This chapter is all about cardinality of sets. At first this looks like a

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

1 CHAPTER Cardinality of Sets This chapter is all about cardinality of sets At first this looks like a very simple concept To find the cardinality of a set, just count its elements If A = { a, b, c, d }, then A = ; if B = { n Z : n }, then B = In this case A < B What could be simpler than that? Actually, the idea of cardinality becomes quite subtle when the sets are infinite The main point of this chapter is to explain how there are numerous different kinds of infinity, and some infinities are bigger than others Two sets A and B can both have infinite cardinality, yet A < B Sets with Equal Cardinalities We begin with a discussion of what it means for two sets to have the same cardinality Up until this point we ve said A = B if A and B have the same number of elements: Count the elements of A, then count the elements of B If you get the same number, then A = B Although this is a fine strategy if the sets are finite (and not too big!), it doesn t apply to infinite sets because we d never be done counting their elements We need a new approach that applies to both finite and infinite sets Here it is: Definition Two sets A and B have the same cardinality, written A = B, if there exists a bijective function f : A B If no such bijective function exists, then the sets have unequal cardinalities, that is, A B A a b c d e f B 0 The above picture illustrates our definition There is a bijective function f : A B, so A = B The function f matches up A with B Think of f as describing how to overlay A onto B so that they fit together perfectly

2 8 Cardinality of Sets On the other hand, if A and B are as indicated in either of the following figures, then there can be no bijection f : A B (The best we can do is a function that is either injective or surjective, but not both) Therefore the definition says A B in these cases A a b c d f B 0 A a b c d e f B 0 Example The sets A = { n Z : 0 n } and B = { n Z : n 0 } have the same cardinality because there is a bijective function f : A B given by the rule f (n) = n Several comments are in order First, if A = B, there can be lots of bijective functions from A to B We only need to find one of them in order to conclude A = B Second, as bijective functions play such a big role here, we use the word bijection to mean bijective function Thus the function f (n) = n from Example is a bijection Also, an injective function is called an injection and a surjective function is called a surjection We emphasize and reiterate that Definition applies to finite as well as infinite sets If A and B are infinite, then A = B provided there exists a bijection f : A B If no such bijection exists, then A B Example This example shows that N = Z To see why this is true, notice that the following table describes a bijection f : N Z n f (n) Notice that f is described in such a way that it is both injective and surjective Every integer appears exactly once on the infinitely long second row Thus, according to the table, given any b Z there is some natural number n with f (n) = b, so f is surjective It is injective because the way the table is constructed forces f (m) f (n) whenever m n Because of this bijection f : N Z, we must conclude from Definition that N = Z Example may seem slightly unsettling On one hand it makes sense that N = Z because N and Z are both infinite, so their cardinalities are both infinity On the other hand, Z may seem twice as large as

3 Sets with Equal Cardinalities N because Z has all the negative integers as well as the positive ones Definition settles the issue Because the bijection f : N Z matches up N with Z, it follows that N = Z We summarize this with a theorem Theorem There exists a bijection f : N Z Therefore N = Z The fact that N and Z have the same cardinality might prompt us compare the cardinalities of other infinite sets How, for example, do N and R compare? Let s turn our attention to this In fact, N R This was first recognized by Georg Cantor (8 8), who devised an ingenious argument to show that there are no surjective functions f : N R (This in turn implies that there can be no bijections f : N R, so N R by Definition ) We now describe Cantor s argument for why there are no surjections f : N R We will reason informally, rather than writing out an exact proof Take any arbitrary function f : N R Here s why f can t be surjective: Imagine making a table for f, where values of n in N are in the lefthand column and the corresponding values f (n) are on the right The first few entries might look something as follows In this table, the real numbers f (n) are written with all their decimal places trailing off to the right Thus, even though f () happens to be the real number 0, we write it as , etc n f (n)

4 0 Cardinality of Sets There is a diagonal shaded band in the table For each n N, this band covers the n th decimal place of f (n): The st decimal place of f () is the st entry on the diagonal The nd decimal place of f () is the nd entry on the diagonal The rd decimal place of f () is the rd entry on the diagonal The th decimal place of f () is the th entry on the diagonal, etc The diagonal helps us construct a number b R that is unequal to any f (n) Just let the nth decimal place of b differ from the nth entry of the diagonal Then the nth decimal place of b differs from the nth decimal place of f (n) In order to be definite, define b to be the positive number less than whose nth decimal place is 0 if the nth decimal place of f (n) is not 0, and whose nth decimal place is if the nth decimal place of f (n) equals 0 Thus, for the function f illustrated in the above table, we have b = and b has been defined so that, for any n N, its nth decimal place is unequal to the nth decimal place of f (n) Therefore f (n) b for every natural number n, meaning f is not surjective Since this argument applies to any function f : N R (not just the one in the above example) we conclude that there exist no bijections f : N R, so N R by Definition We summarize this as a theorem Theorem There exists no bijection f : N R Therefore N R This is our first indication of how there are different kinds of infinities Both N and R are infinite sets, yet N R We will continue to develop this theme throughout this chapter The next example shows that the intervals (0, ) and (0,) on R have the same cardinality P f (x) 0 x Figure A bijection f : (0, ) (0,)

5 Sets with Equal Cardinalities Example Show that (0, ) = (0,) To accomplish this, we need to show that there is a bijection f : (0, ) (0,) We describe this function geometrically Consider the interval (0, ) as the positive x-axis of R Let the interval (0,) be on the y-axis as illustrated in Figure, so that (0, ) and (0,) are perpendicular to each other The figure also shows a point P = (,) Define f (x) to be the point on (0,) where the line from P to x (0, ) intersects the y-axis By similar triangles, we have x + = f (x) x, and therefore f (x) = x x + If it is not clear from the figure that f : (0, ) (0,) is bijective, then you can verify it using the techniques from Section (Exercise 6, below) It is important to note that equality of cardinalities is an equivalence relation on sets: it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive Let us confirm this Given a set A, the identity function A A is a bijection, so A = A (This is the reflexive property) For the symmetric property, if A = B, then there is a bijection f : A B, and its inverse is a bijection f : B A, so B = A For transitivity, suppose A = B and B = C Then there are bijections f : A B and g : B C The composition g f : A C is a bijection (Theorem ), so A = C The transitive property can be useful If, in trying to show two sets A and C have the same cardinality, we can produce a third set B for which A = B and B = C, then transitivity assures us that indeed A = C The next example uses this idea Example Show that R = (0, ) Because of the bijection g : R (0, ) where g(x) = x, we have R = (0, ) Also, Example shows that (0, ) = (0,) Therefore R = (0,) So far in this chapter we have declared that two sets have the same cardinality if there is a bijection between them They have different cardinalities if there exists no bijection between them Using this idea, we showed that Z = N R = (0, ) = (0, ) So, we have a means of determining when two sets have the same or different cardinalities But we have neatly avoided saying exactly what cardinality is For example, we can say that Z = N, but what exactly is Z, or N? What exactly are these things that are equal? Certainly not numbers, for they are too big

6 Cardinality of Sets And saying they are infinity is not accurate, because we now know that there are different types of infinity So just what kind of mathematical entity is Z? In general, given a set X, exactly what is its cardinality X? This is a lot like asking what a number is A number, say, is an abstraction, not a physical thing Early in life we instinctively grouped together certain sets of things (five apples, five oranges, etc) and conceived of as the thing common to all such sets In a very real sense, the number is an abstraction of the fact that any two of these sets can be matched up via a bijection That is, it can be identified with a certain equivalence class of sets under the "has the same cardinality as" relation (Recall that this is an equivalence relation) This is easy to grasp because our sense of numeric quantity is so innate But in exactly the same way we can say that the cardinality of a set X is what is common to all sets that can be matched to X via a bijection This may be harder to grasp, but it is really no different from the idea of the magnitude of a (finite) number In fact, we could be concrete and define X to be the equivalence class of all sets whose cardinality is the same as that of X This has the advantage of giving an explicit meaning to X But there is no harm in taking the intuitive approach and just interpreting the cardinality X of a set X to be a measure the size of X The point of this section is that we have a means of deciding whether two sets have the same size or different sizes Exercises for Section A Show that the two given sets have equal cardinality by describing a bijection from one to the other Describe your bijection with a formula (not as a table) R and (0, ) R and (, ) R and (0,) The set of even integers and the set of odd integers A = { k : k Z } and B = { k : k Z } 6 N and S = { n : n N} Z and S = {, 8,,,,,,8,6,} 8 Z and S = { x R : sin x = } { 0, } N and N 0 { 0, } N and Z [0,] and (0,) N and Z (Suggestion: use Exercise 8 of Section ) P(N) and P(Z) (Suggestion: use Exercise, above) N N and { (n, m) N N : n m } B Answer the following questions concerning bijections from this section Find a formula for the bijection f in Example (page 8) 6 Verify that the function f in Example is a bijection

7 Countable and Uncountable Sets Countable and Uncountable Sets Let s summarize the main points from the previous section A = B if and only if there exists a bijection A B N = Z because there exists a bijection N Z N R because there exists no bijection N R Thus, even though N, Z and R are all infinite sets, their cardinalities are not all the same The sets N and Z have the same cardinality, but R s cardinality is different from that of both the other sets This means infinite sets can have different sizes We now make some definitions to put words and symbols to this phenomenon In a certain sense you can count the elements of N; you can count its elements off as,,,,, but you d have to continue this process forever to count the whole set Thus we will call N a countably infinite set, and the same term is used for any set whose cardinality equals that of N Definition Suppose A is a set Then A is countably infinite if N = A, that is, if there exists a bijection N A The set A is uncountable if A is infinite and N A, that is, if A is infinite and there exists no bijection N A Thus Z is countably infinite but R is uncountable This section deals mainly with countably infinite sets Uncountable sets are treated later If A is countably infinite, then N = A, so there is a bijection f : N A You can think of f as counting the elements of A The first element of A is f (), followed by f (), then f () and so on It makes sense to think of a countably infinite set as the smallest type of infinite set, because if the counting process stopped, the set would be finite, not infinite; a countably infinite set has the fewest elements that a set can have and still be infinite It is common to reserve the special symbol ℵ 0 to stand for the cardinality of countably infinite sets Definition The cardinality of the natural numbers is denoted as ℵ 0 That is, N = ℵ 0 Thus any countably infinite set has cardinality ℵ 0 (The symbol ℵ is the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet, and is pronounced aleph The symbol ℵ 0 is pronounced aleph naught ) The summary of facts at the beginning of this section shows Z = ℵ 0 and R ℵ 0 Example Let E = { k : k Z } be the set of even integers The function f : Z E defined as f (n) = n is easily seen to be a bijection, so we have Z = E Thus, as N = Z = E, the set E is countably infinite and E = ℵ 0

8 Cardinality of Sets Here is a significant fact: The elements of any countably infinite set A can be written in an infinitely long list a, a, a, a, that begins with some element a A and includes every element of A For example, the set E in the above example can be written in list form as 0,,,,,6, 6,8, 8, The reason that this can be done is as follows Since A is countably infinite, Definition says there is a bijection f : N A This allows us to list out the set A as an infinite list f (), f (), f (), f (), Conversely, if the elements of A can be written in list form as a, a, a,, then the function f : N A defined as f (n) = a n is a bijection, so A is countably infinite We summarize this as follows Theorem A set A is countably infinite if and only if its elements can be arranged in an infinite list a, a, a, a, As an example of how this theorem might be used, let P denote the set of all prime numbers Since we can list its elements as,,,,,,, it follows that the set P is countably infinite As another consequence of Theorem, note that we can interpret the fact that the set R is not countably infinite as meaning that it is impossible to write out all the elements of R in an infinite list (After all, we tried to do that in the table on page, and failed!) This raises a question Is it also impossible to write out all the elements of Q in an infinite list? In other words, is the set Q of rational numbers countably infinite or uncountable? If you start plotting the rational numbers on the number line, they seem to mostly fill up R Sure, some numbers such as, π and e will not be plotted, but the dots representing rational numbers seem to predominate We might thus expect Q to be uncountable However, it is a surprising fact that Q is countable The proof presented below arranges all the rational numbers in an infinitely long list Theorem The set Q of rational numbers is countably infinite Proof To prove this, we just need to show how to write the set Q in list form Begin by arranging all rational numbers in an infinite array This is done by making the following chart The top row has a list of all integers, beginning with 0, then alternating signs as they increase Each column headed by an integer k contains all the fractions (in reduced form) with numerator k For example, the column headed by contains the fractions,,,,, and so on It does not contain,, 6, etc, because those are not reduced, and in fact their reduced forms appear in the column headed by You should examine this table and convince yourself that it contains all rational numbers in Q

9 Countable and Uncountable Sets Next, draw an infinite path in this array, beginning at 0 and snaking back and forth as indicated below Every rational number is on this path

10 6 Cardinality of Sets Beginning at 0 rational numbers: and following the path, we get an infinite list of all 0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, By Theorem, it follows that Q is countably infinite, that is, Q = N It is also true that the Cartesian product of two countably infinite sets is itself countably infinite, as our next theorem states Theorem If A and B are both countably infinite, then so is A B Proof Suppose A and B are both countably infinite By Theorem, we know we can write A and B in list form as A = { a, a, a, a, }, B = { b, b, b, b, } Figure shows how to form an infinite path winding through all of A B Therefore A B can be written in list form, so it is countably infinite B b (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a 6, b ) (a, b ) b 6 (a, b 6 ) (a, b 6 ) (a, b 6 ) (a, b 6 ) (a, b 6 ) (a 6, b 6 ) (a, b 6 ) b (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a 6, b ) (a, b ) b (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a 6, b ) (a, b ) b (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a 6, b ) (a, b ) b (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a 6, b ) (a, b ) b (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a, b ) (a 6, b ) (a, b ) a a a a a a 6 a A Figure A product of two countably infinite sets is countably infinite

11 Countable and Uncountable Sets As an example of a consequence of this theorem, notice that since Q is countably infinite, the set Q Q is also countably infinite Recall that the word corollary means a result that follows easily from some other result We have the following corollary of Theorem Corollary Given n countably infinite sets A, A, A,, A n, with n, the Cartesian product A A A A n is also countably infinite Proof The proof is by induction on n For the basis step, notice that when n = the statement asserts that for countably infinite sets A and A, the product A A is countably infinite, and this is true by Theorem Assume that for k, any product A A A A k of countably infinite sets is countably infinite Consider a product A A A A k+ of k + countably infinite sets It is easily confirmed that the function f : A A A A k A k+ (A A A A k ) A k+ f (x, x,, x k, x k+ ) = ( ) (x, x,, x k ), x k+ is bijective, so A A A A k A k+ = (A A A A k ) A k+ By the induction hypothesis, (A A A A k ) A k+ is a product of two countably infinite sets, so it is countably infinite by Theorem As noted above, A A A A k A k+ has the same cardinality, so it too is countably infinite Theorem 6 If A and B are both countably infinite, then A B is countably infinite Proof Suppose A and B are both countably infinite By Theorem, we know we can write A and B in list form as A = { a, a, a, a, }, B = { b, b, b, b, } We can shuffle A and B into one infinite list for A B as follows A B = { a, b, a, b, a, b, a, b, } (We agree not to list an element twice if it belongs to both A and B) Therefore, by Theorem, it follows that A B is countably infinite

12 8 Cardinality of Sets Exercises for Section Prove that the set A = { ln(n) : n N } R is countably infinite Prove that the set A = { (m, n) N N : m n } is countably infinite Prove that the set A = { (n, n) : n Z } is countably infinite Prove that the set of all irrational numbers is uncountable (Suggestion: Consider proof by contradiction using Theorems and 6) Prove or disprove: There exists a countably infinite subset of the set of irrational numbers 6 Prove or disprove: There exists a bijective function f : Q R Prove or disprove: The set Q 00 is countably infinite 8 Prove or disprove: The set Z Q is countably infinite Prove or disprove: The set { 0, } N is countably infinite 0 Prove or disprove: The set A = { n : n N} countably infinite Describe a partition of N that divides N into eight countably infinite subsets Describe a partition of N that divides N into ℵ 0 countably infinite subsets Prove or disprove: If A = {X N : X is finite}, then A = ℵ 0 Suppose A = { (m, n) N R : n = πm } Is it true that N = A? Theorem implies that N N is countably infinite Construct an alternate proof of this fact by showing that the function ϕ : N N N defined as ϕ(m, n) = n (m ) is bijective Comparing Cardinalities At this point we know that there are at least two different kinds of infinity On one hand, there are countably infinite sets such as N, of cardinality ℵ 0 Then there is the uncountable set R Are there other kinds of infinity beyond these two kinds? The answer is yes, but to see why we first need to introduce some new definitions and theorems Our first task will be to formulate a definition for what we mean by A < B Of course if A and B are finite we know exactly what this means: A < B means that when the elements of A and B are counted, A is found to have fewer elements than B But this process breaks down if A or B is infinite, for then the elements can t be counted The language of functions helps us overcome this difficulty Notice that for finite sets A and B it is intuitively clear that A < B if and only if there exists an injective function f : A B but there are no surjective functions f : A B The following diagram illustrates this:

13 Comparing Cardinalities A a b c d f B 0 We will use this idea to define what is meant by A < B and A B For emphasis, the following definition also restates what is meant by A = B Definition Suppose A and B are sets () A = B means there is a bijection A B () A < B means there is an injection A B, but no surjection A B () A B means A < B or A = B For example, consider N and R The function f : N R defined as f (n) = n is clearly injective, but it is not surjective because given the element R, we have f (n) for every n N In fact, Theorem of Section asserts that there is no surjection N R Definition yields N < R () Said differently, ℵ 0 < R Is there a set X for which R < X? The answer is yes, and the next theorem explains why It implies R < P(R) (Recall that P(A) denotes the power set of A) Theorem If A is any set, then A < P(A) Proof Before beginning the proof, we remark that this statement is obvious if A is finite, for then A < A = P(A) But our proof must apply to all sets A, both finite and infinite, so it must use Definition We prove the theorem with direct proof Let A be an arbitrary set According to Definition, to prove A < P(A) we must show that there is an injection f : A P(A), but no surjection f : A P(A) To see that there is an injection f : A P(A), define f by the rule f (x) = { x } In words, f sends any element x of A to the one-element set { x } P(A) Then f : A P(A) is injective, as follows Suppose f (x) = f (y) Then { x } = { y } Now, the only way that { x } and { y } can be equal is if x = y, so it follows that x = y Thus f is injective Next we need to show that there exists no surjection f : A P(A) Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there does exist a surjection

14 0 Cardinality of Sets f : A P(A) Notice that for any element x A, we have f (x) P(A), so f (x) is a subset of A Thus f is a function that sends elements of A to subsets of A It follows that for any x A, either x is an element of the subset f (x) or it is not Using this idea, define the following subset B of A: B = { x A : x f (x) } A Now since B A we have B P(A), and since f is surjective there is an a A for which f (a) = B Now, either a B or a B We will consider these two cases separately, and show that each leads to a contradiction Case If a B, then the definition of B implies a f (a), and since f (a) = B we have a B, which is a contradiction Case If a B, then the definition of B implies a f (a), and since f (a) = B we have a B, again a contradiction Since the assumption that there is a surjection f : A P(A) leads to a contradiction, we conclude that there are no such surjective functions In conclusion, we have seen that there exists an injection A P(A) but no surjection A P(A), so Definition implies that A < P(A) Beginning with the set A = N and applying Theorem over and over again, we get the following chain of infinite cardinalities ℵ 0 = N < P(N) < P(P(N)) < P(P(P(N))) < () Thus there is an infinite sequence of different types of infinity, starting with ℵ 0 and becoming ever larger The set N is countable, and all the sets P(N), P(P(N)), etc, are uncountable In the next section we will prove that P(N) = R Thus N and R are the first two entries in the chain () above They are are just two relatively tame infinities in a long list of other wild and exotic infinities Unless you plan on studying advanced set theory or the foundations of mathematics, you are unlikely to ever encounter any types of infinity beyond ℵ 0 and R Still you will in future mathematics courses need to distinguish between countably infinite and uncountable sets, so we close with two final theorems that can help you do this Theorem 8 infinite An infinite subset of a countably infinite set is countably Proof Suppose A is an infinite subset of the countably infinite set B Because B is countably infinite, its elements can be written in a list

15 Comparing Cardinalities b, b, b, b, Then we can also write A s elements in list form by proceeding through the elements of B, in order, and selecting those that belong to A Thus A can be written in list form, and since A is infinite, its list will be infinite Consequently A is countably infinite Theorem If U A, and U is uncountable, then A is uncountable Proof Suppose for the sake of contradiction that U A, and U is uncountable but A is not uncountable Then since U A and U is infinite, then A must be infinite too Since A is infinite, and not uncountable, it must be countably infinite Then U is an infinite subset of a countably infinite set A, so U is countably infinite by Theorem 8 Thus U is both uncountable and countably infinite, a contradiction Theorems 8 and can be useful when we need to decide whether a set is countably infinite or uncountable They sometimes allow us to decide its cardinality by comparing it to a set whose cardinality is known For example, suppose we want to decide whether or not the set A = R is uncountable Since the x-axis U = { (x,0) : x R } R has the same cardinality as R, it is uncountable Theorem implies that R is uncountable Other examples can be found in the exercises Exercises for Section Suppose B is an uncountable set and A is a set Given that there is a surjective function f : A B, what can be said about the cardinality of A? Prove that the set C of complex numbers is uncountable Prove or disprove: If A is uncountable, then A = R Prove or disprove: If A B C and A and C are countably infinite, then B is countably infinite Prove or disprove: The set { 0, } R is uncountable 6 Prove or disprove: Every infinite set is a subset of a countably infinite set Prove or disprove: If A B and A is countably infinite and B is uncountable, then B A is uncountable 8 Prove or disprove: The set { (a, a, a,) : a i Z} of infinite sequences of integers is countably infinite Prove that if A and B are finite sets with A = B, then any injection f : A B is also a surjection Show this is not necessarily true if A and B are not finite 0 Prove that if A and B are finite sets with A = B, then any surjection f : A B is also an injection Show this is not necessarily true if A and B are not finite

16 Cardinality of Sets The Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder Theorem An often used property of numbers is that if a b and b a, then a = b It is reasonable to ask if the same property applies to cardinality If A B and B A, is it true that A = B? This is in fact true, and this section s goal is to prove it This will yield an alternate (and highly effective) method of proving that two sets have the same cardianlity Recall (Definition ) that A B means that A < B or A = B If A < B then (by Definition ) there is an injection A B On the other hand, if A = B, then there is a bijection (hence also an injection) A B Thus A B implies that there is an injection f : A B Likewise, B A implies that there is an injection g : B A Our aim is to show that if A B and B A, then A = B In other words, we aim to show that if there are injections f : A B and g : B A, then there is a bijection h : A B The proof of this fact, though not particularly difficult, is not entirely trivial, either The fact that f and g guarantee that such an h exists is called the the Cantor-Bernstein- Schröeder theorem This theorem is very useful for proving two sets A and B have the same cardinality: it says that instead of finding a bijection A B, it suffices to find injections A B and B A This is useful because injections are often easier to find than bijections We will prove the Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder theorem, but before doing so let s work through an informal visual argument that will guide us through (and illustrate) the proof Suppose there are injections f : A B and g : B A We want to use them to produce a bijection h : A B Sets A and B are sketched below For clarity, each has the shape of the letter that denotes it, and to help distinguish them the set A is shaded A B Figure The sets A and B The injections f : A B and g : B A are illustrated in Figure Think of f as putting a copy f (A) = { f (x) : x A } of A into B, as illustrated This copy, the range of f, does not fill up all of B (unless f happens to be surjective) Likewise, g puts a copy g(b) of B into A Because they are

17 The Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder Theorem not necessarily bijective, neither f nor g is guaranteed to have an inverse But the map g : B g(b) from B to g(b) = {g(x) : x B} is bijective, so there is an inverse g : g(b) B (We will need this inverse soon) f g g Figure The injections f : A B and g : B A Consider the chain of injections illustrated in Figure On the left, g puts a copy of B into A Then f puts a copy of A (containing the copy of B) into B Next, g puts a copy of this B-containing-A-containing-B into A, and so on, always alternating g and f f f f g g g Figure An infinite chain of injections The first time A occurs in this sequence, it has a shaded region A g(b) In the second occurrence of A, the shaded region is (A g(b)) (g f )(A g(b)) In the third occurrence of A, the shaded region is (A g(b)) (g f )(A g(b)) (g f g f )(A g(b)) To tame the notation, let s say (g f ) = (g f ) (g f ), and (g f ) = (g f ) (g f ) (g f ), and so on Let s also agree that (g f ) 0 = ι A, that is, it is the identity function on A Then the shaded region of the nth occurrence of A in the sequence is n (g f ) k (A g(b)) k=0 This process divides A into gray and white regions: the gray region is G = (g f ) k (A g(b)), k=0

18 Cardinality of Sets and the white region is A G (See Figure 6) Figure 6 suggests our desired bijection h : A B The injection f sends the gray areas on the left bijectively to the gray areas on the right The injection g : g(b) B sends the white areas on the left bijectively to the white areas on the right We can thus define h : A B so that h(x) = f (x) if x is a gray point, and h(x) = g (x) if x is a white point A B f g f g Figure 6 The bijection h : A B This informal argument suggests that given injections f : A B and g : B A, there is a bijection h : A B But it is not a proof We now present this as a theorem and tighten up our reasoning in a careful proof, with the above diagrams and ideas as a guide Theorem 0 (The Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder Theorem) If A B and B A, then A = B In other words, if there are injections f : A B and g : B A, then there is a bijection h : A B Proof (Direct) Suppose there are injections f : A B and g : B A Then, in particular, g : B g(b) is a bijection from B onto the range of g, so it has an inverse g : g(b) B (Note that g : B A itself has no inverse g : A B unless g is surjective) Consider the subset G = (g f ) k (A g(b)) A k=0

19 The Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder Theorem Let W = A G, so A = G W is partitioned into two sets G (think gray) and W (think white) Define a function h : A B as { f (x) if x G h(x) = g (x) if x W Notice that this makes sense: if x W, then x G, so x A g(b) G, hence x g(b), so g (x) is defined To finish the proof, we must show that h is both injective and surjective For injective, we assume h(x) = h(y), and deduce x = y There are three cases to consider First, if x and y are both in G, then h(x) = h(y) means f (x) = f (y), so x = y because f is injective Second, if x and y are both in W, then h(x) = h(y) means g (x) = g (y), and applying g to both sides gives x = y In the third case, one of x and y is in G and the other is in W Say x G and y W The definition of G gives x = (g f ) k (z) for some k 0 and z A g(b) Note h(x) = h(y) now implies f (x) = g (y), that is, f ((g f ) k (z)) = g (y) Applying g to both sides gives (g f ) k+ (z) = y, which means y G But this is impossible, as y W Thus this third case cannot happen But in the first two cases h(x) = h(y) implies x = y, so h is injective To see that h is surjective, take any b B We will find an x A with h(x) = b Note that g(b) A, so either g(b) W or g(b) G In the first case, h(g(b)) = g (g(b)) = b, so we have an x = g(b) A for which h(x) = b In the second case, g(b) G The definition of G shows g(b) = (g f ) k (z) for some k > 0, and z A g(b) Thus g(b) = (g f ) (g f ) k (z) Rewriting this, ( g(b) = g f ( (g f ) k (z) )) Because g is injective, this implies b = f ( (g f ) k (z) ) Let x = (g f ) k (z), so x G by definition of G Observe that h(x) = f (x) = f ( (g f ) k (z) ) = b We have now seen that for any b B, there is an x A for which h(x) = b Thus h is surjective Since h : A B is both injective and surjective, it is also bijective

20 6 Cardinality of Sets Here are some examples illustrating how the Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder theorem can be used This includes a proof that R = P(N) Example 6 The intervals [0, ) and (0, ) in R have equal cardinalities Surely this fact is plausible, for the two intervals are identical except for the endpoint 0 Yet concocting a bijection [0,) (0,) is tricky (Though not particularly difficult: see the solution of Exercise of Section ) For a simpler approach, note that f (x) = + x is an injection [0,) (0,) Also, g(x) = x is an injection (0,) [0,) The Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder theorem guarantees a bijection h : [0,) (0,), so [0,) = (0,) Theorem The sets R and P(N) have the same cardinality Proof Example shows that R = (0, ), and Example 6 shows (0,) = [0,) Thus R = [0,), so to prove the theorem we just need to show that [0, ) = P(N) By the Cantor-Bernstein-Schröeder theorem, it suffices to find injections f : [0,) P(N) and g : P(N) [0,) To define f : [0,) P(N), we use the fact that any number in [0,) has a unique decimal representation 0b b b b, where each b i one of the digits 0,,,,, and there is not a repeating sequence of s at the end (Recall that, eg, 0 = 060, etc) Define f : [0,) P(N) as f ( 0b b b b ) = { 0b, 0 b, 0 b, } For example, f (0) = { 0,00,000,0000,00000, }, and f (00) = { 0,00 } Also f (0) = f (00) = { 0,0 } To see that f is injective, take two unequal numbers 0b b b b and 0d d d d in [0,) Then b i d i for some index i Hence b i 0 i f (0b b b b ) but b i 0 i f (0d d d d ), so f (0b b b b ) f (0d d d d ) Consequently f is injective Next, define g : P(N) [0,), where g(x) = 0b b b b is the number for which b i = if i X and b i = 0 if i X For example, g ({, }) = 00000, and g ({,,6,8, }) = Also g( ) = 0 and g(n) = 0 To see that g is injective, suppose X Y Then there is at least one integer i that belongs to one of X or Y, but not the other Consequently g(x) g(y ) because they differ in the ith decimal place This shows g is injective From the injections f : [0,) P(N) and g : P(N) [0,), the Cantor- Bernstein-Schröeder theorem guarantees a bijection h : [0, ) P(N) Hence [0,) = P(N) As R = [0,), we conclude R = P(N)

Finite Sets. Theorem 5.1. Two non-empty finite sets have the same cardinality if and only if they are equivalent.

MATH 337 Cardinality Dr. Neal, WKU We now shall prove that the rational numbers are a countable set while R is uncountable. This result shows that there are two different magnitudes of infinity. But we

CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE

CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE With the notion of bijection at hand, it is easy to formalize the idea that two finite sets have the same number of elements: we just need to verify

13 Infinite Sets. 13.1 Injections, Surjections, and Bijections. mcs-ftl 2010/9/8 0:40 page 379 #385

mcs-ftl 2010/9/8 0:40 page 379 #385 13 Infinite Sets So you might be wondering how much is there to say about an infinite set other than, well, it has an infinite number of elements. Of course, an infinite

MAT2400 Analysis I. A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions

MAT2400 Analysis I A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions In Analysis I there is a lot of manipulations with sets and functions. It is probably also the first course where you have to take

INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY

M.Sc. program in mathematics INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY Katalin Károlyi Department of Applied Analysis, Eötvös Loránd University H-1088 Budapest, Múzeum krt. 6-8. CONTENTS 1. SETS Set, equal sets, subset,

Sets and Subsets. Countable and Uncountable

Sets and Subsets Countable and Uncountable Reading Appendix A Section A.6.8 Pages 788-792 BIG IDEAS Themes 1. There exist functions that cannot be computed in Java or any other computer language. 2. There

Georg Cantor (1845-1918):

Georg Cantor (845-98): The man who tamed infinity lecture by Eric Schechter Associate Professor of Mathematics Vanderbilt University http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/ schectex/ In papers of 873 and 874,

Introducing Functions

Functions 1 Introducing Functions A function f from a set A to a set B, written f : A B, is a relation f A B such that every element of A is related to one element of B; in logical notation 1. (a, b 1

You know from calculus that functions play a fundamental role in mathematics.

CHPTER 12 Functions You know from calculus that functions play a fundamental role in mathematics. You likely view a function as a kind of formula that describes a relationship between two (or more) quantities.

It is not immediately obvious that this should even give an integer. Since 1 < 1 5

Math 163 - Introductory Seminar Lehigh University Spring 8 Notes on Fibonacci numbers, binomial coefficients and mathematical induction These are mostly notes from a previous class and thus include some

In mathematics you don t understand things. You just get used to them. (Attributed to John von Neumann)

Chapter 1 Sets and Functions We understand a set to be any collection M of certain distinct objects of our thought or intuition (called the elements of M) into a whole. (Georg Cantor, 1895) In mathematics

Sets and Cardinality Notes for C. F. Miller

Sets and Cardinality Notes for 620-111 C. F. Miller Semester 1, 2000 Abstract These lecture notes were compiled in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics in the University of Melbourne for the use

SETS, RELATIONS, AND FUNCTIONS

September 27, 2009 and notations Common Universal Subset and Power Set Cardinality Operations A set is a collection or group of objects or elements or members (Cantor 1895). the collection of the four

Mathematics for Computer Science

Mathematics for Computer Science Lecture 2: Functions and equinumerous sets Areces, Blackburn and Figueira TALARIS team INRIA Nancy Grand Est Contact: patrick.blackburn@loria.fr Course website: http://www.loria.fr/~blackbur/courses/math

How many numbers there are?

How many numbers there are? RADEK HONZIK Radek Honzik: Charles University, Department of Logic, Celetná 20, Praha 1, 116 42, Czech Republic radek.honzik@ff.cuni.cz Contents 1 What are numbers 2 1.1 Natural

vertex, 369 disjoint pairwise, 395 disjoint sets, 236 disjunction, 33, 36 distributive laws

Index absolute value, 135 141 additive identity, 254 additive inverse, 254 aleph, 466 algebra of sets, 245, 278 antisymmetric relation, 387 arcsine function, 349 arithmetic sequence, 208 arrow diagram,

Applications of Methods of Proof

CHAPTER 4 Applications of Methods of Proof 1. Set Operations 1.1. Set Operations. The set-theoretic operations, intersection, union, and complementation, defined in Chapter 1.1 Introduction to Sets are

Chapter 6 Finite sets and infinite sets. Copyright 2013, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.1, Slide 1

Chapter 6 Finite sets and infinite sets Copyright 013, 005, 001 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.1, Slide 1 Section 6. PROPERTIES OF THE NATURE NUMBERS 013 Pearson Education, Inc.1 Slide Recall that denotes

Sets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.

Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.

CHAPTER 1. Basic Ideas

CHPTER 1 asic Ideas In the end, all mathematics can be boiled down to logic and set theory. ecause of this, any careful presentation of fundamental mathematical ideas is inevitably couched in the language

Students in their first advanced mathematics classes are often surprised

CHAPTER 8 Proofs Involving Sets Students in their first advanced mathematics classes are often surprised by the extensive role that sets play and by the fact that most of the proofs they encounter are

INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS

INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS STEVEN HEILMAN Contents 1. Homework 1 1 2. Homework 2 6 3. Homework 3 10 4. Homework 4 16 5. Homework 5 19 6. Homework 6 21 7. Homework 7 25 8. Homework 8 28

4. TILING AND DISSECTION 4.2. Scissors Congruence

What is Area? Despite being such a fundamental notion of geometry, the concept of area is very difficult to define. As human beings, we have an intuitive grasp of the idea which suffices for our everyday

This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics.

Appendix A Set Theory This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics. A.1 Basic Definitions Definition A.1.1. A set is an unordered collection of elements.

2. Methods of Proof Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try.

2. METHODS OF PROOF 69 2. Methods of Proof 2.1. Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try. Trivial Proof: If we know q is true then

We now explore a third method of proof: proof by contradiction.

CHAPTER 6 Proof by Contradiction We now explore a third method of proof: proof by contradiction. This method is not limited to proving just conditional statements it can be used to prove any kind of statement

Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the axioms and any previously proven theorems.

Math 232 - Discrete Math 2.1 Direct Proofs and Counterexamples Notes Axiom: Proposition that is assumed to be true. Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques

4CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL: SETS, FUNCTIONS AND MATHEMATICAL INDU 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques The purpose of this section is to study the proof technique known as mathematical induction.

3. Mathematical Induction

3. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 83 3. Mathematical Induction 3.1. First Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P (n) be a predicate with domain of discourse (over) the natural numbers N = {0, 1,,...}. If (1)

Section 2.6 Cantor s Theorem and the ZFC Axioms

1 Section 2.6 and the ZFC Axioms Purpose of Section: To state and prove Cantor theorem, which guarantees the existence of infinities larger than the cardinality of the continuum. We also state and discuss

WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT?

WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT? introduction Many students seem to have trouble with the notion of a mathematical proof. People that come to a course like Math 216, who certainly

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

3. Recurrence Recursive Definitions. To construct a recursively defined function:

3. RECURRENCE 10 3. Recurrence 3.1. Recursive Definitions. To construct a recursively defined function: 1. Initial Condition(s) (or basis): Prescribe initial value(s) of the function.. Recursion: Use a

Notes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan

The General Approach Notes on Factoring MA 26 Kurt Bryan Suppose I hand you n, a 2 digit integer and tell you that n is composite, with smallest prime factor around 5 digits. Finding a nontrivial factor

Sets, Relations and Functions

Sets, Relations and Functions Eric Pacuit Department of Philosophy University of Maryland, College Park pacuit.org epacuit@umd.edu ugust 26, 2014 These notes provide a very brief background in discrete

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement

GROUPS ACTING ON A SET

GROUPS ACTING ON A SET MATH 435 SPRING 2012 NOTES FROM FEBRUARY 27TH, 2012 1. Left group actions Definition 1.1. Suppose that G is a group and S is a set. A left (group) action of G on S is a rule for

CHAPTER 3. Methods of Proofs. 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs

CHAPTER 3 Methods of Proofs 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs 1.1. Basic Terminology. An axiom is a statement that is given to be true. A rule of inference is a logical rule that is used to deduce

Review for Final Exam

Review for Final Exam Note: Warning, this is probably not exhaustive and probably does contain typos (which I d like to hear about), but represents a review of most of the material covered in Chapters

Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning

Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or

9.2 Summation Notation

9. Summation Notation 66 9. Summation Notation In the previous section, we introduced sequences and now we shall present notation and theorems concerning the sum of terms of a sequence. We begin with a

CS 3719 (Theory of Computation and Algorithms) Lecture 4

CS 3719 (Theory of Computation and Algorithms) Lecture 4 Antonina Kolokolova January 18, 2012 1 Undecidable languages 1.1 Church-Turing thesis Let s recap how it all started. In 1990, Hilbert stated a

An Innocent Investigation

An Innocent Investigation D. Joyce, Clark University January 2006 The beginning. Have you ever wondered why every number is either even or odd? I don t mean to ask if you ever wondered whether every number

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples

If A is divided by B the result is 2/3. If B is divided by C the result is 4/7. What is the result if A is divided by C?

Problem 3 If A is divided by B the result is 2/3. If B is divided by C the result is 4/7. What is the result if A is divided by C? Suggested Questions to ask students about Problem 3 The key to this question

PRINCIPLE OF MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION

Chapter 4 PRINCIPLE OF MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION Analysis and natural philosophy owe their most important discoveries to this fruitful means, which is called induction Newton was indebted to it for his theorem

2.1 Sets, power sets. Cartesian Products.

Lecture 8 2.1 Sets, power sets. Cartesian Products. Set is an unordered collection of objects. - used to group objects together, - often the objects with similar properties This description of a set (without

Chapter 3. Cartesian Products and Relations. 3.1 Cartesian Products

Chapter 3 Cartesian Products and Relations The material in this chapter is the first real encounter with abstraction. Relations are very general thing they are a special type of subset. After introducing

CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems

CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems Numbers play an important role in almost all areas of mathematics, not least in calculus. Virtually all calculus books contain a thorough description of the natural,

Cartesian Products and Relations

Cartesian Products and Relations Definition (Cartesian product) If A and B are sets, the Cartesian product of A and B is the set A B = {(a, b) :(a A) and (b B)}. The following points are worth special

We give a basic overview of the mathematical background required for this course.

1 Background We give a basic overview of the mathematical background required for this course. 1.1 Set Theory We introduce some concepts from naive set theory (as opposed to axiomatic set theory). The

SECTION 10-2 Mathematical Induction

73 0 Sequences and Series 6. Approximate e 0. using the first five terms of the series. Compare this approximation with your calculator evaluation of e 0.. 6. Approximate e 0.5 using the first five terms

S(A) X α for all α Λ. Consequently, S(A) X, by the definition of intersection. Therefore, X is inductive.

MA 274: Exam 2 Study Guide (1) Know the precise definitions of the terms requested for your journal. (2) Review proofs by induction. (3) Be able to prove that something is or isn t an equivalence relation.

Consistency, completeness of undecidable preposition of Principia Mathematica. Tanmay Jaipurkar

Consistency, completeness of undecidable preposition of Principia Mathematica Tanmay Jaipurkar October 21, 2013 Abstract The fallowing paper discusses the inconsistency and undecidable preposition of Principia

Problem Set. Problem Set #2. Math 5322, Fall December 3, 2001 ANSWERS

Problem Set Problem Set #2 Math 5322, Fall 2001 December 3, 2001 ANSWERS i Problem 1. [Problem 18, page 32] Let A P(X) be an algebra, A σ the collection of countable unions of sets in A, and A σδ the collection

Chapter 4 Lecture Notes

Chapter 4 Lecture Notes Random Variables October 27, 2015 1 Section 4.1 Random Variables A random variable is typically a real-valued function defined on the sample space of some experiment. For instance,

Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF

Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF To be able to understand mathematics and mathematical arguments, it is necessary to have a solid understanding of logic and the way in which known facts can be combined to prove

Section 1. Statements and Truth Tables. Definition 1.1: A mathematical statement is a declarative sentence that is true or false, but not both.

M3210 Supplemental Notes: Basic Logic Concepts In this course we will examine statements about mathematical concepts and relationships between these concepts (definitions, theorems). We will also consider

MATHS 315 Mathematical Logic

MATHS 315 Mathematical Logic Second Semester, 2006 Contents 2 Formal Statement Logic 1 2.1 Post production systems................................. 1 2.2 The system L.......................................

Introduction Russell s Paradox Basic Set Theory Operations on Sets. 6. Sets. Terence Sim

6. Sets Terence Sim 6.1. Introduction A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One. Georg Cantor Reading Section 6.1 6.3 of Epp. Section 3.1 3.4 of Campbell. Familiar concepts Sets can

136 CHAPTER 4. INDUCTION, GRAPHS AND TREES

136 TER 4. INDUCTION, GRHS ND TREES 4.3 Graphs In this chapter we introduce a fundamental structural idea of discrete mathematics, that of a graph. Many situations in the applications of discrete mathematics

1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers.

+a 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers. Definition 1.1. (Sequence) A sequence is a function with domain N. Example 1.2. A sequence of real

ORDERS OF ELEMENTS IN A GROUP

ORDERS OF ELEMENTS IN A GROUP KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let G be a group and g G. We say g has finite order if g n = e for some positive integer n. For example, 1 and i have finite order in C, since

Revised Version of Chapter 23. We learned long ago how to solve linear congruences. ax c (mod m)

Chapter 23 Squares Modulo p Revised Version of Chapter 23 We learned long ago how to solve linear congruences ax c (mod m) (see Chapter 8). It s now time to take the plunge and move on to quadratic equations.

Math 3000 Running Glossary

Math 3000 Running Glossary Last Updated on: July 15, 2014 The definition of items marked with a must be known precisely. Chapter 1: 1. A set: A collection of objects called elements. 2. The empty set (

Prime Numbers. Chapter Primes and Composites

Chapter 2 Prime Numbers The term factoring or factorization refers to the process of expressing an integer as the product of two or more integers in a nontrivial way, e.g., 42 = 6 7. Prime numbers are

Degrees that are not degrees of categoricity

Degrees that are not degrees of categoricity Bernard A. Anderson Department of Mathematics and Physical Sciences Gordon State College banderson@gordonstate.edu www.gordonstate.edu/faculty/banderson Barbara

A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One. (Georg Cantor)

Chapter 4 Set Theory A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One. (Georg Cantor) In the previous chapters, we have often encountered sets, for example, prime numbers form a set, domains

Introduction to mathematical arguments

Introduction to mathematical arguments (background handout for courses requiring proofs) by Michael Hutchings A mathematical proof is an argument which convinces other people that something is true. Math

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction

31 is a prime number is a mathematical statement (which happens to be true).

Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic In its most basic form, Mathematics is the practice of assigning truth to welldefined statements. In this course, we will develop the skills to use known true statements to

MATH10040 Chapter 2: Prime and relatively prime numbers

MATH10040 Chapter 2: Prime and relatively prime numbers Recall the basic definition: 1. Prime numbers Definition 1.1. Recall that a positive integer is said to be prime if it has precisely two positive

A Second Course in Mathematics Concepts for Elementary Teachers: Theory, Problems, and Solutions

A Second Course in Mathematics Concepts for Elementary Teachers: Theory, Problems, and Solutions Marcel B. Finan Arkansas Tech University c All Rights Reserved First Draft February 8, 2006 1 Contents 25

1 The Concept of a Mapping

Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan 1 The Concept of a Mapping The concept of a mapping (aka function) is important throughout mathematics. We have been dealing

Problems on Discrete Mathematics 1

Problems on Discrete Mathematics 1 Chung-Chih Li 2 Kishan Mehrotra 3 Syracuse University, New York L A TEX at January 11, 2007 (Part I) 1 No part of this book can be reproduced without permission from

The last three chapters introduced three major proof techniques: direct,

CHAPTER 7 Proving Non-Conditional Statements The last three chapters introduced three major proof techniques: direct, contrapositive and contradiction. These three techniques are used to prove statements

Mathematical Induction

Mathematical Induction (Handout March 8, 01) The Principle of Mathematical Induction provides a means to prove infinitely many statements all at once The principle is logical rather than strictly mathematical,

Cardinality. The set of all finite strings over the alphabet of lowercase letters is countable. The set of real numbers R is an uncountable set.

Section 2.5 Cardinality (another) Definition: The cardinality of a set A is equal to the cardinality of a set B, denoted A = B, if and only if there is a bijection from A to B. If there is an injection

University of Oslo MAT2 Project The Banach-Tarski Paradox Author: Fredrik Meyer Supervisor: Nadia S. Larsen Abstract In its weak form, the Banach-Tarski paradox states that for any ball in R, it is possible

Probability Foundations for Electrical Engineers Prof. Krishna Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Probability Foundations for Electrical Engineers Prof. Krishna Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 9 Borel Sets and Lebesgue Measure -1 (Refer

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein and Shakarchi s text, Chapter 1. 1. Prove that the Cantor set C constructed in the text is totally disconnected and perfect. In other

Lecture 1: Elementary Number Theory

Lecture 1: Elementary Number Theory The integers are the simplest and most fundamental objects in discrete mathematics. All calculations by computers are based on the arithmetical operations with integers

Chapter 11 Number Theory

Chapter 11 Number Theory Number theory is one of the oldest branches of mathematics. For many years people who studied number theory delighted in its pure nature because there were few practical applications

Math 3000 Section 003 Intro to Abstract Math Homework 2

Math 3000 Section 003 Intro to Abstract Math Homework 2 Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences University of Colorado Denver, Spring 2012 Solutions (February 13, 2012) Please note that these

Chapter 1. Informal introdution to the axioms of ZF.

Chapter 1. Informal introdution to the axioms of ZF. 1.1. Extension. Our conception of sets comes from set of objects that we know well such as N, Q and R, and subsets we can form from these determined

Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned

CONSTRUCTION OF THE FINITE FIELDS Z p S. R. DOTY Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned solely with questions about the set of integers Z = {0, ±1,

FIRST YEAR CALCULUS. Chapter 7 CONTINUITY. It is a parabola, and we can draw this parabola without lifting our pencil from the paper.

FIRST YEAR CALCULUS WWLCHENW L c WWWL W L Chen, 1982, 2008. 2006. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It It is is

(Refer Slide Time: 1:41)

Discrete Mathematical Structures Dr. Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture # 10 Sets Today we shall learn about sets. You must

It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing

CHAPTER 4 Direct Proof It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing this; we now examine the most straightforward approach, a technique called direct proof. As we begin, it

Axiom A.1. Lines, planes and space are sets of points. Space contains all points.

73 Appendix A.1 Basic Notions We take the terms point, line, plane, and space as undefined. We also use the concept of a set and a subset, belongs to or is an element of a set. In a formal axiomatic approach

MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION. Mathematical Induction. This is a powerful method to prove properties of positive integers.

MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION MIGUEL A LERMA (Last updated: February 8, 003) Mathematical Induction This is a powerful method to prove properties of positive integers Principle of Mathematical Induction Let P

Set theory as a foundation for mathematics

Set theory as a foundation for mathematics Waffle Mathcamp 2011 In school we are taught about numbers, but we never learn what numbers really are. We learn rules of arithmetic, but we never learn why these

TREES IN SET THEORY SPENCER UNGER

TREES IN SET THEORY SPENCER UNGER 1. Introduction Although I was unaware of it while writing the first two talks, my talks in the graduate student seminar have formed a coherent series. This talk can be

Set Theory Basic Concepts and Definitions

Set Theory Basic Concepts and Definitions The Importance of Set Theory One striking feature of humans is their inherent need and ability to group objects according to specific criteria. Our prehistoric

For the purposes of this course, the natural numbers are the positive integers. We denote by N, the set of natural numbers.

Lecture 1: Induction and the Natural numbers Math 1a is a somewhat unusual course. It is a proof-based treatment of Calculus, for all of you who have already demonstrated a strong grounding in Calculus

Induction. Margaret M. Fleck. 10 October These notes cover mathematical induction and recursive definition

Induction Margaret M. Fleck 10 October 011 These notes cover mathematical induction and recursive definition 1 Introduction to induction At the start of the term, we saw the following formula for computing

Structure of Measurable Sets

Structure of Measurable Sets In these notes we discuss the structure of Lebesgue measurable subsets of R from several different points of view. Along the way, we will see several alternative characterizations

INCIDENCE-BETWEENNESS GEOMETRY

INCIDENCE-BETWEENNESS GEOMETRY MATH 410, CSUSM. SPRING 2008. PROFESSOR AITKEN This document covers the geometry that can be developed with just the axioms related to incidence and betweenness. The full