Wolf Point Public Schools
|
|
- Abraham O’Neal’
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School Wolf Point, Montana Districts 45 and 45A Report Card School Year
2 BELIEVE -- ACHIEVE -- SUCCEED Mission Statement: In partnership with the community, Wolf Point Public Schools will createa positive teaching and learning environment to ensure that every member of the school family reaches academic achievement as set by local, state, and federal standards. We are determined to utilize comprehensive school-wide research based strategies to assure this outcome. Vision Statements: All children will read at or above grade levels by the end of the third grade and remain on or above grade level thereafter. All children feel safe, welcome, and successful. All children appreciate their unique qualities, cultures, and their role as valued members of their school family. All students are responsible for caring for self, caring for others, and caring for property. All students have the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. All children, regardless of race or economic status, have fair and equal treatment. All students and school personnel have clear and focused individual goals. All school personnel are respectful, tolerant of differences, consistent, and nurturing. All school personnel are competent in fulfilling job responsibilities. All parents and community members show respect for education through their availability and involvement. All parents, community members, and school personnel work together to assist children to become productive members of their school and community.
3 Number of Students Wolf Point Public Schools Total Enrollment Enrolled School Years Wolf Point Public Schools Racial/Ethnic Groups Two or more races 16.4% Hispanic 4.8% Asian 0.4% White 14.7% Pacific Islander 0.0% Native American 63.7% Native American Asian Hispanic Two or more races White Pacific Islander The two largest racial/ethnic groups in the Wolf Point Public Schools were Native Americans with a little over 63% and Two or more races with about 16%.
4 Percentage of Students in Attendance Southside Northside J.H. H.S. Attendance Rate 88% 89% 84% 84% Attendance Rate % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Southside Northside J.H. H.S. Attendance Rate As part of No Child Left Behind, elementary and middle schools must have an 80% attendance rate (or improvement toward that goal) to make adequate yearly progress (AYP). Attendance is based on total enrollment, not just the tested grades of 3-8 and 10. Attendance does not apply concerning AYP for high schools. The above attendance rates are for the entire academic year and are little changed from the previous year. Southside Northside J.H. H.S. Reading / M ath Reading / M ath Reading / M ath Reading / M ath Test Participation Rate 100% / 100% 100% / 100% 99% / 99% 97% / 97% AYP is determined using reading and math test scores, test participation rates (minimum of 95%), improvement on test scores, attendance rates, graduation rates (85%), and effectiveness reports. Each school's test scores are divided into student subgroups based on race/ethnicity, free/reduced lunch status, students with disabilities, and LEP (Limited English Proficiency). The "All Students" group needs to have 30 students and all other subgroups need to have 30 students as well in order for scores to be used for the AYP calculated process. The minimum number of students for test participation rates is 40. All information for was carried over from the previous year. MontCAS = Montana Comprehensive Assessment System CRT = Criterion-Referenced Tests (MontCAS Phase 2) MAP = Measures of Academic Progress Test A statewide report card may be accessed online at and selecting the Reports and Data tab followed by selecting NCLB Report Card from the list. Information for each school and district is available at this website.
5 Percentage of Students Graduating Montana WPHS Graduation Rate 84.2% 70.4% Graduation Rate % 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Montana WPHS Graduation Rate High Schools must show an 85% graduation rate (or improvement toward that goal) to make AYP The 2013 graduation rate is used for the AYP determinations School Year AYP Status for Wolf Point Public Schools Reading Math Improvement AYP Status Status Status Status Southside Yr1 Yr1 Ryr4 Did not make AYP Northside HRYr3 RYr7 RYr7 Did not make AYP WP Jr. High ImYr2 RYr4 RYr5 Did not make AYP WPHS ImYr2 RYr3 RYr5 Did not make AYP WP Elem. CYr7 CYr7 CYr7 Did not make AYP HS District ImYr2 CYr4 CYr6 Did not make AYP RYr3 =Restructuring Year 3 RYr4 = Restructuring Year 4 RYr5 = Restructuring Year 5 RYr7 = Restructuring Year 7 ImYr2 = 2nd Year Identified for Improvement HRYr3 = Holding at Restructuring Year 3 CYr4 = Corrective Action Year 4 CYr6 = Corrective Action Year 6 Yr1 = 1st Year did not make AYP (Watch List) CYr 7 = Corrective Action Year 7 The AYP status for was carried forward for The state of Montana is in the 11th Year Identified for Improvement.
6 Percentages Southside Northside JH HS Montana Highly Qualified 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% Percentage of Highly Qualified Teachers Core Academic Subjects % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% Southside Northside JH HS Montana Highly Qualified Montana teachers meet the definition of a highly qualified teacher if they are licensed and endorsed in the areas in which they teach by the Montana Office of Public Instruction. "Core Academic Subjects" are English, reading, language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history, and geography. All Wolf Point Public schools had 100% highly qualified teachers. Our schools are classified as high poverty schools. For Montana, 16.6% of the teachers are at high poverty schools, 20.5% at low poverty schools, and 62.3% at mid-range poverty schools All paraprofessionals who assist in student instruction in the Wolf Point Public Schools have met the NCLB requirement of highly qualified by successfully completing one of the three following categories: AA degree or higher, 2 years of relevant college course work, or the Language Arts/Quantitative Skills Assessment. During the school year, local and grant funds for professional development for certified and classified staff were spent in training them to work with students in the areas of reading, math, science, technology, health, and behavioral issues. At the time of publishing this report card, the Montana OPI had not released the highly qualified teacher ratings for the school year.
7 Number of Staff Percent of Staff Class 7 BA BA + 30 MA MA + 10 PhD Percent of Staff 1% 48% 13% 16% 22% 0% Wolf Point Public Schools Professional Qualifications 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Class 7 BA BA + 30 MA MA + 10 PhD Percent of Staff Degrees Earned * 37.9% of the staff had a Master's degree or higher. * 61% of the staff had a Bachelor's degree to +30 semester credits. Years of Experience for School Year Teaching/Education Years of 30 Experience Years of Experience Years 36 (43.9%) of the certified staff were in their first 10 years of experience. 21 (25.6%) of the certified staff were in their years of experience. 25 (30.5%) of the certified staff were in their 21+ years of experience.
8 Climate Surveys were conducted in May of the school year Elementary District Climate Survey Results: OVERALL: Students agree their families want them to do well in school and believe that they can do well in school. They feel that their teachers believe they can learn, but are concerned about students treating each other with respect and being friendly. Upper elementary students are tending to disagree in feeling that they have freedom at school and choices in what they learn. They also feel that they could be better students. Parents agree they support their child's learning at home and feel good about themselves as a parent. Parents agree that they respect the schools' teachers and principals. They feel that their children are safe going to and from school. Upper elementary parents are concerned about students showing respect for other students. Teachers love seeing the results of their work with students, they love to teach, that learning can be fun, and every student can learn. They also believe that student achievement can increase through a threat-free environment and effective parent involvement. Upper elementary teachers are neutral in feeling that morale is high on the part of the support staff. Junior High teachers are concerned about working effectively with low achieving students. All teachers are concerned about the public image of each school. Classified Staff love seeing the results of their work with students, believe it is important to communicate often with parents, and believe quality work is expected of them. They are clear about what their job is at the school and the administrator treats them with respect. Some are concerned about the public image of the schools. Elementary and High School Secretarial, Kitchen, and Custodial Staff believe quality work is expected of them and feel like they belong at the school. They are neutral in feeling that the schools have a good public image and morale is high among support staff. One group strongly disagrees that their administrator facilitates communication effectively High School District Climate Survey Results: OVERALL: Students felt doing well in school makes them feel good about themselves and they have confidence in their ability to learn on their own outside of a classroom. They have confidence in their ability to read and process information. They were neutral in feeling that they are in charge of what they learn and what they learn in school is relevant to real life. Also, they were neutral in feeling that school is fun and that they like the school. Parents agree that they support their child's learning at home, parent volunteers are vital to the school community, and believe that they feel welcome at the school. They are neutral in believing that calls to the school are returned in a timely manner, that the school clearly communicates how parent volunteers can help, and that the school has a good public image. Teachers love seeing the results of their work with students, love to teach, that learning can be fun, that every student can learn, believe that student achievement can increase through effective parent involvement and "hands-on" learning. It is important to communicate often with parents. They are neutral in believing that teachers communicate with each other to make student learning consistent across grades, that morale is high on the part of teachers, and disagree that the school has a good public image. Classified Staff agree quality work is expected of them, they are clear about what their job is at the school. that the administrator treats them with respect, and that they feel recognized for good work. They are neutral in believing that moral is high on the part of students, teachers, and support staff. There is concern about the school having a good public image. Complete results of the climate survey will be found in the Five-Year Comprehensive School Improvement Plans found in each school's library, the principal's office, and the district office.
9 Grade 3 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students % 84% 57% 72% % 84% 26% 69% % 84% 26% 69% Fem ales % 87% 48% 72% % 86% 22% 69% % 86% 22% 69% Males % 82% 67% 73% % 82% 32% 70% % 82% 32% 70% LEP (Lim ited English % 48% 25% 28% Proficient) % 48% 0% 29% % 48% 0% 29% Econom ically % 77% 57% 61% Disadvantaged % 77% 26% 57% % 77% 26% 57% Special Education NR 56% NR 43% % 57% 8% 37% % 57% 8% 37% Without Disabilities % 88% 62% 76% % 88% 31% 73% % 88% 31% 73% Native Am erican % 65% 52% 45% % 63% 26% 39% % 63% 26% 39% White/Non-Hispanic NR 87% NR 77% NR 89% NR 75% NR 89% NR 75% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in and 94.8% in M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in and 90% in Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in M ath AYP for CRT =100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in These test results are for different groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student confidentiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for were carried forward for the school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.
10 Grade 4 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Grade 4 Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students % 84% 38% 69% % 83% 38% 67% % 83% 38% 67% Fem ales % 87% 36% 69% % 85% 39% 67% % 85% 39% 67% Males % 83% 41% 69% % 80% 36% 69% % 80% 36% 69% LEP (Lim ited English % 40% 0% 24% Proficient) % 35% 0% 25% % 35% 0% 25% Econom ically % 77% 38% 57% Disadvantaged % 74% 38% 56% % 74% 38% 56% Special Education NR 56% NR 37% NR 51% NR 35% NR 51% NR 35% Without Disabilities % 89% 43% 73% % 86% 43% 72% % 86% 43% 72% Native Am erican % 64% 34% 40% % 60% 32% 41% % 60% 32% 41% White/Non-Hispanic NR 89% NR 74% NR 87% NR 73% NR 87% NR 73% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in and 94.8% in M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in and 90% in Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores were carried forward for the school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.
11 Grade 5 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students % 88% 53% 73% % 85% 39% 70% % 85% 39% 70% Fem ales % 91% 59% 73% % 88% 37% 71% % 88% 37% 71% Males % 85% 50% 73% % 83% 41% 70% % 83% 41% 70% LEP (Lim ited English % 45% 8% 22% Proficient) % 42% 0% 24% % 42% 0% 24% Econom ically % 81% 53% 62% Disadvantaged % 76% 39% 59% % 76% 39% 59% Special Education % 58% 27% 36% NR 53% NR 33% NR 53% NR 33% Without Disabilities % 92% 61% 78% % 88% 43% 74% % 88% 43% 74% Native Am erican % 68% 52% 44% % 63% 33% 42% % 63% 33% 42% White/Non-Hispanic NR 91% NR 79% NR 89% NR 76% NR 89% NR 76% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in and 94.8% in M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in and 90% in Reading AYP for CRT =100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for were carried forward for the school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.
12 Grade 6 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students % 89% 52% 69% % 86% 39% 65% % 86% 39% 65% Fem ales % 92% 58% 68% % 89% 40% 64% % 89% 40% 64% Males % 86% 47% 69% % 82% 38% 65% % 82% 38% 65% LEP (Lim ited English % 47% 27% 23% Proficient) % 43% 10% 20% % 43% 10% 20% Econom ically % 82% 52% 57% Disadvantaged % 78% 39% 51% % 78% 39% 51% Special Education NR 56% NR 26% NR 49% NR 24% NR 49% NR 24% Without Disabilities % 93% 61% 74% % 90% 44% 69% % 90% 44% 69% Native Am erican % 71% 47% 43% % 67% 33% 36% % 67% 33% 36% White/Non-Hispanic NR 92% NR 73% NR 89% NR 70% NR 89% NR 70% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in and 94.8% in M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in and 90% in Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for were carried forward for the school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.
13 Grade 7 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students % 89% 30% 67% % 83% 36% 70% % 83% 36% 70% Fem ales % 92% 29% 69% % 88% 43% 70% % 88% 43% 70% Males % 85% 31% 66% % 79% 39% 69% % 79% 39% 69% LEP (Lim ited English % 44% 9% 17% Proficient) % 33% 27% 17% % 33% 27% 17% Econom ically % 82% 30% 54% Disadvantaged % 75% 36% 57% % 75% 36% 57% Special Education NR 58% NR 25% NR 44% NR 25% NR 44% NR 25% Without Disabilities % 93% 33% 73% % 88% 39% 75% % 88% 39% 75% Native Am erican % 72% 24% 39% % 61% 35% 42% % 61% 35% 42% White/Non-Hispanic NR 92% NR 72% NR 87% NR 75% NR 87% NR 75% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in and 94.8% in M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in and 90% in Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for were carried forward for the school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.
14 Grade 8 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students % 86% 37% 65% % 83% 27% 63% % 83% 27% 63% Fem ales % 90% 35% 65% % 88% 35% 64% % 88% 35% 64% Males % 83% 39% 65% % 80% 19% 62% % 80% 19% 62% LEP (Lim ited English % 28% 7% 12% Proficient) % 33% 7% 17% % 33% 7% 17% Econom ically % 78% 37% 51% Disadvantaged % 75% 27% 50% % 75% 27% 50% Special Education NR 50% NR 22% NR 48% NR 22% NR 48% NR 22% Without Disabilities % 92% 43% 70% % 88% 26% 67% % 88% 26% 67% Native Am erican % 65% 34% 34% % 60% 18% 33% % 60% 18% 33% White/Non-Hispanic NR 90% NR 70% NR 88% NR 69% NR 88% NR 69% Reading AYP for CRT =89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 8 in and 94.8% in M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 8 in and 90% in Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 8 in M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient Advanced for Grade 8 in T he sco res were carried fo rward to the scho o l year per the OP I. These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.)
15 Grade 10 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students % 83% 47% 59% % 82% 27% 56% % 82% 27% 56% Fem ales % 86% 48% 58% % 87% 25% 56% % 87% 25% 56% Males % 80% 47% 61% % 77% 30% 56% % 77% 30% 56% LEP (Lim ited English NR 27% NR 6% Proficient) NR 20% NR 8% NR 20% NR 8% Econom ically % 73% 47% 44% Disadvantaged % 72% 27% 41% % 72% 27% 41% Special Education NR 45% NR 22% NR 42% NR 18% NR 42% NR 18% Without Disabilities % 87% 50% 63% % 87% 29% 60% % 87% 29% 60% Native Am erican % 64% 38% 29% % 60% 12% 28% % 60% 12% 28% White/Non-Hispanic % 85% 67% 65% % 86% 51% 61% % 86% 51% 61% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 10 in and 94.8% in M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 10 in and 90% in Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 10 in M ath AYP for CRT =100% Proficient Advanced for Grade 10 in These test results are for different groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student confidentiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores were carried forward to the school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.
16 ISIP Year Tier Tier Tier Reading Kindergarten % 33% 17% 1st Grade % 24% 25% 2nd Grade % 22% 19% The percentages indicate the portion of students scoring at each Tier level. Indicators of Progress using the Istation' assessment test: Tier 1: Performing at or above grade level. Tier 2: Performing moderately below grade level. Tier 3: Performing seriously below grade level. Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for LEP (limited English Proficient Students): At the elementary level the AMAO 1 goal was not met missing the goal by 0.6% for students progressing half of a proficiency level on the ACCESS English language proficiency assessment. The secondary level met the AMAO 1 goal. The elementary level and secondary level both met the AMAO 2 goal for the percentage of students scoring proficient on the ACCESS. The AMAO 3 goal of students making adequate yearly progress based on statewide reading and math assessments was not met because these assessments were not conducted in
17 Grade 11 Average Ye ar Wolf Point State of ACT Scores D istrict M o ntana Englis h M athe m atics Re ading Scie nce Com pos ite Total Stude nts Year Wolf Point Montana Te s te d College readiness benchmark scores f or designated college courses: *English Composition: 18 on ACT English Test *Algebra: 22 on ACT Mathematics Test *Social Science: 22 on ACT Reading Test *Biology: 23 on ACT Science Test A benchmark score is the minimum score needed on an ACT subjectarea test to indicate a 50% chance of obtaining a B or higher or about a 75% chance of obtaining a C or higher in the corresponding creditbearing college courses. Beginning in 2013 all Juniors w ere required to take the ACT, not just those intending to go to college. There has been a decline in the average scores since all students now take the test. Scores in science increased for Wolf Point students in 2014 and the composite score remained the same compared to 2013.
18 Second Grade: Year At Grade Above Total for MAP Testing Level Grade Level At/Above Num bers Sense & % 11% 35% Operations % 2% 31% Data % 10% 30% Analysis % 8% 37% Geom etric % 7% 36% Reasoning % 10% 35% Agebraic % 11% 35% Reasoning % 6% 31% Third Grade: Year Tier Tier Tier ISIP Math % 26% 18% Mid Year ( N o t all st ud ent s t est ed ) ISIP Math % 28% 28% End of Year The percentages indicate the portion of students scoring at each Tier level. Indicators of Progress using the Istation's assessment test: Tier 1: Performing at or above grade level. Tier 2: Performing moderately below grade level. Tier 3: Performing seriously below grade level.
19 Percentage of Students At or Above Proficient Levels CRT Tests for Science Grade Science Science Science All Students 4 28% 37% 39% 8 28% 23% 25% 10 30% 22% 19% Females 4 21% 29% 34% 8 30% 28% 32% 10 26% 16% 25% Males 4 34% 46% 44% 8 25% 18% 19% 10 34% 30% 16% LEP (Limited English 4 0% 18% 6% Prof icient) 8 0% 0% 0% 10 NR NR NR Economically 4 28% 37% 39% Disadvantaged 8 28% 23% 25% 10 30% 22% 19% Special Education 4 NR NR NR 8 NR NR NR 10 NR NR NR Without Disabilities 4 30% 41% 44% 8 33% 25% 30% 10 33% 23% 21% Native American 4 25% 34% 37% 8 21% 15% 21% 10 22% 6% 10% White/Non-Hispanic 4 NR NR NR 8 NR NR NR 10 46% 51% NR Science test scores are not part of the AYP determinations for schools and districts, but are mandated tests in grades 4, 8, and 10 under the provisions of NCLB (No Child Left Behind).
20 The purpose of a school and district report card is to help parents and the general public see where our schools and the districts are succeeding and where there is still work to do. An improvement process, as part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act requirements of data collection, enables educators to make better decisions about teaching and learning. In turn, the reporting of data through report cards helps parents and other community members to work effectively with educators and local school officials to promote school improvement. The current Five Year Comprehensive School Improvement Plans for each school and the district are available for review at the District Office and at each school library. These plans cover The plans are reviewed and updated each year during the 5 year time span. Interested persons are encouraged to contact Wolf Point Public School officials at
Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School
Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School Wolf Point, Montana Districts 45 and 45A Report Card 2012-2013 School Year 1 BELIEVE -- ACHIEVE -- SUCCEED Mission
More informationAllen Elementary School
Allen Elementary School April 4, 216 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER), which provides key information on the 214-15 educational progress for the. The AER
More informationBangor Central Elementary School 2014-2015 Annual Education Report
Bangor Central Elementary School 24-25 Melissa Vrable; Principal March 23, 26 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 24 5
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
17-2-15-2-24 Lincoln Elem Clinton CUSD 15 Clinton, ILLINOIS GRADES : 2 3 2 1 3 Lincoln Elem 1 ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the
More informationTexas Education Agency 2014 15 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools
Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level Texas Education Agency 2014 15 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Campus Name: AIKIN EL Campus ID: 057916135 District Name: RICHARDSON ISD This
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-63-56-6- McHenry CHSD 56 McHenry CHSD 56 McHenry, ILLINOIS 2 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. Starting in
More informationIntroduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been
Introduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been reporting ABCs results since 1996-97. In 2001, the state General
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
SOUTH PEKIN SD 37 SOUTH PEKIN, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
Highland Park High Twp HSD 3 Highland Park, ILLINOIS GRADES : 9 2 Highland Park High 2 8 ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public
More informationThe New York State Report Card
The New York State Report Card School WALTER G O'CONNELL COPIAGUE HIGH SCHOOL School ID 58--5--5 District COPIAGUE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT Principal JEANETTE ALTRUDA Telephone (6) 8- Grades 9-, US The
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
5-8-9-6- MASCOUTAH ELEM SCHOOL MASCOUTAH C U DISTRICT 9 MASCOUTAH, ILLINOIS GRADES : PK K 5 6 MASCOUTAH ELEM SCHOOL ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release
More informationThe New York State District Report Card. This District s Report Card. Use this report to: Accountability and Overview Report 2010 11
The New York State District Report Card Accountability and Overview Report 200 District CORTLAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT District ID -02-00-0-0000 Superintendent LAURENCE SPRING Telephone (607) 758-400 Grades
More informationCardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2010 11 School Year
Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2010 11 School Year Published During 2011 12 Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School
More informationAdvanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.
Virginia Department of Education P.O. Box 2120, Richmond, VA 23218 Superintendent: Dr. Steven R. Staples 1-800-292-3820 The is committed to providing a quality education for all students. The Virginia
More informationState of New Jersey 2012-13 41-5460-050 OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL
1 415465 OVERVIEW TECHNICAL SCHOOL 15 ROUTE 57 GRADE SPAN 912 WASHINGTON, NEW JERSEY 78829618 1. This school's academic performance is high when compared to schools across the state. Additionally, its
More informationState of New Jersey 2013-14
1 OVERVIEW 21314 GRADE SPAN 912 31411 15 PARK AVENUE PATERSON, NJ 751 1. This school's academic performance significantly lags in comparison to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
-69-7--6 Lincoln Elem Jacksonville SD 7 Jacksonville, ILLINOIS GRADES : K 6 Lincoln Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
Bottenfield Elem Champaign CUSD Champaign, ILLINOIS GRADES : K Bottenfield Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
---6- Herrin C U S D Elem Herrin CUSD Herrin, ILLINOIS GRADES : Herrin C U S D Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
9--4-6-7 Robeson Elem Champaign CUSD 4 Champaign, ILLINOIS GRADES : K 4 Robeson Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
9--4-6- Westview Elem Champaign CUSD 4 Champaign, ILLINOIS GRADES : K 4 Westview Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public
More informationTexas Education Agency 2013-14 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State
Texas Education Agency 2013-14 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State Part I: Percent Tested and Student Achievement by Proficiency Level This section provides the State of Texas Assessments
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
7-6-4--4 Kerkstra Elem Forest Ridge SD 4 Oak Forest, ILLINOIS GRADES : Kerkstra Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each
More informationState of New Jersey 2012-13
1 OVERVIEW GRADE SPAN 912 395262 SCOTCH PLAINS, NEW JERSEY 776 1. This school's academic performance is very high when compared to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance is very
More informationState of New Jersey 2013-14 31-4010-002 OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY AND TOURI PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY
1 31412 OVERVIEW 15 PARK AVENUE GRADE SPAN 912 PATERSON, NJ 751 1. This school's academic performance significantly lags in comparison to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
5-6--7- Wm Fremd High Township HSD Palatine, ILLINOIS GRADES : 9 Wm Fremd High ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
6-99-6-- Frankfort Square Elem Summit Hill SD 6 Frankfort, ILLINOIS GRADES : 4 Frankfort Square Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards
More informationWestview Early Childhood Education Center 1100 Patterson Street, Petersburg, VA 23803
1100 Patterson Street, Petersburg, VA 23803 State Accreditation Results for All Students This table summarizes the data used in calculating the state accreditation status of the school and is reported
More informationState of New Jersey 2014-15
Page 1 of 22 OVERVIEW COUNTY VOCATIONAL GRADE SPAN 0912 1.00 313995050 WAYNE, NJ 074702210 The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) is pleased to present these annual reports of Performance. These
More informationBryan Middle School. Bryan Middle School. Not Actual School Data. 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE 19900 (555) 555-5555. Administration.
O Hare School District Emma Haviland 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE 19900 (555) 555-5555 Administration Principal Assistant Principal Assistant Principal Emma Haviland Stan Westfield Barbara Powell Accountability
More informationHow To Ask A School Administrator A Question About Your School
ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR QUESTIONNAIRE for THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPLEMENT TO THE FAMILY ECONOMICS STUDY Please read each question carefully and follow any statements that appear in
More informationMoberly School District. Moberly School District. Annual District Report 2009-2010. Accredited with Distinction. www.moberly.k12.mo.
Moberly School District Moberly School District Accredited with Distinction Annual District Report 2009-2010 www.moberly.k12.mo.us Moberly School District VISION: Create a safe environment that fosters
More informationOrange County High 201 Selma Road, Orange, VA 22960
State Accreditation Results for All Students This table summarizes the data used in calculating the state accreditation status of the school and is reported for the "all students" group. Proficiency Gap
More informationIllinois Criteria for Meeting the NCLB Requirements for Highly Qualified Teachers
Illinois Criteria for Meeting the NCLB Requirements for Highly Qualified Teachers Illinois State Board of Education ADOPTED June 17, 2003 1 Illinois Criteria for Meeting the NCLB Requirements for Highly
More informationBowler School District Bowler, Wisconsin. First-Year Report: Fall 2005 Data
Impact of the Payne School Model on Student Achievement Bowler School District Bowler, Wisconsin First-Year Report: Fall 2005 Data William W. Swan, Ed.D., The University of Georgia Athens, GA. Impact of
More informationELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT Comparison of the No Child Left Behind Act to the Every Student Succeeds Act Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) 1 to replace the No Child Left
More informationSouth Dakota DOE 2014-2015 Report Card
Performance Indicators School Performance Index District Classification: - Exemplary Schools 1 / 24 Schools 4.17% Status Schools 1 / 24 Schools 4.17% Progressing Schools 19 / 24 Schools * No bar will display
More informationOVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.
The University of the State of New York The State Education Department OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE for
More informationOVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.
The University of the State of New York The State Education Department OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE for
More informationACT High School Profile Report. The Graduating Class of 2007 Wyoming
ACT High School Profile Report The Graduating Class of 2007 ACT High School Profile Report The Graduating Class of 2007 Section I: Executive Summary P. 5 Section II: Academic Achievement P. 9 Section
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
19-22-2-26-5 Metea Valley High Prairie CUSD 2 Aurora, ILLINOIS GRADES : 9 1 11 12 2 1 2 Metea Valley High 1 ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report
More informationAnnual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) Title III, Part A Accountability System
2010 AMAOs Guide Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) Title III, Part A Accountability System Texas Education Agency Department of School Improvement and Support Division of NCLB Program Coordination
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
Blaine Elem City of Chicago SD 299 Chicago, ILLINOIS GRADES : PK K 2 3 6 7 8 2 5 Blaine Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
4-4--6- Capron Elem North Boone CUSD Capron, ILLINOIS GRADES : PK K 4 Capron Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each
More informationParent and Community Survey
Parent and Community Survey Results and Analysis Lake Washington School District May 20 June 12, 2014 Overview Parents and community members were invited to share feedback on opportunities for the district
More informationILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD
6-99-6-- Arbury Hills Elem Summit Hill SD 6 Mokena, ILLINOIS GRADES : 3 4 Arbury Hills Elem ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public
More informationHighly Qualified Teachers Workbook
Highly Qualified Teachers Workbook CASPA CDE http://www.cde.state.co.us/fedprograms/nclb/downloads/tiia_hqtwkbk.pdf 3/15/06 PHILOSOPHY The intent of the highly qualified teacher portion of the No Child
More informationState of Colorado K-12 Mandate
State of Colorado K-12 Mandate Below is a partial list of state and federal mandates for school districts in Colorado: Minimum Number of Days of Instruction Every child who has attained the age of six
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Central City
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the Central City public school district. The
More informationSouth Carolina State Report Card
James Island Charter High 1000 Ft. Johnson Road Charleston, SC 29412 2015 South Carolina Report Card and federal laws require public schools to release report cards to the public each year. This year,
More informationNO CHILD LEFT BEHIND (NCLB) HIGHLY QUALIFIED SUMMARY REPORT
December 8, 215 215 HCISD NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND (NCLB) HIGHLY QUALIFIED SUMMARY REPORT Prepared by: Rosalinda R. Vargas, Assistant Superintendent for Human Services Email: rosalinda.vargas@hcisd.org Harlingen
More informationTEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
Certificated Personnel BP 4112.24(a) Recognizing the importance of teacher effectiveness in improving student achievement, the Board of Trustees desires to recruit and hire teachers who possess the subject
More informationTEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
Personnel BP 4112.24 (a) Recognizing the importance of teacher effectiveness in improving student achievement, the Governing Board desires to recruit and hire teachers who possess the subject matter knowledge
More informationRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATTERN OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE COURSES TAKEN AND TEST SCORES ON ITED FOR HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATTERN OF AND COURSES TAKEN AND TEST SCORES ON FOR HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS Xiaoping Wang, Administrative Consultant Abstract Three years of student-level data were used in this study
More informationARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR 2006-07
Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR 26-7 AZ LEARNS1 High School Achievement Profile 25-6 24-5 23-4 Performing Performing Performing 329 N. Alma School
More informationFor more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year Published During 2014-15 Every school in California is required by state
More informationSan Joaquin County Special Education
San Joaquin County Special Education Brandie Brunni, Division Director Principal, San Joaquin County Special Education About Our School About Our School Grade Span: Preschool - Young Adult San Joaquin
More informationSouth Dakota DOE 2013-2014 Report Card
School Classification: Focus Title I Designation: Schoolwide Performance Indicators * No bar will display at the school or district level if the subgroup does not meet minimum size for reporting purposes.
More informationOVERVIEW OF DISTRICT PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.
The University of the State of New York The State Education Department OVERVIEW OF DISTRICT PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE for
More informationHuntsville City. Superintendent Dr. Ann R. Moore
State Board of Education School Report Card 2006-2007 Huntsville City State Board of Education Members Gov. Bob Riley, Board President Randy McKinney, President Pro Tem, District 1 Betty Peters, District
More informationIllinois e-plans. Title I District Plan Checklist
Illinois e-plans Title I District Plan Guide Overview Submission of a Title I District Plan is required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), Section 1101 et seq., (here referred to as NCLB ). The specifics
More informationFor Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites 860.713.6525
For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites 860.713.6525 2012 CMT, CAPT RESULTS SHOW SOME INCREASES, WHILE GAPS IN ACHIEVEMENT PERSIST The Connecticut State Department of Education
More informationDistrict Demographic Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Purpose of Report: To inform the Board of the 2013 District demographics.
District Demographic Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of Report: To inform the Board of the 2013 District demographics. The Sioux Falls School District is committed to its mission: to educate and prepare
More informationExecutive Summary DRAFT. Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary School
Executive Summary Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary School Dougherty County School System Mr. David C Adams, Assistant Principal 3125 Martin Luther King Drive Albany, GA 31707 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction
More informationState of New Jersey 2012-13
1 OVERVIEW GRADE SPAN 912 2152151 TRENTON CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL WEST CAMPUS 11 WEST STATE ST TRENTON, NEW JERSEY 8618 1. This school's academic performance lags in comparison to schools across the state.
More informationThe Math TLC Master s in Mathematics for Secondary Teachers Program
Math TLC Master s Application Form Page 1 The Math TLC Master s in Mathematics for Secondary Teachers Program Electronic Application Form Instructions Save your completed application a filename of the
More informationTEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
Personnel AR 4112.24(a) Definitions Core academic subjects include English, reading or language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history and geography.
More informationFor Canyon View School
Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card, 200 For Canyon View School Address: 760 W. Cypress Avenue Phone: (909) 599-227 ext: 2623 Principal: John Mann Grade Span: K-2 This executive summary
More informationOVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.
The University of the State of New York The State Education Department OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE for
More informationWORLD S BEST WORKFORCE PLAN
WORLD S BEST WORKFORCE PLAN ANNUAL REPORT 2014 2015 School Year South Early Learning Center, North Intermediate, Saint Peter Middle/High School 1 Saint Peter Public Schools World s Best Workforce Report
More informationA Comparison of the Top Ten High School Cohorts and Regents
The University of the State of New York The State Education Department OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE for
More informationDistrict % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced) State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card Part I Preview C O N F I D E N T I A L 14 Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District Campus Compared to the State, Percent of, Student Achievement by Proficiency
More information2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment. Executive Summary
2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment Executive Summary The New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment (APA) is a portfolio assessment designed to measure progress toward achieving New Jersey
More informationEvaluation of the Seattle Public School s Family Support Program
Evaluation of the Seattle Public School s Family Support Program The 17 th Annual Conference on Advancing School Mental Health October 26, 2012 Michael Pullmann, Ph.D Eric Bruns, Ph.D. Ericka Weathers,
More informationty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan
Nassau Count ty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan Nassau County School Districtt Digital Classrooms Plan 1 P age The intent of the District Digital Classroom Plan (DCP) is to provide a perspective
More informationState of New Jersey 2012-13 31-4010-002 OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY & TOURISM PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY
1 31412 OVERVIEW 15 PARK AVENUE GRADE SPAN 912 PATERSON, NEW JERSEY 751 1. This school's academic performance significantly lags in comparison to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance
More informationAccountability and Virginia Public Schools
Accountability and Virginia Public Schools 2008-2009 School Year irginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards, known as the Standards of Learning
More informationSchool Performance Framework: Technical Guide
School Performance Framework: Technical Guide Version 1.6 August 2010 This technical guide provides information about the following topics as they related to interpreting the school performance framework
More informationMethodology, business rules, and data components used in the implementation of the Washington State Equity Plan, 2015
Methodology, business rules, and data components used in the implementation of the Washington State Equity Plan, 2015 Table of Contents I Table of Contents 1 II Objective and Overview of 2013 14 school
More informationTEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT, PERSONNEL SERVICES
Page 1 of 5 SUBJECT: ORIGINATING OFFICE: TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT, PERSONNEL SERVICES EFFECTIVE: OCTOBER 13, 2015 REVISED: Certificated Personnel
More information2015 TN Accountability Protocol
SAS EVAAS 2015 TN Accountability Protocol 06/09/2015 2015 TN Accountability Protocol Contents 1 Document Intent...4 2 Accountability Background...4 2.1 Accountability Subjects... 4 2.2 Accountability Subgroups...
More informationMississippi Department of Education Highly Qualified Teacher Criteria The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
Mississippi Department of Education Highly Qualified Teacher Criteria The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 General Information 1. Mississippi issues teacher licenses at four levels to persons who have
More informationRiver Islands Technology Academy School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year Published During 2014-15
River Islands Technology Academy School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year Published During 2014-15 Every school in California is required by state law to publish
More informationOVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.
The University of the State of New York The State Education Department OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE for
More informationPersonnel TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
Administrative Regulation SANGER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AR 4112.24 (a) Personnel TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT Definitions Core academic subjects include English, reading or
More informationSanta Clarita Valley International
Santa Clarita Valley International Kim Shaw, Lower School Director Principal, Santa Clarita Valley International About Our School About Our School Kim Shaw Lower School Director Contact 28060 Hasley Canyon
More information74% 68% 47% 54% 33% Staying on Target. ACT Research and Policy. The Importance of Monitoring Student Progress toward College and Career Readiness
Staying on Target ACT Research and Policy The Importance of Monitoring Student Progress toward Research Brief 74% Percentage of ACT-tested 11 high school graduates took a core curriculum in high school
More informationJohn Muir Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year Published During 2014-15
John Muir Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year Published During 2014-15 Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School
More information2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR
2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR Virginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards known as the Standards of Learning (SOL) and through annual assessments of student
More informationDistrict Name: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS UNIVERSITY CHA Campus Name: TNC CAMPUS (TEXAS NEUROREHABILITAT Campus Number: 227806024
2012-13 Texas Academic Performance Report District Name: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS UNIVERSITY CHA Campus Name: TNC CAMPUS (TEXAS NEUROREHABILITAT 2013 Accountability Rating: Not Rated (evaluated with alternative
More informationhttp://www.ccusd.k12.ca.us/board_ed/policies/4000/4112-24ar.htm
AR 4112.24 Teacher Qualifications Under The No Child Left Behind Act Definitions Core academic subjects include English, reading or language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government,
More information2009 CREDO Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) Stanford University Stanford, CA http://credo.stanford.edu June 2009
Technical Appendix 2009 CREDO Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) Stanford University Stanford, CA http://credo.stanford.edu June 2009 CREDO gratefully acknowledges the support of the State
More informationElmhurst Community Prep
Elmhurst Community Prep California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year Published During 2014-15 Every school in California is required
More informationOffice of Institutional Research & Planning
NECC Northern Essex Community College NECC College Math Tutoring Center Results Spring 2011 The College Math Tutoring Center at Northern Essex Community College opened its doors to students in the Spring
More informationNew Jersey High School Performance Ranking - A Summary
1 OVERVIEW This school's academic performance significantly lags in comparison to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance lags in comparison to its peers. This school's college
More informationConducting the Parent and Family Involvement Survey for your school(s): Instructions and Guidelines
Conducting the Parent and Family Involvement Survey for your school(s): Instructions and Guidelines The Survey Instrument The Ohio Department of Education (ODE) has developed and piloted a Parent and Family
More informationAlliance Environmental Science and Technology High
Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High Melissa Chew, Principal Principal, Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High About Our School About Our School Environmental Science and Technology
More informationAlliance Media Arts and Entertainment Design High
Alliance Media Arts and Entertainment Design High Arthur Sanchez Principal, Alliance Media Arts and Entertainment Design High About Our School About Our School Dear Media Arts and Entertainment Design
More informationEvaluating the School Strategic Plan Components Title I Rubric for Schoolwide Projects
Evaluating the School Strategic Plan Components Title I Rubric for Schoolwide Projects Category Planning Committee The stakeholders represent various school groups or committees that can assist in aligning
More informationState of New Jersey 2012-13
OVERVIEW SWEDESBOROWOOLWICH 21213 GRADE SPAN 6 Student Growth 83 85 1% Very High Performance is defined as being equal to or above the 8th percentile. High Performance is defined as being between the 6th
More information