School Improvement Grant Program Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
- Colin Greene
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 School Improvement Grant Program Frequently Asked Questions GENERAL INFORMATION What is the School Improvement Grant Program? The School Improvement Grant (SIG) program is a federal formula-based funding program contained in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). It is intended to provide resources to improve student achievement in low-achieving Title I schools. Under SIG, states apply for their allotment of federal funds and then provide a substantial portion of those funds to eligible districts by conducting a state application process. The eligible districts must use those funds to reform low-achieving schools as defined by federal guidelines. Pennsylvania s application for approximately $140 million is pending; when it is approved by the U.S. Department of Education, districts may apply to PDE for a share of the funds. How does the School Improvement Grant Program differ from Race to the Top? The School Improvement Grant Program resembles Race to the Top because both programs require certain districts receiving federal funds to implement one of four school intervention models in their persistently low performing schools. However, the School Improvement Grant program differs from Race to the Top in four key ways. 1. SIG does not require the submission of a Memorandum of Understanding in order to qualify for funds; RTTT does. This means a district can apply for SIG funds prior to engaging in any substantial discussions with the union. 2. The implementation timeline for SIG is substantially faster than for RTTT. Districts that apply for SIG funds are expected to begin to implement one of four intervention models in each designated school at the beginning of the school year. 3. Schools that are eligible for SIG and RTTT funds differ. RTTT provides funds to support districtwide reforms in every district that submitted a signed MOU to the state. It also includes targeted funds for designated low achieving or turnaround schools that will implement an intervention model. SIG funds may only be granted to specific Title I and Title I-eligible schools that have been designated as either a Tier I, Tier II, or Tier III school for the purposes of the SIG grant process. Different criteria define the two sets of schools, and consequently RTTT turnaround schools and SIG Tier I, II, and III schools are not the same. A complete list of Tier I, Tier II, and Tier III schools is available on the PDE website or from PSEA. 4. SIG funds are sure to arrive in Pennsylvania within the next couple of months; RTTT funds have not yet, and ultimately may not be awarded to Pennsylvania. RTTT is a competitive grant program, so Pennsylvania must compete against other states to secure a grant and will find out by September if its application is successful. SIG funds are distributed to all states via a formula, not a competitive grant process. In other words, Pennsylvania is certain to receive $140 million in SIG funds, and these funds will be distributed by PDE to those districts with Tier I, Tier II or Tier III schools that apply for funds. What is the difference between a Tier I, Tier II and Tier III school in the SIG program? Tier I schools are defined as any Title I school in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that is among the lowest-achieving five percent of those schools in the state or a high school that has had a graduation rate below 60 percent for several years. Tier II schools are defined as any secondary school that is eligible for, but does not receive, Title I, Part A funds and is among the lowest-achieving five percent of such secondary schools in the state or is a high school that has had a graduation rate below 60 percent for several years.
2 Tier III schools are defined as any Title I school in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that is not a Tier I school. A complete list of Tier I, Tier II, and Tier III schools is available on the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) website or from PSEA. The key practical difference between SIG and RTTT is that the SIG program prioritizes Tier I and Tier II schools. These are the schools that will be dealing with SIG in the coming months, and they must implement an intervention model in order to receive SIG funds. What does it mean if a school is not on the SIG list of Tier I, Tier II or Tier III schools? Only schools listed on the PDE list of Tier I, II and III schools are eligible to receive SIG funds. Schools that are not on that list are not eligible to receive any SIG funds. These schools also are not required by SIG to implement any of the four SIG intervention models. SCHOOL INTERVENTION MODELS What are the four intervention models that schools need to implement in order to receive SIG funds? These four SIG intervention models mimic the four models included in the federal Race to the Top program: transformation, turnaround, restart, and closure. Transformation model: A district implementing the transformation model in a participating school must implement each of the following strategies: Replace the principal (unless hired within the last two years); Grant the principal operational flexibility; Provide ongoing, sustained, job-embedded professional development for all instructional staff; Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain highly-effective staff; Implement standards-aligned assessments, curriculum, instruction, and interventions; Promote the continuous use of student data to inform and differentiate instruction; Establish schedules and strategies that provide increased learning time; and Provide ongoing mechanisms for family and community engagement. Turnaround model: A district implementing the turnaround model in a participating school must undertake several tasks: Replace the principal (unless hired within the last two years) and at least 50 percent of staff; Grant the principal operational flexibility; Use evaluation systems for teachers and principals that include data on student growth; identify and reward educators who increase achievement and remove those who do not; Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain highly effective staff; Increase learning time for students; Provide ongoing, sustained, job-embedded professional development for all instructional staff; Adopt a new governance structure which may include establishing a turnaround office ; Implement standards-aligned assessments, curriculum, instruction, and interventions; Promote the continuous use of student data to inform and differentiate instruction; Establish schedules and implement strategies that provide increased learning time; and Provide appropriate social-emotional and community-oriented services and supports. Restart model: A restart model is one in which a district converts a school or closes and reopens a school under a charter school operator, a charter management organization (CMO), or an education management organization (EMO). A restart model must enroll, within the grades it serves, any former student who wishes to attend the school.
3 School closure: School closure occurs when a district closes a school and enrolls the students who attended that school in other schools in the district that are higher achieving or in a newly opened school. Do all schools that qualify for SIG funds need to implement one of the four intervention models? All Tier I and Tier II schools that receive SIG funds must implement one of the four intervention models defined by the SIG program. If funds are available after all Tier I and Tier II schools identified in the District s application are funded, SIG funds may be used to implement other school reforms in Tier III schools that are not specifically defined within one of the four intervention models. PDE has not revealed what reforms it may expect or require Tier III schools to implement. We do know that districts must apply separately for SIG funds for Tier III schools, and the funds must be used to support research-based strategies that meet the particular needs of the Tier III school. What is the Rule of 9? The Rule of 9 in the SIG Regulations states that any district with nine or more Tier I and Tier II schools included in their application may not implement the transformation intervention model in more than 50 percent of those schools. What is the definition of increased learning time, as used in the transformation and turnaround intervention models? Increased learning time means using a longer school day, week, and/or year schedule to significantly increase the total number of school hours. The additional hours can be used to increase instruction in core academic subjects, increase instruction in other subjects and provide enrichment activities that contribute to a well-rounded education, and/or provide time for teachers to collaborate and engage in professional development within and across grades and subjects. If a district lacks capacity to implement any of the four interventions in all of its Tier I schools, can the district apply for SIG funds to provide other services to some of its Tier I schools? No. The only services a district may provide to a Tier I school using SIG funds are services related to the implementation of one of the four interventions models. If the district lacks capacity to implement one of those models in some or all of its Tier I schools, the district may not use any SIG funds in those schools. IMPLEMENTATION What is the timeline for implementing an intervention model in a Tier I or Tier II school? The United States Department of Education expects that the majority of SIG funds will be used to fully implement intervention models in Tier I and Tier II schools in the school year. Certain intervention model components, such as increased learning time and job-embedded professional development, may need to occur later in the implementation process. Additionally, in some cases a district may need to take precursor actions to implement an intervention model in a Tier I school. Therefore, if not every Tier I school is able to use SIG funds to implement an intervention model in the school year, the state must carry over 25 percent of the funds to distribute in the following year. This is intended to give districts more time to prepare to implement a SIG intervention in those Tier I schools that are not ready to implement interventions at the beginning of the school year.
4 USE OF FUNDS Can a district use SIG funds for general district-level improvement activities in addition to directing the funds toward individual schools? A district may only use SIG funds to pay for district-level activities to support implementation one of the four school intervention models in each Tier I and Tier II school it commits to serve. A district may also use SIG funds to support other related school improvement strategies in the Tier III schools it commits to serve once it has met its obligations to serve identified Tier I and Tier II schools. A district may not use SIG funds to support district-level activities for schools that are not receiving SIG funds. Can the state grant to a district a smaller amount of SIG funds than the district requests in its application? Yes. A state s decision to award SIG funds to a district does not obligate the state to award all of the funds requested by the district. The state must award at least $50k to each school identified in the District s application for each year of the SIG program.
5 APPLICATION When will districts be able to apply for SIG funds? Districts will be able to apply sometime this summer, but the exact dates are still unfortunately unclear. The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) has applied for $140 million in SIG funds from the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE). When PDE s application is approved by USDOE, PDE anticipates opening the application window within a week and keeping the application window open for one month. This initial application window will be for districts with Tier I and Tier II schools only. USDOE has not said when it will approve PDE s application for funds. USDOE must, however, distribute all funds to states by September 20, When will districts with Tier III schools be eligible to apply for SIG funds? PDE s application to USDOE says it will hold two different competitions: one for Tier I and II schools, and then a second one following the award of funds to Tier I and II schools, which will be for Tier III schools. The second competition for Tier III schools will only happen if funds are available after Districts apply for Tier I and Tier II schools and PDE awards such funds. It is impossible to say if Tier III schools will receive SIG funds until after all Tier I and Tier II requests for funds are processed. Additionally, a district with Tier I and II schools may only apply for funds for its Tier III schools if it has served all of its Tier I and II schools. Is a district required to commit to serve every Tier I school in the district? A district that applies for a SIG grant must commit to implement an intervention model in each of its Tier I schools unless the district demonstrates in its application that it lacks sufficient capacity to do so. Can a district omit any of the actions outlined in the SIG application and implement its own version of an intervention model? No. A district implementing an intervention model in one or more of its schools must take all of the actions required in that intervention model. A district may take additional actions to supplement those that are required as part of an intervention model, but it may not implement its own version of a model that does not include all of the required elements. What is the definition of staff as that term is used in the discussion of a turnaround model (for example, the requirement that 50 percent of staff be replaced)? The U.S. Department of Education says that staff includes all instructional staff. A district has discretion to determine whether or not staff also includes non-instructional staff. In determining the number of staff members that must be replaced for the turnaround model, a district should count the total number of staff positions (however staff is defined) within the school, including any positions that may be vacant at the time of the implementation.
6 UNION ISSUES The district wants to apply for SIG funds, but the local does not want to implement one of the four intervention models. Can the local refuse to participate in SIG? The SIG program does not require districts to attain union approval prior to submitting the SIG application to the state. However, SIG does not authorize the district to violate the collective bargaining agreement or state law. Consequently, full implementation of one of the four intervention models may require the district to bargain with the local. If any portion of an intervention model would violate the collective bargaining agreement, the district cannot unilaterally implement that component of the model. Can the district implement the SIG intervention model if the district and union cannot come to agreement on interventions that are subject to collective bargaining by September 2010? School districts applying for SIG grants must still comply with Act 195, Act 88, the School Code, and local collective bargaining agreements in implementing any of the four intervention models. SIG requirements do not preempt federal, state, or local laws, or collective bargaining agreements. Therefore, it is PSEA s position that until agreement is reached, a district could only implement those elements of the intervention model that are not subject to collective bargaining.
Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs (SASA) Monitoring Plan for School Improvement Grants October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011
Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs (SASA) Monitoring Plan for School Improvement Grants October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011 January 12, 2011 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION...
More informationAgenda for Reform. Summary Briefing December 14, 2009
Summary Briefing December 14, 2009 The Vision The Board of Regents envisions a New York where all students are prepared for college, the global economy, 21 st century citizenship, and continued learning
More informationEvery Student Succeeds Act
Every Student Succeeds Act A New Day in Public Education Frequently Asked Questions STANDARDS, ASSESSMENTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY Q: What does ESSA mean for a classroom teacher? A: ESSA will end the obsession
More informationTeacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview
Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements: An Overview The Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) believes that all District of Columbia
More informationDistrict Accountability Handbook Version 3.0 September 2012
District Accountability Handbook Version 3.0 September 2012 Colorado Department of Education Page 1 The purpose of this handbook is to provide an outline of the requirements and responsibilities for state,
More informationPrivate Schools/Equitable Participation
Private Schools/Equitable Participation Equitable Participation Q & A The revision to IDEA in 2004 and the subsequent 2006 IDEA regulations significantly changed the obligation of States and LEAs to children
More informationNCEE EVALUATION BRIEF December 2013 OPERATIONAL AUTHORITY, SUPPORT, AND MONITORING OF SCHOOL TURNAROUND
NCEE EVALUATION BRIEF December 2013 OPERATIONAL AUTHORITY, SUPPORT, AND MONITORING OF SCHOOL TURNAROUND The federal School Improvement Grants (SIG) program, to which $3 billion were allocated under the
More informationLouisiana s Schoolwide Reform Guidance
Overview How educational funds are spent not just how much is spent impacts student achievement. Louisiana Believes is based on the premise that those closest to kids parents and educators know better
More information2014 2015 Open Range Schedule
2014 15 and 2015 16 Instructional Grandfathered/Performance Salary Schedule 2014 2015 Open Range Schedule Minimum Maximum Tier 1 Range $38,500 $43,175 Tier 2 Range $41,080 $49,035 Tier 3 Range $47,370
More informationNCEE EVALUATION BRIEF May 2015 STATE CAPACITY TO SUPPORT SCHOOL TURNAROUND
NCEE EVALUATION BRIEF May 2015 STATE CAPACITY TO SUPPORT SCHOOL TURNAROUND One objective of the U.S. Department of Education s (ED) School Improvement Grants (SIG) and Race to the Top (RTT) program is
More informationGIVING STUDENTS A FRESH START
A ISSUE BRIEF GIVING STUDENTS A FRESH START A NEW APPROACH TO SCHOOL TURNAROUNDS IN NEW YORK STATE This report was published in September 2013 by : The New York Campaign for Achievement Now. To order copies
More informationConnecticut s Race to the Top Phase I Application Framework
Connecticut s Race to the Top Phase I Application Framework Application Goal - Improve the educational success of all students from the preschool years through post secondary education by taking the following
More informationLouisiana Believes. 2016 Charter APPLICATION
Louisiana Believes 2016 Charter APPLICATION Process Manual For Local School Boards and District Administrators A guide to running an evaluation process for charter schools applying to open in the fall
More informationM D R w w w. s c h o o l d a t a. c o m 8 0 0-3 3 3-8 8 0 2
MDR s Guide to Federally Funded Education Programs Major federal programs in the Education Budget for Fiscal Year 2011 are listed below. Twenty-three programs were eliminated from the FY2011 budget, including
More informationDISTRICT: Date Submitted to DOE: Contact Person s Name Title. Phone # E mail:
Review and Approval Checklist for RTTT Principal Evaluation Systems 6 1 2011 *represents beginning of change and # represents end of change. * Modified to Reflect Statutory Changes 4/12/11 # DISTRICT:
More informationSCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) PRACTICE:
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) PRACTICE: TURNAROUND LEADERSHIP ASPIRING LEADERS PIPELINE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS MIAMI, FLORIDA In response to a critical shortage of leaders to support school
More informationSCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) PRACTICE:
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) PRACTICE: BUILDING DISTRICT CAPACITY THROUGH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Recognizing that the causes of low student achievement in a state s lowest
More informationOrange County Public Schools. State Accountability System September 2, 2014
State Accountability System September 2, 2014 Assessment and Accountability in Transition No major portion of Assessment and Accountability is going to stay constant for the 2014 15 school year In addition,
More information0.00 185,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000.00 177,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Budget Ohio Virtual Academy (142950) Lucas County 2012 Rev 2 Application Number (17) U.S.A.S. Fund #: 537 Plus/Minus Sheet (opens new window) Purpose Code Object Code Salaries 100 Retirement Fringe Benefits
More informationGAO RACE TO THE TOP. Reform Efforts Are Under Way and Information Sharing Could Be Improved. Report to Congressional Committees
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees June 2011 RACE TO THE TOP Reform Efforts Are Under Way and Information Sharing Could Be Improved GAO-11-658 Accountability
More informationQuestions and Answers Regarding the Requirements for Highly Qualified Teachers Under ESEA and IDEA
Questions and Answers Regarding the Requirements for Highly Qualified Teachers Under ESEA and IDEA September 15, 2015 09/15/2015 1 Questions and Answers Regarding the Requirements for Highly Qualified
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Contact us: RAC@doe.state.nj.us
Frequently Asked Questions Contact us: RAC@doe.state.nj.us 1 P a g e Contents Identification of a Priority, Focus, or Reward School... 4 Is a list of all Priority, Focus, and Reward Schools available to
More informationHow to Request an Initial Evaluation for Special Education Eligibility
2222 West Braker Lane Austin, Texas 78758 MAIN OFFICE 512.454.4816 TOLL-FREE 800.315.3876 FAX 512.323.0902 How to Request an Initial Evaluation for Special Education Eligibility If you or someone you know
More informationILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SYSTEM OF SUPPORT AND DISTRICT INTERVENTION DIVISION SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) 1003(G)
ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SYSTEM OF SUPPORT AND DISTRICT INTERVENTION DIVISION SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) 1003(G) FY 2014 STATE APPLICATION PUBLIC COMMENT FEEDBACK A request for Public Comments
More informationSupport Services Evaluation Handbook
Support Services Evaluation Handbook for members of Paraprofessionals and School-Related Personnel (PRSP), Baltimore Teachers Union, Local 340 City Union of Baltimore (CUB), Local 800 Baltimore City Public
More informationFY 2013 Budget Request
FY 2013 Budget Request DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education for the Disadvantaged Program FY 2012 Administration FY 2013 Request Difference Title I, Part A (ESEA) $14,516,457,000 $14,516,457,000 $0 School
More informationMEETING NCLB S HIGHLY QUALIFIED GUIDELINES. An NEA-AFT Publication
MEETING NCLB S HIGHLY QUALIFIED GUIDELINES An NEA-AFT Publication July 2003 AFT and NEA Leaders: AFT and NEA share a common commitment to ensuring that every student has a high quality teacher. Our organizations
More information6. Additional Requirements - Teachers Created Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Updated Thursday, September 26, 2013
6. Additional Requirements - Teachers Created Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Updated Thursday, September 26, 2013 Page 1 Please check the boxes below: Assure that teachers who receive a Developing or Ineffective
More informationPlanning a NCLB Title VA Program ODE April 2007
This document is a companion piece to the Planning a NCLB Title VA Program power point. The NCLB Title VA text and USDE Guidance referencing the items in the power point are listed by page number with
More informationRace to the Top (RTTT) Technical Assistance Conference Call Regarding Budget September 10, 2010
Race to the Top (RTTT) Technical Assistance Conference Call Regarding Budget September 10, 2010 1 The 90-Day Timeline August 24 August 30-September 2 September 3 September 7-14 September 15- October 13
More information1. Modernizing Ohio Classrooms and Curriculum
Reforming Ohio s Education System for the Modern Economy Outline of Governor Ted Strickland s Education Reform and Funding Plan, as Included in the FY 2010-2011 Biennial Budget Components of Governor Strickland
More informationCII - Promising Practices
March 2011 The Oklahoma Story CII - Promising Practices Situating School Improvement Grants within a Coherent System of Support Prepared by Julie Corbett of Corbett Education Consulting for the Center
More informationTechnical Assistance Response 1
Technical Assistance Response Date: March 23, 2015 To: From: Re: Michigan Department of Education Bersheril Bailey, State Manager, and Beverly Mattson, Ph.D., contributing author, Great Lakes Comprehensive
More informationThe Money You Don t Know You Have for School Turnaround:
The Money You Don t Know You Have for School Turnaround: Maximizing the Title I Schoolwide Model Authors Melissa Junge and Sheara Krvaric July 2013 Acknowledgements This report is funded in part by the
More informationBecome more knowledgeable about the education reform landscape. Learn how to better advocate on behalf of your child(ren)
Tennessee Become more knowledgeable about the education reform landscape Learn how to better advocate on behalf of your child(ren) Education Choices in Tennessee Public Schools Tennessee public schools
More informationQuestions and Answers On Highly Qualified Teachers Serving Children With Disabilities
Questions and Answers On Highly Qualified Teachers Serving Children With Disabilities January 2007 The final regulations for the reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) were published
More informationDescription of Florida s Support for Turnaround Efforts
Technical Assistance Response Date: April 28, 2015 To: Michigan Department of Education From: Re: Bersheril Bailey, State Manager and Beverly Mattson, contributing author, Great Lakes Comprehensive Center
More informationNew Hampshire Farmington High School 40 Thayer Drive Farmington NH 03836 603-755-2811. Interventions Annual Form by Federal Requirement
New Hampshire Farmington High School 40 Thayer Drive Farmington NH 03836 603-755-2811 Interventions Annual Form by Federal Requirement Instructions: When SIG Implementation begins, complete the descriptions
More informationProfessionals Responsible for Campus Turnaround Plan Development: Name:
Date of Board Grades Served: 6 8 Approval: 5/23/2016 Consecutive School Years Rated Academically Unacceptable/Improvement Required: Dr. Terrence Eaton Ron Gonzales Jonathan Smith Dr. Velma Wilson Diane
More informationJUST THE FACTS. Memphis, Tennessee
JUST THE FACTS Memphis, Tennessee The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational
More informationTechnical Review Coversheet
Status: Submitted Last Updated: 07/08/2010 10:15 AM show names show group subtotals Technical Review Coversheet Applicant: New Schools for New Orleans --, -, (U396B100118) Reader #1: POINTS POSSIBLE POINTS
More informationOPPORTUNITY COMPACT EDUCATION ILLINOIS RACE TO THE TOP APPLICATION BRIEFING
As of March 5 th, Illinois has been selected as one of 16 Finalists for the 1 st Round of Race to the Top Funding. OVERVIEW In 2009, President Obama announced an unprecedented financial commitment providing
More informationTexas Title I Priority Schools Grant
San Antonio ISD on this page have been confirmed with Organization Name County-District# Standard Application System (SAS) Sam Houston High School 006 Campus Name Campus Number School Years - 74-6002167
More informationParent and Family Engagement Provisions in the Every Student Succeeds Act
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) serves as the latest reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) which was last reauthorized in 2002 as the No Child Left Behind Act
More informationLEA Scope of Work. Buckeye Online School for Success LEA IRN: 000417-YEAR 3 LEA Contact: Jason Duke (jduke@go2boss.com) YEAR 3
LEA Scope of Work LEA Name: Buckeye Online School for Success LEA IRN: 000417-YEAR 3 LEA Contact: Jason Duke (jduke@go2boss.com) YEAR 3 The purpose of this agreement is to establish a framework of collaboration
More informationFEDERAL ROLE IN EDUCATION
FEDERAL ROLE IN EDUCATION KEY ISSUES The majority of decisions on public education are made at the state and local levels, but the federal government does contribute resources to North Carolina s public
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Funding Highlights: Provides $77.4 billion. The Budget includes a significant increase for K-12 education, while making tough choices to put the Pell Grant program on a sustainable
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Funding Highlights: Provides $77.4 billion. The Budget includes a significant increase for K-12 education, while making tough choices to put the Pell Grant program on a sustainable
More informationLouisiana Department of Education 2013 Common District Charter Request for Applications
Louisiana Department of Education 2013 Common District Charter Request for Applications Table of Contents I. Introduction... 3 II. New and Experienced Operator Application Tracks... 4 III. Charter Application
More informationStrategic Plan A broadly-defined plan aimed at creating a desired future.
Strategic Plan A broadly-defined plan aimed at creating a desired future. The Parkland School District s Strategic Plan is a living document that is used as a basis for the district s annual goals process.
More informationGAO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS. Education Should Take Additional Steps to Enhance Accountability for Schools and Contractors
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters April 2012 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS Education Should Take Additional Steps to Enhance Accountability for Schools and
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 50 Section 50.10 Purpose 50.20 Applicability 50.30 Definitions TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL
More informationA Year Two Progress Report on Race to the Top in Rhode Island August 2012
Leading the Way Toward Great Schools A Year Two Progress Report on Race to the Top in Rhode Island August 2012 Rhode Island Department of Education, August 2012 Race to the Top in Rhode Island In 2010,
More informationMulti-Tiered System of Supports SITE-BASED INTEVENTION AND SUPPORTS GUIDANCE For Balanced Score Card Development
Multi-Tiered System of SITE-BASED INTEVENTION AND SUPPORTS GUIDANCE For Balanced Score Card Development Site Leaders, In Fall 2012 we introduced a comprehensive, system-wide strategy to address equity
More informationTK EXPANSION PLAN GOALS. The short and long-term goals of the TK Expansion Project are to:
TK EXPANSION PLAN The Transitional Kindergarten Expansion Plan is intended to provide an alternate program in schools with closed School Readiness Language Development Program (SRLDP) classrooms. $14.3M
More informationU.S. Department of Education - EDCAPS G5-Technical Review Form (New)
U.S. Department of Education - EDCAPS G5-Technical Review Form (New) Status: Submitted Last Updated: 8/25/214 5:25 PM Technical Review Coversheet Applicant: Reader #1: ********** Success Academy Charter
More informationPennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support
Pennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support The Pennsylvania Department of Education s (PDE) mission is to lead and serve the educational community to enable each individual to grow into an inspired,
More informationLewis Frasier Middle School Parent Involvement Policy 2015-2016 School Year SCHOOL PLAN FOR SHARED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
Lewis Frasier Middle School Parent Involvement Policy 2015-2016 School Year Stephanie Clark, Title I Director Jermaine Williams, Principal Kevin VanHouten, Asst. Principal Lavanda Spencer, Parent Involvement
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 50 Section 50.10 Purpose 50.20 Applicability 50.30 Definitions TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL
More informationTechnical Review Coversheet
Status: Submitted Last Updated: 8/6/1 4:17 PM Technical Review Coversheet Applicant: Seattle Public Schools -- Strategic Planning and Alliances, (S385A1135) Reader #1: ********** Questions Evaluation Criteria
More informationThe School Improvement Grant Rollout in America s Great City Schools
The School Improvement Grant Rollout in America s Great City Schools February 2012 The School Improvement Grant Rollout in America s Great City Schools Jonathon Lachlan-Haché Manish Naik Michael Casserly
More informationLINE CREEK 2015-2016 TITLE 1 AND STUDENT SUPPORT 2015-2016
LINE CREEK 2015-2016 TITLE 1 AND STUDENT SUPPORT 2015-2016 WHAT IS TITLE I? Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) provides financial assistance to states and school districts
More informationServing Preschool Children Through Title I
Serving Preschool Children Through Title I Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended NON-REGULATORY GUIDANCE U. S. Department of Education u l u l u l u l u l u l u l u l
More informationSecondary/Postsecondary Career Technical Education Initiative
Secondary/Postsecondary Career Technical Education Initiative In January 2012, Governor Brownback announced a bold and innovative plan to enhance career technical education in Kansas and better prepare
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE BILL 1080 RATIFIED BILL AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE ACHIEVEMENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE BILL 1080 RATIFIED BILL AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE ACHIEVEMENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: SECTION 1. Subchapter III
More informationPolicy Position Charter and Cyber Charter School Law March 2013
Policy Position Charter and Cyber Charter School Law March 2013 Background The passage of Pennsylvania s charter school law in the late 1990s gave children and families more choices within public education
More informationPolicy/Program Memorandum No. 8
Ministry of Education Policy/Program Date of Issue: August 26, 2014 Effective: Until revoked or modified Subject: Application: Reference: IDENTIFICATION OF AND PROGRAM PLANNING FOR STUDENTS WITH LEARNING
More information2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR
2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR Virginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards known as the Standards of Learning (SOL) and through annual assessments of student
More informationANNUAL REPORT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
The mission of the Greenbush-Middle River School is to provide a quality education which will prepare all students to meet success by developing self-directed thinkers and communicators who are responsible,
More informationTalent Development Secondary Business Plan 2011-2016
Talent Development Secondary Business Plan 2011-2016 Talent Development Secondary Growth Plan Talent Development Secondary is in the middle of a significant growth strategy that currently maps out the
More information2015-16 Salary Schedules Frequently Asked Questions
2015-16 Salary Schedules Frequently Asked Questions Please see additional budget information posted on the NCDPI Financial and Business Services Division website at www.ncpublicschools.org/fbs/budget/.
More informationPeaks and Valleys: Oregon s School Improvement Grants. Status Report 2012 2013
Peaks and Valleys: Oregon s School Improvement Grants Status Report 2012 2013 September 2013 PEAKS AND VALLEYS: OREGON S SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS Status Report 2012 2013 Caitlin Scott, Ph.D. Basha Krasnoff
More informationA Blueprint for Reform
U. S. D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N A Blueprint for Reform The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act college- and career-ready students great teachers and leaders Accelerate
More informationEXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 1. Who is eligible for extended school year programs and services? 2. Must the IEP for the extended school year program be identical to
More informationIllinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions
Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions The Core Functions and Indicators, which form the structure for the delivery and execution of (Illinois CSI) services, describe the big ideas or
More informationState Legislated reforms for 2014 - Principle 4
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011 INTRODUCTION STATES LEADING REFORM States and districts have initiated groundbreaking reforms and innovations to increase the quality of instruction and
More informationHow To Create A Community Partnership School
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNEAPOLIS FEDERATION OF TEACHERS AND MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SPECIAL DISTRICT No. 1 MPS / MFT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS WHEREAS, Minneapolis Public Schools
More informationMISSOURI SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS COALITION
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMBERS MIKE LODEWEGEN SB 493 SUMMARY FEBRUARY 28, 2014 SB 493 was passed out of the State Senate this week by a vote of 27-5. The vote capped nearly 12 hours of debate
More informationPOLICIES AND REGULATIONS Policy #54
POLICIES AND REGULATIONS Policy #54 EQUITY AND INCLUSIVE EDUCATION Statement The Peel District School Board is committed to providing and maintaining safe and healthy environments conducive to learning
More informationCommunity Action Head Start Self Assessment Final Report and Program Improvement Plan 2011-2012
Community Action Head Start Self Assessment Final Report and Program Improvement Plan 2011-2012 The annual self assessment took place in March 2012 with the participation of program staff, parents, community
More informationSchool Ranking Business Rules. Short Narrative Version
School Ranking Business Rules Short Narrative Version Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools for MCL 380.1280c, SFSFII and SIG Applications To identify the persistently lowest performing schools the Michigan
More informationThe Historic Opportunity to Get College Readiness Right: The Race to the Top Fund and Postsecondary Education
The Historic Opportunity to Get College Readiness Right: The Race to the Top Fund and Postsecondary Education Passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the creation of the Race to
More informationSchool Improvement Grants Online Tool
School Improvement Grants Online Tool Monitoring and Evaluating Transformations by FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS Center on Innovation & Improvement Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive Center Appalachia Regional Comprehensive
More informationThe Massachusetts Tiered System of Support
The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Chapter 1: Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Overview Massachusetts has developed a blueprint outlining a single system of supports that is responsive
More informationAYP reporting. Application for Supplementary Title I SIP Funding
Texas Comprehensive Center Annual Forum Marriott River Center San Antonio, TX July 31, 2006 Anita Villarreal, Director Title I School Improvement Texas Education Agency Division of NCLB Program Coordination
More informationIllinois e-plans. Title I District Plan Checklist
Illinois e-plans Title I District Plan Guide Overview Submission of a Title I District Plan is required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), Section 1101 et seq., (here referred to as NCLB ). The specifics
More informationschool) 0.00 FY12 Pre Implementation Budget Amount
Application Electronic Classroom Of Tomorrow (133413) Franklin County 2012 Rev 0 Application Number (40) Please note that if LEA does not apply for one of the Tier I or Tier II schools, describe the lack
More informationTEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
Certificated Personnel BP 4112.24(a) Recognizing the importance of teacher effectiveness in improving student achievement, the Board of Trustees desires to recruit and hire teachers who possess the subject
More informationAllen Elementary School
Allen Elementary School April 4, 216 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER), which provides key information on the 214-15 educational progress for the. The AER
More informationAs the discussion about school funding and tax reform
acloserlook Referendum: It s Not Tax Reform As the discussion about school funding and tax reform continues in the General Assembly, one issue that is being mentioned as part of the solution is a referendum
More informationSelf-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4
Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 1.1 The system engages in a systematic, inclusive, and comprehensive process to review, revise, and communicate a system-wide propose for the student success. The system
More informationSpringfield Public Schools English Language Learner Recommended Actions and Implementation Plans
Springfield Public Schools English Language Learner Recommended Actions and Implementation Plans Dr Alan J Ingram, Superintendent September 2010 Prepared for Springfield Public Schools by Rosann Tung,
More informationQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT CHARTER SCHOOLS UPDATED MAY 2015
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT CHARTER SCHOOLS UPDATED MAY 2015 Definitions Q. What is a charter school in Massachusetts? A. A charter school is a public school that is governed by a board of trustees and
More informationMetropolitan Nashville Public Schools School Improvement Plan
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools School Improvement Plan School Name: Nashville Prep Principal: Arlyn Ilgenfritz Date: 11/1/2014 Section 1A: Assurances Section 1 Needs Assessment I certify that Nashville
More information2. What is expanded learning time (ELT) in the context of ESEA flexibility?
1 21 st Century Community Learning Centers (21 st CCLC) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Expanded Learning Time (ELT) under the ESEA Flexibility Optional Waiver I. 21 st CCLC Program Requirements 1. What
More informationESEA Reauthorization Proposals in the 113 th Congress: Comparison of Major Features
ESEA Reauthorization Proposals in the 113 th Congress: Comparison of Major Features Rebecca R. Skinner Specialist in Education Policy Jeffrey J. Kuenzi Specialist in Education Policy Cassandria Dortch
More informationAmeriCorps Tier 1 Education and VetSuccess Informational Session
AmeriCorps Tier 1 Education and VetSuccess Informational Session AmeriCorps AmeriCorps State & National AmeriCorps VISTA AmeriCorps NCCC AmeriCorps AmeriCorps State and National supports a wide range of
More informationThe Any Given Child Fine Arts FAQ
The Any Given Child Fine Arts FAQ What is the Any Given Child Creative Learning Initiative? The Any Given Child Creative Learning Initiative is a fresh approach to arts in education. The Any Given Child
More informationHow To Run A Gifted And Talented Education Program In Deer Creek
IGBB PROGRAMS FOR GIFTED STUDENTS District Goal for the Gifted and Talented Education Program The goal of the Deer Creek Gifted and Talented Education Program is to provide a wide variety of educational
More information2015-2016 SCHOOL YEAR
2015-2016 SCHOOL YEAR Virginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards known as the Standards of Learning (SOL) and through annual assessments of student
More information