Kuhn and Popper (Andrew Pickin) 1.The perceived difference in methods: normative versus descriptive
|
|
- Pierce Higgins
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Kuhn and Popper (Andrew Pickin) In the article Reflections on my Critics Kuhn sorts the points made by Popper, Feyerabend, Lakatos, Toulmin and Watkins into three categories. 1 Although the primary aim of this essay is to provide a comparison of the views of Kuhn and Popper it is not so much concerned with the legitimacy of the points made by Kuhn s critics, nor with the adequacy of Kuhn s replies it will be useful to structure the essay around the three categories. 1.The perceived difference in methods: normative versus descriptive Kuhn correctly observes that some of his critics see him as solely concerned with giving a description of science, whereas Popper s approach, they say, is normative. For example, Watkins writes: Popper says, in effect, that major theoretical advances in science ought to have a revolutionary character; and Kuhn says, in effect, that they do have a revolutionary character. 2 And Feyerabend is not sure what to make of Kuhn: Whenever I read Kuhn, I an troubled by the following question: are we here presented with methodological prescriptions which tell the scientist how to proceed; or are we given a description, void of any evaluative element, of those activities which are generally called scientific? Kuhn s writings, it seems to me, do not lead to a straightforward answer. They are ambiguous in the sense that they are compatible with, and lend support to, both interpretations. 3 Kuhn s reply is emphatic. In response to Feyerabend s queries he writes: 1 Kuhn (1969:233) 2 Watkins (1965:37) [Watkins s italics] 3 Feyerabend (1969:198) [Feyerabend s italics]
2 The answer, of course, is that they [i.e., Kuhn s remarks] should be read in both ways [i.e., as descriptions and as prescriptions] at once. If I have a theory of how and why science works, it must necessarily have implications for the way in which scientists should behave if their enterprise is to flourish scientists should behave essentially as they do if their concern is to improve scientific knowledge. 4 Thus, Kuhn s account is normative in the following sense: it attempts to tell us how scientists do behave; and how scientists do behave is essentially how they should behave. Popper is also concerned with the question of how scientists ought to behave. However, there is a significant difference between his view and Kuhn s although Kuhn plays it down. The difference is this: Kuhn thinks that science is largely successful, and further that this is necessarily so. The reason for this is that he does not think that there can be criteria of scientific success which are independent of our understanding of the essentials of the scientific process. 5 Thus, for Kuhn, description and prescription go hand in hand. For Popper, in contrast, they come apart. Popper thinks that the aim of science ought to be to get nearer to the truth. Science could therefore be largely unsuccessful; science that fails to get nearer to the truth is unsuccessful science. Thus, for Popper, the normative question of how scientists ought to behave is principally separate from the question of how in fact they do behave. From these considerations another difference between Kuhn and Popper emerges. We have already made the point that Kuhn approaches normative concerns through the project of description. Now, Kuhn thinks that a description of science must, in the final analysis, be psychological or sociological. 6 Consequently, Kuhn approaches the normative question through psychology and sociology. Popper s arguments, on the other hand, are essentially logical. He advocates for science the critical method on the grounds that the search for truth logically requires the elimination of falsehoods. 2. Normal science 4 Kuhn (1969:237) 5 Kuhn (1969:264) 6 Kuhn (1965:21)
3 The second category of criticisms identified by Kuhn groups together remarks made about what Kuhn labels normal science. Again, I will not survey the remarks, nor will I bother with a description of normal science. 7 Instead I will sketch some differences between the views of Kuhn of Popper in the area of normal science. I begin with two remarks: First, Popper agrees that normal science exists. 8 Second, contrary to Watkins s reading of Kuhn, Kuhn thinks that the central episodes in scientific advance are revolutions. 9 Now that the remarks are dealt with, let us turn to where Kuhn and Popper differ. Popper acknowledges that normal science exists, and then goes on to characterise it as a danger to science 10 ; later he characterises its practitioners as applied scientists rather than pure scientists. 11 Popper therefore thinks both that normal science ought to be avoided and that it is not proper science. Kuhn disagrees on both counts. Kuhn first argues that the existence of normal science is a logical corollary of the existence of revolutions. 12 However, since Popper accepts that normal science exists, there is no obvious disagreement here. The real conflict arises when Kuhn goes on to explain why he sees value in normal science. He thinks that once the transition to normal science is made, the time for steady criticism and theory proliferation has passed. 13 There are benefits to focusing all energy on a particular theory; Kuhn writes, Because they can ordinarily take current theory for granted, exploiting rather than criticizing it, the practitioners of mature sciences are freed to explore nature to an esoteric depth and detail otherwise unimaginable. 14 In contrast, Popper advocates the critical method for science at all times. It should be mentioned that Popper does think that there is a need for some dogmatism; theories must be retained long enough to extract their true worth. And Kuhn accepts that critical thinking has an important role to play in science. Thus, their disagreement over normal science is far from absolute. 7 I will write normal science for what Kuhn means by normal science. And I will write normal science for what is conventionally meant by normal science. 8 Normal science, in Kuhn s sense, exists Popper (1965:52) 9 Kuhn (1969:241) 10 Popper (1965:52) 11 Popper (1965:53) 12 Kuhn (1969); see p.233 and p Kuhn (1969:246) 14 Kuhn (1969:247)
4 As stated above, Popper does not think that normal science is science in the proper sense of the term. Popper demarcates science by the presence of the possibility of refutation by observation and experiment. It is not clear that Popper describes normal science as applied science because he thinks that it fails to meet his demarcation criterion. However, mentioning the demarcation criterion allows us to notice another divergence of the views of Popper and Kuhn. Although Kuhn does not believe that it is possible to find a sharp line of demarcation, 15 he does think that puzzle solving is more fundamental to science than testing (he does, however, think that the presence of testing is necessary for a field to qualify as a science 16 ). 3.Irrationality, Relativism, and Incommensurability The third category of criticisms picked out by Kuhn consists of charges of irrationality, relativism, and the defence of mob rule. As usual, I shall only consider how these criticisms relate to a comparison of Kuhn and Popper. Also, I will not discuss mob rule Irrationality Lakatos writes the following about Kuhn s view: Each paradigm contains its own standards. The crisis sweeps away not only the old theories and rules but also the standards which made us respect them. The new paradigm brings a totally new rationality. There are no super-paradigmatic standards. The change is a bandwagon effect. Thus in Kuhn s view scientific revolution is irrational. 17 The passage nicely captures the reason why Kuhn is accused of declaring science irrational. Lakatos s interpretation of Kuhn is wide of the mark. Kuhn thinks that there are many good reasons for choosing one theory rather than another, and he cites some: 15 Kuhn (1965:6) 16 Kuhn (1969:245) 17 Lakatos (1969:178) [Lakatos s italics]
5 accuracy, scope, simplicity, and fruitfulness. 18 These are Kuhn s super-paradigmatic standards. The standards enable him to make sense of rational scientific revolution. Thus, Kuhn and Popper agree that science is, and ought to be, rational. They do, however, differ in their conceptions of rationality. Popper thinks that the critical attitude is characteristic of the rational attitude. 19 On the other hand, we have already seen that Kuhn believes that science does not need to be critical at all times. 3.2 Relativism and Incommensurability Kuhn is also charged with relativism. In response, he writes, In one sense of the term I may be a relativist; in a more essential one I am not. 20 Looking at why Kuhn thinks that he is a relativist will bring out further divergence of his own views and Popper s. The reason why Kuhn thinks that he is in some sense a relativist pertains to truth. Namely, he rejects the idea that one theory can be a better approximation to the truth than another theory. This rejection marks a substantial clash between himself and Popper; it is a rejection Popper s criterion of verisimilitude, and this criterion is a fundamental feature of Popper s philosophy of science. I think that there are two motivations for Kuhn s rejection of the idea that one theory can be a better approximation to the truth than another theory. The first is that he does not believe that one theory can be a better representation of what is really out there than another. He writes: To say, for example, of a field theory that it approaches more closely to the truth than an older matter-and-force theory should mean, unless words are being oddly used, that the ultimate constituents of nature are more like fields than like matter and force. But in this ontological context it is far from clear how the phrase more like is to be applied. Comparison of historical theories gives no sense that their ontologies are approaching a limit: in some fundamental ways Einstein s general relativity resembles Aristotle s physics more than Newton s. In any case, the evidence from which conclusions about an ontological limit are 18 Kuhn (1969:261) 19 Popper (1979:31) 20 Kuhn (1969:264)
6 to be drawn is the comparison not of whole theories but of their empirical consequences. That is a major leap, particularly in the face of a theorem that any finite set of consequences of a given theory can be derived from another incompatible one. 21 The second motivation is related to his notion of incommensurability. Kuhn frequently says that successive theories are incommensurable. One sense in which successive theories are incommensurable, and the important one in this context, is that in the transition from one theory to the next words change their meanings or conditions of applicability in subtle ways. 22 There is no such thing as a theoryindependent vocabulary. Kuhn thinks that a theory-independent vocabulary is required for comparing the verisimilitude of alternate theories (it is not at all clear to me that this is right), and for this reason he sees a second reason to reject Popper s criterion of verisimilitude. Bibliography Feyerabend (1969): Consolations for the Specialist, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Kuhn (1965): Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Kuhn (1969): Reflections on my Critics, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Lakatos (1969): Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Popper (1965): Normal Science and its Dangers, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Popper (1979): Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, OUP, Oxford. Watkins (1965): Against Normal Science, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Kuhn (1969:265) 22 Kuhn (1969:266)
How does the problem of relativity relate to Thomas Kuhn s concept of paradigm?
How does the problem of relativity relate to Thomas Kuhn s concept of paradigm? Eli Bjørhusdal After having published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962, Kuhn was much criticised for the use
More informationPhilosophy of Science: Post-positivism, part II
Philosophy of Science: Post-positivism, part II Kristina Rolin 2012 Positivism (logical empiricism) Empiricism: Scientific knowledge is based on observation statements (which are understood to be basic
More informationMethodology in Social Psychology. Logics of inquiry
Methodology in Social Psychology Logics of inquiry How to carry out scientific research given our understanding of the nature of knowledge. Philosophy of Science clarifies why experimental, scientific
More informationLevels of Measurement. 1. Purely by the numbers numerical criteria 2. Theoretical considerations conceptual criteria
Levels of Measurement 1. Purely by the numbers numerical criteria 2. Theoretical considerations conceptual criteria Numerical Criteria 1. Nominal = different categories based on some kind of typology 2.
More information2. Argument Structure & Standardization
2. Argument Structure & Standardization 1 Some Review So, we have been looking at arguments: What is and is not an argument. The main parts of an argument. How to identify one when you see it. In the exercises
More informationThe Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas
The Slate Is Not Empty: Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas René Descartes and John Locke, two of the principal philosophers who shaped modern philosophy, disagree on several topics; one of them concerns
More informationThe Darwinian Revolution as Evidence for Thomas Kuhn s Failure to Construct a Paradigm for the Philosophy of Science
The Darwinian Revolution as Evidence for Thomas Kuhn s Failure to Construct a Paradigm for the Philosophy of Science Kuhn s goal in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is to propose his ideas as a
More informationThe Function of Paradigms in Scenario Methodology
The Function of Paradigms in Scenario Methodology Scenario 2015 Improving Scenario Methodology: Theory and Practice December 14 th 15 th Perspectives on Corporate Strategy 2 Selected Frameworks and Tools
More informationModern Science vs. Ancient Philosophy. Daniel Gilbert s theory of happiness as presented in his book, Stumbling on Happiness,
Laura Katharine Norwood Freshman Seminar Dr. Golden 10/21/10 Modern Science vs. Ancient Philosophy Daniel Gilbert s theory of happiness as presented in his book, Stumbling on Happiness, has many similarities
More information1/9. Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas
1/9 Locke 1: Critique of Innate Ideas This week we are going to begin looking at a new area by turning our attention to the work of John Locke, who is probably the most famous English philosopher of all
More informationScientific Reasoning: A Solution to the Problem of Induction
International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences IJBAS-IJENS Vol:10 No:03 49 Scientific Reasoning: A Solution to the Problem of Induction Wilayat Khan and Habib Ullah COMSATS Institute of Information
More informationCritical Rationalism
Matthias Baumgart 1 Yaser Houri 2 Özlem Maras 3 1 Efficient Algorithms, TU München, baumgart@in.tum.de 2 System Architecture Group, University of Karlsruhe, houri@ibds.uka.de 3 Applied Informatics Cooperative
More informationThe Refutation of Relativism
The Refutation of Relativism There are many different versions of relativism: ethical relativism conceptual relativism, and epistemic relativism are three. In this paper, I will be concerned with only
More informationCONCEPTUAL CONTINGENCY AND ABSTRACT EXISTENCE
87 CONCEPTUAL CONTINGENCY AND ABSTRACT EXISTENCE BY MARK COLYVAN Mathematical statements such as There are infinitely many prime numbers and 2 ℵ 0 > ℵ 0 are usually thought to be necessarily true. Not
More informationUnifying Epistemologies by Combining World, Description and Observer
Unifying Epistemologies by Combining World, Description and Observer Stuart Umpleby Research Program in Social and Organizational Learning The George Washington University Washington, DC Umpleby@gwu.edu
More informationKant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Winter, 2015/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
More informationTowards a new paradigm of science
Essay Towards a new paradigm of science in scientific policy advising 2007 Eva Kunseler Kansanterveyslaitos Environment and Health Department Methods of Scientific Thought Prof. Lindqvist Introduction:
More informationPositive Philosophy by August Comte
Positive Philosophy by August Comte August Comte, Thoemmes About the author.... August Comte (1798-1857), a founder of sociology, believes aspects of our world can be known solely through observation and
More informationThomas Kuhn and The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Thomas Kuhn and The Structure of Scientific Revolutions The implications of the story so far is that science makes steady progress That the process of science cycles round and round from Induction to Deduction...
More informationThomas Kuhn and the Structuralist View of Scientific Theories. The Formal and the Historical Perspective of Theory Change
Thomas Kuhn and the Structuralist View of Scientific Theories. The Formal and the Historical Perspective of Theory Change Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle University of Vienna christian.damboeck@univie.ac.at
More informationWriting an essay. This seems obvious - but it is surprising how many people don't really do this.
Writing an essay Look back If this is not your first essay, take a look at your previous one. Did your tutor make any suggestions that you need to bear in mind for this essay? Did you learn anything else
More informationEDITOR S COMMENTS: PUBLISHING THEORY
Academy of Management Review 2006, Vol. 31, No. 2, 252 255. EDITOR S COMMENTS: PUBLISHING THEORY I have read hundreds of submissions to AMR and have written hundreds of decision letters. Recently, I was
More informationReply to French and Genone Symposium on Naïve Realism and Illusion The Brains Blog, January 2016. Boyd Millar millar.boyd@gmail.
Reply to French and Genone Symposium on Naïve Realism and Illusion The Brains Blog, January 2016 Boyd Millar millar.boyd@gmail.com 1. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the managing editor of The Brains
More informationKant on Time. Diana Mertz Hsieh (diana@dianahsieh.com) Kant (Phil 5010, Hanna) 28 September 2004
Kant on Time Diana Mertz Hsieh (diana@dianahsieh.com) Kant (Phil 5010, Hanna) 28 September 2004 In the Transcendental Aesthetic of his Critique of Pure Reason, Immanuel Kant offers a series of dense arguments
More informationOrganizing an essay the basics 2. Cause and effect essay (shorter version) 3. Compare/contrast essay (shorter version) 4
Organizing an essay the basics 2 Cause and effect essay (shorter version) 3 Compare/contrast essay (shorter version) 4 Exemplification (one version) 5 Argumentation (shorter version) 6-7 Support Go from
More informationDivine command theory
Today we will be discussing divine command theory. But first I will give a (very) brief overview of the semester, and the discipline of philosophy. Why do this? One of the functions of an introductory
More informationCritical Analysis So what does that REALLY mean?
Critical Analysis So what does that REALLY mean? 1 The words critically analyse can cause panic in students when they first turn over their examination paper or are handed their assignment questions. Why?
More informationThe European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) and the Autorité des Normes Comptables (ANC) jointly publish on their websites for
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) and the Autorité des Normes Comptables (ANC) jointly publish on their websites for information purpose a Research Paper on the proposed new Definition
More informationStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Thomas Kuhn. 1. Life and Career
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Thomas Kuhn Bird, Alexander, "Thomas Kuhn", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
More informationFILMS AND BOOKS ADAPTATIONS
FILMS AND BOOKS Reading a book is very different to watching a film. The way that we understand both is also different. We firstly need to think of the ways in which films and books tell their stories.
More informationTO HELL WITH SPEECH ACT THEORY
In: Marcelo Dascal (Ed.), Dialogue: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Amsterdam / Philadelphia (Benjamins), 1985, S. 205-211. Georg Meggle TO HELL WITH SPEECH ACT THEORY 0. During the last few years semantics,
More informationCurrent Conceptions of the Function of the School. 5.1 Hilda Taba
Current Conceptions of the Function of the School 5.1 Hilda Taba Hilda Taba 1902-1967 Major influence in curriculum theory and practice Observed relations between students and teachers Wrote books and
More informationWriting Thesis Defense Papers
Writing Thesis Defense Papers The point of these papers is for you to explain and defend a thesis of your own critically analyzing the reasoning offered in support of a claim made by one of the philosophers
More informationHANNE ANDERSEN, PETER BARKER AND XIANG CHEN, The Cognitive. Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1 HANNE ANDERSEN, PETER BARKER AND XIANG CHEN, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. xvii + 199. ISBN 978-0-521-85575-4. [Pound Symbol] 45.00
More informationPhil 420: Metaphysics Spring 2008. [Handout 4] Hilary Putnam: Why There Isn t A Ready-Made World
1 Putnam s Main Theses: 1. There is no ready-made world. Phil 420: Metaphysics Spring 2008 [Handout 4] Hilary Putnam: Why There Isn t A Ready-Made World * [A ready-made world]: The world itself has to
More informationAtheism. Richland Creek Community Church
Atheism Richland Creek Community Church The Existence of God: Does America believe in God? Google - What percentage of Americans believe in God? = well over 90%. In fact, over the past 50 years of research
More informationHow should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence?
Subject: Title: Word count: Epistemology How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it reducible to other kinds of evidence? 2,707 1 How should we think about the testimony of others? Is it
More informationPhysical Science and Common-sense Psychology
Physical Science and Common-sense Psychology Gilbert Harman January 31, 2008 1 Introduction Scott Sehon argues for a complex view about the relation between commonsense psychology and the physical sciences.
More informationANOTHER GENERATION OF GENERAL EDUCATION
ANOTHER GENERATION OF GENERAL EDUCATION Peter K. Bol Charles H. Carswell Professor of East Asian Languages and Civilizations I was asked to set forth some personal reflections rather than to summarize
More informationHOW TO CHANGE NEGATIVE THINKING
HOW TO CHANGE NEGATIVE THINKING For there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2, 239 251. Although you may not be fully aware of it, our minds
More informationPlato gives another argument for this claiming, relating to the nature of knowledge, which we will return to in the next section.
Michael Lacewing Plato s theor y of Forms FROM SENSE EXPERIENCE TO THE FORMS In Book V (476f.) of The Republic, Plato argues that all objects we experience through our senses are particular things. We
More informationNeil Murray University of South Australia April 2011
Introduction When it comes to writing, academic disciplines particularly those within the humanities and social sciences have a good deal in common and, for the most part, they share very similar expectations
More information*Heinemann, London, 1979
Burrell and Morgan s Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis * *Heinemann, London, 1979 Main 4 debates in Sociology Is reality given or is it a product of the mind? Must one experience something
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College. Lecture 3: Induction
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College Lecture 3: Induction Hume s s Fork 2 Enquiry IV starts with a vital distinction between types of proposition: Relations of ideas can be known a priori
More informationScience and Scientific Reasoning. Critical Thinking
Science and Scientific Reasoning Critical Thinking Some Common Myths About Science Science: What it is and what it is not Science and Technology Science is not the same as technology The goal of science
More informationThe Null Hypothesis. Geoffrey R. Loftus University of Washington
The Null Hypothesis Geoffrey R. Loftus University of Washington Send correspondence to: Geoffrey R. Loftus Department of Psychology, Box 351525 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-1525 gloftus@u.washington.edu
More informationWriting = A Dialogue. Part I. They Say
Writing = A Dialogue You come late. When you arrive, others have long preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated discussion, a discussion too heated for them to pause and tell you exactly what it is
More informationDiscrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2
CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2 Proofs Intuitively, the concept of proof should already be familiar We all like to assert things, and few of us
More informationGCE Religious Studies Explanation of Terms Unit 1D: Religion, Philosophy and Science
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Explanation of s Unit 1D: Religion, Philosophy and Science The Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) is a company limited by guarantee registered
More informationMethodological Issues for Interdisciplinary Research
J. T. M. Miller, Department of Philosophy, University of Durham 1 Methodological Issues for Interdisciplinary Research Much of the apparent difficulty of interdisciplinary research stems from the nature
More informationhij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit B Religion and Ethics 2 Example of Candidate s Work from the January 2009 Examination Candidate A
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit B Religion and Ethics 2 Example of Candidate s Work from the January 2009 Examination Candidate A Copyright 2009 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved.
More informationUse the Academic Word List vocabulary to make tips on Academic Writing. Use some of the words below to give advice on good academic writing.
Use the Academic Word List vocabulary to make tips on Academic Writing Use some of the words below to give advice on good academic writing. abstract accompany accurate/ accuracy/ inaccurate/ inaccuracy
More informationRemodelling the Big Bang
Remodelling the Big Bang Dewey B. Larson Unquestionably, the most significant development that has taken place in cosmology in recent years is the replacement of the original Big Bang theory by a totally
More informationDecision Making under Uncertainty
6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making under Uncertainty How to make one decision in the face of uncertainty Lecture 19 1 In the next two lectures, we ll look at the question of how
More informationIntroduction. My thesis is summarized in my title, No. God, No Laws : the concept of a law of Nature cannot be
No God, No Laws Nancy Cartwright Philosophy LSE and UCSD Introduction. My thesis is summarized in my title, No God, No Laws : the concept of a law of Nature cannot be made sense of without God. It is not
More informationEmile Durkheim: Suicide as Social Fact Leslie-Ann Bolden, Michela Bowman, Sarah Kaufman & Danielle Lindemann
Emile Durkheim: Suicide as Social Fact Leslie-Ann Bolden, Michela Bowman, Sarah Kaufman & Danielle Lindemann In The Rules of the Sociological Method (1895), Durkheim examines a category of human facts
More informationInternal Audit and supervisory expectations building on progress
1 Internal Audit and supervisory expectations building on progress Speech given by Sasha Mills, Director, Cross Cutting Policy, Bank of England Ernst & Young, London 3 February 2016 2 Introductions Hello,
More informationPlanning and Writing Essays
Planning and Writing Essays Many of your coursework assignments will take the form of an essay. This leaflet will give you an overview of the basic stages of planning and writing an academic essay but
More informationKilling And Letting Die
[This essay originally appeared in the Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition, ed. Lawrence Becker and Charlotte Becker (New York: Routledge, 2001), vol. 2, pp. 947-50.] Killing And Letting Die Is it worse
More informationOne natural response would be to cite evidence of past mornings, and give something like the following argument:
Hume on induction Suppose you were asked to give your reasons for believing that the sun will come up tomorrow, in the form of an argument for the claim that the sun will come up tomorrow. One natural
More informationEAST-WEST Journal of ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS. Journal of Economics and Business Vol. XIIΙ 2010, No 2 (125-129) BOOK REVIEW
Journal of Economics and Business Vol. XIIΙ 2010, No 2 (125-129) BOOK REVIEW Joel Bakan s, The Corporation The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. Free Press - Constable & Robinson, 2004, 2005. Reviewed
More informationIn Defense of Kantian Moral Theory Nader Shoaibi University of California, Berkeley
In Defense of Kantian Moral Theory University of California, Berkeley In this paper, I will argue that Kant provides us with a plausible account of morality. To show that, I will first offer a major criticism
More informationINCIDENCE-BETWEENNESS GEOMETRY
INCIDENCE-BETWEENNESS GEOMETRY MATH 410, CSUSM. SPRING 2008. PROFESSOR AITKEN This document covers the geometry that can be developed with just the axioms related to incidence and betweenness. The full
More informationContents. A Word About This Guide... 3. Why Is It Important for My Child to Read?... 4. How Will My Child Learn to Read?... 4
Contents A Word About This Guide............................... 3 Why Is It Important for My Child to Read?................ 4 How Will My Child Learn to Read?....................... 4 How Can I Help My
More informationThe Bayesian Approach to the Philosophy of Science
The Bayesian Approach to the Philosophy of Science Michael Strevens For the Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, second edition The posthumous publication, in 1763, of Thomas Bayes Essay Towards Solving
More informationWRITING AN ESSAY Some thoughts to help you get started. A: 'Golden rules' of essay-writing
WRITING AN ESSAY Some thoughts to help you get started. A: 'Golden rules' of essay-writing 1. STRUCTURE Always make it clear to yourself and to your reader: "Where you are, how you got there, and where
More informationActing humanly: The Turing test. Artificial Intelligence. Thinking humanly: Cognitive Science. Outline. What is AI?
Acting humanly: The Turing test Artificial Intelligence Turing (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence : Can machines think? Can machines behave intelligently? Operational test for intelligent behavior:
More informationReligion and Science
Religion and Science Glossary Cosmology the study of the origins of the universe How did the world come into existence? Theory one Aristotle Taught that the universe has always existed and would always
More informationCHECKLIST FOR THE DEGREE PROJECT REPORT
Kerstin Frenckner, kfrenck@csc.kth.se Copyright CSC 25 mars 2009 CHECKLIST FOR THE DEGREE PROJECT REPORT This checklist has been written to help you check that your report matches the demands that are
More informationEinstein s Theory of Special Relativity Made Relatively Simple!
Einstein s Theory of Special Relativity Made Relatively Simple! by Christopher P. Benton, PhD Young Einstein Albert Einstein was born in 1879 and died in 1955. He didn't start talking until he was three,
More informationPractical Jealousy Management
Florida Poly Retreat 2006 Practical Jealousy Management Part 1: On the Nature of Jealousy Jealousy is an unusual emotion in that it is an emotion rooted in other emotions. Often, the root of jealousy lies
More informationENGLISH LITERATURE Candidate Style Answers: An Inspector Calls J. B. Priestley
GCSE (9 1) Topic Exploration Pack J352 ENGLISH LITERATURE Candidate Style Answers: An Inspector Calls J. B. Priestley August 2015 Contents Script A Level 5 3 Script B Level 4 7 Script C Level 3 12 Script
More informationBook Review of Rosenhouse, The Monty Hall Problem. Leslie Burkholder 1
Book Review of Rosenhouse, The Monty Hall Problem Leslie Burkholder 1 The Monty Hall Problem, Jason Rosenhouse, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009, xii, 195 pp, US $24.95, ISBN 978-0-19-5#6789-8 (Source
More informationMetaphysics and the Question of Being
Metaphysics and the Question of Being 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between Heidegger s account of metaphysics and the central topic of his work, the question of
More informationAP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES
AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 2 The score should reflect the essay s quality as a whole. Remember that students had only 40 minutes to read and write; the paper,
More informationRegular Expressions and Automata using Haskell
Regular Expressions and Automata using Haskell Simon Thompson Computing Laboratory University of Kent at Canterbury January 2000 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Regular Expressions 2 3 Matching regular expressions
More informationInterviews and Focus Groups in Advertising, Public relations and Media
1 Your topic: an essay about interviews and focus groups which has to be from the point of view of my course specialism which is ADVERTISING PUBLIC RELATIONS AND MEDIA! Your desired style of citation:
More informationThe Problem of Evil not If God exists, she'd be OOG. If an OOG being exists, there would be no evil. God exists.
24.00: Problems of Philosophy Prof. Sally Haslanger September 14, 2005 The Problem of Evil Last time we considered the ontological argument for the existence of God. If the argument is cogent, then we
More informationCommunity Legal Information Association of Prince Edward Island, Inc. Custody and Access
Community Legal Information Association of Prince Edward Island, Inc. Custody and Access Separating parents must make arrangements for child custody, access and visitation. This pamphlet explains some
More informationKoko's Kitten/Dr. Francine Patterson/Created by Long Beach District
Unit 5/Week 4 Title: Koko s Kitten Suggested Time: 5 days (45 minutes per day) Common Core ELA Standards: RI.4.1, RI.4.2, RI.4.3, RI.4.4; RF.4.4; W.4.2, W.4.4, W.4.7, W.4.9; SL.4.1; L.4.1, L.4.2, L.4.4
More informationJob Design from an Alternative Perspective
Job Design from an Alternative Perspective Paula W. Potter Western Kentucky University Abstract The purpose of this paper is to explore a theoretical aspect of job design in a way that departs from the
More informationP1. All of the students will understand validity P2. You are one of the students -------------------- C. You will understand validity
Validity Philosophy 130 O Rourke I. The Data A. Here are examples of arguments that are valid: P1. If I am in my office, my lights are on P2. I am in my office C. My lights are on P1. He is either in class
More informationBiological kinds and the causal theory of reference
Biological kinds and the causal theory of reference Ingo Brigandt Department of History and Philosophy of Science 1017 Cathedral of Learning University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 E-mail: inb1@pitt.edu
More informationQuine on truth by convention
Quine on truth by convention March 8, 2005 1 Linguistic explanations of necessity and the a priori.............. 1 2 Relative and absolute truth by definition.................... 2 3 Is logic true by convention?...........................
More information3. Logical Reasoning in Mathematics
3. Logical Reasoning in Mathematics Many state standards emphasize the importance of reasoning. We agree disciplined mathematical reasoning is crucial to understanding and to properly using mathematics.
More informationQuotes from Object-Oriented Software Construction
Quotes from Object-Oriented Software Construction Bertrand Meyer Prentice-Hall, 1988 Preface, p. xiv We study the object-oriented approach as a set of principles, methods and tools which can be instrumental
More informationThe Greatest Gift is Love
The Greatest Gift is Love Sunday school lesson for the week of May 31, 2015 By Dr. Hal Brady Lesson scripture: 1 Corinthians 13 It goes beyond feelings. It is the set of the will for the welfare of another.
More informationWhy economics needs ethical theory by John Broome, University of Oxford
Why economics needs ethical theory by John Broome, University of Oxford For the meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, 2000. Economics is a branch of ethics. Well, that
More informationSection 1: What is Sociology and How Can I Use It?
Section 1: What is Sociology and How Can I Use It? CHAPTER 1.1: WHAT IS SOCIOLOGY? If you are going to apply sociology, you first need to know what sociology is! In this section, we will introduce you
More informationThe Handbook of Program Management: How to Facilitate Project Success with Optimal Program Management. Dr. James T. Brown, McGraw Hill, 2008
The Handbook of Program Management: How to Facilitate Project Success with Optimal Program Management Dr. James T. Brown, McGraw Hill, 2008 I received this book unsolicited in the mail from Dr. Brown.
More informationJesus and the Counsellor in John s Gospel
Jesus and the Counsellor in John s Gospel In Jesus farewell speech, recorded in John s Gospel (chapters 13-17) Jesus introduces the disciples to one he calls the Counsellor. This Counsellor (the name itself
More informationKant s deontological ethics
Michael Lacewing Kant s deontological ethics DEONTOLOGY Deontologists believe that morality is a matter of duty. We have moral duties to do things which it is right to do and moral duties not to do things
More informationConditional Probability, Hypothesis Testing, and the Monty Hall Problem
Conditional Probability, Hypothesis Testing, and the Monty Hall Problem Ernie Croot September 17, 2008 On more than one occasion I have heard the comment Probability does not exist in the real world, and
More informationDescriptions of Scientific Revolutions: Rorty s Failure at Redescribing Scientific Progress
Stance Volume 5 2012 Descriptions of Scientific Revolutions: Rorty s Failure at Redescribing Scientific Progress Kyle Cavagnini Abstract: The twentieth century saw extended development in the philosophy
More informationUse Your Master s Thesis Supervisor
Use Your Master s Thesis Supervisor This booklet was prepared in dialogue with the heads of studies at the faculty, and it was approved by the dean of the faculty. Thus, this leaflet expresses the faculty
More informationPhil. 4400 Notes #6: Thomas Kuhn
Phil. 4400 Notes #6: Thomas Kuhn Kuhn trivia - Author of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions - Most cited 20 th -century work in Arts & Humanities Index, 1976-1983
More informationTHE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE
THE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE KEITH CONRAD This handout is a supplementary discussion leading up to the definition of dimension and some of its basic properties. Let V be a vector space over a field
More informationMathematical Induction
Mathematical Induction (Handout March 8, 01) The Principle of Mathematical Induction provides a means to prove infinitely many statements all at once The principle is logical rather than strictly mathematical,
More informationSocial Constructionism & Discourse Analysis. Pertti Alasuutari Academy professor University of Tampere
Social Constructionism & Discourse Analysis Pertti Alasuutari Academy professor University of Tampere Topics covered during the course Social constructionism Social theory & human reality Introduction
More informationHow To Teach History And Philosophy Of Science
Course Syllabus NSC-202E: History and Philosophy of Science Contact Details for Professor Name: Tel: E-mail: Koen Lefever 02/641.81.70 (Vesalius College reception desk) koen.lefever@vub.ac.be Course Prerequisites
More information