STIPULATION FOR ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MONETARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT RYAN FOLAND
|
|
|
- Helena Stevens
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MICHELLE L. SCHAEFER 2 JOHN ANDREW SINGER j [email protected] BENJAMIN J. THEISMAN [email protected] MIRIAM R. LEDERER [email protected] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 00 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC (Schaefer) (Singer) (Theisman) (Lederer) (Fax) STACY PROCTER (local counsel) 1 CA Bar No., [email protected] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 1 I 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 1 Los Angeles, CA (Fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff FTC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. 2 DEBTPRO LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. SACV 1-00 AG (ANx) STIPULATION FOR ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MONETARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT RYAN FOLAND
2 Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("Commission" or "FTC''), filed its 2 Complaint for Permanent Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief ("Complaint") in this matter, pursuant to Sections 1(b) and 1 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 1 U.S.C. (b) and b, the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act ("Telemarketing Act"), 1 U.S.C. 1-, and Section (b) ofthe Credit Repair Organizations Act ("CROA"), 1 U.S.C. 1h(b). The Commission, through counsel, and Defendant Ryan Foland, representing himself, stipulate to the entry of the attached Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment Against Defendant Ryan Foland ("Order") to resolve all matters in dispute in this action between them with the terms set forth below FINDINGS This Court has jurisdiction over this matter. The Complaint charges that Defendant participated in deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section ofthe FTC Act, 1 U.S.C. ; abusive or deceptive telemarketing acts or practices in violation of Sections.(a)(2)(iii), 1 0.(a)(2)(x), and 1 0.(a)() of the Telemarketing Sales Rule ("TSR"), 1 C.F.R..(a)(2)(iii), 1 0.(a)(2)(x), 1 0.(a)(); and acts or practices in violation of Sections 0(a)(), 0(b), and 0 ofcroa, 1 U.S.C. 1b(a)(), 1b(b), 1c, in connection with the marketing and sale of a product or service purporting to resolve consumers' debts and improve consumers' credit.. Defendant Ryan Foland neither admits nor denies any of the allegations in 2 the Complaint, except as specifically stated in this Order. Only for purposes of this 2 action, Defendant Ryan Foland admits the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction. 2. Defendant Ryan Foland waives any claim that he may have under the Equal 2 Access to Justice Act, 2 U.S.C. 2, concerning the prosecution of this action 2 through the date of this Order, and agrees to bear his own costs and attorney fees. 2 2
3 . The parties waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge or contest the 2 validity of this Order. DEFINITIONS ll For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions apply: 1. "Competent and reliable evidence" means tests, analyses, research, studies, or other evidence based on the expertise of professionals in the relevant area, that has been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results. 2. "Defendant" means Ryan Foland, a!k/a R. Eugene Foland.. "Financial product or service" means any product, service, plan, or program represented, expressly or by implication, to: A. provide any consumer, arrange for any consumer to receive, or assist any consumer in receiving, a loan or other extension of credit; B. provide any consumer, arrange for any consumer to receive, or assist any consumer in receiving, credit, debit, or stored value cards; C. improve, repair, or arrange to improve or repair, any consumer's credit record, credit history, or credit rating; or D. provide advice or assistance to improve any consumer's credit record, credit history, or credit rating.. "Goods or Services" includes any product, service, plan, or program.. "Person" means a natural person, organization, or other legal entity, 2 2. including a corporation, partnership, proprietorship, association, cooperative, or any other group or combination acting as an entity. "Secured or unsecured debt relief product or service" means: A. With respect to any mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation between a person and one or more secured or unsecured creditors or debt 2
4 collectors, any product, service, plan, or program represented, expressly or by implication, to: 1. stop, prevent, or postpone any mortgage or deed of foreclosure sale for a person's dwelling, any other sale of collateral, any repossession of a person's dwelling or other collateral, or otherwise save a person's dwelling or other co1latera1 from foreclosure or repossession; 2. negotiate, obtain, or arrange a modification, or renegotiate, settle, or in any way alter any terms of the mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation, including a reduction in the amount of interest, principal balance, monthly payments, or fees owed by a person to a secured or unsecured creditor or debt collector;. obtain any forbearance or modification in the timing of payments from any secured or unsecured holder or servicer of any mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation;. negotiate, obtain, or arrange any extension of the period oftime within which a person may (i) cure his or her default on the mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation, (ii) reinstate his or her mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation, (iii) redeem a dwelling or other collateral, or (iv) exercise any right to reinstate the mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation or redeem a dwelling or other collateral;. obtain any waiver of an acceleration clause or balloon payment contained in any promissory note or contract secured by any dwelling or other collateral; or 2 2 2
5 . negotiate, obtain, or arrange (i) a short sale of a dwelling or 2 other collateral, (ii) a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or (iii) any other disposition of a mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation other than a sale to a third party that is not the secured or unsecured loan holder. The foregoing shall include any manner of claimed assistance, including auditing or examining a person's application for the mortgage, loan, debt, or obligation. B. With respect to any loan, debt, or obligation between a person and one or more unsecured creditors or debt collectors, any product, service, plan, or program represented, expressly or by implication, to: repay one or more unsecured loans, debts, or obligations; or combine unsecured loans, debts, or obligations into one or more new loans, debts, or obligations. 1. "Telemarketing" means any plan, program, or campaign that is conducted 1 to induce the purchase of goods or services, or a charitable contribution, by 1 use of one or more telephones, and which involves a telephone call, whether or not covered by the TSR, 1 C.F.R. Part. ORDER 1 I. BAN ON DEBT RELIEF PRODUCTS OR SERVICES IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland, whether acting directly or indirectly, is permanently restrained and enjoined from: A. advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling 2 any secured or unsecured debt relief product or service; and 2 B. assisting others engaged in advertising, marketing, promoting, 2 offering for sale, or selling any secured or unsecured debt relief product or service
6 II. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland, Defendant's IO II I2 I I I I 1 I agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, selling, or assisting others in the advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling of any product, service, plan, or program, are permanently restrained and enjoined from making any representation, expressly or by implication, about the benefits, performance, or efficacy of such product, service, plan, or program, unless at the time such representation is made, Defendant possesses and relies upon competent and reliable evidence that, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable evidence, is sufficient to substantiate that the representation is true. ID. PROHIBITION AGAINST TELEMARKETING PRACTICES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland, Defendant's agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation with any of them who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with the telemarketing of any goods or services, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from: A. Initiating or assisting others in initiating any outbound telephone call, or receiving or assisting others in receiving any inbound telephone call, without maintaining records reflecting: 1. the date each consumer is charged; 2. where each consumer's funds are being held;. the goods or services for which each consumer is paying, including but not limited to details that are specific for each consumer;. the representations made to each consumer, including but not limited to any scripts or other statements made to the consumer 2
7 v. regarding any material restrictions, limitations, or conditions; or any material aspect of the performance, efficacy, nature, or central characteristics of the goods or services. B. Initiating or assisting others in initiating any outbound telephone call, or receiving or assisting others in receiving any inbound telephone call, in which they, or the persons they are assisting, fail to disclose truthfully, promptly, and in a clear and conspicuous manner to the consumer receiving or making the call: 1. the identity of the seller, including the entity or entities for whom the seller is trying to sell goods or services; 2. that the purpose of the call is to sell goods or services; and. the nature of the goods or services. PROHIBITIO N AGAINST MISREPRESENTATIONS RELATING TO ANY FINANCIAL P RO DUC T OR SERVICE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland, Defendant' s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling of any fmancial product or service, are permanently restrained and enjoined from misrepresenting or assisting others in misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, any material fact, including: A. the terms or rates that are available for any loan or other extension of credit, including: 1. closing costs or other fees; 2. the payment schedule, monthly payment amount(s), any balloon payment, or other payment terms;. the interest rate(s), annual percentage rate(s), or finance charge(s),
8 B. C. D. E. F. G. and whether they are fixed or adjustable;. the loan amount, credit amount, draw amount, or outstanding balance; the loan term, draw period, or maturity; or any other term of credit;. the amount of cash to be disbursed to the borrower out of the proceeds, or the amount of cash to be disbursed on behalf of the borrower to any third parties;. whether any specified minimum payment amount covers both interest and principal, and whether the credit has or can result in negative amortization; or. that the credit does not have a prepayment penalty or whether subsequent refinancing may trigger a prepayment penalty and/or other fees; the savings associated with the loan or other extension of credit; that a consumer will receive legal representation; that any person can improve any person's credit record, credit history, or credit rating by permanently removing negative information from the person's credit record, credit history, or credit rating, even where such information is accurate and not obsolete; the timing under which a consumer can be charged money or other valuable consideration for the performance of credit repair services; the written information and disclosures to which a consumer is entitled in advance of the execution of any contract or agreement for credit repair services, including misrepresentation by failing to provide to the consumer any required written disclosures; or the ability to improve or otherwise affect a consumer's credit record, credit history, credit rating, or ability to obtain credit, including that a consumer's credit record, credit history, credit rating, or ability to
9 v. obtain credit can be improved by permanently removing current, accurate negative information from the consumer's credit record or history. PROIDBITION AGAINST MISREPRESENTATIONS RELATING TO ANY PRODUCT OR SERVICE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland, Defendant's agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly in connection with advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling any product, service, plan, or program are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from misrepresenting or assisting others in misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, any material fact, including: A. any material aspect of the nature or terms of any refund, cancellation, exchange, or repurchase policy, including the likelihood of a consumer obtaining a full or partial refund, or the circumstances in which a full or partial refund will be granted to the consumer; B. that any person is affiliated with, endorsed or approved by, or otherwise connected to any other person; government entity; public, non-profit, or other non-commercial program; or any other program; c. D. E. the nature, expertise, position, or job title of any person who provides any product, service, plan, or program; that any person providing a testimonial has purchased, received, or used the product, service, plan, or program; that the experience represented in a testimonial of the product, service, plan, or program represents the person's actual experience resulting from the use of the product, service, plan, or program under the circumstances depicted in the advertisement;
10 F. the total costs to purchase, receive, or use, or the quality of, the product, service, plan, or program; G. any material restriction, limitation, or condition on purchasing, receiving, or using the product, service, plan, or program; H. the total time period it will take to complete or receive the product, service, plan, or program; or I. any other material fact concerning any aspect of the performance, efficacy, nature, or characteristics of the product, service, plan, or program. VI. PROIDBITION AGAINST MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL FACT THROUGH OTHERS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland, Defendant's agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly in connection with advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling of any product, service, plan, or program, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from providing to others the means and instrumentalities with which to make, directly or indirectly, expressly or by implication, any false, unsubstantiated, or otherwise misleading representation of material fact. VII. MONETARY JUDGMENT AND PARTIAL SUSPENSION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: A. Judgment in the amount of seven million, nine hundred and fifty one thousand, two hundred and eleven dollars ($, 1,1.00) is entered in favor of the Commission against Defendant Ryan Foland as equitable monetary relief. This judgment shall be reduced by funds turned over to the Commission by the Defendant as set forth below.
11 IO II I2 I I 1 I I All taxes and fees assessed against the Defendant resulting from the sale or transfer of assets shall not reduce the amount of judgment. Upon transfer of the assets set forth in Subsections VI (B), (C), and (D), the remainder of the judgment is suspended, subject to the Subsections below. B. Within seven () days after entry of this Order, Prudential shall transfer to the Commission by wire transfer in accordance with instructions previously provided by a representative of the Commission, the cash surrender value of the Independent Retirement Account ("IRA") ending in and held in the name of, or for the benefit of, Defendant Ryan Foland. C. Defendant Ryan Foland assigns all of his rights, title and interest in any future payments, after payment of attorneys fees, identified in Item 1 ("Pending Insurance Payments or Inheritances") of the Financial Statement of Individual Defendant signed by Ryan Foland on May, 1 and related to property damage and personal injury arising from a February, 1~ car accident, to the Commission. D. At the conclusion of Paul Raymond's representation ofdefendant Ryan Foland, Paul Raymond is ordered to, by wire transfer in accordance with instructions previously provided by a representative of the Commission, transfer to the Commission any unused portion of the $,2.00 legal retainer described in Item ("Trusts and Escrows") of the Financial Statement of Individual Defendant signed by Ryan Foland on May, 0 and held in trust by Paul Raymond, Attorney at Law in the name of, or for the benefit of, Defendant Ryan Foland. E. Defendant Ryan Foland shall take all steps necessary to assist in the transfer, liquidation and assignment of the assets identified in II
12 Subsections VI (B), (C), and (D). In the event it is necessary to execute additional documents to transfer, liquidate, or assign assets of Defendant Ryan Foland or any other assets that are to be surrendered under this Order, Defendant Ryan Foland shall execute such documents within three business days of a request from the FTC. F. The Commission's agreement to the suspension of the judgment is expressly premised upon the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of Defendant's sworn financial statements and related documents (collectively, "financial representations") submitted to the Commission, namely: The Financial Statement of Defendant Ryan Foland signed on May,1, inc1uding the attachments. G. The suspension of the judgment wil1 be lifted as to Defendant if, upon motion by the Commission, the Court finds that Defendant failed to disclose any material asset, materially misstated the value of any asset, or made any other material misstatement or omission in the financial representations identified above. H. If the suspension of the judgment is lifted, the judgment becomes immediately due as to Defendant in the amount specified in Subsection A above (which the parties stipulate only for purposes of this Section represents Defendant's portion of the consumer injury and unjust enrichment alleged in the Complaint), less any payment previously made pursuant to this Section or by any other Defendant in this action in satisfaction of a monetary judgment, plus interest computed from the date of entry of this Order. VIII. ADDITIONAL MONETARY PROVISIONS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 2 2 2
13 A. Defendant relinquishes dominion and all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in all assets transferred pursuant to this Order and may not seek the return of any assets. B. The facts alleged in the Complaint will be taken as true, without further proof, in any subsequent civil litigation by or on behalf of the Commission, including in a proceeding to enforce its rights to any payment or monetary judgment pursuant to this Order, such as a nondischargeability complaint in any bankruptcy case. C. The facts alleged in the Complaint establish all elements necessary to sustain an action by the Commission pursuant to Section 2(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, U.S.C. 2(a)(2)(A), and this Order will have collateral estoppel effect for such purposes. D. Defendant acknowledges that his Taxpayer Identification Numbers (Social Security Numbers or Employer Identification Numbers), which Defendant previously submitted to the Commission, may be used for collecting and reporting on any delinquent amount arising out of this Order, in accordance with 1 U.S.C. 01. E. All money paid to the Commission pursuant to this Order may be deposited into a fund administered by the Commission or its designee to be used for equitable relief, including consumer redress and any attendant expenses for the administration of any redress fund. If a representative of the Commission decides that direct redress to consumers is wholly or partially impracticable or money remains after redress is completed, the Commission may apply any remaining money for such other equitable relief (including consumer information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to Defendant's practices alleged in the Complaint. Any money not used for such equitable relief is to be deposited to the U.S. Treasury as 1
14 IO II 1 1 I I I disgorgement. Defendant has no right to challenge any actions the Commission or its representatives may take pursuant to this Subsection. IX. CUSTOMER INFORMATION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland, Defendant's agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, are permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly: A. Failing to provide sufficient customer infom1ation to enable the Commission to efficiently administer consumer redress. Defendant represents that he has provided this redress infomation to the Commission. If a representative of the Commission requests in writing any information related to redress, Defendant must provide it, in the form prescribed by the Commission, within 1 days. B. Disclosing, using, or benefitting from customer infomation, including the name, address, telephone number, address, social security number, other identifying information, or any data that enables access to a customer's account (including a credit card, bank account, or other financial account), that Defendant obtained prior to entry of this Order in connection with the marketing or sale of any secured or unsecured debt relief product or service and any financial product or service; and C. Failing to destroy such customer information in all forms in his possession, custody, or control within 0 days of entry of the final order disposing of all claims and parties in this matter. Disposal shall be by means that protect against unauthorized access to the customer information, such as by burning, pulverizing, or shredding any papers, 1
15 and by erasing or destroying any electronic media, to ensure that the 2 customer information cannot practicably be read or reconstructed. Provided, however, that customer information need not be disposed of, and may be disclosed, to the extent requested by a government agency or required by law, regulation, or court order. X. COOPERATION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland must fully cooperate with representatives of the Commission in this case and in any investigation related to or associated with the transactions or the occurrences that are the subject of the Complaint. Defendant must provide truthful and complete information, evidence, and testimony. Defendant must appear for interviews, discovery, hearings, trials, and any other proceedings that a Commission representative may reasonably request upon five () days written notice, or other 1 reasonable notice, at such places and times as a Commission representative may 1 designate, without the service of a subpoena. This Section does not preclude 1 1 Individual Defendant from invoking any valid Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. 1 XI. ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland obtain acknowledgments of receipt of this Order: A. Defendant, within seven () days of entry of this Order, must submit to the Commission an acknowledgment of receipt of this Order sworn under penalty of perjury B. For five () years after entry of this Order, Defendant, for any business that Defendant, individually or collectively with any other Defendant, is the majority owner or controls directly or indirectly must deliver a copy of this Order to: (1) all principals, officers, 2 1
16 directors, and LLC managers and members; (2) all employees, agents, and representatives who participate in conduct related to the subject matter of the Order; and () any business entity resulting from any change in structure as set forth in the Section titled Compliance Reporting. Delivery must occur within seven () days of entry of this Order for current personnel. For all others, delivery must occur before they assume their responsibilities. C. From each individual or entity to which Defendant delivered a copy of this Order, Defendant must obtain, within 0 days, a signed and dated acknowledgment of receipt of this Order. XII. COMPLIANCE REPORTING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland makes timely submissions to the Commission: A. One year after entry of this Order, Defendant must submit a compliance report, sworn under penalty of perjury: 1. Defendant must: (a) identify the primary physical, postal, and address and telephone number, as designated points of contact, which representatives of the Commission may use to communicate with Defendant; (b) identify all ofdefendant's businesses by all of their names, telephone numbers, and physical, postal, , and Internet addresses; (c) describe the activities of each business, including the goods and services offered, the means of advertising, marketing, and sales, and the involvement of any other Defendant (which Defendant Ryan Foland must describe if he knows or should know due to his own involvement); (d) describe in detail whether and how Defendant is in compliance with each Section of this Order; and (e) provide a copy of each Order Acknowledgment obtained pursuant to this Order, unless 1
17 II I B. c. previously submitted to the Commission. 2. Additionally, Defendant must: (a) identify all telephone numbers and all physical, postal, and Internet addresses, including all residences; (b) identify all business activities, including any business for which Defendant performs services whether as an employee or otherwise and any entity in which Defendant has any ownership interest; and (c) describe in detail Defendant's involvement in each such business, including title, role, responsibilities, participation, authority, control, and any ownership. For ten () years after entry of this Order, Defendant must submit a compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within fourteen ( 1) days of any change in the following: 1. Defendant must report any change in: (a) any designated point of contact; or (b) the structure of any corporate defendant or any entity that Defendant has any ownership interest in or controls directly or indirectly that may affect compliance obligations arising under this Order, including: creation, merger, sale, or dissolution of the entity or any subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or practices subject to this Order. 2. Additionally, Defendant must report any change in: (a) name, including aliases or fictitious name, or residence address; or (b) title or role in any business activity, including any business for which Defendant perforn1s services whether as an employee or otherwise and any entity in which Defendant has any ownership interest, and identify the name, physical address, and any Internet address of the business or entity. Defendant must submit to the Commission notice of the filing of any I
18 bankruptcy petition, insolvency proceeding, or similar proceeding by or against Defendant within fourteen ( 1) days of its filing. D. Any submission to the Commission required by this Order to be sworn under penalty of perjury must be true and accurate and comply with 2 U.S.C. 1, such as by concluding: "I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: " and supplying the date, signatory' s full name, title (if applicable), and signature. E. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all submissions to the Commission pursuant to this Order must be ed to [email protected] or sent by overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to: Associate Director for Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 00 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 0. The subject line must begin: FTC v. DebtPro LLC, et a!., Matter Number X 02. XIII. RECORDKEEPING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ryan Foland must create certain records for ten () years after entry of the Order, and retain each such record for five () years. Specifically, for any business that Defendant, individually or collectively with any other Defendants, is a majority owner or controls directly or indirectly, he must create and retain the following records: A. accounting records showing the revenues from all goods or services sold; B. personnel records showing, for each person providing services, whether as an employee or otherwise, that person's: name, addresses, telephone numbers, job title or position, dates of service, and (if applicable) the reason for termination;
19 I C. records of all consumer complaints and refund requests, whether received directly or indirectly, such as through a third party, and any response; D. all records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each provision of this Order, including all submissions to the Commission; and E. a copy of each unique advertisement or marketing material, including but not limited to any sales scripts, direct mail solicitations, informational packets, or the design, text, or use of images of any Internet website, , or other electronic communication. XIV. COMPLIANCE MONITORING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the purpose of monitoring Defendant Ryan Foland's compliance with this Order, including the financial representations upon which the judgment was suspended: A. Within fourteen (1) days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the Commission, Defendant must: submit additional compliance reports or other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury; appear for depositions; and produce documents for inspection and copying. The Commission is also authorized to obtain discovery, without further leave of court, using any of the procedures prescribed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2, 0 (including telephonic depositions), 1,,,,, and. B. For matters concerning this Order, the Commission is authorized to communicate directly with Defendant. Defendant must permit representatives of the Commission to interview any employee or other person affiliated with Defendant, who has agreed to such an interview. The person interviewed may have counsel present
20 II I2 1 I C. The Commission may use all other lawful means, including posing, through its representatives as consumers, suppliers, or other individuals or entities, to Defendant or any individual or entity affiliated with Defendant, without the necessity of identification or prior notice. Nothing in this Order limits the Commission's lawful use of compulsory process, pursuant to Sections and of the FTC Act, 1 U.S.C., b-l. D. Upon written request from a representative of the Commission, any consumer reporting agency must furnish consumer reports concerning Defendant, pursuant to Section 0( 1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 1 U.S.C. b(a)(l). XV. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order. I 1 I I
21 SO STIPULATED: FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION JJ~ &--- MICHELLE L. SCHAEFER JOHN ANDREW SINGER BENJAMIN J. THEISMAN MIRIAM R. LEDERER FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 00 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 0 Tel: (Schaefer); (Singer) (Theisman); (Lederer) [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected]; [email protected] STACY PROCTER (Local Counsel) CA Bar No., [email protected] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 002 Tel: ; Fax: -2-0 Counsel for Federal Trade Commission Date: \ -z. q\ \ S '
22 1 2 to II
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES
Case 1:15-cv-01872-WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.
Case 1:15-cv-01872-WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. PROFESSIONAL CAREER DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-cjc-jpr Document 00 Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #:0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. DENNY LAKE, et al. Defendants. Case
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Case No.
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES OF COLORADO, FLORIDA, INDIANA, KANSAS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, NORTH CAROLINA, OHIO, TENNESSEE,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:08-cv-02062-JDW-AEP Document 139 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 14 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:08-cv-2062-T-27MAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW ORDER
Case 8:13-cv-01647-SDM-TGW Document 10 Filed 07/17/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No. -----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General of the State ofnew Jersey, and STEVE C. LEE, Acting Director of the New Jersey
Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 2-1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.
Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 2-1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts
United States District Court Southern District of Florida. Case No. -Civ- -
United States District Court Southern District of Florida Case No. -Civ- - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, v. Plaintiff, American Debt Settlement Solutions, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Michael
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 6:12-cv-01618-ACC-KRS Document 241 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID 4291 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION v. Case No:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 1 of 21
Case :-cv-00-cjc-jpr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, SAMEER LAKHANY, et al. Defendants. Case
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel CAROLE A. PAYNTER (CP 4091) Federal Trade Commission 150 William Street, 13th floor New York, New York 10038 (212) 264-1225 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Case 3:16-cv-03474 Document 2-1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document - Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION United States of America, Plaintiff, v. InMobi Pte Ltd., a private limited company,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING ) CONSENT ORDER EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, ) a limited liability company. ) FILE NO. 102 3252 ) The Federal
In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division
Case 1:14-cv-02211-AT Document 61-1 Filed 12/28/15 Page 1 of 20 In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
2014-CFPB-0006 Document 1 Filed 02/12/2015 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2015-CFPB-0006 In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER Flagship
individually and as an officer of Safety Cell, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
WILLIAM E. KOVACIC General Counsel BARBARA ANTHONY Regional Director Northeast Region RONALD L. WALDMAN (RW 2003) DARA J. DIOMANDE (DD 4304) DONALD G. D AMATO (DG 3008) Federal Trade Commission 1 Bowling
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU CONSENT ORDER
2015-CFPB-0004 Document 1 Filed 02/10/2015 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2015-CFPB-0004 In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER NEWDAY
2016-CFPB-0006 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
2016-CFPB-0006 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2016-CFPB- In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER FALONI
Case 5:09-cv-04104-JAR Document 391 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:09-cv-04104-JAR Document 391 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and the STATES OF ILLINOIS, KANSAS, MINNESOTA, and NORTH CAROLINA,
Case 0:12-cv-61872-RNS Document 232 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2013 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-61872-RNS Document 232 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2013 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-CV-61872-SCOLA/SNOW FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v.
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 110 Filed 03/22/2006 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 110 Filed 03/22/2006 Page 1 of 19 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 04-377-JD SEISMIC ENTERTAINMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:12-cv-02248-FJM Document 137 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Ambrosia Web Design LLC, an Arizona limited
Case 2:13-cv-01887-ES-JAD Document 282-1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:13-cv-01887-ES-JAD Document 282-1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Wyndham Worldwide
Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20580, Plaintiff, v. Case
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission
Case :-cv-0-gms Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Federal Trade Commission v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, American Business Builders, LLC, et al., FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Defendants.
Case 2:13-cv-00143-JAD-GWF Document 193 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 19
Case :-cv-00-jad-gwf Document Filed 0/0/ Page of R. MICHAEL WALLER MEGAN A. BARTLEY Attorneys Federal Trade Commission 00 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Mailstop M-B Washington, D.C. 00 Phone: (0) -0 (Waller)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:15-cv-02064-SRN-JSM Document 5 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and ) CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION ) BUREAU, ) 15-cv-02064
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has reviewed the business practices
2015-CFPB-0033 Document 1 Filed 12/17/2015 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2015-CFPB32 In the Matter of CONSENT ORDER Eric
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C. 1679 et. seq.
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C. 1679 et. seq. Please note that the information contained herein should not be construed as legal advice and is intended for informational purposes only. In addition,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Case No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. v. Plaintiff, INTEGRATED CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC.; FLAGSHIP CAPITAL SERVICES CORP.; LIGHTHOUSE CREDIT
General David N. Kirkman of the North Carolina Department of Justice. Defendants were
NORTH CAROLINA ::\'... :~\ i L....._... ~ \ IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE WAKE COUNTY nll:.,~..., ~n ".-. \''' I)\ J i.1 I, :; u 1 ',u 1 '-I t SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION File No. 13 CVS 014147 STATE OF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( Bureau ), through its examiners and other
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU In the Matter of Dealers Financial Services, LLC, Lexington, Kentucky ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2013-CFPB-0004 CONSENT ORDER The Consumer
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff VS. LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION
- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,
- "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,
Chapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act
Chapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act 13-21-1 Short title. This chapter is known as the "Credit Services Organizations Act." Enacted by Chapter 29, 1985 General Session 13-21-2 Definitions -- Exemptions.
JS-6. Attorneys for Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-ddp-jpr Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 ANTHONY ALEXIS, DC Bar # Email: [email protected] Phone: () - LUCY E. MORRIS, WA Bar #0 Email: [email protected] Phone: () - CARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 ANTHONY ALEXIS, DC Bar # Email: [email protected] Phone: (0) - JEFFREY PAUL EHRLICH, FL Bar # Email: [email protected] Phone: (0) - JOHN C.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"), for its Complaint alleges:
... ~- - -... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintitl: COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF Mikael Marczak, a/k/a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,
Credit Repair Organizations Act
Credit Repair Organizations Act Title IV of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (Public Law 90-321, 82 Stat. 164) is amended to read as follows: TITLE IV--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS'' Sec. 401. Short title.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION In the Matter of MACHINIMA, INC., a corporation File No. 1423090 AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER The Federal Trade Commission has conducted
Case 1:14-cv-00652 Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00652 Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION * FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, * * Civil Case No. Plaintiff, * * v.
CHAPTER 2--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS SEC. 2451. REGULATION OF CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS.
CODES COMPLAINTS EMPLOYEE CERTIFICATION FEDERAL LAWS NACSO GUIDELINES LOG OUT CHAPTER 2--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS SEC. 2451. REGULATION OF CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS. Title IV of the Consumer Credit
CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE
Title IV of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (Public Law 90-321, 82 Stat. 164) is amended to read as follows:
The Credit Repair Organizations Act CHAPTER 2--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS(1) SEC. 2451. REGULATION OF CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS. Title IV of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (Public Law 90-321, 82
Case 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM Document 285 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM Document 285 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY
Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana.
Regular Session, 0 HOUSE BILL NO. BY REPRESENTATIVE PONTI Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section (A)()(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana. FINANCIAL PLANNING: Provides relative to debt relief services
Case 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, Case
Case 5:14-cv-00014-BO Document 1-1 Filed 01/08/14 Page 1 of 20
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. : FOUR OAKS FINCORP, INC., and : FOUR OAKS BANK AND TRUST
JAIME M. HAWLEY, NAN X. ESTRELLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i~, I:, ~lsn~ict FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORID CQU?
r J UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i~, I:, ~lsn~ict FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORID CQU?T. r'f,'$ble D1STH1CT FLOfUOA ORLANDO DIVISION GHUJ;;}O. FL FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, JPMACCELERATED
AN ACT RELATING TO PROPERTY; ENACTING THE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CONSULTANT FRAUD PREVENTION ACT; IMPOSING PENALTIES.
AN ACT RELATING TO PROPERTY; ENACTING THE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CONSULTANT FRAUD PREVENTION ACT; IMPOSING PENALTIES. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO: Section 1. SHORT TITLE.--This
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS In re: MICHELE GRAHAM, Case No.: 02-43262 (Chapter 7 Debtor. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Adversary Proceeding
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF COURT ORDER ENTERED IN FTC v. IRA SMOLEV, ET AL. FOR DEFENDANT BRUCE TURIANSKY ON DEFINITIONS
APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF COURT ORDER ENTERED IN FTC v. IRA SMOLEV, ET AL. FOR DEFENDANT BRUCE TURIANSKY ON DEFINITIONS 1. Assisting others means knowingly providing any of the following services to any person
Plaintiff, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB or Bureau ),
The Gordon Law Firm, P.C., a professional corporation; Abraham Michael Pessar, an individual; Division One Investment and Loan, Inc., a corporation, and also d/b/a Division One Business Solutions, D1 Companies,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, SUN BRIGHT VENTURES LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, CITADEL ID PRO LLC, a Florida
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) i'" 17-1 1 - - -a* 1, T Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) 3R BANCORP; ) ) 3R E-SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Determining Whether Debt Relief Service Complies with FTC Rule (Telemarketing Sales Rule 16 C.F.R. Part 310) INTERNAL BBB IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE
Determining Whether Debt Relief Service Complies with FTC Rule (Telemarketing Sales Rule 16 C.F.R. Part 310) INTERNAL BBB IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE The FTC amended its Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R. Part
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) FILE NO. 022 3053 ) THE LASER VISION INSTITUTE, LLC, ) a corporation, et al. ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING ) CONSENT ORDER ) The Federal
COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT. Table of Contents COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT... 1
COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT Table of Contents COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT... 1 12-14.5-101. Short title.... 1 12-14.5-102. Legislative declaration.... 1 12-14.5-103. Definitions...
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
2016-CFPB-0008 Document 1 Filed 03/30/2016 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2016-CFPB-0008 In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER STUDENT
Case 2:13-cv-00279-TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
0 JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel ROBERT J. SCHROEDER Regional Director NADINE SAMTER, WA Bar # JENNIFER LARABEE, CA Bar # nd Ave., Suite Seattle, WA ( 0- (Samter; ( 0-0 (Larabee Email: [email protected];
The Mortgage Brokerages and Mortgage Administrators Act
MORTGAGE BROKERAGES AND 1 The Mortgage Brokerages and Mortgage Administrators Act being Chapter M-20.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007 (effective October 1, 2010), as amended by the Statutes of
) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 132 3088 COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny In the Matter of PaymentsMD,
Case 2:15-cv-09340 Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION
Case 2:15-cv-09340 Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Sprint Corporation, a
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:11-cv-80155-JIC
Case 9:11-cv-80155-JIC Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2011 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:11-cv-80155-JIC FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
CREDIT REPAIR SERVICES (California Civil Code 1789.10 et seq.; 15 U.S.C.A. 1679 et seq.)
Legal Affairs 1625 North Market Blvd., Suite S 309, Sacramento, CA 95834 www.dca.ca.gov Legal Guide CR-9 CREDIT REPAIR SERVICES (California Civil Code 1789.10 et seq.; 15 U.S.C.A. 1679 et seq.) January
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 4:10-cv-00706 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/04/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 122 3095 COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny In the Matter of GMR TRANSCRIPTION
Case 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: JOHN WAYNE ATCHLEY and CASE NO. 05-79232-MHM ROBIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 5:15-cv-01005 Document 1 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Civil Action No. Plaintiff, v. Affinion Group Holdings,
Case 3:14-cv-01046-RNC Document 17 Filed 08/12/14 Page 1 of 18. UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO}Jo.RT,. DISTRICT OF CONNECTICuT. 1.
Case 3:14-cv-01046-RNC Document 17 Filed 08/12/14 Page 1 of 18 FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO}Jo.RT,. DISTRICT OF CONNECTICuT. 1.JG I 2 p LJ: 2 1 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and STATE OF CONNECTICUT, L/3
New Federal Regulation of Tax Resolution, Tax Negotiation and Tax Settlement Services: FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule
New Federal Regulation of Tax Resolution, Tax Negotiation and Tax Settlement Services: FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule October 5, 2010, 3:00 4:00 pm ET Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. Venable LLP, Washington, D.C.
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY STATE OF IOWA ex rel. ) THOMAS J. MILLER, ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA, ) Equity No. 99AG25112, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC.) PETITION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ENTREPRENEURIAL STRATEGIES, LTD.; and Civil No. 2:06-CV-15 (WCO) DALE ALLISON,
