HIGH-TECH AND HIGH-TOUCH. Investors Make the Case for Converging Automated Investing Platforms and Financial Planning

Transcription

1 Sharper Insight. Smarter Investing. HIGH-TECH AND HIGH-TOUCH Investors Make the Case for Converging Automated Investing Platforms and Financial Planning

2 WHAT S INSIDE? Summary and Methodology Page 1 Key Finding #1: Investors require both high-tech and high-touch forms of advice to satisfy today s complex financial needs. Pages 2-3 Key Finding #2: Investors are equally satisfied with automated investing platforms and financial planners/advisors, but appear to be more satisfied when utilizing both. Key Finding #3: There is a growing opportunity for automated investing platforms and financial planners/advisors to work together. Pages 4-9 Pages Respondent Demographics Pages 12-13

3 SUMMARY AND METHODOLOGY Today s fast-paced, digital world is presenting new opportunities for investors to get low-cost, more accessible advice for their investments through automated investing platforms (a.k.a. robo advisors). With the number of solutions seemingly growing by the day, what s clear is that while investors have an increasing interest in these high-tech advice providers, they also have a need for the high-touch level of advice offered by financial planners/ advisors. High-Tech and High-Touch: Investors Make the Case for Converging Automated Investing Platforms and Financial Planning, new research by Investopedia and the Financial Planning Association (FPA ), reveals three primary findings: Investors require both high-tech and high-touch forms of advice to satisfy today s financial needs. Investors are equally satisfied with automated investing platforms and financial planners/advisors, but appear to be more satisfied when utilizing both. There is a growing opportunity for automated investing platforms and financial planners/advisors to work together. METHODOLOGY Investopedia and the Financial Planning Association (FPA ) conducted a survey among users of Investopedia.com to better understand their opinions about automated investing platforms and financial planners/advisors. The web-based survey on investopedia.com was fielded between Aug. 25 and Sept. 14, 2016 and resulted in 2,002 completed responses from investors meeting the following criteria: Live in the United States Age 21+ Have input in household investment decisions The data was weighted to match Investopedia.com demographics on ComScore. Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 1

4 1 Investors require both high-tech and high-touch forms of advice to satisfy today s complex financial needs. To properly put this report into context, it s important to understand the current and immediate future financial concerns people have. People are squarely focused on retirement planning (71 percent), before and after-tax investment planning (57 percent respectively), as well as budgeting and developing spending plans (63 percent). As you think about your personal financial situation, how important to you are each of the following areas to your financial planning over the next 12 months? (1 = Not Important, 5 = Very Important) % = respondents who chose 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale Retirement Planning Budgeting and Spending Plans Before-Tax Investments After-Tax Investments Tax Planning Health Care Planning Debt Management Planning for Major Purchases Estate Planning Education Funding Insurance Planning Elder Care Planning Post-Divorce, Separation, or Widow Planning 11% 36% 34% 33% 31% 57% 57% 52% 48% 47% 44% 63% 71% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% While automated investing platforms can satisfy the need for people to address their before and after-tax investments, they are not capable of addressing the many other areas of a sound financial plan that many financial planners/advisors are proficient at addressing. No algorithm exists that can prudently assess the many areas of an individual s financial life and make the necessary strategic decisions relating to retirement planning, estate planning, tax planning, health care planning, elder care planning, and the many other personal financial areas most people face. With that said, automated investing platforms are making it possible for investors of all backgrounds and asset levels get easily accessible, lower cost investment services. Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 2

5 1 When we break out the financial concerns by respondent age, what we find is that people in their 40s and 50s are more likely to be concerned about retirement planning and before-tax investing than those in other age groups. And, not surprisingly, people in their 20s and 30s are more likely to have immediate concerns regarding budgeting and spending plans, debt management, and planning for major purposes. With that said, it is heartening to see that 54 percent of respondents age 21 to 30, and a whopping 71 percent of respondents age 31 to 40, are concerned about their retirement planning and consider it important to address over the next 12 months. As you think about your personal financial situation, how important to you are each of the following areas to your financial planning over the next 12 months? (1 = Not Important, 5 = Very Important) % = respondents who chose 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 21 to to to to Retirement Planning 54% 71% 82% 83% 64% Budgeting and Spending Plans 76% 71% 60% 56% 53% Before-Tax Investments 47% 59% 64% 66% 53% After-Tax Investments 52% 61% 53% 63% 54% Tax Planning 47% 51% 47% 59% 57% Health Care Planning 33% 42% 49% 58% 56% Debt Management 55% 53% 52% 39% 37% Planning for Major Purchases 60% 54% 47% 32% 28% Estate Planning 26% 24% 33% 47% 51% Education Funding 45% 47% 46% 21% 13% Insurance Planning 28% 36% 40% 31% 28% Elder Care Planning 18% 24% 34% 38% 41% Post-Divorce, Separation, or Widow Planning 9% 12% 11% 12% 13% Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 3

6 2 Investors are equally satisfied with automated investing platforms and financial planners/advisors, but appear to be more satisfied when utilizing both. Automated investing platforms have burst onto the scene over the past few years providing millions of American investors to lower cost investment advice, guidance and allocation services. Before we delve into the satisfaction of these platforms and the satisfaction with financial planners/advisors let s explore the familiarity and usage of automated investing platforms. 58% At least somewhat familiar with automated investing platforms. 1 18% Searched for an automated investing platform. 2 7% Currently using an automated investing platform. 3 1 How familiar are you with automated investing platforms that can help you allocate your investments? 2 Have you personally searched for an automated investing platform to handle your investments? 3 Do you currently use an automated investing platform? Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 4

7 2 As we break out respondents based on age, what we find is that, generally, people are familiar with automated investing platforms no matter their age with a slightly higher percentage of those in the 50 to 60 age range being familiar (63 percent). How familiar are you with automated investing platforms that can help you allocate your investments? % = respondents who chose extremely, very, or somewhat familiar % 58% 57% 63% 59% 58% Age Age Age Age Age 61+ Overall Familiarity doesn't always translate to action. While older respondents are slightly more likely to be familiar with a platform, younger people are more likely to actually search for one. Have you personally searched for an automated investing platform to handle your investments? % 21% 16% 17% 15% 18% Age Age Age Age Age 61+ Overall Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 5

8 2 As revealed earlier, seven percent of respondents are currently utilizing an automated investing platform. When we break out those respondents by age what we find is people in their 30s appear to be more interested in using one of these solutions (11 percent) compared to other age brackets; however, the difference isn t major. Popular opinion would tell you that younger people are more likely to use one of these platforms due to the interest and comfort younger people have with online services. And while only four percent of respondents who are 61 years or older are using an automated investing platform, it is hard to discern whether or not age plays a key role in the decision to use such platforms. Do you currently use an automated investing platform? 12 11% 10 9% 8 7% 7% 7% 6 4 4% 2 0 Age Age Age Age Age 61+ Overall With this background on the usage of automated investing platforms, how are they fairing in terms of satisfaction and how does it compare to the satisfaction of those working with a financial planner/advisor? Let s examine. Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 6

9 2 SATISFACTION WITH AUTOMATED INVESTING PLATFORMS For those respondents who are using an automated investing platform, satisfaction is fairly high with 73 percent of investors indicating they are satisfied/very satisfied with the primary automated investing platform they are using. Overall, how satisfied are you with your primary automated investing platform? (1 = Very Unsatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied) 42% 31% } 73% % = respondents who chose 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale Determining the source of what appears to be a high level of satisfaction overall with automated investing platforms among users, one only needs to look at the fact that investors are seemingly pleased with a number of specific attributes, including performance (75 percent) and transparency in fees (74 percent). How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your primary investing platform? (1 = Very Unsatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied) Performance Transparency in fees Accessibility on multiple platforms Investment options Rebalancing services Responsiveness to questions online Responsiveness to questions via call center Tax-loss harvesting 75% 74% 65% 64% 61% 49% 48% 45% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% % = respondents who chose 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 7

10 2 SATISFACTION WITH FINANCIAL PLANNERS/ADVISORS For those respondents who are working with a financial planner/advisor, 3 in 4 (75 percent) are either satisfied or very satisfied. In fact, nearly half of respondent are very satisfied with their financial planner/advisor (46 percent). Overall, how satisfied are you with your financial planner/advisor? (1 = Very Unsatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied) 46% 29% } 75% % = respondents who chose 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your financial planner/advisor? (1 = Very Unsatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied) Services related to estate planning Services related to tax planning Services related to investments Services related to retirement planning Experience in working on matters of concern to you Services related to debt management and budgeting Services related to education funding Accessibility Attentiveness to family Responsiveness to questions/concerns Knowledge of financial planning 62% 63% 64% 65% 65% 65% 66% 66% 67% 67% 61% 64% 67% 70% % = respondents who chose 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 70% Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 8

11 2 We have clearly identified that investors are satisfied with their decision to use an automated investing platform, but will the satisfaction remain during a period of extreme market volatility? Will they be okay with simply working through a computer or will the preference to work with a financial planner/advisor take over? Based on this research, 30 percent of respondents would classify themselves as either comfortable or very comfortable with using an automated investing platform during extreme market volatility while 40 percent are either uncomfortable or very uncomfortable. In the event of extreme market volatility, how comfortable on a scale of 1 to 5 would you be with an automated investing platform? (1 = Very Uncomfortable, 5 = Very Comfortable) 19% 21% 30% 18% 12% Very Uncomfortable Very Comfortable Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 9

12 3 There is a growing opportunity for automated investing platforms and financial planners/advisors to work together. Automated investing platforms have made lower-cost investment advice easily accessible and convenient, but they lack the same high-touch level of advice that financial planners/advisors can provide especially from those who are CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER TM (CFP ) professionals. But what is clear is that investors who are using automated investing platforms feel that their usage of these solutions is supporting their goal of having a sound financial plan. We asked respondents to read the definition of financial planning as defined by the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc. s Standards for Professional Conduct and indicate whether their use of an automated investing platform supports them and their financial plan. An overwhelming 81 percent say that it does. The Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards defines financial planning as the process of determining whether and how an individual can meet life goals through the proper management of financial resources. Based on this definition, do you feel the automated investing platform you re using is supporting you and your financial plan? 19% 81% Yes No Some financial planners/advisors view the growth of automated investing platforms as competition rather than as an opportunity to augment their high-touch financial planning services. Through this research we found that respondents who are working with a financial planner/advisor report a high level of satisfaction with the advice they are receiving on estate planning (70 percent), tax planning (67 percent), investment planning (67 percent) and retirement planning (67 percent). There is an opportunity to embrace these platforms as a means of on-boarding new clients while allowing financial planners/advisors to focus on those areas of a financial plan that require the experience, knowledge, and skill of a CFP professional. Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 10

13 3 When it came to a myriad of financial issues people today need to address, the preference of those surveyed was clearly for the advice to be given by a financial planner/advisor, although many feel that quality advice can be accessed through an automated investing platform as well. Of the following financial services, would you prefer to receive each from an automated investing platform, a financial planner/advisor, or both? Financial Planner/Advisor Automated Investing Platform Both Estate Planning 52% 18% 30% Elder Care Planning 49% 22% 29% Tax Planning 48% 20% 32% Health Care Planning 44% 25% 31% Finances related to getting married 43% 32% 25% Finances related to buying a home 43% 28% 29% Finances related to having children 42% 30% 28% Investment Planning 39% 22% 39% Education Funding 38% 33% 29% Finances related to buying a car/other major purchases 36% 36% 28% Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 11

14 RESPONDENT DEMOGRAPHICS What is your age? Gender? 22% 20% 38% 18% 21% 62% 19% 22 to to to to and older Female Male What was your total household income in 2015? Under $40,000 $40,000 to $59,999 $60,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,000 $200,000 to $299,999 $300,000 to $399,999 $400, % 14% 12% 16% 29% 11% 4% 2% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% What is the total of your investable assets (e.g. bank accounts, certificates of deposit, annuities, mutual funds, stocks, and bonds)? Under $100,000 $100,000 to $249,999 $250,000 to $499,999 $500,000 to $749,999 $750,000 to $1,000,000 $1,000,000 to $5,000,000 $5,000, % 16% 12% 8% 5% 12% 1% 0% 25% 50% Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 12

15 RESPONDENT DEMOGRAPHICS What is your highest level of education? Grade school Some high school High school graduate 1% 1% 3% Some college 16% College graduate Graduate degree 38% 40% Technical school 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Which of the following best describes your role in making investment decisions in your household: I am the primary decision maker 72% I have significant input in the decision 24% I have some input in the decision I have no input in the decision 0% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Top U.S. States or Territories Represented? 12% 7% 7% 4% 64% 6% California New York Texas Illinois Florida All Others Investopedia and Financial Planning Association (FPA ) Page 13

16 Sharper Insight. Smarter Investing. Members of the media interested in talking with a representative of Investopedia or the Financial Planning Association (FPA ) can contact the following. FOR INVESTOPEDIA: Kevin Moogan Public Relations Representative investopedia@fullyvested.com FOR FPA: Ben Lewis Director of Public Relations BLewis@OneFPA.org Access great additional content of personal finance and financial planning through Investopedia at and through FPA at HIGH-TECH AND HIGH-TOUCH Investors Make the Case for Converging Automated Investing Platforms and Financial Planning