Guidance for Research Involving Human Subjects
|
|
- Samuel Carroll
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING Purpose: This is not meant to be a governing document and, as with all research involving human subjects (hereafter referred to as HSR), the Indiana University Institutional Review Board (IRB) has independent authority to approve or disapprove HSR. For questions regarding specific protocols, please contact IU Human Subjects Research Office in Indianapolis at (317) or in Bloomington at (812) CONTENTS I. Definitions II. Background and Summary III. DSMP A. What is in a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan? IV. Who monitors data and safety? A. Internal to Study Team B. External to Study Team V. What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Board? A. When is a DSMB necessary? B. When is a DSMB unnecessary? VI. Investigator Responsibilities A. New Study Submissions 1. Expedited Studies 2. Full Board Studies B. Renewals VII. IRB Responsibilities A. Review of Plan is Required B. Is the Plan Adequate? C. Renewal VIII. Addendum: Risk Matrix IX. Resources I. DEFINITIONS Data and Safety Monitoring: safety review. The IRB is tasked with ensuring that risks to subjects in research are minimized. One way the IRB accomplishes this task is to review a study team s proposed procedures for reviewing study data and monitoring subject safety. This review is called Data and Safety Monitoring (DSM), and it can vary from study to study. Monitoring is needed to ensure and enhance the safety of study subjects. Monitoring also assures the scientific validity of the study, i.e., to protect the data and preserve its integrity. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP): the proposed procedure for reviewing study data and monitoring subject safety within a study. A DSMP is submitted by the study team and is unique to each study. Depending on the risks a subject population may be exposed to, a DSMP may 1
2 consist of anything from an annual review of enrollment data to a monthly review of complete study data by an independent board. Not all DSMPs will appoint a DSMB. Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) or Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC): an independent monitoring entity that is tasked with completing review at specified intervals. The DSMB should be composed of members whose expertise and experience provide them the ability to note problems that should be addressed and make recommendations to ensure subject safety. Additionally, these reviewers should not possess a conflict of interest with the research, including a financial interest in the outcome of the research. Note: The IU Simon Cancer Center does not use the terms DSMB and DMC interchangeably. It identifies DSMBs as study-specific boards and the DMC at the IUSCC as a committee that reviews all trials that are not externally monitored, such as investigator-initiated studies. II. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY In order for the IRB to approve research involving human subjects, the IRB must determine that risks to subjects are minimized. When appropriate, the research must make adequate provisions for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects. III. DSMP A. What is in a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan? A DSMP, depending on the risks, size, and complexity of the research, may account for: Types of data and events, for example: o Data Quality o Subject recruitment, accrual, and retention o Adverse events o Procedures for the protection of subject privacy o Information from outside sources that may impact subject safety (related studies, scientific reports, therapeutic development) Roles and responsibilities for gathering, evaluating, and monitoring data Frequency of review of data and events (no less than annually) Reporting of adverse events and unanticipated problems Actions taken upon specific events o Statistical analyses (interim analysis) o Pre-planned stopping rules Because the risks inherent to research vary greatly from study to study, data and safety monitoring is reviewed within the context of the study. A study team will be prompted to answer questions about a DSMP when the study exposes subjects to greater than minimal risk. A DSMP should take into account the risks within the study and provide an adequate plan to review study data in order to minimize those risks. Additionally, monitoring may at times need to account for stopping rules should an overwhelmingly positive response be noted. Resources are available to investigators to construct a data and safety monitoring plan (CTSI Bioethics and Subject Advocacy Program). 2
3 IV. WHO MONITORS DATA AND SAFETY? The party performing data and safety monitoring should vary depending on the potential risks, complexity, and nature of the study. In many situations, various groups or individuals may share responsibility for different aspects of study monitoring and oversight. If a study is multi-site, a central reporting entity should be used to communicate between sites and IRBs. A. Internal to Study Team 1. Principal investigator/study team a. Generally appropriate for studies that involve a small number of subjects at a single site and the interventions are minimal risk or when there is a low risk: benefit assessment. Close, continuous monitoring is expected. 2. Sponsor a. The sponsor often completes the monitoring when it is a multi-site trial with a low risk: benefit assessment. 3. Internal monitoring is often suitable for Phase I and early Phase II trials. Early studies are frequently not randomized or controlled so accumulating results are known to the investigators and sponsor. Internal monitors often review the data during frequent conferences due to study design. Issues regarding statistical interpretation or confidentiality of interim data are therefore generally less relevant in this setting. B. External to Study Team 1. Institutional/departmental monitor: independent affiliation from the research/researchers but possesses relevant expertise a. May be suitable when research is occurring at a single site and contains a low risk: benefit assessment. Appropriate to include additional expertise or objectivity from the investigators involved in the research. 2. Safety/Medical monitor: Often affiliated with a contract research organization (CRO) a. Monitors may act alone in monitoring or may act as a supplemental monitor to other individuals or entities 3. DSMB/DMC: a group of individuals with relevant expertise that reviews accumulating study data on a regular basis a. Required by FDA for emergency research where informed consent is waived (21 CFR 50.24(a)(7)(iv)) b. Required by NIH for multi-site clinical trials involving interventions that entail potential risk to the subjects (NIH policy) c. Generally established for large, randomized multi-site studies that evaluate treatments intended to prolong life or reduce risk of a major adverse health outcome d. Commonly recommended for late Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials 3
4 V. DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING BOARDS A. When is a DSMB necessary? 1. The following types of studies are required to have a DSMB appointed: a. NIH sponsored Phase III clinical trials (as well as some Phase I and II) b. FDA sponsored planned emergency research c. Other studies when required by the IRB 2. Studies that fall under the following categories are most likely to have a DSMB: a. Large, multisite randomized studies evaluating treatments intended to prolong life or reduce risk of a major adverse health outcome b. Controlled trials comparing rates of mortality or major morbidity 3. The FDA recommends the use of a DSMB where a sponsored study includes: a. A study endpoint which might ethically require termination of the study at interim analysis, where a highly favorable or unfavorable finding is made b. A particular safety concern, such as administration of treatment by an invasive method (done only for research purposes) c. A subject group that includes a fragile population such as children, pregnant women, the elderly, or the terminally ill or those with diminished capacity d. A subject group at elevated risk of death or other serious consequences, even with a study objective that addresses a lesser endpoint B. When is a DSMB unnecessary? The FDA cautions that DSMBs add administrative complexity and require additional resources, so they are not recommended for all clinical trials. (FDA Guidance) 1. DSMBs are generally not needed for: a. Trials at early stages of product development; or b. Trials addressing lesser outcomes, such as relief of symptoms, unless the trial population is at elevated risk of more severe outcomes. c. Multisite studies or late phase studies using an approved drug for a new indication may not require an independent monitor such as a DSMB. The IRB may request justification for not using an independent monitor, such as when there is a low risk to benefit assessment. 2. DSMBs are not needed for: a. Social/Behavioral Studies b. Phase I: Generally, a DSMB is not required in Phase I studies because they are designed to include frequent internal monitoring. These trials typically advance faster than later-phase trials, so the monitoring plan must be commensurate with that frequency of monitoring. VI. INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES A. New Study Submissions In KC IRB, data and safety monitoring information will be entered into the Questionnaire F Data Safety Monitoring. 4
5 1. Expedited Studies For studies that involve no more than minimal risks to subjects, the submission must describe how the data will be monitored in order to ensure the safety and well being of the subjects. a. Provisions for monitoring data may be as simple as the study team reviewing the data on an ongoing or interim basis to ensure that the study is proceeding as planned and no additional risks have been identified. 2. Full Board Studies For studies that involve greater than minimal risk to subjects, the submission must provide a plan addressing several key elements: a. The plan should clearly explain who is responsible for the monitoring of the data, their role in the study (if applicable), and if the individual or committee is independent from the sponsor and/or the PI of the study. b. The IRB will likely require that the following elements be monitored: Data Quality, Subject Recruitment, Accrual, Retention, Outcome and adverse event data, Assessment of scientific reports or therapeutic development, Results of related studies that may impact subject safety, and procedures designed to protect the privacy of subjects. c. There may be other elements to be monitored, and those should also be included as a part of the initial submission. d. The submission must also describe how often the individuals or committee responsible for the DSMP will monitor the study. i. Keep in mind that this information will be reviewed at the time of study renewal. The Board will want to see that the individuals/committee actually met at the intervals that were indicated in the DSMP in the initial study submission. e. Any planned statistical analysis, pre-planned stopping rules, and/or endpoints in the study should be explained. This section should describe whether the protocol has any planned recruitment stops or statistical analyses to allow safety monitoring to occur at certain points during the study. B. Renewals At the time of renewal, the Renewal Questionnaire in KC IRB must be completed. The section discussing Data and Safety Monitoring Plans can be found in Section 3, Protocol Event Summary. 1. If the study includes a DSMP, Section 3 should describe the findings since the beginning of the study (or last renewal). Many times, sponsors or study teams will provide meeting minutes or notes from the scheduled data reviews, which should be attached with the renewal submission on the Notes & Attachments tab. If applicable, this section should explain why there have been no findings since the last review. 2. If the study has a Data and Safety Monitoring Board, submit the following on the Notes & Attachments tab: a. DSMB report at each renewal. If no report is available or the DSMB has not met since the last review, the Renewal Questionnaire should explain why. The DSMB report should include: i. Confirmation that the monitoring entity reviewed adverse events, subject withdrawal, complaints, and any interim findings; 5
6 ii. The date of the review; and iii. The monitoring entity s assessment of the information that was reviewed. If the monitoring entity has not identified any issues and recommends continuation of the study, this recommendation should be included in the report as well. b. Local adverse event data. VII. IRB RESPONSIBILITIES Review of plan is required A criterion for approval by the IRB is that, when appropriate, the research plan makes adequate provisions for monitoring the data to ensure the safety of subjects (45 CFR (a)(6)). AAHRPP also charges the IRB with the responsibility to evaluate whether research submitted for review satisfies this criterion. Is the plan adequate? For minimal risk studies, which can include biomedical and social/behavioral research, the IRB will evaluate whether the provisions for monitoring data are adequate. For non-interventional studies, the IRB expects that the PI will review data regularly to ensure that the study is proceeding as planned. For interventional studies, the IRB expects that the PI will review and monitor recruitment, adverse events, procedures for maintaining privacy and confidentiality, and safety, outcomes, or endpoints. For studies that are greater than minimal risk or are FDA-regulated, the IRB likely will expect that all of the elements listed above (see What is in a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan?) are being monitored as part of the data and safety monitoring plan. In addition, the IRB will evaluate who is responsible for the data and safety monitoring and whether the frequency/timing of the monitoring is appropriate. Finally, the IRB will review any planned statistical analyses, preplanned stopping rules, actions to be taken upon specific events, and/or endpoints. Renewal The IRB has the responsibility to ensure that results from data and safety monitoring justify the continuation of IRB approval of the research study. If the plan outlined in the Summary Safeguard Statement or Data Safety Monitoring Questionnaire indicates that a DSMB will meet regularly, the IRB requires the renewal submission to include all reports for DSMB meetings that occurred since the last renewal. At the time of renewal, the IRB has within its authority to request changes to the monitoring plan. VIII. ADDENDUM: RISK MATRIX The chart on the following page is intended as a supplement to this guidance. It contains factors to be considered when developing a DSMP, ways to enhance monitoring, and examples of research for illustration. These examples are not exhaustive, and should not be relied on for determining the exact data and safety monitoring procedures a study should use. 6
7 Factors to Consider when Drafting a DSMP When creating a plan for monitoring, it is important to consider the nature, complexity, and risks of the study. When deciding whether to enhance the monitoring plan (see below for ways to do that), one should consider the factors listed below. The more of these factors that are present, and the more these factors increase risks to subject safety, the IRB is more likely to request heightened review procedures. Research is greater than minimal risk Large subject population Lengthy duration of research Multi-center study Use of investigational drug or device Randomization to research intervention Inclusion of a control group Endpoints that include mortality or major morbidity Enhancing your DSMP There are several ways to account for increased risks posed by research, in the development of a DSMP. Below are examples of ways to enhance your DSMP to account for the presence of the factors listed above. These are simply guidelines, and your DSMP may not adhere strictly to them. Frequency of Review Annually Quarterly Weekly Reviewers P.I. only P.I. along with independent reviewer P.I. reviews local data, while DSMB reviews all study data across all sites Planned Statistical Analyses and Actions None Interim analysis planned after reaching half of enrollment goal Multiple pre-planned stopping rules included, related to subject safety and efficacy of intervention Lower Risk Higher Risk A DSMP should take into account all factors of the research to adequately plan for monitoring of subject safety. At right are three examples of studies, with facts about the research and potential requests from an IRB to account for them. A study surveys 15 healthy adult subjects about their preferred toothpaste. The IRB asks that the PI monitor the study by reviewing enrollment data at the time of renewal, and report any protocol deviations at the appropriate time. A study collects blood twice from 50 child subjects. The IRB asks that the PI monitor the study, along with a Higher Risk colleague in the same Dept. who is not on the study team. The IRB also asks the study team to report findings after the first 10 children have completed study procedures. A multi-site study uses an investigational drug to treat diabetes in patients who have had serious reactions to conventional treatments. The IRB asks that the study team enlist the services of a DSMB to review study data every quarter, and provide reports to the IRB at the time of renewal.
8 IX. RESOURCES A. OHRP CFR (a)(6): When appropriate, the research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects. 2. Guidance on Continuing Review of Research B. AAHRPP 1. Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation a. Element I.8.B: In studies were Sponsors conduct research site monitoring visits or conduct monitoring activities remotely, the Organization has a written agreement with the Sponsor that the Sponsor promptly reports to the Organization findings that could affect the safety of participants or influence the conduct of the study. b. Element I.8.C: When the Sponsor has the responsibility to conduct data and safety monitoring, the Organization has a written agreement with the Sponsor that addresses provisions for monitoring the data to ensure the safety of participants and for providing data and safety monitoring report to the Organization. c. Element II.3.B: The IRB has and follows written policies and procedures for reviewing the plans for data and safety monitoring, when applicable, and determines that the data and safety monitoring plan provides adequate protection for participants. d. Element III.1.C: Researchers employ sound study design in accordance with the standards of the discipline. Researchers design studies in a manner that minimizes risks to participants. 2. Tip Sheets a. Tip Sheet 1: Criteria for Approval of Research b. Tip Sheet 6: Evaluating Provisions for Monitoring Data and Safety in Proposed Research c. Tip Sheet 20: Sufficient Information to Determine Whether the Criteria for Approval are Met C. FDA CFR (a)(6) 2. Guidance for Clinical Trial Sponsors: Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees D. NIH 1. NIH Policy for Data and Safety Monitoring 2. Further Guidance on a Data and Safety Monitoring for Phase 1 and Phase 2 Trials 3. Guidance on Reporting Adverse Events to Institutional Review Boards for NIH- Supported Multicenter Clinical Trials E. VA CFR (a)(6) 2. VHA Handbook F. DOD CFR (a)(6) 2. DOD Directive G. IU SOP for HSO 1. Safety Monitoring H. Indiana CTSI Bioethics and Subject Advocacy Program 1. Resources to construct a data and safety monitoring plan 7
9 I. KC IRB Crosswalk: 1. F Data Safety Monitoring a. Minimal risk 1. Describe the provisions for monitoring the data to ensure the safety of subjects b. Greater than minimal risk 1. Explain who will be responsible for the data and safety monitoring, including their role in the study, if any, and whether the individual or committee is independent from the sponsor and/or PI. 2. Choose all of the following which will be monitored as part of the DSMP: i. Data quality ii. Subject recruitment iii. Accrual iv. Retention v. Outcome and adverse event data vi. Assessment of scientific reports or therapeutic development vii. Results of related studies that may impact subject safety viii. Procedures designed to protect the privacy of subjects ix. Other: describe 3. Describe how often individuals or committee responsible for the DSMP will monitor the study: 4. Describe any planned statistical analyses and any pre-planned stopping rules, actions to be taken upon specific events, and/or endpoints. a. Some protocols include planned recruitment stops or statistical analyses to allow for data and safety monitoring to occur at certain points during the study. If your study includes such a plan, or if specific stopping rules have already been denoted, describe them here. If not, simply N/A or nothing planned at this time is sufficient. 8
Laurie Shaker-Irwin, Ph.D., M.S. Co-Leader, Regulatory Knowledge and Research Ethics UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Laurie Shaker-Irwin, Ph.D., M.S. Co-Leader, Regulatory Knowledge and Research Ethics UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute Understand the protocol completely Recognize institutional polices
More informationUniversity of Hawai i Human Studies Program. Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol
University of Hawai i Human Studies Program Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol Following are guidelines for writing a clinical research protocol for submission to the University of
More informationGuidance for Clinical Trial Sponsors
Guidance for Clinical Trial Sponsors Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees For questions on the content of this guidance, contact the Office of Communication, Training,
More information2014 Metrics on Human Research Protection Program Performance
2014 Metrics on Human Research Protection Program Performance Updated May 15, 2015 About the Metrics Improving the quality of human research protection programs (HRPP) is a top priority of AAHRPP. Effective
More informationEvaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2015
Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2015 Copyright 2002-2014 AAHRPP. All rights reserved. Use of the Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation The Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation is
More informationPolicy of the National Institute of Nursing Research for Data and Safety Monitoring of Extramural Clinical Trials
Policy of the National Institute of Nursing Research for Data and Safety Monitoring of Extramural Clinical Trials Purpose and Scope This policy sets forth the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
More informationWHEN I WANT TO: I NEED TO SUBMIT: {for CIRB studies, see the specific FAQ}
IRB forms and materials to be submitted WHEN I WANT TO: I NEED TO SUBMIT: {for CIRB studies, see the specific FAQ} 1 2 Request a determination as to whether AHC is the appropriate IRB of record (i.e. is
More informationA Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky
A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky I. Compliance with IRB and Applicable Federal Requirements A. Investigators
More informationGuidance on IRB Continuing Review of Research
NOTE: THIS GUIDANCE SUPERSEDES OHRP S JANUARY 15, 2007 GUIDANCE ENTITILED GUIDANCE ON CONTINUING REVIEW. CLICK HERE FOR THE JANUARY 15, 2007 GUIDANCE. Office for Human Research Protections Department of
More informationIRB Submissions and Human Subjects Research Compliance. Georgia Health Sciences University
IRB Submissions and Human Subjects Research Compliance Offi f H R hp t ti Office of Human Research Protection Georgia Health Sciences University Objectives Identify the steps required to submit a protocol
More informationPrincipal Investigator Responsibilities for Education and Social/Behavioral Researchers
Principal Investigator Responsibilities for Education and Social/Behavioral Researchers Introduction The purpose of this module is to provide a basic understanding of the responsibilities of the principal
More informationPrincipal Investigator and Sub Investigator Responsibilities
Principal Investigator and Sub Investigator Responsibilities I. Purpose To define the roles and responsibilities of Principal Investigators conducting research at GRU. II. Definition The term Principal
More informationHollie Goddard Sr. IRB Coordinator McKesson Specialty Health
Hollie Goddard Sr. IRB Coordinator McKesson Specialty Health We are responsible for acquiring, analyzing, and protecting medical information vital to providing quality patient care HIM professionals ensure
More informationGuidance on Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Guidance on Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events
More informationEvaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2016
Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2016 Copyright 2002-2014 AAHRPP. All rights reserved. Use of the Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation The Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation is
More informationYale Cancer Center Data and Safety Monitoring Committee Charter
Yale Cancer Center Data and Safety Monitoring Committee Charter Purpose/Mission The purpose of the Yale Cancer Center (YCC) Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) is to provide ongoing data and safety
More informationHuman Subjects Research (HSR) Series
Human Subjects Research (HSR) Series CITI Program s HSR series consists of modules from two basic tracks, Biomedical (Biomed) and Social- Behavioral- Educational (SBE), and a set of Additional Modules
More informationCLINICAL RESEARCH ROLES CLINICAL RESEARCH ROLESCLINICAL RESEARCH ROLES
CLINICAL RESEARCH ROLESCLINICAL RESEARCH ROLES 1. Clinical Study Team Principal Investigator Co Principal Investigator (Co PI) Research Coordinator Study Monitor Data manage Sponsor Post Doctoral Scholar
More informationRole of IRB/IEC in GCP. Benjamin Kuo, MD, Dr.PH, CIP.
Role of IRB/IEC in GCP Benjamin Kuo, MD, Dr.PH, CIP. Institutional Review Board (IRB) An independent body constituted of medical, scientific and non scientific members Responsible for ensuring protection
More informationSubject: No. Page PROTOCOL AND CASE REPORT FORM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW Standard Operating Procedure
703 1 of 11 POLICY The Beaumont Research Coordinating Center (BRCC) will provide advice to clinical trial investigators on protocol development, content and format. Upon request, the BRCC will review a
More informationThe Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board Overview
The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board Overview Research Ethics Research ethics review is vital to the advancement of ethically sound research. Before individuals can be enrolled in a research study,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM. DoD/DON-funded Research
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM DoD/DON-funded Research Policy In 2006, the Department of the Navy (DON) enhanced its human subject protection requirements, including
More informationEthical Principles in Clinical Research. Christine Grady Department of Bioethics NIH Clinical Center
Ethical Principles in Clinical Research Christine Grady Department of Bioethics NIH Clinical Center 1 Ethical principles Are these studies ethical? How do we know? Ethics of clinical research The goal
More information12.0 Investigator Responsibilities
v. 5.13.13 12.0 Investigator Responsibilities 12.1 Policy Investigators are ultimately responsible for the conduct of research. Research must be conducted according to the signed Investigator statement,
More informationData Safety Monitoring and the IRB. Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office February 2011
Data Safety Monitoring and the IRB Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist February 2011 Commonly Used Terms: DMP Data monitoring plan describes how PD will oversee research participant s safety and welfare
More informationGuide for Research Sites Seeking Accreditation
Guide for Research Sites Seeking Accreditation (For research sites that only conduct research and do not have their own IRBs) November 16, 2010 Purpose of the Guide The accreditation process for most research
More informationPRE-TEST/POST-TEST FOR THE RESEARCH ETHICS TRAINING CURRICULUM. Please indicate if the following statements are True (T) or False (F).
PRE-TEST/POST-TEST FOR THE RESEARCH ETHICS TRAINING CURRICULUM Name: Please indicate if the following statements are True (T) or False (F). The Principles of Research Ethics 1. The principle of respect
More informationGuidelines for preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for Institutional Ethics Committee for Human Research
Guidelines for preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for Institutional Ethics Committee for Human Research 1. Objective: The objective of this SOP is to contribute to the effective functioning
More informationReliance Agreement for Institutions Utilizing Stony Brook University s Institutional Review Board(s)
Name of Organization Providing IRB Review: Stony Brook University ( SBU IRB ) Name of Institution Relying on the SBU IRB ( Institution ): Latest AAHRPP Accreditation Date (if applicable) OHRP Federal Wide
More informationSAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) INVESTIGATOR GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS
BACKGROUND SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) INVESTIGATOR GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS The first priority of the SDCCD Institutional Review Board (IRB)
More informationUC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH AAHRPP Preparation UC Davis Human Research Part IV Criteria for Review. Cindy Gates IRB Administration
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH AAHRPP Preparation UC Davis Human Research Part IV Criteria for Review Cindy Gates IRB Administration Tips for Reviewer s Comments - Comments should be easily transferrable
More informationStudy Protocol Template
Study Protocol Template (Chart Reviews) Instructions: This protocol template is a tool to facilitate the development of a study protocol specifically designed for the investigator initiated studies. It
More informationCore Training Outline
Core Training Outline Modules: 1) Study Design 2) PI Oversight 3) Financial Management 4) Study Operations 5) Recruitment & Retention 6) Informed Consent 7) Investigational Products 8) Subject Safety 9)
More informationInstitutional Review Board
Institutional Review Board Ethical Principles of Informed Consent Informed Consent Guidelines The principle of respect for persons requires that people be given the opportunity to choose what will or will
More informationHuman Research Protection Program Good Clinical Practice Guidance for Investigators Investigator & Research Staff Responsibilities
This Guidance Document is to ensure that investigators and research personnel recognize their responsibilities associated with the conduct of human subject research by outlining their responsibilities,
More informationCLINICAL RESEARCH PROTOCOL CHECKLIST
CLINICAL RESEARCH PROTOCOL CHECKLIST [taken from ICH GCP : Guidance for Industry, Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance, Revision 1 (R1) June 1996] ICH GCP, Section 6. CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL AND
More informationRESEARCH STUDY PROTOCOL. Study Title. Name of the Principal Investigator
RESEARCH STUDY PROTOCOL Study Title Name of the Principal Investigator For research involving human subjects, certain elements must be included with each new IRB submission to ensure an effective review
More informationNova Southeastern University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures
Nova Southeastern University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures Monitoring of Approved Research, Approval Duration, and Continuing Review Effective 03/08/2007; Revised 10/14/2010; 8/29/2011;
More informationDAIDS Bethesda, MD USA POLICY
Overview NIH policy requiring independent data and safety monitoring boards (DSMB) for all multicenter Phase III trials has existed since 1979; the most recent restatement was issued in 1998 (NIH Policy
More informationAdventist HealthCare, Inc.
IRB POLICY ON HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION (HRP) AND GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE (GCP) TRAINING Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) Requirements at Adventist Healthcare, Inc. I. Required Human
More informationThis policy applies to research administrators, investigators, research staff, Human Investigation Committee (HIC) members and HIC staff.
REVIEW BY AN EXTERNAL INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD 233 1 of 5 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish a procedure for requesting authorization for an approved, external (non-beaumont) institutional
More informationUsing Social Media in Research: Regulatory and IRB Considerations
Using Social Media in Research: Regulatory and IRB Considerations Webinar Housekeeping Questions & Answers Feel free to submit questions at any point during the webinar using the chat box on your webinar
More informationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Reporting Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board Reporting Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Introduction This policy details the Institutional Review Board
More informationInvestigator responsibilities for research conducted under the authority of the UTHSCSA Institutional Review Board (IRB)
March 1, 2006 M E M O R A N D U M F O R R E C O R D TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Deans Department Chairs Principal Investigators Brian Herman, Ph.D. Vice President for Research Investigator responsibilities for
More informationGuidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors. Considerations When Transferring Clinical Investigation Oversight to Another IRB
Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors Considerations When Transferring Clinical Investigation Oversight to Another IRB U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration
More informationGuidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors
Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for
More informationDHHS/NIH/OD/OIR/OHSRP 1/2/2015
DHHS/NIH/OD/OIR/OHSRP 1/2/2015 The audience for this course is Principal Investigators (PIs), investigators and Research Coordinators (RCs) serving on the study team of human clinical studies and trials.
More informationDepartment of the Navy Human Research Protection Program
Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators May 2013 HISTORY AND REGULATIONS 2 US Historical Underpinnings Tuskegee Experiment Began in
More informationMinimum Education Requirements for DoD Personnel Involved in Human Research Protection
Minimum Education Requirements for DoD Personnel Involved in Human Research Protection The Department of Defense (DoD) is committed to conducting high-quality and ethical research, development, test, and
More informationChildren's Hospital, Boston (Draft Edition)
Children's Hospital, Boston (Draft Edition) The Researcher's Guide to HIPAA Evervthing You Alwavs Wanted to Know About HIPAA But Were Afraid to Ask 1. What is HIPAA? 2. What is the Privacy Rule? 3. What
More informationGlossary of Clinical Trial Terms
Glossary of Clinical Trial Terms ADVERSE REACTION: (Adverse Event): Also known as side effects, adverse reactions include any undesired actions or effects of the experimental drug or treatment. Experimental
More informationTo IRB, or Not to IRB? That Is the Question!
To IRB, or Not to IRB? That Is the Question! A presentation by Mary Sapp, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President, Planning & Institutional Research University of Miami and Thomas K. Martin, Ph.D. Associate Vice
More informationPolicy on Human Subject Protection Training, Certification and Recertification at AUB
Policy on Human Subject Protection Training, Certification and Recertification at AUB Policy Number: 005 Draft Version Number: 1 Dated: Prepared and Edited by: Mona Nabulsi and Mary Ellen Sheridan (Consultant)
More informationCOMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES
European Medicines Agency Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 27 July 2005 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/EWP/5872/03 Corr COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE
More informationGuidance on Withdrawal of Subjects from Research: Data Retention and Other Related Issues
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Guidance on Withdrawal of Subjects from Research: Data Retention and Other Related Issues This guidance represents
More informationROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR Study Start-up Best Practices
Clinical and Translational Science Institute / CTSI at the University of California, San Francisco Welcome to Online Training for Clinical Research Coordinators ROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR Study Start-up
More informationINVESTIGATOR HANDBOOK
INVESTIGATOR HANDBOOK Liberty IRB, Inc. 1450 S. Woodland Blvd., Suite 300A Deland, Florida 32720 Phone (386) 279-4318 Fax: (386)868-4563 Website: www.libertyirb.com Business hours: Monday Friday, 8:00am
More informationIRB#: 11-1215 ID# r041418
APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL or REVISION APPROVAL OF A PROJECT INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS Biomedical, Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (BIRB) Community Research Institutional Review Board (CRIRB) Social
More informationPOLICY. Title: NIAID POLICY ON DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING BOARD (DSMB) OPERATIONS
POLICY Date: September 4, 2014 NIAID Bethesda, MD USA Page 1 of 11 Release Date: October 14, 2014 Effective Date: December 11, 2014 Title: NIAID POLICY ON DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING BOARD (DSMB) APPROVAL
More informationQuality Monitoring Checklist
Quality Monitoring Checklist Instructions: For each task below, the Quality Monitor indicates in the appropriate column if the Monitor accomplished the task by using the following codes Yes No N/A = Monitor
More informationConduct of clinical Trials Communication of
PrinciPles on Conduct of clinical Trials Communication of clinical Trial results Table of Contents Preamble...1 Commitment to Protecting Research Participants...5 Conduct of Clinical Trials...7 Ensuring
More informationThis policy applies to all clinical research conducted at Beaumont Health System.
CLINICAL RESEARCH QUALITY AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 113 1 of 6 PURPOSE Prior The purpose of this policy is to provide an overview of the Clinical Research Quality and Process Improvement Program
More informationST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014
ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014 1. Introduction The St. Michael s Hospital (SMH) REB
More informationEffective Date: October 2015
University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center UMGCC Standard Operating Procedure Title: Data & Safety Monitoring Plan Effective Date: October 2015 Procedure No: DSM001 University of Maryland Greenebaum
More informationRoles & Responsibilities of the Sponsor
Roles & Responsibilities of the Sponsor Developed by Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH Endorsed by the CTN SIG Leadership Group Objectives Funding for clinical research comes from
More informationStandard Operating Procedures
Standard Operating Procedures Ffff H a r v a r d L o n g w o o d M e d i c a l A r e a Office of Human Research Administration 90 Smith St. Suite 335 Boston, MA 02120 617-432-3071/ 617-432-2157 www.hsph.harvard.edu/ohra
More informationBest Practices in Clinical Research Protocol Writing: Eight tips from an IRB member
Best Practices in Clinical Research Protocol Writing: Eight tips from an IRB member 02/02/16 description The clinical research protocol is the single most important document to ensure critical elements
More informationSponsored Programs Guidance Cradle to Grave
Sponsored Programs Guidance Cradle to Grave Data Management Data Management for Sponsored Programs (Adapted from Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research, Clinical Tools, Inc.)
More informationClinical Trials Ontario
Clinical Trials Ontario Streamlined Research Ethics Review System Erin Bell, Program Coordinator June 6-7, 2016 CLINICAL TRIALS ONTARIO Independent non-profit, established in June 2012 and funded by the
More informationOPERATING PROCEDURES
OPERATING PROCEDURES CATEGORY: RESEARCH AFFAIRS CODE: H-27A APPROVED: 8/17/2010 SUBJECT: PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCT OF CONVENED IMPLEMENTED: 11/2010 REPLACES: PAGE: 1 of 6 Please note: Definitions are found
More informationInstructions for Form: Application for Claim of Exemption
Instructions for Form: Application for Claim of Exemption In order to decide whether your activity involves research that may be reviewed and approved at the exempt level, review the following information.
More informationEmail Address Co-Principal Investigator Information Co- Principal Investigator Faculty Staff Grad. Student Undergrad. Student
Illinois State University Institutional Review Board Research with Human Subjects Protocol Submission Form IRB Number (Number to be completed by REC) Federal regulations and Illinois State University policy
More informationU.S. Food and Drug Administration
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA s website for reference purposes only. It was current when produced, but is no longer maintained
More informationThe Importance of Following the PROTOCOL in Clinical Trials
The Importance of Following the PROTOCOL in Clinical Trials Presentation Objectives: Upon completion of this presentation, participants will be able to: Describe the following terms: Protocol, Protocol
More information[Informed Consent Form for ] Name the group of individuals for whom this consent is written. Explanation Example
[YOUR INSTITUTIONAL LETTERHEAD] Please do not submit consent forms on the WHO letter head [Name of Principle Investigator] [Informed Consent Form for ] Name the group of individuals for whom this consent
More informationRevisions on the Declaration of Helsinki
Revisions on the Declaration of Helsinki Prof. J. Mfutso-Bengo, PhD Center of Bioethics (CEBESA) University of Malawi College of Medicine Cape Town South Africa December 2012 www.medcol.mw Joseph-matthew@gmx.net
More informationCompliance Programs in Academic Medical Centers. Georgetown University
Compliance Programs in Academic Medical Centers Kenneth L. Dretchen, PhD Director of Regulatory Affair Chair, Department of Pharmacology Sheila Cohen Zimmet, RN, JD Director, Research Assurance and Compliance
More informationOperational aspects of a clinical trial
Operational aspects of a clinical trial Carlo Tomino Pharm.D. Coordinator Pre-authorization Department Head of Research and Clinical Trial Italian Medicines Agency Mwanza (Tanzania), June 11, 2012 1 Declaration
More informationEVALUATION BRIEF Understanding the Institutional Review Board (IRB) January 2008
1 Serving the public and non-profit sectors through independent program evaluation, applied research, and technical assistance. EVALUATION BRIEF Understanding the Institutional Review Board (IRB) January
More informationMiami University: Human Subjects Research General Research Application Guidance
Miami University: Human Subjects Research General Research Application Guidance Use the accompanying Word template for completing the research description. You must provide sufficient information regarding
More informationDepartment of Health and Human Services. Final Guidance Document
Department of Health and Human Services Final Guidance Document Financial Relationships and Interests in Research Involving Human Subjects: Guidance for Human Subject Protection This document replaces
More informationand Regulatory Aspects
Good Clinical Practice and Regulatory Aspects Nora Espiritu MD, MPh, PhD (c) Former Executive Director of Research and Technology Transfer. Peruvian National Institute t of Health. Member of the Ethics
More informationIntroduction to Clinical Research
Introduction to Clinical Research NCURA Region I Spring Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Introductions Brief History of Clinical Research Clinical Research in Context Clinical Research Compliance Clinical Research
More informationOperational Guidelines for Institutional Review Boards
Operational Guidelines for Institutional Review Boards TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Definition of Human Biomedical Research 1 3 Basic Ethical Principles 2 4 Objectives of Document 3 5 Responsibilities
More informationThe Regulatory Binder/Trial Master File: Essential Records for the Conduct of a Clinical Trial
The Regulatory Binder/Trial Master File: Essential Records for the Conduct of a Clinical Trial Clinical Research Operations & Regulatory Support (CRORS) Ann Glasse, RN, BSN, MBA Director-CRORS Objectives
More informationAttachment B HIPAA-P03 Instructions for Completing IU s Authorization for Research Purposes
Attachment B HIPAA-P03 Instructions for Completing IU s Authorization for Research Purposes The HIPAA Privacy Rule generally prohibits health care providers from using or releasing protected health information
More information2 Applicability: Effective Date: 1/15/2010 Revised: 8/13/2010, 9/10/10, 5/9/14
2 Applicability: Effective Date: 1/15/2010 Revised: 8/13/2010, 9/10/10, 5/9/14 NDSU research may involve the collaboration or assistance of other research institutions, schools, hospitals, clinics, private
More informationDisclaimer. Objectives 5/30/2016
Good Clinical Practice Informed Consent Training Presented by Jacqueline Everett Clinical Trial Governance Manager, Research Integrity Disclaimer The material in this presentation has been prepared by
More informationTRAINING AND EDUCATION
P&P: GA 102 Version No: 1.6 Effective Date: 5/1/2015 TRAINING AND EDUCATION Supercedes: CPHS Policies and Procedures 5/5/2014 1. POLICY The UC Berkeley Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) recognizes
More informationRESEARCH SUBJECT INFORMATION AND CONSENT FORM
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 RESEARCH SUBJECT INFORMATION AND CONSENT FORM TITLE: PROTOCOL NR: SPONSOR: INVESTIGATOR: WIRB VCU tracking number This template is based on a drug or device research study. The
More informationUse of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations
Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding
More informationKAISER PERMANENTE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION
Notice of Privacy Practices KAISER PERMANENTE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION THIS NOTICE DESCRIBES HOW MEDICAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU MAY BE USED AND DISCLOSED AND HOW YOU CAN GET ACCESS TO THIS INFORMATION.
More information(2) The neurological surgeon shall not participate in any activity, which is not in the best interest of the patient.
AANS Code of Ethics a) General Statement of Purpose The American Association of Neurological Surgeons has established a Code of Ethics for neurological surgeons as guidelines in medical, social, and professional
More informationDecember 13, 2011 Maureen Coyne
December 13, 2011 Maureen Coyne No industry relationships No financial conflicts of interests Recent experience weighted toward industrysponsored clinical trials Information based on my experiences IRB
More informationClinical Research Professional Certification & Preparing for the CCRP Exam
Clinical Research Professional Certification & Preparing for the CCRP Exam Signe Denmark, MS, CCRP Toni Mauney, CCRP SoCRA: Society of Clinical Research Associates SoCRA established the Certification Program
More informationCORPORATE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL MANUEL DES POLITIQUES ET PROCÉDURES DE L HOPITAL D OTTAWA
CORPORATE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL MANUEL DES POLITIQUES ET PROCÉDURES DE L HOPITAL D OTTAWA OTTAWA HEALTH SCIENCE NETWORK RESEARCH ETHICS BOARD GOVERNANCE POLICY SECTION : / NO. / N : BOARD POLICY
More informationClinical Trials: Questions and Answers
Clinical Trials: Questions and Answers Key Points Clinical trials are research studies that test how well new medical approaches work in people (see Question 1). Every clinical trial has a protocol, which
More informationROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR Recruitment of Subjects Best Practices
Clinical and Translational Science Institute / CTSI at the University of California, San Francisco Welcome to Online Training for Clinical Research Coordinators ROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR Recruitment
More informationNo. 706. Page 1 of 5. Issue Date 4/21/2014
Subject: ROUTINE MONITORING VISITS Standard Operating Procedure Prepared By: Beaumont Research Coordinating Center, Research Institute PURPOSE Prior Issue Date 8/15/2011 No. 706 Issue Date 4/21/2014 Page
More informationSubmission Date: Project Start Date: Approximate Project End Date:
APPLICATION FOR INITIAL APPROVAL Submission Date: Project Start Date: Approximate Project End Date: Research Protocol Title: Principal Investigator: Research Study Contact: Email: Institution: Phone: SENIOR/KEY
More information