1 Submitted to ApJ 6 Sep 2006; accepted 16 Nov 2006 The Physical Properties of HD 3651B: An Extrasolar Nemesis? Adam J. Burgasser 1 arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 16 Nov 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Building 37, Room 664B, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139; ABSTRACT I present detailed analysis of the near infrared spectrum of HD 3651B, a faint, co-moving wide companion to the nearby planet-hosting star HD These data confirm the companion as a brown dwarf with spectral type T8, consistent with the analysis of Luhman et al. Application of the semi-empirical technique of Burgasser, Burrows & Kirkpatrick indicates that HD 3651B has T eff = 790±30 K and log g = 5.0±0.3 for a metallicity of [M/H] = 0.12±0.04, consistent with a mass M = 0.033±0.013 M and an age of Gyr. The surface gravity, mass and age estimates of this source are all highly sensitive to the assumed metallicity; however, a supersolar metallicity is deduced by direct comparison of spectral models to the observed absolute fluxes. The age of HD 3651B is somewhat better constrained than that of the primary, with estimates for the latter ranging over 2 Gyr to >12 Gyr. As a widely orbiting massive object to a known planetary system that could potentially harbor terrestrial planets in its habitable zone, HD 3651B may play the role of Nemesis in this system. Subject headings: Galaxy: solar neighborhood stars: individual (HD 3651B, Gliese 570D) stars: fundamental parameters stars: low mass, brown dwarfs stars: planetary systems 1. Introduction Luhman et al. (2006) and Mugrauer et al. (2006) have recently reported the discovery of a co-moving, widely-separated (43 ; 480 AU projected separation) companion to the 1 Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement NCC with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Space Science, Planetary Astronomy Program.
2 2 nearby K0 V dwarf HD Low resolution near-infrared spectroscopy of this source has identified it as a late T-type brown dwarf (Luhman et al. 2006). The HD 3651 system also hosts a closely-separated (a = 0.296±0.017 AU), high-eccentricity (e = 0.64±0.04) sub-saturn-mass planet (Msin i = 0.23±0.02 M Jupiter ), HD 3651b, identified from radial velocity variability (Fischer et al. 2003). While several exoplanet-host stars are known to have stellar-mass companions (e.g., Lowrance, Kirkpatrick & Beichman 2002; Patience et al. 2002; Eggenberger, Udry & Mayor 2004; Raghavan et al. 2006), HD 3651ABb is the first star/brown dwarf/planet system to be identified, and is therefore a key target for studies of all three of these mass-delineated classes. In this article, I analyze low-resolution near-infrared spectroscopy of HD 3651B, using the technique of Burgasser, Burrows & Kirkpatrick (2006, hereafter BBK) to derive the effective temperature (T eff ), surface gravity (log g), metallicity ([M/H]), mass and age of this source. Acquisition and characterization of the spectral data, obtained with SpeX (Rayner et al. 2003) mounted on the 3m NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (hereafter IRTF) is described in 2. Spectral analysis to derive the physical properties of HD 3651B is presented in 3, with the importance of metallicity effects highlighted by the determination that this companion must be metal-rich like the system s primary. Finally, in 5 I speculate on the role of HD 3651B as a Nemesis analog in the HD 3651 system. 2. Observations HD 3651B was observed with SpeX on 3 September 2006 (UT) under clear and dry conditions with good seeing (0. 7 at J-band). The target was acquired using the SpeX guiding camera, and low resolution near infrared spectral data were obtained using the SpeX prism mode and 0. 5 slit, yielding a spectral resolution λ/ λ 120. The slit was aligned to the parallactic angle to mitigate differential refraction effects. Note that this setup was similar to that used by Luhman et al. (2006) for their spectral observations of HD 3651B, with the exception of a slightly narrower slit (0. 5 versus 0. 8). Eight exposures of 180 s each were obtained in an ABBA dither pattern along the slit. The A0 V star HD 7215 was observed immediately afterward and at a similar airmass (1.06) for flux calibration. Internal flat field and Ar arc lamps exposures were also acquired for pixel response and wavelength calibration. All data were reduced using SpeXtool version 3.3 (Cushing, Vacca, & Rayner 2004) using standard settings (cf. Burgasser et al. 2004). Figure 1 compares the reduced spectrum of HD 3651B to equivalent data for the T7.5 companion brown dwarf Gliese 570D (Burgasser et al. 2000) and the T8 field brown dwarf 2MASS J (Burgasser et al. 2002, hereafter 2MASS ). The strong
3 3 H 2 O and CH 4 bands present in the spectrum of HD 3651B are consistent with the observations of Luhman et al. (2006), and confirm this object as a late T-type brown dwarf. Classification of this source was done using the spectral indices of Burgasser et al. (2006). The measurements and associated subtypes are as follows: H 2 O-J = (T8), CH 4 -J = (T7.5), H 2 O-H = (T8), CH 4 -H = (T7.5) and CH 4 -K = (T8), for a mean classification of T8. This value is consistent with the T7.5 subtype derived by Luhman et al. (2006) given the typical 0.5 subtype uncertainty in near infrared T dwarf classifications (Burgasser et al. 2006). 3. The Physical Properties of HD 3651B 3.1. Derived Properties and Metallicity Dependence As a companion to a well-studied, nearby star, the properties of HD 3651B could be readily derived by adopting the age and metallicity of the primary (e.g. Kirkpatrick et al. 2001; Wilson et al. 2001; Luhman et al. 2006). Alternately, the semi-empirical technique described in BBK can be employed. This method involves the comparison of H 2 O and color spectral ratios measured on the spectrum of a late-type T dwarf, which are separately sensitive to T eff and log g (for a given metallicity), to the same ratios measured on theoretical spectral models. The latter are calibrated to reproduce the measured indices for the near infrared SpeX prism spectrum of Gliese 570D (Burgasser et al. 2004), which has reported physical parameters of T eff = K, log g = and [Fe/H] = 0.09±0.04, based on empirical measurements and evolutionary models (Geballe et al. 2001; Saumon et al. 2006). This method provides constraints on both T eff and log g which can then be used to infer mass and age with evolutionary models or empirically via the source s bolometric luminosity. In BBK and Liebert & Burgasser (2006), this method was applied assuming solar or subsolar metallicities. However, the primary of the HD 3651 has a metallicity greater than solar, [Fe/H] = 0.12±0.04 (Santos, Israelian & Mayor 2004). It has been shown in both BBK and Liebert & Burgasser (2006) that slightly subsolar metallicities can significantly skew the derived T eff and log g values. Hence, several cases were considered for 0 [M/H] The spectral models of Burrows, Sudarsky & Hubeny (2006) were employed, spanning 700 T eff 1100 K, 4.5 log g 5.5 (cgs) and 0 [M/H] 0.5. Four pairs of indices were compared between (H 2 O-J, H 2 O-H) and (K/J, K/H). 1 Figure 2 illustrates the (T eff, log g) phase spaces for both [M/H] = 0 and 0.12 over which 1 For definitions of these spectral ratios, see BBK and Burgasser et al. (2006).
4 4 the spectral ratios H 2 O-J and K/H measured on the spectrum of HD 3651B match calibrated values from the models. Their intersection yields robust constraints on these parameters for the source. All four pairs of indices result in a combined T eff = 790±30 K and log g = 5.0±0.2 for [M/H] = 0.12 (Table 1); including the full uncertainty in [M/H] increases the uncertainty on log g to 0.3 dex. 2 For [M/H] = 0, the analysis yields T eff = 810±30 K and log g = 4.7±0.2. Note that a decrease in the assumed metallicity leads to a decrease in the derived surface gravity. This is consistent with trends for subsolar metallicity T dwarfs (BBK; Liebert & Burgasser 2006), and is largely due to the impact of both metallicity and surface gravity on the relative opacity of collision-induced H 2 absorption that dominates the K-band opacity (e.g., Saumon et al. 1994). The T eff and log g values of HD 3651B for [M/H] = 0.12±0.04 infer M = 0.033±0.013 M and an age τ = Gyr, based on the evolutionary models of Burrows et al. (2001). For solar metallicity, these values decrease to M = 0.020±0.005 M and τ = Gyr, primarily due to the lower surface gravity indicated in this case. An estimate of mass can also be obtained from the bolometric luminosity (L) of HD 3651B by the relation M = Lg/4πGσTeff 4. Using the luminosity derived by Luhman et al. (2006), log L/L = 5.60±0.05, and the T eff and log g values derived from the spectroscopic analysis yields M = M (M = M ) for [M/H] = 0.12 ([M/H] = 0.0). These values are consistent with those derived from the evolutionary models, albeit with larger uncertainties driven primarily by the uncertainty in log g HD 3651B: A Metal-Rich T Dwarf The method outlined above, based on only two indices, cannot discriminate between [M/H] = 0 and 0.12 for HD 3651B, for in both cases it is possible to derive robust constraints on both T eff and log g (this is not always the case; cf. Figure 8 of BBK). A third spectral index that is uniquely sensitive to metallicity is required, and BBK have suggested the ratio between the 1.05 and 1.25 µm peak fluxes (Y/J index) as a possible option. This ratio is sensitive to the far red wings of the pressure-broadened 0.77 µm K I doublet, and models indicate considerable metallicity sensitivity to this feature. However, the Burrows, Sudarsky & Hubeny (2006) models do not reproduce the observed trends between Y -band and J-band, likely due to current uncertainties in the treatment of the far-wing 2 Note that additional systematic uncertainties of ±50 K and ±0.1 dex in the derived T eff and log g values may be present due to uncertainty in the parameters of Gliese 570D and possible systematic effects in the spectral models (BBK).
5 5 opacities (Burrows & Volobuyev 2003; Allard et al. 2003). An alternate procedure, used by Liebert & Burgasser (2006), is to compare the observed absolute fluxes of the brown dwarf to spectral models based on the best fit parameters for a given metallicity. This is done in Figure 3, which shows the absolute flux-calibrated spectrum of HD 3651B, based on J-band photometry from Luhman et al. (2006, 16.16±0.03) and the parallax of HD 3651A from HIPPARCOS (Perryman et al. 1997, π = 90.0±0.7 mas); to predicted fluxes for two T eff = 800 K models, one with log g = 4.7 and [M/H] = 0 and one with log g = 5.0 and [M/H] = While the models provide poor fits to the 1.1 and 1.6 µm CH 4 bands, the result of well-documented deficiencies in CH 4 opacities at these wavelengths, it is clear that the lower surface gravity, solar metallicity model is too bright as compared to the data. The [M/H] = 0.12 model, on the other hand, provides a reasonably good match to the absolute fluxes at each of the spectral peaks. This comparison clearly supports a supersolar metallicity for HD 3651B. Another consideration is the inferred age of HD 3651B as compared to previous age determinations for HD 3651A. Published estimates for the primary vary appreciably. Wright et al. (2004) report an age of 5.9 Gyr on the basis of weak Ca II HK emission (log R HK = 5.07) and the age/activity relation of Donahue (1993). On the other hand, Rocha-Pinto et al. (2004) report a chromospheric age of only 2.1 Gyr based on a higher value of log R HK = 4.85 from Soderblom et al. (1993). Indeed, a 35% variation in Ca II HK emission of HD 3651B has been seen over 17 years of observations at Mount Wilson Observatory (Duncan et al. 1991). From isochrone fitting, Nordström et al. (2004) derive a minimum age of 2.6 Gyr, Valenti & Fischer (2005) an age of Gyr and Takeda et al. (2006) a minimum age of 11.8 Gyr. While there appears to be little consensus, an older age for HD 3651A is most consistent with its chromospheric inactivity, its long rotation period (48 days; Noyes et al. 1984) and its UV W space velocities (Eggen 1989). A value in the range 2 12 Gyr is indicated. This result again argues in favor of HD 3651B being metal-rich. The derived age for the solar metallicity case is considerably younger than that of the primary; while for [M/H] = 0.12±0.04, the ages of the primary and secondary overlap in the range of 2 5 Gyr. Note that this age constraint is more precise than that inferred from the primary alone, and is consistent with both components having been formed at the same time and from the same gas/dust reservior (same age and metallicity) There are two conclusions that may be drawn from this analysis. First, it is clear that the determination of T eff and log g, and hence mass and age, of an individual brown dwarf using the BBK technique is highly sensitive to the assumed metallicity, even for small
6 6 variations. 3 This reflects the overall sensitivity of cool brown dwarf spectra to changes in photospheric abundances, and is not surprising given that the entire near infrared spectrum of a T dwarf is draped by atomic and molecular absorptions. While metallicity effects have been previously noted in the spectra of metal-poor T dwarfs such as 2MASS J (Burgasser et al. 2002; Knapp et al. 2004, BBK) and 2MASS J (Burgasser et al. 1999; Liebert & Burgasser 2006), it is now clear that metal-rich T dwarf spectra can also exhibit metallicity effects. These results emphasize the importance of characterizing the overall abundances and abundance patterns in deriving a complete and accurate characterization of a low-temperature brown dwarf. Note that HD 3651B and Gliese 570D may be a particularly useful pair in studying metallicity effects, as they appear to be identical in nearly all aspects (T eff, log g, age, mass and spectral energy distribution) except metallicity. Second, it is possible that coeval brown dwarf companions may provide additional or even better constraints on the ages of their host systems than some stellar primaries. While age estimates for stars on the basis of chromospheric activity and kinematics can vary appreciably, and are less discriminating at later ages, the example of HD 3651B demonstrates that a late-type brown dwarf can potentially be age-dated with higher precision. However, the accuracy of these ages remains unclear, as they are tied to both the fidelity of evolutionary models and, in the case of the BBK technique, the accuracy and calibration of spectral models. In the former case, there have been few empirical checks on the evolutionary models of brown dwarfs at late ages, 4 although BBK found consistency between the radii of field T dwarfs empirically derived from luminosity measurements and those based on evolutionary models. In the latter case, there appears to be consistency between different sets of spectral models, as an equivalent analysis of the spectrum of HD 3651B using the COND models of Allard et al. (2001) produced nearly identical results. Hence, at first glance it appears that late-type brown dwarf companions could be useful sources for characterizing the properties of a presumably coeval system, although further empirical tests of brown dwarf evolutionary models are needed. 3 [M/H] = 0.12 implies only a 32% increase in metal abundance over solar. 4 At very young ages ( 1 5 Myr), both Mohanty et al. (2004) and Stassun, Mathieu & Valenti (2006) have found discrepancies between evolutionary models and observed parameters. It is possible that these discrepancies arise from the initial conditions assumed in the evolutionary models, and may be unimportant at late ages (cf. Marley et al. 2006).
7 7 4. HD 3651B: An Extrasolar Nemesis? HD 3651B is the first wide brown dwarf companion found in a system hosting at least one known planet. This raises an intriguing question: how has the evolution of the HD 3651 planetary system and specifically the development of life on any putative habitable planets in this system been influenced by this distant brown dwarf companion? This speculative question is an appropriate one, as putative terrestrial bodies within a portion of HD 3651A s habitable zone (Kasting, Whitmire & Reynolds 1993) can persist without dynamical disruption by HD 3651b (Jones, Underwood & Sleep 2005), even considering this giant planet s probable inward migration (Mandell & Sigurdsson 2003). Terrestrial planet formation around the primary of a wide binary system has also been shown to be feasible (Holman, & Wiegert 1997; Quintana 2004). However, the formation, existence and habitability of terrestrial planets in the HD 3651 system may be inhibited by dynamical perturbations from HD 3651B, both directly through orbital modulation 5 (Takeda & Rasio 2005); or the scattering of small bodies, resulting in sustained impacting onto the planet s surface. Yet terrestrial planets on mildly eccentric orbits can maintain habitability depending on the properties of their atmospheres (Adams & Laughlin 2006), while increased impacting rates may in fact facilitate the emergence of life. In the case of the Earth, the late heavy bombardment period between 4.5 and 3.8 Gyr ago resulted in one particularly cataclysmic impact that formed the Moon (Hartmann & Davis 1975), whose tidal forces have maintained Earth s tilt to the Sun and have thereby reduced climate variation. Impacts of icy bodies may have brought necessary water ice to Earth s surface (Chyba 1987; Delsemme 1998) as well as chemical precursors to biotic life (Chyba et al. 1990). On the other hand, later impacts clearly have a negative effect on the evolution of macrobiotic life (Alvarez et al. 1980; Hildebrand et al. 1991). As an instigator of planetary impacts, HD 3651B may play the role of Nemesis in the HD 3651 system. This hypothesized companion to the Sun (Davis, Hut & Muller 1984; Whitmire & Jackson 1984) has been proposed to explain apparent periodicities in massive extinctions (Fischer & Arthur 1977; Raup & Sepkoski 1984; Hut et al. 1987), terrestrial cratering rates (Alvarez & Muller 1984; Rampino & Stothers 1984), reversals of Earth s magnetic fields (Raup 1985) and, more recently, the peculiar orbits of inner Oort Cloud planetoids (Brown, Trujillo & Rabinowitz 2004; Gaudi & Bloom 2005). If HD 3651B were present at its observed separation but bound to the Sun, it would be invisible to the naked eye (M V 27 implies V 9) but readily detectable by Hipparcos, Tycho (Perryman et al. 5 Indeed, Luhman et al suggest that the eccentricity of HD 3651b may be driven by secular perturbations from HD 3651B.
8 8 1997) and early wide-field near-infrared sky surveys (K 1; cf. the Two-Micron Sky Survey, Neugebauer & Leighton 1969). If HD 3651B was at the distance from the Sun proposed for Nemesis ( AU; Davis, Hut & Muller 1984), it would be invisible on visual photographic plate images (V 20) but a relatively bright source (J 10) in the Two Micron All Sky Survey (Skrutskie et al. 2006). Searches for a solar Nemesis have so far turned up negative (e.g., Perlmutter 1986). However, as widely-separated low mass stellar companions appear to be prevalent in known planet-hosting systems (e.g., Raghavan et al. 2006), and with widely-separated brown dwarf companions to these systems only now being identified, Nemesis counterparts may be a common facet of all planetary systems and an important consideration for the emergence of terrestrial-based life. The author thanks D. Chakrabarty and J. Winn for their helpful comments on an early version of the manuscript, and acknowledges the support of telescope operator E. Volquardsen and instrument specialist J. Rayner during the IRTF observations. The author also thanks the anonymous referee for her/his insightful comments that led to the investigation of metallicity effects in the T eff /log g analysis. Electronic versions of their evolutionary and spectral models were kindly provided by A. Burrows and P. Hauschildt for this work. The author wishes to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. He is most fortunate to have had the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. Facilities: IRTF(SpeX) REFERENCES Adams, F. C., & Laughlin, G. 2006, ApJ, 649, 992 Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., Tamanai, A., & Schweitzer, A. 2001, ApJ, 556, 357 Allard, N. F., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Kielkopf, J. F., & Machin, L. 2003, A&A, 411, L473 Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., & Michel, H. V. 1980, Science, 208, 1095 Alvarez, W., & Muller, R. A. 1984, Nature, 308, 718
9 9 Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D. 2004, ApJ, 617, 645 Burgasser, A. J., Burrows, A., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2006, ApJ, 639, 1095 (BBK) Burgasser, A. J., McElwain, M. W., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Cruz, K. L., Tinney, C. G., & Reid, I. N. 2004, AJ, 127, 2856 Burgasser, A. J., Geballe, T. R., Leggett, S. K., Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Golimowski, D. A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 1067 Burgasser, A. J., et al. 1999, ApJ, 522, L65 Burgasser, A. J., et al. 2000, ApJ, 531, L57 Burgasser, A. J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 564, 421 Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. 2001, Rev. of Modern Physics, 73, 719 Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1063 Burrows, A., & Volobuyev, M. 2003, ApJ, 583, 985 Chyba, C. F. 1987, Nature, 330, 632 Chyba, C. F., Thomas, P. J., Brookshaw, L., & Sagan, C. 1990, Science, 249, 366 Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362 Davis, M., Hut, P., & Muller, R. A. 1984, Nature, 308, 715 Delsemme, A. H. 1998, P&SS, 47, 125 Donahue, R. A. 1993, Ph.D. Thesis, New Mexico State University Duncan, D. K., et al. 1991, ApJS, 76, 383 Eggen, O. J. 1989, PASP, 101, 366 Eggenberger, A., Udry, S., & Mayor, M. 2004, A&A, 417, 353 Fischer, A. G., & Arthur, M. A. 1977, Soc. Econ. Paleont. Miner. Spec. Publ. 25, 19 Fischer, D. A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Vogt, S. S., & Henry, G. W. 2003, ApJ, 590, 1081
10 10 Gaudi, B. S., & Bloom, J. S. 2005, ApJ, 635, 711 Geballe, T. R., Saumon, D., Leggett, S. K., Knapp, G. R., Marley, M. S., & Lodders, K. 2001, ApJ, 556, 373 Hartmann, W. K., & Davis, D. R Icarus, 24, 505 Hildebrand, A. R., Penfield, G. T., Kring, D. A., Pilkington, M., Camargo, A. Z., Jacobsen, S. B., & Boynton, W. V. et al. 1991, Geology, 19, 867 Holman, M., & Weigert, P. A. 1997, AJ, 117, 621 Hut, P., Alvarez, W., Elder, W. P., Kauffman, E. G., Hansen, T., Keller, G., Shoemaker, E. M., & Weissman, P. R. 1987, Nature, 329, 118 Jones, B. W., Underwood, D. R., & Sleep, P. N. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1091 Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. 1993, Icaurs, 101, 108 Kirkpatrick, J. D., Dahn, C. C., Monet, D. G., Reid, I. N., Gizis, J. E., Liebert, J., & Burgasser, A. J. 2001, AJ, 121, 3235 Knapp, G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 127, 3553 Liebert, J., & Burgasser, A. J. 2006, ApJ, in press Lowrance, P. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Beichmann, C. A. 2002, ApJ, 572, L79 Luhman, K. L., et al. 2006, ApJ, in press Mandell, A. M., & Sigurdsson, S. 2003, ApJ, 599, L111 Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2006, ApJ, in press Mohanty, S., Basri, G., Jayawardhana, R., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P., & Ardila, D. 2004, ApJ, 609, 854 Mugrauer, M., Seifahrt, A., Neuhäuser, R., & Mazeh, T. 2006, MNRAS, in press Neugebauer, G., & Leighton, R. B. 1969, Two-Micron Sky Survey, A Preliminary Catalogue (Washington: NASA) Nordström, B., et al. 2004, A&A, 418, 989
11 11 Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., & Vaughan, A. H. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763 Patience, J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 654 Perlmutter, S. 1986, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley Perryman, M. A. C., et al. 1997, A&A, 323, L49 Quintana, E. V. 2004, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan Raghavan, D., Henry, T. J., Mason, B. D., Subasavage, J. P., Jao, W.-C., Beaulieu, T. D., & Hambly, N. C. 2006, ApJ, 646, 523 Rampino, M. R., & Strothers, R. B. 1984, Nature, 308, 709 Raup, D. M. 1985, Nature, 314, 341 Raup, D. M., & Sepkoski, J. J. 1984, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 81, 801 Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D. W., Onaka, P. M., Denault, A. J., Stahlberger, W. E., Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., & Wang, S. 2003, PASP, 155, 362 Rocha-Pinto, H. J., et al. 2004, A&A, 423, 517 Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2004, A&A, 415, 1153 Saumon, D., Bergeron, P., Lunine, J. I., Hubbard, W. B., & Burrows, A. 1994, ApJ, 424, 333 Saumon, D., Marley, M. S., Cushing, M. C., Leggett, S. K., Roellig, T. L., Lodders, K., & Freedman, R. S. 2006, ApJ, in press. Soderblom, D. R., Stauffer, J. R.,, Hudon, J. D., & Jones, B. F. 1993, ApJS, 85, 315 Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163 Stassun, K. G., Mathieu, R. D., & Valenti, J. A. 2006, Nature, 440, 311 Takeda, G., Ford, E. B., Sills, A., Rasio, F. A., Fischer, D. A., & Valenti, J. A. 2006, ApJS, submitted Takeda, G., & Rasio, F. A. 2005, ApJ, 627, 1001 Valenti, J. A., & Fischer, D. A. 2005, ApJS, 159, 141
12 12 Whitmire, D. R., & Jackson, A. A. 1984, Nature, 308, 713 Wilson, J. C., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Gizis, J. E., Skrutskie, M. F., Monet, D. G., & Houck, J. R. 2001, AJ, 122, 1989 Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. 2004, ApJS, 152, 261 This preprint was prepared with the AAS L A TEX macros v5.2.
13 13 Table 1. Derived Physical Properties of HD 3651B. Parameter [M/H] = 0.00 [M/H] = 0.08 [M/H] = 0.12 a [M/H] = 0.16 [M/H] = 0.24 T eff (K) 810±30 790±30 790±30 790±30 780±40 log g (cgs) 4.7± ± ± ± ±0.2 Mass (M ) 0.020± ± ± ± ±0.013 Age (Gyr) a Santos, Israelian & Mayor (2004) derive a metallicity for the primary of [Fe/H] = 0.12±0.04.
14 14 CH CH 4 H 2 O Gliese 570D (T7.5) H 2 O HD 6351B (T8) 2MASS (T8) CH CIA H 2 K I H 2 O CH 4 Normalized f λ 1.0 H 2 O O 2 O Wavelength (µm) Fig. 1. From top to bottom, normalized near-infrared spectra of the T7.5 companion Gliese 570D, HD 3651B and the T8 field brown dwarf 2MASS , all obtained with SpeX on IRTF. All spectra are normalized at 1.27 µm and offset by constants (dotted lines). Major spectral features are noted; the symbols designate regions of strong telluric absorption.
15 15 Fig. 2. Phase spaces of T eff and log g constrained for HD 3651B by the indices H 2 O-J and K/H using the technique of BBK for metallicities [M/H] = 0.0 (left) and 0.12 (right). Model indices are measured from calculations by Burrows, Sudarsky & Hubeny (2006) and calibrated to observations of Gliese 570D. The intersecting cross-hatched regions provide robust constraints on T eff and log g. Note the higher gravity constraint derived for the higher metallicity (see also Table 1).
16 HD 3651B T = 800 K, log g = 4.7, [M/H] = 0.0 T = 800 K, log g = 5.0, [M/H] = 0.12 F ν (mjy) Wavelength (µm) Fig. 3. Comparison of the absolute flux-calibrated spectrum of HD 3651B (black line) to two T eff = 800 K spectral models from Burrows, Sudarsky & Hubeny (2006): log g = 4.7 and [M/H] = 0.0 (red dashed line), and log g = 5.2 and [M/H] = 0.12 (blue triple-dot dashed line). Flux calibration of the HD 3651B spectrum is based on J-band photometry from Luhman et al. (2006, 16.16±0.03) and the parallax of the primary as measured by HIPPARCOS (Perryman et al. 1997, π = 90.0±0.7 mas). Uncertainty in this calibration at the J-band peak is indicated by the error bar. Note the agreement between the data and the [M/H] = 0.12 model.
Bull. Astr. Soc. India (2005) 33, 27 33 Mass limit on Nemesis Varun Bhalerao 1 and M.N. Vahia 2 1 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India 2 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,
The M-dwarfs in Multiples (MinMs) Survey - Stellar Multiplicity within 15 pc K. Ward-Duong 1, J. Patience 1, R. J. De Rosa 1, J. Bulger 1, A. Rajan 1, D. McCarthy 2, C. Kulesa 2, S. Goodwin 3, R. Parker
Monografías de la Real Academia de Ciencias de Zaragoza. 25: 115 120, (2004). Extra-solar massive planets with small semi-major axes? S. Fernández, D. Giuliodori and M. A. Nicotra Observatorio Astronómico.
Virtual Observatory tools for the detection of T dwarfs Enrique Solano, LAEFF / SVO Eduardo Martín, J.A. Caballero, IAC T dwarfs Low-mass (60-13 MJup), low-temperature (< 1300-1500 K), low-luminosity brown
Astro 130, Fall 2011, Homework, Chapter 17, Due Sep 29, 2011 Name: Date: 1. If stellar parallax can be measured to a precision of about 0.01 arcsec using telescopes on Earth to observe stars, to what distance
OVERVIEW More than ever before, Physics in the Twenty First Century has become an example of international cooperation, particularly in the areas of astronomy and cosmology. Astronomers work in a number
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Einstein Rings: Nature s Gravitational Lenses Leonidas Moustakas and Adam Bolton Taken from: Hubble 2006 Science Year in Review The full contents of this book
Explorations of the Outer Solar System B. Scott Gaudi Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Known Solar System How big is the solar system? a tidal R 0 M Sun M Galaxy 1/3 200,000AU How big is
Rest optical spectroscopy of FeLoBALs and LoBALs at intermediate redshift Kentaro Aoki Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan E-mail: email@example.com NLS1s and low-ionization
The Origin of the Solar System and Other Planetary Systems Modeling Planet Formation Boundary Conditions Nebular Hypothesis Fixing Problems Role of Catastrophes Planets of Other Stars Modeling Planet Formation
Spatially resolved spectroscopy of the exoplanet HR 8799 c M. Janson 1,4, C. Bergfors 2, M. Goto 2, W. Brandner 2, D. Lafrenière 3 firstname.lastname@example.org ABSTRACT HR 8799 is a multi-planet system detected
7. Our Solar System Terrestrial & Jovian planets Seven large satellites [moons] Chemical composition of the planets Asteroids & comets The Terrestrial & Jovian Planets Four small terrestrial planets Like
Lecture Outlines Chapter 15 Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems Units of Chapter 15 15.1 Modeling Planet Formation 15.2 Terrestrial and Jovian Planets
The Gaia Archive Astronomisches Rechen-Institut am Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg http://www.stefan-jordan.de 1 2 Gaia 2013-2018 and beyond Progress with Gaia 3 HIPPARCOS Gaia accuracy
PROJECT 4 THE HERTZSPRUNG RUSSELL DIGRM Objective: The aim is to measure accurately the B and V magnitudes of several stars in the cluster, and plot them on a Colour Magnitude Diagram. The students will
Science Standard 4 Earth in Space Grade Level Expectations Science Standard 4 Earth in Space Our Solar System is a collection of gravitationally interacting bodies that include Earth and the Moon. Universal
Using Photometric Data to Derive an HR Diagram for a Star Cluster In In this Activity, we will investigate: 1. How to use photometric data for an open cluster to derive an H-R Diagram for the stars and
Observing the Universe Stars & Galaxies Telescopes Any questions for next Monday? Light Doppler effect Doppler shift Doppler shift Spectra Doppler effect Spectra Stars Star and planet formation Sun Low-mass
The Spectra of T Dwarfs I: Near-Infrared Data and Spectral Classification Adam J. Burgasser 1,J.DavyKirkpatrick 2, Michael E. Brown 3, I. Neill Reid 4, Adam Burrows 5, James Liebert 5, Keith Matthews 1,JohnE.Gizis
Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds 13.1 Detecting Extrasolar Planets Our goals for learning: Why is it so difficult to detect planets around other stars? How do we detect
Spectrophotometry of Ap Stars ASTRA Status Report Barry Smalley Astrophysics Group Keele University Staffordshire United Kingdom email@example.com What is Spectrophotometry? Spectroscopy through a wide
Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds 13.1 Detecting Extrasolar Planets Our goals for learning: Why is it so difficult to detect planets around other stars? How do we detect
The Formation of Planetary Systems Astronomy 1-1 Lecture 20-1 Modeling Planet Formation Any model for solar system and planet formation must explain 1. Planets are relatively isolated in space 2. Planetary
Chapter 5 Light and Matter: Reading Messages from the Cosmos Messages Interactions of Light and Matter The interactions determine everything we see, including what we observe in the Universe. What is light?
Top 10 Discoveries by ESO Telescopes European Southern Observatory reaching new heights in astronomy Exploring the Universe from the Atacama Desert, in Chile since 1964 ESO is the most productive astronomical
1 THE GAIA ASTROMETRIC SURVEY OF THE SOLAR NEIGHBORHOOD AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE TARGET DATABASE FOR DARWIN/TPF A. Sozzetti 1,2,3, S. Casertano 4, M. G. Lattanzi 3, and A. Spagna 3 1 Harvard-Smithsonian
Planets beyond the solar system Review of our solar system Why search How to search Eclipses Motion of parent star Doppler Effect Extrasolar planet discoveries A star is 5 parsecs away, what is its parallax?
Highlights of Spanish Astrophysics VII, Proceedings of the X Scientific Meeting of the Spanish Astronomical Society held on July 9-13, 2012, in Valencia, Spain. J. C. Guirado, L.M. Lara, V. Quilis, and
15.6 Planets Beyond the Solar System Planets orbiting other stars are called extrasolar planets. Until 1995, whether or not extrasolar planets existed was unknown. Since then more than 300 have been discovered.
Be Stars By Carla Morton Index 1. Stars 2. Spectral types 3. B Stars 4. Be stars 5. Bibliography How stars are formed Stars are composed of gas Hydrogen is the main component of stars. Stars are formed
The Solar Journey: Modeling Features of the Local Bubble and Galactic Environment of the Sun P.C. Frisch and A.J. Hanson Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics University of Chicago and Computer Science
Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems The New Science of Distant Worlds Detecting Extrasolar Planets Brightness Difference A Sun-like star is about a billion times brighter than the sunlight reflected from
Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems The New Science of Distant Worlds 13.1 Detecting Extrasolar Planets Our goals for learning Why is it so difficult to detect planets around other stars? How do we detect
Giant Molecular Clouds http://www.astro.ncu.edu.tw/irlab/projects/project.htm Galactic Open Clusters Galactic Structure GMCs The Solar System and its Place in the Galaxy In Encyclopedia of the Solar System
Elliptical galaxies: Ellipticals Old view (ellipticals are boring, simple systems)! Ellipticals contain no gas & dust! Ellipticals are composed of old stars! Ellipticals formed in a monolithic collapse,
Astronomy of extrasolar planetary systems Methods and results of searches for planets around other stars Course layout - methods Introduction and history of searches for planets Doppler spectroscopy and
Indiana University Science with the WIYN One Degree Imager Katherine Rhode (Indiana University, WIYN SAC member) Indiana University Department of Astronomy Nine faculty members, plus active emeritus faculty
Lecture #34: Solar System Origin II How did the solar system form? Chemical Condensation ("Lewis") Model. Formation of the Terrestrial Planets. Formation of the Giant Planets. Planetary Evolution. Reading:
Stony Brook University Caltech Palomar Observatory Partnership Proposal Stanimir Metchev, Jin Koda, Frederick Walter, Michal Simon Department of Physics & Astronomy, Stony Brook University, NY 11794 and
From Cosmic Birth to Living Earths A Vision for Space Astronomy in the 2020s and Beyond Are We Alone?! Exoplanet Characterization and Direct Imaging! A Study Commissioned by the Associated Universities
THE HR DIAGRAM THE MOST FAMOUS DIAGRAM in ASTRONOMY Mike Luciuk 1.INTRODUCTION Late in the nineteenth century, astronomers had tools that revealed a great deal about stars. By that time, advances in telescope
The Astrophysical Journal, 658:1217 Y 1235, 2007 April 1 # 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. A THE NIRSPEC BROWN DWARF SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY. II. HIGH-RESOLUTION
The Milky Way Galaxy is Heading for a Major Cosmic Collision Roeland van der Marel (STScI) [based on work with a team of collaborators reported in the Astrophysical Journal July 2012] Hubble Science Briefing
California Standards Grades 912 Boardworks 2009 Science Contents Standards Mapping Earth Sciences Earth s Place in the Universe 1. Astronomy and planetary exploration reveal the solar system s structure,
GAIA Spectroscopy, Science and Technology ASP Conference Series, Vol. XXX, 2002 U.Munari ed. Grids of synthetic spectra for the GAIA mission arxiv:astro-ph/0301212v1 13 Jan 2003 Tomaž Zwitter University
Astro 301/ Fall 2005 (48310) Introduction to Astronomy Instructor: Professor Shardha Jogee TAs: David Fisher, Donghui Jeong, and Miranda Nordhaus Lecture 22 = Tu Nov 15 Lecture 23 = Th Nov 17 http://www.as.utexas.edu/~sj/a301-fa05/
MY FIRST STEPS IN SLIT SPECTROSCOPY Andrew Wilson BAAVSS Spectroscopy Workshop Norman Lockyer Observatory October 2015 Overview My choice of spectrograph, camera and telescope Getting started and basic
Draft version March 12, 2013 Preprint typeset using L A TEX style emulateapj v. 11/10/09 DISCOVERY OF A BINARY BROWN DWARF AT 2 PARSECS FROM THE SUN 1 K. L. Luhman 2,3 Draft version March 12, 2013 ABSTRACT
Astronomy & Physics Resources for Middle & High School Teachers Gillian Wilson http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~gillianw/k12 A cosmologist is.... an astronomer who studies the formation and evolution of the
LLNL-JRNL-476433 Clouds and Chemistry in the Atmosphere of Extrasolar Planet HR8799b T. S. Barman, B. A. Macintosh, Q. M. Konopacky, C. Marois March 28, 2011 Astrophysical Journal Disclaimer This document
Study Guide: Solar System 1. How many planets are there in the solar system? 2. What is the correct order of all the planets in the solar system? 3. Where can a comet be located in the solar system? 4.
Planet Detection Techniques and Results (outline of lectures) These notes are meant to be read in conjunction with the lecture presentation. A pdf of the powerpoint presentation containing all the illustrations
3D MODEL ATMOSPHERES OF THE SUN AND LATE-TYPE STARS Remo Collet Australian National University STELLAR SPECTRA Stellar spectra carry the information about the physical properties and compositions of stars
In studying the Milky Way, we have a classic problem of not being able to see the forest for the trees. A panoramic painting of the Milky Way as seen from Earth, done by Knut Lundmark in the 1940 s. The
Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems The New Science of Distant Worlds Why is it so difficult to detect planets around other stars? Brightness Difference A Sun-like star is about a billion times brighter
Lecture 23: Terrestrial Worlds in Comparison Astronomy 141 Winter 2012 This lecture compares and contrasts the properties and evolution of the 5 main terrestrial bodies. The small terrestrial planets have
Lecture 14 Introduction to the Sun ALMA discovers planets forming in a protoplanetary disc. Open Q: what physics do we learn about the Sun? 1. Energy - nuclear energy - magnetic energy 2. Radiation - continuum
First Discoveries The Sloan Digital Sky Survey began operating on June 8, 1998. Since that time, SDSS scientists have been hard at work analyzing data and drawing conclusions. This page describes seven
NATIONAL OBSERVATORY OF ATHENS Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote Sensing HELMOS OBSERVATORY COOKBOOK for Aristarchos Transient Spectrometer (ATS) P. Boumis, J. Meaburn,
14b. Pluto, Kuiper Belt & Oort Cloud Pluto Pluto s moons The Kuiper Belt Resonant Kuiper Belt objects Classical Kuiper Belt objects Pluto Data: Numbers Diameter: 2,290.km 0.18. Earth Mass: 1.0. 10 22 kg
HABITABLE PLANETS For every star with planets, how many of these planets (on average) are habitable for life? (ne in Drake equation) There are several main requirements: A. heavy elements (C, N, O,...)
Assembly & Use Instructions -- Stanford Spectrographs Instructions You ll need: Spectrograph poster, diffraction grating, adhesive tape NOTE: Try not to touch the grating material, since the oils on your
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 000 (0000) Printed 26 January 2006 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey ZY JHK Photometric System: Passbands and Synthetic Colours P. C. Hewett,
SCIENCE 0 DISTANCES IN ASTRONOMY LECTURE NOTES Distances in the Solar System Distance to Venus can be obtained using radar ranging Send signal, determine how long it takes to return Radio waves move at
Cosmic Journey: Teacher Packet Compiled by: Morehead State University Star Theatre with help from Bethany DeMoss Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Corresponding Standards 2 Vocabulary 4 Sizing up the
Orbital Dynamics of Planetary Systems Melvyn B. Davies Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University How do planetary systems evolve? Planetary systems evolve due to the exchange of angular
Grade 6 Standard 3 Unit Test A Astronomy Multiple Choice 1. The four inner planets are rocky and small. Which description best fits the next four outer planets? A. They are also rocky and small. B. They
Name Date Period 30 GALAXIES AND THE UNIVERSE SECTION 30.1 The Milky Way Galaxy In your textbook, read about discovering the Milky Way. (20 points) For each item in Column A, write the letter of the matching
Stars as Suns: Activity, Evolution, and Planets IAU Symposium, Vol. 219, 2004 A. K. Dupree and A. O. Benz, Eds. Understanding Solar Variability as Groundwork for Planet Transit Detection Andrey D. Seleznyov,
How Rare Is Earth? Dr. Stephen Eastmond (60 minutes) Experience the rarity and beauty of our planet Earth s position within our Solar System and within the Milky Way Galaxy. This introductory astronomy
Supplementary Material Contents 1. Alternative designations, celestial coordinates and apparent magnitudes 2. Stellar properties 3. Data preparation and transit modeling 4. Kepler data validation 5. Follow
RESULTS FROM A SIMPLE INFRARED CLOUD DETECTOR A. Maghrabi 1 and R. Clay 2 1 Institute of Astronomical and Geophysical Research, King Abdulaziz City For Science and Technology, P.O. Box 6086 Riyadh 11442,
Solar System Formation Solar System Formation Question: How did our solar system and other planetary systems form? Comparative planetology has helped us understand Compare the differences and similarities
ASTR 405: Exoplanetary Science Stephen Kane Transiting planets discovered via radial velocity HD 209458 b HD 149026 b HD 189733 b GJ 436 b 55 Cancri e GJ 3470 b HD 17156 b (P = 21 days) HD 80606 b (P =
Chapter 5 Database and website This work was done in collaboration with the Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg (CDS) and in particular with F. X. Pineau. 5.1 Introduction The X-shooter Spectral
Some Basic Principles from Astronomy The Big Question One of the most difficult things in every physics class you will ever take is putting what you are learning in context what is this good for? how do
Old Science 30 Physics Practice Test A on Fields and EMR Test Solutions on the Portal Site Use the following image to answer the next question 1. Which of the following rows identifies the electrical charge
A SHORT BIOGRAPHY OF DR. SHIV S. KUMAR A SHORT BIOGRAPHY OF DR. SHIV S. KUMAR (ssk @ galileoinstitute.org) Dr. Shiv S. Kumar was born on March 15, 1939 in Bannu, India (now Pakistan). After obtaining a
Physical Self-Calibration of X-ray and SZ Surveys Greg L. Bryan, Zoltan Haiman (Columbia University) and Joshua D. Younger (CfA) 1. Cluster Surveys and Self-Calibration Clusters of galaxies form at the
Origins of the Cosmos Summer 2016 Pre-course assessment In order to grant two graduate credits for the workshop, we do require you to spend some hours before arriving at Penn State. We encourage all of
White Dwarf Properties and the Degenerate Electron Gas Nicholas Rowell April 10, 2008 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Discovery....................................... 2 1.2 Survey Techniques..................................
Detecting and measuring faint point sources with a CCD Herbert Raab a,b a Astronomical ociety of Linz, ternwarteweg 5, A-400 Linz, Austria b Herbert Raab, chönbergstr. 3/1, A-400 Linz, Austria; firstname.lastname@example.org
Let s first consider the large gas planets: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune Planets to scale with Sun in background 67 62 14 The many moons of the outer planets.. Most of the moons are very small 1
Planetary Dynamics in the Kepler Era Eric B. Ford UF Frontiers September 2, 2011 w/ results from UF students/postdocs (Althea Moorhead, Robert Morehead, Benjamin Nelson, Matthew Payne), Kepler Follow-Up