1 Integrating Physical and Behavioral Health Care: Promising Medicaid Models Many individuals receiving care for behavioral health conditions also have physical health conditions that require medical attention, and the inverse is also true. Unfortunately, our physical and behavioral health care systems tend to operate independently, without coordination between them, and gaps in care, inappropriate care, and increased costs can result. This brief examines five promising approaches currently underway in Medicaid to better integrate physical and behavioral health care. They can be arrayed along a continuum that ranges from relatively modest steps to coordinate care between the two systems, to more ambitious efforts to implement a single integrated system of care. 1. Integrated care begins with screening patients for conditions in addition to the ones they present for. A number of evidence-based tools are available for primary care providers to use to screen for behavioral health disorders easily. Routine screening for common medical conditions among adults with behavioral health conditions can be accomplished by providing behavioral health practitioners with basic equipment like a scale, a blood pressure cuff, and a stethoscope, along with training in how to use them. Early identification of conditions helps to prevent or mitigate their progression. 2. Even when individuals get screened for other conditions and referred for care, obtaining the recommended services can be challenging. Many Medicaid programs are deploying a new cadre of navigators, who may be nurses, social workers, or trained paraprofessionals, to help Medicaid beneficiaries navigate the health care system. Navigators functions can range from simply helping individuals to seek care, to interacting with their health care providers on their behalf, to improving home and community-based support for their clients. Navigators also foster patient engagement. 3. Geographic distance between physical and behavioral health provider settings can itself be a significant barrier to coordinated care. Community health centers are leaders in the co-location of physical and behavioral health care at the same site. Medicaid s system of prospective, cost-based payment for health centers supports this model because the costs of licensed behavioral health practitioners can be included in the calculation of health centers prospective rates. 4. A growing number of states are using the Medicaid health home option, established by the ACA, to advance the integration of physical and behavioral health care for Medicaid beneficiaries with serious mental illness. Health home services, which are eligible for a 90% federal match for two years, include comprehensive care management, transitional care, referral to community and social services, and other services to foster integrated care for people with complex conditions and needs. Community mental health centers are one natural choice to be designated health home providers for Medicaid beneficiaries with serious mental illness. 5. System-level integration of services and fiscal accountability underpins truly person-centered, holistic care and represents the most advanced model on the integration continuum. A fully integrated system for Medicaid beneficiaries is one that directly provides and is at financial risk for the entire complement of acute physical and behavioral health services covered by Medicaid.
2 In 2006, a report issued by the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors cited research showing that adults with serious mental illness (SMI) die, on average, 25 years earlier than the general population, and that the rates of illness and death in this population have been on the rise. 1 Much of the excess mortality among people with SMI is explained by their disproportionately high rates of mortality from the same preventable conditions, including cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, that are among the leading causes of death in the general population. People with SMI also have higher rates of modifiable risk factors for these conditions, such as smoking and obesity; experience higher rates of homelessness, poverty, and other causes of vulnerability; and face symptoms associated with SMI, such as disorganized thought and decreased motivation, that impair compliance and self-care. Further, co-occurring substance use disorders are prevalent among individuals with SMI. But despite the high rate of substance abuse comorbidities among people with SMI, the mental health and substance abuse systems are often entirely separate, and both are segregated from the physical health system. This fragmentation of the health care system can lead to inappropriate care, disjointed care, gaps in care, and redundant care, and can result in increased health care costs. Medicaid, the nation s public health insurance program for low-income people, is the chief source of coverage for low-income individuals with disabilities, including many who have behavioral health needs. Mental illness is more than twice as prevalent among Medicaid beneficiaries as it is in the general population, and roughly 49% of Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities have a psychiatric illness. 2 As might be expected given its coverage role, Medicaid is also a major source of financing for mental health services. The Medicaid program finances more than one-quarter of the nation s spending for behavioral health care and it is, by far, the largest single source of funding for public mental health services. 3 Mental health care is an important driver of Medicaid costs. Among the highest-cost 5% of Medicaid-only enrollees with disabilities, three of the five most prevalent disease pairs include psychiatric illness. The most common disease pair is cardiovascular disease and psychiatric illness, found in 40% of the Medicaid beneficiaries in this top spending group. 4 Given the prevalence of mental illness in the Medicaid population, the high level of Medicaid spending on behavioral health care, and the adverse impact that uncoordinated care can have on the physical health of people with SMI and, thus, on total spending, it is not surprising that Medicaid directors consider initiatives to integrate physical and behavioral health care to be one of their top priorities. According to a 50-state Medicaid survey conducted by the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured in 2012, a large majority of states had initiatives underway in state fiscal year (FY) 2012 or planned for FY 2013 to better coordinate care between the two systems. 5 The Affordable Care Act (ACA) also places a heavy emphasis on this issue, responding to shortcomings of the current fragmented systems of care, and setting forth expectations for better outcomes and reduced costs for those with comorbid conditions. In addition to increasing access to care by expanding Medicaid and private health coverage, the ACA specifically includes mental health and substance use disorder services as one of the ten categories of required essential health benefits, and the law requires parity between the mental and physical health benefits covered by health plans. The ACA also establishes new mechanisms and funding opportunities designed to promote coordinated and person-centered care, such as a new Medicaid option for health homes, a large trust fund dedicated to expanding health center services and capacity, and initiatives to develop Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Medicaid enrollees who are also eligible for Medicare are excluded from these data.
3 Interested in both improving care and controlling Medicaid costs, and aided by federal reforms and investment, states, health plans and provider systems are increasingly developing and implementing strategies to better integrate physical and behavioral health services. Efforts to date have taken a variety of forms, but two central themes emerge. One is the importance of identifying all of a patient s health care needs regardless of why or through what door he or she entered the health care system. The other is the broad goal of personcentered care and the specific role of care coordination in achieving it. This brief examines several approaches that state Medicaid programs, health plans, and providers are pursuing, ranging from relatively modest steps to improve coordination between the physical and behavioral health systems, to more ambitious efforts to fully integrate them. In a recent paper on integrated physical and behavioral health (PH/BH) care, the SAMHSA-HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions (CIHS) outlined a continuum of collaboration/integration, ranging from separate systems and settings with little communication between them, to PH/BH co-location with some degree of collaboration in screening and treatment planning, to fully integrated care, manifested when behavioral and physical health care providers and other providers function as a true team in a shared practice and with a shared vision, and both providers and patients experience the operation as a single system treating the whole person. 6 (Figure 1) Considering different strategies as stages along an integration continuum can help states, health plans, and providers assess where they are currently and determine what next steps they might take to further integrate the care that Medicaid beneficiaries receive, even if full integration cannot be achieved. Nationwide, many state agencies, plans and providers are implementing PH/BH integration strategies in Medicaid that can be mapped loosely to the different levels of collaboration/integration identified in the SAMHSA-HRSA framework. This brief highlights five strategies currently underway in Medicaid: universal screening; navigators; co-location; health homes; and system-level integration. These models may offer those seeking to advance PH/BH care integration in Medicaid promising directions for change.
4 The foundation of integrated care is a holistic view of the individual and personal health as complex, integrated systems, rather than a simple sum of independent body systems. It follows that integrated care begins with an assessment of patients for conditions and/or the risk of developing conditions in addition to the ones they present for. As a practical matter, this means the adoption by primary health care providers of tools to screen for behavioral health needs and, by the same token, the adoption by behavioral health providers of tools to screen for physical health needs. Today, it is more common for primary care providers (PCP) to screen for behavioral health needs than for behavioral health providers to screen for physical health needs. Numerous studies have documented the effectiveness of screening for behavioral health disorders in primary care settings, and a number of evidence-based tools to screen for depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance use disorders are quick and easy to administer and are available in the public domain. 7 Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), a method of screening for substance use disorders, represents one such evidenced-based practice that is reimbursable under many state Medicaid programs (see Box 1). Oregon is including an SBIRT benchmark and improvement target among the measures for which its ACO-like Medicaid Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs) will be accountable. The CCOs will be eligible for incentive funds based on their performance on the SBIRT metric. 9 Routine screening for common medical conditions among adults with behavioral health conditions is equally critical. Such screening can be accomplished by providing behavioral health practitioners with basic equipment like a scale, a blood pressure cuff, and a stethoscope, along with training in how to use them. The Small County Care Integration Quality Improvement Collaborative, established by the California Institute of Mental Health, takes this approach to assessing clients at the time of their intake at publicly funded behavioral health settings. County mental health centers participating in the Collaborative measure and record blood pressure, weight, and body mass index at each patient visit. When they identify a health concern, they refer patients for medical care as appropriate. is a comprehensive approach to identifying persons with or at risk of substance use disorders who present at primary care centers, emergency departments, trauma centers, and other community settings. Screening at the time of intake to assess the severity of substance use and determine the appropriate level of treatment affords the opportunity for early intervention, before more serious consequences occur. Brief Intervention focuses on increasing the individual's awareness of his or her substance use problem and his or her motivation to change the behavior. Referral to Treatment provides access to the needed specialty care. SAMHSA reports a growing body of evidence in support of SBIRT's clinical and cost-effectiveness in identifying and treating risky alcohol and tobacco use. Screening for behavioral health problems is especially important as a prevention strategy for children and adolescents. According to the 2003 report from President George W. Bush s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, undetected and untreated "early childhood mental health disorders may persist and lead to a downward spiral of school failure, poor employment opportunities and poverty in adulthood." 10 Researchers have estimated that over 1 million children and adolescents experience problems suggestive of a pre-psychosis risk state. 11 Early intervention may prevent the onset of psychosis among at-risk individuals, and also avert other adverse mental health outcomes associated with psychosis risk states, such as mood syndromes,
5 substance use disorders, and functional decline. 12 The earlier that depression is identified and treatment begins, the more effective the treatment is likely to be and the less likely recurrence becomes. As with adults, physical health screens for children and adolescents with a behavioral health disorder or condition are as important as behavioral health screens for those who present for physical health reasons. For example, a child taking medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) may develop tachycardia and high blood pressure, and a child in active treatment for a behavioral health disorder may begin to experience symptoms of an emerging medical condition such as asthma. Routine medical screening by the principal behavioral health provider serves to foster identification of physical health conditions when they first appear and thereby prevent or mitigate their progression. Even when individuals with behavioral health problems get screened for other medical conditions and referred for care, obtaining the recommended follow-up services can be extremely challenging. People with serious behavioral health conditions often lack trust in professionals and agencies. Also, by the nature of their disorders, they may find the task of seeking medical care overwhelming or frightening. Further, people with chronic mental illness can be poor historians of their own health and unable to provide information that medical professionals need to diagnose their medical problems. For Medicaid beneficiaries and other lowincome people with behavioral health conditions, these obstacles are compounded by poverty and other disadvantages. Recognizing the difficulties of navigating the health care system, professionals in both the physical and behavioral health spheres have affirmed the benefit of having an informed companion help patients with this challenge, and Medicaid programs are exploring opportunities to use a new cadre of navigators to serve in this role. The navigator workforce in behavioral health settings includes professionals such as nurses and licensed clinical social workers as well as paraprofessionals. The role of navigators may be as simple as assisting individuals with behavioral health conditions in seeking medical help, or as sophisticated as directly interacting with medical professionals to advocate for a certain medical procedure or reconcile medications. Their role also involves promoting patient engagement to help achieve better-integrated, more holistic care. Whatever their formal credentials, effective navigators must have the ability to establish a trusting relationship with their clients. In addition, the relationships they establish with providers can foster a culture of coordination and integration between physical and behavioral health professionals. "Wellness Recovery Teams" offer an example of a clinical team-based navigator model that has improved access to and integration of primary care for patients with SMI (see Box 2). 13 In another model, Medicaid programs in 30 states and the District of Columbia cover the services of Certified Peer Specialists, individuals who have personal experience with behavioral health needs and have completed training and certification to apply that experience to help their clients. 14 Peer Specialists often interact with Medicaid beneficiaries outside of office-based settings, supporting them in their homes and communities. Evidence has shown that peer navigators are effective at improving patient activation," a construct that measures an individual's self-management capacity, and at increasing the likelihood that a person with SMI will use primary care medical services. 15
6 , piloted in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, represent a clinical team-based navigator model that includes Medicaid-funded navigators, a registered nurse (RN) with behavioral health training and experience, and a Master's-prepared or licensed behavioral health professional. The Wellness Recovery Teams identify and engage with adults with SMI who also have at least one chronic medical condition. These navigator teams form a virtual multidisciplinary treatment team with each individual they serve by building relationships with professionals from all the agencies involved in their client s care, including the PCP, medical specialists, social service providers, family members, Certified Peer Specialists, and other community-based service providers. Important functions of the RNs are to review clients medications and contact their PCPs to reconcile them if necessary, and to provide clinical insights and behavioral health consultation to the PCPs. The RNs also coach patients before their medical visits about what to expect and what kinds of information to share. Teaching clients self-advocacy and self-management is a priority. In the first six months of the pilot, emergency department (ED) visits for medical care declined by 11% relative to the preceding six months, and psychiatric and medical inpatient admissions fell by 43% and 56%, respectively. All participating adults were connected with a PCP and 92% were connected to a medical specialist. Nearly 90% made progress toward recovery from substance abuse; 44% reported improved physical health. The pilot has produced other positive outcomes, too. Since working with the navigator teams, primary care practices have become more collaborative and willing partners in treating individuals with serious behavioral health disorders. ED physicians have also expressed strong support for the navigators, and at least one hospital developed a mental health rotation for its ED physicians following its experience with the teams. The physical distance between separate physical and behavioral health provider settings can itself pose a significant barrier to coordinated care. Especially for Medicaid beneficiaries and other low-income people, the child care and transportation costs associated with making trips to multiple locations can be prohibitive. Increasingly, an approach that is being used to address this problem is co-location the provision of physical and behavioral health care at the same site. The co-location trend is particularly visible in community health centers. In 2012, about 1,200 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) operating in nearly 9,000 sites served more than 21 million patients in lowincome communities; 41% of those served were Medicaid beneficiaries. 16 The ACA established a dedicated fiveyear $11 billion trust fund for the health center program, primarily to increase health center capacity to meet expected increased demand for health care as coverage expands; 17 this significant new investment has enabled many health centers to enhance the medical, oral, and behavioral health services they offer. The National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) reported that, in 2010, over 70% of health centers provided mental health services, 55% provided substance abuse treatment services, and 65% provided components of integrated care, such as a shared treatment plan. 18 Health centers provide behavioral health services either by employing or contracting with licensed behavioral health practitioners, primarily to treat patients with mild to moderate behavioral health disorders. Some health centers provide a broader scope of behavioral health services and treat individuals with more serious and chronic mental health conditions. Golden Valley Health Centers in California is an example of a community health center that provides an array of behavioral health services to achieve integrated treatment for its patients (see Box 3).
7 Medicaid s system of prospective, costbased payment for health centers supports the provision of behavioral health care in this setting because health centers can include the costs of licensed behavioral health practitioners in the calculation of their prospective rates. This integration of Medicaid funding for physical and behavioral services in the health center context contrasts with Medicaid fee-for-service payment, in which primary care and behavioral health providers are reimbursed separately for the specific services they deliver. Still, health centers may face other Medicaid payment barriers. For example, some states do not allow health centers to include the costs of multiple services provided to the same individual on the, located in Merced and Stanislaus Counties, California, which serve a large number of Medicaid beneficiaries, have co-located behavioral and physical health services. They employ a psychologist, licensed clinical social workers, associate social workers, and psychiatrists to provide a full array of treatment for persons with SMI as well as milder depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and stress. The availability of physical and behavioral health services at the same site, an organizational culture of integration, and the use of an integrated care plan promote integrated care for Golden Valley patients with behavioral health conditions. Changing the culture in provider settings is challenging and time-consuming. Clinicians in settings serving low-income populations and communities, in particular, face heavy caseloads and are stretched thin just to meet patients primary physical health care needs. Medical professionals may view initiatives that expand their work to encompass behavioral health issues as overwhelming, because identifying additional health needs and arranging for follow-up and referrals require more time and effort. The director of behavioral health services at Golden Valley reports that it took a few years for the medical staff, who ultimately did embrace integrated care, to recognize that the added time and effort up-front resulted in more effective and efficient care for their patients in the long run. same day, such as a physical health and a behavioral health service. Other states prohibit same-day billing for certain combinations of behavioral health services. 19 Also, although Medicaid covers the services and allows the costs of licensed behavioral health practitioners, many of the substance use treatment professionals employed by or under contract to health centers are not licensed; therefore, health centers must find other financing sources for these services. Finally, some states have not activated billing codes established specifically for Medicaid payment for SBIRT, hindering health centers from providing these particular services. While co-location enables health centers to provide highly integrated care within their walls," this model has also been enhanced in some cases. For example, in Genesee County, Michigan, a pilot project involving a partnership between a health center and a community-based behavioral health provider located on the same campus has produced encouraging results (see Box 4). 20 The pilot is a hybrid of colocation and navigator models that extends the reach of care integration by employing navigator teams to help The Genesee Health System s health center and Hope Network, a human services agency serving a predominantly Medicaid and low-income population, are located on a shared campus. Hope Network connects patients with PCPs in the health center, who share patient medical information and develop treatment plans collaboratively with Hope Network staff. The health center also provides pharmacy support, facilitating access to medication and educating patients about medication compliance. Hope Network employs Navigator Teams to monitor and support clients who are receiving primary care at the health center, locate needed specialty care that is not available through the health center, and connect patients with community-based services and supports. All needed services and supports are encompassed in a single integrated care plan that is coordinated by the Navigator Teams. Hope Network reports that, for the small cohort of clients who received Navigator Team services and for whom longitudinal data were available, psychiatric inpatient admissions per person fell from an average of 1.95 in the year prior to receipt of navigator services, to.48 after receiving navigator services for one year.
8 clients gain access to specialty care and support services that are not available through either of the co-located entities. Health homes, a new Medicaid state plan option established by the ACA, are designed to support comprehensive, coordinated care for Medicaid beneficiaries with complex health care needs. Medicaid health homes can be viewed as an outgrowth and enhancement of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, a care delivery approach designed to promote care that is patient-centered, coordinated across the health care spectrum, and provided by a team of professionals led by a patient s personal physician. 21 The ACA provides for a temporary 90% federal Medicaid matching rate for health home services provided to Medicaid beneficiaries who have two chronic conditions, or have one chronic condition and are at risk for another, or have one serious and persistent mental health condition. 22 Health home services include comprehensive care management; care coordination and health promotion; comprehensive transitional care; patient and family support; referral to community and social support services; and the use of health information technology to support these services. The idea is that health home services connect, coordinate, and integrate the many services and supports, including primary health care, behavioral health care, acute and long-term services, and family and community-based services, that Medicaid beneficiaries with chronic and often complex conditions need. In health home programs for Medicaid beneficiaries with serious mental health conditions, behavioral health agencies are a natural choice to be the designated health home providers. However, there are some challenges to overcome. First, behavioral health providers must be willing and able to provide the holistic and longitudinal care expected from the health home model, which may not have been their mode of practice previously. Second, state and federal laws intended to protect client confidentiality regarding the use of mental health and substance abuse treatment services have had the unintended consequence of preventing information-sharing that is essential to support integrated care for individuals with both physical and behavioral health needs. Third, both low Medicaid reimbursement rates for behavioral health services and fee-for-service payment have worked against a more integrated approach to care. In combination, these factors have contributed to a siloed system of behavioral health care, with limited incentives and capacity for coordination and collaboration aimed at producing more comprehensive and integrated care. A growing number of states are using the health home option and its enhanced federal support to advance PH/BH integration for Medicaid beneficiaries. Missouri was the first state to adopt health homes specifically for individuals with SMI (see Box 5). Since then, four additional states (Rhode Island, Ohio, Iowa, and Maryland) have received approval for health home programs targeted to this population, and all but two of the 13 states with approved health home programs include SMI as one of the chronic conditions that can qualify Medicaid beneficiaries to enroll in health homes. The comprehensive nature of health home services and the holistic approach to care that health homes represent place health homes further east on the PH/BH integration continuum than the models discussed earlier.
9 , community mental health centers (CMHCs) certified by the state Department of Mental Health serve as designated providers, responsible for providing health home services as well as behavioral health treatment to participating Medicaid beneficiaries. In addition to meeting federal health home requirements, the CMHCs must also meet state-established criteria in order to provide health home services, including active use of the state s electronic health record for care coordination and prescription monitoring; access standards; NCQA recognition as a PCMH; and improvement on statespecified clinical indicators. Health home providers receive a per member per month fee that is based on the costs of establishing a clinical and administrative team to provide health home services, including a health home director responsible for leading practice transformation and day-to-day operation of the health home, and, at a minimum, nurse care managers with primary care backgrounds, primary care providers under contract to provide medical consultation and treatment, and administrative support staff. Since becoming designated health home providers, the CMHCs have provided extensive training to staff on topics such as patient engagement in treatment, support for patients with complex medical conditions, and team-based care. The CMHCs screen for medical concerns and use evidence-based practice guidelines to treat identified conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes. Additional strategies include comprehensive care management and care coordination, wellness education and self-care management, and integrated care plans, all of which are supported by the state s electronic health record system for Medicaid enrollees. Missouri has enrolled close to 19,000 Medicaid beneficiaries in CMHC-led health homes. Preliminary results reported by the state indicate that the percentage of beneficiaries in these health homes who had one hospitalization or more declined by 27% between 2011 and In addition, adults continuously enrolled since the inception of the program (approximately 2,800 individuals) showed marked improvement in key quality metrics related to management of diabetes, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels. 23 These preliminary data suggest the potential that PH/BH integration through health homes might hold to improve outcomes, decrease unnecessary hospital utilization, and reduce costs for high-need Medicaid members. While the approaches described above involve efforts to coordinate physical and behavioral health care that sometimes extend well beyond the organizational boundaries of clinicians, practices, and agencies, each model stops short of fully integrated services and fiscal accountability, which underpin truly person-centered and holistic care. Such system-level or systemic integration represents the most advanced stage on the PH/BH integration continuum. One model of system-level integration can be seen in the Medicaid managed care program in Maricopa County, Arizona (see Box 6). Many states with Medicaid managed care programs include limited behavioral health benefits in their contracts with managed care organizations (MCOs) typically, a limited psychiatric inpatient benefit, outpatient therapy and, sometimes, inpatient detoxification. Behavioral health services for Medicaid enrollees who require more intensive treatment and rehabilitation services and supports have often been viewed as beyond the scope of Medicaid MCO contracts, and beneficiaries generally obtain these services on a fee-for-service basis, or through a separate Behavioral Health Organization (BHO), or through the local or
10 funding and accountability for care provided to county residents with SMI will rest with one managed care entity that is responsible for providing behavioral health care that encompasses recovery services for those with the most serious mental health and substance use disorders, and for providing physical as well as behavioral health services for Medicaid-covered adults with SMI. The managed care entity is expected to build on the use of SMI health homes, blending strengths of the PCMH model with best practices from the behavioral health system, including: Health education and health promotion; Primary prevention; Early identification and intervention that reduce the incidence and severity of serious physical and mental illness; Member-defined engagement, treatment planning, and service delivery; Peer and family members actively involved participants at all levels; and Implementation of SAMHSA evidence-based practices designed to promote and support Recovery for adults with SMI including Supported Employment, Permanent Supportive Housing and Assertive Community Treatment a multidisciplinary team approach that provides off-site treatment, rehabilitation and support to persons with serious and persistent mental illness,. Additionally, the managed care plan would have to meet specific benchmarks designed to measure the plan s performance in improving care and the patient care experience and in reducing growth in aggregate physical and behavioral health care costs. state mental health and substance abuse authorities. In a departure from this model, Arizona recently issued a procurement for a contractor to serve as the Regional Behavioral Health Authority in Maricopa County, which would be responsible for providing all Medicaid and other publicly-funded behavioral health services for county residents and, in the case of adult Medicaid beneficiaries with SMI, for providing Medicaid-covered physical health services as well. In this way, Arizona is seeking a comprehensive, fully integrated health plan to provide the full complement of physical and behavioral health care for adult Medicaid enrollees with SMI, including coordination of Medicare and Medicaid benefits for dual eligible members. In addition to integrated PH/BH care for adults with SMI, the chosen vendor will also be responsible for behavioral health services for both children and other adults in Medicaid, and for non-medicaid children and adults for whom the Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Behavioral Health Services receives funding. The state recently issued a Request for Information (RFI) exploring the feasibility of implementing a similar model statewide. An assessment of whether the approach that is, holding a managed care entity accountable and at financial risk for the full spectrum of behavioral health and Medicaid-covered physical health services for the Medicaid SMI population results in a high degree of PH/BH integration will be of wide interest to other state Medicaid programs. It may also help to inform federal initiatives to promote innovative models of coordinated and accountable care that are focused particularly on individuals and populations with the most complex and highcost needs for care.
11 The rising human as well as economic costs of fragmented health care, especially for those with the most complex needs, have fueled interest in and demand for more patient-centered approaches to providing care to Medicaid beneficiaries. Because of the morbidity and mortality risk profile of those with behavioral health conditions, Medicaid s large role in covering this population, and the fact that individuals with behavioral health comorbidities are among the program s highest-cost beneficiaries, models that improve the integration of physical and behavioral health care are attracting keen attention and taking hold in many places. No single approach in Medicaid is likely to be a universal solution; rather, a diversity of promising strategies present options for states, health plans, and providers seeking to move further in the direction of integrating care. As different models emerge and evolve, it will be important to examine how they operate and what they require, and to evaluate their performance from the perspective of patient outcomes and experience and other Medicaid program goals. This brief was prepared by Mike Nardone and Sherry Snyder of Health Management Associates and Julia Paradise of the Kaiser Family Foundation.
12 1 Parks J et al., Mortality and Morbidity in People with Serious Mental Illness, National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, October Kronick R et al., The Faces of Medicaid III: Refining the Portrait of People with Multiple Chronic Conditions, Center for Health Care Strategies, October Mental Health Financing in the United States: A Primer, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, April Kronick et al. Op. cit. 5 Smith V et al., Medicaid Today, Preparing for Tomorrow: A Look at State Medicaid Program Spending, Enrollment, and Policy Trends, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, October Heath B et al., A Standard Framework for Levels of Integrated Healthcare, SAMHSA-HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions, March Integrated Publicly Funded Physical and Behavioral Health Services: A Description of Selected Initiatives, Final Report, prepared by Health Management Associates for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, February 2007 Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in Behavioral Healthcare, SAMHSA White Paper, April, See Oregon CCO Incentive Measures, Oregon Health Authority website, Baseline-Data.aspx 10 Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America, The President s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, Final Report, July Kelleher I et al., Identification and Characterization of Prodromal Risk Syndromes in Young Adolescents in the Community: A Population-Based Clinical Interview Study, Schizophrenia Bulletin 38 (2), March McGorry P et al., Early Intervention in Psychosis: Concepts, Evidence and Future Directions, World Psychiatry 7(3), October This pilot was developed through a collaborative effort between the state Medicaid program and the Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, Montgomery County Office of Behavioral Health, and its managed care partner, Magellan Behavioral Health of Pennsylvania. 14 'Peers' Seen Easing Mental Health Worker Shortage, Kaiser Health News, September 11, Druss B et al., The Health and Recovery Peer Program: A Peer-Led Intervention to Improve Medical Self-Management for Persons with Serious Mental Illness, Schizophrenia Research 118(1-3), May Public Law , The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Section (a) and (b). 18 Lardiere M et al., NACHC 2010 Assessment of Behavioral Health Services Provided in Federally Qualified Health Centers, National Association of Community Health Centers, January FQHCs_1_14_11_FINAL.pdf 19 Brolin M et al., Financing of Behavioral Health Services within Federally Qualified Health Centers, SAMHSA/HRSA, July 23, Recovery Navigation Teams, The Hope Network Diversion Program Report, Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, and American Osteopathic Association, February P.L , The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Section October 29, 2013 PowerPoint document provided by Dr. Joseph Parks, Chief Clinical Officer, Missouri Department of Mental Health.
13 The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Headquarters: 2400 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA Phone Fax Washington Offices and Barbara Jordan Conference Center: 1330 G Street, NW, Washington, DC Phone Fax The Kaiser Family Foundation, a leader in health policy analysis, health journalism and communication, is dedicated to filling the need for trusted, independent information on the major health issues facing our nation and its people. The Foundation is a non-profit private operating foundation, based in Menlo Park, California.
A FEDERAL STATE DISCOURSE ON PRIMARY CARE AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INTEGRATION Background Material 1 The Need for Primary Care and Behavioral Health Integration Individuals with behavioral health needs often
P O L I C Y B R I E F kaiser commission on medicaid SUMMARY and the uninsured Community Care of North Carolina: Putting Health Reform Ideas into Practice in Medicaid May 2009 Why is Community Care of North
Medicaid Health Homes Emerging Models and Implications for Solutions to Chronic Homelessness November 2012 Several states have begun implementing the new Medicaid health home benefit created by the Affordable
Integrated Health Care Models and Practices The Greater Houston Behav io r al Health Affordable Care Act Initiative S e c o n d C o m m u n i t y E d u c a t i o n E v e n t I n t e g r a t e d H e a l
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NUMBER Background... 2 Policy... 2 535.1 Member Eligibility and Enrollment... 2 535.2 Health Home Required Functions... 3 535.3 Health Home Coordination Role... 4 535.4 Health
Home Care Association of Washington Conference MaryAnne Lindeblad, State Medicaid Director Washington Health Care Authority April 25, 2013 Overview Overview of Health Care Authority Public Employees Benefits
Idaho Health Home State Plan Amendment Matrix: Summary Overview This matrix outlines key program design features from health home State Plan Amendments (SPAs) approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
How Health Reform Will Help Children with Mental Health Needs The new health care reform law, called the Affordable Care Act (or ACA), will give children who have mental health needs better access to the
The Maryland Public Behavioral Health System Arleen Rogan, Ph.D. Division Director, Integrated Health Services Family Services, Inc. Arleen.firstname.lastname@example.org Behavioral Health includes: Mental health conditions
Managing Care Transitions in Medicaid: Spotlight on Community Care of North Carolina EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This second of three case studies examining key operational aspects of coordinated care initiatives
Making the Case: Supporting, Expanding and Promoting Access to Student Health Services through Innovative Health Financing Models Overview Challenging economic times invite opportunities for innovation.
Health Homes in Medicaid Melissa Cuerdon, MSW, LCSW-C and Christa Speicher, MPH Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Centers for Medicaid & CHIP Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
EMERGING SYSTEM DELIVERY MODELS FOR INTEGRATED CARE SUMMER INSTITUTE PRESENTERS With 20+ years experience as a clinician and administrator, Zohreh leads Inter-Growth s team of experts and works with clients
May 2006 Strategies For Improving Access To Mental Health Services In SCHIP Programs Prepared by: Jennifer May Children and adolescents experience substantial barriers to obtaining needed mental health
From Mental Health and Substance Abuse to Behavioral Health Services: Opportunities and Challenges with the Affordable Care Act. Ron Manderscheid, Ph.D. Exec Dir, National Association of County Behavioral
Summary of the Final Medicaid Redesign Team (MRT) Report A Plan to Transform The Empire State s Medicaid Program May 2012 This document summarizes the key points contained in the MRT final report, A Plan
Community Care Collaborative Integrated Behavioral Health Intervention for Chronic Disease Management 307459301.2.3 Pass 3 Provider: The Community Care Collaborative (CCC) is a new multi-institution, multi-provider,
Summary of the Major Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Updated 10/22/10 On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law comprehensive health care reform legislation,
Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Health Care: Development, Maintenance, and Sustainability Cici Conti Schoenberger, LCSW, CAS Behavioral Health Provider Sunshine Community Health Center Why Integrate?
Dual Eligibles and State Innovations in Care Management Ann Kohler, Director of Health Services National Association of State Medicaid Directors American Public Human Services Association Ann.Kohler@aphsa.org
TERESA C. ARMON 30 Sharon Lane East Schodack NY 12063 (518) 428-5355 (C) (518) 402-4182 (W) Email: Teresa.Armon@omh.ny.gov EDUCATION: Post Masters Certificate Nurse Practitioner in Psychiatry, 2010 Sage
UNDER THE MICROSCOPE NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THE ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION (ACO) TRAIN IS LEAVING THE STATION: ARE YOU ON BOARD? ISSUE. A 2006 Institute of Medicine report ( Performance measurement: Accelerating
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Medicaid and SCHIP in Maryland As of July 2003, 638,662 people were covered under Maryland's Medicaid/SCHIP programs. There were 525,080 enrolled in the Medicaid
Redesigning the Publicly-Funded Mental Health System in Texas Access to care when services are needed Choice in health plans for consumers and providers Integration of care at the plan and provider level
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT UPDATE & EXPANSION OF MENTAL HEALTH SEMINAR Paul Jaconette Chief Operating Officer CenCal Health Progress of Medi-Cal Expansion How is enrollment going? Approx. # of adults receiving
ValueOptions PROGRAMS THAT ADDRESS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH & MEDICAL INTEGRATION October 2014 Copyright 2014. All rights reserved. ValueOptions currently offers integrated care programs in several states. The
I S S U E kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured AUGUST 2012 P A P E R MEDICAID HEALTH HOMES FOR BENEFICIARIES WITH CHRONIC CONDITIONS Executive Summary Medicaid, the main public health insurance
Medicaid ACO Pediatric Quality Measures and Innovative Payment Models Select States Summer, 2015 Introduction Since the Medicaid program was implemented 50 years ago, it has undergone several evolutions
BRIEF July 2014 Considerations for Integrating Behavioral Health Services within Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations By Deborah Brown and Tricia McGinnis, Center for Health Care Strategies IN BRIEF
What is an Accountable Care Organization & Why is it Important to Your Home Infusion Company? Lisa Harvey McPherson RN, MBA, MPPM EMHS Vice President Continuum of Care & Chief Advocacy Officer Disclosures
An Affiliate of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 820 First Street NE, Suite 460 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-1080 Fax (202) 408-1073 www.dcfpi.org April 16, 2015 WHAT S IN THE PROPOSED FY 2016
Arkansas Behavioral Health Home State Plan Amendment Draft - 03/11/14 NOTE: Bolded text within document denotes required health home language by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with
Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile The National Summary Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Introduction... 1 Data Source and General Notes... 2 Types and Ages of Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees...
Johns Hopkins HealthCare LLC: Care Management and Care Coordination for Chronic Diseases Epidemiology Over 145 million people ( nearly half the population) - suffer from asthma, depression and other chronic
Behavioral Health Centers of Excellence & the Future of Health -draft concept paper- Healthcare reform is creating tremendous disruption in nearly all aspects of healthcare. As many industries have already
Id: NEW YORK State: New York Health Home Services Effective Date- January 1, 2012 SPA includes both Categorically Needy and Medically Needy Beneficiaries- check box 3.1 - A: Categorically Needy View Attachment
69 th Annual Meeting of the Southern Legislative Conference Medicaid Behavioral Health Homes Integrating Services- Overview and Implementation Advice Savannah, GA July 19, 2015 Michael S. Varadian, JD,
What is an Accountable Care Organization & Why is it Important to Your Home Infusion Company? Lisa Harvey McPherson RN, MBA, MPPM EMHS Vice President Continuum of Care & Chief Advocacy Officer Disclosures
ROLE OF PSYCHIATRY IN HEALTHCARE REFORM SUMMARY REPORT A REPORT BY AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES WORK GROUP ON THE ROLE OF PSYCHIATRY IN HEALTHCARE REFORM 2014 Role of Psychiatry in
Department of Health Services Behavioral Health Integrated Care Health Home Certification Application (Langlade, Lincoln, and Marathon Counties) December 18, 2013 1 Behavioral Health Integrated Care Health
STATEMENT OF JAMES MACRAE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION BEFORE THE U.S. SENATE HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR AND PENSIONS COMMITTEE WASHINGTON, D.C. OCTOBER 29, 2015 Good
ACCOUNTABLE CARE ANALYTICS: DEVELOPING A TRUSTED 360 DEGREE VIEW OF THE PATIENT Accountable Care Analytics: Developing a Trusted 360 Degree View of the Patient Introduction Recent federal regulations have
Care and EHR Integration Connecting Physical and Behavioral Health in the EHR Tarzana Treatment Centers Integrated Healthcare Outline of Presentation Why Integrate Care? Integrated Care at Tarzana Treatment
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS 1345 NC P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, MD 21244 8013 RE: Medicare Program; Request for Information Regarding Accountable
REPORT Key Findings on Medicaid Managed Care: December 2014 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE MEDICAID MANAGED CARE MARKET TRACKER Prepared by: Julia Paradise Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid, the public health insurance
February 29, 2012 Jerry Dubberly, PharmD, MBA Chief, Medicaid Division Georgia Department of Community Health 2 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, GA 30303 Dear Dr. Dubberly: RE: Comments on the Navigant Medicaid
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Medicaid and SCHIP in Florida As of July 2003 2,441,266 people were covered under Florida's Medicaid and SCHIP programs. There were 2,113,820 enrolled in the
Behavioral Health Homes For People With Mental Health & Substance Use Conditions THE CORE CLINICAL FEATURES May 2012 Acknowledgements Behavioral Health Homes for People with Mental Health & Substance Use
Medicaid Topics Impact of Medicare Dual Eligibles Stephen Wilhide, Consultant Issue Summary The term dual eligible refers to the almost 7.5 milion low-income older individuals or younger persons with disabilities
Oklahoma Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Oklahoma Department of Rehabilitation Services Oklahoma Health Care Authority Improving the System of Care for Individuals with Mental Health
Using Home-Based Programs in Other States to Support a Medicaid Claim to Intensive Home-Based Services Under EPSDT December 2005 QA Center for Public Representation I. Introduction Because EPSDT requires
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) NASMHPD Policy Brief Financing and the Public Mental Health System December 2010 NASMHPD Policy Brief Financing and the Public Mental
COMPARISON OF KEY PROVISIONS House and Senate Comprehensive Mental Health Reform Legislation Note: A full title-by-title summary of H.R. 2646, the Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2015 (Murphy/Johnson)
POLICY BRIEF September 2014 THE LANDSCAPE OF MEDICAID ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODELS Authored by: America s Essential Hospitals staff KEY FINDINGS States have increasingly sought to establish alternative payment
About This Series In February 2010, the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Department of Health Policy released Changing po 2 licy: The Elements for Improving Childhood
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Providing Health Home Care Management Interim Instruction: February 19, 2014 Introduction The Office of Mental Health (OMH) licensed and regulated Assertive Community
on on medicaid and and the the uninsured March 2013 THE MEDICAID PROGRAM AT A GLANCE Medicaid, the nation s main public health insurance program for low-income people, covers over 62 million Americans,
INTEGRATING HOUSING IN STATE MEDICAID POLICY April 2014 INTRODUCTION As evidence continues to establish supportive housing as an intervention that stabilizes people with chronic illnesses and/or behavioral
Section 8 Behavioral Health Services Superior subcontracts with Cenpatico Behavioral Health Services, Inc. to manage behavioral health services (mental health and substance abuse) for Superior Members.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Medicaid and SCHIP in Colorado As of July 2003, 377,123 people were covered under Colorado s Medicaid and SCHIP programs. There were 330,499 enrolled in the
Florida Medicaid: Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Beth Kidder Assistant Deputy Secretary for Medicaid Operations Agency for Health Care Administration House Children, Families, and Seniors Subcommittee
Judge David L. BAZELON CENTER for Mental Health Law How Will Health Reform Help People with Mental Illnesses? An analysis of the Affordable Care Act passed by Congress in 2010 and how it will affect people
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) NASMHPD Policy Brief Health Information Technology (HIT) and the Public Mental Health System December 2010 NASMHPD Policy Brief Health
Title: Grants and Funding Opportunities under the Affordable Care Act Summary of Several Sections State Options Overview: This document provides background information on grants and other funding opportunities
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Providing Health Home Care Management Interim Instruction: December 6, 2013 Introduction The OMH licensed and regulated Assertive Community Treatment Program (ACT) will
Fact Sheet AARP Public Policy Institute How Health Reform Will Affect Health Care Quality and the Delivery of Services The recently enacted Affordable Care Act contains provisions to improve health care
Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS) Office of Health Policy (OHP) State Innovation Model (SIM) Model Design June Integrated and Coordinated Care Workgroup June 16, 2015
Fixing Mental Health Care in America A National Call for Measurement Based Care in Behavioral Health and Primary Care An Issue Brief Released by The Kennedy Forum Prepared by: John Fortney PhD, Rebecca
West Virginians for Affordable Health Care The Affordable Care Act: What It Means for Nurses and Future Nurses The Affordable Care Act: What It Means for Nurses and Future Nurses Prepared by Renate Pore
Health Home Program (Section 2703) Iowa Medicaid Enterprise Marni Bussell Project Manager December 13, 2013 1 Two Health Home Programs: Same Triple Aim Goals Chronic Condition Health Home: Primary Care
Managed Long-Term Care in From Families USA June 2012 Managed Long-Term Care in Medicaid: What Advocates Need to Know As of May 2012, only 16 states were using managed care plans to provide long-term care
A Sustainable Source for Services through Health Home Legislation: What it Means for Supportive Housing The Source for Housing Solutions Sharon Rapport, CSH Lezlie Murch, Exodus Recovery Brenda Goldstein,
The VA Health Care System: An Unrecognized National Safety Net Veterans who use the VA health care system have a higher level of illness than the general population, and 60 percent have no private or Medigap
Home Health Care: A More Cost-Effective Approach to Medicaid in Illinois Illinois HomeCare & Hospice Council December 2010 As the Illinois Legislature prepares to act on the future of Medicaid, it is important
Health Reform Roundtables: Charting A Course Forward MEDICAID POLICY OPTIONS FOR MEETING THE NEEDS OF ADULTS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT APRIL 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Patient Protection
Transition from Targeted Case Management (TCM) to Health Home Care Management and non-medicaid funded Care Management (CM) Interim Instruction: February 21, 2012 The New York State (NYS) Office of Mental
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Medicaid and SCHIP in Connecticut As of July 2003, 378,961 people were covered under Connecticut Medicaid/SCHIP programs. There were 364,692 enrolled in the
Alabama Autism Task Force Preliminary Recommendations Having reviewed the findings to date from the Alabama Autism Collaborative Group (AACG), The Alabama Autism Task Force proposes the following changes
SNHPI Safety Net Hospitals for Pharmaceutical Access Why the 340B Program Will Continue to be Important and Necessary after Health Care Reform is Fully Implemented Since 1992, the 340B drug discount program
Customized Care Coordination Strategies that Fill Workforce Gaps and put a Human Face on Health Systems Page 1 Customized care coordination strategies that fill workforce gaps and put a human face on health
Mental Health 101 for Criminal Justice Professionals David A. D Amora, M.S. Director, National Initiatives, Council of State Governments Justice Center Today s Presentation The Behavioral Health System
Comprehensive Care Management Program The ValueOptions Comprehensive Care Management Program: ValueOptions has partnered with McKesson Health Solutions, a leading healthcare services and technology company,
1115 Medicaid Waiver Programs Section1115 of the Social Security Act allows CMS the authority to approve state demonstration projects that improve care, increase efficiency, and reduce costs related to
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Medicaid and SCHIP in Kansas As of July 2003, 262,791 people were covered under Kansas's Medicaid and SCHIP programs. There were 233,481 enrolled in the Medicaid
Health Reform and the AAP: What the New Law Means for Children and Pediatricians Throughout the health reform process, the American Academy of Pediatrics has focused on three fundamental priorities for
Ohio s Care Coordination Program A Proven Opportunity for a new way in Ohio s Medicaid Program Ohio s Status Quo: The economy and reliance on one time funding has led to an $8 billion shortfall State expenditures
Health Disparities in H.R. 3590 (Merged Senate Bill) Definitions: Health disparity population is defined in the bill as defined in Section 485E (Sec. 931) Current Law: a population is a health disparity