Journal of International Economics


 Rosemary Norman
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) Contents lsts avalable at ScenceDrect Journal of Internatonal Economcs journal homepage: Composton and growth effects of the current account: A syntheszed portfolo vew Ka Guo 1, Keyu Jn Department of Economcs, Harvard Unversty, Unted States artcle nfo abstract Artcle hstory: Receved 1 September 007 Receved n revsed form 5 February 009 Accepted 5 March 009 Keywords: Current account Portfolo vew Valuaton effects Composton effects Growth effects hs paper analyzes a useful accountng framework that breaks down the current account to two components: a composton effect and a growth effect. We show that past emprcal evdence, whch strongly supports the growth effect as the man drver of current account dynamcs, s msconceved. he remarkable emprcal success of the growth effect s drven by the domnance of the crosssectonal varaton, whch, under condtons met by the data, s generated by an accountng approxmaton. In contrast to prevous fndngs that the portfolo share of net foregn assets to total assets s constant n a country, both our theoretcal and emprcal results support a hghly persstent process or a untroot process, wth some countres dsplayng a trend. Fnally, we reestablsh the composton effect as the quanttatvely domnant drvng force of current account dynamcs n the past data. 009 Elsever B.V. All rghts reserved. JEL classfcaton: F1 F3 F41 1. Introducton he U.S.'s wdenng current account defct over the past decade and the growng current account mbalances have become a subject of vast nterest. Alongsde these recent experences of global mbalances s an exploson of nternatonal fnancal asset trade among an expandng group of economes. 3 Wth the ncreasng leverage n natonal portfolos and the potentally huge wealth transfers assocated wth alteratons of the portfolo allocaton, concepts of external We thank Kenneth Rogoff for hs gudance and encouragement over the entre process of ths research. We are grateful to Robert Barro, Rchard Cooper, Graham Ellott, L Han, Elhanan Helpman, Rustam Ibragmov, Dale Jorgenson, Konstantn Styrn, Aleh syvnsk, Erc van Wncoop, and Harvard Internatonal Economcs Workshop, Macroeconomcs, and Econometrcs Workshop partcpants for helpful comments. We thank Florent Ségonne for certan techncal support. Any remanng errors are the responsblty of the authors. Correspondng author. el.: Emal addresses: (K. Guo), (K. Jn). 1 el.: he share of U.S. current account defcts n GDP reached an unprecedented hgh of 6.4% n the year of 005 and remans at a hgh level. 3 For ndustral countres, the sum of the stock of foregn assets and foregn labltes relatve to GDP has ncreased by a factor of 7, from 45% to 300% over the perod of For developng countres, t has ncreased from around 40% to 150% over the same perod (Lane and MlesFerret, 007). adjustment and external mbalances are no longer adequate wthout reference to the structure of natonal portfolos, accordng to Obstfeld (004), among many others. he recent surge n the lterature on portfolo models of the current account reflects these new trends n global fnance. One of the frst that marked the recent emergence n portfolo models s the partalequlbrum approach of Kraay and Ventura (000, 003). Accordng to ther theory, nternatonal captal flows, or the current account, s caused by portfolo growth through changes n wealth. Countres nvest the margnal unt of wealth as the average unt, or n other words, portfolo shares (net foregn assets to total assets) are constant, and the current account s smply equal to the changes n wealth tmes the portfolo share. Most recently, the works of Devereux and Sutherland (006a,b,c) and lle and Van Wncoop (008) explctly model portfolo choce for both gross and net nternatonal captal flows, takng nto account the general equlbrum effects of portfolo choce on external adjustment. Whle ther emphass s methodologcal 4, they make the mportant pont that nternatonal captal flows n ther framework can be broken down nto a component assocated wth portfolo 4 hey develop a method for solvng dynamc stochastc general equlbrum openeconomy models wth portfolo choce that can be mplemented both n a complete market settng and an ncomplete market settng /$ see front matter 009 Elsever B.V. All rghts reserved. do: /j.jnteco
2 3 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) growth through savngs and a component assocated wth the optmal reallocaton of portfolo as a result of changes n expected rsk and returns of varous assets. her models also ncorporate valuaton effects, whch have been at the heart of emprcal research on external adjustments, notably Lane and MlesFerrett (006), Gournchas and Rey (007), and lle (008). In ths paper, the frst objectve s to show that most of the recent lterature on the current account can be nested nto a nonstructural, accountng framework. he accountng framework decomposes the current account nto two factors that are synonymous to the portfolo growth and portfolo reallocaton breakdown emphaszed n the general equlbrum model of lle and Van Wncoop (008). We call these two effects a composton effect and a growth effect. he composton effect s lke a substtuton effect, and refers to the reallocaton of the portfolo towards or away from foregn assets. It s manfested n changes to the portfolo share (share of net foregn assets n total assets). he growth effect s smlar to an ncome effect, and refers to changes n the budget set, or total wealth, that leads to correspondng proportonal changes n both assets and labltes. he framework can also ncorporate valuaton effects and captal gans and losses and ther mpact on the current account. hs nonstructural, syntheszed framework, despte ts smplcty, can be very useful as a framework n nestng, and emprcally assessng, varous theores of the current account wthout needng to mpose more structure on the model. hs framework, along wth the general equlbrum models, demonstrates the theoretcal mportance of both the composton effect and the growth effect n accountng for external adjustments. Yet, the Kraay and Ventura (000) theory put forth the growth effect as the source of longrun current account movements. Other theores of the current account, albet not based on portfolo choce models, such as Blanchard et al. (005), Caballero et al. (008), essentally post that the composton effect s the man drver of current account movements. hese three dfferent vews of the current account naturally call for an emprcal nvestgaton on whch factor, f not both, s more quanttatvely relevant. Whle there s stll a dearth n the emprcal assessment of these portfolo choce models, the closest related emprcal work s that of Kraay and Ventura (000, 003). Based on ther vew that portfolo shares are fxed n the long run and current account changes are brought about by changes n wealth, they run a fxedportfolo regresson to test the theory, and fnd overwhelmng support for the growtheffect theory. 5 Consequentally, t appears that the growth effect s suffcent for descrbng the realworld dynamcs of external adjustment, leavng the composton effect hghlghted by general equlbrum models only as a theoretcal plausblty. he need for more concrete emprcal assessment of these theores leads to the paper's second objectve, whch s to use hstorcal OECD data to emprcally assess the relatve mportance of the composton effect and the growth effect. wo results emerge: frst, we overturn the Kraay Ventura concluson that changes to the current account are explaned by the growth effect, by theoretcally showng that the surprsng result of ther fxedportfolo crosscountry regresson s the outcome of a concdence, whereby an omtted varable bas s concealed by the case of a short tme seres. Furthermore, because the ntal values of net foregn assets are small relatve to the subsequent flows n the data sample, the crosssectonal varaton s generated only by an accountng approxmaton and therefore contans lmted nformatonal content. Second, we fnd that the portfolo share s consstent wth followng a hghly persstent process, wth some countres dsplayng a determnstc trend, drectly n opposton to the earler clams that the portfolo share s constant. hese fndngs suggest that the exstng emprcal work can be very msleadng n ascrbng the growth effect as the man explanaton for 5 Kraay and Ventura (003) show emprcally that the rule that portfolo shares are constant does not hold well n the short run, but s rather a good descrpton of the data n the long run. nternatonal captal flows. By overturnng the Kraay Ventura result, together wth a varance decomposton of the current account, we are able to establsh the composton effect as the man drver of external adjustment dynamcs, and that the growth effect, whle theoretcally plausble, s quanttatvely nsgnfcant. he paper s organzed as follows. In Secton we derve an accountng framework that exposts dfferent possble channels through whch current account adjustments can occur, and nest the recent current account lterature nto ths framework. Secton 3 gves a theoretcal exposton of the problem of the fxedportfolo crosscountry regresson results, and Secton 4 undertakes the emprcal analyses. Secton 5 concludes the paper.. he framework.1. heoretcal dervaton In ths secton, we derve an accountng framework of the current account that can nest the myrad of dfferent vews on external mbalances recently put forth n the lterature. hs framework, although nonstructural, can emprcally evaluate structural models of the current account such as Kraay and Ventura (000, 003), Blanchard et al. (005), and Caballero et al. (008), and nonstructural models such as Gournchas and Rey (007), at the same tme gvng certan theoretcal predctons related to the current account. In dervng the framework, we frst begn wth an accountng dentty. Defne wealth, W=K+NFA, where W s total wealth, K s the domestc captal stock and NFA s the net foregn asset poston. Defne x as the share of net foregn assets n total wealth. herefore, NFA = x W: akng a total dfferentaton of ths equaton yelds the followng: ΔNFA = Δx W + x ΔW: Here, ΔNFA s the change n net foregn assets, Δx s the change n the portfolo share of net foregn assets, and ΔW s the change n the total wealth, whch we call savngs (explaned below). By defnton, the change n net foregn assets ΔNFA s just the current account CA. hs gves us the followng equaton: CA = Δx W + x S: Eq. (3) leads to an accountng framework that attrbutes the current account balance to the sum of two effects: the effect of a change n the portfolo share, x, what we call the composton effect, and the effect of a change n wealth, whch s n our termnology the growth effect. 6 On one sde of the current account lterature, Blanchard et al. (005), Caballero et al. (008) and part of Cooper (005) argue that current account changes reflect changes n x, the composton effect. 7 Accordng to Eq. (3), ths means that CA=Δx W. On another sde, 6 hese two effects are tantamount to the portfolo growth effect and portfolo reallocaton effect n the general equlbrum model of lle and Van Wncoop (008). 7 Blanchard et al. (005) attrbute the large U.S. current account defct to exogenous shocks to asset preferences, n partcular, a permanent ncrease n demand for U.S. assets. Caballero et al. (008) explan the rse n the share of U.S. assets n the global portfolo and the subsequent large current account defcts by the slow growth condton n Europe relatve to the U.S. and the nablty of Asan fnancal markets to generate suffcent fnancal assets to cope wth ther good growth condtons. Cooper (005) argues that the margnal foregn nvestment n the U.S. exceeds ts average foregn nvestment, and that the U.S. has nvestment opportuntes that produce hgher returns than n Japan and Europe. In essence, all of these papers argue that changes n portfolo composton are the man source of large current account movements, albet for dfferent underlyng reasons. ð1þ ðþ ð3þ
3 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) Kraay and Ventura (000, 003), among others, argue that the U.S. current account defct s due to a growth effect. 8 Countres mantan a constant portfolo composton as the portfolo enlarges, as t s customary that countres nvest the margnal unt of wealth n the same way as the average unt. 9 Based on the Kraay Ventura clam, a smple rule predcts the current account response to changes n wealth: t s equal to ths constant share of net foregn assets multpled by the addtonal wealth. 10 In our framework: countres mantanng constant portfolo shares over tme amounts to Δx=0. Namely, only the growth effect remans: CA=x S. he thrd vew of the lterature s represented by the general equlbrum portfolo models developed most recently, such as lle and Van Wncoop (008), and Devereux and Sutherland (006a,b,c). hey pont to the theoretcal mportance of takng nto account both the composton effect and the growth effect n explanng current account adjustments. he followng sectons take up the task of emprcally assessng these three dfferent portfolo vews of the current account... Emprcal results n the lterature Although many theores of the current account from a portfolo perspectve have emerged from ths recent wave of nterest, there has been very lttle lucd emprcal analyss on these theores. No exstng emprcal work, to our knowledge, has specfcally amed at explorng the relatve mportance of the two effects n explanng the current account. he most relevant emprcal study to ths end s the work done by Kraay and Ventura (000), whch tests the valdty of the growtheffect theory. o test the theory that CA=x S, the regresson 11 CA t = β 0 + β 1 ðx t S t Þ + η t ð4þ s performed. CA t and S t denote the current account and savngs as a share of GNP n country n year t; x t s the share of net foregn assets n total assets; and η t s the error term. 1 Accordng to the growtheffect theory, β 1 should be 1. Kraay and Ventura (000) run both the pooled regresson that ncludes all country/year observatons of 13 OECD countres over the tme frame of and the crosssecton regresson that uses countryaverages of all varables,.e. CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η (upper bar of a varable denotes ts average over tme). hey fnd that the estmated β 1 s n the pooled regresson and n the crosssecton regresson, and cannot reject the null that β 1 s equal to 1 n ether 8 Bussere et al. (00) emprcally fnd that n a panel of 18 OECD countres, ntal portfolo allocaton affects current account behavor followng temporary shocks, therefore concludng that these results are compatble wth the new rule suggested by Kraay and Ventura (000). Iurrta (004) extends the Kraay Ventura (000) model to a twocountry large openeconomy model, and examnes the current account responses to transtoryncome shocks n a twocountry world. 9 he other dmenson of Cooper (005)'s argument also encompasses the growth effect feature n stressng that the large U.S. current account defct s only a natural feature of the ncreasngly globalzed world, where a porton of the world's excess savng s nvested n the U.S. 10 hs seemngly smple equaton yelds surprsng mplcatons that are absent n the standard vew of the current account. An ncrease n savngs wll lead to a current account defct n debtor countres but a current account surplus n credtor countres. For ths reason, Kraay and Ventura's explanaton of the huge current account defct n the U.S. s not a reflecton of shfts towards U.S. assets and away from foregn assets by foregn countres, but of the large ncrease n ts wealth and of the fact that U.S. had been a debtor. 11 Kraay and Ventura (000) confrms that the results of ths regresson hold even after controllng for a number of relevant varables and usng an nstrumental varable to estmate the β1 coeffcent. Omtted varable bas and measurement error seem not to affect much of the result, and therefore we follow Kraay and Ventura n usng ths reducedform equaton as the bass of our analyss. 1 Note that n runnng ths regresson, Kraay and Ventura's measure of the current account CA does not consstently take nto account valuaton effects and captal gans. Later, we rerun the regresson wth our measure of current account CA, whch nclude these effects. able 1 Duplcaton of Kraay and Ventura (000, 003) results. radtonal CA Mark I data Mark II data (Gross Natonal Savngs/GDP) (Foregn Assets/otal Assets) (0.136) (0.093) (0.070) R Number of observatons 0 Pvalue for null hypothess that coeffcent on savng foregn assets=1 hs table reports the results of estmatng CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η, where CA t and x t S t denote the average current account to GDP rato and average savngs rate multpled by net foregn asset rato n country over the sample perod; and η s the error term. Standard errors are n parentheses and are corrected for heteroskedastcty. case. We rerun the crosssecton regresson usng three dfferent measures of the current account, ncludng measures that account for valuaton effects, and fnd smlar results, reported n able β 1 =1 cannot be rejected when usng any of the three measures, despte the datasets' dssmlarty. Fg. 1 dsplays the emprcal result of the crosssecton regresson. We make two mportant observatons here. Frst, accordng to our accountng framework, β 1 =1 does not necessarly rule out the mportance of the composton effect, nor by tself provde support for the growth effect. If the composton effect s uncorrelated wth the growth effect, whch s not mplausble, we could well have β 1 =1, whle a sgnfcant porton of current account movements can stll be accounted for by the composton effect. However, the fact that the R n the crosssecton regresson above can be as hgh as 0.85 seems to suggest that the majorty of the crosssectonal varatons of the current account s attrbuted to the growth effect. he composton effect, on the other hand, s at best margnally mportant. he second observaton s that the emprcal support for the growth effect comes from prmarly the crosssectonal varatons and not n the least bt from the tmeseres varatons. able compares the outcome of the wthn regresson (tmeseres varaton wthn each country) and between regresson (crosssectonal varaton). Clearly, there s no evdence supportng the new rule at the tmeseres dmenson whle t performs remarkably well at the crosssectonal dmenson. In Kraay and Ventura (003), they nterpret ths dvergence n performance as the dstncton between a shortrun and a longrun phenomenon. hey argue that the new rule may not hold well n the shortrun possbly as a result of adjustment costs, but that t nevertheless holds very well n the longrun, as s evdent from the crosssecton regresson results. For ths reason, the next sectons focus exclusvely on the crosssectonal regressons (n whch the evdence les), and show that the crosssectonal varatons n the current account are manly drven by an accountng approxmaton, so that the only pece of evdence that remans provdes lttle meanngful emprcal support for the new rule. An mportant and equally surprsng result s: when nstead of runnng the shares regresson above, CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η, where the current account s the share of GNP, and savngs s taken to be the savngs rate, we run a levels regresson, where CA t s taken to be the levels of the current account and S t s taken to be total savngs, the coeffcent s β 1 now actually close to (able 3). Accordng to the 13 Frst, we expand the orgnal K V dataset, usng conventonal measures of the current account, to 0 OECD countres over Because of data avalablty ssues and especally of the mssng IIP data n the IMF's Balance of Payment Statstcs for some countres n early years, t s an unbalanced panel. We subsequently use the change n net foregn assets and IIP taken from the Lane and MlesFerret (007), Mark II dataset for OECD countres over to run the same regresson, also reportng the results usng the Lane and MlesFerret (001), Mark I dataset coverng a shorter tme perod of for the same set of countres, where estmates of net foregn assets are based on a dfferent methodology from the subsequent one and are therefore somewhat dfferent.
4 34 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) able he K V wthn regresson. Country radtonal CA Obs Mark I data Obs Mark II data Obs AUS 0.59(.349) (.650) 6.547(.964) 31 AU.017(.636) (.883) (1.693) 31 CAN.7(.400) (.966) (.701) 31 CHE 1.406(.641) 1.596(.813) (.5) 31 DEU 1.914(.671) 1.40(.886) 6.530(.884) 31 DNK 0.118(.409) (.748) (1.066) 31 ESP 0.616(.315) 31.97(1.179) (1.170) 31 FIN 0.588(.156) (.898) (.155) 31 FRA 0.4(.517) (1.00) 6.93(1.338) 31 GBR 0.885(.476) (1.38) 6.54(1.067) 31 IRL N.A..045(.580) (.803) 31 ISR 0.31(.658) (.806) 6.66(1.34) 31 IA 0.513(.80) 31.4(1.171) (1.59) 31 JPN 1.51(.3) (.4) 6.407(.640) 31 KOR 0.700(1.53) 18.78(.355) (.61) 31 MEX N.A. 0.76(1.141) 6.00(.775) 31 NLD 0.357(.9) 8.587(.53) (1.353) 31 NOR.515(.509) 0.38(.599) 6.669(.416) 31 NZL 0.4(.93) (.643) 6.18(.307) 31 PR 0.453(.650) (1.067) (1.094) 31 SWE 0.969(.468) (.971) (1.695) 31 USA 1.784(0.308) (.83) (.711) 31 hs table reports the results of estmatng the K V wthn regresson (tme seres) for each country usng dfferent measures of the current account. Standard errors are n parentheses. he followng accountng dentty follows: x = NFA 0 + CA 1 + CA + N + CA : ð5þ W 0 + S 1 + S + N + S If the ntal net foregn asset poston NFA 0 and assets W 0 are quanttatvely small compared to the ncremental net foregn assets and wealth over subsequent perods, these ntal values can be gnored. As such, the followng equaton wll be approxmately true: Fg. 1. Duplcaton of Kraay and Ventura (000, 003) Results. hs fgure duplcates the crosscountry regresson n Kraay and Ventura (000, 003) usng our own datasets. he top panel uses the tradtonal current account, the mddle panel uses the valuatonadjusted current account taken from the Lane et al. Mark I dataset and the bottom panel uses the valuatonadjusted current account taken from the Lane et al. Mark II dataset. x = NFA 0 + CA 1 + CA + N CA W 0 + S 1 + S + N S P t =1 = CA t = P t =1 S t = = CA t S t : P t =1 CA t P t =1 S t ð6þ growtheffect theory, these two dfferent specfcatons should be dentcal n terms of predctng β 1 =1, wth the levels regresson beng an even more drect way of assessng the growtheffect theory than CA=x S. he theoretcal analyss n the next secton wll llustrate exactly why one could obtan the result that β 1 =, and how t sheds lght on the Kraay Ventura result. 3. he problem of the K V crosssecton regresson 3.1. he shares regresson he endofperod portfolo share x s approxmately equal to the sum of all current account balances n each perod dvded by the sum of savngs n each perod. Consequently, x s smply equal to the average current account over the average savngs (upper bar of a varable denotes ts average over tme). Note that ths approxmaton does not requre a very long tme seres,.e. a large.hereasonsthatfnancal globalzaton and economc growth over the past three decades have served to reduce the quanttatve mportance of ntal net foregn asset postons and wealth compared to the subsequent flow varables. From our sample, whch conssts of the perod between 1973 and 003, the ntal assets represent on average 10% of the sum n the denomnator, We theoretcally derve the explct expresson for the β 1 coeffcent of the crosssecton specfcaton for three dfferent data generatng processes of x, for both the shares and the levels regresson. We wll show that we can n fact obtan β 1 =1 for all of the consdered DGP's of x n the shares regresson, but that the possblty of seeng β 1 = n the levels regresson s only consstent wth x followng a hghly persstent or untroot process wth some countres dsplayng a trend. By defnton, the portfolo share x of country at tme s equal to the ntal net foregn asset poston, NFA 0, plus the sum of subsequent ΔNFA n every perod current account n each perod), dvded by the ntal total asset poston, W 0, plus the sum of savngs n every subsequent perod. able 3 Levelsregresson results of the K V specfcaton. radtonal CA Mark I data Mark II data (Gross Natonal Savngs) (Foregn Assets/otal Assets) (0.408) (0.167) (0.386) R Number of observatons 0 Pvalue for null hypothess that coeffcent on savng foregn assets= hs table reports the results of estmatng CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η, where CA t and x t S t denote the average current account and average savngs multpled by net foregn asset rato n country over the sample perod; and η s the error term. Standard errors are n parentheses and are corrected for heteroskedastcty.
5 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) and the ntal net foregn asset poston represents about 5% of the total sum n the numerator. Rearrangng Eq. (6), weget CA t = x S t whch says that the average current account of country over the sample perod s smply equal to the endofperod share of net foregn assets tmes the average savngs over the same perod. It should be noted that Eq. (7) s very smlar to the crosssecton regresson CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η n Kraay and Ventura (000, 003), albet not dentcal. In the rest of ths secton, we wll show that the accountng approxmaton Eq. (7), whch holds regardless of the underlyng process of x t and S t, may undermne the valdty of the crosssecton regresson n Kraay and Ventura (000, 003). Inpartcular,we show that gven the short tme horzon of the perod n consderaton, ths accountng approxmaton may domnate the crosssecton varatons of the current account for a wde range of processes of x t, regardless of whether t's consstent or nconsstent wth the new rule. A caveat s, should we care about the process of S t, or alternatvely the process of W t? In prncple, yes. o see ths, the regresson CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η can be rewrtten as h CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + cov t ðx t ; S t Þ + η ; where cov t (x t, S t ) s the tmeseres correlaton between x t and S t n country, whch shows that the process of S t and n partcular ts tmeseres correlaton wth x t matters. A look at the data, however suggests that ths term s quanttatvely neglgble: the correlatons between x t St and xt S t are as hgh as 0.986, and 0.997, usng the three dfferent measures of the current account. 14 herefore, n ths case, the key evdence supportng the K V new rule s essentally the followng crosssecton regresson CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η : It s plausble that there s crosssectonal correlaton between x t and S t. For nstance, countres whch have hgher savngs may also have a hgher share of net foregn assets. But ths would automatcally nvaldate Kraay and Ventura (000, 003) as ther theory suggests that x should be ndependent of S, partcularly n the crosssecton. Allowng for such a correlaton, however, would only strengthen our results (below) at the cost of more ntrcate algebra. For expostonal purposes, we wll assume that there s no crosssectonal correlaton between x t and S t. A techncal appendx showng that all results derved below carry through when relaxng ths assumpton s avalable upon request. Why does the pont estmate of β 1 =1 of Eq. (8) smply reflect the accountng approxmaton CA t = x St? o see ths ntutvely, compare Eqs. (8) and (6). he only dfference between the accountng approxmaton and the regresson specfcaton s x and x t. But when the tmeseres s not too long (for example =30, where =30 s more than suffcent for Eq. (6) to hold), the endofperod portfolo share x and the average portfolo share x t are not very dfferent even n the case where x t has a determnstc trend or s nonstatonary, cases whch would be contrary to the new rule. It follows that runnng the crosssecton regresson n Kraay and Ventura (000, 003) can always yeld β 1 =1 as seen n able 1. Whle β 1 =1 s certanly consstent wth the new rule, β 1 =1 s n fact, consstent wth any rule. herefore, t cannot be taken as evdence for, or for that matter aganst, the new rule. 14 hese measures correspond to the Lane et al. Mark I, Mark II, and the tradtonal current account measures. ð7þ ð8þ o be more concrete, consder the followng three possble data generatng processes of x: (a) x s statonary wthout trend,.e. x t =x +ε t, (b) x s nonstatonary wth/wthout trend,.e. x t =α +x t 1 +ε t, t (c) x s a trendstatonary process,.e. x t =x 0 +α t+ j =1 ρ t j ε j, where subscrpts and t represent country and year t, respectvely. Next we attempt to work out the exact value of β 1 for all three cases by pluggng n Eq. (7) nto the regresson. Case (a). he crosssectonal regresson specfcaton CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η yelds var x S t β 1 g =1: ð9þ var x S t Proof. See Appendx B. he ntuton s the followng: f x =x +ε, t s roughly the case that x =x t +ε. Namely, the endofperod portfolo share x s equal to the average portfolo share plus an error term. he accountng approxmaton CA t = x S t then becomes CA t = x t S t + e S t. Notce that e S t s by assumpton uncorrelated across countres, and denotng t as η, the accountng approxmaton fnally becomes CA t = x t S t + η, precsely the crosscountry regresson n Kraay and Ventura (000, 003). So even f ther conjecture that x s roughly constant over tme s correct, these regresson results carry no emprcal content, and consequently do not serve as a valdaton to the growtheffect theory, or the new rule. In fact, ths case mathematcally confrms the pont made n Van Wncoop (003), where he argues that any model that has a steadystate portfolo share can delver β 1 =1 n the K V regresson snce devatons from the steady state would cancel out when takng averages. Gong one step beyond ths argument, n Cases (b) and (c), we wll show that even f there were no steadystate portfolo share x, the crosssecton varatons may stll be domnated by the accountng approxmaton when s not very long, the case of ths partcular data sample. Case (b). he same regresson specfcaton yelds var x 0 S t β 1 = var x 0 S t + A + +1 ð Þ B + C ð10þ 6 A + ð +1Þ 4 B + C; Þ cov x 0 S t ; α S t ð +1 Þð +1Þ where A=var(ε t )E(S t ), B=var(α S t), and C = ð +1 Proof. See Appendx B. he frst term of both the numerator and denomnator s dentcal and s a crosssecton varaton nvolvng the ntal net foregn asset share and average savngs rate. Ignorng the other terms, β 1 s just equal to 1, and ths reverts back to Case (a). Other terms n the numerator and denomnator reflect devatons from Case (a). he second terms dffer only by a coeffcent and contan the varance of the randomwalk part of x whch we call a whtenose varaton, and ther rato s close to 1.5 when s very large. he last two terms are related to the trend: the thrd terms represent the trend varaton and ther rato converges to when s very large. he fourth terms, whch we group wth the crosssecton varaton term, are dentcal and ther rato s therefore 1. Consequently, β 1 s a weghted average of 1, 1.5 and, the weghts dependng on the crosssecton varaton (terms 1 and 4), the whtenose varaton (term ), the trend varaton (term 3) and tme.if the crosssecton varaton s large and s not too large, namely, we are not far away from Case (a), more weght s put on 1, and we could see β 1 =1. If, however, the trend varaton s large and/or s very bg, we could see β 1 =. A specal case s f α =0 for all, the case where the portfolo share x has no tme trend, and the last two trendrelated terms
6 36 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) Fg.. Evoluton of x over tme. hs fgure depcts the evoluton of x over tme for each country, where x represents the share of net foregn assets n total assets. he data s taken from the Mark II dataset and the tme frame s from 1973 to 003. (terms 3 and 4) vanshes, so that β 1 s a weghted average of 1 and he key s that wth a relatvely short tme seres of 31 years n ths data sample, t s the case that the crosssecton varaton domnates both the trend varaton and the whtenose varaton. o llustrate the order or magntude, the sample crosssecton varaton s of order 10 4, the sample whtenose varaton s of order 10 6,and the sample trend varaton s of order 10 7.Clearly,wth=31, the crosssecton varance (the frst term) domnates the rest of the terms. Snce Case (a) has already shown that the crosssecton varaton s determned by an accountng approxmaton, t s dffcult to see anythng but β 1 equal to 1 because of the relatvely short tme seres. When n the future wll we be able to see β 1 =? he answer s, only after a very long tme, and we would always see β 1 =1 f usng avalable data. Accordng to the above magntudes, wth 50 years of data, the coeffcent wll be only 1.5. Wth 100 years of data, the coeffcent can reach 1.5. And t wll take more than four centures for the coeffcent to reach 1.9! he mportant pont s that even f x follows a nonstatonary process of Case (b), whch s drectly n opposton to the growtheffect's theory of a constant portfolo, β 1 =1 cannot be rejected when the crosssecton varance domnates, precsely the case when the tme seres s relatvely short (b50). Case (c). he same regresson specfcaton as the above yelds var x 0 S t + E 1 ρ ρ ρ + 1 A + +1 ð Þ ð1=ρ β 1 = Þ ð1+ρ Þ B + C var x 0 S t + E ð 1 ρ Þ ρ ρ +ρ + 1 +ρ + ρ + A + ð +1Þ ð1 ρ Þð1 ρ Þ 4 B + C ð11þ where A=var(ε t )E(S t ), B=var(α S t ), and C = +1Þ cov x 0 S t ;α S t. 15 β 1 could be close to 1 f the crosssecton varaton s large and s relatvely small, and close to 1.5 f the whtenose varaton and/or s very large. Proof. See Appendx B. he only change to ths formula from the precedng case (Eq. (10)) s the coeffcents of the second term of both the numerator and denomnator. Both Cases (a) and (b) are encompassed n Case (c) n the lmt. 16 he nterestng case where ρ s between 0 and 1, the rato of the second terms wll be less than 1 and β 1, a weghted average of 1, a value less than 1, and. Agan, f the magntude of the crosssecton varaton s large and the tme seres s short, more weght wll be put on 1 and we can stll obtan β 1 =1. 17 o summarze the theoretcal predctons of β 1 for the crosssectonal regresson specfcaton: Case (a): β 1 =1. Case (b): β 1 s a weghted average of 1, 1.5, and, the weghts dependng on the magntude of the crosssecton varance, the whtenose varance, the trend varance and. If the crosssecton varance s bg and tme s relatvely small, we can see β 1 =1; f the trend varance and/or s very large, we can see β 1 =. Case (c): when ρ s between 0 and 1, β 1 s a weghted average of 1, a value less than 1, and. If the crosssecton varance s large and s relatvely small, β 1 s equal to 1; f the trend varance s large and/or s very bg, β 1 can be equal to. 16 Note that ρ and α both beng equal to 0 for all brngs us back to the statonary Case (a). ρ =1 brngs us back to the unt root case wthout trend (f α =0 for all ), or the unt root case wth trend (f α s not 0 for all ), as n Case (b). he more nterestng case s when ρ s between 0 and However, t s possble to have β 1 beng below 1 f the magntude of the second terms s larger than the magntude of the thrd terms n a small sample. But when becomes very large, β 1 can gradually converge to as n Case (b).
7 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) able 4 Frstorder autocorrelaton of x. Country AUS AU CAN CHE DEU DNK ESP FIN α (0.086) (0.117) (0.05) (0.148) (0.081) (0.086) (0.101) (0.139) α (0.011) (0.005) (0.006) (0.033) (0.003) (0.01) (0.006) (0.030) Country FRA GBR IRL ISR IA JPN KOR MEX α (0.099) (0.098) (0.087) (0.15) (0.105) (0.08) (0.033) (0.10) α (0.00) (0.004) (0.00) (0.019) (0.003) (0.003) (0.006) (0.01) Country NLD NOR NZL PR SWE USA α (0.094) (0.058) (0.075) (0.093) (0.097) (0.053) α (0.006) (0.004) (0.03) (0.010) (0.007) (0.00) hs table reports the results for estmatng x t =α 0 +α 1 x t 1 +ε t for each country n the sample usng the Mark II dataset, where x t denotes the share of foregn assets n total assets n year t; and ε t s the error term. he tme perod s Standard errors are n parentheses. Clearly, the result that β 1 =1 should not be consdered as a verfcaton to the growtheffect theory and the result s consstent wth all three cases of x. However, at ths pont, not much can be sad about the underlyng DGP of x. Wth 31 years of data, we are stuck wth a relatvely short tmeseres that make all of these cases a possblty. 3.. he levels regresson One way to get around ths dffculty and to be able to say somethng about the DGP of x s to do the same exercse for the levels regresson, CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η, where CA t and S t are now actually levels of the current account and levels of savngs. In the prevous secton, we are confronted wth the puzzlng regresson result that β 1 = n ths levels specfcaton, even though the new rule prescrbes the two specfcatons to be equvalent n predctng β 1 =1. he explct formula of β 1 n ths specfcaton s the same as before except that the levels replace shares for each of the terms. As we know, savng rates dffer lttle across countres relatve to the dfference n the levels of savngs across countres, the szes of economes beng remarkably dfferent. Hence, swtchng to the levels regresson amounts to effectvely puttng more weght on the trend varaton term, thus reducng the short tmeseres problem by effectvely magnfyng the trend varance term and puttng enough weght on so that even wth a relatvely short tme seres, we may stll observe f the true DGP were Case (b) or Case (c). 18 From the data sample, the crosssectonal varaton s on the order of magntude of 10 19, the sample whtenose varaton, , and the sample trend varaton, +1 ð Þ Wth =31, the number of years n our sample, t s clear that the trend varaton term can domnate, pushng β 1 towards. In ths case, the result that β 1 = n the levels regresson s not consstent wth Case (a), but wth Cases (b) and (c). Recall that n the shares regresson specfcaton β 1 =1 s consstent wth all three cases, so that we can conclude that only Case (b) and Case (c) are the possble true DGP of x. he supportng evdence for the growtheffect theory was n fact msnterpreted. 4. Emprcal analyss Wth the theoretcal analyss n the prevous secton suggestng that the process of x (consstent wth β 1 =) s a nonstatonary process or a hghly persstent process wth trend, we proceed to nvestgate ths drectly. A frst glance at the graphs (Fg. ) of the 18 More specfcally, the levels regresson puts more weght on large economes and large economes, such as the U.S. and Japan, happen to have trends n ther portfolo shares. portfolo share over tme for each of the countres seems to suggest that x s unlkely to be constant, but rather changng over tme, wth some countres seemng to dsplay a secular trend. o be more concrete, we run a few econometrc tests to examne the process of x. Consder the smplest possble case of x followng an AR(1) process, where x t =α 0 +α 1 x t 1 +ε t. 19 Results are reported n able 4.It s clear that α 1 s very close to 1 (wthn standard devatons) or even slghtly greater than 1, for most countres n our sample. hs suggests that x may follow a untroot process. In ths case, we proceed to conduct augmented Dckey Fuller tests for each ndvdual country. Wth varous specfcatons that nclude and exclude tme trends and dfferent lengths of tme lags, unt roots can be rejected for at most eght countres out of the twentytwo countres n the sample. 0 here are fourteen countres n our sample for whch none of the Dckey Fuller tests can reject unt root at conventonal sgnfcance levels. hese results notwthstandng, t s a well known fact that these untroot tests have very low power for short tme seres, not easly rejectng the null hypothess of a unt root. Gven that there are only 31 observatons ( ) for each country, the above results cannot be conclusve. Nevertheless, the results of these smple econometrc tests show that x s lkely to be a hghly persstent AR (1) process or a untroot process, wth some countres dsplayng a tme trend, effectvely gvng support to our theoretcal analyss n the prevous secton. 1 We have shown that results taken to be evdence for the growtheffect theory are overturned, both from our theoretcal and emprcal analyses. he followup queston s, to what extent should current account movements be attrbuted to portfolo composton adjustments and to what extent s the growth effect stll quanttatvely mportant, accordng to the syntheszed accountng framework? 19 hs regresson s run for each ndvdual country usng the Mark II data, whch has the longest tme seres. 0 he Dckey Fuller test wthout trend or lags rejects unt root for Mexco. he specfcaton ncludng tme lags rejects unt roots for Swtzerland, Korea and Mexco, and the specfcaton ncludng a tme trend rejects Israel and Japan. Includng both lags and trends rejects unt roots for Austra, Canada, Swtzerland, Japan and New Zealand. 1 An mportant caveat s that x beng a hghly persstent process or unt root process wth trend n the very long run s somewhat nconcevable and dffcult to reconcle wth theores that have a steadystate portfolo share. But avalable data smply cannot reject ths result. hs outcome may reflect the fact that the world s stll on a transtonal path to a new steady state, wth countres ntegratng more deeply nto the global economy wthout havng yet fully reached ts steady state portfolo equlbrum. Our man pont s that so long as the process of x s observatonally equvalent to a unt root process wth trend for ths sample perod, the regresson result β=1 based on ths data sample wll nevtably be the outcome of the domnance of a crosssectonal varaton generated by an account equaton. On the other hand, even f x s statonary n the very long run, whch may be lkely, β 1 =1 n a crosssecton regresson remans to be drven by accountng, and therefore contnues to confer no nformaton.
8 38 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) Fg. 3. A decomposton of the current account. hs fgure depcts a decomposton of the current account for each country. he sold lne represents the composton effect and the dashed lne represents the growth effect, both of whch are n terms of shares of current GDP. he data s taken from the Mark II dataset and the tme frame s
9 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) Fg. 3 (contnued). o see ths, we decompose the change n net foregn asset postons nto the composton effect and the growth effect usng Eq. (3) and normalze them by current GDP. Fg. 3 plots these two tme seres for Here we use the data taken from the Mark II dataset. each country. wo salent features emerge: Frst, the growth effect s smooth and changes slowly. For example, as the U.S. gradually sld nto a bg debtor n the md 1980's, the growth effect also gradually turned from postve nto negatve. he opposte case s Japan, the growth effect becomes more and more postve as Japan accumulates huge foregn assets. he growth effect does seem to capture some longrun
10 40 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) Fg. 3 (contnued). movements n the current account but for reasons that are completely dfferent from the one argued by Kraay and Ventura (000, 003). It smply reflects an accountng fact: a country that contnues to run current account defcts must become a debtor and a debtor country must be runnng current account defcts on average. Second, the composton effect s very volatle and accounts for most varatons of the current account n a country over tme. o be more concrete, we perform a varance decomposton exercse on the accountng equaton, CA=Δx W+x S. he results are reported n able 5. Clearly, the composton effect s much more mportant n explanng the varatons of the current account than the growth effect for most countres n our sample. It s noteworthy that ths emprcal result s also n lne wth results that emerge from a numercal example n lle and Van Wncoop (008), whch decomposes nternatonal captal flows generated by the model nto the growth effect (portfolo growth) and the composton effect (portfolo reallocaton). 3 In ther example t s also true that the growth effect s qute smooth whle the majorty of the varaton n the current account s due to the composton effect Concluson We have analyzed a nonstructural framework of the current account that s based upon an mportant accountng dentty that hghlghts two channels of current account adjustment: a composton effect and a growth effect. he framework s general enough to nest the majorty of the lterature on the portfolo vew of the current account, whle allowng for the nterplay between the composton effect and the growth effect also emphaszed n the recent general equlbrum portfolo models. hs framework can be used as a gudelne for more specfc theores, whch wll have to be compatble wth our emprcal fndngs regardng the quanttatve mportance of the two effects. We have shown that partalequlbrum models, wthout reference to a syntheszed framework may gve rse to msleadng nterpretatons of current account movements. Our basc message s clear: never agan run a K Vtype crosscountry regresson regardless of the underlyng DGP of the portfolo share; there s smply no nformaton embedded n ths regresson. It s therefore clear that partalequlbrum portfolo models cannot supplant general equlbrum models n explanng external adjustments despte ther seemngly remarkable emprcal success n the past. hs paper attempts to further the very lttle exstng emprcal work on portfolo models of the current account. Usng the accountng framework as a gudelne, we theoretcally and emprcally overturn the growth effect theory, and reestablsh the composton effect as the quanttatvely sgnfcant drver of current account dynamcs. Usng both drect and ndrect emprcal evdence, we show that the net 3 hey further decompose the composton effect nto parts that come from changes n expected excess returns and that whch come from tmevaryng second moments. See Chart 8 and 9 n lle and Van Wncoop (008). 4 More specfcally, t s due to tmevaryng second moments. foregn asset share s far from beng constant or even statonary, as s requred by a groweffect theory, but s n fact a hghly persstent process or a untroot process, wth some countres dsplayng a trend. Along wth general equlbrum models, ths syntheszed framework ponts to the components that matter for the current account, ncludng the components that have not mattered so much n the past but may potentally matter qute substantally n the future. In a world wth explodng gross holdngs of external assets and labltes, t s possble that the growth effect may overtake the composton effect n contrbutng to current account dynamcs, and ts systematc ncluson despte ts small relevance n the past data may become essental. Newly developed general equlbrum models embody precsely ths level of comprehensveness and can therefore serve to be a benchmark for future analyses on portfolo vews of external mbalances. In a fnancal world that s ntegratng ever more profoundly, theoretcal and emprcal works n ths area need to keep up wth global trends furtherng our understandng of the facts and the theory wll be mportant for handlng the massve global captal flows that we wll, n all lkelhood, contnue to wtness. Appendx A. Data descrpton Our dataset conssts of OECD countres. he countres nclude Austra, Australa, Canada, Swtzerland, Germany, Denmark, Span, Fnland, France, Great Brtan, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexco, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, Portugal, Sweden, and the U.S. 5 We select post1973 data, the years after Bretton Woods collapsed. For measures of the net foregn asset poston and the current account, we use both the tradtonal measure taken from the IIP data n IFS and Mark I and Mark II estmates from Lane and Mles Ferret (001) and Lane and MlesFerret (007), whch consstently account for valuaton effects and captal gans, although the methodologes have slghtly changed from one dataset to another. hey provde an accountng framework whch hghlghts the lnk between the balance and payment flows and the underlyng stocks, as well as the mpact of unrecorded captal flght, exchange rate fluctuatons, debt reducton, and valuaton changes not captured n the conventonal current account defnton. hrough ths lnk, they show that one method of estmatng net foregn assets s cumulatng the current account and adjustng for the captal account balance. We take ther net foregn asset measure, whch s just the adjustedcumulatve current account. For our current account, we take the frst dfference of ther adjustedcumulatve current account measure wth consstent captal gans and losses and valuaton effects. By dong so, we effectvely capture the valuaton effect and captal gans and losses for both the current account and net foregn assets measure. 5 We omt the followng OECD countres: Belgum, Greece, Hungary, and Luxemburg, Czech Republc, Poland, Slovak Republc, and urkey for the reason that, except for Belgum and Luxembourg, these countres do not have full tme seres of all varables between 1973 and 003. Belgum and Luxembourg are omtted because they are often reported as one n some datasets whle reported separately n others.
11 K. Guo, K. Jn / Journal of Internatonal Economcs 79 (009) able 5 Varance decomposton of the current account. Country R Composton effect Growth effect cov AUS AU CAN CHE DEU DNK ESP FIN FRA GBR IRL ISR IA JPN KOR MEX NLD NOR NZL PR SWE USA hs table reports the varaton decomposton of the current account for each country n the sample accordng to Eq. (3). he R s the proporton of the varaton of current account that can be explaned by ths equaton. he formula for the varance decomposton s var(δx W+x S)=var(Δx W)+var(x S)+cov(Δx W, x S).he three terms on the rght correspond to the composton effect, growth effect and cov n the table, respectvely, the sum of whch should be 1. omeasurethedomestccaptalstock,weusetheperpetualnventory method: 6 we cumulate gross domestc nvestment n current U.S. dollars taken from the World Bank's Global Development Indcators, assumng a deprecaton rate of 4% a year, and n each year revalung the prevous year's stock usng the U.S. GDP deflator. We take 1965 as the startng year. he captal stock n 1965 s estmated usng the average captaloutput rato over the perod n Nehru and Dhareshwar (1993), multpled by GDP n All varables are denoted n current U.S. dollars. Appendx B Case (a). Snce P x t =x +ε t, n partcular, we have x =x +ε and j = 1 x t = x + e j gx, where the second equalty comes from the fact that the average of ndependent shocks s approxmately 0 (a more detaled dervaton wthout takng ths approxmaton s avalable upon request). Eq. (7), CA t = x S t, mples that CA t = ðx + e Þ S t. Pluggng these equatons nto the regresson CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η, we then have (x t + ε ) S t = β0 + β 1 (x ) S t + η. herefore β 1 = cov ð ðx S t ; ðx + e ÞS t Þ = var ð x S t Þ = 1. For the savngs rate case, varððx S t Þ varðx S t Þ smply replace S t by S t Y t. t Case (b). Snce x t =α +x t 1 +ε t,wehavex t =x 0 +α t+ j =1 ε j.in partcular, x = x 0 + α + Σ j =1 ε j and x t = x 0 + α ð +1Þ + e 1 + ð 1Þe + N e. Agan, Eq. (7) CA t = x S t mples that CA t =(x0 + α + t j =1 ε j ) S t. Pluggng these equatons nto the regresson CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η, we then have β 1 = cov P x 0 + α + e j = 1 j S t ; x 0 + α ð + 1Þ + e 1 + ð 1Þe + N e var x 0 + α ð + 1Þ + e 1 + ð 1Þe + N e S t Þ Expandng the varances and covarances term by term, we obtan fnally β 1 = var ð x 0S t Þ A + ð + 1Þ B + C ; where A=var varðx 0 S t Þ + ð + 1Þð + 1Þ 6 A + ð + 1Þ 4 B + C (ε t )E(S t ), B=var(α S t), and C = ð +1Þ cov x 0 S t ;α S t. S t. Notce that for the case that α =0 for all (nonstatonary case wthout trend), we have β 1 = var ð x 0S t Þ varðe t ÞEðS t Þ. For the varðx 0 S t Þ + ð + 1Þð + 1Þ varðe 6 t ÞEðS t Þ savngs rate case, smply replace S t by S t t t Case (c). Snce x t =x 0 +α t+ j =1 ρ j ε j, n partcular, we have x = x 0 + α + j =1 ρ j ε j and x t = x 0 + α ð +1Þ ρ P j = 1 1 ρ + 1 j j e j. Agan, Eq. (7), CA t = x S t, mples that CA t = x 0 + α + P j =1 ρ j e j S t. Pluggng these equatons nto the regresson CA t = β 0 + β 1 x t S t + η, we then have β 1 = Y t. 0 0 cov x 0 + α + P B j =1 ρ j B e j S t x 0 + α + 0 B var x 0 + α ð + P ρ ð1 ρ + 1 j Þe j j =1 C A S t Þ P ρ + 1 j 1 ρ ð Þe j j =1 C C A S t A Expandng the varances and covarances term by term, we obtan fnally var x 0 S t + E 1 ρ ρ ρ + 1 A + +1 ð Þ ð1 ρ β 1 = Þ ð1+ρ Þ B + C ; var x 0 S t + E ð 1 ρ Þ ρ ρ +ρ + 1 +ρ + ρ + A + ð +1Þ ð1 ρ Þð1 ρ Þ 4 B + C where A=var(ε t )E(S t ), B=var(α S t), and C = ð +1Þ cov X 0 S t ; α S t. For the savngs rate case, smply replace S t by S t Y. t References Blanchard, O., Gavazz, F., Sa, F., 005. he U.S. current account and the dollar. NBER Workng Papers, vol Bussere, M., Chortareas, G., Drver, R., 00. Current accounts, net foregn assets, and the mplcatons of cyclcal factors. Bank of England Workng Paper. Caballero, R., Farh, E., Gournchas, P.O., 008. An equlbrum model of global mbalances and low nterest rates. Amercan Economc Revew 98, Cooper, R., 005. Lvng wth global mbalances: a contraran vew. Insttute for Internatonal Economcs Polcy Brefs No. PB053. Devereux, M., Sutherland, A., 006a. Solvng for country portfolos n open economy macro models. Workng Paper. Unversty of Brtsh Columba. Devereux, M., Sutherland, A., 006b. Monetary polcy rules and nternatonal portfolo choce. Workng Paper. Unversty of Brtsh Columba. Devereux, M., Sutherland, A., 006c. Country portfolo dynamcs. Workng Paper. Unversty of Brtsh Columba. Gournchas, P.O., Rey, H., 007. Internatonal fnancal adjustment. Journal of Poltcal Economy 115, Iurrta, I., 004. he Current Account and the New Rule n a wocountry World. Mmeo, ESE Facultad de CC.EE. y Empresarales, Department of Economcs. Kraay, A., Ventura, J., 000. Current accounts n debtor and credtor countres. Quarterly Journal of Economcs 115, Kraay, A., Ventura, J., 003. Current accounts n the long and short run. In: Gertler, M., Rogoff, K. (Eds.), 00 NBER Macroeconomcs Annual. MI Press, Cambrdge. Lane, P., MlesFerret, G., 001. he external wealth of natons. Journal of Internatonal Economcs 55, Lane, P., MlesFerret, G., 006. A global perspectve on external postons. In: Clarda, R. (Ed.), G7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustanablty and Adjustment. Chcago Unversty Press, Chcago, pp Lane, P., MlesFerret, G., 007. he external wealth of natons mark : revsed and extended estmates of foregn assets and labltes, Journal of Internatonal Economcs 73, Nehru, V., Dhareshwar, A., A new database on physcal captal stock: sources, methodology, and results. Rvsta de Analss Economco 8, Obstfeld, M., 004. External Adjustment. Reprnted from Revew of World Economcs, December 004. lle, C., 008. Fnancal ntegraton and the wealth effect of exchange rate fluctuatons. Journal of Internatonal Economcs 75 (), (July). lle, C., Van Wncoop, E., 008. Internatonal captal flows. Workng Paper. Unversty of Vrgna. Van Wncoop, E., 003. Comments on current accounts n the long and short run. In: Gertler, M., Rogoff, K. (Eds.), 00 NBER Macroeconomcs Annual. MI Press, Cambrdge. : 6 Kraay and Ventura (000) uses the same methodology n constructng ther dataset of 13 countres over
The Relationship between Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: Studied in a Multivariate Model Desislava Dimitrova, The College of Wooster
Issues n Poltcal Economy, Vol. 4, August 005 The Relatonshp between Exchange Rates and Stock Prces: Studed n a Multvarate Model Desslava Dmtrova, The College of Wooster In the perod November 00 to February
More informationThe Global Macroeconomic Costs of Raising Bank Capital Adequacy Requirements
W/1/44 The Global Macroeconomc Costs of Rasng Bank Captal Adequacy Requrements Scott Roger and Francs Vtek 01 Internatonal Monetary Fund W/1/44 IMF Workng aper IMF Offces n Europe Monetary and Captal Markets
More informationDo Firms Maximize? Evidence from Professional Football
Do Frms Maxmze? Evdence from Professonal Football Davd Romer Unversty of Calforna, Berkeley and Natonal Bureau of Economc Research Ths paper examnes a sngle, narrow decson the choce on fourth down n the
More informationShould Countries Promote Foreign Direct Investment?
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT UNITED NATIONS CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT HARVARD UNIVERSITY G24 Dscusson Paper Seres Should Countres Promote Foregn Drect Investment? Gordon
More informationWhy Don t We See Poverty Convergence?
Why Don t We See Poverty Convergence? Martn Ravallon 1 Development Research Group, World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washngton DC, 20433, USA Abstract: We see sgns of convergence n average lvng standards amongst
More informationFinance and Economics Discussion Series Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C.
Fnance and Economcs Dscusson Seres Dvsons of Research & Statstcs and Monetary Affars Federal Reserve Board, Washngton, D.C. Banks as Patent Fxed Income Investors Samuel G. Hanson, Andre Shlefer, Jeremy
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER. Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced? Ian W.H. Parry and Kenneth A. Small
DISCUSSION PAPER JULY 2007 RFF DP 0738 Should Urban Transt Subsdes Be Reduced? Ian W.H. Parry and Kenneth A. Small 1616 P St. NW Washngton, DC 20036 2023285000 www.rff.org Should Urban Transt Subsdes
More informationThe Developing World Is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight against Poverty
Publc Dsclosure Authorzed Pol c y Re s e a rc h Wo r k n g Pa p e r 4703 WPS4703 Publc Dsclosure Authorzed Publc Dsclosure Authorzed The Developng World Is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful
More informationAssessing health efficiency across countries with a twostep and bootstrap analysis *
Assessng health effcency across countres wth a twostep and bootstrap analyss * Antóno Afonso # $ and Mguel St. Aubyn # February 2007 Abstract We estmate a semparametrc model of health producton process
More informationDocumentation for the TIMES Model PART I
Energy Technology Systems Analyss Programme http://www.etsap.org/tools.htm Documentaton for the TIMES Model PART I Aprl 2005 Authors: Rchard Loulou Uwe Remne Amt Kanuda Antt Lehtla Gary Goldsten 1 General
More informationIncome per natural: Measuring development as if people mattered more than places
Income per natural: Measurng development as f people mattered more than places Mchael A. Clemens Center for Global Development Lant Prtchett Kennedy School of Government Harvard Unversty, and Center for
More informationREVEALED FACTOR INTENSITY INDICES AT THE PRODUCT LEVEL
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND COMMODITIES STUDY SERIES No. 44 REVEALED FACTOR INTENSITY INDICES AT THE PRODUCT LEVEL by Mho Shrotor UNCTAD
More informationcan basic entrepreneurship transform the economic lives of the poor?
can basc entrepreneurshp transform the economc lves of the poor? Orana Bandera, Robn Burgess, Narayan Das, Selm Gulesc, Imran Rasul, Munsh Sulaman Aprl 2013 Abstract The world s poorest people lack captal
More informationEffect of a spectrum of relaxation times on the capillary thinning of a filament of elastic liquid
J. NonNewtonan Flud Mech., 72 (1997) 31 53 Effect of a spectrum of relaxaton tmes on the capllary thnnng of a flament of elastc lqud V.M. Entov a, E.J. Hnch b, * a Laboratory of Appled Contnuum Mechancs,
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER. Is There a Rationale for OutputBased Rebating of Environmental Levies? Alain L. Bernard, Carolyn Fischer, and Alan Fox
DISCUSSION PAPER October 00; revsed October 006 RFF DP 03 REV Is There a Ratonale for OutputBased Rebatng of Envronmental Leves? Alan L. Bernard, Carolyn Fscher, and Alan Fox 66 P St. NW Washngton, DC
More informationWHICH SECTORS MAKE THE POOR COUNTRIES SO UNPRODUCTIVE?
MŰHELYTANULMÁNYOK DISCUSSION PAPERS MT DP. 2005/19 WHICH SECTORS MAKE THE POOR COUNTRIES SO UNPRODUCTIVE? BERTHOLD HERRENDORF ÁKOS VALENTINYI Magyar Tudományos Akadéma Közgazdaságtudomány Intézet Budapest
More informationSequential DOE via dynamic programming
IIE Transactons (00) 34, 1087 1100 Sequental DOE va dynamc programmng IRAD BENGAL 1 and MICHAEL CARAMANIS 1 Department of Industral Engneerng, Tel Avv Unversty, Ramat Avv, Tel Avv 69978, Israel Emal:
More informationShould marginal abatement costs differ across sectors? The effect of lowcarbon capital accumulation
Should margnal abatement costs dffer across sectors? The effect of lowcarbon captal accumulaton Adren VogtSchlb 1,, Guy Meuner 2, Stéphane Hallegatte 3 1 CIRED, NogentsurMarne, France. 2 INRA UR133
More informationDropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting
Journal of Machne Learnng Research 15 (2014) 19291958 Submtted 11/13; Publshed 6/14 Dropout: A Smple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfttng Ntsh Srvastava Geoffrey Hnton Alex Krzhevsky Ilya Sutskever
More informationBoosting as a Regularized Path to a Maximum Margin Classifier
Journal of Machne Learnng Research 5 (2004) 941 973 Submtted 5/03; Revsed 10/03; Publshed 8/04 Boostng as a Regularzed Path to a Maxmum Margn Classfer Saharon Rosset Data Analytcs Research Group IBM T.J.
More informationSolving the IndexNumber Problem in a Historical Perspective
Solvng the IndexNumber roblem n a Hstorcal erspectve Carlo Mlana * January 2009 "The fundamental and wellknown theorem for the exstence of a prce ndex that s nvarant under change n level of lvng s that
More informationPRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Vol. 17, No. 5, September October 2008, pp. 532 542 ssn 10591478 essn 19375956 08 1705 0532 POMS do 10.3401/poms.1080.0054 2008 Producton and Operatons Management
More informationComplete Fairness in Secure TwoParty Computation
Complete Farness n Secure TwoParty Computaton S. Dov Gordon Carmt Hazay Jonathan Katz Yehuda Lndell Abstract In the settng of secure twoparty computaton, two mutually dstrustng partes wsh to compute
More informationVerification by Equipment or EndUse Metering Protocol
Verfcaton by Equpment or EndUse Meterng Protocol May 2012 Verfcaton by Equpment or EndUse Meterng Protocol Verson 1.0 May 2012 Prepared for Bonnevlle Power Admnstraton Prepared by Research Into Acton,
More informationWhat to Maximize if You Must
What to Maxmze f You Must Avad Hefetz Chrs Shannon Yoss Spegel Ths verson: July 2004 Abstract The assumpton that decson makers choose actons to maxmze ther preferences s a central tenet n economcs. Ths
More informationMultiProduct Price Optimization and Competition under the Nested Logit Model with ProductDifferentiated Price Sensitivities
MultProduct Prce Optmzaton and Competton under the Nested Logt Model wth ProductDfferentated Prce Senstvtes Gullermo Gallego Department of Industral Engneerng and Operatons Research, Columba Unversty,
More informationAlgebraic Point Set Surfaces
Algebrac Pont Set Surfaces Gae l Guennebaud Markus Gross ETH Zurch Fgure : Illustraton of the central features of our algebrac MLS framework From left to rght: effcent handlng of very complex pont sets,
More informationUPGRADE YOUR PHYSICS
Correctons March 7 UPGRADE YOUR PHYSICS NOTES FOR BRITISH SIXTH FORM STUDENTS WHO ARE PREPARING FOR THE INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS OLYMPIAD, OR WISH TO TAKE THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF PHYSICS BEYOND THE ALEVEL SYLLABI.
More informationEVERY GOOD REGULATOR OF A SYSTEM MUST BE A MODEL OF THAT SYSTEM 1
Int. J. Systems Sc., 1970, vol. 1, No. 2, 8997 EVERY GOOD REGULATOR OF A SYSTEM MUST BE A MODEL OF THAT SYSTEM 1 Roger C. Conant Department of Informaton Engneerng, Unversty of Illnos, Box 4348, Chcago,
More informationWho are you with and Where are you going?
Who are you wth and Where are you gong? Kota Yamaguch Alexander C. Berg Lus E. Ortz Tamara L. Berg Stony Brook Unversty Stony Brook Unversty, NY 11794, USA {kyamagu, aberg, leortz, tlberg}@cs.stonybrook.edu
More information