How to run casing and openhole pressure tests
|
|
- Julianna Jenkins
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 How to run casing and openhole pressure tests Prof. dr. Davorin Matanović
2 Leak-off test PRESSURE TESTING below the casing seat is generally performed for two reasons: 1. To test the cement job. 2. To determine the fracture gradient in the first sand below the casing shoe. If the cement job is faulty, remedial work can be carried out before further drilling is attempted. Usually, the next casing string depends on what can be contained with the one just set. So maximum permissible well-bore pressure that can be imposed on the formation is valuable information for the operator. 2
3 Leak-off test If for some reason the operator anticipates a need for a total hydrostatic pressure in excess of the test pressure, he should either retest with the drill string back in the last casing string or set a liner before drilling ahead. Testing initially to leak-off is an arbitrary decision that depends on the operator's objectives. If experience shows the hydrostatic pressure plus circulating pressures will not exceed 1920 kg m -3 (16 lb/gal.) then there is no need to increase the pressure to the leak-off point that may reach 2160 kg m -3 (18 lb/gal.) On the other hand, if the next casing string depends on what can be contained with the last casing string then maximum advantage can be obtained from a specific knowledge of the maximum permissible well-bore pressure that can be imposed on the formation. Thus, in this case the operator can profit from a knowledge of the maximum leak-off and rupture pressure. 3
4 Leak-off test TESTING the well bore for maximum pressure limits can be easy and accurate if certain specific procedures are followed. These procedures include correcting for mud gel strength, displaying pressure and volume limits on the test graph, having the proper pump rate, and running the test long enough. Post-test analysis is also a critical factor. A properly run leak-off test (maximum pressure test) provides the operator with a vital piece of information the maximum equivalent mud weight his casing shoe can stand before lost circulation occurs. 4
5 Leak-off test This must be known in daily operations such as: picking casing seats, weighting up the mud, and in critical operations such as shutting in a well when it kicks. 5
6 General procedure Well-bore pressure testing is achieved by: pulling the bit into the casing, conditioning the mud, closing the BOP, then slowly pumping mud down the drill pipe (or annulus) (0,048 to 0,08 m 3 min-1 ) until pressures reach the maximum pressure specified or the anticipated leak-off pressure for uncased holes. 6
7 General procedure The leak-off pressure is the point at which the exposed formation, or cement job, just starts to fracture as evidenced by a change in slope of the pressure-volume graph plotted. A typical leak-off pressure plot is shown in Fig. for a well which has a short section of open hole exposed. psi x 6895 = Pa bbl. x 0,159 = m 3 7
8 As shown, there is a constant pressure increase for each determined volume (m 3 ) or (bbl) of mud pumped so that the points fall on a relatively straight line. 8
9 The line should parallel, or fall slightly below, the "minimum volume" line calculated (or previously measured) for the drilling mud in the hole. 9
10 General procedure The straight-line trend continues until point A where the points bend to the right. At point A the formation starts to accept whole mud since a smaller pressure increase is seen for the same volume of mud pumped. Point A is referred to as the leak-off pressure and represents the point where the formation grains just start to fracture apart. This leak-off pressure is corrected for mud gel strength effects, then used to figure fracture pressures and equivalent mud weights. psi x 6895 = Pa bbl. x 0,159 = m 3 10
11 General procedure As shown in Fig. it is necessary to record several more points as the curve bends over to insure that the fracture limit has been reached. At point B the pump should be shut down, the instantaneous shut-in pressure recorded (point B), and the well left shut in to observe the rate of pressure decline. This pressure decline is an indication of the filtration rate which is useful information when evaluating the quality of the leak-off test. psi x 6895 = Pa bbl. x 0,159 = m 3 11
12 General procedure (1) After determining leak-off pressure, the formation fracture pressure can be calculated by first subtracting the mud gelation pressure from the leak-off pressure and adding the mud-weight pressure. P P ff ff = = P P lo lo P P g g + + P ρ h m g H Where: P ff - Well bore pressure next to the formation at fracture, Pa P lo - Leak-off pressure, Pa P g = Mud gelation pressure, Pa P h - Hydrostatic pressure of mud column ρ - Mud weight, kgm 3 g gravitational constant, m s -2 H - True vertical depth of formation, m 12
13 General procedure In terms of equivalent mud weight: Where: (2) EMW = P ff g H EMW Equivalent mud weight next to the formation when fracture occurs, kgm 3 13
14 Mud gelation effects Equation (3) used to calculate the mud gelation pressure when the leak-off test is run down the drill pipe. Pumping down the drill pipe: (3) P Where: P gdp - Gelation pressure in drill pipe, Pa L - Length of drill pipe, m d dp - Drill pipe ID, m Y - Gel strength of mud, Pa gdp = 4 L Y d dp 14
15 Mud gelation effects Equation (4) used when the test is made down the annulus. Pumping down the annulus: (4) Where: P ga - Gelation pressure in annulus, Pa L - Length of drill pipe, m Y - Gel strength of mud, Pa d h ID of hole or casing, m D dp - Drill pipe OD, m P ga = 4 d h L Y D dp 15
16 Mud gelation effects Pressure charts for Equations are given in Figs. 2 and 3. 16
17 Field gel strengths The most questionable quantity in Equations 3 and 4 is the gel strength of the mud. In normal practice the gel strength is measured at the surface in a rotational viscometer after the mud has been quiescent for 10 min. This method has been criticized because it is not performed at down-hole temperature and pressure and it does not reflect the properties of any contaminated mud which may be in the annulus. 17
18 Field gel strengths The most questionable quantity in Equations 3 and 4 is the gel strength of the mud. In normal practice the gel strength is measured at the surface in a rotational viscometer after the mud has been quiescent for 10 min. This method has been criticized because it is not performed at down-hole temperature and pressure and it does not reflect the properties of any contaminated mud which may be in the annulus. 18
19 Field gel strengths One way to take such factors into consideration is to determine gel strength using field circulation data not the field viscometer. After the leak-off test is run, wait 5-10 min and then turn on the pump with the BOP open. Measure the pres-sure necessary to break circulation (P bc ) while pumping at a rate equal to the rate used in the leak-off test. The pressure recorded is used to calculate the effective gel strength, (Y e ), of the mud using the equation: (5) Y e = 1, 083 L P ( ) bc dh Ddp ( d + d D ) dp h dp d dp 19
20 Leak-off graph Before starting the leak-off test it is important to prepare a leak-off graph which contains an "anticipated leak-off pressure" line and a "minimum volume" line. These lines are used as instant guides while the test is in progress. 20
21 Anticipated leak-off This line shows pressure expected so the test can be evaluated when the curve bends over. It has been found useful under the following conditions. 1. Testing the casing for leaks. Before drilling out, the casing should be tested for leaks. Maximum test pressure specified will vary according to which casing string is being tested. USGS requires that on offshore leases the conductor string be tested to 13, Pa (200 psi), the surface string to 68, Pa (1,000 psi) and the intermediate, liner, and production strings be tested to Pa (1,500 psi) or 0, Pa/0,3048 m (0.2 psi/ft), whichever is greater. In other areas the maximum test pressure is usually set by the operator. 21
22 Anticipated leak-off 2. Testing the open hole. The leak-off test run in the open hole should be at least as high as the predicted fracture pressure value for the area. This predicted value is obtained using data from nearby wells and equations presented by various authors. One method found most useful uses the equation: ff (6) ( ) S ' P P v p p P = K + K - Effective stress ratio S' v - Total vertical stress, Pa P p - Pore pressure, Pa P ff - Formation fracture pressure, Pa 22
23 Anticipated leak-off (S' v ) is often assumed to be 0, Pa/0,3048 m (1.0 psi/ft) of depth. This may not be accurate, especially when drilling offshore in very deep water. When possible, it should be determined using density logs. ff ( ' S ) v Po Po P = K + K - Effective stress ratio S' v - Total vertical stress, Pa P o - Pore pressure, Pa P ff - Formation fracture pressure, Pa K P ff = S ' v P P o o (6) 23
24 Anticipated leak-off Using Equation 6 and field data it is possible to determine the effective stress ratio, K, as a function of depth for a given area. Fig. 4 shows a typical plot of such data. ft x 0,3048 = m 24
25 Anticipated leak-off Effective stress ratio is in fact Poisson s ratio ν P ff = + 1 ν ( P ) ob Pp Pp P ob pressure of overburden formations, Pa 25
26 After P H is determined, the anticipated leak-off pressure line is calculated using the equation: Where: P = P P + P (7) a P a anticipated leak-off pressure, Pa ff h g 26
27 Minimum volume line This line provides a guide for determining if the pumping rate is fast enough when testing the open hole. The pumping rate should stay equal to, or a little below this line. The line represents the pressure necessary to compress the mud in the well bore until leak off occurs. It can be calculated with Equation 8. V i = C m (8) V w P i Where: V i - Volume of mud injected, m 3 C m - Compressibility of mud, Pa -1 V w - Volume of well bore (drill pipe plus annulus), m 3 P i - Injection pressure, Pa 27
28 Minimum volume line The compressibility of the mud can be calculated with the equation: Where: C w - Compressibility of water, Pa -1 C s - Compressibility of solids, Pa -1 C m = Cw s % water + C % solids (9) 28
29 Fig. 5 Curves A and B represent the volume correction which must be subtracted from each curve when drill pipe is in the hole. Curve A is for 4-in. drill pipe and curve B is for 5-in. drill pipe. Fig. 5 presents the volume of fluid (V i ) required to pressure up various size casings and open holes containing water for each 7 MPa injected pressure. 29
30 Fig. 6 A further correction must be applied if a weighted mud is in the hole. Fig. 6 shows the volume percent correction to be used as a function of mud weight. 30
31 As an example It takes 0,36 m 3 (2 ¼ bbl) of water to pressure 3048 m (10,000 ft) of 9 5/8-in. casing to Pa (1,000 psi). If 5 1/2-in. drill pipe is in the casing, 0,04 m 3 (¼ bbl) must be subtracted from the 0,36 m 3 (2 1/4 bbl), leaving 0,32 m 3 / Pa (2 bbl/1,000 psi). If 1560 kgm -3 (13 lb/gal) mud is in the hole Fig. 6. shows that it takes only 85% of this volume, or 0,32 m 3 / Pa x 0.85 = 0,272 m 3 / Pa. This value was used to construct the "minimum volume" line of Fig
32 Leak-off test procedure The following steps are general guidelines which have been useful in running the leak-off test. 1. Construct a graph similar to Fig. 1. The dashed lines indicate the "minimum volume" line and the anticipated leak-off pressure line. 2. While coming out of the hole, position the bit in the casing above the shoe. Fig. 1 32
33 Leak-off test procedure 3. If the mud is not of a known, uniform density it should be circulated until it is. Two common causes of nonuniform density are barite slugs in the drill pipe and formation cuttings in the annulus. 4. Close the ram preventer above the drilling spool. Fig. 1 33
34 Leak-off test procedure 5. Using a small pump (such as a cementing pump) begin pumping mud down the drill pipe at a constant rate of 0,04 to 0,24 m 3 min -1. The rate depends on conditions. With no open hole use 0,04 to 0,053 m 3 min -1. With sandstone formations exposed use 0,12 to 0,24 m 3 min -1 depending on the amount of open hole. Data obtained should fall very close (within 0,08 m 3 min -1. ) to the "minimum volume" line at leak-off. 6. Record on the graph the pressure after each 0,04 or 0,08 m 3 increment is pumped. Fig. 1 34
35 Leak-off test procedure 7. Continue pumping until the curve bends over, or until the anticipated leak-off pressure line is exceeded. Exceeding this line is often caused by only shale being exposed in the open hole. 8. When the pump is shut off, keep the well shut in and read an instantaneous pressure. Then read pressure values each minute for about 10 min. These should also be plotted on the graph as shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 35
36 Leak-off test procedure 9. Release the pressure and record the volume of testing fluid recovered in the trip tank if one is available. The volume of fluid recovered should approximate the volume of fluid pumped. Fig Compare the graph with typical plots to be sure it is a good test. After the test is run the leak-off pressure is picked off the graph as that point where the curve starts to bend over. Using this leak-off point, correct for mud gelation effects then calculate the equivalent mud weight which the casing seat can hold. 36
37 Leak-off test procedure The leak-off test should be run under the following drilling conditions. Casing pressure test. The test should be run before drill out with the bit positioned in the float collars. Pump rates should be 0,04 to 0,053 m 3 min -1 ( bbl/min) and continued until the maximum test pressure required is reached. Hold the pressure for the designated period of time. USGS requires a 30-min test in OCS waters. This volume-pressure plot can be used as the "minimum volume" line when running a leak-off test in open hole. 37
38 Leak-off test procedure Cement job test. After drilling out 2,44 to 3,048 m (8-10 ft) below the casing shoe and pulling the bit up above the shoe run the leak-off test pumping at 0,04 to 0,053 m 3 min -1 ( bbl/min). The cement job at the casing shoe should be tested to a leak-off pressure at least as high as the expected leak-off pressure for the area. Failure of the cement job to hold such pressures may require the casing shoe be squeeze cemented. 38
39 Leak-off test procedure A poor cement job will have a plot similar to Fig. 7. Note the departure from the "minimum volume" line and the low leak-off pressure which is repeatable. 39
40 Leak-off test procedure Formation pressure test. On the first bit run after setting casing, a test should be made on the first trip for a new bit after drilling a sand section. Procedures are the same as listed above. The pumping rate should be 0,08 to 0,12 m 3 min -1 ( bbl/min). The higher rate should cover the filtration loss to the formation and thereby keep the volume-pressure curve near the "mini-mum volume" line. Fig. 1 is an example of this type of test. 40
41 Leak-off test procedure As drilling continues, several potential problems may be anticipated which would suggest running the leak-off test to determine if the well bore has become weakened since the last leak-off test. Typical potential problems would be a lostcirculation zone, a transition zone, or a large mud weight increase. 41
42 Leak-off test procedure If the second leak-off test is lower than the first, one might suspect a failure of the cement job which would require squeeze cementing, or a weaker formation has been exposed which may require a liner. Various logging methods are available to help define the stratigraphy and suggest a solution. When testing in a long section of open hole the pump rate may need to be increased to as high as 0,24 m 3 min -1 (1.50 bbl/ min). Before leaving a dry hole it is useful to run a leak-off test to get additional formation fracture information which will be useful in defining fracture gradients for that area. 42
43 An example This example shows how the various steps perform the leakoff test. Assume 244,48 mm (9 5/8 in.) casing is set at 3048 m (10,000 ft), and the hole is then deepened to 3057 m (10,030 ft) after the primary cement job has been tested. Mud weight is 1560 kgm -3 (13 lb/gal), and the mud has a 10-min gel strength of 4,788 Pa (10 lb/100 sq ft). Before the test, 3048 m (10,000 ft) of 139,7 mm (5 1/2 in.) drill pipe is in the hole. A sand is exposed from 3048 m to 3054 m (10,000 ft to 10,020 ft) and it has a pore pressure, P 0, of 358,510 5 Pa (5,200 psi). 43
44 An example Mud gel pressure. In this case it was decided to pump down the drill pipe when running the leak-off test. Due to mud gel strength, it will be necessary to apply 4, Pa (70-psi) extra surface pressure to overcome gelation forces. This gel pressure is obtained by entering Fig. 2 with 4,788 Pa (10 lb/100 sqft) gel strength value then reading 4, Pa/3048 m (7 psi/ 1,000 ft) of pipe. For 3048 m (10,000 ft) of drill pipe, we need to apply 4, Pa (7 x 10 or 70 psi). Equation 3 gives a similar answer. If the contractor had decided to pump down the annulus he would have needed 6, Pa (100 psi) extra surface pressure to overcome the gelation forces. 44
45 An example In Fig. 3, a gel strength of 4,788 Pa (10 lb/100 sqft) and an annulus of 244,48 mm (9 5/8 in.) casing x 139,7 mm (5 ½ in.) drill pipe gives 0, Pa/304,8 m (10 psi/1000 ft) of annulus. For a 3048 m (10000-ft) annulus, apply 6, Pa (10 x 10 or 100 psi). Equation 4 gives similar results. Some operators pump down the annulus and drill pipe. If this was tried in this example the mud would, as always, take the path of least resistance and flow only down the drill pipe when leak-off occurred. No major benefit is achieved by pumping down the annulus and the drill pipe simultaneously. 45
46 An example Minimum volume line. This line, as plotted in Fig. 1, was determined earlier to have a slope of 0,272 m 3 /68, Pa (1,7 bbl/1000 psi) for the hole conditions given above. psi x 6895 = Pa bbl. x 0,159 = m 3 46
47 ff ( ' S ) v Po Po P = K + An example Anticipated leak off. Using fracture data for the area (such as that in Fig. 4) the effective stress ratio, K, is found to be 0.85 at 3048 m (10000 ft). The overburden stress gradient is assumed to be 0, Pa/0,3048 m (1,0 psi/ft) therefore S' V = 689, Pa (10000 psi.) The formation fracture pressure P ff calculated with Equation 6 is 639, Pa (9280 psi). P ff = 0.85 (689, , ) + 358, = 639, psi. 47
48 P = P P + a ff h P g An example The anticipated leak-off pressure is determined using Equation 7. P a = 639, ,81 x 1560 x , = 178, Pa This pressure is drawn on the leakoff graph (Fig. 1). 48
49 Leak-off data Before shutting in the well the bit was positioned in the casing just above the shoe, and the mud circulated until 1560 kgm -3 (13 lb/gal) mud was going in and coming out. When the kelly was removed the hole stood full and no "U-tube" action of the mud was observed. The BOP above the drilling spool was closed and mud was pumped down the drill pipe at a rate of 0,08 m 3 /min (0,50 bbl/min). As each 0,08 m 3 /min (0,50 bbl) was pumped, the pump pressure was plotted on the leak-off graph. 49
50 Leak-off data Fig. 1 shows the results. At 175, Pa (2540 psi), point A, the curve started bending over. This was the leak-off pressure of the sand exposed. Pumping continued until point B, then pressures were plotted each minute for 10 min (point C). At this time the fluid was bled from the well into the trip tank and 0,96 m 3 (6 bbl) of mud was recovered. The volume recovered checked with the amount injected. 50
51 Leak-off data To verify mud gel strength pressure, mud was pumped (after waiting 5 min) down the drill pipe at 0,08 m 3 /min (0,50 bbl/min) and the amount of pressure needed to break circulation was measured as 17, Pa (260 psi). This value was picked at the maximum pressure (Fig. 1, point D) measured before the pressures fell back. Using the 17, Pa (260 psi) gelation pressure and Equation 5 the average gel strength of the mud was calculated to be 7,22 Pa (15.1 lb/100 sq ft). 51
52 Y = e = 1,083 L 1,083 17, Leak-off data This value is higher than the value measured with the viscometer. P gdp is therefore 7, Pa (110 psi). P ( ) bc dh Ddp ( d + d D ) dp h dp dp = 5 10 ( 0,222 0,1397 ) ( 0, ,232 0,1397 ) d = 7,22 Pa 52
53 P ff = 175,13 10 Leak-off data Formation fracture pressure was determined using Equation 1. As equivalent mud weight, the formation fracture pressure becomes (Equation 2): = P P + ρ g H lo 5 = 633,65 10 Pa Pff EMW = = g H g 5 m 7, = + 9, = 633, , = 2119 kg m -3 53
54 Rock stress behavior In the example, drilling mud started to leak off when surface pressures reached 175, Pa (2540 psi). A better understanding of what is happening in the formation as well-bore pressures increase helps to dispel the belief that once the leak-off test is run the formation fracture strength cannot be regained. Some believe that a leak-off test can weaken the formations significantly. This belief is false. 54
55 Stress theory It has often been thought that a well-bore fractures much like a pipe bursts when too much internal pressure is added. This is not so. The fracture pressure of a pipe is determined by tensile strength of the pipe, but the fracture pressure of a formation is determined primarily by overburden and tectonic compressive loads on the rock grains. 55
56 Stress theory The tensile strength of most rocks such as sandstone is small relative to the compressive loads. In this article, the tensile strength of the formations is treated as equal to zero. A well bore fractures when the mud pressure in the well bore causes the rock grain stress to be decreased from high-compressive stresses to zero. At this point, additional pressure causes a fracture to form, and mud can flow into the fracture. 56
57 Stress theory Using the same well conditions as in the example, and assuming the original horizontal stress in the sandstone is 496, Pa (7200 psi), the rock stresses around the well bore before and during the leak-off test can be calculated. To do this, first consider stress conditions in the sand before the well was drilled. 57
58 After the well is drilled the rock stresses change to those shown in Fig. 8b. It is the horizontal stress tangential to the borehole wall, S' t, which is of primary concern when rock rupture is being considered. The symbol S' t describes the horizontal stress "tangential" to the well bore wall, and S' r is the horizontal stress radial to the well bore. Stress theory 58
59 Stress theory 358, Pa 466, Pa 496, Pa 3048 m 526, Pa 689, Pa 496, Pa 689, Pa 466, Pa In Fig. 8a a block of sandstone is shown with a vertical stress S' v of 689, Pa (10000 psi) on top and two equal horizontal stresses, S' h, of 496, Pa (7200 psi). 59
60 Rock grain stress Well-bore fracture is imminent when the rock grain stress decreases to zero. In this example, rock grain stress (S h ) is Pa (2000 psi) before the well is drilled and 168, Pa (2440 psi) (S t ) after the well is drilled. S h and S t are "grain stress" or "effective rock stress, calculated by: S h =S h -P o and S t =S t -P o 60
61 Rock grain stress Because of the presence of the well bore, the horizontal stress S' t is not constant but varies relative to the distance from the well bore. Fig. 9 is a plot of S' t for the 200,03 mm (7 7/8 in.) hole. 61
62 Note that it decreases from 466, Pa (7640 psi) at the well bore to near original conditions of 497, Pa (7218 psi) 508 mm (20 in.) from the center of the hole. Likewise, if the pore pressure is subtracted, grain stress goes from 168, Pa (2440 psi) at the well bore wall to 139, Pa (2018 psi). Rock grain stress 62
63 The stress distribution given in Fig. 9 can be calculated by the equation: S t = S h [1 + (a 2 /r 2 )] - [P w - P o ] a 2 /r 2 ) (11) and S' t = S t + P o Where: a = Radius of well bore, m r = Radius under consideration, m As well bore pressure (P w ) is increased during a leak-off test, horizontal grain stress (S t ) is decreased. Rock grain stress 63
64 Fig. 9 also shows the stress distribution when the total well-bore pressure has been increased to Pa (9200 psi) with the leakoff pressure of Pa (2540 psi) shown in Fig. 1. Note that the pressure of 2540 psi needed to initiate leak-off is much higher than the pressure required to form a long vertical fracture. Such a fracture is evidenced by a large drop in pump pressure and large volumes of mud loss. Rock grain stress 64
65 Rock grain stress If this occurs the remedy is simple. Bleed off pump pressure. This allows the fracture to close. After a mud filter cake is formed across the fracture on the borehole wall, it will have regained the stress effect of the well bore, and can again accept Pa (2540 psi) pump pressure. This is the process of "healing the formation" as practiced in regaining lost circulation. 65
66 Fig. 1 shows a leak-off test below surface casing at 914,4 m (3000 ft). In this case 3,048 m (10 ft) of hole was made below the surface casing. Thus this test is primarily a test of the cement job. In this example the leak-off occurred at 45, Pa (655 psi), the rupture pressure was 518, Pa (7520 psi), and the propagation pressure was 43, Pa (635 psi). Leak-off examples 66
67 Considering the leak-off pressure as the maximum permissible, results in a maximum mud weight of 1656 kg/m 3 (13,8 ppg) as shown below: Leak-off examples ρ max 5 45,2 10 = = ,4 9,81 kg/m 3 67
68 Leak-off examples This does not prove that all formation below the surface casing will hold 1656 kg/m 3 (13,8 lb/gal) mud. It does show that no more than 1656 kg/m 3 (13,8- lb/gal) mud should be used unless a retest shows an increase in strength. An increase in strength has been noted in many cases after several days of drilling. It is uncommon for a zone which held only 1656 kg/m 3 (13,8 lb/gal) as shown in Fig.1 to hold 1200 kg/m 3 (10 lb/gal) later. 68
69 Leak-off examples A knowledge of this increase in strength might be very helpful in many cases when drilling into a pressure-transition zone. The increase in strength, when it occurs, is probably due to plugging of pore spaces by drill solids. It should be emphasized that this strength increase may or may not occur. It is not something the operator can assume will happen. 69
70 Leak-off examples Open hole test Fig. 2 is a leakoff test where the drill string is back in the surface casing, but there is 1829 m (6000 ft) of open hole. It is noted that the leak-off occurred at about 45, Pa (655 psi). Also it is noted that 4,16 m 3 (26 bbl) of mud were required to reach this point while in Fig. 1 only 0,608 m 3 (3,8 bbl) of mud where required for the casing-seat test in Fig.1. 70
71 Leak-off examples The primary difference is the amount of open hole. In Fig. 1 only 3,048 m (10 ft) of hole had been opened below the casing seat. In Fig. 2, 1829 m (6000 ft) of hole had been opened. The additional mud was required because of filtration and loss of mud to very permeable sands. 71
72 Leak-off examples The leak-off pressure of 45, Pa (655 psi) in Fig. 2 shows the formation just below the casing seat will hold a 1656 kg/m 3 (13,8 lb/gal) mud. Again this does not ensure that all the open formations below 914,4 m (3000 ft) will hold 1656 kg/m 3 (13,8 lb/gal) mud, because 45, Pa (655 psi) imposed, say at 1829 m (6000 ft) would represent only a 228 kg/m 3 (1,9 lb/gal) increase in mud weight. 72
73 Leak-off examples Thus the 1829 m (6000 ft) formation has been tested to only 1428 kg/m 3 (11,9 lb/gal) in the test shown in Fig. 2. However, in young sediments normally associated with most offshore and coastal area formations the leak-off test results taken just below the casing shoe are generally indicative of the maximum mud weight that can be used. 73
74 Test for first sand. Fig. 3 is a leak-off test for the first sand below protective casing. It will be noted that the leak-off occurred when the surface pressure increase reached 134, Pa (1950 psi). This occurred with a 1620 kg/m 3 (13,5 lb/gal) mud in the hole, and the surface pres-sure plus mud weight represents a formation resistance equal to a mud weight of 2070 kg/m 3 (17,25 lb/gal): Leak-off examples ρ max 5 134,45 10 = = , kg/m 3 74
75 Special considerations Special considerations in running leak-off tests include: Pumping rate. Decision to test to a leak-off pres-sure. Which pressure to use if there is a difference in drill pipe and annulus pressure. Changes in line slope during the test. Frequency of testing and the effect on formation resistance. What is the maximum mud weight relative to that shown on a leak-off test. 75
76 Special considerations The pumping rate should be kept at a low value, such as 0,04 to 0,08 m 3 /min (0,25 to 0,5 bbl/ min). Tests in Figs. 1, 2, and 3 were run at 0,05 m 3 /min (0,3 bbl/min). This means the normal rig pump should generally not be used. Exceptions would be with plunger-type pumps where the suggested low volumes can be attained. A cementing unit, with pump and volume tank is generally to be preferred. 76
77 Special considerations If pumping rates are too high, the leak-off test may follow the pattern shown in Fig. 4. There is no indicated leak-off pressure; the formation suddenly ruptured, and whole mud was lost quickly. Even this type test will probably have no long-range detrimental effects. The primary problem is that the objective of determining the leakoff pressure has not been reached. 77
78 Objections to leak-off tests Some operators are repelled by the concept of increasing surface pressure until some mud is lost to the formation. Others may feel that their drilling conditions do not justify such tests. If all the drilling is to be performed in formations with a normal pore pressure, leak-off tests would not be necessary. The belief, commonly accepted in drilling, that, once the formation is tested to leak-off, it will never again hold that much pressure is an out-dated concept. 78
79 Objections to leak-off tests There may, however, be valid reasons for not testing to a leak-off pressure. At times, surface equipment may not permit the surface pressure necessary to reach the leak-off point. If the maximum leak-off pressure is desirable under these conditions a retest may be performed later, after the mud weight has been increased. Another reason for not testing to leak-off is that the operator knows based on offset well data or geologic information that future mud weights will not be high enough to justify a test to leak-off. 79
80 Fig. 5 shows what has been ob-served in some tests. The pressure leaked off at 41, Pa (600 psi), continued to increase to Pa (900 psi) where it leaked off again, and then continued to increase to the true leak-off. However, if the pressure at which this occurs is substantially below that anticipated, pumping should be continued to the rupture pressure, because in all probability some type remedial action will be necessary. Pressure differences 80
Drilling Problems. pull
Drilling Problems Pipe Sticking Lost Circulation Hole Deviation Pipe Failures Borehole Instability Mud Contamination Formation Damage Hole Cleaning H S General Equipment & Personnel Pipe Sticking Can not
More informationThe Impact Of Cementing On Proper Well Control
The Impact Of Cementing On Proper Well Control Lee Dillenbeck Senior Advisor, Cementing Chevron ETC Drilling and Completions 2010 Chevron Learning Objectives Explain the main reasons for cementing wells
More informationHydraulic Fracturing Operations Well Construction and Integrity Guidelines API GUIDANCE DOCUMENT HF1 FIRST EDITION, OCTOBER 2009
Hydraulic Fracturing Operations Well Construction and Integrity Guidelines API GUIDANCE DOCUMENT HF1 FIRST EDITION, OCTOBER 2009 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations Well Construction and Integrity Guidelines
More informationA CRITICAL REVIEW OF AN IMPROVED WELL CONTROL PROCEDURE FOR THE PREVENTION OF BLOWOUTS
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF AN IMPROVED WELL CONTROL PROCEDURE FOR THE PREVENTION OF BLOWOUTS By Muhammad Imran B00535042 Submitted In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MEng in Petroleum
More informationBS PROGRAM IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING (VERSION 2010) Course Descriptions
BS PROGRAM IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING (VERSION 2010) Course Descriptions PETE201 Introduction to Petroleum Engineering (Core) (1-0-1) The course's main goal is to provide the student with an overview of
More informationIrresponsible of Statoil
Irresponsible of Statoil Having reviewed all the available information, Bellona feels it is irresponsible of Statoil to resume production at Gullfaks C. All production from the Gullfaks C platform was
More informationStep Rate Testing: Determining Fracture Pressure for Injection Wells 2016 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL CONFERENCE DENVER, CO LEWIS WANDKE, PE
1 Step Rate Testing: Determining Fracture Pressure for Injection Wells 2016 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL CONFERENCE DENVER, CO LEWIS WANDKE, PE AND KEN COOPER, PE PETROTEK ENGINEERING CORPORATION Overview
More informationEnergize your mind. www.halliburton.com April 2007. Lightweight Cement Meets Challenges of Weak Formations and Depleted Zones
Energize your mind. www.halliburton.com April 2007 Lightweight Cement Meets Challenges of Weak Formations and Depleted Zones Today, operators are forced to drill in increasingly challenging environments
More informationDiagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT ) in Ultra Low Permeability Formations
Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT ) in Ultra Low Permeability Formations Pressure transient testing has been the standard method over the years to obtain important well information such as reservoir
More informationArgentina Tataru*, Marcel Adrian Piteiu*, Dan-Paul Stefanescu*, Ioana Vlasin*
WIERTNICTWO NAFTA GAZ TOM 24 ZESZYT 1 2007 Argentina Tataru*, Marcel Adrian Piteiu*, Dan-Paul Stefanescu*, Ioana Vlasin* NEW TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF ROMGAZ COMPANY REGARDING DRILLING, COMPLETION AND
More informationMECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS
MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS This is the second tutorial on bending of beams. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises.
More informationTubular Design and Downhole Equipment
Well Construction Basics How Wells are Designed & Constructed Minimum Expectations and Best Practices Assessing Completion Reliability and Risk Key Performance Indicators Tubular Design and Downhole Equipment
More informationWELL COMMANDER Versatile multi-cycle ball-activated drilling valve for mitigating downhole hazards
WELL COMMANDER Versatile multi-cycle ball-activated drilling valve for mitigating downhole hazards Note: Operating instructions updated July 2014 WELL COMMANDER: Versatile multicycle ball-activated drilling
More informationIntroduction. The following is an outline of the contents of this paper: Definition of Artificial Lift Page 2. How an Oil Well is Produced Page 2
Introduction Canadian Oilwell Systems Company and it s subsidiaries are suppliers of oil well Electric Submersible Pumping systems (ESPs). Such pumps are used to lift oil from oil wells so that the oil
More informationAn Introduction to Oil and Gas Well Servicing
An Introduction to Oil and Gas Well Servicing Educational Material from the IOM 3 Oil and Gas Division The global network for the materials cycle Introduction The Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining
More informationDecisionSpace Well Engineering Software
DATA SHEET DecisionSpace Well Engineering Software DecisionSpace Drilling & Completions Key features Configure the right tools to drill any type of well Dramatically simple to use, complete complex fluids
More informationGreen Thread Product Data
Green Thread Product Data Applications Dilute Acids Caustics Produced Water Industrial Waste Hot Water Condensate Return Materials and Construction All pipe manufactured by filament winding process using
More informationRigorous Qualification and Development Program
FMC Subsea High Capacity 20K Wellhead System Overview 03/20/2013 UWD HC-20 Subsea Wellhead System Rigorous Qualification and Development Program 2 1 Qualification program Qualification testing is performed
More informationDIRECTIONAL DRILLING
DIRECTIONAL DRILLING 1. General. Installation of pipelines through the levee embankment using directional drilling technology is prohibited. Installation of pipelines through a flood control project foundation
More informationGas Well Deliverability Testing
Gas Well Deliverability Testing What is deliverability testing? The "deliverability" of a gas well can be defined as the well's capacity to produce against the restrictions of the well bore and the system
More informationApplication for Monitoring and Analysis of real-time drilling data PFAS from ITC a.s
Application for Monitoring and Analysis of real-time drilling data PFAS from ITC a.s ITC a.s Stalsbergveien 7 3115 Tønsberg Phone: 33 32 29 80, web: www.itcas.no Management note PFAS has been developed
More informationBarometric Effects on Transducer Data and Groundwater Levels in Monitoring Wells D.A. Wardwell, October 2007
Barometric Effects on Transducer Data and Groundwater Levels in Monitoring Wells D.A. Wardwell, October 2007 Barometric Effects on Transducer Data Barometric Fluctuations can Severely Alter Water Level
More informationGraduate Courses in Petroleum Engineering
Graduate Courses in Petroleum Engineering PEEG 510 ADVANCED WELL TEST ANALYSIS This course will review the fundamentals of fluid flow through porous media and then cover flow and build up test analysis
More informationINSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!
In-situ Testing! Insitu Testing! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:! To allow the determination of shear strength or penetration resistance or permeability of soils that would be difficult or impossible
More informationSpecification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems
Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems The following specifications provide Allan Block Corporation's typical requirements and recommendations. At the engineer of record's
More informationPhysics 1114: Unit 6 Homework: Answers
Physics 1114: Unit 6 Homework: Answers Problem set 1 1. A rod 4.2 m long and 0.50 cm 2 in cross-sectional area is stretched 0.20 cm under a tension of 12,000 N. a) The stress is the Force (1.2 10 4 N)
More informationRecommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations
Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations API standards program includes best-practices for hydraulic fracturing which include: Proper well construction and integrity Zonal
More informationHDD High Definition Data. defining a new standard for Open Hole, Cased Hole & Production Logging
HDD High Definition Data defining a new standard for Open Hole, Cased Hole & Production Logging Get More Accurate Data At No Extra Cost From RECON s Standard Logging Service At 10 samples per foot (33
More informationWELL DEVELOPMENT COMPARING SEVERAL METHODS OF WELL
WELL DEVELOPMENT This continuing education course is primarily written for an audience of groundwater professionals who live in a water rich state, Florida. Because Florida is blessed with one of the most
More informationAn Overview of Drill Cuttings Re-Injection Lessons Learned and Recommendations ABSTRACT
11 th International Petroleum Environmental Conference Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 12-15, 24. An Overview of Drill Cuttings Re-Injection Lessons Learned and Recommendations M-I SWACO ABSTRACT Drill
More informationObjectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.
Lab 3 Tension Test Objectives Concepts Background Experimental Procedure Report Requirements Discussion Objectives Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity
More informationUnderstanding Well Construction and Surface Footprint
Understanding Well Construction and Surface Footprint Well Construction Timeline Well Site Planning & Preparation Drilling Stage 1: Planning and Preparation Acquire Surface Lease Agreement Determination
More informationoil liquid water water liquid Answer, Key Homework 2 David McIntyre 1
Answer, Key Homework 2 David McIntyre 1 This print-out should have 14 questions, check that it is complete. Multiple-choice questions may continue on the next column or page: find all choices before making
More informationSubsea Drilling Systems
Subsea Drilling Systems 2 Reliable, cost-effective solutions for offshore drilling... FMC Technologies Subsea Drilling Systems lead the industry with reliable and cost-effective drilling solutions which
More informationBOP PRESSURE TESTING PROCEDURE
0 Discuss Operator BOP requirements WITH RIG MANAGER. Insure that all Romfor's BOP equipment is tested consistent with Romfor's policy. This may require Nabors to incur the cost for the testing subcontractor
More informationDetermination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells
International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 40 (2003) 1049 1076 Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells M.D. Zoback a, *, C.A. Barton b, M. Brudy b, D.A. Castillo
More informationE-Line and Braided Line. E-Line Open Hole wireline
E-Line and Braided Line E-Line Open Hole wireline Braided Line More strength Less feel Harder to seal Much harder to fish Braided line stronger (2800 to 3500 lb working strength, but less feel when fishing
More informationSelection and Determination of Tubing and Production Casing Sizes
CHAPTER 3 Selection and Determination of Tubing and Production Casing Sizes OUTLINE 3.1 Overview 3.2 Overview of Nodal Analysis 3.3 Selection and Determination of Tubing and Production Casing Sizes for
More informationPlug and Abandonment Forum
Plug and Abandonment Forum Developments in Non-Traditional Plug and Abandonment Methods Thomas Ferg ConocoPhillips Norway June 13, 2013 Efficient P&A Thoughts - Do as Much as Possible Without a Rig Remove
More informationComposite Drill Pipe Perfect Fit for Short-Radius Drilling
American Oil & Gas Reporter Article Composite Drill Pipe Perfect Fit for Short-Radius Drilling With much of the nation's "easy-to-produce" oil and gas gone, many U.S. companies are looking for lower cost
More informationOil and Gas Terms. Anticline: An arch of stratified rock layers that may form a trap for hydrocarbons.
Oil and Gas Terms American Petroleum Institute (API): The API is the trade organization for the oil and gas industry, which establishes standards governing industry operations, safety and the manufacturing
More informationFlorinel ªuþoiu*, Argentina Tãtaru*, Bogdan Simescu* RIGLESS JOBS IN GAS WELLS
AGH DRILLING, OIL, GAS Vol. 30 No. 1 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/drill.2013.30.1.221 Florinel ªuþoiu*, Argentina Tãtaru*, Bogdan Simescu* RIGLESS JOBS IN GAS WELLS 1. INTRODUCTION At the same time with
More informationTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL SCOPE This section of the specifications includes requirements for the Slurry Trench Cutoff Wall and related work as indicated on the
More informationNORSOK Standard D-010 Rev. 4, August 2012
Below is a listing of the main changes 1. Definitions of suspension, temporary and permanent abandonment 2. Included more examples of well barrier schematics 3. Included illustrations for permanent abandonment
More informationShear Force and Moment Diagrams
C h a p t e r 9 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams In this chapter, you will learn the following to World Class standards: Making a Shear Force Diagram Simple Shear Force Diagram Practice Problems More Complex
More informationENHANCED OIL RECOVERY BY HORIZONTAL WATERFLOODING
ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY BY HORIZONTAL WATERFLOODING Final Report September 6, 2002 September 30, 2005 By Scott Robinowitz Dwight Dauben June Schmeling May 2006 Work Performed Under Contract No. DE-FG26-02NT15452
More informationReport as Per Consulting Services Agreement Causation Factors for the Banjar Panji No. 1 Blowout
Neal Adams Services 16434 DeLozier Street Houston, Texas 77040 Office 713-849-4323 Fax 713-849-1943 www.nealadamsservices.com Registered in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Colorado and New Mexico Friday, September
More informationWellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM
WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM WORKOVER & COMPLETION OPERATIONS CORE CURRICULUM AND RELATED FORM WCT-2WF FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL The purpose of the core curriculum is to identify a body of knowledge
More informationENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P
ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P This material is duplicated in the Mechanical Principles module H2 and those
More informationDiagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT ) Analysis
Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT ) Analysis Over the past few years at Halliburton we have seen a marked increase in the number of diagnostic fracture injection tests (DFIT ) performed along with
More informationGRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK
GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK Although numerous papers have been written concerning the proper gradation for concrete mixes, they have generally dealt with plastic mixes, and very little published
More informationDrilling Performance Benchmark Metrics Overview: Benchmark Metric Definitions Below the Mudline (BML) SPUD Date Kick Off Point (KOP) KOP Date
Page 1 of 7 Drilling Performance Benchmark Metrics Overview: The primary application of the Dodson Drilling Performance Benchmark Database System is to measure and rank drilling performance for wells drilled
More informationChapter 5 Using Newton s Laws: Friction, Circular Motion, Drag Forces. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 5 Using Newton s Laws: Friction, Circular Motion, Drag Forces Units of Chapter 5 Applications of Newton s Laws Involving Friction Uniform Circular Motion Kinematics Dynamics of Uniform Circular
More informationC O M P L E T I O N S E R V I C E S
Well Screens Well Screens Contents ProWeld TM ProWeld TM TOP DynoFlo TM DB UniFlo HELICAL Inflow Control Screen UniFlo TM ROI Inflow Control Screen SlimFlo TM Pre-packed CoilFlo TM DB Screen Communication
More informationALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE
C H A P T E R 5 ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE Section I. BASICS 5-1. Considerations. For safe, economical pile foundations in military construction, it is necessary to determine the allowable load capacity
More informationGuidelines For Sealing Groundwater Wells
Guidelines For Sealing Groundwater Wells Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Environment and Conservation Water Resources Management Division Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Department
More informationCertificate Programs in. Program Requirements
IHRDC Online Certificate Programs in OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT Program Requirements IHRDC 535 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02116 Tel: 1-617-536-0202 Email: certificate@ihrdc.com Copyright International Human
More informationModelling and Simulation Multi-stage Fracturing Propagation in Tight Reservoir through Horizontal Well
Modelling and Simulation Multi-stage Fracturing Propagation in Tight Reservoir through Horizontal Well Smail ALIOUI (1) (1) Sonatrach First Calgary Petroleums, Association Division, Hassi Messaoud, 30500,
More informationResearch question: How does the velocity of the balloon depend on how much air is pumped into the balloon?
Katie Chang 3A For this balloon rocket experiment, we learned how to plan a controlled experiment that also deepened our understanding of the concepts of acceleration and force on an object. My partner
More informationProcedures for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Remanufacture of Drilling Equipment
Addendum 2 April 2006 Procedures for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Remanufacture of Drilling Equipment API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 7L FIRST EDITION, DECEMBER 1995 Procedures for Inspection, Maintenance,
More informationDirective 059: Well Drilling and Completion Data Filing Requirements
Directive 059 Directive 059: Well Drilling and Completion Data Filing Requirements December 19, 2012 Effective June 17, 2013, the Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) has been succeeded by the Alberta
More informationReservoir Performance Monitor Formation evaluation and reservoir monitoring
A d v a n c i n g R e s e r v o i r P e r f o r m a n c e Reservoir Performance Monitor Formation evaluation and reservoir monitoring Reservoir Performance Monitor (RPM) Comprehensive reservoir evaluation
More informationCOMPARISON OF DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES BETWEEN TOP DRIVE AND ROTARY TABLE IN GEOTHERMAL FIELDS: A CASE STUDY OF OLKARIA GEOTHERMAL FIELDS.
Proceedings 5 th African Rift geothermal Conference Arusha, Tanzania, 29-31 October 2014 COMPARISON OF DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES BETWEEN TOP DRIVE AND ROTARY TABLE IN GEOTHERMAL FIELDS: A CASE STUDY OF OLKARIA
More informationIntroduction to Solid Modeling Using SolidWorks 2012 SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial Page 1
Introduction to Solid Modeling Using SolidWorks 2012 SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial Page 1 In this tutorial, we will use the SolidWorks Simulation finite element analysis (FEA) program to analyze the response
More informationANALYSIS OF GASKETED FLANGES WITH ORDINARY ELEMENTS USING APDL CONTROL
ANALYSIS OF GASKETED FLANGES WITH ORDINARY ELEMENTS USING AP... Page 1 of 19 ANALYSIS OF GASKETED FLANGES WITH ORDINARY ELEMENTS USING APDL CONTROL Yasumasa Shoji, Satoshi Nagata, Toyo Engineering Corporation,
More informationTax Executives Institute
Tax Executives Institute Texas Oil and Gas Transactions May 6, 2013 Circular 230 disclaimer Any US tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose
More informationEstimation of shear force for blind shear ram blowout preventers
Estimation of shear force for blind shear ram blowout preventers Abdulkadir Tekin *, Changhyok Choi, Taylan Altan, Hamit Adin Online Publication Date: 17 Feb 2015 URL: http://www.jresm.org/archive/resm2014.02st1225.html
More informationFor Water to Move a driving force is needed
RECALL FIRST CLASS: Q K Head Difference Area Distance between Heads Q 0.01 cm 0.19 m 6cm 0.75cm 1 liter 86400sec 1.17 liter ~ 1 liter sec 0.63 m 1000cm 3 day day day constant head 0.4 m 0.1 m FINE SAND
More informationWhen the fluid velocity is zero, called the hydrostatic condition, the pressure variation is due only to the weight of the fluid.
Fluid Statics When the fluid velocity is zero, called the hydrostatic condition, the pressure variation is due only to the weight of the fluid. Consider a small wedge of fluid at rest of size Δx, Δz, Δs
More informationExperiment 3 Pipe Friction
EML 316L Experiment 3 Pipe Friction Laboratory Manual Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department College of Engineering FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Nomenclature Symbol Description Unit A cross-sectional
More informationChapter 8 Design of Concrete Mixes
Chapter 8 Design of Concrete Mixes 1 The basic procedure for mix design is applicable to concrete for most purposes including pavements. Concrete mixes should meet; Workability (slump/vebe) Compressive
More informationDrill String Design. The following topics will be discussed
Drill String Design The following topics will be discussed Kelly Drill pipe Drill collars Accessories; heavy wall drill pipe, jars, stabilizers, reamers, shock sub and bit sub Drill bits 1 Kelly Used to
More informationWELL LOGGING TECHNIQUES WELL LOGGING DEPARTMENT OIL INDIA LIMITED
WELL LOGGING TECHNIQUES WELL LOGGING DEPARTMENT OIL INDIA LIMITED The Hydrocarbon E & P Process In the exploration process, a most probable hydrocarbon bearing rock structure is defined based on seismic
More information4D reservoir simulation workflow for optimizing inflow control device design a case study from a carbonate reservoir in Saudi Arabia
4D reservoir simulation workflow for optimizing inflow control device design a case study from a carbonate reservoir in Saudi Arabia O. Ogunsanwo, 1* B. Lee, 2 H. Wahyu, 2 E. Leung, 1 V. Gottumukkala 1
More informationWell control equipment. Matanović Davorin, professor
Well control equipment Matanović Davorin, professor Blowout Preventers Blowout preventers (BOPs), in conjunction with other equipment and techniques, are used to close the well in and allow the crew to
More informationADX ENERGY. Sidi Dhaher Well test Briefing Live Webcast, 4 July 2012. Wolfgang Zimmer, Paul Fink
ADX ENERGY Sidi Dhaher Well test Briefing Live Webcast, 4 July 2012 Wolfgang Zimmer, Paul Fink Decision to test ASX announcement, 3 October 2011 2 Decision to test: First Evidence Wellsite geologists (highly
More informationMud logging, also known as hydrocarbon well logging, is the creation of a detailed record (well
Types of Logging Well Logging Mud logging, also known as hydrocarbon well logging, is the creation of a detailed record (well log) of a borehole by examining the bits of rock or sediment brought to the
More informationdu u U 0 U dy y b 0 b
BASIC CONCEPTS/DEFINITIONS OF FLUID MECHANICS (by Marios M. Fyrillas) 1. Density (πυκνότητα) Symbol: 3 Units of measure: kg / m Equation: m ( m mass, V volume) V. Pressure (πίεση) Alternative definition:
More informationV47 Series Temperature Actuated Modulating Water Valves
V47 Series Temperature Actuated Modulating Water Valves Master Catalog 125 Valves, Miscellaneous (Other Than Gas) Section V Product Bulletin V47 Issue Date 0286 Application The V47 modulating valves regulate
More informationT U R B I N E G A S M E T E R
TURBINE GAS METER TURBINE GAS METER CGT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Design and function page 2 General technical data page 3 Measurement outputs page 4 Dimensions and weights page 5 Performance page 7 Pressure loss
More informationDávid Szabó*, Ján Pinka*, ¼uboš Fedorko** UGS WELLS IN DEPLETED FIELDS
WIERTNICTWO NAFTA GAZ TOM 28 ZESZYT 1 2 2011 Dávid Szabó*, Ján Pinka*, ¼uboš Fedorko** UGS WELLS IN DEPLETED FIELDS 1. INTRODUCTION While gas consumption in Slovakia is increasing, domestic gas production
More informationNOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.
September 1, 2003 CONCRETE MANUAL 5-694.300 MIX DESIGN 5-694.300 NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT. 5-694.301
More informationStandard Test Method for Mechanical Cone Penetration Tests of Soil 1
Designation: D 3441 98 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428 Reprinted from the Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Copyright ASTM Standard Test Method
More informationModule 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 5 : Geophysical Exploration [ Section 5.1 : Methods of Geophysical Exploration ]
Objectives In this section you will learn the following General Overview Different methods of geophysical explorations Electrical resistivity method Seismic refraction method 5 Geophysical exploration
More informationTunnels & Arches OLDROYD THE ULTIMATE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE SYSTEM
P r o d u c t a p p l i c a t i o n s a n d t e c h n i c a l i n f o r m a t i o n 5 Tunnels & Arches V OLDROYD THE ULTIMATE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE SYSTEM V Create dry usable space with the original X pattern
More informationBHA Design. 2011 Best-drilling-practices.tk. All rights reserved.
BHA Design Drill Collar vs. Heavy Weight Drill Pipe Use minimum number of drill collars in the BHA. The noticeable exception is the drilling of vertical wells. The main advantages of omitting drill collars
More informationCENTRIFUGAL PUMP SELECTION, SIZING, AND INTERPRETATION OF PERFORMANCE CURVES
CENTRIFUGAL PUMP SELECTION, SIZING, AND INTERPRETATION OF PERFORMANCE CURVES 4.0 PUMP CLASSES Pumps may be classified in two general types, dynamic and positive displacement. Positive displacement pumps
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Graduate Program (Version 2002)
DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Graduate Program (Version 2002) COURSE DESCRIPTION PETE 512 Advanced Drilling Engineering I (3-0-3) This course provides the student with a thorough understanding of
More informationFiber Optics in a Bakken Multi-Stage Fractured Well. Montana Tech 2011 SPE Drilling Symposium Presented by: Chelsea Kadler
Fiber Optics in a Bakken Multi-Stage Fractured Well Montana Tech 2011 SPE Drilling Symposium Presented by: Chelsea Kadler Agenda FracPoint Design FracPoint Real-time Monitoring System Downhole Equipment
More informationBest Practice for Stand-alone Screens
Best Practice for Stand-alone Screens Ian Wattie Completion Engineering Consultant Yala Peak Limited Sand Management Forum 26 th 27 th March 2014 Aberdeen 1 Stand-alone Screens Best Practices Completion
More informationEthanol-Water Phase Separation White Paper
Ethanol-Water Phase Separation White Paper Samir Jain Background The use of ethanol as a fuel in the United States has significantly increased over the past decade. Today, greater than 80% of all retail
More informationSubsea wellhead systems. Advanced solutions for extreme conditions
Subsea wellhead systems Advanced solutions for extreme conditions Subsea wellhead systems As offshore drilling pushes past 10,000-foot water depths and 30,000- foot wells, pressure increases exponentially
More informationGeomechanical Effects of Waterflooding
Geomechanical Effects of Waterflooding II INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON OILFIELD WATER MANAGEMENT OCTOBER 16 19, 2007 Dale Walters A. (Tony) Settari Taurus Reservoir Solutions General Outline Characteristics
More informationGrassroots Drilling. A History and Look Ahead. David Wennerstrom. ICOTA Roundtable October 2005 Canadian Chapter
Grassroots Drilling A History and Look Ahead David Wennerstrom ICOTA Roundtable October 2005 Canadian Chapter In the past 10 years CTD rigs have come to dominate much of the shallow gas drilling market
More informationHow to avoid fluid losses that slow drilling
How to avoid fluid losses that slow drilling OVERVIEW As a result of the highly fractured geology in Kurdistan, operators encounter constant fluid and cement losses. Many report that wells expected to
More informationPhysics 221 Experiment 5: Magnetic Fields
Physics 221 Experiment 5: Magnetic Fields August 25, 2007 ntroduction This experiment will examine the properties of magnetic fields. Magnetic fields can be created in a variety of ways, and are also found
More informationCode of Practice for Coal Seam Gas
Code of Practice for Coal Seam Gas Well Integrity DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & INVESTMENT, REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES RESOURCES & ENERGY SEPTEMBER 2012, WWW.RESOURCES.NSW.GOV.AU Title: NSW Code of Practice
More informationINDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT) Reference can be made to IS 2131 1981 for details on SPT. It is a field edtest to estimate e the penetration e resistance
More informationSeries 4000 Fiberglass Pipe and Fittings
Series 4000 Fiberglass Pipe and Fittings for corrosive industrial service Uses and applications Listings Performance Acid drains Chemical process piping Corrosive slurries Food processing Geothermal Nonoxidizing
More informationTECHNICAL NOTE Culvert Sliplining and Lining of Casings with HPPipe
TECHNICAL NOTE Culvert Sliplining and Lining of Casings with HPPipe TN 5.14 February 2010 Introduction It may be at times necessary, in an aging infrastructure, to rehabilitate drainage and sanitary lines
More information