Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 4:15-cv-00146-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION"

Transcription

1 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION CHRISTOPHER M. JENSEN, v. Plaintiff, LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, SENTINEL OFFENDER SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability company, WANDA HUNTER- DONALDSON, EDUARD RODRIGUEZ, individually and as employees of LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, Defendants. / CASE NO: 4:15-CV-146 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER M. JENSEN (hereinafter Jensen or Plaintiff ), by and through undersigned counsel, brings this action against Defendants, LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, SENTINEL OFFENDER SERVICES, LLC, WANDA HUNTER-DONALDSON, and EDUARD RODRIGUEZ, individually, and as employees of LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA and in support thereof, states as follows: I. INTRODUCTION, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331, as a civil action arising under the Constitution, laws, and/or treaties of the United States; 28 U.S.C. 1337, as this is a civil action or proceeding arising under an Act of Congress regulating commerce and/or protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies; and 28 U.S.C. 1343, as this is a civil action seeking to redress deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom and/or usage, of a right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United 1

2 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 19 States and/or by an Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States. 2. Plaintiff s claims for relief are predicated, in part, upon 42 U.S.C. 1983, which authorizes actions to redress the deprivation, under color of state law, of rights, privileges, and immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and upon 42 U.S.C. 1988, which authorizes the award of attorneys fees and costs to prevailing plaintiffs in actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C Plaintiff further invokes the supplemental jurisdiction of this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367, to consider the state law claims alleged herein. 4. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and 1391(c), as one or more Defendants live or do business in this judicial district. 5. Plaintiff served a claim under , Florida Statutes on Defendant Leon County on August 12, On January 8, 2015, Defendant Leon County mailed Plaintiff a letter denying the claim. 7. All conditions precedent to this lawsuit have been performed or waived. II. PARTIES 8. Plaintiff is, and all times relevant hereto, was a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the State of Florida. During all times relevant to this action, Plaintiff has been a resident of Leon, Jefferson, and Wakulla Counties, Florida. 9. At all times material hereto, Defendant LEON COUNTY, was a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and responsible for the operation of the Leon County Office 2

3 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 3 of 19 of Intervention and Detention Alternatives, who is responsible for the Leon County Pretrial Release Program (collectively referred to as Defendant Leon County ). 10. At all times material hereto, Defendant, SENTINEL OFFENDER SERVICES, LLC, (hereinafter Defendant Sentinel ) was a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of California, and doing business in Leon County, Florida under a contract with Leon County to monitor, control, maintain, and provide Global Positioning System ( GPS ) monitoring of accused and convicted persons under court order to be supervised by Leon County with GPS ankle monitors. 11. At all times material hereto, Defendant, WANDA HUNTER-DONALDSON (hereinafter Defendant Hunter-Donaldson ), was the Director of the Leon County Office of Intervention and Detention Alternatives and was responsible for all aspects of Sentinel s contract with Leon County. 12. At all times material hereto, Defendant, EDUARD RODRIGUEZ (hereinafter Defendant Rodriguez ), was employed by the Leon County Office of Intervention and Detention Alternatives, and supervised the work performed by employees of Defendant Sentinel pursuant to Defendant Sentinel s contract with Defendant Leon County. 13. The above named individuals, collectively referred to as the Individual Defendants acted within the scope of their employment with Defendant Leon County and under color of law for purposes of 42 U.S.C III. ALLEGATIONS AS TO LEON COUNTY S RELATIONSHIP WITH SENTINEL 14. Pursuant to its contract with Leon County, Sentinel began providing GPS monitoring for Leon County and was responsible for providing GPS monitoring services. 3

4 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 4 of Defendant Wanda Hunter-Donaldson approved the contract with Sentinel. Defendant Hunter-Donaldson and Sentinel knew, and have known for years, that Sentinel s GPS equipment was faulty, out-of-date, and failed to accurately monitor individuals released on pretrial GPS supervision. Despite this knowledge, Leon County continued to use Sentinel for GPS monitoring of defendants on pretrial release and probation. IV. ALLEGATIONS REGARDING PLAINTIFF S GPS SUPERVISION 16. On or about July 4, 2012, Plaintiff was arrested for violating the terms of his release in Leon County Case No. 2012MM1386. On or about July 25, 2012, Plaintiff was reinstated to bond with the additional condition that he wear an active GPS monitoring through Defendant Leon County which was provided by Defendant Sentinel according to its contract with Defendant Leon County. 17. From July 25, 2012 through April 4, 2013, Plaintiff was monitored by Defendant Sentinel on behalf of Defendant Leon County. 18. On March 11, 2013 the Plaintiff was placed on a period of probation for onecount of aggravated stalking in Case No. 2012CF2167. Plaintiff was still facing a charge of violation of an injunction for protection against domestic violence in Leon County case number 2012MM1386, for which he was being supervised by the Defendant Leon County and Defendant Sentinel with active GPS monitoring. There were a multitude of areas he was not permitted to travel due to exclusion zones being established by the alleged victim and according to the terms of an injunction. 19. After the termination of Plaintiff s pretrial release supervision, Leon County and Sentinel provided the State of Florida, Office of the State Attorney with documents showing Plaintiff's purported whereabouts while on pretrial release supervision. 4

5 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 5 of As a result of providing this information, and while knowing the GPS equipment was faulty, Defendants caused the Plaintiff to be incarcerated in the Wakulla County Jail from April 22, 2013 until August 20, 2013, and then in the Leon County Jail from August 20, 2013 until December 17, In addition to being incarcerated on a violation of probation based on the false data provided by Sentinel in Leon County Case No. 2012CF2167, the State also filed a charge of Aggravated Stalking in Leon County Case No. 2013CF3226 on October 9, 2013 based solely on the false data provided by Sentinel. 22. The Plaintiff was arrested for allegedly violating the injunction by driving by a school listed in the injunction in Wakulla County. Plaintiff s then-counsel secured a subpoena duces tecum directed to Sentinel for all of the GPS logs of the Plaintiff. Sentinel produced some 300 pages of documents, including a GPS coordinate log for April 4, Such logs were not produced for any other day. 23. Since the dates of the alleged violations of the exclusion zones did not correspond to dates GPS logs had been produced, Plaintiff s counsel and the Assistant State Attorney embarked on a journey to obtain the GPS coordinate logs for the dates/times the Plaintiff was alleged to have violated the exclusion zones. 24. After significant difficulty, lack of cooperation from Defendant Leon County, and the run-around from Defendant Sentinel, Defendant Sentinel finally produced GPS logs for eight of the twenty alleged violations. 25. A comparison of the records produced by Defendant Sentinel in August 2013 with those produced on November 20, 2013, established that the Plaintiff could not have violated the 5

6 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 6 of 19 exclusion zones for those dates. Such a result also raised significant concerns over the validity of the other alerts which lead to the affidavit of violation of probation. 26. After an independent investigation by both counsel for the Plaintiff and the Office of the State Attorney, the violation of probation and new charges were dismissed because it was established that the data provided by Defendant Sentinel was unreliable. Further, but for the false data obtained from the faulty GPS equipment, there would not have been probable cause for the violation of probation in Case No. 2012CF2167 and the new charge in Case No. 2013CF As a direct and proximate result of utilizing faulty equipment provided by Defendant Sentinel, Defendant Leon County and Defendant Sentinel caused Claimant to be falsely arrested, falsely imprisoned, and maliciously prosecuted. forth herein. COUNT I - VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1983 (POLICY "MOVING FORCE" FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION AGAINST DEFENDANT LEON COUNTY) 28. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set 29. The Plaintiff sues Defendant Leon County for the unconstitutional actions of its agents acting pursuant to: (1) an express policy; (2) a widespread custom, practice or policy with the force of law; and (3) the decision(s) of a person with final policymaking authority which are without immediate review. The Defendant Leon County, its employees and agents, acting within their authority and under color of state law, instituted and followed departmental written policy directives and or on-the-job training, procedures and customs which directly resulted in, malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprisonment against Plaintiff, which was the "moving force" causing his injuries and is actionable under 42 U.S.C as a violation of the Fourth and 6

7 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 7 of 19 Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Alternatively, the Defendant has a widespread custom and practice of the following: (a) failing to adequately train officers on a foreseeable inaccurate GPS reports of probation violation; (b) a policy of allowing the faulty, outof-date GPS equipment to monitor individuals released on pretrial GPS supervision; (c) failing to accurately monitor individuals released on pretrial GPS supervision; (d) a policy of raising false alerts resulting in probation violations and causing the arrest of suspects without probable cause; (e) a policy of causing the arrest of suspects on faulty GPS reports without investigation; (f) a policy of arresting and prosecuting suspects without probable cause; and (g) a policy of instituting cover charges to insulate the County from liability for misconduct. 30. The Plaintiff sues Defendant Leon County pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 for failing to train, supervise, and to control subordinate employees. The Defendant Leon County, acting within the scope of its authority and under color of state law, was deliberately indifferent to training, hiring, supervising and controlling its officers to correct widespread patterns of arresting, incarcerating and prosecuting on faulty and inaccurate GPS data for probation violations, which was the moving force causing his injuries and is actionable under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 as a violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 31. The Defendant Leon County has an official policy and widespread custom and practice of: (1) authorizing, ratifying or approving the actions of subordinate employees who violate departmental policies, the laws of the United States and the State of Florida by failing to adequately and properly receive citizen complaints, investigate the complaints and then discipline, retrain, or otherwise sanction and/or remedy the improper conduct of its employees; 7

8 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 8 of 19 and, (2) authorizing, ratifying or approving the actions of subordinate employees who maliciously prosecute individuals known to be innocent and who have not committed any crime. 32. As a direct and proximate result of the willful and deliberate actions or inactions of Defendant Leon County in violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, which was the moving force for the malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprisonment and injuries suffered by Plaintiff, and has been brought into public scandal, with great humiliation, mental suffering and damaged reputation. 33. Additionally, by failing to take action, discipline Defendant Sentinel and individual Defendants while Plaintiff had been the subject to the malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprisonment and injuries, Defendant Leon County has ratified Defendant Sentinel and the individual Defendants decisions and their reasons for their decisions, thus constituting a policy, custom or practice. Alternatively, the individual Defendants were the ultimate policymakers for Defendant Leon County as their decisions were not immediately or effectively reviewable. 34. Furthermore, as a direct and proximate result of the conduct of Defendant Leon County, Plaintiff suffered loss of liberty and freedom, bodily injury and resulting pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of earnings, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, medical care and treatment. Plaintiff's losses are either permanent or continuing and Plaintiff will suffer the losses in the future. 35. The actions or inactions alleged above were undertaken or failed to be undertaken because of the Defendant Leon County s willful, wanton, callous and knowing disregard of the clearly established rights of Plaintiff as guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 8

9 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 9 of Plaintiff has been forced to retain counsel to represent him to vindicate his rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C Plaintiff is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys fees and costs. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury, judgment against Defendant Leon County for all general and compensatory damages, medical and incidental expenses, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs of suit and an award of reasonable attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 and for such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. COUNT II - VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1983 (FALSE ARREST/FALSE IMPRISONMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS LEON COUNTY AND SENTINEL) forth herein. 37. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set 38. At all times relevant herein Defendants Hunter-Donaldson and Rodriguez were agent or employee of the Leon County and were acting within their scope of authority and under color of state law. 39. Defendants Leon County and Sentinel provided the State of Florida, Office of the State Attorney, with inaccurate information about Plaintiff s purported whereabouts while on pretrial release supervision which resulted in Plaintiff s incarceration for violation of probation and also prosecution for Aggravated Stalking in Leon County Case No. 2013CF Plaintiff s arrest and incarceration in the Wakulla County Jail from April 22, 2013 until August 20, 2013 and then in the Leon County Jail from August 20, 2013 until December 18, 2013, violated Plaintiff s rights under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 9

10 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 10 of Defendants Leon County and Sentinel violated Plaintiff s Fourth Amendment rights by causing his incarceration in jail, by encouraging and causing false criminal charges filed against him and by actively encouraging and participating in the wrongful prosecution of Plaintiff. 42. As a direct and proximate result of the willful and deliberate actions or inactions of the Defendants Leon County and Sentinel, Plaintiff has suffered grievously, has been brought into public scandal, and with great humiliation, mental suffering, and damaged reputation. 43. Furthermore, Plaintiff has suffered bodily injury and resulting pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of earnings, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, and expense of hospitalization, medical care and treatment. Plaintiff's losses are either permanent or continuing and Plaintiff will suffer the losses in the future. 44. The actions or inactions alleged above were undertaken or failed to be undertaken because of the Defendants Leon County s and Sentinel s willful, wanton, callous and knowing disregard of the clearly established rights of Plaintiff as guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 45. Plaintiff has been forced to retain counsel to represent him to vindicate his rights pursuant to 72 U.S.C Plaintiff is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys fees and costs. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury, judgment against Defendants Leon County and Sentinel for all general and compensatory damages, medical and incidental expenses, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs of suit and an award of reasonable attorney s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. 10

11 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 11 of 19 COUNT III - VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1983 (FALSE ARREST/FALSE IMPRISONMENT AGAINST INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS) forth herein. 46. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set 47. The Plaintiff sues the individual Defendants Hunter-Donaldson and Rodriguez in their individual capacity while acting within their scope of authority and under color of state law, engaged in conduct that caused the Plaintiff s false arrest and deprived him of his right to be free from false arrest/false imprisonment, which was the moving force causing his injuries and is actionable under 42 U.S.C as a violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. At all times material hereto, Defendants Hunter-Donaldson and Rodriguez acted with deliberate indifference to Plaintiff s constitutional rights. 48. As a direct and proximate result of the willful and deliberate actions or inactions of the Defendants Hunter-Donaldson and Rodriguez, Plaintiff has suffered grievously, has been brought into public scandal, and with great humiliation, mental suffering, and damaged reputation. 49. Furthermore, Plaintiff has suffered bodily injury and resulting pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of earnings, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, and expense of hospitalization, medical care and treatment. Plaintiff s losses are either permanent or continuing and Plaintiff will suffer the losses in the future. 50. The actions or inactions alleged above were undertaken or failed to be undertaken because of the Defendant Hunter-Donaldon s and Defendant Rodriguez s willful, wanton, callous and knowing disregard of the clearly established rights of Plaintiff as guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 11

12 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 12 of Plaintiff has been forced to retain counsel to represent him to vindicate his rights pursuant to 72 U.S.C Plaintiff is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys fees and costs. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury, judgment against Defendants Hunter- Donaldson and Rodriguez for all general and compensatory damages, Judgment for Punitive damages against the individual officers, medical and incidental expenses, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs of suit and an award of reasonable attorney s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. COUNT IV - STATE LAW CLAIM FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT 52. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set forth herein. 53. The Plaintiff sues the Defendants, acting through its employees and agents, for false arrest and/or false imprisonment by holding Plaintiff against his will or causing Plaintiff s false arrest and/or false imprisonment. Pursuant to section (9)(a), Florida Statutes, Defendant Leon County is liable to Plaintiff in tort for false arrest/false imprisonment, based upon the conduct of its employees and agents. 54. The conduct of Defendant Leon County, Defendant Sentinel, and the individual Defendants proximately caused Plaintiff s arrest without probable cause, and in the absence of lawful authority. The conduct of Defendants constitutes false arrest/false imprisonment. 55. As a direct and proximate result of the acts described herein, Plaintiff has suffered grievously, has been brought into public scandal, and with great humiliation, mental suffering, and damaged reputation. 12

13 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 13 of As a further direct and proximate result of the conduct described above, Plaintiff suffered loss of his liberty and freedom, loss of personal property, bodily injury and resulting pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, medical expenses, care and treatment, loss of earnings, loss of ability to earn money. The losses are either permanent or continuing and Plaintiff will suffer the losses in the future, in violation of Plaintiff s rights and incurred the expense of hiring an attorney to represent him. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands Judgment against the Defendants in excess of Seventy Five Thousand ($75,000.00) Dollars, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs of suit incurred in connection with this action, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. COUNT V - MALICIOUS PROSECUTION 57. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set forth herein. 58. Defendant Leon County owed a duty of care to the citizenry in general, and specifically in this case, owed a duty of care to Plaintiff. 59. The Defendants encouraged and participated in the prosecution of the Plaintiff without probable cause and the facts known to Defendants would not have warranted a reasonable person to believe that Plaintiff had committed any criminal offense. 60. There was absence of probable cause to arrest and prosecute Plaintiff and for the continued prosecution against Plaintiff. 61. The prosecution against Plaintiff stemming from his arrest was terminated in favor of Plaintiff. The termination of the prosecution constituted a bona fide determination in 13

14 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 14 of 19 favor of Plaintiff, that there was an absence of probable cause for the prosecution and continued prosecution against Plaintiff. 62. The Defendants acted maliciously and in bad faith against the Plaintiff at all times mentioned herein. No prosecution of Plaintiff would have occurred but for the actions of Defendants. 63. As a direct result of Defendants actions, Plaintiff has suffered damages, which include physical inconvenience, physical discomfort and pain, loss of time, loss of income, loss of her business, mental suffering, embarrassment, humiliation, disgrace and injury to his feelings and reputation, the emotional and physical aspects, which are continuing to this day and are likely to continue into the future. Plaintiff also suffered damages as the result of his being forced to hire counsel and incur attorneys fees and costs to defend the prosecution. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury, judgment against Defendants in excess of Seventy Five Thousand ($75,000.00) Dollars for all general and compensatory damages, medical and incidental expenses, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs of suit incurred in connection with this action, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. forth herein. COUNT VI - STATE LAW CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE (AGAINST DEFENDANTS LEON COUNTY & SENTINEL) 64. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set 65. This is a cause of action under the common law of the State of Florida for negligence. Such claims arise from a common nucleus of operative facts with violation(s) of 42 U.S.C as set forth above. 14

15 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 15 of Defendant Hunter-Donaldson was negligent in recommending Leon County s approval of the contract with Sentinel, despite the knowledge that Sentinel s GPS equipment was faulty, out-of-date, and failed to accurately monitor individuals released on pretrial and probation GPS supervision. 67. Defendant Sentinel owed a duty to persons supervised by its GPS equipment and to Defendant Leon County to provide equipment to Defendant Leon County which was accurate and reliable. 68. Defendant Sentinel knew its GPS equipment was faulty, out-of-date, and failed to accurately monitor individuals released on pretrial and probation GPS supervision and despite this knowledge, continue to provide such equipment to Defendant Leon County. 69. Defendants Leon County and Sentinel, subsequent to the termination of Plaintiff s pretrial release supervision, were negligent in providing the State of Florida, Office of the State Attorney, as well as prior counsel for the Plaintiff with documents showing Plaintiff s purported whereabouts while on pretrial release supervision. At the time this information was provided to the Office of the State Attorney, Defendants Leon County and Sentinel knew that the GPS equipment was faulty and provided false information. 70. As a result of providing this false information, and while knowing the GPS equipment was faulty, Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Wakulla County Jail and then in the Leon County Jail. In addition to be incarcerated on a violation of probation in Leon County, and based solely on the data provided by Leon County and Sentinel, the State also filed a charge of Aggravated Stalking against Plaintiff. 71. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants Leon County and Sentinel s negligence, Plaintiff sustained personal injury and mental anguish, lost enjoyment of life, has 15

16 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 16 of 19 incurred medical expenses and lost earnings, aggravation of a previously existing condition, has scarring, disfigurement and morbidity, and these conditions are permanent or continuing in nature. The Plaintiff will incur future medical bills and expenses, and will have impaired future earnings. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury, judgment against Defendants in excess of Seventy Five Thousand ($75,000.00) Dollars for all general and compensatory damages, medical and incidental expenses, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest and costs, and such other relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT VII - STATE LAW CLAIM FOR BATTERY 72. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set forth herein. 73. This is a cause of action arise from a common nucleus of operative facts with violation(s) of 42 U.S.C as set forth above. 74. The conduct of Defendant through its employees or agents constituted a harmful and/or offensive, non-consensual physical contact on the person of Plaintiff. Specifically, Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Wakulla County Jail and then in the Leon County Jail all against Plaintiff s will and without his consent. 75. Plaintiff has a clear legal right to bodily privacy and to be secure in his person against illegal seizures. 76. Defendants knew that there was no legal basis to touch Plaintiff or to incarcerate Plaintiff against his will. 77. As a direct and proximate result of the batteries alleged above, Plaintiff suffered bodily injury resulting in pain and suffering, significant mental anguish, loss of capacity of the 16

17 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 17 of 19 enjoyment of life, and medical care and treatment. His injuries are permanent and/or continuing in nature and he will continue to suffer such losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury, judgment against Defendants in excess of Seventy Five Thousand ($75,000.00) Dollars for all general and compensatory damages, medical and incidental expenses, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs of suit incurred in connection with this action, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. COUNT VIII - STATE CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS forth herein. 78. Plaintiff reasserts and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 27 as though more fully set 79. Defendant, Leon County through its employees or agents, intentionally, unlawfully and without justification negligently inflicted and caused Plaintiff to suffer emotional distress. 80. Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Wakulla County Jail and then in the Leon County Jail. In addition to be incarcerated for violation of probation, and based solely on the data provided by Sentinel, the State also filed a charge of Aggravated Stalking against Plaintiff. After an independent investigation the violation of probation and new charges were dismissed because it was established that the data provided by Sentinel was unreliable. Further, but for the false data obtained from the faulty GPS equipment, there would not have been probable cause for Plaintiff s arrest and charge of Aggravated Stalking. 81. As the outrageous acts, omissions and conduct of the Defendants, Plaintiff has suffered injuries caused by the psychological trauma including difficulty extreme emotional distress, mental anguish, anxiety and physical injury. 17

18 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 18 of 19 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury, judgment against Defendants in excess of Seventy Five Thousand ($75,000.00) Dollars for all general and compensatory damages, medical and incidental expenses, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs of suit incurred in connection with this action, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. V. PRAYER OF RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully prays this Court will award the following relief, and any and all other relief deemed appropriate: A. Judgment for compensatory damages for physical injuries, past and present pain and suffering, past and present mental and emotional distress, past and future medical expenses, past and present humiliation and degradation; B. Judgment for Punitive damages against the individual Defendants; C. An award of reasonable attorney s fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988, as to those counts alleging federal claims to which attorney s fees are recoverable; and D. Any other equitable and legal relief which the court deems appropriate. VI. DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues set forth herein which are so triable. 18

19 Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 19 of 19 Respectfully submitted this 17th day of March, Respectfully submitted, ZELMAN LAW By: _/s/ Joshua D. Zelman JOSHUA D. ZELMAN Florida Bar No N. Meridian Street Tallahassee, Florida (850) phone (850) fax Josh@ZelmanPA.com Eservice@ZelmanPA.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Christopher M. Jensen 19

Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAMELA ANDERSON, Individually and ) as Independent

More information

CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA File No. Julius Chad Zimmerman, Plaintiff, v. Dave Bellows, in his individual and official

More information

Case 1:13-cv-00001-SEB-TAB Document 1 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:13-cv-00001-SEB-TAB Document 1 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 Case 1:13-cv-00001-SEB-TAB Document 1 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JAIME MILLER, Plaintiff v. No.: 1:13-cv-1 CITY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of Michael Millen Attorney at Law (#) Calle Marguerita Ste. 0 Telephone: Fax: (0) -0 mikemillen@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 OSB#013943 sean.riddell@live.com Attorney At Law 4411 NE Tillamook St Portland, OR 97140 971-219-8453 Attorney for Plaintiff IN

More information

Case 2:13-cv-01431-RBS Document 1 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:13-cv-01431-RBS Document 1 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:13-cv-01431-RBS Document 1 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID GARCIA : 7427 Belden Street : Basement Apt. : PHILADELPHIA,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:11-cv-00225-KDE-SS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) MARIO CACHO and ANTONIO OCAMPO, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. v. ) ) SHERIFF

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-04340 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/04/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv-04340 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/04/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:12-cv-04340 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/04/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION BENJAMIN PEREZ and BOBBY ) MILTON, ) ) Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.

More information

2:13-cv-12772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

2:13-cv-12772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1 2:13-cv-12772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL DWAYNE THOMAS Vs Plaintiff, Judge Magistrate Case No:

More information

Case: 1:15-cv-09957 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/04/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv-09957 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/04/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-09957 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/04/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 JACLYN PAZERA Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION v. Case No.

More information

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,

More information

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00-loa Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Bradley Jardis, vs. Keith M. Knowlton, L.L.C. SBN 0 S. Rural Road, Suite 0, PMB# Tempe, Arizona -00 (0 -; FAX (0 - Keith M. Knowlton - SBN 0 Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK MARY A. WILKOWSKI 4622 304C Iolani Avenue Honolulu, Hawai 96813 Telephone: (808) 536-5444 FacsImile: (808) 591-2990 E-Mail: maw808@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff-Intervenor DORIS F ALETOI UNITED STATES

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00039-MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:14-cv-00039-MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1 Case :-cv-000-mmd-vpc Document - Filed 0// Page of EXHIBIT EXHIBIT Case :-cv-000-mmd-vpc Document - Filed 0// Page of JOHN OHLSON, ESQ. NV Bar No. Hill Street, Suite 0 Reno, Nevada 0 Telephone: () -00

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;

More information

Case 4:09-cv-00502-RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 4:09-cv-00502-RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Case :0-cv-000-RCC Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of DAVID MONROE QUANTZ, P.L.C. E. Camp Lowell Dr. Tucson, Arizona ( -00 David Monroe Quantz State Bar No: 000 david@quantzlawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, BASS PRELITIGATION

More information

Case 1:15-cv-07513-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1

Case 1:15-cv-07513-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 Case 1:15-cv-07513-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 Law Offices of Swati M. Kothari, LLC Swati M. Kothari, Esq. 712 East Main Street, Suite 2A Moorestown, New Jersey 08057 (856)

More information

Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9 Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO DAVID ASHE Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 10-2236 ( DRD ) vs. DISTRIBUIDORA NORMA,

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00644-DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:14-cv-00644-DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-00644-DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10 STEWART GOLLAN USB # 12524 UTAH LEGAL CLINIC Cooperating Attorneys for UTAH CIVIL RIGHTS & LIBERTIES FOUNDATION, INC. 214 East Fifth South Street

More information

vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues

vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th 16 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. JAMES SCHAIRER, individually, Plaintiff, vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PAUL KERCHER,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff, CASE NUMBER: JUDGE: vs. Defendant. / COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Plaintiff,, and hereby sues

More information

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION Form 2:40-2 Complaint Negligence, Motor Vehicle IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ## JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR [COUNTY], FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF], Plaintiff, CASE NO.: ##-##### ## ## GENERAL JURISDICTION vs. [DEFENDANT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their CASE 0:13-cv-00873-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Michael A. Ofor, Case No: Plaintiff, v. Steven Lecy, and City of Minneapolis, NOTICE

More information

Case 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Case 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION DESTINY ANNMARIE RIOS Plaintiff VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-00590

More information

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin

More information

virtue of Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 806 of the Corporate and

virtue of Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 806 of the Corporate and IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 1 +. DIVISION DIANA WINGARD, 2091 QLT -q (O: 2I Plaintiff, V. Civil Case No. 2:07-CVAC 1 `- < < ) Plaintiff Demands Jury Trial COUNTRYWIDE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORIGINAL COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION WALTER ALLEN ROTHGERY, v. Plaintiff, GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS, Defendant. Cause No. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Walter Allen

More information

Filing # 41603514 E-Filed 05/17/2016 11:58:08 AM

Filing # 41603514 E-Filed 05/17/2016 11:58:08 AM Filing # 41603514 E-Filed 05/17/2016 11:58:08 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA KENDALLE HOLLEY by and through her parents and next friends, DAVID

More information

Case 1:14-cv-02790-ILG-JMA Document 1 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1. KAREN FENNELL, JAMES JORDAN, JR. and ANTHONY SOLIS,

Case 1:14-cv-02790-ILG-JMA Document 1 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1. KAREN FENNELL, JAMES JORDAN, JR. and ANTHONY SOLIS, Case 1:14-cv-02790-ILG-JMA Document 1 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X KAREN

More information

Case 5:11-cv-00736-FB Document 1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 14

Case 5:11-cv-00736-FB Document 1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 14 Case 5:11-cv-00736-FB Document 1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION DAN NAPIER and DANA NAPIER v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-cv-736

More information

JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIVISION. MELISSA ROWE, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of E.R

JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIVISION. MELISSA ROWE, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of E.R NO. MELISSA ROWE, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of E.R VS. COMPLAINT JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIVISION PLAINTIFF LANA KAELIN c/o Eastern High School 12400 Old Shelbyville Road Louisville,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, BLUE MAX TRUCKING, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:02CV COMPLAINT

More information

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAROL PARKER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PARADE ENTERPRISES, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-08084-MAS-DEA AMENDED COMPLAINT

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM

More information

Filing # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM

Filing # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM Filing # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM PENELOPE BELVOIR, as Executor de son Tort for the Pending Estate of Robert Belvoir, Deceased, vs. Plaintiff, ROPES COURSES, INC., FB ORLANDO

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 10 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION Case 4:14-cv-00397-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JOSEPH REILLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly

More information

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND

More information

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Ryan Michael Stinnett, on behalf of himself CASE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) LAW FIRM OF KAISER, DEBIASO. ANDREW AND SWINDELLS SUMfTOMO TOWER NINTH FLOOR 444 WEST OCEAN BOULEVARD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802-4516 (310) 590-8471 ERIC C. DEMLER

More information

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Plaintiffs: SCARLET RANCH, a privately owned club; BRADLEY MITCHELL; KENDALL SEIFERT;

More information

Case 3:10-cv-04126-JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case 3:10-cv-04126-JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 Case 310-cv-04126-JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Newark Area Office One Newark Center, 21st Floor Newark, N.J. 07102 Rosemary DiSavino,

More information

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE A Stock Insurance Company, herein called the Company PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE Various provisions in this policy restrict coverage. Please read the

More information

Case4:13-cv-05715-DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

Case4:13-cv-05715-DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed// Page of WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 (CA) MARCIA L. MITCHELL, SBN (WA) DERA A. SMITH, SBN (CA) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Phillip Burton Federal Building 0

More information

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian Form 2:150 Dog Bite Sample Complaint IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian, [PLAINTIFF S PARENT S

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )

More information

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES Trademark Infringement Complaint [Name/Address] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ALPHA, INC., a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff, MR, DELTA

More information

14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS 14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. FILED: 7/15/2014 1:32:23 PM SHERRI ADELSTEIN Denton County District Clerk By: Heather Goheen, Deputy JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON Plaintiff

More information

Case 1:14-cv-14355 Document 1 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv-14355 Document 1 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT Case 1:14-cv-14355 Document 1 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GEORGE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 14-14355 THOMAS BARBOZA, Defendant. INTRODUCTION

More information

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee

More information

Case 1:12-cv-01676-RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv-01676-RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:12-cv-01676-RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION BRENDA L. HONEYCUTT, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * CIVIL ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON WILLIAM R. GOOODE Attorney at Law 4224 Southwest Melville Avenue Portland, OR 97201-1357 Telephone: (503) 244-9101 Fax: (503) 244-0019 e-mail: goodewilliam@hotmail.com Oregon State Bar ID No. 84049 Attorney

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN KUMANCHIK, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, a Florida

More information

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California 1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]

More information

U ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTER DISTRICT OF KE TUCKY AT LOUISVILLE O. FILED ELECTRO ICALLY U IVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE

U ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTER DISTRICT OF KE TUCKY AT LOUISVILLE O. FILED ELECTRO ICALLY U IVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE U ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTER DISTRICT OF KE TUCKY AT LOUISVILLE O. FILED ELECTRO ICALLY I A YODER 9914 Mary Dell Lane Louisville, KY 40291 PLAI TIFF v. U IVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE DEFE DA TS Serve:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) ron@consumersadvocates.com ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) alexis@consumersadvocates.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) kas@consumersadvocates.com

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Fernando F. Chavez, Esq. SBN 0 CHAVEZ LAW GROUP 00 West Beverly Blvd., Montebello, Ca 00 Phone: () 00-0, Facsimile: (0) 1-01 E-mail: ffchavez0@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LAKESHORE LAW CENTER Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 0 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 0-0 Yorba Linda, CA --0 --0 (fax jeff@lakeshorelaw.org Attorney and Plaintiff

More information

Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CAROLE RIELEY Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14 cv 00631

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION W. ANDREW MCCULLOUGH, L.L.C. (2170) Attorney for Plaintiffs 6885 South State St., Suite 200 Midvale, UT 84047 Telephone: (801) 565-0894 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA V. CIVIL ACTION NO:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA V. CIVIL ACTION NO: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA WILLIAM A. STANLEY Plaintiff V. CIVIL ACTION NO: JIM RUBENSTEIN in both his personal and official capacity as COMMISSIONER of the West Virginia Department

More information

2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County. No. CV05-045 (A)L. June 12, 2006. Second Amended Complaint

2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County. No. CV05-045 (A)L. June 12, 2006. Second Amended Complaint 2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County Charlene DUNN, Plaintiff, v. John A. MURPHY, Future Benefits, Inc. American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA. v. Civil Action No.:CL12-1617 Plaintiff Demands Trial by Jury COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA. v. Civil Action No.:CL12-1617 Plaintiff Demands Trial by Jury COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA MIGUEL RUIZ, HUSAIN SALAH, MOHAMED ABDELWAHAM, ANDREW BRZEZINSKI, MARIO CLOTTER, HECTOR SANCHEZ, CLIFFORD LACON, and JIMMY SABGA, RICHARD HICKS Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Leonard R. Berman 4711 SW Huber St., Suite E-3 Portland, OR 97219 (503) 473-8787 OSB # 96040 Easyrabbi@yahoo.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF(S) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : STATE OF CONNECTICUT, and : STATE OF CONNECTICUT : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civ. No. : HEALTH NET OF THE NORTHEAST, INC., : HEALTH

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. INFANT SWIMMING RESEARCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, FAEGRE & BENSON, LLP, MARK FISCHER, JUDY HEUMANN, NORMAN HEUMANN, BOULDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part

The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part In consideration of the payment of the premium and subject to the General Terms and Conditions, the Insurer and the Insureds agree as follows:

More information

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff

More information

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND DISTRICT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, CO 80401 (303) 271-6145 Plaintiffs: NORMAN NEWELL and LINDA NEWELL, v. Defendants: COURT USE ONLY APRIA HEALTHCARE, INC.;

More information

Question 11 February 2013 Selected Answer 1

Question 11 February 2013 Selected Answer 1 Question 11 February 2013 Selected Answer 1 1. Yes, Hospital is liable for Dan's wrongful debt collection under the TDCA. The Texas Debt Collection acts prohibits a specifically enumerated list of specific

More information

Case 2:02-cv-01069-WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5 , '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 2:02-cv-01069-WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5 , '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA Case 2:02-cv-01069-WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5, '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA D \ \..': t', I ' NORTHERN DIVISION " \ NASH J. COOLEY ) FILED

More information

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of 07/15/2034 12:01 973-539-3130 Prom: D Bayle Loflls 201-488-7D29 To: Kalhryn Haffleld SCHENCK PRICE SMITH Date: 7/14/2004 Time: 12:45:04 PM PAGE 04/11 Page 3 of 5 LAW OFFICE D. GAYLELOFTIS 210 RI\/ER STREET

More information

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., Defendant, / COMPLAINT COMES NOW Plaintiff,,

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Calvin L. Keith, OSB No. 814368 CKeith@perkinscoie.com Sarah J. Crooks, OSB No. 971512 SCrooks@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No. TREVOR A. GRIMM, State Bar No. JONATHAN M. COUPAL, State Bar No. 1 TIMOTHY A. BITTLE, State Bar No. 00 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation 1 Eleventh Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 1 (1-0 Attorneys for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION DE ANGELO BENTLEY, ) MARQUES ROBERTSON, ) IKEYMA MCKENTRY, ) individually,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) ) Case 5:10-at-99999 5:10-cv-00097-sgw Document -jgw 54 Document (Court only 1 Filed 09/21/10 Page 1 1 of of 6 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Civil Action No. Ex rel. ) ) FILED IN CAMERA AND Plaintiff, ) UNDER SEAL ) vs. ) FALSE CLAIMS ACT ) MEDICAID FRAUD, ), and ) JURY

More information

No. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition

No. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition FILED 9/24/2014 10:11:33 AM Donna Kay McKinney Bexar County District Clerk Accepted By: Roxanne Mujica 2014CI15241 No. W/ JD EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. Plaintiff, KOONTZ/MCCOMBS CONSTRUCTION,

More information

1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiff has started a lawsuit against you. The 2. YOU MUST REPLY WITHIN 20 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS.

1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiff has started a lawsuit against you. The 2. YOU MUST REPLY WITHIN 20 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS. Filed in Second Judicial District Court 10/14/2013 8:51:21 AM Ramsey County Civil, MN STATE OF MINNESOTA COLINTY OF RAMSEY DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDiCIAL DiSTRICT Case Type: Personal Injury Doe 20, Court

More information

KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES I. MISSION The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce the

More information

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent HENRY KENT, vs. Plaintiff, SMILES II RESTAURANT,

More information

Case 5:14-cv-01964-IPJ Document 1 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 17

Case 5:14-cv-01964-IPJ Document 1 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 17 Case 5:14-cv-01964-IPJ Document 1 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION FILED 2014 Oct-14 PM 02:46 U.S. DISTRICT COURT

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA vs. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER CV-99-792 Defendants. COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs, Bryan K. Bunten and Lisa Bunten, are over the age of nineteen (19) years

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO. Defendants. ) THE PARTIES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO. Defendants. ) THE PARTIES '. 1 6 MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Attorneys at Law GLENN W. PETERSON, ESQ (SBN 6 Lava Ridge Court, Suite Roseville, CA 661 Phone: -80-8 Fax: -80-8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Otto W. Giuliani ENDORSED

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA H.L. WATKINS AND COMPANY, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. ) ) 06-CV8980-3 THE HOT LEAD COMPANY, LLC, ) ROBERT MICHAEL HORNE, )

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-00364-ODE Document 14 Filed 05/31/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION KIMBERLY L. HARRIS, MALIA COLEMAN, BETTY CURRY, ELSIE STATHAM,

More information

Civil Law and Procedure

Civil Law and Procedure Chapter 5 Civil Law and Procedure Business Law Ms. Turner Crime Offense against society Tort Private or civil wrong; offense against an individual Can sue to receive money damages Can be both a crime and

More information

SPECIMEN. (1) a written demand for monetary damages or non-monetary relief;

SPECIMEN. (1) a written demand for monetary damages or non-monetary relief; In consideration of payment of the premium and subject to the Declarations, General Terms and Conditions, limitations, conditions, provisions and other terms of this Policy, the Company and the Insureds

More information

Case: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. MYRIAM DEL SOCORRO LOPEZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this First

PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. MYRIAM DEL SOCORRO LOPEZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this First IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO.: 08-56892 CA 27 WILSON TORRES, individually, and as Personal Representative

More information

Plaintiff, MICHAEL REBECK, by his attorneys, STEVENS, HINDS & WHITE, P.C., Preliminary Statement

Plaintiff, MICHAEL REBECK, by his attorneys, STEVENS, HINDS & WHITE, P.C., Preliminary Statement Case 2:11-cv-02649-KSH -PS Document 1 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 Lennox S. Hinds Steven Hinds & White Attorney for Plaintiff 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, N.J. 08873 (732) 873 3096 116 West

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT CORY GROSHEK, and all others, similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Defendant. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff,

More information