1 IMAGINE that! You can use a population health approach in your planning, programs and practice! the northern way of caring Visit us online: A Population Health Primer for Northern Health By Theresa Healy & Julie Kerr, Population Health
2 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER Investing upstream and for the long haul Multiple, strength based strategies Addressing the determinants of health Grassroots engagement Intersectoral collaboration Nurturing healthy public policy Evidence based decision making We are members of a great body. We must consider that we were born for the good of the whole. Seneca. 4BC 65AD Produced by: Population Health, Northern Health Centre for Healthy Living 1788 Diefenbaker Drive Prince George, BC V2N 4V7 Phone Fax Theresa Healy and Julie Kerr Contact us at:
3 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS IMAGINE: An Introduction to Population Health Principles...3 The determinants of health...5 Investing upstream and for the long haul...7 Tools for thought: Ripple in the Pond...8 Multiple, strength based strategies...9 Tools for thought: Selecting the right tools Addressing the determinants of health Tools for thought: DOH Review Grassroots Engagement Tools for thought: Sociogram Intersectoral collaboration Tools for thought: Understanding Partnership Nurturing healthy public policy Tools for thought: Identifying Policy Opportunities Evidence based decision making Tools for thought: Literature review Weaving it all together Tools for thought: Population Health Check List Resources consulted Back page - Contact information Acknowledgements We want to acknowledge that we stand on the shoulders of giants in producing this work. Dr Lorna Medd, Dr. David Bowering, and Ms. Joanne Bays were all involved in the brainstorming sessions that developed the IMAGINE acronym. Many other colleagues and friends have contributed insights, work and ideas to this primer. Many community activists and champions have lived and breathed this work in the practical laboratory of everyday life. To all of these supporters we offer our sincere thanks.
4 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 3 I N T R O D U C T I O N IMAGINE: An Introduction to Population Health Principles A challenge to think and act differently in how we approach health care issues and services We use the word IMAGINE to remind us of the seven major principled activities of population health: Invest upstream and for the long haul; use Multiple, strength-based strategies; Address the determinants of health; garner Grassroots engagement; lead Intersectoral collaboration; Nurture healthy public policy; employ Evidence based decision making. We also view it as a call to action for all of us who envision a healthier future to articulate and work for the healthy communities that are the foundation of a well society. Northern Health is leading a new edge of thinking and practice in adopting a population health approach as one of the four pillars in its strategic plan looking to This primer is designed to introduce NH practitioners to the basic concepts of population health as our Population Health and Healthy Community Development programs conceive and apply them. Currently under development are two sequels. The next primer will introduce stories of success from NH practice as examples of IMAGINE in action, or IMAGINEaction, so to speak. The third primer will seek to demystify the use of research and evaluation as we purpose to continuously improve the effectiveness of our service delivery from a population health perspective, using the IMAGINE principles. Canada has long been a world leader in the field of population health beginning with Jake Epp s work, the Ottawa Charter, and Alma Alta. There is a long standing and honorable history of involvement in the improvement of living conditions that directly impact the health and wellbeing of members of Population health is the theory and practice of improving the health of groups of people rather than of individuals. society. This longstanding concern with uncovering the links between poverty and disease sees a need for health organizations to champion social justice efforts and to have an impact on the broader determinants of health. This has led to improved health and well being for a wide segment of the population. In fact, it has been argued that more lives have been saved because of advances in this area than in any other branch of medicine. Dr. David Butler Jones, Canada s first National Public Health Officer, has identified an aligning of a constellation of factors that promises a brighter future for those working in population health. Reports and discussion papers from the World Health Organization, the Conference Board of Canada and the Health Officers Council of BC, related to the underlying determinants of health, were released within weeks of each other in the fall of 2008 and have received broad media and political attention. This growing interest in the broader determinants of health is an opportunity to embrace population health and integrate it into the core activities of the health care sector. The challenge is for front line health care providers, community health activists and policy makers to understand and champion population health principles and practices as preferred practice. This primer is a beginner tool to set you on this exciting journey. Population health is a relatively new term that has not yet been precisely defined. Is it a concept of health or a field of study of health determinants? We propose that the definition be the health outcomes of a group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group, and we argue that the field of population health includes health outcomes, patterns of health determinants, and policies and interventions that link these two. We present a rationale for this definition and note its differentiation from public health, health promotion, and social epidemiology. We invite critiques and discussion that may lead to some consensus on this emerging concept. (American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93: )
5 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 4 Key questions to ask: What are the causes of poor health? How do we address those causes before they lead to health problems? The issues that population health addresses are critical in BC. While averages suggest that the BC population, in general, is enjoying improving health status, the averages conceal - as the Provincial Health Officer s report states - some very dangerous inequities: While on the whole, British Columbians are among the healthiest people in the world, there is a relatively large number of disadvantaged people in the province the unemployed and working poor, children and families living in poverty, people with addictions and/or mental illness, Aboriginal people, new immigrants, the homeless, and others all of whom experience significantly lower levels of health than the average British Columbian. In fact, BC has the highest rates of poverty (particularly child poverty) in Canada. This presents a paradox: despite having, by some measures, the best overall health outcomes in Canada, BC also has the highest rates of socioeconomic disadvantage in the country. Figure 1: Nancy Hamilton and Tariq Bhatti, Health Promotion Development Division, Health Canada, Feb I am in public health because I am an optimist. And I think there are reasons for that optimism. We have never had such a constellation coming together as we have right now in recognizing the interconnectivity of these (social determinants of health) issues and that we can t do it alone Given the economic challenges we are facing, that spirit of cooperation and collaboration, the skills we have in those areas, are even more necessary. Dr, David Butler- Jones, Dec 2nd presentation to the Public Health Association of BC (PHABC), Dec 2, 2008 Since the 1990s, British Columbia has employed the innovative and well tested Healthy Communities methodology as a way to redress health inequities, and the province has recently revived the model. Provincially, there are multiple networks, councils, initiatives and programs aimed at reducing health inequities and improving health outcomes for all. The province s decision to include public health as a core program has been matched in Northern Health by the inclusion of population health as one of the four pillars of Northern Health's strategic plan looking to 2015.
6 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 5 The determinants of health The determinants of health are those factors in our daily lives that directly and indirectly impact the state of health we can enjoy. Dennis Rapheal argues that the determinants of health are, in a nutshell, about how a society chooses to distribute resources. (from a lecture for Nursing 5190, The Politics of Population Health viewer/?peid=ac ccc-4268-a1af-9a9e04b28e1d). While we need to address ill health, we also have to address the underlying causes of ill health. It makes more sense, morally, physically, financially and emotionally to prevent disease than to struggle to cope with the effects of disease and sickness upon individuals, families and communities. Figure 2, below, illustrates the interconnected nature of these influencing factors. In essence, the determinants of health lay out the range of possible factors that influence how healthy we will be: genetic predispositions, lifestyle choices, opportunities and challenges that enhance or limit quality of life and ultimately impact on health outcomes. Some, particularly the genetic or biological ones, are limits that we have little control over, for better or for worse. Others we can and should try to reverse. But research clearly demonstrates that individual behaviour change is difficult to achieve unless a combination of education, legislation and enforcement is mobilized in the society at large to make healthy choices possible, socially acceptable, and easy. It requires political will and a collective commitment to addressing the needs of the most disadvantaged, to improving early childhood development opportunities and education for all, to facilitating stronger networks of support and creating a truly inclusive society. Health inequities are differences in health status experienced by various individuals or groups in society. These can be the result of genetic and biological factors, choices made, or by chance; but often they are because of unequal access to key factors that influence health, like income, education, employment and social supports. The State of Public Health in Canada p3 Figure 2: Factors that influence our health, as found in The Report on the State of Public Health In Canada, Dahlgreen & Whitehead, European strategies for tackling social inequities in health: Leveling up Part 2, World Health Organization, 2006 Poverty Exercise Racism Diet Isolation Tobacco Literacy Housing Addictions Mental Health Colonization Abuse What lies beneath The tip of the iceberg, we can see and measure and direct people to change; individual focus Beneath the surface are the things that impact and influence lifestyle, choices and capacities of change we can see and measure and direct people to change; needs a collective focus. Higher levels are barriers to be addressed. The deeper we go, the more complex and difficult the issues Adapted from R.A. Dovell, Population Health Confernece 2002
7 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 6 Inequities are killing people on a "grand scale" reports WHO's Commission: "(The) toxic combination of bad policies, economics, and politics is, in large measure, responsible for the fact that a majority of people in the world do not enjoy the good health that is biologically possible," the Commissioners write in Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health, The impacts of the determinants of health demonstrate that there are two types of health status. One is acquired through hereditary means including class and status, while the other derives from environmental conditions. As Romanow s advice famously states, there is a sure fire recipe to acquire and sustain good health. (see figure 3 below) In summary Canada has a commitment to and is a leader in recognizing the complex interdependencies of the determinants of health on the potential well being and health of populations. British Columbia has been making important changes at the policy level which support the work of population health. Northern Health has adopted population health as one of four pillars in its strategic plan. Taken together, the signs point to a need to be familiar with and actively apply the principles of population health as a way to redress health inequity and ensure scarce resources are put to their best use. The Minister of Finance can choose what level of poverty we will live with. M.Marmot, 2008 Figure 5: Text and illustration from Social Determinants of Health in Canada, presentation by Elizabeth Gyorfi-Dyke, CHPA, 2005
8 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 7 I Investing upstream, for the long haul Ultimately, health is political; it is the allocation of resources that has the greatest impact on health. Helena Bryant Investing upstream and for the long haul refers to the necessity of looking beyond the immediate acute care focused model of health care service. While there is no denying the importance of providing a system of care to those who are sick, the reality is that if we build it they will come. Planning for and resourcing thousands of acute care beds assumes and prepares for an ailing population, while investing significant time, energy, expertise and money into preventative health would decrease the need for those beds substantially. Population health is a key approach for building a more sustainable health care system that proactively supports wellness while maintaining a contingency plan to treat illnesses. The BC Public Health Association has proposed that the provincial government adopt a 6% solution, which would mean a doubling of the current investment of 3% of the total health care budget currently being spent on health promotion and disease prevention. This would require all health authorities to reallocate a small portion of their budgets and make a deliberate increased investment in public health initiatives. It would force us to ask ourselves some challenging questions about our existing practices. What could we stop doing? What could we take a break from doing? How can we deliver needed downstream services more efficiently to free up resources for prevention efforts? As we experience financial savings that result from more effective prevention work, where should those dollars be reinvested? What will give us the biggest population health outcome bang for our limited bucks? Marc Lalonde s work in New Perspectives on the Health of Canadians envisioned a balance between investing in the "upstream" of public health and illness prevention as well as in the "downstream" of health care delivery. Northern Health s mission, vision, values and principles overtly support us in asking these questions. Furthermore, there are people within Northern Health that have been trained as internal experts to assist us in reviewing our services and programs in this way. There are processes that have been developed within the business sector that are now being applied to health care settings as population health planning tools. PBMA and Lean are two such methodologies that have been adopted within Northern Health and there are people and practical tools available to assist managers, leaders and teams in applying these methods to their service planning and evaluation (See next page for more detail). Albert Einstein said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. The time has come for us to think and act in a radically different manner as we plan and deliver our services. The most challenging part about allocating more resources upstream is proving that the reallocation has had a significant positive outcome on health. It is much easier to count numbers of people with illnesses and report on service utilization than it is to demonstrate that fewer services were required and people did not get an injury or disease. Evidence of population health outcomes takes upwards of years to accumulate, especially since the preventive measures taken in early childhood have the largest impact on health in the adult years. An example of this was encountered in a First Nation in the northeast recently, when a Spectra Energy employee pointed out that a Head Start early childhood development program started on a reserve 30 years ago has resulted in a thriving young workforce in that community today. Because youth in this community have completed high school, avoided addictions and remained healthy into young adulthood, they are now able to earn a good, secure income, provide an increasingly high quality of life for their families and break the cycle of poverty. The positive impacts are being felt within the First Nation, the energy sector, in reduced unemployment rates, and in decreased negative outcomes for the entire area.
9 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 8 PBM-what?!?!?! Due to resource scarcity, health organizations worldwide must decide what services to fund and, conversely, what services not to fund. One approach to priority setting, which has been widely used in Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, is program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). To date, such activity has primarily been based at a micro level, within programs of care. Health Serv Manage Res 2005;18: doi: / Royal Society of Medicine Press Tools for thought: Ripple in the Pond Imagine an intervention of your program as a pebble tossed in a pond. Visualise where the ripples have the potential to reach. Describe the intervention Lean - it might not be what you think! Who (or what) will be impacted first? Lean isn t about being skinny; lean is not mean. Lean does not mean cutting staff in the name of cutting costs (see lean is not mean ). Lean is the set of management principles based on the Toyota Production System (TPS). Lean has been applied in manufacturing, as well as in service industries. Lean has 2 essential components: What are the secondary impacts? Identify more remote impacts or trickle down effects 1. Eliminate waste and non-value-added (NVA) activity 2. Have respect for people If you want to learn more about these and other quality improvement tools that may help you to plan upstream interventions, contact NH s Corporate Planning team. Now, with an objective, constructively critical eye, consider whether the impacts of the intervention you are analyzing are more upstream/preventative in nature or more downstream/ reactive. Is your intervention decreasing the likelihood of health problems, or is it treating an injury or illness after the fact? Is there another intervention you could be undertaking that would have more upstream impacts? Should this be done instead of what you re doing, or in addition to it?
10 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 9 M Multiple, strength based strategies Looking for more than one tool and method and focusing on strengths increases the potential for successful intervention. Working with communities is not easy. The human factor means work always takes longer than planned and that process issues are as important as content. Neglecting process almost always guarantees problems. Thus, having an array of tools in your toolbox for population health work is a necessity. This section of the primer is a brief orientation to some of the most effective tools in the world of community development and organizational change. They lend themselves very well to the community capacity building work that is the heart and spirit of population health. There is also a list of hyperlinks that will take you to a major resource for each one. Appreciative Enquiry Appreciative Enquiry is a foundational approach that asks how we can enter the worlds of other people with our desire to support positive change. Appreciative Enquiry argues that change begins the moment we start asking questions. There is a vast difference between What s wrong with your community?, which is likely to elicit a litany of complaints and negative feelings about one s home town and What do you like about your community?, which allows people to focus on those positive attributes that contribute to resiliency and commitment. In terms of respect and engagement, entering communities and asking what they value, rather than arriving armed with data about what s wrong and what must be changed, will receive a warmer reception. Appreciative Enquiry provides a respectful and strength focused platform on which to open the dialogues that communities need to undertake to identify for themselves the issues they deem important. Interestingly, Appreciative Enquiry requires the major shift to come first from within the practitioner, not the community. For more in depth discussion, see World Café World Café is a community consultation method that encourages groups of people to engage in deep and meaningful conversation. It spells out a process and format that supports exploration and discovery. In light of the speed at which the world is changing and the intrusion of technology into human communication, World Café lays out what we need to communicate face to face more effectively. It relies on our innate human desire to relate, learn and understand and the universal familiarity of a café table. Skilled facilitators engage minds while table top toys and art supplies engage hands and creatively ensure that the outcomes of World Café discussions are fruitful and inspiring, even among strangers. Visit: and see also The World Café: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter by Juanita Brown and David Isaacs with the World Café Community; Forward by Meg Wheatley, Afterword by Peter Senge Open Space Created by Harrison Owen, who observed that his most meaningful education at conferences and workshops happened during coffee and meal times, this process calls on people to be self organizing. The agenda for the work is created from the passions and interests of those present in the room. Experienced initially by some participants as uncomfortable, the Open Space quickly becomes an energizing and dynamic process that can be highly productive. It requires a skilled facilitator and non-traditional facilitation techniques. The process asks participants to nominate topics for discussion; the nominator then becomes the host for that discussion. The underlying principle is that personal passion implies responsibility and may often provoke conflict. An important tenet is to see conflict not as something to be avoided but something to be welcomed and handled well as a companion of passion. With only four principles and one rule, Open Space supports individual initiative and collective creation. See: Turn your face to the sun and the shadows fall behind you. Maori proverb
11 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 10 Community Development; Community Capacity Building; Capability Approaches; Integral Capacity Building Framework These terms refer to a broad range of methods and approaches that conceive of communities and their members as vital participants in the successful working of population health. The Quick Links resource section on page 25 of this primer includes a list of reliable sources to check out for more information and new developments in each of these dynamic approaches. Briefing workshop An amazingly simple way to get a group to cycle through the major stages of a research project in a short time with immediate and useful data and feedback. Word clouds Wordle is an easy to use web based tool. You enter a list of words generated by a group on a topic or pick words out of a website or article. The resulting artistic presentation is also a visual representation of what is important. See Tools for thought: Selecting the right tools from your tool box The methods that you can choose from as tools to help develop multiple, strength based approaches are many. Each will contribute different supports in different ways. You need to be aware of limiting and facilitative factors that can determine which tool is the best for your task at hand. The following check list should help you determine what will work best for you. 1. What sort of process are you looking at? Do you want to gather information or develop a team? If you are gathering information, what sort of data are you after? Some methods can multitask and contribute to more than one outcome. 2. Who are you working with? If it is a group struggling with literacy issues or a group that is suspicious of your organization, you will need to adopt non-written approaches for the first group and devote time to relationship building with the second. 3. Who is the intended audience for the results? The validity and credibility of the tools you choose will be assessed differently by different audiences. A community group may value the stories and hearing their own voices and concerns resonating in the data. A funding body may want more numerical and statistical information. Some key questions to think about: What do I want to get from the strategies I use? Who will I be working with? Who is the audience? A word cloud generated from the IMAGINE acronym and principles using the tool found at What are some facilitators I can rely on? What are some potential barriers I can anticipate and prepare for?
12 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 11 A Addressing health determinants Addressing the determinants of health requires a shift in thinking for many of us in the health care field. Rather than focusing on the person in front of us, their symptoms and needs, we step back to consider the context within which the person lives, demographic trends and clusters of health concerns emerging in our region. The factors and elements in a person s life influence or determine how healthy they can be. If we improve these factors, we can improve health status and health care outcomes. The Canadian Population Health Initiative estimated that personal lifestyle factors have a very strong or strong impact on the health of Canadians: a person s eating habits (72%), amount of exercise a person gets (65%), whether a person smokes (80%). At the same time, the broader determinants affect one in three Canadians, who report social and economic conditions (a person s level of income 33%; availability of quality housing 34%; a person s level of education 33%; safety of communities 35%) influenced the health of Canadians (CPHI, 2005). The World Health Organization argues that prevention of the chronic diseases that are increasing globally is best achieved by acknowledging misconceptions, such as that chronic diseases affect only the wealthy and the aged and are expensive and problematic to address. As Dr. Butler-Jones notes in the Chief Public Health Officer s Report for 2008 CPHO report: As we strive to achieve good health for as long as possible, it is important to note that, while some health challenges can be related to our genetic make-up, evidence shows that Canadians with adequate shelter, a safe and secure food supply, access to education, employment and sufficient income for basic needs adopt healthier behaviours and have better health. (The Chief Public Health Officer s Report on the State of Public Health in Canada 2008: Helping Canadians achieve the best health possible p.3) Addressing the determinants of health requires understanding: 1) How these determinants impact the potential of individuals, families and communities to understand the implications of issues to their health, 2) The constraints and limitations that inhibit participation or involvement in health promotion activities, and 3) The ingenuity required to develop alternatives to reduce the impact of those constraints. The necessary creativity and innovation is grounded in the vital expertise of front line practitioners. However, to move innovative and promising initiatives developed by frontline practitioners into sustainable and broad ranging practice, beyond the working life span of particular individuals, requires the development of policies and enforcement structures that ensure organizational commitment to emerging best practices. Policies can and should be developed within the health authority for each of the social and environmental determinants (omitting biology and genetics). Many examples of such policies and practices operate in ad hoc or issue specific ways (such as social support initiatives within mental health, for example, or peer support groups for those struggling with addictions). Such program initiatives have direct and meaningful lessons for program policies. The challenge for practitioners is to broaden the impact of such innovations beyond specific program areas and make them foundational to all the services we deliver. We know what makes us ill. When we are ill we are told That it s you who will heal us. When we come to you Our rags are torn off us And you listen all over our naked body. As to the cause of our illness One glance at our rags would Tell you more. It is the same cause that wears out Our bodies and our clothes. Bertolt Brecht, A Worker s Speech to a Doctor, Quoted by Dennis Raphael, Social Determinants of Health: Why is There Such a Gap Between Our Knowledge and Its Implementation? Ryerson, Toronto, 2002
13 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 12 Examples of policies that address income and social status might include income support; incentive and subsidy commitments; partnerships in developing safe, affordable housing alternatives; including provision of healthy snacks and refreshments at programs such as immunization clinics or educational workshops; alternative communication and outreach strategies that address trust and social alienation issues; readiness assessments and support to ensure cultural and social respect. Improving social support networks might include peer support and family support training network development. It is clear that such initiatives toward addressing the determinants of health and reducing inequities could have quite direct health impacts, for example, by reducing youth suicide rates in a community. A multitude of indirect impacts may also occur, as depicted in the complexity model below. Social Structures Work Material Conditions Tools for Thought: Your Health Determinants Review Consider the population you serve. Which of the health determinants can you identify as key in their lives? Prioritize them and then consider in what ways your program and services can address them. For example, if your first determinant was poverty, you may be able to advocate for free entry to programs, offer nutritious snacks with programs, develop income supplement options, transportation, etc. Determinant #1: Ways to impact this: Determinant #2: Ways to impact this: Social Environment Early life Genetics Culture Psychological Health Behaviours Brain Neuroendocrinal and immune response Pathophysiological and organ impairment Well being and mortality Mortality Morbidity Determinant #3: Ways to impact this: Determinant #4: Ways to impact this: Figure 3: Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, et al. (1998) Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States.Am J Public Health. 88:
14 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 13 G Grassroots engagement Grassroots engagement is the most critical component of a successful population health approach. Research consistently shows us that, across disciplines, time and place, where people have a hand in shaping solutions, they are more committed to and involved in the success of those solutions. Community engagement, for Northern Health, is the active mobilization of organized groups around the common goal of improving health. Engaged communities can support and sustain reforms, and disengaged communities can jeopardize them. Engagement is defined as:...the mobilization of constituencies organized as groups and the meshing of constituency groups into an active relationship around a common mission, goal, or purpose Such engagement, ultimately, results in a shared culture of action and mobilization in which participating groups are evaluated by what they do rather than by what they say. (Adapted from Engaging Communities, VUE Number 13, Fall 2006). Community organizing Grassroots community organizing has been long used as a civic engagement tool, particularly for disadvantaged or marginalized people, to gain influence over the social and political institutions and agencies that impact their lives. It has a longstanding and diverse history, from neighborhood based groups (e.g. Saul Alinksy) to the broader political activities of the civil rights movement. Community organizing is a process whereby people are brought together, acting in a common self-interest to achieve common aims. It is one of the basic tools for grassroots engagement. Mobilizing populations If we subscribe to Paulo Frieire s Pedagogy of the Oppressed concepts, we believe that people hold the keys, the solutions, to the challenging situations in their own lives. What they lack are the means to share their knowledge in constructive ways. Lack of education, lack of self esteem, a sense of powerlessness, alienation from social and political supports all combine to convince people that they are not qualified or competent to act on their own behalf. Only experts, the highly educated, or governments are seen as the authorities who can and should act on issues. When the experts do act, however, and regardless of the best of their intentions and the high level of knowledge and expertise they bring, their efforts are ridiculed, fail or miss the mark, and no one is happy. Finding the key: Personal Passion Principles for meaningful engagement: People must be able to share what they know about an issue in an atmosphere of respect They must be encouraged to learn and grow and acquire new skills They must be encouraged to translate their knowledge into effective actions to improve their own lives and health and the lives and health of their community Opportunities to engage with tools for change, with each other and with the system must be regular and ongoing Address assumptions: consultation does not necessarily mean agreement. Be frank about what is negotiable and what is not. Teachers working with the youngest students know that, if you use the things that matter to them as content, you can encourage them to learn. Grassroots engagement starts from that same basic premise: speak to people s passions and they will want to be involved. A lecture on the personal dangers of smoking, accompanied by statistics on the poor health outcomes in a community, is more likely to depress and alienate the audience from a community than encourage them to tackle the problem of tobacco. Understanding the issues that worry the community most such as access to affordable and healthy food, or closing down the crack houses in a neighborhood and helping people to find resources to respond to those issues, builds a relationship of reciprocity and mutual respect. This may create opportunities at a later date to help the community collectively mobilize against tobacco use. The simple fact is that community members are likely to make better choices and have more successful programs if you find ways to motivate and inspire involvement.
15 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 14 There are many guides to assist you in determining how to encourage the involvement of ordinary people in your programs. Check the resource guide at the end of this primer for some ideas. A basic plan would include the following steps: 1. Define your aims and goals for involving grassroots community members 2. Identify tools for engaging citizens (see tools for thought box on page 11, on consultation methods) 3. Identify the groups or individuals that need to be involved (see tools for thought on this page) 4. Develop your plan for recruiting and retaining participants 5. Create a positive and supportive environment for ongoing engagement 6. Identify evaluation criteria and decide on next steps 7. Maintain open lines of communication Tools for thought: Sociogram The mental mind map, shown on the right, helps you visualize links and connections you already have or might need to build for grassroots engagement. Your connections can be organizations or individuals. They may be paid service providers or volunteer community activists. They may include people who use your services and who are invested in helping you to improve them. They may include First Nations governments, city planners, researchers, youth, and elders. If you re a manager, they may be your front line staff or contracted service providers. The more people you can engage from the grassroots, the less resistance you may experience and the more successful your initiative is likely to be. Inclusion, finding ways to engage people, may sometimes look very different from the traditional gathering in a room around a table. Be prepared to be innovative and go to where the people are gathered already and ask permission to visit their space.
16 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 15 I Intersectoral collaboration Intersectoral collaboration calls for new work in breaking down the silos that separate many people working, with the best of intentions, within their own particular disciplines and fields. Largely through the work of the World Health Organization, it is now widely accepted that the definition of health includes more than not being sick. Health is a resource for everyday life the ability to realize hopes, satisfy needs, change or cope with life experiences, and participate fully in society. Health has physical, mental, social and spiritual dimensions and, therefore, achieving the vision of improved health in northern BC requires commitment beyond our systems of public health and health care alone. All individuals, sectors, systems, agencies, political structures and institutions in the community share responsibility for and reap the rewards of improved health. If we accept this premise, then we have to accept that we cannot do this work alone. Embracing the determinants of health and a population health approach requires a new concept: intersectoral collaboration. Increasingly, health care service providers need to look to external, and perhaps unexpected, partners to help promote health and influence public policy, making healthy choices easier for people and more widely supported in the society at large. For example, early childhood educators and schools play a pivotal role in the healthy development of children and can also be a support to help families to live in healthier ways. Faith organizations can play a pivotal role in promoting social justice and can be a point of entry in accessing populations, such as new Dr. Trevor Hancock, a consultant for the BC Ministry of Health, tells the story of the Welsh hospital that sent their carpenter out into the community to retrofit seniors homes: It doesn t look like health care but the rate of falls requiring seniors to be hospitalized fell dramatically. immigrants, to encourage proactive engagement with health services. In fact, once we embrace the determinants of health, we can see many potential partners doing really good work that aligns very well with a population health approach. The challenge is, how do we as health care providers find opportunities to work in new and mutually supportive ways with others, who may or may not have a health care background, but who do share our goals and objectives? Intersectoral collaboration is, in a nutshell: A recognized relationship between part or parts of the health sector with part or parts of another sector which has been formed to take action on an issue to achieve health outcomes in a way that is more effective, efficient or sustainable than could be achieved by the health sector acting alone. WHO International Conference on Intersectoral Action for Health, The tool on the page opposite lays out some simple first steps. If we remember that the first and logical place to start is to focus on respectful and equitable relationships, believing that everyone brings something to the table, the odds of successful intersectoral collaboration improve in our favour. Managing partnerships is important for effective health services delivery. Partners or stakeholders might include the community, civil society organizations, other sectors, district, regional and national authorities, donors, private providers, and others. WHO (World Health Organization), Managing partnerships.
17 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 16 Intersectoral collaboration can take many forms we have identified four in our Healthy Community development work: Sponsorship A commitment to provide some material support in return for acknowledgment, verbal and written, in the proceedings. Cooperation An agreement to work together to carry out a task, initiative or project, dividing labour and delegating responsibilities. Collaboration This is a more formal understanding and usually involves shared power and decision making. It is often short term. Partnership - This is a full-fledged, long term and ongoing agreement to work together, equitably sharing resources, decisions and work. Tools for thought: Understanding partnership This tool helps you determine current and potential levels of collaboration. Approaching and Opening Intersectoral Collaboration Opportunities Level of partnership Currently no existing partnerships Strategies for connecting Identify local events or activities and approach, offering concrete support. Initiate conversations about repeating the offer in other venues. Some informal contacts Ask for opportunity to discuss progress of informal work with a view to increasing levels of involvement. Formal agreements and structures Jointly developed action plan Memorandum of understanding or similar document has been drafted and signed by all parties; usually spells out agreed upon expectations and deliverables. Ongoing team work and joint planning are agreed upon. Meeting agendas created jointly and tasks such as chairing and minute taking are rotated. Approaching and opening intersectoral collaboration opportunities. Adapted from Jim Frankish, and Glenn Moulton, Intersectoral Collaboration on the Non-Medical Determinants of Health: The Role of Health Regions in Canada Intersectoral collaboration opportunities. Adapted from Jim Frankish, and Glenn Moulton, Intersectoral Collaboration on the Non-Medical Determinants of Health: The Role of Health Regions in Canada Key points: Setting the Context: Understand the impetus for the partnership Players: Know who should be involved and how Process: Identify steps you can take and ways to connect parallel processes and activities. Value Added: Stress how the partnerships can help ensure sustainability and extend to other mutual interest areas. Impacting Multiple Planning & Policy Processes: The outcome may be more integrated community capacity to respond (engaging both elected officials and senior administration). Model Replication: Remember the model can help build cohesion, reduce friction, and look at issues from a how could we appreciative perspective.
18 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 17 N Nurturing healthy public policy Lasting change lies in our capacity to make sure the community has a memory for what works. Healthy public policy is one way of ensuring that the legacy of good work builds Canada beyond what Monique Begin called a nation of pilot projects. The role of policy within any institution, organization or government is to document and ensure adherence to corporate values, philosophies, ideologies and priorities by prescribing how the representatives of that corporate body will behave in practice. It commits the members of that corporate body to allocating resources to make adherence to policy possible, and it calls for attention to be paid to ensuring people have the training, skills, structural support and capacity to uphold a standard. It allows the people who interface with or depend on an organization to predict what to expect and how to effectively engage with its structures. Policy is the vehicle that enables organizations and governments to put their money where their mouth is. If a government claims to value its children, but does not pass legislation and allocate resources to ensure children are safe, well-educated, appropriately fed and given access to early developmental opportunities, if it does not ensure parents a living income and does not plan for affordable housing for families, then it is reasonable to conclude that, in fact, the government does not value its children. If an employer claims to value its workers, but does not implement policy to ensure safe working conditions and provide a healthy workplace, the Sustainability of community driven efforts and service providers best practices requires a matching level of understanding and action within the institutions and agencies responsible for population health measures. Healthy public policy is the key to ensuring that good ideas and effective practices live on. workers will likely not feel valued and will experience higher rates of illness, stress, accidental injury and lack of engagement. As a result, the employer will deserve a reputation for not valuing its people. Evidence suggests that the alignment of policies that address the health inequities generated by the determinants of health can result in a multiplication effect; the impact of policies can be increased and the time for such improvements to be visible can be reduced because the determinants of health are so closely connected and build on each other (Evidence into Action, Saskatoon Health Authority 2008). Therefore, advocating for policy changes that address underlying determinants of health, such as child poverty, becomes an important component of population health and healthy community development work. Consider, as an example, the achievements that have been made in addressing the negative impacts of tobacco use. Without legislation and policy, we would still be subjected to second hand smoke in restaurants and on airplanes and advertising would still be promoting tobacco use as a pathway to success. There still is a tobacco use health problem in Canada, but not to the extent seen in countries that have not created legislation and enforcement to curtail public smoking. Revisit: Build in a policy Review Take some time to review your program Policy manual. Does it reflect the values, philosophical underpinnings and priorities of your program area and team? Do your policies reflect a health inequities lens or pay attention to underlying determinants of health, either for your staff or for the population you serve? Have there been shifts in NH policy or in the legislative landscape that are not reflected in your existing policy manual?
19 IMAGINE POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER - 18 Tools for thought: Identifying policy opportunities One way of thinking about opportunities for policy development is to think about populations by their place on the life stage continuum. For example, what polices could be developed that would improve the long-term health odds for children in their early years, or that would improve health outcomes for seniors approaching later stages of life? Alternatively, it can be useful to look for transition points on the life course when people, by virtue of being at a critical developmental juncture, are open to learning and making lifestyle changes. Graduation from high school, becoming a new parent, retiring and empty nesting are all good examples of transition points where policy intervention may be particularly well-received and effective.
20 POPULATION HEALTH PRIMER 19 E Evidence based decision making Allocation of resources and decisions about strategies and direction will only ever be as good as the evidence provided for their rationale. As Arthur C. Clarke wrote in 2001: A Space Odyssey: The only hard decision is what to do next. Evidence based decision making is the process of systematically reviewing, appraising and applying the best research findings to ensure optimal decisions. Evidence is defined as any data or information used to identify problems, to assess their magnitude, to explain them and to make decisions, based on the evidence, for their resolution. This evidence based approach was articulated in the 1990s, but the concept dates back to the 1980s, when the focus within health care shifted from trust, conviction and authority to the use of the best available research and practice. (Robust Decision Making, Evidence based practice in decision making ) The assumption underlying evidence based decision making is that assessing the results from a multitude of sources allows decisions to be based on a foundation of research that has been reviewed and considered statistically significant. This review, conducted to specific standards, allows busy practitioners to rely on up to date and relevant research findings, without having to carry out the necessary review work themselves. As a result, better value for the money invested in health care can be expected and better health care means better health outcomes for individuals. There have, however, been some drawbacks. While advances in We need to commit to ongoing evaluation and monitoring of interventions undertaken to reduce health inequity. Some can affect change quite quickly. Others will take more time. But we need to have the ongoing measures to show the commitment is still there and the inequities are not going away. And we need more frequent reports than every five years to show those changes. Dr. Cory Neudorf, Board of the Canadian Public Health Association and Medical Health Officer, Saskatoon. Presentation to Responding to Health Inequities: The Role of Public Health, May, 2009 technology have increased access to a global data bank of research, findings must still be applied within a local context. Further, much of the necessary technological and financial infrastructure needed to ensure evidence banks are relevant and timely to quality improvements are still not in place. The necessary cooperation between government, academic and commercial interests is still lacking. As a consequence, while there is agreement about the need for quality information on which to base decisions, the governance and oversight to put evidence based materials in the hands of policy makers and practitioners is not yet fully developed. In spite of the very real potential contained in systematic, evidence-based approaches to practice and policy, (e)vidence alone will never resolve the numerous complex decisions involved in taking care of individuals or making health care decisions for diverse populations. (Clancy and Cronin) Drawbacks aside, evidence based approaches are clearly important. For front line practitioners, clinicians and policy makers, the challenge lies in understanding the rules underlying evidence based material and applying some basic rules of literature review when reading the evidence case. Cultural competency is also a key trait for developing evidence based decision making. The medical model is not the only source of information for our decision making processes. Research findings derived from a single study are rarely definitive, while replication of results in multiple studies offers assurance that the findings are reliable. Systematic reviews, based on quantitative techniques to evaluate and synthesize a body of research in a particular area, represent a core component of efforts to incorporate science into clinical decisions, yet there is a recognized need to expedite this process to keep up with the continuously growing literature and the need to transfer knowledge to the consumer and clinician at the point of care. Carol M. Clancy and Kelly Cronin, Health Affairs, 24, no. 1 (2005): /hlthaff (abstract at: