BEARING AND FRICTION DESIGN CAPACITY FOR HELICAL ANCHORS AND PILES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "BEARING AND FRICTION DESIGN CAPACITY FOR HELICAL ANCHORS AND PILES"

Transcription

1 BEARING AND FRICTION DESIGN CAPACITY FOR HELICAL ANCHORS AND PILES Original Author: Editor: Gary L. Seider, P.E., Hubbell Power Systems, Inc./CHANCE, Centralia, MO, USA Wayne G. Thompson, PE, CTL Thompson, Fort Collins, CO BEARING CAPACITY METHODOGOLY General The capacity of a helical anchor/pile is dependent on the strength of the soil, the projected area of the helix plate(s), and the depth of the helix plate(s) below grade. The soil strength can be evaluated by use of various techniques and theories (Clemence et al, 1985). The projected area is controlled by the size and number of helix plates. For a given helix depth, two modes of soil failure may occur: shallow and deep. The terms shallow and deep refer to the location of the bearing plate with respect to the earth s surface. By definition, shallow foundations in tension exhibit a brittle failure mode with general eruption of soil all the way to the surface and a sudden drop in load resistance to almost zero. With deep foundations in tension, the soil fails progressively, maintaining significant postultimate load resistance, and exhibits little or no surface deformation. The dividing line between shallow and deep foundations has been reported by various researchers to be between three and eight times the foundation diameter. It is generally assumed that the soil failure mechanism will follow the theory of a general bearing capacity failure. This theory suggests that the capacity of a helical anchor/pile is equal to the sum of the capacities of the individual helix plates. The helix capacity is determined by calculating the unit bearing capacity of the soil at each helix and then multiplying the result by the individual helix s projected area. Friction along the central shaft is typically not used to determine capacity, but may be included when the central shaft is round pipe shaft (Type RS) and at least 3-1/2 inch (89 mm) in diameter. See figure 1 for a graphical representation of a compression application. A necessary condition for this method to work is that the helix plates be spaced far enough apart to avoid overlapping of their individual pressure bulbs, i.e., stress zones in the soil. This will prevent one helix from significantly influencing the performance of another. A preferred spacing between any two helical plates on a helical anchor/pile is three times the diameter of the lower helix. This is consistent with the findings of others (Bassett, 1977) for multi-belled concrete piers. For example, the distance between a 10 inch (254 mm) and 12 inch (305 mm) helix is three times the diameter of the lower helix, or 10 x 3 = 30 inches (762 mm). The following is Terzaghi s general bearing capacity equation, which allows determination of the ultimate capacity of the soil. This equation and its use form the basis of determining helix capacity by the software. Q ult = A h ( CN c + q'n q 'B w N ) Q ult = Ultimate capacity of the soil C = Soil cohesion q' = Effective overburden pressure Bw = Footing width (base width) Nc, N q and N are bearing capacity factors. The following is quoted from (Bowles, 1988) where the various terms of the bearing equation are discussed:

2 1) The cohesion term (CN c ) predominates in cohesive soils. 2) The depth term (q'n q ) predominates in cohesionless soils. Only a small D (vertical depth to footing or helix plate) increases Qult substantially. 3) The base width term (0.5 'BwN ) provides some increase in bearing capacity for both cohesive and cohesionless soils. In cases where B w < 9.8 ft. to 13.1 ft. (3 m to 4 m), this term could be neglected with little error. The base width term of the bearing equation is not used since Bw for helical anchors/piles is small (< 16 (0.4 m)) and the resulting bearing capacity of that term would also be quite small. The effective overburden pressure (q', of consequence for cohesionless soils) is the product of depth and the effective unit weight of the soil. The water table location may cause a reduction in the soil bearing capacity. The effective unit weight of the soil is its in-situ unit weight when it is above the water table. However, the effective unit weight of soil below the water table is its in-situ unit weight less the unit weight of water. The case of a fluctuating water table when a helical anchor/pile installation is terminated above the water table with the likelihood that the water table will rise with time to be above the helix plates requires special considerations. In this situation, the helical plate configuration and depth should be determined with the water at its highest anticipated level. Then the capacity of the same helical anchor/pile should be determined in the same soil with the water level below the plate configuration, which will typically produce higher load capacities and a more difficult installation, i.e., it will require more installation torque. It is sometimes the case that a larger helical anchor/pile product series, i.e., one with greater torque capacity, must be used in order to facilitate installation into the dry conditions. This method sums the individual bearing capacity of each helix on a multi-helix anchor/pile to determine the total ultimate multihelix anchor/pile capacity (Q t ) provided that the helix spacing along the shaft is 3 helix diameters. Q t = Q h Q t = Total ultimate multi-helix anchor/pile capacity Q h = Individual helix capacity The ultimate capacity of an individual helix is evaluated using the following equation. An upper limit for this capacity is based on the helix mechanical strength. Q h = A h (CN c + q'n q ) Q s Q s = Capacity upper limit, determined by the helix mechanical strength Cohesive Soil Determination of helix ultimate bearing capacity in a cohesive or fine-grained soil is accomplished by using the following equation. Q h = A h CN c = A h C9 C = Cohesion N c = Bearing capacity factor for cohesive component of soil = 9 The N c bearing capacity factor when applied to helical anchors/piles is often taken as equal to 9, as it is in other deep foundation applications, The design engineer has the option of overriding the default clay bearing capacity factor of 9. Non-Cohesive Soil Determination of helix ultimate bearing capacity in a non-cohesive or granular soil is accomplished by using the following equation. Q h = A h q'n q = A h 'dn q d = Vertical depth to helix plate N q = Bearing capacity factor for non-cohesive component of soil ' = Effective unit weight of the soil

3 The bearing capacity factor N q is dependent on the angle of internal friction ( ) of the cohesionless soil. When a value for the friction angle is provided the graph (N q vs ) in Figure 2 can be used to determine the value of N q. = Angle of internal friction N = Blow count per ASTM D 1586 Standard Penetration Test The estimated value of the angle of internal friction from the above relationship and Figure 2 can be used to estimate the bearing capacity factor N q. Mixed or c - Soil Determination of helix ultimate bearing capacity in a mixed soil is accomplished by using the following equation. Q h = = A h (CN c + q'n q ) A h (CN c + 'dn q ) Angle of Internal Friction Figure 2 The curve given in Figure 2 is adapted from work by Meyerhof (1976). It is based on the following equation, which is Meyerhof s N q values divided by two for long term applications. N q = 0.5 ( 12 x ) /54 N q = Bearing capacity factor for noncohesive component of soil = Angle of internal friction When the angle of internal friction is not known, but blow counts from ASTM D 1586 Standard Penetration Tests are available, then the following relationship can be used to estimate the angle of internal friction. This relationship is based on empirical data provided by Bowles (1968). Again, it is suggested that results be used with caution. The terms in this equation are as defined in above sections. The use of this equation is fairly uncomplicated when accurate values are available for both the cohesion and friction terms of the equation. However, it is recommended that another approach be taken when accurate values are not available for both terms of the equation. One suggestion is to first consider the soil as cohesive and determine capacity. Then consider the same soil as cohesionless and determine capacity. Finally, take the lower of the two results and use that as the soil bearing capacity. APPLICATIONS Compression The Total Ultimate Helix Compression Capacity (Q bc ) for a helical pile is calculated as the sum of the individual helix capacities (Q h ). Individual helix capacity in soil is determined by calculating the bearing capacity at each helix. The Recommended Total Ultimate Compression Capacity (Q hc ) is the total ultimate compression capacity of the helical pile such that no individual helix exceeds the mechanical strength (Q s ) of the helix plate. In soft or loose soil conditions (N-value of less than 4), columnar buckling of the shaft may control the total ultimate compression capacity. = 0.28 N Tension The Total Ultimate Helix Tension Capacity (Q bt ) for a helical anchor is calculated the same as for

4 a helical pile, except the individual helix capacity (Q h ) is determined by calculating the bearing capacity above the helix. The Recommended Total Ultimate Tension Capacity (Q ht ) is the total ultimate tension capacity of the helical anchor such that no individual helix exceeds the mechanical strength (Q s ) of the helix plate. Alternate Approach Another common design theory is to take the bearing area of one helix, and then add the shear capacity of a cylinder of soil between top and bottom helix plates. [Editor s note: This section is a late addition and will need to be expanded upon depending on group feedback] INSTALLATION TORQUE A simple, industry accepted and reasonably accurate method to estimate the ultimate capacity of helical anchors and piles is called installation torque vs. capacity correlation, an empirical method originally developed by the A.B. Chance Company over 40 years ago. Precise definition of the relationship for all possible variables remains to be achieved. However, simple empirical relationships have been used for a number of years. The principle is: As a helical anchor/pile is installed (screwed) into increasingly denser soil, the resistance to penetration, called installation torque, is measured. The higher the resistance encountered, the higher the torque required, and therefore, the higher the axial capacity. The following torque/capacity relationship is cited by Hoyt and Clemence (1989): Qu = Kt x T Qu = Ultimate uplift capacity (lb. (kn)) Kt = Empirical torque factor (ft -1 (m -1 )) T = Average installation torque (lb.-ft. (kn-m)) The value of Kt may range from 3 to 20 ft -1 (10 to 66 m -1 ), depending on soil conditions and anchor/pile design (principally the shaft size and shape). FRICTION CAPACITY METHODOLOGY The following section describes the theories generally used to calculate the theoretical capacity of piles due to friction along the shaft. In the case of slender shaft (less than 3 inch [76 mm] helical anchor/piles, friction capacity along the shaft is generally not calculated. However, friction capacity is significant enough to calculate when the shaft size exceeds 3-1/2 inch (89 mm). The general equation is: Q f Where: B f s L f = [ Bf s L f ] = Diameter of steel, or concrete pile column = Sum of friction and adhesion between soil and pile = Incremental pile length over which B and f s are taken as constant There are several empirical methods available to calculate skin friction along a pile shaft. Two design methodologies are explained below: Gouvenot Method Gouvenot reported a range of values for skin friction of concrete/grout anchors and micropiles both under pressure and without pressure based on a number of field load tests. Helical piles with grouted shafts are installed without pressure. The soil conditions are divided into three categories based on friction angle ( ) and cohesion (C). The equations used to calculate f s are: Type I: Sands and gravels with 35 < < 45 and C = 0: f s = o tan Where: o = Mean normal stress for the concrete/grout column Type II: Mixed soils; fine loose silty sands with 20 < < 30 and sandy clays with 205 lb/ft 2 < C < 1024 lb/ft 2 (9.8 kpa < C < 49 kpa): f s = o sin + C(cos ) Type III: Clays and marls with 1024 lb/ft 2 < C < 4096 lb/ft 2 (49 kpa < C < 196 kpa) f s = C Where: 1024 lb/ft 2 < C < 2048 lb/ft 2 (49 kpa < C < 98 kpa) And f s = 2048 lb/ft 2 (98 kpa) Where: 2048 lb/ft 2 < C < 4096 lb/ft 2 (98 kpa < C

5 < 196 kpa) The Gouvenot Method assumes a uniform shaft diameter for each soil layer. Department of the Navy Design Manual 7 Method The Navy method is well known in the foundation industry. It provides a simplified, straightforward approach to pile foundation design. For cohesive soils ( Method): Table 3. Skin Friction Resistance Values for Concrete Piles Non-cohesive Soils P o Angle of Internal Friction (degrees) (psf) S = Average Friction Resistance on Pile Surface (psf) f s = C a Where: C a = Adhesion factor Navy Design Manual 7 provides the following table as recommended values of adhesion to determine ultimate load capacity of piles for cohesive soils. Table 2. Navy Method Recommended Values for Adhesion Cohesive Soils PILE TYPE Soil Consistency Cohesion, C (psf) Adhesion, C a (psf) Timber or Very Soft Concrete Soft Medium Stiff Stiff Very Stiff Steel Very Soft Soft Medium Stiff Stiff Very Stiff For Non-cohesive soils: The engineer can use the Alternate Method from the 1974 Edition of DM 7 per the following equation. Q f = [ B(S) L f ] Where: S = Average friction resistance on pile surface area = K(P o tan ) where K is assumed to equal 1 P o = Average overburden pressure on element L f K = Coefficient of lateral earth pressure = Angle of internal friction The tables below provide the average friction resistance (S) on straight concrete and steel piles in non-cohesive soils. Table 4. Skin Friction Resistance Values for Steel Piles Non-cohesive Soils P o Angle of Internal Friction (degrees) (psf) S = Average Friction Resistance on Pile Surface (psf) Values shown are 75% of the values given for straight concrete piles in Table 3 Tables 3 and 4 are derived from graphs in the Dept. of Navy Design Manual 7 (1974). A later edition of DM 7 (1986) limits the depth to 20B at which the average overburden pressure is assumed to increase, where B is the diameter of the pile. This limit was based on experimental and field evidence as cited in a previous section of this paper. In the case of slender shaft helical anchor/piles, the 20B limit is probably conservative, but it is not clear what a more practical limit should be. REASONABILITY CHECKS General Consideration should be given to the validity of the values obtained when determining the bearing capacity of the soil. The calculated theoretical ultimate capacity is no better than the data used to obtain that value. Data from boring logs, the water table depth, and load information may not accurately represent actual conditions where the helical anchor/pile must function. Empirical values that are used and estimates of strength parameters, etc. that must be made

6 because of lack of data affect the calculated bearing capacity value. In those situations where soil data is insufficient or not available, a helical trial anchor/pile probe can help determine such items as, location of bearing strata, location of soft/loose soil, and the presence of obstructions, such as, cobbles, boulders, and debris. Helical Anchor/Pile Spacing Once the capacity of the helical anchor/pile is determined, it is important to review the location of the foundation element with respect to the structure and to other helical anchors/piles. It is recommended that the center-to-center spacing between adjacent anchors/piles be no less than five times the diameter of the largest helix. The minimum spacing is three feet (0.91 m). It is suggested that this latter spacing be used only when the job can not be accomplished in any other way and should involve special care during installation to ensure that the spacing does not decrease with depth. Minimum spacing requirements apply only to the helix bearing plate(s), i.e., the anchor/pile shaft can be battered to achieve minimum spacing. Spacing between the helical anchors/piles and other foundation elements, either existing or future, requires special. Group effect, or the reduction of capacity due to close spacing, has never been accurately measured with helical piles. However, bearing capacity theory would indicate that capacity reduction due to group effect is possible. Factor of Safety The equations discussed above are used to obtain the ultimate capacity of a helical anchor/pile. An appropriate Factor of Safety must be applied to reduce the ultimate capacity to an acceptable design (or working) capacity. It is the responsibility of the user to determine the Factor of Safety to be used. In general, a minimum Factor of Safety of 2 is recommended. For tieback applications, the Factor of Safety typically ranges between 1.25 and 2. Project specific conditions may warrant the use of higher factors of safety. DISPLACEMENT Lateral and vertical displacement of helical piles is an area that is constantly being studied. Some pile manufacturers have test data indicating vertical and horizontal pile deflection in various soil types. In some case, field load testing is still the best way to get an accurate representation of a pile s response to load. [Editor s note: This section is also a late addition and will need to be expanded upon depending on group feedback] REFERENCES BASSETT, 1977, Reference details were not available at the time of this writing. CLEMENCE, S. P., Editor, Contributing Authors ADAMCZAK, Jr., S., CLEMENCE, S. P., DAS, B. M., FINN, M., HOWARD, R. E., KULHAWY, F. H., MITSCH, M. P., MOONEY, J. S., RAPOPORT, V., VALDES, J. A., YOUNG, A. G., 1985, Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York City, New York. BOWLES, J. E., 1968, Foundation Analysis and Design, First Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York City, New York. BOWLES, J. E., 1988, Foundation Analysis and Design, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York City, New York. MEYERHOF, G. G., 1976, Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Volume 102, No. GT3, New York City, New York. US NAVY DESIGN MANUAL DM7, NAVFAC, 1974, Foundations and Earth Structures, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. US NAVY DESIGN MANUAL DM7, NAVFAC, 1986, Foundations and Earth Structures, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. CHANCE CIVIL CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL, 2007, published by the Chance Division of Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. (Bulletin # ), Centralia, MO. HOYT, R. L. and CLEMENCE, S. P., 1989, Uplift Capacity of Helical Anchors in Soil, Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

7 CADDEN, ALLEN, GOMEZ, JESUS, 2002, "Buckling of Micropiles", ADSC-IAF Micropile Committee, Dallas, TX., ADSC, Dallas, TX. GOUVENOT, D., (1973), Essais En France et a L Etranger sur le Frottement Lateral en Fondation: Amelioration par Injection, Travaux, 464,Nov, Paris, France. VICKARS, R. A., VICKARS, J. C. T., TOEBOSCH, GARY, United States Patent 5,707,180, Method and Apparatus for Forming Piles In-Situ, US Patent Office, Washington, DC.

CHANCE HELICAL ANCHOR/PILE BEARING CAPACITY

CHANCE HELICAL ANCHOR/PILE BEARING CAPACITY 1 Experience has shown that in most cases the footing and stem wall foundation system that will withstand a given long term working load will withstand a pier installation force of up to 1.5 times that

More information

Step 4 Bearing Capacity

Step 4 Bearing Capacity Step 4 Bearing Capacity Calculating Helical Screw Foundation Capacity The capacity of a helical screw foundation is dependent on the strength of the soil. The soil strength can be evaluated by use of various

More information

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate Addendum HELICAL PULLDOWN Micropile (HPM) Introduction The HPM is a system for constructing a grout column around the shaft of a standard Helical Screw Foundation (see Figure A1). To begin the process,

More information

BATTERED CHANCE HELICAL ANCHORS/PILES for LATERAL LOADING

BATTERED CHANCE HELICAL ANCHORS/PILES for LATERAL LOADING BATTERED CHANCE HELICAL ANCHORS/PILES for LATERAL LOADING Lateral loads are commonly resolved with battered helical anchors and piles. The method is to statically resolve the axial load capacity into its

More information

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility Problem The project consists of building several dry product storage silos near an existing rail siding in an open field presently

More information

Summary of Earth Retaining Methods Utilizing Helical Anchors

Summary of Earth Retaining Methods Utilizing Helical Anchors Summary of Earth Retaining Methods Utilizing Helical Anchors by Howard A. Perko, PE Consulting Engineer for Magnum Piering, Inc. March 4, 1999 (Revised November 11, 1999 and July 24, 2001) Abstract A summary

More information

The Leading Edge In Helical Foundations. Engineering Roadmap. MacLean Dixie HFS. Building Solid Foundations

The Leading Edge In Helical Foundations. Engineering Roadmap. MacLean Dixie HFS. Building Solid Foundations Engineering Roadmap For New Construction Helical Pile Design The Leading Edge In Helical Foundations MacLean Dixie HFS Building Solid Foundations Before You Begin For the preliminary design of a new helical

More information

HELICAL ANCHORS & FOUNDATIONS. Presented by: Josh Lindberg Helical Concepts, Inc. Distributor CHANCE Civil Construction

HELICAL ANCHORS & FOUNDATIONS. Presented by: Josh Lindberg Helical Concepts, Inc. Distributor CHANCE Civil Construction HELICAL ANCHORS & FOUNDATIONS Presented by: Josh Lindberg Helical Concepts, Inc. Distributor CHANCE Civil Construction Presentation Preview Historical Perspective Product Overview Determination of Capacity

More information

SCREW ANCHOR TEST PROGRAM

SCREW ANCHOR TEST PROGRAM SCREW ANCHOR TEST PROGRAM (Part II): FIELD TEST RESULTS and DESIGN IMPLICATION D.J.Y. Zhang, R. Chalaturnyk, P.K. Robertson, D.C. Sego, and G. Cyre Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University

More information

International Society for Helical Foundations (ISHF)

International Society for Helical Foundations (ISHF) QUICK DESIGN GUIDE For Screw-Piles and Helical Anchors in Soils Ver. 1.0 Prepared by Dr. Alan J. Lutenegger, P.E., F. ASCE for International Society for Helical Foundations (ISHF) Copyright 2015 (ISHF)

More information

Vertical Capacity The program evaluates the uplift and compression capacity of the pile.

Vertical Capacity The program evaluates the uplift and compression capacity of the pile. AllPile Software is a Windows-based analysis program that handles virtually all types of piles, including steel pipes, H-piles, pre-cast concrete piles, auger-cast piles, drilled shafts, timber piles,

More information

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor Model 150 HELICAL ANCHOR System PN #MBHAT Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor System About Foundation Supportworks is a network of the most experienced and knowledgeable foundation repair

More information

DRILLED DEEP FOUNDATIONS

DRILLED DEEP FOUNDATIONS GROUPS: ADVANTAGES Figure 14-2. Group vs. Single Shaft (FHWA NHI-10-016). Large overturning moments are most effectively resisted using groups of shafts. Higher axial capacities. May be cost effective

More information

Helical Torque Anchors Design Examples

Helical Torque Anchors Design Examples Chapter 3 Helical Torque Anchors Heavy Weight New Construction Light Weight New Construction Basement Wall Tieback Anchors Retaining Wall Tieback Anchors Foundation Restoration Motor Output Torque Ultimate

More information

CHANCE HELICAL ANCHORS/PILES

CHANCE HELICAL ANCHORS/PILES noted at each pier and recorded on the field log. The actual verified Factor of Safety between installation pre-load and final lock off can then be confirmed. Table 6-1 is an example of the driving (installation)

More information

Screw-Piles, Helical Anchors and Soil Mechanics Where are We? Kansas City ASCE Geotechnical Seminar January 10, 2014

Screw-Piles, Helical Anchors and Soil Mechanics Where are We? Kansas City ASCE Geotechnical Seminar January 10, 2014 Screw-Piles, Helical Anchors and Soil Mechanics Where are We? Kansas City ASCE Geotechnical Seminar January 10, 2014 Presented by Dr. Alan J. Lutenegger, P.E. Professor of Civil Engineering University

More information

HIGH CAPACITY HELICAL PILES A NEW DIMENSION FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS

HIGH CAPACITY HELICAL PILES A NEW DIMENSION FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS Proceedings of 8 th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges Niagara Falls, Canada 2010 HIGH CAPACITY HELICAL PILES A NEW DIMENSION FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS Mohammed Sakr Almita Manufacturing

More information

HELICAL SCREW ANCHORS AND FOUNDATIONS IN SOIL. History, Applications, Design

HELICAL SCREW ANCHORS AND FOUNDATIONS IN SOIL. History, Applications, Design HELICAL SCREW ANCHORS AND FOUNDATIONS IN SOIL Historical Perspective 1 st Recorded use of a Screw Pile was by Alexander Mitchell in 1836 for Moorings and was then applied by Mitchell to Maplin Sands Lighthouse

More information

Behavior of High Pressure grouted Screw Piles in Santa Clara, CA

Behavior of High Pressure grouted Screw Piles in Santa Clara, CA Behavior of High Pressure grouted Screw Piles in Santa Clara, CA MAMDOUH. H. Nasr P.Eng M.Eng,PhD Candidate, Geotechnical Engineer Abstract Helical Pier Systems Ltd Sponsored Project Screws piles have

More information

EXAMPLE. HelixPile software program (Version 2014) Version 1.0 Issued: 24-April-2014 Deep Excavation LLC DEEP EXCAVATION LLC

EXAMPLE. HelixPile software program (Version 2014) Version 1.0 Issued: 24-April-2014 Deep Excavation LLC  DEEP EXCAVATION LLC EXAMPLE HelixPile software program (Version 2014) Version 1.0 Issued: 24-April-2014 Deep Excavation LLC www.deepexcavation.com 1 A. Project description This example will present a helical pile design example

More information

Step 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations

Step 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations Step 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations Introduction Buckling of slender foundation elements is a common concern among designers and structural engineers. The literature shows that several researchers

More information

Step 11 Static Load Testing

Step 11 Static Load Testing Step 11 Static Load Testing Test loading is the most definitive method of determining load capacity of a pile. Testing a pile to failure provides valuable information to the design engineer and is recommended

More information

Helical Pier Foundation System U.S. Patents 5,011,336; 5,120,163; 5,213,448

Helical Pier Foundation System U.S. Patents 5,011,336; 5,120,163; 5,213,448 Helical Pier Foundation System U.S. Patents 5,011,336; 5,120,163; 5,213,448 Technical Manual Contents Helical Pier Foundation System History Research and Development Advantages Theory of Foundation Anchor

More information

IV Designing Helical Piles per the IBC

IV Designing Helical Piles per the IBC IV Designing Helical Piles per the IBC 4.1 Introduction Helical piles and anchors have been used in construction applications for more than 175 years. However, there was not a uniform standard of testing

More information

Performance of Helical Anchors in Sand

Performance of Helical Anchors in Sand Performance of Helical Anchors in Sand Hamed Niroumand 1, Khairul Anuar Kassim 1, Amin Ghafooripour 2, Ramli Nazir 1, H.S. Chuan 3 1 Department of geotechnical engineering, Faculty of civil engineering,

More information

CHANCE Helical Pier Foundation System. Installation Specifications for Remedial Applications

CHANCE Helical Pier Foundation System. Installation Specifications for Remedial Applications CHANCE Helical Pier Foundation System Installation Specifications for Remedial Applications The following suggested specifications are written as a guide to assist the specifier in writing his own specifications.

More information

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY. Volume 2 CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY Detailed in this chapter: the theories behind the program the equations and methods that are use to perform the analyses. CH8-1 CONTENTS

More information

CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT CATALOG VOL. I

CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT CATALOG VOL. I CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT CATALOG VOL. I Table of Contents Section Description A Page CHANCE Helical Round Corner Square Shaft Products Introduction to Round and Square Shaft 3 Square Shaft (SS) Product

More information

Fundamentals of Helical Anchors/Piles

Fundamentals of Helical Anchors/Piles Fundamentals of Helical Anchors/Piles By Thomas B. Watson, III, P. E. Table of Contents I. History of Helical Anchors/Piles II. What are Helical Anchors/Piles? III. An Overview of Corrosion IV. Spacing

More information

Screw Piles: Use and Design

Screw Piles: Use and Design Screw Piles: Use and Design Kristen M. Tappenden November 2006 Objectives What are screw piles? geometry fabrication installation common uses Why use screw piles? advantages over conventional pile types

More information

EFFECT OF PILE LOAD TESTING SETUP ON THE ACCURACY OF THE RESULTS ABSTRACT

EFFECT OF PILE LOAD TESTING SETUP ON THE ACCURACY OF THE RESULTS ABSTRACT EFFECT OF PILE LOAD TESTING SETUP ON THE ACCURACY OF THE RESULTS HOSSAM E.A. ALI 1 AND AHMED H. ABDEL-RAHMAN 2 ABSTRACT It is a common practice to axially load piles in order to test their load-settlement

More information

Module 5 : Design of Deep Foundations. Lecture 25 : Pile Groups [ Section 25.1 : Different types of pile groups ]

Module 5 : Design of Deep Foundations. Lecture 25 : Pile Groups [ Section 25.1 : Different types of pile groups ] Lecture 25 : Pile Groups [ Section 25.1 : Different types of pile groups ] Objectives In this section you will learn the following Different types of pile groups Lecture 25 : Pile Groups [ Section 25.1

More information

Page C-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS

Page C-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS Page C-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 A Basic Guideline for Designers Appendix C CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTON... C-3 II. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS... C-4 A. Shaft Type of Helical

More information

DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS. Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA

DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS. Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA Historical Perspective 1 st Recorded Screw Pile was by Alexander

More information

How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code

How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code ABSTRACT How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code by Darin Willis, P.E. 1 Helical piles and anchors have been used in construction applications for more than 150 years. The

More information

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations from New construction foundations don t have to be a headache. The CHANCE Helical Pier Foundation System gives you the performance of concrete without the drawbacks and liabilities of driven piles and

More information

4.2. Backfill Soil. Figure 4.4a Vibratory Drum Roller Compacting a Lift for T8.0-1

4.2. Backfill Soil. Figure 4.4a Vibratory Drum Roller Compacting a Lift for T8.0-1 4.2. Backfill Soil The abutment wall backfill for tests T8.0-1 and T8.0-2 was composed of a sandy material referred to in the construction industry as sand-equivalent 30 (SE-30). The height of the fill

More information

Module 5 : Design of Deep Foundations Lecture 22 : Ultimate pile capacity [ Section 22.1 : Procedure for ultimate pile capacity : Static analysis ]

Module 5 : Design of Deep Foundations Lecture 22 : Ultimate pile capacity [ Section 22.1 : Procedure for ultimate pile capacity : Static analysis ] Lecture 22 : Ultimate pile capacity [ Section 22.1 : Procedure for ultimate pile capacity : Static analysis ] Objectives In this section you will learn the following Static analysis Piles in granular soils

More information

Helical Pile Application and Design

Helical Pile Application and Design PDHonline Course C513 (1 PDH) Helical Pile Application and Design Instructor: Andrew P. Adams, PE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.pdhonline.org

More information

Stability. Security. Integrity.

Stability. Security. Integrity. Stability. Security. Integrity. PN #MBHPT Foundation Supportworks provides quality helical pile systems for both new construction and retrofit applications. 288 Helical Pile System About Foundation Supportworks

More information

Shaft Friction of Bored Piles in Hard Clay

Shaft Friction of Bored Piles in Hard Clay Pak. J. Engg. & Appl. Sci. Vol. 3 Jul 2008 (p.54 60) Shaft Friction of Bored Piles in Hard Clay A. Akbar 1, S. Khilji 1, S.B. Khan 1, M.S.Qureshi 1 and M. Sattar 2 1 Civil Engineering Department, University

More information

HELICAL FOUNDATIONS AND TIE BACKS. State of the Art. Richard W. Stephenson. Professor of Civil Engineering. University of Missouri-Rolla

HELICAL FOUNDATIONS AND TIE BACKS. State of the Art. Richard W. Stephenson. Professor of Civil Engineering. University of Missouri-Rolla ELICAL FOUNATIONS AN TIE BACKS State of the Art Richard W. Stephenson Professor of Civil Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, Missouri 6509 June 6, 997 November, 003 (0:AM) INTROUCTION...3 ISTORY...3

More information

CHANCE Helical Tieback Anchors. from. Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN.

CHANCE Helical Tieback Anchors. from. Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN. CHANCE Helical Tieback Anchors from Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN. Better tieback walls with CHANCE Helical Tieback Anchors Typical construction applications:

More information

Design of Drilled Shafts in Expansive Soils

Design of Drilled Shafts in Expansive Soils Design of Drilled Shafts in Expansive Soils Robert L. Lytton Professor, Fred J. Benson Endowed Chair Zachry Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Foundation Performance Association Houston,

More information

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed. How Many Piers? By Gary Collins, P.E. A clear-cut guide to helical pier spacing Introduction Helical pier spacing is not an exact science. How many does it take to support a structure adequately or repair

More information

PILE FOUNDATION. Pile

PILE FOUNDATION. Pile PILE FOUNDATION. One or more of the followings: (a)transfer load to stratum of adequate capacity (b)resist lateral loads. (c) Transfer loads through a scour zone to bearing stratum 1 (d)anchor structures

More information

Auger Grouted Steel Core Displacement Piles. A vast and growing network.

Auger Grouted Steel Core Displacement Piles. A vast and growing network. A vast and growing network. IDEAL is a C.S. Stroyer & Sons company. Est. 1956 and began manufacturing in 2004. Headquarters in Greater Rochester, NY 15 acres 13,500 Sq Ft Corporate office and Training

More information

A Feasibility Study Evaluating Use of Large Screw Piles for Offshore Wind Tower Foundations as an Alternative to Driven Pile Foundation.

A Feasibility Study Evaluating Use of Large Screw Piles for Offshore Wind Tower Foundations as an Alternative to Driven Pile Foundation. A Feasibility Study Evaluating Use of Large Screw Piles for Offshore Wind Tower Foundations as an Alternative to Driven Pile Foundation Byron Byrne, Rodolfo Sancio, Miguel Torres, Guy Houlsby, Terence

More information

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 14-1 Load Path and Transfer to

More information

Engineering Design Manual

Engineering Design Manual Engineering Design Manual Table of Contents Helical Anchors Design Manual ------------------------------------------------------ 5 Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE C H A P T E R 5 ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE Section I. BASICS 5-1. Considerations. For safe, economical pile foundations in military construction, it is necessary to determine the allowable load capacity

More information

A SEISMIC RETROFITTING APPLICATION BY MEANS OF MULTI-HELIX MICROPILES. Shigeo Kanai 1

A SEISMIC RETROFITTING APPLICATION BY MEANS OF MULTI-HELIX MICROPILES. Shigeo Kanai 1 A SEISMIC RETROFITTING APPLICATION BY MEANS OF MULTI-HELIX MICROPILES Shigeo Kanai 1 Abstract The Multi-helix Micropile method utilizes a unique method of directly screwing a small steel pipe pile with

More information

Engineered foundation technology for fast Telecom Tower build-out!

Engineered foundation technology for fast Telecom Tower build-out! Engineered foundation technology for fast Telecom Tower build-out! Speed your sites to market Nothing faster than our all-steel piles and guys No excavation spoils; torque indicates capacity Immediately

More information

Foundation Design May 2008

Foundation Design May 2008 Advance Design America (VisualDesign) TUTORIAL 13 Foundation Design Footings Soil-Structure Interaction &Piles May 2008 CivilDesign Inc 1995-2008 INTRODUCTION Introduction Project Configuration Foundation

More information

Page D-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 FORMS

Page D-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 FORMS Page D-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 Appendix D CONTENTS Preliminary Design Request Form...D-3 HeliCAP Helical Capacity Design Software Buyer...D-4 Qualification and

More information

A STUDY ON BEARING CAPACITY OF STRIP AND SQUARE FOOTINGS IN SAND FROM N AND φ

A STUDY ON BEARING CAPACITY OF STRIP AND SQUARE FOOTINGS IN SAND FROM N AND φ Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference December 22-24,2013, Roorkee A STUDY ON BEARING CAPACITY OF STRIP AND SQUARE FOOTINGS IN SAND FROM N AND φ S.V. Abhishek, PG Student, A.U. College of Engineering,

More information

Large and deep cast-in-place reinforced concrete piles using of shaft grout

Large and deep cast-in-place reinforced concrete piles using of shaft grout IABSE-JSCE Joint Conference on Advances in Bridge Engineering-II, August 8-10, 2010, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ISBN: 978-984-33-1893-0 Amin, Okui, Bhuiyan (eds.) www.iabse-bd.org Large and deep cast-in-place

More information

Page 5-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Page 5-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 DESIGN METHODOLOGY Page 5-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 SECTION 5 CONTENTS 5.1 ATLAS RESISTANCE PIER CAPACITY... 5-5 5.2 CHANCE HELICAL ANCHOR/PILE BEARING CAPACITY... 5-8 5.3 EVALUATING

More information

DYNAMIC PILE MONITORING FOR OFFSHORE PILE ACCEPTANCE

DYNAMIC PILE MONITORING FOR OFFSHORE PILE ACCEPTANCE DYNAMIC PILE MONITORING FOR OFFSHORE PILE ACCEPTANCE Scott Webster and Robin Givet, GRL Engineers, Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA Dynamic pile Monitoring Services (DMS) have been used for testing of offshore

More information

SOLDIER PILE SYSTEMS

SOLDIER PILE SYSTEMS SOLDIER PILE SYSTEMS SOLDIER PILE SYSTEMS SOLDIER PILES Soldier piles of varying materials and sections are used, often in conjunction with some form of lagging to support soils as a continuous wall above

More information

GUIDE FOR POWER LIFT HELICAL SCREW PILES AND ANCHORS

GUIDE FOR POWER LIFT HELICAL SCREW PILES AND ANCHORS GUIDE FOR POWER LIFT HELICAL SCREW PILES AND ANCHORS Product Description Power Lift helical screw piles and anchors, also known as helical piles and anchors, are square bar or round tubular steel shafts

More information

Patented. Since 1912 down. right. solid.

Patented. Since 1912 down. right. solid. Patented Since 1912 down. right. solid. Faster construction Building on weak soil sites High-capacity applications Limited-access installation Underpinning foundations New construction foundations Authorized

More information

Measurement of Shear Strength of Soil with Unconfined Compression Test

Measurement of Shear Strength of Soil with Unconfined Compression Test 1 Measurement of Shear Strength of Soil with Unconfined Compression Test Shear Strength of Soil Shear strength of soil is the internal resistance of soil to shearing forces. Determination of the shear

More information

Development of API Soil Models for Studying Soil- Pile Interaction Analysis Using FB-MultiPier

Development of API Soil Models for Studying Soil- Pile Interaction Analysis Using FB-MultiPier BSI Research Report June 2007 Development of API Soil Models for Studying Soil- Pile Interaction Analysis Using FB-MultiPier Investigators: Marc Hoit, Ph.D. Jae H. Chung, Ph.D. Scott J. Wasman, E.I. Henry

More information

ALMITA & SCREW PILE INTRODUCTION

ALMITA & SCREW PILE INTRODUCTION ALMITA & SCREW PILE INTRODUCTION Charlie Street Inside Sales charlie.street@almita.com Chris Boettcher Business Development Manager chris.boettcher@almita.com Agenda Safety Moment Introduction of the Company

More information

Helical Design Theory and Applications. By Darin Willis, P.E.

Helical Design Theory and Applications. By Darin Willis, P.E. Helical Design Theory and Applications By Darin Willis, P.E. Solution Systems Ram Jack utilizes two unique underpinning & anchoring systems Hydraulically driven piles (pressed) Helical piles (torqued)

More information

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Lesson 09

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Lesson 09 SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Lesson 09 Chapter 9 Deep Foundations Testing Theory Experience Lesson Plan g Topic 1 (Section 9.0 to 9.8) - Driven piles - Static capacity g Topic 2 (Section 9.9) - Driven Piles -

More information

ODOT LRFD Foundations

ODOT LRFD Foundations Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director ODOT LRFD Foundations Alexander Dettloff, P.E. Foundation Engineer Office of Geotechnical Engineering May 07, 2013 AASHTO

More information

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134 C H A P T E R 6 PILE FOUNDATIONS Section I. GROUP BEHAVIOR 6-1. Group action. Piles are most effective when combined in groups or clusters. Combining piles in a group complicates analysis since the characteristics

More information

o n Multi-helix helical foundation installation.

o n Multi-helix helical foundation installation. D e e p Foundations have been around since the construction of ancient buildings and structures. The Pyramids were probably the most stable of these ancient structures, as they are still standing. The

More information

Deep Foundation Axial Load Capacity Static Load Tests Analytic Methods Dynamic methods

Deep Foundation Axial Load Capacity Static Load Tests Analytic Methods Dynamic methods Deep Foundation Axial Load Capacity Static Load Tests Analytic Methods Dynamic methods Pile Foundation vs. Shallow Foundation Soil property unknown after driving Excessive pore water pressure during driving

More information

HELICAL SCREW PILES (HSP) CAPACITY FOR AXIAL CYCLIC LOADINGS IN COHESIVE SOILS

HELICAL SCREW PILES (HSP) CAPACITY FOR AXIAL CYCLIC LOADINGS IN COHESIVE SOILS 4 th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering June 25-28, 27 Paper No. 1567 HELICAL SCREW PILES (HSP) CAPACITY FOR AXIAL CYCLIC LOADINGS IN COHESIVE SOILS M. Hesham EL NAGGAR 1,

More information

Uplift Resistance of Coated Driven Steel Piles. 1Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Ma

Uplift Resistance of Coated Driven Steel Piles. 1Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Ma Uplift Resistance of Coated Driven Steel Piles Alan J. Lutenegger 1, F. ASCE and Jahan Khalili 2 1Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Ma. 13 2 Geotechnical Engineer, GZA Geoenvironmental,

More information

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation Jeff R. Hill, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. 111 W. Port Plaza Drive Suite 600 St. Louis, MO 63146 314-542-3040 JRHill@HaywardBaker.com

More information

13.1 SCOPE...13-1 13.2 DEFINITIONS...13-1 13.3 NOTATION...13-1 13.4 DETERMINATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES...13-2

13.1 SCOPE...13-1 13.2 DEFINITIONS...13-1 13.3 NOTATION...13-1 13.4 DETERMINATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES...13-2 SECTION 13: FOUNDATION DESIGN TABLE OF CONTENTS 13 13.1 SCOPE...13-1 13.2 DEFINITIONS...13-1 13.3 NOTATION...13-1 13.4 DETERMINATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES...13-2 13.5 FOUNDATION BEARING CAPACITY...13-2 13.5.1

More information

Geotechnical Modeling and Capacity Assessment

Geotechnical Modeling and Capacity Assessment Geotechnical Modeling and Capacity Assessment by Geoffrey R. Martin Chapter 6 : Geotechnical Modeling and Capacity Assessment Foundation Modeling (Evaluation Methods D and E) Equivalent linear stiffness

More information

LEGACY REPORT ER-5110. www.icc-es.org. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, 2003. Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

LEGACY REPORT ER-5110. www.icc-es.org. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, 2003. Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code LEGACY REPORT Reissued November 1, 2003 ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. www.icc-es.org Business/Regional Office # 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 # (562) 699-0543 Regional Office # 900

More information

Prestressed Concrete Piles

Prestressed Concrete Piles FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVES TO MITIGATE EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS 13.17 FIGURE 13.11 Excavation for the grade beam that will span between the two piers. Usually this foundation system is designed by the structural

More information

Bearing Capacity. Reading Assignment Salgado Ch. 10 Lecture Notes. Other Materials None. Homework Assignment 9

Bearing Capacity. Reading Assignment Salgado Ch. 10 Lecture Notes. Other Materials None. Homework Assignment 9 Ch. 10 - Bearing Capacity Page 1 Bearing Capacity Reading Assignment Salgado 10.1-10.6 Ch. 10 Lecture Notes Other Materials None Homework Assignment 9 1. Develop a spreadsheet program to calculate q ult

More information

Introduction to Bearing Capacity Analysis

Introduction to Bearing Capacity Analysis Introduction to Bearing Capacity Analysis Course No: G02-004 Credit: 2 PDH J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A., Fellow ASCE, Fellow AEI Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 9 Greyridge Farm Court Stony Point,

More information

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations: Overview Terzaghi s Method of Bearing Capacity Estimation

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations: Overview Terzaghi s Method of Bearing Capacity Estimation ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations: Overview Terzaghi s Method of Bearing Capacity Estimation Types of Shallow Foundations Shallow foundations are usually placed within a depth

More information

CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES

CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES To engineer an adequate earth retaining system for a trench or excavation it is first necessary to identify

More information

Geosynthetic Reinforced Foundations Laboratory Model Tests & FE Analyses

Geosynthetic Reinforced Foundations Laboratory Model Tests & FE Analyses Geosynthetic Reinforced Foundations Laboratory Model Tests & FE Analyses by Murad Abu-Farsakh, Ph. D., P.E., Qiming Chen, and Jie Gu Louisiana Transportation Research Center February 12, 2007 Acknowledgment

More information

foundations Dr Trevor Orr Trinity College Dublin Convenor TC250/SC7/EG3 Eurocodes: Background & Applications June 2013, Dublin

foundations Dr Trevor Orr Trinity College Dublin Convenor TC250/SC7/EG3 Eurocodes: Background & Applications June 2013, Dublin 13-14 June 2013, Dublin Dr Trevor Orr Deep foundations design of pile foundations Trinity College Dublin Convenor TC250/SC7/EG3 Outline of the talk Scope and contents Design situations, ti limit it states,

More information

Address for Correspondence

Address for Correspondence Research Paper PREDICTION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF GRANULAR LAYERED SOILS BY PLATE LOAD TEST Sanjeev Kumar Verma 1, Pradeep Kumar Jain 2, Rakesh Kumar 3 Address for Correspondence 1 Technical Expert, DMI,

More information

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: GEOTECH ENTERPRISES, INC.

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: GEOTECH ENTERPRISES, INC. 0 ICC ES Report ICC ES (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org 000 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 3623 Reissued 04/2016 This report is subject to renewal 04/2017. DIVISION: 31 00 00 EARTHWORK

More information

Helical Torque Anchors. Installation Guidelines and Testing Procedures

Helical Torque Anchors. Installation Guidelines and Testing Procedures Installation and Chapter 2 Helical Torque Anchors Installation Guidelines and Procedures Hydraulic Torque Motors Installation Procedures Field of Torque Anchors EARTH CONTACT PRODUCTS Designed and Engineered

More information

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions This document is available for free download at piledrivers.org. Preferred terms are descriptively defined. Potentially synonymous (but not preferred) terms are identified

More information

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles ANNUAL KANSAS CITY SPECIALTY SEMINAR 2014 JANUARY 10, 2014 Jorge Beim JWB Consulting LLC Pile Dynamics, Inc. Main Topics Brief description of the Dynamic Load Test

More information

Helical Pile Behaviour and Load Transfer Mechanism in Different Soils

Helical Pile Behaviour and Load Transfer Mechanism in Different Soils Helical Pile Behaviour and Load Transfer Mechanism in Different Soils Andina Sprince 1, Leonids Pakrastinsh 1 1 Riga Technical University, 16 Azenes Str., Riga LV-1048, Latvia. This article explores the

More information

Installation and Performance Characteristics of High Capacity Helical Piles in Cohesive Soils

Installation and Performance Characteristics of High Capacity Helical Piles in Cohesive Soils Installation and Performance Characteristics of High Capacity Helical Piles in Cohesive Soils Mohaed Sakr, PhD., P.Eng, Core Manager, Geotechnical Services, WorleyParsons Canada, Infrastructure & Environment,

More information

Design of helical pier foundations in frozen ground

Design of helical pier foundations in frozen ground Design of helical pier foundations in frozen ground Permafrost, Phillips, Springman & Arenson (eds) 2003 Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, ISBN 90 5809 582 7 H.K. Zubeck & H. Liu University of Alaska Anchorage,

More information

CIGMAT-2011 Conference & Exhibition EFFECTS OF TREES ON THE DEPTH OF THE ACTIVE ZONE

CIGMAT-2011 Conference & Exhibition EFFECTS OF TREES ON THE DEPTH OF THE ACTIVE ZONE EFFECTS OF TREES ON THE DEPTH OF THE ACTIVE ZONE Kenneth E. Tand, P.E. Kenneth E. Tand & Associates 2817 Aldine Bender Road Houston, TX 77032 Phone: 281-590-171; Fax: 281-590-1430; E-mail: ktand@ketand.com

More information

FB Multipier v.4. Single Pile Example

FB Multipier v.4. Single Pile Example FB Multipier v.4 Single Pile Example Professor s Driven Pile Institute Utah State University June 26, 2013 J. Brian Anderson (jbanders@auburn.edu) Department of Civil Engineering Auburn University 2 Deep

More information

Common Retaining Walls

Common Retaining Walls Page 1 Common Back Fill Back Fill Stem Toe Heel Gravity or Semi-gravity Retaining wall Toe Footing Cantilever Retaining wall Heel Back Fill Back Fill Buttress Stem Stem Counterfort Toe Footing Heel Toe

More information

8.5 Structural arrangement of foundation

8.5 Structural arrangement of foundation 8.5 Structural arrangement of foundation Based on structural arrangement of foundations, the various type of foundations are possible. The necessity of erecting towers on a variety of soils has made it

More information

Bearing Capacity and Driving Efficiency of Ecological Screw Pile: Tsubasa PileTM

Bearing Capacity and Driving Efficiency of Ecological Screw Pile: Tsubasa PileTM JFE TECHNICAL REPORT No. 19 (Mar. 014) Bearing Capacity and Driving Efficiency of Ecological Screw Pile: Tsubasa PileTM ICHIKAWA Kazuomi*1 KONO Kenji* Abstract: Tsubasa PileTM developed by JFE Steel is

More information