TEMPLATE FOR THE INTERNAL REVIEWS OF DEPARTMENTS AND SCHOOLS. for
|
|
- Evan Gilbert
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SENATE COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL REVIEWS TEMPLATE FOR THE INTERNAL REVIEWS OF DEPARTMENTS AND SCHOOLS for BACKGROUND Internal reviews, as mandated by Senate, are intended to assist departments as they develop and improve the quality of what they do. These reviews are required by the Ontario government, and the University is audited at ten-year intervals to assure the Minister that they are being conducted as per the Senate policy. Responsibility for the reviews rests with the Subcommittee on Internal Reviews (SCIR), which reports to the Senate Committee on University Planning. An Internal Review Subcommittee, consisting of one faculty member of SCIR (selected by the Chair of SCIR) who will act as facilitator for the review process, and two consultants selected by SCIR (one external to the university and one from within the university but external to the department or school under review) will evaluate the department in order to identify (I) strengths and weaknesses of the department s undergraduate activity, including all of the specializations offered solely by the department, and courses offered by the department that support other programs either as core, restricted electives or service courses; (ii) immediate improvements that could be made; and (iii) future opportunities for quality enhancement. It will be the responsibility of the SCIR member of the Internal Review Subcommittee, in consultation with the Chair of SCIR, to ensure that all relevant units have an opportunity to comment on the department s programs, including relevant program committees and, in consultation with the student members on SCIR, to ensure that there is sufficient opportunity for student input. Where needed, information on graduate programs will be drawn from materials prepared by the department for the most recent OCGS review and from the Dean of Graduate Studies. The objectives of the department review include, but are not restricted to, an assessment of the following: (c) Consonance of the department s undergraduate offering(s) within the general framework of the University's mission and strategic directions. The appropriateness of the department s academic objectives and the structure for meeting its academic objectives. The appropriateness of the pedagogical and evaluation strategies and methods applied to the undergraduate program.
2 Internal Review Template - Departments 2 (d) (e) (f) The adequacy of the available human, physical, and financial resources to support the department's program. The departmental definition and application, where possible, of indicators to determine the outcomes of the program. The relationship of the department s undergraduate activities with its graduate and research programs. 2. OVERALL SCHEDULING The schedule of reviews was designed to accommodate departments, mesh with existing reviews (e.g., OCGS and external accreditation), and to keep workload to a minimum. The Chair of SCIR may make amendments to the schedule as appropriate, with changes being reported to SCIR for information. Each department, school, and program must be reviewed no less often than once every 10 years. 3. SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS To facilitate the selection process, the Department/School will be asked to submit to SCIR the names of six possible consultants (three from within the university and three from without). SCIR will normally select names from this list, but may consult further with the department chair, the dean of the college, the relevant program committees, or others as appropriate. At least one consultant must be from another University. 4. CONDUCT OF THE REVIEW 4.1 PROVISION OF MATERIAL The Chair of SCIR and the Internal Review Subcommittee will receive the information listed below prior to the consultants' visit. From the Department/School A very brief description of the department (one page maximum) including its history, structure and relationship with other academic units. A brief self-study prepared by the department/school (with participation by professors and students) which reflects on its activities and accomplishments, reaffirms or redefines its objectives, and describes how they relate to the mission of the University. The self-study should include an analysis of the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the undergraduate activities, together with the rationale and planning for future developments. It should also discuss how the undergraduate offerings are coordinated with the graduate, research and service activities. Progress along any of the University s strategic directions (research-intensiveness, learner-centredness, collaboration,
3 Internal Review Template - Departments 3 internationalism and open learning) and towards the department s/school s own agreed-upon strategic objectives will be important components of the self-study. (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Accreditation briefs and reports of reviewers, as required. A summary table listing the names and qualifications of all faculty, including sessional instructors, together with a listing of the courses (graduate and undergraduate) they taught, together with the sessions in which they were offered over the previous two years; anticipated course/program changes; and T.A. and Lab. Technician support provided for the courses. Course outlines will be available to the committee upon request, as will be the full curriculum vitae of the faculty members, as per the previous OCGS appraisal with any relevant updating. A summary of the department s/school s teaching effectiveness based on student course evaluations (submitted in a form which does not identify individuals). Other outcome assessment indicators will be used, where available or appropriate (e.g., the percentage of students going to graduate or professional schools, the success of students in competitions, the percentage of students involved in collaborative ventures such as internships, etc.). A summary of the relationships (relevant to the undergraduate activities) with other University units (e.g. interdisciplinary courses, cross appointments of faculty members, and collaborative efforts with TSS and Open Learning), with other universities, and with other relevant external agencies. The department s/school s impression of how it compares with similar programs in other post-secondary institutions (this would include articulation agreements with colleges, etc.) in Canada, with information concerning the basis for the comparisons made. Enrolment projections accompanied by rationale if changes are predicted. A summary of the administrative and staff support in the department/school and the reporting structure. The Office of Resource Planning and Analysis will co-ordinate the collection of the following package of reports which will be supplied to the department/school: Information to be provided by the Budget Office: Report #1 - MTCU Actual Results compared to Annual Budget Report #2 - MTCU Base Budget Summary
4 Internal Review Template - Departments Report #3 - MTCU Established Position FTEs Information to be provided by Resource Planning and Analysis: Summary Table and Graph - Course Enrolments by Program of Students Enrolled Summary Report - Department Course Enrolment by Program Summary Detail Report - Department Course Enrolment by Program and Course Summary Table and Graph - Course Enrolments by Year Level of Course Summary Report - Department Course Enrolment by Year Level Summary Table and Graph Course Sections Taught (primary meeting type such as lecture, if available or other mode if lecture not used) Department Report Section Count and Average Section Size by Year Level University Summary Report (by College) Section Count and Average Section Size by Course Year Level Summary Table and Graph Student Faculty Ratios Summary Table and Graph Student FTEs Summary Table and Graph Faculty FTEs Department Report Student Faculty Ratios University Summary Report Student Faculty Ratios by College (c)information to be provided by Enrolment Statistics and Systems: Tables and Graphs - Department Specializations: Enrolment and Graduation Counts by Regular and Co-op options, where applicable Table and Graph Admission Cut-offs, Counts and Averages Post Graduation Survey Findings: graphs showing results for selected questions, from the most recent survey with comparative information for the overall program and college associated with the particular department as well as university overall The following will be supplied to the department/school by the Library: Library resources with comments on any special features of the collection. Members of SCIR will receive a copy of the department self-study document and will have access to the other materials noted above as necessary. 4.2 WORK OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE
5 Internal Review Template - Departments The Subcommittee will meet with the dean, the department chair or school director, and as many faculty, staff and students as possible. They will write a comprehensive and detailed report, based on available evidence. This report will be provided to the Chair of SCIR, the department chair or school director, and the college dean. The latter two individuals will provide feedback on any errors, and the subsequently corrected Subcommittee's report will be lodged with the Chair of SCIR. 4.3 WORK OF SCIR Prior to forwarding the report to SCIR, the Chair of SCIR will provide the corrected report to the Department Chair, College Dean and Provost for comment. If there are substantive concerns about the content of the report and its recommendations, the Chair of SCIR and the member of SCIR who served on the Internal Review Subcommittee will meet with the Chair, College Dean, and/or Provost, as appropriate, to determine whether amendments to the report are warranted. Regardless of whether changes are made, the administrators' comments will be forwarded to SCIR along with the final report. SCIR will receive the report and comments. SCIR may choose to accept the report and recommendations in whole or in part. If SCIR believes that further discussion or review is warranted it shall instruct its Chair to carry out those discussions on its behalf. 5. FINAL REPORTS TO SCUP AND SENATE SCIR will forward the final report in confidence, first, for comment to the Chair/Director and Dean, and subsequently, to the Senate Committee on University Planning (SCUP). The report will include an outline of the review process, the findings and recommendations of the review subcommittee, the Chair/Director s and Dean s responses to the findings, and a Provostial response. SCUP, in turn, will forward to Senate for information a short summary document which will present the findings and recommendations, a summary of the administrative response to the recommendations, and an indication of when and by whom the recommendations will be implemented. 6. FOLLOW-UP ON RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED in SCIR FINAL REPORT The person or group designated as being responsible for addressing each of the recommendations which are included in the SCIR Report will report to SCUP on their implementation, or reasons for choosing an alternative course of action, no later than one year following Senate s receipt of The SCUP summary. SCUP will make a report to Senate for information on actions taken. 7. REPORT TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
6 Internal Review Template - Departments Each year, the Senate Committee on University Planning will prepare a summary report for submission to the Board of Governors. This summary report will include: (c) A status report on the reviews performed during the year in question. A presentation of the general principles, guidelines, and methodology used by the institution in the review of its programs. A summary of the outcomes of the reviews. The summary should include references to the programs strengths and weaknesses as well as the actions to be taken on the recommendations arising from their reviews. Original Nov/2004 Revised April 2006 t\scirshare\templates\departments & schools.
Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3, 2011, May 7, 2013
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE PERIODIC PROGRAM REVIEW OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS Policy Number 126 Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3,
More informationUniversity of Guelph
University of Guelph Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP) Submitted for review and approval: June 17, 2010 - Joint meeting of the Boards of Undergraduate Studies and Graduate Studies July 1,
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAMS: APPROVAL OF NEW PROGRAMS AND PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE GRADUATE PROGRAMS: APPROVAL OF NEW PROGRAMS AND PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS Policy Number: 127 Submitted by: School of Graduate Studies Approval Dates: October 1996 October,
More informationSenate Policy on the Review of Undergraduate Programs at Saint Mary's University Policy Number: 8-1006 University Senate Approved: March 12, 2010
Name: Senate Policy on the Review of Undergraduate Programs at Saint Mary's University Policy Number: 8-1006 Origin: University Senate Approved: March 12, 2010 Issuing Authority: Responsibility: University
More informationINSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY
INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY Approval: Responsibility: Contact Office: University Senate; Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance (Quality Council) Provost and Vice President Academic
More informationQUALITY ASSURANCE HANDBOOK. Policies, procedures and resources to guide undergraduate and graduate program development and improvement at UOIT
QUALITY ASSURANCE HANDBOOK Policies, procedures and resources to guide undergraduate and graduate program development and improvement at UOIT UOIT Academic Council June 15, 2010, revised June 9, 2011 QUALITY
More informationInstitutional Quality Assurance Process
Institutional Quality Assurance Process (Covering also the academic, non vocational degree programs of Dominican University College) February 17, 2012 Senate Approved May 30, 2012 Quality Council Ratification
More informationAcademic: Review and Approval of Academic Programs
Academic: Review and Approval of Academic Programs Effective Date: Approved by: Senate Policy for the Review and Approval of Academic Programs I OVERVIEW The Policy for the Review and Approval of Academic
More information3.2.1 Evaluation and approval process for new fields and new programs created from existing and approved University of Ottawa programs
3.2 Protocol for the Expedited Approval of Graduate Programs The Expedited Approval Process requires the submission to the Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance of a Proposal Brief. No external
More informationNew Degree Program Proposals INTERNAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL
New Degree Program Proposals Revised May 2014 INTERNAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL All proposals for new degree programs, both undergraduate and graduate, are subject to internal review and approval by both UBC
More informationNomination and Selection of External Consultants for Graduate Program Reviews
Nomination and Selection of External Consultants for Graduate Program Reviews Graduate Programs External Consultants are required for the review of all new programs (with the exception of new collaborative
More informationMARSHALL UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE POLICY HANDBOOK
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE POLICY HANDBOOK PURPOSE This handbook offers basic information about the procedures and practices of the Honors College at Marshall University. The information presented
More informationGUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE PROVOST UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15260 JULY, 2002 Guidelines for Conducting Evaluations of Academic Programs
More informationInstitutional Quality Assurance Process. University of Ottawa
Institutional Quality Assurance Process University of Ottawa June 27, 2011 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Authorities...1 1.2 Contact person...1 1.3 Definitions...1 1.4 Evaluation of programs...2
More informationInstitutional Quality Assurance Process Joint Graduate Programs Carleton University and University of Ottawa
Institutional Quality Assurance Process Joint Graduate Programs Carleton University and University of Ottawa April 19, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction. 2 1 Authorities. 4 2 Scope... 5 3 Definitions.
More informationRecommendations of the Task Force on Graduate Education Administration and Delivery
Recommendations of the Task Force on Graduate Education Administration and Delivery I. Introduction The task force was established by the Provost and its membership and mandate are provided in Appendix
More informationInstitutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP)
Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP) Office of the Associate Vice-President, Academic and Office of the Associate Provost, Graduate Studies University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Approved
More informationUniversity Policy No.: AC1135 Classification: Academic and Students
POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTIFICATE AND DIPLOMA PROGRAMS University Policy No.: AC1135 Classification: Academic and Students Approving Authority: Senate Effective Date: December/07 Supersedes:
More informationGeorgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate
1 Georgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate Curriculum Proposal Cover Sheet (Course, Program, and Core) Title of Proposal: Assignment of LIST 2020 to Area F (Certificate) Number: Date Submitted: Date approved:
More informationJanuary 28, 2014. May 2015 (or sooner at the request of the Provost and Vice President Academic or Senate)
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS Policy Number 1 : 112 Previous Approval Dates for Policy 112 February 7, 1995 (original policy), May 9, 2002,
More informationTemplate for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic)
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic) Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness
More informationPart III. Self-Study Report Template
Part 3 Ministry Of Education And Higher Education Directorate General of Higher Education Part III Self-Study Report Template LABE SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE http://www.labe.org.lb General Instructions Introduction
More informationPROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY DEGREE PROGRAMS
PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY DEGREE PROGRAMS Interdisciplinary degree program refers to a program that is comprised of two or more interrelated disciplines or fields. The
More informationDEGREE BREADTH PROCEDURE
DEGREE BREADTH PROCEDURE Approved by: Academic Coordinating Committee Authorizer: Executive Dean, Academic Administration Reference Code: D10 V1 Effective Date: 5/1/2013 PROCEDURE STATEMENT: All breadth
More informationPolicy Abstract. for the. Handbook for Program Review: Cleveland State University s Self-Study Process for Growth and Change Spring 2005
Policy Abstract for the Handbook for Program Review: Cleveland State University s Self-Study Process for Growth and Change Spring 2005 Significant institutional resources are devoted to academic program
More informationCURRICULUM MODIFICATIONS: GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE CURRICULUM MODIFICATIONS: GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS Policy Number: 127 Approval Date: November 4, 2014 Previous Approval Dates: May 3, 2011 Policy Review Date
More informationBrandon University Senate Policy of Non-credit Certificate Programs
Brandon University Senate Policy of Non-credit Certificate Programs Purpose To establish a new sub-committee of Senate (i.e., Curriculum and Academic Planning Committee) with representation from the Board
More informationUNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK
UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK Effective July 1 2011 Office of the Associate Vice President, Academic Programs And Graduate Studies Office University of Waterloo Waterloo,
More informationDOC 2014-04 Actions pertaining to degree programs and academic departments
University of Dayton ecommons Senate Documents Academic Senate 3-14-2014 DOC 2014-04 Actions pertaining to degree programs and academic departments University of Dayton. Academic Policies Committee Follow
More informationAcademic Program Review Handbook
Handbook Continuously Improving Programs and Student Learning Revised July 2014 Original Issue: December 6, 2010 Approved: Derry Connolly, President Current Issue: July 3, 2014 Effective: July 3, 2014
More informationUniversity of Toronto Quality Assurance Process (UTQAP)
University of Toronto Quality Assurance Process (UTQAP) Revised version approved by the Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance September 21, 2012 Table of Contents 1 Quality Assurance Context
More informationGUIDELINES FOR DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE RHODE ISLAND SYSTEM OF PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION
GUIDELINES FOR DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE RHODE ISLAND SYSTEM OF PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION SCOPE: WHAT THESE GUIDELINES COVER 1 These guidelines pertain to any distance learning course or program offered by
More informationUNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS
UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 4 Program-Related Actions New and Spin-off Degree Program
More informationGUIDELINES FOR PROGRAM REVIEW AND ACADEMIC PLANNING
Page 1 of 8 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES` IN-DEPTH PROGRAM REVIEWS The process of evaluation is an important ingredient of any successful academic program. Periodic evaluations provide
More informationOAKLAND UNIVERSITY. Graduate Study. Approved Combined Bachelor/Master Degree Programs
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COUNCIL Graduate Study 520 O Dowd Hall Approved Combined Bachelor/Master Degree Programs Definition A combined bachelor/master degree program provides high achieving students
More informationThe University of North Carolina at Charlotte Graduate Program Feasibility Planning
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Graduate Program Feasibility Planning Rationale The fundamental purpose of this planning document is to provide a uniform means by which the University can
More informationABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE: TEMPLATE FOR A SELF-STUDY REPORT 2011-2012 Review Cycle
ABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE: TEMPLATE FOR A SELF-STUDY REPORT 2011-2012 Review Cycle ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION ABET, Inc. 111 Market Place, Suite 1050 Baltimore, MD 21202-4012 Phone: 410-347-7000
More informationGUIDELINES FOR DISTANCE LEARNING IN PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS OPERATING IN RHODE ISLAND
GUIDELINES FOR DISTANCE LEARNING IN PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS OPERATING IN RHODE ISLAND SCOPE: WHAT THESE GUIDELINES COVER 1 These guidelines pertain to any distance learning course or program offered by or
More informationNipissing University Institutional Quality Assurance Process: Policy and Procedures (IQAP)
Nipissing University Institutional Quality Assurance Process: Policy and Procedures (IQAP) Governing Cyclical Program Reviews, New Programs and Program Revisions Recommended to Senate by the Planning and
More informationYORK UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOLS AND PROCEDURES (YUQAP)
YORK UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOLS AND PROCEDURES (YUQAP) July 2012 York University Quality Assurance Procedures Table of Contents 1. Quality Assurance Context.... 3 2. University Authorities
More informationThe University of North Texas at Dallas Policy Manual
The University of North Texas at Dallas Policy Manual Chapter 6.000 6.020 Academic Program Review Faculty Affairs Policy Statement. UNT Dallas offers high-quality academic programs that are achieved through
More informationIona College. Comprehensive Academic Program Review
1 Iona College Comprehensive Academic Program Review I. Introduction The Comprehensive Academic Program Review Project Team was charged to: Finalize the five-year program review policy; establish the cycle
More informationProposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels. Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes
Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes This document presents the format, criteria, and submission procedures for CSU bachelor
More informationProposed: USF System Policy Number: 10-115 Subject: Faculty Credentials for Teaching Undergraduate and Graduate Courses
Proposed: USF System Policy Number: 10-115 Subject: Faculty Credentials for Teaching Undergraduate and Graduate Courses Date of Origin: Proposed Date Last Amended: Date Last Reviewed: 1 I. INTRODUCTION
More informationTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL Purpose: To consider all matters relating to graduate programs at Tarleton State University and to recommend practices and procedures
More informationRules of Organization and Bylaws Gladys A. Kelce College of Business
Rules of Organization and Bylaws Gladys A. Kelce College of Business Approved by the General Faculty December 11, 2012 PREAMBLE This document provides the framework within which the Faculty of the Gladys
More information9. The ad hoc joint committee drafts a formal program implementation proposal. (See Attachment B for a description of the contents of this document.
GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPING JOINT DOCTORAL PROGRAMS WITH INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS These procedures are based on documents developed by the CSU and California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC)
More informationPROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NEW GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Approval Process Overview PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NEW GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS Proposal for a new degree program is initiated by the submission of a Program Development Plan (PDP). Following
More informationGraduate Program Policies and Procedures
The University of British Columbia Department of Physics & Astronomy Graduate Program Policies and Procedures Sept 2011 Table of Contents 1. Introduction!... 4 2. Programs!... 4 3. Admissions!... 4 3.1.
More informationSCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE
SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE The School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy is an interdisciplinary graduate and professional school, designated
More informationGUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM REVIEW At Illinois State University, primary responsibility
More informationSELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS
SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS Although programs engage in continual self-assessment and review of their work, periodic program reviews are designed to provide a broader view
More informationThe Office of the Provost and Vice President Academic. Response to the Senate Task Force on Interdisciplinary Programs. May 2015
The Office of the Provost and Vice President Academic Response to the Senate Task Force on Interdisciplinary Programs May 2015 To the Ryerson University Senate: Enclosed is my official response to the
More informationOCAD UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS (IQAP) Re-ratified by the Quality Council July 27, 2012
OCAD UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS (IQAP) Re-ratified by the Quality Council July 27, 2012 CONTENTS 1. Institutional Quality Assurance Process Overview 1.1. Preamble 1.2. Principles
More informationLaney Graduate School Curricular Revision Guidelines. Updated September 2012
Laney Graduate School Curricular Revision Guidelines Updated September 2012 Contents 1. Courses... 3 1.1. Credit Hour Determination... 3 1.2. Revisions to Existing Courses... 3 1.3. New Course Proposals...
More informationGraduate Program Policies and Procedures
The University of British Columbia Department of Physics & Astronomy Graduate Program Policies and Procedures May 2007 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Programs 4 3 Admissions 4 3.1 Eligibility 4 3.2
More informationInstructions for Preparing the Self-Study Report, Doctoral Programs
Instructions for Preparing the Self-Study Report, Doctoral Programs The minimum required elements of the self-study report are listed below. The overall purpose of the report is to allow the program to
More informationMEMORANDUM. Accreditation Report for Baccalaureate Program in Social Work, University of Northern Iowa
MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Board of Regents Board Office Accreditation Report for Baccalaureate Program in Social Work, University of Northern Iowa Date: March 6, 2000 Recommended Action: Receive the
More informationUniversity of Richmond
University of Richmond http://facultyhandbook.richmond.edu/ch_iii/index.html#discontinuance E. Procedures for the Discontinuance of an Academic Department or Program of Instruction Involving Possible Dismissal
More informationProcedures for the Review of New and Existing Undergraduate Programmes
Procedures for the Review of New and Existing Undergraduate Programmes 1. Quality Assurance at Imperial College 1.1 The Senate of Imperial College has established a number of principal committees which
More informationCutler Hall Athens, OH 45701-2979 T: 740.593.2600 F: 740.593.9591 September 4, 2009
Office of the Provost Cutler Hall Athens, OH 45701-2979 T: 740.593.2600 F: 740.593.9591 September 4, 2009 To: Randy Leite, Dean, College of Health and Human Services Jack Brose, Dean, College of Osteopathic
More informationCertificates guidelines are found at: http://www.gradschool.unh.edu/pdf/pol_certificate.pdf
GUIDELINES FOR THE APPROVAL OF NEW, MODIFIED, OR DELETED GRADUATE PROGRAMS (DEGREES, MAJORS AND OPTIONS) THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Approved by the Graduate Council, 3/8/00; rev 12/11*, rev. 8/12**
More informationProposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes
Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes This document presents the format, criteria, and submission procedures for CSU bachelor
More informationGUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2016 RESEARCH AND SERVICE CENTERS
GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2016 RESEARCH AND SERVICE CENTERS OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM REVIEW Primary responsibility for maintaining
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM COUNCIL BYLAWS. Master of Health Science in Nutrition Communication
GRADUATE PROGRAM COUNCIL BYLAWS Master of Health Science in Nutrition Communication Approved by YSGS Council 10/11/2014 Approved by Dean, YSGS 14/11/2014 Approved by the Academic Governance and Policy
More informationINTERIM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED COURSES AND PROGRAMS
INTERIM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED COURSES AND PROGRAMS I. Rationale The primary purposes of instructional technology are to facilitate effective instruction and enhance student learning,
More informationUniversity of Guelph. Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP) v.2
University of Guelph Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP) v.2 2015 Version 2: Approved by the University of Guelph Senate April 6, 2015 [Version 1 (2011): Approved February 7, 2011 by the University
More informationPROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus
PROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus Self Study Elements for Academic Program Review for Doctoral Programs Program Improvement from Last Academic Program
More informationOklahoma State University. INTERNAL ROUTING/SIGNATURE APPROVAL SHEET for NEW and MODIFIED DEGREE PROGRAMS
Page 1 of 8 Oklahoma State University INTERNAL ROUTING/SIGNATURE APPROVAL SHEET for NEW and MODIFIED DEGREE PROGRAMS This routing sheet is to be used for all new program proposals or for modifications
More informationDonna Woolcott, PhD Executive Director, Quality Assurance
Donna Woolcott, PhD Executive Director, Quality on Quality MAY 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR Overview of quality assurance R International context R Ontario context Quality Council mandate Key elements
More informationA 5 STANDING COMMITTEES. Academic and Student Affairs Committee
A 5 as Collegiate-Level Units Headed by Deans RECOMMENDED ACTION It is the recommendation of the Administration and the Academic and Student Affairs Committee that the status of the Institute of Technology
More informationGRADUATE GROUP REVIEW PROTOCOL FOR SCHOOLS
GRADUATE GROUP REVIEW PROTOCOL FOR SCHOOLS (Adopted 1.10.10) Overview of the Graduate Council of the Faculties The Graduate Council of the Faculties is advisory to the Provost and Vice Provost for Education.
More informationNational Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment. Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions November 2009 Standards for Institutional Accreditation in
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM COUNCIL BYLAWS. Master of Arts in Public Policy and Administration
GRADUATE PROGRAM COUNCIL BYLAWS Master of Arts in Public Policy and Administration Approved by YSGS Council 10/11/2014 Approved by Dean, YSGS 14/11/2014 Approved by the Academic Governance and Policy Committee
More informationPROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF JOINT AND COOPERATIVE GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF JOINT AND COOPERATIVE GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS A joint degree program occurs when two or more universities share the administrative, supervisory, and academic
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS PROCEDURES FOR UNIVERSITY APPROVAL OF NEW ACADEMIC DEGREE PROGRAMS, PROGRAM CHANGES, AND PROGRAM TERMINATION
Doc. T92-012, as amended Passed by the BoT 4/8/92 Revised 8/6/97 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS PROCEDURES FOR UNIVERSITY APPROVAL OF NEW ACADEMIC DEGREE PROGRAMS, PROGRAM CHANGES, AND PROGRAM TERMINATION
More informationFINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Institutional Quality Assurance Program (IQAP) Review. Classics
FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Institutional Quality Assurance Program (IQAP) Review Classics Date of Review: March 4-5, 2014 In accordance with the University Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP),
More informationDocumentation for Curriculum and Academic Calendar were merged in November 2007 to create the Curriculum and Academic Calendar Guidelines.
Documentation for Curriculum and Academic Calendar were merged in November 2007 to create the Curriculum and Academic Calendar Guidelines. Section A: Curriculum The curriculum guidelines were developed
More informationProfessional Education Unit
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY Professional Education Unit ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK 2011/2012 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK Table of Contents The Unit Assessment System Overview...
More informationFinal Assessment Report History Tri-University (MA, PhD) December 2014
Final Assessment Report History Tri-University (MA, PhD) December 2014 The Tri-University Graduate Programs in History is the joint program for graduate research and education operated by the history departments
More informationWHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM
WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM REVISED SPRING 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Development And Evaluation Process: Tenure Track Faculty... 4 Overview Of Mentoring And Evaluation Process
More informationNEW GRADUATE DEGREE PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND PROPOSAL OUTLINE
Office of the Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs MSC05 3400 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 505.277.2611 NEW GRADUATE DEGREE PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND PROPOSAL
More informationRequest for Proposal ecampus 2015-16 Technology Equipment Program
Request for Proposal ecampus 2015-16 Technology Equipment Program ecampus, Academic Technology San José State University Instructional Resource Center (IRC) 206 One Washington Square, San José, CA 95192-0026
More informationREQUEST TO COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE FOR CURRICULAR IMPROVEMENTS
REQUEST TO COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE FOR CURRICULAR IMPROVEMENTS DEPARTMENT: PSY PROPOSED EFFECTIVE SEMESTER: Fall 2012 COLLEGE: Arts & Sciences PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Academic Program Substantive Course
More informationCAMPUS GUIDE TO THE NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS
CAMPUS GUIDE TO THE NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS As of February 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS New Graduate Program Approval Process Steps (Overview).... 2 1. Introduction.... 3 2. Initial Discussion
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of these regulations, please see the Table of Regulations.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current to February 25, 2006. It is intended for information and reference purposes
More informationPOLICY. Academic. Provost and Vice-President Academic. Senate May 10, 2011 Quality Council March 31, 2011 Date of last revision: N/A
POLICY INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY Category: Approval: Responsibility: Date: Academic Senate (internal); Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance (Quality Council) (external)
More informationGeorgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate New Course
Page 1 of 7 Georgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate New Course Title of Proposal: PHED 2200 Introduction to Sport Management Number: Date Submitted: Date approved: Initiator and Place of Origin: Bonnie
More informationFaculty Contact. Course # Dept: (Requires approval of both departments and deans involved. Add lines at end of form for such signatures.
FORMAT 1 Submit original with signatures + 1 copy+ electronic copy to UAF Governance. See http://www.uaf.edu/uafgov/faculty/cdfor a complete description of the rules governing curriculum & course changes.
More informationPolicies, Procedures and Guidelines
Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Academic Program Reviews Policy on Policy Number (if applicable): Approved by: Senate Date of Original Approval(s): May 11, 2011 (effective July
More informationTRANSFER CREDIT DEFINITIONS POLICY REGULATIONS NUMBER 107 APPROVAL DATE 10-06-1986 LAST AMENDMENT 04-17-2009 LAST REVIEWED NEXT REVIEW DATE 04-2014
NUMBER 107 APPROVAL DATE 10-06-1986 LAST AMENDMENT 04-17-2009 LAST REVIEWED TRANSFER CREDIT NEXT REVIEW DATE 04-2014 Approval Authority Senate Responsible Executive Provost and Vice-President, Academic
More informationCollege of Engineering, Forestry & Natural Sciences Conditions of Faculty Service Guidelines for Annual Evaluation, Promotion, and Tenure
College of Engineering, Forestry & Natural Sciences Conditions of Faculty Service Guidelines for Annual Evaluation, Promotion, and Tenure Approved by Vote of the CEFNS Faculty December 18, 2015; 74 yes,
More informationThe Communications Handbook
The Communications Handbook Table of Contents The Purpose of Communications in the College Curriculum... 3 Georgian College Communications Courses... 3 Essential Skills and Communications Courses... 4
More informationUse 4-digit year followed by term code. 1=spring, 2=summer and 3=fall. (ex: 20113 for "Fall 2011.")
FORM 201 New Program Proposal * Action TRACKING NUMBER NEW Add Degree Program Add Area of Emphasis Add Dual Degree Program (Graduate Program Only) Add New Certificate Program (Graduate Program Only) Add
More informationRequired Faculty Resources for Accredited Public Health Programs and Schools of Public Health *
Required Faculty Resources for Accredited Public Health Programs and Schools of Public Health * Background and context The purpose of this paper is to help schools and programs understand the expectations
More informationNew Programs & Program Revisions Committee New Certificate Program Form
New Programs & Program Revisions Committee New Certificate Program Form I. General Information Certificate Program Title: College/Division/Unit: Department/School: Contact Person: Graduate Certificate
More informationThe CSUCM Program
I. Unit Definition (size, disciplines, majors, etc.) The Environmental Management (ESRM) program comprises the faculty appointed in the areas of Environmental Management. The ESRM program houses one degree
More informationHow to Change Approved Fields Within a MBA Program
University of Toronto Major Modification Proposal Template Proposal to Transition Existing Approved Fields to Concentrations within a Graduate Degree Program Section 1 Graduate Program and Degree Levels
More informationGuidelines for Preparing New Graduate Program Proposals
Guidelines for Preparing New Graduate Program Proposals The New Programs and Program Review Committee of the Graduate Council recommends that the originators of proposals for new graduate programs follow
More information