Models of Distributed Computing

Transcription

1 COMP 150-IDS: Internet Scale Distributed Systems (Spring 2015) Models of Distributed Computing Noah Mendelsohn Tufts University Web:

2 Architecting a universal Web Identification: URIs Interaction: HTTP Data formats: HTML, JPEG, GIF, etc.

3 Goals Introduce basics of distributed system design Explore some traditional models of distributed computing Prepare for discussion of REST: the Web s model 3

4 Communicating systems

5 Communicating systems CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage We have multiple programs, running asynchronously, sending messages Reference: (very theoretical)

6 Communicating Sequential Processes We ve got pretty clean higher level abstractions for use on a single machine CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage We have multiple programs, running asynchronously, sending messages Reference: (very theoretical)

7 Communicating systems How can we get a clean model of two communicating machines? CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage We have multiple programs, running asynchronously, sending messages Reference: (very theoretical)

8 Large scale systems How can we get a clean model of a worldwide network of communicating machines? What are the clean abstractions on this scale? Internet

9 WARNING!! This is a very big topic many important approaches have been studied and used there is lots of operational experience, and also formalisms This presentation does not attempt to be either comprehensive or balanced the goal is to introduce some key concepts

10 Traditional Models of Distributed Computing - Message Passing

11 Message passing CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage Programs send messages to and from each others memories

12 Half duplex: one way at a time CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage Programs send messages to and from each others memories

13 Full duplex: both ways at the same time CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage Programs send messages to and from each others memories

14 Message passing Data abstraction: Low level: bytes (octets) Sometimes: agreed metaformat (XML, C struct, etc.) Synchronization Wait for message Timeout

15 Interaction Patterns

16 Between pairs of machines CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage Request Response Message passing: no constraints Common pattern: request/response

17 Traditional Models of Distributed Computing - Client Server

18 Client / server CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage Request service Response Request / response is a traffic pattern Client / server describes the roles of the nodes Server provides service for client

19 Client / server Probably the most common dist. sys. architecture Simple well understood Doesn t explain: How to exploit more than 2 machines How to make programming easier How to prove correctness: though the simple model helps Most client/server systems are request/response

20 Traditional Models of Distributed Computing - N-Tier

21 N-tier also called Multilevel Client/Server CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage CPU Memory Storage Request Request Response Response Layered Each tier provides services for next higher level Reasons: Information hiding Management Scalability

22 Typical N-tier system: airline reservation Reservation Records iphone or Android Reservation Application Flight Reservation Logic Browser or Phone App Application - logic Application - logic Many commercial applications work this way

23 The Web itself is a 2 or 3 Tier system Web Server Browser Proxy Cache (optional!) E.g. Firefox E.g. Squid E.g. Apache Many commercial applications work this way

24 Web Reservation System Web-Base Reservation Application Reservation Records Proxy Cache (optional!) Flight Reservation Logic HTTP HTTP RPC? ODBC? Proprietary? Browser or Phone App E.g. Squid Application - logic Application - logic Many commercial applications work this way

25 Web Publishing System Web-Base Reservation Application Content Management System Content Distribution Network Content Web Site Browser or Phone App E.g. Akamia E.g. cnn.com Database or CMS Many commercial applications work this way

26 Advantages of n-tier system Separation of concerns each layer has own role Parallism and performance? If done right: multiple mid-tier servers work in parallel Back end systems centralize mainly data requiring sharing & synchronization Mid tier can provide shared, scalable caching Information hiding Mid-tier apps shielded from data layout Security Credit card numbers etc. not stored at mid-tier

27 Other patterns Spanning tree Broadcast (send to many nodes at once) Flood Various P2P Etc.

28 Traditional Models of Distributed Computing - Remote Procedure Call

29 Remote Procedure Call The term RPC was coined by the late Bruce Nelson in his 1981 CMU PhD thesis Key idea: an ordinary function call executes remotely The trick: the language runtime or helper code must automatically generate code to send parameters and results For languages like C: proxies and stubs are generated Not needed in dynamic languages like Ruby, JavaScript, etc. RPC is often (erroneously IMO) used to describe any request / response system

30 RPC: Call remote functions automatically x = sqrt(4) float sqrt(float n) { send n; read s; return s; } proxy CPU Memory Storage Request invoke sqrt(4) CPU Memory Storage result=2 (no exception thrown) Response Interface definition: float sqrt(float n); void domsg(msg m) { s = sqrt(m.s); send s; } stub Proxies and stubs generated automatically RPC provides transparent remote invocation float sqrt(float n) { compute sqrt return result; }

31 RPC: Pros and Cons Pros: Transparency is very appealing Simple programming model Useful as organizing principle even when not fully automated Cons Getting language details right is tricky (e.g. exceptions) No client/server overlap: doesn t work well for long-running operations May not optimize large transfers well Not all APIs make sense to remote: e.g. answer = search(tree) Versioning can be a problem: client and server need to agree exactly on interface (or have rules for dealing with differences)

32 Traditional Models of Distributed Computing - Distributed Object Systems

33 How do you build an RPC for this? Call method on remoted object Class Point { int x,y int getx() {return x;} int gety() {return y;} } Class Rectangle { members and constructs not shown Point getupperleft() { }; Point getlowerright { }; } int area (Rectangle r) { width=r.getlowerright().getx() r.getupperleft.getx(); width=r.getlowerright().gety() r.getupperleft.gety(); } myrect = new Rectangle; assume position set here.. int a = area(myrect); // REMOTE THIS CALL! Pass object to remote method Distributed Object systems make this work!

34 Distributed object systems In the 1990s, seemed like a great idea Advantages of OO encapsulation & inheritance + RPC Examples CORBA (Industry standard) DCOM (Microsoft) Still quite widely used within enterprises Complicated Marshalling object references Distributed object lifetime management Brokering: which object provides the service today Remote new : creating objects on remote systems All the pros & cons of RPC, plus the above Generally not appropriate at Internet scale

35 Traditional Models of Distributed Computing - Some Other Options

36 Special Purpose Models Remote File System Network provides transparent access to remote files Examples: NFS, CIFS Remote Database Examples: ODBJ, JDBC Remote Device Remote printing, disk drive etc. Virtual terminal One computer simulates an interactive terminal to another

37 Some other interesting models Broadcast / multicast Send messages to everyone (broadcast) / named group (multicast) Publish / subscribe (pub/sub) Subscribe to named events or based on query filter Call me whenever Pepsi s stock price changes Implements a distributed associative memory Reliable queuing Examples: IBM MQSeries, Java Message Service (JMS) Model: queued messages, preserved across hardware crashes Widely used for bank machine transactions; long-running (multi-day) ecommerce transactions; Depends on disk-based transaction systems at each node to keep queues Tuple spaces Pioneered by Gelernter at Yale (Linda kernel), picked up by Jini (Sun), and TSpaces (IBM) Network-scale shared variable space, with synchronization Good for queues of work to do: some cloud architectures use a related model to distribute work to servers

38 Stateful and Stateless Protocols

39 Stateful and Stateless Protocols Stateful: server knows which step (state) has been reached Stateless: Client remembers the state, sends to server each time Server processes each request independently Can vary with level Many systems like Web run stateless protocols (e.g. HTTP) over streams at the packet level, TCP streams are stateful HTTP itself is mostly stateless, but many HTTP requests (typically POSTs) update persistent state at the server

40 Advantages of stateless protocols Protocol usually simpler Server processes each request independently Load balancing and restart easier Typically easier to scale and make fault-tolerant Visibility: individual requests more self-describing

41 Advantages of stateful protocols Individual messages carry less data Server does not have to re-establish context each time There s usually some changing state at the server at some level, except for completely static publishing systems

42 Text vs. Binary Protocols

43 Protocols can be text or binary on the wire Text: messages are encoded characters Binary: any bit patterns Pros and cons quite similar to those for text vs. binary file formats When sending between compatible machines, binary can be much faster because no conversion needed Most Internet-scale application protocols (HTTP, SMTP) use text for protocol elements and for all content except photo/audio/video HTTP 2.0 moving to binary (for msg size and parsing speed)

44 Summary

45 Summary The machine-level model is complex: multiple CPUs, memories A number of abstractions are widely used for limited-scale distribution RPC is among the most interesting and successful Statefulness / statelessness is a key design tradeoff We ll see next time why a new model was needed for the Web