2. Recognizing and Promoting Quality in Online Education
|
|
- Elvin Butler
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 College of Education, Health and Human Services University of Michigan Dearborn Quality Online Course Development and Delivery Plan DRAFT of June 20, 2014 The Curriculum Committee of the College of Education, Health, and Human Services considered the campus' emerging policies on the development of online courses twice during the academic year in September and late April. The body will consider the following policy statement in the academic year. Underlying the following draft statement is an assumption articulated by the Curriculum Committee as representatives of the Governing Faculty of the college that all courses in the CEHHS regardless of mode of delivery should be equivalent in terms of course objectives and largely parallel, therefore, in terms of their development, approval, and maintenance processes that pertain. 1. Current Online Course Development Process and Support 1.1. Funding and Technical Support : CEHHS faculty possess specific knowledge of their programs and faculty, and they are best suited to make decisions about their online curriculum selection. Several campus wide and college based resources are available to faculty teaching online to support their instructional proficiency. The main resource at the college level is an Instructional Learning Assistant, who assists faculty with the campus' adopted Learning Management System, Canvas and offers training and consultation regarding the creation and improvement of online instruction. CEHHS faculty have additional access to training and consulting at the Hub for Teaching and Learning (campus wide). Further resources at the university's Ann Arbor campus include the Center for Research, Learning, and Teaching (at the Ann Arbor campus), the Faculty Exploratory and Knowledge Navigation Center, and an annual "TeachTech" event each May for continuing education and professional development focused on productive use and best practice in online teaching and learning and in instructional technology 1
2 more generally. Faculty are encouraged to participate in professional development activities related to online instruction (workshops, webinars, consultation with an instructional designer, or with faculty peers) Course Design and Evaluation : The CEHHS does not have a separate process for creating online courses, or maintaining their quality, since the disciplines expect equivalence in content and rigor between online and face to face courses. CEHHS faculty evaluate and assess online courses using a system of peer review, in which experienced faculty conduct class visits or observation of online classes of junior and adjunct faculty. These reviews include examination of course materials for appropriateness and rigor, the effectiveness of the delivery method in the classroom or on line, and the extent to which courses are updated and teaching innovations applied. Peer review is generally formative and developmental, with suggestions for change, and ongoing mentoring occurring as an important part of the evaluation process. Normally, peer reviews for online courses will require a different observation protocol. Above all, CEHHS faculty seek online course development and delivery that is learner centered and focused on meeting the same course objectives as in face to face offerings. Similarly, course evaluations for online courses should meet the same standards as face to face course evaluations require. 2. Recognizing and Promoting Quality in Online Education Like Quality Matters, a rubric of general and specific standards intended to guide the design of online courses in use at a large number of universities, CEHHS has adopted a 1 rubric, which it recommends that faculty utilize. Based on established best practices in online instruction, the CEHHS Course Design Rubric (CDR; see in Appendix 1) is an optional but recommended tool that can be used: a. As a road map to aid faculty in designing a new course for the online environment. 1 CEHHS Course Design Rubric is largely based on a rubric used at California State University, Chico. It is licensed as a CC 3.0, which allows modifications, given appropriate attribution. 2
3 b. As a course "self evaluation" tool advising instructors how to revise an existing course. Faculty have the option to use this self evaluation to strengthen their online courses, or to mentor peer online instructors. c. As a means for getting recognition for exemplary online instruction. d. As an aid for mentoring of faculty new to online teaching. The Course Design Rubric includes four categories: Learner Support and Resources, Online Organization and Design, Instructional Design, Delivery, and Technology, Assessment and Evaluation of Student Learning 3. Creating an Online Course: The Process All new course proposals and major course changes are reviewed by the CEHHS Curriculum Committee. A sponsoring faculty member working through his or her department chair normally presents a proposed new course for consideration within the college's Curriculum Committee (which is advisory to the college Executive Committee). The Curriculum Committee approves proposed courses (normally after offering recommendations and stipulations that are incorporated into the course proposal), and these approvals stand as recommendations for approval by the Executive Committee. Courses approved at the collegiate level in this fashion then move through the campus UCDC and relevant UCDC subcommittees for final recording by the campus registrar. New course proposals and course changes require a standard course form including a supporting statement and rationale for Curriculum Committee consideration and ultimate approval in the Executive Committee. The CEHHS will use the same process for the creation of new online courses and for changing the delivery format of an existing course to include online and hybrid courses. 3
4 The supporting statement and rationale for online courses will include an Online Course Supporting Statement (OCSS) in Appendix 2, with 6 questions, closely aligned with the categories of the Course Design Rubric discussed above. Faculty members plan and design their course using the optional Course Design Rubric, and on that basis, can easily complete the Online Course Supporting Statement. Faculty can then choose to append a completed Course Design Rubric to supplement their Online Course Supporting Statement. Faculty are also encouraged to consult with relevant support staff. In summary, submitting a new online course proposal, or a course change proposal from face to face delivery to online or hybrid, requires: a standard Course Approval or Course Change Form; a supporting statement and rationale that includes the OCSS (Note that the OCSS is considered part of the supporting statement for offering/modifying the course, not an extra step in the approval process.) 4. Self evaluation in Online Instruction The Course Design Rubric is intended as a guide to help faculty structure plans for designing an online course. The rubric also serves as a helpful template for describing course design and delivery in the Online Course Supporting Statement, since they are congruent. Placing check marks across the rubric categories would give the instructor a visual map of strengths in course design and delivery in the planning phase, as well as an idea of what areas to improve over time. Most importantly, this visual map can provide a reference for future self evaluations. 5. Maintaining and Refreshing Online Courses Faculty are encouraged to use the Course Design Rubric and other existing support systems in the college and campus in order to keep pace with new instructional technology and pedagogical developments. The college relies on the peer review system (as set forth in faculty governance policies and the Standard Practice Guide for the 4
5 University of Michigan) to evaluate and assess online courses, including online observation, ongoing training, and mentoring. 5
6 APPENDIX 1 Online Course Design Rubric Category 1: Learner Support & Resources Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Course lacks relevant information for online learner support and links to campus resources. Course lacks access to contact information for the instructor, department and/or other relevant support personnel/services. Course contains relevant information for online learner support and links to campus resources. Course includes access to contact information for the instructor, department and other relevant support personnel/services. Course contains extensive relevant information for online learner support and links to campus resources. Course lacks sufficient access to a wide range of resources supporting course content and different learning styles. Accessibility needs are only partially addressed. (Including: sight, mobility, hearing, cognition, and technical.) Course offers sufficient access to a wide range of resources supporting course content and different learning styles. Accessibility needs are adequately addressed. (Including: sight, mobility, hearing, cognition, and technical.) Course offers extensive access to a wide range of resources supporting course content and different learning styles. 6
7 Online Course Design Rubric Category 2: Online Organization & Design Developing Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Much of the course is under construction, with some key components identified such as the syllabus. Course syllabus is unclear about what is expected of students. Course interface lacks clarity. Course is organized and navigable. Students can understand the key components and structure of the course. Course syllabus identifies and delineates the role the online environment will play in the course. Course interface presents and communicates course information clearly. Course is well organized and easy to navigate. Students can clearly understand all components and structure of the course. Course syllabus explicitly identifies and delineates the role the online environment will play in the course. Course interface presents and communicates course information clearly throughout the course. The layout has a consistent appearance. 7
8 Online Course Design Rubric Category 3: Instructional Design, Delivery & Technology Developing Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Course offers limited opportunity for interaction and communication student to student, student to instructor and student to content. Course goals are not clearly defined and do not align to learning objectives. Learning objectives are vague or incomplete and learning activities are absent or unclear. Course uses limited technology tools to facilitate communication and learning. There are limited multimedia elements and/or learning objects for accommodating different learning styles. Course offers a variety of opportunities for interaction and communication student to student, student to instructor and student to content. Course goals are defined and aligned to learning objectives. Learning objectives are identified and learning activities are consistent with the stated objectives. Course uses a variety of technology tools to appropriately facilitate communication and learning. A variety of relevant multimedia elements and/or learning objects are used to accommodate different learning styles throughout the course. Course offers extensive and frequent opportunities for interaction and communication student to student, student to instructor and student to content. Course goals are clearly defined and closely aligned to learning objectives. Learning objectives are explicitly identified and learning activities are consistent with, and directly related to, the stated objectives. Course takes advantage of the affordances of a variety of technology tools to effectively facilitate communication and learning. Multimedia elements and/or learning objects are extensively used to effectively accommodate different learning styles throughout the course. 8
9 Online Course Design Rubric Category 4: Assessment & Evaluation of Student Learning Developing Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Course has limited activities to assess student readiness for course content and mode of delivery. Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are not aligned. Assessment strategies are limited in use to measure content knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Opportunities for students to receive feedback about their own performance are infrequent and sporadic. Students self assessments and/or peer feedback opportunities are limited. Course has adequate activities to assess student readiness for course content and mode of delivery. Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are adequately aligned. Ongoing strategies are used to measure content knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Opportunities for students to receive feedback about their own performance are provided. Students self assessments and/or peer feedback opportunities exist. Course has multiple timely and appropriate activities to assess student readiness for course content and mode of delivery. Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are closely aligned. Multiple ongoing assessment strategies are used to measure student learning. Regular feedback about student performance is provided in a timely manner throughout the course. Students self assessments and peer feedback opportunities exist throughout the course. 9
10 APPENDIX 2 College of Education, Health, and Human Services Online Course Supporting Statement Date: Course number: Course title: Faculty member: Proposed first/next offering: Term Yr Is this an existing course? Yes No If existing, what is the delivery method for which the course is currently approved? Face to Face Online with regular meeting (hybrid) 1. What instructional support will be offered to online learners? (i.e. chat sessions, how to videos, conferencing, etc.) (CDR Category 1) 2. In what ways is the online environment conducive to the learning experience in this course? (CDR Category 2) 3. How will students interact with each other and the professor? Multiple modes of interaction are strongly recommended. (CDR Category 3) 4. What delivery methods will be used for course content? What technology will be required to develop and run the course? (CDR Category 3) 5. How will student mastery of course concepts be evaluated? Multiple methods of evaluation are strongly recommended. (CDR Category 4) 6. Other relevant supporting comments. 10
How To Write An Online Course
College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters Process for Quality Online Course Development and Delivery Approved by CASL Executive Committee, September 10, 2014 CASL Online Learning Advisory Committee (OLAC)
More informationHow To Write A Rubric For Online Instruction
Rubric for Online Instruction Rationale California State University, Chico's first strategic priority is to create and enhance high quality learning environments. Academic technologies, especially online
More informationCoffeyville Community College. Progress Report for Associate of Arts Online Delivery
Coffeyville Community College Progress Report for Associate of Arts Online Delivery November 2011 Alysia Johnston Vice President of Academics Brad Weber Director of Distance Learning Introduction In November
More informationOnline Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook
Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Hbook Distance Education Course sites must meet Effective Level scores to meet Distance Education Criteria. Distance Education Course Sites will be reviewed a semester
More informationDistance Learning Policy With Proposed Procedures
Distance Learning Adopted by PWO 19 Feb 2010 Distance Learning Policy With Proposed The Instructional Division will be responsible for the development, delivery, assessment and accreditation of Distance
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Background The following document is intended as a guide to assist College
More informationIvy Tech Community College of Indiana
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana POLICY TITLE Distance Education Course Design and Development POLICY NUMBER ASOM 6.0 (Formerly APPM 5. & 5.) PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY Instructional Design CREATION /
More informationTeaching with ilearn Innovation Award APPENDIX
Teaching with ilearn Innovation Award APPENDIX Please reference this appendix to assist in writing your ilearn Innovation Award submission. Apereo Teaching and Learning Award s (ATLAS) definition of innovation
More informationStandards for Online Professional Development
Standards for Online Guidelines for Planning and Evaluating Online Courses and Programs Southern Regional Education Board 592 10th St. N.W. Atlanta, GA 30318 (404) 875-9211 www.sreb.org For more information,
More informationCLAS Peer Teaching Evaluation Best Practices 4.2015 (including online) Purpose
Purpose The College of Liberal Arts and Sciences values excellence in teaching. Such excellence can be enhanced through constructive and candid evaluation of peer teaching. Periodic peer teaching evaluations
More informationA. Course Content and Instructional Design: Courses and instruction employ the following to ensure a quality academic experience:
A. Course Content and Instructional Design: Courses and instruction employ the following to ensure a quality academic experience: Course Goals and Outcomes A2. * Content of sufficient rigor, depth, and
More informationTOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
More informationRequest for Proposal ecampus 2015-16 Technology Equipment Program
Request for Proposal ecampus 2015-16 Technology Equipment Program ecampus, Academic Technology San José State University Instructional Resource Center (IRC) 206 One Washington Square, San José, CA 95192-0026
More informationNortheastern State University Online Educator Certificate
Northeastern State University Online Educator Certificate Purpose Beginning in October 1999, the Northeastern State University Distance Learning Advisory Committee (now the Center for Teaching and Learning
More informationNC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES OCTOBER 28, 2014 The details that follow concern the pedagogy of online teaching and
More informationCriteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses
Criteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses In this document, hybrid refers to any course that replaces face-to-face contact hours with online instruction and online refers to courses that have no
More informationPRO-NET 2000. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2002
Professional Development Coordinator Competencies and Sample Indicators for the Improvement of Adult Education Programs A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators
More informationDRAFT LAMC Addendum to the Course Outline of Record Course Approval Application for Online/Distance Learning Delivery
Date of Submission: DRAFT LAMC Addendum to the Course Outline of Record Course Approval Application for Online/Distance Learning Delivery Credit and Acknowledgements: Special thanks and credit to both
More informationIvy Tech Community College of Indiana
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana POLICY TITLE Distance Education Course Design and Development POLICY NUMBER ASOM 6.0 (Formerly APPM 5. & 5.) PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY Instructional Design CREATION /
More informationStrengthening the Role of Part-Time Faculty in Community Colleges
Strengthening the Role of Part-Time Faculty in Community Colleges EXAMPLE JOB DESCRIPTION FOR PART-TIME FACULTY: Valencia College - Job Description and Essential Competencies Valencia College Job Description:
More informationOnline Course Self-Assessment Form
Online courses are approved by the University of California in two steps: Online Course Self-Assessment Form 1. Assessment against International Association for K-12 Online Learning (inacol) course standards.
More informationDISTANCE EDUCATION. References: Title 5 Sections 55200 et seq.; ACCJC Accreditation Standard, II.A.1
AP 4105 DISTANCE EDUCATION References: Title 5 Sections 55200 et seq.; ACCJC Accreditation Standard, II.A.1 Definition Distance education means instruction in which the instructor and student are separated
More informationTeaching Writing in the Community College Implications for English Faculty and Community Colleges
Teaching Writing in the Community College Implications for English Faculty and Community Colleges Purpose Statement English departments and faculty in community colleges traditionally have been dedicated
More informationTeacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors
Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors This document is intended to inform school communities in recognizing the performance levels for key elements defined in the Teacher Rubric and
More informationTexas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy
Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy Policy Statement Texas Wesleyan University recognizes the goal of distance education is to increase accessibility to learning by providing
More informationPOWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS Poway Unified School District Teaching Standards Domain I Domain II Domain III Domain IV Domain V Planning and Designing Instruction Element
More informationMJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT
MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT Online courses have on average 10% lower student success across all disciplines. To enhance the teaching and learning experience and help promote student success,
More informationUNLV Department of Curriculum and Instruction Masters in Education Degree with an emphasis in Science Education Culminating Experience
UNLV Department of Curriculum and Instruction Masters in Education Degree with an emphasis in Science Education Culminating Experience The culminating experience for the Masters of Education degree with
More information12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1
12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1 Getting Started 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. 1.2 Students are introduced to the purpose
More informationOnline Course Development Guidelines and Rubric
Online Development Guidelines and Rubric Introduction and Task Force Recommendations Purpose The guidelines identify the issues that faculty at Michigan community colleges should address when developing
More informationJames Madison University. Best Practices for Online Programs
James Madison University Best Practices for Online Programs Updated December 2013 JMU Best Practices for Online Programs I. Introduction... 2 II. Institutional Context and Commitment... 2 III. Curriculum
More informationTeaching and Learning Standards and Principles
The Alamo Colleges Online (ACOL) is committed to quality teaching and learning. A critical component of maintaining quality online programs is the evaluation process. All faculty teaching online, hybrid,
More informationTraditional courses are taught primarily face to face.
REACH Distance Learning Program Center Handbook Introduction Distance learning is an educational delivery method where students work on their own and communicate with faculty and other students through
More informationAutism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric
Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs
More informationRUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses
RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses Instructor Name: Course (DEPT, number, title): When using this rubric to evaluate your course, use this guideline and the rubric below to award points. 0 Component
More informationCategories Criteria 3 2 1 0 Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.
1.0 Instructional Design Exemplary Acceptable Needs Revision N/A Categories Criteria 3 2 1 0 Instructional and Audience Analysis 1. Prerequisites are described. Prerequisites are clearly listed in multiple
More informationEffective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses
Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses Initial Course Development Below are some tips and strategies for initial development and conceptualization of your course: Blueprint your course.
More informationHCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC
HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project and Lake Superior College I. COURSE OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION General Review Standard: The overall design of the course, navigational
More informationThe University of Hawai i Community Colleges Online Learning Strategic Plan
The University of Hawai i Community Colleges Online Learning Strategic Plan GOAL 1,2,3,4,5 DESCRIPTION OUTCOMES RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND DATA REPORTING FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS Overview As an important subset
More informationTeacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
More informationDistance Education Handbook
Distance Education Handbook Pierce Education Technology Committee Introduction and Purpose What is distance learning? Section 51865 of the California Education Code defines distance learning as instruction
More informationOnline Course Proposal Form Form 1
If using Firefox, you must download the form. Click the download icon in the top right corner (looks like a down arrow on a sheet of paper). You will then be asked in the pop window if you want to open
More informationHello, thank you for joining me today as I discuss universal instructional design for online learning to increase inclusion of I/DD students in
Hello, thank you for joining me today as I discuss universal instructional design for online learning to increase inclusion of I/DD students in Associate and Bachelor degree programs. I work for the University
More informationPolicies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process
Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process Overview Effective teaching is the core of any outstanding university and is
More informationAppendix D: Faculty Evaluation Form Second/Third Year Appointments
Appendix D: Faculty Evaluation Form Second/Third Year Appointments Introduction This form lists criteria dean/supervisors will use to evaluate whether or not expectations have been met in the second-year
More informationGuide to Best Practices in Online Teaching. Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College. Revised November 2012
Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College Revised November 2012 Committee: Rhonda Bauerlein, Joe D Amato, Connie Elder, Brian Josephson, Kathy Kotowski,
More informationBYLAWS FOR THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MANAGEMENT APPENDIX B
BYLAWS FOR THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MANAGEMENT APPENDIX B INSTRUMENTS FOR FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Procedures are detailed
More informationPolicies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process DRAFT
Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process DRAFT Overview In 2011, The University of Texas System Chancellor unveiled
More informationTLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers 2012-2013
TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers 0-0 Domain/Relative Weight Dimension Page Classroom Management 0%. Preparation. Discipline. Building-Wide Climate Responsibility. Lesson Plans. Assessment
More informationQuality Guidelines for Online Courses
Quality Guidelines for Online Courses The quality of an online course is determined by several factors, some of which can only be assessed while the course is in progress. These Quality Guidelines are
More informationPenn State Online Faculty Competencies for Online Teaching
Teaching in an online environment can be considerably different in nature than teaching face-to-face. The competencies listed in this document are intended to provide faculty and administrators with a
More informationRoles, Responsibilities and Expectations for Developing and Teaching Online Courses in Continuing and Distance Studies
CONTINUING AND DISTANCE STUDIES FACULTY OF ARTS AND S CIENCE Roles, Responsibilities and Expectations for Developing and Teaching Online Courses in Continuing and Distance Studies www.queensu.ca/artsci_online
More informationOnline and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines
Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines February 10, 2011 The following is intended to serve as a guide to the development of online and hybrid courses at Cedar Crest College. Substantively, the
More information12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2
12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1 Getting Started 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. 1.2 Learners are introduced to the purpose
More informationOnline Instruction - Requirements and Reviewing Recommendations
1 Quality Guidelines for Course Development The following guidelines are based on the Rubric for Online Instruction (ROI) created by Chico State University and on an adaptation of the instructional design
More informationVideo Demo Storyboard Ohio State University
Video Demo Storyboard Ohio State University MAY 2010 1 2 3 Welcome to Ohio University. Established in 1804, Ohio University is the ninth oldest public institution of higher learning in the United States.
More informationQuality Standards for Online Learning
Quality Standards for Online Learning Guidelines regarding minimum standards are used for course development, design, and delivery of quality online instruction (such as course syllabus elements, course
More informationB. Public School Partners Involvement in the Revisioning of the Program and Continued Involvement in the Delivery and Evaluation of the Program
Re-Visioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina MA in History, Secondary Education with Licensure in History and Social Studies Appalachian State University A. Description of how the Proposed
More informationMississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
More informationTVCC Distance Learning Faculty Handbook. Distance Learning. Faculty Handbook. 1 P age
Distance Learning Faculty Handbook 1 P age Contents Distance Learning at Trinity Valley Community College... 3 Mission Statement... 3 Definition (EBB Legal 19 TAC 4.103(9))-... 3 TVCC Distance Learning
More informationLAW Legal Assisting Paralegal Studies Program
LAW Legal Assisting Paralegal Studies Program 1. Briefly outline the department s/program s core goals and priorities for the next three years using the table below, and describe the rationale (e.g., supporting
More informationThe Transition from Face-to Face to Online Teaching
The Transition from Face-to Face to Online Teaching Rosemary Macy, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Nursing Boise State University Abstract The transition of university faculty from teaching face-to-face to
More informationMain Author: Contributing Authors:
Main Author: Amy Roche, Instructional Designer Contributing Authors: Tricia Clark, Instructional Technologist Mary Ann Mengel, Multimedia Specialist John Shank, Director for the Center for Learning & Teaching
More informationA Student s Right to Challenge
A Student s Right to Challenge Dr. Penelope D. Keough National University School of Education Special Education, Los Angeles, California, USA Abstract When a university s syllabus is not clear students
More informationEagle Learning Online Policies & Procedures
Eagle Learning Online Policies & Procedures Table of Contents Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Definitions Infrastructure Faculty/Instructor Electronic Curriculum and
More informationEXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program
EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program Secondary Education (Math, History/Social Studies, Science, World Languages) and Special Education (K-12) Goal: The MAT program focuses on preparing
More informationDES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROCEDURES FACULTY
ES4077 Page 1 DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROCEDURES FACULTY Section: INSTRUCTIONAL ADMINISTRATION Procedure: Application for Award of and Completion of Online Courses Effective
More informationTENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Alternative Education Program Model/Standards Standard 1.0: Mission An exemplary alternative education program operates with a clearly stated mission, a formal set of standards, and a plan for program
More informationAssessment of Student Learning Outcomes Annual Report (Due May 20 to lpraslova@vanguard.edu and officeoftheprovost@vanguard.edu ).
of Student Learning Annual Report (Due May 20 to lpraslova@vanguard.edu and officeoftheprovost@vanguard.edu ). /Department: Date: Mission learning outcomes (also included in the assessment plan). Please
More informationChecklist for Evaluating Online Courses
Educational Technology Cooperative Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses November 2006 Southern Regional Education Board 592 10th St. N.W. Atlanta, GA 30318 (404) 875-9211 www.sreb.org This publication
More informationElmhurst College Elmhurst, Illinois
Elmhurst, Illinois 2010 UNDERGRADUATE SPECIAL EDUCATION Teacher Preparation Program Design C+ While its university's selectivity in admissions and fairly strong reading preparation enhance the design of
More informationSection I: Introduction
Section I: Introduction Educators: In order to fulfill the requirements of Texas Education Code 21.045 and Texas Administration Code (TAC) Chapter 229, the Texas Education Agency is required to collect
More informationNortheastern Illinois University Chicago, Illinois
Chicago, Illinois 2010 UNDERGRADUATE SPECIAL EDUCATION Teacher Preparation Program Design D While general professional coursework enhances the design of this program, there are other critical elements
More informationPrincipal Practice Observation Tool
Principal Performance Review Office of School Quality Division of Teaching and Learning Principal Practice Observation Tool 2014-15 The was created as an evidence gathering tool to be used by evaluators
More informationOnline Course Development Guide and Review Rubric
Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric Thank you for participating in our online course review process! Your input is extremely valuable to us, and we appreciate the time you are taking to help
More informationGUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE COURSES OFFERED FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL
GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE COURSES OFFERED FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL Rationale: Professional development takes many forms, including such activities as workshops, courses, conferences,
More informationOnline Class* Development Guidelines Middlesex Community College March 11, 2015
Online Class* Development Guidelines Middlesex Community College March 11, 2015 I. Online Class Proposal: Submission and Review** The proposal to develop a new online course should start six months before
More informationPROTOCOL FOR PEER OBSERVATION OF AN ONLINE COURSE. The forms to be used for the peer observation of an online course are modeled on
PROTOCOL FOR PEER OBSERVATION OF AN ONLINE COURSE The forms to be used for the peer observation of an online course are modeled on those in current usage in the classroom setting. The observer and the
More informationIvy Tech Community College of Indiana
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana POLICY TITLE Faculty Considerations for Distance Education and Use of Blackboard POLICY NUMBER 7.5 (formerly APPM 5.1 & 5.2) PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY Ivy Tech Online
More informationIvy Tech Community College of Indiana
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana POLICY TITLE Faculty Considerations for Distance Education and Use of Blackboard POLICY NUMBER ASOM 7.5 (formerly APPM 5.1 & 5.2) PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY Ivy Tech Online
More informationTeacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
More informationCourse Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative
Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative In order for a course to be offered as a part of the Online Education Initiative (OEI) course exchange, it must meet established standards relating
More informationSection Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
More information! Standards For Online Courses!
Standards For Online Courses The following Standards for Online Courses have been carefully developed to ensure the highest quality and consistency of online course offerings (full online, partial online,
More informationBlended Course Evaluation Standards
Introduction: Blended learning is defined as to combine Face-to-Face instruction with computer-mediated instruction Graham 2006. Mixing technology and content does not necessarily yield effective learning.
More informationSchool of Music College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY REVIEW AND PROMOTION GUIDELINES
School of Music College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY REVIEW AND PROMOTION GUIDELINES Policy Title: School of Music Non-Tenure Track Faculty Review and Promotion
More informationREVISIONING GRADUATE TEACHER EDUCATION IN NORTH CAROLINA
REVISIONING GRADUATE TEACHER EDUCATION IN NORTH CAROLINA Masters of Arts in Special Education with Concentrations in Emotional/Behavioral Disorders, Intellectual Disabilities, and Learning Disabilities
More informationDoes not teach online, not interested (12) Does not teach. online, is
Demographics (completed surveys) Does not teach interested Does not teach online, is interested Has taught doing so now Is teaching online now (37) TOTALS CAS 7 9 4 20 40 College of Education 0 0 2 8 10
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)
Approved by Academic Affairs May 2010 DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP) I. DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING RTP POLICY A. Preamble B.
More informationRevisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
More informationAssessment of Student Learning Plan (ASLP): ART Program
ART Department: Assessment Plans for All ART Programs Assessment of Student Learning Plan (ASLP): ART Program A. College, Department/Program, Date College CAHS Department/Program ART Date May 15, 2015
More informationOnline Course Standards Rubric
Online Course Standards Rubric The Online Course Standards Rubric provides a framework for online course design based on the University of New Mexico s online course standards and expectancies for quality
More informationOnline Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers
Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers The intent of this document is to serve as a tool for instructional designers and faculty developers to use during the course
More informationBlended Learning in Writing & Literature I & II and Deaf Literature Classes
Integrating Library Resources Using IdeaTools Web Course http://idea3.rit.edu/jxnwml/libres/index.asp Blended Learning in Writing & Literature I & II and Deaf Literature Classes Background Information
More informationRUBRIC ASSESSMENT: Online Educators
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: Online Educators Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component Failing Needs Improvement Proficient Distinguished has a limited knowledge of
More informationPROGRAM DESIGN. Our design process, philosophy and values.
PROGRAM Our design process, philosophy and values. Program Design and Development is one of our core services in which we work with faculty to design and develop courses that are part of a new or redesigned
More informationAlternate Route to Interim Teaching Certification Program Application
Office of Professional Preparation Services Alternate Route to Interim Teaching Certification Program Application For Educator Preparation Providers seeking approval to offer an alternate route to interim
More informationVirtual Coastal Bend College (vcbc) Course Approval Form
Virtual Coastal Bend College (vcbc) Course Approval Form This document will be used by vcbc Faculty when submitting courses for online delivery. Compliance with this document demonstrates adherence to:
More informationAcademic Audit Site Visit Report. Pellissippi State Community College University Parallel Program April 17, 2015
Academic Audit Site Visit Report Pellissippi State Community College University Parallel Program April 17, 2015 Audit Team: Debra McCarter, Team Chair, Walters State Community College Jim Kelly, Northeast
More information