Fuel economy labels: Focus on non-eu countries

Transcription

1 Fuel economy labels: Focus on non-eu countries Peter Mock IEA Paris April 30, 2013

2 United Kingdom

3 United States Vehicle technology & fuel Fuel economy Comparison with other vehicles Comparison with other vehicles Fuel consumption Estimate annual fuel cost CO 2 emission info Details in fine print Fuel economy + GHG rating Smog rating QR code fueleconomy.gov No color

4 United States (Plug-in hybrids) No color No graphical comparison with other vehicles

5 United States (Electric vehicles)

6 Chile First country in Latin America to introduce mandatory label New Energy label since Feb 2013 Provides information on: CO 2 emissions in (g/km) fuel consumption in highway, city, and overall (km/l) model and maker of the car emission standard QR code No color No comparison with other vehicles No fuel cost / tax info

7 Brazil Voluntary since November 2009 The categories are defined as: Subcompact Compact Medium size Large Sports cars Off-road Pick-up Shows fuel economy for ethanol (álcool) and gasoline (gasolina)

8 China Mandatory fuel economy label since July, 2009 No color No comparison with other vehicles No fuel cost / tax info

9 China s tax incentive label (certificate) Established in June, 2010 Promotion for certain cars with engine displacement of 1.6L and below Consumer gets a one-time fixed subsidies of 3000 yuan/vehicle Label shows vehicle details and level of subsidy

10 China s traffic control labels Yellow Label: Cars in Beijing that fail to meet Euro 1 standards Cars manufactured before 1996 Imported cars before 1998 Green Label: Gasoline cars meeting Euro 1 Diesel cars meeting Euro 2

11 South Korea Grade based on fuel economy Combined fuel economy City mode fuel economy Highway mode fuel economy CO2 emissions Reminder that there are many reasons why actual FE may vary from estimates Legal basis

12 Singapore Old Label Annex D NEW New FUEL Label ECONOMY LABEL (since January 2013) FUEL ECONOMY Fuel Consumption (L/100km) Combined Test CO 2 Emissions (g/km) Combined Test Tested in accordance with UN ECE R101 CARBON EMISSIONS- BASED VEHICLE SCHEME BANDING (Year 2013 & 2014) CO2 Emissions (g/km) A A A Feebate Amount $20,000 $15,000 $10, g/km g/k 3 0 g/k L/100km CO 2 Relative Comparison 135 Fuel Consumption Relative Comparison 5.8 Engine Cap & Fuel Type: 1399cc Petrol 400 g/km g/k g/k L/100km Make & Model: (Make)(Model) 1.4(A) Hatchback A B C C C C4 > 270 $5,000 $0 - $5,000 - $10,000 - $15,000 - $20,000 Vehicle actual fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions will depend on the driving behaviours as well as other non-technical factors such as traffic condition and vehicle condition. CO 2 is the main greenhouse gas responsible for global warming. For comparison of fuel economy of various vehicles, please visit FELS S/No. xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-1234 Carbon Emissions-Based Vehicle Scheme (CEVS) is a new vehicle scheme which will apply to new cars registered on or after 1 Jan 2013.

13 India: BEE and SIAM Labels SIAM FUEL ECONOMY CONSUMER INFORMATION Vehicle Manufacturer's name would be mentioned Vehicle Manufacturer s Details XYZ Motors Weight (Kgs) Diesel kmpl Model/Variant 3 Engine Displacement (cm ) Name of the model / variant being displayed would be mentioned ABCD 1248 cc Engine size in Cubic Centimeter would be metioned Fuel used for running the vehicle would be mentioned. For Bi-fuel vehicles both the fuel types would be mentioned Fuel Type Diesel Fuel Economy (Under Standard Test conditions) 20.5 kmpl Fuel Economy upto one decimal place would be mentioned in km/l for Petrol, Diesel & Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG), in km / kg. for Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and in km/kw - hr for Electric vehicles Disclaimers: 1. The values declared above are the extract of the results that have been obtained in a mandatory emission test specified in Rule 115 of Central Motor Vehicle Rule 1989 under controlled conditions using a reference fuel at an agency authorized by Rule 126 of the said Rules. The values obtained by users will differ from these values due to infinite variables such as driving habits, road and traffic conditions, fuel quality, maintenance practices, loading pattern, ambient conditions, and usual engineering tolerances on components and so on. Voluntary for Consumer Interest 2. The comparative band indicated on the label is based the data received by SIAM till shortly before this label was printed. Any subsequent addition and removal of data will be considered in the next printing of label. For further details please refer SIAM website 3. The values declared above for this vehicle have been obtained on one of the variants of the displayed make/model. Users may obtain different values on other variants of this make/model. 4. The vehicle manufacturer and its authorized dealers shall not be liable for any difference in fuel consumption values due to any of the aforesaid variables and no claim shall lie thereon. 5. The information provided above for this vehicle is the property of the aforementioned vehicle manufacturer. This is for user information only and may not be quoted without prior permission of the vehicle manufacturer. 6. The values for this vehicle indicated herein above are subject to change without notice due to changes in the parts related to fuel economy and such change can be made by vehicle manufacturer at its own discretion, without notice. 7. The accuracy or correctness of the values is not undertaken or guaranteed when not tested under identical conditions. This label is printed on: This information is issued in public interest by the vehicle manufacturer as a member of Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) SIAM 2010 Based on ARAI test data released by manufacturers Comparison of vehicle fuel economy in its market segment 3

14 Japan

15 New Zealand Came to effect in April 2008 Star rating: 6 being most efficient 1 being a gas guzzler Annual cost based on average fuel price and 14,000 km/year

16 Countries Test Cycle CO 2 emission Displayed? Fuel Consumption/Economy Unit Comparison United States 5 Cycle Yes mpg Relative: Fuel economy Absolute: GHG and smog China NEDC No l/100km --- South Korea FTP-75 (up till 2011) US comb. (2012~) Yes km/l Relative: Fuel economy India NEDC No km/l BEE: Relative and absolute SIAM: Relative Singapore UN ECE R 101 (NEDC) No (old) Yes (new) l/100km Relative: CO 2 emission Absolute: Fuel consumption Brazil FTP-75 No km/l Relative: Energy consumption by car class Chile FTP-75 Yes km/l Absolute Australia ADR 81/02 (NEDC) Yes l/100km Absolute New Zealand NEDC (new cars) Japanese (used cars) No l/100km Absolute United Kingdom NEDC Yes l/100km Absolute

17 Labeling best practice (for discussion) Present CO 2 emission number clearly on the label? Display fuel costs and vehicle taxation? Present cost estimate for the next few years? Have both absolute and relative scale on the same label? Use color? Star system (e.g. New Zealand) instead of numbers? Point out influence of driving style and vehicle use? How to deal with alternative technologies? Strive towards harmonization?

18 For more information US Department of Energy: Department of Transportation (UK): Land Transport Authority (Singapore): New Zealand: ANFAVEA (Brazil): Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA) and 2011 Report on Environmental Protection Efforts (Japan) Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People s Republic of China: Korea Energy Management Corporation (KEMCO) Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (Chilé):