IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AVON SURAJ BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES
|
|
- Maximillian Hardy
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV BETWEEN FURNESS RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND AVON SURAJ ESSENTIA LIMITED Defendants BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES Appearances: Mr. S. Young instructed by Mr. K. McQuilkin for Claimant Mr. S. Sharma instructed by Mr. A. Le Blanc for Second Defendant JUDGMENT 1. The facts are not in dispute. The Claimant is a car rental company and the owner of motor vehicle registration number PCB 3883 ( the motor vehicle ). At the material time the motor vehicle was assigned by the Claimant to Ray Brillinger ( Brillinger ), an occupant of a gated community known as Cascade River Gardens ( River Gardens ). The Second Defendant is a security firm and under contract to River Gardens to provide security services for the premises in accordance with a written contract.
2 2. On the 1 st August 2007, pursuant to an arrangement made between the Claimant and Brillinger, the keys for the Motor vehicle were left with a security guard employed by the Second Defendant at the guard booth situated at the entrance to River Gardens. The keys had been placed in a sealed envelope marked with the Claimant s name and handed to the guard on duty for collection by someone on behalf of the Second Defendant. 3. It is not in dispute that sometime between the 2 nd and 3 rd of August 2007 the First Defendant, a security guard employed by the Second Defendant, without the permission of either the Claimant or Brillinger, removed the motor vehicle from the compound and while driving it was involved in an accident. The evidence is that the First Defendant took the vehicle for the purpose of visiting his girlfriend who had just given birth. The motor vehicle was subsequently recovered but was assessed as uneconomical to repair and written off. There is no evidence identifying the First Defendant as the guard who received the keys. 4. This action proceeded against the Second Defendant as owner of the car. The case as pleaded is that the First Defendant caused the motor vehicle to be involved in an accident by reason of his negligence in the driving and controlling and managing of the said motor vehicle. The particulars of negligence pleaded relate to the First Defendant s negligence in the driving of the vehicle. The liability of the Second Defendant is by paragraph 9 of the Statement of Case described as follows: Page 2 of 11
3 As a result of the negligence of the First Named Defendant both of his doing and as the servant and/or agent of the Second Named Defendant, the Claimant has suffered loss and damage. 5. Both sides agree that the case falls squarely within the realm of vicarious liability. The question to be answered being whether the action of the First Defendant which resulted in the damage to the vehicle was so closely connected to the acts that he was authorised to do by the Second Defendant that for the purpose of liability of the Second Defendant his wrongful act may fairly and properly be regarded as made by him while acting in the ordinary course of his employment: Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd. [2002] 1 AC This rule has been restated by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Brown v Robinson and another (2004) 65 WIR 258 to be whether the acts were so closely connected with the employment that it would be just and reasonable to hold the employer liable. At the end of the day this is an issue of fact for my determination. 7. Despite being summoned to Court as a witness for the Claimant the First Defendant did not appear. As would be expected the evidence with respect to the scope of the employment of the First Defendant comes from the Second Defendant. The effect of the evidence of the Managing Director of the Second Defendant was that the scope of employment of security guards employed by it Page 3 of 11
4 and stationed at River Gardens did not include keeping items for collection at the security booth. According to him the guards were stationed on the premises merely to direct and regulate traffic in and out of the compound. In particular he denies that the guards were stationed there for the purpose of protecting the property of the residents from intruders. According to him in the event of an intruder the guards are instructed to call Securicor, another security firm, who would then respond accordingly. 8. The effect of his evidence therefore is that the guards were not employed to protect the property of the residents of River Gardens. In this regard, save that the guards were also required to close the pool washrooms at night, distribute mail, assist with the parking of vehicles and be responsible for the condition of their guard booth the rules, the written instructions provided to the guards and tendered into evidence by the Second Defendant accord with this position. 9. Of note is the fact that the instructions to the guards provide that (a) the officer at the main guard booth not leave that location and contact the officer at the rear guard booth via radio if assistance is required (b) in the event that a driver does not identify as a resident and is uncooperative, if the guard is of the opinion that the driver is a non-resident and may have criminal intentions, the guard is to refuse entry, call for backup from the rear guard booth and contact the property manager and (c) record the arrival and departure time of the mobile patrol when they conduct their visits. Further it is clear that, save as to the requirement that all Page 4 of 11
5 persons leaving the compound are to be logged out and their duties with respect to the opening and closing of the gate, the rules give no responsibility to the guards with respect to persons leaving the compound, as for example, searching the vehicle or person so exiting. 10. Brillinger no longer resides in the jurisdiction. His evidence by way of a written statement given to Insurance Investigators is that he placed the keys for the car in an envelope addressed it to the Claimant with his name and apartment number on it. The envelope was stapled about five times. He gave the envelope to the guard on duty at the Security Gate House at that time. This, according to him, was to facilitate the Claimant picking up the vehicle. This he says he was accustomed doing whenever he left the country. 11. The evidence of Roger Khan, the Operations Manager of the Claimant, is that the Claimant had a number of vehicles assigned to persons living at River Gardens. To facilitate the procedure of taking the cars to have them cleaned, serviced and returned to the compound. The resident would place the keys in a sealed envelope addressed to the Claimant and leave it at the security booth with the security officer. When they were finished with the car they would use the same procedure to return the car to the resident. 12. This he says was done with respect to the motor vehicle on at least 3 to 4 occasions. The 1 st August 2006 was a public holiday and as a result he made Page 5 of 11
6 arrangements to have the car collected on the next working day. On the 3 rd August, presumably the next working day, he was told something about the motor vehicle and thereafter discovered that the motor vehicle was in the possession of the First Defendant. Under cross-examination he admits that the arrangement with respect to the keys was a private arrangement made between Brillinger and himself. 13. On the evidence therefore it seems to me that the primary duty of the guards were to secure the perimeter of the compound; monitor the traffic, both vehicular and pedestrian, and ensure that no entry was given to any unauthorised person. The fact that they were also required to note the arrival and departure time of the Mobile Patrol suggests to me that the security arrangements at River Gardens included additional security services not provided by these guards. In this regard therefore I accept the evidence of the Managing Director of the Second Defendant as to the scope of employment of the guards. 14. The Claimant suggests that it must be that the Second Defendant was also responsible for the protection of the property of residents on the premises. It seems to me that given the evidence in this regard I cannot come to that conclusion. It seems to me that the absence of any authority to prevent persons leaving the compound or to search persons or vehicles leaving coupled with the fact that there were clearly other security services provided to the compound militates against arriving at this conclusion. Page 6 of 11
7 15. The matter however does not end here. Under consideration here are two acts, the first is the act of accepting the keys for the car in order to pass those keys onto the Claimant s representative and the second the acts directly causing the accident. Presumably by accepting the keys the guard guaranteed (i) their safekeeping, (ii) that they would be passed on to the right person, and (iii) that the guard would allow the representative of the Claimant company entry onto the premises for the purpose of collecting the motor vehicle. I accept the evidence led on behalf of the Claimant that this was an arrangement entered into by the resident and the guard. I also accept the evidence of the Claimant s operations manager that it was an arrangement adopted on a relatively regular basis with respect to other motor cars owned by them and assigned to other residents on the compound and that in particular it had been used on several occasions prior to August 2007 with respect to the motor vehicle. 16. These facts lead me to the inescapable conclusion that the arrangement for the collection of the car by the Claimant s employees was not merely personal to the resident and the particular guard on duty on the particular day in question. As well it is clear that the accommodation described was on the basis that the car would be collected within a reasonable time of the keys being left with the guard. From that it is reasonable to assume that since each guard worked a 12 hour shift the guard with whom the keys were left would be the same guard who would hand Page 7 of 11
8 over the keys to the Claimant s representative and allow entry onto the premises for the purpose of removing the vehicle. 17. Against that background the question to be answered is: the connection if any between the act in question and the employment. And if there is a connection then the closeness of that connection is to be considered. According to Lord Clyne in Lister v Hesley Hall Limited [2002] 1 A.C. 215 at page 232 paragraph 37 G The sufficiency of the connection may be gauged by asking whether the wrongful acts can be seen as ways of carrying out the work which the employer had authorised. 18. In this regard he suggests three matters which may be relevant in a given situation. The first is that in considering the scope of the employment a broad approach should be adopted. If there is a prohibition is it one that limits the sphere of the employment or does it merely deal with the conduct within the sphere? The second is that while consideration of the time and place at which the act occurred will always be relevant they may not be conclusive. And thirdly while the employment enables the employee to be present at a particular time at a particular place, the opportunity of being present at a particular premise whereby the employee has been able to perform the act in question does not mean that the act is necessarily within the scope of the employment. (Lister pages paragraph 42 E 45 G) Page 8 of 11
9 19. According to Lord Diplock in Ilkiw v Samuels [1963] 1 WLR 991 at 1004 the question to be asked is What is the job on which he was engaged for his employer? The answer, in my opinion, is securing the perimeter of the premises and ensuring that unauthorised persons did not enter the compound. In this regard therefore unlike the facts in Central Motors (Glasgow) Ltd. v Cessnock Garage and Motor Co SC 796 where the employer was held to be vicariously liable for the action of its night watchman, the car had not been entrusted to the guard for its safekeeping. 20. In my view the keys were entrusted to the guard for the purpose of allowing entry of the Claimant s representative and authorising the removal of the motor vehicle from the premises. In this regard therefore giving a broad approach to the scope of the employment of the guard the receipt of the keys could be considered to be within the scope of his employment in that it provided the authority to allow access to and egress from the compound of the Claimant s representative for the purpose of collecting the motor vehicle. 21. The guard was however not employed to protect and secure the safe keeping of the motor vehicle. There could have been no complaint for example, at least from this source, had the guard given the keys to someone masquerading as the representative of the Claimant and thereby allowed that person entry onto to the premises and to exit with the motor vehicle. In that instance the fault would lie Page 9 of 11
10 with the persons who made the arrangement, that is, the resident and the Claimant. 22. In the instant case of course the matter is complicated by the fact that it was an employee of the Second Defendant, facilitated by the arrangement made with respect to the keys, who took the car. Due consideration must be given to the fact that the car was not collected on that day. In addition have no evidence as to whether the keys were actually entrusted to the First Defendant or when the motor vehicle was removed from the compound. Evidence that the keys were actually entrusted to the First Defendant or that it was removed during that 12 hour shift may have made a difference. 23. It must be noted however that this is not a case where there is a claim of negligence against the Second Defendant directly. The Claimant has not alleged that the Second Defendant was itself negligent in, for example, its choice of security guard or in breach of some duty of care owed to a resident or River Gardens. The plea is solely that the employee was negligent in the driving of the motor vehicle and that the Second Defendant, as employer, must therefore be liable for his actions. 24. In my opinion therefore the answer to the question what was the job on which he was engaged for his employer does not assist the Claimant. The First Defendant was employed by the Second Defendant to secure the premises and to monitor Page 10 of 11
11 and control the entry and exit of vehicles and pedestrians. The acts complained of, that is, his negligence in the managing and control of the vehicle, occurred while the First Defendant was on the classic frolic of his own for which the Second Defendant cannot be held liable. 25. In the circumstances the Claim is dismissed. The Claimant is to pay the Second Defendant s costs to be assessed on a prescribed costs basis. Dated this 5th day of February 2010 Judith A. D. Jones Judge Page 11 of 11
Code of Practice on the Identity Card Number and other Personal Identifiers Compliance Guide for Data Users
Code of Practice on the Identity Card Number and other Personal Identifiers Compliance Guide for Data Users INTRODUCTION What does the code of practice cover? The code of practice gives practical guidance
More informationHow To Process A Small Claims Case In Anarizonia
What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All
More informationSPECIALIST 24 HR CRIMINAL DEFENCE
SPECIALIST 24 HR CRIMINAL DEFENCE What happens at the Police Station? Often the most important stage in any case is what happens in the police station. In most cases you will be under arrest and it may
More informationROGERS SPECIALIST CARS LTD T/A CATERHAM HIRE WALES
ROGERS SPECIALIST CARS LTD T/A CATERHAM HIRE WALES TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RENTAL In these terms and conditions reference to we, us or our means ROGERS SPECIALIST CARS LTD T/A CATERHAM HIRE WALES, a limited
More informationJAMAICA THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN GODFREY THOMPSON APPELLANT
[2014] JMCA Civ 37 JAMAICA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO 41/2007 BEFORE: THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 13/33469 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED... DATE...
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB REGISTRY SAN FERNANDO H.C.A. No. S 2161 of 1986 H..C.A. No. S 2162 of 1986 H.C.A. No. S 2163 of 1986 H.C.A. No. S 2164 of 1986 BETWEEN
More informationPersonal Injury? What to Do?
Personal Injury? What to Do? 1 If you have been involved in a road traffic accident, an accident at work or an accident in a public place, you may be liable for a compensation! Every personal injury case
More informationJUDGMENT. TLM Company Limited (Appellant) v Bedasie and another (Respondent)
[2014] UKPC 25 Privy Council Appeal No 0023 of 2013 JUDGMENT TLM Company Limited (Appellant) v Bedasie and another (Respondent) From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago before Lord
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR USE
Uniform Personal Injury Interrogatories INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE A. All information is to be divulged which is in the possession of the individual or corporate party, his attorneys, investigator, agents, employees,
More informationMOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND
MOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND COMPENSATION OF UNINSURED ROAD ACCIDENT VICTIMS Agreement dated 29th January 2009 between the Minister for Transport and the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) AGREEMENT
More informationTEDDY YOMENA vs S W MOTORS I 227/97
TEDDY YOMENA vs S W MOTORS I 227/97 HEARD ON: 1997/02/06 DELIVERED ON: 1997/02/12 JUDGMENT Plaintiff gave a vehicle to Defendant to sell. Defendant sold vehicle but failed to pay the purchase price to
More informationPREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.
Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee
More informationRoad Traffic Accidents Do s and Don ts & the Legal Process
Legal Discussion on Tipp FM with Orlagh Wafer 22 nd January 2013 Road Traffic Accidents Do s and Don ts & the Legal Process Introduction As the temperatures are dropping and the roads are becoming more
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HAROLD JOSEPH. And EWART THOMAS. 2005: June 7 th November 21 st JUDGMENT
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CLAIM NO: ANUHCV 2003/0364 BETWEEN: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HAROLD JOSEPH And EWART THOMAS Claimant Defendant Appearances: Mr George Lake for the Claimant Ms Turkessa Benjamin
More informationTITLE 2 - RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER 2-2 CIVIL ACTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND LIABILITY CIVIL ACTIONS
TITLE 2 - RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER 2-2 2-2-1 Availability of Civil Actions CIVIL ACTIONS (a) Civil actions are those causes, within the jurisdiction of the Tribal Court, originating in: (1) Tribal law,
More informationTHE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION ATLANTIC STATES INSURANCE : February Term 2004 COMPANY, : Plaintiff, : No. 2642 v. : PATRICK
More informationClaim notification form (RTA1) Low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents ( 1,000-25,000)
Date sent / / Claim notification form (RTA1) Low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents ( 1,000-25,000) Before filling in this form you are encouraged to seek independent legal advice.
More information29 October 2015. By email: towtruckreview@esc.vic.gov.au
29 October 2015 By email: towtruckreview@esc.vic.gov.au Submission to the Tow Truck Review Essential Services Commission Level 37, 2 Lonsdale Street MELBOURNE VIC 3000 Dear Commissioners Accident towing
More informationLEVEL 4 - UNIT 3 THE LAW AND PRACTICE RELATING TO ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015
LEVEL 4 - UNIT 3 THE LAW AND PRACTICE RELATING TO ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors
More informationIN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
1 NOT REPORTABLE IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 46854/2009 DATE: 29/04/2011 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE REPORTABLE: YES/NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and EDMUND BICAR. 2010: March 25; May 3.
SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2008/014 BETWEEN: EASTERN CARIBBEAN INSURANCE LTD. Appellant and EDMUND BICAR Before: The Hon. Mde. Janice George-Creque The Hon. Mr. Davidson K. Baptiste The Hon.
More informationThe Lifecycle of a Personal Injury Claim. By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom July 2012. Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.
1 1. Introduction The Lifecycle of a Personal Injury Claim By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom July 2012 The aim of the presentation is to look at the basic steps from the taking instructions
More informationReference No: Circular 11/82; Date: 05/07/82. Circular 11/82:- Travelling and Subsistence Regulations. A Dhuine Uasail
Reference No: Circular 11/82; Date: 05/07/82 Circular 11/82:- Travelling and Subsistence Regulations A Dhuine Uasail I am directed by the Minister for the Public Service to inform you that he has accepted
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationMotor Vehicle Claim Form
Motor Vehicle Claim Form MOTOR VEHICLE CLAIM FORM Dear Policyholder, We re sorry to hear you ve had an accident. Our aim is to settle your claim as quickly as possible. You can help us do this by ensuring
More informationREHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS (Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011) GUIDANCE NOTE
REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS (Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011) GUIDANCE NOTE This guidance note provides background information on Part 25 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011 which
More informationCivil Suits: The Process
Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized
More informationClaim notification form
Before filling in this form you are encouraged to seek independent legal advice. Date sent / / Claim notification form Low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents( 1,000-10,000) Are you
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS COMMONWEALTH SUPERIOR COURT RULES GOVERNING PROCEDURE IN TRAFFIC CASES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE RULE
COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS COMMONWEALTH SUPERIOR COURT RULES GOVERNING PROCEDURE IN TRAFFIC CASES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE RULE 1. Scope, Purpose, and Construction... 1 2. Definitions...
More informationMotor Vehicle Accident Report Form
Motor Vehicle Accident Report Form 1300 725 788 Your Car, Your Choice Know Your Rights Service & Quality Guaranteed One Call Does It All Owner s Particulars (PLEASE COMPLETE IN BLOCK LETTERS) Full Name
More informationPREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com
Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff
More informationHistory: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971; Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976.
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Act 198 of 1965 AN ACT providing for the establishment, maintenance and administration of a motor vehicle accident claims fund for the payment of damages for injury to
More informationSample Pleadings in a Auto Accident Case
Civil Procedure for R.I. Paralegals First Edition - 2000 Printing Sample Pleadings in a Auto Accident Case The following documents are designed to show the kinds of pleadings that may arise in a civil
More informationFLORIDA PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION
POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL AUTO CA 22 10 01 08 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. FLORIDA PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION For a covered "auto" licensed or principally garaged in,
More informationCOURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI. MAC Case No. 881 of 2011. Md Surjat Ali Claimant. Versus
1 COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- B J Mahanta Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No. 881 of 2011 Md Surjat Ali Claimant Versus 1 Sri Sameswar Barman (Driver of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DANIELLE SOO YEE AND. JOHNNY SOONG (Trading as CLUB COCONUTS) AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA: No.416/2000 BETWEEN DANIELLE SOO YEE AND Plaintiff JOHNNY SOONG (Trading as CLUB COCONUTS) AND CASCADIA HOTEL LTD Defendants BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationLegal Research Record
Legal Research Record Summary of problem(s) Design and Dress Limited (DDL) has experienced problems due to the alleged harassment of one of their employees, Susie Baker, by another employee, Stephen Harding
More informationJUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961
JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
More informationPersonal Injury Accident Claims 2011 You still need a Solicitor.
Personal Injury Accident Claims 2011 You still need a Solicitor. Subsequent to the passing of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003 and the Civil Liability & Courts Act 2004 Brian Morgan wrote
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Foreclosure
Frequently Asked Questions Foreclosure What is a Foreclosure? How Can I Avoid A Foreclosure Once a Complaint Has Been Filed Against Me? Where is a Foreclosure Complaint Filed? What Should You Do if Served
More informationInquests & Coroner's Courts.
INFORMATION HANDBOOK No 3 Inquests & Coroner's Courts. CADD contact numbers: Help Line: 0845 1235542 (local rate call) Office Phone & Fax: 0845 1235541 / 43 Address: CADD, PO Box 62, Brighouse, HD6 3YY.
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI
1 IN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI Present Sri. H. C. Sarma, B. Sc., LLb. AJS MACT. Case No.490 of 2008 U/S 166 of the M.V. Act 1. Manabendra Malakar S/o Janardan
More informationBefore: HIS HONOUR JUDGE P. GREGORY -------------- LIAQAT RAJA. and MR KANE DAY MOTOR INSURERS' BUREAU JUDGMENT ON APPEAL APPROVED ---------------
IN THE BIRKENHEAD COUNTY COURT Case No. 3YM66264 76 Hamilton Street Birkenhead CH41 5EN Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE P. GREGORY 2 March 2015 Between: -------------- LIAQAT RAJA and Claimant (Respondent) MR
More informationThe mission of the Legal Aid Society is to pursue justice for people in poverty.
The mission of the Legal Aid Society is to pursue justice for people in poverty. The information in this booklet is for educational purposes only. Do not rely on it if you live outside Louisville, Kentucky.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court No. CI0200503911. Appellee Decided: November 30, 2007 * * * * *
[Cite as Reserve Assoc. Ltd. v. Selective Ins. Co. of South Carolina, 2007-Ohio-6369.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Reserve Associates Limited Appellant Court of
More informationDRAFT MOTOR TRAFFIC (THIRD- PARTY INSURANCE) (COST RECOVERY) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS
STATES OF JERSEY r DRAFT MOTOR TRAFFIC (THIRD- PARTY INSURANCE) (COST RECOVERY) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 201- Lodged au Greffe on 13th December 2012 by the Minister for Health and Social Services STATES GREFFE
More informationU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (MD) Assistant General Counsel for Administration 301-415-1550
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (MD) MD 7.1 TORT CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES DT-10-06 Volume 7: Legal and Ethical Guidelines Approved By: Gregory B. Jaczko, Chairman Date Approved:
More informationIntroduction Page to the Appellant s PDF Factum:
Introduction Page to the Appellant s PDF Factum: Note: When you bind your factum, all pages (except for the cover and index) starting with your chronology, should always be on the left-hand side. The righthand
More informationRunning Water, Ineffective Drains and Highway Maintenance. Hodges v Somerset County Council
Running Water, Ineffective Drains and Highway Maintenance Hodges v Somerset County Council By Geoffrey Brown and Nathan Peacey Running water can be a cause of problems, not least on the roads. A highway
More informationPenalty Fares Rules. 55 VICTORIA STREET, LONDON SW1H 0EU TEL 020 7654 6000 www.sra.gov.uk. May 2002
Penalty Fares Rules 55 VICTORIA STREET, LONDON SW1H 0EU TEL 020 7654 6000 www.sra.gov.uk May 2002 1 Contents Page 1 The rules 2 2 Definitions 2 3 Setting up a penalty fares scheme 4 4 Displaying warning
More informationOREGON LAWS 2015 Chap. 5 CHAPTER 5
CHAPTER 5 AN ACT SB 411 Relating to personal injury protection benefits; creating new provisions; and amending ORS 742.500, 742.502, 742.504, 742.506, 742.524 and 742.544. Be It Enacted by the People of
More informationMOTOR VEHICLE CLAIM FORM
MOTOR VEHICLE CLAIM FORM Dear Policyholder, We re sorry to hear you ve had an accident. Our aim is to settle your claim as quickly as possible. You can help us do this by ensuring the enclosed claim form
More informationLicence Appeal Tribunal
Licence Appeal Tribunal Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario (SLASTO) Rules of Practice Revised: May 1, 2014 Disponible en français TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Page 1. DEFINITIONS...
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0425 444444444444 PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, INC., PETITIONER, v. BILL HEAD D/B/A BILL HEAD ENTERPRISES AND TITEFLEX CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationVEHICLE DAMAGE CLAIMS*
VEHICLE DAMAGE CLAIMS* ACCIDENTS HAPPEN! Unfortunately, road traffic collisions are all too common with over 30,000 accidents occurring on Irish roads each year. When an accident happens it can be a stressful
More informationLIVERPOOL JOHN LENNON AIRPORT TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE OF CAR PARKS
LIVERPOOL JOHN LENNON AIRPORT TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE OF CAR PARKS IMPORTANT NOTICE Entry to or use of the car parks at Liverpool John Lennon Airport ( the airport ) is subject to the current terms
More informationHow To Prepare For Court In Small Claims Court
Getting Ready for Court Small Claims Court Guide #5 If your small claims court case is going to court - whether it's for a settlement conference or a trial - you probably have a lot of questions to ask.
More informationRoad Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (RAFA)
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (RAFA) Topic: Roads and Public Liability IN A CALABASH Introduction Road transportation is the major mode of transportation in South Africa. Despite a number of road laws
More informationHOW TO FILE AN ANSWER TO A CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE OR WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS
SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY SELF HELP CENTER HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER TO A CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE OR WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS (THIS GUIDE ONLY APPLIES TO LAWSUITS INVOLVING
More informationLONG TERM RENTAL REGISTRATION APPLICATION All sections are required to be completed. Please print, type, or apply through portal.
City of Destin Community Development Department Code Enforcement Division City of Destin Annex 4100 Indian Bayou Trail Destin, Florida 32541 Phone (850) 654-1119 Fax (850) 460-2171 Email to: code@cityofdestin.com
More informationClaim notification form
Before filling in this form you are encouraged to seek independent legal advice. Date sent / / Claim notification form Low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents( 1,000-10,000) Are you
More informationIN THE COURT OF MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL, NAGAON (ASSAM) M.A.C. Case No.170/09
IN THE COURT OF MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL, NAGAON (ASSAM) M.A.C. Case No.170/09 Md. Ramjan Ali : Claimant. -Vs- (1) Sri Karuna Mahanta (2) Sri Thomas Marsdi (3) Oriental Ins. Co. Ltd., and (4)
More informationPRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph 1.1 Preamble Paragraph 2.1 Aims Paragraph 3.1 Scope Paragraph
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. LEGALEase. If You Have An Auto Accident SAMPLE
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LEGALEase If You Have An Auto Accident If You Have An Auto Accident What should you do if you re involved in an automobile accident in New York? STOP! By law, you are required
More informationPARTICULARS OF CLAIM - ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT (Claim by Driver)
Client Ref. No. PARTICULARS OF CLAIM - ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT (Claim by Driver) 2001 Please use the Notes for Guidance when completing this form. Note 1. IN THE Claim No. Note 2. Between Claimant Note 3.
More informationSpecimen. Specimen. Specimen. Specimen. pecimen
Client Ref. No. Please use the Notes for Guidance when completing this form. Note 1. Note 2. Note 3. Note 4. Note 5. Note 6. * Give the name of the employee driver. Note 7. Note 8. PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
More informationGuide to Statutory Demands for those presenting and receiving one
Guide to Statutory Demands for those presenting and receiving one What is a statutory demand? A statutory demand is a prescribed type of written request from a creditor for payment of a debt. What forms
More informationThe Libel and Slander Act
c. 69 1 The Libel and Slander Act being Chapter 69 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1930 (effective February 1, 1931). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated
More informationRaising and Defending Ordinary Actions in the Court of Session. A Guide for Party Litigants
Raising and Defending Ordinary Actions in the Court of Session A Guide for Party Litigants Updated August 2012 Contents Background... 3 (i) Using this guide... 3 (ii) Introduction... 3 (iii) The Offices
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Strathclyde Police
Case reference: PIRC/00007/13/SP February 2014 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Strathclyde Police under section 35(1) of the Police Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act
More informationPART 37 TRIAL AND SENTENCE IN A MAGISTRATES COURT
Contents of this Part PART 37 TRIAL AND SENTENCE IN A MAGISTRATES COURT When this Part applies rule 37.1 General rules rule 37.2 Procedure on plea of not guilty rule 37.3 Evidence of a witness in person
More informationPersonal Injury Accident Claims Do you need a Solicitor anymore?
Personal Injury Accident Claims Do you need a Solicitor anymore? In the current climate, where the Personal Injuries Assessment Board advises that Claimants do not need a solicitor, Brian Morgan Litigation
More informationMotor Vehicle Claim Form
1st Floor, 50 Hindmarsh Square Adelaide SA 5000 PO Box 6095 Halifax St Adelaide 5000 Phone 08 8413 6300 Facsimile 08 82119838 enquiries@brecknock.com.au brecknock.com.au Motor Vehicle Claim Form We re
More informationMotor Vehicle Claim Form
Motor Vehicle Claim Form Dear Policyholder, We re sorry to hear you ve had an accident. Our aim is to settle your claim as quickly as possible. You can help us do this by ensuring the enclosed claim form
More informationVicarious liability of a charity or its trustees
1 of 7 Guidance Vicarious liability of a charity or its trustees Contents In general, for what are trustees liable? Liability for the actions or omissions of others What does the law cover in this area?
More informationForm DC-421 SUMMONS FOR UNLAWFUL DETAINER Form DC-421
1. Copies a. Original to court. Using This Revisable PDF Form b. First copy to defendant. If more than one defendant, provide a copy for each defendant. c. Second copy to plaintiff. 2. All but Case Disposition
More informationMOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER
MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT You (the defendant) have TWENTY (20) calendar days to file an answer to the small claims complaint. The
More informationIN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG LENTIKILE DAVID PHETE JUDGMENT. [1] This is an action instituted by Lentikile David Phete, a major male
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG In the matter
More informationHERMUS CYRUS CHRISTOPHER WYLLIE. 2011: June 29 2012: February 7 JUDGMENT
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 232 OF 2008 BETWEEN: HERMUS CYRUS v CHRISTOPHER WYLLIE Claimant Defendant Appearances:
More informationbeen asked to be a witness - what do I do?
Being a witness in the High Court and County Courts Ex 341- w3 I have been asked to be a witness - what do I do? Why have I been asked to be a witness? You have been asked to be a witness because you have
More informationIN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT
IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT PRESENT: Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam MAC CASE NO. 48/2010 (Under Section 166of the MV Act)
More informationIN THE COURT OF MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL, NAGAON (ASSAM) M.A.C. Case No.454/09
IN THE COURT OF MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL, NAGAON (ASSAM) M.A.C. Case No.454/09 Sri Ina Bordoloi : Claimant. -Vs- (1) Md. Abdul Karim and (2) Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd., : Opp. Parties.
More informationCLAIMS HANDLING GUIDELINES. for CTP Insurers
CLAIMS HANDLING GUIDELINES for CTP Insurers Initially issued 2000 Reissued: 1 July 2004; 18 September 2006; 1 July 2008; 1 October 2008, 1 May 2014 INTRODUCTION The MAA Claims Handling Guidelines (the
More informationGeneral terms and conditions of the contract for accommodation in A&O Hostel Praha s.r.o. (Ltd), U Vystavyste 1/262 170 00 Prague 7.
Translation from the German language General terms and conditions of the contract for accommodation in A&O Hostel Praha s.r.o. (Ltd), U Vystavyste 1/262 170 00 Prague 7 1 Scope (1) These general terms
More informationGeneral Conditions of Rail Cargo Operator Hungaria Ltd. (RCO-HU) Implemented on 1st of January 2009
General Conditions of Rail Cargo Operator Hungaria Ltd. (RCO-HU) Implemented on 1st of January 2009 Preamble These General Conditions of Rail Cargo Operator Hungaria Ltd. govern the relationship between
More information1 (5) The state and its agencies and subdivisions shall be liable for tort claims in the
768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification; risk management programs. (1) In accordance with
More informationMIB Uninsured Agreement
MIB Uninsured Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made on the 3rd July 2015 between the SECRETARY OF STATE ( the Secretary of State ) and the MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU ( MIB ), whose registered office is for the time
More informationFLEET MANAGEMENT POLICY
FLEET MANAGEMENT POLICY Contents 1. OBJECTIVES OF THIS POLICY...3 2. DUTIES OF THE TRANSPORT OFFICER...3 2. ITINERARIES...4 3. LOG-BOOKS FOR OFFICIAL VEHICLES...4 1 3.1 Completion...4 3.2 Supply...4 4.
More informationAutomobile Negligence Lawsuits
SOG/DGL, CH, JB Page 1 of 6 Automobile Negligence Lawsuits Who Is Sued? Driver the driver is the person whose negligence gives rise to the liability. The person suing must prove that the driver negligently
More informationFIRE ON THE ICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE REGARDING CAUSATION
Aaron L. Sherriff FIRE ON THE ICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE REGARDING CAUSATION 2 Aaron L. Sherriff TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE CGL POLICY... 3 II. NEGLIGENCE... 3 III. MR. HANKE... 4
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) Case No: 454/2005 In the matter between: JOHN PAGE PLAINTIFF and FIRST NATIONAL BANK MICHAEL M RIES FIRST DEFENDANT SECOND DEFENDANT
More informationPURCHASE PRICE PROTECTION INSURANCE
PRODUCT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND POLICY WORDING PURCHASE PRICE PROTECTION INSURANCE Insurer: Swann Insurance (Aust) Pty Ltd ABN 80 000 886 680 AFS Licence No. 238292 Preparation date: 29 February 2016
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2010. represented herein by his duly appointed personal representative Mr. Hubert Elrington
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2010 CLAIM NO. 195 of 2009 JAMES LIGHTBURN (deceased) represented herein by his duly appointed personal representative Mr. Hubert Elrington CLAIMANT AND LIONEL HAMILTON
More informationMAC CASE NO.185/2013: U/S 166 OF THE M.V.ACT. Member, MACT, Golaghat
1 P a g e IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT. MAC CASE NO.185/2013: U/S 166 OF THE M.V.ACT. Present: Md.A.U.Ahmed Member, MACT, Golaghat Sri Dilip Sarma Son of Sri Jogen
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
More informationCase 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION DESTINY ANNMARIE RIOS Plaintiff VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-00590
More informationGAUNTLET MOTOR CLAIM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS INDEX
GAUNTLET MOTOR CLAIM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS INDEX FIRST STEPS 1. When an accident happens involving one of my vehicles what should I do? 2. When should I contact Gauntlet? 3. Are photographs important?
More information