# Elliptic integrals, the arithmetic-geometric mean and the Brent-Salamin algorithm for π

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Elliptic integrals, the arithmetic-geometric mean and the Brent-Salamin algorithm for π"

## Transcription

1 Elliptic integrals, the arithmetic-geometric mean and the Brent-Salamin algorithm for π Notes by G.J.O. Jameson Contents. The integrals I(a, b) and K(b). The arithmetic-geometric mean 3. The evaluation of I(a, b): Gauss s theorem 4. Estimates for I(a, ) for large a and I(, b) for small b 5. The integrals J(a, b) and E(b) 6. The integrals L(a, b) 7. Further evaluations in terms of the agm; the Brent-Salamin algorithm 8. Further results on K(b) and E(b).. The integrals I(a, b) and K(b) For a, b >, define I(a, b) = An important equivalent form is: π/ (a cos θ + b sin dθ. () θ) /.. We have I(a, b) = dx. () (x + a ) / (x + b ) / Proof. With the substitution x = b tan θ, the stated integral becomes π/ b sec θ (a + b tan θ) / b sec θ dθ = = π/ π/ (a + b tan θ) / cos θ dθ (a cos θ + b sin dθ. θ) / We list a number of facts that follow immediately from () or (): (I) I(a, a) = π a ; (I) (I3) I(b, a) = I(a, b); I(ca, cb) = I(a, b), hence ai(a, b) = I(, b/a); c (I4) I(a, b) decreases with a and with b; (I5) if a b, then π a I(a, b) π b.

2 Note that the substitution x = /y in () gives I(a, b) = dx. (3) ( + a x ) / ( + b x ) /.. We have I(a, b) π (ab) /. Proof. This follows from the integral Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, applied to (). Note further that, by the inequality of the means, π (ab) π ( / 4 a + ). b This upper bound for I(a, b) is also obtained directly by applying the inequality of the means to the integrand in (). Clearly, I(a, ) is undefined, and one would expect that I(a, b) as b +. This is, indeed, true. In fact, the behaviour of I(, b) for b close to is quite interesting; we return to it in section 4. The complete elliptic integral of the first kind is defined by K(b) = π/ ( b sin dθ. (4) θ) / For b, the conjugate b is defined by b = ( b ) /, so that b + b =. Then cos θ + b sin θ = b sin θ, so that I(, b) = K(b ). (An incomplete elliptic integral is one in which the integral is over a general interval [, α]. We do not consider such integrals in these notes.) Clearly, K() = π.3. We have and K(b) increases with b. Another equivalent form is: K(b) = dt. (5) ( t ) / ( b t ) / Proof. Denote this integral by I. Substituting t = sin θ, we have I = π/ cos θ( b sin cos θ dθ = K(b). θ) /.4 PROPOSITION. For b <, π K(b) = d n b n = + 4 b b4 +, (6) n=

3 where d = and d n =.3... (n ).4... (n). where Proof. By the binomial series, ( b sin θ) / = + a n b n sin n θ, n= ( ) a n = ( ) n = n n! ( )( 3) (n (n ) ) = (n) For fixed b <, the series is uniformly convergent for θ π. Now π/ sin n θdθ = πa n: identity (6) follows. In a sense, this series can be regarded as an evaluation of I(a, b), but a more effective one will be described in section 3..5 COROLLARY. For b <, + 4 b π K(b) + b 4( b ). Proof. Just note that + 4 b n= d nb n + 4 (b + b ). Hence π K(b) + b for b. These are convenient inequalities for K(b), but when translated into an inequality for I(, b) = K(b ), the right-hand inequality says I(, b) + ( π b )/(4b ) = /(4b ), and it is easily checked that this is weaker than the elementary estimate I(, b) + /b given above. 4 π The special case I(, ) The integral I(, ) equates to a beta integral, and consequently to numerous other integrals. We mention some of them, assuming familiarity with the beta and gamma functions..6 PROPOSITION. We have I(, ) = = dx ( x 4 ) / (7) dx (x 4 ) / (8) = 4 B( 4, ) (9) = Γ( 4 ) 4 π. () 3

4 Proof. For (7), substitute x = sin θ, so that x 4 = cos θ( + sin θ). Then π/ dx = ( x 4 ) / Substituting x = /y, we also have dx = ( x 4 ) / π/ ( + sin dθ = θ) / Substituting x = t /4 in (7), we obtain I(, ) = (cos θ + sin θ) / dθ = I(, ). ( y 4 ) / y dy = dy. (y 4 ) / ( t) / ( 4 t 3/4 ) dt = 4 B( 4, ). Now using the identities B(a, b) = Γ(a)Γ(b)/Γ(a + b) and Γ(a)Γ( a) = π/(sin aπ), we have Γ( ) = π and Γ( 4 )Γ( 3 4 ) = π/(sin π 4 ) = π, hence B( 4, ) = Γ( 4 )Γ( ) Γ( 3 4 ) = πγ( 4 ) π = Γ( 4 ) π..7. We have π/ (sin θ) dθ = I(, ), () / ( x 4 ) / dx = ( x ) /4 dx = 3 I(, ). () Proof. For (), substitute x = (sin θ) / in (7). Denote the two integrals in () by I, I. The substitutions x = t /4 and x = t / give I = B(, 3) and I 4 4 = B(, 5 ). The 4 identity (a + b)b(a, b + ) = bb(a, b) now gives I = I = B(, ) The arithmetic-geometric mean Given positive numbers a, b, the arithmetic mean is a = (a + b) and the geometric mean is b = (ab) /. If a = b, then a = b = a. If a > b, then a > b, since 4(a b ) = (a + b) 4ab = (a b) >. With a > b, consider the iteration given by a = a, b = b and a n+ = (a n + b n ), b n+ = (a n b n ) /. At each stage, the two new numbers are the arithmetic and geometric means of the previous two. The following facts are obvious: 4

5 (M) a n > b n ; (M) a n+ < a n and b n+ > b n ; (M3) a n+ b n+ < a n+ b n = (a n b n ), hence a n b n < n (a b). It follows that (a n ) and (b n ) converge to a common limit, which is called the arithmeticgeometric mean of a and b. We will denote it by M(a, b). Convergence is even more rapid than the estimate implied by (M3), as we will show below. First, we illustrate the procedure by the calculation of M(, ) and M(, ): n b n a n n b n a n Of course, a n and b n never actually become equal, but more decimal places would be required to show the difference at the last stage shown. In fact, in the first example, a 3 b 3 < 4, as we will see shortly. Clearly, M(a, b) = M(a n, b n ) and b n < M(a, b) < a n for all n. Also, M(ca, cb) = cm(a, b) for c >, so M(a, b) = am(, b/a) = bm(a/b, ). For further analysis of the process, define c n by a n b n = c n... With c n defined in this way, we have (M4) c n+ = (a n b n ), (M5) a n = a n+ + c n+, b n = a n+ c n+, (M6) c n = 4a n+ c n+, (M7) c n+ c n 4b. Proof. For (M4), we have c n+ = a n+ b n+ = 4 (a n + b n ) a n b n = 4 (a n b n ). (M5) follows, since a n+ = (a n + b n ), and (M6) is given by c n = (a n + b n )(a n b n ) = (a n+ )(c n+ ). Finally, (M7) follows from (M6), since a n+ > b. (M5) shows how to derive a n and b n from a n+ and b n+, reversing the agm iteration. 5

6 (M7) shows that c n (hence also a n b n ) converges to quadratically, hence very rapidly. We can derive an explicit bound for c n as follows:.. Let R > and let k be such that c k 4b/R. Then c n+k 4b/R n for all n. The same holds with b replaced by b k. Proof. The hypothesis equates to the statement for n =. Assuming it now for a general n, we have by (M7) c n+k+ < (4b) = 4b. 4b R n+ R n+ In the case M(, ), we have c = b =. Taking R = 4, we deduce c n 4/4 n for all n. For a slightly stronger variant, note that c = a a <, hence c n+ 4/(4 n ) = 4/( n+ ) for n, or c n 4/( n ) for n. In particular, c <. We finish this section with a variant of the agm iteration in the form of a single sequence instead of a pair of sequences..3. Let b >. Define a sequence (k n ) by: k = b and Then k n+ = k/ n. + k n M(, b) = n= ( + k n). Proof. Let (a n ), (b n ) be the sequences generated by the iteration for M(, b) (with a =, b = b, whether or not b < ), and let k n = b n /a n. Then k = b and k n+ = b n+ = (a nb n ) / = k/ n. a n+ a n + b n + k n So the sequence (k n ) defined by this iteration is (b n /a n ). Also, so n r= ( + k n) = a n + b n = a n+, a n a n ( + k r) = a n M(, b) as n. Quadratic convergence of (k n ) to is easily established directly: k n+ = k/ n + k n < kn / + k n = ( kn / ) < ( k n ). + k n 6

7 Another way to present this iteration is as follows. Assume now that b <. Recall that for k, the conjugate k is defined by k + k =. Clearly, if t = k / /( + k) (where k ), then t = ( k)/( + k). So we have kn+ = ( k n )/( + k n ), hence + kn+ = /( + k n ), so that M(, b) =. + kn n= 3. The evaluation of I(a, b): Gauss s theorem We now come to the basic theorem relating I(a, b) and M(a, b). It was established by Gauss in 799. There are two distinct steps, which we present as separate theorems. In the notation of section, we show first that I(a, b) = I(a, b ). It is then a straightforward deduction that I(a, b) = π/[m(a, b)]. Early proofs of the first step, including that of Gauss, were far from simple. Here we present a proof due to Newman [New] based on an ingenious substitution. 3. THEOREM. Let a b >, and let a = (a + b), b = (ab) /. Then I(a, b) = I(a, b ). () is even: Substitute Proof. We write I(a, b ) as an integral on (, ), using the fact that the integrand I(a, b ) = dx. (x + a ) / (x + b / ) x = t ab t. Then x as t and x as t +. Also, dx dt = ( + ab/t ) and 4(x + b ) = 4x + 4ab = t + ab + a b = t ( t + ab t ), hence Further, (x + b ) / = ( t + ab ). t 4(x + a ) = 4x + (a + b) = t + a + b + a b t = t (t + a )(t + b ). 7

8 Hence I(a, b ) = ( t (t + a ) / (t + b ) / ab (t + ) + ab ) t t = dt (t + a ) / (t + b ) / = I(a, b). dt Lord [Lo] gives an interesting alternative proof based on the area in polar coordinates. 3. THEOREM. We have I(a, b) = π M(a, b) () Proof. Let (a n ), (b n ) be the sequences generated by the iteration for M(a, b). By Theorem 3., I(a, b) = I(a n, b n ) for all n. Hence π a n I(a, b) for all n. Since both a n and b n converge to M(a, b), the statement follows. We describe some immediate consequences; more will follow later. π b n 3.3. We have π a + b I(a, b) π. (3) (ab) / Proof. This follows from Theorem 3., since π/(a ) I(a, b ) π/(b ). The right-hand inequality in (3) repeats., but I do not know an elementary proof of the left-hand inequality. From the expressions equivalent to I(, ) given in.6, we have: 3.4. Let M = M(, ) (.984). Then ( x 4 ) / dx = I(, ) = π M (.39), B( 4, ) = π M ( 5.446), Γ( 4 ) = (π)3/4 M / ( 3.656) Example. From the value M(, ) 6.67 found in section, we have I(, ) 8

9 Finally, we present several ways in which Theorem 3. can be rewritten in terms of K(b). Recall that I(, b) = K(b ), where b + b =, and that if k = ( b)/( + b), then k = k / /( + b) For b <, K(b) = I( + b, b). (4) Proof. By Theorem 3., I( + b, b) = I[, ( b ) / ] = I(, b ) = K(b) For < b <, K(b) = + b K K(b ) = + b K ( b / + b ( b + b ), (5) ). (6) Proof. By (4) and the property I(ca, cb) = I(a, b), c K(b) = I( + b, b) = ( + b I, b ) = + b + b K Also, by Theorem 3., K(b ) = I(, b) = I ( ) + b, b/ = + b I ( b / ) (, b/ = + b + b K + b ). ( ) b. + b Conversely, any of (4), (5), (6) implies () (to show this for (4), start by choosing c and k so that ca = + k and cb = k). For another proof of Theorem 3., based on this observation and the series expansion of ( + ke iθ ) / )( + ke iθ ) /, see [Bor, p. ]. 4. Estimates for I(a, ) for large a and I(, b) for small b In this section, we will show that I(, b) is closely approximated by log(4/b) for b close to. Equivalently, ai(a, ) is approximated by log 4a for large a, and consequently M(a, ) is approximated by F (a) =: π a log 4a. By way of illustration, F () = 6.7 to four d.p., while M(, ) This result has been known for a long time, with varying estimates of the accuracy of the approximation. For example, a version appears in [WW, p. 5], published in 97. 9

10 A highly effective method was introduced by Newman in [New], but only sketched rather briefly, with the statement given in the form ai(a, ) = log 4a+O(/a ). Following [Jam], we develop Newman s method in more detail to establish a more precise estimation. The method requires nothing more than some elementary integrals and the binomial and logarithmic series, and a weaker form of the result is obtained with very little effort. The starting point is: 4.. We have (ab) / dx = (x + a ) / (x + b ) / dx. (ab) (x / + a ) / (x + b ) / Proof. With the substitution x = ab/y, the left-hand integral becomes ab (ab) / ( a b + a y ) / ( a b + b y ) / y dy = dy. (ab) (b / + y ) / (a + y ) / where Hence b / I(, b) = H(x) dx, () H(x) =. () (x + ) / (x + b ) / Now ( + y) / > y for < y <, as is easily seen by multiplying out ( + y)( y), so for < x <, ( x ) (x + b ) < H(x) <. (3) / (x + b ) / Now observe that the substitution x = by gives b / /b / dx = (x + b ) / (y + ) dy = / sinh b. / 4. LEMMA. We have log b < / sinh < log b/ b + b. (4) / 4 Proof. Recall that sinh x = log[x + (x + ) / ], which is clearly greater than log x. Also, since ( + b) / < + b, ( ) / b + / b + = b [ + ( + / b)/ ] < b ( + b) = / b ( + b). / 4 The right-hand inequality in (4) now follows from the fact that log( + x) x.

11 where This is already enough to prove the following weak version of our result: 4.3 PROPOSITION. For < b and a, log 4 b b < I(, b) < log 4 b + b, (5) log 4a a < ai(a, ) < log 4a + a. (6) Proof. The two statements are equivalent, because ai(a, ) = I(, ). By () and (3), a Since (x + b ) / > x, we have sinh b / R (b) < I(, b) < sinh b /, R (b) < R (b) = b / b / x dx. (7) (x + b ) / x b / x dx = x dx = b. Both inequalities in (5) now follow from (4), since log b / = log 4 b. This result is sufficient to show that M(a, ) F (a) as a. To see this, write ai(a, ) = log 4a + r(a). Then I(a, ) which tends to as a, since ar(a). a log 4a = ar(a) log 4a[log 4a + r(a)], Some readers may be content with this version, but for those with the appetite for it, we now refine the method to establish closer estimates. All we need to do is improve our estimations by the insertion of further terms. ( + y) / <. Instead, we now use the stronger bound ( + y) / < y y The upper estimate in (3) only used for < y <. These are the first three terms of the binomial expansion, and the stated inequality holds because the terms of the expansion alternate in sign and decrease in magnitude. So we have instead of (3): ( x ) (x + b ) < H(x) < ( / x x4 ). (8) (x + b ) / We also need a further degree of accuracy in the estimates for sinh b / and R (b).

12 4.4 LEMMA. For < b, we have log b + b 3 / 4 3 b < sinh < log b/ b + b / 4 Proof. Again by the binomial series, we have So, as in Lemma 4., 6 b + 3 b3. (9) + b 8 b < ( + b) / < + b 8 b + 6 b3. () ( ) / b + / b + < b ( + b / 8 b + 6 b3 ) = b ( + b / 4 6 b + 3 b3 ). The right-hand inequality in (9) now follows from log( + x) x. Also, ( ) / b + / b + > b ( + b / 8 b ) = ( + B), b/ where B = 4 b 6 b (so B < 4 b). By the log series, log( + x) > x x for < x <, so log( + B) > B B > 4 b 6 b 3 b = 4 b 3 3 b. 4.5 LEMMA. For < b, we have: R (b) < b + 4 b b log, () b/ R (b) > b + 4 b b log b / 3 6 b3, () R (b) < b 5 b. (3) Proof: We can evaluate R (b) explicitly by the substitution x = b sinh t: R (b) = c(b) where c(b) = sinh (/b / ). Now c(b) b sinh t dt = b (cosh t ) dt = 4 b sinh c(b) b c(b), sinh c(b) = sinh c(b) cosh c(b) = ( ) / b / b + = b ( + b)/, so R (b) = b( + b)/ b c(b). Statement () now follows from ( + b) / < + b and c(b) > log. Statement () b / follows from the left-hand inequality in () and the right-hand one in (4).

13 Unfortunately, (3) does not quite follow from (). We prove it directly from the integral, as follows. Write x /(x + b ) / = g(x). Since g(x) < x, we have b / g(x) dx < b (b b ). For < x < b, we have by the binomial expansion again ) x x g(x) = ( x b( + x /b ) / b b + 3x4, 8b 4 and hence b g(x) dx < ( )b < 3 b. Together, these estimates give R (b) < b 5 b. We can now state the full version of our Theorem. 4.6 THEOREM. For < b and a, we have log 4 b < I(, b) < ( + 4 b ) log 4 b, (4) ( log 4a < ai(a, ) < + ) log 4a. (5) 4a Moreover, the following lower bounds also apply: Hence I(, b) > ( + 4 b ) log 4 b 7 6 b, (6) ( ai(a, ) > + ) log 4a 7 4a 6a. (7) I(, b) = ( + 4 b ) log 4 b + O(b ) for < b <, ( ai(a, ) = + ) log 4a + O(/a ) for a >. 4a Note. As this shows, the estimation log 4a + O(/a ) in [New] is not quite correct. Proof: lower bounds. By (8), (9) and (3), I(, b) > sinh b / R (b) > log 4 b + b 3 6 b ( b 5 b ) > log 4 b, (with a spare term 8 b ). Of course, the key fact is the cancellation of the term b. Also, using () instead of (3), we have I(, b) > log 4 b + b 3 6 b ( b + 4 b 4 b log 4 b ) = ( + 4 b ) log 4 b 7 6 b. 3

14 Upper bound: By (8), I(, b) < sinh b / R (b) R (b), where So by (9) and (), R (b) = b / x 4 b / dx < x 3 dx = (x + b ) / 4 b. I(, b) < log 4 b + b 8 b + 6 b3 ( b + 4 b 4 b log 4 b 3 6 b3 ) b = ( + 4 b ) log 4 b 3 6 b + 4 b3. If b < 3 4, then 3 6 b 4 b3, so I(, b) < ( + 4 b ) log 4 b. For b 3 4, we reason as follows. By., I(, b) π 4 (+ b ). Write h(b) = (+ 4 b ) log 4 b π ( + ). We find that h( 3 ) >. One verifies by differentiation that h(b) 4 b 4 is increasing for < b (we omit the details), hence h(b) > for 3 b. 4 By Gauss s theorem and the inequality /( + x) > x, applied with x = /(4a ), statement (5) translates into the following pair of inequalities for M(a, ): 4.7 COROLLARY. Let F (a) = (πa)/( log 4a). Then for a, ( ) F (a) < M(a, ) < F (a). (8) 4a Since M(a, b) = b M(a/b, ) we can derive the following bounds for M(a, b) (where a > b) in general: π ) a ( b < M(a, b) < π log(4a/b) 4a a log(4a/b). (9) Note: We mention very briefly an older, perhaps better known, approach (cf. [Bow, p. ]). Use the identity I(, b) = K(b ), and note that b when b. Define A(b ) = π/ b sin θ ( b sin dθ θ) / and B(b ) = K(b ) A(b ). One shows by direct integration that A(b ) = log[(+b )/b] and B() = log, so that when b, we have A(b ) log b and hence K(b ) log 4 b. This method can be developed to give an estimation with error term O(b log ), [Bor, p. b ], but the details are distinctly more laborious, and (even with some refinement) the end result does not achieve the accuracy of our Theorem

15 By a different method, we now establish exact upper and lower bounds for I(, b) log(/b) on (, ]. The lower bound amounts to a second proof that I(, b) > log(4/b) The expression I(, b) log(/b) increases with b for < b. Hence log 4 I(, b) log b π for < b ; () π log 4 ai(a, ) log a π for a ; () a log a + π M(a, ) π a for a. () log a + log 4 Proof. We show that K(b) log(/b ) decreases with b, so that I(, b) log(/b) = K(b ) log(/b) increases with b. Once this is proved, the inequalities follow, since I(, b) log(/b) takes the value π/ at b = and (by 4.3) tends to log 4 as b +. By.4, for b <, we have K(b) = π n= d nb n, where d = and d n =.3... (n ).4... (n). Hence K (b) = π n= nd nb n. Meanwhile, log(/b ) = log( b ), so d db log b = b b = b n. By well-known inequalities for the Wallis product, nπd n <, so K (b) < d db log(/b ). n= Application to the calculation of logarithms and π. Theorem 4.6 has pleasing applications to the calculation of logarithms (assuming π known) and π (assuming logarithms known), exploiting the rapid convergence of the agm iteration. Consider first the problem of calculating log x (where x > ). Choose n, in a way to be discussed below, and let 4a = x n, so that n log x = log 4a, which is approximated by ai(a, ). We calculate M = M(a, ), and hence I(a, ) = π/(m). Then log x is approximated by (a/n)i(a, ). How accurate is this approximation? By Theorem 4.6, log 4a = ai(a, ) r(a), where < r(a) < 4a log 4a. Hence in which log x = a r(a) I(a, ) n n, < r(a) n < log x = 4 log x 4a x. n We choose n so that this is within the desired degree of accuracy. It might seem anomalous that log x, which we are trying to calculate, appears in this error estimation, but a rough estimate for it is always readily available. 5

16 For illustration, we apply this to the calculation of log, taking n =, so that a = = 4. We find that M = M(4, ) , so our approximation is π 4 M , while in fact log = to seven d.p.. The discussion above (just taking log < ) shows that the approximation overestimates log, with error no more than 4/ 4 = /. We now turn to the question of approximating π. The simple-minded method is as follows. Choose a suitably large a. By Theorems 3. and 4.6, where π = M(a, )I(a, ) = M(a, )log 4a a + s(a), s(a) = M(a, ) r(a) 4a < M(a, )log a 4a. 3 So an approximation to π is M(a, ) log 4a, with error no more than s(a). Using our a original example with a =, this gives to five d.p., with the error estimated as no more than 8 5 (the actual error is about ). For a better approximation, one would repeat with a larger a. However, there is a way to generate a sequence of increasingly close approximations from a single agm iteration, which we now describe (cf. [Bor, Proposition 3]). In the original agm iteration, let c n = (a n b n) /. Note that c n converges rapidly π to. By Gauss s theorem, = M(a, c )I(a, c ). To apply Theorem 4.6, we need to equate I(a, c ) to an expression of the form I(d n, e n ), where e n /d n tends to. This is achieved as follows. Recall from. that a n = a n+ + c n+ and c n = 4a n+ c n+, so the arithmetic mean of a n+ and c n+ is a n, while the geometric mean is c n. So by Theorem 3., I(a n, c n ) = I(a n+, c n+ ), and hence I(a, c ) = I( n a n, n c n ) = n a n I (, c ) n. a n Since c n /a n tends to, Theorem 4.6 (or even 4.3) applies to show that I(a, c ) = lim log 4a n. n n a n c n Now take a = and b =. Then c = b, so M(a, b ) = M(a, c ), and (a n ) converges to this value. Since π = M(a, c )I(a, c ), we have established the following: 4.9 PROPOSITION. With a n, b n, c n defined in this way, we have π = lim n log 4a n. n c n 6

17 Denote this approximation by p n. With enough determination, one can derive an error estimation, but we will just illustrate the speed of convergence by performing the first three steps. Values are rounded to six significant figures. To calculate c n, we use c n = c n /(4a n ) rather than (a n b n ), since this would require much greater accuracy in the values of a n and b n. n a n b n c n p n More accurate calculation gives the value p 3 = , showing that it actually agrees with π to eight decimal places. While this expression does indeed converge rapidly to π, it has the disadvantage that it requires the calculation of logarithms at each stage. This is overcome by the Gauss-Brent- Salamin algorithm, which we describe in section The integrals J(a, b) and E(b) For a, b, define J(a, b) = π/ (a cos θ + b sin θ) / dθ. () Note that 4J(a, b) is the perimeter of the ellipse x /a + y /b =. Some immediate facts: (E) J(a, a) = (E) J(a, ) = π/ π/ a dθ = πa, a cos θ dθ = a, (E3) for c >, J(ca, cb) = cj(a, b); (E4) J(b, a) = J(a, b) (substitute θ = π φ); (E5) J(a, b) increases with a and with b; (E6) if a b, then πb J(a, b) πa. (E6) follows from (E) and (E5), since J(b, b) J(a, b) J(a, a). Since x + for x >, we have I(a, b) + J(a, b) π. For < b, we have x J(, b) π I(, b). 7

18 We start with some further inequalities for J(a, b). Given that J(a, b) is the length of the quarter-ellipse, it would seem geometrically more or less obvious that (a + b ) / J(a, b) a + b, () since this says that the curve is longer than the straight-line path between the same points, but shorter than two sides of the rectangle. An analytic proof of the right-hand inequality is very easy: since (x + y ) / x + y for positive x, y, we have (a cos θ + b sin θ) / a cos θ + b sin θ for each θ. Integration on [, π/] gives J(a, b) a + b. We will improve this inequality below. For the left-hand inequality in (), and some further estimations, we use the Cauchy- Schwarz inequality, in both its discrete and its integral form. 5.. We have J(a, b) (a + b ) /. (3) Proof. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, a cos θ + b sin θ = a(a cos θ) + b(b sin θ) (a + b ) / (a cos θ + b sin θ) /. Integrating on [, π/], we obtain a + b (a + b ) / J(a, b), hence (3). A slight variation of this reasoning gives a second lower bound, improving upon (E6). 5.. We have J(a, b) π (a + b). (4) 4 Proof. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, a cos θ + b sin θ = (a cos θ) cos θ + (b sin θ) sin θ (a cos θ + b sin θ) / (cos θ + sin θ) / = (a cos θ + b sin θ) /. Integration gives (4), since π/ cos θ dθ = π/ sin θ dθ = π 4. Note that equality holds in (3) when b =, and in (4) when b = a. 8

19 5.3. We have Equality holds when a = b. J(a, b) π (a + b ) /. (5) Proof. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for integrals (with both sides squared), ( ) π/ π/ J(a, b) (a cos θ + b sin θ) dθ = π π 4 (a + b ). Since π/( ).7, J(a, b) is actually modelled fairly well by (a + b ) /. For u = (a, b), write u = (a + b ) / : this is the Euclidean norm on R. In this notation, we have J(a, b) = π/ (a cos θ, b sin θ) dθ. The triangle inequality for vectors says that u + u u + u. We show that J(a, b) also satisfies the triangle inequality (so in fact is also a norm on R ) Let u j = (a j, b j ) (j =, ), where a j, b j. Then Proof. For each θ, we have J(u + u ) J(u ) + J(u ). (6) [(a + a ) cos θ, (b + b ) sin θ] (a cos θ, b sin θ) + (a cos θ, b sin θ). Integrating on [, π ], we deduce that J(a + a, b + b ) J(a, b ) + J(a, b ). By suitable choices of u and u, we can read off various inequalities for J(a, b). Firstly, J(a, b) J(a, ) + J(, b) = a + b, as seen in (). Secondly: Second proof of (4). Since (a + b, a + b) = (a, b) + (b, a), we have (a + b) π = J(a + b, a + b) J(a, b) + J(b, a) = J(a, b). Thirdly, we can compare J(a, b) with the linear function of b that agrees with J(a, b) at b = and b = a. The resulting upper bound improves simultaneously on those in (E6) and (). 9

20 5.5. For b a, we have J(a, b) a + Equality holds when b = and when b = a. Proof. Since (a, b) = (a b, ) + (b, b), ( π ) b. (7) J(a, b) J(a b, ) + J(b, b) = (a b) + π b. Inequality (7) reflects the fact that J(a, b) is a convex functon of b for fixed a; this also follows easily from (6). We now consider equivalent and related integrals We have J(a, b) = b (x + a ) / dx. (8) (x + b ) 3/ Proof. Substituting x = b tan θ, we obtain (x + a ) / dx. = (x + b ) 3/ π/ (a + b tan θ) / b sec θ dθ b 3 sec 3 θ = π/ (a + b tan θ) / cos θ dθ b = J(a, b). b The complete elliptic integral of the second kind is E(b) = π/ Since cos θ + b sin θ = b sin θ, we have J(, b) = E(b ). ( b sin θ) / dθ. (9) Clearly, E() = π/, E() = and E(b) decreases with b. Also, K(b) E(b) = π/ ( b sin θ) ( b sin dθ = θ) / π/ b sin θ ( b sin dθ. () θ) / We use the usual mathematical notation E (b) for the derivative d E(b). We alert the db reader to the fact that some of the literature on this subject, including [Bor], writes b where we have b and then uses E (b) to mean E(b ) We have E (b) = [E(b) K(b)] for < b <. () b

21 Proof. This follows at once by differentiating under the integral sign in (9) and comparing with () We have E(b) = ( b t ) / ( t ) / dt. () Proof. Denote this integral by I. The substitution t = sin θ gives I = π/ ( b sin θ) / cos θ cos θ dθ = E(b) For b, b π E(b) 4 b. (3) Proof. For x, we have x ( x) / x. Hence E(b) π/ and similarly for the upper bound. ( b sin θ) dθ = π ( b ), When applied to J(, b) = E(b ), (3) gives weaker inequalities than (4) and (5). We now give the power series expression. Recall from.4 that π K(b) = n= d nb n, where d = and d n =.3... (n ).4... (n). 5. PROPOSITION. For b <, π E(b) = d n n bn = 4 b 3 64 b4 + (4) n= where Proof. By the binomial series, ( b sin θ) / = + ( ) a n = ( ) n = ( )n ( n n! )( ) ( a n b n sin n θ, n=... (n 3) n + ) = (n) For fixed b <, the series is uniformly convergent for θ π. The statement follows, since π/ sin n θ dθ = π (n ) (n)

22 6. The integral L(a, b) Most of the material in this section follows the excellent exposition in [Lo]. Further results on I(a, b) and J(a, b) are most conveniently derived and expressed with the help of another integral. For a > and b, define L(a, b) = π/ cos θ (a cos θ + b sin dθ. () θ) / The first thing to note is that L(b, a) L(a, b). In fact, we have: 6.. For a and b >, L(b, a) = π/ sin θ (a cos θ + b sin dθ. () θ) / Proof. The substitution θ = π φ gives L(b, a) = π/ cos θ π/ sin φ (b cos θ + a sin dθ = θ) / (a cos φ + b sin dφ. φ) / Hence, immediately: 6.. For a, b >, L(a, b) + L(b, a) = I(a, b), (3) a L(a, b) + b L(b, a) = J(a, b). (4) 6.3 COROLLARY. For a, b >, (a b )L(a, b) = J(a, b) b I(a, b). (5) Some immediate facts: (L) L(a, ) = ; L(, b) is undefined; a (L) L(a, a) = π 4a ; (L3) L(ca, cb) = L(a, b) for c > ; c (L4) L(a, b) decreases with a and with b; (L5) L(a, b) a for all b; (L6) if a b, then π 4a L(a, b) π, and similarly for L(b, a) (by (L5) and (L)). 4b

23 6.4. We have J(a, b) = bl(b, a). (6) b Proof. Differentiate under the integral sign in the expression for J(a, b). π/4. So if we write J (b) for J(, b), then J (b) = bl(b, ). In particular, J () = L(, ) = 6.5. We have L(a, b) = L(b, a) = b dx, (7) (x + a ) / (x + b ) 3/ x dx, (8) (x + a ) / (x + b ) 3/ Proof. With the substitution x = b tan θ, the integral in (7) becomes π/ b 3 sec θ (a + b tan θ) / b 3 sec 3 θ dθ = = π/ π/ cos θ dθ (a + b tan θ) / cos θ (a cos θ + b sin dθ. θ) / The integral in (8) now follows from (3) and the integral (.) for I(a, b) If a > b, then L(a, b) < L(b, a). Proof. By (7), applied to both L(a, b) and L(b, a), L(b, a) L(a, b) = a (x + b ) b (x + a ) (x + a ) 3/ (x + b ) 3/ dx. This is positive, since the numerator is (a b )x We have b I(a, b) = L(a, b), (9) b b(a b ) b I(a, b) = b I(a, b) J(a, b). () Proof. (9) is obtained by differentiating the integral expression (.) for I(a, b) under the integral sign and comparing with (7). (The integral expressions in terms of θ do not deliver this result so readily.) Using (5) to substitute for L(a, b), we obtain (). Hence, writing I (b) for I(, b), we have I () = L(, ) = π/4. There is a corresponding expression for K (b), but we defer it to section 8. 3

24 Identities (9) and () are an example of a relationship that is expressed more pleasantly in terms of L(a, b) rather than J(a, b). More such examples will be encountered below. The analogue of the functions K(b) and E(b) is the pair of integrals L(, b ) = π/ cos θ ( b sin θ) / dθ, L(b, ) = π/ Corresponding results apply. For example, the substitution t = sin θ gives L(, b ) = ( t ) / dt ( b t ) / sin θ ( b sin dθ. θ) / (compare.3 and 5.8), and power series in terms of b are obtained by modifying.5. However, we will not introduce a special notation for these functions. Recall Theorem 4.6, which stated: log 4 < I(, b) < ( + b 4 b ) log 4 for < b <. We b now derive a corresponding estimation for J(, b) (actually using the upper bound from 4.8). 6.8 LEMMA. For < b <, where c = log 4, c = π/4. log b + c L(b, ) log b + c, () Proof. By 4.8, we have log b + log 4 I(, b) log b + π. Also, π 4 Statement () follows, by (3). L(, b). 6.9 PROPOSITION. For < b <, J(, b) = + b log b + r(b), () where c 3 b r(b) < c 4 b, with c 3 = log 4 and c 4 = 4 + π 8. Proof. Write J (t) = J(, t). By (6), J (t) = tl(t, ), so J (b) = b tl(t, ) dt. Now b ( t log t) dt = [ t log t ] b b + t dt = b log b + 4 b. By (), a lower bound for J(, b) is obtained by adding b c t dt = c b, and an upper bound by adding c b. Since J(a, ) = aj(, ), we can derive the following estimation for a >, a where c 3 /a r (a) c 4 /a. J(a, ) = a + log a a 4 + r (a),

### THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY

Chapter 8 THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY 8.1 Introduction In this chapter we present a vector algebra approach to three dimensional geometry. The aim is to present standard properties of lines and planes,

### Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction

### The cyclotomic polynomials

The cyclotomic polynomials Notes by G.J.O. Jameson 1. The definition and general results We use the notation e(t) = e 2πit. Note that e(n) = 1 for integers n, e(s + t) = e(s)e(t) for all s, t. e( 1 ) =

### Some Notes on Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series

Some Notes on Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Mark MacLean October 3, 27 UBC s courses MATH /8 and MATH introduce students to the ideas of Taylor polynomials and Taylor series in a fairly limited

### General Theory of Differential Equations Sections 2.8, 3.1-3.2, 4.1

A B I L E N E C H R I S T I A N U N I V E R S I T Y Department of Mathematics General Theory of Differential Equations Sections 2.8, 3.1-3.2, 4.1 Dr. John Ehrke Department of Mathematics Fall 2012 Questions

### 1.5. Factorisation. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style

Factorisation 1.5 Introduction In Block 4 we showed the way in which brackets were removed from algebraic expressions. Factorisation, which can be considered as the reverse of this process, is dealt with

### Solutions to Homework 10

Solutions to Homework 1 Section 7., exercise # 1 (b,d): (b) Compute the value of R f dv, where f(x, y) = y/x and R = [1, 3] [, 4]. Solution: Since f is continuous over R, f is integrable over R. Let x

### MATH 289 PROBLEM SET 1: INDUCTION. 1. The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear:

MATH 89 PROBLEM SET : INDUCTION The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear: Axiom Every nonempty subset of the set of nonnegative integers Z 0 = {0,,, 3,

Adaptive Online Gradient Descent Peter L Bartlett Division of Computer Science Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94709 bartlett@csberkeleyedu Elad Hazan IBM Almaden Research Center 650

### FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization

### Sequences and Series

Contents 6 Sequences and Series 6. Sequences and Series 6. Infinite Series 3 6.3 The Binomial Series 6 6.4 Power Series 3 6.5 Maclaurin and Taylor Series 40 Learning outcomes In this Workbook you will

### Inner Product Spaces

Math 571 Inner Product Spaces 1. Preliminaries An inner product space is a vector space V along with a function, called an inner product which associates each pair of vectors u, v with a scalar u, v, and

### MOP 2007 Black Group Integer Polynomials Yufei Zhao. Integer Polynomials. June 29, 2007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu

Integer Polynomials June 9, 007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu We will use Z[x] to denote the ring of polynomials with integer coefficients. We begin by summarizing some of the common approaches used in dealing

### Chapter 7. Induction and Recursion. Part 1. Mathematical Induction

Chapter 7. Induction and Recursion Part 1. Mathematical Induction The principle of mathematical induction is this: to establish an infinite sequence of propositions P 1, P 2, P 3,..., P n,... (or, simply

### 1. Periodic Fourier series. The Fourier expansion of a 2π-periodic function f is:

CONVERGENCE OF FOURIER SERIES 1. Periodic Fourier series. The Fourier expansion of a 2π-periodic function f is: with coefficients given by: a n = 1 π f(x) a 0 2 + a n cos(nx) + b n sin(nx), n 1 f(x) cos(nx)dx

### Math Review. for the Quantitative Reasoning Measure of the GRE revised General Test

Math Review for the Quantitative Reasoning Measure of the GRE revised General Test www.ets.org Overview This Math Review will familiarize you with the mathematical skills and concepts that are important

### Definition of Vertical Asymptote The line x = a is called a vertical asymptote of f (x) if at least one of the following is true: f (x) =

Vertical Asymptotes Definition of Vertical Asymptote The line x = a is called a vertical asymptote of f (x) if at least one of the following is true: lim f (x) = x a lim f (x) = lim x a lim f (x) = x a

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics

Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some

### 5 =5. Since 5 > 0 Since 4 7 < 0 Since 0 0

a p p e n d i x e ABSOLUTE VALUE ABSOLUTE VALUE E.1 definition. The absolute value or magnitude of a real number a is denoted by a and is defined by { a if a 0 a = a if a

### CITY UNIVERSITY LONDON. BEng Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part II BSc Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part III PART 2 EXAMINATION

No: CITY UNIVERSITY LONDON BEng Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part II BSc Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part III PART 2 EXAMINATION ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS 2 (resit) EX2005 Date: August

### Course 221: Analysis Academic year , First Semester

Course 221: Analysis Academic year 2007-08, First Semester David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1989 2007 Contents 1 Basic Theorems of Real Analysis 1 1.1 The Least Upper Bound Principle................

### Limit processes are the basis of calculus. For example, the derivative. f f (x + h) f (x)

SEC. 4.1 TAYLOR SERIES AND CALCULATION OF FUNCTIONS 187 Taylor Series 4.1 Taylor Series and Calculation of Functions Limit processes are the basis of calculus. For example, the derivative f f (x + h) f

### Section 1.1. Introduction to R n

The Calculus of Functions of Several Variables Section. Introduction to R n Calculus is the study of functional relationships and how related quantities change with each other. In your first exposure to

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights

### Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 126

Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 26 In many problems in science and engineering we have a function f(x) which is too complicated to answer the questions we d like to ask. In this chapter, we will

### CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

### Determinants, Areas and Volumes

Determinants, Areas and Volumes Theodore Voronov Part 2 Areas and Volumes The area of a two-dimensional object such as a region of the plane and the volume of a three-dimensional object such as a solid

### 5. Convergence of sequences of random variables

5. Convergence of sequences of random variables Throughout this chapter we assume that {X, X 2,...} is a sequence of r.v. and X is a r.v., and all of them are defined on the same probability space (Ω,

### Section 3.7. Rolle s Theorem and the Mean Value Theorem. Difference Equations to Differential Equations

Difference Equations to Differential Equations Section.7 Rolle s Theorem and the Mean Value Theorem The two theorems which are at the heart of this section draw connections between the instantaneous rate

### Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes

Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes Peter J. Olver 5. Inner Products and Norms The norm of a vector is a measure of its size. Besides the familiar Euclidean norm based on the dot product, there are a number

### Roots of Polynomials

Roots of Polynomials (Com S 477/577 Notes) Yan-Bin Jia Sep 24, 2015 A direct corollary of the fundamental theorem of algebra is that p(x) can be factorized over the complex domain into a product a n (x

### The Ideal Class Group

Chapter 5 The Ideal Class Group We will use Minkowski theory, which belongs to the general area of geometry of numbers, to gain insight into the ideal class group of a number field. We have already mentioned

### Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize

### Continued fractions and good approximations.

Continued fractions and good approximations We will study how to find good approximations for important real life constants A good approximation must be both accurate and easy to use For instance, our

### NON SINGULAR MATRICES. DEFINITION. (Non singular matrix) An n n A is called non singular or invertible if there exists an n n matrix B such that

NON SINGULAR MATRICES DEFINITION. (Non singular matrix) An n n A is called non singular or invertible if there exists an n n matrix B such that AB = I n = BA. Any matrix B with the above property is called

### Notes on weak convergence (MAT Spring 2006)

Notes on weak convergence (MAT4380 - Spring 2006) Kenneth H. Karlsen (CMA) February 2, 2006 1 Weak convergence In what follows, let denote an open, bounded, smooth subset of R N with N 2. We assume 1 p

### CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems

CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems Numbers play an important role in almost all areas of mathematics, not least in calculus. Virtually all calculus books contain a thorough description of the natural,

### 16.1. Sequences and Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style

Sequences and Series 16.1 Introduction In this block we develop the ground work for later blocks on infinite series and on power series. We begin with simple sequences of numbers and with finite series

### A matrix over a field F is a rectangular array of elements from F. The symbol

Chapter MATRICES Matrix arithmetic A matrix over a field F is a rectangular array of elements from F The symbol M m n (F) denotes the collection of all m n matrices over F Matrices will usually be denoted

### Lecture 3: Fourier Series: pointwise and uniform convergence.

Lecture 3: Fourier Series: pointwise and uniform convergence. 1. Introduction. At the end of the second lecture we saw that we had for each function f L ([, π]) a Fourier series f a + (a k cos kx + b k

### It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing

CHAPTER 4 Direct Proof It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing this; we now examine the most straightforward approach, a technique called direct proof. As we begin, it

### Mark Scheme (Results) Summer 2013. GCE Core Mathematics 2 (6664/01R)

Mark (Results) Summer 01 GCE Core Mathematics (6664/01R) Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications Edexcel and BTEC qualifications come from Pearson, the world s leading learning company. We provide a wide range

### it is easy to see that α = a

21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore

### A Curious Case of a Continued Fraction

A Curious Case of a Continued Fraction Abigail Faron Advisor: Dr. David Garth May 30, 204 Introduction The primary purpose of this paper is to combine the studies of continued fractions, the Fibonacci

### MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 20: Inner product spaces. Orthogonal sets.

MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 20: Inner product spaces. Orthogonal sets. Norm The notion of norm generalizes the notion of length of a vector in R n. Definition. Let V be a vector space. A function α

### 1 Lecture: Integration of rational functions by decomposition

Lecture: Integration of rational functions by decomposition into partial fractions Recognize and integrate basic rational functions, except when the denominator is a power of an irreducible quadratic.

### SMT 2014 Algebra Test Solutions February 15, 2014

1. Alice and Bob are painting a house. If Alice and Bob do not take any breaks, they will finish painting the house in 20 hours. If, however, Bob stops painting once the house is half-finished, then the

### Exercises with solutions (1)

Exercises with solutions (). Investigate the relationship between independence and correlation. (a) Two random variables X and Y are said to be correlated if and only if their covariance C XY is not equal

### Lecture Notes on Polynomials

Lecture Notes on Polynomials Arne Jensen Department of Mathematical Sciences Aalborg University c 008 Introduction These lecture notes give a very short introduction to polynomials with real and complex

### Complex Numbers and the Complex Exponential

Complex Numbers and the Complex Exponential Frank R. Kschischang The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto September 5, 2005 Numbers and Equations

### PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

### Course Notes for Math 162: Mathematical Statistics Approximation Methods in Statistics

Course Notes for Math 16: Mathematical Statistics Approximation Methods in Statistics Adam Merberg and Steven J. Miller August 18, 6 Abstract We introduce some of the approximation methods commonly used

### 3. INNER PRODUCT SPACES

. INNER PRODUCT SPACES.. Definition So far we have studied abstract vector spaces. These are a generalisation of the geometric spaces R and R. But these have more structure than just that of a vector space.

### ON LIMIT LAWS FOR CENTRAL ORDER STATISTICS UNDER POWER NORMALIZATION. E. I. Pancheva, A. Gacovska-Barandovska

Pliska Stud. Math. Bulgar. 22 (2015), STUDIA MATHEMATICA BULGARICA ON LIMIT LAWS FOR CENTRAL ORDER STATISTICS UNDER POWER NORMALIZATION E. I. Pancheva, A. Gacovska-Barandovska Smirnov (1949) derived four

### SECOND-ORDER LINEAR HOMOGENEOUS DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

L SECOND-ORDER LINEAR HOOGENEOUS DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS SECOND-ORDER LINEAR HOOGENEOUS DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH CONSTANT COEFFICIENTS A second-order linear differential equation is one of the form d

### LINE INTEGRALS OF VECTOR FUNCTIONS: GREEN S THEOREM. Contents. 2. Green s Theorem 3

LINE INTEGRALS OF VETOR FUNTIONS: GREEN S THEOREM ontents 1. A differential criterion for conservative vector fields 1 2. Green s Theorem 3 1. A differential criterion for conservative vector fields We

### Notes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan

The General Approach Notes on Factoring MA 26 Kurt Bryan Suppose I hand you n, a 2 digit integer and tell you that n is composite, with smallest prime factor around 5 digits. Finding a nontrivial factor

### MATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.

MATH 45, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS. Exercise. a Is the operator L defined on smooth functions of x, y by L u := u xx + cosu linear? b Does the answer change if we replace the operator L by the operator

### IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction

IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL R. DRNOVŠEK, T. KOŠIR Dedicated to Prof. Heydar Radjavi on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Abstract. Let S be an irreducible

### 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers.

+a 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers. Definition 1.1. (Sequence) A sequence is a function with domain N. Example 1.2. A sequence of real

### Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials

Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.

### PURE MATHEMATICS AM 27

AM SYLLABUS (013) PURE MATHEMATICS AM 7 SYLLABUS 1 Pure Mathematics AM 7 Syllabus (Available in September) Paper I(3hrs)+Paper II(3hrs) 1. AIMS To prepare students for further studies in Mathematics and

### PURE MATHEMATICS AM 27

AM Syllabus (015): Pure Mathematics AM SYLLABUS (015) PURE MATHEMATICS AM 7 SYLLABUS 1 AM Syllabus (015): Pure Mathematics Pure Mathematics AM 7 Syllabus (Available in September) Paper I(3hrs)+Paper II(3hrs)

### We call this set an n-dimensional parallelogram (with one vertex 0). We also refer to the vectors x 1,..., x n as the edges of P.

Volumes of parallelograms 1 Chapter 8 Volumes of parallelograms In the present short chapter we are going to discuss the elementary geometrical objects which we call parallelograms. These are going to

### ANALYTICAL MATHEMATICS FOR APPLICATIONS 2016 LECTURE NOTES Series

ANALYTICAL MATHEMATICS FOR APPLICATIONS 206 LECTURE NOTES 8 ISSUED 24 APRIL 206 A series is a formal sum. Series a + a 2 + a 3 + + + where { } is a sequence of real numbers. Here formal means that we don

### a 1 x + a 0 =0. (3) ax 2 + bx + c =0. (4)

ROOTS OF POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS In this unit we discuss polynomial equations. A polynomial in x of degree n, where n 0 is an integer, is an expression of the form P n (x) =a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 + + a 1 x

### Short Programs for functions on Curves

Short Programs for functions on Curves Victor S. Miller Exploratory Computer Science IBM, Thomas J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 May 6, 1986 Abstract The problem of deducing a function

### Know the following (or better yet, learn a couple and be able to derive the rest, quickly, from your knowledge of the trigonometric functions):

OCR Core Module Revision Sheet The C exam is hour 0 minutes long. You are allowed a graphics calculator. Before you go into the exam make sureyou are fully aware of the contents of theformula booklet you

### Lies My Calculator and Computer Told Me

Lies My Calculator and Computer Told Me 2 LIES MY CALCULATOR AND COMPUTER TOLD ME Lies My Calculator and Computer Told Me See Section.4 for a discussion of graphing calculators and computers with graphing

### Fourier series. Jan Philip Solovej. English summary of notes for Analysis 1. May 8, 2012

Fourier series Jan Philip Solovej English summary of notes for Analysis 1 May 8, 2012 1 JPS, Fourier series 2 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Fourier series 3 2.1 Periodic functions, trigonometric polynomials

### The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if

### t := maxγ ν subject to ν {0,1,2,...} and f(x c +γ ν d) f(x c )+cγ ν f (x c ;d).

1. Line Search Methods Let f : R n R be given and suppose that x c is our current best estimate of a solution to P min x R nf(x). A standard method for improving the estimate x c is to choose a direction

### x if x 0, x if x < 0.

Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the

### Taylor and Maclaurin Series

Taylor and Maclaurin Series In the preceding section we were able to find power series representations for a certain restricted class of functions. Here we investigate more general problems: Which functions

### UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS

number and and algebra TopIC 17 Polynomials 17.1 Overview Why learn this? Just as number is learned in stages, so too are graphs. You have been building your knowledge of graphs and functions over time.

### Student Performance Q&A:

Student Performance Q&A: AP Calculus AB and Calculus BC Free-Response Questions The following comments on the free-response questions for AP Calculus AB and Calculus BC were written by the Chief Reader,

### Tangent and normal lines to conics

4.B. Tangent and normal lines to conics Apollonius work on conics includes a study of tangent and normal lines to these curves. The purpose of this document is to relate his approaches to the modern viewpoints

### Lesson A - Natural Exponential Function and Natural Logarithm Functions

A- Lesson A - Natural Exponential Function and Natural Logarithm Functions Natural Exponential Function In Lesson 2, we explored the world of logarithms in base 0. The natural logarithm has a base of e.

### Math Department Student Learning Objectives Updated April, 2014

Math Department Student Learning Objectives Updated April, 2014 Institutional Level Outcomes: Victor Valley College has adopted the following institutional outcomes to define the learning that all students

### MATH31011/MATH41011/MATH61011: FOURIER ANALYSIS AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION. Chapter 4: Fourier Series and L 2 ([ π, π], µ) ( 1 π

MATH31011/MATH41011/MATH61011: FOURIER ANALYSIS AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION Chapter 4: Fourier Series and L ([, π], µ) Square Integrable Functions Definition. Let f : [, π] R be measurable. We say that f

### www.mathsbox.org.uk ab = c a If the coefficients a,b and c are real then either α and β are real or α and β are complex conjugates

Further Pure Summary Notes. Roots of Quadratic Equations For a quadratic equation ax + bx + c = 0 with roots α and β Sum of the roots Product of roots a + b = b a ab = c a If the coefficients a,b and c

### CONTROLLABILITY. Chapter 2. 2.1 Reachable Set and Controllability. Suppose we have a linear system described by the state equation

Chapter 2 CONTROLLABILITY 2 Reachable Set and Controllability Suppose we have a linear system described by the state equation ẋ Ax + Bu (2) x() x Consider the following problem For a given vector x in

### CONTINUED FRACTIONS, PELL S EQUATION, AND TRANSCENDENTAL NUMBERS

CONTINUED FRACTIONS, PELL S EQUATION, AND TRANSCENDENTAL NUMBERS JEREMY BOOHER Continued fractions usually get short-changed at PROMYS, but they are interesting in their own right and useful in other areas

### INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS

INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS STEVEN HEILMAN Contents 1. Homework 1 1 2. Homework 2 6 3. Homework 3 10 4. Homework 4 16 5. Homework 5 19 6. Homework 6 21 7. Homework 7 25 8. Homework 8 28

### Applications of Fourier series

Chapter Applications of Fourier series One of the applications of Fourier series is the evaluation of certain infinite sums. For example, n= n,, are computed in Chapter (see for example, Remark.4.). n=

### MATH REVIEW KIT. Reproduced with permission of the Certified General Accountant Association of Canada.

MATH REVIEW KIT Reproduced with permission of the Certified General Accountant Association of Canada. Copyright 00 by the Certified General Accountant Association of Canada and the UBC Real Estate Division.

### Inverses and powers: Rules of Matrix Arithmetic

Contents 1 Inverses and powers: Rules of Matrix Arithmetic 1.1 What about division of matrices? 1.2 Properties of the Inverse of a Matrix 1.2.1 Theorem (Uniqueness of Inverse) 1.2.2 Inverse Test 1.2.3

### The minimum number of monochromatic 4-term progressions

The minimum number of monochromatic 4-term progressions Rutgers University May 28, 2009 Monochromatic 3-term progressions Monochromatic 4-term progressions 1 Introduction Monochromatic 3-term progressions

### Lecture 6. Inverse of Matrix

Lecture 6 Inverse of Matrix Recall that any linear system can be written as a matrix equation In one dimension case, ie, A is 1 1, then can be easily solved as A x b Ax b x b A 1 A b A 1 b provided that

### Prime Numbers. Chapter Primes and Composites

Chapter 2 Prime Numbers The term factoring or factorization refers to the process of expressing an integer as the product of two or more integers in a nontrivial way, e.g., 42 = 6 7. Prime numbers are

### Subsets of Euclidean domains possessing a unique division algorithm

Subsets of Euclidean domains possessing a unique division algorithm Andrew D. Lewis 2009/03/16 Abstract Subsets of a Euclidean domain are characterised with the following objectives: (1) ensuring uniqueness

### k=1 k2, and therefore f(m + 1) = f(m) + (m + 1) 2 =

Math 104: Introduction to Analysis SOLUTIONS Alexander Givental HOMEWORK 1 1.1. Prove that 1 2 +2 2 + +n 2 = 1 n(n+1)(2n+1) for all n N. 6 Put f(n) = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6. Then f(1) = 1, i.e the theorem

### DEFINITION 5.1.1 A complex number is a matrix of the form. x y. , y x

Chapter 5 COMPLEX NUMBERS 5.1 Constructing the complex numbers One way of introducing the field C of complex numbers is via the arithmetic of matrices. DEFINITION 5.1.1 A complex number is a matrix of

### DETERMINANTS. b 2. x 2

DETERMINANTS 1 Systems of two equations in two unknowns A system of two equations in two unknowns has the form a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x 2 = b 2 This can be written more concisely in

### Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus

Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus n-dimensional Euclidean Space and Matrices Definition of n space As was learned in Math b, a point in Euclidean three space can be thought of

### An example of a computable

An example of a computable absolutely normal number Verónica Becher Santiago Figueira Abstract The first example of an absolutely normal number was given by Sierpinski in 96, twenty years before the concept

### The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem

The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem COS 528 class notes October 18, 2006 Scribe: Dávid Papp Main idea: use of the blocking flow paradigm to achieve essentially O(min{m 2/3, n 1/2 }

### Section 4.2: The Division Algorithm and Greatest Common Divisors

Section 4.2: The Division Algorithm and Greatest Common Divisors The Division Algorithm The Division Algorithm is merely long division restated as an equation. For example, the division 29 r. 20 32 948