OHIO STATE BAR O ASSOCIATION.
|
|
- Jemimah Preston
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 OHIO STATE BAR O ASSOCIATION. EST I880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion January 25, 2013 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State Bar Association Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct on the following question: May a lawyer enter into a contingent-fee agreement to negotiate an oil and gas lease on behalf of a client, where the lawyer's fee will be a fixed percentage of the possible royalty the client will potentially receive in the future? The Committee concludes that the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct ("ORPC") do not prohibit entering into a contingent-fee agreement where the lawyer represents the client in a transaction and it is agreed that the lawyer's compensation, if any, will come from revenue that the transaction will potentially generate, provided that: (1) the matter is appropriate for a contingent fee, including under ORPC Rule 1.5(d)(l)-(2); (2) the agreement does not result in an illegal or clearly excessive fee under ORPC Rule 1.5(a); and (3) the client has been fully informed under ORPC Rule 1.5(b) and (c)(1). Applicable Rules of Professional Conduct: Your request for an opinion requires consideration of the following provisions of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct ("ORPC" or "Rules"): 1.5(a) 1.5(b) 1.5(c) 1.5(c)(l) (lawyer shall not make an agreement for or charge illegal or clearly excessive fee); (basis of fee shall be communicated to the client); (fee may be contingent on outcome of the matter for which service is rendered, except in matter in which a contingent fee is prohibited); (contingent fee agreement shall be in writing signed by client and lawyer and shall state method by which fee is to be determined); 1.5 (d)(1) (contingent fees in domestic relations matters prohibited); 1.5(d)(2) (contingent fees in criminal cases prohibited). HEADQUARTERS MAILING ADDRESS PHONE 1700 Lake Shore Drive PD Box FAX /-1008 Columbus, Ohio Columbus, Ohio WEB www_ohiobar.org
2 Opinion: 1. Contingent fee agreements can be appropriate in transactional representations. The most common use of contingent-fee agreements between lawyers and clients is in personal injury litigation. But contingent fees are not necessarily confined to that context. ORPC 1.5(c) provides that "[a] fee may be contingent on the outcome of the matter for which the service is rendered, except in a matter in which a contingent fee is prohibited by division (d) of this rule or other law." Contingent fees are prohibited in domestic relations matters and in criminal cases. ORPC 1.5(d)(1)-(2). But apart from these exceptions, which are based on public policy concerns, Rule 1.5(c) does not expressly bar contingent fees for representing clients in transactions such as leases or in litigation that does not involve personal injury. Indeed, the language of Rule 1.5(c) ("contingent on the outcome of the matter") is broad enough to include many types of matters. l In 1994, the ABA's Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Committee considered several issues in connection with contingent fees, and concluded that such compensation arrangements are permitted in multiple situations -- they are not limited to situations in which the lawyer will be representing a plaintiff, or confined to clients who cannot afford to pay hourly rates or flat fees. See ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof1 Resp., Formal Op at 2 (Dec. 5, 1994). The Committee opined that "contingent fees are not limited to litigation practice." Id. 2 Rather, contingent-fee arrangements "reflec[t] the desire of clients to tie a lawyer's compensation to her performance and to give the lawyer incentives to improve returns to the client," and can potentially be appropriate whenever the lawyer and client agree to that objective. Id. In the most usual setting for a contingent-fee arrangement a plaintiff's personal-injury suit the lawyer's fee is dependent on an obvious contingency (the client's recovery), and there is an obvious risk that the lawyer will not earn any fee if the contingency does not occur. The same can be true in the transactional setting. For instance, in the oil-and-gas lease that raises the ' Two Ethical Considerations of the former Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility reflect a former assumption that contingent fees would arise in connection with a lawyer's representation of a client in litigation. See EC 2-19 (contingent fees "in civil cases" have been longaccepted in proceedings to "enforce claims"); EC 5-7 (contingent fee gives lawyer "financial interest in the outcome of litigation," but reasonable contingent fee nonetheless permissible). However, current Rule 1.5 (effective February 1, 2007) and its accompanying explanatory comments do not reflect the same assumption. See also Rev. Code (B) (requiring that a contingent fee agreement be in writing when it is in "connection with a claim that is or may become the basis of a tort action..." but without restricting contingent fee agreements to tort actions). The ABA Ethics Committee noted that "[f]ees in the mergers and acquisitions arena are often either partially or totally dependent on the consummation of a takeover or successful resistance of such a takeover. Additionally, fees on public offerings are often tied to whether the stocks or bonds come to market and to the amount generated in the offering. Banks are also hiring lawyers to handle loan transactions in which the fee for the bank's lawyers is dependent in whole or part on the consummation of the loan." (Id. at 2.) -2-
3 inquiry here, there is the possibility that the parties will not reach any lease agreement; there is also the possibility that if a lease is achieved there will be no oil or gas production and therefore no royalties resulting from the project. Additional risks include the risk of changes in the relevant law or regulations that could eliminate (or diminish) royalties, and the risk that the client will exercise its right to dismiss the lawyer, in which case the lawyer would only be entitled to recover under a quantum meruit theory. See Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. Lansberry, 68 Ohio St. 3d 570, 1994-Ohio-512 (1994). Moreover, even if royalties result from the lease, their amount would be contingent on factors outside the lawyer's control, including the productivity of the leasehold, fluctuation in the price of the commodity and fluctuation in the demand for the product.3 Courts have expressly or tacitly approved contingent-fee agreements in contexts similar to the one giving rise to this inquiry. In Schrader Byrd & Companion, P.L.L.C. v. Marks, 648 S.E.2d 8 (W. Va. 2007), a contingent fee agreement provided for the attorneys to receive ongoing payments equal to 30 percent of the increase in coal royalties that resulted from the settlement of lengthy litigation. In upholding the agreement, the court ruled that "fee payment arrangements whereby the attorney receives a portion of future income to the client do not inherently create an impermissible relationship..." Id. at 13. The court endorsed the trial court's observation that the settlement itself was uncertain, and that even after the settlement the fee was uncertain "because it was contingent on the price of coal, whether anyone would mine it, and the amount of usage that would take place." Id. See also Dream Makers, Inc. v. Marshek, Ohio-7069 (8th Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2002) (upholding, without discussing ethics rules, contingent fee agreement between inventor and lawyer who negotiated license with infringer in exchange for 40 percent of any royalties received under the licensing agreement); In re Mueller, 873 N.E.2d 652, 659 n.1 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (approving, in dicta, contingent fee charged by conservatorship's attorney for negotiating mining lease; fee was tied to amount of royalties received under lease, no fee would be received if no royalties were paid, and agreement was in writing and signed by all parties). Ethics opinions in other jurisdictions also have approved contingent-fee agreements in non-litigation settings. See, e.g., Los Angeles Cty. Bar Ass'n Formal Op. 507 (Oct. 15, 2001) (contingent fee for preparing and prosecuting a patent application, consisting of percentage of net profits from licensing the patent); Maine Prof 'l Ethics Comm'n Op. 57 (July 1, 1985) (contingent fee for obtaining development permits from administrative commission); Ill. St. Bar Ass'n Prof1 Cond. Adv. Op (July 2012) (contingent fee for identifying and recovering unclaimed Even in situations where there is no risk of non-recovery, a contingent fee can be reasonable within the definition of ORPC 1.5(a). For instance, as the ABA Ethics Committee noted, defendants may enter into "reverse contingent fee" agreements, in which their lawyers are compensated by an agreed percentage of the amount the client saves; yet the achievement of some savings from the amount the plaintiff demands is almost always a certainty. Formal Op at 2, 6 n. 14. And where there is no risk of non-recovery, market forces should be counted on to reduce the fee accordingly. See Formal Op at n. 13 (noting that in air disaster cases where insurers conceded liability and made early settlement offers, contingent fee rates averaged 17 percent of recovery). -3-
4 property of client); Ill. St. Bar Ass'n Prof I Cond, Adv. Op (1991) (contingent fee for handling securities registration, consisting of securities). 2. A contingent fee agreement must not result in an illegal or clearly-excessive fee. A contingent fee agreement can involve payments to the lawyer that stretch into the future; however, if the agreement results in excessive fees, it becomes impermissible, even if the agreement was permissible at its inception. See ORPC 1.5(a). A fee is "excessive" when it is higher than reasonable. Id. Multiple factors determine whether a fee is reasonable, including: whether it is fixed or contingent; the time and labor required; the amount involved; the results obtained; relevant time limitations; and the experience and ability of the lawyer. See ORPC 1.5(a)(1)-(8). Because a contingent fee consisting of a percentage of a client's royalty can possibly become excessive over time, the lawyer receiving such payments has a continuing obligation to monitor the agreement. In order to avoid an excessive fee, the lawyer and the client might be required to modify or even terminate the agreement at some future time. In order to avoid the possibility that the fee will become excessive over time, the lawyer and client should consider during their discussions whether it is appropriate to place an upper limit on the amount of the total fee.4 Several courts have analyzed the reasonableness of contingent fees received over time, emphasizing the ongoing nature of the reasonableness requirement. See, e.g., Holmes v. Loveless, 94 P.3d 338, (Wash. Ct. App. 2004) (evaluating reasonableness of fee is ongoing process, not restricted to time that agreement is entered into; agreement basing fee on cash distributions from joint venture not enforceable after 20 years of payments where payments had totaled more than $380,000 but legal fees were valued at only $8,000); Colorado v. Feather, 180 P.2d 437 (Colo. 2007) (contingent fee agreement under which attorney received $11,000 in oiland-gas royalties over 12 years was unreasonable, where attorney recovered only $4,000 for client and fee did not relate to value of lawyer's services; attorney's claim of "perpetual interest" in royalty payments rejected and attorney publically censured). But see Baumeister v. McReynolds, 571 N.W.2d 79 (Neb. 1997) (fee of $700,000 based on tonnage of material brought to landfill was not unreasonable after four years, where lawyer had successfully negotiated complex deal despite high risk of failure, future income was completely dependent on unpredictable usage of landfill, and client could not afford hourly rates, which would have amounted to $250,000; analyzing contingent fee agreement as a business transaction with client).5 4 Rule 1.5 cmt. [3] notes that "applicable law may impose limitations on contingent fees, such as a ceiling on the percentage allowable..." 3 This Opinion assumes that the lawyer and client have agreed on terms that could result in a contingent fee to the lawyer consisting of the payment of future revenue from a client's transaction or business. Under different circumstances, a lawyer and client might agree that the lawyer will actually "accept an interest in the client's business or other nonmonetary property as payment of all or part of a fee." ORPC Rule 1.8 cmt. [1] (emphasis added). When this occurs, the arrangement constitutes a business transaction between the lawyer and client, mandating compliance with the requirements of Rule 1.8(a). Id. However, Rule 1.8 "does not apply to ordinary fee arrangements between client and lawyer, which are governed by Rule 1.5." Id. Under -4-
5 3. Some matters are not appropriate for a contingent fee; in all events, the client's decision to enter into a contingent fee agreement must be fully-informed. While "nothing.., expressly prohibits a lawyer from entering into a contingent fee agreement with any client" (Formal Op at 3), not all matters are appropriate for a contingent fee. Contingent fees are barred in domestic relations cases (ORPC Rule 1.5(d)(1)) and in criminal cases (ORPC Rule 1.5(d)(2)). It has also been deemed impermissible to charge a contingent fee for some other types of non-litigation matters, either because they are viewed as merely administrative, or because the amount of the fee is deemed excessive, given the near certainty of a successful outcome. See, e.g., Iowa Supreme Ct. Bd. of Prof 'l Ethics & Cond. Op (Sept. 2, 1993) (disapproving contingent fee in workers' compensation matters where employer or insurer pays benefits voluntarily); Ga. St. Disc. Bd. Op. 37 (Jan. 20, 1984) (disapproving contingent fee for obtaining nofault insurance benefits); Utah St. Bar Ass'n Op. 114 (Feb. 20, 1992) (disapproving contingent fee for obtaining undisputed no-fault insurance benefits). In situations where a contingent fee is not barred, the client's decision to enter into a contingent-fee agreement must be an informed one. The lawyer must communicate the basis of the fee to the client. ORPC 1.5(b). "The nature (and details) of the compensation arrangement should be fully discussed by the lawyer and client before any final agreement is reached." Formal Op at 3. Where the client is considering a contingent fee in connection with negotiating an agreement, factors that would be particularly pertinent to discuss include: "the likelihood of success... the amount of time that is likely to be invested by the lawyer... the likely amount of the fee if the matter is handled on a non-contingent basis; the client's ability and willingness to pay a non-contingent fee; the percentage... that the lawyer would receive as a contingent fee and whether that percentage will be fixed or on a sliding scale; [and]... how expenses of the [matter] are to be handled." Id. at 3-4. The client's degree of sophistication is a significant factor in providing information sufficient to ensure that the client's consent is fully informed. ORPC Rule 1.0 cmt. [6]. The client's business acumen (or lack thereof) is especially relevant when entering into a contingent fee agreement that will potentially stretch into the future and result in a series of payments to the lawyer. Particularly in that setting, the lawyer must take into consideration "the experience and sophistication of the client with respect to litigation and other legal matters." Formal Op at 3. The importance of informed consent to a contingent-fee arrangement is underscored by the requirement that the agreement be in writing and signed by the client and the lawyer. ORPC 1.5(c)(1). The written agreement must "state the method by which the fee is to be determined." Id. In the context of a contingent fee agreement for negotiating an oil-and-gas lease, this requirement calls for express written terms outlining how the fees will be calculated against any royalties and how the fees will be paid. The agreement should also indicate how expenses will be treated. the facts presented by this inquiry, the lawyer would not acquire an interest in the client's business. -5-
6 Sincerely, Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Committee OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Note: Advisory Opinions of the Ohio State Bar Association Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Committee are informal, non-binding opinions in response to prospective or hypothetical questions regarding the application of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the Code of Judicial Conduct, and the Attorney's Oath of Office. S
OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2012-02. June 20, 2012. Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion
OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION EST I880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2012-02 June 20, 2012 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State Bar Association Committee
More information^^^^ A S S O C I AT I ON
?^}^1 OHIO STATE BAR ^^^^ A S S O C I AT I ON EST I880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2011-02 December 2, 2011 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State
More informationBased on these facts, you have raised the following questions:
r ^)1j OHIO STATE BAR gr ill ASSOCIATION,. ElI 1880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2012-01 April 10, 2012 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State Bar
More informationOPINION 2014-2 Issued August 8, 2014. Imputation of Conflicts in a Part-Time County Prosecutor s Law Firm
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov DAVID E. TSCHANTZ CHAIR
More informationOpinion #177. Advancing Litigation Costs Through Lines of Credit
Opinion #177. Advancing Litigation Costs Through Lines of Credit Issued by the Professional Ethics Commission Date Issued: December 14, 2001 Facts and Question An attorney has requested an opinion on whether
More informationETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ALTERNATIVE FEE AGREEMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE LAWYER
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ALTERNATIVE FEE AGREEMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE LAWYER BRIAN P. VOKE CAMPBELL CAMPBELL & EDWARDS ONE CONSTITUTION PLAZA BOSTON, MA 02129 (617) 241-3000 bvoke@campbell-trial-lawyers.com
More informationOPINION 2011-2 Issued October 7, 2011. Multijurisdictional Practice and Debt Settlement Legal Services
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 RICHARD A. DOVE SECRETARY 614.387.9370 888.664.8345 FAX: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov
More informationOPINION 2015-2 Issued August 7, 2015. Direct In-person Solicitation of Prospective Clients at Seminars
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov PAUL M. DE MARCO CHAIR WILLIAM J. NOVAK VICE-
More informationOPINION 2012-2 Issued June 8, 2012. Identification of Nonlawyers on Law Firm Letterhead, Websites, and Business Cards
RICHARD A. DOVE SECRETARY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 614.387.9370 888.664.8345 FAX: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov
More informationARBITRATION ADVISORY 1997-03 FEE ARBITRATION ISSUES INVOLVING CONTINGENCY FEES. August 22, 1997
ARBITRATION ADVISORY 1997-03 FEE ARBITRATION ISSUES INVOLVING CONTINGENCY FEES August 22, 1997 Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the Committee on Mandatory Fee Arbitration.
More informationAttorney s Fees: Limitations And Awards
7 Attorney s Fees: Limitations And Awards 7.01 INTRODUCTION TO ATTORNEY S FEES IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT LITIGATION To the old adage that death and taxes share a certain inevitable character, federal judges
More informationRULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]
More informationXYZ Co. shall pay $200 per hour to each of Lawyer A and Lawyer B for additional time (including travel) spent beyond the initial eight hours.
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1715 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; FUTURE CONFLICTS; RESTRICTION OF LAWYER'S PRACTICE. This responds to your letter dated December 15, 1997, requesting an advisory opinion that addresses a
More informationHow To Discipline A Lawyer
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hackett, 129 Ohio St.3d 186, 2011-Ohio-3096.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HACKETT. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hackett, 129 Ohio St.3d 186, 2011-Ohio-3096.] Attorneys
More informationJUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division A. Opinion by JUDGE NIETO. Casebolt and Dailey, JJ., concur
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS February 15, 2001 Court of Appeals No. 98CA1099 El Paso County District Court No. 96CV2233 Honorable Theresa M. Cisneros, Judge Carol Koscove, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Bolte,
More informationWHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO?
WHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO? The Oregon Child Advocacy Project Professor Leslie J. Harris and Child Advocacy Fellows Colin Love-Geiger and Alyssa
More information(1) No action shall be filed by plaintiffs' attorneys based on workplace exposure based on any theory other than workers' compensation.
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1788 POTENTIAL RESTRICTION ON ATTORNEY S RIGHT TO PRACTICE LAW WHEN CO. X REQUIRES ATTORNEY TO AGREE NOT TO FILE FUTURE LAWSUITS AGAINST CO. X IN EXCHANGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONDITIONS.
More informationORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. Formal Opinion 2011-01 (Collaborative Family Law)
ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion 2011-01 (Collaborative Family Law) Issue: Can a family lawyer enter into a collaborative law agreement consistent with her ethical duties, notwithstanding the
More informationFLORIDA PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION
POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL AUTO CA 22 10 01 08 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. FLORIDA PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION For a covered "auto" licensed or principally garaged in,
More informationReflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship
Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship [click] By Bruce A. Campbell 1 Introduction In most areas of the practice of law, there are a number of ethical issues that arise on a frequent
More informationCAN YOU PUT AN INDEPENDENT FACT WITNESS UNDER A CONTRACT THAT PROVIDES THAT HE OR SHE WILL NOT TALK TO OPPOSING COUNSEL VOLUNTARILY?
CAN YOU PUT AN INDEPENDENT FACT WITNESS UNDER A CONTRACT THAT PROVIDES THAT HE OR SHE WILL NOT TALK TO OPPOSING COUNSEL VOLUNTARILY? 1 I. Introduction by Charles L. Gholz 2 and Bryan J. Byerly 3 This article
More informationISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct
ISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct ISBA Advisory Opinions on Professional Conduct are prepared as an educational service to members of the ISBA. While the Opinions express the ISBA interpretation
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 91-3
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 91-3 I. AS COUNSEL FOR A PLAINTIFF, AN ATTORNEY MAY NOT ETHICALLY INTERVIEW PRESENT OR FORMER EMPLOYEES OF A DEFENDANT CORPORATION IF: (a) THE EMPLOYEES
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 12-11 May 2012 Subject: Digest: References: Discharged of lawyer; Division of Fees; Fees and Expenses A discharged attorney may not share in a division
More informationIowa Unauthorized Practice of Law:
Note: Current to March 19, 2015 Iowa Unauthorized Practice of Law: (NOTE: The Unauthorized Practice of Law in Iowa is governed primarily by the Iowa Court Rules and the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct.)
More informationDefining Aggregate Settlements: the Road Not to Take. By: Peter R. Jarvis and Trisha M. Rich. Summary and Introduction
Defining Aggregate Settlements: the Road Not to Take By: Peter R. Jarvis and Trisha M. Rich I Summary and Introduction ABA Model Rule 1.8(g) provides that: A lawyer who represents two or more clients shall
More informationPENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE PHILADELPHIA BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE COMMITTEE
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE Summary PHILADELPHIA BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE COMMITTEE JOINT FORMAL OPINION 2015-100 PROVIDING ADVICE TO
More informationACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT
ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is B E T W E E N : Bogoroch & Associates LLP Sun Life Financial Tower 150 King Street West, Suite 1707 Toronto,
More informationTHE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION 2009-6 AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS
THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION 2009-6 AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS TOPIC: Multiple Representations; Aggregate Settlements; Advance
More informationOpinion 465. October 1990 QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Opinion 465 October 1990 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. May an attorney ethically own an interest in a lending institution which loans money to personal injury clients of the attorney? 2. May an attorney borrow
More informationWhat to do when a lawyer dies:
What to do when a lawyer dies: Sounds like a line from a lawyer joke, but it s not. There are some serious considerations. Being mindful that the lawyer may have assumed the responsibility for thousands
More informationDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GENERAL COUNSEL DIVISION. July 11, 2002
HARDY MYERS Attorney General PETER D. SHEPHERD Deputy Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GENERAL COUNSEL DIVISION John Shilts, Administrator Workers Compensation Division Labor & Industries Building
More informationNovember 29, 2000 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Page 1 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion 00-420 Surcharge to Client for Use of a Contract Lawyer November 29, 2000 When costs associated
More informationPotential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers
Potential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers by Phillip M. Callesen and James W. May Lawyers know that one of the biggest risks of practicing law is that a client may sue the lawyer for
More informationCONTINGENCY FEE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT
CONTINGENCY FEE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this Day of, 2009 by and between JOSEPH L. KASHI, Attorney at Law, hereinafter called "Attorney" and,
More information5/12/2015 AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS PURPOSE OF AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS
Pretrial Practice 2015 4:00 P.M. PANEL TOPIC SETTLEMENT AGGREGATE SETTLEMENT CONCERNS May 12, 2015 New York, New York Kelly Strange Crawford, Esq. AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS Class Actions SINGLE LAW SUIT PROCEEDING
More informationTel: 86-020-83486962 Tel: 86-757-8327 6090 Fax: 86-020-83486990 Fax: 86-757-8327 6100
GUANGZHOU FOSHAN Room 1801, TIMES PROPERTY CENTER 2/F, 17 Hongxiang First North Street 410 Dong Feng Zhou Road, Caihong Road Guangzhou, China Foshan, China Tel: 86-020-83486962 Tel: 86-757-8327 6090 Fax:
More informationHow To Know If A Prosecutor Can Contact A Victim In A Criminal Case
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 09-03 IF THE VICTIM IN A CRIMINAL CASE THAT A COUNTY ATTORNEY IS PROSECUTING HAS RETAINED COUNSEL TO REPRESENT HIM IN A CIVIL CASE ARISING FROM THE SAME
More information101 UNBUNDLED LEGAL SERVICES
101 UNBUNDLED LEGAL SERVICES Adopted January 17, 1998. Addendum issued 2006. Introduction and Scope For many years, courts have experienced increasing numbers of pro se litigants. While by definition attorneys
More informationHot Ethics Issues for Product Liability Defense Attorneys
Hot Ethics Issues for Product Liability Defense Attorneys Dane S. Ciolino Loyola University New Orleans College of Law 6363 Saint Charles Ave New Orleans, LA 70118 (504) 861-5652 dciolino@loyno.edu Return
More informationISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct
ISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct ISBA Advisory Opinions on Professional Conduct are prepared as an educational service to members of the ISBA. While the Opinions express the ISBA interpretation
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ROBERT M. EDWARDS, JR. Jones Obenchain, LLP South Bend, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: KATHRYN A. MOLL Nation Schoening Moll Fortville, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
More informationThe Role of Defense Counsel in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims
The Role of Defense Counsel in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims I. Every criminal defense lawyer will, at sometime or another, be challenged as ineffective it comes with the territory. It is natural
More informationKENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-402 Issued: September 1997
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-402 Issued: September 1997 Since the adoption of the Rules of Professional Conduct in 1990, the Kentucky Supreme Court has adopted various amendments, and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-01170-COA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-01170-COA JAY FOSTER APPELLANT v. PAUL KOTSAKOS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/14/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES B. PERSONS COURT FROM WHICH
More informationConclusions: 1. No, qualified. 2. Yes. 3. No, qualified. Discussion:
FORMAL OPINION NO 2005-158 [REVISED 2015] Conflicts of Interest, Current Clients: Representing Driver and Passengers in Personal Injury/Property Damage Claims Facts: Lawyer is asked to represent both the
More informationCRIMINAL DEFENSE AGREEMENTS
5/6/13 CRIMINAL DEFENSE & CIVIL LITIGATION AGREEMENTS LLOYD M. CUETO LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD M. CUETO P.C. 7110 WEST MAIN STREET BELLEVILLE, ILLINOIS 62223 (618) 277-1554 CRIMINAL DEFENSE AGREEMENTS HOW TO
More informationTORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER. Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and Plaintiff's Treating Physicians
This article originally appeared in The Colorado Lawyer, Vol. 25, No. 26, June 1996. by Jeffrey R. Pilkington TORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and
More informationCONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT. This contingency fee retainer agreement is. Tel: 905 850 2642 Fax: 905 850 8544 Toll Free: 1-866-850 2642.
CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is B E T W E E N : POTESTIO LAW FIRM 401 Bay Street, Suite 1400 Toronto ON M5H 2Y4 Tel: 905 850 2642 Fax: 905 850 8544 Toll Free:
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-1343 AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation,
PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 6, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court CITY CENTER WEST, LP, a Colorado limited partnership,
More informationCaught in the Middle: What to Do When Conflicts Arise Between Policyholders and Insurers
Caught in the Middle: What to Do When Conflicts Arise Between Policyholders and Insurers Robert A. Shults Jacob A. DeLeon McFall, Sherwood & Breitbeil, P.C. Houston, Texas Within the tripartite relationship,
More informationKENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-290 Issued: September 1984
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-290 Issued: September 1984 This opinion was decided under the Code of Professional Responsibility, which was in effect from 1971 to 1990. Lawyers should consult
More informationrequires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1814 UNDISCLOSED RECORDING OF THIRD PARTIES IN CRIMINAL MATTERS In this hypothetical, a Criminal Defense Lawyer represents A who is charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 14-01 May 2014 Subject: Digest: Client Funds and Property; Fees and Expenses A lawyer may accept payment for earned services and expenses by credit
More informationSOCIAL MEDIA AND LAW FIRM MARKETING: A REVIEW OF ETHICS GUIDANCE OPINIONS
SOCIAL MEDIA AND LAW FIRM MARKETING: A REVIEW OF ETHICS GUIDANCE OPINIONS Presented by the American Bar Association Law Practice Division and Center for Professional Development American Bar Association
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN STEVEN OLSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-C-1126 BEMIS COMPANY, INC. et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
More informationORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY / HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE S MOTION TO INTERVENE
Pulitano v. Thayer St. Associates, Inc., No. 407-9-06 Wmcv (Wesley, J., Oct. 23, 2009) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy
More informationAN ATTORNEY'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIS CLIENT'S REPUTATION AND SELF-ESTEEM IN THE SETTLEMENT CONTEXT
AN ATTORNEY'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIS CLIENT'S REPUTATION AND SELF-ESTEEM IN THE SETTLEMENT CONTEXT With the increasing volume of litigation, the role of settlements in the litigation process has also increased.
More informationDELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION 1991-4. August 21, 1991
DELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION 1991-4 August 21, 1991 THIS OPINION IS MERELY ADVISORY AND IS NOT BINDING ON THE INQUIRING ATTORNEY OR THE COURTS OR ANY OTHER TRIBUNAL.
More informationKENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-275 Issued: July 1983
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-275 Issued: July 1983 This opinion was decided under the Code of Professional Responsibility, which was in effect from 1971 to 1990. Lawyers should consult
More informationNOVEMBER 2009 LAW REVIEW TRADITION AND TRENDS IN PARENT/CHILD WAIVERS
TRADITION AND TRENDS IN PARENT/CHILD WAIVERS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2009 James C. Kozlowski State court opinions and state laws cited below are representative of significant differences among
More informationThe Lien Resource. Why Outsource Medical Liens & Healthcare Reimbursement?
1 2 The Lien Resource Why Outsource Medical Liens & Healthcare Reimbursement? Eliminate the cost and time-drain of resolving liens in-house at no additional cost to your firm; Increase the likelihood of
More informationSUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO
People v. Kocel, Report,No.02PDJ035,1-08-03. Attorney Regulation. Respondent, Michael S. Kocel, attorney registration number 16305 was suspended from the practice of law in the State of Colorado for a
More informationOPINION 2013-2 Issued April 5, 2013. Direct Contact with Prospective Clients: Text Messages
RICHARD A. DOVE SECRETARY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov
More informationPennsylvania Bar Association Legal. Ethics and Professional Responsibility. Formal Opinion 99-120. Retention of Client Files
Pennsylvania Bar Association Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Formal Opinion 99-120 Retention of Client Files The Pennsylvania Bar Association Committee-on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
More informationVIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion 06-441 May 13, 2006 Ethical Obligations of Lawyers Who Represent Indigent Criminal Defendants When Excessive
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS. No. 12-10
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 12-10 A Nebraska lawyer s duties to former clients do not allow representing someone with interests materially adverse to the former client where the conflicting
More informationORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion 2014-1 (Ghostwriting by Contract Lawyers and Out-of-State Lawyers)
ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion 2014-1 (Ghostwriting by Contract Lawyers and Out-of-State Lawyers) Issue: What ethical issues are raised when (1) a lawyer licensed to practice law only outside
More informationTHE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONDUCT FORMAL OPINION NO. 2012-186
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONDUCT FORMAL OPINION NO. 2012-186 ISSUE: DIGEST: AUTHORITIES INTERPRETED: Under what circumstances would an attorney
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION CASE NO.: 99-557-3F7 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: CASE NO.: 99-557-3F7 NICOLE L. WILHELM, Debtor. / FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW This case came before the
More informationcourts within the City and also may not accept referral fees for referring such cases to lawyers in
Page 2 of 6 courts within the City and also may not accept referral fees for referring such cases to lawyers in private practice. Background A criminal matter involves an action or proceeding in which
More informationLien Law: Recognizing and Management in the Personal Injury Case
Lien Law: Recognizing and Management in the Personal Injury Case I. INTRODUCTION At first blush, a personal injury plaintiff's procurement of proceeds either through settlement or adjudication may seem
More informationAdvisory on the Law of Lawyering in New Hampshire
Advisory on the Law of Lawyering in New Hampshire Advisory No. 25 ETHICS, THE INTERNET AND ATTORNEY MARKETING (PART TWO IN A THREE PART SERIES ON ETHICS AND SOCIAL MEDIA) Attorney Conduct, Liability &
More informationIn-House Insurance Defense Counsel
In-House Insurance Defense Counsel Permissible Cost-Saving Measure or Impermissible Conflict of Interest? by Nathan Price Chaney Why have In-House Counsel? From Company s point of view: Control Effective
More informationConflict of Interests When Representing a Beneficiary and the Trustee
Conflict of Interests When Representing a Beneficiary and the Trustee In the administration of a trust or estate, an attorney may be in the position of representing both the trustee and the beneficiaries
More informationSTANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS
Notice: This Agreement is not valid unless signed and accepted by an officer of The Feldman Law Firm, P.C., who will make the sole decision whether to accept your case. This Agreement may be digitally
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, DC 20580 Washington, DC 20530. September 20, 1996
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, DC 20580 Washington, DC 20530 September 20, 1996 The Honorable Thomas A. Edmonds Executive Director Virginia State Bar
More information(3) (a) whether an attorney/executor or trustee may retain his law firm as attorney for a trust or estate for which he is serving as fiduciary;
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1515 ATTORNEY DRAFTING INSTRUMENT WHICH NAMES SELF EITHER AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OR TRUSTEE OR WHICH DIRECTS SUCH OTHER DESIGNEE TO EMPLOY ATTORNEY AS FIDUCIARY ADMINISTRATOR.
More informationShow Me the $$: Trust Accounting and Fee Agreements. Earning Fees is Good... Get the Money Up Front... 10/8/2012
Show Me the $$: Trust Accounting and Fee Agreements James M. McCauley, Ethics Counsel Virginia State Bar July 2012 Earning Fees is Good.... Get the Money Up Front... 1 1. All Lawyer Trust Accounts Must
More informationORDER and MEMORANDUM. Motions for Summary Judgment of Providence Washington Insurance Company
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE : December Term, 2002 COMPANY : Plaintiff, : No. 03844 v.
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 94-1
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 94-1 SINCE THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY IS A NEWLY DESIGNATED ENTITY WHICH, BY STATUTE, PURPORTS TO AFFORD LIMITED LIABILITY TO ITS MEMBERS, AND RECOGNIZING
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO 12-09. Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO 12-09 Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client s interests, including surrendering
More information(H.299) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: * * *
No. 44. An act relating to amending consumer protection provisions for propane refunds, unsolicited demands for payment, bad faith assertions of patent infringement and failure to comply with civil investigations.
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice NORTHBROOK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY OPINION BY JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, v. Record No. 951919 September
More informationIf you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.
If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading. Court procedures can be complex. This brochure was developed to help Ohioans who are considering representing themselves in court. It
More informationUnited States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview
United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview January 18, 2012 Jill Kirila jill.kirila@squiresanders.com Kevin Hess kevin.hess@squiresanders.com 36 Offices in 17 Countries Workers Compensation
More informationIndiana Supreme Court Answers Issue of First Impression on Attorney Fees Under Medical Malpractice Act
www.pavlacklawfirm.com August 29 2014 by: Colin E. Flora Associate Civil Litigation Attorney Indiana Supreme Court Answers Issue of First Impression on Attorney Fees Under Medical Malpractice Act This
More informationExhibit 3 INSURANCE SETTLEMENT FUND PLAN OF ALLOCATION
Exhibit 3 INSURANCE SETTLEMENT FUND PLAN OF ALLOCATION If you are eligible to receive a payment from the Insurance Settlement Fund, the amount of your payment will be calculated using the Insurance Settlement
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CALVERT BAIL BOND AGENCY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION March 10, 2016 9:00 a.m. v No. 324824 St. Clair Circuit Court COUNTY OF ST. CLAIR, LC No. 13-002205-CZ
More informationNew Guidance from the California Supreme Court on Incentive Compensation Plans and Authorized Deductions
October 2007 New Guidance from the California Supreme Court on Incentive Compensation Plans and Authorized Deductions By George W. Abele, Holly R. Lake, and M. Kirby C. Wilcox In Prachasaisoradej v. Ralphs
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 201045005 Release Date: 11/12/2010 Index Number: 162.25-05 ----------------------- ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
More information2015 IL App (3d) 130003-U. Order filed February 5, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 130003-U Order filed
More informationNYCLA Professional Ethics Committee Ethics Opinion 739 July 10, 2008
NYCLA Professional Ethics Committee Ethics Opinion 739 July 10, 2008 Topic: Fees for specialized counsel retained to negotiate a plaintiff s complex Medicare, Medicaid or private health insurance lien
More informationHistory: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971; Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976.
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Act 198 of 1965 AN ACT providing for the establishment, maintenance and administration of a motor vehicle accident claims fund for the payment of damages for injury to
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: RONALD E. WELDY Weldy & Associates Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: DAVID E. WRIGHT KEVIN D. KOONS Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 07-04
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 07-04 AN ATTORNEY MAY UNDERTAKE EMPLOYMENT AS A STAFF ATTORNEY FOR THE STANDING CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE IF THE ATTORNEY IS PROPERLY SCREENED FROM
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 13-03
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 13-03 A SALE OF A LAW PRACTICE BY A LAWYER OR LAW FIRM TO AN EXISTING ASSOCIATE EMPLOYEE OR OWNER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SALE FOR PURPOSES OF NEB. CT. R.
More informationREPRESENTATION AGREEMENT to be executed in duplicate
ATTACHMENT I (law firm letterhead optional) REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT to be executed in duplicate Dated this...... day of........................................., (year) ATTORNEY Address: Phone: CLIENT:
More informationTHE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White
THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)
More information