I1II I Ill I I II II II Item Number: 44

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "I1II I Ill I I II II II Item Number: 44"

Transcription

1 1111I I1 II I I1IIIIII I I Control Number: I1II I Ill I I II II II Item Number: 44 Addendum StartPage: 0

2 DOCKET NO SUGAR LAND TELEPHONE COMPANY S 3 COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR - 1 BEFo984rh f TV 1 23 P1 1 2: 49 EXPEDITED RULING AGAINST FOCAL, 0 PUBLIC UTWE GQMY %W&, 0 H COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION 9 OF TEmsF1LING CLERK TO THE HONORABLE COMMISSION: SUGAR LAND S RESPONSE TO FOCAL S MOTION TO ADDRESS THRESHOLD ISSUE Sugar Land Telephone Company ( Sugar Land ) provides the following response to Focal Communications Corporation s ( Focal ) Motion to Address Threshold Issue, and in response states as follows: Focal asks the Arbitrators to address a threshold issue in the event its Motion to Abate is denied. (Focal Motion at p. 4.) The question which Focal poses as a threshold issue is the following: Is VOIP traffic subject to access compensation under current FCC regulations? Id. Focal asserts that some or part of the traffic in dispute may be VOIP, and/or may be declared by its customer to be VOIP, without defining what is or is not VOIP for purposes of this motion. Focal then asserts that if access does apply to VOIP traffic, then the only issue is (1) the amount of compensation due Sugar Land and (2) whether Focal is liable for the charges on this traffic. Sugar Land urges the Arbitrators to deny this motion for the following reasons: 1. The question posed does not address the ultimate issue - whether the traf$c in dispute is the type of traffic the parties have agreed to exchange under their Interconnection Anreem ent. The issue for decision in this proceeding is whether the traffic in dispute can be exchanged pursuant to the Focal/Sugar Land Interconnection Agreement. As Sugar Land has detailed in its Amended Complaint, the traffic in dispute is outside the parties Interconnection Agreement. The

3 Interconnection Agreements provide that Focal may exchange only traffic which is telephone exchange service or exchange access originated on Focal s network, not traffic generated by third parties and handed to Focal for termination. (Interconnection Agreement at Attachment 12, r( 1.2.) The Interconnection Agreement contains no provision that Sugar Land must accept Focal s customer s declaration in determining the jurisdictional nature of the traffic delivered. In fact, the Interconnection Agreement has express provisions that govern how the jurisdictional nature of the traffic will be determined. (See Interconnection Agreement at Attachment 12, Section 2, and Attachment 4, Section ) Focal asserts that because its customers have expressly warranted to Focal that the traffic is VOP traffic that is exempt from access charges, the traffic can be terminated as Local Traffic under the agreement. As addressed in Sugar Land s Response to the Intervention of Transcom Enhanced Services, LLC, filed February 12, 2004, at page 3, Focal s agreement with a third party cannot change the provisions of the Interconnection Agreement. Based on the data available to Sugac Land, the disputed traffic originates at a telephone number outside Focal s network, and is therefore outside the parties Interconnection Agreement. Moreover, Focal has not submitted its contracts for review, nor tied the disputed traffic to any such contract. Focal has provided Sugar Land s counsel with a redacted copy of the Master Service Agreement, but it has not filed this document or produced it in discovery by which the representations attributed to are assumed to have been provided under oath. Rather, Focal simply states that these miscellaneous pages are representative of contracts with the customers whose traffic is in dispute. Examination of the document itself reveals these pages are incomplete, many The first page of the document indicates the document has 30 pages. Pages 1-4 are marked Page 1 of 30, Page 2 of30, etc. Page 5 then begins with different pagination which states only Page 5. Pages 5 through 15 are provided with redactions; then the document skips to page 23. Pages 24 through 30 are not provided. Exhibits A, B, C, and D -2-

4 pages are wholly missing, it is undated, and could have been entered into subsequent to the traffic in dispute. Moreover, parts of these contracts are executed by Focal Communications Corporation or Focal Financial Services, Inc. None bear the name Focal Communications Corporation of Texas, the party to the Sugar Land Interconnection Agreement. There is no representation that these pages are complete or that they are the terms that govern all the traffic in dispute, and Focal has resisted all discovery that would allow such facts to be ascertained. The forwarding of this collection of miscellaneous pages from other Focal entities contracts to Sugar Land s counsel, outside the discovery process and without filing them in the docket, does not establish Focal s assertions that all of the traffic in dispute is VOIP, or even that its customers claim the traffic in dispute to be VOIP. In addition, there are numerous provisions in these pages that indicate the traffic originated as interexchange toll calling by these third-party customers, or otherwise outside the Interconnection Agreement, is being terminated to Focal under this so-called representative Master Agreement. Because these pages were provided under Focal s counsel s claims that they are confidential, the substantive nature of these provisions are not recited here. 2. The stated threshold issue is whollv hvpotheticul. Focal seeks a ruling on a question that, at this point, is wholly hypothetical. Focal asserts the traffic in dispute is VOIP traffic. However, Focal has not shown, or pled, that the disputed traffic, even if VOW, originates on its network and is therefore subject to the parties Interconnection Agreement. The VOIP issue is relevant only if Focal first shows that VOIP traffic (which, by the Index, is Call Detail Records ) are not provided. One page of an Exhibit E is provided. The title on this page differs from the title of this Exhibit in the Index. It is unclear whether Exhibit E is complete. Exhibit E is apparently from a different agreement, entered into between the customer and Focal Financial Services, Inc. There is no reference between it and the preceding or subsequent pages. Exhibit F is not provided. The next page is Page 1 of 4 of a First Amendment to Agreement, followed by a Page 1 of 4 in a different type set. The last two pages are titled Transition Agreement. -3-

5 arising from other networks (such as Transcorn) is subject to the parties Interconnection Agreement, and that the disputed traffic is VOIP. As yet, Focal has resisted all discovery that would enable the parties to examine whether the traffic is in fact VOIP. In addition, Focal offers no definition of VOIP y for purposes of this threshold question. While resisting all discovery as to whether the traffic is or is not VOIP, and resisting all efforts to define what is or is not VOIP, 2 Focal asks the Arbitrators to decide what is, at this point, the hypothetical question - that if the traffic were some undefined type of VOIP traffic, would such undefined VOIP traffic be subject to access charges? As the Arbitrators are likely aware, there are questions pending before the FCC as to various forms of traffic, defined in various ways, that may use some form of internet protocol in the transport of that call. As yet in this proceeding, Focal has not defined the nature of the traffic at issue, but only states that its customers claim the traffic to be VOIP. These declarations remain secret, including the definition used by these customers to define what traffic is subject to their VOIP declaration. From the response given by Focal quoted in footnote 1, supra, Focal allows its customers to self-define VOIP. Assuming that this declaration also has rate consequences for the Focal customer, such secret declarations can be given no weight at all. Thus, at this point, in order to address this threshold question, the Arbitrators would have to address every conceivable form of traffic that a self-interested customer might declare to be VOIP, to address the threshold issue Focal poses. As is obvious, this is not an efficient manner of proceeding, nor will it narrow the issues. See Focal s Response to Sugar Land s 1 RFI No. 1: Since there are many types of VoIP, it may not be possible to apply a single over-arching definition to all of the various service architectures. One of the questions before the FCC is how to define VoIP in a meaningful manner and Focal awaits further direction from the FCC before attempting to define VoIP. Focal further states that its ESP customers warrant that the traffic they deliver to Focal is only VoIP traffic. Apparently, VoIP is whatever Focal s customers declare it to be, knowing that if that characterization is given, Focal will represent the traffic to Sugar Land as local and not subject to switched access. -4-

6 In summary, Focal seeks a decision on a wholly hypothetical question which will not resolve any matter at issue in this controversy. In addition, because the term VOIP is not defined, the issue is not framed in such a way as to provide for a meaningful decision. 3. There is no procedure for addressing a threshold issue under PUC Proc. R The procedural process for dispute resolution under PUC Proc. R contemplates that a hearing will be conducted, then a draft arbitration award will be presented to the Commission. This process requires a hearing to be initiated within 50 days of a complaint being filed. There is no procedure under this rule to consider a threshold issue as requested by Focal. Nor is there a procedure to then apply such a decision in the subsequent fact hearing to determine the nature of the traffic in dispute. As these questions show, Focal s motion puts the cart before the horse. The first step is to establish whether the disputed traffic is subject to termination as Local Traffic under the parties Interconnection Agreement. Focal s proposal to use the limited time frame in which this dispute must be decided to address a hypothetical question is not an efficient or practical means of narrowing and resolving this dispute. Sugar Land urges that the Motion be denied. Respectfully submitted, MCGINNIS, LOCHRIDGE & KILGORE, L.L.P Capitol Center 919 Congress Avenue Austin, Texas Tel: (512) Fax: (512) I By: wi$zlzb- Brook Bennett Brown State Bar No.: ATTORNEYS FOR SUGAR LAND TELEPHONE COMPANY -5-

7 CERTIFICATE OF SER VICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via telecopy to the following counsel of record on this 23rd day of February, 2004: Ms. Diane Barlow 919 Congress Ave., Suite 1060 Austin, TX VIA TELECOPY (512) In addition, a copy has been provided by to Mr. Scott McCullough, counsel for Transcorn, by fax to Mr. McCullough, at (512) Brook Bennett Brown -6-

Control Number : Item Number : 4. Addendum StartPage: 0

Control Number : Item Number : 4. Addendum StartPage: 0 Control Number : 43983 Item Number : 4 Addendum StartPage: 0 DOCKET NO. 43983 F^ ;1! COMPLAINT OF ALEX BROOKS JR 2815 J"^j '8 All 11: 42 AGAINST TXU ENERGY RETAIL PUBLIC UTILITY d0mm1sni}q111 COMPANY LLC

More information

STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UTILITIES BOARD

STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UTILITIES BOARD STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UTILITIES BOARD IN RE: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner, DOCKET NO. ARB-05-4 vs. QWEST CORPORATION, Respondent. ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR HEARING AND GRANTING

More information

Control Number : 26381. Item Number : 262. Addendum StartPage : 0

Control Number : 26381. Item Number : 262. Addendum StartPage : 0 Control Number : 26381 Item Number : 262 Addendum StartPage : 0 A Limited Liability Partnership Post Office Box 13366 Austin, Texas 78711 Telephone ( 512) 879-0900 Fax (512) 879-0912 February 16, 2011

More information

Dulaney L. O Roark III Vice President & General Counsel, Southeast Region Legal Department 5055 North Point Parkway Alpharetta, Georgia 30022

Dulaney L. O Roark III Vice President & General Counsel, Southeast Region Legal Department 5055 North Point Parkway Alpharetta, Georgia 30022 Dulaney L. O Roark III Vice President & General Counsel, Southeast Region Legal Department 5055 North Point Parkway Alpharetta, Georgia 30022 Phone 678-259-1449 Fax 678-259-1589 de.oroark@verizon.com July

More information

RE: ARB 165(1) and ARB 422(1) Comments of Verizon Northwest Inc.

RE: ARB 165(1) and ARB 422(1) Comments of Verizon Northwest Inc. March 18, 2004 Ms. Cheryl Walker Administrative Hearings Division Oregon Public Utility Commission 550 Capitol Street N.E., Suite 215 Salem, OR 97310 RE: ARB 165(1) and ARB 422(1) Comments of Verizon Northwest

More information

Control Number : 43695. Item Number : 103. Addendum StartPage : 0

Control Number : 43695. Item Number : 103. Addendum StartPage : 0 Control Number : 43695 Item Number : 103 Addendum StartPage : 0 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-15-1556 PUC DOCKET NO. 43695 5 X" -1 12 P"tl' 4: 35 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN BEFORE THE STATE OFFIe^ PUBLIC SERVICE

More information

Case 8:14-cv RAL-TBM Document 45 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID 217 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:14-cv RAL-TBM Document 45 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID 217 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:14-cv-03035-RAL-TBM Document 45 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID 217 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COLIN SPEER, CASE NO. 8:14-CV-3035-RAL-TBM v. Plaintiff,

More information

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE DT 08-013. Com cast Phone of New Hampshire, LLC Request for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE DT 08-013. Com cast Phone of New Hampshire, LLC Request for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DT 08-013 Com cast Phone of New Hampshire, LLC Request for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services Objection by New Hampshire

More information

August 19, 2004-1 - Final Decision and Order 04-150 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

August 19, 2004-1 - Final Decision and Order 04-150 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION August 19, 2004-1 - Final Decision and Order 04-150 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Student v. Shelton Board of Education On behalf of the Parents: On behalf of the Board: Before Hearing Officer:

More information

NORTH CAROLINA EDUCATION LOTTERY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 6 LEGAL POLICIES 6.02 CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

NORTH CAROLINA EDUCATION LOTTERY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 6 LEGAL POLICIES 6.02 CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION Page 1 of 12 SCOPE These Dispute Resolution Procedures apply to and shall constitute the exclusive procedure for binding resolution of all claims, disputes, complaints and Dispute Resolution Requests of

More information

Case sgj11 Doc 658 Filed 01/22/15 Entered 01/22/15 13:12:17 Page 1 of 4

Case sgj11 Doc 658 Filed 01/22/15 Entered 01/22/15 13:12:17 Page 1 of 4 Case 14-34941-sgj11 Doc 658 Filed 01/22/15 Entered 01/22/15 13:12:17 Page 1 of 4 Texas State Bar No. 24079031 Bankruptcy & Collections Division P. O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 P: (512) 463-2173/F:

More information

DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND THE DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM.

DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND THE DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM. DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND THE DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM. 1.0 Mandatory Referral to Discovery Facilitator Program 1.1 Any party wishing to file a discovery motion must first serve a Request for Assignment

More information

Addendum StartPage: 0

Addendum StartPage: 0 Control Number : 44607 Item Number : 12 Addendum StartPage: 0 at&t Christie M. Villarreal General Attorney Legal AT&T Texas T: 512.457-2305 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100 F: 512.870.3420 Austin, Texas

More information

Address: City: State: Zip:

Address: City: State: Zip: As an equal opportunity Company, it is the policy of RusticCo, LLC, (the Company ) to treat all employees and applicants for employment equally without regard to race, religion, color, age, sex, sexual

More information

Addendum StartPage : 0

Addendum StartPage : 0 Control Number : 40625 Item Number : 36 Addendum StartPage : 0 P.U.C. DOCKET NO. 40625 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-13-081 ^: ---, - _ COMPLAINT OF FELIX PUBLIC UTILITY COM^-^S*N CARRILLO D/B/A RANCHO VIEJO AGAINST

More information

Control Number : Item Number: 70. Addendum StartPage : 1

Control Number : Item Number: 70. Addendum StartPage : 1 Control Number : 45415 Item Number: 70 Addendum StartPage : 1 ^...... ^ May 13, 2016 RECEIVED 2016 MAY ^ ^ ^^ 9: ^^ GVNW CON S, l.til.id ^ r LTING INC. 1001 WATER STREET SUITE A-100 KERRVILLE, TX 78028

More information

the Interconnection Agreements filed with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (the

the Interconnection Agreements filed with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (the - ' '..:,- ':)CeC \ir i \;- ; L!LED IDAHO pub~i~~:i~~~e OMMISgWi'fEB -6 1"- ~;i'i 9: 58 In the Matter of the Petition for Approval of an Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement Between Verizon Northwest

More information

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES FOR THE SUPERIOR, STATE, PROBATE, MAGISTRATE & JUVENILE COURTS OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES FOR THE SUPERIOR, STATE, PROBATE, MAGISTRATE & JUVENILE COURTS OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES FOR THE SUPERIOR, STATE, PROBATE, MAGISTRATE & JUVENILE COURTS OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA Adopted and Approved by the Board of Trustees of the Fulton County

More information

POLICY MANUAL CHAPTER 1 - PROCUREMENT POLICIES 1.1 DISPUTE RESOLUTION

POLICY MANUAL CHAPTER 1 - PROCUREMENT POLICIES 1.1 DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY MANUAL CHAPTER 1 - PROCUREMENT POLICIES 1.1 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1.1.1 DEFINITIONS A. Act means the Tennessee Education Lottery Implementation Law, as may be amended from time to time. B. Aggrieved

More information

LAWYER-CLIENT FIXED-FEE AGREEMENT

LAWYER-CLIENT FIXED-FEE AGREEMENT 1 1. Parties. This Lawyer-Client Fixed-Fee Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into by and 2 between Dane S. Ciolino, LLC ( Lawyer ), and 3 ( Client ) as of the latest date set forth 4 below. Lawyer is

More information

STATE OF MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (410) WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NO. ADDRESS:

STATE OF MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (410) WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NO.  ADDRESS: Case 1:13-cv-02841-CCB Document 18 Filed 10/15/13 Page 1 of 3 DOUGLAS F. GANSLER Attorney General KATHERINE WINFREE Chief Deputy Attorney General JOHN B. HOWARD, JR. Deputy Attorney General (410 576-6955

More information

BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT

BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT JPMorgan Chase believes that if a dispute related to an employee s or former employee s employment arises, it is in the best interests of both the individual and JPMorgan

More information

Controi N mber: Item Number: 375. Addendum StartPage: 0

Controi N mber: Item Number: 375. Addendum StartPage: 0 Controi N mber: 4544 Item Number: 375 Addendum StartPage: 0 REVIEW OF THE RATES PF SHARYLAND UTILITIES, L.P., ESTABLISHMENT OF RATES FOR SHARYLAND DISTRIBUTION & TRANSM, ISSION SERVICES, L.L.C., AND REQUEST

More information

Control Number : 40915. Item Number: 1. Addendum StartPage: 0

Control Number : 40915. Item Number: 1. Addendum StartPage: 0 Control Number : 40915 Item Number: 1 Addendum StartPage: 0 DOCKET NO. AGREED SETTLEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISUIY"^ PROPOSED AND CONSENT `

More information

Control Number: 36164. Item Number : 48. Addendum StartPage : 0

Control Number: 36164. Item Number : 48. Addendum StartPage : 0 Control Number: 36164 Item Number : 48 Addendum StartPage : 0 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-09-2277 PUCT DOCKET NO. 36164 APPLICATION OF TRUE WIRELESS BEFORE THE t. ^ LLC FOR DESIGNATION AS AN -- ^ ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA )) )) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA )) )) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 XXXXXXXX, AZ Bar. No. XXXXX ORGANIZATION Phone Number WELFARE LAW CENTER, INC. Attorney s Name Seventh Avenue, Suite New York, New York 001 ( - Attorneys for Plaintiffs Plaintiff One and Plaintiff

More information

Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes

Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes Effective February 2015 NOTICE: These Rules are the copyrighted property of JAMS. They cannot be copied, reprinted or used in any way without permission

More information

Addendum StartPage: 0

Addendum StartPage: 0 Control Number : 40491 Item Number : 11 Addendum StartPage: 0 DOCKET NO. 40491 APPLICATION OF CABLF. & PUBLIC UTILITY" t'om

More information

Case 0:12-cr RNS Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:12-cr RNS Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 0:12-cr-60298-RNS Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 12-60298-SCOLA /O SULLIVAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

More information

Case KJC Doc 5 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case KJC Doc 5 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 16-51494-KJC Doc 5 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE: RYCKMAN CREEK RESOURCES, LLC, et al., DEBTORS. ANADARKO ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY,

More information

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 27 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 27 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 5 Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 27 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS; MARC VEASEY; ROY BROOKS; VICKY BARGAS;

More information

SAMPLE BLENDED/HYBRID FEE AGREEMENT

SAMPLE BLENDED/HYBRID FEE AGREEMENT SAMPLE BLENDED/HYBRID FEE AGREEMENT Privileged Attorney-Client Communication Via Hand Delivery Mr. John Doe 123 Park Place Houston, TX 77002 January 1, 2012 Re: Fulkerson Lotz LLP Dear John: This agreement

More information

Case 9:08-bk MGW Doc 634 Filed 05/18/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 9:08-bk MGW Doc 634 Filed 05/18/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 9:08-bk-04360-MGW Doc 634 Filed 05/18/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION In re CASE NO. 9:08-bk-04360-MGW ULRICH FELIX ANTON ENGLER, CHAPTER 7

More information

FREEDOM RING COMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a BAYRING COMMUNICATIONS

FREEDOM RING COMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a BAYRING COMMUNICATIONS FREEDOM RING COMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a BAYRING COMMUNICATIONS Complaint of Freedom Ring Communications, LLC d/b/a BayRing Communications against Verizon, New Hampshire Re: Access Charges Procedural Order

More information

Case 1:13-cv RJL Document 10 Filed 09/27/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv RJL Document 10 Filed 09/27/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:13-cv-00871-RJL Document 10 Filed 09/27/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFREY M. CAMARDA AND KIMBERLY K. CAMARDA, individuals, 4371 U.S. Highway

More information

Control Number : 42782. Item Number : 11. Addendum StartPage : 0

Control Number : 42782. Item Number : 11. Addendum StartPage : 0 Control Number : 42782 Item Number : 11 Addendum StartPage : 0 DOCKET NO. 42782 ^. APPLICATION OF ONE RING NETWORKS II, INC. FOR A SERVICE PROVIDER CERTIFICATE OF OPERATING AUTHORITY ^^^^ PUBLIC UTILITY

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20544 In the Matter of ) Vonage Holdings Corp. ) Petition for Limited Waiver ) of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the ) CC Docket No. 99-200 Commission

More information

Case4:12-cv PJH Document15 Filed10/02/12 Page1 of 7

Case4:12-cv PJH Document15 Filed10/02/12 Page1 of 7 Case:-cv-00-PJH Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP Jill F. Kopeikin (SBN 0) Valerie M. Wagner (SBN ) Landings Drive Mountain View CA 0 FARNEY DANIELS LLP (SBN ) Steven R. Daniels 00 S. Austin

More information

U "ted States Court of A --ýeals

U ted States Court of A --ýeals U "ted States Court of A --ýeals District of Columbia-Circuit DOCKETING STATEMENT Administrative Agency Review Proceedings (To be completed by appellant/petitioner 1. CASE NO. 01-1246 2. DATE DOCKETED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. Act. No. 03-cv-11661-NG (LEAD DOCKET NUMBER v. NOOR ALAUJAN, Defendant. SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,

More information

MECKLENBURG COUNTY BAR 26th Judicial District FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE BYLAWS RELATED TO ATTORNEY-ATTORNEY FEE ARBITRATION

MECKLENBURG COUNTY BAR 26th Judicial District FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE BYLAWS RELATED TO ATTORNEY-ATTORNEY FEE ARBITRATION MECKLENBURG COUNTY BAR 26th Judicial District FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE BYLAWS RELATED TO ATTORNEY-ATTORNEY FEE ARBITRATION These Bylaws, adopted by the Board of Directors of the Mecklenburg County

More information

Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce The Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 16050 S-103 21 Stockholm Sweden Office: Jakobs Torg 3 Tel:

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHAW & WEITZ John R. Shaw, Bar #123928 Mark S. Weitz, Bar #138244 5030 Katella Avenue, Ste 228 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Telephone: (562) 799-1699 Facsimile (562) 799-1696 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR

More information

Case 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035

Case 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035 Case 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,

More information

DISPUTE SOLUTIONS, INC.

DISPUTE SOLUTIONS, INC. 1. NOTIFICATION OF USE OF DSI DISPUTE SOLUTIONS, INC. ARBITRATION RULES Any company intending to incorporate these rules or to refer to the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services of Dispute Solutions,

More information

THE ATKERSON LAW FIRM

THE ATKERSON LAW FIRM THE ATKERSON LAW FIRM Attorneys & Mediators 1155 Dairy Ashford, Ste. 104 E-MAIL ADDRESS: Houston, Texas 77079 TEL 281.293.0706 bill@atkerson.com FAX 281.759.3214 REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT & CONTRACT (FAMILY

More information

Control Number : 42004. Item Number: 239. Addendum StartPage: 0

Control Number : 42004. Item Number: 239. Addendum StartPage: 0 Control Number : 42004 Item Number: 239 Addendum StartPage: 0 SOAR DOCKET NO. 473-14-1665 DOCKET NO. 42004 tia 12 Am11: 50 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES

More information

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 1065 Filed 04/16/2010 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 1065 Filed 04/16/2010 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 1065 Filed 04/16/2010 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION IN RE: * * [Debtor s Name] * (***-**-last four digits of SSN) * Case No. - [Joint Debtor s Name, if any * Chapter 13 (***-**-last

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EEOC versus BROWN & GROUP RETAIL, INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-3074 Memorandum and Order Regarding Discovery Motions,

More information

LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL S. WASSMER Sample Retainer Agreement for Legal Representation

LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL S. WASSMER Sample Retainer Agreement for Legal Representation LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL S. WASSMER Sample Retainer Agreement for Legal Representation Individuals and/or entities, hereinafter identified as Client, Clients or the Clients and, The Law Firm of: The Law Of

More information

Name Change Of A Minor In A Proceeding That Is Not Part Of Or An Adoption Or A Divorce

Name Change Of A Minor In A Proceeding That Is Not Part Of Or An Adoption Or A Divorce Name Change Of A Minor In A Proceeding That Is Not Part Of Or An Adoption Or A Divorce 1. A parent, managing conservator or guardian of a child may request a change of name. The petition is filed in the

More information

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 20 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 177

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 20 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 177 Case 4:16-cv-00731-ALM Document 20 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 177 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLAINTIFFS, v.

More information

CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING

CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING As updated from time-to-time for billing rates and responsible attorney and, following actual notice to the client. This agreement forms the basis

More information

ARBITRATION COMPLAINT CLIENT OF MEMBER PACIFIC WEST ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

ARBITRATION COMPLAINT CLIENT OF MEMBER PACIFIC WEST ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ARBITRATION COMPLAINT CLIENT OF MEMBER PACIFIC WEST ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS 1. A dispute arising from the real estate business has arisen between me (us) and the person(s) and/or entity(ies) named below.

More information

BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Comcast Phone of New Hampshire, LLC ( Comcast Phone ) provides the following

BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Comcast Phone of New Hampshire, LLC ( Comcast Phone ) provides the following BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Petition of Comcast Phone of New Hampshire, LLC ) d/b/a Comcast Digital Phone for Arbitration of ) Rates, Terms and Conditions of Interconnection with

More information

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS Page: 1 Job Path: @psc3912/cville_data2/stcodes/wy/rls-supp/qj46679.22 Date: 02/26/16 Time: 10:29:29 WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability.

More information

Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law in West Virginia

Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law in West Virginia STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA At a Regular Term of the Supreme Court of Appeals, continued and held at Charleston, Kanawha County, on September 29, 2014, the following order was made and entered: Re: Approval

More information

19:13-2.1 Who may file

19:13-2.1 Who may file CHAPTER 13 SCOPE OF NEGOTIATIONS PROCEEDINGS Authority N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4d, 34:13A-11 and 34:13A-27. SOURCE AND EFFECTIVE DATE R.2011 d.238, effective August 11, 2011. See: 43 N.J.R. 1189(a), 43 N.J.R.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case :-cr-00-dgc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 JOHN S. LEONARDO United States Attorney JULIE A. EDELSTEIN Trial Attorney Counterintelligence and Export Control Section National Security Division U.S. Department

More information

Control Number : 35882

Control Number : 35882 Control Number : 35882 Item Number : 96 Addendum StartPage: 0 Barry T. Smitherman Chairman Donna L. Nelson Commissioner Kenneth W. Anderson, Jr. Commissioner W. Lane Lanford Executive Director Z008 OCT

More information

Michael 3. Wid Director Public Affiin. Policy, and Communications 100 Communications Drive P.O. Box 49 Sun Prairie, WI 535950049

Michael 3. Wid Director Public Affiin. Policy, and Communications 100 Communications Drive P.O. Box 49 Sun Prairie, WI 535950049 Michael 3. Wid Director Public Affiin. Policy, and Communications 100 Communications Drive P.O. Box 49 Sun Prairie, WI 535950049 January 13,2009 Phone: 608-837-1732 FAX: 608-837-1 128 E-mail: mike.wirl@verizon.com

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re: ) Jointly Administered ) Case No. 00-41584 N ) Chapter 11 CROWN VANTAGE, INC., ) ) ORDER ESTABLISHING Debtor. ) CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544 Ameren Missouri Petition for Declaratory ) Ruling Pursuant to Section 1.2(a) of ) WC Docket No. 13-307 the Commission's Rules ) OPPOSITION

More information

Streamlined Process. Streamlined Costs

Streamlined Process. Streamlined Costs C o n s u m e r D i s p u t e s a n d B u s i n e s s D i s p u t e s I n t r o d u c t i o n The American Arbitration Association s (AAA) Non-Binding Arbitration Rules provides parties with streamlined

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-1173 L.T. NO. 3D10-488. JOAN RUBLE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of LANCE RUBLE, deceased,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-1173 L.T. NO. 3D10-488. JOAN RUBLE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of LANCE RUBLE, deceased, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-1173 L.T. NO. 3D10-488 JOAN RUBLE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of LANCE RUBLE, deceased, Petitioner, vs. RINKER MATERIALS CORPORATION, RINKER

More information

APSC FILED Time: 9/26/2014 11:13:03 AM: Recvd 9/26/2014 11:01:49 AM: Docket 14-099-U-Doc. 1

APSC FILED Time: 9/26/2014 11:13:03 AM: Recvd 9/26/2014 11:01:49 AM: Docket 14-099-U-Doc. 1 Arkansas Public Service Commission Docket Summary Cover Sheet (For all dockets other than Rate Cases, "TD", "C" and "TF" Dockets Must be filed with each new docket filed at the Commission STYLE OF DOCKET:

More information

Control Number: 38339. Item Number : 301. Addendum StartPage : 0

Control Number: 38339. Item Number : 301. Addendum StartPage : 0 Control Number: 38339 Item Number : 301 Addendum StartPage : 0 301 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-10-5001 DOCKET NO. 38339 APPLICATION OF CENTERPOINT BEFORE THE ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC STATE OFFICE OF,m{ FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON Action No. 0403-12898 B E T W E E N : TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE Plaintiffs - and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN

More information

RULE APPEARANCE BY NON-FLORIDA LAWYER IN AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING IN FLORIDA

RULE APPEARANCE BY NON-FLORIDA LAWYER IN AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING IN FLORIDA RULE 1-3.11 APPEARANCE BY NON-FLORIDA LAWYER IN AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING IN FLORIDA (a) Non-Florida Lawyer Appearing in an Arbitration Proceeding in Florida. A lawyer currently eligible to practice law

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2011-016442 10/27/2011 HONORABLE DEAN M. FINK

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2011-016442 10/27/2011 HONORABLE DEAN M. FINK Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Electronically Filed *** 10/28/2011 8:00 AM HONORABLE DEAN M. FINK CLERK OF THE COURT S. Brown Deputy STATE OF ARIZONA, et al. THOMAS C HORNE MARY JO FOSTER v. COLLEEN

More information

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-15-004336 GRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP, INC., E.G.S., A.E.S.G., F.D.G., and N.R.C.D. Plaintiffs, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES (DFPS), HENRY WHITMAN, in his official capacity

More information

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability. 3. Pleadings. 3.1. Commencement of action. 4. Compulsory counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party

More information

CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF

CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT VS. LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Comes Now, Charles Durham,

More information

Comparison of AAA, JAMS, ICDR, and ICC Arbitration Rules

Comparison of AAA, JAMS, ICDR, and ICC Arbitration Rules Comparison of AAA, JAMS, ICDR, and ICC Arbitration Rules Domestic Application of the Rules Where the parties have provided for arbitration by the AAA under its Commercial Arbitration Rules, or they have

More information

THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS BEFORE THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS BEFORE THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS BEFORE THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Level 3 Communications, L.L.C. Revisions to Access Tariff R.I. PUC Rate Schedule No. 2 Docket No.

More information

Case3:11-cv SI Document90 Filed03/03/11 Page1 of 6. March 1, 2011

Case3:11-cv SI Document90 Filed03/03/11 Page1 of 6. March 1, 2011 Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document90 Filed03/03/11 Page1 of 6 United States District Court Northern District of California Courtroom A, 15 th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Sony Computer

More information

l Iu:blkJl:er&ke C1t:otmttissiott

l Iu:blkJl:er&ke C1t:otmttissiott " State of Florida 11 JUl28 AM 10: ~2 l Iu:blkJl:er&ke C1t:otmttissiott Cot1HISSlON CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER. 2540 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0850 -~-~-~-(}-It-j\-~-J)-lJ-~- ClERK

More information

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. Application of VIRGIN AMERICA INC. Docket No. OST-2005-23307 for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity under 49 U.S.C.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Larry Klayman, et al., Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Case Nos. 14-5004, 14-5005, 14-5016, 14-5017 v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case 3:07-cv-00172-MJR-CJP Document 8-1 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, Plaintiff, and PEARLE PHILLIPS,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11. Jointly Administered

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11. Jointly Administered IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CD LIQUIDATION CO., LLC, f/ka CYNERGY DATA, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 09-13038 (KG) Jointly Administered Related

More information

APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REVIEW FORM. CASE NAME: v. Docket No:

APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REVIEW FORM. CASE NAME: v. Docket No: U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REVIEW FORM PLEASE COPY THE FOLLOWING FROM YOUR DECISION: CASE NAME: v. (Appellant Name) (Agency) Docket No: Initial or Addendum Decision Finality

More information

Amended Board Resolution. Grayson Collin Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Amended Board Resolution. Grayson Collin Electric Cooperative, Inc. Amended Board Resolution of Grayson Collin Electric Cooperative, Inc. WHEREAS, the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), 18 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., as amended by the Energy Independence

More information

DOCKET NO. TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY AND THE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS

DOCKET NO. TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY AND THE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS DOCKET NO. COMPLAINT OF CHAMPION ENERGY SERVICES, LLC AGAINST TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY AND THE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS ^^ ^o c.i;. ;, P14 ^ k f!,... T PUBLIC UTILITY COAl^T^^^^ OF TEXAS`

More information

In re: ) ) Chapter 11 TERRESTAR NETWORKS INC., et al. ) Case No (SHL) ) (Jointly Administered) Debtors. )

In re: ) ) Chapter 11 TERRESTAR NETWORKS INC., et al. ) Case No (SHL) ) (Jointly Administered) Debtors. ) REED SMITH LLP Nicole K. O Sullivan, Esq. 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 521-5400 Facsimile: (212) 521-5450 -and- Kurt F. Gwynne, Esq. 1201 Market Street, Suite 1500 Wilmington,

More information

Control Number : 42906. Item Number : 11. Addendum StartPage: 0

Control Number : 42906. Item Number : 11. Addendum StartPage: 0 Control Number : 42906 Item Number : 11 Addendum StartPage: 0 Donna L. Nelson Chairman Kenneth W. Anderson, Jr. Commissioner Brandy D. Marty Commissioner Brian H. Lloyd Executive Director Public Utility

More information

Jt,J~ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII VERIZON HAWAII INC. ) DOCKET NO. 02-0181

Jt,J~ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII VERIZON HAWAII INC. ) DOCKET NO. 02-0181 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII In the Matter of the Application of) VERIZON HAWAII INC. ) DOCKET NO. 02-0181 For Approval to Offer CentraNet, CustoPAK and/or WorkSmart Services

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS AND ASBESTOS WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 45 Relator Case No. 2009-2031 [ORIGINAI, ACTION IN PROHIBI'1'ION MANDAMUS] V. LUCAS

More information

Case Document 2211 Filed in TXSB on 07/09/13 Page 1 of 8

Case Document 2211 Filed in TXSB on 07/09/13 Page 1 of 8 Case 12-36187 Document 2211 Filed in TXSB on 07/09/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Debtor. Case

More information

Important Boilerplate Provisions for Contracts. Numerous sample boilerplate or miscellaneous provisions for contracts

Important Boilerplate Provisions for Contracts. Numerous sample boilerplate or miscellaneous provisions for contracts Form: Important Boilerplate Provisions for Contracts Description: Numerous sample boilerplate or miscellaneous provisions for contracts IMPORTANT BOILERPLATE PROVISIONS FOR CONTRACTS Miscellaneous (a)

More information

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2003... Agenda Item # **1 Company: Docket No. Vonage Holdings Corporation P-6214/C-03-108 In the Matter of

More information

Control Number : 41446. Item Number : 59. Addendum StartPage : 0

Control Number : 41446. Item Number : 59. Addendum StartPage : 0 Control Number : 41446 Item Number : 59 Addendum StartPage : 0 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-13-4070 PUC DOCKET NO. 41446 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN BEFORE THE*1'16)[E^^I PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY TO ^ ADJUST ITS

More information

Case 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584

Case 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584 Case 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

More information

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 205.6 Please type or print 1. Name: Please complete the information in item 1 by providing your full legal name for the

More information

Case 0:12-cr RNS Document 131 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:12-cr RNS Document 131 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 0:12-cr-60298-RNS Document 131 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-60298-CR-SCOLA/O SULLIVAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

More information

Suffolk County Bar Association. Dispute Resolution Program Rules

Suffolk County Bar Association. Dispute Resolution Program Rules Suffolk County Bar Association Dispute Resolution Program Rules Suffolk County Bar Association 560 Wheeler Road Hauppauge, New York 11788-4357 (631) 234-5511 Section 1 Establishment of Program This program

More information

ORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY / HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE S MOTION TO INTERVENE

ORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY / HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE S MOTION TO INTERVENE Pulitano v. Thayer St. Associates, Inc., No. 407-9-06 Wmcv (Wesley, J., Oct. 23, 2009) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy

More information

NORTH CAROLINA EDUCATION LOTTERY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 8 SALES 8.02 RETAILER DISPUTE RESOLUTION

NORTH CAROLINA EDUCATION LOTTERY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 8 SALES 8.02 RETAILER DISPUTE RESOLUTION Page 1 of 6 A. SCOPE These Lottery Game Retailer Dispute Resolution Procedures apply to and shall constitute the exclusive procedure for binding resolution of: A. All claims, disputes and complaints of

More information