The Dirac Equation May 18, 2015


 Colin Nelson
 11 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 The Dirac Equation May 8, 25
2 . Introduction In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, wave functions are descibed by the timedependent Schrodinger equation : 2m 2 ψ + V ψ = i () This is really just energy conservation ( kinetic energy ( p2 ) plus potential energy (V) equals total 2m energy (E)) with the momentum and energy terms replaced by their operator equivalents p i ; E i (2) In relativistic quantum theory, the energymomentum conservation equation is E 2 p 2 = m 2 (note that we are working in the standard particle physics units where h = c = ). Proceeding with the same replacements, we can derive the KleinGordon equation : In covariant notation this is E 2 p 2 m 2 2 ψ ψ m 2 = (3) µ µ ψ m 2 ψ = (4) Suppose ψ is solution to the KleinGordon equation. Multiplying it by iψ we get iψ 2 ψ 2 iψ 2 ψ + iψ m 2 = (5) Taking the complex conjugate of the KleinGordon equation and multiplying by iψ we get iψ 2 ψ 2 iψ 2 ψ + iψm 2 = (6) If we subtract the second from the first we obtain [ ( i ψ )] ψ + [ i (ψ ψ ψ ψ )] = (7) This has the form of an equation of continuity with a probability density defined by ρ + j = (8) ( ρ = i ψ ) ψ (9) and a probability density current defined by j = i (ψ ψ ψ ψ ) () Now, suppose a solution to the KleinGordon equation is a free particle with energy E and momentum p ψ = Ne ipµxµ ()
3 Substitution of this solution into the equation for the probability density yields ρ = 2E N 2 (2) The probability density is proportional to the energy of the particle. Now, why is this a problem? If you substitute the free particle solution into the KleinGordon equation you get, unsurpisingly, the relation E 2 p 2 = m 2 (3) so the energy of the particle could be E = ± p 2 + m 2 (4) The fact that you have negative energy solutions is not that much of a problem. What is a problem is that the probability density is proportional to E. This implies a possibility for negative probability densities...which don t exist. This (and some others) problem drove Dirac to think about another equation of motion. His starting point was to try to factorise the energy momentum relation. In covariant formalism where p µ is the 4momentum : (E, p x, p y, p z ). Dirac tried to write E 2 p 2 m 2 p µ p µ m 2 (5) p µ p µ m 2 = (β κ p κ + m)(γ λ p λ m) (6) where κ and λ range from to 3. This notation looks a bit confusing. It may help if we write both sides out longhand. On the lefthand side we have On the righthand side we have p µ p µ m 2 = p 2 p p = p 2 p 2 p 2 2 p 2 3 m 2 (7) (β κ p κ + m)(γ λ p λ m) = (β p β p β 2 p 2 β 3 p 3 + m)(γ p γ p γ 2 p 2 γ 3 p 3 m) (8) Expanding the righthand side (β κ p κ + m)(γ λ p λ m) = β κ γ λ p κ p λ m 2 + mγ λ p λ mβ κ p κ (9) This should be equal to p µ p µ m 2, so we need to get rid of the terms that are linear in p. We can do this just be choosing β κ = γ κ. Then p µ p µ m 2 = γ κ γ λ p κ p λ m 2 (2) Now, since κ, λ runs from to 3, the right hand side can be fully expressed by γ κ γ λ p κ p λ m 2 = (γ ) 2 p 2 + (γ ) 2 p 2 + (γ 2 ) 2 p (γ 3 ) 2 p 2 3 (2) + (γ γ + γ γ )p p + (γ γ 2 + γ 2 γ )p p 2 (22) + (γ γ 3 + γ 3 γ )p p 3 + (γ γ 2 + γ 2 γ )p p 2 (23) + (γ γ 3 + γ 3 γ )p p 3 + (γ 2 γ 3 + γ 3 γ 2 )p 2 p 3 m 2 (24) 2
4 This must be equal to p µ p µ m 2 = p 2 p 2 p 2 2 p 2 3 m 2 (25) One could make the squared terms equal by choosing (γ ) 2 = and (γ ) 2 = (γ 2 ) 2 = (γ 3 ) 2 =, but this would not eliminate the crossterms. Dirac realised that what you needed was something which anticommuted : i.e. γ µ γ ν + γ ν γ µ = if µ ν. He realised that the γ factors must be 4x4 matrices, not just numbers, which satisfied the anticommutation relation where {γ µ, γ ν } = 2g µν (26) g µν = (27) We also define, for later use, another γ matrix called γ 5 = iγ γ γ 2 γ 3. This has the properties (you should check for yourself) that (γ 5 ) 2 =, {γ 5, γ µ } = (28) We will want to take the Hermitian conjugate of these matrices at various times. The Hermitian conjugate of each matrix is γ = γ γ 5 = γ 5 γ µ = γ γ µ γ = γ for µ (29) If the matrices satisfy this algebra, then you can factor the energy momentum conservation equation p µ p µ m 2 = (γ κ p κ + m)(γ λ p λ m) = (3) The Dirac equation is one of the two factors, and is conventionally taken to be Making the standard substitution, p µ equation γ λ p λ m = (3) i µ we then have the usual covariant form of the Dirac (iγ µ µ m)ψ = (32) where µ = (,,, ), m is the particle mass and the γ matrices are a set of 4dimensional x y z matrices. Since these are matrices, ψ is a 4element column matrix called a bispinor. This bispinor is not a 4vector and doesn t transform like one..2 The BjorkenDrell convention Any set of four 4x4 matrices that obey the algebra above will work. The one we normally use includes the Pauli spin matrices. Recall that each component of the spin operator S for spin /2 particles is defined by its own Pauli spin matrix : S x = 2 σ = 2 ( ) S y = 2 σ 2 = 2 3 ( ) i i S z = 2 σ 3 = 2 ( ) (33)
5 In terms of the Pauli spin matrices, the γ matrices have the form ( ) ( ) σ γ = γ µ µ = σ µ γ 5 = ( ) Each element of the matrices in Equations 34 are 2x2 matrices. denotes the 2 x 2 unit matrix, and denotes the 2 x 2 null matrix..3 The Probability Density and Current In order to understand the probability density and probability flow we will want to derive an equation of continuity for the probability. The first step is to write the Dirac equation out longhand : iγ + iγ x + iγ2 y We want to take the Hermitian conjugate of this : [iγ + iγ x + iγ2 y + iγ3 z (34) mψ = (35) + iγ3 z mψ] (36) Now, we must remember that the γ are matrices and that ψ is a 4component column vector. Thus [γ ] = [ 2 3 ] (37) 4 2 = 3 (38) 4 ( ) = (39) = γ (4) Using the Hermitian conjugation properties of the γ matrices defined in the previous section we can write Equation 36 as i γ i x γ i y γ2 i z γ3 mψ (4) which, as γ µ = γ µ for µ means we can write this as i γ i x ( γ ) i y ( γ2 ) i z ( γ3 ) mψ (42) 4
6 We have a problem now  this is no longer covariant. That is, I would like to write this in the form ψ ( i µ γ µ m) where the derivative µ now operates to the left. I can t because the minus signs on the spatial components coming from the γ µ spoils the scalar product. To deal with this we have to multiply the equation on the right by γ, since we can flip the sign of the γ matrices using the relationship γ µ γ = γ γ µ. Thus or i γ γ i x ( γ γ ) i y ( γ2 γ ) i z ( γ3 γ ) mψ γ (43) i γ γ i x (γ γ ) i y (γ γ 2 ) i z (γ γ 3 ) mψ γ (44) Defining the adjoint spinor ψ = ψ γ, we can rewrite this equation as and finally we get the adjoint Dirac equation i γ i x (γ ) i y (γ2 ) i z (γ3 ) mψ (45) Now, we multiply the Dirac equation on the left by ψ : and the adjoint Dirac equation on the right by ψ : and we add them together, which eliminates the two mass terms or, more succinctly,. If we now identify the bit in the brackets as the 4current : ψ(i µ γ µ + m) = (46) ψ(iγ µ µ m)ψ = (47) ψ(i µ γ µ + m)ψ = (48) ψ(γ µ µ ψ) + (ψ µ γ µ )ψ = (49) µ (ψγ µ ψ) = (5) j µ = (ρ, j) (5) where ρ is the probability density and j is the probability current, we can write the conservation equation as µ j µ = with j µ = ψγ µ ψ (52) which is the covariant form for an equation of continuity. The probability density is then just ρ = ψγ ψ = ψ γ γ ψ = ψ ψ and the probability 3current is j = ψ γ γ µ ψ. This current is the same one which appears in the Feynman diagrams. It is called a Vector current, and is the current responsible for the electromagnetic interaction. 5
7 ψ i e ψ f e q γ e e φ i φ f For the interaction in Figure.3, with two electromagnetic interactions, the matrix element is then.4 Examples M = e2 4π [ψ fγ µ ψ i ] q 2 [φ fγ ν φ i ] (53) Now let s look at some solutions to the Dirac Equation. The first one we will look at is for a particle at rest..4. Particle at rest Suppose the fermion wavefunction is a plane wave. We can write this as ψ(p) = e ixµpµ u(p) (54) where p µ = (E, p x, p y, p z ) and x µ = (t, x, y, z) and so ix µ p µ = i(et x p). This is just the phase for an oscillating plane wave. For a particle at rest, the momentum term disappears : ix µ p µ = i(et). Furthur, since the momentum is zero, the spatial derivatives must be zero : reads x,y,z =. The Dirac equation therefore or which gives us iγ mψ = (55) iγ ( ie)u(p) mu(p) = (56) Eγ u(p) = mu(p) (57) 6
8 Now, u(p) is a 4component bispinor, so properly expanding the gamma matrix in Equation 57, we get u E = m u 2 u 3 (58) u 4 This is an eigenvalue equation. There are four independent solutions. Two with energy E = m and two with E = m. The solutions are just u = u 2 = u 3 = u 4 = (59) with eigenvalues m, m, m and m respectively. The first two solutions can be interpreted as positive energy particle solutions with spin up and spin down. One can see this be checking if the function is an eigenfunction of the spin matrix : S z. S z u = 2 = 2 u (6) and similarly for u 2. Note that we have yet to normalise these solutions. We won t either for the purposes of this discussion. What about these negative energy solutions? We are required to keep them (we can t just say that they are unphysical and throw them away) since quantum mechanics requires a complete set of states. What happens if we allow the particle to have momentum?.4.2 Particle in Motion Again, let s look for a plane wave solution ψ(p) = e ixµpµ u(p) (6) Plugging this into the Dirac equation means that we can replace the µ by p µ and remove the oscillatory term to obtain the momentumspace version of the Dirac Equation (γ µ p µ m)u(p) = (62) Notice that this is now purely algebraic and can be easily(!) solved γ µ p µ m = Eγ p x γ p y γ 2 p z γ 3 m (63) ( ) ( ) ( ) σ = E p m (64) σ ( ) (E m) σ p = (65) σ p (E + m) 7
9 where each element in this 2x2 matrix is actually a 2x2 matrix itself. In this spirit, let s write the 4component bispinor solution as 2component vector ( ) ua u = (66) u B then the Dirac Equation implies that (γ µ p µ m)u(p) = = leading two coupled simultaneous equations ( ) ( ) (E m) σ p ua = σ p (E + m) u B ( ) (67) (σ p)u B = (E m)u A (68) (σ p)u A = (E + m)u B (69) Now, let s expand that (σ p) : (σ p) = = and right back to the Dirac Equation ( ) ( ) p x + p i y + ( ) pz p x ip y p x + ip y p z ( ) (7) (7) (σ p)u B = (E m)u A (72) (σ p)u A = (E + m)u B (73) gives u B = = (σ p) E + m u A (74) ( ) pz p x ip y u E + m p x + ip y p A (75) z Now, we just need to make choices for the form of u A. Let s make the obvious choice and remember that u A is a 2component spinor so we need to specify two solutions: ( ) ( ) u A = or u A = (76) These give u = N p z p x+ip y and u 2 = N 2 p x ip y p z (77) where N and N 2 are normalisation factors we won t go into. Note that, if p = these correspond to the E > solutions we found for a particle at rest, which is good. 8
10 Repeating this for u B = ( ) and u B = u 3 = N 3 p z p x+ip y ( ) which gives solutions u 3 and u 4 p x ip y and u p z 4 = N 4 (78) and collecting them together u = N p z p x+ip y u 2 = N 2 p x ip y p z u 3 = N 3 p z p x+ip y u 4 = N 4 p x ip y p z (79) All of which, if put back into the Dirac Equation, yields : E 2 = p 2 + m 2 as you might expect. Comparing with the p = case we can identify u and u 2 as positive energy solutions with energy E = p 2 + m 2, and u 3, u 4 as negative energy solutions with energy E = p 2 + m 2. How do we interpret these negative energy solutions? The conventional interpretation is called the FeynmanStuckelberg interpretation : A negative energy solution represents a negative energy particle travelling backwards in time, or equivalently, a positive energy antiparticle going forwards in time. With this interpretation we tend to rewrite the negative energy solutions to represent positive antiparticles. Starting from the E < solutions p z p x ip y p x+ip y u 3 = N 3 and u p z 4 = N 4 (8) Here we implicitly assume that E is negative. We define antiparticle states by just flipping the sign of E and p following the FeynmanStuckelberg convention. v (E, p)e i(et x p) = u 4 ( E, p)e i(et x p) (8) v 2 (E, p)e i(et x p) = u 3 ( E, p)e i(et x p) (82) where E = p 2 + m 2. Note that v is associated with u 4 and v 2 is associated with u 3. We do this because the spin matrix, S antiparticle, for antiparticles is equal to S particle i.e. the spin flips for antiparticles as well and the spin eigenvalue for v = u 4 is spinup and v 2 = u 3 is spindown. In general u, u 2, v and v 2 are not eigenstates of the spin operator (Check for yourself). In fact we should expect this since solutions to the Dirac Equation are, by definition, eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator, Ĥ, and the S z does not commute with the Hamiltonian : [Ĥ, Ŝz], and hence we can t find solutions which are simultaneously solutions to S z and Ĥ. However if the zaxis is aligned with particle direction : p x = p y =, p z = ± p then we have the following Dirac states u = N ± p u 2 = N p v = N 9 p ± p v 2 = N (83)
11 These are eigenstates of S z S z u = + 2 u S z u 2 = 2 u 2 S anti z v = S z v = + 2 v (84) S anti z v 2 = S z v 2 = 2 v 2 (85) So we have found solutions of the Dirac Equation which are also spin eigenstates...but only if the particle is travelling along the zaxis..4.3 Charge Conjugation Classical electrodynamics is invariant under a change in the sign of the electric charge. In particle physics, this concept is represented by the charge conjugation operator that flips the signs of all the charges. It changes a particle into an antiparticle, and vice versa: Ĉ p >= p > (86). Application of Ĉ twice brings us back to the the orignal state : Ĉ2 = and so eigenstates of Ĉ are ±. In general most particles are not eigenstates of Ĉ. If p > were an eigenstate of Ĉ then Ĉ p >= ± p >= p > (87) implying that only those particles which are their own antiparticles are eigenstates of Ĉ. This leaves us with photons and the neutral mesons like π, η and ρ. Ĉ changes a particle spinor into an antiparticle spinor. The relevant operation is ψ ψ C = Ĉγ ψ (88) with Ĉ = iγ2 γ. We can apply this to, say, the u solution to the Dirac Equation. if ψ = u e i(et x p), the ψ C = iγ 2 ψ = iγ 2 u e i(et x p) i iγ 2 u = i i i N i p z p x+ip y = N p x ip y p z = v (89) or, in full, Ĉ(u e i(et x p) ) = v e i(et x p). Hence charge conjugation changes the particle eigenspinors into their respective antiparticle spinors..4.4 Helicity The fact that we can find spin eigenvalues for states in which the particles are travelling along the spindirection indicates that the quantity we need is not spin but helicity. The helicity is defined as the projection of the spin along the direction of motion: ( ) σ ĥ = Σ ˆp = 2S ˆp = ˆp (9) σ
12 Figure : The two helicity states. On the left the spin vector is aligned in the direction of motions of the particle. This is a righthanded helicity state and has helicity +. On the right the spin vector is antiparallel to the particle momentum. This is a lefthanded helicity state with helicity . and has eigenvalues equal to + (called righthanded where the spin vector is aligned in the same direction as the momentum vector) or  (called lefthanded where the spin vector is aligned in the opposite direction as the momentum vector), corresponding to the diagrams in Figure. It can be shown that the helicity does commute with the Hamiltonian and so one can find eigenstates that are simultaneously states of helicity and the Hamiltonian. The problem, and it is a big problem, is that helicity is not Lorentz invariant in the case of a massive particle. If the particle is massive it is possible to find an inertial reference frame in which the particle is going in the opposite direction. This does not change the direction of the spin vector, so the helicity can change sign. The helicity is Lorentz invariant only in the case of massless particles..4.5 Chirality We d rather have operators which are Lorentz invariant, than commute with the Hamiltonian. In general wave functions in the Standard Model are eigenstates of a Lorentz invariant quantity called the chirality. The chirality operator is γ 5 and it does not commute with the Hamiltonian. Due to this, it is somewhat difficult to visualise. The best picture I can get comes from the definition : something is chiral if it s mirror image does not superimpose on itself. Think of your left hand. It s mirror image (from the point of view of someone in that mirror looking back at you) is actually a right hand. It and it s mirror image cannot be superimposed andit is therefore an intrinsically chiral object. In the limit that E >> m, or that the particle is massless, the chirality is identical to the helicity. For a massive particle this is no longer true. In general the eigenstates of the chirality operator are γ 5 u R = +u R γ 5 u L = u L γ 5 v R = v R γ 5 v L = +v L (9), where we define u R and u L are right and lefthanded chiral states. We can define the projection operators P L = 2 ( γ5 ) P R = 2 ( + γ5 ) (92) such that P L projects outs the lefthanded chiral particle states and righthanded chiral antiparticle states. P R projects out the righthanded chiral particle states and lefthanded chiral antiparticle states. The projection operators have the following properties : P 2 L,R = P L,R ; P R P L = P L P R = ; P R + P L = (93)
13 Any spinor can be written in terms of it s left and righthanded chiral states: ψ = (P R + P L )ψ = P R ψ + P L ψ = ψ R + ψ L (94) Chirality holds an important place in the standard model. Let s take a standard model probability current ψγ µ φ (95) We can decompose this into it s chiral states ψγ µ φ = (ψ L + ψ R )γ µ (φ L + φ R ) = ψ L γ µ φ L + ψ L γ µ φ R + ψ R γ µ φ L + ψ R γ µ φ R Now, ψ L = ψ L γ = ψ 2 ( γ5 )γ = ψ γ 2 ( + γ5 ) = ψ 2 ( + γ5 ) = ψp R where I have used the fact that γ 5 = γ 5 and γ 5 γ = γ γ 5. Similarly ψ R = ψp L. Using this, it is easy to show that the terms ψ L γ µ φ R and ψ R γ µ φ L are equal to : ψ L γ µ φ R = ψp R γ µ P R φ (96) = ψ 2 ( + γ5 )γ µ 2 ( + γ5 )φ (97) = ψ 4 ( + γ5 )(γ µ + γ µ γ 5 )φ (98) = ψ 4 ( + γ5 )(γ µ γ 5 γ µ )φ (99) = ψ 4 ( + γ5 )( γ 5 )γ µ φ () = ψ 4 ( + γ5 γ 5 (γ 5 ) 2 )γ µ φ () = (2) since (γ 5 ) 2 = and γ µ γ 5 = γ 5 γ µ. Similarly for the other cross term, ψ R γ µ φ L. Hence, ψγ µ φ = ψ L γ µ φ L + ψ R γ µ φ R (3) So lefthanded chiral particles couple only to lefthanded chiral fields, and righthanded chiral fields couple to righthanded chiral fields. One must be very careful with how one interprets this statement. What it does not say is that there are lefthanded chiral electrons and righthanded chiral electrons which are distinct particles. Useful though it is when describing particle interactions, chirality is not conserved in the propagation of a free particle. In fact the chiral states φ L and φ R do not even satisfy the Dirac equation. Since chirality is not a good quantum number it can evolve with time. A massive particle starting off as a completely left handed chiral state will soon evolve a righthanded chiral component. By contrast, helicity is a conserved quantity during free particle propagation. Only in the case of massless particles, for which helicity and chirality are identical and are conserved in freeparticle propagation, can leftand righthanded particles be considered distinct. For neutrinos this mostly holds. 2
14 .5 What you should know Understand the covariant form of the Dirac equation, and know how to manipulate the γ matrices. Know where the definition of a current comes from. Understand the difference between helicity and chirality. Be able to manipulate gamma matrices..6 Futhur reading Griffiths Chapter 7, Sections 7., 7.2 and 7.3 Griffiths Chapter, Section.7 3
We can represent the eigenstates for angular momentum of a spin1/2 particle along each of the three spatial axes with column vectors: 1 +y =
Chapter 0 Pauli Spin Matrices We can represent the eigenstates for angular momentum of a spin/ particle along each of the three spatial axes with column vectors: +z z [ ] 0 [ ] 0 +y y [ ] / i/ [ ] i/
More information1D 3D 1D 3D. is called eigenstate or state function. When an operator act on a state, it can be written as
Chapter 3 (Lecture 45) Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Now we turn to an application of the preceding material, and move into the foundations of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is based on a series
More informationRelativistic Electromagnetism
Chapter 8 Relativistic Electromagnetism In which it is shown that electricity and magnetism can no more be separated than space and time. 8.1 Magnetism from Electricity Our starting point is the electric
More informationMixed states and pure states
Mixed states and pure states (Dated: April 9, 2009) These are brief notes on the abstract formalism of quantum mechanics. They will introduce the concepts of pure and mixed quantum states. Some statements
More informationFrom Einstein to KleinGordon Quantum Mechanics and Relativity
From Einstein to KleinGordon Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Aline Ribeiro Department of Mathematics University of Toronto March 24, 2002 Abstract We study the development from Einstein s relativistic
More informationH = = + H (2) And thus these elements are zero. Now we can try to do the same for time reversal. Remember the
1 INTRODUCTION 1 1. Introduction In the discussion of random matrix theory and information theory, we basically explained the statistical aspect of ensembles of random matrices, The minimal information
More informationChapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Hans de Vries
Chapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory Hans de Vries January 2, 2009 2 Chapter Contents 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities
More informationHermitian Operators An important property of operators is suggested by considering the Hamiltonian for the particle in a box: d 2 dx 2 (1)
CHAPTER 4 PRINCIPLES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS In this Chapter we will continue to develop the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, using heuristic arguments as necessary. This will lead to a system
More informationHomework One Solutions. Keith Fratus
Homework One Solutions Keith Fratus June 8, 011 1 Problem One 1.1 Part a In this problem, we ll assume the fact that the sum of two complex numbers is another complex number, and also that the product
More informationA. The wavefunction itself Ψ is represented as a socalled 'ket' Ψ>.
Quantum Mechanical Operators and Commutation C I. BraKet Notation It is conventional to represent integrals that occur in quantum mechanics in a notation that is independent of the number of coordinates
More informationHarmonic Oscillator Physics
Physics 34 Lecture 9 Harmonic Oscillator Physics Lecture 9 Physics 34 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, February th, 00 For the harmonic oscillator potential in the timeindependent Schrödinger equation: d ψx
More informationParticle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 7 : Symmetries and the Quark Model. Introduction/Aims
Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson Handout 7 : Symmetries and the Quark Model Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 206 Introduction/Aims Symmetries play a central role in particle physics;
More informationSubatomic Physics: Particle Physics Lecture 4. Quantum ElectroDynamics & Feynman Diagrams. Antimatter. Virtual Particles. Yukawa Potential for QED
Ψ e (r, t) exp i/ (E)(t) (p) (r) Subatomic Physics: Particle Physics Lecture Quantum ElectroDynamics & Feynman Diagrams Antimatter Feynman Diagram and Feynman Rules Quantum description of electromagnetism
More informationThe Essentials of Quantum Mechanics
The Essentials of Quantum Mechanics Prof. Mark Alford v7, 2008Oct22 In classical mechanics, a particle has an exact, sharply defined position and an exact, sharply defined momentum at all times. Quantum
More informationThe Schrödinger Equation
The Schrödinger Equation When we talked about the axioms of quantum mechanics, we gave a reduced list. We did not talk about how to determine the eigenfunctions for a given situation, or the time development
More informationLecture 2. Observables
Lecture 2 Observables 13 14 LECTURE 2. OBSERVABLES 2.1 Observing observables We have seen at the end of the previous lecture that each dynamical variable is associated to a linear operator Ô, and its expectation
More informationPhysics 53. Wave Motion 1
Physics 53 Wave Motion 1 It's just a job. Grass grows, waves pound the sand, I beat people up. Muhammad Ali Overview To transport energy, momentum or angular momentum from one place to another, one can
More informationFeynman diagrams. 1 Aim of the game 2
Feynman diagrams Contents 1 Aim of the game 2 2 Rules 2 2.1 Vertices................................ 3 2.2 Antiparticles............................. 3 2.3 Distinct diagrams...........................
More information1 Spherical Kinematics
ME 115(a): Notes on Rotations 1 Spherical Kinematics Motions of a 3dimensional rigid body where one point of the body remains fixed are termed spherical motions. A spherical displacement is a rigid body
More informationLinear Algebra In Dirac Notation
Chapter 3 Linear Algebra In Dirac Notation 3.1 Hilbert Space and Inner Product In Ch. 2 it was noted that quantum wave functions form a linear space in the sense that multiplying a function by a complex
More information07. Quantum Mechanics Basics.
07. Quantum Mechanics Basics. SternGerlach Experiment (Stern & Gerlach 1922) magnets splotches sliver atoms detection screen Suggests: Electrons possess 2valued "spin" properties. (Goudsmit & Uhlenbeck
More informationContents Quantum states and observables
Contents 2 Quantum states and observables 3 2.1 Quantum states of spin1/2 particles................ 3 2.1.1 State vectors of spin degrees of freedom.......... 3 2.1.2 Pauli operators........................
More informationSpecial Relativity and Electromagnetism Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN
Special Relativity and Electromagnetism Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN United States Particle Accelerator School, University of California  Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, CA 14 th 18 th January 2008 1 Outline Notions
More informationLecture 4. Reading: Notes and Brennan
Lecture 4 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics, Operators and Mathematical Basics of Quantum Mechanics Reading: Notes and Brennan.3.6 ECE 645  Dr. Alan Doolittle Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Classical
More informationThe Central Equation
The Central Equation Mervyn Roy May 6, 015 1 Derivation of the central equation The single particle Schrödinger equation is, ( H E nk ψ nk = 0, ) ( + v s(r) E nk ψ nk = 0. (1) We can solve Eq. (1) at given
More information1. The quantum mechanical state of a hydrogen atom is described by the following superposition: ψ = (2ψ 1,0,0 3ψ 2,0,0 ψ 3,2,2 )
CHEM 352: Examples for chapter 2. 1. The quantum mechanical state of a hydrogen atom is described by the following superposition: ψ = 1 14 2ψ 1,, 3ψ 2,, ψ 3,2,2 ) where ψ n,l,m are eigenfunctions of the
More informationFor the case of an Ndimensional spinor the vector α is associated to the onedimensional . N
1 CHAPTER 1 Review of basic Quantum Mechanics concepts Introduction. Hermitian operators. Physical meaning of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of Hermitian operators. Representations and their use. onhermitian
More informationIntroduction to SME and Scattering Theory. Don Colladay. New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A.
June 2012 Introduction to SME and Scattering Theory Don Colladay New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A. This lecture was given at the IUCSS summer school during June of 2012. It contains a
More informationLectureXXIV. Quantum Mechanics Expectation values and uncertainty
LectureXXIV Quantum Mechanics Expectation values and uncertainty Expectation values We are looking for expectation values of position and momentum knowing the state of the particle, i,e., the wave function
More informationQuanta of Geometry and Unification
Quanta of Geometry and Unification Memorial Meeting for Abdus Salam 90 th Birthday Ali Chamseddine American University of Beirut (AUB) and Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifique (IHES) January 2528,
More informationUNIT 2 MATRICES  I 2.0 INTRODUCTION. Structure
UNIT 2 MATRICES  I Matrices  I Structure 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Objectives 2.2 Matrices 2.3 Operation on Matrices 2.4 Invertible Matrices 2.5 Systems of Linear Equations 2.6 Answers to Check Your Progress
More information6. Quantum Electrodynamics
6. Quantum Electrodynamics In this section we finally get to quantum electrodynamics QED), the theory of light interacting with charged matter. Our path to quantization will be as before: we start with
More informationTime Ordered Perturbation Theory
Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013 Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field We have so far quantized the free scalar field and the free Dirac field.
More information2. Introduction to quantum mechanics
2. Introduction to quantum mechanics 2.1 Linear algebra Dirac notation Complex conjugate Vector/ket Dual vector/bra Inner product/bracket Tensor product Complex conj. matrix Transpose of matrix Hermitian
More informationGauge Field Theory UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE PART III NATURAL SCIENCES TRIPOS. Dr. Ben Gripaios.
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE PART III NATURAL SCIENCES TRIPOS Gauge Field Theory Dr. Ben Gripaios Cavendish Laboratory, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, United Kingdom. January 4, 2016 Email: gripaios@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
More information2x + y = 3. Since the second equation is precisely the same as the first equation, it is enough to find x and y satisfying the system
1. Systems of linear equations We are interested in the solutions to systems of linear equations. A linear equation is of the form 3x 5y + 2z + w = 3. The key thing is that we don t multiply the variables
More informationOn the controversy concerning the definition of quark and gluon angular momentum. Elliot Leader. Imperial College London
On the controversy concerning the definition of quark and gluon angular momentum Elliot Leader Imperial College London 1 Important question: how are the momentum and angular momentum of a nucleon built
More information1. Coordinates (x, t) in one frame are related to coordinates (x, t ) in another frame by the Lorentz transformation formulas.
Physics 00 Problem Set 7 Solution Quick overview: Although relativity can be a little bewildering, this problem set uses just a few ideas over and over again, namely. Coordinates x, t in one frame are
More informationPHY411. PROBLEM SET 3
PHY411. PROBLEM SET 3 1. Conserved Quantities; the RungeLenz Vector The Hamiltonian for the Kepler system is H(r, p) = p2 2 GM r where p is momentum, L is angular momentum per unit mass, and r is the
More informationQuick Reference Guide to Linear Algebra in Quantum Mechanics
Quick Reference Guide to Linear Algebra in Quantum Mechanics Scott N. Walck September 2, 2014 Contents 1 Complex Numbers 2 1.1 Introduction............................ 2 1.2 Real Numbers...........................
More informationClassical Physics Prof. V. Balakrishnan Department of Physics Indian Institution of Technology, Madras. Lecture No. # 13
Classical Physics Prof. V. Balakrishnan Department of Physics Indian Institution of Technology, Madras Lecture No. # 13 Now, let me formalize the idea of symmetry, what I mean by symmetry, what we mean
More informationThe Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb
The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb The Importance of the Harmonic Oscillator The quantum harmonic oscillator holds a unique importance in quantum mechanics, as it is both one of the few problems
More informationAverage Angular Velocity
Average Angular Velocity Hanno Essén Department of Mechanics Royal Institute of Technology S100 44 Stockholm, Sweden 199, December Abstract This paper addresses the problem of the separation of rotational
More informationQuantum Mechanics I: Basic Principles
Quantum Mechanics I: Basic Principles Michael A. Nielsen University of Queensland I ain t no physicist but I know what matters  Popeye the Sailor Goal of this and the next lecture: to introduce all the
More informationSupplemental Worksheet Problems To Accompany: The PreAlgebra Tutor: Volume 1 Section 5 Subtracting Integers
Supplemental Worksheet Problems To Accompany: The PreAlgebra Tutor: Volume 1 Please watch Section 5 of this DVD before working these problems. The DVD is located at: http://www.mathtutordvd.com/products/item66.cfm
More informationHelpsheet. Giblin Eunson Library MATRIX ALGEBRA. library.unimelb.edu.au/libraries/bee. Use this sheet to help you:
Helpsheet Giblin Eunson Library ATRIX ALGEBRA Use this sheet to help you: Understand the basic concepts and definitions of matrix algebra Express a set of linear equations in matrix notation Evaluate determinants
More informationLecture L3  Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations
S. Widnall 16.07 Dynamics Fall 2009 Lecture notes based on J. Peraire Version 2.0 Lecture L3  Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations By using vectors and defining appropriate operations between
More informationEAppendix: Bell s Theorem
EAppendix: Bell s Theorem Christopher T. Hill and Leon M. Lederman, 01 Let s recapitulate Bell s thought experiment as described in the text. In a tropical aquarium we notice (1) that every fish comes
More informationThe basic unit in matrix algebra is a matrix, generally expressed as: a 11 a 12. a 13 A = a 21 a 22 a 23
(copyright by Scott M Lynch, February 2003) Brief Matrix Algebra Review (Soc 504) Matrix algebra is a form of mathematics that allows compact notation for, and mathematical manipulation of, highdimensional
More informationChapter 3. Principles and Spin. There are many axiomatic presentations of quantum mechanics that aim at
Chapter 3 Principles and Spin 3. Four Principles of Quantum Mechanics There are many axiomatic presentations of quantum mechanics that aim at conceptual economy and rigor. However, it would be unwise for
More information1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics
1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics 1.1 Basic notions of operator algebra. In the previous lectures we have met operators: ˆx and ˆp = i h they are called fundamental operators. Many operators
More informationQuantum Fields in Curved Spacetime
Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime Lecture 1: Introduction Finn Larsen Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics Yerevan, August 20, 2016. Intro: Fields Setting: many microscopic degrees of freedom interacting
More informationAppendix 12.A: OneDimensional Collision Between Two Objects General Case An extension of Example in the text.
Chapter 1 Appendices Appendix 1A: OneDimensional Collision Between Two Objects General Case An extension of Example 11 in the text Appendix 1B: TwoDimensional Elastic Collisions Between Two Objects with
More informationINTRODUCTION TO FOURIER TRANSFORMS FOR PHYSICISTS
INTRODUCTION TO FOURIER TRANSFORMS FOR PHYSICISTS JAMES G. O BRIEN As we will see in the next section, the Fourier transform is developed from the Fourier integral, so it shares many properties of the
More informationNEGATIVE ENERGIES AND FIELD THEORY
NEGATIVE ENERGIES AND FIELD THEORY Gerald E. Marsh Argonne National Laboratory (Ret) 5433 East View Park Chicago, IL 60615 Email: gemarsh@uchicago.edu Abstract: The assumption that the vacuum is the minimum
More informationLinear Dependence Tests
Linear Dependence Tests The book omits a few key tests for checking the linear dependence of vectors. These short notes discuss these tests, as well as the reasoning behind them. Our first test checks
More informationMathematical Formulation of the Superposition Principle
Mathematical Formulation of the Superposition Principle Superposition add states together, get new states. Math quantity associated with states must also have this property. Vectors have this property.
More informationQuantum Mechanics: Fundamental Principles and Applications
Quantum Mechanics: Fundamental Principles and Applications John F. Dawson Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 0384 October 14, 009, 9:08am EST c 007 John F. Dawson, all rights
More informationIntroduces the bra and ket notation and gives some examples of its use.
Chapter 7 ket and bra notation Introduces the bra and ket notation and gives some examples of its use. When you change the description of the world from the inutitive and everyday classical mechanics to
More informationFrom Fourier Series to Fourier Integral
From Fourier Series to Fourier Integral Fourier series for periodic functions Consider the space of doubly differentiable functions of one variable x defined within the interval x [ L/2, L/2]. In this
More informationNotes on wavefunctions III: time dependence and the Schrödinger equation
Notes on wavefunctions III: time dependence and the Schrödinger equation We now understand that the wavefunctions for traveling particles with momentum p look like wavepackets with wavelength λ = h/p,
More information2. Wavefunctions. An example wavefunction
2. Wavefunctions Copyright c 2015 2016, Daniel V. Schroeder To create a precise theory of the wave properties of particles and of measurement probabilities, we introduce the concept of a wavefunction:
More informationSCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY
SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY New College of Florida, 5700 Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL 34243, USA Email: colladay@sar.usf.edu To date, a significant effort has been made
More informationHigh Energy Physics Summer School 2016 PreSchool Notes and Problems
STFC HEP Summer School September 2016 High Energy Physics Summer School 2016 PreSchool Notes and Problems Quantum Field Theory Christoph Englert, University of Glasgow Introduction to QED and QCD Andrea
More informationComputer Graphics Prof. Sukhendu Das Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture 7 Transformations in 2D
Computer Graphics Prof. Sukhendu Das Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture 7 Transformations in 2D Welcome everybody. We continue the discussion on 2D
More informationCHAPTER 12 MOLECULAR SYMMETRY
CHAPTER 12 MOLECULAR SYMMETRY In many cases, the symmetry of a molecule provides a great deal of information about its quantum states, even without a detailed solution of the Schrödinger equation. A geometrical
More information4. The Infinite Square Well
4. The Infinite Square Well Copyright c 215 216, Daniel V. Schroeder In the previous lesson I emphasized the free particle, for which V (x) =, because its energy eigenfunctions are so simple: they re the
More informationBasic Quantum Mechanics Prof. Ajoy Ghatak Department of Physics. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi
Basic Quantum Mechanics Prof. Ajoy Ghatak Department of Physics. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Module No. # 02 Simple Solutions of the 1 Dimensional Schrodinger Equation Lecture No. # 7. The Free
More informationA Very Short Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. A. W. Stetz
A Very Short Introduction to Quantum Field Theory A. W. Stetz November 21, 2007 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Second Quantization and Relativistic Fields 7 2.1 Introduction to Field Theory..................
More informationProbability & Statistics Primer Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington 2 January 2009 v2.0
Probability & Statistics Primer Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington 2 January 2009 v2.0 This primer provides an overview of basic concepts and definitions in probability and statistics. We shall
More informationQuantum Information in the Framework of Quantum Field Theory
Quantum Information in the Framework of Quantum Field Theory Jacques Calmet a1 and Xavier Calmet b2 a Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT, Institute for Cryptography and Security, Am Fasanengarten 5,
More informationENTANGLEMENT OF BOSONIC AND FERMIONIC FIELDS IN AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE. Ivette Fuentes University of Nottingham
ENTANGLEMENT OF BOSONIC AND FERMIONIC FIELDS IN AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE Ivette Fuentes University of Nottingham with: Robert B. Mann (U Waterloo) Shahpoor Moradi (U Razi) Eduardo Martin Martinez (CISC Madrid)
More informationWe consider a hydrogen atom in the ground state in the uniform electric field
Lecture 13 Page 1 Lectures 1314 Hydrogen atom in electric field. Quadratic Stark effect. Atomic polarizability. Emission and Absorption of Electromagnetic Radiation by Atoms Transition probabilities and
More informationSolutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 7
Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition Homer Reid April 21, 2002 Chapter 7 Problem 7.2 Obtain the Lorentz transformation in which the velocity is at an infinitesimal angle
More informationUnified Lecture # 4 Vectors
Fall 2005 Unified Lecture # 4 Vectors These notes were written by J. Peraire as a review of vectors for Dynamics 16.07. They have been adapted for Unified Engineering by R. Radovitzky. References [1] Feynmann,
More informationField Theory and Standard Model
DESY06151 arxiv:hepph/0609174v1 18 Sep 2006 Field Theory and Standard Model W. Buchmüller, C. Lüdeling Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany Abstract This is a short introduction
More information1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Math 20 Chapter 5 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors. Definition: A scalar λ is called an eigenvalue of the n n matrix A is there is a nontrivial solution x of Ax = λx. Such an x
More informationQuantum Mechanics: Postulates
Quantum Mechanics: Postulates 5th April 2010 I. Physical meaning of the Wavefunction Postulate 1: The wavefunction attempts to describe a quantum mechanical entity (photon, electron, xray, etc.) through
More information6. ISOMETRIES isometry central isometry translation Theorem 1: Proof:
6. ISOMETRIES 6.1. Isometries Fundamental to the theory of symmetry are the concepts of distance and angle. So we work within R n, considered as an innerproduct space. This is the usual n dimensional
More informationLaws of Motion and Conservation Laws
Laws of Motion and Conservation Laws The first astrophysics we ll consider will be gravity, which we ll address in the next class. First, though, we need to set the stage by talking about some of the basic
More informationPHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Test 3 November 22, 2004
PHY464 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 4 Practice Test 3 November, 4 These problems are similar but not identical to the actual test. One or two parts will actually show up.. Short answer. (a) Recall
More informationLecture Notes for Ph219/CS219: Quantum Information and Computation Chapter 2. John Preskill California Institute of Technology
Lecture Notes for Ph19/CS19: Quantum Information and Computation Chapter John Preskill California Institute of Technology Updated July 015 Contents Foundations I: States and Ensembles 3.1 Axioms of quantum
More informationMatrix Algebra and Applications
Matrix Algebra and Applications Dudley Cooke Trinity College Dublin Dudley Cooke (Trinity College Dublin) Matrix Algebra and Applications 1 / 49 EC2040 Topic 2  Matrices and Matrix Algebra Reading 1 Chapters
More information3. A LITTLE ABOUT GROUP THEORY
3. A LITTLE ABOUT GROUP THEORY 3.1 Preliminaries It is an apparent fact that nature exhibits many symmetries, both exact and approximate. A symmetry is an invariance property of a system under a set of
More information develop a theory that describes the wave properties of particles correctly
Quantum Mechanics Bohr's model: BUT: In 192526: by 1930s:  one of the first ones to use idea of matter waves to solve a problem  gives good explanation of spectrum of single electron atoms, like hydrogen
More informationPHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Exam Solutions Dec. 13, 2004
PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Exam Solutions Dec. 1, 2004 No materials allowed. If you can t remember a formula, ask and I might help. If you can t do one part of a problem,
More informationIntroduction to Matrix Algebra
Psychology 7291: Multivariate Statistics (Carey) 8/27/98 Matrix Algebra  1 Introduction to Matrix Algebra Definitions: A matrix is a collection of numbers ordered by rows and columns. It is customary
More informationQuantum Chemistry Exam 2 Solutions (Takehome portion)
Chemistry 46 Spring 5 Name KEY Quantum Chemistry Exam Solutions Takehome portion 5. 5 points In this problem, the nonlinear variation method will be used to determine approximations to the ground state
More information5.61 Physical Chemistry 25 Helium Atom page 1 HELIUM ATOM
5.6 Physical Chemistry 5 Helium Atom page HELIUM ATOM Now that we have treated the Hydrogen like atoms in some detail, we now proceed to discuss the next simplest system: the Helium atom. In this situation,
More informationDefinition 12 An alternating bilinear form on a vector space V is a map B : V V F such that
4 Exterior algebra 4.1 Lines and 2vectors The time has come now to develop some new linear algebra in order to handle the space of lines in a projective space P (V ). In the projective plane we have seen
More informationIntroduction to Matrix Algebra I
Appendix A Introduction to Matrix Algebra I Today we will begin the course with a discussion of matrix algebra. Why are we studying this? We will use matrix algebra to derive the linear regression model
More informationMechanics 1: Conservation of Energy and Momentum
Mechanics : Conservation of Energy and Momentum If a certain quantity associated with a system does not change in time. We say that it is conserved, and the system possesses a conservation law. Conservation
More informationMatrices in Statics and Mechanics
Matrices in Statics and Mechanics Casey Pearson 3/19/2012 Abstract The goal of this project is to show how linear algebra can be used to solve complex, multivariable statics problems as well as illustrate
More information1 Anomalies and the Standard Model
1 Anomalies and the Standard Model The GlashowWeinbergSalam model of the electroweak interactions has been very successful in explaining a wide range of experimental observations. The only major prediction
More informationGenerally Covariant Quantum Mechanics
Chapter 15 Generally Covariant Quantum Mechanics by Myron W. Evans, Alpha Foundation s Institutute for Advance Study (AIAS). (emyrone@oal.com, www.aias.us, www.atomicprecision.com) Dedicated to the Late
More informationCHAPTER 5 THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR
CHAPTER 5 THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR The harmonic oscillator is a model which has several important applications in both classical and quantum mechanics. It serves as a prototype in the mathematical treatment
More informationMATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS
MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS Systems of Equations and Matrices Representation of a linear system The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a x + a 2 x 2 + + a n x n b a
More informationGravity and Geometric Phases
Gravity and Geometric Phases A. Corichi and M. Pierri arxiv:grqc/9412006v1 1 Dec 1994 Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry Department of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University University
More informationName: Section Registered In:
Name: Section Registered In: Math 125 Exam 3 Version 1 April 24, 2006 60 total points possible 1. (5pts) Use Cramer s Rule to solve 3x + 4y = 30 x 2y = 8. Be sure to show enough detail that shows you are
More informationBraket notation  Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Page 1 Braket notation FromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia Braket notation is the standard notation for describing quantum states in the theory of quantum mechanics. It can also be used to denote abstract
More information