance or participate in such business if such person has the written consent of any insurance regulatory official authorized to regulate the insurer, which consent specifically refers to this subsection." The questions arising from these key words are: What is "convicted of any criminal felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust"? What does "willfully engages in the business of insurance... or participates in such business" mean? Who is an individual engaged in the business of insurance "who willfully permits the participation" of a prohibited person in the business of insurance? What "written consent of any insurance regulatory official authorized to regulate the insurer" will provide the necessary exemption to avoid the crime created by this statute? What is "convicted of any criminal felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust"? Criminal felony may be either a state or federal conviction. The Guidelines point out that a "deferred adjudication" is not a conviction, and a conviction on appeal, though not a final judgment, is such a conviction. There is no time limit, statute of limitations or "grandfather provision" with respect to any such criminal conviction. The statute relates back to the earliest time a person may be subject to a criminal felony conviction. There is federal and statute authority dealing with both federal and state convictions involving the definitions of dishonesty, breach of trust, or other similar descriptions. The Guidelines note that some federal courts seem to apply a "you know it when you see it" to the dishonesty test and refer to authorities using words such as "perjury or subordination of perjury, false statement, criminal fraud, embezzlement, or false pretense or any other offense which involves some element of deceit, untruthfulness, or falsification." 5 What does "willfully engages in the business of insurance... or participates in such business" mean? The Guidelines say: "There appears to be no limitation or restrictions... as to which persons are covered so long as those persons are engaged in, or participate in, the "business of insurance" a term broadly defined by Section " 6 The statute defines the "business of insurance" as "the writing of insurance or the reinsuring of risks, by an insurer, including all acts necessary or incidental to such writing or reinsuring and the activities of persons who act as, or are, officers, directors, agents, or employees of insurers or who are other persons authorized to act on behalf of such persons " This latter group of "other persons," according to the Guidelines, appears to include any subcontractors, third party administrators, consultants, professionals and the like." 7 What is the significance of the statute s reference to both anyone who "engages in the business of insurance" and who "participates in such business"? Since "participates in such business" is stated separately from the term "engages in the business of insurance," it is assumed by the Guidelines that "participation" is broader than merely engaging in the business of insurance. The Guidelines suggest that the broad sweep of this subsection includes any person who receives compensation or remuneration from such insurance business. 8 Who is an individual engaged in the business of insurance "who willfully permits the participation" of a prohibited person in the business of insurance? The Guidelines have expanded the meaning of "individual" beyond a natural person to include an "entity" or "company" by saying: "Thus, the statute makes it illegal for an insurer, reinsurer, its officers, directors, employees, agents and brokers (or others) to willfully employ a person who has been convicted of a felony crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust." As emphasized by the Guidelines, the law makes it a crime for any of these employers or their subcontractors to continue to employ an individual if the employer or subcontractor subsequently learns of a conviction and does not immediately terminate the individual. The Guidelines describe the "universe" of individuals who may not participate with, or work with, such a prohibited person as very broad in its scope. 9
3 saying: "Thus, the statute makes it illegal for an insurer, reinsurer, its officers, directors, employees, agents and brokers (or others) to willfully employ a person who has been convicted of a felony crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust." As emphasized by the Guidelines, the law makes it a crime for any of these employers or their subcontractors to continue to employ an individual if the employer or subcontractor subsequently learns of a conviction and does not immediately terminate the individual. The Guidelines describe the "universe" of individuals who may not participate with, or work with, such a prohibited person as very broad in its scope. 9 The Guidelines suggest means of satisfying an insurer s responsibility to discover any such person within the insurer s organization. Is the fact that the conviction is contained within personnel records, or within the knowledge of any management level person within a corporate organization, sufficient knowledge to place the burden on the insurer to take action? If a research of records is unduly burdensome, the Guidelines suggest that a program may be implemented whereby written certifications are required of both current and prospective employees, as well as other affected persons involved with the insurer. An ongoing program should require that employees or other such persons promptly notify the insurer in writing of a subsequent felony conviction. 10 What does "willfully" mean in this context of the above two questions? The statute refers to the prohibited person "who willfully engages in the business of insurance" and to the individual engaged in the business of insurance "who willfully permits the participation" of the prohibited person. The meaning of "willfully" is uncertain in this context. It has been held in some cases that an act or omission is "willfully done" if done voluntarily and intentionally and with the specific intent to do something the law forbids. In other cases, however, "willfully" has been held to require mere knowledge of the relevant facts and not knowledge that the fact situation is illegal. 11 These inconsistent definitions are extremely important to the application of this statute since it can be assumed that there are numerous violations occurring at this time with the affected parties having no knowledge of this federal crime. The Guidelines present a "two-tier" definition of "willfully." In the case of the "insurer," the Guidelines suggest that the insurer s actual knowledge of the statutory prohibition is required in order for the insurer s employment, or continued employment, of the prohibited person to constitute a crime. Therefore, one not knowing of the effect of the antifraud statute, though knowing of the existence of a felony conviction of an employee, would not be individually acting in violation of the statute. On the other hand, the Guidelines suggest applying the more stringent definition to the individual convicted of a crime. That person s involvement in the insurance business would be a crime after the statute s enactment in September 1994, even with no knowledge of the statute. This is based upon the general rule that one is presumed to know the law. Based upon that presumption, since a person is deemed to know the existence of his own conviction for felony, any involvement by that person in the business of insurance is a crime. 12 While there may be an instinctive reaction in favor of this distinction, i.e., one who was previously convicted of a crime being subject to a more stringent definition of "willfully" than an insurer who had no knowledge of the statute, different definitions of the same word in adjoining provisions are difficult to justify. What is "interstate commerce"? The Guidelines do not attempt to discuss the requirement of "interstate commerce" since it is apparently assumed that all insurance involves interstate commerce. 13 What written consent of "any insurance regulatory official authorized to regulate the insurer" will provide the necessary exemption to avoid the crime created by this statute? The statute is silent as to the procedure and standards to be used by a regulatory official in considering and granting any exemption requested by a prohibited person. The nature and form of the consent, so long as it is written and refers to this statute, are apparently within the discretion of the regulator, or the Commissioner, director or superintendent of the regulatory agency, as the Guidelines have identified the "regulator." Depending upon the facts of each case, the regulatory official s consent may be limited or conditional in the discretion of the regulator. For example, the prohibited employee may be limited to a certain employer, and there may be a limitation in the scope of the nature of the employment or the time period for the exemption. Conditions may be attached which could involve the employer s agreement. All of these would seem reasonable and within the implied authority of the regulator.
4 and within the implied authority of the regulator. There are questions raised in this area which may not be within the discretion of the regulator. The most serious is the jurisdictional effect of any action by "any state regulatory official authorized to regulate the insurer." Is the effect of an exemption limited to the regulator s state or does it apply to some or all states (plus territories) of the United States? What if multiple insurers are involved? Does the statute intend there to be "extraterritorial" authority of a state regulator? It is argued by some in the industry that the Commissioner of any state where the insurer is authorized to conduct business would have the authority to grant an exemption to the statute. 14 This would not, in that view, be "extraterritorial," but would simply apply a literal interpretation of the statute. The counter argument is that each state affected by the prohibited person s insurance activities has the authority to give or to withhold an exemption. The Guidelines have suggested a procedure for determining the "appropriate regulatory official" whose written consent would apply to all states. 15 Until this issue is resolved by the federal courts or by Congress, the safest route is for a system to be put in place in which the "appropriate regulatory official" is determined and, through reciprocity, all states follow with an automatic form of "written consent." Also a concern is the suggestion by the Guidelines that if a determination is made that an application does not meet all criteria set by the regulatory agency for consideration (e.g., whether the crime involves dishonesty or whether there is participation in the business of insurance) the application would be returned. That is, a regulatory official may, relying on a staff opinion that an exemption is not necessary, determine that an application is, therefore, not appropriate, as opposed to turning it down on the merits. In that situation, consideration should be given that some form of "tentative" written consent or, at the very least, a "regulatory interpretation" be issued so as to provide the insurer and others with some comfort that they are not violating a federal criminal statute. It should be remembered that a regulator s interpretation of this statute, outside the delegation of authority, is entitled to no deference by the U. S. Attorney General s office. What is the application process? The application process itself is wholly within discretion of the regulatory official (absent an arbitrary or capricious ruling) as is with the discretion of the regulatory official to grant or deny an exemption to the prohibited person. In an earlier draft of the Guidelines, there was included a sample form for a person applying for a certificate of exemption to the U.S. Parole Commission. In the Guidelines finally adopted, proposed administrative practices and procedures have been modified to apply to this statute. It is understood that the Guidelines will be supplemented in this area. An important suggestion of the Guidelines is that there be established an "initial" application form to determine whether an "expedited" written consent should be granted to a prohibited person whose insurance activity on its face does not constitute a risk or a threat to insurance consumers or to the insurer. 16 If the regulator concludes in the expedited process that the applicant s activities could pose a risk or a threat, only then would a standard application form be required. The contents of the standard application include, as expected, a request for personal historical information, or full description of the criminal conviction, and an explanation for the reasons that a risk will not be posed to insurance consumers or the insurer. The submission of character endorsements is also requested. 17 The Guidelines suggested form contains a requirement that, for purposes of the application, the applicant not contest the validity of the felony condition. No reviewing authority wants to hear the "retrial" of the case. However, if the applicant has mitigating information, this could be contained in the description of the nature of the crime. According to Michael Bownes, General Counsel, Alabama Insurance Department, a policy has been instituted to require Alabama agents, under certain circumstances, to obtain an exemption under this statute upon renewal of their licenses. Those agents, whose licenses have been granted pursuant to an exemption to the Alabama statute controlling the issuance of licenses to persons convicted of a crime, are now required to obtain an exemption under the specific authority of Section 1033(e) before their agents licenses are renewed. Although the state is not required to notify anyone of a requirement to file such an application, this is a positive effort to connect state agents laws to the federal statute. Conclusion This statute has ramifications beyond the ability of the Guidelines to anticipate, and of course, to provide an authoritative answer. Its broad look has potential application to almost anyone involved in the insurance business if enforced strictly by the U.S. Attorney General s office. The Guidelines and the scheduled training sessions at the NAIC Winter Meeting are intended to alert the industry and to provide some guidance to the responsibilities raised by this statute, in addition to the assistance directed to state regulators. Michael A. Bownes, who has served as chairman of the working group involved in the preparation of the Guidelines, is a speaker at the education program in December. He has observed that the states are generally receptive to the establishment of procedures.
5 intended to alert the industry and to provide some guidance to the responsibilities raised by this statute, in addition to the assistance directed to state regulators. Michael A. Bownes, who has served as chairman of the working group involved in the preparation of the Guidelines, is a speaker at the education program in December. He has observed that the states are generally receptive to the establishment of procedures. Conversations with the New York department s general counsel s office indicate that New York has been aware of and processed applications under this statute for several years. Texas is instituting the procedures and has been involved in the preparation of the Guidelines. Some states have less interest and, therefore, little or no awareness of the import of the statute. With the NAIC s activities, there will be a greater understanding of the statute s requirements and, we assume, a greater awareness of the statute s inadequacies. With some urging, Congress may realize that there is a need to correct the inadequacies. The overly broad and uncertain application of the statute to the individuals (or companies) who are obligated to exclude prohibited persons from the business of insurance should be corrected. The prohibited activities of "prohibited persons" should bear a reasonable relationship to the risk of insurance fraud. The definition of "insurance business" should be reasonably contained and the word "willfully" should be defined for these purposes. With respect to the exemption process, the jurisdictional question should be resolved. While a federal antifraud statute applicable specifically to the insurance industry was appropriate, there was a leap in the federal government s involvement in insurance regulation from specific and direct antifraud provisions to a statute which applies to all felony convictions involving dishonesty which may or may not be relevant to past or future fraudulent activities in the insurance industry. Does the situation addressed in Section 1033(e) have the same urgency as investigating and prosecuting insurance fraud schemes and conspiracies on an interstate basis? Since states have similar provisions with respect to the licensing of agents, which are administered by the state regulatory authority, couldn t states be relied upon to enact similar statutes for other persons who might be involved in the insurance business? Are the difficulties in applying this statute a preview of the federalization of insurance laws? Endnotes 1. The Violent Crime Control Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C and 1034, effective September 13, This statute has also been the subject of two previous articles in this Journal: Ann Monaco Warren and John William Simon in the Fall edition, dated September 12, 1998, and S. David Childers and Christie A. Chism in the Winter edition, December 7, Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett, 494 U.S. 638, 108 L.Ed.2d 585, 110 S.Ct (1990). 3. Guidelines for State insurance Regulators to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 adopted March, Supra, Childers and Chism article 5. Guidelines Id Id Id Id Id. - 9, 10.
Guidelines for State Insurance Regulators to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 18 U.S.C. 1033 1034 Guidelines for State Insurance Regulators to the Violent Crime Control and Law
CRIMES OF DISHONESTY AND BREACH OF TRUST: IS THEFT SUCH A CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1033(e)? Zack Stamp, Esq. Steve W. Kinion, Esq. (217) 525-0700 The purpose of this article is to examine an ambiguity between
Part I. Texas Department of Insurance Page 1 of 42 SUBCHAPTER D. EFFECT OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT DIVISION 1. FITNESS FOR LICENSING 28 TAC 1.501 1.509 DIVISION 2. PROCEDURES GOVERNING PERSONS SUBJECT TO 18 U.S.C.
304.15-717 Circumstances under which life settlement transactions are unlawful -- Required statement regarding false information -- Furnishing information regarding fraudulent life settlement acts. (1)
0 Items in your cart Home Article Library Article detail The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act and You Grieco, Jennifer M., May 26, 2008 Review articles and blog posts by our list of insurance
BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION In the Matter of CHERIE G. SMITH and BEST INSURANCE CONSULTANTS, LLC
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
RENDERED: MARCH 14, 2008; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2007-CA-001304-MR DONALD T. CHRISTY APPELLANT v. APPEAL FROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE STOCKTON
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE, NY and TOOMEY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Compliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures Purpose:
San Diego County Code of Regulatory Ordinances TITLE 2 LICENSES, BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND BUSINESS TAXES* DIVISION 1. BUSINESS REGULATIONS* CHAPTER 1. UNIFORM LICENSING PROCEDURE CHAPTER 1. UNIFORM LICENSING
GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR MICHIGAN INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSURE Department of Insurance and Financial Services Office of Insurance Licensing and Market Conduct Revised Page 1 of 9 Introduction A primary mission
Case 8:15-cr-00244-SDM-AEP Document 3 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP
Oklahoma Company-affiliated facilities in Oklahoma must ensure that all employees, including management, and any contractors or agents are educated regarding the federal and state false claims statutes
VNSNY CORPORATE DRA Policy TITLE: FEDERAL DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005: POLICY REGARDING THE DETECTION & PREVENTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE AND APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS APPLIES TO: VNSNY ENTITIES
CHAPTER 267 AN ACT concerning third party administrators of health benefits plans and third party billing services and supplementing Title 17B of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and
DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA TITLE I - POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION COUNTY INFRACTIONS AND JUDICIAL MATTER 2.01 Definitions 2.03 Civil Infractions 2.02 Violations, Penalties and Alternative Relief 2.04 Criminal Infractions
AN OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF 18 U.S.C. 1033(e) Heather Young Seminar: Contemporary Issues in Insurance Law Fall 2010 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Thesis Statement and Introduction: 4 a. Background and Overview
Proposed SEC Rules Undermine Dodd-Frank s Whistleblower Incentives By: Marc S. Raspanti, Esq. and Bryan S. Neft, Esq. For years, the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) had a whistleblower program
Appraisal Management Company Registration Act 63 P.S. 457.21 457.31 (Current through 02/02/2012) (When referring to section numbers, use a truncated version of the number after the decimal point. For example,
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
I1 UNOFFICIAL COPY OF SENATE BILL 660 ENROLLED BILL -- Finance/Economic Matters -- (5lr2457) Introduced by Senator Astle Senators Astle and Exum Read and Examined by Proofreaders: Proofreader. Proofreader.
Policy and Procedure: Corporate Compliance Topic: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions, Deficit Reduction Act SCOPE OF POLICY This policy applies to all CFS employees, including trainees, volunteers,
ROCKWALL POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION 205 W. Rusk St. Rockwall, Texas 75087 (972) 771-7716 Identity Theft Information and Affidavit RPD Case # - The attached Identity Theft Affidavit
H. R. 4173 466 activities and evaluates the effectiveness of the Ombudsman during the preceding year. The Investor Advocate shall include the reports required under this section in the reports required
HERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Date: October 8, 2013 Rationale: It is Heritage Farm s intent to make sure all claims are submitted in a timely
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 S SENATE BILL Short Title: Regulate Debt Settlement. Sponsors: Senators Clodfelter; and Berger of Rockingham. Referred to: Commerce, Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics John Scalia, Jr. Statistician Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Federal criminal case processing
FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS I. FEDERAL LAWS 1) Federal False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-3733) II. NEW YORK STATE LAWS A. CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS 1) New York False Claims
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) DEFERRED PROSECUTION ) AGREEMENT v. ) ) BIXBY ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) The United
STATE OF NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE 941 O STREET, SUITE 400 LINCOLN, NE 68508 Switchboard (402) 471-2201 Licensing Division (402) 471-4913 REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING A CORPORATE INSURANCE
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS REGULATION Division of Insurance Report on the Comprehensive Market Conduct Examination of Arbella Indemnity Insurance Company,
CHAPTER 2011-71 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1316 An act relating to loan processing; amending s. 494.001, F.S.; creating and revising definitions; deleting a redundant
Chapter 9 The Georgia Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act A. OVERVIEW PURPOSE OF THE ACT The Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act (BRRETA) http://www.crowngeorgia.com/brreta.htm
California PUBLIC CONTRACT LAW Book at a Glance CHAPTER 1 Basic Principles of Contract and Civil Law............. page 1 CHAPTER 2 Special Requirements Applicable to Public Contracts......... page 23 CHAPTER
H. R. 3606 10 have any person associated with that person subject to such a statutory disqualification. (3) For the purposes of this subsection, the term ancillary services means (A) the provision of due
Updated July 2015 REVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT 1. Initial Considerations The District of Columbia has recently modernized its statute dealing
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS REGULATION DIVISION OF INSURANCE Report on the Comprehensive Market Conduct Examination of The Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance
93-1. Definitions; practice of law. (a) Chapter 93. Certified Public Accountants. Definitions. As used in this Chapter certain terms are defined as follows: (1) An "accountant" is a person engaged in the
Summary of Changes to Chapter 494, Florida Statutes Senate Bill 2226 2009 Florida Legislative Session Effective July 1, 2009 Effective January 1, 2010 Effective September 1, 2010 Effective October 1, 2010
Who needs to register? Frequently Asked Questions for Professional Solicitors and Professional Fundraising Counsels Professional Solicitors and Professional Fundraising Counsels must register. A Professional
Case 1:11-cr-00326-SCJ-JFK Document 119-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 16 GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify
AHCA MEMBER GUIDANCE IMPLEMENTING THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT EDUCATIONAL PROVISIONS OF THE DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT THE TOPIC: Section 6033 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 ( DRA ) requires entities that make
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE TITLE 48. FOOD AND DRUGS SUBTITLE III. ILLEGAL DRUGS CHAPTER 9. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES UNIT A. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT SUBCHAPTER IV. OFFENSES AND PENALTIES 48-904.01.
QUICK NOTES Insurance Schools, Inc. Supplemental Study Guide For NEW YORK LIFE, ACCIDENT & HEALTH INSURANCE AGENT / BROKER EXAMINATION SERIES 17-55 (April 2015 Edition) Click here http://www.insurance-schools.com/category.aspx?categoryid=516
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MASTER GRANT CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARDS DRAFT for Discussion Only 8.22.14 THIS MASTER GRANT CONTRACT, and amendments and supplements thereto, is between the State
R156. Commerce, Occupational and Professional Licensing. R156-55d. Burglar Alarm Licensing Rule. R156-55d-101. Title. This rule is known as the "Burglar Alarm Licensing Rule". R156-55d-102. Definitions.
H. R. 5005 11 (d) OTHER OFFICERS. To assist the Secretary in the performance of the Secretary s functions, there are the following officers, appointed by the President: (1) A Director of the Secret Service.
SENATE BILL Q, C, Q lr CF HB By: Senators Conway, Colburn, Della, Garagiola, Lenett, and Pugh Pugh, and Haines Introduced and read first time: February, 00 Assigned to: Rules Re referred to: Education,
Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018
Model Spent Convictions Bill - Consultation paper Background The Standing Committee of Attorneys-General is working on a project to design a national model Bill for a spent-convictions scheme. A spentconvictions
Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02) This memorandum addresses the California and federal law protections that exist to shield volunteer directors of nonprofit corporations
APPENDIX ONE PHYSICAL ADDRESS The principle office and official address of the Board is as follows: Arkansas State Board of Public Accountancy, 101 East Capitol Avenue, Suite 450, Little Rock, AR 72201.
Self-reporting is getting complicated: Balancing FINRA's rule 4530 and the SEC's whistleblowing requirements Jun 30 2011 K. Susan Grafton recommended FINRA rule 4530 will take effect on July 1, 2011. The
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael H. TARKOFF, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-13223. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Feb. 20, 2001. Appeal from the United States District
TITLE 135 LEGISLATIVE RULE WEST VIRGINIA COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION SERIES 35 CORRESPONDENCE, BUSINESS, OCCUPATIONAL, and TRADE SCHOOLS SECTION 1. GENERAL 1.1 Scope - Rule regarding
Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 26. Judgment; presentence report; sentence hearing; sentence. Rule 26.11. Fines and restitution. (a) IMPOSITION OF RESTITUTION. Restitution should be ordered in
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts Massachusetts has a relatively good state whistleblower law: Scoring 64 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 11 th out of 51 (50 states and the
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion **** This Advisory Opinion expresses an interpretation of Illinois Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2(d) for the situation in which a lawyer provides services to
[As of July 22, 2004] Anti-Bribery and Books & Records Provisions of The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Current through Pub. L. 105-366 (November 10, 1998) UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 15. COMMERCE AND TRADE
SUBCHAPTER IX. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE. Article 48. Discovery in the Superior Court. 15A-901. Application of Article. This Article applies to cases within the original jurisdiction of the superior court. (1973,
Instructions: Please fill out the form in its entirety and return to W.W. Williams. A copy of your certificate of insurance should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org. Supplier Representations and Certifications
June 10, 2010 2010 Legislative Amendments to the Indiana Code Relating to First Lien Mortgage Act (the Act ) Effective July 1, 2010 (except as otherwise indicated) Questions, Answers, and Administrative
West s Annotated MISSISSIPPI CODE Using the Classification and Numbering System of the Mississippi Code of 1972 Title 73 Professions and Vocations 2002 Cumulative Annual Pocket Part Chapter 60 HOME INSPECTORS
COUNTY OF ORANGE False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Policy and Procedures COUNTY OF ORANGE FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROVISIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES I. Purpose. The County of Orange
Case 106-cr-00271-PLF Document 24 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GUSTAVO VILLANUEVO-SOTELO, Defendant. CRIMINAL
Your Criminal Justice System Helpful Information for the Victims and Witnesses of Crime Provided by Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt Victims Services Division 120 SW 10th Ave, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS
Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection 15 USC 78u-6 (As added by P.L. 111-203.) 15 USC 78u-6 78u-6. Securities whistleblower incentives and protection (a) Definitions. In this section the following
PRACTICE ALERT: SUPREME COURT DECISION IN LUNA-TORRES V. LYNCH 1 May 20, 2016 Written by Manny Vargas, Dan Kesselbrenner, and Andrew Wachtenheim 1 Practice Alerts identify select substantive and procedural
Title V Preventing Fraud and Abuse Subtitle A- Establishment of New Health and Human Services and Department of Justice Health Care Fraud Positions Sec. 501. Health and Human Services Senior Advisor There
Regular Session, 0 HOUSE BILL NO. BY REPRESENTATIVE PONTI Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section (A)()(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana. FINANCIAL PLANNING: Provides relative to debt relief services
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices. ---------------------------------------x
CGU PROFESSIONAL RISKS BUSINESS PROTECTION MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE Summary of significant changes Business Insurance Policy (CGU BPML 11-15) Replacing Lumley Policy Policy General Definitions Authority
1.0 Insurance Regulation 15% of the test 1.1 LICENSING The process of licensing in Pennsylvania is highly regulated. The Pennsylvania Department of Insurance supervises the process. You are about to find
COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT US Code as of: 01/05/99 Title 18 Sec. 1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers (a) Whoever - (1) having knowingly accessed a computer without authorization
0 LC House Bill 0 By: Representatives Boggs of the th, Bordeaux of the th, Westmoreland of the th, Jenkins of the rd, Smyre of the th, and others A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT To amend Article of Chapter
Case: 12-13381 Date Filed: 05/29/2013 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-13381 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00281-RBD-JBT-1
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS Department of Business Regulation INSURANCE DIVISION 1511 Pontiac Avenue, Bldg. 69-2 Cranston RI 02920 Telephone No. (401) 462-9520 FAX No. (401) 462 9559
San Antonio Police Department FORGERY DETAIL 315 S. Santa Rosa SAN ANTONIO, TX 78207 (210)-207-7451 OFFICE (210)-207-4070 FAX Identity Theft Packet SAPD case # Assigned Detective: The San Antonio Police
July 19, 2011 Government Enforcement The Texas Life Settlements Act Alert No. 2: New Protection The recently enacted Texas Life Settlements Act promises to provide additional protection for policy owners
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
ELDER & VULNERABLE ADULTS S.B. 49 (S-1) & 50 (S-1): ANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE Senate Bill 49 (Substitute S-1 as reported) Senate Bill 50 (Substitute S-1 as reported) Sponsor: Senator Virgil Smith
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.