Understanding the Business Risk Limitations
|
|
- Rafe Miller
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Understanding the Business Risk Limitations John H. Podesta Murchison & Cumming, LLP San Francisco, CA I. INTRODUCTION Some of the most commonly cited, yet least understood coverage limitations for contractors are those limiting the carrier s exposure to claims that the insured s work is nonconforming and in need of repair or replacement. In the industry standard general liability policy form, Exclusions J, K, L, M and N collectively form the business risk Exclusions that address non-conforming work claims. While often referred to collectively, each must be understood in its own place: Exclusion J is the broadest, excluding damage to property owned by the insured(j1), to real property sold by the insured to others(j2), and to property being worked on by the insured that must be replaced(j5 and J6); Exclusion K excludes coverage for damage to the Named Insured s own product; 1
2 Exclusion L excludes coverage for damage to the Named Insured s own work, while not excluding coverage for damage to completed subcontracted work; Exclusion M excludes coverage for loss of use of a structure that incorporates the Named Insured's defective work, where the insured s work can be corrected or replaced and the host (the building or structure that the insured s work is incorporated into) restored to use; Exclusion N precludes economic losses where a host cannot be used because of a known or suspected defect in another similar structure 1. This article will provide background of the business risk exclusions and recent cases interpreting them, in the context of contractors. RISK MANAGEMENT AND ISSUE SPOTTING One of the most important steps in determining if a Business Risk Exclusion applies to a given situation is view the claim in the context of the risks insured and the purpose of General Liability Insurance. 1. Who has the right to seek coverage from the carrier? In a liability insurance context, the insured is entitled to protection from a claim presented against it. Regarding insurance coverage for contractors, the distinction recognizing who the Named Insured is carries additional importance. By definition, the Named Insured is referred to throughout the policy as you. Many exclusions and other provisions draw a distinction between "you" or "your" and simply "an insured" or "the insured". An exclusion that applies to you, your, or similar language by definition only to the named insured, rather than the party seeking coverage or making the claim. 2. Errors and Omissions versus General Liability coverage. While there are many differences between professional liability coverage and general liability coverage, for purposes of risk management, there is one major difference. A professional liability policy or errors and omissions coverage covers all damages that result from a wrongful act committed by the insured in the course of performing covered services. Therefore, so long as the "insured" is engaged in a covered 1 It is sometimes called a sister ship exclusion, where one ship must be taken out of use because a defect was discovered in a sister ship. 2
3 activity, there is broad coverage for the economic damages awarded against it. The "Business Risk" exclusions are not present in Errors and Omissions policies. Unlike Errors and Omissions coverage, General Liability coverage is triggered, or provides coverage, only for certain types of damages ( bodily injury or property damage ) but covers a broad range of the insured s activities Does the claim involve property damage or a mere defect in the insured s work? General liability policies provide generally that the carrier will pay on behalf of the insured those sums that the insured is obligated to pay because of property damage caused by occurrence. Therefore, it begs the question what is property damage? Critical to understanding whether property damage has occurred are two elements: physical injury to and tangible property. If there is no physical injury, has there been a "loss of use of tangible property"? If these elements are not present, then there is no property damage and no CGL coverage, before addressing any of the exclusions. 4. Did the damage occur during operations or after operations were complete? A general liability policy is divided into two basic coverages for purposes of contractors. The first is the products-completed operations hazard. The other is the general aggregate, or "ongoing operations" coverage. The general aggregate or operations coverage applies to damage that occurs while the Named Insured s work is being performed. The products-completed operations hazard applies once the work is turned over by the contractor to the owner or the general contractor (if the Named Insured is a subcontractor). Whether the loss falls within the General Aggregate or the Product-Completed Operations Hazard is critical, especially to general contractors. III. CASE LAW INTERPRETING BUSINESS RISK EXCLUSIONS 1. Exclusion J For purposes of contractors claims, Exclusion J, especially J(1) ("Owned Property") and J(2) ("Alienated Premises") will apply in the context of conversion projects where, for example, an apartment building is converted to condominiums. In that case, an insured purchases the existing apartment building, hire contractors and other inspectors to refurbish and prepare the building for sale; oftentimes, the original 2 General liability policies also provide personal injury and advertising injury coverage, which applies somewhat differently, but the business risk exclusions have little or no effect on that portion of the policy. 3
4 purchaser of the building is the one that sells the individual units to unit owners. Should the converter be sued later for damages, the owner will likely have no coverage for damage occurring while he owns the property, prior to creation of the HOA and transfer to purchasers. Similarly, in Exclusion J(2), the socalled alienated premises exclusion, in a conversion context, the property was not constructed for sale and thus the exclusion for damage to property the insured sells would apply. Care should be taken however, where the converter is an LLC or Corporation, where the liability for damages at the project may not be the Named Insured, but a member or employee who may not be subject to the exclusion. Where the Named Insured performs contracting work on a real estate project, Exclusion J(5) and J(6) are very significant. A General Liability policy is not a performance bond-- it does not guarantee the performance of the insured s work. To apply the exclusion, therefore, the initial focus is on the scope of work being performed by the Named Insured at the time of the incident causing damage, and that particular part of the property being worked on. For example, where the Named Insured s work encompasses several trades or subp-parts, such as fire alarms and plumbing, the actual trade that is responsible for the damage is the relevant inquiry for whether the damage is to that particular part of real property on which the insured is performing operations. Your next inquiry is whether the work is only performed on a portion of the host, if the host is divisible into subparts. Regardless of the jurisdiction, the basic analysis is as follows: where the insured is working on an area that is logically detached and separable from the damaged areas, coverage is only excluded from the discrete area where the insured is working. This is especially true in jurisdictions where Courts have held that the exclusions are ambiguous. 3 The key policy language is that damage to that particular part of real property being worked on is excluded. The following cases had an expansive view of that particular part, finding that it extends to the entire property affected by the insured s work: 1) Copple Constr., L.L.C. v. Columbia Nat'l Ins. Co., 279 Neb.60 (Neb. 2009).2) Visant Elec. Contr. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur., 530 S.W.2d 76 (Tenn. 1975). 3)Jet Line Services, Inc. v. American Employers Insurance Co., 404 Mass. 706, 537 N.E.2d 107 (1989) 4) Am. Equity Ins. Co. v. Van Ginhoven, 788 So.2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 5th Dist. 2001) 5) Southwest Tank & Treater Mfg. Co. v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 243 F. Supp. 2d 597 (E.D. Tex. 2003). 6) Goldsberry Operating Co. v. Cassity, Inc., 367 So. 2d 133 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1979). 7) Shelby Insurance Company v. Northeast Structures, Inc.; 767 A.2d See, Pekin Ins. Co. v. Miller, 367 Ill. App.3d 263, for a discussion on the ambiguity in the exclusions language. 4
5 8) Century Indem. Co. v. Golden Hills Builders, Inc., 348 S.C. 559 (S.C. 2002). 9) Amerisure Mut. Ins. Co. v. Am. Cutting & Drilling Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2009); 10) William Crawford, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 838 F. Supp. 157 (S.D.N.Y. 1993). In the above cases, the insured was performing its operations on property which could not be divided into individual parts or components, thus, the entire project was excluded property, for example a swimming pool or a fuel tank. However, there is a second line of cases which holds a more restrictive view of that particular part. Closer examination of the cases reveals not so much a difference in the law, but distinguishable facts. The following cases show a restrictive view of that particular part, that limits the exclusion to the limited area area where the insured is actually working on at the time of loss that occurs during operations. 1) Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Mark Yacht Club on Brickell Bay, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. Aug. 25, 2009); 2) Columbia Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schauf, 967 S.W.2d 74 (Mo. 1998); 3) ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Constr., Inc., 2006 ND 187, P27 (N.D. 2006); 4) EOTT Energy Pipeline Limited Partnership v. Hattiesburg Speedway, Inc., 303 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2004); 5) Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. JHP Dev., Inc., 557 F.3d 207 (5th Cir. Tex. 2009). 4 6) Gore Design Completions, Ltd. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 538 F.3d 365; 7) Minergy Neenah, LLC v. Rotary Dryer Parts, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (E.D. Wis. Apr. 24, 2008); 8) Basic Energy Servs. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 666, 668 (W.D. Tex. 2009); 9) General Cas. Ins. Cos. v. Exterior Sheet Metal, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25423; 10) Beaverdam Contr. v. Erie Ins. Co., 2008 Ohio 4953; 11) Transp. Ins. Co. v. Piedmont Constr. Group, LLC, 301 Ga. App. 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009) 12) Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Dormitory N.Y., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Exclusion K While significant, in the context of contractors, the your product exclusion has limited application. The exclusion has been specifically held not to apply to a real property construction risk, by definition, since your product does not include real property. Md. Casualty Co. v. Reeder, (Cal.App. 1990) 221 Cal.App.3d No relation to the author 5
6 3. Exclusion L Exclusion L excludes coverage for damage to "your work", meaning the work of the Named Insured. For a General Contractor, this would nearly eliminate coverage entirely for construction defect claims. However, in the ISO General Liability coverage form (e.g. form number CG 0001), damage to subcontracted work is not excluded in completed work, which functionally fills the gap left by the absence of builders risk coverage once the project is complete (Maryland Casualty vs. Reeder). Thus, where there is damage to a completed structure that is caused by a subcontractor, or is caused by the general contractor's own work that damages a subcontractor s work, the exclusion for damage to "your work" does not apply. There are three relevant inquiries to determine whether the "damage to subcontracted work" coverage applies: 1) is the loss within the products-completed operations hazard; 2) is there a claim for property damage; and, 3) is the damaged property work that was performed by a subcontractor, or did a subcontractor's work cause the damage? The first question, whether the loss is within the products-completed operations hazard, is determined by the language of the policy itself as to the Named Insured. California has recently ruled that a contractor that is terminated does not enjoy the benefits of coverage for damage to subcontracted work. Therefore, the more restrictive exclusions applicable to damage occurring during operations (Exclusion J, above) applies. Functionally, for a terminated general contractor, this means that since the entire project is being built by or on behalf of the insured, the entire project is likely excluded property. Clarendon America Ins. Co. v. General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona, (Cal.App. 2011) 193 Cal.App.4th Assuming that the work of the Named Insured is completed, and thus the Products-Completed Operations Hazard is triggered, the next question is whether the damaged work (or the work that caused the damage) was performed by a subcontractor. In this context, the definition of subcontractor is broad, and generally is understood to include an entity that undertakes a portion of the general contract, including the supply of specifically manufactured components. National Union Fire Ins. v. Structural Sys. Tech. (E.D. Mo. 1991) 756 F. Supp If the damaged work was performed by a subcontractor, that damage is covered, or, stated more precisely, it is not excluded by the "your work" exclusion. Limbach Co., LLC v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. (4th Cir. Va. 2005), 396 F.3d 358, 365: 6
7 Thermacor custom manufactured the steam pipe in accordance with the shop drawings and project specifications[for the General Contractor Limbach], and the company provided on-site installation instructions. Since we conclude that the steam pipe was manufactured by a subcontractor, and since the parties stipulated that the pipe was damaged by the leak, the "your work" exclusion does not preclude coverage for the cost of replacing the pipe. The damaged pipe clearly falls within the exclusion's exception for work performed by a subcontractor. 4. Exclusion M the Impaired Property Exclusion The impaired property exclusion addresses only one situation: where a defect in construction, or a malfunction in material supplied, creates a loss of use. An example of impaired property is a building that cannot be used or is less useful because the wrong material was used, therefore, it cannot be used for its intended purpose. If the only damage is a loss of use of the host structure, and the structure can be restored to use by removing and replacing the insured s work or product, the exclusion is intended to apply. Note, however, that if there is any physical injury to the host structure, the impaired property exclusion does not apply. A second significant feature of the "Impaired Property" exclusion is historical. Arguments were made under the 1973 ISO General Liaibility forms that although the defective work or product may not have caused any resulting physical injury, to remove it from the host and repair the condition would involve damaging the host; therefore, the method of repair of the defective work or product creates property damage. The addition of the defined term Impaired Property in the 1985 form eliminates that possibility, because the definition of excluded property now specifically includes not just the condition, but the repair of the condition, even if the repair would involve physically injuring the host. The Massachusetts Court of Appeal applied the Exclusion in Dorchester Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. First Kostas Corp. (Mass. App. Ct. 2000) 49 Mass. App. Ct. 651, thusly: The damage claimed by the owners came from the alleged dispersal of lead-based paint chips and dust. The painters are said to have failed to contain the toxins they set free through their scraping and sanding operations, certainly an inadequacy and a dangerous condition in their work. That faulty workmanship denied the owners the use of their house until it could be restored to use by the removal of the faulty element of the 7
8 contractor's work, the errant chips and dust. There was no other damage to the property other than the contractor's work. IV. CONCLUSION From a risk management perspective, the insurance professional should recognize that the business risk exclusions, collectively, will limit or eliminate coverage under a general liability policy for work and damage that is under the control of the contractor, and many losses that are occasioned by a contractor's normal operations. Things that are not installed properly, or components that do not work, are supposed to be the responsibility of the contractor, according to the insurance policy. The risk manager or broker should decide whether additional types of coverage may be available that might not have these same limitations, for example errors and omissions coverage in addition to the general liability coverage. Once the damage has occurred, however, and looking to the General Liability policy, the lawyer or claims professional should look first to the injury for which compensation is being sought: is there a claim for property damage, either a physical injury to some property or loss of use of property, occasioned by an accidental event? Second, one should determine whose policy is potentially triggered for this event: the subcontractor, a general contractor or the owner? Determine whose work is the cause of the injury: the named insured s, an additional insured s, or some third party s? Third, identify whether the damage caused by the responsible subcontractor occurred during its operations or once operations were complete, to determine if the Products-Completed Operations Hazard is triggered or not. The completed operations hazard requires completion of the work by the Named Insured, not the project as a whole, and different exclusions apply. If the work was complete, the General Contractor's own coverage may afford him or her more protection than the subcontractor's policy. Fourth, look to the terms of the exclusions themselves as to whether the particular loss is barred. Following these steps makes it much more likely that the exclusions will be applied as intended. The carrier and the policyholder will get the benefit of the policy as drafted. 8
By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP. (Published July 24, 2013 in Insurance Coverage, by the ABA Section Of Litigation)
Tiara Condominium: The Demise of the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation and Impact on the Property Damage Requirement in a General Liability Policy By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant
More informationHow To Know If A Property Damage Claim Is Covered Under A Cgl Policy
COVERAGE FOR DEFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR FAULTY WORKMANSHIP: EXCLUSIONS J(5) AND J(6) R. Douglas Rees Co-author Tara L. Sohlman Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75202
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:01 CV 726 DDN VENETIAN TERRAZZO, INC., Defendant. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Pursuant
More informationThat s A Wrap What Every Claims And Construction Professional Needs To Know About Wrap-up Insurance Programs
2015 CLM Atlanta Conference November 5-6, 2015 in Atlanta, GA That s A Wrap What Every Claims And Construction Professional Needs To Know About Wrap-up Insurance Programs In the construction industry,
More informationINSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION RISKS
INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION RISKS Timothy L. Pierce, Partner (Los Angeles) Jacquelyn S. Bryan, Associate (Pittsburgh) 01.08.2014 Copyright 2013 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. OVERVIEW OF
More informationCGL Coverage for Construction Defects in Nebraska and Iowa
CGL Coverage for Construction Defects in Nebraska and Iowa Craig F. Martin Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP www.constructioncontractoradvisor.com A common question in construction law is whether commercial
More informationClarifying the Confusion Over the Business Risk Exclusions and Other Related Construction Defect Topics
The University of Texas School of Law Presented: 11 th Annual INSURANCE LAW INSTITUTE December 7-8, 2006 Four Seasons Hotel Austin, Texas Clarifying the Confusion Over the Business Risk Exclusions and
More informationVertical Exhaustion & Occurrences
Vertical Exhaustion & Occurrences R. Brent Cooper Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: 214-712-9501 Email: brent.cooper@cooperscully.com 2016 This paper and/or
More informationCOVERAGE UNDER A CGL POLICY. A. CGL coverage is Commercial General Liability Coverage.
COVERAGE UNDER A CGL POLICY I. Type of coverage provided by CGL coverage. A. CGL coverage is Commercial General Liability Coverage. B. Generally, a CGL policy provides coverage for the insured s liability
More informationReverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01546-CV OKLAHOMA SURETY COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee
More informationCourt of Appeals Finds Coverage in Cyberspace and Criticizes Standard CGL Exclusions: Computer Corner, Inc. v. Fireman s Fund Insurance Company
Court of Appeals Finds Coverage in Cyberspace and Criticizes Standard CGL Exclusions: Computer Corner, Inc. v. Fireman s Fund Insurance Company by Tim L. Fields and Michelle A. Hernandez Modrall, Sperling,
More informationCONSTRUCTION LIABILITY CLAIMS: ARE YOU COVERED? (IND004)
CONSTRUCTION LIABILITY CLAIMS: ARE YOU COVERED? (IND004) Speakers: Edward M. Joyce, Partner, Jones Day Scott Allan, Senior Vice President, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. The views expressed by the speakers
More informationIndemnity and Insurance Provisions in Commercial Contracts
Survey Says: The Feud Over Insurance and Indemnity Provisions in Business Contracts Indemnity and Insurance Provisions in Commercial Contracts Kenneth M. Gorenberg Stefan R. Dandelles Indemnity and insurance
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS )SS:
STATE OF OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY CASE NO. CV-484139 THE OAKWOOD CLUB Plaintiff vs. OPINION AND ORDER KINNEY GOLF COURSE DESIGN, ET AL Defendants MICHAEL J. RUSSO, JUDGE: This
More informationCGL COVERAGE FOR RIP AND TEAR COSTS
Workshop W2 Wednesday, November 14 9:00 10:15 a.m. and 10:45 a.m. noon CGL COVERAGE FOR RIP AND TEAR COSTS Presented by Jeffrey D. Masters Partner Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP Claims involving damage to
More informationConstruction Defects As An Occurrence Recent Appellate Rulings
ABA Section of Litigation 2012 Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee CLE Seminar, March 1-3, 2012: Emerging Trends in Coverage for Construction Risks Construction Defects As An Occurrence Recent Appellate
More informationAnalyzing Coverage For Construction-Defect Liability
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Analyzing Coverage For Construction-Defect Liability
More informationClear as Mud: Legislating the Definition of Occurrence in a CGL Policy
Clear as Mud: Legislating the Definition of Occurrence in a CGL Policy Seth M. Friedman 1 Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, P.C. Atlanta, GA One of the biggest issues affecting coverage litigation for construction
More informationEvery responsible owner of commercial property carries. public liability insurance. The purpose is usually to provide
THE CGL POLICY - WILL IT COVER A COMMERCIAL BUILDING OWNER FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS IN THE BUILDING? By David H. Fishman GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, LLC BALTIMORE, MD Every responsible
More informationCOVERAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS
COVERAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS An Illinois Perspective Scott W. Hoyne Joseph F. Spitzzeri Johnson & Bell, Ltd. Johnson & Bell, Ltd. 33 W. Monroe Street 33 W. Monroe Street 27 th Floor 27 th Floor Chicago,
More informationYOUR WORK EXCLUSIONS IN CGL POLICIES
YOUR WORK EXCLUSIONS IN CGL POLICIES Presented by Wayman, Irvin & McAuley, LLC www.waymanlaw.com (412) 566-2970 Dale K. Forsythe, Esq. Scott W. Stephan, Esq. September 7, 2010 For Hartford Insurance 2
More informationDecisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals
CIZEK HOMES v. COLUMBIA NAT. INS. CO. 361 Cite as 22 Neb. App. 361 require perfection of a parent when deciding whether termination of parental rights is appropriate. We conclude that there is insufficient
More informationGetting to know. Northeast Agencies, Inc. June 2008. Presented by:
Getting to know COMMERCIAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Presented by: Northeast Agencies, Inc. June 2008 1 Business Liability Coverage Provides Liability coverage for business operations if a claim arises due to
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 09-3874 Brake Landscaping & Lawncare, Inc., * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District
More informationInsurance Specialty Group LLC
Insurance Specialty Group LLC Introduction to the Asset Protection Program ( APP ) for Residential General Contractors 1 4501 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite F6200 Atlanta, GA (678) 742 6300 Asset Protection
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 14-11987 Non-Argument Calendar. Docket No. 1:13-cv-02128-WSD.
Case: 14-11987 Date Filed: 10/21/2014 Page: 1 of 11 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11987 Non-Argument Calendar Docket No. 1:13-cv-02128-WSD PIEDMONT OFFICE
More information6 Commercial General Liability Insurance
6 Commercial General Liability Insurance I. Overview 6.1 Mark D. Willmarth Deborah A. Hebert II. What Is a CGL Policy? A. Scope of a CGL Policy 6.2 B. Parts of a CGL Policy 6.3 III. The CGL Insuring Agreements
More informationG U E S T E S S A Y S
Comparing and Maximizing Performance Bond and Commercial General Liability Protections Frank L. Pohl, Esq. and James C. Washburn, Esq. Often when acting as the prime on a construction project, the design
More informationInsurance and the Construction Failure
Insurance and the Construction Failure 18 th Annual Construction SuperConference December 12, 2003 San Francisco, California James D. Hollyday hollydaj@pepperlaw.com 1 Introduction 1. Contract Drafting
More informationContractual Indemnification Obligations and Insurance Coverage
Contractual Indemnification Obligations and Insurance Coverage Joseph Fields Steven H. Weisman McCarter & English, LLP Jacqueline Beaudet Frenkel & Company Contractual Indemnification Business contracts
More informationChapter XI INSURANCE. While many insurance policies do not cover environmental remediation and damages, insurance. A. General Liability Insurance
Chapter XI INSURANCE There are several different types of insurance that may apply to environmental problems. While many insurance policies do not cover environmental remediation and damages, insurance
More informationNumber of Occurrences For Asbestos Claims: Not A One Size Fits All Analysis
March 2007 Number of Occurrences For Asbestos Claims: Not A One Size Fits All Analysis Contributor: Linda Bondi Morrison California Illinois New Jersey New York www.tresslerllp.com Please note that statutes
More informationInsuring Construction Risks - Hot Topics Related to Construction Defect Claims
Insuring Construction Risks - Hot Topics Related to Construction Defect Claims Jeffrey J. Vita Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Michael J. Donnelly Murtha Cullina, LLP Alice Sherman Willis of Massachusetts,
More informationTENDERING CLAIMS UNDER YOUR CGL INSURANCE POLICY By Nick M. Campbell, Esq. GREEN & CAMPBELL, LLP. A. History of Commercial Liability Policies
TENDERING CLAIMS UNDER YOUR CGL INSURANCE POLICY By Nick M. Campbell, Esq. GREEN & CAMPBELL, LLP Please note that this article is only intended to provide some general educational information regarding
More informationFourth Circuit Decision Holds that Under Virginia Law Faulty Workmanship Does Not Constitute an "Occurrence"
AUGUST 2005 Fourth Circuit Decision Holds that Under Virginia Law Faulty Workmanship Does Not Constitute an "Occurrence" Travelers Indem. Co. of America v. Miller Building Corp., 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14780
More informationTravelers v. Moore and a Developing Split of Authority
Insurance Coverage of Defective Workmanship By William H. Tate Travelers v. Moore and a Developing Split of Authority Inconsistent application of the law from jurisdiction to jurisdiction is likely to
More informationPerformance Bonds and CGL Insurance In Construction Projects: Navigating the Interplay Between Insurance and Surety
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Performance Bonds and CGL Insurance In Construction Projects: Navigating the Interplay Between Insurance and Surety Minimizing Risks and Maximizing
More informationADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE
William E. Anderson McDANIEL & ANDERSON, L.L.P. Raleigh, North Carolina Tel. (919) 872-30000 FAX. (919) 790-9273 e-mail: w.anderson@mcdas.com www/mcdas.com ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE People often get
More informationSeptember 30, 2002 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE STRATEGIC ADVICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Number: 200302016 Release Date: 01/10/2003 UILC:162.04-02 September 30, 2002 POSTF-112725-02 CC:FIP:4
More informationLegal Separation The Severability Test in the CGL
Legal Separation The Severability Test in the CGL June 2011 Armstrong, Inc., is a landlord that rents space to various tenants in a commercial office building it owns located on 1 Main Street. On 3 Main
More informationIntroduction to Insurance Policies
Chapter 1 Introduction to Insurance Policies 1-1 TYPES OF POLICIES 1-1:1 Personal Lines Versus Commercial Lines Policies Personal lines policies are purchased by an individual, rather than an organization,
More informationAllocation of Coverage Between Direct and Additional Insured Coverage
Recent Developments in Insurance Coverage Disputes Allocation of Coverage Between Direct and Additional Insured Coverage John H. Podesta Murchison & Cumming, LLP San Francisco, CA New insurance law cases
More informationOther Insurance and the CGL Policy
Other Insurance and the CGL Policy by Craig F. Stanovich Austin & Stanovich Risk Managers, LLC April 2009 We usually make sure our client has purchased its own CGL policy a policy on which it is a named
More informationTexas Measure of Damages For First- Party Property Losses
Texas Measure of Damages For First- Party Property Losses Partial Loss vs. Total Loss Facts: The insured s home was damaged by a fire. The remaining portions were leaning and barely standing, the roof
More informationThe Limitations of Liability Coverage Under Designated Premises Policies By Jonathan H. Pittman and Elaine A. Panagakos
The Limitations of Liability Coverage Under Designated Premises Policies By Jonathan H. Pittman and Elaine A. Panagakos Defendants facing tort liability for bodily injury claims usually turn to their comprehensive
More informationHOW TO DETERMINE WHETHER YOUR COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ( CGL ) INSURANCE CARRIER IS OBLIGATED TO COVER A CLAIM MADE AGAINST YOUR COMPANY
HOW TO DETERMINE WHETHER YOUR COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ( CGL ) INSURANCE CARRIER IS OBLIGATED TO COVER A CLAIM MADE AGAINST YOUR COMPANY Every company has a person in charge of its insurance. If your
More informationCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTOR LIABILITY INSURANCE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTOR LIABILITY INSURANCE The following are excerpts from Caltrans 2010Standard Specifications. Specifications are subject to change so refer to the project
More informationAdditional Insured Changes in the CGL
Additional Insured Changes in the CGL May 2004 New changes to the additional insured endorsements and the introduction of a limitation to the definition of "insured contract" are characterized by ISO as
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE COGSWELL FARM CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. TOWER GROUP, INC. & a.
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationLiability Insurance Guidelines For Water Restoration and Mold Contractors April 2013
Liability Insurance Guidelines For Water Restoration and Mold Contractors April 2013 Disclaimer: The following is a draft of suggested language for incorporation into construction insurance specifications.
More information2014 IL App (5th) 120588-U NO. 5-12-0588 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 01/23/14. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2014 IL App (5th) 120588-U NO. 5-12-0588
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PARIENTE, J. No. SC05-1295 UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Petitioner, vs. J.S.U.B., INC., etc., et al., Respondents. [December 20, 2007] J.S.U.B., Inc. seeks review
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 13a0014p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FORREST CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationOCP Liability versus Additional Insured Coverage. Ancient History. OCP Liability Form. Protective Liability Coverage
OCP Liability versus Additional Insured Coverage October 2009 In my yellowed "Policy Kit," acquired sometime in the last century, buried along with policies with monikers such as "OL&T," "M&C," and "SMP,"
More informationCASE NO. SC05-168 L.T. CASE NO. 2D03-134 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA U.S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. FIRST HOMEBUILDERS OF FLORIDA,
CASE NO. SC05-168 L.T. CASE NO. 2D03-134 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA U.S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. Petitioner, FIRST HOMEBUILDERS OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY CONFLICT REVIEW OF A DECISION
More informationExcess Insurance: Questions Raised by Qualcomm and Issues Relating to the Duty to Defend
ACI s 2 nd National Forum on Insurance Allocation June 25-26, 2015 PLEASE SEND PRESENTATION TO m.richardson@americanconference.com Excess Insurance: Questions Raised by Qualcomm and Issues Relating to
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: February 26, 2015 518993 BROOME COUNTY, v Respondent- Appellant, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
More informationDissecting the Professional Services Exclusion in a Commercial General Liability Policy
Dissecting the Professional Services Exclusion in a Commercial General Liability Policy Lewis S. Wooton December 15, 2010 Most commercial general liability policies contain a professional services exclusion
More informationSubcontractor General Liability Insurance Concerns
Subcontractor General Liability Insurance Concerns By: John H. Podesta In this rapidly evolving market, many retail agents are experiencing problems in placing liability insurance for subcontractors. The
More informationPetitioner, CASE NO.: SC05-1295
MAB/eac/200100 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC05-1295 vs. 2 nd DCA Case No.: 2D-03-0134 Lee Co. Case No.: 01-5533CA J.S.U.B.,
More informationPREQUALIFICATION APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
PREQUALIFICATION APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To be eligible to bid and contract work with Webcor, subcontractors are required to be prequalified annually. If you have any questions, please contact Webcor
More informationCase 8:10-cv-00313-SCB-AEP Document 47 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID 370 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:10-cv-00313-SCB-AEP Document 47 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID 370 AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. Case No.:
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-3147 NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1452-4 N. MILWAUKEE AVENUE, LLC, GREAT CENTRAL INSURANCE
More informationInsuring Against Loss at the Construction Site
Insuring Against Loss at the Construction Site A. Introduction The typical construction project, if there is such a beast, presents insurable risks of two kinds. There is the risk of damage to property
More informationEXCESS OF LOSS COVERAGE FOR SELF-INSURERS: IS IT INSURANCE OR REINSURANCE (Revisited)? Robert M. Hall
EXCESS OF LOSS COVERAGE FOR SELF-INSURERS: IS IT INSURANCE OR REINSURANCE (Revisited)? By Robert M. Hall Mr. Hall is an attorney, a former law firm partner, a former insurance and reinsurance executive
More informationProgressive Damage Construction Defect Cases
Construction Law Allocation of Risk Among Multiple Insurers By R. Michael Ethridge and Katherine W. Sullivan Progressive Damage Construction Defect Cases The landscape surrounding these issues is constantly
More informationChapter 11: Advertisement Offenses. Joanna M. Roberto. Goldberg Segalla
Chapter 11: Advertisement Offenses Joanna M. Roberto Goldberg Segalla 100 Garden City Plaza Suite 225 Garden City, NY 11530 (516) 281-9820 jroberto@goldbergsegalla.com Joanna M. Roberto, a New York-based
More informationRevisiting The Duty to Defend After the Exhaustion of the Policy Limits
Revisiting The Duty to Defend After the Exhaustion of the Policy Limits Introduction The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are distinct duties with the duty to defend wider in scope than the duty
More informationCONTRACTORS APPLICATION
CONTACT: E-MAIL ADDRESS: FOR COMPANY USE ONLY CONTRACTORS PRODUCER TELEPHONE: FAX: SUB- PRODUCER TELEPHONE: FAX: NAME: NAME: ADDRESS: ADDRESS: CITY: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: STATE: ZIP CODE: PROPOSED EFFECTIVE
More informationISO COVERAGE FORM & ENDORSEMENT CHANGES DIGGING THROUGH THE DETAILS APRIL 9, 2013
ISO COVERAGE FORM & ENDORSEMENT CHANGES DIGGING THROUGH THE DETAILS APRIL 9, 2013 INTRODUCTIONS CHRISTINE J. WILLIAMS U.S. Casualty Client Management Leader +1 212 345 6636 christine.j.williams@marsh.com
More informationILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER XI INSURANCE COVERAGE AND DEFENSES
If you have questions or would like further information regarding Definitions in Insurance Policies, please contact: Jennifer Medenwald 312-540-7588 jmedenwald@querrey.com Result Oriented. Success Driven.
More informationRecent Developments and Issues in Insurance Coverage for Asbestos Claims
Recent Developments and Issues in Insurance Coverage for Asbestos Claims Presented by: Lawrence A. Hobel Linda Bondi Morrison Cutting-Edge Issues in Asbestos Litigation Conference March 17, 2014 Topics»
More informationCyber Insurance and Your Data Ted Claypoole, Partner, Womble Carlyle and Jack Freund, PhD, InfoSec Mgr, TIAA-CREF
Cyber Insurance and Your Data Ted Claypoole, Partner, Womble Carlyle and Jack Freund, PhD, InfoSec Mgr, TIAA-CREF October 9, 2013 1 Cyber Insurance Why? United States Department of Commerce: Cyber Insurance
More informationAn Overview of the Insurance Coverage Consequences of the Las Vegas Construction Defect Conspiracy
An Overview of the Insurance Coverage Consequences of the Las Vegas Construction Defect Conspiracy Andrew B. Downs 1 Bullivant Houser Bailey PC 601 California St., Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94108-2823
More informationNEW YORK CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE ADDENDUM
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE ADDENDUM DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) THIS ADDENDUM SUMMARIZES SOME OF THE POLICY PROVISIONS IN THE REFERENCED INSURANCE POLICIES AND IS
More informationOwner s Damages for Construction Defects:
Owner s Damages for Construction Defects: A Primer 18th Annual Construction Superconference December 12, 2003 San Francisco, California Kenneth I. Levin levink@pepperlaw.com 1 Owner s Damages Generally
More informationArtisan Contractors Application
Agency Name: Address: Contact Name: Phone: Fax: Email: Artisan Contractors Application All questions must be answered in full. Application must be signed and dated by the applicant. Applicant s Name Agent
More informationSchedule Q (Revised 1/5/15)
Schedule Q (Revised 1/5/15) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 0.0 Introduction of the Owner-Controlled Insurance Program The City of Oakland (City) has implemented an Owner-Controlled
More informationInsurance Services Office, Inc. to release new standard Commercial General Liability forms and endorsements
Authors: Attorney Gregory D. Podolak Attorney David G. Jordan Insurance Services Office, Inc. to release new standard Commercial General Liability forms and endorsements Coverage changes, restrictions
More informationAllocating Defense Costs Among Multiple Insurers and Between Covered and Uncovered Claims
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Allocating Defense Costs Among Multiple Insurers and Between Covered and Uncovered Claims Methods of Allocation Among Insurers and Allocation to
More informationMAY I HAVE THIS DANCE? TO WRAP OR NOT
MAY I HAVE THIS DANCE? TO WRAP OR NOT Grace V.B. Garcia, Esquire Morrison Mahoney LLP 250 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 P: 617.737.8822 F: 617.342.4914 ggarcia@morrisonmahoney.com Grace V.B. Garcia is
More informationFOLLOW THE SETTLEMENTS: BAD CLAIMS HANDLING EXCEPTION. Robert M. Hall
FOLLOW THE SETTLEMENTS: BAD CLAIMS HANDLING EXCEPTION By Robert M. Hall [Mr. Hall is a former law firm partner, a former insurance and reinsurance company executive and acts as an insurance consultant
More informationExclusions Gone Awry: Misinterpretations of the Contractual Liability and Faulty Workmanship Exclusions Pose a Threat to the Construction Industry
Recent Developments in Insurance Coverage Disputes Exclusions Gone Awry: Misinterpretations of the Contractual Liability and Faulty Workmanship Exclusions Pose a Threat to the Construction Industry Jeffrey
More informationFrom GCL to E&O, With a Bit of D&O:
From GCL to E&O, With a Bit of D&O: Getting the Most Out of Your Insurance Coverage David R. McDonald, Partner Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP 50 California Street, 34 th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 13-20512 Document: 00512673150 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED June 23, 2014 Lyle W.
More informationA S P A T O R E T H O U G H T L E A D E R S H I P. Insurance Law 2012 Top Lawyers on Trends and Key Strategies for the Upcoming Year
A S P A T O R E T H O U G H T L E A D E R S H I P Insurance Law 2012 Top Lawyers on Trends and Key Strategies for the Upcoming Year 2012 Thomson Reuters/Aspatore All rights reserved. Printed in the United
More informationLiability Insurance and Wrap-Up claims: A New Set of Challenges For Insurers. By: John H. Podesta
Liability Insurance and Wrap-Up claims: A New Set of Challenges For Insurers By: John H. Podesta Murchison & Cumming, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 550 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 524-4300 i TABLE OF
More informationACC Houston Chapter Meeting
ACC Houston Chapter Meeting Indemnities and Insurance: Managing Risks Via Contracts in the Post-Macondo World April 9, 2013 Panelists Lisa Brown Managing Counsel, Oxy Permian Former outside counsel. Received
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-341 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 3:12-cv-00341 Document 30 Filed in TXSD on 03/31/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION PAC-VAN, INC., Plaintiff, VS. CHS, INC. D/B/A CHS COOPERATIVES,
More informationEmployers Liability and Insurance Coverage in the Construction Industry
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 1 (18.1.29) Insurance Law By: Gregory G. Vacala and Allison H. McJunkin Rusin
More informationJUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division II Opinion by JUDGE TERRY Casebolt and Furman, JJ., concur. Announced June 10, 2010
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 09CA0830 Arapahoe County District Court No. 08CV1981 Honorable Michael Spear, Judge Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
More informationHow the Limits Apply in the CGL
How the Limits Apply in the CGL July 2004 All insurance professionals need to understand how the limits of liability apply in the commercial general liability policy. Whether providing advice to a policyholder
More informationGordon L. Mountjoy & Associates, Inc.
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST Submit an Acord 25 form and the endorsements as required below. Your insurance must be in compliance immediately after you sign your subcontract and before you start work.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-4634 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, VS. Plaintiff, WILLBROS CONSTRUCTION (U.S.) LLC, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-4634 MEMORANDUM
More informationCasualty Insurance. Long-Term Professional Liability Cases: Who Is Responsible For Nursing Home Claims? By Walter J. Andrews and Syed S.
March, 2005 No. 5 Casualty Insurance In This Issue Walter Andrews is a partner in the McLean, VA office of Hunton & Williams. His practice focuses on complex insurance coverage litigation and counseling.
More informationFully Integrated Insurance Solutions
Fully Integrated Insurance Solutions Agenda Identify gaps within the General Liability form Determine what is E&O and why it is needed Explain Chubb s E&O solution Obtain a quote from Chubb General Liability
More informationThe Uninsured Risks Of Development
The Uninsured Risks Of Development Raymond S. Iwamoto Don t assume that just because the architect and contractor have insurance that they will have coverage. Raymond S. Iwamoto, a member of the firm of
More informationINSURANCE LAW UPDATE. Revisiting the "Number of Occurrences" Issue
INSURANCE LAW UPDATE Revisiting the "Number of Occurrences" Issue An Examination of Case Law on "Number of Occurrences" in Light of the New York Federal Court's Recent Ruling that the Terrorist Attack
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 6:13-cv-01088-GAP-TBS Document 81 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID 4945 ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
More information