Employee Whistleblower Rights Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
- Pamela Dennis
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Employee Whistleblower Rights Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by Karen L. Corman & Kristin Major On July 30, 2002, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1514A ( Sarbanes-Oxley or the Act ) to promote corporate accountability. Of particular importance to both securities and employment law practitioners are the whistleblower provisions of the Act, set forth in Section 806. These provisions allow employees to seek civil remedies against companies or individuals who retaliate against them for reporting violations of securities laws or fraud against shareholders and, in some extreme circumstances, allow for criminal penalties. While employers have thus far prevailed on the majority of complaints filed under Section 806, the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protections continue to present a significant issue for public companies in terms of human resources and litigation management. For companies already concerned with SEC oversight and compliance issues as well as the constant pressure to increase shareholder value, these claims may provide yet one more cost in the already expensive proposition of complying with Sarbanes-Oxley. This article addresses the procedural elements of the employee whistleblower complaint that employers should be familiar with as well the potential for interaction with the Securities Exchange Commission ( SEC ) in the complaint investigation and adjudication. Also discussed is the developing body of case law in this area, where this relatively new law and newly-finalized regulations are being shaped and interpreted by both Administrative Law Judges ( ALJ s ) and the federal courts. 1. The Administrative Process The Occupational Health and Safety Administration ( OSHA ), a division of the Department of Labor ( DOL ), is the federal agency charged with enforcing the new regulations. OSHA already has responsibility for investigating whistleblower complaints under thirteen other federal statutes. These thirteen other statutes, however, all involve safety, health or environmental issues, so issues of complex securities law and accounting standards represent a new challenge for OSHA and its investigators. OSHA has already received well over 300 whistleblower complaints in the two years the Act has been in effect. In May of 2003, OSHA published its interim rules for the specific enforcement of Section 806. See 29 C.F.R The interim Sarbanes-Oxley rules created a comprehensive, threelevel administrative review process within OSHA for employee whistleblower retaliation claims. On August 24, 2004, the DOL issued the final rules governing Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower complaints (the Rules ). Although public comments were received from various organizations concerning virtually every section of the interim rules, OSHA ultimately included only one significant change in the final Rules concerning employee reinstatement rights, which is discussed in more detail below. To initiate the whistleblower complaint process, an employee is required to submit a detailed written complaint to OSHA within 90 days of the alleged retaliatory act. For purposes of the Rules, employee is broadly defined to include both current or former employees, applicants or any individual whose employment could be affected by a company or company representative. The following sets forth the steps the employer must navigate as the complaint winds its way through the administrative process established by OSHA. It is important to note that if the entire OSHA administrative claim process is not completed within 180 days of the filing of the complaint then the employee may bring a private action in federal district court, regardless of the amount in controversy. OSHA Investigator Level: Once notified of the complaint by OSHA, the employer has twenty days to submit a written response. If, after the twenty-day period, OSHA believes that evidence exists that gives reasonable cause to believe the employer violated the Act, OSHA will inform the employer of the evidence and then the employer has another ten business days to respond to that evidence. The OSHA investigator is required to issue a preliminary decision and an order of relief 2
2 within sixty days of the filing of the complaint. ALJ Level: If a party files an appeal of the preliminary decision or order within sixty days, then the complaint rises to the second level of review, a hearing before an OSHA ALJ. Upon appeal, the ALJ must expeditiously hold a formal hearing on the merits and issue a final decision. Administrative Review Board Level: Once the ALJ issues a decision, a party may then petition for review by the Administrative Review Board ( Review Board ) within ten business days of the issuance of the decision. The Review Board has thirty days from the filing of the petition for appeal to decide whether to grant it. If the Review Board denies the petition, the ALJ decision becomes final. If the Review Board agrees to review the ALJ decision, it must issue its own decision within 120 days of the conclusion of the ALJ hearing. Appeal to U.S. Federal Courts: A party then has sixty days after the Review Board issues its review of the ALJ decision to appeal to the federal appeals court, either in the circuit where the violation occurred or where the employee resided on the date of the violation. Alternatively, if the Review Board denies review of the ALJ decision, the aggrieved party has sixty days from the issuance of the ALJ decision to appeal to the appropriate court of appeals. 2. Remedies for the Whistleblower If the employee is determined to be the prevailing party, he or she is entitled to make-whole relief, including, where appropriate: reinstatement with the same seniority that the employee would have had but for the adverse personnel action; back pay with interest; and compensation for any special damages sustained, including litigation costs, expert witness fees and reasonable attorneys fees. The preliminary order of relief issued by the OSHA investigator takes effect thirty days after the employer receives it, unless one of the parties files an appeal within that time, in which case, all but the reinstatement order is automatically stayed. An employer may, under certain, narrow circumstances, avoid the preliminary reinstatement order, either by demonstrating that the employee poses a security risk (limited to circumstances in which the employer can clearly establish that physical violence against people or property might result from the employee s reinstatement) or by obtaining a stay of the reinstatement order. Under the final Rules, OSHA conceded that a stay of the reinstatement order would be appropriate in the exceptional case where the employer can make a showing of the criteria necessary for injunctive relief (i.e., irreparable injury, likelihood of success of the merits, and a balancing of possible harms to the parties and the public). If the employer is unable to obtain a stay of reinstatement and cannot establish that the employee poses a security risk, the employer may be allowed to limit the reinstatement to economic reinstatement and prevent the employee from physically returning to work. In the commentary to the final Rules, it was noted that if the employer establishes to OSHA s satisfaction that reinstatement is inadvisable, notwithstanding the employer s retaliatory discharge of the employee, then actual reinstatement may be delayed until after the administrative adjudication is completed as long as the employee continues to receive full pay and benefits. 3. SEC Involvement The Act and the Rules contemplate potential involvement of the SEC in the whistleblower complaint process. Notice of the whistleblower retaliation complaint must be sent to the SEC by OSHA and the SEC may participate as amicus curiae at any time in the proceedings. The SEC may also request copies of all of the pleadings in the case, whether or not it directly participates in the case. Thus, companies should assume that any information provided to OSHA with respect to a whistleblower retaliation claim will be shared with the SEC. Of course, there is also always the potential that the SEC may conduct its own investigation of alleged financial or accounting irregularities. Accordingly, this presents a strategic decision for an employer. Given that, pursuant to the Rules, the SEC will receive notice of the complaint and will have an opportunity to participate in the proceedings, the employer must determine whether it is in the company s interests to initiate contact with the SEC in order to attempt to defuse the situation and present its own version of the events surrounding the employee s complaint during the very early stages of the administrative process. 3
3 4. The Developing Case Law under Section 806 Procedural and Substantive Decisions a. Procedural Decisions ALJ decisions addressing whistleblower retaliation claims have been rendered on numerous jurisdictional and procedural grounds. For instance, several cases hold that the Act does not apply retroactively to retaliatory actions occurring before its enactment. See, e.g., Kunkler v. Global Futures & Forex, Ltd., OALJ Case No SOX (Apr. 24, 2003) (rejecting a whistleblower claim where the employee was terminated 60 days before the Act became law). Further, complaints not filed with OSHA within 90 days of the alleged retaliatory act have been dismissed as timebarred. See, e.g., Kale v. Kakivik Asset Management, Inc., OALJ Case No SOX-l (Mar. 24, 2004) (dismissing complaint where the employee failed to show that the employer committed any violations of the Act occurring within 90 days of the filing of the complaint). When the 90-day period commences was addressed in Flood v. Cendant Corp., OALJ Case No SOX (Feb. 23, 2004). In Flood, the employee argued that the 90-day period commenced when his discharge became effective. The employer, however, contended that the 90-day period started when the employee received an notifying him that his employment would be terminated unless he found alternate employment within the company by a certain date. The ALJ dismissed the complaint, noting that the 90-day period commences when the discriminatory decision has been both made and communicated to the complainant. Id. at 2 (citing 29 C.F.R (d)). In a similar case, Lawrence v. AT&T Labs, OALJ Case No SOX-00065, the ALJ held that the statute of limitations begins to run when the employee is made aware of the employer s decision to terminate, even if there is the possibility that the termination can be avoided e.g., by securing another position within the same company. Thus, even though the employee s termination date was pushed back by more than three months, her claim was barred as the 90-day period began to run when she received the letter notifying her of the intended elimination of her position. In addition, ALJ decisions have confirmed the provision in the Act that allows an employee to bring a private action in federal district court when OSHA has not issued a final decision within 180 days of the initial complaint. See, e.g., Cissom v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., OALJ Case No SOX (Mar. 10, 2003) (dismissing administrative complaint on jurisdictional grounds where 180 days had elapsed and separate action was pending in federal court). Similarly, at least one federal district court refused to dismiss or stay an action where OSHA failed to act at all within 180 days. Murray v. TXU Corp., 279 F. Supp. 2d 799 (N.D. Tex. 2003). b. Substantive Decisions Recent ALJ decisions also have addressed the underlying merits of employee whistleblower claims. In Halloum v. Intel Corp., OALJ Case No SOX (Mar. 4, 2004), the complainant, Ammar Halloum ( Halloum ), was a manager primarily responsible for reducing computer chip manufacturing costs for Intel Corporation ( Intel ). Halloum filed a complaint with OSHA alleging that he had been constructively discharged after he had informed the SEC that his supervisor had instructed him to delay payment of invoices to enable Intel to meet Wall Street expectations. Id. at 7. OSHA denied the complaint and Halloum appealed the case to an ALJ, who affirmed OSHA s decision. The ALJ, noting Halloum s reliance on the intense news coverage of Enron s creative accounting, first determined that Halloum s belief that following his supervisor s instruction would defraud Intel s shareholders was reasonable. Id. at 15 (noting that since the Act only requires an objectively reasonable belief that securities laws have been violated, a belief that activity was illegal may be reasonable even when subsequent investigation proves a complaint was entirely wrong ). Thus, Halloum s notifying the SEC was activity protected under the Act. See also Collins v. Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-1374-RWS (N.D. Ga., Sept. 4, 2004) (plaintiff, who was a marketing director, was not required to cite specific securities code sections allegedly being violated; more general allegations of internal accounting control violations through kickbacks and preferential treatment to certain vendors were sufficient). While the ALJ determined that Halloum met his burden of proving that his disclosures were a contributing factor to Intel s decision to take several disciplinary actions, including modifying Halloum s corrective action plan 4
4 and reducing his supervisory authority, ultimately, the ALJ ruled in favor of Intel. The ALJ determined that Intel met its burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the actions it took would have been the same even if Halloum did not make the disclosures. For instance, Intel had documented Halloum s poor work performance in his initial corrective action plan, which the ALJ found was evidence that Halloum was on his way out anyway. Id. As such, Intel proved that it had adequate reasons to fire Halloum that were unrelated to his protected disclosures to the SEC. Id. By contrast, in Getman v. Southwest Securities, Inc., OALJ Case No SOX (Feb. 2, 2004), the ALJ ruled in favor of the employee. Margot Getman ( Getman ) was an equity research analyst for Southwest Securities, Inc. ( Southwest ) who filed a complaint alleging that she was terminated for refusing to change a rating she had given to a company in which Southwest had a financial interest. Getman claimed that management pressured her to change her rating by intense and aggressive questioning as to why she had assigned the company the weaker accumulate rating and not a strong buy rating. The ALJ, in reversing OSHA s initial dismissal of the complaint, found that Getman s refusal to change her rating was protected whistleblowing activity. Further, the ALJ disagreed with OSHA s decision that the eight-month period between the management meeting and the discharge showed that the discharge was not motivated by the protected activity. Southwest failed to convince the ALJ it had met its burden of establishing a legitimate reason for terminating Getman that was unrelated to Getman s refusal to change her rating. Id. Southwest argued that Getman s work performance was poor, offering as evidence two s and testimony from Getman s supervisor. Id. The ALJ refused to consider the s, however, because he found that these evaluations were not written until several months following the management meeting. The ALJ also rejected Southwest s second purported reason for Getman s termination referral of a potential customer to a competitor on the grounds that the evidence did not support the assertion. Id. Accordingly, the ALJ ordered reinstatement, back pay with interest and additional damages for moving expenses. Because Getman proceeded pro se, she did not seek attorneys fees. Id. at In Welch v. Cardinal Bankshares Corp., OALJ Case No SOX (Jan. 28, 2004), which was featured in a recent front-page article in the Wall Street Journal, the ALJ also ruled against the employer. David Welch ( Welch ) filed a complaint alleging that he was discharged as Chief Financial Officer of respondent Cardinal Bankshares Corp. ( Cardinal ) after he had refused to certify a financial statement and repeatedly communicated to Cardinal his concerns regarding Cardinal s financial statements and accounting procedures. Cardinal argued that it discharged Welch for refusing to meet with Cardinal s attorney and auditor without his personal attorney being present. The ALJ reversed OSHA s decision to deny Welch s claim and instead determined that Welch s belief that certain entries in the financial statements were improper and could mislead potential investors was reasonable. The unrefuted evidence showed that Welch believed the entries were improper based on the Federal Reserve s instructions for the preparation of quarterly reports. Id. at 55. In addition, outside auditors later corrected the entries about which Welch had expressed concern. Id. Consequently, the ALJ determined that Welch had engaged in protected activity. The ALJ held that the relatively brief period of time approximately seven weeks between Welch s refusal to certify the financial statement and Cardinal s decision to suspend and then terminate him showed that Welch s conduct was a contributing factor to Cardinal s decision. Id. at 62. Even without the close proximity between Welch s activity and his suspension and discharge, the ALJ determined that Cardinal s explanation for its actions did not ring true. Id. The ALJ found that not allowing the complainant to have his personal attorney present while being questioned was an arbitrary requirement and, given the sequence of events, was imposed to cause the complainant s anticipated refusal to comply as a pretext for firing him. Id. at 62. As a remedy, Welch was reinstated, awarded back pay with interest and litigation costs and expenses, including expert witness fees and reasonable attorneys fees. In addition, Cardinal was ordered to purge from his personnel file all references to the discharge. Id. at Conclusion With the increased media exposure for high-profile whistleblowers and the nation s continuing concern with corporate accountability, it is safe to assume that these types of whistleblower 5
5 claims will increase and that the law will develop significantly in this area. While Sarbanes-Oxley requires the implementation of certain complaint policies and procedures, companies facing the prospect of Section 806 claims are well-served to make their reporting procedures easily accessible to all employees, not just those in the accounting and finance areas, and to educate managers and supervisors concerning the permissible treatment of whistleblowing employees. As we are now seeing, it is not just a company s accounting and finance employees who are potential whistleblowers, but employees from areas as unlikely as marketing or public relations. As the court stated in Collins v. Beazer Homes, if Congress had intended to limit protection of Sarbanes-Oxley to accountants, or to have required complainants to specifically identify the code section that they believe was being violated, it could have done so. It did not. Congress instead protected employees and adopted the reasonable belief standard for those who blow the whistle on fraud and protect investors. Civil Action No. 1:03-CV RWS (N.D. Ga., Sept. 4, 2004). Karen L. Corman is a partner in the Los Angeles office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Ms. Corman represents national and international clients in a broad range of workplace-related matters, including defending employers in individual and class action employment litigation. Ms. Corman regularly consults with clients regarding employment practices, as well as assists in conducting sexual harassment and other workplace internal investigations. Kristin Major is a senior associate in Skadden s Palo Alto office where she represents employers in all areas of labor and employment law, including employment-related litigation, preventive counseling and serving as a labor and employment specialist for mergers and acquisitions. ACC Releases New InfoPAKs Find out why members have accessed all InfoPAKs over 100,000 times this year. These new and updated packets represent some of the most commonly asked questions and are free to all members. Internal Investigations This InfoPAK examines the duties and responsibilities of corporate management, including their personal risks arising from both civil and criminal liability; the process of conducting an internal investigation; determining who should conduct the investigation and the relevant benefits and detriments associated with that decision; gathering information during the investigation; the responsibilities of the investigative counsel, and the findings of the investigation. Also discussed are the legal and practical aspects of protecting investigative results under the attorney-client privilege, the self evaluative privilege and the work product doctrine and practical tips to consider when conducting an internal investigation. Responding to Government Investigations This InfoPAK also provides practical advice regarding responding to a government investigation, including considerations to be made when selecting the appropriate team or person to oversee the response, if any, to the investigation. It outlines the relevant Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission policies and sets forth various investigative methods utilized by investigative agencies in conducting corporate investigations and provides information regarding the duties and responsibilities of corporate management when it learns that an investigation is being conducted into activities conducted by the corporation or its agents. Hiring Foreign Nationals in the United States This InfoPAK provides a comprehensive overview of employment-based immigration which involves a corporation s sponsorship of a foreign national to work with the sponsoring company and live in the United States. 6
Blowing the Whistle on Accounting Fraud: The Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protections Act At A Glance
Blowing the Whistle on Accounting Fraud: The Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protections Act At A Glance A White Paper for Finance Professionals by David J. Marshall and Nicole J. Williams 1 Katz, Marshall
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico New Mexico has a pretty strong state whistleblower law: Scoring 72 out of a possible 100 points; Ranking 4 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts Massachusetts has a relatively good state whistleblower law: Scoring 64 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 11 th out of 51 (50 states and the
More informationA New Headache For Employers: Whistleblower Claims Under the Affordable Care Act
March 2013 A New Headache For Employers: Whistleblower Claims Under the Affordable Care Act BY STEPHEN H. HARRIS, MELINDA A. GORDON & MARC E. BERNSTEIN INTRODUCTION On February 22, 2013, the United States
More informationSouth Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections. A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms
South Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms South Carolina whistleblowers who are employed by a South Carolina
More informationWHISTLEBLOWING AND CONDUCTING INVESTIGATIONS. Eileen P. Kennedy Berliner Cohen
WHISTLEBLOWING AND CONDUCTING INVESTIGATIONS Eileen P. Kennedy Berliner Cohen 1 Topics I. New Laws Protecting Whistleblowers. II. III. IV. Other Anti-Retaliation and Whistleblower Protections. Discipline
More informationIntroduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
More informationS. ll. To provide anti-retaliation protections for antitrust whistleblowers. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
OLL TH CONGRESS ST SESSION S. ll To provide anti-retaliation protections for antitrust whistleblowers. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES llllllllll Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) introduced
More informationHP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
More informationDodd-Frank, Part I Whistleblower Regulations and Responses
Dodd-Frank, Part I Whistleblower Regulations and Responses Presenters: Thomas A. Aldrich Partner, Thompson Hine, LLP Robert M. Loesch Partner, Tucker Ellis & West LLP David A. Zagore Partner, Squire Sanders
More informationWhen Employment Law and Law Enforcement Intersect
When Employment Law and Law Enforcement Intersect Joe H. Tucker, Jr. V. Amanda Witts Tucker Law Group LLC One Penn Center at Suburban Station, Suite 1700 Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 875-0609 jtucker@tlgattorneys.com
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders
More informationDOL Whistleblower Rule Will Have Far-Reaching Effects
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com DOL Whistleblower Rule Will Have Far-Reaching Effects
More informationTHE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Advanced Employment Law and Litigation 2015 March 26-28, 2015 Washington, D.C.
1349 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Advanced Employment Law and Litigation 2015 March 26-28, 2015 Washington, D.C. Whistleblower Litigation By Debra S. Katz Katz, Marshall & Banks,
More informationCorporate Litigation:
Corporate Litigation: Dodd-Frank and Whistleblower Protection: Who Qualifies? JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN * SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP AUGUST 8, 2013 Among the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Pennsylvania
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania has a passable state whistleblower law: Scoring 61 out of a possible 100; Ranking 17 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationWhistleblower Litigation. Debra S. Katz David J. Marshall Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP Washington, D.C.
1 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Whistleblower Litigation Under SOX and Dodd-Frank: Key Issues for Employers and Employees August 5, 2014 Video Webcast Whistleblower Litigation By
More informationCALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
More informationNew York Law Journal
New York Law Journal Whistleblower Protections and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Administrative law judge decisions apply provision to broad range of conduct Michael Starr Adam J. Heft April 4, 2005 As we approach
More informationAN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2015 Session
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2015 Session HB 1187 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE House Bill 1187 Judiciary (Delegates Carter and Anderson) Public Safety - Law Enforcement Officers
More informationLast Approval Date: May 2008. Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE
Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to comply with the requirements in Section 6032 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (the DRA ), which amends Section 1902(a) of the Social Security
More informationBlowing the Whistle on Nuclear Safety Lapses: Federal Whistleblower Protections Act At A Glance
Blowing the Whistle on Nuclear Safety Lapses: Federal Whistleblower Protections Act At A Glance by David J. Marshall 1 Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP www.kmblegal.com Following decades of opposition from
More informationBILL ANALYSIS. Senate Research Center C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Jurisprudence 4/5/2007 Committee Report (Substituted)
BILL ANALYSIS Senate Research Center C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Jurisprudence 4/5/2007 Committee Report (Substituted) AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT C.S.S.B. 1309 gives the State of Texas civil
More informationWhistleblower Claims: Are You Covered?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Whistleblower Claims: Are You Covered? Law360, New
More informationTITLE 34. LABOR AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CHAPTER 19. CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT. N.J. Stat. 34:19-1 (2007)
TITLE 34. LABOR AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CHAPTER 19. CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT N.J. Stat. 34:19-1 (2007) 34:19-1. Short title This act shall be known and may [be] cited as the "Conscientious
More informationKey Definitions: VT LEG #309032 v.1
Key Definitions: Side-by-Side Comparison of Vermont s Law and New Jersey s CEPA Prepared on May 6, 2015 by Damien Leonard, Esq. Office of Legislative Council Defines employer to include both public and
More informationA summary of administrative remedies found in the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
BLACK HILLS SPECIAL SERVICES COOPERATIVE'S POLICY TO PROVIDE EDUCATION CONCERNING FALSE CLAIMS LIABILITY, ANTI-RETALIATION PROTECTIONS FOR REPORTING WRONGDOING AND DETECTING AND PREVENTING FRAUD, WASTE
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION. Labor & Employment Law Section Fall Meeting Kaatskill Mountain Club Resort, Hunter, NY September 21, 2012
I. Federal Whistleblower Protection: WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION Labor & Employment Law Section Fall Meeting Kaatskill Mountain Club Resort, Hunter, NY September 21, 2012 A. Sarbanes Oxley: Most recent law
More informationERISA Causes of Action *
1 ERISA Causes of Action * ERISA authorizes a variety of causes of action to remedy violations of the statute, to enforce the terms of a benefit plan, or to provide other relief to a plan, its participants
More informationMINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT. Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them.
As amended by Chapter 16 of the 2013 Minnesota Session Laws. 15C.01 DEFINITIONS MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings
More informationHoward Shapiro Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman U.S. Department of Labor
Howard Shapiro Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman U.S. Department of Labor The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 directs the DOL Inspector General to designate a Whistleblower Protection
More informationEnvironmental laws have been enacted to protect natural resources and the public health. A number
Workers Whistleblower Protection Under Seven Federal Environmental Laws Protecting Workers Who Exercise Rights PWWER A PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL Committees for Occupational Safety and Health NETWORK FACTSHEET
More informationWHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE SEC S WHISTLEBLOWER RULES: Regulations. Presented By Daniel J. Dunne May 18, 2012
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE SEC S WHISTLEBLOWER RULES: Dodd-Frank and the SEC s Whistleblower Regulations Presented By Daniel J. Dunne May 18, 2012 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
More informationBroward County False Claims Ordinance. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance.
Broward County False Claims Ordinance Sec. 1-276. - Short title; purpose. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (b) The purpose of the Broward County
More informationNEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code 7-801 through 7-810 *
NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code 7-801 through 7-810 * 7-801. Short title. This chapter shall be known as the "New York city false claims act." 7-802. Definitions. For purposes of this
More informationNOTIFICATION AND FEDERAL EMPLOYEE ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION ACT OF 2002
NOTIFICATION AND FEDERAL EMPLOYEE ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION ACT OF 2002 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 09:01 May 20, 2002 Jkt 099139 PO 00174 Frm 00001 Fmt 6579 Sfmt 6579 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL174.107 APPS10 PsN:
More informationMinnesota False Claims Act
Minnesota False Claims Act (Minn. Stat. 15C.01 to.16) i 15C.01 DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim.
More informationRepresenting Whistleblowers Nationwide
Minnesota False Claims Act Minnesota Stat. 15C.01 to 15C.16) 15C.01 DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim.
More informationINDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
More informationP.O. Box 11615, Eugene, OR 97440 Tel: (541) 484-2692 Fax: (541) 484-3004 Email: andys@fseee.org
P.O. Box 11615, Eugene, OR 97440 Tel: (541) 484-2692 Fax: (541) 484-3004 Email: andys@fseee.org October 6, 2010 Liz Brown, Attorney U.S. Office of Special Counsel 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1220N Oakland,
More informationSarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Cases
DECEMBER 28, 2004 Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Cases By Philip M. Berkowitz The Sarbanes-Oxley Act ( SOX ) prohibits retaliation against certain corporate whistleblowers. In the two years since its enactment,
More information51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013
SENATE BILL 1ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, INTRODUCED BY Joseph Cervantes 1 ENDORSED BY THE COURTS, CORRECTIONS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS; CLARIFYING
More informationHB 2845. Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT
REFERENCE TITLE: state false claims actions State of Arizona House of Representatives Fiftieth Legislature Second Regular Session HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, ARIZONA
More informationSENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session 0 SENATE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTION -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 00, CHAPTER, SECTION ; AMENDING
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Oklahoma
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Oklahoma Oklahoma has a relatively good state whistleblower law: Scoring 58 out of a possible 100; Ranking 24 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationGOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS
GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE DIVISION I. GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT. TITLE 2. GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION. CHAPTER 3B. OTHER PROCUREMENT MATTERS. SUBCHAPTER
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationSMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
More informationPolicies and Procedures: WVUPC Policy Pursuant to the Requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
POLICY/PROCEDURE NO.: B-17 Effective date: Jan. 1, 2007 Date(s) of review/revision: Nov. 1, 2015 Policies and Procedures: WVUPC Policy Pursuant to the Requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
More informationLegal Ethics: THE LAWYER S ROLE WHEN SOMETHING GOES WRONG
THE PRACTICING LAW INSTITUTE: FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE & ETHICS FORUM 2014 Legal Ethics: THE LAWYER S ROLE WHEN SOMETHING GOES WRONG October 29, 2014 Lawyers As Whistleblowers
More informationWhistleblower Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Agenda. Dodd-Frank Act 9/13/2010
Whistleblower Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act Jason M. Zuckerman The Employment Law Group Law Firm Tel: 202.261.2810 Fax: 202.261.2835 jzuckerman@employmentlawgroup.com www.employmentlawgroup.com Agenda
More informationPreparing for a Post Dodd Frank World
A Whistleblower in Your Midst: Preparing for a Post Dodd Frank World July 21, 2011 Amy L. Bess, Shareholder, Vedder Price P.C. Joseph M. Mannon, Of Counsel, Vedder Price P.C. Jeannette L. Lewis, Principal,
More informationSecurities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection
Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection 15 USC 78u-6 (As added by P.L. 111-203.) 15 USC 78u-6 78u-6. Securities whistleblower incentives and protection (a) Definitions. In this section the following
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 741. Short Title: Shift Workers' Bill of Rights. (Public)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 01 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1 Short Title: Shift Workers' Bill of Rights. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Brockman, Baskerville, Harrison, and Fisher (Primary
More informationFALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
More informationPrevention of Fraud, Waste and Abuse
Procedure 1910 Responsible Office: Yale Medical Group Effective Date: 01/01/2007 Responsible Department: Administration Last Revision Date: 09/20/2013 Prevention of Fraud, Waste and Abuse Policy Statement...
More informationNOYES HEALTH ADMINISTRATION POLICY/PROCEDURE
NOYES HEALTH ADMINISTRATION POLICY/PROCEDURE SUBJECT: DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF POLICY: 200.161 FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE EFFECTIVE DATE: June, 2012 ISSUED BY: Administration TJC REF: None PAGE: 1 OF 5
More informationSECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
--S.20-- S.20 One Hundred First Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,491. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 99,491 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 55 Article 14 1
Article 14. Dissolution. Part 1. Voluntary Dissolution. 55-14-01. Dissolution by incorporators or directors. (a) The board of directors or, if the corporation has no directors, a majority of the incorporators
More informationCompliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE, NY and TOOMEY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Compliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures Purpose:
More informationCase 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
More informationSOX Whistleblower Law - An Overview
"To be published by the Washington Legal Foundation." Corporate Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Risks: Still Real, Still Hazy Donn C. Meindertsma & Melinda L. Kirk Conner & Winters, LLP November 2006 From
More informationThe N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463. (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense
The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463 (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense The North Carolina State Bar Disciplinary Hearing Commission did not err
More informationAssisting, testifying or otherwise participating in a proceeding regarding the alleged violation; or
WHISTLEBLOWER ALERT Sep 08, 2010 Whistleblower Alert: DOL/OSHA Publishes Interim Final Rule For Handling Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Whistleblower Cases, Reiterates Existing Jurisdictional
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Tennessee
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Tennessee Tennessee has one of the strongest state whistleblower laws: Scoring 75 out of a possible 100; Ranking 3 rd out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationSweeping Changes Made to Labor and Employment Whistleblower Protections
Sweeping Changes Made to Labor and Employment Whistleblower Protections Financial reform legislation, if signed, will among other changes allow employee whistleblowers to bypass Sarbanes-Oxley administrative
More informationThe Whistleblower Stampede And The. New FCA Litigation Paradigm. Richard L. Shackelford. King & Spalding LLP
The Whistleblower Stampede And The New FCA Litigation Paradigm Richard L. Shackelford King & Spalding LLP Actions under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act ( FCA ), 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)-(h), are
More informationCase 1:04-cv-08034 Document 70 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-08034 Document 70 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) AND STATE OF ILLINOIS
More informationNotification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Retaliation Act of 2002
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Retaliation Act of 2002 [DOCID: f:publ174.107] [[Page 565]] NOTIFICATION AND FEDERAL EMPLOYEE ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION ACT OF 2002 [[Page
More informationCase 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43
Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Calvin L. Keith, OSB No. 814368 CKeith@perkinscoie.com Sarah J. Crooks, OSB No. 971512 SCrooks@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP
More informationOffice of Personnel Management. Policy Policy Number: Definitions. Communicate: To give a verbal or written report to an appropriate authority.
Citation: Arkansas Code Annotated 21-1-601 through 608, 21-1-610; 21-1-123 and 124 Office of Personnel Management Policy 1 Forms: Fraud Reporting Complaint Form Definitions Adverse action: To discharge,
More informationOther Workplace Standards: Whistleblower and Retaliation Protections U.S Department of Labor, September 2009
Other Workplace Standards: Whistleblower and Retaliation Protections U.S Department of Labor, September 2009 Provisions of the following Statutes: Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSH Act), 29 USC 660(c)
More informationACC OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA. What In-house Lawyers Need To Know About Internal Workplace Investigations
ACC OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA What In-house Lawyers Need To Know About Internal Workplace Investigations February 2, 2009 Presented By: Lynn C. Outwater, Esq. Vincent J. Tersigni, Esq. Can be sued if you
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2015 Kentucky
Accountability Report Card Summary 2015 Kentucky Kentucky has a fair state whistleblower law: Scoring 54 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 33 rd out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationForm 990 Policy Series
Form 990 Policy Series The attached Memorandum is a part of the Form 990 Policy Series, developed by a group of lawyers, all members of the California bar and practicing nonprofit law (the Form 990 Policy
More informationEmployee Whistleblower Claims A Legal Overview
Employee Whistleblower Claims A Legal Overview Heidi Goldstein Shepherd James W. Nagle, P.C. Goodwin Procter LLP Exchange Place Boston, MA 02109 (617) 570-1000 2004 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved.
More informationINVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees
INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may
More informationQueensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994
Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Act No. 68 of 1994 Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Section PART 1 PRELIMINARY TABLE OF PROVISIONS Division 1 Title and commencement Page 1 Short
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit MICHAEL N. OHNSTAD, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent 2015-3220 Petition for review
More informationInformation Memo Securities Law June 2011
www.bsk.com Information Memo Securities Law June 2011 SEC Implements Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions The Securities and Exchange Commission s final rules 1 implementing Section 21F of the Securities
More informationAvoiding Retaliation Claims from Whistleblowers
Avoiding Retaliation Claims from Whistleblowers Christopher L. Ottele Husch Blackwell LLP WHAT IS A WHISTLEBLOWER? What is a Whistleblower? Securities Laws Whistleblowers disclose information reasonably
More informationEmployment - Federal Employers Liability Act. EMPLOYMENT FEDERAL RAILWAY SAFETY ACT. LEGAL OVERVIEW (GENERAL)
. EMPLOYMENT FEDERAL RAILWAY SAFETY ACT. LEGAL OVERVIEW (GENERAL) The Federal Railway Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. 20101 et seq., (the FRSA ) was enacted in 1970 to promote safety in every area of railroad operations
More informationThe SEC s Whistleblower Program Christian Bartholomew June 2012 Sarah Nilson
The SEC s Whistleblower Program Christian Bartholomew June 2012 Sarah Nilson Christian Bartholomew (202) 682-7070 / (305) 416-3763 christian.bartholomew@weil.com Mr. Bartholomew leads the firm s securities
More informationWhistleblower Claims on the Rise
Preventing Whistleblower Claims in the Automotive Industry Jeff Kopp 313-234-7140 jkopp@foley.com Felicia O Connor 313-234-7172 foconnor@foley.com Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a
More informationHandling Disagreement with Superiors Decisions and Whistleblowing
Handling Disagreement with Superiors Decisions and Whistleblowing The mandate of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) is to root out fraud, waste, and abuse, as well as promote the economy and efficiency
More informationWhistleblower Act, 2006 Act 720
Whistleblower Act, 2006 Act 720 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Information the disclosure of which is protected 1. Disclosure of impropriety 2. Person who qualifies to make disclosure of impropriety 3.
More informationINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION. The ISA Certification Board develops and promotes high ethical standards for the Certified Arborist
More informationPOLICY AND STANDARDS. False Claims Laws and Whistleblower Protections
POLICY AND STANDARDS Corporate Policy Applicability: Magellan BH (M) NIA (N) ICORE (I) Magellan Medicaid Administration (A) Corporate Policy: Policy Number: Policy Name: Date of Inception: January 1, 2007
More informationMINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT
. MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT Sec. 24. [15C.01] DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. Scope. For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim. "Claim" includes
More informationBILL ANALYSIS. C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
BILL ANALYSIS C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE C.S.S.B. 1309 gives the State of Texas civil remedies to be invoked by the attorney general
More informationFEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS. 1) Federal False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-3733)
FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS I. FEDERAL LAWS 1) Federal False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-3733) II. NEW YORK STATE LAWS A. CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS 1) New York False Claims
More informationUPDATED. OIG Guidelines for Evaluating State False Claims Acts
UPDATED OIG Guidelines for Evaluating State False Claims Acts Note: These guidelines are effective March 15, 2013, and replace the guidelines effective on August 21, 2006, found at 71 FR 48552. UPDATED
More informationWhistleblower Protection in New York State. Leslie Perrin, Senior Counsel CSEA Legal Department
Whistleblower Protection in New York State Leslie Perrin, Senior Counsel CSEA Legal Department Civil Service Law Section 75-b Protects Public Employees Prohibits termination, discipline or adverse personnel
More informationChapter No. 367] PUBLIC ACTS, 2001 1 CHAPTER NO. 367 HOUSE BILL NO. 779. By Representatives Briley, Hargett, Pleasant
Chapter No. 367] PUBLIC ACTS, 2001 1 CHAPTER NO. 367 HOUSE BILL NO. 779 By Representatives Briley, Hargett, Pleasant Substituted for: Senate Bill No. 261 By Senator Cohen AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code
More informationCase: 1:14-cv-06113 Document #: 45 Filed: 03/22/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:299
Case: 1:14-cv-06113 Document #: 45 Filed: 03/22/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:299 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MARIE RODGERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 14 C 6113
More informationCase 3:13-cv-01349-DRD Document 1 Filed 05/06/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Case 3:13-cv-01349-DRD Document 1 Filed 05/06/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Ronald Stewart : Plaintiff : vs. : Civil No. 13-1349 DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
More informationPOLICY ON THE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS
EAST ORANGE GENERAL HOSPITAL COMPLIANCE POLICY Title: Policy on The False Claims Acts Code No.: Section: Corporate Compliance Effective Date: March 1, 2015 Approved by: Compliance Officer Publication Status:
More information