MEMORANDUM OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MEMORANDUM OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE"

Transcription

1 MEMORANDUM OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DATE: January 12, 2016 TO: FROM: Greg Apke, Statewide Fish Passage Program Coordinator John Spangler, District Fish Biologist, Mid-Coast Watershed District SUBJECT: Net Benefit Analysis for Fish Passage Waiver Application for the Oregon Department of Transportation FFO US20 PME: UPRR-Eddyville Project at Eddy C Creek and Cougar Creek, Yaquina River Basin, Lincoln County (W ) Introduction and Policy Context Oregon revised fish passage statutes ( ) and corresponding administrative rules ( ), administered by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) provides specific authority to waive the requirement for fish passage if the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission determines that alternatives to fish passage proposed by the person owning or operating the artificial obstruction provide a benefit to native migratory fish (NMF). Fish passage waivers, defined in ORS (7) and administrative rules (OAR ) are permissible if it is determined that the alternatives to fish passage provide a net benefit to NMF. ODFW s role in processing passage waivers is to review the Applicant s fish passage waiver application and perform a net benefit analysis determination on the proposed compensatory mitigation. The purpose of the benefit analysis is to evaluate and make a determination as to whether or not the proposed fish passage alternatives achieve a net benefit greater than if passage were provided at the location for which the waiver is being sought. Net benefit analyses shall be determined based upon conditions that exist at the time of comparison. Proposed Action The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) submitted a final fish passage waiver application for the FFO US20 PME: UPRR-Eddyville Project (PME) project on December 18, The ODFW Fish Passage Program in coordination with the ODFW Mid-Coast Watershed District fisheries staff, has reviewed the ODOT request to obtain a fish passage waiver for permanent fish passage artificial obstructions proposed for Eddy Creek Tributary C (Eddy C Creek) and Cougar Creek in the Yaquina River Basin in Lincoln County. The ODOT waiver application seeks a fish passage waiver for the installation of rock buttresses and culverts in Eddy C and Cougar Creek to provide slope stability and facilitate completion of the PME project. Fish passage has been blocked in sections of these drainages since 2008 when landslide mitigation was installed to stabilize the steep slopes adjacent to these streams in the new highway corridor

2 alignment. A previous ODOT PME fish passage waiver (W ) was approved for permanently lost fish passage/habitat and resulted in off-site mitigation in the Yaquina River estuary. The mitigation package continues to be implemented in The PME project has experienced extensive geotechnical challenges due to Oregon Coast Range geology and climate. As such, ODOT proposes to install rock buttresses within two fish-bearing streams in order to stabilize the movement of valley fills supporting the newly-aligned state highway. Specifically, the PME project will result in permanent impacts to Eddy C and Cougar Creek, both of which support native migratory fish (NMF), resulting in the permanent loss of 1,936 feet of NMF habitat. The ODOT fish passage waiver application submitted on December 18, 2015 identifies proposed fish passage and habitat improvement mitigation actions in the Bull Creek basin, a direct tributary to the Big Elk Creek, a mainstem tributary to the Yaquina River. These proposed actions are intended to mitigate for the permanent loss of fish passage and habitat access and the lost watershed processes and functions in Eddy C and Cougar Creek from the PME project. Department analysis concludes that the mitigation projects proposed in the fish passage waiver application do provided a net benefit, as required by Oregon Revised Statutes (7) and Oregon Administrative Rules and Project Description The ODOT is realigning a section of Highway 20 between Corvallis and Newport to improve driving safety for the traveling public, and to improve freight mobility between the Willamette Valley and Oregon Coast. The project will replace the existing 10-mile highway alignment adjacent to the Yaquina River between Pioneer Mountain and Eddyville with a new 5.37-mile alignment that is primarily on the ridge line of the Oregon coast range. ODOT initially proposed placing bridge structures over Eddy and Cougar Creeks. This approach was ideal from a fish passage perspective. Unfortunately, several massive landslides were discovered in 2006 during construction in the project alignment adjacent to these tributaries. According to ODOT, these slides are natural geologic features to the area. ODOT s geotechnical engineers and their engineering consultants have thoroughly evaluated the project areas and have determined there are major landslide masses in all four of the major creek sub-basins affected by the PME project. These include Cougar Creek, Crystal Creek, Eddy Creek Tributary B (Eddy Creek B), Eddy Creek C, and their tributaries. Consequently, before the project can be completed, these landslide areas must be stabilized to ensure stability and safety along the proposed highway alignment. ODOT engineers have evaluated different geotechnical design solutions to remediate the landslides. ODOT s initial proposal to remediate the landslides was to install rock buttresses to stabilize the unstable slopes. These buttresses were installed beginning in Extensive monitoring and evaluation resulted in the conclusion that despite the installation of the buttresses, bridges were not safe solutions to cross these streams. ODOT s final proposal includes plans to fill these stream valleys with large rock buttresses. Culverts will be constructed through the rock buttresses to carry the creeks through the fill material under the new highway alignment. These designs, given the site and design constraints and steep slopes and lengths of the new rock buttress fills, will not accommodate passage of NMF and will permanently preclude future fish passage at these locations. During the filling of the 2

3 stream valleys in 2014 the weight of the fill material caused the hillslopes to begin moving. This movement threatened to shear the drain fields that had been installed. ODOT s solution to this new slope instability is to install additional rock buttresses on Eddy C Creek and Cougar Creek. These new buttresses, proposed to be constructed in 2016, will permanently impact NMF habitat and watershed process and functions on Eddy C Creek and Cougar Creek. A more comprehensive project description including more information regarding the geologic setting of the PME project area, landslide risks, buttress details, and highway construction implications are included in the Geotechnical Data Report located in Attachment D and a map of the PME project corridor and proposed fish passage impact locations is located in Attachment A of the ODOT waiver application. Project Impact Analysis Waiver Sites: Cougar Creek: Cougar Creek is a small, approximately 5,000-foot long headwater tributary that discharges directly into the Yaquina River. The subbasin drains approximately 170 acres and its land use is private timber production. Listed coho salmon have been documented by ODFW (at low densities) in the lower section of the proposed rock buttress footprint and coho salmon and cutthroat trout occupancy have been assumed up to a natural channel slope break from 5-9% to over 20%. Construction of the proposed rock buttress and culvert will permanently block fish passage to 1,720 feet of coho salmon habitat (710 feet of culvert + 1,010 feet of open channel upstream of the rock buttress). Cougar Creek supports coho salmon and cutthroat trout within the project limits. The stream reach of Cougar Creek where the ODOT project impacts are proposed contains functional riparian and upland habitats and an average slope of the creek bed ranges between 5-9%. In addition to the direct loss of fish habitat at the construction site there will be the associated loss of watershed processes and functions. The longitudinal profile of the affected reach of Cougar Creek has a high average gradient ( % slope) and the gradient upstream of the proposed imacts quickly increases to %. Coho salmon and cutthroat trout have been sampled in the mainstem of Cougar Creek and in two tributaries that were affected by earlier phases of the PME project. Current and historic cutthroat trout distribution in Cougar Creek is assumed to occur from the confluence with the Yaquina River upstream to the % slope break. Pacific and western brook lamprey are known to reside in Cougar Creek. Pacific lamprey are a NMF species; western brook lamprey are not a NMF species as per OAR (32). Eddy C Creek: Eddy C Creek is a small, steep headwater creek that is approximately 2,700 feet long and drains an area of approximately 70 acres. The creek contains one small ephemeral tributary that is approximately 130 feet long. The subbasin s land use was historically private timber production prior to highway construction. The creek has natural channel slopes ranging from 6% to 17%. Results of stream habitat survey indicate that Eddy Creek mainstem and Eddy C Creek met most of the ODFW habitat benchmarks for forested streams. ODOT fish sampling efforts within the portion of Eddy C Creek affected by the 2013 rock buttress/culvert fills immediately upstream of the currently proposed impacts revealed juvenile 3

4 listed coho salmon and cutthroat trout. As noted above, cutthroat trout and Pacific and western brook lamprey are also known to occur in the Eddy Creek system including Eddy C tributary. The ODOT design at this location proposes a rock buttress and culvert that will permanently block passage of NMF to their habitat. The increased volume of slope stabilization material (buttress fill) will permanently cover a total of 216 feet of Eddy C Creek. In addition to the direct loss of fish habitat at the construction site there will be the associated loss of watershed processes and functions. Project Impacts Summary: The revised PME project will have direct impacts to 1,936 linear feet of headwater stream habitat that primarily provides spawning and rearing habitat for resident cutthroat trout and coho salmon. These impacts include 216 feet in Eddy C Creek and 1,720 feet in Cougar Creek. These impacted areas are important production areas, but are not limited as defined by the ODFW Habitat Mitigation Policy (HMP). Therefore, according to the ODFW HMP these areas would qualify as Category 4 Habitat. The mitigation goal for Category 4 habitat defined in the ODFW HMP is no net loss of habitat quality or quantity. The impacts from the PME project are unusual in that the habitats impacted are not just blocked by an artificial obstruction or structure; they are being eliminated by burying them under the new highway alignment. These impacts are permanent. Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) estimates that there are 1.67 miles of fish bearing stream per square mile in the Yaquina River Basin or approximately 423 miles of fish bearing stream in the Yaquina River basin. Based on these estimates, the most recent ODOT project proposal will impact approximately 0.08% of the basin s available stream habitat. Similarly, the project will permanently impact acres of aquatic, riparian and upland habitat. These impacts include acre on Eddy C Creek and acres in Cougar Creek. Above and beyond the direct impacts to NMF, the headwater stream and associated riparian area habitat impacts are also important habitat for amphibians, other aquatic organisms, small mammals and bird species dependent on these habitats. These headwater streams also provide abiotic functions including water quality and quantity, nutrient cycling, as well as, serving as a source for material delivered to downstream areas such as large wood, organic material, gravel, etc. These functions are important for downstream aquatic habitats and fish production, but based on the impact area in the PME project and the availability of headwater areas throughout other parts of the Yaquina, are not limited. Fish Passage Mitigation Description As presented in the fish passage waiver application, ODOT proposes several actions within the Siletz-Yaquina 4th-field hydrologic unit code basin to mitigate for the proposed fish passage barriers to be constructed for the PME project rock buttresses. The proposed fish passage mitigation actions will occur in the Big Elk Creek subbasin at Bull Creek. These proposed actions focus on mitigating the permanent loss of NMF passage at the PME rock buttresses in both the Cougar Creek and Eddy C Creek, as well as the loss of critical aquatic, riparian, and upland processes that contribute to properly functioning NMF habitat. The specific fish passage mitigation actions proposed by ODOT include the permanent removal of an existing state-priority fish passage barrier (i.e., culvert), restoration of Bull Creek on a privately 4

5 owned 400 feet reach immediately proximal to the proposed culvert to be removed, preservation of riparian buffers along a portion of Bull Creek on private property downstream of the proposed culvert to be removed, the transition through a land exchange and deed restriction of 52-acres of private industrial timberland to the US Forest Service for late successional reserve management, and the abandonment of a logging road that presently crosses Bull Creek and provides access to the 52-acre private timberland parcel. These mitigation actions are intended to collectively result in a net benefit to NMF in relation to the permanent fish passage barriers and habitat impacts associated with the PME project at Cougar Creek and Eddy C Creek. ODOT also proposes to restore 9.5 acres of the Big Elk Creek narrow floodplain and riparian corridor near the creek s head of tide. This specific mitigation action is a requirement of PME project wetlands and waterway impacts, regulated by Oregon Department of State Lands and the US Army Corps of Engineers. While this action will similarly provide enhanced functions for NMF in Big Elk Creek (floodplain and off-channel habitat connectivity), this action cannot be included into and credited towards the ODFW benefit analysis as per OAR (3). This mitigation action is a requirement of another agency authorization and permit(s). A more comprehensive and thorough description of this proposed mitigation actions, corresponding locations and maps, figures, and photographs can be found in the ODOT fish passage waiver application. Mitigation Actions Benefit Analysis Bull Creek Culvert Removal and Site Restoration: Bull Creek is a tributary of Big Elk Creek, a direct tributary of the Yaquina River. Bull Creek empties into Big Elk Creek at approximately river mile The culvert proposed for removal occurs approximately 0.55 mile upstream of the Bull Creek/Big Elk Creek confluence. Removal of the culvert will eliminate a fish passage barrier that is a partial upstream barrier for adult coho salmon and adult cutthroat trout, and a complete upstream barrier for juvenile coho salmon, juvenile and sub-adult cutthroat trout, and lamprey species. The existing culvert outlet is perched approximately 2-3 feet above the downstream scour pool during most flow conditions. The culvert removal will result in the abandonment of the existing road segment upstream of the crossing and facilitate a land donation to the Siuslaw National Forest that is also a part of the proposed mitigation package discussed later in this section. The culvert is listed on the 2013 ODFW Statewide Fish Passage Priority List as a Group 11 barrier and is noted as a priority barrier in the Siletz-Yaquina Basin. Culvert removal and restoration of the stream channel proximal to the existing culvert will provide full volitional access to approximately 10,900 feet of upstream coho salmon spawning and rearing habitat and approximately 23,593 feet of upstream coastal cutthroat trout habitat. The watershed segment upstream of the culvert includes high-quality stream, riparian, and upland habitats located on land managed as late successional reserve by the Siuslaw National Forest. There are no known fish passage barriers or roads upstream of the culvert. The reach of Bull Creek downstream of the culvert and road crossing includes high-quality, low-gradient, sandstone-based in-stream habitat with a well-established riparian corridor. Upstream and downstream reaches contain critical overwinter rearing habitat for coho salmon, which has been documented as being a critical stream habitat element for sustaining viable coho salmon populations. The average active channel width of Bull Creek within the vicinity of the Bull Creek culvert is approximately 20 feet. The average channel gradient in the vicinity of the culvert is approximately 1.9 percent. 5

6 Approximately 20 large wood structures have been previously installed in the downstream reach between the Bull Creek/Big Elk Creek confluence and culvert by ODFW to further enhance the instream habitat and channel complexity. Approximately six large wood structures occur upstream of the Bull Creek culvert. These structures have helped encourage additional sediment deposition, the creation of point bars and small islands, and a complex glide-riffle dominated wetted channel type. However, at the culvert outlet, a large scour pool has formed due to localized scour associated with the hydraulic impacts of the undersized culvert. The scour pool has led to the deformation of the adjacent streambanks. The areas proximal to the culvert removal will be restored, graded to match existing topographic contours immediately up and downstream of the abandoned culvert. These restored stream banks will be replanted with native riparian vegetation to stabilize stream banks and return them to a more functioning riparian habitat condition. Existing large woody materials, previously placed by ODFW and immediately downstream of the culvert will be redistributed and repositioned to promote improved instream habitat features. In conjunction with the culvert removal, the road upstream of the culvert within the construction footprint will be graded and seeded; areas of the decommissioned road outside of the construction footprint upslope of the culvert construction area and within the 52-acres will be restored by removing three culvert cross drains, installing drainage bars to control surface drainage and erosion, and the road surface will be de-compacted with a excavator bucket. Bull Creek Riparian Buffers: Riparian conservation buffers are proposed along both sides of Bull Creek downstream of the culvert proposed for removal within private industrial timberland. Riparian buffers are proposed to offset the loss of riparian, floodplain, and upland habitat processes and functions that will be permanently impacted by the PME buttresses. Property deed restrictions will be established in perpetuity to ensure that no timber removal or new road building will be allowed to occur within the buffers. The existing landowner will maintain ownership of the property encompassed by the riparian buffers. The Wetland Conservancy, or a similar land trust entity, will provide long-term stewardship of the buffers. The riparian buffers will extend approximately 0.55 mile downstream of the existing culvert crossing along Bull Creek and a major tributary that joins Bull Creek downstream of the crossing from the southwest to the Bull Creek confluence with Big Elk Creek. The buffer will lie adjacent (downstream) of a 52-acre parcel that will be donated to the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) for late successional reserve management, providing a contiguous conservation corridor from the Bull Creek headwaters to the confluence with Big Elk Creek. The buffers will average approximately 275 feet in total width (horizontal distance) excluding the stream area between the ordinary high water marks (OHWM) on both banks, and include a variety of tree species and age classes including both deciduous and coniferous native species. 52-Acre Land Conservation: ODOT proposes to purchase a 52-acre parcel of private industrial timberland from Nestucca Forests LLC (managed by Hancock Forest Management) and donate the parcel to the Siuslaw National Forest to transition the land s use from industrial timber production to late successional reserve management. This parcel is bounded by USFS land to the east, south, and west and these adjacent lands are presently managed for late successional/riparian reserve. This aspect of the mitigation approach is intended to offset the permanent stream function and process impacts that will occur from construction of the PME buttresses. 6

7 Approximately 2,067 linear feet of stream habitat is included in the 52-acre parcel (13.4 acres riparian buffers and 38.6 acres upland habitat conserved). The parcel is composed primarily of Douglas fir and secondarily western hemlock second growth and was last harvested in ODOT also proposes to conduct restoration of the forest stands on the 52-acre parcel by thinning the existing densely-planted stands to decrease competition and foster more natural forest structure and dynamics to set the parcel on a late successional forest trajectory as the forest matures. This is expected to help shift the parcel from a tree farm to a healthy mature forest in the future. Table 1 (below) includes a numeric summary of the proposed PME project s fish passage and habitat impacts and the corresponding mitigation activities and conservation measures intended to offset the impacts and provide localized net benefits to NMF. The Big Elk Creek mitigation action is a requirement of fill-removal authorities and while this restoration activity is important for NMF, we are unable to apply direct credit to the NMF benefit analysis (see footnote below). Table 1. Summary of Proposed Impacts and Mitigation and Conservation Measures Impact and Mitigation Sites NMF Stream Habitat Lost (CS, CT, PL) Aquatic, Riparian, and Upland Habitat Lost NMF Stream Habitat Access Provided Weighted NMF Stream Habitat Access Provided * Riparian Buffer Area Conserved ** Upland Habitat Conserved Stream Length Conserved *** Eddy C 216 ft ac Creek Cougar 1,720 ft ac Creek Bull Creek ,900 ft. (CS) 23,593 ft. (CT, PL) 6,540 ft. (CS) 14,155 ft. (CT, PL) 17 ac. 0 2,900 ft. 52-Acre ac ac. 2,067 ft. Parcel Big Elk ac. 0 2,200 ft. Creek **** Total 1,936 ft ac. 10,900 ft. (CS, PL) 23,593 ft. (CT) 6,540 ft. (CS, PL) 14,155 ft. (CT) 30.4 ac ac. 4,967 ft. * Weighted NMF Stream Habitat Access Provided Column uses the % level of passage at the partial barrier at Bull Creek Culvert to derive a weighted habitat credit to the extent of habitat made accessible by the removal of the partial barrier culvert at Bull Creek. ** Riparian buffers areas also include upland habitats. *** Stream length conserved includes stream reaches that will have riparian buffers established, in-stream or riparian habitat improved, and/or land use changed from industrial timberland to late successional reserve management. **** Big Elk Creek Mitigation Action is for State Lands and USCOE Fill Removal Impacts and are presented but not taken into account for the total stream length figures and the final ODFW Net Benefit Analysis, as prescribed in ORS (3). CS - Coho Salmon, CT Cutthroat Trout, PL Pacific lamprey Species Benefited from Mitigation Actions, Proximity to Waiver Sites, and Mitigation Construction Schedule Species Benefited: 7

8 All NMF species inhabiting the Bull Creek basin will benefit from the proposed mitigation actions. These species include Oregon coast coho salmon, coastal cutthroat trout, and Pacific lamprey. Oregon Coast Coho are listed as threatened under the Federal Endangered Species Act. Unimpeded fish passage at the Bull Creek culvert site will allow adults and juveniles the ability to migrate throughout the stream corridor as environmental conditions dictate. Significant benefits are anticipated for Pacific and western brook lamprey. Western brook lamprey, while a native species are not classified as migratory, are not identified as a NMF. Both species have been excluded from the upper Bull Creek basin since the culvert was installed and both will realize a net benefit from the mitigation actions, but since western brook lamprey are not an identified NMF they have not been factored into the conclusions and recommendations of the benefit analysis. Multiple wildlife species, including ESA listed species, will benefit from the proposed mitigation by developing the 52-acre acquisition property into late successional forest, i.e. spotted owls, marbled murrelets and amphibians. In addition to the specific species benefits, the larger watershed processes and functions will be improved in the 52-acre acquisition and mainstem riparian conservation area. Growing larger trees in the riparian areas and upslope will allow for large woody materials to enter the stream and riparian areas, improve upslope habitats, and restore natural hydrology for the foreseeable future. Impact Sites Proximity to Mitigation Actions: Oregon Administrative Rules for fish passage mitigation (OAR (9)(a)) requires the mitigation activities are in proximity to the waiver sites. In proximity is defined, as per (5), as within the same watershed or water basin and having the highest likelihood of benefiting the NMF populations directly affected by the site for which the waiver is being sought. The Big Elk Creek mitigation site is approximately 2.5 miles southwest of the PME project. The Bull Creek mitigation site is approximately 6.5 miles south of the PME project. The PME project and the proposed mitigation actions are within the Mid Coast Basin, as defined by the Oregon Water Resources Department Oregon Drainage Basins (1991) and are therefore by definition in proximity. Timing of Impacts and Mitigation Actions: The rock buttresses and culverts at Eddy C Creek and Cougar Creek are proposed to be constructed in spring 2016, with completion by fall In-water work associated with the proposed actions at both creeks (i.e., culvert construction) will occur during the ODFW-preferred in-water water work window (IWWW) (July 1 st to September 15 th ). Construction at the Bull Creek mitigation site is currently planned to occur in the summer of 2017 after the 52-acre parcel land exchange has occurred. All work below the Bull Creek OHWM will occur during the ODFW-preferred IWWW for Yaquina River tributaries (July 1 September 15). 52-acre land conservation management actions described in the ODOT fish passage waiver application are presently being negotiated between ODOT, their consultants, private land owner, and the US Forest Service. It is expected these negotiations shall be complete by December 31, It is presumed the specific management actions within the 52-Acres, while still being negotiated, will commence in 2017 and be completed in

9 Monitoring and Reporting Post construction monitoring, evaluation, and reporting is a standard provision and requirement for all fish passage waivers (OAR (8). As such, ODOT, or their designee shall monitor, evaluate, and report for a standard 5 year period after project completion (mitigation actions are complete). The primary purpose of the monitoring and evaluation is to ensure the project plans were implemented as designed and the appropriate mitigation actions and site restoration is complete and mitigation objectives are achieved. If monitoring or evaluation indicates mitigation activities are not performing or the anticipated conditions are not achieved i.e., passage conditions at the abandoned culvert are problematic, ODOT shall be responsible to ensure corrective actions are taken, as required in Oregon fish passage rules and regulations. General Reporting Commitments and Expectations: ODOT, or their designee shall monitor mitigation construction so that all mitigation activities are implemented as per mitigation plans, design criteria, and permit conditions. The mitigation will be monitored at the completion of construction (as-built monitoring) to ensure the mitigation elements were constructed per project plans, design, and performance criteria. All mitigation activities will be evaluated, monitored, reported on, and maintained after construction to determine if the sites are stable, native plantings are establishing, invasive weeds are controlled, and instream channel restoration at the Bull Creek crossing is consistent with intended post-construction conditions. After the five-year post construction permit required monitoring and maintenance period, longterm site stewardship will be conducted on behalf of ODOT by The Wetland Conservancy or similar land trust (land steward) in perpetuity. The land steward shall monitor each site, exclusive of the 52-acre parcel under USFS management, at least annually to ensure the terms of the site deed restrictions are achieved. This includes, as defined in the fish passage waiver application, no mitigation vegetation is removed or damaged, sites are free of trash and liter, no grading, excavating or other earthwork has occurred, and mitigation site signage is present and properly positioned. The land steward shall provide maintenance to the site(s) if any of the mitigation components are not meeting mitigation plan and permit conditions. The 52-acre parcel to be donated to USFS will be evaluated, monitored, and maintained by the USFS after ownership of the land is transitioned to USFS. The USFS will manage the land per the standards and guidelines outlined in the Northwest Forest Plan s late successional reserve management designation. This may involve additional forest restoration activities conducted by the USFS over time as the site continues on a late successional forest trajectory. Conclusions and Recommendations Small coastal Oregon headwater streams, similar to the ODOT PME project waiver locations of Eddy C Creek and Cougar Creek are typically high gradient, lower productivity streams, can contain high quality but limited amounts of habitats and may produce limited numbers of NMF. Conversely, larger, low gradient stream reaches can produce large numbers of NMF (cutthroat trout, juvenile coho salmon and Pacific lamprey) and other native species like western brook lamprey. The proposed mitigation site in Bull Creek is a larger stream relative to the two impact/waiver sites at Eddy C Creek and Cougar Creek, and typically are capable of producing larger numbers of coho salmon juveniles, cutthroat trout and Pacific and Brook lamprey juveniles. 9

10 The Bull Creek culvert, proposed for complete removed, is listed as a Mid-coast fish passage priority in the 2013 ODFW Statewide fish passage priority list (ODFW, 2013). The Bull Creek culvert is listed as a passage level 3 barrier, a partial barrier to some native migratory fish adults and/or species for only part of the migration period. Score less than 5 (complete barriers) for the Level of Passage ranking reduces the overall credit made available through mitigation for habitat upstream of any given fish passage barrier. This approach is consistent with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife s (WDFW) Fish Passage Barrier and Surface Water Diversion Screening Assessment and Prioritization Manual (WDFW, 2009). ODFW passage rating categorizes the culvert as a level 3 or a 60% barrier resulting in a 40% reduction in habitat made available for mitigation. The WDFW manual would rate the Bull Creek culvert as 67% barrier based on the size of the culvert and degree to which the culvert is perched, resulting in a 33% reduction in habitat made available. Given the partial passage barrier status of this culvert the credit for the habitat above this location would be diminished by 40%. Using the Oregon percent passage estimates, the improved passage distance upstream of the Bull Creek culvert is 10,900 feet for coho salmon, 23,593 feet for cutthroat trout, and an assumed minimum of 10,000 feet, for lamprey species. Given these distances and applying a 40% reduction in credit for improved upstream passage the culvert replacement would gain approximately 6,540 feet for coho salmon and approximately 14,155 feet for cutthroat trout. Pacific lamprey species passage improvement would gain the full assumed distance of approximately 10,000 feet due to the inability of lamprey to jump or navigate around sharp corners. Using the WDFW guidelines, i.e., a 33% reduction in habitat credit, the culvert replacement would gain approximately 7,303 ft for coho salmon and 15,807 ft for cutthroat trout. Both the ODFW and WDFW methods are estimates and the percentages of habitat credit differ (60% and 67% respectively). These two fish passible rating methods provide a basis for determining the level of realized benefit to NMF from the culvert removal at Bull Creek. We have applied the ODFW guidelines (60% of credit) to the linear amount of improved fish passage gained for NMF by the removal of the Bull Creek culvert. Comparatively, the PME impacts are 1,720 feet and 216 feet of permanently lost habitat for coho salmon, cutthroat trout and lamprey species on Cougar Creek and Eddy C Creek respectively. ODFW supports the permanent removal of the Bull Creek culvert and conclude this component of the proposed mitigation will contribute towards and provide benefits to NMF We expect the conservation of 30.4-acres of riparian reserves along the Bull Creek mainstem (17- acres downstream and 13.4-acres upstream the Bull Creek Culvert) will improve riparian and upslope conditions and, in the future, provide more inputs of large wood to the stream system to increase stream and habitat complexity. These riparian reserves will continue to maintain good water quality, provide additional wildlife habitat, and contribute to the overall benefit to NMF. ODFW supports these actions and concludes they will contribute towards and provide benefits to NMF and numerous wildlife species for the foreseeable future. The impact sites as well as the 52-acre mitigation site are both currently in industrial timber ownership that operate on a harvest rotation of 40 to 50 years. The 52-acre mitigation site will be acquired and transferred to the USFS to add to the larger block of late successional forest in the upper Bull Creek basin. The 52-acres of industrial forest becoming late successional forest will provide for improved watershed processes and functions that are being lost from impacts from the PME project. The lost watershed processes and functions are difficult to quantify but given the 10

11 relatively small footprint from the proposed rock buttresses on Cougar Creek and Eddy C Creek, the 52-acre acquisition we believe will provide sufficient long term mitigation to provide for improved watershed processes and functions in a basin with higher fish production potential. ODFW supports this action and conclude this component of the proposed mitigation actions will contribute towards and provide a benefit to NMF and numerous wildlife species for the foreseeable future. In summary, ODFW staff concludes the collective fish passage mitigation actions proposed by ODOT to offset the buttress fill impacts in Eddy C and Cougar Creeks from the Hwy 20 PME Project will result in a net benefit to NMF when compared to Eddy C and Cougar Creek if fish passage were provided. The permanent impacts associated with the project will be sufficiently offset by the permanent improvements in fish passage and land conservation management mitigation actions and ODFW concludes the mitigation actions will provide a net benefit to NMF. Based on staff analysis of this benefit analysis it is recommended that the request for a fish passage waiver be granted for the fish passage barriers created by the buttress fills in Eddy C and Cougar Creeks for the ODOT Hwy 20 PME project. Cc: Alan Ritchey (ODFW) Chris Knutsen (ODFW) Bill Warncke (ODOT) Brad Livingston (ODOT) Nick Testa (ODOT) John Raasch (ODOT) Stuart Myers (ODOT Consultant, Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc.) 11

12 Literature Cited: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Screening and Passage Program, Fish Passage Priority List. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Salem, Oregon. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Passage and Surface Water Diversion Screening Assessment and Prioritization Manual. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Olympia, Washington. Figures: Site locations, maps, physical description and photographs are included in the ODOT Fish Passage Waiver Application. 12

Year 2 7-15-10 Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco.

Year 2 7-15-10 Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco. Year 2 7-15-10 Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco.net Project Sponsors include: The City of Corvallis Oregon

More information

Coldwater Heritage Partnership Implementation Grant Final Report Morrison Run Watershed Restoration Project Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Summary The goal of the Morrison Run Watershed Restoration

More information

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration project is being undertaken in partnership with the Squamish River Watershed Society, Fisheries

More information

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA April 17, 2013 Goal To develop a basic understanding of PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and US Army Corps of Engineers

More information

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title] General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title] Purpose These rules set forth the conditions under which a person may, without an individual removal-fill permit

More information

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002 Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed Summary Report 2002 DOE/BP-00005268-5 November 2002 This Document should be cited as follows: "Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon

More information

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile Chapter 3 CULVERTS Description A culvert is a closed conduit used to convey water from one area to another, usually from one side of a road to the other side. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality

More information

September 25, 2015. Dear Concerned Citizen:

September 25, 2015. Dear Concerned Citizen: IN REPLY REFER TO 5400/1792 (ORC030) ORC00-TS-2016.0001 Cloud 19 CT Timber Sale DOI-BLM-OR-C030-2010-0001-EA Fairview NWFP Project Environmental Assessment September 25, 2015 Dear Concerned Citizen: United

More information

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE L OW E R C A R M E L R I V E R A N D L AG O O N F L O O D P L A I N R E S TO R AT I O N A N D E N H A N C E M E N T P R O J E C T AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE FLOOD PROTECTION RESTORE AND PROTECT RIPARIAN

More information

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting Agenda Public Outreach, Funding, Monitoring EA/BA/Permit Updates Deconstruction Plans Fish Passage & Salvage Plan Hydraulic Modeling Next Steps Public Outreach,

More information

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MEDFORD DISTRICT OFFICE GRANTS PASS RESOURCE AREA 2164 NE SPALDING AVENUE GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA) Office: Grants

More information

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER 9 levees and revetments / Approximately 1.1 miles of river bank are armored Revetments provide limited, localized erosion protection, but impact habitat Frequent and costly

More information

COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N

COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N Submitted by the National Park Service Point Reyes National Seashore Point Reyes Station, California, 94956 Project Description: Muddy

More information

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS Chapter 3 3.01 General Provisions 3.01.1 Introduction 3.01.2 Application and Interpretation of Chapter 3.01.3 Unbuildable Lots 3.01.4 Other Permits 3.01.5 Prohibited Activities 3.02 Service Provider Letter

More information

a. For all activities that would result in the discharge of fill material into any vernal pool;

a. For all activities that would result in the discharge of fill material into any vernal pool; Final Sacramento District Nationwide Permit Regional Conditions for Nevada and the Lake Tahoe Basin in California (Effective March 19, 2012 until March 18, 2017) 1.* When pre-construction notification

More information

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization Introduction A visual examination of Doolittle Creek in a highly developed suburban county in Georgia yielded telltale signs of a creek whose original streambed had been altered. Examination of official

More information

Appendix C. Project Opportunities. Middle Twisp River (RM 7.8 18.12)

Appendix C. Project Opportunities. Middle Twisp River (RM 7.8 18.12) Appendix C Project Opportunities Middle Twisp River (RM 7.8 18.12) This table describes project opportunities by project area. Locator maps of the project opportunities are included below the table. Reach

More information

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit 30-Day Notice Issue Date: June 20, 2016 Expiration Date: July 20, 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers No: NWP-2010-535 Oregon Department of State Lands No: 58311-RF Interested

More information

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management Stream Restoration Cost Estimates BRIAN BAIR USDA Forest Service Gifford-Pinchot National Forest 1262 Hemlock

More information

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank Black Creek Pioneer Village, South Theatre 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Habitat Restoration and Environmental Monitoring Projects Section Restoration

More information

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016 Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016 James L. McIntire Washington State Treasurer Summary The State of Washington offered green bonds to investors in September 2015, with approximately

More information

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria 1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria 1.7.1 Introduction These guidelines set out standards for evaluating and processing proposed modifications of the 100- year floodplain with the following objectives:

More information

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program Manual for Counties and Cities Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction Purpose of the habitat program Objective

More information

STREAMFLOW RESTORATION PRIORITY AREAS

STREAMFLOW RESTORATION PRIORITY AREAS STREAMFLOW RESTORATION PRIORITY AREAS Synopsis The Water Resources Department and the Department of Fish and Wildlife jointly identified priority areas for streamflow restoration in basins throughout the

More information

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location Prattsville Berm Removal Project 1.0 Project Location The project site is located between the New York State Route 23 Bridge over the Schoharie Creek and the Schoharie Reservoir. The restoration plan encompassed

More information

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs 10 Year Plan Update UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update Page A 1 UMRWD LIST OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since its inception in 1967, the

More information

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, 2015. icfi.com

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, 2015. icfi.com HCP Team Meeting November 18, 2015 icfi.com 1 Welcome and Introductions Where are we in the HCP process Hydrology modeling update Native fish survey Fish translocation Finalize covered activities Next

More information

Liquid Capital. Cochran s Creek: A Case Study in Stream Mitigation Banking in Georgia

Liquid Capital. Cochran s Creek: A Case Study in Stream Mitigation Banking in Georgia Liquid Capital Cochran s Creek: A Case Study in Stream Mitigation Banking in Georgia Basic Bank Permitting Process Submit Prospectus to IRT. If approved then: Conduct site visit with IRT. If approved then:

More information

Carlton Fields Memorandum

Carlton Fields Memorandum Carlton Fields Memorandum TO: FROM: RE: DAN WEEDE FRED RUSHING RIPARIAN BUFFER DATE: JULY 26, 2013 BACKGROUND Both the state of Georgia and the city of Atlanta 1 have certain guidelines that must be followed

More information

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples Pierre Y. Julien Wuhan 2005 Objectives Part I - Stream restoration and rehabilitation: 1. Present and discuss important concepts, laws, criteria

More information

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN May 2011 - April 2013 1. Introduction 2. Recommendations Table of

More information

Napa River Restoration Projects

Napa River Restoration Projects Napa River Restoration Projects Shaun Horne, Napa County, shaun.horne@countyofnapa.org Jeremy Sarrow, Napa County, jermy.sarrow@countyofnapa.org The Napa River flows though one of the most scenic landscapes

More information

Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised

Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised NC Association of Environmental Professionals June 9, 2011 Background Purposes Update rules due to required changes from statutes Put all

More information

Steelhead Recovery in San Juan and Trabuco Creeks Watershed

Steelhead Recovery in San Juan and Trabuco Creeks Watershed Steelhead Recovery in San Juan and Trabuco Creeks Watershed Are there fish now? Overview Final San Juan and Trabuco Creeks Watershed Management Plan Fish & Game Implementation NOAA Steelhead Recovery and

More information

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for:

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for: EG-30NY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDANCE PAGE 1 of 9 DATE 10/1/10 EP 3 Natural Resource Protection 1.0 SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITIES National Grid s New York service territory encompasses thousands of wetlands, lakes,

More information

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC Addendum D Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC Moody Wash ACEC is hereby nominated by Citizens for Dixie s Future to: BLM St. George Field Office 345 East Riverside Drive St. George, UT 84790 Moody Wash is a

More information

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington Viewed broadly, the concept of ecosystem services describes the many resources and services provided by nature. Typically, traditional planning and development practices do not adequately represent the

More information

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed Buena Vista Creek Watershed 4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed Watershed Overview The Buena Vista Creek Watershed is the fourth-largest system within the Carlsbad Hydrologic Unit. The watershed extends approximately

More information

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Emergency Watershed Protection Program Floodplain Easements Rhode Island Natural Resources Conservation Service Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4

More information

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin Yakima Basin Integrated Water Resource Management Plan October 23, 2014 Presented by Derek Sandison, Director Office of Columbia River Photo Courtesy of Tom Ring Basin size: 6,155 sq. miles Population:

More information

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary: The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary: The Teton Creek Restoration Project area extends for approximately one mile upstream from the Cemetery Road Bridge and includes the Aspen Pointe, The Aspens

More information

Neversink River East Branch

Neversink River East Branch Neversink River East Branch Management Unit 10 Summary of Post-Flood Recommendations Intervention Level Full restoration of the stream reach including the eroding bank site between Station 38380 and Station

More information

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project City of Fremont, Alameda County Agenda Background Why are proposed improvements necessary? Proposed project components Challenges Construction schedule/phasing

More information

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services Restoring Ecosystems Ecosystem Restoration Services 2 Ecosystem Restoration Services AECOM s integrated approach sciencebased planning, with innovative design and execution delivers sustainable and cost-effective

More information

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk 1 Introduction 1.1 Key objective The aim of this study is to identify and assess possible options for improving the quality of the river channel and habitats in the River South Esk catchment whilst helping

More information

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY 1710. The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY 1710. The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14. Earth Science GEOGRAPHY 1710 River Systems and Landforms DAVID R. SALLEE Robert W. Christopherson Charlie Thomsen Chapter 14 Introduction Rivers and streams are dynamic systems that continually adjust

More information

21. Soil and Water: Restoration

21. Soil and Water: Restoration 21. Soil and Water: Restoration Goal: Maintain and restore the biological, physical and chemical integrity of the Tongass National Forest waters. Objectives: Complete hydrologic condition assessments and

More information

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/laws/policies.

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/laws/policies. RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/laws/policies.htm#storm Definition: A permanent, erosion-resistant ground cover

More information

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1 ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4.2 GOALS AND POLICIES 4.2.A General Goals and Policies 1 4.2.B

More information

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1 A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1 J. Bonham 2 and K. Stephenson Abstract Recently the US Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) has increased

More information

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013 Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013 1. Design alternatives for large capital flood projects (basinlevel water retention and Interstate

More information

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services Robert Deal USDA Forest Service - PNW Research Station, Portland, OR Nikola Smith USDA Forest Service - Pacific Northwest Region, Portland,

More information

The LAndscape Management Policy Simulator (LAMPS) Pete Bettinger Department of Forest Resources Oregon State University

The LAndscape Management Policy Simulator (LAMPS) Pete Bettinger Department of Forest Resources Oregon State University The LAndscape Management Policy Simulator (LAMPS) Pete Bettinger Department of Forest Resources Oregon State University CLAMS Landscape Planning and Analysis Process Existing forest inventories Management

More information

SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN

SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Public Works Department Natural Resources Division August 2012 Mission To create and advance restoration strategies that support Skagit County goals for promoting

More information

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Background Located in southwestern Pennsylvania, Crooked Creek is a major tributary of the Allegheny River, entering near Ford City in Armstrong County. It is rich in natural

More information

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL Book 2 (SW) SW9 June 2015 SW9.01 Purpose This Chapter provides information for the design of open channels for the conveyance of stormwater in the City of Fort Wayne.

More information

Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008

Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008 Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008 In partnership with Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP), American Wildlands, and Wildlife Forever, the Madison

More information

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function What is a Wetland Buffer? A wetland buffer is a simple land management practice that is employed by municipalities to protect

More information

Project Pre-Application

Project Pre-Application Project Pre-Application (Please use the Up, Down, Left & Right Arrows to move from Field to Field) Project Title: Pataha Culverts Submitting Organization: The Nez Perce Tribe Project Contact Information

More information

Proposal to the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG)

Proposal to the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG) Proposal to the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG) Request that the TAMWG recommend that the Trinity River Restoration Program fund BLM to purchase the Weigel parcel at Gold Bar (river mile

More information

Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings

Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide River crossings Second edition, November 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Impacts of crossings 5 2.1 Construction phase impacts 5 2.2 Barrier to

More information

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT CHAD R. GOURLEY P.O. Box 919 Verdi, Nevada 89439 phone 775.345.9960 cell 775.250.8140 chad_gourley at att.net SPECIALTY Restoration of riverine, spring, and wetland ecosystems, specializing in a process

More information

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold CHAPTER 11 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Active Channel The channel that contains the discharge Leopold where channel maintenance is most effective, sediment are actively transported and deposited, and that are capable

More information

Monitoring the Benefits of Instream Habitat Diversity. Entiat River, Chelan County, Washington

Monitoring the Benefits of Instream Habitat Diversity. Entiat River, Chelan County, Washington Monitoring the Benefits of Instream Habitat Diversity Entiat River, Chelan County, Washington Bureau of Reclamation Bonneville Power Administration May 2013 This is an update of the report that first occurred

More information

How To Assess An Area For Erosion

How To Assess An Area For Erosion SKY BASIN (UPPER CA 1 WATERSHED) EROSION ASSESSMENT Prepared by Kevin Drake, CPESC Integrated Environmental Restoration Services, Inc. August 2014 COMMON GROUND UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS P.O. BOX 7559 2780 LAKE

More information

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

How To Plan A Buffer Zone Backyard Buffers Protecting Habitat and Water Quality What is a buffer? A buffer (also called a riparian buffer area or zone) is the strip of natural vegetation along the bank of a stream, lake or other

More information

Lower Dungeness River Estuarine & Floodplain Restoration

Lower Dungeness River Estuarine & Floodplain Restoration PARTNERS: Clallam County; Jamestown S Klallam Tribe; WA Department of Fish & Wildlife; US Army Corps of Engineers; US Fish & Wildlife Service; WA Department of Transportation; WA Department of Ecology;

More information

MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1 MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives o Describe functions lost at impact site o Describe functions to be gained at mitigation site o Describe overall watershed

More information

ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN. Evaluation of spring Chinook salmon spawning in Big Butte Creek, 2008

ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN. Evaluation of spring Chinook salmon spawning in Big Butte Creek, 2008 ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN Evaluation of spring Chinook salmon spawning in Big Butte Creek, 28 Rogue Watershed District Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife March 29 Introduction

More information

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project I. Description of the Project and its Relationship to Other Projects in the Proposal The Lower

More information

The project site lies within an AE Zone and portions lie within the regulated floodway. Development of this site is subject to TCLUO, Section 3.060.

The project site lies within an AE Zone and portions lie within the regulated floodway. Development of this site is subject to TCLUO, Section 3.060. Introduction This application is for the Southern Flow Corridor-Landowner Preferred Alternative, a flood mitigation and tidal wetland restoration project. The Port of Tillamook Bay is the applicant in

More information

Decision Memo. Restore Act Land Acquisition

Decision Memo. Restore Act Land Acquisition Decision Memo Restore Act Land Acquisition USDA Forest Service National Forests in Mississippi Background A broad coalition of federal. state, and municipal government agencies and private conservation

More information

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS by Hany Elwany, Ph.D. Scripps Institution of Oceanography Headwaters to Oceans Conference 25 October 2003 CE Ref #03-22 San Diego County Lagoons

More information

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation May 26, 2016 LOWER GREEN VALLEY CREEK COHO MIGRATION ENHANCEMENT

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation May 26, 2016 LOWER GREEN VALLEY CREEK COHO MIGRATION ENHANCEMENT COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation May 26, 2016 LOWER GREEN VALLEY CREEK COHO MIGRATION ENHANCEMENT Project No. 16-014-01 Project Manager: Lisa Ames RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse

More information

Habitat Quality, Rainbow Trout Occurrence, and Steelhead Recovery Potential Upstream of Searsville Dam

Habitat Quality, Rainbow Trout Occurrence, and Steelhead Recovery Potential Upstream of Searsville Dam Habitat Quality, Rainbow Trout Occurrence, and Steelhead Recovery Potential Upstream of Searsville Dam Prepared by: Matt Stoecker Biologist Owner Stoecker Ecological December 19, 2014 Table of Contents

More information

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan Throughout the Plan 1. There is a fundamental need for the revised plan to address how

More information

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description; QIN Shoreline Master Program Project Summary The Shoreline Master Program (SMP) development process for the Quinault Indian Nation (QIN) includes the completion of inventory and analysis report with corresponding

More information

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum Final Report Dixie Creek Restoration Project Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum Plumas Corporation January 2009 1 Background FR-CRM staff presented this project to the Dixie Valley Landowners Association

More information

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES GOVERNMENT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND LABOUR CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DIVISION Water Investigations

More information

Part Two Critical Areas

Part Two Critical Areas Part Two Critical Areas Flood Hazard Areas Fact Sheet Components of flood hazard areas Reference CAO Sections 137, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166 Flood hazard areas are composed of: 1. Floodplain; 2. Zero-rise

More information

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE Introductions Brett Long, PE Project Permitting & Construction Oversight Chris Streb, PE Project Designer & Construction Oversight Assistance WHO WE ARE

More information

Return to the River: Baikie Island Backchannels Phase 2 Implementation Project # 05.Ca.03

Return to the River: Baikie Island Backchannels Phase 2 Implementation Project # 05.Ca.03 Return to the River: Baikie Island Backchannels Phase 2 Implementation Project # 05.Ca.03 Prepared by Greenways Land Trust P.O. Box 291 Campbell River, BC V9W 5B1 Prepared with financial support of: BC

More information

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN 1 AUGUST 2011 LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN: 1. Replace the existing unsafe Ragged Mountain dam with a new dam and raise the reservoir pool level initially

More information

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are: CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN Adopted 9/23/98 PART 1: GOALS. POLICY. COVERAGE. A. Goals The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are: 1. Preservation and protection

More information

Assessment of the White Salmon Watershed Using the Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment Model

Assessment of the White Salmon Watershed Using the Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment Model Assessment of the White Salmon Watershed Using the Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment Model Draft Final Report For the Period: November 2003 to December 2004 May 2005 Brady Allen Fishery Biologist and Patrick

More information

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208 STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208 RANGELAND HEALTH STANDARDS - ASSESSMENT SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208 STANDARD 1 - UPLAND WATERSHED This standard is being met on the allotment.

More information

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 email list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 email list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio 18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 email list Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio State Representative Krieger State Senators: Roblan, Johnson, and Kruse Governor Brown s office County

More information

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR WATERBODIES CROSSED BY CONNECTICUT PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT CONNECTICUT LOOP Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company,

More information

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design 2015 Symposium on Restoration in a Contaminated Environment: Lessons Learned and Challenges in Moving Forward Part II April 2015 Karin Boyd Applied Geomorphology,

More information

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge Case Studies Bridge Scour Inspection and Repair Edward P. Foltyn, P.E. Senior Hydraulic Engineer ODOT Bridge Unit 2013 PNW Bridge Inspectors Conference April 2013 REFERENCES Stream Stability at Highway

More information

Emergency Streambank Restoration/Stabilization. Kentucky Division of Water Water Quality Certification May 2010 Educational Assistance

Emergency Streambank Restoration/Stabilization. Kentucky Division of Water Water Quality Certification May 2010 Educational Assistance Emergency Streambank Restoration/Stabilization Kentucky Division of Water Water Quality Certification May 2010 Educational Assistance Due to the severity of the recent rains and flooding occurrences, the

More information

Chapter 11. Costs and Funding

Chapter 11. Costs and Funding Chapter 11. 11.1 Financial Summary...11-1 11.2 Program Costs...11-2 11.2.1 Habitat Conservation Program Costs...11-2 Bull Run Habitat Conservation Measures...11-2 Offsite Sandy River Basin Habitat Conservation

More information

Water Quality Restoration Plan. West Fork Illinois River Watershed HUC 1710031104

Water Quality Restoration Plan. West Fork Illinois River Watershed HUC 1710031104 Water Quality Restoration Plan West Fork Illinois River Watershed HUC 1710031104 Prepared by: Medford District Bureau of Land Management, Grants Pass Resource Area February 2007 1 Table of Contents Element

More information

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form HFQLG Evaluation Form Names: Watershed Restoration Defensible Fuel Profile Zone Loyalton Pines Wildland Urban Interface Fuels Reduction Types: Watershed Restoration - Implemented pond and plug restoration

More information

https://orm.usace.army.mil/orm2/f?p=106:34:4198546103662037::no::

https://orm.usace.army.mil/orm2/f?p=106:34:4198546103662037::no:: Page 1 of 6 APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers JD Status: DRAFT SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

More information

Jackson Gulch Outlet Canal Rehabilitation Project

Jackson Gulch Outlet Canal Rehabilitation Project Jackson Gulch Outlet Canal Rehabilitation Project Preliminary Budgetary Estimate for Rehabilitation February 2004 Prepared for the Mancos Water Conservancy District Jackson Gulch Reservoir 42888 County

More information

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality Department of Environmental Quality Wetlands are a significant component of Michigan s landscape, covering roughly 5.5 million acres, or 15 percent of the land area of the state. This represents about

More information

Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Cost Analysis of Low Impact Development Best Management Practices

Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Cost Analysis of Low Impact Development Best Management Practices Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Cost Analysis of Low Impact Development Best Management Practices Amy H. Brennan (440) 975-3870 www.crwp.org abrennan@crwp.org Chagrin River Watershed Partners Formed

More information

Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013

Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013 NCDA&CS - North Carolina Forest Service Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013 For the N.C. Division of Water Quality

More information

WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT 1

WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT 1 Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment & Adaptation Strategies for Sierra Nevada Resources Sierra Nevada Workshop Series October 14-17, 2014 WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT 1 Photo: ESA 1 Authors: Jessi Kershner

More information