3.1 INTRODUCTION : First two clauses of Article 22 read as follows :

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "3.1 INTRODUCTION : First two clauses of Article 22 read as follows :"

Transcription

1 CHAPTER - 3 RIGHTS OF ARRESTED PERSON UNDER ARTICLE 22(1) & (2) 3.1 INTRODUCTION : First two clauses of Article 22 read as follows : 22. Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases - (1) No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice. (2) Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate. Article 22 (1) and (2) confers four following fundamental rights upon a person who has been arrested : i) Right to be informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such ii) iii) iv) arrest. Right to consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice. Right to be produced before the nearest magistrate within twenty-four hours of his arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the Court of Magistrate. Right not to be detained in custody beyond the period of twentyfour hours without the authority of the Magistrate. 3.2 RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE GROUNDS OF ARREST : The object underlying the provision that the ground for arrest should be communicated to the person arrested appears to be this. On learning about the ground for arrest, the man will be in a position to make an application to the appropriate court for bail or move the High Court for a writ of habeas corpus.

2 61 Further, the information will enable the arrested person to prepare his defence in time for purposes of his trial. For these reasons, it has been provided in clause (1) of Article 22 that the ground for the arrest must be communicated to the person arrested as soon as possible. In re, Madhu Limaye 1 the facts were : Madhu Limaye, Member of the Lok Sabha and several other persons were arrested. Madhu Limaye addressed a petition in the form of a letter to the Supreme Court under Article 32 mentioning that he along with his companions had been arrested but had not been communicated the reasons or the grounds for arrest. It was stated that the arrested persons had been merely told that the arrest had been made under sections which are bailable. In the return filed by the State this assertion had neither been controverted nor had anything been stated with reference to it. One of the contentions raised by Madhu Limaye was that there was a violation of the mandatory provisions of Article 22 (1) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court observed that Article 22 (1) embodies a rule which has always been regarded as vital and fundamental for safeguarding personal liberty in all legal systems where the Rule of Law prevails. For example, the 6th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America contains similar provisions and so does Article XXXIV of the Japanese Constitution of In England, whenever an arrest is made without a warrant, the arrested person has a right to be informed not only that he is being arrested but also of the reasons or grounds for the arrest. The court further observed that the two requirements of Clause (1) of Article 22 are meant to afford the earliest opportunity to the arrested person to remove any mistake, misapprehension or misunderstanding in the minds of the arresting authority and, also to know exactly what the accusation against him is so that he can exercise the second right, namely of consulting a legal practitioner of his choice and to be defended by him. Those who feel called upon to deprive other persons of

3 62 liberty in the discharge of what they conceive to be their duty must, strictly and scrupulously, observe the forms and rules of law. Whenever that is not done, the petitioner would be entitled to a writ of Habeas Corpus directing his release. In the present case, the return did not contain any information as to when and by whom Madhu Limaye and other arrested persons were informed of the grounds for their arrest. It had not been contended on behalf of the state that the circumstances were such that the arrested persons must have known the general nature of the alleged offences for which they had been arrested. Hence, the Court held that Madhu Limaye and others were entitled to be released on this ground alone. 3.3 RIGHT TO CONSULT AND TO BE DEFENDED BY LEGAL PRACTITIONER : In Article 22 (1) the opportunity for securing services of lawyer is alone guaranteed. The Article does not require the state to extend legal aid as such but only requires to allow all reasonable facilities to engage a lawyer to the person arrested and detained in custody. The choice of counsel is entirely left to the arrested person. The right to consult arises soon after arrest. In Janardhan Reddy v. State of Hyderabad 2 one of the main points urged on behalf of the petitioners was that in criminal cases Nos. 17 & 18 of 1949, there was no fair trial, in as much as the persons accused in those cases were not afforded any opportunity to instruct counsel and they had remained undefended throughout the trial. So it was contended that the whole trial in these cases was bad, because the accused were denied the right of being defended by a pleader. Fourth para of the affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners read as follows : The Court never offered to facilitate my communication with my relations and friends or to adjourn the case or to appoint counsel at state expense for my defence. In fact they said they would not adjourn the case under any circumstances. Being ignorant, I did not know that I had any right to ask for any of these things.

4 63 As to the circumstances under which the accused were not represented by a lawyer a counter-affidavit filed by Mr. Hanumantha Naidu, a senior police officer, who investigated the case stated : Facilities were given to the accused to engage lawyers for their defence. In case in which the accused had no means to engage pleaders for their defence and applied to the Tribunal for appointment of pleaders at Government cost, this was done. In some cases, the accused declined to accept the pleaders appointed by the Tribunal for their defence. Some engaged pleaders of their choice at their cost. Some accused stated that they did not want any lawyer to defend them. Judges of the High Court had expressed the view that the contention that the Tribunal did not give the accused an adequate opportunity to engage lawyers was not well-founded. The Supreme Court observed in this connection that suggestion of the High Court that the curious attitude adopted by the accused, to whatever cause it may have been due, to some extent accounts for their not being represented by a lawyer cannot be ruled out. However, the Supreme Court further added that the Special Tribunal should have taken some positive steps to assign a lawyer to aid the accused in their defence. Advocate of the petitioners relied on Powell v. Alabama 3, in which the Supreme Court of America observed as : In a capital case where the defendant is unable to employ counsel and is incapable of adequately making his own defence because of ignorance, feeblemindedness, illiteracy or the like, it is the duty of the Court whether requested or not, to assign a counsel for him as a necessary requisite of due process of law. The Supreme Court while observing that the assignment of a counsel in the circumstances mentioned in the passage was highly desirable, held that the judgement cannot rest wholly on American precedents, which are based on the doctrine of due process of law, which is peculiar to the American Constitution and also on certain specific provisions bearing on the right of representation in

5 64 a criminal proceeding. The provision which was material to the contention raised was S. 271 of the Hyderabad Cr. P.C., which corresponded to S. 340 Cr. P.C., 1898, which ran as follows : Any person accused of an offence before a criminal court or against whom proceedings are instituted under this code in any such Court may of right be defended by a pleader. The Supreme Court observed that this provision must be construed liberally in favour of the accused and must be read along with the rules made by the High Courts and the circular orders issued by them enjoining that where in capital cases the accused has no means to defend himself, a counsel should be provided to defend him. The court laid down following two principles in this regard. (1) That it cannot be laid down as a rule of law that in every capital case where the accused is unrepresented, the trial should be held to be vitiated. (2) That a court of appeal or revision is not powerless to interfere if it is found that the accused was so handicapped for want of legal aid that the proceedings against him may be said to amount to negation of a fair trial. By laying down the first principle the Court, in other words, accepted the position that even in some capital cases the trial would be valid even if the accused is not represented by a lawyer. This is a literal view of Article 22 (1). The Court could not show the courage to accept the principle of Powell v. Alabama. However, by laying down second principle, the Supreme Court at least sowed a seed for further development of law in this regard in future. Another important provision in this connection is S. 303 (earlier S. 340) of Criminal Procedure Code, That Section is in these terms :

6 Any person accused of an offence before a Criminal Court, or against whom proceedings are instituted under this code, may of right be defended by a pleader of his choice. Before the Constitution come into force, this was probably the only provision from which the right of the accused to have consultation between him and his legal advisers appears to have been derived and sustained. In Ram Sarup v. Union of India 4 the facts were : Ram Sarup, petitioner was a sepoy and subject to the Army Act. He shot dead two sepoys. He was charged on three counts under S. 69 of the Army Act read with S. 302 of I.P.C. and was tried by the General Court-Martial. He was found guilty of the three charges and sentenced to death. One of the contentions raised by the petitioner was that he was not allowed to be defended at the General Court- Martial by a legal practitioner of his choice and therefore, there had been a violation of the provisions of Article 22 (1) of the Constitution. Petitioner alleged that he had expressed his desire, on many occasions, for permission to engage a practising civil lawyer to represent him at the trial but the authorities turned down those requests and told him that it was not permissible under the Military rules to allow the services of a civilian lawyer and that he would have to defend his case with the counsel he would be provided by the Military Authorities. In reply it was stated that this allegation about the petitioner's requests and their being turned down was not correct, that it was not made in the petition but was made in the reply after the State had filed its counteraffidavits in which it was stated that no such request for his representation by a legal practitioner had been made and that there had been no denial of his fundamental rights. The Supreme Court was of the opinion that the petitioner made no request for his being represented at the Court-Martial by a counsel of his choice, that consequently no such request was refused and that he cannot be said to have been denied his fundamental right of being defended by

7 66 counsel of his choice. The Court pointed out that the petitioner did not state in his petition that he had made a request for his being represented by a counsel of his choice. He had simply stated that certain of his relatives who sought interview with him subsequent to his arrest were refused permission to see him and that this procedure which resulted in denial of opportunity to him to defend himself properly by engaging a competent civilian lawyer through the resources and help of his relatives had infringed his fundamental right under Article 22 of the Constitution. If the petitioner had made any express request for being defended by a counsel of his choice, he should have stated so straightforwardly in his petition. His involved language could only mean that he could not contact his relations for their arranging a civilian lawyer for his defence. This negatived any suggestion of a request to the Military Authorities for permission to allow him representation by a practising lawyer and its refusal. The Court held on the facts that there had been no violation of the fundamental right of the petitioner to be defended by a counsel of his choice conferred under Article 22 (1) of the Constitution. In this case too, the Court took a technical view of the matter by observing that the petitioner did not state in his petition that he had made a request for his being represented by a counsel of his choice. The Court was not much impressed by the statement of the petitioner, that he could not contact his relations for their arranging a civilian lawyer for his defence. After all a person who is arrested and confined has to take the help of somebody else like relatives to make provision for engaging a lawyer. But the Court was inclined to take hyper-technical approach to hold that Article 22(1) is not violated. In Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani 5 the Supreme Court observed that Article 22 (1) directs that the right to consult an advocate of his choice shall not be denied to any person who is arrested. This does not mean that persons who are not under arrest or custody can be denied that right. The spirit and

8 67 sense of Article 22 (1) is that it is fundamental to the rule of law that the services of a lawyer shall be available for consultation to any accused person under circumstances of near-custodial interrogation. Moreover, the observance of the right against self incrimination is best promoted by conceding to the accused the right to consult a legal practitioner of his choice. Lawyer's presence is a constitutional claim in some circumstances in our country also, and in the context of Article 20(3) is an assurance of awareness and observance of the right to silence. The Court referred to Miranda decision 6 which had insisted that if an accused person asks for lawyer's assistance, at the stage of interrogation, it shall be granted before commencing or continuing with the questioning. The Court further observed that Article 20 (3) and Article 22 (1) may, in a way, be telescoped by making it prudent for the police to permit the advocate of the accused, if there be one, to be present at the time he is examined. Over-reaching Article 20(3) and Section 161(2) Cr. P.C. will be obviated by this requirement. A rule is not laid down that the Police must secure the services of a lawyer. That will lead to police station lawyer system, an abuse which breeds other vices. But if an accused person expresses the wish to have his lawyer by his side when his examination goes on, this facility shall not be denied, without being exposed to the serious reproof that involuntary self-incrimination secured in secrecy and by coercing the will, was the project. Not that a lawyer's presence is a panacea for all problems of involuntary self-crimination, for he cannot supply answers or whisper hints or otherwise interfere with the course of questioning except to intercept where intimidatory tactics are tried, caution his client where incrimination is attempted and insist on questions and answers being noted where objections are not otherwise fully appreciated. He cannot harangue the police but may help his client and complain on his behalf, although his very presence will ordinarily remove the implicit menace of a police station. The Court observed that presence of a lawyer is asking for the moon in many cases until a public

9 68 defender system becomes ubiquitous. The police need not wait more than for a reasonable while for an advocate's arrival. Nandini Satpathy's Case makes a clear departure from the literal interpretation stance of the Supreme Court in earlier cases. The case added an additional fortification to the right to counsel. The Supreme Court went a step forward in holding that Article 22(1) does not mean that persons who are not strictly under arrest or custody can be denied the right to counsel. The Court enlarged this right to include right to counsel to any accused person under circumstances of near-custodial interrogation. However, the Court took the help of Article 20 (3) and Miranda decision for this liberal interpretation. In Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. 7 the Supreme Court held that right of arrested person upon request, to have some one informed about his arrest and right to consult privately with lawyers are inherent in Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court observed that no arrest can be made because it is lawful for the Police officer to do so. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing. The justification for the exercise of it is quite another. The Police Officer must be able to justify the arrest apart from his power to do so. Arrest and detention in police lock-up of a person can cause incalculable harm to the reputation and self-esteem of a person. No arrest should be made by Police Officer without a reasonable satisfaction reached after some investigation as to the genuineness and bona fides of a complaint and a reasonable belief both as to the person's complicity and even so as to the need to effect arrest. The Supreme Court issued the following requirements : (1) An arrested person being held in custody is entitled, if he so requests, to have one friend, relative or other person who is known to him or likely to take an interest in his welfare told as far as practicable that he has been arrested and where is being detained.

10 69 (2) The Police Officer shall inform the arrested person when he is brought to the police station of this right. (3) An entry shall be required to be made in the Diary as to who was informed of the arrest. These protections from power must be held to flow from Articles 21 and 22 (1) and enforced strictly. The above requirements shall be followed in all cases of arrest till legal provisions are made in this behalf. Section 56 (1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 in England provides : Where a person has been arrested and is being held in custody in a police station or other premises, he shall be entitled, if he so requests, to have one friend or relative or other person who is known to him or who is likely to take an interest in his welfare told, as soon as practicable except... We find a shift in judicial concern in Joginder Kumar's Case for ensuring constitutional right to arrested person. A new angle of approach was adopted to the interpretation of Article 22(1) but with the help of Article 21. The Supreme Court recognised three incidental rights of arrested person in this regard i.e. i) The right to have some one i.e. his relative or friend informed about his arrest; ii) The right to consult privately with lawyer; iii) The right to know from the police officer about this right. The Supreme Court imposed corresponding duties on the police officers. Custodial death is perhaps one of the worst crimes in a civilised society governed by the Rules of Law. The rights inherent in Article 21 and 22 (1) of the Constitution require to be jealously and scrupulously protected. Any form of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment would fall within the inhibition of Article 21 of the Constitution, whether it occurs during investigation, interrogation or otherwise. The precious right guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution cannot be denied to convicts, under-trials,

11 70 detenus and other prisoners in custody, except according to procedure established by law by placing such reasonable restrictions as are permitted by law. Therefore, the Supreme Court issued in D.K.Basu v. State of W.B. 8 the following requirements to be followed in all cases of arrest or detention till legal provisions are made in that behalf as preventive measures. (1) The police personnel carrying out the arrest and handling the interrogation of the arrestee should bear accurate, visible and clear identification and name tags with their designations. The particulars of all such police personnel who handle interrogation of the arrestee must be recorded in a register. (2) That the police officer carrying out the arrest of the arrestee shall prepare a memo of arrest at the time of arrest and such memo shall be attested by at least one witness, who may be either a member of the family of the arrestee or a respectable person of the locality from where the arrest is made. It shall also be countersigned by the arrestee and shall contain the time and date of arrest. (3) A person who has been arrested or detained and is being held in custody in a police station or interrogation centre or other lock-up shall be entitled to have one friend or relative or other person known to him or having interest in his welfare being informed, as soon as practicable, that he has been arrested and is being detained at the particular place, unless the attesting witness of the memo of arrest is himself such a friend or a relative of the arrestee. (4) The time, place of arrest and venue of custody of an arrestee must be notified by the police where the next friend or relative of the arrestee lives outside the district or town through the Legal Aid Organisation in the District

12 71 and the police station of the area concerned telegraphically within a period of 8 to 12 hours after the arrest. (5) The person arrested must be made aware of this right to have someone informed of his arrest or detention as soon as he is put under arrest or is detained. (6) An entry must be made in the diary at the place of detention regarding the arrest of the person which shall also disclose the name of the next friend of the person who has been informed of the arrest and the names and particulars of the police officials in whose custody the arrestee is. (7) The arrestee should, where he so requests, be also examined at the time of his arrest and major and minor injuries, if any, present on his/her body, must be recorded at that time. The Inspection Memo must be signed both by the arrestee and the police officer effecting the arrest and its copy provided to the arrestee. (8) The arrestee should be subjected to medical examination by a trained doctor every 48 hours during his detention in custody, by a doctor in the panel of approved doctors appointed by Director, Health Services of the concerned State or Union Territory. Director, Health Services should prepare such a panel for all Tehsils and Districts as well. (9) Copies of all the documents including the memo of arrest, referred to above, should be sent to illaqa Magistrate for his record. (10) The arrestee may be permitted to meet his lawyer during interrogation, though not throughout the interrogation. (11) A police control room should be provided at all Districts and State headquarters, where information regarding the arrest and the place of custody of the arrestee shall be communicated by the Officer causing the arrest, within

13 72 12 hours of effecting the arrest and at the police control room it should be displayed on a conspicuous notice board. The Court emphasized that failure to comply with the said requirements shall apart from rendering the concerned official liable for departmental action, also render him liable to be punished for contempt of Court and the proceedings for contempt of Court may be instituted in any High Court of the country, having territorial jurisdiction over the matter. The requirements flow from Articles 21 and 22 (1) of the Constitution and need to be strictly followed. The requirements are in addition to the constitutional and statutory safeguards and do not detract from various other directions given by the Courts from time to time in connection with the safeguarding of the rights and dignity of the arrestee. Speaking on the right to compensation to arrestee in case of custodial torture, the Supreme Court observed that monetary or pecuniary compensation is an appropriate and indeed an effective and sometimes perhaps the only suitable remedy for redressal of the established infringement of the fundamental right to life of a citizen by the public servants and the State is vicariously liable for their acts. The claim of the citizen is based on the principle of strict liability to which the defence of sovereign immunity is not available and the citizen must receive the amount of compensation from the State, which shall have the right to be indemnified by the wrong-doer. In the assessment of compensation, the emphasis has to be on the compensatory and not on punitive element. The objective is to apply balm to the wounds and not to punish the transgressor or the offender, as awarding appropriate punishment for the offence (irrespective of compensation) must be left to the Criminal Courts in which the offender is prosecuted; which the state in law, is duty bound to do. The award of compensation in the public law jurisdiction is also without prejudice to any other action like civil suit for damages which is

14 73 lawfully available to the victim or the heirs of the deceased victim with respect to the same matter for the tortuous act committed by the functionaries of the state. The quantum of compensation will, of course, depend upon the peculiar facts of each case and no strait jacket formula can be evolved in that behalf. The relief to address the wrong for the established invasion of the fundamental rights of the citizen under the public law jurisdiction is, thus, in addition to the traditional remedies and not in derogation of them. The amount of compensation as awarded by the Court and paid by the State to redress the wrong done, may in a given case, be adjusted against any amount which may be awarded to the claimant by way of damages in a civil suit. This was a case of PIL. A letter by the Executive Chairman, Legal Aid Services, West Bengal addressed to the Chief Justice of India drawing his attention to certain news items published in the newspapers regarding deaths in police lock-ups and custody was treated by the Supreme Court as a writ petition. The Supreme Court observed that with a view to bring in transparency, the presence of the counsel of the arrestee at some point of time during the interrogation may deter the police from using the third degree methods during interrogation. D.K. Basu's Case not only travels a path of few steps ahead of Joginder Kumar but also takes a big leap forward. In its anxiety to protect the interests of the arrested person, the Court has exhibited an instance of judicial overactivism rather judicial waywardness. The case sounds death-knell to Montesquieu's theory of separation of powers amongst three organs of the State. The Supreme Court arrogated to itself the Constituent or at least legislative power in laying down eleven requirements in this connection. It is submitted that it is a case of out-right judicial legislation. Showing concern for the plight of the arrested person is one thing and exceeding one's jurisdiction

15 74 and encroaching on the field of another organ is another thing. The Supreme Court while interpreting a provision of the Constitution may fill in the interstices but the zeal to artificially create such interstices and then fill it should be deprecated. The judicial pendulum swung to the other extreme in this case. The judiciary needs now self-discipline. This judicial hegemony needs to be checked. As the other two organs of the state cannot control or check this judicial encroachment, what is required is doctrine of judicial selfrestraint should be followed. The judiciary should restrain from trespassing in the field of another organ under the guise of interpretation of the Constitution or doing complete justice. Though these eleven requirements comprise human rights jurisprudence and it would be in the fitness of the things, if these were law, these sweeping eleven requirements laid down by the Supreme Court, it is submitted, cannot have the status of law as its source is not legislature but judiciary. It may be noted that these requirements were held to flow from Article 21 and 22 (1) jointly. 3.4 RIGHT TO BE PROVIDED WITH A LAWYER BY THE STATE In M.H.Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra 9 it was observed by the Supreme Court that generally speaking and subject to just exceptions, at least a single right of appeal on facts, where criminal conviction is fraught with long loss of liberty, is basic to civilized jurisprudence. Every step that makes the right of appeal fruitful is obligatory and every action or inaction which stultifies it is unfair and unconstitutional. Pertinent to the point are two requirements : (i) service of a copy of the judgment to the prisoner in time to file an appeal and (ii) provision of free legal services to a prisoner who is indigent or otherwise disabled from securing legal assistance where the ends of justice call for such service. Both these are State responsibilities under Article 21. Where the procedural law provides for further appeals these

16 75 requirements will similarly apply. One of the ingredients of fair procedure to a prisoner, who has to seek his liberation through the court process is lawyer's services. Judicial justice, with procedural intricacies, legal submissions and critical examination of evidence, leans upon professional expertise and a failure of equal justice under the law is on the cards where such supportive skill is absent for one side. The Indian socio-legal milieu makes free legal service at trial and higher levels, an imperative processual piece of criminal justice where deprivation of life or personal liberty hangs in the judicial balance. Partial statutory implementation of the mandate is found in S. 304 Cr. P.C., and in other situations courts cannot be inert in the face of Article 21 and 39-A. Maneka Gandhi's Case has laid down that personal liberty cannot be cut out or cut down without fair legal procedure. Enough has been set out to establish that a prisoner, deprived of his freedom by court sentence but entitled to appeal against such verdict, can claim, as part of his protection under Article 21 and as implied in his statutory right to appeal, the necessary concomitant of right to counsel to prepare and argue his appeal. If a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment, is virtually unable to exercise his constitutional or statutory right of appeal, inclusive of special leave to appeal for want of legal assistance, there is implicit in the Court under Article 142 read with Articles 21 and 39-A of the Constitution, power to assign counsel for such imprisoned individual 'for doing complete justice'. The inference is inevitable that this is a State's duty and not Government's charity. Equally affirmative is the implication that while legal services must be free to the beneficiary the lawyer himself has to be reasonably remunerated for his services. Naturally, the State concerned must pay a reasonable sum that the court may fix when assigning counsel to the prisoner. Of course, the court may judge the situation and consider from all angles whether it is necessary for the ends of justice to make available legal aid in the particular case. That discretion resides in the Court.

Legislative Brief The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2006

Legislative Brief The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2006 Legislative Brief The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2006 The Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on August 23, 2006. The Bill has been referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee

More information

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 1 BAIL AND REMAND Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Since we are governed by the rule of law, freedom of every individual within the

More information

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, 2015. DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW.

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, 2015. DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW. CAYMAN ISLANDS Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, 2015. DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW (2015 Revision) Law 26 of 2006 consolidated with 19 of 2012. Revised under

More information

ACT NO. 70 OF 1971 AN ACT TO DEFINE AND LIMIT THE POWERS OF CERTAIN COURTS IN PUNISHING CONTEMPTS OF COURT

ACT NO. 70 OF 1971 AN ACT TO DEFINE AND LIMIT THE POWERS OF CERTAIN COURTS IN PUNISHING CONTEMPTS OF COURT THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 ACT NO. 70 OF 1971 AN ACT TO DEFINE AND LIMIT THE POWERS OF CERTAIN COURTS IN PUNISHING CONTEMPTS OF COURT [24th December, 1971] BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty-second

More information

CUSTODY AND BAIL. CPD III Custody and bail 14A Bail before sending for trial CPD CPD 14B 14C 14G 14H

CUSTODY AND BAIL. CPD III Custody and bail 14A Bail before sending for trial CPD CPD 14B 14C 14G 14H CRIMINAL PRACTICE DIRECTIONS 2015 DIVISION III Contents of this Division CUSTODY AND BAIL 14A Bail before sending for trial 14B 14C Bail: Failure to surrender and trials in absence Penalties for failure

More information

BERMUDA COURT OF APPEAL ACT : 221

BERMUDA COURT OF APPEAL ACT : 221 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA COURT OF APPEAL ACT 1964 1964 : 221 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17A PART I CONSTITUTION OF COURT OF APPEAL Interpretation Court of Record

More information

Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000

Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Act No. 3 of 2000 Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Section TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Page 1 Short title.....................................................

More information

Guide to Criminal procedure

Guide to Criminal procedure Guide to Criminal procedure This free guide gives a general idea to members of the public as to what you may expect to encounter if you or someone you know is charged with a criminal offence. The overriding

More information

WITNESSES AT TRIAL. Case: Doorson v Netherlands. ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow

WITNESSES AT TRIAL. Case: Doorson v Netherlands. ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow Case: Doorson v Netherlands WITNESSES AT TRIAL ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow A LANDMARK DECISION A.0 RATIONALE: WHY THIS ARTICLE? WHY THIS JUDGMENT?

More information

In the Name of Allah, the most merciful and the most compassionate. Juvenile Code

In the Name of Allah, the most merciful and the most compassionate. Juvenile Code In the Name of Allah, the most merciful and the most compassionate Juvenile Code 1 Preamble Article 1 1. This Code, in compliance with the International Conventions protecting human rights and in particular

More information

Good article to know about your right!!!

Good article to know about your right!!! On Your Rights If Arrested Good article to know about your right!!! Arrest of a person A person is arrested when a police officer or a citizen takes him into custody or otherwise substantially deprives

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2014 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2014 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1516 OF 2014 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 261 of 2013] Atul Tripathi Appellant (s) Versus State of

More information

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney

More information

WITNESS PROTECTION ACT

WITNESS PROTECTION ACT LAWS OF MALAYSIA ONLINE VERSION OF UPDATED TEXT OF REPRINT Act 696 WITNESS PROTECTION ACT 2009 As at 1 May 2013 2 WITNESS PROTECTION ACT 2009 Date of Royal Assent............... 18 April 2009 Date of publication

More information

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR FOREST (PROTECTION) FORCE ACT, 2001 ACT NO. VI OF 2001 [12th April, 2001. An Act to provide for the constitution of Forest Protection Force for better protection and security of the

More information

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED] Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED] CONTENTS Section PART 1 ARREST AND CUSTODY CHAPTER 1 ARREST BY POLICE 1 Power of a constable 2 Exercise of the power Arrest without warrant Procedure following

More information

Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment

Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment 1 Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment Adopted by General Assembly resolution 43/173 of 9 December 1988 Scope of the Body of Principles These

More information

Queensland DANGEROUS PRISONERS (SEXUAL OFFENDERS) ACT 2003

Queensland DANGEROUS PRISONERS (SEXUAL OFFENDERS) ACT 2003 Queensland DANGEROUS PRISONERS (SEXUAL OFFENDERS) ACT 2003 Act No. 40 of 2003 Queensland DANGEROUS PRISONERS (SEXUAL OFFENDERS) ACT 2003 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Short title....................................................

More information

Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum

Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office PO BOX 201706 Helena, MT 59620-1706 (406) 444-3064 FAX (406) 444-3036 Memorandum To: Law and Justice Interim Committee From: Julianne Burkhardt

More information

The Criminal Procedure Rules Part 17 as in force on 2 February 2015 PART 17 EXTRADITION

The Criminal Procedure Rules Part 17 as in force on 2 February 2015 PART 17 EXTRADITION Contents of this Part PART 17 EXTRADITION Section 1: general rules When this Part applies rule 17.1 Meaning of court, presenting officer and defendant rule 17.2 Section 2: extradition proceedings in a

More information

ACT NO. 60 OF *AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONS OF I NQUIRY ANDFOR VESTI

ACT NO. 60 OF *AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONS OF I NQUIRY ANDFOR VESTI THE COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY ACT, 1952 ACT NO. 60 OF 1952 1*AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONS OF I NQUIRY ANDFOR VESTI [14th August, 1952.] BE it enacted by Parliament as follows: - 1.

More information

The Civil Rights Act of 1866

The Civil Rights Act of 1866 The Civil Rights Act of 1866 1866 Civil Rights Act 14 Stat. 27-30, April 9, 1866 A.D. CHAP. XXXI. An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their

More information

Mutual Legal Assistance (International)

Mutual Legal Assistance (International) Mutual Legal Assistance (International) 2005-32 MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE (INTERNATIONAL) ACT 2005 Principal Act Act. No. 2005-32 Commencement 23.5.2005 Assent 23.5.2005 Amending enactments Relevant current

More information

THE CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2003 BILL

THE CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2003 BILL As INTRODUCED IN RAJYA SABHA Bill No.LX of 2003 THE CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2003 A BILL further to amend the Indian Penal Code 1860, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Indian Evidence

More information

CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT. Revised Laws of Mauritius. Act 9 of January 1955

CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT. Revised Laws of Mauritius. Act 9 of January 1955 Revised Laws of Mauritius CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT Act 9 of 1954 1 January 1955 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Constitution of Court of Criminal Appeal 4. 5. Right of appeal

More information

Witness Protection Act 1995 No 87

Witness Protection Act 1995 No 87 New South Wales Witness Protection Act 1995 No 87 Status information Currency of version Current version for 5 October 2012 to date (generated 10 October 2012 at 19:15). Legislation on the NSW legislation

More information

... THE FACTS [TRANSLATION]

... THE FACTS [TRANSLATION] NIVETTE v. FRANCE DECISION 1 [TRANSLATION]... THE FACTS The applicant, Mr James Dewayne Nivette, is an American national, born in 1942 and currently in custody in Strasbourg-Elsau Prison. He was represented

More information

7. MY RIGHTS IN DEALING WITH CRIMINAL LAW AND THE GARDAÍ

7. MY RIGHTS IN DEALING WITH CRIMINAL LAW AND THE GARDAÍ 7. MY RIGHTS IN DEALING WITH CRIMINAL LAW AND THE GARDAÍ 7.1 Victim of a crime What are my rights if I have been the victim of a crime? As a victim of crime, you have the right to report that crime to

More information

What is the "Code Of Service Discipline"?

What is the Code Of Service Discipline? This booklet has been designed to provide general information on disciplinary proceedings under the Code of Service Discipline, focusing on the rights and entitlements of CF members under the Canadian

More information

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:

More information

THE LONDON SCHEME FOR EXTRADITION WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH incorporating the amendments agreed at Kingstown in November 2002.

THE LONDON SCHEME FOR EXTRADITION WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH incorporating the amendments agreed at Kingstown in November 2002. THE LONDON SCHEME FOR EXTRADITION WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH incorporating the amendments agreed at Kingstown in November 2002. 1. (1) The general provisions set out in this Scheme will govern the extradition

More information

INDIANA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹

INDIANA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹ Constitution INDIANA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹ Article 1, 13(b) Rights of accused in criminal proceedings Victims of crime, as defined by law, shall have the right to be treated with fairness, dignity and respect

More information

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza

More information

BELIZE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT CHAPTER 13 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

BELIZE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT CHAPTER 13 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 BELIZE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT CHAPTER 13 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority

More information

CRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008

CRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008 CRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008 1 What are your rights? As a human being and as a citizen you automatically have certain rights. These rights are not a gift from anyone, including the state. In fact,

More information

(9 July 2016 to date) PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY REGULATION ACT 56 OF 2001

(9 July 2016 to date) PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY REGULATION ACT 56 OF 2001 (9 July 2016 to date) PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY REGULATION ACT 56 OF 2001 (Gazette No. 23051, Notice No. 77, dated 25 January 2002. Commencement date: 14 February 2002 [Proc. R10, Gazette No. 23120, dated

More information

S G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

S G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Definitive Guideline Revised 2007 FOREWORD One of the first guidelines to be issued by the Sentencing Guidelines Council related

More information

CHAPTER 154 TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF WORKMEN

CHAPTER 154 TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF WORKMEN [Cap.154 CHAPTER 154 Act No. 45 of 1971, Law No. 4 of 1976. AN ACT TO MAKE SPECIAL PROVISIONS IN RESPECT OF THE TERMINATION OF THE SERVICES OF WORKMEN IN CERTAIN EMPLOYMENTS BY THEIR EMPLOYERS. [21 st

More information

Victims of Crime. information leaflet. Working together for a safer Scotland

Victims of Crime. information leaflet. Working together for a safer Scotland Working together for a safer Scotland If you have been a victim of crime this leaflet is to help let you know about how to find support and help and to tell you about the criminal justice system. Support

More information

PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL LEGAL AID FEES

PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL LEGAL AID FEES PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL LEGAL AID FEES Courts Policy Division Department of Justice and Equality March 2015 Note: This document does not purport to provide legal advice or to provide

More information

INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED

INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED *(Please be advised that this is a general guide only and is by no means an exhaustive summary of all criminal court hearings.

More information

PROBATION OF OFFENDERS ACT

PROBATION OF OFFENDERS ACT PROBATION OF OFFENDERS ACT CHAPTER 13:51 Act 35 of 1947 Amended by 40 of 1961 28 of 1973 45 of 1979 18 of 1994 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by 1 17.. 2 Chap. 13:51 Probation of

More information

Jurisdiction: In the High Court of the Supreme Court Judicature: Civil Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction: In the High Court of the Supreme Court Judicature: Civil Jurisdiction Case Summary Applicants McEwan, Clarke, Fraser, Persaud and Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD) v Attorney General of Guyana Application No: 21-M, 2010 1. Reference Details Jurisdiction:

More information

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A

More information

Full Text of CENTRAL ACTS ARE AVAILABLE ON TERRORISM

Full Text of CENTRAL ACTS ARE AVAILABLE ON TERRORISM Full Text of CENTRAL ACTS ARE AVAILABLE ON TERRORISM http://www.indiacode.nic.in (A) Central Acts on Terrorism Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers (Amendment ) Act, 1972 (No. 7 of 1972). Armed

More information

ATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD

ATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD ATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD A FOREWORD A1. These Guidelines set out a process by which a prosecutor may discuss an allegation of serious or complex

More information

THE KERALA CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013

THE KERALA CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013 Thirteenth Kerala Legislative Assembly Bill No. 177 THE KERALA CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013 Kerala Legislature Secretariat 2013 KERALA NIYAMASABHA PRINTING PRESS. Thirteenth Kerala Legislative Assembly

More information

Role of Police in Lagos criminal justice law reforms By Olasupo Sasore

Role of Police in Lagos criminal justice law reforms By Olasupo Sasore Role of Police in Lagos criminal justice law reforms By Olasupo Sasore THE success of any system of criminal justice administration depends on the level of efficient performance of responsibility imposed

More information

THE PUNJAB SALES TAX ON SERVICES ACT 2012

THE PUNJAB SALES TAX ON SERVICES ACT 2012 THE PUNJAB SALES TAX ON SERVICES ACT 2012 CHAPTER VIII OFFENCES AND PENALTIES 48. Offences and penalties. (1) If a person commits any offence described in column 2 of the Table below shall, in addition

More information

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AMENDMENT BILL

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AMENDMENT BILL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 3111 of 2 June 2008)

More information

Lecture 8 How Law is Proceed

Lecture 8 How Law is Proceed TRAN A803BF Hong Kong Legal System and Legal English Lecture 8 How Law is Proceed 1 8.1.1 Introduction The usual procedures to trial are as follows: Arrest The police arrests a suspect. Laying of charges

More information

LEGAL AID ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I. Establishment of Legal Aid Council. 1. Legal Aid Council. 2. Membership of the Council, etc.

LEGAL AID ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I. Establishment of Legal Aid Council. 1. Legal Aid Council. 2. Membership of the Council, etc. LEGAL AID ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I Establishment of Legal Aid Council 1. Legal Aid Council. 2. Membership of the Council, etc. 3. Director-General of Legal Aid and other staff of the Council.

More information

THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) (CAPITAL OFFENCES) BILL, Explanatory Note

THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) (CAPITAL OFFENCES) BILL, Explanatory Note THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) (CAPITAL OFFENCES) BILL, 2011 Explanatory Note (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport) This Bill seeks to amend the Constitution

More information

INSTRUCTIONS ON OMBUDSMAN

INSTRUCTIONS ON OMBUDSMAN INSTRUCTIONS ON OMBUDSMAN The Instructions for NREGS Ombudsman have been formulated under Section 27 of NREG Act with the objective of establishing a system for redressal of grievances and disposal of

More information

Crimes (Computer Hacking)

Crimes (Computer Hacking) 2009-44 CRIMES (COMPUTER HACKING) ACT 2009 by Act 2011-23 as from 23.11.2012 Principal Act Act. No. 2009-44 Commencement except ss. 15-24 14.1.2010 (LN. 2010/003) Assent 3.12.2009 Amending enactments Relevant

More information

EXTRADITION UP-TO-DATE FULL TEXT TRANSLATIONS. of the EXTRADITION LAW and the

EXTRADITION UP-TO-DATE FULL TEXT TRANSLATIONS. of the EXTRADITION LAW and the EXTRADITION UP-TO-DATE FULL TEXT TRANSLATIONS of the EXTRADITION LAW 5714-1954 and the EXTRADITION REGULATIONS (LAW PROCEDURES AND RULES OF EVIDENCE IN PETITIONS) 5731-1970 1. Extradition only under this

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 17 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 17 1 SUBCHAPTER III. CRIMINAL PROCESS. Article 17. Criminal Process. 15A-301. Criminal process generally. (a) Formal Requirements. (1) A record of each criminal process issued in the trial division of the General

More information

REVISED RULES OF COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT RULE 102 HABEAS CORPUS

REVISED RULES OF COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT RULE 102 HABEAS CORPUS REVISED RULES OF COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT RULE 102 HABEAS CORPUS Sec. 1. To what habeas corpus extends. - Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, the writ of habeas corpus shall extend

More information

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Third Committee (A/65/456/Add.1)]

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Third Committee (A/65/456/Add.1)] United Nations A/RES/65/205 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 March 2011 Sixty-fifth session Agenda item 68 (a) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report of the Third Committee (A/65/456/Add.1)]

More information

SCHEDULES. SCHEDULE 1 Section 1(3). THE ARTICLES PART I THE CONVENTION RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ARTICLE 2

SCHEDULES. SCHEDULE 1 Section 1(3). THE ARTICLES PART I THE CONVENTION RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ARTICLE 2 Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42) 1 SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1 Section 1(3). THE ARTICLES PART I THE CONVENTION RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ARTICLE 2 RIGHT TO LIFE 1 Everyone s right to life shall be protected by law. No

More information

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Accused: Acquittal: Adjudication: Admissible Evidence: Affidavit: Alford Doctrine: Appeal:

More information

NORTH CAROLINA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

NORTH CAROLINA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution NORTH CAROLINA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Article I, 37 Rights of Victims of Crime 1. Basic Rights. Victims of crime, as prescribed by law, shall be entitled to the following basic rights: a. The

More information

Judicial Communications Office

Judicial Communications Office Friday 22 March 2013 COURT FINDS PRACTICE FOR DEALING WITH NON-PAYMENT OF FINES IS UNLAWFUL Summary of Judgment On Friday 22 March 2013, the Divisional Court delivered two judgments relating to five judicial

More information

Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en) Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0409 (COD) 13132/14 NOTE From: To: Presidency DROIPEN 104 COPEN 218 CODEC 1799 Working Party on Substantive

More information

SEAFARER SUBJECT GUIDE

SEAFARER SUBJECT GUIDE USING LAWYERS IN SOUTH KOREA This Guide deals in general terms with using lawyers in South Korea. It aims to help a seafarer understand the legal profession in South Korea, and how to select, engage, and

More information

EXTRADITION UP-TO-DATE FULL TEXT TRANSLATIONS. of the. EXTRADITION LAW and the

EXTRADITION UP-TO-DATE FULL TEXT TRANSLATIONS. of the. EXTRADITION LAW and the EXTRADITION UP-TO-DATE FULL TEXT TRANSLATIONS of the EXTRADITION LAW 5714-1954 and the EXTRADITION REGULATIONS (LAW PROCEDURES AND RULES OF EVIDENCE IN PETITIONS) 5731-1970 1. Extradition only under this

More information

Criminal Procedure Code Act 1950 (Ch 116)

Criminal Procedure Code Act 1950 (Ch 116) Criminal Procedure Code Act 1950 (Ch 116) Section 1. Interpretation. Arrest. CHAPTER 116 THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE ACT. Arrangement of Sections. PART I INTERPRETATION. PART II GENERAL PROVISIONS. Arrest,

More information

DEFAMATION ACT CHAPTER 36 CAP. 36. Defamation LAWS OF KENYA

DEFAMATION ACT CHAPTER 36 CAP. 36. Defamation LAWS OF KENYA CAP. 36 LAWS OF KENYA DEFAMATION ACT CHAPTER 36 Revised Edition 2012 [1972] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012]

More information

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES 1.6.2012 Official Journal of the European Union L 142/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2012/13/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in

More information

Forty-Second Congress. Sess. I. CH

Forty-Second Congress. Sess. I. CH CHAP. XXII.- An Act to enforce the Provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and for other Purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives

More information

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System Some Things You Should Know An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System Office of the Federal Public Defender Southern District of West Virginia 300 Virginia Street

More information

Building Work Contractors Act 1995

Building Work Contractors Act 1995 Version: 21.11.2015 South Australia Building Work Contractors Act 1995 An Act to regulate building work contractors and the supervision of building work; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1 Preliminary

More information

BELIZE CERTIFIED INSTITUTIONS (CHILDREN S REFORMATION) ACT CHAPTER 121 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

BELIZE CERTIFIED INSTITUTIONS (CHILDREN S REFORMATION) ACT CHAPTER 121 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 BELIZE CERTIFIED INSTITUTIONS (CHILDREN S REFORMATION) ACT CHAPTER 121 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision

More information

WHERE WILL MY CRIMINAL CASE BE DEALT WITH AND WHAT HAPPENS?

WHERE WILL MY CRIMINAL CASE BE DEALT WITH AND WHAT HAPPENS? WHERE WILL MY CRIMINAL CASE BE DEALT WITH AND WHAT HAPPENS? This factsheet relates to those who are 18 or over. If you are 17 or under, please see our separate factsheet for the Youth Court. Where will

More information

The Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1947

The Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1947 The Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1947 Sections Contents Preamble 1 Short title and extent 2 Interpretation 3 Offences under Sections 161 to 165 of the Penal Code to be cognizable offences 4 Presumption

More information

GHANA ARBITRATION CENTRE THE ARBITRATION RULES

GHANA ARBITRATION CENTRE THE ARBITRATION RULES GHANA ARBITRATION CENTRE THE ARBITRATION RULES 1 SUGGESTED ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy, claim or interpretation arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach of this contract,

More information

Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court

Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court Preamble The following are guidelines for attorneys and non-lawyer volunteers appointed as guardians ad litem for children in most family

More information

Protection from Harassment Bill

Protection from Harassment Bill Protection from Harassment Bill Bill No. 12/2014. Read the first time on 3rd March 2014. PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 2014 (No. of 2014) Section ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title

More information

COMPUTER MISUSE AND CYBERSECURITY ACT (CHAPTER 50A)

COMPUTER MISUSE AND CYBERSECURITY ACT (CHAPTER 50A) COMPUTER MISUSE AND CYBERSECURITY ACT (CHAPTER 50A) (Original Enactment: Act 19 of 1993) REVISED EDITION 2007 (31st July 2007) An Act to make provision for securing computer material against unauthorised

More information

THE GOVERNMENT SECURITIES ACT. [INDIA ACT X, 1920.] (1 st April, 1920,) 2. In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,

THE GOVERNMENT SECURITIES ACT. [INDIA ACT X, 1920.] (1 st April, 1920,) 2. In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, THE GOVERNMENT SECURITIES ACT. [INDIA ACT X, 920.] ( st April, 920,). * * * * 2. In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, (a) "Government security " means promissory notes

More information

ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION

ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION Committee against Torture Forty-fifth session 1-19 November 2010 List of issues prior to the submission of the second periodic report of Qatar (CAT/C/QAT/2) 1 ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION Specific information

More information

ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS

ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS June 2013 Legal Policy Division Department of the Attorney-General and Justice

More information

CHAPTER 35 CONTROL OF DRUGS (TRAFFICKING) ORDINANCE and Subsidiary Legislation

CHAPTER 35 CONTROL OF DRUGS (TRAFFICKING) ORDINANCE and Subsidiary Legislation TURKS AND CHAPTER 35 CONTROL OF DRUGS (TRAFFICKING) ORDINANCE and Subsidiary Legislation Revised Edition showing the law as at 15 May 1998 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision

More information

Enforced subject access (section 56)

Enforced subject access (section 56) ICO lo Enforced subject access (section 56) Data Protection Act Contents Introduction... 2 Overview.3 The criminal offence.... 3 Exceptions and penalties.... 7 Relevant records....... 8 Other considerations

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 34 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 34 1 SUBCHAPTER XIII. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES. Article 34. Arrest and Bail. 1-409. Arrest only as herein prescribed. No person may be arrested in a civil action except as prescribed by this Article, but this provision

More information

What you don t know can hurt you.

What you don t know can hurt you. What you don t know can hurt you. Why you need a defense lawyer if you are charged with a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor conviction is SERIOUS A misdemeanor is not a minor crime. If you are convicted of a

More information

THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2005

THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2005 TO BE INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. CXXV of 2005 THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2005 A BILL further to amend the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. BE it enacted by Parliament

More information

BERMUDA WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES OF COURT 1965 SR&O 14 / 1966

BERMUDA WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES OF COURT 1965 SR&O 14 / 1966 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES OF COURT 1965 SR&O 14 / 1966 [made under section 41 of the Workmen s Compensation Act 1965 brought into operation on 2 August 1965] TABLE OF

More information

The Federal Criminal Process

The Federal Criminal Process Federal Public Defender W.D. Michigan The Federal Criminal Process INTRODUCTION The following summary of the federal criminal process is intended to provide you with a general overview of how your case

More information

CCBE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA RETENTION DIRECTIVE

CCBE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA RETENTION DIRECTIVE Représentant les avocats d Europe Representing Europe s lawyers CCBE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA RETENTION DIRECTIVE CCBE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA RETENTION

More information

VICTIMS RESTITUTION AND COMPENSATION PAYMENT ACT

VICTIMS RESTITUTION AND COMPENSATION PAYMENT ACT Province of Alberta VICTIMS RESTITUTION AND COMPENSATION Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor,

More information

THE EXTRADITION ACT, 1974. An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive offenders. CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY

THE EXTRADITION ACT, 1974. An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive offenders. CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY THE EXTRADITION ACT, 1974 (ACT No. LVIII of 1974) An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive offenders. WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating

More information

General District Courts

General District Courts General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance

More information

Title 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights

Title 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights Section 15-23-60 Definitions. As used in this article, the following words shall have the following meanings: (1) ACCUSED. A person who has been arrested for committing a criminal offense and who is held

More information

Being a witness in a criminal trial

Being a witness in a criminal trial Being a witness in a criminal trial If you have been the victim of an offence, or a witness to that offence, you may be asked to make a formal statement. The judge who hears the case can use your statement

More information

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench Glossary of Terms The Glossary of Terms defines some of the most common legal terms in easy-tounderstand language. Terms are listed in alphabetical order. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

More information

Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid

Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES Last Amended: 1 July 2006 Manual of Legal Aid TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6B - STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES GENERAL...3 PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE...3 GENERAL GUIDELINES

More information

THE REGULATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS BILL, 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES. PART I - PRELIMINARY

THE REGULATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS BILL, 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES. PART I - PRELIMINARY THE REGULATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS BILL, 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES. PART I - PRELIMINARY Clause. 1. Interpretation. PART II - CONTROL OF INTERCEPTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A MONITORING CENTRE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A. CHARLES EDWARD DAVIS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County,

More information

Colorado Revised Statutes 2013 TITLE 21

Colorado Revised Statutes 2013 TITLE 21 Colorado Revised Statutes 2013 TITLE 21 STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER ARTICLE 1 State Public Defender 21-1-101. Public defender - policy - commission. (1) The office of state public defender is hereby created

More information