Address for Correspondence


 Shanna Ray
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Research Paper PREDICTION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF GRANULAR LAYERED SOILS BY PLATE LOAD TEST Sanjeev Kumar Verma 1, Pradeep Kumar Jain 2, Rakesh Kumar 3 Address for Correspondence 1 Technical Expert, DMI, Bhopal, Housing & Environment Deptt. of (M.P.) 2 Assistant Professor, 3 Lecturer, Dept. of Civil Engineering, M.A.N.I.T., Bhopal (M.P.) ABSTRACT: Bearing capacity and settlement are two main criteria for designing the foundation of a structure. Several theories and experimental methods have been propounded by many researchers for computing the bearing capacity and settlement parameters separately. Traditional bearing capacity theories for determining the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations assume that the bearing stratum is homogenous and infinite. However this is not true in all cases. Layered soils are mostly encountered in practice. It is possible to encounter a rigid layer at shallow depth or the soil may be layered and have different shear strength parameters. In such cases shear pattern gets distorted and bearing capacity becomes dependent on the extent of the rupture surface in weaker or stronger material. The best estimation of bearing capacity and settlement on layered soil are possible only, if the pressuresettlement characteristics of the foundationsoil are known for the size of the footing. From the review of literature, it may be noted that the bearing capacity equations proposed for the homogenous soils by Terzaghi (1943) and Meyerhof (1951) are not applicable to layered soils. Hence it is necessary to develop an equation for predicting the bearing capacity of granular layered soils. In present investigation, plate load test have been conducted in a large tank to observe the load settlement behavior of plates of different sizes resting on layered granular soils. Tests were conducted on two layers of soils. Fine gravel layer overlain sand layer were tested using mild steel plates of square shapes. The effect of the placement of layers on the bearing capacity, settlement characteristics of footing, has been studied and an equation for predicting the bearing capacity of two layered granular soils is developed based on the plate load test data. INTRODUCTION One of the important geotechnical structures is the foundation which transfers the load coming from the superstructure to underlying soil subgrade without shear. Traditional bearing capacity theories for determining the ultimate load carrying capacity of shallow foundations assume that the thickness of the bearing stratum is homogenous and infinite. However, this is not true in all cases. It is possible to encounter a rigid layer at shallow depth or the soil may be layered and have different shear strength parameters (Bowles, 1988). The best estimation of bearing capacity and settlement on layered soil are possible only, if the pressuresettlement characteristics of the foundationsoil are known for the size of the footing. The problem of estimating the ultimate bearing capacity becomes complicated if the scale effect is taken into consideration. The study on scale effect shows that the ultimate bearing capacity decreases with the increase in the size of the foundation. This condition is more predominant in granular soils. In general, Ultimate bearing capacity is governed by settlement consideration rather than shear consideration. The bearing capacity increases as the width of footing is increased resulting in an increase in margin of safety against shear failure for a given intensity of loading. However, the increase in width increases the settlement for a given intensity of loading, thus reducing the margin of safety with respect to tolerable settlement. Therefore a reliable estimation of Ultimate bearing capacity for design of footing is necessary. Naturally occurring soils are often deposited in layers. Within each layer the soil may, typically, be assumed to be homogeneous, although the strength properties of adjacent layers are generally quite different. If a foundation is placed on the surface of a layered soil for which the thickness of the top layer is large compared with the width of the foundation, then realistic estimates of the bearing capacity may be obtained using conventional bearing capacity theory. however, this approach may not be appropriate, If the thickness of the top layer is not large compared to width of the footing. In present investigation attempt has been made to study the bearing capacity and settlement characteristics of footings subjected to central vertical load and resting on layered soil with the help of model tests, because in case of layer soil plate load test, the layer thickness is 2B or more, the effect of both layer will not be effected, However in case of actual large size footing the effect of lower layer will exist, Hence safe bearing capacity change. The tank size was 2000mm x 2000mm x1500mm (Length x Width x Depth). The depth below the base of the footing up to which the gravel is used is called as top layer thickness, and it thickness was varied as, 0.5B, 1.0B, 1.5B, and 2.0B, where B is the width of the plate. A total of 18 tests were conducted. For each test, load versus settlement curves were plotted and with the help of loadsettlement curves, the ultimate bearing capacity of soil is determined. Objective of the study To develop an equation for predicting ultimate bearing capacity of two layered soils based on the test data. Literature Review For strip or circular footing on twolayered soils, the bearing capacity usually depends on the ratio of thickness of the top layer to the footing width or diameter, i.e., H/B. The literature dealing with bearing capacity of footing is quite extensive. Methods for calculating the bearing capacity of multilayer soils range from averaging the strength parameters (Bowles, 1988), using limit equilibrium considerations (Meyerhof, 1974), to a more rigorous limit analysis approach (Michalowski and Shi, 1995). Semi empirical approaches have also been proposed based on experimental studies (Brown and Meyerhof, 1967; Meyerhof and Hanna, 1978; Pokrovsky s, 1937; Button s Analysis, 1953). The Finite Element Method, which can handle very complex layered patterns, has also been applied to this problem. (Burn and Frydman, 1997).
2 For layered soils, an approximate method was suggested by Pokrovsky (1937) for a line load in case of the upper layer is more rigid than the lower layer. Button (1953) found that in layered cohesive soils the bearing capacity factor Nc value varies with the ratio of cohesions as well as the depth of the top layer with reference to the width of the footing. An analysis was developed by Meyerhof and Hanna (1978) for a foundation is supported by a weaker soil layer underlain by a stronger soil at a shallow depth and proposed a semi empirical relationship as below: Pokrovsky s (1937) an approximate method was suggested in 1937 by Pokrovsky for a line load if the upper layer is more rigid than the lower layer. An equivalent depth h for the top layer in terms of properties of these two layers is given by: h = t (E 1 ρ 2 / E 2 ρ 1 ) ½ h>t Where, E 1 and E 2 = Modulus of elasticity of top and bottom layer respectively (E 1 >E 2 ) ρ 1 and ρ 2 = Bulk density of top and bottom layer respectively The stresses in the lower layer (at M) are calculated assuming a depth z 2. For a point Q in upper layer, a virtual distance z 1 is used for determination of stresses with load at the imaginary G.L. Brown and Meyerhof (1969) investigated the ultimate bearing capacity of foundations resting on clay subsoil s for the cases of a stiff layer overlying a soft layer, and the soft layer overlying a stiff layer. The studies have been based on modal tests using circular and strip footings, and using a range of layer thicknesses and clay strengths. The results of the investigation are summarized in the charts. This may be used in evaluating the bearing capacity of layered clay foundations. The problems contain many variables, and the limitation of the study may be seen from the following points, which set forth the scope of the experimental work. All studies were carried out in terms of undrained shear strength of the clay, using total stress analyses. Studies were confined to surface loadings, using rigid strip and circular footing with rough bases. Only one type of clay was used. Therefore, although the strength of the clay was varied, the deformation properties remained constant. Meyerhof (1974) the ultimate bearing capacity of footing resting on subsoils consisting of two layers has been investigated for the cases of dense sand on soft clay and loose sand on stiff clay. The analyses of different modes of soil failure are compared with the result of model tests on circular and strip footing and some field observations of foundation failures. The ultimate bearing capacity of footing on sand layers overlying clay can be expressed by punching shear coefficients for the case of dense sand on soft clay and by modified bearing capacity coefficients or an empirical interaction relationship for the case of loose sand on stiff clay. If the shearing resistance of the sand layer approaches that of the clay, the bearing capacity does not vary significantly from that of the individual strata. Theory and test results show that the influence of the sand layer thickness beneath the footing depends mainly on the bearing capacity ratio of the clay to the sand, the friction angle of the sand, the shape and depth of the foundation. Meyerhof and Hanna (1978) the ultimate bearing capacity of footing resting on subsoils consisting of two layers has been investigated for the cases of a dense or stiff layer overlying a weak deposit, and a loose or soft layer overlying a firm deposit. The analyses of different models of soil failure are compared with the results of model tests on circular and strip footing on layered sand and clay soils. Theory and test results show that the influence of the upper soil layer thickness beneath the footing depends mainly on the shear strength parameters and bearing capacity ratio of the layers, the shape and depth of the foundation, and the inclination of the load. Hanna (1980) the ultimate bearing capacity of footing resting on subsoil consisting of a weak sand layer overlaying a strong deposit has been investigated. Based on model tests of strip and circular footing in a loose or compact sand layer overlaying a dense sand deposit, the classical equation of bearing capacity of footing on homogeneous sand was extended to cover cases of these footing in layered sands where the upper layer is the weaker. The theory compared well with available model test result. Design chart are presented. Georgiadis (1985) a new numerical method for evaluating the bearing capacity of shallow foundation on layered soil which may contain any combination of cohesive and cohesionless layers is presented. Several potential failure surfaces are analyzed and the minimum material factor for which the foundation is stable is determined. Comparison between the results obtained with the new method, a number of semiempirical solutions for uniform and twolayer systems, experiments and other numerical method including finite elements, provide a valuable assessment of the performance of the various methods used and demonstrate the validity of the new method. Bowles (1988) A practicable solution which gives reasonable safety is as follows 1. Consider the different layers of soil with in effective shear depth which is approximately equal to 0.5 B tan (45+Φ/ 2 ). If the thickness of the first layer below the base of the footing is more than the significant shear depth, analysis of single layer holds good. 2. Average values of c and Φ are obtained as c1h 1+ c2h c n h c n av = h Φ = av i h tanφ + h tan Φ +... h tanφ h n n tan Determine the bearing capacity of the footing considering the single layer with average shear strength parameter c av and Φ av. Madhav and Sharma (1991): The bearing capacity of a footing resting on stiff upper layer overlaying soft clay is examined. The stiff layer distributes the i
3 applied uniform stress on to the soft soil over a much larger width. The loading on the soil clay is considered to be uniform (q u ) over a width, B and to decrease linearly or exponentially with distance. The bearing capacity of a footing with variable surcharge is evaluated and shown to increase by about 2030% in case the surcharge stress extends to a distance of 5B corresponding to Es (the ratio of moduli of E c upper and lower layers) of 100. A similar increase is obtained in the case of triangular loading as well. Michalowski and shi (1995) the bearing capacity of strip footing over a two layer foundation soil is considered. The kinematics approach of limit analysis is used to calculate the average limit pressure under footing. The method is applicable to any combination of parameters of the two layers, but the results are presented only for a specific case when a footing placed on a layer of a granular soil resting on clay. The depth of a collapse mechanism is found to be very much dependant on the strength of the clay. Very weak clay can attract the mechanism even at great depths. The results are presented as limit pressures rather than traditional bearing capacity coefficients. The later are strongly dependant not only on the internal friction angle of the sand, but also on the thickness of the sand layer, cohesion of the clay, and surcharge pressure. Results are presented in the form of dimensionless charts for different internal friction angle of sand. It was found that linear interpolation within 5 increments is acceptable in the range of Φ from 30 to 45. Burd and Frydman (1997) a study has been carried out of the bearing capacity of sand layers overlaying clay soil of the case where the thickness of the sand layer is comparable to the width of a rigid foundation placed on the soil surface. A discussion is presented of the dimensionless group that governs the behavior of this type of foundation. A parametric study is carried out using both finite element difference methods. This study based on the use of soil parameter obtained from an assessment of the range of values that might be expected to be appropriate for fullscale structure. The results of the parametric study are used illustrate the mechanic of the system and also to develop charts that may be used directly in design. In particular, the results illustrate that the shear strength of the clay has an important influence on the mechanisms of load spread with in the fill. Several experimental studies have also been done by many researchers for computing the Bearing capacity and load settlement behavior of layered soils. The effect of size of foundation on bearing capacity of granular material were investigated by Cerato and Lutenegger (2007) to evaluate the trend of decreasing bearing capacity factor, N γ, with increasing footing width, B. Load Testing and Settlement Prediction of Shallow Foundation study was done by Anderson et al. (2007). The purpose of this study was to critically examine insitu test methods as a means for predicting settlement of shallow foundations. The results of the static load test showed that the actual settlements were less than that predicted by all methods. Bearing Capacity of Square and Circular Footings on a Finite Layer of Granular Soil Underlain by a Rigid Base has been studied by Cerato et al. (2006) through a model test. Results of the model scale footing tests show that the bearing capacity factor, N Y, should be modified up to H/B=3, instead of H/B=1. The footing shape factor, S Y, should account for both shape and finite layering. From the above theories it may be noted that there is decrease in the ultimate bearing capacity when the foundation is resting on to layered soil and scale effects need to be considered on bearing capacity of shallow foundation. However, these theories needs to be verified experimentally for layered granular soils and based on the test results new equations accounting for the effect of size of the footing and the properties of layers needs to be developed, if required. From above review, it is found that most of the investigators have found that on increasing the width of test plate, the ultimate bearing capacity increases (in case of clay) but at a decreasing rate as the size increases. Most of the investigators have found that the observed values of ultimate bearing capacity are much greater than those calculated from Terzaghi equation. Properties of soils used in plate load tests The sand used in this investigation was dry, Narmada sand and particle size 75 µ to 4.75 mm. The fine gravel is used in this investigation was dry, geera gitti and particle size 2.25mm to 10 mm. Table: 1 Properties of soils used in Plate Load Tests Plate Load Test Programme In present investigation plate load test has been conducted in a large test tank to observe the load settlement behaviour of plates of different sizes resting on layered granular soils. Tests were conducted on two layers of soils. Fine gravel layer overlain sand layer were tested using mild steel plates of square shapes. The effect of the thickness of the top layer on the bearing capacity and settlement characteristics of footing has been studied. The large test tank (shown in Photo 1) is having inside dimensions of 2.0 m X 2.0 m in plan and 1.50 m in depth. The tank was made from steel plates and was supported directly on steel angle sections of size 50mm x 50mm. The tank was strengthened by cast iron angles and plates at the corners, top, and bottom of the tank. The entire tank rested on the solid concrete base. A cross beam was fixed on vertical posts to support the loading device. The horizontal
4 cross beam (Channel section) was thus placed across the middle of the tank. An overall view of the test arrangement is illustrated in Photo 2. To prepare the test bed, the sand or gravel was allowed to fall freely for a height of one metre with the help of strainer. When the soil layer becomes approximate 10 cm the strainer is lifted the same height above. The strainer (sieve) is lifted slowly such that free fall is approximately one meter. For each layer the required amount of sand or gravel to produce a desired bulk density was weighted out and placed in the test tank. When sand or gravel is filled up to the desired height, the sand or gravel was then gently leveled out. Each layer maintains a constant height of one meter, so as to achieve a uniform density in all the test beds. Photo:1 Large Steel Test Tank Photo:2 Plate Load Test Arrangement Total eighteen numbers of tests were performed. While three tests were performed on homogenous sand and three tests were performed on homogenous Gravel. Twelve tests were performed with layered soils. The details of tests carried out are listed in Table 2. The plate is placed at the proposed level of the foundation and is subjected to incremental loading. At each increment of loading settlement is measured and a load settlement curve is plotted. The ultimate bearing capacity and the settlement of the foundation can be determined with the help of load settlement curve for test plate. Table: 2 Details of Plate Load Tests Performed Plate Load Test Results Three tests were conducted on homogenous sand with square test plates of size 250 mm, 300 mm and 400 mm. The thickness of all size square plate is 25 mm. Loadsettlement curves are plotted for each size of test plates on natural scale as well as on loglog scale. For comparision loadsettlement graph for all plate size are plotted in a graph as shown in Fig.1. The ultimate bearing capacities of the square test plates are calculated by both intersection tangent method and loglog method. for each size of test plates on natural scale as well as on loglog scale. For comparision loadsettlement graph for all plate size are plotted in a graph as shown in Fig.2. The ultimate bearing capacities of the test plates are calculated by both intersection tangent method and loglog method. Fig.:1 Comparative study of Load  Settlement curve for various size square test plate on homogenous sand Three tests were conducted on homogenous fine gravel with square test plates of size 250 mm, 300 mm and 400 mm. The thickness of all size square plate is 25 mm. Loadsettlement curves are plotted Fig. :2 Comparative study of Load  Settlement curve for various size square test plate on homogenous gravel Twelve tests were conducted on layered soils with square test plates of size 250 mm, 300 mm and 400 mm and layer thickness L = 0.5 B, L = B, L= 1.5 B and 2 B (Where L = Thickness of top layer fine gravel and B = Width of test plate). Loadsettlement curves are plotted for each size of test plates and thickness of top layer fine gravel on natural scale as well as on loglog scale. For comparision loadsettlement graph for all plate size in same thickness
5 of top layer fine gravel are plotted in a graph as shown in Fig.3 to Fig 6. The ultimate bearing capacities of the test plates are calculated by both intersection tangent method and loglog method. Fig. 5 Comparative study of Load  Settlement curve for various size square test plate on Layered soils at top layer (Fine gravel) L = 1.5 B Fig. 3 Comparative study of Load  Settlement curve for various size square test plate on Layered soils at top layer (Fine gravel) L = 0.5 B Fig. 4 Comparative study of Load  Settlement curve for various size square test plate on Layered soils at top layer (Fine gravel) L = B Fig. 6 Comparative study of Load  Settlement curve for various size square test plate on Layered soils at top layer (Fine gravel) L = 2 B Table: 3 Ultimate Load obtained from Model Plate Load Tests on Granular layered soils in Kg, as well as Ultimate Bearing capacities in KN/m 2. (Taken q u = load intensity at settlement of 1/5 th of size of test plate). Discussion on Load Settlement Behavior of Layered Granular Soils The ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of layered soil is more than the ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of homogenous soil bed of sand for a particular size of the square test plates. The ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of sand is slightly less than the ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of layered soil. The ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of homogenous fine gravel slightly more than the ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of layered soil. The ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of layered soil for L = 2 B is slightly equally than the corresponding value for homogenous Fine gravel. Effect of thickness of top layer soil (Fine gravel) on Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q u ) & settlement Ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) increases with increase in the thickness of top layer of fine gravel. For the same load intensity, settlement is decreases with increase in the thickness of top layer soil beds of fine gravel. Ultimate bearing capacities (q u ) remain constant after the top layer of fine gravel is exceeding twice of the width of square test plate on layered soil. Settlement in 250mm square test plate is more than the 300mm and 400mm square test plates for same load intensity. Effect of size of test plate on Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q u ) & settlement
6 Ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) increases with the increase in the size of square test plate. For the same settlement, load increases with the increase in the size of the square test plate. For the same load intensity, settlement decreases with the increase in the sizes of square test plate. Ultimate bearing capacity increases with increase the top layer thickness of fine gravel layer, in all size test plates. Calculation of N γ For homogenous soils and layered soils The value of N γ is calculated based on the Terzaghi s bearing capacity equation and assume that the equation is valid for homogenous soil as well as layered soils. The Terzaghi s equation for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of square footing is given as: q ult = CN c + γ D N q γ B N γ.. 1 Where, q ult = Ultimate bearing capacity C = Cohesion D = Depth of footing B = Width of footing γ = Dry Density of soil N c, N q, N γ were the Terzaghi s bearing capacity factors. In case of cohesionless soil, C = 0, and also depth of footing, D = 0, hence equation (1) is written as, q ult = 0.4 γ B N γ 2 In the above equation (2), the value of B, γ, and q ult are known, only the value of N γ was unknown. The values of N γ for homogenous sand as well as layered soils are calculated and given in Table 4. Table: 4 The value of N γ for various sizes of square test plates on homogenous soils as well as Layered soils. Calculation of angle of shearing resistance (ϕ) A lot of theories are available for calculating the bearing capacity factors Nc, N q, and N γ. In the present investigation Vesic s bearing capacity theory are considered for calculating the angle of shearing resistance (ϕ). The calculation is based on the interpolation of N γ value of different angle of shearing resistance. Angle of shearing resistance (ϕ), corresponding to N γ value of homogenous soils as well as layered soils are calculated and given in Table 5. Table: 5 Angle of shearing resistance (ϕ) corresponding to N γ value of homogenous soils as well as layered soils. Effective Depth factor (X) of Layered soils by applied vertical load Effective depth factor (X) is the important consideration in any load testing. It gives the idea to safe design and construction of any civil engineering projects. Hence it is necessary to calculate the effective depth factor (X) of layered soils. In the case of layered soils, the ultimate bearing capacity in the combination of the layers affected by the load, an effective depth factor (X) is introduced. It is defined as the multiplication factor which, when multiplying with the width of test plates give the total thickness of soils affected by the applied load. In present investigation, Effective depth factor (X) of layered soils is determined by the following equation: (q Layered ) = (q fine gravel ) at top layer + (q sand ) at bottom layer (q Layered ) = Thickness of top layer (fine gravel)/(xb) x0.4x(γ Layered )B(N γ ) fine gravel + XB 0.5B x 0.4 x(γ sand )B(N γ ) sand.3 XB
7 Where, X = Effected depth factor B = Width of square test plate In equation (3), it is assume that the Ultimate bearing capacity of layered soils is equal to the sum of the bearing capacities of fine gravel at top layer and bearing capacity of sand at bottom layer. It is also assumed that the total effected depth of layered soils is XB, during applying the vertical load. The X is multiplying with the width of test plate to find out the total thickness of layered soils is affected by vertical load. Table: 6 Effective depth factor (X) and the total depth affected of layered soils during applied vertical load Determination of the general equation for effected depth in layered soils. Based on the Table 6, the graph is plotted between Effective depth factors (X) versus Thickness of top layer/width of square test plate or (T/B) (Shown in Fig. 7). The effected depth of layered soils are given by the equation, D efl = 0.73 R T/B for 0.5 < T/B < 2.0 Where, D efl = Effected depth of layered soils R T/B = Thickness of top layer/width of square test plate (T/B) If the top layer thickness (fine gravel) of layered soils and size of test plate is known, then with the help of above equation, the effected depth of layered soils by applied vertical load is easily calculated. Fig.: 7 Curve are plotted between Effective depth factor (X) and Thickness of top layer/width of square test plate or (T/B) of Layered soils. CONCLUSIONS In case of layered soils, for the same thickness and type of soils in top layer (fine gravel) and bottom layer (sand), the ultimate bearing capacity increases with the increase of size of square test plates and settlement decreases with increases the size of the square test plate. In case of layered soils in which the top layer is courser (fine gravel) than the bottom layer (sand), the ultimate bearing capacity increases with the increase of the thickness of top layer (fine gravel) and settlement decreases in all cases. The ultimate bearing capacity (q u ) of layered soil for L = 2 B is slightly equally than the corresponding value for homogenous Fine gravel and Ultimate bearing capacities (q u ) remain constant after the top layer of fine gravel is exceeding twice of the width of square test plate on layered soil. In case of homogenous sand and fine gravel, the value of N γ obtained from the Terzaghi s theory find results of the plate load test, decreases with increases the size of square test plates. In case of layered soils, the value of N γ obtained from the Terzaghi s theory find results of the plate load test, increases with increases the thickness of top layer (fine gravel). The value of angle of shearing resistance (ϕ) for homogenous sand and homogenous fine gravel, calculated indirectly from plate load test results and Vesic s theory is more than the value calculated in laboratory by box shear test. In the case of layered soils, the ultimate bearing capacity in the combination of the layers affected by the load, an effective depth factor (X) is introduced. It is defined as the multiplication factor which, when multiplying with the width of test plates give the total thickness of soils affected by the applied load. Effected depth factor (X) is not constant in layered soil. Its value depends on the thickness of top layer and width of test plates. Its value varies from to Its value increases with increase the thickness of top layer (fine gravel). The effected depth of layered soils are given by the equation, D efl = 0.73 R T/B for 0.5 < T/B < 2.0 REFERENCES 1. Bowles J.E. (1988). Foundation analysis and design, 4 th Ed., McGrawHill, New York, N.Y. 2. Burd, H.J., and Frydman, S. (1997), Bearing capacity of planestrain footing on layered soils. Can.Geotech.J, 34, Cerato A. B., A.M.ASCE; and Lutenegger A. J., P.E., M.ASCE, Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi. 4. Technical notes on Bearing Capacity of Square and Circular Footings on a Finite Layer of Granular Soil Underlain by a Rigid Base, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE,Volume 132, No. 11, November 1, Commissiong, D.M. (1968). The ultimate bearing capacity of surface footing on dry sand overlying
8 saturated clay, M.Eng. Thesis, Nova Scotia technical College, Halifax, N.S. 6. Ghumman (1966), Effect of shape on bearing capacity of model footing in sand, M.Tech dissertation. 7. Hanna, A.M. (1982), Bearing capacity of foundations on a weak sand layer overlying a strong deposit. Can.Geotech.J, Hanna, A.M., and Meyerhof G.G. (1980), Design charts for ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on sand overlying soft clay. Can.Geotech.J, 17(2) Madhav, M.R., and Sharma, J.S.N. (1991). Bearing capacity of clay overlain by stiff soil, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 117(12): Meyerhof G.G. (1948), An investigation of the bearing capacity of shallow footings on dry sand, 2 nd international conference on SMEF, Vol. 1, p Meyerhof.G.G. (1974), Ultimate bearing capacity of footing on sand layer overlying clay. Can.Geotech.J, 11(2), Michalowski, R.L., and Shi, L. (1995). Bearing capacity of footings over twolayer foundation soils, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 121(5): Ramasamy, G (1984), Estimation of settlement of footings on sand. A critical Re appraisal Indian Geotechnical journal, Vol. 14, pp Srivastava, A.K. (1982), Relevance of small scale model tests for estimating load settlement behaviour of footings on sand. M.Tech dissertation. 15. Varghese P.C., A text Book of Foundation Engineering, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, Edition Zhu, F., Clark, J.I., and Phillips, R. (2001). Scale effect of strip and circular footings on a dense sand. J. Geotech. Geoenvioron Eng., 127(7),
EFFECT OF GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT ON LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF A COARSE SAND BED
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 3, May June 2016, pp. 01 06, Article ID: IJCIET_07_03_001 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=3
More informationEffect of shape on bearing capacity of embedded footings on reinforced foundation beds over soft nonhomogeneous ground
Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication The 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Effect of shape on bearing capacity of embedded footings on reinforced
More informationShallow Foundation Analysis on Heterogeneous Soil Formation in the Niger Delta of Nigeria
Shallow Foundation Analysis on Heterogeneous Soil Formation in the Niger Delta of Nigeria Akpila, S.B Department of Civil Engineering Rivers State University of Science & Technology, PortHarcourt. Eluozo,
More informationMETHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT UNIFORM STRESSES DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FOUNDATION
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 2, MarchApril 2016, pp. 4566, Article ID: IJCIET_07_02_004 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=2
More informationStress Analysis Verification Manual
Settle3D 3D settlement for foundations Stress Analysis Verification Manual 00701 Rocscience Inc. Table of Contents Settle3D Stress Verification Problems 1 Vertical Stresses underneath Rectangular Footings
More informationNumerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil
Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil M.M. Ahmadi, Assistant Professor, mmahmadi@sharif.edu Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Abstract The paper
More informationModule 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS
Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS Topics 17.1 INTRODUCTION Rectangular Combined Footing: Trapezoidal Combined Footings: Cantilever Footing: Mat foundation: 17.2 COMMON TYPES OF MAT FOUNDATIONS
More informationBEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD
SENRA Academic Publishers, British Columbia Vol., No. 1, pp. 272774, February 20 Online ISSN: 0353; Print ISSN: 177 BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SAND USING STANDARD
More informationINTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. JeanLouis BRIAUD 1
INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI By JeanLouis BRIAUD 1 The modulus of a soil is one of the most difficult soil parameters to estimate because it depends on so many factors. Therefore when one says for example:
More informationPILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5134
C H A P T E R 6 PILE FOUNDATIONS Section I. GROUP BEHAVIOR 61. Group action. Piles are most effective when combined in groups or clusters. Combining piles in a group complicates analysis since the characteristics
More informationEffect of Gradation on Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Reinforced Sand
Effect of Gradation on Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Reinforced Sand M. S. Dixit Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad (Maharashtra State),
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SOIL CLASSIFICATION...3 1.1 USCS: Unified Soil Classification System...3 1.1.1
More informationVERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOILS TYPES OF LOADING
14.53 THEORETICAL SOIL MECHANICS VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOILS TYPES OF LOADING Point Loads (P) Line Loads (q/unit length) Figure 6.11. Das FGE (005). Examples: Posts Figure 6.1. Das FGE (005). Examples:
More informationDESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,
DESIGN OF SLABS Dr. G. P. Chandradhara Professor of Civil Engineering S. J. College of Engineering Mysore 1. GENERAL A slab is a flat two dimensional planar structural element having thickness small compared
More informationFinite Element Analysis of Elastic Settlement of Spreadfootings Founded in Soil
Finite Element Analysis of Elastic Settlement of Spreadfootings Founded in Soil Jae H. Chung, Ph.D. Bid Bridge Software Institute t University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Content 1. Background 2.
More informationESTIMATION OF UNDRAINED SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON LONDON CLAY
International Conference on Structural and Foundation Failures August 24, 2004, Singapore ESTIMATION OF UNDRAINED SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON LONDON CLAY A. S. Osman, H.C. Yeow and M.D. Bolton
More informationEffect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand
Discovery ANALYSIS The International Daily journal ISSN 2278 5469 EISSN 2278 5450 2015 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength
More informationDIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA
DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA DIRECT SHEAR TEST OBJEVTIVES To determine the shear strength parameters for a
More informationVERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL TYPES OF LOADING. Point Loads (P) Line Loads (q/unit length) Examples:  Posts. Examples:  Railroad track
VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL Point Loads (P) TYPES OF LOADING Line Loads (q/unit length) Revised 0/015 Figure 6.11. Das FGE (005). Examples:  Posts Figure 6.1. Das FGE (005). Examples:  Railroad
More informationModule 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS Topics 24.1 INTRODUCTION 24.2 GRAVITY AND CANTILEVER WALLS 24.3 PROPORTIONING RETAINING WALLS 24.4 APPLICATION OF LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE THEORIES TO DESIGN 24.5
More informationA study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil
ISSN: 31953 (An ISO 39: 00 Certified Organization) A study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil Utpal Kumar Das Associate Professor, Department
More informationWhite Paper: Establishing and Investigating Foundation Zones of Influence
White Paper: Establishing and Investigating Foundation Zones of Influence Prepared by: Bracken Engineering, Inc. 2701 W. Busch Blvd, Ste 200 Tampa, Florida 33618 December 1, 2012 (Revised: December 2014)
More informationAppendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file
Appendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file Notation B1 = lowest level of basement slab c = cohesion E = drained Young s Modulus Eu = undrained Young s Modulus
More information4.3 Results... 27 4.3.1 Drained Conditions... 27 4.3.2 Undrained Conditions... 28 4.4 References... 30 4.5 Data Files... 30 5 Undrained Analysis of
Table of Contents 1 One Dimensional Compression of a Finite Layer... 3 1.1 Problem Description... 3 1.1.1 Uniform Mesh... 3 1.1.2 Graded Mesh... 5 1.2 Analytical Solution... 6 1.3 Results... 6 1.3.1 Uniform
More informationCHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS
CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS CONTENTS: Introduction, hydraulic head and water flow, Darcy s equation, laboratory determination of coefficient of permeability, field determination of coefficient
More informationLABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO STANDARD IS: 2720 (Part 16) 1979. DEFINITION California bearing ratio is the ratio of force per unit area required to penetrate in to a soil mass with
More informationOptimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge
Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB), 34 (1) (26) 114 Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge Tanvir Manzur and Alamgir Habib Department of Civil Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering
More informationENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design
This image cannot currently be displayed. ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations Total and Differential Settlement Schmertmann s Method This image cannot currently be displayed. Strength
More informationASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS
Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference IGC2014 December 1820, 2014, Kakinada, India ASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS Kant, L., M. Tech Student, Department of Earthquake
More informationSettlement of Shallow Circular Foundations with Structural Skirts Resting on Sand. ÉeôdG Y I~æà ùÿg á«fé ûf G ±Gƒ G e á«ë ùdg ájôfg~dg ~YGƒ dg hõf
The Journal of Engineering Research Vol. 4, No. (7) 6 Settlement of Shallow Circular Foundations with Structural Skirts Resting on Sand M.Y. AlAghbari Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan
More informationMeasurement of Soil Parameters by Using Penetrometer Needle Apparatus
Vol.3, Issue.1, JanFeb. 2013 pp284290 ISSN: 22496645 Measurement of Soil Parameters by Using Penetrometer Needle Apparatus Mahmoud M. Abu zeid, 1 Amr M. Radwan, 2 Emad A. Osman, 3 Ahmed M.Abubakr,
More informationModule 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : Insitu tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives
Lecture 4 : Insitu tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives In this section you will learn the following Penetrometer Tests Standard penetration test Static cone penetration test Dynamic cone
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach  Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:
HANDOUT REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach  Fifth Edition RETAINING WALLS Fifth Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationFINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION
FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AT SS6B AREA AT HPCL VISAKH REFINERY VISAKHAPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM) AETP(P) LIMITED #1163, RockDale Layout,
More informationBearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah)
Bearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah) Dr. Ir.H. Erizal, MAgr Definisi Daya dukung yang diizinkan (allowable bearing cap.) tekanan maksimum yang dapat diaplikasikan ke tanah dimana 2 kondisi diatas dipenuhi.
More informationGUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST
GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST NZ GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY INC August 2001 CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Background 2 3.0 Recommended Practice 3 4.0 Undrained Shear Strength 3 5.0 Particular
More informationLABORATORY MODEL TESTS TO EFFECT OF DENSITY TO FILL MATERIAL ON THE PERFORMANCE OF A MODEL REINFORCED SOIL WALL
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 3, May June 216, pp. 365 372, Article ID: IJCIET_7_3_37 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=3
More informationProgram COLANY Stone Columns Settlement Analysis. User Manual
User Manual 1 CONTENTS SYNOPSIS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. PROBLEM DEFINITION 4 2.1 Material Properties 2.2 Dimensions 2.3 Units 6 7 7 3. EXAMPLE PROBLEM 8 3.1 Description 3.2 Hand Calculation 8 8 4. COLANY
More informationCE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions)
CE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions) P. 1) LOAD UNDER A RECTANGULAR AREA (1) Question: The footing shown in the figure below exerts a uniform pressure of 300 kn/m 2 to the soil. Determine vertical
More informationALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE
C H A P T E R 5 ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE Section I. BASICS 51. Considerations. For safe, economical pile foundations in military construction, it is necessary to determine the allowable load capacity
More informationEXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM RETROFITTED WITH FERROCEMENT
Int. J. Struct. & Civil Engg. Res. 2013 Y V Ladi and P M Mohite, 2013 Research Paper EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM RETROFITTED WITH FERROCEMENT Y V Ladi 1 * and P M Mohite 2 *Corresponding
More information13. AN INTRODUCTION TO FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
131 13. AN INTRODUCTION TO FOUNDATION ENGINEERING 13.1 TYPES OF FOUNDATIONS The foundation is that portion of a structure that transmits the loads from the structure to the underlying foundation material.
More informationGeotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters
Geotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters Arpan Laskar Post Graduate Student Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology
More informationFOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples
FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 141 Load Path and Transfer to
More informationTHE EFFECT OF IMPROVEMENT SURROUNDING SOIL ON BORED PILE FRICTION CAPACITY
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 1, JanFeb 2016, pp. 260273, Article ID: IJCIET_07_01_022 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=1
More informationGeotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture No. # 13 (Refer Slide Time: 00:18) So last class, it was
More informationConstruction Planning, Equipment, and Methods
CHAPTER Construction Planning, Equipment, and Methods Sixth Edition GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS, COMPACTION, AND STABILIZATION A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationWhen to Use Immediate Settlement in Settle 3D
When to Use Immediate Settlement in Settle 3D Most engineers agree that settlement is made up of three components: immediate, primary consolidation and secondary consolidation (or creep). Most engineers
More informationIntroduction to Spread Footings and Mat Foundations
Introduction to Spread Footings and Mat Foundations Course No: G02008 Credit: 2 PDH J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A., Fellow ASCE, Fellow AEI Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 9 Greyridge Farm Court
More informationDETERMINATION OF SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS PERFORMING THE PLATE BEARING TEST
III Międzynarodowa Konferencja NaukowoTechniczna Nowoczesne technologie w budownictwie drogowym Poznań, 8 9 września 005 3rd International Conference Modern Technologies in Highway Engineering Poznań,
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Test Report
Geotechnical Investigation Test Report Report No. htsc/rcd/ 3457 Dated:  20/03/2010 Asphalt Standard Penetration Test as per IS 2131  IS 6403 Soil Job Card No  1649 Cement Client/Department
More informationINDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT) Reference can be made to IS 2131 1981 for details on SPT. It is a field edtest to estimate e the penetration e resistance
More informationDRIVEN PIPE PILES IN DENSE SAND
DRIVEN PIPE PILES IN DENSE SAND BYRON BYRNE GEOMECHANICS GROUP THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA ABSTRACT: Piles are often driven open ended into dense sand with the aim of increasing the ease of penetration
More informationLABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF USE OF SYNTHETIC FIBERS TO MINIMIZE SWELL IN EXPANSIVE SUBGRADES
IGC 29, Guntur, INDIA Laboratory Investigation of Use of Synthetic Fibers to Minimize Swell in Expansive Subgrades LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF USE OF SYNTHETIC FIBERS TO MINIMIZE SWELL IN EXPANSIVE SUBGRADES
More informationCONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST
CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST 1 Permeability is a measure of the ease in which water can flow through a soil volume. It is one of the most important geotechnical parameters. However,
More informationSettlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains
Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains Doug Jenkins 1, Chris Lawson 2 1 Interactive Design Services, 2 Reinforced
More informationSoil Mechanics SOIL STRENGTH page 1
Soil Mechanics SOIL STRENGTH page 1 Contents of this chapter : CHAPITRE 6. SOIL STRENGTH...1 6.1 PRINCIPAL PLANES AND PRINCIPAL STRESSES...1 6.2 MOHR CIRCLE...1 6.2.1 POLE METHOD OF FINDING STRESSES ON
More informationWorked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites
Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites Worked example to accompany MBIE Guidance on the seismic design of retaining
More informationCEEN 162  Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7  Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests
PURPOSE: The parameters of the shear strength relationship provide a means of evaluating the load carrying capacity of soils, stability of slopes, and pile capacity. The direct shear test is one of the
More informationNumerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test
International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 3; March 2012 Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test Nutan Palla Project Engineer, TolunayWong Engineers, Inc. 10710 S Sam
More informationAnalysis of Underground Water Tank
Analysis of Underground Water Tank Using SAP2000 (Metric Units) Analysis of Underground Water Tank Using SAP2000 Table of Content Objective... 3 Problem... 3 Step by Step... 6 1. Start Model with Template...
More informationEffect of slurry clogging phenomena on the face stability of slurryshield tunnels
Effect of slurry clogging phenomena on the face stability of slurryshield tunnels InMo Lee & Sam Lee Korea University, Seoul, Korea KiHoon Choi Dooosan Industrial & Development Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea
More informationPILE FOUNDATION. Pile
PILE FOUNDATION. One or more of the followings: (a)transfer load to stratum of adequate capacity (b)resist lateral loads. (c) Transfer loads through a scour zone to bearing stratum 1 (d)anchor structures
More informationc. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.
Design Manual Chapter 6  Geotechnical 6B  Subsurface Exploration Program 6B2 Testing A. General Information Several testing methods can be used to measure soil engineering properties. The advantages,
More informationSPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT 1.0 SOIL IMPROVEMENT 1.1 General Soil Investigation Information are provided in Part B1 annex as a guide to the Contractor for his consideration
More informationAn Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test
An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test Yongyuth Sirisriphet 1, Kitidech Santichaianant 2 1 Graduated student: Faculty of Industrial Education in and Technology. King Mongkut's University of Technology
More informationCopyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd. www.casaxps.com. Centre of Mass
Centre of Mass A central theme in mathematical modelling is that of reducing complex problems to simpler, and hopefully, equivalent problems for which mathematical analysis is possible. The concept of
More informationFric3. force F k and the equation (4.2) may be used. The sense of F k is opposite
4. FRICTION 4.1 Laws of friction. We know from experience that when two bodies tend to slide on each other a resisting force appears at their surface of contact which opposes their relative motion. The
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations  Scope for Improvement  Examples
Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations  Scope for Improvement  Examples Prof. V.S.Raju (Formerly: Director, IIT Delhi & Professor and Dean, IIT Madras) Email: rajuvs_b@yahoo.com
More informationThe kinematic interaction of a single pile with heterogeneous soil
Earthquake Ground Motion: Input Definition for Aseismic Design 135 The kinematic interaction of a single pile with heterogeneous soil M. Maugeri, E. Motta, E. Raciti & D. Ardita Department of Civil and
More informationFoundation Size Effect on Modulus of Subgrade Reaction on Sandy Soils
Foundation Size Effect on Modulus of Subgrade Reaction on Sandy Soils Aminaton Marto Professor of Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Technology Malaysia (UTM) 81310 Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia;
More informationBending Stress in Beams
93673600 Bending Stress in Beams Derive a relationship for bending stress in a beam: Basic Assumptions:. Deflections are very small with respect to the depth of the beam. Plane sections before bending
More informationEarth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for NonGeotechnical Engineers
PDHonline Course C155 (2 PDH) Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for NonGeotechnical Engineers Instructor: Richard P. Weber, P.E. 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA
More informationGround improvement using the vibrostone column technique
Ground improvement using the vibrostone column technique A. Kosho 1 A.L.T.E.A & Geostudio 2000, Durres, Albania ABSTRACT The vibro stone columns technique is one of the most used techniques for ground
More informationDetermination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils
Proceedings World Geothermal Congress Bali, Indonesia,  April Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils Indra Noer Hamdhan 1 and Barry G. Clarke 2 1 Bandung National of Institute
More informationEstimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah
Estimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah Report Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation Research Division by Steven F. Bartlett, PhD. P.E. Assistant Professor
More informationMECHANICS OF SOLIDS  BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.
MECHANICS OF SOLIDS  BEAMS TUTOIAL 1 STESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING This is the first tutorial on bending of beams designed for anyone wishing to study it at a fairly advanced level. You should judge
More informationSite effects on ground motion
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Site effects on ground motion Ioannis N. Psycharis Site effects Ground motion propagation from source to site (Kramer, 1996)
More informationFigure 2.31. CPT Equipment
Soil tests (1) Insitu test In order to sound the strength of the soils in Las Colinas Mountain, portable cone penetration tests (Japan Geotechnical Society, 1995) were performed at three points C1C3
More informationWhat is the most obvious difference between pipe flow and open channel flow????????????? (in terms of flow conditions and energy situation)
OPEN CHANNEL FLOW 1 3 Question What is the most obvious difference between pipe flow and open channel flow????????????? (in terms of flow conditions and energy situation) Typical open channel shapes Figure
More informationSolid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation
Solid Mechanics Stress What you ll learn: What is stress? Why stress is important? What are normal and shear stresses? What is strain? Hooke s law (relationship between stress and strain) Stress strain
More informationGeotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture No. # 28 Last lecture we have covered this Atterberg limit,
More informationCHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOILSHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION
391 CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOILSHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION 9.1 OVERVIEW OF FE SOILSTRUCTURE INTERACTION Clough and Denby (1969) introduced Finite Element analysis into the soilstructure interaction
More informationANALYSIS FOR BEHAVIOR AND ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CORBELS WITH HYBRID REINFORCEMENT
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 6, Issue 10, Oct 2015, pp. 2535 Article ID: IJCIET_06_10_003 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=6&itype=10
More informationDimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes. PD 26 rev D 21/09/05
Dimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes 21/09/05 Page 1 of 15 1. Foreword This document details a method for the structural design of Stanton Bonna Elliptical pipes for the common conditions
More informationAbstract. Keywords. Pouya Salari 1, Gholam Reza Lashkaripour 2*, Mohammad Ghafoori 2. Email: * lashkaripour@um.ac.ir
Open Journal of Geology, 2015, 5, 2312 Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg http://dx.doi.org/./ojg.2015.55021 Presentation of Empirical Equations for Estimating Internal
More informationDrained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength
Drained and Undrained Conditions Undrained and Drained Shear Strength Lecture No. October, 00 Drained condition occurs when there is no change in pore water pressure due to external loading. In a drained
More informationNEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION AND SETTLEMENT OF PILES. Dr. Bengt H. Fellenius, P. Eng. University of Ottawa, Canada
Fellenius, B. H., 1984. Negative skin friction and settlement of piles. Second International Seminar, Pile Foundations, Nanyang Technological Institute, Singapore, November 2830, 12 p. NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION
More informationNew Technique Assessment of Plastic Limit of Soft Clay Particularly Peat Soils
Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, Vol.73, No.1, June 13 New Technique Assessment of Plastic Limit of Soft Clay Particularly Peat Soils by Rashidah ADON *, Noriyuki YASUFUKU **,
More informationChapitre 3. Effective Stress 1 and Pore Water Pressure 2
Soil Mechanics Effectie Stress and Pore Water Pressure page 1 Contents of this chapter : CHAPITRE. EFFECTIVE STRESS AND PORE WATER PRESSURE...1.1 STRESSES IN A SATURATED SOIL...1.2 CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE
More informationEstimation of Adjacent Building Settlement During Drilling of Urban Tunnels
Estimation of Adjacent Building During Drilling of Urban Tunnels Shahram Pourakbar 1, Mohammad Azadi 2, Bujang B. K. Huat 1, Afshin Asadi 1 1 Department of Civil Engineering, University Putra Malaysia
More informationDYNAMIC ANALYSIS ON STEEL FIBRE
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 2, MarchApril 2016, pp. 179 184, Article ID: IJCIET_07_02_015 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=2
More informationLaterally Loaded Piles
Laterally Loaded Piles 1 Soil Response Modelled by py Curves In order to properly analyze a laterally loaded pile foundation in soil/rock, a nonlinear relationship needs to be applied that provides soil
More informationEmbedded Retaining Wall Design Engineering or Paradox?
Embedded Retaining Wall Design Engineering or Paradox? A personal viewpoint by A.Y. Chmoulian, associate at Royal Haskoning Introduction Retaining wall design theory is a complicated subject with a long
More information1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids
1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties What is fluid mechanics? As its name suggests it is the branch of applied mechanics concerned with the statics and dynamics of fluids  both liquids and gases.
More informationCRDC Standard Test Method for Determining the California Bearing Ratio of Soils*
(Issued 1 Dec. 1995) C654 CRDC 65495 Standard Test Method for Determining the California Bearing Ratio of Soils* 1. Scope. 1.1 This test method is used for determining the California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
More informationMECHANICS OF SOLIDS  BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4  COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS
MECHANICS OF SOLIDS  BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4  COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS This the fourth and final tutorial on bending of beams. You should judge our progress b completing the self assessment exercises.
More informationBenchmarking MultiDimensional Large Strain Consolidation Analyses D. Priestley 1, M.D. Fredlund 2 and D. van Zyl 3
Benchmarking MultiDimensional Large Strain Consolidation Analyses D. Priestley 1, M.D. Fredlund 2 and D. van Zyl 3 1,3 University of British Columbia 6350 Stores Road Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4 2 SoilVision
More informationSoil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters
Soil Mechanics Shear Strength of Soils ChihPing Lin National Chiao Tung Univ. cplin@mail.nctu.edu.tw 1 Outline Shear Failure Soil Strength MohrCoulomb Failure Criterion Laboratory Shear Strength Test
More informationCOMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2
(PREVIEW) SP 36 (Part 2) : 1988 COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2 IS 1893 : 1979 (Reaffirmed 1987) CODE OF PRACTICE FOR SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION FOR FOUNDATIONS 1.1 This code deals
More information