ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE MICHAEL MOSEY. - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO (ONTARIO MINISTRY OF LABOUR) STATEMENT OF CLAIM

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE MICHAEL MOSEY. - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO (ONTARIO MINISTRY OF LABOUR) STATEMENT OF CLAIM"

Transcription

1 Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: MICHAEL MOSEY Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO (ONTARIO MINISTRY OF LABOUR) Defendant STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANT: A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the Plaintiff. The claim made against you is set out in the following pages. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must prepare a Statement of Defence in Form 18A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the Plaintiff s lawyer, or where the Plaintiff does not have a lawyer, serve it on the Plaintiff and file it, with proof of service, in this Court office, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS after this Statement of Claim is served on you, if you are served in Ontario. If you are served in another Province or Territory of Canada or in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your Statement of Defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days. Instead of serving and filing a Statement of Defence, you may serve and file a Notice of Intent to Defend in Form 18B prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. This will entitle you to ten more days within which to file your Statement of Defence.

2 - 2 - IF YOU FAIL TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN AGAINST YOU IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY CONTRACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE. Date: Issued By: Local Registrar Address of the Court Office: 150 Bond Street East Oshawa Ontario L1G 0A2 TO: ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF ONTARIO CIVIL LAW BRANCH 8TH FLOOR 720 BAY ST TORONTO, ONTARIO M7A 2S9

3 - 3 - THIS ACTION IS BROUGHT AGAINST YOU UNDER THE SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE PROVIDED IN RULE 76 OF THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CLAIM 1. The Plaintiff claims against the Defendant the following: (a) Damages in the amount of $104,000; (b) pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with the provisions of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, as amended; (c) costs of this action on a substantial indemnity basis, together with applicable Harmonized Sales Tax, payable pursuant to the provisions of the Excise Tax Act, R.S., 1985, c. E-15, as amended; and, (d) such further and other relief as may seem fair and just to this Honourable Court. THE PARTIES 2. The Plaintiff, Michael Mosey ( Michael ), is an individual residing in the City of Bowmanville, in the Province of Ontario. 3. The Defendant, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario (Ontario Ministry of Labour) ( MOL ), is a branch of the Provincial Government for Ontario with a mandate to develop and enforce employment and labour laws in the Province, including but not limited to the Employment Standards Act 2000, S.O. 2000, Chapter 41 ( Act ). BACKGROUND FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES 4. Michael commenced his employment with Trillium Screw Mfg. Co. Ltd. ( Trillium ) on June 4, He worked at a facility located in Pickering, Ontario. 5. At all material times, Michael held a senior position of product manager at Trillium. His duties included the purchasing of raw materials, tooling and finished products, as well as managing production costs and the customer service/order

4 - 4 - desk. Michael held this position until his employment was terminated by Trillium on or about June 8, Michael s annual package of remuneration from Trillium included the following: (a) base salary of $50,100; (b) a full suite of group benefits, including medical, dental, vision care, life insurance, health care spending account, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and long term disability; and, (c) four (4) weeks paid vacation. 7. For more than twenty-two (22) years, Michael devoted himself to the growth and success of Trillium. He possessed an impeccable record of service. At all times, he was a loyal and dedicated employee who performed all of his employment duties and obligations in a diligent, professional and competent manner, to the best of his ability. His exceptional performance was recognized by Trillium through promotions and salary increases and through his sheer longevity of service. 8. On April 16, 2012, Michael was advised by management at Trillium that his employment was being terminated due to the company s intention to curtail its operations. At that time, Trillium provided Michael with eight (8) weeks working notice of the termination of his employment. 9. Michael states that, having worked for Trillium for over twenty-two (22) years without interruption, he had no knowledge whatsoever as to his entitlements from Trillium arising from the termination of his employment. Michael specifically states that he had no information as to whether he was entitled to more than eight (8) weeks notice of termination or whether he was owed any payment in lieu of notice. 10. Michael states that in order to educate himself as to whether he received appropriate and sufficient notice from Trillium, he sought the advice of the Defendant, MOL. Specifically, on or about April 16, 2012, immediately upon

5 - 5 - receiving the notice of termination from Trillium, he contacted by telephone the MOL at their Employment Standards Information Centre, a service provided by the MOL, and which the MOL advertises as being dedicated to answering public inquiries with respect to rights and entitlements in the workplace. 11. Upon calling the MOL, Michael spoke with a female representative (the Representative ) of the MOL, the identity of whom is currently unknown to Michael, although whose identity should be known to the Defendant, regarding his employment and termination from Trillium. Michael advised the Representative of his specific situation and made inquiries as to whether the notice that he had received from Trillium was sufficient. In doing so, Michael sought to determine whether he was being adequately compensated by Trillium for the loss of his employment. 12. Michael states that the Representative conclusively advised him that as Trillium was terminating less than fifty (50) employees, he was only entitled to eight (8) weeks working notice. 13. Michael states that the Representative did not advise him that he may have additional entitlements at common law, or that the eight (8) weeks notice amounted to the absolute minimum entitlements, and not his full entitlements. Michael was further not advised that he should consider seeking independent legal advice regarding his entitlements resulting from the termination of his employment from Trillium. 14. Michael states that the Representative was adamant and unequivocal that eight (8) weeks notice of termination was all that Michael was entitled to receive from Trillium. 15. In full reliance on the unequivocal advice he received from the MOL, through the Representative, Michael did not pursue the matter with Trillium, did not seek legal advice from a lawyer, and did not obtain additional notice or severance from the company.

6 Michael states that he ceased working for Trillium on or about June 2, 2012, without receiving additional compensation and without having any other job prospects which would allow him to earn income and continue to support his family. 17. Michael pleads that it was not until April 2013, upon hearing an employment lawyer speak on a local radio station, that it came to his attention that he received completely incorrect advice by the Representative and that he had additional significant termination entitlements under the common law, arising from the termination of his employment at Trillium. 18. Michael states that, as of the date that he realized that he had received incorrect advice from the MOL and that he had additional significant termination entitlements, Trillium had ceased its operations and had no assets, income or a viable business. DUTY OF CARE 19. Michael pleads that the Representative and the MOL owed him a duty to ensure that he understood his entitlements under the Act, as well as at common law, from the termination of his employment at Trillium, or in the alternative, ought to have referred him to seek independent legal advice with respect to his full entitlements. Specifically, Michael pleads that the Representative and the MOL were under a strict duty to advise Michael that the Act only outlines a person s minimum entitlements and not a person s full entitlements, and that he should seek legal advice as to what else may be owed to him as a result of the termination of his employment. 20. Michael claims that the Representative knew or ought to have known that Michael was relying on the advice of the Representative concerning his entitlements resulting from the termination of his employment at Trillium and accordingly, the Representative owed a duty to ensure that Michael understood all his entitlements and options with respect to the said termination.

7 Michael pleads that the purpose of the aforesaid service provided by the MOL is to provide advice with respect to an employee s workplace rights, including their rights on termination of employment. It was clearly the Ministry s intention for Michael to rely on the advice he received from the Representative. 22. Michael further pleads that it was wholly reasonable for him to rely on the advice provided to him by the Representative, as he had called a service dedicated to answering inquiries about workplace rights. Michael received unequivocal advice from the Representative which he saw no reason to question. 23. Michael further pleads that he relied on the advice he received from the MOL, through the Representative, to his direct detriment, as outlined further below. NEGLIGENCE 24. Michael pleads that the Representative and the MOL were wholly negligent in advising him that he had no additional termination entitlements from Trillium when they knew or ought to have known that Michael will be relying on the unequivocal advice he received from the Representative and the MOL. 25. Michael further pleads that the Representative and/or her manager(s), supervisor(s), and/or director(s) were negligent in performing their services and advising Michael of his entitlements with respect to the termination of his employment at Trillium, for which the MOL is vicariously liable. The particulars of such negligence are as follows: As against the Representative, for whose negligence the MOL is in law responsible: (a) she advised Michael that he was only entitled to eight (8) weeks working notice from the termination of his employment at Trillium when she knew or ought to have known that Michael had additional entitlements under the common law and failed to advise Michael of them;

8 - 8 - (b) she failed or neglected to advise Michael that the eight (8) weeks working notice he received from Trillium was only the minimum Michael was entitled to receive under the Act, and that he may have additional entitlements under the common law; (c) she failed or neglected to advise Michael to obtain independent legal advice with respect to Michael s full entitlements from the termination of his employment at Trillium; (d) she failed or neglected to provide Michael with adequate advice regarding his entitlements from the termination of his employment at Trillium when she knew or ought to have known that Michael was relying on her advice; (e) she failed or neglected to make adequate enquiries regarding Michael s employment at Trillium before advising Michael of his entitlements with respect to the termination of his employment at Trillium; (f) she failed or neglected to ensure that Michael had adequate information regarding his entitlements with respect to the termination of his employment at Trillium, and/or failed to advise him to seek independent legal advice; (g) she breached her and the MOL s fiduciary duty to Michael by failing to ensure that Michael had adequate information regarding his options and entitlements from the termination of his employment at Trillium; and, (h) Such further and other grounds as counsel may ascertain prior to the trial of this action. As against the manager(s), supervisor(s) and/or director(s) of the Representative, for whose negligence the MOL is in law responsible:

9 - 9 - (a) he/she or they failed or neglected to ensure that Michael was given adequate advice regarding his entitlements with respect to the termination of his employment at Trillium; (b) he/she or they failed or neglected to ensure that the Representative had taken all reasonable steps to ensure that Michael was given adequate advice regarding his options and entitlements from the termination of his employment at Trillium; (c) he/she or they failed or neglected to ensure that the Representative had been adequate educated, trained, informed and/or instructed before permitting her to interact with the public regarding employment matters, including an employee s entitlements upon termination of employment; (d) he/she or they employed or neglected to employ adequate, competent and/or sufficiently trained personnel to ensure that Michael was given adequate advice regarding his options and entitlements with respect to the termination of his employment from Trillium; (e) he/she or they employed individuals that he/she or they knew or ought to have known were inexperienced, incompetent and/or incapable of ensuring that Michael was provided with adequate advice regarding his options and entitlements from the termination of the his employment from Trillium; (f) he/she or they failed or neglected to provide adequate and proper rules, regulations, training, guidelines and/or policies to the employees and representatives of the MOL to ensure that all employment termination options and entitlements were explained to the public when answering inquiries; and, (g) Such further and other grounds of negligence as counsel may ascertain prior to the trial of this action;

10 DAMAGES 26. Michael pleads that he was entitled to be treated fairly by Trillium when his employment was terminated without cause or reasonable notice on June 8, It was an express and/or an implied term of Michael s employment contract with Trillium that his employment could only be terminated upon the provision of reasonable notice, or pay in lieu thereof, or for just cause. 28. Based upon his age (50), years of service (22), position (product manager), and the availability of similar employment in the present economic climate, Michael pleads that he was entitled to no less than twenty-four (24) months notice of the termination of his employment or pay in lieu of such notice. Further, such notice and/or severance was to consist of all of the components of his compensation during the reasonable notice period, including his salary, and full group benefits coverage including long term disability. 29. By contrast, Trillium only provided Michael with the statutory minimums under the Act, consisting of eight weeks working notice and eight weeks coverage under the group insurance benefits. 30. Michael pleads that, had it not been for the advice of the Representative, he would have sought and obtained legal advice with respect to his entitlements arising from the termination of his employment from Trillium and would have then pursued his full and proper termination compensation. 31. Michael states that he has incurred significant damages, amounting to the severance he forewent by not pursuing the matter with Trillium, which damages resulted directly from the negligent acts outlined above, for which the Defendant is vicariously liable. 32. Michael has taken, and continues to take, diligent steps to mitigate his damages.

11 LEGISLATION RELIED UPON 33. The Plaintiff pleads and relies upon the following legislation: (a) the Employment Standards Act 2000, S.O. 2000, Chapter 41; (b) the Negligence Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.n.1, as amended; (c) the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.p.27; (d) the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-50; (e) the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.c.43, as amended; (f) the Excise Tax Act, R.S., 1985, c. E-15, as amended. VENUE FOR TRIAL 34. Michael respectfully requests that the trial of this action be held in the City of Oshawa, in the Province of Ontario. Date: SAMFIRU TUMARKIN LLP Barristers & Solicitors 350 Bay Street, 10 th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S6 Lior Samfiru LSUC#48609U Tel.: Fax: Lawyers for the Plaintiff

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DANIIL ABARNIKOV. - and -

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DANIIL ABARNIKOV. - and - Court file # ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: DANIIL ABARNIKOV Plaintiff - and - 746 WILSON RESIDENCES INC. and U & R AUGUST MANAGEMENT INC. and FNR CLEANING SOLUTIONS INC. AMENDED STATEMENT

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. OMAS, MICHAEL DAYAL, DOUGLAS ROBINSON, and DIANA - (vo SCANLON ks. - and -

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. OMAS, MICHAEL DAYAL, DOUGLAS ROBINSON, and DIANA - (vo SCANLON ks. - and - Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: SE MT\.-, OMAS, MICHAEL DAYAL, DOUGLAS ROBINSON, and DIANA - (vo SCANLON ks - and - Plaintiffs RAL OF CANADA, ONTARIO PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES'

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM A ) Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ******************** Plaintiff and ******** corporation Defendant STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANT A LEGAL

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE STATEMENT OF CLAIM

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE STATEMENT OF CLAIM ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE In the matter of a Claim under the Class Proceedings Act,1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 Court File No. 02-6522-CP B E T W E E N: PAUL MCARTHUR Plaintiff and CANADA POST CORPORATION,

More information

ONTARIO COURT (GENERAL DIVISION)

ONTARIO COURT (GENERAL DIVISION) STATEMENT OF CLAIM (GENERAL) Dye & Durham CFS (Litigation v 4.1) (Form 14A under the Rules) Court file no. 1292/97 ONTARIO COURT (GENERAL DIVISION) In the matter of a Claim under the Class Proceedings

More information

(PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM B ) ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE *************************** - and - STATEMENT OF CLAIM

(PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM B ) ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE *************************** - and - STATEMENT OF CLAIM (PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM B ) Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: Plaintiffs - and - Defendants STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANTS A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED

More information

Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA. -and-

Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA. -and- Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA -and- PLAINTIFFS DR. CHRISTIANE FARAZLI, and C. FARAZLI MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION DEFENDANTS STATEMENT

More information

Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained

Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained A Presentation for CLE Employment Law Conference 2013 Pan Pacific Hotel Vancouver, BC May 9, 2013 Carman J. Overholt,

More information

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Province of Alberta MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter M-22 Current as of April 1, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s

More information

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza

More information

Pension and Benefit Plans: Employer Obligations and Potential Liabilities Janice Payne, Nelligan O Brien Payne LLP. Introduction

Pension and Benefit Plans: Employer Obligations and Potential Liabilities Janice Payne, Nelligan O Brien Payne LLP. Introduction Pension and Benefit Plans: Employer Obligations and Potential Liabilities Janice Payne, Nelligan O Brien Payne LLP Introduction A key objective of any human resources administrator is to ensure that an

More information

NOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS

NOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS NOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL This is a court authorized

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to September 1, 2014. It is intended for information and reference purposes only.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM Form 1 (Rule 3-1(1)) No. Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN AND THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM This action has been started

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This

More information

Factors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case. Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability

Factors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case. Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability Factors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability benefits. This paper provides strategic suggestions on

More information

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:

More information

Dependant Support Claim Against an Estate. 1. Review the legislation and case law and identify relevant information and documentation

Dependant Support Claim Against an Estate. 1. Review the legislation and case law and identify relevant information and documentation Dependant Support Claim Against an Estate 1. Review the legislation and case law and identify relevant information and documentation Review Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act (the "SLRA"), titled

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court file No.01/--1/3-4 / ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: THE POLISH NATIONAL CATHOLIC CHURCH OF CANADA - and - Plaintiff IONAL CATHOLIC CHURCH and ANTHONY A. MIKOVSKY Defendants STATEMENT

More information

Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014

Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 South Australia Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 SCHEDULE 3 APPROVED FORMS Schedule 3 Approved Forms relate to Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014, dated 2nd September 2014, that came

More information

RULES PROMULGATED UNDER THE WINDING-UP ACT, RSC. 1985, C. W-10

RULES PROMULGATED UNDER THE WINDING-UP ACT, RSC. 1985, C. W-10 JUDGES' RULES RULE 76 R. 76.01 RULES PROMULGATED UNDER THE WINDING-UP ACT, RSC. 1985, C. W-10 PETITION TO WIND UP COMPANY Title of Petition 76.01 A petition for the winding up of a company by the court,

More information

SELF-DIRECTED RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN APPLICATION

SELF-DIRECTED RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN APPLICATION SELF-DIRECTED RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN APPLICATION CALEDON TRUST COMPANY LIRA Locked in Retirement Account* LRSP Locked in Retirement Savings Plan* RSP - Retirement Savings Plan - Member Plan RSP - Retirement

More information

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON Action No. 0403-12898 B E T W E E N : TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE Plaintiffs - and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN

More information

The Rights of a Disabled / Brain Injured Person Returning to Work

The Rights of a Disabled / Brain Injured Person Returning to Work HARNESSING THE POWER AFTER BRAIN INJURY WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28TH - FRIDAY, OCTOBER 30TH The Rights of a Disabled / Brain Injured Person Returning to Work Prepared By: David R. Tenszen 416 868 3210 dtenszen@thomsonrogers.com

More information

IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA 1 NOT REPORTABLE IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 46854/2009 DATE: 29/04/2011 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE REPORTABLE: YES/NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO

More information

ESTATE PLANNING. Ian M. Hull and Nick Esterbauer. Hull & Hull LLP Barristers and Solicitors

ESTATE PLANNING. Ian M. Hull and Nick Esterbauer. Hull & Hull LLP Barristers and Solicitors ESTATE PLANNING Ian M. Hull and Nick Esterbauer Ian M. Hull Tel: (416) 369-7826 Fax: (416) 369-1517 Email: ihull@hullandhull.com Nick Esterbauer Tel: (416) 640-4818 Fax: (416) 369-1517 Email: nesterbauer@hullandhull.com

More information

BILL NO. 64. 2nd Session, 62nd General Assembly Nova Scotia 63 Elizabeth II, 2014. An Act Respecting the Limitation of Actions

BILL NO. 64. 2nd Session, 62nd General Assembly Nova Scotia 63 Elizabeth II, 2014. An Act Respecting the Limitation of Actions BILL NO. 64 Government Bill 2nd Session, 62nd General Assembly Nova Scotia 63 Elizabeth II, 2014 An Act Respecting the Limitation of Actions CHAPTER 35 ACTS OF 2014 AS ASSENTED TO BY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

More information

Management liability - Employment practices liability Policy wording

Management liability - Employment practices liability Policy wording Special definitions for this section Benefits Claim Defence costs The General terms and conditions and the following terms and conditions all apply to this section. Any compensation awarded to an employee

More information

Civil Notice of Appeal IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE OF DPMI-IELLER BETWEEN: JESSICA ERNST ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD

Civil Notice of Appeal IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE OF DPMI-IELLER BETWEEN: JESSICA ERNST ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD Appeal Number: c- 3LL4 Q. B. Number: 0702-00120 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE OF DPMI-IELLER BETWEEN: JESSICA ERNST Appellant (Plaintiff) -and- ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD Respondent

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM C ) Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: **************, *********** and ************* and Plaintiffs **********HOSPITAL, DR. *************, DR. **********,

More information

LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001

LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High

More information

PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES AND MASTERS IN CHAMBERS COMPENSATION REGULATION

PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES AND MASTERS IN CHAMBERS COMPENSATION REGULATION Province of Alberta PROVINCIAL COURT ACT COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH ACT PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES AND MASTERS IN CHAMBERS COMPENSATION REGULATION Alberta Regulation 176/1998 With amendments up to and including

More information

RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.

RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v. COURT FILE NO.: 4022A/07 (Milton) DATE: 20090401 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO Defendants

More information

Strata Corporations and the new Limitation Act By Shawn M. Smith Cleveland Doan LLP

Strata Corporations and the new Limitation Act By Shawn M. Smith Cleveland Doan LLP Strata Corporations and the new Limitation Act By Shawn M. Smith Cleveland Doan LLP The application of limitation periods has generally not been given much consideration in the strata community. That is

More information

LIV Limitation of Liability Scheme Guide UPDATED AUGUST 2015

LIV Limitation of Liability Scheme Guide UPDATED AUGUST 2015 LIV Limitation of Liability Scheme Guide UPDATED AUGUST 2015 2 Professional benefits for LIV members The LIV is pleased to have in force a Limitation of Liability Scheme pursuant to the Professional Standards

More information

(2) name whose principal place of business is address (hereafter referred to as 'the Consultant').

(2) name whose principal place of business is address (hereafter referred to as 'the Consultant'). NB This is an example of the type of agreement we may require with a consultant. Individual circumstances and AACT s requirements may alter the format in particular instances. THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANCY

More information

LIMITATIONS. The Limitations Act. being

LIMITATIONS. The Limitations Act. being 1 LIMITATIONS c. L-16.1 The Limitations Act being Chapter L-16.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2004 (effective May 1, 2005), as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007, c.28. *NOTE: Pursuant

More information

July 2015. New Limitation of Actions Act. Q&A p. 1-10 Transition Rules p. 11 Table of Concordance p. 12

July 2015. New Limitation of Actions Act. Q&A p. 1-10 Transition Rules p. 11 Table of Concordance p. 12 July 2015 New Limitation of Actions Act Q&A p. 1-10 Transition Rules p. 11 Table of Concordance p. 12 1 Questions and Answers For the Questions and Answers For the New Limitation of Actions Act While the

More information

PRO-DEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

PRO-DEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY PRO-DEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY IMPORTANT: This Fund has a MAXIMUM AMOUNT PAYABLE. Supplementary payment and damages are paid as incurred until the Fund is exhausted. No further payments will be made on

More information

PERFORMANCE BONDS AND LABOUR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BONDS: WHAT THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SHOULD KNOW

PERFORMANCE BONDS AND LABOUR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BONDS: WHAT THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SHOULD KNOW PERFORMANCE BONDS AND LABOUR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BONDS: WHAT THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SHOULD KNOW Deborah E. Palter, B.A., LL.B., J.D. What is a Bond? A bond is a three party written agreement. The three

More information

NOTICE OF HEARING FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF HEARING FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF HEARING FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Joseph Michael O Neill v. General Motors of Canada Limited Court File No. CV-10-40251500CP PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT

More information

LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT

LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 7:09 Act 36 of 1997 Amended by 2 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 18.. L.R.O. 2 Chap. 7:09 Limitation of Certain Actions

More information

CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH, an Ontario municipality. ( City ) and. an Ontario. ( Consultant").

CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH, an Ontario municipality. ( City ) and. an Ontario. ( Consultant). Page 1 of 13 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT This consulting services agreement is between: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH, an Ontario municipality ( City ) and, an Ontario ( Consultant"). The parties

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF SYSTEMATECH SOLUTIONS INC., APRIL VUONG AND HAO QUACH

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF SYSTEMATECH SOLUTIONS INC., APRIL VUONG AND HAO QUACH Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 22 nd Floor CP 55, 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN

More information

Victims of Crime (Statutory Compensation) Regulations 2004

Victims of Crime (Statutory Compensation) Regulations 2004 Version: 21.10.2004 South Australia Victims of Crime (Statutory Compensation) Regulations 2004 under the Victims of Crime Act 2001 Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement 3 Interpretation 4 Requirements

More information

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE OF CALGARY

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE OF CALGARY Action No. IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE OF CALGARY BETWEEN: William Lloyd Murray, on behalf of himself and all of those members of a class having a claim against the Defendants

More information

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP

More information

HEALTH EMERGENCY ACT

HEALTH EMERGENCY ACT PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] HEALTH EMERGENCY ACT Published by As it read up until May 31st, 2007 Updated To: Important: Printing multiple copies of a statute or

More information

The Law Society's insurance program is managed by the Lawyers Insurance Fund.

The Law Society's insurance program is managed by the Lawyers Insurance Fund. Information Compulsory Professional Liability Insurance 845 Cambie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 4Z9 t 604.669.2533 BC toll-free 1.800.903.5300 Membership 604.605.5311 f 604.687.0135 TTY 604.443.5700

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Merlo v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1136 Date: 20130625 Docket: S122255 Registry: Vancouver Between: Brought under the Class Proceedings Act,

More information

Employment Contract. This sample employment contract is from Self-Employment vs. Employment Status, CDHA (no date available)

Employment Contract. This sample employment contract is from Self-Employment vs. Employment Status, CDHA (no date available) Employment Contract This sample employment contract is from Self-Employment vs. Employment Status, CDHA (no date available (NOTE: This is only one example of an employment contract. This example is meant

More information

MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT

MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT (hereinafter called "the Company") MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT In consideration of the payment of the premium, in reliance upon the statements

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 34 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 34 1 SUBCHAPTER XIII. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES. Article 34. Arrest and Bail. 1-409. Arrest only as herein prescribed. No person may be arrested in a civil action except as prescribed by this Article, but this provision

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Joseph Michael O Neill v. General Motors of Canada Limited Court File No. CV-10-40251500CP PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY

More information

(ONTARIO) SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

(ONTARIO) SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO) SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. 04-CV-045435 CP THE HONOURABLE "t0's, TUESDAY, THE 17th DAY JUSTICE 1 af OF JULY, 2012 BETWEttlt, C. A 4*e smignacca AND ELAINE MIGNACCA - and - TCANADA

More information

CHBA Briefing Note on Liability in the Residential Building Industry

CHBA Briefing Note on Liability in the Residential Building Industry CHBA Briefing Note on Liability in the Residential Building Industry Introduction Objectives The objective of this report is to present some recent developments in Canada on the topic of liability in the

More information

Part 57 Rules and Orders Promulgated under the Winding-up Act

Part 57 Rules and Orders Promulgated under the Winding-up Act Alberta Rules of Court 390/68 R754-757 Part 57 Rules and Orders Promulgated under the Winding-up Act (1) Petition to Wind Up Company Title of petition 754 Every petition for the winding up of any company

More information

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Ryan Michael Stinnett, on behalf of himself CASE

More information

Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Contract)

Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Contract) Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Contract) Policy Wordings Please read this insurance Policy carefully to ensure that you understand the terms and conditions and that this Policy meets your requirements.

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to May 30, 2012. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This

More information

Schedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil

Schedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil Queen s Bench Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3 Schedule of Forms FORMS FOR PART 1 [Foundational Rules] Form R Nil rule No. Form No. Source FORMS FOR PART 2 [Parties to Litigation] Form R rule No. Form No. Source

More information

December 18, 2012. Ella Ferris, RN, MBA St. Michael s Hospital 30 Bond Street Toronto, Ontario. Dear Ella,

December 18, 2012. Ella Ferris, RN, MBA St. Michael s Hospital 30 Bond Street Toronto, Ontario. Dear Ella, December 18, 2012, RN, MBA St. Michael s Hospital 30 Bond Street Toronto, Ontario Dear Ella, I am pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President, Programs, Chief Nursing Executive and Chief

More information

Precedent 15. Property Insurance Contract Insurer s and Agent s Breach of Contract and Negligence

Precedent 15. Property Insurance Contract Insurer s and Agent s Breach of Contract and Negligence Contracts CONTRACTS Precedent 15. Property Insurance Contract Insurer s and Agent s Breach of Contract and Negligence Statement of Claim 1. The plaintiff claims: (a) damages for breach of contract and

More information

Victims of Crime (Compensation) Regulations 2003

Victims of Crime (Compensation) Regulations 2003 Historical version: 18.12.2003 to 5.5.2004 Regulations disallowed South Australia Victims of Crime (Compensation) Regulations 2003 under the Victims of Crime Act 2001 Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement

More information

Terminating The Employment Relationship

Terminating The Employment Relationship Terminating The Employment Relationship The contents of this document are intended to provide an overview of concepts relating to the termination of a non-union employment relationship in the province

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST)

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) Court File No. CV-12-9719-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C 36, AS AMENDED APPLICATION OF LIGHTSQUARED

More information

COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM

COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM Various provisions in this policy restrict coverage. Read the entire policy carefully to determine rights, duties and what is and is not covered. Throughout

More information

Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Annual)

Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Annual) Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Annual) Policy Wordings Please read this insurance Policy carefully to ensure that you understand the terms and conditions and that this Policy meets your requirements.

More information

Accident Insurance (Transitional Provisions) Act 2000

Accident Insurance (Transitional Provisions) Act 2000 Provisions) Act 2000 Public Act 2000 No 5 Date of assent 25 March 2000 Commencement see section 2 Contents I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 Title Commencement Purpose Interpretation Removal of competition for

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 19, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only.

More information

An Overview of the Health Care Costs Recovery Act

An Overview of the Health Care Costs Recovery Act Helping to create windows of opportunity An Overview of the Health Care Costs Recovery Act Lunch n Learn Seminar Presented by: Bruno De Vita and Kevin McLaren HEALTH CARE COSTS RECOVERY ACT, SBC 2008 c.

More information

Province of Alberta DEFAMATION ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter D-7. Current as of November 1, 2010. Office Consolidation

Province of Alberta DEFAMATION ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter D-7. Current as of November 1, 2010. Office Consolidation Province of Alberta DEFAMATION ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of November 1, 2010 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza

More information

ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS

ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS June 2013 Legal Policy Division Department of the Attorney-General and Justice

More information

B.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL 00-01-01

B.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL 00-01-01 B.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL 00-01-01 INSURER: THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. (the Company ) Administrative Offices, 6th Floor, 845 Cambie Street

More information

S.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth

S.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth S.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth Historically, at common law, a plaintiff was not obliged to accept a structured settlement,

More information

Insurance Journal. Defending Until the End When Does the Duty to. Volume 1, Issue 3 Editor Keoni Norgren. May 1, 2013

Insurance Journal. Defending Until the End When Does the Duty to. Volume 1, Issue 3 Editor Keoni Norgren. May 1, 2013 Insurance Journal May 1, 2013 In this Issue Volume 1, Issue 3 Editor Keoni Norgren Defending Until the End When Does the Duty to Defend End? Cyber Liability Laws in Canada Dolden Wallace Folick Welcomes

More information

The board of directors of a company is primarily responsible for:

The board of directors of a company is primarily responsible for: The board of directors of a company is primarily responsible for: Determining the company s strategic objectives and policies. Monitoring progress towards achieving the objectives and policies. Appointing

More information

SPECIMEN. (1) advising, counseling or giving notice to employees, participants or beneficiaries with respect to any Plan;

SPECIMEN. (1) advising, counseling or giving notice to employees, participants or beneficiaries with respect to any Plan; In consideration of payment of the premium and subject to the Declarations, limitations, conditions, provisions and other terms of this Policy, the Company and the Insureds agree as follows: I. INSURING

More information

What are the main liability policies you should consider for your commercial business?

What are the main liability policies you should consider for your commercial business? A PUBLICATION BY: GODFREY MORROW GODFREY INSURANCE MORROW AND INSURANCE FINANCIAL AND SERVICES FINANCIAL LTD. SERVICES LTD. 2012 What are the main liability policies you should consider for your commercial

More information

CHARITY LAW BULLETIN NO. 364

CHARITY LAW BULLETIN NO. 364 CHARITY LAW BULLETIN NO. 364 APRIL 29, 2015 EDITOR: TERRANCE S. CARTER EMPLOYER LIABLE FOR DISMISSAL AND ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS CODE DAMAGES By Barry W. Kwasniewski * A. INTRODUCTION Bray v Canadian College

More information

MOCK COMMERCIAL EXAM. Brian J. Scherman Balfour Moss Barristers & Solicitors #850, 410-22nd Street East Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5T6

MOCK COMMERCIAL EXAM. Brian J. Scherman Balfour Moss Barristers & Solicitors #850, 410-22nd Street East Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5T6 ) MOCK COMMERCIAL EXAM Brian J. Scherman Balfour Moss Barristers & Solicitors #850, 410-22nd Street East Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5T6 Neil B. Fisher Cuelenaere, Kendall, Fisher, Gaucher, Duncan Barristers

More information

MOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND

MOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND MOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND COMPENSATION OF UNINSURED ROAD ACCIDENT VICTIMS Agreement dated 29th January 2009 between the Minister for Transport and the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) AGREEMENT

More information

Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95

Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95 New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of these regulations, please see the Table of Regulations.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of these regulations, please see the Table of Regulations. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current to September 6, 2003 It is intended for information and reference purposes

More information

Business Relationships Within the Professions: Selected Business and Legal Issues. by Dale W. Wilcox, LL.B. Vancouver

Business Relationships Within the Professions: Selected Business and Legal Issues. by Dale W. Wilcox, LL.B. Vancouver Practice Resources Business Relationships Within the Professions: by Dale W. Wilcox, LL.B. Vancouver The following article was prepared by Dale W. Wilcox, LL.B., of Vancouver, and was first published by

More information

TEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance

TEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance TEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance In return for the payment of the Premium specified in the Schedule and based on any Information that

More information

BASIC CONCEPTS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW

BASIC CONCEPTS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW BASIC CONCEPTS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW Jeffrey A.L. Kriwetz Partner Garfinkle, Biderman LLP Suite 801 1 Adelaide Street East Toronto, Ontario M5C 2V9 416.869.1234 ext. 234 416.869.0547 (fax) jkriwetz(ii2garfinkle.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint. Credit Extension Uniformity Act 73 P.S. 2270, et seq.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint. Credit Extension Uniformity Act 73 P.S. 2270, et seq. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Michael XXXX : Civil Action v. : Enhanced Recovery Corp. : Complaint Jurisdiction & Venue 1. This is an action under the Fair Debt

More information

CHAPTER 32-19 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION

CHAPTER 32-19 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION CHAPTER 32-19 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION 32-19-01. Action to foreclose mortgage on real estate authorized. The plaintiff shall bring an action in district court for the foreclosure

More information

THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS

THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS Introduction In professional negligence proceedings against a solicitor, the court s aim is to determine what amount of money would put the plaintiff in the position he would

More information

Creditor Priority as between Factoring Companies and Lienholders in the Wake of the Alberta Decision in Van T Holdings Inc. v. KCS Equipment Ltd.

Creditor Priority as between Factoring Companies and Lienholders in the Wake of the Alberta Decision in Van T Holdings Inc. v. KCS Equipment Ltd. November 2012 Construction Law Section Creditor Priority as between Factoring Companies and Lienholders in the Wake of the Alberta Decision in Van T Holdings Inc. v. KCS Equipment Ltd. By Karen Groulx*

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

CORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM

CORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM CORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE POLICY WITH DEFENSE EXPENSES INCLUDED IN THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY. PLEASE READ AND REVIEW THE POLICY CAREFULLY. In consideration

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL

More information

Province of Alberta POLICE ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter P-17. Current as of March 30, Office Consolidation

Province of Alberta POLICE ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter P-17. Current as of March 30, Office Consolidation Province of Alberta POLICE ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of March 30, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98

More information

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#

More information

Essex Recruitment Services: Terms of Engagement of Limited Company Contractors to Supply Workers to Clients (Opted Out) 1. Definitions 1.

Essex Recruitment Services: Terms of Engagement of Limited Company Contractors to Supply Workers to Clients (Opted Out) 1. Definitions 1. Essex Recruitment Services: Terms of Engagement of Limited Company Contractors to Supply Workers to Clients (Opted Out) 1. Definitions 1.1 In these terms of engagement the following definitions apply:-

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with

More information

SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER INVESTIGATION REPORT F-2012 003. Saskatchewan Workers Compensation Board

SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER INVESTIGATION REPORT F-2012 003. Saskatchewan Workers Compensation Board Date: August 29, 2012 File No.: 2008/101 SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER INVESTIGATION REPORT F-2012 003 Saskatchewan Workers Compensation Board Summary: The Commissioner

More information