Attorney Grievance Defense Character and Fitness Representation
|
|
- Rolf Tate
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 70 Orders of Discipline and Disability Disbarment David B. Dunn, P62773, Detroit, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #10, effective June 6, The respondent did not appear at the hearing and was found to be in default for failing to respond to the order to show cause. Based on the respondent s default, the hearing panel found that the respondent committed the criminal offenses of conspiracy to commit perjury, in violation of MCL a, and solicitation of perjury, in violation of MCL B. By engaging in conduct that violates a criminal law of the United States, the respondent was also found to have violated MCR 9.104(5). The hearing panel ordered that the respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in Michigan. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1, The respondent has been continuously suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since February 20, Please see notice of automatic suspension for failure to pay costs, issued February 20, Automatic Reinstatement Attorney Grievance Defense Character and Fitness Representation Former Macomb County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney (24 years) and former Attorney Discipline Board Hearing Panel Chairperson (23 years) welcomes the opportunity to represent attorneys in disciplinary and grievance proceedings, and law school graduates in character and fitness hearings. Steven Kaplan, Attorney at Law Adjunct Law Professor, M.S.U. College of Law Law Offices of Rodnick, Unger, and Kaner, PC 3280 East 13 Mile Road Warren, MI Office (586) Cell (248) ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE DEFENSE John L. Coté Attorney and Counselor to the Legal Profession SM Statewide Practice Well over 250 attorneys and many judges have relied on Jack Coté for competent and effective legal representation at all stages of disciplinary proceeding and counseling on ethical issues. Former chair (5 years) of Attorney Discipline Board. Served 7 years by Supreme Court appointment. Expert testimony on standard of care in legal malpractice cases. Experienced handling of Character and Fitness matters at all stages. Outstanding Attorney Award, from Ingham County Bar Association in memory of Leo A. Farhat for outstanding trial achievements Fountain View Circle, #3 Holland, MI Fax: or Thomas James Shannon, P35152, Grosse Pointe, effective June 16, The respondent was suspended from the practice of law in Michigan for 90 days, effective March 14, In accordance with MCR 9.123(A), the suspension was terminated with the respondent s filing of an affidavit of compliance with the clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court on June 16, Reprimand (By Consent) David S. Brady, P11106, St. Joseph, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Berrien County Hearing Panel #1, effective June 6, The respondent and the grievance administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. Based on the respondent s plea of no contest, the panel found the respondent made statements with reckless disregard as to their truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, in violation of MRPC 8.2(a). The panel also found that the respondent violated MRPC 8.4(a) and MCR 9.104(4). In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that the respondent be reprimanded and pay costs in the amount of $ Suspension Michael L. Donaldson, P35780, Plymouth, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri- County Hearing Panel #15, for 60 days, effective June 18, The respondent filed an answer to the formal complaint and appeared at the hearing. Based on the stipulated motion regarding misconduct filed by the parties, the panel found that the respondent held funds other than client or third-person funds in an IOLTA, in violation of MRPC 1.15(a)(3); failed to hold property of his clients or third persons separately from his own, in violation of MRPC 1.15(d); and deposited his own funds into an IOLTA in an amount more than reasonably necessary to pay financial institution service charges or fees, or to obtain a waiver of service charges or fees, in violation of MRPC 1.15(f). The panel also found that the respondent violated MRPC 8.4(a) and MCR 9.104(4). for 60 days and assessed costs in the amount of $1,
2 August 2014 Michigan Bar Journal Orders of Discipline and Disability 71 Suspension and Restitution Susan L. West, P56340, Farmington Hills, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #53, for 180 days, effective June 20, The respondent did not appear at the hearing and was found to be in default for her failure to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on her default, the panel found that the respondent, in a probate matter, neglected the matter, in violation of MRPC 1.1(c); failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing her client, in violation of MRPC 1.3; failed to keep her client reasonably informed about the status of her matter and failed to comply promptly with reasonable requests for information, in violation of MRPC 1.4(a); failed to refund any advance payment of fees that had not been earned, in violation of MRPC 1.16(d); failed to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of her client, in violation of MRPC 3.2; knowingly failed to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority, in violation of MRPC 8.1(a)(2); and failed to answer a request for investigation, in violation of MCR 9.104(7) and MCR 9.113(A) and (B)(2). The respondent was also found to have violated MRPC 8.4(a) and MCR 9.104(1) (4). license to practice law be suspended for 180 days and that she pay restitution in the amount of $10,741. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1, Final Suspension and Restitution Matthew C. Shepard, P71547, Troy, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #74, for three years, effective June 26, The panel issued an order of interim suspension of the respondent s license, effective April 28, 2014, based on his failure to appear at a hearing scheduled for April 21, The respondent was also found to be in default for his failure to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on the respondent s default, the panel found that he had committed professional misconduct. Specifically, the respondent neglected a legal matter, in violation of MRPC 1.1(c); failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing his client, in violation of MRPC 1.3; failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of the matter and comply promptly with reasonable requests for information, in violation of MRPC 1.4(a); failed to explain a matter to a client to the extent necessary for the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation, in violation of MRPC 1.4(b); failed to refund an unearned The Attorney Grievance Commission occasionally receives requests from complainants to withdraw a previously filed request for investigation. While it may be tempting to enter into an agreement in which a former client agrees not to report alleged misconduct to the Attorney Grievance Commission or to withdraw a pending request for investigation, lawyers are cautioned that this is not ethically permissible. MCR 9.104(10) specifies that it is misconduct to enter into an agreement or attempt to obtain an agreement that (1) the professional misconduct or terms of the settlement of a claim for professional misconduct will not be reported to the AGC, (2) a party will withdraw a request for investigation or will not cooperate with the investigation or prosecution of misconduct by the AGC, or (3) the record of any civil action for professional misconduct will be sealed from review by the AGC. There are several reasons why a request for investigation cannot be withdrawn. First, the grievance administrator is under an independent obligation to thoroughly review and investigate a request for investigation. Laypeople often do not know or fully comprehend a lawyer s myriad ethical duties. It is within the exclusive province of the AGC to conduct an investigation to determine whether there is evidence of professional misconduct. Second, the investigative or disciplinary process cannot be used to try to gain an advantageous resolution in litigation. If AGC/JTC Practice Pointers Seeking to Withdraw a Request for Investigation a former client files a legal malpractice action against a lawyer, forcing the former client to withdraw a request for investigation as part of the settlement of the legal malpractice action is prohibited. Lawyers cannot contract away their ethical obligations. Further, protection of the public, the courts, and the legal profession might warrant the filing of formal charges and, ultimately, discipline of an attorney who has engaged in misconduct. Lawyers should be aware of two relevant ethics opinions: RI-220 and RI-88. These opinions state that a lawyer may not directly or indirectly (through a client) use alleged misconduct of another lawyer as a means of obtaining an advantageous resolution of the client s matter. Consequently, a lawyer may not threaten an offending lawyer with the reporting of misconduct if a certain outcome is not obtained or warn an offending lawyer that if the matter is not resolved to the client s satisfaction, the client may report the offending conduct. This is due, in part, to the fact that lawyers are duty bound to report significant violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, raising a substantial question regarding the offending lawyer s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in accordance with MRPC 8.3(a). Accordingly, lawyers should be mindful that they risk disciplinary action if they participate in a matter in which it is agreed that a request for investigation will be withdrawn as part of resolving the matter.
3 72 Orders of Discipline and Disability defending drinking drivers Winning dui arguments and techniques To challenge probable cause, keep the prosecution s evidence out, or file effective motions, you must have a well-prepared case. From initial client contact to sentencing, Defending Drinking Drivers will guide you through every phase of a drinking driving trial. SAVE 15% with coupon code The book begins with the nuts & bolts of drunk driving defense, then focuses on teaching how to create reasonable doubt. Particular attention is given to analyzing specific testing methods and handling expert witnesses. This two-volume set offers court-tested strategy, practice tips, sample arguments and the most up-to-date case law and statutory changes to keep you on the cutting edge of drunk driving law. Practical, step-by-step guidance helps you: $149 $ with code MBJ15 MBJ15 Identify sources of error in BAC calculations Successfully attack damaging chemical test results Effectively cross-examine the prosecution s key witnesses Find weaknesses in the use of field sobriety tests Suppress audiovisual evidence Know when and how to use experts cost-effectively author: patrick t. barone Patrick T. Barone has an AV (highest) rating from Martindale- Hubbell, and since 2009 has been included in the highly selective U.S. News & World Report s America s Best Lawyers, while the Barone Defense Firm appears in their companion America s Best Law Firms. He has been rated Seriously Outstanding by Super Lawyers, rated Outstanding/10.0 by AVVO, and has recently been rated as among the top 5 percent of Michigan s lawyers by Leading Lawyers magazine. Mr. Barone is the principal and founding member of The Barone Defense Firm, whose practice is limited exclusively to DUI cases including those involving injury or death. To purchase your copy of Patrick Barone s guide to winning DUI arguments, go to: jamespublishing.com/shop/defending-drinking-drivers/... With offices in Birmingham and Grand Rapids, The Barone Defense Firm accepts referrals from throughout Michigan. Call legal fee paid in advance, in violation of MRPC 1.15(d); and failed to respond to a lawful demand for information by a disciplinary authority, in violation of MRPC 8.1(a)(2). The panel also found that the respondent violated MRPC 8.4(b) and (c), and MCR 9.104(2) (4). The hearing panel ordered that the respondent s license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for three years and that he pay restitution in the amount of $500. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1, The respondent has been continuously suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since April 28, Please see notice of interim suspension pursuant to MCR 9.115(H), issued April 28, Automatic Interim Suspensions Nader W. Nassif, P72557, Royal Oak, effective May 23, The respondent pleaded no contest, in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court, to the charge of felonious assault, a felony, in violation of MCL In accordance with MCR 9.120(B)(1), the respondent s license to practice law in Michigan was automatically suspended the date she was convicted. The interim suspension will remain in effect until the effective date of an order filed by a hearing panel. Derrick N. Okonmah, P68221, Clarkston, effective June 10, The respondent pleaded guilty, in the Oakland County Circuit Court, to the charge of operating while intoxicated third or subsequent offense, a felony, in violation of MCR In accordance with MCR 9.120(B)(1), the respondent s license to practice law in Michigan was automatically suspended the date he was convicted. The interim suspension will remain in effect until the effective date of an order filed by a hearing panel. Suspension (By Consent) J. Kim Welch, P59766, Clarkston, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #66, for 180 days, effective July 3, The respondent and the grievance administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR
4 August 2014 Michigan Bar Journal Orders of Discipline and Disability (F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. Based on the respondent s plea of no contest to the allegations in the first amended formal complaint, the panel found that the respondent handled a client s legal matter without preparation adequate in the circumstances, in violation of MRPC 1.1(b); neglected five different clients legal matters, in violation of MRPC 1.1(c); failed to seek the lawful objectives of his client through reasonably available means, in violation of MRPC 1.2(a); counseled a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knew was illegal or fraudulent, in violation of MRPC 1.2(c); failed to act with reasonable diligence in representing four clients, in violation of MRPC 1.3; failed to keep three of his clients reasonably informed about the status of their legal matters, in violation of MRPC 1.4(a); in seven matters, failed to explain matters to the extent necessary to permit his clients to make informed decisions, in violation of MRPC 1.4(b); collected an excessive or illegal fee with regard to five clients, in violation of MRPC 1.5(a); failed to communicate the basis or rate of his fee to two clients, in violation of MRPC 1.5(b); knowingly revealed a confidence or secret of a client, in violation of MRPC 1.6(b); failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent employees, associates, and others from disclosing confidences or secrets of a client, in violation of MRPC 1.6(d); in three matters, failed to hold client property in connection with a representation in an IOLTA, in violation of MRPC 1.15(c); failed to keep property of a client or third person in connection with the representation separate from the lawyer s own property, in violation of MRPC 1.15(d); failed to deposit legal fees and costs that had been paid in advance in three matters, in a client trust account, in violation of MRPC 1.15(g); upon termination of the representation in four matters, the respondent failed to refund the advance payment of fees that had not been earned, in violation of MRPC 1.16(d); failed to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of a client, in violation of MRPC 3.2; knowingly made a false statement of material fact, in violation of MRPC 3.3(a)(1); knowingly disobeyed an obligation under the rules of a tribunal in two matters, in violation of MRPC 3.4; failed to make reasonable efforts to ensure that a nonlawyer s conduct was compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer, in violation of MRPC 5.3(b); made a knowing misrepresentation of facts or circumstances surrounding three requests for investigation, in violation of MCR 9.104(6); and failed to fully and fairly disclose all the facts and circumstances pertaining to the alleged misconduct in three matters, in violation of MCR 9.113(A). The panel also found that the respondent violated MRPC 8.4(a) and (b); and MCR 9.104(1) (4). In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that the respondent s license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 180 days. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1, Suspension (Pending Appeal) Charles D. Davenport, P22768, Ann Arbor, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Washtenaw County Hearing Panel #4, for one year, effective May 29, The respondent appeared at the hearing and, based on the certified copy of a judgment of conviction, the panel found that the respondent was convicted in the 15th District Court of a misdemeanor for unemployment compensation misrepresentation ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE DEFENSE Veteran trial and appellate attorneys, experienced in defending attorneys in discipline and contempt proceedings Representation in grievances, answers to requests for investigation, hearings, appeals, reinstatement petitions, ethics consultations and character and fitness proceedings KENNETH M. MOGILL JILL M. SCHINSKE 27 E. Flint St., 2nd Floor Lake Orion, MI (248) Town Center, Suite 909 Southfield, Michigan Phone: Reputation Matters Donald D. Campbell A Lawyer for Lawyers donald.campbell@ceflawyers.com CAROLE M. STANYAR 221 N. Main Street, Suite 300 Ann Arbor, MI (313) Named 2014 Lawyer of the Year by The Best Lawyers in America for ethics and professional responsibility law 10 years of service with the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission Adjunct ethics professor since 2002 Liaison to the American Bar Association s ethics committee An attorney s reputation is her most valuable possession. Sixth Circuit in United States v Llanez-Garcia
5 74 Orders of Discipline and Disability Facilitations 39 Years Judicial Experience William J. Giovan (313) Cell (313) with a loss of between $1,000 and less than $25,000, in violation of MCL (a)(ii)(A). The respondent s conduct was found to have violated a criminal law of a state or of the United States, contrary to MCR 9.104(5). for one year. The respondent filed a petition for review and a motion for stay of discipline. On June 19, 2014, the Attorney Discipline Board issued its order denying the respondent s motion for stay of discipline. This matter will be scheduled for hearing before the Attorney Discipline Board. Suspension (With Conditions) Dennis P. Mikko, P33736, Traverse City, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Grand Traverse County Hearing Panel #1, for one year, effective June 28, The respondent appeared at the hearing and filed an answer to the formal complaint. The hearing panel found that the respondent, while serving as a Family Division referee with the Grand Traverse County Circuit Court, failed to establish, maintain, enforce and personally observe high standards of conduct so that the integrity and inde pendence of the judiciary may be preserved, in violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 1; engaged in irresponsible or improper conduct which erodes public confidence in the judiciary, in violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2A; and engaged in conduct involving impropriety and the appearance of impropriety, in violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2A. The panel also found that the respondent had violated MCR 9.104(2) and (3). for one year and that he be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $2, ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE DEFENSE Experienced attorney (38 yrs) who handles criminal and civil cases, trial and appeal, is available for representation in defending attorneys in discipline proceedings. I can represent you in answering requests for investigations, grievances, and at hearings. I am also available for appeals, reinstatement petitions, and general consultation. References are available upon request. For further information, contact: LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS M. LOEB Northwestern Hwy, Ste 170 Farmington Hills, MI (248) Fax (248) tmloeb@mich.com DUTY TO REPORT AN ATTORNEY S CRIMINAL CONVICTION All Michigan attorneys are reminded of the reporting requirements of MCR 9.120(A) when a lawyer is convicted of a crime: What to Report: A lawyer s conviction of any crime, including misdemeanors. A conviction occurs upon the return of a verdict of guilty or upon the acceptance of a plea of guilty or no contest. Who Must Report: Notice must be given by all of the following: 1. The lawyer who was convicted; 2. The defense attorney who represented the lawyer; and 3. The prosecutor or other authority who prosecuted the lawyer. When to Report: Notice must be given by the lawyer, defense attorney, and prosecutor within 14 days after the conviction. Where to Report: Written notice of a lawyer s conviction must be given to: Grievance Administrator Attorney Grievance Commission Buhl Building, Ste Griswold, Detroit, MI and Attorney Discipline Board 211 W. Fort Street, Ste Detroit, MI 48226
Based on the respondent s convictions, the hearing panel found that he had violated MCR 9.104(5). Additionally, the panel
54 Orders of Discipline and Disability Disbarments Peter J. Harrington, P32481, Grosse Pointe Park, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #5, effective November 22, 2013. 1 The respondent
More informationAttorney Grievance Defense Character and Fitness Representation
68 Orders of Discipline and Disability Disbarment and Restitution Michael R. Josey, P36364, Detroit, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #19, effective January 31, 2015. 1 The respondent
More informationAttorney Grievance Defense Character and Fitness Representation
58 Orders of Discipline and Disability Disbarment William F. Doran, P12900, Phoenix, Arizona, by the Attorney Discipline Board, effective December 5, 2014. 1 The respondent was disbarred by the Supreme
More informationA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM HISTORY Michigan s system for attorney discipline has existed in its current form since 1978. With the creation of the State Bar of Michigan
More information2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:
2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: 2011AP778-D In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2013 WI 36 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Joseph M. Engl, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Joseph M.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2014 WI 2 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Steven T. Berman, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Steven T.
More informationInquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer
Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer This pamphlet provides general information relating to the purpose and procedures of the Florida lawyer discipline system. It should be read carefully and completely
More informationRULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA December 1, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RULES
More informationSupreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York 10006 (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX
Departmental Disciplinary Committee Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION When you hire a lawyer
More informationMISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM Discipline System Clients have a right to expect a high level of professional service from their lawyer. In Missouri, lawyers follow a code of ethics known as the Rules
More informationPUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
This information has been prepared for persons who wish to make or have made a complaint to The Lawyer Disciplinary Board about a lawyer. Please read it carefully. It explains the disciplinary procedures
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2014 WI 48 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Geneva E. McKinley, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Geneva
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2012 WI 123 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Bielinski, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Thomas
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 38 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: 2014AP2906-D In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jon Evenson, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v.
More informationStandards and Requirements for Specialist Certification and Recertification
Standards and Requirements for Specialist Certification and Recertification The following are Standards and Requirements for Certification and Recertification of lawyers as Criminal Law Specialists. The
More informationSubchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court
Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative
More informationThe Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction
The Circuit Court The circuit court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Virginia, and the court has authority to try a full range of both civil and criminal cases. Civil cases involve disputes
More informationHB 2845. Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT
REFERENCE TITLE: state false claims actions State of Arizona House of Representatives Fiftieth Legislature Second Regular Session HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, ARIZONA
More informationINTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES COMMISSION ON BAR DISCIPLINE GUIDELINES FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS A. PURPOSE AND NATURE OF SANCTIONS
INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES COMMISSION ON BAR DISCIPLINE GUIDELINES FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS A. PURPOSE AND NATURE OF SANCTIONS 1.1 Purpose of Lawyer Discipline Proceedings The purpose of lawyer
More informationGeneral District Courts
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
More informationYour Rights as a Complainant in the Grievance Process State of Connecticut Judicial Branch www.jud.ct.gov
Attorney Grievance Procedures in Connecticut Your Rights as a Complainant in the Grievance Process State of Connecticut Judicial Branch www.jud.ct.gov Attorney Grievance Procedures in Connecticut To the
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS Definitions Adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court in Grievance Administrator v Lopatin, 462 Mich 235, 238 n 1 (2000) AInjury@ is harm to
More informationDefending Your License
Defending Your License The How-To for Michigan Health Care Professionals www.fb-firm.com About the Author: Tariq S. Hafeez Mr. Hafeez practices in the areas of business/corporate law, healthcare law, and
More informationWEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List
WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List PLEASE COMPLETE THIS ENTIRE PAGE Date: Name: Birth Date: Business Address: Day Phone:
More informationNEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO STANDARDS FOR LEGAL SPECIALIZATION WORKERS COMPENSATION LAW
NEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO Post Office Box 93070 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87199 (505) 821-1890 Fax (505) 821-0220 e-mail mdespain@nmlegalspecialization.org
More informationBANKRUPTCY AND DEBTOR-CREDITOR LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION AND DECERTIFICATION
BANKRUPTCY AND DEBTOR-CREDITOR LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION AND DECERTIFICATION By virtue of the authority vested in the Bankruptcy and
More informationHP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
More informationChapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018
More informationCalifornia Judges Association OPINION NO. 56. (Issued: August 29, 2006)
California Judges Association OPINION NO. 56 (Issued: August 29, 2006) ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN A JUDGE OR A MEMBER OF A JUDGE S FAMILY HAS BEEN ARRESTED OR IS BEING PROSECUTED FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
More informationInformation For Defendants About Getting A Court-Appointed Attorney
Information For Defendants About Getting A Court-Appointed Attorney If you are charged with a criminal offense and cannot afford to hire an attorney, you are entitled to a court-appointed attorney. May
More informationCALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2013 WI 20 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Joan M. Boyd, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Joan M. Boyd,
More informationSEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015
SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015 INTRODUCTION JONATHAN MCFARLAND 2 IN RE REINES - CASE OVERVIEW CHRISTIE MATTHAEI 3 APPLICABLE RULES THERESA WANG 4 APPLICABLE FEDERAL
More information2008 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against R. L. McNeely, Attorney at Law:
2008 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against R. L. McNeely, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. R. L. McNeely,
More informationYour Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts
Consumer Legal Guide Your Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts Presented by the Illinois Judges Association and the Illinois State Bar Association Illinois Judges Association Traffic courts hear more cases
More informationMERCER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION XTREME CLE. 2.0 NJ CLE Credits. Charles Centinaro, Esq., Director of Attorney Ethics
MERCER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION XTREME CLE COURSE TITLE: LOCATION: Ethics with Charles Centinaro 2.0 NJ CLE Credits The Conference Center at MCCC DATE: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 TIME: SPEAKERS: 8:00 am
More informationAPPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP)
APPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP) 1. Read the enclosed summary of Program Description, Trial Requirements, Rules, Application, Agreement and Authorization and Release
More informationBRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY
BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY People make mistakes, especially young people. Juvenile lawyer Bryce Fetter believes children should get a second chance through rehabilitation rather
More informationBEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT. Parties and Appearance
BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS 11 Austin Office COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * * 201400539 v. * * CHARLES J. SEBESTA, JR., * Respondent
More informationCriminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions
Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Accused: Acquittal: Adjudication: Admissible Evidence: Affidavit: Alford Doctrine: Appeal:
More informationOctober 2005. 68 Tex. B. J. 868
October 2005 68 Tex. B. J. 868 REINSTATEMENT Robert L. Crill, 54, of Arlington, has petitioned the District Court of Tarrant County for reinstatement as a member of the State Bar of Texas. BODA ACTIONS
More informationLAWYER REGULATION. was assessed the costs and expenses of the disciplinary
SANCTIONED ATTORNEYS CHERYL C. CAYCE Bar No. 012447; File No. 04-2103 Supreme Court No. SB-06-0177-D dated Feb. 9, 2007, Cheryl C. Cayce, 2730 E. Broadway, Suite 250, Tucson, AZ 85716, a member of the
More informationAPPLICATION FOR INDIGENT REPRESENTATION
APPLICATION FOR INDIGENT REPRESENTATION AFFIDAVIT OF LICENSED ATTORNEY RESIDING OR PRACTICING LAW IN BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZORIA I,, (PRINT name of attorney completing
More informationAmerican Board of Professional Liability Attorneys *ABA Accredited Organization
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Applicant s Firm _ Street_ City _ State _ Zip _ Business Phone _ Fax E-Mail Address _ State of Principle Practice _ Other states where you practice _ Attorney Registration
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationSTANDARDS FOR ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION. The Standards for Attorney Certification are divided into two parts.
STANDARDS FOR ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION These Attorney Standards for Certification are established by Texas Board of Legal Specialization after approval of the Supreme
More informationCHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985
CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 Subchapter 6.000 General Provisions Rule 6.001 Scope; Applicability of Civil Rules; Superseded Rules and Statutes (A) Felony Cases. The rules
More information[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Nienaber (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 534.] Attorneys at law Misconduct Indefinite suspension Making affirmative
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. NIENABER. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Nienaber (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 534.] Attorneys at law Misconduct Indefinite suspension Making affirmative representations to courts
More informationGlossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench
Glossary of Terms The Glossary of Terms defines some of the most common legal terms in easy-tounderstand language. Terms are listed in alphabetical order. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
More informationThe N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463. (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense
The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463 (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense The North Carolina State Bar Disciplinary Hearing Commission did not err
More informationDEALING WITH DIFFICULT ATTORNEYS (Attorney Grievance Committee) 2014 New York State Magistrates Association Conference Syracuse, New York
DEALING WITH DIFFICULT ATTORNEYS (Attorney Grievance Committee) 2014 New York State Magistrates Association Conference Syracuse, New York REGULATION OF LAWYER CONDUCT NEW YORK STATE MAGISTRATES ASSOCIATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) ) PETITION TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY (Misdemeanor) I,, respectfully represent
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES 1. Description. The Superior Court of California, County of Orange (Court), offers a voluntary civil mediation program for
More informationINDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
2005 WI 102 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP838-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Joseph Engl, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v.
More informationINDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT
INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT PREAMBLE The Indiana Paralegal Association ("IPA") is a professional organization comprised of individual
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2013 WI 14 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Donald A. Hahnfeld, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Donald
More informationMODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program
MODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program The following is submitted as a Model Mentoring Plan for the criminal defense practice field. It was prepared by an experienced
More informationHOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP The Houston Lawyer Referral Service, Inc. (HLRS) is a non-profit corporation sponsored by the Houston Bar Association, Houston Young Lawyers Association,
More informationAn Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System
Some Things You Should Know An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System Office of the Federal Public Defender Southern District of West Virginia 300 Virginia Street
More informationBOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS For the purpose of facilitating disciplinary hearings and related proceedings that are conducted pursuant to Rule V of
More informationSTANDARDS FOR ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION. The Standards for Attorney Certification are divided into two parts.
STANDARDS FOR ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION These Attorney Standards for Certification are established by Texas Board of Legal Specialization after approval of the Supreme
More informationDisciplinary Summary
Disciplinary Summary The following compilation of disciplinary action taken by the Board of Professional Responsibility collects cases arising since 2002, along with some earlier cases published in Pacific
More informationAttorneys convicted of crimes.
Rule 214. Attorneys convicted of crimes. (a) An attorney convicted of a [serious] crime shall report the fact of such conviction within 20 days to the [Secretary of the Board] Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
More informationHow To File An Appeal In The United States
CHAPTER 7. APPELLATE RULES MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 Subchapter 7.100 Appeals to Circuit Court Rule 7.101 Scope of Rules (A) Scope of Rules. The rules in this subchapter govern appeals to the circuit
More informationHow to Complain About Lawyers and Judges in New York City
How to Complain About Lawyers and Judges in New York City COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE JUNE 2012 NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION 42 WEST 44 TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10036 INTRODUCTION The New York
More informationPETER L. OSTERMILLER Attorney at Law Kentucky Home Life Building Eighteenth Floor 239 South Fifth Street Louisville, Kentucky 40202 www.ploesq.
PETER L. OSTERMILLER Attorney at Law Kentucky Home Life Building Eighteenth Floor 239 South Fifth Street Louisville, Kentucky 40202 www.ploesq.com Telephone: (502) 736-8100 Fax: (502) 736-8129 E-mail:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. AMENDED CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN January 2015..
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, 1 (' r,f~_ilejj,,.). J/.:; r1c 1 cnufjr -. -, ; I. II. l015 JAN 8 /\ 8: Ob AMENDED CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN January 2015.. UIS7RICT or UTAH AUTHORITY.
More informationFALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
More informationAPPEARANCE, PLEA AND WAIVER
Guide to Municipal Court What Types of Cases Are Heard in Municipal Court? Cases heard in municipal court are divided into four general categories: Violations of motor vehicle and traffic laws Violations
More informationCorporate Counsel Beware: Limits Of 'No Contact Rule'
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Corporate Counsel Beware: Limits Of 'No Contact Rule'
More informationA Guide to Minnesota Criminal Procedures
t A Guide to Minnesota Criminal Procedures What's the difference between felonies, gross misdemeanors, misdemeanors and petty misdemeanors? Under Minnesota law, felonies are crimes punishable by more than
More informationFACT SHEET Contact: Office of Legislative and Public Affairs (703) 305-0289 Fax: (703) 605-0365 PAO.EOIR@usdoj.gov www.justice.gov/eoir/ Feb.
U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Office of the Director 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, Virginia 22041 FACT SHEET Contact: (703) 305-0289 Fax: (703) 605-0365
More informationDESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS
DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS This pamphlet has been provided to help you better understand the federal
More informationDecember 10, 2013. Paula Frederick General Counsel State Bar of Georgia 104 Marietta Street, Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30303 PaulaF@gabar.
December 10, 2013 College of Law Clark D. Cunningham W. Lee Burge Professor of Law & Ethics P.O. Box 4037 Atlanta, GA 30302-4037 404-413-9168 fax: 404-413-9225 cdcunningham@gsu.edu Home page: http://law.gsu.edu/ccunningham/
More informationSTATE OF NEW YORK : : ALLEGANY COUNTY DRUG COUNTY OF ALLEGANY : : TREATMENT COURT. Defendant.
STATE OF NEW YORK : : ALLEGANY COUNTY DRUG COUNTY OF ALLEGANY : : TREATMENT COURT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK against CONTRACT JOHN DOE., Defendant. I, JOHN DOE, agree to enter the Allegany County
More informationCriminal Justice 101 (Part II) Grand Jury, Trial, & Sentencing. The Charging Decision. Grand Jury 5/22/2014. Misdemeanors v.
Criminal Justice 101 (Part II) Grand Jury, Trial, & Sentencing Presented at: Office of the Attorney General 2014 Texas Crime Victim s Services Conference Transformations: Building Community Networks Grand
More informationWhat to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration
What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration Russell R. Yurk Jennings, Haug & Cunningham, L.L.P. 2800 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800 Phoenix, AZ 85004-1049 (602) 234-7819
More informationWilliam Austin Watkins, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. WILLIAM AUSTIN WATKINS Respondent No. 99 DB 2012 Attorney Registration No. 52407 (Monroe
More informationLawyers 291 CHAPTER 18 LAWYERS
Lawyers 291 CHAPTER 18 LAWYERS 292 MICHIGAN CHILD WELFARE LAW Revised: 9/1/2007 Lawyers 293 CHAPTER 18 LAWYERS 18. 1. LAWYER-GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THE CHILD 18.1.1. Lawyer-Guardian ad litem for the Child
More informationJUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM A delinquency petition is a court document alleging that a juvenile, between ages 10-16, has violated a law which would be a criminal offense if committed by an adult. Disposition
More informationC RIMINAL LAW O V E RVIEW OF T H E T E XAS C RIMINAL J USTICE P ROCESS
T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S C RIMINAL LAW 1 0 1 : O V E RVIEW OF T H E T E XAS C RIMINAL J USTICE P ROCESS A C RIMINAL LAW 1 0 1 Prepared
More informationNEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO STANDARDS FOR LEGAL SPECIALIZATION FAMILY LAW
NEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO Post Office Box 93070 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87199 (505) 821-1890 Fax (505) 821-0220 e-mail mdespain@nmlegalspecialization.org
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 51 1
Article 51. False Claims Act. 1-605. Short title; purpose. (a) This Article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) The purpose of this Article is to deter persons from knowingly causing
More informationTexas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act
Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act 36.001. Definitions In this chapter: (1) Claim means a written or electronically submitted request or demand that: (A) is signed by a provider or a fiscal agent and
More informationMICHIGAN APPELLATE ASSIGNED COUNSEL SYSTEM (MAACS) BASIC INFORMATION SHEET
MICHIGAN APPELLATE ASSIGNED COUNSEL SYSTEM (MAACS) BASIC INFORMATION SHEET NOTICE: Pursuant to MCL 780.712; MSA 28.114(102), lawyers wishing to receive appellate assignments from any circuit court must
More informationESTATE PLANNING AND PROBATE LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION, AND DECERTIFICATION
ESTATE PLANNING AND PROBATE LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION, AND DECERTIFICATION By virtue of the authority vested in the Estate Planning and
More informationOffice of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Complaints and Investigations Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility 1500 Landmark Towers 345 St. Peter Street St. Paul, MN 55102-1218 (651) 296-3952
More informationMINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT. Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them.
As amended by Chapter 16 of the 2013 Minnesota Session Laws. 15C.01 DEFINITIONS MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings
More informationGlossary of Court-related Terms
Glossary of Court-related Terms Acquittal Adjudication Appeal Arraignment Arrest Bail Bailiff Beyond a reasonable doubt Burden of proof Capital offense Certification Charge Circumstantial evidence Citation
More informationC O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C
C O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C John L. O Shea Member Direct: (513) 333-5227 Mobile: (513) 300-4012 Email: joshea@ctks.com visit superlawyers.com Top 50 Cincinnati Super Lawyer 2012,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 2 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Emory H. Booker, III, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Emory
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL : No. 734, Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : Supreme Court : : No. 52 DB 2002 Disciplinary Board v.
More informationGUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia
Case 1:11-cr-00326-SCJ-JFK Document 119-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 16 GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationProsecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia Transition Into Prosecution Program
Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia Transition Into Prosecution Program Office: Name of Beginning Lawyer: Bar No. Name of Mentor: Bar No. MODEL MENTORING PLAN OF ACTIVITIES AND EXPERIENCES FOR STATE
More informationEL PASO DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURTS TEXAS FAIR DEFENSE ACT ATTORNEY APPLICATION DO NOT USE THE BACK OF PAGES
EL PASO DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURTS TEXAS FAIR DEFENSE ACT ATTORNEY APPLICATION DO NOT USE THE BACK OF PAGES PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE. INCOMPLETE OR ILLEGIBLE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED Last Name:
More informationcourt. However, without your testimony the defendant might go unpunished.
Office of State Attorney Michael J. Satz VICTIM RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS The stages of the criminal justice system are as follows: We realize that for
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 104 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Richard W. Voss, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Richard
More information