1 The Federal Court System SSCG16 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the operation of the federal judiciary. a. explain the jurisdiction of the federal courts and the state courts b. examine how John Marshall established the Supreme Court as an independent, coequal branch of government through his opinions in Marbury v. Madison c. describe how the Supreme Court decides cases d. compare the philosophies of judicial activism and judicial restraint
2 Powers of the Fed Courts Federal courts are generally created by the United States Congress under the constitutional power described in Article III. These courts are much more independent of Congress and the President. Article III requires the establishment of a Supreme Court and permits the Congress to create other federal courts, and place limitations on their jurisdiction.
3 Jurisdiction is the authority to hear certain cases. Federal courts have jurisdiction in cases that involve United States laws, treaties with other countries, or interpretations of the Constitution. (Also hear cases involving bankruptcy & maritime law)
4 Jurisdiction Federal courts also have jurisdiction over cases involving certain persons: Ambassadors/representatives of foreign governments 2 or more state governments The US government or office/agency of Citizens who are residents of different states Citizens who are residents of the same state but claim lands under grants from different states.
5 Concurrent jurisdiction occurs when both state and federal court appear to have jurisdiction. Ex: A case involving citizens from different states in a dispute concerning more than $75,000. A person may sue in federal or state court but if the person being sued insists, the case must be tried in federal court.
6 Original/Appellate The court in which a case is originally tried is known as a trial court. A trial court has original jurisdiction. If a person loses a case in trial court and wishes to appeal the decision, he or she may take the case to the court with appellate jurisdiction. If a person loses in the court of appeals, he or she may appeal to the Supreme Court, (which has both original and appellate jurisdiction.
7 Developing Supreme Court Power Early in the court s history, it was established that the Supreme Court, nor any other federal court may initiate action. (A judge/justice can not seek out an issue and request that the parties bring their case before the court) The court must wait for litigants, those involved in a lawsuit, to come before them
8 John Marshall John Marshall shaped American constitutional law and made the Supreme Court a center of power. The longest serving Chief Justice in Supreme Court history, Marshall established that the courts are entitled to exercise judicial review, the power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution. He repeatedly confirmed the supremacy of federal law over state law and supported an expansive reading of the enumerated powers.
9 Due Process Following the Civil War, the Supreme Court issued several rulings on the 13 th, 14 th, & 15 th Amendments. These amendments were intended to ensure the rights of newly freed African Americans, BUT the Court did not apply the due process clause of the 14 th Amendment when individuals challenged business or state interests. The due process clause says that no state may deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law.
10 Landmark Cases Fletcher v. Peck (1810), was one of the first cases in which the Supreme Court ruled a state law unconstitutional. It is the earliest case of the Court asserting its right to invalidate state laws conflicting with the Constitution.
11 Marbury v. Madison,, is a landmark case in U.S. law. It formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the U.S. under Article III of the Constitution. Marbury v. Madison was the first time the Supreme Court declared something "unconstitutional unconstitutional," and established the concept of judicial review in the U.S. (the idea that courts may oversee and nullify the actions of another branch of government). The landmark decision helped define the "checks and balances" of the American form of government.
12 Landmark Cases Dred Scott v. Sandford was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that ruled that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves, or their descendants whether or not they were slaves were not protected by the Constitution and could never be citizens of the United States.
13 It also held that the United States Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories. The Court also ruled that because slaves were not citizens, they could not sue in court. Lastly, the Court ruled that slaves as private property could not be taken away from their owners without due process.
14 The Slaughter-House Cases,, (1873) was the first United States Supreme Court interpretation of the relatively new Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. It is viewed as a pivotal case in early civil rights law, reading the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the "privileges or immunities" conferred by virtue of the U.S. citizenship to all individuals of all states within it. It, the 14 th Amendment, partially overturned the Dred Scott decision.
15 Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation even in public accommodations (particularly railroads), under the doctrine of "separate but equal". "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until it was overturned with Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954.
16 Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka,, (1954), overturned earlier rulings going back to Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, by declaring that state laws that established separate public schools for black and white students denied black children equal educational opportunities. As a result, de jure racial segregation was ruled a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This victory paved the way for integration and the civil rights movement.
17 Lower Federal Courts The Constitution created the Supreme Court and allowed for Congress to establish a network of lower federal courts as well. These courts are of 2 basic types: constitutional federal courts and legislative federal courts.
18 The United States Judiciary Act of 1789 was a landmark statute adopted on September 24, 1789 in the first session of the First United States Congress establishing the U.S. federal judiciary. Article III, section 1 of the Constitution prescribed that the "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court", and such inferior courts as Congress saw fit to establish.
19 Constitutional Courts Courts established by Congress under the provisions of Article III of the Constitution are constitutional courts. These courts include: federal district courts, the federal courts of appeals the U.S. Court of International Trade
20 Federal District Courts Congress created district courts in 1789 to serve as trial courts. As population grew and cases multiplied, Congress divided some states into more than one district. There are 94 federal judicial districts, including at least one district in each state, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Three territories of the United States -- the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands -- have district courts that hear federal cases, including bankruptcy cases
21 Federal District Courts The district courts have jurisdiction to hear nearly all categories of federal cases, including both civil and criminal matters. Every day hundreds of people across the nation are selected for jury duty and help decide some of these cases
22 Juries Federal courts use 2 types of juries: grand jury and trial jury. Grand jury has people and hears evidence against the accused. If they think there is enough evidence, they pass an indictment a formal accusation charging the person with a crime. The trial jury /petit jury has 6 12 people. They find the accused guilty or innocent. In some states, they pass sentence on the convicted.
23 The 94 U.S. judicial districts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has a United States court of appeals. A court of appeals hears appeals from the district courts located within its circuit, as well as appeals from decisions of federal administrative agencies.
24 Court of Appeals Courts of appeals have only appellate jurisdiction. Most appeals arise from decisions of district courts, the U.S. Tax Court and various territorial courts. These courts also hear appeals on the rulings of regulatory agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission or the Federal Communications Commission.
25 Courts of appeals may decide an appeal in one of 3 ways: Uphold the original decision Reverse that decision Or send it back to the lower court to be tried again. Unless appealed to the Supreme Court, the appeals court decision is final.
26 A special court of appeals called the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was created by Congress with passage of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982 making the judges of the former courts into circuit judges. It is housed in Washington, D.C.
27 The United States Court of Federal Claims hears non- tort monetary claims against the U.S. government. It hears claims for money that arise from the United States Constitution, federal statutes, executive regulations, or an express or implied contract with the United States Government.
28 The United States Tax Court specializes in adjudicating disputes over federal income tax, generally prior to the time at which the formal tax assessments are made by the Internal Revenue Service. The Tax Court is the only forum in which taxpayers outside of bankruptcy may do so without having first paid the disputed tax in full.
29 The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces exercises worldwide appellate jurisdiction over members of the United States armed forces on active duty and other persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The court is composed of five civilian judges appointed for 15- year terms by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the United States Senate.
30 Selection of Federal Judges Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution provides that the president, with consent of the Senate, appoints all federal judges. Judges in constitutional courts are appointed to serve for life. What advantages/disadvantages (political) would there be for a judge to be appointed for life?
31 Party Affiliation/Political Philosophy Presidents favor judges who belong to their own political party. Because judges are appointed for life, presidents view the appointments are a way to ensure their political ideas will continue even after they leave office. Senatorial courtesy allows that the president submit the name of the judicial candidate to the senators from the candidate s state before submitting to the entire Senate for approval. If either or both senators oppose the nominee, the president usually withdraws that nomination.
32 The Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest judicial body in the United States. It consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight Associate Justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed with the of the Senate. Once appointed, Justices effectively have life tenure, serving "during good Behavior, which terminates only upon death, resignation, retirement, or conviction on impeachment. The Court meets in Washington, D.C. in the United States Supreme Court building. The Supreme Court is primarily an appellate court, but it has original jurisdiction over a small range of cases
33 How do they decide which cases to The Supreme Court decides to hear a case on three major factors. Whether it was an appeal by the federal court and is in conflict with the decisions of other circuits, the general importance of the case, and whether the lower court's decisions may be wrong in light of the Supreme Court's opinions. hear?
34 A petition for a writ of certiorari is the documentation sent to the Supreme Court of the United States to request that they review a case. A writ of certiorari ("to be informed") is issued from any appellate court (the Supreme Court is the highest appellate court) to a lower court requesting more information about a case - seeking judicial review.
35 How do they decide a case? Once the Supreme Court accepts a case, the lawyers give the Court lengthy, detailed documents called "briefs" arguing their points and providing legal support for them. Next, the attorneys typically argue the merits of their cases orally before the Supreme Court (which the public is welcome to attend). The Court considers these briefs and arguments in researching and deciding the cases.
36 The Conference After the lawyers complete their oral arguments, the justices debate the case. Usually about 30 minutes per case then they vote. A majority of the justices must be in agreement.
37 The Opinion The opinion states the facts of the case. The opinions are as important as the decision itself. They set a precedent for the lower courts to follow in future cases and gives the public an explanation for their decision. There are 4 different opinions: Unanimous, majority, concurring, and dissenting
38 Opinions Unanimous: all justices vote the same way (only about 1/3 of the decisions are unanimous) Majority: expresses the views of a majority of the justices Concurring: one or more of the justices agree with the majority s conclusions on the case, but for different reasons Dissenting: opinion of the justices on the losing side.
39 Judicial Activism The philosophy of judicial activism is the charge that judges are going beyond their appropriate powers and engaging in making law and not merely interpreting it. Judicial activism is a critical term used by some to describe judicial rulings that they feel are based more upon the judge's personal bias than by existing law.
40 Judicial Restraint Judicial restraint encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional.
CHAPTER 16 THE FEDERAL COURTS CHAPTER OUTLINE I. Politics in Action: Appealing to the Supreme Court (pp. 509 510) A. The Supreme Court has considerable power. B. The Supreme Court makes only the tiniest
Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!) Understanding the Federal Courts There are three levels of Federal courts that hear tax cases. At the bottom of the hierarchy,
Crete-Monee Middle School U.S. Constitution Test Study Guide Answers 2010-2011 1. What is the more common name for the first ten amendments to the constitution? Bill of Rights 2. The introduction to the
Stern v. Marshall Shaking Bankruptcy Jurisdiction to Its Core? July/August 2011 Benjamin Rosenblum Scott J. Friedman In Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011), the estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall, a.k.a.
1965 Alabama Literacy Test 1. Which of the following is a right guaranteed by the Bill of Rights? Public Education Employment Trial by Jury Voting 2. The federal census of population is taken every five
SENATE BILL 698 By Stevens AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2; Title 4; Title 6; Title 16; Title 17 and Title 38, Chapter 6, relative to judges. WHEREAS, pursuant to language proposed to
FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES In the United States, we are governed by both national and state governments and our rights are protected by state and federal Constitutions. Basically,
RENDERED: DECEMBER 16, 2011; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2010-CA-002019-MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 email@example.com The Fate of Anti-Assignment Clauses After Bankruptcy
Course Court Systems and Practices Unit I Criminal Justice System Essential Question What are the history, structure, and function of the state and federal courts and criminal procedure? TEKS 130.296(c)
Judges rule on the basis of law, not public opinion, and they should be totally indifferent to pressures of the times. Warren E. Burger, chief justice, U.S. Supreme Court, 1969-1986 Guide for Florida Voters
Powers of Congress Expressed, Implied, and Non-Legislative What are the basic powers of Congress? w Under the Constitution, Congress has three (3) sets of powers: n n n Expressed Powers: Powers specifically
The Texas Judicial System The Texas Judicial System OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION Prepared by the Office of Court Administration P.O. BOX 12066 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2066 512.463.1625 www.txcourts.gov September
Lesson Overview Overview: This lesson will teach students how the legal system works and how a case progresses through the state courts. Objectives: Students will be able to Define key terms related to
VOLUNTEER PROTECTION ACT OF 1997 111 STAT. 218 PUBLIC LAW 105 19 JUNE 18, 1997 June 18, 1997 [S. 543] Volunteer Protection Act of 1997. 42 USC 14501 note. 42 USC 14501. Public Law 105 19 105th Congress
CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM California Courts and the Judicial System Unlike the federal system, in which judges are appointed by the president, confirmed by the Senate, and serve for life
Austria Belgium Denmark Austrian law is based on European traditions and is primarily statute law, with a very limited role played by customary law. The independence of the courts is enshrined in the constitution.
DAPTO HIGH SCHOOL YEAR 11 LEGAL STUDIES Preliminary Mid-Course Examination 2009 General Instructions: Reading time 5 minutes Working time 1 ½ hours Write using blue or black pen Write your Student Number/Name
COMMITTEE ON RULES AND JUDICIARY 0//0-REPORTED OUT TO THE FLOOR 0//-HELD IN COMMITTEE BILL NO. -0 Thirty-first Legislature of the Virgin Islands November, 0 An Act amending titles,,,,,,,, 0, and of the
2014 GED Test Resources The GED Ready Practice Test Social Studies Extended Response Prompts and Source Texts The enclosed source texts are drawn directly from the Extended Response (ER) tasks on the GED
Chapter One: Our Laws Lessons: 1-1 Our Laws & Legal System 1-2 Types of Laws Lesson 1-2 Goals Explain how constitutional, statutory, case and administrative laws are created Explain how to resolve conflicts
RENDERED: MARCH 14, 2008; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2007-CA-001304-MR DONALD T. CHRISTY APPELLANT v. APPEAL FROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE STOCKTON
Filed 9/25/96 PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-3409 GERALD T. CECIL, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 140252-U Order filed
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
American Government/Civics The government course provides students with a background in the philosophy, functions, and structure of the United States government. Students examine the philosophical foundations
Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics John Scalia, Jr. Statistician Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Federal criminal case processing
A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant
The Circuit Court The circuit court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Virginia, and the court has authority to try a full range of both civil and criminal cases. Civil cases involve disputes
UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR JUDICIAL NOMINEES PUBLIC 1. Name: State full name (include any former names used). 2. Position: State the position for which you have been
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC04-110 AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE [December 2, 2004] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar s Workers Compensation Rules Committee has filed its
The Texas Judicial System The judicial power of the State of Texas is derived from Article 5, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution, which provides: The judicial power of this State shall be vested in one
THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN CYPRUS A. GENERAL (i) Historical background The island of Cyprus in the northeastern part of the Mediterranean lies forty miles away from Asia Minor, sixty miles away from
The NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf NH court system: The modern trial and appellate court system in New Hampshire took shape in 1901, when the legislature
THE EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT The political institutions of the United Kingdom are divided into the legislative, the executive and the judiciary. The last of these will be developed
NEW MEXICO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM New Mexico Department Page: 1 of 11 INSTRUCTOR NOTES New Mexico Department Page: 2 of 11 COURSE TITLE: NEW MEXICO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BLOCK: 2.4 DPS ACCREDITATION
APPENDIX APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE VAWA PILOT PROJECT ON TRIBAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Instructions Completing this Application Questionnaire is a necessary step for any Indian tribe that wishes
Case 2:12-cv-00699-JRG Document 1 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PRISON LEGAL NEWS, PLAINTIFF v. ANTHONY BETTERTON, individually
Federal Courts & What They Do Contents What Is a Court? 1 What Is a Federal Court? 2 What Kinds of Federal Courts Are There? 2 Map: Geographical Boundaries of U.S. Courts of Appeals and U.S. District Courts
Courts & Our Legal System 2012 (Version 1.0) This booklet has been prepared, published and distributed by the Public Legal Education Association of Saskatchewan (PLEA). The purpose of PLEA and this booklet
RENDERED: May 7, 1999; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED C ommonwealth Of K entucky Court Of A ppeals NO. 1997-CA-002339-MR JOHN BRENTON PRESTON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JOHNSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE STEPHEN
United States District Court Northern District of Illinois Judge Marvin E. Aspen PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND DATE OF APPOINTMENT July 24, 1979 Chambers: (312) 435-5696 ENTERED ON DUTY September 4, 1979 JUDICIAL
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S An Introduction for Judges and Judicial Administrators in Other Countries Honorable Thomas F. Hogan, Director Administrative Office of the U.S.
F REQUENTLY A SKED Q UESTIONS A BOUT T HE C RIMINAL J USTICE S YSTEM WHO IS THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY? The New York State Constitution provides that the District Attorney is a public official elected by the
New Hampshire Bar Association s Law-Related Education Program Presents An Overview of the American Legal System A Guide for Classroom Use To Be Used in Conjunction with the Mock Trial Competition Handbook
Recommendation 84-7 Administrative Settlement of Tort and Other Monetary Claims Against the Government (Adopted December 7, 1984) In the Federal Tort Claims Act and dozens of other statutes, 1 Congress
Commencement of a Deficiency Proceeding and Pretrial Practice Michael J. Desmond is a certified as a Tax Law Specialist by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization. Mike began his career
THE CONSTITUTION ON SLAVERY AND VOTING SLAVERY AND THE CONSTITUTION Lesson Objectives: When you complete Lesson 19, you will be able to: Understand that the term slave or slavery is not in the Constitution.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-IA-02028-SCT RENE C. LEVARIO v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/23/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY
1776 Only people who own land can vote Declaration of Independence signed. Right to vote during the Colonial and Revolutionary periods is restricted to property owners most of whom are white male Protestants
Vital Supreme Court Cases to know for the U.S. History and Government Regents Created by Ms. Iacopelli and Mr. Gross Supreme Court of the United States The important court cases you should know for your
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC06-2065 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FINAL ARGUMENTS. [May 3, 2007] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar s Criminal Procedure Rules Committee (Rules
CORRELATION SUNSHINE STATE STANDARDS SUBJECT: Social Studies SUBMISSION TITLE: Prentice Hall Civics: Government and Economics In Action 2005 PUBLISHER: Pearson Prentice Hall GRADE: Grade 6-8 M/J Civics/
OCTOBER TERM, 1992 147 Syllabus EL VOCERO de PUERTO RICO et al. v. PUERTO RICO et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of puerto rico No. 92 949. Decided May 17, 1993 Puerto Rico
Ethics in Judicial Elections A guide to judicial election campaigning under the California Code of Judicial Ethics This pamphlet covers the most common questions that arise in the course of judicial elections.
1 Darth Vader Legal Studies 250 Fall 2004: Paper 1 The Deliverance of Justice, And Money Among the services people expect from the law are the deliverances of justice and repayment, and as our institutionalized
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
Determining Jurisdiction for Patent Law Malpractice Cases This article originally appeared in The Legal Intelligencer on May 1, 2013 As an intellectual property attorney, the federal jurisdiction of patent-related
By course completion, learners will be able to: LEARNING OBJECTIVES U.S. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE Describe the organization of U.S. government as established by the Constitution. Identify the Bill of Rights
!" If there is substantial authority for a position taken on a tax return, neither the taxpayer nor the tax preparer will be subject to the penalty for underreporting income even if the IRS successfully
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Petitioner/Defendant, v. Case No.: SC09-1045 Lower Case Nos.:4D08-3090; 07-10734 CF10B STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent/Plaintiff. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
P O L I C Y B R I E F kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured September 2011 Explaining Douglas v. Independent Living Center: Questions about the Upcoming United States Supreme Court Case Regarding
JUNE 2015 COMMENTARY Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Scope of Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act, Interprets False Claims Act First to File Rule In a unanimous decision issued on May 26, 2015, the United
A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office Bill Lockyer, Attorney General A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims
LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY By Peter L. Ostermiller Occasionally, a defendant, while incarcerated and apparently having nothing better to do, will file a Motion under RCr. 11.42,
Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights and the Parot Doctrine March 2014 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) (866) 550-0442 (fax) firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.law.gov
2015 IL App (1st 15-0693-U NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. No. 1-15-0693
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION PLAN OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE 1.1 The objective of the Louisiana State Bar Association Plan of Legal Specialization ( Plan ) is to promote
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division One STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent, vs. No. SD31758 JOHN S. BYERS, Filed October 16, 2012 Defendant-Appellant. AFFIRMED APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT
CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM: Addressing Deficiencies in Idaho s Public Defense System By delegating to each county the responsibility to provide counsel at the trial level without any state funding or oversight,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SHARON SUMERA, NO. 66944-3-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. GREGORY BEASLEY and JANE DOE UNPUBLISHED OPINION BEASLEY, husband and wife and the marital community
Workers Compensation: A Response To the Recent Attacks on the Commission s Authority to Suspend A Claimant s Benefits by Charles F. Midkiff Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C. 300 Arboretum Place, Suite 420 Richmond,
Forum Shopping and Limitations on Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction John D. Snethen Section Chief, Tax Litigation Office of the Attorney General of Indiana 1 Bankruptcy Background What is Forum Shopping? Taxpayer
McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 Appellant: James William McCulloch Appellee: State of Maryland Appellant s Claim: That a Maryland state tax imposed on the Bank of the United States was unconstitutional interference
YesWeScan: The FEDERAL CASES Case No. 7,052. [1 Woods, 85.] 1 INSURANCE CO. V. NEW ORLEANS. Circuit Court, D. Louisiana. Nov. Term, 1870. FOREIGN CORPORATIONS TAXATION FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO CONSTITUTION
Multiple Choice Questions STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER NINE 1. Which of the following is a type of case that is often heard by lower level courts? a. Breach of contract b. Federal appeals c. Maritime claims
Chapter 3 Justice Process at the County Level Brooks County Courthouse Chapter Three: Judice Process at the County Level Developmental Assets: Life Skills: TEKS: Objectives: 10. Safety 30. Responsibility